my manager lies to make me stay late, over-using an employee discount, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Is is possible to over-use an employee discount?

I currently work for a company that gets deep discounts (60% or more) on high dollar items. I may be leaving it soon and I am struggling with the morality of “stocking up” before leaving. How do you feel about situations like this?

They’re offering you the discount, so it’s there for you to use. If they haven’t put limits on it, it’s because they’re okay with you using it. And really, stocking up on, say, 10 purchases (or even more) isn’t that different than if you’d bought that many things spread out over the last year. Unless you’re planning something really over the top (buying 100 TVs, for instance), I think you can proceed without guilt.

2. My manager is lying to get me to stay late and do unnecessary work

I am a salaried baker/pastry chef in a supervisory position. I am usually very efficient with my schedule and I can get a large workload delegated to my team and have us all finish up in just around 8 hours. Right now, it is very slow where I work (a resort) and 8 hours is the maximum amount of time it would take us to finish up; occasionally we are looking for things to do to make it to 8 hours. However, every day that I work, after I send my subordinates home for the day and I am finishing up, my manager finds me and tells me, “Oops, there is x, y, and z to do” or there “isn’t enough of this or that.” So I have to stay at least a few extra hours to do the task she asks of me (literally waiting on the bread to rise).

However, I caught her in a lie. She had told me that one of the resort restaurants was booked for 100 people, even though they only ordered for 50 people, and that I would need to stay and make more food. And then (since I’m new) she showed me where to look on the computer to find the bookings for all the restaurants. But here’s the kicker: When she was showing me that day’s bookings, the restaurant only had 50 people booked, the number that they had ordered from me originally. So, why is she lying to me to have me stay every day and do extra work, when that work is going to go into the trash later in the evening and not being eaten by the customers who don’t exist? (They really don’t exist and can’t just walk in, because the resort is on a very small island. We know how many people are here, and we can’t just have 30 extra people show up for dinner.)

This has been terribly frustrating even before I saw that she was lying. And why not tell me hours before I leave, rather than when I am cleaning up? This is almost a daily occurrence. She hasn’t expressed any dissatisfaction with my performance yet. Does she just want me to put in more hours just because she does and I am a “supervisor”? Just meander around twiddling my thumbs?

I don’t know what’s up with her, but it does sound like something is off. I wonder if you could try to head this off by regularly touching base with her earlier in the day and saying, “I’m planning to let people go at (time) tonight — is there anything you want me to make sure is done before that?” Or even addressing it more directly: “I’m finding that I’m ending up staying several extra hours at the end of the day because you and I have been touching base so late. Is there a time I could check in with you earlier each day so that we’re hearing from you about what you’d like to see earlier on?” And for that matter, you could also say, “I’d like to plan to normally leave around (time) unless the day’s workload is particularly heavy. Based on what I’ve seen of the workload, that should be doable if I’m able to plan in advance. Is there a way for me to get requests from you before (time), so that I still have staff around to work on them?”

3. Can I ask my current boss to be a reference for my freelancing work?

I am employed full-time as an administrative support person with a great nonprofit, but have recently started doing freelancing admin tasks for other small businesses on the side. Is it okay for me to use my current boss as a reference to new clients, since she oversees all of the types of work I will be offering?

How fully okay is your boss with you taking on side work? If she’s an enthusiastic supporter of your side endeavor, then yes, it’s fine to ask her. But if she has trepidations about it (which even a boss who adores you could have, since she might worry about it taking away from your focus on your full-time job), I’d be wary of putting her in that position.

4. Is the customer really always right?

Many managers, including mine, still go by the principle of “the customer is always right.” Even when a customer is being unreasonable or is clearly in error (backed up by a paper trail), my manager uniformly sides with the customer. He or she is placated and we are chastised. What is your opinion on how a manager should walk the line between appeasing a customer and standing behind his/her team? More importantly, is there a way to bring it up that doesn’t sound accusatory or petulant?

Customers aren’t always right. Customers are sometimes quite wrong, or liars, or assholes. Smart managers know that treating great employees fairly — and thus retaining them in the long-run — is usually more important than retaining a jerk as a customer. In the rare cases where this isn’t true (said jerk’s sales are keeping employed, for instance), smart managers acknowledge the situation openly with employees and make a point of treating them as well as possible to make up for having to work with difficult customers.

As for how to bring it up with your manager … if he doesn’t already get this, I’m not sure there’s much you can say that will change his mind, unfortunately. If you’re getting chastised when you’ve done nothing wrong, I’d think long and hard about whether you want to work for this dude. Placating a customer shouldn’t require chastising you unfairly.

5. How to help students estimate salary ranges for their desired fields

I am currently using your site to help my two student workers, who are both a few years from entering the workforce in their chosen fields, develop career skills (I give them your site map, ask them to mark what intrigues them most, and then we discuss various posts in those areas from there).

At this point, both students have honed in on salary negotiations – when to bring it up, how to negotiate, etc. I’ve sent them articles of yours like how to answer questions about your salary expectations and ways employers discourage you from negotiating salary (among others). I’ve asked them to find a real job posting that will fit the skills and experience they expect to possess when they graduate. I then ask them to tell me what salary they’d negotiate for and why based on the advice given in the articles.

I want to provide feedback on their strategies and proposed amounts, but I’ve never negotiated salary myself and I have never worked in the fields my students are studying. Do you have any advice on how to gauge how realistic their answers are? I don’t want them to wait until actual negotiations to find out they were way off base. I’m half-tempted to reach out to the companies they’ve chosen and ask for feedback, but I have no idea how to do that (or if it’s even an option to begin with).

I think you’d need to evaluate the strategies they used to come up with their answers, which means they should provide you with a pretty detailed map to how they came up with their numbers and that’s the part that you can provide feedback on. You could also have them run their numbers by people in their fields, but beyond that, I don’t think there’s a lot you can do, at least not without a huge amount of probably impractical legwork.

I don’t think I’d reach out to the companies they’ve chosen; companies too often play salary info close to the vest, and if the info isn’t already publicly available, you’re likely to get a vague (or no) answer.

why don’t employers tell you the reason they’re rejecting you for a job?

A reader writes:

I recently had a very positive phone interview for a position I was very excited about. Because of the hiring manager being out of the office for awhile, he was planning to interview local candidates this week and then non-local candidates when he got back. I was a non-local candidate.

I received this email this morning:

“I wanted to thank you once again for your interest in the XXXX position. In the course of conducting in-person interviews this week, we identified a candidate whose professional experience and technical skills were an exceptional match for what we were seeking, and her academic background in international studies and languages was very well suited for speaking about the XXXX. As a result of these circumstances, we decided to offer the candidate the position and she accepted. I’m sorry that this didn’t work out for you, and extend my sincere best wishes for your success in your job search.”

I am of course disappointed but getting an email explaining that a) they didn’t even get around to the second batch of in-person interviews, and b) that the chosen candidate was an incredible fit, has preserved my morale and self-confidence. Whereas, if I had just gotten a vague “we decided to go in a different direction” email, I’d be kicking myself wondering why I sucked so much that I could do really well in a phone interview and still not get an in-person interview.

Of all the interviews I’ve had over the past few years, this is the only non-canned rejection I’ve gotten. I guess I wonder why hiring managers don’t tend to write more thoughtful rejections to candidates who have put in the time and energy interviewing. Does it really add that much extra time to the process since the pool has already been whittled down to the top few candidates anyway?

A few reasons:

1. Notice that this rejection was sent after they hired someone, and it’s about the person they hired rather than the person they’re rejected. However, many employers (myself included) like to send rejections on a rolling basis, rather than waiting until a hire is made. That allows people to hear a decision much sooner; otherwise, they might be waiting months before they hear something. But if you’re sending rejections before a hire has been made, it’s going to be about why someone was rejected, not why the other person was hired. And those are, obviously, often trickier to write in a personalized way.

2. Lawyers have advised them not to be specific about reasons, because it can open the door to legal issues. For instance, if I tell you that we’re looking for a candidate with more experience in teapot policy, but later on I hire a candidate without that experience (because she wowed me in some other, legitimate way), you might conclude that the real reason I didn’t hire you was because you’re pregnant or a woman or some other legal issue that my company will now have to spend time and money defending itself against. So lawyers often prefer the “say nothing” policy.

3. The reason isn’t always as easy to articulate as this one was. Sometimes the real reason is something like this:
– you were okay but not great
– you had bad social skills
– you didn’t communicate clearly
– you didn’t seem as smart as what we need in this role
– you had really lukewarm references
– you were long-winded in an environment where you’d need to be more concise
– you came across as really cold
– all manner of other awkward reasons

And you might be thinking that you’d love to hear that kind of feedback so you know if something like this is causing you a problem, but it’s not an interviewer’s obligation to relay that kind of thing, the vast majority aren’t interested in providing this sort of coaching to people who they’re not hiring, and so many rejected job candidates argue when they get feedback that most interviewers aren’t interested in opening up that possibility.

While I agree with you that this was a particularly nice rejection to receive, I’d recommend focusing on changing your reaction to other rejections. You say that your response to most rejections is to wonder why you sucked so much. But that’s totally out of line with the reality of how hiring works. Hiring managers reject loads of excellent candidates every day — because they have 20 of them and only one spot to hire for, or because there’s some additional qualification that you didn’t know about that wasn’t in the ad, or because the job changed in some way, or because the boss is a jerk and you seem like a lovely person who wouldn’t be happy there, or all sorts of other reasons.

Reading rejections as “you suck” is much more of a problem than employers sending vague rejections!

how to fight perfectionism and call a project complete

If you agonize over details and find it hard to ever call a project complete, you’re probably suffering from acute perfectionism. If you miss deadlines or neglect other work because you’re spending so much time trying to perfect a project that you can’t let you go, you’re at real risk of perfectionism harming your career.

Of course, a bit of perfectionism is a good thing. You want to be someone who produces excellent work, rather than rushing through and settling for something subpar. But perfectionism is a real problem if it causes you to spend far longer on something than most people would find reasonable, and especially when it interferes with your ability to juggle other priorities.

But you can retrain yourself to let go of projects and stop agonizing over whether they’re flawless enough. Try these five steps.

* Realize that not everything needs to be done perfectly. In many cases, getting something done reasonably quickly is more important than making it flawless. You might find it helpful to talk to your manager or others who are affected by your work to discuss their expectations. Would they be okay with a less “perfect” product if it left you with more time for other work? Do they care about the details you’re putting in hours to perfect? You might be surprised by the answers! You can also talk with others who do work similar to yours; pick people whose work you admire and find out what they consider the standard to strive for. You might learn that they don’t even think about some of the factors that you agonize over, because it doesn’t make much difference to the final output.

* Realize that sometimes merely “good” work is actually better than “excellent” work because it will leave you with more time and energy to work on other important priorities. After all, the costs of perfectionism can be missed deadlines or lower productivity, which are very much the opposite of  a perfect performance – something that perfectionists often overlook.

* Be honest with yourself about how much difference extra time will make. If you tend to spend an hour getting a sentence to sound just right, it’s probably not going to make enough of a difference in the final product to be worth the time you’re spending on it.

* Be clear with yourself about the trade-offs you’re making. If you spend two more hours reworking that draft, that’s two hours that you won’t be spending on something else. Do you have that time available to you, or will you be digging yourself into a hole with the rest of your work?

* Use an alarm to time yourself while you work or schedule your work in rigid chunks. For example, tell yourself that you’ll spend one hour working on that client report, and then you’ll move on to a second project. This will prevent time getting away from you and discovering that you’ve spent far more time than you intended on something.

how to decline men’s help carrying things at work

A reader writes:

I’m a young (early 20s) woman, petite, and I’ve been at my current position about 8 months now. I’m generally very happy here, but I’m not sure how to deal with certain kinds of comments.

For example, part of my job requires me to carry large boxes and put large shipments into our storage room, which involves pushing carts and pallets with pallet jacks. I’m happy to do the work and it’s not difficult; I’m quite strong. Today I was unloading some boxes from a pallet, and two guys from IT walked by me in the hall. I wasn’t struggling in any way, but one of them saw me and said, “Are you sure you’re supposed to be handling that kind of equipment?” He said it in a friendly way, but I said no and (also in a friendly manner) and asked him why. He ignored the question and asked if I needed help. I told him no, I was fine, the boxes weren’t very heavy, and I’d be all right. He asked if I was sure and I said yes. Then he started picking up the boxes for me and asked if I minded if he helped me anyway. At this point, I wasn’t sure how to decline further without seeming rude, so I let him help.

I feel quite certain that if I were a tall strapping man, he would not have been so insistent. How can I deal with subtle sexism like this in the workplace without coming off as confrontational?

“I can’t let you help me with this — it’s a normal part of my job.”

Followed by, if necessary: “No, really, if I can’t do this, then I can’t do my job.”

And you say that last one in a serious tone and no smile. Inexplicably, people sometimes read a friendly tone and or a smile as “It’s okay if you ignore what I’m saying.” That doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t be friendly or smile at people — but it does mean that you shouldn’t do those things in a situation where someone has made it clear that they’re not taking you seriously.

And if that still doesn’t work, then you say (again, seriously and with no smile), “Fergus, I know you’re trying to help and I’m sure you haven’t thought of it this, but it’s really undermining to me if people think I can’t do this on my own.”

Some people will argue that that’s nicer than it needs to be — and that someone who has ignored several direct requests doesn’t deserve an “I know you’re trying to help” — but this is a colleague and helping people save face is good for your standing in the office. And frankly, you’d be doing the world (and him) a favor if you spelled out for him what the problem is what his behavior, and might decrease the chances of him repeating it with someone else in the future.

(I actually do think that a lot of men who ignore clear statements from women in these situations genuinely don’t realize why the women are taking that stance — which makes some of them more likely to get offended and huffy, the way you might if you offered someone a tissue and they threw it back in your face. I’m not saying that’s reasonable, and certainly they should think it through and figure it out on their own, but they’re up against centuries of cultural norms and those are powerful. So while you’re not obligated to explain it to them, I think it’s a kindness to all involved if you do — especially at work, where you’re going to have continued interaction.)

companies without HR, hair styling in the work bathroom, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Makeup and hair styling is making our work bathrooms gross

My organization shares a floor with a few other companies, and I noticed that some of the women in the other companies treat the shared bathroom like their own. I’ll come in in the morning and they will be gathered around the sink, putting on makeup and straightening their hair. While bizarre, I tried not to let this bother me, but lately the bathroom has been really gross with towels all over the floor and hair in the sink. Is there anything I can do? I don’t know these women personally, who even who they work for.

Unless they’re blocking your ability to use the sinks, I’d try not to care about their morning hair and makeup rituals. (And if they are blocking your ability to get to the sink, just say, “Excuse me, could I use the sink?” Most people are going to let you through if you directly point out that you need access.)

The towels on the floor and hair in the sink is a different issue. For that, I’d talk to whoever manages building space issues for your company and ask if they can talk to the building management about the cleanliness issue. The building management might need to clean the bathrooms more regularly, or they might decide to put up signs or talk to tenants about keeping the bathrooms neater — but first someone should tell them that there’s an issue.

2. Should I be worried if a company doesn’t have an HR department?

I’m job hunting in the tech field, and there’s a company I really like that has invited me for an in-person interview after a phone interview. In the phone interview, the person mentioned that there is no formal HR person in a company of ~40 employees. This was a big red flag for me, particularly after he described a really liberal vacation/PTO policy– they don’t have set amounts of vacation employees can take, it’s as you need it within reason.

I know this is tech, and a smaller company, and tech is liberal in these kinds of things, but I’m coming from a Fortune 500 company which is HUGE and has a formal HR department! How reasonable is it for a company of ~40 (but expanding!) to not have an HR department? Do you have any recommendations for questions to ask in the interview about how HR issues are handled?

It’s totally reasonable. There’s not going to be full-time HR work for a company that size. There should be someone who handles HR stuff, of course, but it’s very reasonable that they don’t have a dedicated HR person. In fact, if a 40-person company did, I’d wonder what that person did all day.

As for what to ask, I think it would come off strangely to ask about how benefits or harassment complaints or other HR stuff is managed. It would be like asking about how payroll is managed; you can generally assume that they have systems in place for those things. But once you get an offer, ask for details about benefits and pay attention to how that request is handled. If they have organized information on benefits that they’re able to get to you quickly, that tells you that someone is on it. If they don’t, that might be a prompt to dig further. But really, no dedicated HR person for a 40-person company is reasonable and common.

The bigger issue I’d think about is whether you’re up for the changes that will come from moving to a small company. You’re talking about a big shift in culture, and you should make sure that you’re clear on what that’s going to entail.

3. I don’t want the director sitting in on my performance evaluation

I’m due to have my annual performance review. This is usually held with my own line manager, but the director wants to come along too. I’m not comfortable with this and want to know whether I can prevent this from happening without causing bad feelings.

The director is not known for his listening skills or support for staff development and was instrumental in my not being successful in achieving a promotion last year. The norm in our organization is to meet with your line manager alone so I could probably gain HR support, but it doesn’t seem the best of times for me to be oppositional; I want to rebuild the relationship with my own manager and have an honest open discussion about my career.

I think it would be reasonable to ask your manager about it. I’d say something like this: “I was hoping we could talk one-on-one the way we usually do performance reviews. Can you tell me more about why Fergus is going to join us?” Depending on the answer, and on the type of rapport you have with manager, you might say, “I’ve found Fergus hard to talk candidly with in the past, and I’d hate to give up the chance for a really candid conversation with you about my performance and the future. Do you think it could be possible to do that with just the two of us?”

If nothing else, you might be able to arrange to have that as a separate meeting later on, after the one that includes the director.

4. Was I wrong to ask about my coworker’s dating life?

I have a coworker who I am very friendly with. We talk about so many things and are a source of support to one another at work. Unfortunately, she seems to have a habit of making me feel like I’ve crossed a line when I talk about something personal but non-offensive. This has happened three times over the course of two years. She talks about her dating life a lot, and today I asked her how it was going. It was a casual question and she had just asked me if I had met anyone at a party, but she said I crossed a line. I said I was sorry, but honestly I don’t like being blindsided. I know she’s my coworker first, but you can’t tell me I’ve crossed a line when we’ve discussed something that you brought up. Am I wrong?

It sounds like she’s opened the door to talking about her dating life — by talking it about a lot herself, and in this particular conversation by having just asked you if you’d met anyone at a party! So no, I don’t think you’re wrong. But it sounds like she’s weirdly sensitive and has double standards and different norms than the rest of the word on how conversations work. Given that, I’d just assume going forward that she’s weird about personal stuff and you shouldn’t ask about it, because you never know when she might randomly bite you.

5. Is having international references holding me back?

I recently returned from a five-year stint living and working abroad. When I left the company I was working for, I asked a few people to be my references (and they all graciously agreed). Now that I am back in the States and applying for jobs, I am worried that having international references is putting me at a disadvantage. I don’t think that companies will make the effort to get in touch with my references because they require an international phone call — assuming that an email questionnaire wouldn’t suffice. What should I do?

I’d include the international references, but also some domestic ones if you have any — so that employers have choices. And for the international ones, I’d make it as easy as possible to contact them, by listing phone numbers with country codes, email addresses, and time zone and a note about the best way to get ahold of them. You could even add a note to your reference list that says something like, “Apologies for all the international references here! Since I’ve been working abroad for the last five years, they’re my most recent ones, but if that poses any obstacles, please let me know and I’d be happy to provide other names as well.”

But regarding your worry overall: Few employers check references before they’ve interviewed you, so it’s unlikely that this is causing you to lose out on jobs before that stage. And once you reach the interview stage, if things seem like they’re moving forward, you can always address it proactively at that point. If someone really likes you in an interview, it’s unlikely that they’re going to be put off by international references.

my company keeps pushing me to extend my notice period

A reader writes:

I work at a small company where the workload is heavy and the pay is little. I would say I’m doing the job of 2-3 people, but they pay me well below my market value (not because they lack the financial means but because they’re stingy and take advantage of naive newcomers). So I decided to leave and pursue a different career. Since my current responsibilities are mine only and it’s a lot of information to pass on, I gave them 4 weeks notice out of professional courtesy.

However, the first two weeks came and went with no replacement coming in. Finally on the third week, the manager sat me down and informed me they’ve been diligently searching for my replacement and have found one but he will not start until my final week with the company. So to help ease with the transition, my manager asked if I can find a way to stay longer. I said no, but after their persistence worked out a way to stay one additional week (giving my company a total of five weeks notice).

It’s been one week since my replacement started working, and at the end of the week he confided in me that the workload was too much to handle and he would be informing my manager that he would not take this job and leaving immediately.

So knowing my company, they will definitely come down on me and guilt me into staying longer until they find another replacement and I can train that replacement again. How do I get out of this? I believe they are entirely in the wrong here but it can be hard to say no because they’ve sort of built a superficial “friendly relationship” with me over the year.

I wrote back and asked, “Why can’t you just tell them no if that happens?”

The response:

I think it will be hard to say no because my company can be really sly with their words and I tend to be a push-over.

My manager knows I have nothing lined up after the job and I would be free for a couple of months. So he’s going to come down on me, saying he doesn’t understand why I couldn’t just stay a little longer as a favor to him and my teammates because now there is no one to train the next replacement (the responsibilities of my teammates are entirely different so they wouldn’t be able to do the training). All I can leave him is a manual that he would not see as sufficient. But I’m finding it very hard to stay and work for him because I can’t stand him/upper management and felt I’ve been taken advantage of too long.

I can’t exactly outright voice my discontent as the reason for why I can’t say another 1-2 weeks because of our relationship. And they would insist on being given a reason if I just went out to say “No, I gave my 5 weeks and do not wish to stay longer” because I would be effectively screwing him and my teammates over. Maybe because this is an Asian company (I myself am Asian), the culture makes it extra hard to be clearcut and stone-cold to my manager. Because he will spin it in a way where I am needlessly and purposely screwing him and my teammates since I do have the power to stay and help them.

Sorry, I feel like I’m being too much of a wimp but I don’t know why I just can’t help getting overwhelmed and pushed in a corner when I’m actually there speaking to my manager in the flesh.

I can’t speak to the cultural issues at play here and I don’t doubt that they’re playing a role, but you’re giving your company way too much power here.

You have the absolute right — legally, ethically, and morally — to say “no, I’m not working past X date.” You’ve already been more than generous with the notice you providing, and have already extended it once.

It’s time to stick to your guns.

If you’re asked to stay longer, say this: “I’m sorry but I can’t. My last day will be X.”

If you’re pushed, repeat that: “I’m sorry but I can’t. My last day will be X.”

If your manager tells you that you don’t have any reason to refuse since you don’t have another job lined up, you say, “I’m sorry but I can’t. My last day will be X.”

If you can’t imagine yourself saying that without having some kind of additional excuse to tack on, then you say, “I’ve made commitments to family members and others for the time after X. I can’t extend my final day.”

I’d also advise most people in your situation to say, “I’m not comfortable continuing to discuss this. My last day will be X and I need you to stop pushing me to change it.” The cultural dynamics here might preclude you saying that, but I’d recommend considering it.

Also, the point of a notice period isn’t to give them time to find and train your replacement. It’s very, very unusual for a typical notice period to be long enough for that to happen. A notice period is to allow you to wrap up your work and answer any questions about it. Again, it is not intended to allow them time to hire and train a replacement. You need to get that thought out of your head, because it’s totally irrelevant here and it’s warping how you’re thinking about this.

But you know, even if it were intended for that (which it’s not), it still wouldn’t be your responsibility to keep extending your notice period. Businesses are equipped to handle resignations. They’re equipped to make do when someone leaves and a replacement hasn’t been found yet. This is totally normal, it happens in businesses every single day, and they all make do. Yours will do the same.

Ultimately, though, you need to see standing up for yourself as your responsibility. Don’t fall back on “I’m a pushover.” If you want to keep your last day where you want it, you’re the one who’s going to need to speak up and say it, and keep saying it even if you get push-back.

5 little-known secrets about job-searching

You might think you’re an experienced job seeker who understands how hiring processes work. But behind the scenes, hiring often works differently than job seekers assume that it does.

Here are five hiring secrets that you probably don’t know – but which can give you an advantage over your competition.

1. Application deadlines often don’t mean anything. Job seekers often take application deadlines as gospel, but they’re frequently interpreting them incorrectly. Many job posting sites require employers to list a deadline when submitting a job opening; that means that employers are forced to pick a date even if it doesn’t reflect how they’re actually managing the search. That means that a candidate might see a deadline listed and figure that they have until then to submit an application – when in reality, the employer might be interviewing candidates on a rolling basis and make a hire before that deadline has rolled around. Or perhaps they haven’t yet made a hire, but they might be far along in the process with other candidates and using much stricter criteria to add anyone else to the mix.

2. You can fudge your answers to some of those automated application requirements. The people who set up online application systems often don’t think about the requirements they program into them, and how they’ll kick out people whose applications they might actually like to see. For example, you might encounter an application system that asks if you have a bachelor’s degree in say, economics, giving you the option to answer yes or no. Let’s say that you don’t have a bachelor’s in economics – but you do have a masters in economics. If you answer the system’s question honestly, you might be automatically rejected, even though your masters should get you by this screening requirement – and if you were being screened by a human, almost certainly would. Rather than answering every question literally, thereby getting yourself automatically rejected, it’s often smarter to answer the questions in the spirit in which they seem intended. It’s okay to answer in the way that you think best gets your qualifications across; then just make sure that you include clear, concise explanations of anything necessary in the notes section and make sure that your resume is accurate.

3. Employers call references who aren’t on your official reference list. Employers know that the names on your reference list were likely selected because they’re the people most likely to say glowing things about you. Because of that, smart employers won’t stick to the list you provide; they’ll ask to be put in touch with additional managers from your past or just contact them on their own. And employers don’t need your permission to call people who aren’t on your reference list, so you might not know that they’re doing this.

And speaking of references…

4. Policies about not providing references are frequently broken. Some employers have policies of not giving references beyond confirming your dates of employment and your title. That might lead you to think you don’t need to worry about that manager who hated you giving you a bad reference, or to worry that the boss who loved you won’t be able to tell anyone that. But in reality, these corporate policies are broken all the time. HR offices are generally sticklers about adhering to them themselves, but individual managers are often willing to give detailed references no matter what their company policy is. That’s especially true when a manager thinks you’re a great worker and wants to help you get your next job.

5. No one is going to be outraged if you apply for a job you’re not perfectly qualified for. Conscientious job-seekers often worry about whether they have precisely the right qualifications to apply for a particular opening – but you might be worrying about this too much. If you have most but not all of the qualifications an employer is looking for, it’s often worth applying anyway. Many times, job qualifications are more like wish lists, and the employer will end up hiring someone who doesn’t perfectly match the job posting. And if you’re worried that you’re wasting the employer’s time or that they’ll roll their eyes at your application, know that loads of unqualified people apply for most openings. There are almost certainly people in the candidate pool for the job you’re considering who are less qualified than you are!

Besides, the worst that can happen is that they’ll reject you. But you might end up with an interview.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

is it inappropriate to hire an employee to pet-sit at my house?

A reader writes:

My wife and I live 1,000 miles from our hometown, but we go back to visit quite a bit, and we go on vacation once in a while. We don’t have anybody that lives nearby who we are comfortable asking to take care of our cat while we are away for an extended period since our really good friends recently moved away. Last time, we were out of town for 10 days and we put him up in a pet hotel.

I manage two administrative assistants, one of whom frequently mentions that she pet-sits on the side. Is it inappropriate of me to request her services? Obviously due to the power dynamic at play I couldn’t ask it as a favor, but is there anything wrong with paying her to do it if she is interested?

I’d only be hiring her to stop by once a day for a half hour to feed him and clean the box, as he is not a fan of strangers and wouldn’t enjoy the company an extended visit would provide anyway, but I worry as a relatively new manager that I’d somehow be breaking an unwritten rule of management by doing this.

It’s probably fine. I could make an argument against it, but in most cases (see caveats below), I think it’s probably not going to be a big deal if you do it.

That said, here are all the arguments against it that I can think of:

* Because you’re in a position of power over her, it could create an awkward situation where she feels obligated to say yes even if she doesn’t want to do it.
* Having someone come into your home when you’re not there is a relatively intimate thing, and she might be exposed to things about your personal life that she’s not comfortable seeing or that you’re not comfortable sharing (anything from a medication she spots on the bathroom counter to your collection of erotic-art paintings to your terrible taste in literature).
* It could look to colleagues like she’s doing it to curry favor with you, or it could make others think that you’re more likely to give her preferential treatment in the future because you have the sort of close relationship where she takes care of your cat when you’re gone.

But if you have a good relationship with her, if you know that she’s someone who will feel comfortable telling you if she can’t or doesn’t want to do it (and if you’re careful to make it clear that you want her to do that, and you make it easy for her to say no), and if you’re generally perceived as a fair and reasonable person, I think it’s unlikely to cause problems.

That said, have you tried looking at other pet-sitting services? It might be a cleaner way to do it. (I found my cat-sitter on Yelp and she’s awesome.)

Read an update to this letter here.

my boss wants me to fix his mother’s computer issues, my coworker is competing with me for a Ph.D. spot, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My boss keeps telling me to fix his mother’s computer issues

I’m a tech support technician for a small ISP business. My boss (the company owner) has me answering calls from his mother almost every day. She calls in about everything from hardware to software. She even brought her computers in on a Friday from 3 hours away for me to work on. My boss demanded I get everything fixed before she left on Sunday, even if it meant missing church (I don’t work Sundays). When she calls in, it takes at least 45 minutes to fix all her problems, taking time away from helping actual clients. Am I required to help his mother, even if she is not a client?

Yes. Your boss is basically telling you that she is a client; whether a particular client pays or not is up to him.

Treat her as you would a client. If doing work for her interferes with your work for other clients, raise that with your boss — not as a complaint, but to find out how he’d like you to handle it. So it’s not “your mom is taking up too much of my time” but rather, “I’d need about three hours to fix the problems on your mom’s computer, but if I do that today, I won’t be able to finish X or Y for other clients who are expecting resolutions today. How would you like me to prioritize?”

It’s also reasonable to say, “I’m glad to put in overtime if you need me to, but I’m unavailable on Sundays for religious reasons” or “I’m not available until 1 p.m. on Sunday” or “I’m not available this weekend because of prior commitments” or whatever the case is.

2. I’m livid that my coworker is applying for the same niche Ph.D. program as I am

I have been interested in pursuing a niche career in Alaska for the last 8 years. I have a B.S. and M.S. in the discipline and am in the process of applying for a Ph.D. to better my chances of employment. I told a coworker about a Ph.D. opportunity that I would like to pursue. Initially, he was supportive. Recently, however, this friend declared that he too would like to apply for the same Ph.D. opportunity with the same academic advisor. This friend has the exact academic qualifications as I do, except I have more work experience and a stronger undergraduate GPA. The Ph.D. program will only accept one of us with funding. I am livid—should I be? Do you have any suggestions on what I should do?

I can understand why you’re upset — he’s basically saying “I’m going after something which, if I get it, will prevent you from getting the thing you want … and I’m using info you shared with me to do it.” That said, there’s no calling dibs on stuff like this — if he wants to apply, he shouldn’t be locked out just because you got there first. So “livid” feels like an overreaction, but I can understand why you’re bothered.

3. Should I remind my manager of upcoming training sessions that she might have forgotten about?

I’ve recently started working at a new company, and when I started my boss recommended that I sign up for two upcoming training sessions in March. The training sessions aren’t on my usual days of work and as a result they’d have to be listed as overtime hours on my time sheet. Typically, we aren’t supposed to work overtime unless we have express permission from her. Because I signed up for these sessions almost two months ago, do I need to remind her about them?

I’m a bit worried that she’ll be shocked when she sees them on my timesheet, because what if she’s forgotten about them? She’s quite busy, so I’m not sure if she’d even remember telling me to go to these sessions. Or is it best to just go to my training sessions and put them on my timesheet and not even ask about it again?

This seems like it should be simple, but I’ve never worked anywhere that had huge training sessions like this available to employees, so I’m just not sure what is the right thing to do and what is the etiquette around it.

As an across-the-board rule, if you think your manager might be shocked by something if you don’t remind her, you should remind her. Otherwise you’re setting both of you up for a bad situation. So yes, absolutely remind her! Say this: “When I started, you asked me to sign up for training sessions on X and Y. They’re coming up this month, and they’re on days I don’t normally work. Should I list them as overtime hours on my timesheet, cut back on other hours that week so I don’t go into overtime, or something else?”

4. Company won’t give me the names of the people I’ll be interviewing with

I have an interview next week for which I am flying in (including an overnight stay). I emailed the HR assistant to ask for the schedule and names of people I will be meeting. She responded by saying that I’m scheduled for 5 hours, with 2 people per hour from various depts and a small lunch break. She also said that she couldn’t provide more info as knowing the names of people wouldn’t be useful without knowing who they are.

Of course, the purpose of getting the names is so I can google them and be more prepared. But I’m not sure if she understands that, so should I respond and explain? Or should I go higher and ask the senior recruiter for the info? Though I suspect she’ll send me to the assistant for the info anyway, as she did the scheduling. What’s the best way to respond? I don’t want to be a pest.

I’d drop it. It’s not essential information — although I agree it’s nice to have — and she already declined to provide it when you asked. Pushing back or going over her head is more likely to annoy them than help you.

5. How should I respond to internal recruiters reaching out on LinkedIn?

Recently, I’ve been getting a number of LinkedIn InMails from internal HR recruiters inviting me to apply for positions which match my experience. They are perfect for me and I am looking for a new job. How do I follow up exactly? Being contacted as a passive candidate leads me to think that I’m a shoo-in for an interview. Is the ball in my court to suggest chatting about the position over the phone/hint at being open to an interview?

I wouldn’t read it as you’re a shoo-in for an interview; once you talk with each other, it might turn out that you’re not a perfect fit. These are more like preliminary conversations to find out more. I’d just respond back and say that you’re interested in learning more and ask if there’s a good time to talk or what the right next step would be; they should take it from there.

weekend free-for-all – February 28-March 1, 2015

Olive in blanketsThis comment section is open for any non-work-related discussion you’d like to have with other readers, by popular demand. (This one is truly non-work only; if you have a work question, you can email it to me or post it in the work-related open thread on Fridays.)

Book Recommendation of the Week:  The Thorn Birds by Colleen McCullough. Yes, this is the book that led to the mini-series of the 80s, and that might turn you off. But come on, it’s a love story between a priest and the woman he’s adored her whole life. It’s tortured and epic and full of people and families being torn apart. It is magnificent.

* I make a commission if you use that Amazon link.