how to start an email, turning down an offer that a friend helped me get, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Am I selfish for not wanting people to mooch off my knowledge?

I am a proactive person, one who researches, calls people, gets stuff done. Lately, I am feeling as though everyone wants to mooch off my knowledge. For example, I am in grad school and for one of our subjects we have to organize to go to a museum and write a report on it. I googled the museum, and found out there’s this behind-the-scenes educational tour available. I called the rep, and set up a time for myself and my three friends. I told the lecturer and she told everyone in the lecture, and now everyone thinks I’m some sort of expert on the museum. I’m getting really frustrated that everyone wants to tag along, and continually asks me questions, when I know no more than the rest of them: I just happen to be proactive! They could have the same knowledge too, if they tried!

This isn’t an isolated example; often in my life, whether at work or school, I will get ahead by making things happen for myself and then people will try to, so to speak, ride on my coat tails. Is it wrong of me to be annoyed by this? It’s a competitive world, and we’re all competing for grades. If I can get myself an edge – well, I don’t want to share it! I know this is selfish thinking, but they too could have my knowledge if they tried. I literally did nothing more than go on their website and found a link for these educational tours and then call the woman. Anyone could do it. I was asking myself today “WWAD” (What Would Alison Do) but I can’t get past wanting to keep my extra information to myself (or my friends) and not the masses. Is this completely selfish? I have repeated so many times “check the museum’s website” but now everyone thinks I’m the holder of all the information for everything about the course and it’s getting out of control.

I don’t think it’s selfish to feel like you go the extra mile and then other people coast because you’ve eased the path for them. And it’s annoying when being good at something causes other people to behave as if they’re helpless because it just feels easier to have you do it for them, even when they should be handling said thing their own. (And these people sound particularly willing to lean on you unnecessarily and in an annoying way.)

But I don’t think you’re danger of your help leading to a situation where they win at your expense, because you’re the one who’s proving yourself the talented, driven one. Plus, you can and should set boundaries if you’re starting to feel like people are taking advantage of you. For example, if people come to you with questions about something they really should be figuring out for themselves, it’s fine to just say, “Oh, you should check ___; that’s what I do.” You’re not required to hand-hold them.

But more importantly, being a person with drive comes with benefits that far outweigh this annoying side effect: You’re going to end up with a great reputation for getting shit done, and that pays off in all kinds of ways.

2. Pronouns when opening a group email

I send a fair amount of emails, and I’m always unsure of what’s appropriate/polite/sane to say at the start of emails to groups with both men and women in them;

· “Hello people…”
· “hey guys…”
· “hey guys and gals…”
· “hello ladies and gentlemen…” (very formal for the groups I normally talk to)

Do you have any easy advice?

I started using “y’all” for that reason. It sounds southern, but it’s one of the only non-gendered ways of addressing a group that we seem to have and it’s fun to say. But there’s also “hi all,” “hi there,” and even just “hi,” followed by your message.

3. Turning down a job offer after my friend helped connect me

I have a job offer from Company A, largely due to my connection with my good friend. However, I have also received an offer from Company B, which I feel like is a better opportunity for me.

Would it reflect poorly on me to reject Company A’s offer after the effort my friend has put into getting me this connection? Would this also make my friend look bad at her work since she was the one who recommended me? I am so grateful for both opportunities and for my friend’s help during this stressful time of job searching, but ultimately I want to do what is best for my career (without burning bridges).

No, you’re totally allowed to turn down an offer if it ends up not being the best option to you. You’re in no way obligated to take the job just because your friend went to bat for you. That said, you are obligated to handle it as well as possible because of your friend: Tell the company your decision as soon as possible, thank them profusely for the time they spent with you, explain why you’re turning them down, and say that you’d like to stay in touch and hope there might be other possibilities for you to work together in the future. And give your friend a heads-up about the situation, obviously — and tell her how grateful you are for her help and that you’re sorry that it didn’t work out.

4. Can I ask for a referral bonus?

I’m relatively new at my company. They’re doing a lot of hiring and I just referred 3 guys who look like they’ll be getting picked up. Is it inappropriate to ask my boss if I’ll get a bonus for referring them?

You could say, “The company doesn’t have a bonus program for referrals, does it?” because some companies do have such a program. But getting a referral bonus at a company without an existing referral program would be pretty unusual, so you want to frame your query as asking about the existence of such a program.

5. Update: Can I report my friend for helping me lie on my resume?

Remember the letter-writer in January asking if she could tip off her friend’s employer that the friend had helped her lie on her resume (#2 at the link)? Here’s her update.

My situation is resolved. I had elaborated on it a bit more in the comments. It got a bit messy, as I knew it would. After some legal wrangling, I did get the money that she owed me back, but not before she tried to threaten to sue me and emailed my husband telling him what a terrible person I was, reiterating that I deserved everything bad that happened to me. I am SO glad I didn’t try to talk to her boss, as she did all the damage herself in the end, from what I’ve heard. She is blocked from all forms of communication with me, but she still attempts to get to me through other people. I choose to ignore her and live my life in peace!

On a much much happier note, I got a job! I followed your interview advice to the letter, and after 13 interviews, I got a job in my field after being off on maternity leave for 4 years. I started the other day and I am in a wonderful place. I start full time in a couple of weeks after transitioning back in next week for a few days.

how to follow up with a bad guest speaker

A reader writes:

In my current role, I’m responsible for hosting programs for my organization in honor of certain monthly observances (i.e., Women’s History Month, Disability Employment Awareness Month, etc.) that usually require a guest speaker. Because I essentially have no budget for this, I’ve had to rely on the kindness of individuals willing to speak at our programs for free. Usually I Google search who has spoken to other organizations in the area in past years, research their bios, education, and experience, and extend an invitation from there. I’ve had some amazing guest speakers who have given thought-provoking and insightful presentations, and I’ve also had a few that were a little short of amazing…but overall the programs are well received.

I recently invited a speaker who seemed great on paper. While maybe not as experienced as I would have liked, his credentials were a great fit for our presentation and he had public speaking experience. He was very passionate about this particular topic in speaking with him, and I’ve found that passion often equates to a great presentation.

The presentation came and went…and it was bad. He arrived 20 minutes late, citing accidents on the road (it was raining that day, but still). Instead of a lively, engaging presentation, he read a paper he wrote aloud — a paper that I would have considered not great had I read it in fifth grade. His cell phone rang in the middle of his presentation. Some employees afterward commented to me how this particular event was not up to par. This ultimately reflects on me (as it should).

The issue is that when he arrived and before his presentation, he asked me to write a thank-you letter and send it to his boss, and I agreed (I usually write a thank-you letter to the speaker anyway, unrequested). How do I word this thank-you letter now? Usually my letters are glowing about the presentation and how well-received it was. I feel like I’d be lying if I said how engaging, insightful, and well-received his presentation was. To be honest, his communication with me leading up to the event was riddled with grammatical and misspellings and didn’t reflect well on his organization (but he was already invited so I was naively hoping it wasn’t indicative of things to come). But then again, he took time out of his day to speak for free and his heart was in the right place, so I’d like to write something nice. How do I navigate this situation?

How about just thanking him for his time and enthusiasm? Those are two things that he really did lend you, and you could honestly thank him for them.

I’m curious about how you found him. Is he someone who does speaking engagements regularly, or was this more of a one-off for him? If he does this more than very occasionally, it might also be worth offering him feedback. If that’s the case, you could start by asking him if he’d like the feedback or not — saying something like, “I did receive some feedback from participants that I’d be glad to pass along if you’d like it.” Then, if he does, you could share with him that people were looking for more of an engaging presentation rather than just hearing him read a paper, and that people were disappointed that the event started late and was interrupted by his phone. But again, I’d offer him the opportunity to say yes or no to hearing feedback in general before sharing that with him and would only do this if he’s speaking regularly.

If you had paid him, that would be a different story — in that case, I’d say to share your concerns with him much more directly.

4 time management beliefs that are harming you

If you struggle to manage your calendar and find enough time in the day to get everything done, you might wonder if you just haven’t found the right time management technique yet. Maybe you haven’t – but it’s also possible that the real issue is that your thinking about time management is what’s holding you back.

Here are four of the biggest misconceptions about time management that can really mess with your head — and your schedule – if you buy into them.

1. “There’s time in the week to do everything I need/want to do, if I can just figure out the right way to manage my time.”

This might be true – but for a lot of people, it isn’t. Too often, people look to time management systems and techniques to provide a magic bullet solution for a schedule that’s simply loaded up with more than one person can do in a day or a week. When that’s the case, the answer isn’t to keep looking for more time management techniques; in fact, that can hurt you, by making you feel guilty for not being able to get everything done and by leading you away from the dealing with the root cause of the problem.

When there simply isn’t enough time in the week to get everything done that you want or need to do, the solution is to revisit what’s on your plate in the first place. That might mean talking with your manager, or reassessing the relative importance of various items, or delegating more, or accepting that you can’t take a night class during your work’s busiest period. Whatever the solution, it’s always going to start with being brutally honest about what you can and can’t do.

2. “It looks bad if I say no to people.”

What looks bad to people is taking on more commitments than you can handle and then either turning in shoddy work or dropping the ball altogether. That looks far worse than saying from the start, “I’m pretty booked up for the next few weeks and don’t think I’d be able to take this on without reshuffling something else.”

And to be clear, saying no isn’t usually about a flat “no.” Depending on who you’re talking to, it might be, “I can do that but only if we push back X or Y” or “I could do it in two weeks, if you can wait that long” or “I’d love to, but I’m booked solid and can’t see a way to fit that in” or “It’s a great idea, but I’ve got my hands full with X right now.”

And of course, you need to consider your audience. For example, you usually shouldn’t say no to your CEO or a major funder (although even in those situations, there are often times when you might need to; in those cases, it’s about figuring out the best way to frame it.)

3. “If the work keeps coming at me, I must be expected to find a way to do all of it.”

If your manager keeps piling work on you, you might assume that she expects you to do all of it; after all, she knows what your workload is, right? But in reality, many managers will expect you to manage your own workload and to speak up if there’s a problem. If they don’t hear any push-back, they assume you have room to take on more and more. But if you raise the issue (“I’m buried under case files and can’t get through all of these and still sleep during the next two weeks”), reasonable managers will help you re-prioritize, delegate to someone else, bring in extra help, or otherwise work toward a solution. But you have to speak up – don’t assume they know if you don’t say something.

4. “I can get this done at the last minute.”

If you often wait until the last minute to do work, turning it in just before the deadline, you’re setting yourself up for disaster. Sometimes this strategy works just fine – but what will happen when you’re sick or fielding a crisis the day it’s due? Or if you start working on it and realize you need information from someone else before you can complete it, and that person isn’t available? You’ll do yourself a favor in the long-run if you build in a buffer and don’t save things until the last minute.

my boss is sending everyone at my office racist memes

A reader writes:

I work at a branch office of a nonprofit institution (roughly 150 employees over 10 states). Today, my branch manager (vice president in the overall institution) sent this racially-charged political meme to all employees at our site.

I was shocked and disgusted, as were many of my front-line colleagues. My immediate supervisors, however, shrugged it off. They agree that it is distasteful, but not enough to confront the prickly branch manager about it.

I believe that this sort of communication (which has nothing to do with the purpose of our nonprofit) would be seriously frowned upon by the overall organization’s CEO, were he aware. If this email was leaked to the press, it would reflect very poorly on our organization.

I feel compelled to speak up about this – but how?

Confronting my branch manager directly – by myself – is pretty much guaranteed to go poorly for me. And organizing colleagues to action will no doubt be seen as troublemaking.

We have no HR to speak of. I’ve thought about forwarding the e-mail directly to our CEO, but that feels like tattling. I can’t take this to our communications officer (which would seem like the logical next person to talk to), because – surprise! – the branch manger in question also serves as the institution’s chief communications officer.

Please help me!

Wow.

Let us have a moment of silence to reflect on the stupidity and offensiveness of your manager, and our gratitude that the rest of us do not work with him.

The good news here is that you feel confident that your CEO would have a problem with this.

It’s not tattling to report this to him. Tattling would be reporting that a colleague is taking five extra minutes at lunch or annoying you by yodeling in the parking lot. This is about letting him know about something serious — a wildly inappropriate all-staff email (well, all-staff within your location) that’s racist and offensive and creates an unwelcoming environment for loads of people and — because he’s the head of your office — makes it appear that the company itself might condone his views. It’s not tattling to let him know about something that’s horrible for your organization in many ways.

I’d forward that email — right now, today — to your CEO with a note saying this:

“Would you take a look at the email below? Bob forwarded it today to all employees at our site. It reads as racially charged to me, and I’m frankly pretty taken aback by it. In addition to being personally dismayed and thinking it doesn’t represent the kind of environment we want here, I’m also concerned about how it would reflect on us if seen outside the organization.

However, I’m concerned about causing tension in my relationship with Bob, which I obviously need to remain strong. If you agree that this needs to be addressed, I’d be grateful if you’d do that without noting that I was the one to forward it to you.”

Now, is there some risk that your manager will end up finding out that you did this? There is. But if your CEO is a halfway decent manager, he’ll ensure that that won’t happen. If it does happen — well, it’s still very much the right thing to do.

Be the person who doesn’t shrug it off.

Read updates to this letter here and here.

job offer red flags, I feel undermined by a coworker, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Should I be worried about taking this job?

My question is probably a no-brainer, but I’m a recent grad still trying to figure out all the nuances of the professional world, so: I just (this morning) informally accepted my first professional job. It happened very fast – I applied last Thursday, got an invitation to interview on Friday, interviewed on Tuesday and the hiring manager called me this morning (Wednesday) to offer me the job. From what I saw of the office and staff, I definitely want this job, but something about the process is making me uneasy – the speed of it, and also the fact that they didn’t ask for my references (I have internship supervisors and professors who would happily provide one), and also the fact that the hiring manager said she would send me the benefits package today but hasn’t yet (although it’s only been a few hours).

Does this sound normal? I think maybe I’ve interviewed and been turned down for so many jobs over the past few months that I’m reluctant to let myself believe that this could be real… a simple “yes, sounds legit” or “run away!” from you would do wonders to put my mind at ease.

Some otherwise soundly-operating employers don’t check references — weird but true. The speed would worry me a little more, although even that’s not necessarily a problem. I’d put it in context about what else you know about them: Did they explain why they were moving so quickly, or even acknowledge it? What other signals did you get about their culture and how they do things? Did they give you plenty of opportunity to ask your own questions? That’s the stuff I’d look at. If you feel good on those fronts, I wouldn’t let the speed turn you off.

2. I feel undermined by a colleague

I am the new manager for a process improvement team. I was holding a staff meeting with my staff when all of a sudden, my colleague — another manager — barged into my meeting and asked one of my staff members if they were meeting. (This staff member used to be his analyst but has moved on to my team now.) Because this was done in front of my other staff, I felt embarrassed and powerless, as if he feels that his needs are more important than mine.

How should I address this with this manager? This is not the first time I felt undermined by him.

This makes him look rude, far more than it makes you look weak. If you appear rattled by it, that could make you look weak, but otherwise this is just someone being rude.

In the moment when it happened, you could have said, “We’re actually right in the middle of something, but Lavinia can check in with you when we’re done here.” But frankly, even that isn’t really necessary — he came to check if someone was supposed to be meeting with him, she presumably wasn’t, and that’s that. Of course, if your staff member got up to leave your meeting with him, you’d want to address that (“Lavinia, I actually need you here. Can you connect with Lucius later?”), but that doesn’t sound like the case.

My hunch is that you’re letting this guy have too much power over you. You’re rattled (I assume) because he made you feel that he did have the power to pull someone out of your meeting or that your team would think that — but he doesn’t, and your team will follow your cues. Act with the confidence of your own position and speak up when you need to … but allowing yourself to feel undermined by stuff like this will actually weaken you far more than this guy’s behavior could on its own.

3. I have concerns about my new coworker

I have some concerns about a new coworker in my office and am wondering if I should say anything. I am fairly new myself, having been here for a little less than a year. I am not responsible for training this person, but everyone in the office is asked to help out with spending some time training new people or observing them when they first start out working on their own.

In total, I’ve only spent a few hours training or observing this person, and she’s not exactly doing anything wrong, per se. But she’s not exactly doing things really well either. There have been several small red flags (things like not asking any questions in training, not being very thorough, seeming to miss connections between related issues, etc.). Obviously, someone will correct her if she makes a mistake, but I’m worried that no one is pointing out the overall pattern, and that her training period is scheduled to end soon. Should I ask to meet with her and point out some of the big-picture issues I noticed? If that’s too heavy-handed (considering that I’m just a colleague and peer), I could offer to share some of my “tips for success.”

Should I mention something to our supervisor, and suggest that her training period be extended? One concern is that our supervisor mostly deals with management issues and doesn’t do the same day-to-day work, so I’m not sure that she’d even pick up on the things I’m talking about if no one pointed them out. Or, since I’m not responsible for training this person, should I just mind my own business?

I’d do two things: First, ask her how things are going and if there’s anything you can help train her in or cover again with her. You could say something like, “I know it can be a lot to learn at once, and I’d be glad to cover anything that you’re still feeling shaky on.” You could also offer to share some of the things you learned that were particularly helpful to you in the beginning, including work habits.

But I’d also share your observations with your manager. It sounds like she welcomes input from people during this training process, and most decent managers would welcome someone saying something like, “I’ve noticed that Jane might need some additional coaching in things like X, Y, and Z.”

That said, the types of issues you’re describing are ones that can be very hard to coach out of people. All you can really do is make your manager aware of the issues and make your coworker aware that she can use you as a resource if she’s motivated to.

4. How to manage other managers

I’m moving into a new director position in a corporate environment, where I’ll have two managers reporting to me, as well as several individuals. Each manager will have individuals as direct reports. Much of your advice about good management obviously applies, but I’m curious about any specific advice you’d give about how to manage a manager. The managers will be responsible for much of the team’s day-to-day activities, while I will be expected to stay up to speed on the day-to-day but also be responsible for strategy and planning for the next 6-12+ months.

My hope is to enable the managers to lead their respective teams by setting clear goals and expectations. I’m wondering how best to stay involved enough while not interfering, and I definitely don’t want to create a dynamic where the individuals under the managers feel like they have too many bosses. One additional consideration is that the managers are new to the department and our function is pretty specialized.

I have the perfect article for you … somewhere else. It’s this piece from The Management Center (for whom I do lots of work and with whom I helped create this piece).

5. Are some companies exempt from anti-discrimination laws?

This is sort of a “curiosity” question that’s been on my mind for quite a while — ever since being fired from a job due to my religious affiliation a few years back — is it legal for small companies (less than 50 people) to discriminate based on race, religion, disability, etc? Or do those laws only apply to companies over a certain size?

Most anti-discrimination laws cover employers with 15 or more employees. The ADEA — which prohibits discriminating against people 40 or over — covers employers with 20 or more employees. And some states have their own laws that kick in at lower numbers.

The thinking, I believe, was that lawmakers didn’t want to subject very small employers to the financial and staff burden of defending against discrimination claims (a burden which can be significant, even if you ultimately prevail).

applying for a full-time job and asking to work part-time

A reader writes:

Last night I went to bed feeling secure in my newly-undertaken adventure as a part-time freelancer who recently left an unfulfilling full-time job in the wrong city and the wrong working culture to pursue my field in greener pastures. I spent the last two years putting aside all the savings I could to build a safety net for myself while I got started in this new location and was looking forward to a couple of years of dedicating myself to part-time work while spending the rest of my time on unpaid professional development (volunteering, networking, picking up additional credentials and certifications and expanding my skillset) as well as shaking off the stress of the 9-to-5 grind I just left. This morning I woke up to an ideal-but-awkwardly-timed job posting for an entry-level position I’m eminently qualified for at a company I’d already mentally ear-marked as a good potential future employer.

The problem is that the position is full-time and I’m already committed to two part-time contracts up until the end of summer, which were supposed to be the bulk of my income this year. I could not possibly do these projects while also working full-time without completely undoing all the mental and physical health self-care I’ve been investing in (60-70 hour work weeks for several months while living alone with a moderate back problem? No.) I was also not anticipating moving back into full-time so quickly, though if it’s the right job, I’m ready for it. And this might very well be the right job, just a lot sooner than I expected.

I’m going to apply so that at least my CV is on file with them for the future and for the opportunity to get to know the company better and see if they really are someone I can work for (and hopefully to give myself some benchmarks for what to expect in terms of employment in this city). But there’s a reasonable chance they will actually offer me the job, which I can only take if they will allow me to work part-time until my other commitments are finished. My plan is to not bring up my other commitments until the negotiation phase (before the offer, but after the interview), but I’m worried that that would be considered dodgy, since I already know I can’t do full-time yet. Still, I think if I put it in the cover letter, I may as well not apply at all for all the consideration they’re going to give me.

I know they are totally within their rights not to want to hire someone who can’t do full-time (at least not right away), but I also feel that as a part-timer whose other projects come with other significant contacts (it’s a highly collaborative field) and access to resources (my other employer is a university), I also bring some advantages. (Not to mention that my interest in on-going professional development should be an asset as well–the job posting itself lists “interest in learning” as an ideal quality–but this means enough flexibility for me to attend courses, workshops, and conferences.)

How do I navigate this? I don’t want to cut myself off at the knees just because the timing isn’t totally perfect, but I don’t want to run afoul of anyone or burn bridges either. I am trying to balance honesty with diplomacy, and hoping that this falls under the same umbrella as asking an employer if they can be flexible about start dates or telecommuting.

The thing that’s jumping out to me here is that you said the job is entry-level. If it’s entry-level, (a) they’re really unlikely to want to compromise on the role in this way, because they’re almost certainly going to have plenty of other qualified candidates who will be happy to do the work full-time, and (b) you sound like you’re overqualified for it anyway. You might think that being overqualified means that the employer gets a bonus — you can do the tasks of the job and probably take on more too! — but for employers, it’s usually a negative, not a positive. (More on that here.)

Because of that, I’m questioning whether this is even the right job for you. If you apply for something well below your qualifications as a way to start creating a relationship with a company, you risk creating the wrong relationship. By applying for something too junior for you, you’ll potentially look like you’re less qualified than your resume would otherwise indicate, and that will hurt you if you apply for something more suitable to your professional level in the future.

But all that aside, let’s answer the actual question that you’re asking: Most employers aren’t going to be receptive to making a full-time job part-time. There’s a reason it’s full-time; that’s what the work requires. You’d basically be saying, “I know you need X done, but I’m proposing that I just do half of X!” That doesn’t solve the problem they’re attempting to solve by hiring for this role; it actually leaves them paying someone for creating an additional problem that they now have to solve. Sometimes that ends up being okay, if you’re an incredibly desirable candidate who would be great for the work in a way no other candidate would be. But for an entry-level role, that’s very unlikely to be the case.

But if you decide to proceed with this anyway, let’s talk about timing for raising it. You’re right that if you put your part-time constraints in your cover letter, they’re unlikely to consider you further. There might be an opportunity to raise it during the interview stage, but if not, then yeah, the offer stage is where you’d discuss it. It’ll go over a lot better if you frame it as, “Is this something you’d be open to?” rather than “This is what I would definitely need to accept the job.” If it’s framed as the latter, you’re likely to just irritate them (they’ll wonder why you wasted their time when the ad made it clear that the job was full-time). You’d need to convey that you’re open to full-time but wondering about the possibility of part-time, and your reasons for that. And if they’re not open to it and offer you the full-time job, you could always consider it and end up determining that you’re not ready to return to full-time work after all. But I think if you present it as definitely the only thing you’d even consider, the question of why you applied in the first place will annoy them … which is not a good way to build a relationship with a company you might want to apply to in the future.

But really, I’m skeptical that this is the right position at all, for all the reasons above.

Read an update to this letter here.

male coworkers don’t believe I’m coming back after maternity leave

A reader writes:

I’m currently the youngest member of my team and the only female non-manager within my team. I’m 6 months pregnant and I’m the breadwinner of the house while my husband is finishing out his MBA program.

My all-male coworkers have started bombarding me with doubt when I mention that I will be returning after my maternity leave. I have communicated my exact return time and intention multiple times, and always met with: “Well, when you have a kid everything changes,” “You’re a childless person pretending to be an expert on children,” “All the chemical in a woman’s body when that kid hits the ground means that you stop being a separate entity,” etc. In short, I’m now beyond annoyed and feel harassed.

I feel like HR within my company is only there to protect upper management and will not do anything except set up a meeting with me and my coworkers for me to say “stop it.” I pointed out today how offensive it is to say these things to me when within our broader department, all the women are working mothers. I also pointed out how making those comments touches on a personal issue and how coworkers are not aware of everyone’s circumstances so they should not be making judgments. I got a grudging apology from one coworker, but he didn’t seem to understand what he’d done wrong. Any suggestions?

You can read my answer to this question over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and often updating/expanding my answers to them).

can I invite my interviewer to lunch so we can connect on a more personal level?

A reader writes:

A few days ago, I interviewed at a company that I’m really interested in. You can say that I very much want this job. My background, experience, and degree make me an ideal candidate for the position, but the downside is that I’ve been unemployed for about 9 months due to being laid off.

The interview was just a first round with the hiring manager. The interview was pretty average, all things considered, since it was my first interview since my last job (two years). I didn’t do too poorly but I didn’t wow him either. I was able to answer all questions fairly well, but looking back it all felt very robotic and unnatural. To my chagrin, at the end of the interview I was given the typical HR double speak: “It’s still early in the hiring process and that you should expect a call from us within the next few weeks.” I thanked him for his time, asked for his business card, and followed up the next day with a thank-you email reiterating my interest and strengths.

In interviews I notice I tend to automatically revert to putting on this “professional demeanor” in an attempt to appeal to the interviewer. It’s likely doing me more harm than good as I end up blending in with my competition. My goal was to be more personable and be able to interact with the interviewer as if he was a friend, which would be more memorable/likeable.

So my question is would it be weird if I asked the interviewer to an informal lunch? I guess what I’m trying to achieve is to try to connect on a personal level outside of an interview environment. How weird would that be and do you think it would help? I’m trying to think outside the box because I’m really interested in working in this position at the company.

Don’t do that.

It’s likely to come across as trying to circumvent the employer’s hiring process. At this point, things are in their court. They’re talking to other candidates, and then they’ll decide who they’re interested in talking again. It’s really up to them to decide from this point if they’d like to invite you to have further conversations (and, when they do, if they’d like it to be over lunch or not).

It sounds like you’re almost trying to switch to a more networking-type relationship, but you can’t really do that mid-interview-process. At this point, you’re in their process, and you really just need to wait and see if they want to move forward with further conversations or not. (There are contexts where doing that might not feel inappropriate. If you’re a senior level candidate with in-demand skills, you can often operate more like a consultant than a job candidate — proposing next steps and so forth. But that doesn’t sound like the context here, and isn’t the context for most people.)

I think you’re right to identify that having a relaxed, less stiff demeanor (to a point) can help you give a better interview. It’s not you want to interact with the interviewer as a friend, though — you’re not friends. It’s that you want to interact the way you would with a colleague who you’d been working with for a while. You want your interviewer to be able to picture you as a colleague, and taking that approach to the interview will usually make it a warmer, more relaxed conversation. If you’re coming across as stiff, interviewers might be left feeling like they don’t have a good sense of who you really are and what you’d be like to work with.

But the time to do that is in the interview itself. As much as you might like to, you can’t really reach out to set up another meeting outside that context.

my writing partner is a hot mess, coworker hassles me about working from home, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My writing partner is a hot mess

I’ve entered into a tentative writing partnership with a person who shares my interest in a particular historical period. We have a blog and she’s got a terrific idea for a book. What’s the problem, right?

She’s in the very early stages of learning to write, and makes all the common mistakes in terms of point of view, keeping tenses consistent, injecting personal thoughts into narrative, and “telling” not “showing.” She repeatedly dithers over how her version of history is the correct one, whereas I am fact-based, and will die on that hill rather than bend facts to fit narrative. There is absolutely no motivation or seemingly understanding on her part to do the hard-core, no b.s. research that is going to be critical to writing the manuscript. She repeatedly has asked me to bring an event flyer to our meetings when I have already emailed her the details, as well as a link to the organization’s event page; I’ve caught her rifling through my notes and books, and worst of all, she’s begun imitating my writing style and voice in her blog entries and writing samples.

She’s a nice enough person but has issues to which I can’t relate, nor do I want to try. Do I simply plod along, meeting deadlines and submitting my chapters until she drowns under the actual workload that is the reality of writing a manuscript? Or do I just tell her flat out that her lack of writing experience and skills are clearly the work of a ham-handed novice writer (look, I was like that too, but fifteen years and a lot of courses on writing as well as writing several manuscripts and attending workshops etc. has moved me past it) and I’m unwilling to either edit beyond small mistakes or to actually teach her how to write?

Well, neither. But it sounds like you definitely should put the kibosh on any writing agreement with her — if for no reason other than that it’s coming through loud and clear that you don’t want to be in a partnership with her. And there’s no shame in that. Writing a book with someone else is an intense process. You need to trust the other person’s judgment, writing, and general competence. You don’t trust hers, so this is unlikely to be anything other than a miserable and frustrating experience (possibly for both of you, but definitely for you).

But that doesn’t mean that you should call her an amateur and insult her skills when you part ways (even if that assessment has merit). Instead, why not say that as you get deeper into the project, you’re realizing that it’s tough to collaborate when you have such different styles and that you’ve concluded that a joint book isn’t in the cards?

2. Coworker won’t stop badgering me about working from home

I recently relocated to an area in Oklahoma where there is not an office space for me to utilize, so I am working from home. My manager was completely aware prior to my move and is fully supportive. My coworker, who works at the corporate office, has constantly asked me about my work situation and I have told him repeatedly that is between me and my manager. We were discussing this recently and he told me that our situations are not different, and that he and the rest of the team should be allowed to work from home if I do, which I do not agree with. He also told me that I could commute, and that people that have lengthy commutes should just change jobs, implying that if I receive special privileges that he finds unacceptable, it would be better for team morale for me to leave the company.

This situation is beyond frustrating to me because frankly, it is none of his business. If I am performing and my manager and superiors are supportive of the situation, he should worry about his work situation and not concern himself with my unique needs. 

Understanding that we will not come to a middle ground, how should I proceed when he continues to ask me questions? I consider this person a friend and do not understand why he constantly compares our situations.

“If you’d like to work from home, you should talk with (manager).” Followed by, if the badgering continues, “I’d rather not keep this open for discussion, thanks.”

I’d also give your boss a quick heads-up that this is happening: “Just FYI, Constantine seems really interested in why I’m working from home and why he and others aren’t able to. He’s questioned me about it so much that I suggested he talk to you if he wants to discuss it.”

3. Letting candidates know that they’re in our second tier

I am looking for language to use when I send an email thanking a candidate for applying for a job but letting them know that the pool was strong and we would consider them in round 2 if we don’t find someone in round 1. I want to say this as positively as possible.

Well, you could say, “We’re currently focusing in on a small number of especially well-matched candidates, but depending on how that process goes, we may reach back out to you next month.”

But I don’t think I’d be that explicit about it; there’s no reason to make someone feel less qualified than others if you can avoid it (and if they’re someone who you could plausibly end up hiring at the end of the process). I’d say something like this instead: “We’re in the early stages of our hiring process and have many strong candidates. I expect to be back in touch next month.” (And that at that next stage, you’d either reject them or ask them to interview.)

4. Can I ask to negotiate through email?

So, long story short, I’ve made a salary proposal after the recruiter asked about it (final decision is still pending, but it looks pretty good). I made it through email because I’ve never negotiated salary before, and I don’t like the on-the-spot nature of a phone conversation about such an important topic. The recruiter wants to schedule some time to talk about it tomorrow. Is it reasonable to ask that we negotiate through email, and how might I go about that?

I’ve seen your advice about it, but like I said I would feel more comfortable if I had some time to look at the text and formulate a response. A lot of the comments on that post seem to agree that it can be fine to negotiate through email.

I would not ask for it — if it unfolds that way, fine (although even then I think it potentially puts you at a disadvantage), but specifically asking to do it that way, especially after he specifically asked to speak, is likely to make you look like you lack confidence and aren’t comfortable with business norms.

5. Can I purposefully leave a skill off my resume?

My previous job, which I left for my current one about 4 years ago, required me to be able to speak in Spanish at a conversational level as well as doing some written translation and proofreading. The job was primarily customer service in English, and the Spanish-related duties took 10% to 20% of my time. I am not a native speaker, but at the time, I was proficient enough to be able to do the job. However, I haven’t needed to speak Spanish since I left that job, and I would not consider myself proficient now. I definitely don’t want a potential employer to think I am bilingual. Is it weird or unethical to leave the Spanish-related duties from that job off of my resume?

If I do that, a possible complication is that one of the jobs I’m applying for is with my current employer. I’m worried that the change on my resume might look weird to HR, but I could be worried about nothing – I’m sure they know that candidates tailor their resumes for specific jobs. I don’t think the actual hiring committee would care, as the job I’m applying for does not require proficiency in a second language.

It’s not unethical or even weird to leave something off your resume that you don’t want to highlight. Your resume is a marketing document; it’s not required or expected to be a comprehensive listing of everything you’ve ever done. If you don’t want your Spanish work on there, leave it off. (That said, if the only reason you’re leaving it off is because you feel rusty, I’d still include it — it showcases skills that you could likely pick up again if you needed/wanted to.)

how to tell your team their work isn’t good enough

Every manager knows the feeling: Someone turns in a piece of work you assigned, and when you look at it, it’s not the quality you wanted. How do you tell a staff member that work isn’t good enough and needs to be better?

If this isn’t a regular occurrence and is just a one-time happening, you should simply be direct about how your vision for the piece differs from what you received. Treat it as a communication error more than a work quality issue – because if it’s not part of a pattern, that’s the likely explanation anyway. For instance, you might say:

  • “I think this is a good start, but I’d like to tighten up the writing. Right now we’re taking five pages to say whatI think we could say in two. And I think we need to address the broader strategy implications more explicitly. Could you take another run at it? The piece you did last month on X is a great model to use again.”
  • “I’m realizing I didn’t fully communicate what was in my head on this. While this would work for an internal audience, we’ll need to be able to show this to clients and funders. That means it needs to be more ____.”

If you’re regularly seeing an attitude of “it’s good enough” on your staff (or in a particular team member), address it directly. You might say something like this:

  • “I want to talk about the bar we’re aiming to meet in our work. One reason we’re known for being great at what we do is that we work hard to ensure our stuff is better quality than anything else out there. That often means we need to take extra time with it to ___. (Insert whatever’s relevant to your context here, like: test ideas/edit flawlessly/make it easy to understand/align with our branding.) Sometimes work that would be good enough in another company won’t be good enough for us; we really try to stretch for greatness.”

If you can follow this up by pointing to examples of work that did meet that bar, that will usually help people understand what they should be shooting for.

You might also lay out different bars for different types of work: “For emails that are just being circulated internally, it’s fine to write informally and it’s not big deal if you don’t proofread perfectly. But for anything going to the public, we need to be rigorous about writing and proofreading; that’s where mistakes matter and reflect badly on us.”

The important thing in all of these cases is to be direct about how the work is missing the mark and what the bar you’re going for looks like, keeping the focus on the work itself and not the person. (That last part is the difference between “this piece needs to do a better job of communicating with sophisticated audiences” and “your writing is making us sound amateur.”)