bringing luggage to an interview, Monday morning meetings, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. New manager keeps scheduling meetings for Monday mornings

Employee morale is at an all-time low at our organization for many reasons. Our new CEO isn’t helping with the matter. He schedules meetings on Monday mornings. Sometimes these meetings are conference calls, sometimes they’re day-long, in-person, rah-rah meetings. Employees who attend these meetings drive in from far locations.

I’ve not worked anywhere where long meetings are scheduled on Mondays or any meetings are scheduled on Mondays. Mondays are typically the busiest day of the week for us. These meetings make us less productive which in turn has worsened morale. Is this a new management technique to schedule meetings, and especially long ones, on Monday mornings?

I’ve … never worked anywhere that didn’t have meetings on Mondays. Meetings on Mondays are a pretty normal thing — not because it’s a management technique (it isn’t), but because Mondays are a normal work day when meetings might need to happen.

That said, day-long meetings? Day-long rah-rah meetings? That part sounds like a problem for sure, unless they’re very rare.

Why not say to him, “Hey, Mondays are the busiest day for us and it can be tough to fit in meetings; squeezing them in causes X and Y to happen. Is there a different day of the week we could schedule these for?”

2. Should I tell our new director that a board member was a candidate for her job?

I was recently on a hiring committee for the executive director of a small nonprofit. We had several fantastic candidates, and after making our hire, we asked one of the other finalists to be on the board. She enthusiastically accepted.

Here’s my question: How confidential should hiring processes be? Should I tell the new executive director that the new board member was also a finalist? I think I should, because it gives some context and perspective for the new ED, and ensures that the new ED doesn’t accidentally step on any toes because she didn’t know this new board member was also a candidate. I want the new board member to have a great experience, and it will help with the new ED treats her with an extra amount of respect and deference.

If I shouldn’t tell the new ED, should we also destroy the records of the hiring process to ensure confidentiality?

Yes, you should tell the ED, for exactly the reasons you say here: Otherwise you risk putting the ED at a disadvantage and she may inadvertently say something that rubs the new board member the wrong way. But I would not tell the ED to treat the board member with extra respect and deference. The same amount of respect and deference that any board member should get, yes, but not extra — that would be kind of patronizing to the board member, and may put the ED in a needlessly tough spot.

On destroying hiring records, you actually can’t — you’re required by law to keep them on file for one year from the date the application was received, and for two years for applicants who you’re aware are 40 or older, in case any legal challenges are brought to your hiring decisions.

3. We weren’t informed about health insurance open enrollment and now don’t have health insurance

I recently found out that I don’t have health insurance. We were supposed to sign up online during open enrollment but I wasn’t notified. We were supposed to have received an email instructing us. I spoke with several of my coworkers and found they also didn’t get the email to sign up and no one is enrolled because of it. Is there anything we can do?

Yes, go talk to someone in charge of this as a group, and explain that you weren’t notified and that you’re being denied access to health benefits as a result. Say this: “What can we do now so that we can get enrolled? Obviously the company does intend for us to have access to health insurance, so how can we make that happen?”

Don’t go to someone low-level about this, either, even if they’re the one responsible. You want to talk to someone high enough up that they’re going to recognize that this is a big problem and take action to remedy it (whereas if you talk to someone junior, they may not have the judgment or experience to recognize that it needs to be addressed or to know how to address it, and/or may be more interested in covering up the mistake).

4. Bringing luggage to an out-of-town interview

I received a call today that I made it to the third round of interviews. The interview will be in two days, and the company has already purchased my ticket. I will be staying in the area near my interview for 2 nights. There is a small window of time between when I arrive in the city and when my interview begins, which means that I will not have time to drop off my suitcase prior to the interview. I will be meeting with half a dozen people, and am concerned that I may end up wheeling my bag around as go to and fro meeting people. Should I not bring luggage (and purchase items post-interview)? If it is acceptable to have luggage, how do I address it when I arrive at the interview?

It’s totally fine to arrive with luggage, and it often happens when people are in this situation. You don’t need to roll it around with you the whole time. When you first arrive, ask either the receptionist or your first interviewer if there’s somewhere that you can leave it while you meet with people. They’ll take care of it from there.

5. Using notes in a Skype interview

I’ve prepared thoroughly for a Skype interview coming up and I’d like to have my notes on hand. Is it acceptable to look at my notes in the interview? Is it different for when I’m asking my questions to the interviewer?

I also wonder what would be acceptable in an in-person interview.

It’s generally fine to use notes in an interview, as long as you’re only glancing at them occasionally — not reading from them or giving the impression that you don’t know the answers to basic questions about your work history. However, it’s a little different when you’re interviewing over Skype — in that case, looking down a lot can come across differently than it does in person, when there’s a larger context and more cues for the interviewer to get about your interaction. With Skype, I’d try to keep it to a minimum.

However, when it comes to asking your own questions, it’s more reasonable. I’d just say something like, “I have a few notes here about what I want to ask you about,” so that if only your head is in the frame, it’s clear what you’re looking at.

will taking a part-time job impact my future career prospects?

A reader writes:

I am finishing up a PhD in the life sciences and have more or less decided not to pursue traditional academic jobs. My time in grad school was like a real job in that I was making and saving money, working a lot, and making meaningful contributions to my field, but it was obviously not a real job in the traditional sense. I saw a listing for a job at a scientific journal that I’d be well-suited and well-qualified for (it’s basically for a science PhD with good language skills, as well as some more specific qualifications that I also meet). It sounds like interesting, fulfilling work.

The thing that strikes me is that it’s a part-time position — three days a week. Assuming the pay would be enough to live on, this actually sounds really appealing to me. My time outside of work is very valuable to me, and I wouldn’t mind having more of it; I would even venture that I would be a better and more committed employee for fewer days a week. But would taking a job like this be shooting myself in the foot with respect to future career stability and opportunities? If I lost or left this job for whatever reasons, would I then find it impossible to find another similarly appealing job with my resume consisting of “grad school followed by part-time position”?

I don’t think your resume would need to specify that it was a part-time position. If it were four days a month, then yes — that changes the nature of the work. But three days a week doesn’t require a disclaimer.

And I wouldn’t think it would be a huge obstacle for you in the future either. As long as the part-time schedule doesn’t prevent you from doing substantive work, engaging with your organization in a real way, and getting results in your realm, you should be fine. If the schedule significantly minimizes any of those, then I’d be more concerned (as I would be with any job), but as long as you’re good on those fronts, I think you’ll be fine in future job searches.

how to handle chronic complainers on your staff

A reader writes:

I was hired to manage a team of fairly experienced salespeople. I originally was a manager of a different line and left for a better opportunity, and returned for a promotion as sales coordinator. I had known the team already and had a respect built with them.

But now that I am their boss, they are constantly whining, complaining, and irritated about the department. From stock issues to pay rate to the fairness of the department managers to bonus amounts, it never ends. I am exhausted of saying “think positive” and “stay focused.” I have tried firm talks, patient listening, enthusiastic support and encouragement, and partnering with other managers for support. I am slowly losing patience.

As a boss, I have given them every available resource to ensure success. I have rewarded success, put positive spin on failure, built them up to superiors. I guess my point is, I am trying to keep the emotion out of it and try to focus on the facts, but when I get home, I could cry, because I am totally beat up and exhausted from trying to find ways to improve sales and stop the negative whining, complaining, bitterness, and just keep going forward with the business. What approach am I missing?

You can read my answer to this question over at Inc. today, where I’m kicking off new column that will generally revisit letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago. In most cases, my answers will stay pretty much the same as the were the first time (but hopefully will be new to most of you since they’re from so long ago), although in some cases I might expand or revise them.

I’m hoping this will bring fresh life to posts that newer readers have never seen (from seven or eight years ago), as well as reach a whole new audience at Inc.

Please check out the first one here!

my coworker won’t stop caressing me — or the kids we work with

A reader writes:

I work part-time for an organization that deals with recreational programming for all ages. I’ve been there for about 7 years. I work with children in the 6-11-year-old age range.

I have a new-ish coworker, Kim, who is very touchy-feely. She’s like this with everyone. She will get inside your personal bubble when she talks to you, and she will randomly rub your back/stroke your back as she’s walking past you, caress your arm, or even hug you. I am not a person who hates to be touched by others, but she did this from the beginning when I’d just met her, and it was off-putting.

She also does this with children, and it’s really just too much. Parents and other coworkers have mentioned it to me (one coworker actually ran up to me at an event and asked me to keep Kim away from her). I have seen her stroking kids’ faces when she’s talking to them. I heard from a parent that she slapped her daughter’s behind (not in punishment; as part of an exercise). I heard from an adult support staff person that she slapped him in the rear also, as she was laughing when he told her not to touch him (??). I have seen her poke at kids in their ribs/sides. She basically can’t keep her hands to herself. It is hard to say something in the moment when these things happen, because there are other people around, she is theoretically an authority figure, and I don’t want to make a scene around the kids by reprimanding one of their authority figures in front of them.

I have brought it up with our supervisor several times, and she has apparently discussed it with Kim, but it really doesn’t change. Our supervisor is probably hesitant to do anything more than talk to her, because it would create a hardship for her (supervisor) because there is nobody to cover for Kim. When I bring it up, t the story is always the same; our supervisor will agree and sympathize with me that it’s not right, but she won’t take any action against her other than talking to her.

I even discussed it with Kim about two months ago, and she gave lip service to how shocked she was that she did this, because she apparently didn’t realize it. It may have gotten a bit better for a while, but now she’s back to the same old thing, with the difference being that she always says, “Oh, sorry!” afterwards.

I finally lost my cool at Kim once when she was snarky to me in front of the kids. I told her to not talk to me like that in front of the kids, and she was instantly apologetic. This led to discussions about how I was already on edge around her because of the touchy-feely stuff, which segued into discussions of “keep your hands off other people because it’s not appropriate.” This was two months ago.

But at an event this weekend, she was rubbing my son’s head and was stroking my arm a different time. Both things were done, and then it was ‘Oh, sorry’. And of course, everything happens in a public place, where if you say anything, you are the one who is making a scene. She seems like the victim because hey, she’s apologizing, right? She still is touchy-feely, but now just makes a big production of the apologies, which are just downright uncomfortable. And really, what is a child going to say? He’s not going to say, “That made me uncomfortable/I didn’t like it/don’t do it again.” He’s going to say, “It’s okay” or something like that, because he’s a child and he doesn’t have those confrontation social skills, and she’s the authority figure. So it seems like she’s cashing in the situational aspect to get whatever pleasure she gets out of being so touchy-feely. I’m in serious danger of losing my cool again when she comes up with one of her apologies again, because it’s to the point that if she was truly sorry about it, it wouldn’t still be happening. She would have fixed her behavior already. I don’t care how ingrained it is…if THAT many people have commented on it negatively in the span of a year, then you need to do what you can to change it. Sorry doesn’t cut it anymore.

At this point, I don’t know what to do. And it’s all very small things, if you isolate them, so I worry about sounding like I’m making a mountain out of a molehill, or like I have a vendetta against her. I don’t want someone to say, “Oh, she touches you too much? Yeah, right. Drama queen.” But it’s the frequency. It’s the fact that people have said they don’t like it or it’s not appropriate, and she still does it anyway.

Should I be more blunt with Kim? Should I resort to filing a written complaint? I honestly don’t want to make things difficult for anyone. But I want her to stop. I don’t want to have to worry about being caressed by this person randomly, and I don’t want to have to worry about if she’s making the kids uncomfortable. And I really do not want some of this to be seen by others and have her actions negatively affect our organization as a whole. I love what I do, but I am to the point where I’m seriously considering not coming back for the next school year if she is still there.

Wow.

Like you, I don’t buy that someone can’t control this behavior when they’ve been asked multiple times to stop. She either doesn’t take it seriously or doesn’t want to, but either way, it’s unacceptable.

It’s even worse that kids are involved, and it’s pretty outrageous that your manager isn’t even moved by that element to put a stop to it.

You did a good job of capturing the dynamics that allow boundary-violators to continue: You feel like you’ll be the one making a scene, and that it’ll seem petty to people who only see the current incident and don’t know about the whole year-long backdrop of groping and stroking and the repeated requests that she stop.

Here’s the thing though: To get her to stop, I think you’re going to have to push through those worries, stop caring if you make a scene, and … well, make one. The next time she touches you, take a step back and say, “I’ve asked you TO STOP TOUCHING ME.”

Will you look rude to those who don’t know the back story? Maybe. But (a) it’s going to be pretty clear to most people that this didn’t come out of the blue, and (b) it sounds like the people who will be around are people who have witnessed/been subject to Kim’s aggressive unwanted touching in the past. They’ll probably be glad that someone is calling it out.

It does require being willing to be far more direct and aggressive than you’d normally be. But similar to yesterday’s post about an awful coworker, that’s on her, not you — she’s the one who’s ignored your repeated, polite requests to stop, and this is what happens to people who do that. She is the cause of the discomfort, not you. You’re just protecting your entirely reasonable boundaries, which she keeps violating — and knows she’s violating.

I’d also suggest another conversation with her about the pattern, not just addressing it incident by incident: “I’ve told you repeatedly that I don’t want you to keep touching me or the kids. It’s continuing to happen. It’s unwelcome. Touching someone after you’ve been clearly told to stop is a pretty big deal. I’m not interested in an apology; I need it to stop. What needs to happen so that this stops?”

You might be tempted to smile or otherwise soften this when you say it. Don’t. She’s allowing herself to believe that this isn’t that big of a deal, and softening the message will reinforce that.

Also, can you talk to someone other than your supervisor, someone higher up? Frankly, it’s appalling that your supervisor isn’t handling this more assertively, and I have to think that someone above her might be more inclined to put the kibosh on this if they heard about it.

Read multiple updates to this letter here.

being told to sleep on a couch on a business trip, unsolicited sales pitches, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Being made to sleep on a couch on a business trip

My husband is on a business trip at the moment. He told me they are having him sleep on a couch for this trip. He works 12-hour shifts, at night, and is expected to sleep on the couch during the day! Is this a reasonable accommodation for the company to provide for him?

What! No.

It’s not illegal, but it’s wildly unreasonable. He should say this to them: “Sleeping on a couch isn’t an option for me; I won’t sleep well and be rested enough to work. How can I make arrangements for the company to get a hotel room?”

2. My company messed up my pay and doesn’t want me to tell anyone

Yesterday, I was called into the HR benefits coordinator’s office. Apparently, there had been a mistake in Accounting over the span of about 5 months, and I was being overpaid about $9,000. It had to do with the time that merit increases were taking place, and I wasn’t paying much attention to my bank account other than seeing that a check had deposited (I’ve been beating myself up over not being more vigilant).

She apologized on behalf of HR and Accounting, and wants to meet with me later this week to hash out details of repayment. Then, she told me that the conversation was only to be between her, Accounting, and myself, and to not talk to anyone about the overpayment/repayment.

Should she have told me not to talk about it? What rights do employers and employees have when dealing with an overpayment of this size? I felt kinda weird that she didn’t want me to say anything to anyone at all. It’s possible she meant don’t tell everyone what happened, but she didn’t say that, only to not talk about it at all.

Obviously, $9,000 is a huge chunk of change and it’s going to affect my living situation for the rest of 2015. She mentioned a payment plan that would go to the end of the year- even this is about $1,000 a month. I really want to talk to my supervisor and bring her in the loop – my manager is someone that I could trust to go to bat for me if need be and bounce ideas off of.

The National Labor Relations Act forbids employers from preventing employees from discussing wages and working conditions with each other; a request to keep this secret sounds like it would probably violate that law (I’m guessing though; you’d need a lawyer to tell you for sure). But I wouldn’t start there — I’d just say, “Can I ask you about why you asked me not to mention this to anyone? At a minimum, I’d like Manager to be in the loop about this, and was curious about the request more generally as well.”

Regardless of their answer, it’s totally reasonable to bring your manager into the loop here. If they balk at that, I’d just say, “I do feel that I need to bring her into the loop” and hold firm.

By the way, it’s also totally reasonable to say that you can’t swing payments of that size and they need to be lower, and see what they say. They might not agree to it — ultimately the law says that you do owe them that money — but they also might and it’s reasonable to try.

3. Do I have to respond to unsolicited sales pitches?

I have a question about what the etiquette/obligation is in responding to unsolicited cold calls from vendors. I’m in a job where my name and email address are out there in a number of open places so that people can contact me for information; I also seem to have gotten onto a number of lists. I started getting cold emails that were structured like blast emails. That’s totally fine – we all know you don’t have to respond to a blast email, and I’m not opposed to hearing from new businesses or potential vendors. But these days I seem to be getting a lot more solicitations, and they often look like personal messages, even though I’m sure many of them aren’t. I also sometimes get follow-ups from these people and phone messages. Sometimes they are related to my work, but often they are not, and they ask me to forward them to someone in the company who would be more suited.

I know it seems like a small thing, but it feels like such an intrusion on my time, especially when companies I have never heard of contact me more than once selling services that have nothing to do with me. It feels like they want to get their foot in the door at my company in any way possible, so they intrude on my time even though they know I’m not the right contact. I’d actually be more receptive if their tactic was blast email, because they wouldn’t be presuming a personal relationship with me, and I could at least unsubscribe. It’s hard enough for me to get everything done, and I already handle a large amount of email inquiries I’m expected to respond to within 24 hours. Do I have to reply to these unsolicited messages? Return the calls? Can I mark them as spam and be done with it since we have no prior relationship, or do I owe them some kind of response, even if it’s a “No, thank you”?

Nope. You’re under no obligation to respond to sales pitches, even when people specifically ask you to respond. These aren’t social requests (where you would have an obligation to get back to them); these are attempts to get your business, and the rules for that are different. You can delete and ignore without guilt. That’s what most people are doing :)

That said, for the ones that are clearly someone else’s purview, you might ask that person if they want you to forward them the messages. That person will almost surely say absolutely not, but it’s worth checking if you’re not sure.

4. Can my resume include programs that I did as a teenager?

I graduated from college five years ago and been working with the same company ever since. I’m ready to move on and I need to tweak my resume.

When I was a teenager (ages 13-17), I was a cadet in the Civil Air Patrol (auxiliary of the air force), where we learned aerospace education as well as leadership. I also attended boat camp from age 12-14, where we made canoes from scratch.

I’ve left these programs out of my resume for years. In looking at my resume, I felt like I didn’t have much experience since I’ve been with the same company. I wanted to know how I could incorporate these programs into my resume or if it isn’t necessary?

You really can’t include anything from before college, unless it was truly extraordinary — like you started a successful company or something like that. So no, but those programs both sound really cool.

5. Listing contract, temp, and freelance work as “Your Name Consulting”

Yesterday I read an article on how to present contract, temp, and freelance work on your resume. The article stated to describe it as “your consulting firm,” like “Jane Doe Consulting.” The article went on to explain how/why this way looks better than listing your freelance or temp work. I thought this was great advice! (I’ve been with a temp company just over a year, and I’ve worked in the past as an independent contractor.) But I’m no expert. What are your thoughts? Are there any pitfalls to this?

If you’re truly doing consulting, it’s reasonable to call it Your Name Consulting. But if you’re doing temp work, that’s not really consulting; it’s temp work. You can, however, group temp work all under one heading so that it’s not a zillion different job listings.

As for whether it helps to do it, not really. It’s a common thing for people to do when they’ve been working for themselves, but it doesn’t really help or hurt. It doesn’t read all that differently than if they’d simply labeled that section Freelance Consulting Work or something like that. What a good hiring manager cares about is the work you did, not how you label it.

since I gave notice at work, my boss has tripled my workload

A reader writes:

At the beginning of the year, I gave notice at my current position. The decision was necessary due to severe burnout issues (to the point where I have been having anxiety attacks) and a terrible boss who, despite 6+ months of repeated, documented conversations about my burnout levels, only continued to increase my workload, micromanage my every move and consistently make everything as personal as possible.

My end date is March 6. This is not a job where a transition of workflow could happen with 2 weeks notice, as there is no one internally to take on any of my work (every time I have taken PTO, I have had to hire someone to be on call while I was away, or be on call myself).

Ever since I gave notice, demand on me has tripled. I am being asked to complete projects that normally would not be addressed till after I depart. I want to do my best to make this a smooth transition and leave things in good shape, but I just can’t accomplish everything I’m being asked to. When I say that, I’m ignored. My overall job performance is suffering as the burnout increases. It feels like a never-ending cycle. How do I survive the last few weeks?

Also, what advice do you have for interviewing for jobs with this level of burnout? I try to hide it as best I can, but this level of stress has had physical manifestation–“worn down” has come up more than once about my appearance. I worry that when I have been interviewing, I am not effectively hiding the burnout, which surely isn’t attractive to hiring managers.

You had to hire someone to be on call in order to take vacation? With your own money? I’m hoping that you mean that the company hired someone to be on call, and you were the one who arranged it, which isn’t unreasonable. But if you actually mean you yourself had to pay to hire someone so that you could take vacation time, we have a whole different letter to answer here. For the purposes of answering your questions here, I’m going to assume that’s not the case, lest my head explode before I can give you a useful answer.

So here’s the deal: You’re not an indentured servant. You’re not required to work around the clock, or even beyond normal working hours now that you’ve given notice. You might have been required to work insane hours to keep your job earlier (although often there’s a way to push back on that too), but certainly now that you’ve given notice, there’s zero need for you to do that. In fact, you hold the cards here — you’re the one who’s walking away, after all. They don’t have much to hold over you at this point.

Say this to your manager: “You’ve asked me to do X, Y, and Z before I leave. I’ll only have time to do about half of that. I could do X and some of Y, or I could do all of Y and some of Z. Doing it all in four weeks isn’t possible. I’m going to plan to do ___ unless you’d like me to prioritize differently.”

If your boss tells you that you have to do all of it, then you say, “I have four weeks remaining. That’s 160 hours, which is far less than would be needed to do all of this. I want to help you have a smooth transition, but I can’t be working around the clock during these last few weeks. I can do ___ or ___ but not all of it. If you’d like to tell me what order to tackle it in, I can do that. Otherwise I’ll just do as much as I can before I go, but I want you to know that there isn’t time to do all of it.”

Also! You don’t have to stay for the full remaining month if they mistreat you. If they’re rude or hostile to you, you get to say this: “I’d like to work on a smooth transition, but it’s clear that you’re upset with me. I think it would make sense to move my ending date up to ___.” (Ideally you’d still give two weeks from this point so that they can’t later claim that you walked off the job … but that also depends on how rude they’re being. There’s a certain level of rudeness where it’s reasonable to leave earlier. More on that here.)

Also! If this job is truly affecting your health (and it sounds like it might be), you can reconsider the amount of notice you’re giving. You’d say something like this: “I’m so sorry about this, but I have some health issues that I need to take care of and I’ll need to move my ending date up. I’ll need my last day to be ___.”

You sound like you don’t want to do that because there’s no one to cover your work if you leave. But that’s not your problem. That’s your company’s problem, and they’ll figure out a way to deal with it. They’re not going to fall apart (and if they do, that’s not because of you — that would be the sign of some serious mismanagement that you can’t ameliorate anyway). Your obligations here are to give notice and work a reasonable number of hours in good faith until you leave. Your obligations are not to extend your notice at the expense of your mental health or to work unreasonable hours just because they want you to.

And if you can, I’d get yourself some distance from this job before actively interviewing for another. Take a week or two off and relax and recharge; don’t try to perform well in interviews in the middle of all of this, when you can tell that you’re not at your best.

Read an update to this letter here.

can introverts and extroverts work together happily?

Introverts: How often are you annoyed by too much noise and talking from extroverts at work?

Extroverts: Do introverted coworkers come across as chilly or aloof to you?

I know none of you have strong opinions on this (cough).

Most work groups will have a mix of introverts and extroverts in them, and their differing work styles can cause conflict or frustration if not managed well.< Extroverts, after all, tend to engage in more social interaction at work, and often prefer or even need to talk through ideas and processes in order to be their most productive. Introverts, on the other hand, often prefer to work in relative quiet without interruptions and can have trouble focusing when there’s constant conversation around them. Extraverts can easily annoy introverts by too much noise and talking, and introverts can come across to extraverts as chilly or aloof. These differences can affect both job satisfaction and productivity. If you’ve got a team full of extroverts and one or two introverts, those introverts can end up with nowhere quiet to focus and feeling drained by interruptions or noise around them. Alternately, if introverts dominate on your team, the extroverts who find themselves in the minority might feel isolated and have their own troubles being productive if they get more done when they’re able to talk things out and bounce ideas off of other people. So when you’re managing a team with mixed work styles, how do you resolve conflicts between introverts’ need for quiet and focus and extroverts’ need for talking and collaboration?  Here are five compromises that will let everyone,  regardless of where they fall on the introvert/extrovert scale, be reasonably comfortable and productive. 1. Cultivate an office-wide awareness of different working styles. Openly acknowledging differing preferences along the introversion/extroversion scale is an essential step to figuring out solutions that will work. If introverts come to understand that extroverts are often more productive through conversation, and extroverts come to understand that introverts aren’t freezing them out when they put on headphones and keep their heads down, you’re more likely to find compromises people are happy with.

2. Zone your office space for different work styles. Designate some space for conversations and groups working together where people can make noise without guilt, and designate other spaces “quiet space.” If you can, let people choose where they work, and let people move from one to the other as their work needs dictate. You don’t need to revamp your entire physical space, but simply having some quiet conference rooms (and encouraging people to use them when they need quiet space to focus) can go a long way.

3. If your space is limited, encourage people to go off-site when they need quiet or interaction. If you don’t have spare conference rooms to zone for these uses, encourage people to go off-site when they need to. If their roles allow it, your introverts might be thrilled to work from home or a coffee shop when they particularly need to focus. And your extroverts might love the idea of holding a group brainstorm at the pizza shop next door.

4. Consider having set “quiet hours” each day, where any noisy activities take place in rooms with closed doors.Otherwise, introverts may end up feeling like they’re always having to flee shared space if they need to concentrate in a quiet area. This is something you can do team-wide if people like the idea, or it might just be a solution for an otherwise mismatched pair who share an office to implement on their own.

You can balance that with “noisy hours” too if there’s a need for it!

5. Make “let’s take this to a meeting room” a standard phrase in your culture. Create a norm on your team where after a certain amount of time, a conversation is deemed a “meeting” and moves to a more appropriate location (like a conference room). This will allow extroverts to keep having the discussions they may need to work effectively, but without creating ongoing distractions for those who need a quieter space to work.

my coworker writes a mean blog about me

A reader writes:

I have a work colleague we’ll call J. J and I sit next to each other and have been friendly the entire time we worked together. She has told me about things in her personal life (recent loss of a beloved pet, for instance) and I’ve shared the same type of stuff with her.

A couple days ago, J showed me something she’d re-blogged (some animated gif that we both thought was funny), and I happened to notice the URL of her blog. I looked up her blog and started reading it; I didn’t think I was being out of line since she’d showed me the page already.

Then I found a very recent post where she made fun of me for starting a cleanse. I was hurt, but I was even more hurt to find that her followers were urging her on to create a blog devoted to my “ridiculousness”. Apparently she posts about me on her blog a lot (12 posts in the past 3 weeks) and the things she writes are very unkind.

Now I’m at a loss as to what to do. I know that the best option is to let this go, back away from the “friendship” gracefully and not read the blog again. But the extent to which she has posted about me is pretty startling. Worst of all – she’s recently posted (within the last couple weeks) a conversation we had about our boss, who had to go home for medical reasons. J kept insisting it was because of prescription drug overdose, and I tried to stop the conversation by saying “I think it’s a medical issue” (basically, saying – it’s private and using my tone to indicate I didn’t want to talk about it). But now it’s on this blog – and it looks like I was participating in gossip.

It’s not difficult to find her blog at all, and based on personal information she shares, it’s not difficult to identify her or the (small) company that we both work for. Aside from my own anger and hurt over what I’ve found, the things she posts about could be potentially embarrassing for our employer.

At a minimum, I’d really like her to take the post about our boss down, but I don’t know how to broach this topic without blowing things up radically. It’s possible, but not super likely, that I could have stumbled upon the blogs through other means. Do you have any suggestions about how to tackle this diplomatically? Am I being unreasonably sensitive about things she posted in her personal blog (that was probably never meant for me to see)?

J. sounds like a jerk.

I don’t think you’re being unreasonably sensitive. Your coworker, who you thought you had a warm relationship with, is mocking you to strangers, repeatedly. That’s horrible.

I’d say something like this her: “This is awkward to bring up, but I read some of the blog posts you’ve written about me and others in the office, like the one about my cleanse. I was pretty taken aback — I didn’t realize that you felt like that, and I felt pretty awful seeing the things your followers were saying.”

Then stop and see what she says. If she has any sense at all, she’s going to be mortified. She might tell you that she just does it to blow off steam, or that she doesn’t really mean what she posts there. To anything like that, or any kind of defensiveness, I’d just respond, “Well, it was pretty upsetting to see.”

Because it was upsetting, and that’s a reasonable reaction, and it’s reasonable to tell her that so that she’s face-to-face with the consequences of writing mean things about people online.

And if she asks you how you found it, I’d just be straightforward: “You showed me something you’d re-blogged from it, and I was interested to read your writing.”

There’s a good chance that she’s going to take all those posts down now after that conversation (or possibly make the blog private, if that’s an option). It would take some serious gall to leave them up. But if she doesn’t or if you don’t want to wait and see if she does, it’s reasonable to say, “I’d appreciate it if you’d remove those posts about me” and/or “I really think you should remove the post about Boss” and/or “For what it’s worth, I think the company would be concerned if they ever came across it, especially since it’s not hard to identify who you work for.” But that’s really about saving her from herself, and you’re not obligated to do that if you don’t want to get into that level of discussion with her.

Also: This is going to be an uncomfortable conversation, but it’s important to remember that she created the discomfort here, not you. The reason the conversation is going to be uncomfortable is because of her actions, not yours in addressing them.

should I warn my staff about a drug’s mood-altering side effects, getting paid for freelance work that wasn’t completed, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Should I warn my staff about a medication’s mood-altering side effects?

I manage a small department of 3, all of whom work very well together and with me. Whenever I’m in a cranky mood or just stressed out, I do my best to keep it off my staff. Methods usually include shutting my door, asking for particular topics to be discussed at a later time whenever it’s feasible, etc. I recognize that my moods impact my staff.

I am on an anti-depressant for anxiety, and my doctor recently upped my dosage. I am encountering a new side effect where my emotions are more intense. Whether it’s happy, sad, angry, excited, etc (but not to the point where I’m flying into a rage, thank goodness) The meds are doing their job, i.e. I am not an anxious mess, so I am hesitant to come off the drug because of this new side effect.

Is this something I could discreetly let my staff know? I work very closely with them, so it’s not as if I only check in a couple times a week so it wouldn’t matter. I try to be very cognizant of TMI and where to draw the line. This sprung to mind after last week where my reaction to something unpleasant was more intense than usual. I apologized to the employee later, as I could tell he was slightly startled. Or would it be better to just apologize in the moment as I done last week?

I’m slightly torn on this. I do think that it’s TMI to share that with your staff, and ultimately it’s on you to find a way to respond appropriately to staff members regardless; you really have to do that as a manager, and can’t resign yourself to not being able to. But on the other hand, if I were your employee, I might rather know what was up than assume that you were increasingly frustrated with me. I could also see feeling uncomfortable once I knew though.

But ultimately (that bit of wishy-washiness aside), I don’t think the solution here is tell/don’t tell; rather, I think you’ve got to find a way to interact with your staff reasonably calmly. You’re in a position of power over them and your moods will have more impact on them than if you weren’t, and so there’s a greater responsibility to manage those moods than there might otherwise be. That probably means that you do need to try talking to your doctor about the side effects you’re experiencing, because you’re in a role where it could have a real impact.

Read an update to this letter here.

2. Should I get paid for freelance work that wasn’t completed?

Recently I was contacted by a new client (through an online tutor-student broker company that I’ve worked with for several years) who wanted me to deliver PowerPoint training for several people in his company. We had a couple of conference calls with another person at his firm to talk about the details of the training, and I had started working on the content. I spent about 5-6 hours on the project so far. They seemed very happy with my plan for the training, and it was scheduled for a couple of weeks from now. I got an email a few days ago saying that someone in their office is going to train their people on PowerPoint, but they want me to teach an Excel class for them in a couple of months.

Should I ask them to pay for the time I already spent on the PowerPoint project? On the one hand, I don’t like not being paid for my work, but on the other hand, there was no agreement that they would pay for my time whether or not the training went ahead. Also, I want to do more work for them in the future. I’m also wondering if I should let future clients know that there’s a cancellation fee if a project is started but not completed.

Yes, absolutely. You started work on the project after they gave you the go-ahead, and they should pay you for that time. You weren’t putting in that time out of the goodness of your heart; you were doing it because they hired you to do it.

Ideally as soon as they canceled the project, you would have said something like, “I had done X hours of work on this so far so I’ll submit an invoice for that and won’t do any further work on it.” (You can still say that now, of course.) Also, yes, it’s a good idea to note in your contracts that you’ll still bill for your time if a project is canceled before completion.

This is totally normal and standard, by the way, so you shouldn’t worry that it will get in the way of getting future work from them. I mean, that’s always possible, but it would be incredibly odd for them to balk at this; a good client isn’t going to do that.

3. How to explain I got fired for refusing to do something unethical

I got fired today for what is a kind of dumb reason (refusing to do something that I found to be unethical). My boss asked me to add the email addresses of people contacted by cold calling to email lists without having them consent first. I explained to him why this was a bad idea, but he ignored my reasons and insisted that I do so. I set up an email autoresponder to gain that consent and to explain the expectations of what we’d be sending people, and when asked about it, I said that I did so. And thus got fired for “insubordination.”

When applying for new employment, what’s a good way to say, “I got fired because I worked for a crazy person who assumed I was an idiot, and when he demanded that I do something unethical, I did not do it”? I know this isn’t on the order of “creative accounting” or any other blantantly illegal practices. It’s kind of small potatoes and I was definitely wrong. But I will say that he’s also a terrible boss who manages through fear and paranoia, and might be clinically insane. I want a good way to not necessarily absolve myself of blame, but to point out that I was in a bad situation and that this guy is nuts. There may not be a good way to do that.

I’d frame it this way: “My boss wanted to ignore the anti-spam emailing laws and fired me after I attempted to get people’s consent before adding them to our email list.” That’s honest and concise and doesn’t get into whether or not your boss is crazy or a terrible manager, all of which are too subjective when talking to a stranger who will be acutely aware that they don’t know the other side of the story. Short, professional, and factual is what you want here.

4. Checking about pre-scheduled vacation time when applying internally

There is a job posting for a position that is almost in complete alignment with my interests and skills in another part of my organization. I asked to be put on a specific project so I could work with this subject. The project culminates in July (my part will have been complete for a while at this point), and it would be a busy time for the people in the other department. The problem is that I have scheduled a vacation for the month of July. My family is going to Europe, and the tickets are purchased. Because this is within the same company, I would still have the vacation accrued, so that isn’t an issue. Would it be out of line to reach out to the hiring manager before I even apply to see if this would be a deal breaker?

No, but it’s probably unnecessary. Apply, see if you get interviewed, and if things progress beyond that, you can raise it then.

5. Am I being overly neurotic in waiting to tell people about my new job?

I have a written offer letter for my new role with all the details, have confirmed my start date, and they have confirmed that my references are in order. I have given notice at my current job, but have been waiting to tell people (my colleagues, other industry contacts) until I have an actual written contract in my hands. Am I being overly neurotic? My new job says they might not be able to get me a contract for a couple of weeks (I don’t start for 8 weeks) and it’s getting weird that I’ve resigned but haven’t told anyone.

What’s your guidance? Should I stop worrying and just tell people already?

I don’t think it’s crazy to wait until you have the written contract, if you’re more comfortable with that. If anyone asks you later why you didn’t tell them sooner, you can always just explain you were waiting for the contract to be finalized.

can you negotiate salary even if the job ad listed a set number?

This came up in the comments last week, and I thought it was worth addressing it as its own post:

Can you negotiate salary for roles where there’s a set number listed as the wage/salary – e.g., “$20/hr, 15 hours/week” (or whatever). I’ve seen that and felt weird about the idea of saying, “Actually, can you give me $22?” but I don’t want to lowball myself, either.

You can still try to negotiate even in that situation. It’s not outrageous to to see if they have flexibility.

The key is to approach it with an understanding that the employer did list a range up-front; you want to make sure that you’re not using wording that sounds like you missed the salary info at the start. For example, if they offered you something in the range that was posted in the ad (or otherwise discussed earlier), you wouldn’t want to sound disappointed and say that you were hoping for $X instead, because that wouldn’t make sense under the circumstances. But it would be reasonable (in some cases) to say, “Do you have any flexibility on that? Based on what I’ve learned about the range of responsibilities and the fact that I bring Extra Impressive Skill X, I was hoping you might be able to do $Y instead.”

Also, you want to be sure you’re not asking for something wildly outside the range they listed. That’s going to sound out of touch, and it’s likely to exasperate and annoy the employer, who will wonder why you used up their time in interviews if you knew all along that you were so far apart on salary.

But your example, it wouldn’t be unreasonable to wait until you get an offer and then say something like, “I saw that you posted the job at $20/hour. Do you have any flexibility on that? I’m hoping you might be able to do $22.”

They may or may not say yes — but it’s not a risky or outrageous thing to ask.