stop doing the office housekeeping work

I’m quoted in this Refinery29 article (which was also reported on by the UK’s Daily Mail), talking about how taking on the office housekeeping work (planning parties, cleaning up the kitchen, ordering lunch) can hold you back. Here’s an excerpt:

“People don’t get high-profile projects, win promotions, or make a name in their field because they planned office parties or remembered all their coworkers’ birthdays,” says Alison Green, founder of Ask A Manager. “You only have so much energy and focus at work; spending on this sort of housekeeping means that you’re not spending it where it will actually benefit you. You want to be known as a great engineer / spokesperson / lawyer / whatever your job is — not as a great baker [unless that’s your job] or fill-in receptionist or office mom.”

“Too often, women find themselves always being the ones to take notes, clean up the kitchen, order lunch, and do other caretaking work, while their male colleagues in similar roles get to focus on doing work that’s more highly valued,” Green continues. “That can have very real and very long-lasting ramifications for who gets what projects, who gets what recognition, and who builds what reputation.”

…“One of the best things you can do…is to simply point it out,” she argues. “Speak up and say, ‘Hey, I’ve noticed that this work always falls to women. Can we change that?'”

open thread – July 3, 2015

It’s the Friday open thread! The comment section on this post is open for discussion with other readers on anything work-related that you want to talk about. If you want an answer from me, emailing me is still your best bet*, but this is a chance to talk to other readers.

* If you submitted a question to me recently, please don’t repost it here, as it may be in the to-be-answered queue :)

employer asked for references after I’d already been hired, good bosses from TV and movies, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My new employer just asked for my references — after we’d set a start date and I quit my old job

I’m in the process of changing jobs. The new company made me a firm offer and I accepted. My start date at the new company is soon, and they have confirmed plane tickets and hotel reservations for me to fly up to their office for training (they’re opening a new office in my city, but until then I’ll be telecommuting). The gist is, the new job is a “done deal.” My last day at my old job is tomorrow.

I just got an email from the internal recruiter / HR person asking for me to submit references, which — as far as I can tell — makes no sense, and makes me worried that either the job isn’t as much of a “done deal” as I thought or that something’s weird about this company (if they need to ask about that long after the appropriate time).

I replied to the email saying “sure, here are some references” and attempted to call to get clarification about the issue, but I got the HR person’s voicemail so I just left a message saying that I had questions and asking her to call me back. What are your thoughts on the issue?

Incidentally, I had three interviews with this company (phone interview with the HR person, technical phone interview, and was flown in for an in-person interview) and, although I was prepared with references, I was never asked for them and didn’t think to provide them proactively.

Yeah, some companies have a horrible policy of doing background checks — including references — after a job offer is accepted. This is ridiculous for many reasons, including that it totally defeats the point of reference-checking (which isn’t just to get a yay or nay but to actually get nuanced information about people to help make the hiring decision), as well as that it’s incredibly unfair to candidates, who in many cases have already resigned their jobs because they assumed the offer was a done deal.

I’d say this: “Is your offer not final and/or are there remaining contingencies attached to it? My understanding was that it was a formal offer and I gave noticed after we finalized our agreement, so I’m of course concerned to receive this email. Can you shed any light?”

It’s too late now, but in the future I’d carefully read any offer paperwork for mentions of contingencies like this. You can also ask directly, “Are there any outstanding contingencies before the offer is final?”

2. I’ve been promoted to manage my difficult friend

I have recently been promoted to team leader over an older and longer employed colleague who I would also call a friend. I am now her team leader. She has always been very easily distracted, surfing the internet, making personal calls and chatting to colleagues and her previous boss didn’t tackle the issue in the 10+ years she has worked here. She has recently announced that she is pregnant, and the personal calls and internet surfing have cranked up a gear as she sorts everything out for the new baby.

She’s always taken any criticism very personally and gets very defensive if you try and broach the subject. She will also be a bad mood for days, refusing to speak to anyone which affects the whole atmosphere of our very small office. I am really struggling with how to bring this up without World War Three kicking off and ruining our friendship? (She generally gets all the work done that’s required, albeit slightly rushed).

Your goal can’t be to preserve the friendship; that’s a conflict of interest with doing your job. You’re her manager, so you can no longer be her friend. Friendly, yes, but not friends.

Doing your job as her manager means that you need to sit down with her and talk forthrightly about what you need to see from her, and how that differs from what you’re seeing currently. If she becomes defensive, you need to address that too, since it’s not an option for her to just not get feedback. And if she refuses to speak to people or is otherwise unpleasant, you need to address that too, because that’s an unacceptable way for her to behave. You’ll also need to be ready to impose consequences if the feedback doesn’t get you the changes you need. (And frankly, I’d start preparing yourself for the possibility that you may need to let her go at some point, because this is not the behavior of someone you want on your staff.)

3. My professor is a partner at the company I want to apply to

I recently graduated college (I’m 45) and have been looking for employment in my field. I discovered the perfect company and devoured its website, the last section of which featured team bios. Imagine my surprise when I learned that one of the senior partners listed is a former professor (I had three classes with him).

I immediately emailed this professor, expressing my interest in the company and requesting a meeting or phone call to discuss my professional background and its applicability. I sent the email to his university .edu account 10 days ago but have not received a reply. It would be out of character for this professor to not respond, so I am assuming that he has not accessed this email account because school is not in session.

What’s my next move? Do I contact him at this company? I know that he also has his own consultancy and travels internationally for speaking engagements, so I’m not sure how often he’s on site…a voicemail message might also go unanswered. Do I try to contact HR, and somehow mention that I know him? Or do I simply submit my resume and cover letter to the company and hope for the best? I graduated first in my class and that would be the first thing I mention in this particular cover letter…my hope is that HR would be curious enough to contact the professor.

Is there an actual job opening you’re interested in, or is it more general interest in the company? If there’s an opening for a job you want, apply right now; otherwise, while you try to resolve this, you risk it disappearing. It’s fine to mention in your cover letter that this guy recently taught you.

After that — or if there’s not a particular opening — yes, email him at his non-.edu address, or try LinkedIn. When you do, be up-front that you’re interested in working there — you don’t want to sound like you’re requesting an informational interview when you’re actually seeking a job.

4. Good bosses from TV and movies

I know you’ve touched a few times on poor management in books, TV, etc., (and I hope no one is managing like they do on Game of Thrones), and how media isn’t something to model your work life after. But can you point to any TV or movies that demonstrate good management, sane workplace dynamics, a congenial and functional workplace, and so on? I know it doesn’t make for good entertainment, but is there anything you’ve watched and thought “that’s exactly what I would do” and admired?

So much the opposite. TV and movies are rife with terrible management presented as if it’s fine, and it is infuriating.

I racked my brain to answer this question, and I’m still not coming up with anything. I do feel like Tom Colicchio, restauranteur and judge on Top Chef, is probably a good manager, but I’m basing that on little more than gut. Oh, and Commander Adama from Battlestar Galactica. But I’m reaching here.

5. Update: Should I pay for a travel charge stemming from my mistake so that my boss doesn’t know about it?

Thank you for running my question! The comments from the commenters were really helpful as well, and I decided to tell my manager about the charge and explain why it happened. I also told him about some ideas for improving the process so this would be less likely to happen again. Here’s his response: “Sounds like a plan. Go ahead and expense the cancelled travel as mentioned. It shouldn’t be a problem.”

no, you’re not getting anyone fired

“You can’t tell her boss that — you’ll get her fired.”

“Don’t tell the reference-checker the truth about Jane — it could cost her the job.”

I’ve noticed a trend in response to some letters here lately where people assert that sharing information with someone’s manager or with a hiring manager “will get the person fired” or “cost them the job.”

For example, when I recommended that this letter-writer share with her managers her concerns about a job applicant who she’d worked with previously and knew to be difficult, several readers said it was wrong to torpedo the person’s chances for the job. Or in response to this letter-writer wondering whether to alert her company that their HR manager was recently fired from a federal housing apartment complex for instructing tenants to write rent checks in her name (!), some commenters expressed concern that doing so would “get her fired.”

But when you share truthful information, you’re not single-handedly killing someone’s chances at a job or getting them fired. You’re passing information along to a decision-maker so that that person can weigh the information and come to their own conclusions.

I also hear a lot of “X isn’t a big deal, so they shouldn’t have to lose a job over it” — in other words, the idea that saying something to a manager will automatically destroy the person’s chances (and probably unfairly). But if X isn’t a big deal, it’s not reasonable to think that the person would lose their job over it; not every bit of critical information results in rejections or firings, and managers assess and weigh multiple factors in making decisions. And if the person does lose their job over it, then clearly the manager did think it was a big deal and wanted to have the information, and that’s their prerogative. So either it’s a serious issue to the manager and they’d want to know, or it’s not a serious issue and the manager is capable of figuring that out.

(And particularly with hiring, it’s worth noting that the vast majority of managers want to hear from people who know their candidates, and would be dismayed to find out that a staff member had a negative assessment of a candidate and didn’t bother to speak up about it. I don’t know a single good hiring manager who doesn’t strongly, strongly want input from employees who know candidates.)

And last, if someone gets fired because you share that they did X, you’re not “getting them fired.” They’re getting themselves fired. In the example above of the HR manager who committed a major integrity violation at her last job, that’s what would be getting her fired — not the coworker who reported it.

the 5 people you definitely don’t want on your team

Having a team with diverse personalities is a good thing; different types of people will bring different perspectives and viewpoints, and that will usually lead you to better outcomes.

But there are some personality types that you definitely don’t want on your team. Here are five types that can implode even the best team dynamics.

1. The yes-man or yes-woman. Having a team member who unquestionably backs every decision you make and thinks every suggestion you advance is a brilliant idea can feel comfortable, or even flattering. But you really, really don’t want people on your team who won’t reveal what they truly think, because that’s how you end up with failures (project failures, hiring failures, strategy failures, and all kinds of other failures) that could have been avoided if people had shared their perspective. One of the best things you can do for the health of your team is to actively cultivate candid input and make it safe for people to disagree – and to name the issue when you suspect someone is regularly keeping their true opinions buried.

2. The contrarian. Contrarians often think that they’re playing a role by playing devil’s advocate – arguing against a plan or viewpoint for the sake of poking holes in it – but when it’s their regular M.O., it can suck up enormous amounts of your team’s time and energy. To be clear, it’s valuable to think through what might be wrong with a strategy or how a plan could go wrong (see the problem with yes-men in #1 above), and the best-made decisions factor in conflicting viewpoints, but when someone is going head-to-head in every conversation rather than picking their battles, it will have a corrosive effect on the dynamics on your team.

3. The brilliant jerk. When you have an employee who does great work but who is abrasive, unpleasant, and alienates people who should be allies, don’t brush it off as “just” interpersonal issues. Truly high performers don’t chronically alienate colleagues or make it tough for anyone to work with them. “Soft skills” like getting along with others and being generally pleasant are as much a core part of what you need from a staff member as hard skills are, and an employee who’s awful to work with can be as disruptive as one who falling short in any other skill area.

4. The fixed mindset. Stanford University psychologist Carol S. Dweck writes in Mindset: The New Psychology of Success that people have one of two mindsets: a fixed mindset, which views intelligence and abilities as fundamentally predetermined, or a growth mindset, which views intelligence and abilities as works in progress and the result of learning and hard work. A growth mindset is what leads people to embrace challenges, persist in the face of setbacks, and accept and learn from criticism – exactly the qualities you want on your team. On the other hand, a fixed mindset will lead people to avoid challenges, give up easily in the face of difficulties, and ignore or dismiss criticism – which can keep your team from moving forward.

5. The defender. People who bristle at the slightest hint that their work isn’t perfect make it impossible to have the sort of candid feedback conversations that are crucial to developing skills, improving results, or even just tweaking a minor element of a project. Chronic defensiveness will also lead to a situation where the person’s coworkers will shy away from raising problems or making even small requests (like “could you turn your music down while I’m on the phone?”), and that can be toxic to the dynamic you need on a healthy, functioning team.

do I owe my coworkers an explanation about my FMLA leave?

A reader writes:

I am currently taking FMLA leave to care for a terminally ill parent. My absences are intermittent and all my PTO is used up every pay cycle. I cleared it with HR that I can come in early when I can in order to make up unpaid hours after my PTO is used, as we always need help and to lessen the impact of my time off to care for my parent.

I have a particular coworker who has been passively-aggressively whining around me about who she “should talk to about being able to work early to make up time for her scheduled appointments instead of having to use PTO” and why should SHE have to use PTO when OTHER people don’t have to?

She has no clue what she is talking about, and I feel strongly that I don’t owe her any explanation regarding my FMLA.

Today, she did the same whining in front of everyone at a team meeting while staring directly at me! She even insinuated she will visit HR with her “concerns.” I’m not sure why she can’t mind her business, nor do I care about her opinion. (She is more than welcome to step in and singlehandedly care for my parent 24/7 while putting food on her table any time if she is so jealous.) I am concerned, however, about the impact her complaining will have on other coworkers’ perception of me and fear that this will become a witch hunt. I do my work and have discussed my FMLA with only HR and my manager, as I want no accusations of trying to “get sympathy” from anyone. I have enough problems and no time for the drama. Is this woman owed an explanation?

No, she’s not owed an explanation at all.

However, you might be more likely to get the outcome you want by giving her and others some context, if you’re willing to.

To be clear, she is totally out of line. Her comments are obnoxious, and your time off is none of her business unless it’s impacting her, and if it is, she should be addressing that forthrightly, not making snide comments. And you’re under no obligation to share the details of your leave with your coworkers.

However, the reality is that if it looks to others like you suddenly have a really flexible schedule when they don’t, not everyone will think “Oh, there’s probably a good reason for this and I should mind my own business.” Some people will wonder if you’re slacking on your hours or getting special treatment for an unfair reason. This isn’t right, but it’s often human nature. Of course, most people won’t be rude about it like your coworker is, but it’s true that people who notice may wonder, and it can go a lot more smoothly if you’re willing to say something to explain.

You don’t need to share personal details if you don’t want to; there’s range of things that you could say. For example, to the rest of your coworkers (not the obnoxious one, who I’ll get to in a minute), you could say one of these:

* “I want to let you know that I’ve been working a different schedule than normal because of some family health issues. I’ve worked out an arrangement with Jane and HR, but wanted to give you a heads-up too.”

* “I’m taking intermittent FMLA leave so you may notice me working different or fewer hours than usual.”

* “My mom is very sick and I’m using FMLA to take care of her. I wanted to give you a heads-up because it’s going to be impacting my schedule for a while.” (I know you said you don’t want to explain the details lest you be seen as chasing sympathy, but unless your coworkers are horrid people, it isn’t going to come across that way. But again, it’s your call and you can use one of the more vague options above if you prefer.)

To your obnoxious coworker who’s making the comments, I’d say this: “Lavinia, do you have concerns about my schedule? You’ve made several remarks about it and I’m not sure what you’re looking for from me. I’ve made specific arrangements to use FMLA leave with Jane and with HR.” (Or, if you don’t even want to mention FMLA — although, again, I think it will benefit you to — you could say, “”Lavinia, I’ve arranged my schedule with Jane and HR. If you have concerns about your own schedule, I encourage you to talk to them.”)

If it continues after that, I’d talk to your manager. Say something like, “Lavinia is regularly complaining about my FMLA leave. I don’t feel comfortable explaining the details to her, and I’ve asked her to stop but it’s continuing and becoming a distraction.”

my coworker plagiarized my work, manager told me that I can’t give references, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My colleague plagiarized my work

I work in communications at a large, private university. Restructuring has changed many of my job duties in recent months, but I was hired as a writer for an industry-specific magazine the school used to published (it has since folded). It recently came to my attention that a piece I worked for months on has been published and distributed by a coworker in the university’s PR department with her byline. I am credited nowhere in the release, so I ran it through the plagiarism checker that our faculty uses. It returned 0 percent original work.

Upset that she was taking credit for my work, I went to my manager, who brushed me off. Is it worth escalating my complaint to somewhere higher, such as HR? Or is it worth reaching out to the department’s faculty academic integrity officer? For students, plagiarism complaints are taking very, very seriously.

Why not email the bylined coworker’s boss and say something like, “I noticed that the piece I worked on for several months about X was recently published, but had Jane’s byline instead of mine. I’m sure this was an oversight, but I’d like to get it corrected. Is it possible to update it to credit me as the author?”

In other words, approach it as if it was a mistake. If Jane actually presented it as her own and this is the first her boss is hearing of it, that’s going to start things down the path of getting it addressed.

Keep in mind, though, that in some contexts this wouldn’t be seen as a big deal, as long as your coworker didn’t actually misrepresent things and was clear with whoever published it that it wasn’t her work. Unlike with students doing classwork, work that you produce for your employer belongs to them — and they’re free to modify it, reuse it, and in most cases publish it without crediting you.

2. Helping a new colleague get used to delivering bad news

I am a government regulator and love what I do. We inspect restaurants and other facilities for compliance. After the inspection is complete, we review the results and hang a letter and numerical grade card. I feel fortunate to work with professionals who truly want to educate the business owners and not arbitrarily drop the hammer.

I have a young new coworker who gets disheartened by the reaction of some people she has inspected. Grades that are lower than normal can naturally cause a passionate response from the business owner. My young coworker feels badly when the owners are upset with her inspection results. Is there any advice to help mentor her through this? She is quite good and I don’t want her to get too discouraged before her confidence builds.

How about: “You know, it’s just human nature that people sometimes get upset when they get a lower grade, but we work hard to be fair and to explain our process to business owners. We make sure people know that we’re available to answer their questions and point them toward resources that can help them improve. Even people who are initially upset understand that about us, and the vast majority of them calm down pretty quickly. It can rattle you at first when you’re not used to it, but I promise that most of these people don’t dislike you. It’s not personal; you’re just interacting with them during a difficult moment for them.”

3. My manager told me that I can’t give references

I am currently a supervisor at my job, and recently my manager told me that I am not allowed to give references for any past employees of the company, nor am I supposed to allow them to use me as a reference. Is this an infringement on my rights or is it legal?

It’s legal. Some companies do indeed have policies that all references need to go through particular people (often HR or a higher-level manager). It’s also possible that it’s not a company-wide policy but rather something specific to you or your team, which could be legitimate (if your manager has seen people giving inaccurate references or references they weren’t in a position to give) or unreasonable.

If what’s really going on is that your company doesn’t give references at all but only confirms dates of employment and job title, that’s also legal — and stupid. Companies with that policy make it harder for former employees to get jobs, and they’re also wildly hypocritical if they themselves solicit references before making hires (which many of them do).

Keep in mind that you’re only bound by your company’s policy while you’re working there. Once you leave, you’re free to serve as a reference for former colleagues.

4. I’m being told to scoop other people’s food out of their containers in the fridge

I work for a youth mental health organization as a reception/admin assistant. I’ve worked here for over 16 months. Part of my role is general office cleaning, which includes tiding rooms, wiping benches, emptying dishwashers, etc. Recently I have been told that fridges also need to be cleaned on two levels (roughly 80 staff). Specifically, I have been asked to scoop food out of the containers and wash them, rather than throw away people’s containers.

I think this is a very unreasonable request. I spoke to my manager about my reluctance to do this, and suggested two options: (1) I email staff to advise of the fridge clean and that they should remove containers they would like to keep, or (2) same email to staff, commence fridge clean at 4 pm and place containers on the sink area, send another email to staff offering a last chance to collect and advising that containers left on the sink after 5 pm will be thrown away.

I’ve spoken to Fair Work Australia and basically I have no rights; I can be forced to scoop food out every week, or be fired. I’m on the verge of quitting even though I love this job. I just think it’s disgusting to ask someone to do this. What do you think?

I think both your suggestions were reasonable, but since you’ve been overruled, you have to decide if this is a deal-breaker for you. I don’t think this is worth quitting over, or that it’s all that outrageous when the job already includes cleaning … but if you feel strongly about it, you’re entitled to decide that you’re not interested in a job that includes this.

5. Is this coffee part of the interview process?

A couple of weeks ago, I had an interview with one supervisor in person and the other over the phone who works remotely across the country. Toward the end of the interview, they asked about availability and I mentioned that I’m available after my vacation in July, where I’m actually going to the same city where the remote supervisor works. They also mentioned that they’re in the middle of the interview process and hope to wrap up in a couple weeks.

After the interview, I sent a thank-you email, and the next Monday the remote supervisor wrote back, copying the other supervisor, and asked if I’d like to meet for coffee while I’m in her town. I agreed, and it’s set for mid-July, but I am having trouble determining the next steps or how to think about the situation. Is it appropriate to email again about the status of the hiring process? Or do I meet for coffee in a few weeks still hoping that I’m being considered?

Assume this is part of the interview process and you’re still being considered. At the end of your coffee, if things haven’t become more clear, you can ask something like, “Can you tell me a bit about your timeline for next steps for the X position?”

my new employer scolded me for talking to my predecessor

A reader writes:

I recently accepted a managerial position at a small nonprofit where I know the previous manager. One of the office staff also applied for the role I got and was unsuccessful, and there has been much talk during the recruitment process of how this person would be managed, as they are very bitter about the situation.

During the recruitment process, I contacted the previous manager to ask a couple of questions about the role, no insider information but just general questions about the conditions. When I was offered the role, I didn’t tell anyone as I was conscious that the internal candidate’s rejection had to be carefully managed and the hiring manager advised me there were some “serious internal HR issues” they had to resolve, which raised a red flag for me.

I received a message through LinkedIn from the previous manager (who was no longer working there) asking me to call her urgently. When I didn’t, she sourced my number through someone else and called me to congratulate me, as the un-successful internal candidate had called her to tell her I’d got the position. We had a personal conversation about various work and non-work topics, during which I asked her if she was aware of any HR problems, as I had heard there may be some issues. Big mistake! Apparently she hopped straight on the phone to the office team asking what these HR issues were, and the unsuccessful internal candidate called the hiring manager asking what these HR problems were that I was referring to.

The majority of my induction morning (a half day sit-down and chat with the senior management team before I formally start, talking through the practicalities of the role) was spent being scolded by the hiring manager for speaking to the former manager and also being reminded over and over about workplace confidentiality. I wasn’t asked anything about the conversation or what I did/did not say but heard repeated references to my inability to keep work matters confidential. The senior team told me to come in at 10 am on my first day, and then there was an internal panicked conversation about who would tell the staff so they don’t think I feel like I “can stroll in late whenever I feel like it.” 

I accept I made a mistake that I won’t repeat, but it’s also raised some concerns for me over the kind of staff I would be managing, the kind who take the content of a second-hand personal conversation (that they don’t know to be true) and try to use it against someone. I know the internal candidate’s pride/feelings are hurt, and as a result of what’s happened I don’t have one ounce of excitement about starting this new role. My gut is telling me to run. Am I overreacting or does their behavior suggest they’re going to be a misery to manage?

They might be difficult to manage, but I’m far, far more concerned about the people above you.

You can handle difficult employees; you have the authority to lay out standard for behavior and consequences for not meeting them, after all. But there’s not a whole lot you can do about incompetent and unreasonable people above you, and that sounds like the situation here.

Scolding you for talking to the former person in the role, someone who you already knew? Frankly, it would be weird if you didn’t talk to her, since you already knew her and were taking over in the job she used to hold, but even aside from that, scolding you? Repeatedly?

It would be one thing if your soon-to-be-boss said, “I know that you know Jane and will probably talk with her about the team, but she had a really different assessment of things than I do, so I’d ask that you reserve judgment until you get in here and can assess things for yourself.” But scolding you? And reminding you of “workplace confidentiality,” which doesn’t really apply here?

And panicking that your staff might think you can “stroll in late whenever you feel like it” if you arrive an hour later than normal on your first day?

The whole thing is weirdly adversarial in a situation that shouldn’t be adversarial at all. You didn’t do anything wrong.

These are big danger signs that whoever’s running things over there is running them badly, isn’t reasonable, and has poor judgment. That’s the person who’s going to have a massive amount of control over your quality of life and how you’re able to operate. Your gut is telling you to run for a reason.

Read an update to this letter here.

my boss is stealing my lunch

Long-time readers may remember this letter that I’m revisiting over at Inc. today, since it’s hard to forget!

A reader writes:

I have a bit of a weird situation and was wondering if you had any advice on how to deal with my manager. I’ve recently been transferred to a new department, working in a new office environment, under a new manager. His diet consists mainly of fast food and take-out.

I have crazy allergies to a bunch of foods, as well as to chemicals found in most processed foods. Some are the swell-up-like-a-balloon-and-stop-breathing kind of allergy. I make most of my food at home and bring it with me to work. I’m really open about my allergies so that people understand I’m not being rude by not eating food they bring in. And most people get it. Except my manager.

He eats my lunch out of the staff fridge on an almost daily basis as if the food fairy left him a gift. I resorted to packing meals that I could keep at my desk, and he started raiding my drawers when I would be in meetings or away from my desk. When I try to address the fact that he’s stealing my food, he tries to butter me up by complimenting my cooking, and then walks away.

Any thoughts on how I can handle this situation? I’d especially like strategies that don’t have me going above him to complain to his manager (also, we have no HR department to turn to).

You can read my answer to this question over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and often updating/expanding my answers to them).

Read updates to this letter here and here.

I’m an intern managing 8 people

A reader writes:

I got hired as an intern 8 months ago, and continued to be trusted with more and more responsibility. About a month ago, I was given an informal title change and responsibility of leading a small team; I manage 8 people and work directly with leads on sister-teams.

I wasn’t given a pay raise due to budget cuts and recent layoffs, so according to payroll, I am still an intern. The pay doesn’t bother me since it’s a great opportunity to have so early in my career, but when I apply to my next job (which may be soon if projects keep getting cut), I’m worried getting credit for the experience I’ll have.

My company has a rule that prohibits letters of recommendation or contacting direct supervisors. Potential employers are allowed to call HR, who is only able to verify job title, dates of employment, and if they would re-hire you. 

If I put “intern,” they will brush off my experience, but if I put anything but that, it will look like I’m lying. I’m not sure what to do. Please help!

That’s ridiculous, and your new informal title needs to be reflected in your company’s record. Talk to your manager and say this: “Now that I’m managing a team and using the teapots manager title, I’d like my records with the company to reflect that. I understand that there’s no budget for raises right now and so I’m not requesting one, but it’s important to me that the company records are correct. How can I get the title change reflected with HR?”

If your manager pushes back and tells you there’s no need for that since everyone working with you is using the new title anyway, say this: “I’m thrilled to be doing the work I’m doing and have no plans of leaving, but with the recent layoffs, I’m not comfortable risking that my work here will stay recorded as an internship if my role is eliminated at some point. It’s important to me to ensure that it’s recorded accurately.”

Also, your company’s rule on references is horrible. Fortunately, in most cases if your manager loves you, they’ll find ways to communicate that to reference-checkers anyway (and once they move on to a new job, all bets are off anyway and they can say whatever they want).

Paying someone intern-level pay to manage eight people is also pretty horrible. I totally get you deciding to do it in exchange for the experience and resume-builder anyway, but it’s still horrible of them … and at a minimum, they need to ensure it really is a resume-builder by formalizing the title. In fact, you could point that out — “I’m being paid intern-level pay for managing eight people, which I’m willing to do because I’m glad for the experience, but for that trade-off to make sense to me, I absolutely need the correct title reflected in our records.”