my interviewer made me trudge for blocks in the snow with my luggage so she could get lunch

A reader writes:

I am hoping you can weigh in something that happened during a job interview.

I traveled out of state for an interview and incurred all the costs, like hotel and plane tickets, because the hiring manager told me that she really wanted me in the role and it seemed like a really great opportunity. The night before the interview, the manager told me I would be meeting with her and one other manager, so based on that information, I anticipated an interview with two people. I showed up to the interview with my luggage (since I was going to the airport right afterwards) and in professional clothes, only to find out that we were going to get lunch. The manager wanted a lunch item from a very specific place that was a few blocks away and wanted us both to walk over there together.

We walked in the snow for several blocks, with me carrying a rolling suitcase and two tote bags. Once we were there, I tried to find something on the menu for myself, but opted for water because of dietary restrictions. The rest of the interview consisted of me walking around with her, carrying my luggage, to various buildings on various blocks with no real information about the position, like where my office would be located, and no real information about the people I was meeting ahead of time.

I have replayed this over and over in my mind wondering what I could have done differently in this situation. I feel like I was not able to present the best version of myself because I felt dishelved walking around with luggage and fumbling around at the diner trying to find something to eat. At the same time, I wonder if my expectations of a job interview are in the wrong here. I wasn’t expecting someone to buy me a steak dinner, but shouldn’t a hiring manager at least offer a more neutral lunch option or take into consideration that someone has luggage with them before having them carrying it around the city? How much information should a hiring manager give about the interview? Should they alter the interview based on someone bringing luggage/traveling?

Yes, your interviewer was in the wrong here.

Sometimes plans do change. For example, they might have intended for you to have an in-office interview with two people but schedules changed, the other person was out or pulled into a different meeting, and the remaining interviewer had no other time in her day to get lunch. Ideally they would have explained the change to you, but it’s not a huge deal if they didn’t; in general, being able to roll with changes is a good thing, and lunch interviews aren’t inherently problematic.

But there are a few things that your interviewer did wrong here:
– Asking a job candidate to walk several blocks in the snow isn’t generally cool, especially when the person is in nice clothes.
– Upon seeing your luggage, she should have either immediately changed plans or suggested that you leave it in the office and return for it afterwards.
– She should have asked you whether the restaurant she had selected worked for you — and failing that, once she realized that you were stuck only able to order water, she should have apologized profusely and offered up a different plan.
– It sounds like she flubbed the interview conversation itself too, if you were left with no more information about the position than you had before the interview.

That said, once the situation started unfolding, there were a few things you could have done differently too:
– Once you realized your interviewer was going to drag you out for lunch, you could have asked to leave your luggage in her office so you weren’t having to carry it around. That’s a totally reasonable request to make.
– You could have spoken up with your own questions about the job. In an interview where you’re not getting time to ask your own questions, it’s absolutely okay to say, “I’d be really interested in learning more about X — can you tell me more about that?” Or “I have a few questions about the role and the company. Is now a good time for that?”

To be clear, I’m not blaming you for not doing these things — it’s hard to get this stuff right in the moment, and the power dynamics that many job candidates feel in interviews can really mess with your ability to know how to speak up.

As for what to do from here, well, you’ve got some interesting information about the person who would be your boss if you took this job: She’s not particularly considerate and she seems like she might be self-interested to the point that she’s willing to actively inconvenience others when she’s in a position of power. Don’t take that lightly in thinking about what it would be like to work for her.

I’m missing my bus because of my manager, husband’s inappropriate new employee, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. I’m missing my bus waiting for my manager at the end of the work day

I work every day from 9-5:30 for a small company. At 5:30, we all leave together. The problem is that my boss is never ready at 5:30. She takes her time getting ready and we don’t end up leaving until 5:40-5:45. I don’t get paid for the extra 10-15 minutes waiting around, but I wait around to carry her bags to be nice. But now I have to take the bus home, and because she’s not ready at 5:30, I miss my bus and the next one doesn’t come until 6:05.

I want to leave at 5:30, but I’m sure she’s going to have a problem with it because she always makes little comments when one of us leaves on time. If I tell her I need to leave at 5:30, on time, can she say no or fire me if I do?

I think it’s fairly unlikely that she’s going to refuse to let you leave earlier or fire you over this. Just say, “I’ve been missing the bus lately, so I need to start leaving right at 5:30. I’m heading out now, and will you see you all tomorrow!”

If she does tell you that you can’t leave until later, then she’s telling you that your work day doesn’t actually end at 5:30; it ends at 5:45 — and if you’re non-exempt, you’d need to be paid for that time. But it doesn’t sound like that’s really the case; it sounds like an informal habit has developed where she assumes you’ll wait for her just to be polite, not because it’s the kind of strict job requirement where she’d need to be paying you. Explain you can’t wait around because of your bus and assume it will be fine, because it probably will be.

2. When I list off my work, my manager always asks, “Anything else?”

The manager of my sales team requires us to read off our planned appointments for the week each Monday morning, plus a few other items. At the conclusion of our statement, when it’s completely obvious the entire statement is completed, he asked “Anything else?” *every* time.

Coming from him, it has a tone suggesting insufficiency, which is really annoying. Each person then has to then answer “Yes, that’s everything,” or some variation.

Is there another way to answer that question to communicate more confidence, or to deflect the negativity?

It’s possible that he’s implying your list isn’t sufficient, but it’s also possible (and maybe more likely) that he’s just asking “anything else?” as a transition to move on to the next person. I’d just answer it matter-of-factly and with confidence (“Yes, that’s everything!”) and not let it rattle you.

If you get the sense that he has concerns about your productivity from other things, you could address that head-on by asking him about it directly: “When I share my plans for the week, is it about in line with what you’d expect, or do you want me to doing anything differently?” But absent that, I’d assume this is just his repetitive way of moving to the next person, and that you shouldn’t read anything into it.

3. My husband’s new employee is being inappropriate with him

My husband manages a small business and this weekend there was an expo where his business had a booth. One of the employees working the booth is new to the company (two weeks). Her supervisor reports directly to my spouse. Yesterday we ran up there to bring more advertising materials, and my husband introduced me. She ignored him the first two times, and finally on the third she said “hey.” It seemed odd to me, but considering that her job responsibilities don’t require much skill, I chalked it up to her being young and not having professional business manners.

But when we went today, she ran up to my husband and put her hand up his shirt sleeve and held it there for him to feel how cold her hands were. I was glaring at her and she was looking right at me. My husband froze and was looking at me like he didn’t know what to do. It was incredibly inappropriate and very uncomfortable. In all my experience as a manager, I have never encountered something like this, much less as a wife. My initial reaction is that my husband should terminate her. Do you think that I am overreacting?

I’d also like to add I have no doubts that my husband is faithful, and I have no intention of directly confronting this employee, but my husband and I constantly bounce ideas off each other and he really has been at a loss on how to handle this. I want to make sure that my thoughts are not based in emotions.

Yes, she sounds like she’s being inappropriate.

Just to be clear: This is really for your husband to handle himself. She’s his employee, and he’s the one who needs to set boundaries with her. (I think you’re saying that you know that already, so this is just to reinforce that.)

Firing her over this seems pretty extreme to me, when this kind of thing can usually be handled in a far less severe manner. Sometimes managers can correct this kind of thing just by how they react in the moment (for instance, your husband could quickly move away if she touches him) and by modeling boundaries and being extra professional in their interactions. Other times, it might take direct conversation about what is and isn’t appropriate.

On your side, I’d cut out the glaring if you encounter her again; if this woman really does want to flirt with your husband, you’ll come across far better if you don’t appear threatened by it or like you’re engaging in battle with her. Be above it, and let your husband handle it.

4. I missed a week of work during the first month of my internship

I just started working as an intern in January. I really like the company and the work they do, and I was hoping that after my 8 months of internship I might get a full-time position there after I graduate. However, in the first month I’ve worked, I had to take 5 days off because I was really sick. I don’t get sick days or vacation days since I’m still a student, so I don’t get paid for the 5 days I took off. My manager noticed this and pulled me aside and told me that I was missing too many days of work. He told me that I’m doing a great job, but that he is expecting me to be there at all times. I understand where he is coming from and I felt really bad and guilty that I had to take those days off even though I wasn’t feeling well.

Now I’m scared that I’ve made a bad impression and I’m worried that it will affect his decision when I do ask him for a full-time opportunity later on. Do you think I still have a shot at a full-time position?? Or I shouldn’t even bother asking since i’ve screwed up?

It’s tough to miss five days during your first month; it’s a time when you’re not yet a known quantity, and so employers worry about whether this was a legitimate and unusual thing for you or whether it’s a sign about your reliability. And it’s even more concerning when you’re a new intern, because employers know that some interns haven’t yet figured out workplace expectations yet and don’t quite realize that “show up every day” really does mean “show up every day.”

But reasonable employers also know that sometimes shit happens, and sometimes it has the bad timing to strike during your first month. That means that if you prove yourself to be hard-working and reliable going forward, that should be what counts, not the time you got sick for a week right after starting. (I don’t mean to imply that getting sick means that your’e not hard-working and reliable — just that employers don’t know one way or the other when you’re new, until you show them.)

That said, internships are never guaranteed to turn into full-time jobs, no matter how well you do (unless you have an explicit agreement to the contrary), so don’t look at it as something that should happen if the internship goes well. Even if it doesn’t happen, there are all sorts of other things it can lead to, from the experience itself, references, networking, and so forth.

5. I was supposed to get a job offer, but the employer isn’t returning my calls

I went for a job interview three weeks ago. I then received a phone call from the employer; the HR manager left me a message indicating she was done with all the interview process and that she had exciting news for me regarding a potential job offer and to return her call. This was three days ago. So far, I have left her two voicemails since I’m so eager to hear about this job offer! She has not returned my calls. Is it a good idea to send an email to the HR manager as follow-up, since I’m not sure why I’m not getting a call back?

I’m so eager to hear about this job, and I don’t want to accept another job offer if her voicemail indicated that she has a potential job offer for me.

It’s reasonable to wait a few more days and then follow up one more time by email, but then I’d move on. It’s really in her court, and if she’s not getting back to you, there’s a reason for it — she’s on vacation or out sick or the hiring process has gotten hung up in some way or they’re going with another candidate or who knows what. But I can promise you that it’s not that she wants to make you a job offer but won’t remember that unless you contact her; when employers want to hire someone, it doesn’t slip their mind.

Sometimes job offers seem like they’re about to burst into being, only to then fizzle out. That’s true even when an employer says things like “I want to talk to you about an offer.” Sometimes they just don’t come to fruition. And yes, a polite employer will get back to you and tell you that, but this one isn’t doing that — so all you can do is make one final attempt and then move on.

do you know what your staff isn’t getting done?

As a manager, you probably know to give your staff members input on how to prioritize everything that’s on their plate and to check in and see how key projects are coming. But there’s one question that most managers don’t think to ask that can reveal crucial information:

“What things are you not getting done?”

You don’t ask this in an accusatory way, and you’re not seeking to penalize people if it turns out there’s a task or project that they haven’t been working on. Rather, you’re genuinely seeking help understanding their workload, how they’re prioritizing, where the bottlenecks might be, and what’s getting put on the back burner.

After all on a busy team, it’s not uncommon for some things – especially smaller items – to get pushed aside in favor of more pressing or higher-priority work. Your team members may have made precisely the right call in doing that – or they might not have. But either way, as their manager, you want to be aware of what items aren’t getting done. Otherwise, you’re likely to be wrongly assuming that various items are moving along smoothly in the background even if they’re not, and that can lead to real problems down the road.

Asking what’s not getting done will give you the chance to say, “Actually, X is really important, so let’s push back Y instead” (or bring in additional help or reassess whether we need to do X at all, or all sorts of other solutions).

Moreover, if you never open this conversation, you might inadvertently be signaling to your team that no matter how high their workload, they’re expected to find a way to get it all done – even if it means working unreasonable hours or cutting corners or burning out.

Of course, in order to get thorough and honest answers to this question, you have to create a working environment where people feel safe telling you the truth. If you shoot the messenger or otherwise penalize people for being honest about problems, you’re likely to get staff who dance around this question and don’t give you the information that would be most helpful.

And one more thing – it’s helpful to be proactive about initiating this conversation with your own manager, as well. A good manager will appreciate the chance to discuss it, for all the reasons above – and you can end up getting hugely helpful input by raising the issue, from “let’s bring in a temp to handle that” “let’s figure out how to reprioritize” to “let’s reconsider if we even need to do that task at all.”

I originally published this at Intuit QuickBase’s blog.

my manager is ignoring my girlfriend’s request not to call her when he’s looking for me

A reader writes:

After some miscommunication about whether or not I was to work a shift in a snowstorm, my boss called my significant other on the phone in order to find me. She is not listed as an emergency contact, nor did my boss have access to the number anywhere else regarding work. (He had her number because I once had her call management while I had been driving in another snowstorm. There had been accidents that could have affected my ETA, and I wanted to alert them. He apparently kept the number.)

Obviously, I was a little peeved, but thought nothing of it, until said significant person made a complaint to me and asked me to request that she not be called for anything other than an emergency (like if I were hurt or too sick to call my office myself).

Naturally, I composed a formal and professional email to all of the other members of the management team (I am a supervisor myself) expressing the request, specifying that it had been made by my significant other. The upper management took it as passive aggressive, when in reality it was as direct and polite as possible. The following day, I was issued a written warning about sending out passive aggressive emails and was ordered to forget about my significant other’s request, as my manager saw the circumstances of my phone silence and lack of showing up for work as an emergency.

I feel that my presence is my own responsibility, no one else’s, regardless of the consequences. Was it appropriate for them to contact anyone other than me regarding scheduling? And more so, to take disciplinary action for contacting them in this way?

I wrote back to this letter-writer and asked what the email had said. Here it is:

“Hey all. In light of events yesterday, I would like to both update my emergency contacts, and discuss the proper uses of these contacts.

I would like my emergency contact numbers to be:
(Contacts here)

The second reason for this message is to ask everyone, as politely as possible, to please not contact any of these people in regards to me in the workplace unless it is absolutely an emergency. One of these people had been contacted as an alternative way to speak with me, and was not okay with it. They requested me to speak of this to the management team in order to avoid misunderstandings in the future. I hope everyone understands this request.”

Well, it’s weirdly formal, but I wouldn’t say it’s passive aggressive since you’re pretty direct about what you’re asking. I suspect your manager is reacting to the fact that it reads like an odd mix of overly deferential (“as politely as possible”) and a little scolding (“I’d like to discuss the proper uses of these contacts”). It also probably came across strangely to send it to your entire management team, rather than just to the one person who made the call (and who sounds the only person on that team who has this particular number anyway).

I would have just talked to your manager and said, “Hey, Jane asked that the office not contact her in the future about where I am. Can we take her number out of any contact sheet for me?”

But regardless of that, giving you a written warning for “sending out passive aggressive emails” is weird. Refusing to respect the request of someone who doesn’t even work for your company is weird too.

Is there other weirdness going on there? This all feels off enough that I’m wondering what the broader context is. Is your relationship with your manager or others above you already strained? Or might there have been other problems with scheduling you or communications over your schedule, and this could be frustration from that? Absent something like that, I’m left thinking your manager just really overreacted and is being wildly unreasonable about your girlfriend, but it’s worth taking a look at the broader situation and seeing if you can find answers in there.

should managers organize “fun” at work?

A reader writes:

My company is going through some difficult financial times, and employees are feeling stressed, burned out, and anxious. Being fairly new to HR, I think that more fun activities (such as cook-offs, cookie decorating for Valentine’s Day, and maybe even a bean bag toss tournament in the summer) should be introduced to the staff to help relieve some of the tension. I was thinking about having at least one fun activity every other month.

Shouldn’t employees be able to have fun at work? Do you think this could be an effective way to improve morale? I’m thinking about maybe showing a short movie at lunch time in a week, then another employee is scheduling an activity two weeks after that and then April Fool’s Day is approaching and I was thinking about having an activity for that holiday. Does that sound like it would take away too much productivity?

You can read my answer to this question over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and often updating/expanding my answers to them).

my boss wants us to work late for no reason, inviting spouses to team-building events, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My boss wants people to work late for no reason

My boss has told my two salaried coworkers on more than one occasion that she wants to see them working late more often (like she does), even while admitting that they get everything done on time and their work is excellent. The other day she said to me that she believes as a matter of principle that salaried employees should work more than 40 hours a week. I didn’t know how to respond. What would you say to that?

“What I’m concerned about is what results people are getting. I’d hate to think staying late mattered more than my actual contributions. My impression was that you’re happy with the results I’m getting. Am I mistaken? Do you have concerns about my work?”

That said, if she really believes this as a matter of principle, you might always be fighting against that bias in her. You’d want to watch carefully to see how it plays out: Does she just say annoying things about it, or are you actually penalized for it? If it’s the latter, you’d need to decide whether to accept that you’ll be paying that penalty, or occasionally play along to humor her, or go somewhere that doesn’t feel that way.

2. International team-building events where spouses aren’t invited

What is your feeling on out-of-country “team building” where spouses are not invited? Especially all inclusive resorts.

My feeling is that most team-building events are lame, but if you’re going to have them at all, it definitely makes sense not to have spouses there. If you’re team-buildling, you want everyone’s focus on the team, not on people who don’t work there.

3. My manager shares people’s personal medical info at our daily meetings

Our small company has a daily meeting that lasts for about 20 to 30 minutes. My manager has a habit of informing everyone in attendance who has called to say they would not be in for the day and why. Sometimes the reasons are medical. I find this disturbing. I had an accident that had me out of work for 2 days and was told by some in attendance that the reason for my absence was divulged. Is this legal? Does this fall under HIPAA?

It’s going to be legal in the majority of cases. HIPAA restricts what info health care workers can share; it doesn’t apply to employers. That said, sharing employees’ medical info without their permission still isn’t a good idea.

I’d say this to your manager: “I’m uncomfortable having people’s medical info shared with everyone else without their explicit okay. I can imagine a situation where someone really might not appreciate that being shared with the whole group. Do you think we could simply share who will be out without getting into details that might be personal?”

4. Interviewing when covered in skateboarding scrapes

I skateboard recreationally and was recently involved in a minor accident. No serious injuries, just superficial scrapes. However, some of these scrapes are on the palms of my hands and (as luck would have it) my forehead. They are impossible to cover with makeup or carefully styled bangs, and I have a promising interview approaching rapidly. I would reschedule, but these scratches will take a couple weeks to fully disappear, and I fear the worst that comes with postponing an interview longer than a few days. There really isn’t any way to get around having these scrapes.

What do you think would be the best way to reassure my interviewers about my appearance? Should I make the nature of my injuries clear to my interviewers upfront (or risk letting them draw their own conclusions)? Should I slap some large bandages on and hope for the best? The scrapes will be immediately apparent to my interviewers, both when I first greet them and when we shake hands, so I feel it would be most appropriate to address them in some way, though I’m not sure how or at what point.

I’d just address it head-on (ha ha ha) right when you meet them, saying something like, “Excuse these scrapes! I had a skating tumble recently — I’m normally not covered in scratches!”

It’s weird if you don’t address it (because then they’re likely to be sitting there wondering about it), but if you just explain it, it shouldn’t be a big deal at all.

5. Filling out job applications when all my past employers have shut down

I’ve been self-employed for 10 years. Before that, every job I had was with companies that no longer exist (Blockbuster Video, Montgomery Ward). I literally have no background that can be checked. And, yes, potential employers do ask that you go past 10 years. How do I fill out applications that want this non-existent information? And remember, these are all done online. No one will take an application in-person anymore.

You fill it out exactly the same way you would if they still existed. Your job history doesn’t stop counting just because it can’t be verified (and it’s pretty unlikely that most employers will care about verifying employment from 10+ years ago anyway). That said, do whatever you can to track down former managers (on LinkedIn, etc.) who might remember you, just in case you do end up needing them.

when is it okay to call in sick?

If your office is like most at this time of year, it’s probably full of coughing and sneezing coworkers, or the empty desks of people who are out sick. The question of how to handle sick leave stresses workers out more than it should, so here are answers to some of your most common questions about sick leave – including when it’s okay to call in sick, whether you should be expected to work from home when you’re ill, and more.

When is it reasonable to call in sick?

Ideally, you should be able to call in sick whenever you don’t feel you’re well enough to be productive at work or when dragging yourself out of bed and into your office will make you feel worse than you already do. In practice, some people don’t mind working when they’re under the weather, and others just want to get into bed with a cup of tea and watch game shows. It’s really a personal judgment call.

Additionally, if you’re contagious, you should try to stay at home regardless of the factors above. Your coworkers won’t appreciate you spreading germs, and some of them may be immunocompromised or going home to family members who are.

What if your workplace or boss discourages you from taking sick time?

If you work somewhere that frowns on sick days unless you’re hospitalized (and maybe even then!), your workplace has a serious culture and management issue. There are very few roles where disaster will strike if someone takes a day or two off to rest, and requiring sick people to come to work is unkind, short-sighted, and potentially dangerous to their and their coworkers’ health.

What about working from home instead of coming in?

In many jobs, it’s reasonable to work from home instead of coming into the office when you’re sick. It has the advantage of not exposing others to your germs and allowing you to work in cozy pajamas, wrapped in a blanket. Of course, this isn’t an option for everyone. If your role requires your physical presence (for example, if you’re the receptionist or work in a retail store), or if you work somewhere that has a culture opposed to telecommuting, this might not be feasible. But in an increasing number of offices, working from home when under the weather is perfectly reasonable.

It’s important to note, though, that you shouldn’t offer to work from home when you really should be taking a sick day and not working at all. Many American workers increasingly feel that they have to work no matter how sick they are; that’s bad for their health and for their productivity. Working from home with a cold might be easy to do, but there’s a point where you really just need to take the day off and not think about work (things like the flu and food poisoning fall in this category). Plus, paid sick leave is part of your overall compensation and benefits package, so if you need it, take it.

What should you do if you’re too sick to be at work but your boss expects you to work anyway?

Be straightforward with your boss. Explain that you’re too ill to work, and make it clear what people should and shouldn’t expect from you that day. If in your office, “out sick” generally means that you’re still working from home, be explicit when you call in, saying something like, “I’m taking a sick day today. I’m sick enough that I won’t be checking email or otherwise working.”

What you don’t have paid sick leave?

Consider pushing to change that! Point out to your employer that having no sick leave means that employees will come to work sick and make other employees sick – and customers too. And there’s safety in numbers, so consider speaking up as a group with other coworkers.

What should managers do to encourage good sick leave practices among employees?

For starters, managers should make it clear that they don’t want sick people at work. That means sending people home if they come in obviously ill, not penalizing people for using sick days, and setting the right example by staying home themselves when they’re sick.

Moreover, employers shouldn’t require doctor’s notes from ill employees, since colds and flus generally don’t require a doctor’s care. Requiring doctor’s notes discourages employees from staying home when they’re sick, is an unneeded burden on sick employees (who will have to drag themselves to a doctor when a few days of resting in bed will cure them), drives up health care costs by pushing people to make unnecessary medical visits, and signals that you don’t trust your employees to behave responsibly. Of course, if an employee is abusing their sick leave, managers can address that, but blanket doctor’s notes policies penalize everyone.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

yet another reason to stay far away from resume-writing companies

A few weeks ago, I was contacted by someone who told me that she had purchased a professionally written resume and cover letter from a resume-writing company … and then had realized that the cover letter was nearly word-for-word the same as the one from a reader that I posted here last year.

That set off an annoying and ridiculous chain of events in which the following happened:

* The company refused to acknowledge that their employee had plagiarized the letter, after their client and I both complained.

* Their employee claimed that I was a career advisor in Virginia Beach in 2012-2013 (!) and must have attended one of his cover-letter-writing workshops (!) and gotten the letter from him that way (!), because he used it in his workshops. (I’ve never worked as a career advisor, or worked in Virginia Beach, or taught a cover letter writing workshop, or attended a cover letter writing workshop. I assume he simply made up facts in a panic. The company later backed off this claim but suggested he must have known some other Alison Green.)

* The resume-writer then doubled down and attacked me, by writing to the upset client: “Is this cover letter a basis for what I wrote for (the client)? Yes. Is it plagiarism? No, it is my property to begin with. Was Alison Green wrong for taking my work and posting it on some website? Absolutely.” (WTF? This is a blatant lie, which the company later told me they asked him to apologize for. He still hasn’t.)

* The company claimed that the letter was from a cover-letter-writing tutorial that this guy presented “numerous times before and specifically at a conference in 2011.” If you Google key phrases that were identical between the two letters, you’ll get plenty of hits by others who have copied it, but you won’t get a single hit older than the 2014 date of the blog post here. Despite these claims that he’s been circulating it since 2011, there’s not one instance of any of its key phrases that pre-date its publication on Ask a Manager.

* At one point, the company wrote, “I think the likely scenario is that your reader found (the letter) after one of the attendees took the presentation, which they distribute freely, and further distributed it to make it available to more people.” There are two problems here: First, the reader wrote it after I worked with her on her resume, and she was very clear about what what advice she used to create it. Second, apparently this company is totally okay with recycling a letter that they acknowledge they “distribute freely” for a client who is paying for original content.

* When I pointed out that they’re doing their clients a huge disservice by recycling existing content over and over (and that if I received that letter from a candidate, I would have recognized it from the one on my site and assumed the candidate plagiarized it — which would be an instant rejection for that person — and that they’re putting clients in a terrible position by supplying them with un-original work), they responded that “it’s a proven method where clients have had great success.”

* When I asked to see a copy of this tutorial that was allegedly originally created in 2011, they sent it to me — and here’s where it gets truly ridiculous. As you may know, I often use Game of Thrones character names here in place of real ones, in order to keep things anonymous. On the cover letter post in question, I had used the name Catelyn Stark, a Game of Thrones character. In the presentation that they sent me that was allegedly this guy’s original content … the cover letter was also written as “Catelyn Stark.”

* When I pointed out that it was highly unlikely that their resume writer (a) just happened to use Game of Thrones character names too, and (b) happened to pick the exact same character name that I used in the letter on my site, they responded: “I don’t think this is evidence at all that ___ is guilty of plagiarism. Especially since several of our employees are big GOT fans, including myself, and ___ has discussed the show with us on several occasions. We felt that it was odd that someone would use the same fictional character as their placeholder name. However, GOT is one of the most popular shows around right now, so we wrote it off as coincidence.”

No further comment from me. You can draw your own conclusions.

I’m going to continue to strongly recommend that you avoid resume-writing companies though…

my client constantly pesters me and micromanages my every move

A reader writes:

I work as a contractor for a lice-removal company (I’m a recruiter). My tasks aren’t particularly time-sensitive — think mass mailings, follow-up texts, and phone calls. This is my second job; I work as a secretary for a local university as well. I have two questions about the company I contract with.

First, my client harasses me from mid-morning until fairly late at night (9-10 p.m.) despite knowing that I have other commitments. Questions range from, “When are you going to log in to work?” to “What are you doing?” to “What about Task Y?” and the client becomes increasingly hostile if I don’t answer immediately. I’ve clarified my position as a contractor twice (no set hours, will communicate about the work I’m doing and when I’m doing it, other commitments mean I am not always available for immediate response) and the client reacted with anger both times. I work reliably in a consistent routine and if I need to change that routine I let the client know — but the constant harassment is making me anxious, defensive, and unhappy. The client also expects that if I’m going to change my schedule for any reason, I will clear it with her in advance, and this ranges from things like “I’m taking a nap before sending emails this afternoon” to “my son has a play I need to attend in three weeks.” Essentially, I have a set schedule despite being a contractor, I’m required to get permission to change it even by an hour, and she is constantly pestering me about work times and what else I’m doing with my life. How do I get this to stop? Is it even appropriate for me to expect it to stop?

The second question has to do with pay. When I was hired, I was instructed to invoice every Sunday for the hours I worked the previous week and further told, “We pay weekly.” I’ve had several instances now where a check has not arrived for 2-4 weeks and, when I complain, I’m told that there “is no process” for payroll and that “things happen.” The client further says that pay takes 7-10 business days to arrive and that time is counted from when they submit payroll to the bank, which can vary based on “whether our payroll person went to a party the night before” or “whether we’re too busy to do payroll.” The client finished up by telling me that the whole mess was my fault and that I “shouldn’t have been counting on” my pay from them for “time sensitive things.” Finally, when I submit an invoice the payroll manager will often pretend not to know who I am, despite my full name being on my email and on my signature — she claims she “can’t be expected to remember everyone’s email,” and I think this is probably the true root of the random pay delays. Is this fair? Do I have a right, as a contractor, to expect a reliable pay schedule (given that the nature of my work is consistent rather than sporadic)?

I don’t have a contract, and I’m kicking myself about that. I asked about contracts when I was hired and I was told that they “don’t have time” to be “hassling” with that. I got the job through a family friend, and I was far more trusting in that situation than a smart person would have been.

Please don’t hesitate to tell me to suck it up if that’s what I need to do. I’m just feeling taken advantage of and hoping there’s some professional recourse.

Nope, it’s not reasonable and your client is out of line.

It sounds like your client wants an employee, not a contractor, and she’s just going to treat you like an employee even though you’re not one. However, IRS regulations prohibit treating independent contractors (who are responsible for paying their own payroll taxes) as employees (since for the employer, that would be getting all of the benefit of an employee with none of the tax responsibility). To determine who qualifies as a contractor, the IRS looks at the factors described here. (Although to complicate things, they also note: “There is no ‘magic’ or set number of factors that ‘makes’ the worker an employee or an independent contractor, and no one factor stands alone in making this determination. Also, factors which are relevant in one situation may not be relevant in another. The keys are to look at the entire relationship, consider the degree or extent of the right to direct and control, and finally, to document each of the factors used in coming up with the determination.”)

In any case, and with the caveat that I’m not a lawyer, it sure sounds like your employer is treating you as an employee– by expecting to be constantly updated on your schedule and to clear any changes with them ahead of time and expecting you to be always available to them. Those things aren’t generally appropriate for independent contractors.

I’d say this to your client: “I’m concerned that we’re running afoul of the laws on independent contractors. I know it’s easy to fall into treating me like an employee, but the law is really clear that you can’t do that with contractors, and the company could get into legal trouble if they do. As a contractor, I’m glad to let you know generally when I expect to be working on your projects, but I don’t have set hours, shouldn’t be clearing schedule changes with you ahead of time unless they affect a timeline we’ve already agreed to, and will also be spending time on other commitments.”

I’d also add: “Are you positive that you want to have a contractor in this position? If you need someone who you can reach at all hours and who will be available whenever you contact them, you probably need to hire an employee instead.” (Of course, if you’d be upset if she then took that advice, you might not want to say that so explicitly.)

From there, I’d say, “Going forward, I need to work in accordance with the regulations for contractors and with our initial agreement. I don’t have set hours, but I’ll let you know if I expect a major change in my normal routine. I’d like to ask that you stop emailing me to ask when I’m logging in or becoming concerned if you don’t get an immediate answer. That’s making it difficult and stressful to do the work you’ve hired me for. Of course, if there’s ever an issue with my work or with things getting completed on time, I want us to address that right away, but that isn’t typically the case.”

As for the evening contacts, if those are phone calls, tell her stop immediately: “I won’t take phone calls after X and need you to stop calling me that late.” If they’re emails, let them wait for the next day. If they’re urgent or frantic emails where she’s clearly expecting an immediate response, let her know that you may not be working in the evening and that she shouldn’t rely on you seeing emails until the next day. After that, stop responding to any future nighttime emails until the next day.

On the payment issue, this would indeed be easier if you had a contract. Always get a contract! As a contractor, you’re not covered by state laws about late pay, and without a contract, you’re basically at their mercy. That means that you’ll have to decide how far you’re willing to push this. It would be totally reasonable of you to ask them to agree to written payment terms now (ideally with late fees), but it’s possible that this client will react poorly to that. That means that the question for you is how much you want to keep this work. Are you willing to push this issue even if it means losing the client? That’s going to have to guide you here.

And frankly, that’s a question I’d be asking anyway. This person sounds like someone who might simply end the relationship with you if you push her too much on this stuff, which means that you’re going to have to decide how much you need the work before deciding how assertively to push back.

But for what it’s worth, she sounds like a nightmare, she’s pestering you all the time (probably far more than you’re getting paid to tolerate), and she’s making you “anxious, defensive, and unhappy.” If you have the option of severing ties, I’d seriously consider it — or at least be prepared to do that if the steps above don’t get you where you need to be.

Read updates to this letter here and here.

declining a management role, looking young is affecting me at work, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My boss told me to stay home sick and now is demanding a doctor’s note

I work in Florida at a private school as a teacher. I had a fever on earlier this month and called in sick per school policy. I still felt I had a fever at the end of the day when my boss/principal called me and asked if I could return. I told her I was feeling better with rest and would like to return, but she said to stay home another day. I do not get paid sick leave or benefits or have any assistance in going to the doctor from my employer, nor do I have insurance. My boss told me that before I can return to work now, I must provide a doctor’s note saying I may return. I feel like I can work and will have had two days off so far. I cannot provide a sick note because I cannot afford to go to the doctor. How can I return to work and is it legal that she is making this demand?

It’s legal, but it’s really crappy. Requiring doctor’s notes for sick leave is already bad policy, but doing it when you don’t even give your employees health insurance is a new level of ridiculousness and tone-deafness. I’d say this to your boss: “I had a two-day illness and am now recovered. don’t have health insurance and can’t afford to go to the doctor when I’m not in need of treatment. If the school would like to cover it, I’d be glad to go but it’s not something I can afford on my own. More to the point, I don’t believe it’s necessary — we all get occasional flus that we treat at home with rest and then are fine to return to work, and that’s the case here.”

And if she does continue to insist on a doctor’s note, I’d say, “I’m just not sure how to do that, without insurance or the money to cover it. Is there another option here?”

2. I look young and it’s affecting me at work

I am a female third year associate at a small law firm. I know I look young for my age (I’m 30 but at bar events for students I’m often asked if I am pre-law). I am getting increasingly frustrated with vendors (and opposing counsel) assuming I am a secretary or paralegal. One even went so far as to send flowers for my birthday, informing me that they do this for all the secretaries at the firms who use them, despite being told repeatedly that I am not the partner’s assistant (when they called to ask my birthday for this purpose).

I dress in suits every day, my work email signatures states that I am an associate, and I sign most of the pleadings that vendors and opposing counsel see. I’m not sure what else I can do to alleviate this problem (aside from not using vendors who refuse to acknowledge that a young women can be an attorney). In some ways this is not a big deal, but there are portions of my job where it matters and the constant repetition of the problem is getting annoying. Is there something more I can do to help vendors and counsel accept that I am an attorney? If not what is the appropriate response? Should I correct them every time or only when it matters for the task at hand?

With opposing counsel, it might be satisfying to just call it out: “I’m sorry, do you think I’m a secretary?” If they try to joke it off, stay stony-faced, correct them, and move on. They’ll get it pretty quickly. (And it’s not that there’s anything wrong with being a secretary; it’s that people’s assumptions appear to be rooted in stereotypes, and that’s the piece that’s insulting.)

Vendors you have some power over, so the next time it happens, I’d say, “I’m sure you don’t intend to signal that you see all women as secretaries. Can you please ensure that your records are updated to get my position correct? Thank you.” And then if it happens again, I might say, “Is there some reason you continue to assume I’m a secretary, despite being told otherwise?” Make them uncomfortable; it might help. But also, yes, stop working with them if it’s anything other than a one-time honest mistake (and if you have that power).

Other than that, though, there’s not much you can do. It’s a problem that’ll resolve itself with time though!

3. Declining a management role I’ve been recommended for

I work for a Fortune 500 company that is very fast paced and has high expectations. During the holiday season, I took on an temporary management position and didn’t enjoy the experience at all. Come January, I decided that I wanted to lay low, come in and do my job and not take on any additional responsibility.

However, now my HR department has recommended a position for me that I’m not interested in it. Do I submit my application and go through the process and see what happens? Or do I let them know not at this time (which could be career suicide)?

Don’t apply if you know that you don’t want the job! I think it’s fine to say that you’ve realized that you don’t enjoy management as much as you enjoy X and that you really want to focus on X right now. (Alternately, you can try being vague — “thanks for thinking of me, but I don’t think it’s quite the right move for me right now” — but you’d want to be prepared with something more specific if pushed to elaborate.)

That said, in some fields the only way to progress is to move into management roles. If that’s the case in your field, it might mean that you’re limiting your ability to move up and limiting your earning potential … but if you hate managing, you shouldn’t do it (both for your own quality of life and that of the people you’d be managing — managers who dislike it are rarely great to work for).

4. Should I send my references before they’re requested?

I recently went in for a second interview with a small nonprofit. I’ve heard from my contact inside the org that I am a top contender for the position.) At the end of the interview, I asked about next steps. The executive director told me they would be making a decision early the following week and checking references. I haven’t provided my list of references to them yet. It wasn’t required as part of the application packet and I neglected to bring a copy with me to the second interview.

It is now the following week, and I haven’t heard anything from them yet. While I haven’t given up hope, I am getting rather impatient. My boyfriend thinks that I should go ahead and send my references before they ask. I feel like that seems a bit presumptuous, and think that if they want to hire me, they’ll follow up and ask for them.

What are your thoughts on sending along references before the employer requests them?

Sure, that’s fine to do. It’s not going to come across as presumptuous; if they want to use them, they will, and if they don’t, they won’t. That said, sending them along isn’t likely to move things forward at a significantly faster pace than they’d otherwise move, so I’m not sure it really works as a strategy here.

The better strategy, as always in job searches, is to check in once after the timeline they gave you earlier passes, and then assume you didn’t get it, put it out of your mind, move on, and let it be a pleasant surprise if they do contact you. If they want to hire you, they’re not going to forget about you, and if they don’t decide to hire you, you’ll have spared yourself all the waiting and agonizing.

5. Explaining UK academics on a resume going to American employers

I’m American but went to university and got my undergraduate degree in the UK. I’m now back in the U.S. and applying for jobs. I’m getting stuck where applications either ask for a GPA or ask for a degree transcript. UK universities don’t use GPA (degrees are classified as 1st, 2:1, 2:2, or third class honours) and the grading system is very different. Exams are designed to be difficult and achieving full marks is not expected of any but the most exceptional students (and there are no marks for attendance or class quizzes). Anything above 70% is considered very good (a 1st class degree is above 70%) and 40% is the pass mark. I got good marks – mostly above 70%, some 90+% – but I know it wouldn’t necessarily look that way to an American looking at my academic transcript.

Should I add a qualifier to the transcript – e.g. a sentence that explains the grading scale in the UK – or assume most jobs asking for an academic transcript know how to interpret one, even an international one? And what about the GPA box – a lot of application forms won’t let you leave it blank.

Yes, I’d definitely add some context that will help American employers translate it in a way they’ll understand. If you can, I wouldn’t get into explaining how the UK system works but instead just provide an American equivalent — for example, “the UK equivalent of an American 3.8 GPA” or something like that. (I don’t know if you can get that specific, but the more you provide that kind of context, the better.)