are anonymous surveys really anonymous?

A reader writes:

My employer has sent out links to “anonymous surveys” in the past. I don’t respond to them for fear that they are lying about the responses being anonymous. The surveys always ask “are you looking or will you look for a new job in the next year?” and about how satisfied you are with your current position, etc. They usually have URLs that are clearly not a simple mycompany.com/employee-survey. There’s something hashed in there, and it might just be to make it non-guessable by random people on the internet, but it seems just as likely it’s a unique code so employees can’t take the same survey more than once. And *that* suggests, to me, that they actually could go back and see “who was it that said they were looking to leave?”

Am I being paranoid, or are employee surveys used to find “disloyal” employees?

At good companies, they’re not. At bad companies, anything is possible.

And frankly, even at good companies, it can still be pretty obvious who gave a particular piece of feedback if your team is small.

The real question isn’t “will they know that this feedback was mine?” The question to ask is, “How does this company handle feedback in general and, based on my knowledge of how things operate here, do I trust them to make good use of my input and not penalize me for sharing it, regardless of whether or not this is anonymous?”

open thread – March 6, 2015

It’s the Friday open thread! The comment section on this post is open for discussion with other readers on anything work-related that you want to talk about. If you want an answer from me, emailing me is still your best bet*, but this is a chance to talk to other readers.

* If you submitted a question to me recently, please don’t repost it here, as it may be in the to-be-answered queue :)

I don’t want to recommend my dad for a job, refusing to train coworkers, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My new job won’t notify a school about an apparent pedophile

Part of my new job involves finding volunteers to work in schools. Last year, one of those volunteers (mid-40s, married with children) became infatuated with an underage girl in his daughter’s class. He sent her inappropriate messages and photos until she sought help. The man was obviously banned from the program by the person who previously had my role and the school escalated issues.

This week I received an email from that man telling me he had been approached by a school to be a coach for the program and registering his interest to be a volunteer again this year.

I immediately told my employer, assuming we would notify the school. However, my work is worried about a defamation case and is refusing to notify the school. I think the safety of the students is FAR more important. What should I do?

What?! I’m no lawyer, but I’d think that if anything, they could get in more trouble for not speaking up than for speaking up. The only thing I can think of that would explain this is if the allegations were never proven and they think there’s some possibility of innocence, but it doesn’t sound like that’s the case.

Personally, in your shoes, if I was sure that I had the facts correct, I’d consider discreetly reaching out to the other school on my own.

2. My boss is insisting that all interview feedback on candidates be in writing

My office is currently in the process of hiring a new office manager. My associate dean subscribes to the idea that everyone in the office should be involved in the interviews and then provide written feedback. Due to schedule constraints, I was only able able to sit in on one candidate’s interview for about 20 minutes. The candidate is currently temping in this role and I have serious concerns about her work performance. I ignored my associate dean’s initial email asking for feedback since it had been clearly sent to the whole group of 20+ people. Yesterday she sent a personal follow-up email to me asking directly for feedback. I replied that I was uncomfortable providing written feedback but was more than willing to provide verbal feedback. She answered me today with “Written feedback is an important component of our hiring process. Please provide your feedback in writing.” How should I proceed? I was thinking about either asking HR (notorious for just forwarding emails to your supervisor) or writing very general feedback on a word document without my name attached and handing it to her.

Well, first, this interview process sounds absurd. Everyone in the office has to do this? Unless your office is three people, this is weird. And there’s no reason to require it to be in writing.

I’d write back: “I have some concerns about Cordelia that I’m not comfortable putting in writing but that I think are important to share. Could we talk about it briefly?” If she refuses, then put it in writing. There’s no real reason to reuse that if she insists, weird and annoying as it is.

3. My father is pushing me to recommend him for a job and I don’t want to

My father works in construction, specializing in disability renovation for homes. I’m disabled, and recently two places that I work at have begun renovating part of the buildings for disability access (partially because of me). The problem is that my father keeps pushing me to reach out to the people in charge of the project and tell them to give him the job.

I’m having trouble articulating an acceptable reason why I don’t want to do this. I don’t want my father working around me; part of the reason I have two jobs is to get away from him (I live with him, and we often don’t get along). Plus I think it would be incredibly unprofessional to recommend him for it, because I don’t even know if he’s qualified for this type of work, I don’t have confidence in his ability to do the project on time and on budget, and it seems like a shakedown (I’m disabled, so they legally have to renovate, and oh! how convenient that I happen to have family who can do the project).

Am I right in thinking it would be unprofessional to recommend him for this? What would be the most professional way to make this recommendation if I wanted to do so? And, of course, is there any way you can think of that I can explain to him why I won’t recommend him for this (or future) projects at my place(s) of work?

Yes, you’re totally right. He’s putting you in an awkward position, and what he’s proposing would be a conflict of interest. Plus, you plain don’t want to, and that on its own is enough. But the conflict of interest reason will carry the most weight. I’d say this: “Dad, I can’t. It’s a professional conflict of interest and would reflect poorly on me. It’s not possible.”

4. Can I refuse to train coworkers with skills I learned on my own?

I have worked at my company now for 4 years. In that time, I have learned and developed new skills and methods to do my job. I’m considered as a senior and worked very hard to get where I am. But now the company is not doing so well and some people have decided to jump ship. Our manager has made it very clear that anyone is replaceable. And this is where I have a problem.

I have been doing all the training for the new guys and showed them what was needed from them and how to do this. The software we use is not very popular in our country and there are no training courses offered for it. Everything I’ve learned, I did myself at home.

I no longer wish to share my skills with anyone as I’m now replaceable. Do I have the right to do so?

The right legally? Sure. But your company has the right to then fire you and give you a bad reference, and would be justified in doing that. (How do you see this playing out, exactly? That you’d just suddenly refuse to do part of your job and your manager would say, “Oh, sure, that’s fine”? That’s not usually how this goes.)

5. Explaining to employers that my school shut down

I’ve just received news that my undergraduate school will close its doors this year. As a recent graduate, I am concerned about his this will affect my job prospects moving forward. My school is a private, single-sex institution and it just couldn’t compete with larger, co-ed schools. How can I explain this to a prospective employer? I achieved many things in undergrad and I am worried that this news, which is beyond my control, will affect the way employers will view me.

This will have no impact on how employers view you. It’s not your fault, and it doesn’t reflect at all on the quality of your education. (I’m assuming that we’re talking about Sweet Briar.)

should I be worried that my manager doesn’t return calls for references?

A reader writes:

I’m job searching and once I have an offer in hand, I plan on letting the company contact my current supervisor as a reference. Problem is, he doesn’t seem to care about giving references at all. Another employee, who was not his direct report, has been job searching and my supervisor has been contacted multiple times from his staffing agency looking for a reference. Every time, my supervisor just laughs and ignores it. I’ve told him to fill out the reference form for the sheer fact that they will stop bothering him, but he was always a fan of this employee and they are still friends so I think it’s kind of rude he keeps rejecting it. I’m not sure if this is because the reference is requested by a staffing agency but it worries me a bit. Is this something I should worry about? Is it a red flag to a new company if a supervisor just ignores reference requests?

Well, yes. You want to know that in the future, your manager will be willing to speak honestly of your work to prospective future employers.

That said, this is probably only going to be an issue for your next job search, not your current one. For your current job search, it’s completely reasonable to tell a future employer that you’re not able to allow your current manager to be contacted because it could jeopardize your job. You’re saying that you plan to allow it once you already have a job offer (an offer that would presumably be contingent on getting this reference), but you don’t need to proactively offer that — that’s basically a last resort if the new employer is insisting on it. Your default should just be “here are plenty of references from before this job, but my current manager doesn’t know I’m looking.” And that might be all that you need.

But it will certainly be an issue the next time you’re job searching, when you’re ready to leave the job you take next. At that point, you’ll presumably want employers to be able to reach this guy.

I think it’s perfectly reasonable to address it with him now, especially since you’ve already been talking about his refusal to respond to a reference request for someone else. I’d say something like this: “Our conversation the other day made me wonder: Do you generally not give references for employees? I’ve usually counted on having great references from past managers to get jobs, and I’d worry if you weren’t going to be willing to speak about my work in the future.”

If it does turn out that he won’t give references, you can warn prospective employers about that in the future: “In my experience, he doesn’t return reference calls for any former employee, but here’s his contact information if you’d like to try and here’s contact information for other references who I know will be glad to talk to you.”

Related:

how to increase productivity without decreasing morale

Lots of methods managers use to increase productivity end up inadvertently lowering morale. For example, managers who discourage people from taking time off usually in the run end up with burned out, less productive employees who are making more mistakes. And managers who have an autocratic, top-down, “just get it down” delegation style often end up realizing that because they didn’t take the time to talk through the project on the front-end, they lose time later on having to send work back to be redone. And of course, simply ordering people to raise their productivity without giving them the tools to do it usually results in stressed out, frustrated staff.

But you can increase productivity without taking a hit to team morale at the same time. Here’s how.

1. Build a great team. It sounds obvious – of course as a manager you should build a great team – but while its productivity payoff are obvious, you might not have considered its effect on morale. Great people like to work with other great people – and tend to get frustrated when team members aren’t pulling their weight. If you become known for building a great, high performing staff, other high performers are going to want to work with you. Nothing raises morale and quality of life at work like having fantastic coworkers does. (Well, raises come close.)

2. Fire low performers. This is a corollary to #1. If you’re going to have a team of high performers, it follows that you’re going to need to sometimes let people go. Replacing low performers with strong workers won’t just pay off in the results your team gets (although that will certainly happen); it’ll also raise the morale of the high performers on your team, who will appreciate that you’re holding standards high and addressing problems forthrightly. (Make sure you do it a fair and compassionate way, of course.)

3. Explain the “why” behind assignments, decisions, and new processes. You’re probably busy, and it can be incredibly tempting to just ask people to do work without taking the time to explain the context behind it – why the assignment needs to be done, what the background is on it, and why this approach was chosen rather than another. When you have a to-do list that’s cracking under its own weight, taking the time to talk someone through these details can feel like a low priority. But doing it will pay off – people will be better equipped to spot ways to improve the work and head off problems, which they might not be able to do at all if they don’t have the same context you have. Plus, employees who are in the loop like this will be more invested and engaged in their work, which generally leads to people being happier with their jobs. (The same goes for explaining new policies, processes, and decisions as well.)

4. Give people stretch assignments – and coach them through them. If you’re like most managers, you’ve probably thought, “I wish I had someone on my team who could handle X for me.” Even if no one on your staff is perfectly equipped for X, whatever it may be, coaching someone to learn to do new types of work will help you get more done in the long-run and good employees will appreciate being challenged and increasing their skills. (Of course, in doing this, you need to coach them through it – you shouldn’t just give someone a stretch assignment and abandon them to figure it out on their own.)

my coworker is regularly late and it impacts my job

A reader writes:

I work in an office for a high-level official as his staff assistant. I share an office and roles with a coworker a few years older than me. We are both responsible for providing administrative support to the director of our institute. The office needs coverage non-stop to answer phones and greet visitors. It is a demanding job and requires a lot of dedication and flexibility. I make it to work at least 15 minutes early everyday, and stay at least 30 minutes late. My coworker (and back-up) is wonderful to work with, when she is here. Several times a month she shows up several hours late, claiming that she slept through her alarm. If she is supposed to be in by 9 am, we won’t hear from her until 11 am. Sometimes she will not show up at all, and will have been posting pictures of herself out partying at a bar until 2 am the night before.

When she does not show up or comes in late, it is a huge inconvenience to me. Finding coverage to take a lunch break or even just a restroom break is not easy. She rarely apologizes and acts like this is no big deal. However, I think it is a big deal. She is in her 30’s working a highly professional job, where people are relying on her to be dependable. Again, she is super pleasant to work with otherwise. However, I get very annoyed when she continues to party on work nights and call out “hung over.” Is there a way to handle this without causing tension? I tried to talk to her about it last month – and I thought I got somewhere. But she has done it several more times since.

Without causing tension? Maybe not. But that’s not the realistic goal here. A realistic goal is to get it resolved. It would be nice if you can do that without it causing tension, but there’s no magic way to make people not upset when they’re called out on bad behavior. However, if tension results, that’s on her, not on you. She’s the one causing this situation.

You’ve tried to talking to her about it directly, and that hasn’t solved it. So now it’s time to talk to your boss, because this is directly affecting your work. I’d say something like this: “Several times a month, Jane comes in several hours late and says she slept through her alarm. When this happens, it causes X and Y, and I have to do Z, which is a problem because of W. I’ve tried talking to her about it but it’s continuing to happen, and I’m getting the sense that she doesn’t understand the impact on the office. Can you help me figure out how to handle this?”

Notice that with this language, you’re not just reporting wrongdoing; you’re framing it as a problem to be solved — which it is — and you’re doing it in a collaborative way.

I’m getting collection calls for my former coworker, a recruiter is blocking me from a job, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. I’m getting collection calls for my former coworker

I took over from someone who left my company roughly 18 months ago. She had been in this position for a long period of time, and the decision was made for me to keep her phone number so that vendors wouldn’t have any issues with getting in contact with our department. I have had no issues with this, except for the fact that she apparently fielded collection calls on the regular.

While I’ve had a lot of success over the last 18 months in telling these creditors that I am not Jane Smith, I am now getting robo-calls about litigation being taken against this former colleague. I want to reach out to her via LinkedIn to tell her that she’s getting a call about a case being pursued, before I go forward with telling this creditor to stop calling me. At this time, I do not have her personal phone number or email, since I had been advised to not contact her at all regarding the job after she left.

Would this be a breach of professional etiquette to reach out to her? Should I just tell the collection agency that I’m not her instead of reaching out?

I don’t think it would be a breach of etiquette to reach out to her, but if your company has explicitly told you not to contact her, you should clear it with your manager first. Their instruction about that might just be a “don’t bother her now that we’re not paying her” kind of thing (in which case an alert like this would fall outside of that), but there could be other reasons for it that could be in play. So check first.

But if these creditors are aggressive enough to call her at work, they’re probably also aggressive enough to track her down at home or elsewhere too; it’s likely they’ll find her regardless. I think if you prefer to just tell them to stop calling, that would be perfectly fine and not shirking any obligation or courtesy to her.

2. Rewarding employment milestones

Our organization would like to begin recognizing employees for their length of service with a tasteful gift presented at each 5- or 10-year employment milestone. However, we have several employees with over 20 years of service, which leaves us unsure of how to begin an award program. If an employee with 20 years of services receives a watch and an employee with 10 years of service receives a pin (with the understanding that she would receive a watch in 10 years) the 20-year employee may have hard feelings about missing out on the awards for earlier years of services. This could become particularly difficult if we choose to award service in 5 year increments and a person with 25 years of services expects a pen, a pin, a watch, etc. How would you proceed?

I’d skip the pins and watches all together; most people won’t care about them and will see them as a gesture from another time. Give people an extra week of vacation time instead — that’s something that everyone, no matter their taste in watches, will greatly appreciate.

If people complain that they didn’t get particular rewards at their earlier milestones, before the program existed, your choices are basically to (a) offer them to them now — not totally crazy if you’re talking about something like vacation, especially if you spread it over two years, or (b) acknowledge that benefit packages sometimes change, and that you hope they’ll be excited with what you’re giving them now.

3. What to do when a recruiter is blocking you for a job you know you’re right for

What do you do when you know you are right for a job ( know company/know you can implement every responsibility.etc.), but an executive recruiter for all kinds of reasons might be a block?

You move on, because in fact you can’t know that you’re really right for a job from the outside. You don’t have the same information that the employer does about what they’re looking for. So you respect the decision of the person they’ve put in charge of hiring and move on.

The only exception to this is if you have a personal connection to the hiring manager, in which case you could apply with them directly.

But the vast majority of the time when rejected candidates are sure that they were right for the job, they’re actually wrong. And it’s not because they suck or anything like that; it’s because they’re not sufficiently familiar with the nuances of what the employer is looking for, or what qualifications other candidates in the applicant pool bring. (In fact, you could be great for the job, but other people are just better for it. In that case, you’re still getting rejected.)

4. Referring a friend for a job when I’m still new

I started a new job that I’m really excited about. It’s especially refreshing after working in a toxic work environment.

I want to refer my former coworker (who is still working for my old toxic company) for a position that just opened up at my new company. I wanted to know the best way to do that, as I just started this job literally a week ago, and don’t want to look like I’m asking for favors so soon. Should I wait a while to ask?

Well, you’re not asking, “Will you give my friend a job?” You’re suggesting a candidate who you think will be an excellent solution to a problem your current employer has (a job vacancy). So if you really think she’s outstanding, there’s no reason to wait. But you’d want to be really, really sure that she’s a strong candidate — otherwise it can reflect poorly on you.

5. Is it unethical to have students write letters of recommendation for professors to sign?

I work at a college and my colleagues and I have students asking us for letters of recommendation all the time. We’re actually in the busy season for that right now. Of course, they need to be done, and we do them, but they tend to pile up.

A colleague of mine said he stays on top of the letters by asking the student to write the letter themselves, and if my colleague agrees when he reads it, he will sign the letter as if he wrote it. I told him I thought this was very unethical and not what employers or search committees are asking for, and plagiarism. He was honestly shocked. He thought since he learned this from a mentor that it was okay.

He started to ask where the unethical line is: asking the student to make an outline, asking the student for points to highlight, etc. I didn’t know how to answer since I write letters from scratch and have never done it another way. Am I overreacting? Where is the ethical line?

It’s actually pretty common for employers to do that (although generally with employers the whole effort is wasted since few employers care about letters of recommendation outside of academia and apparently law). I don’t know how common it is for academic letters though. I tend to agree with you that it’s not what search committees are asking for (although it still might be common practice — maybe others in academia can weigh in here?) but I don’t think it’s plagiarism; it’s more like ghost-writing.

how to research the company you’re interviewing with

On a recent post, one commenter wrote:

When I first started job searching, I tried to research the companies a lot. That was a waste of time. No hiring manager I ever talked to quizzed me about my company knowledge. They wanted to talk about the specifics of the job.

And honestly, when you think about how many people are interviewing for one position and how many jobs each of those people are interviewing for, that’s a lot of wasted hour memorizing facts about companies they are probably not going to work at.

It’s absolutely true that interviewers are unlikely to quiz you on your knowledge of a company. Some interviewers will say something like, “Tell me what you know about us so far,” but with that question they’re generally just looking to ensure that you know the basics.

So, no, you don’t need to memorize facts about a company — but that’s not what researching a company is about. It’s not about memorizing the names of their board members or their sales numbers last year, or knowing every location they have an office in, or the precise year they were founded. If you spend time on that kind of thing, you’re going to waste your time — and if you try to bring it up, it’s likely to come across as stilted and forced anyway.

If that’s the kind of research you’re doing, you’re doing it wrong.

What you want to know when you research a company is stuff like this:
– how they see themselves — what do they think differentiates them from other companies in the field? What do they say makes them different from their competition?
– what they’re most known for
– any recent news they’ve made and why
– their biggest current initiatives/projects/products/clients
– anything you can find about the company’s culture and values
– roughly what size they are — not to regurgitate back to them in your interview, but to give you a general sense of their context
– who their key players are, so that you recognize names and know what sorts of backgrounds they bring

And here’s the key: This isn’t research for you to then regurgitate in the interview to show you prepared. It’s mainly for your own background information, to inform your understanding of what they’re all about — which will help you have a more intelligent conversation with your interviewers because you’ll better understand their context.

It’s not about rote memorization or proving anything. It’s more like the type of research you’d do if you were an independent consultant about to meet with a prospective new client so that you weren’t starting from scratch in your conversations with them.

should you walk out of a bad job interview?

A reader writes:

I know people say “run, don’t walk” when you find yourself in a job interview with someone you would never work with in a million years. But does that mean that you can leave right in the middle of the interview itself?

I flew to another state for a job interview with the VP of HR for an automotive parts maker. The only flight I could get was for mid-morning, and the VP couldn’t meet me till after 6 pm at a restaurant. So I flew to Detroit, rented a car, and poked around in a small town for hours (turned out to be her hometown–not where the facility was located), and met her at the restaurant as instructed. She arrived with a rep from the executive recruiting firm, and they largely ignored me and smirked together as I put forth my earnest answers to the few questions she asked and sat patiently listening while she spent the majority of the time telling me about what a big shot she was. It was so bad that at one point I felt tearful and had to hide it. I felt trapped and couldn’t think how to end it gracefully and just waited for her to bring it to an end.

I called the recruiter I had originally talked with the next day and told him it was not going to be a fit on either side, but I still wonder how to extricate oneself from a bad interview situation that lasts for hours.

I am not a rude person, but I sometimes think the best thing to do is to just say, “Thank you for your time, but I’m sure you will agree that this is not going to be a good fit,” and end the misery. Thoughts?

You can read my answer to this question over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and often updating/expanding my answers to them).

how can I stop softening the message in tough conversations with my staff?

A reader writes:

I’m a relatively new manager of a small team, and while I do have a lot of strengths as a manager, I’ve also discovered that I have no idea how to communicate directly. Even when I think I am being direct, I replay the conversation in my head later and realize I padded the whole thing with “softening” language that only distorts the message.

Reading your column regularly and forcing myself to push through situations that feel uncomfortable has helped, but I still feel like I’m doing a lot of trial-and-error in real work situations where the risks of “getting it wrong” are sometimes pretty high. I also occasionally catch myself letting smaller issues slide just to avoid having a conversation about them. A couple of times those issues ended up developing into a situation where I couldn’t let them slide anymore, and of course failing to address things earlier only made the conversation even more awkward.

I’d love to figure out how to practice this stuff at times when there isn’t actually an immediate need for it, so that when a real management conversation or workplace issue arises I’m more comfortable handling it in the moment. How do people who are naturally conflict-avoidant learn to confront things head-on? What specific strategies or resources can people use for improving direct communication and building assertiveness?

I can’t tell you how many managers I talk to where a staff member is having performance issues, the manager is frustrated about why the problems are continuing, and when I ask how direct the manager has been about the issues, the answer turns out to be “not very.”

So you’re far from alone in this, and you have a huge leg up in that you recognize that it’s happening and you’re committed to fixing it. Frankly, just that alone is going to be hugely helpful, because if you’re aware that you tend to do this, it’s going to be harder to keep your pattern going.

Here’s what I’d recommend:

* Get really clear in your head about this fact: You are doing people a disservice by hiding the message. Often when managers soften language in these kinds of conversations, they do it because it feels kinder to them. But it’s not kinder! It’s actually unkind, if the result is that the staff member doesn’t quite hear the message or fully understand how serious it is. That denies them full information about their own work life and about possible consequences. It makes it more likely that they’ll continue frustrating or disappointing you, and that has real consequences for their reputation, your assessment of their work, raises, project assignments, their overall dynamic with you, and future references. That’s not fair. (And wouldn’t you hate it if your boss weren’t being direct and straight with you?)

The kindest thing is to be clear and direct so that people have access to the same information that you do. Work on really internalizing that and believing it, because it will change the way you act.

* Before any conversation that you feel has the potential to be uncomfortable or that you might end up softening in a not-ideal way, write out talking points for yourself ahead of time. What are the key things that you need to communicate? What wording will do that? Write out the specific language you’ll use.

* Then, practice saying it out loud. This step is important because, with awkward or tough messages, the hard part is saying it out loud. So imagine yourself in the actual conversation, and say your talking points out loud. Are you internally cringing? Are you attempting to soften the language? Say it enough times that you become comfortable and can imagine saying it in the real conversation.

* Since you know you have a tendency to soften your language in the moment, think about the ways that it might happen here if you’re not vigilant — and then resolve not to do it. Just going through this thought process and being cognizant of the issue makes it a whole lot less likely that you’ll slip backwards. For example, if you know that you need to tell someone that an issue is serious enough that it could end up jeopardizing their job, you might know you’ll be uncomfortable saying that explicitly when you talk — because that’s a hard message to deliver. So vow to yourself beforehand that you will be clear on that point and that you won’t let yourself get away with not saying it.

And to be clear, being direct with people and not softening your language doesn’t mean that you have to be robotic or a jerk. You can still be clear and direct while using a kind tone. In fact, you normally should use a kind tone, even when you’re delivering a no-nonsense kind of message. So maybe you can push your softening impulses into tone, not words, and let your tone sound concerned and empathetic — just keep your words themselves direct.