what’s different about job searching in 2015

If you’re starting a job search this year and haven’t been on the market for a while, you might be surprised by how the job market and typical hiring processes have changed in recent years. Part of this is a function of how the economy has led to more job seekers than there are jobs, part is attributable to changes in technology, and some is simply changing norms of what a good hiring process entails. Regardless, it’s a different world for job seekers than it was a decade ago.

Here’s what you need to know about job searching in 2015.

1. It will take longer than you think. Employers who move quick and wrap up hiring processes in a few weeks are becoming a rarity; increasingly employers are stretching out the interview process and the overall time it takes to hire a new employee. Many employers are adding additional steps to their hiring process, including multiple interview rounds where candidates meet with multiple decision-makers and others who have input into the process. And the time between steps and the time it takes to make a decision once interviews are over can be substantial. Some job seekers report hiring processes that stretch on for four or more months before a hire is made.

What’s more, employers’ own estimates of how long their hiring process will take are often off. It’s not uncommon for an interviewer to tell a candidate that the process is moving quickly, the company feels urgency around filling the position, and a decision will be made within a week, only for the process to drag on for months longer.

2. Simply being qualified won’t get you an interview. Employers these days are often inundated with applications for loads of qualified candidates, far too many to interview. That means that many, many qualified candidates don’t even get interviews. For job seekers, this means that it’s not enough just to show that you meet the posted qualifications for the job; you need to show that you’d excel at it. It’s more important than ever to write a compelling cover letter, have a strong resume that shows a clear track record of achievement and demonstrates your success in the key areas that the employer is seeking, and use your network in any way you can.

3. Employers are increasingly relying on online applications, to the detriment of job seekers. While plenty of employers still direct candidates to apply by emailing a resume and cover letter, there’s a growing move to electronic application systems, which require you to fill out often lengthy online forms, divulging everything from your salary history to your social security number to references’ contact information before you even get a phone screen. These forms can take significant amounts of time, and often put job-seekers in uncomfortable positions, by preventing them from even applying if they don’t answer multiple invasive questions up-front.

4. It’s tough to change fields. The job market continues to be a difficult one for people trying to change fields, since selling your skills as transferable can be an uphill battle when you’re up against plenty of candidates who won’t require any training or ramp-up time. There’s little incentive for employers to take a risk on field-changers, or to figure out how skills from one field might translate to another one. That doesn’t mean it’s impossible to do, but if you’re hoping to change fields, it’s smart to brace yourself for a longer search and do anything you can to get experience in the new field (volunteering can be one good way to do that).

5. You may be asked to demonstrate your work in action. Employers are increasingly testing candidates’ abilities through things like writing tests, skills assessments, problem-solving simulations, role plays, or creating mock work plans. These requests are reasonable and useful as long as they don’t take a significant amount of time – but some employers push the boundaries of what’s reasonable. Spending one to hours on an exercise to demonstrate how you’d approach the job is reasonable; being asked to provide a full day of free work or to create work that the employer will actually use is not.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

I was promoted without warning in an all-staff meeting, how to explain a firing when interviewing, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. I was promoted without warning in an all-staff meeting

I’ve been promoted twice in the past 8 months. The first time it was pretty standard fare — I was promoted in a meeting with my manager and his manager, I negotiated for a raise (probably not as hard as I should have, but some) and moved on. Then I, along with another colleague, was promoted a few days ago with no warning at all, in an all-staff meeting.

Putting aside the ethics of them promoting us in public without advanced notice, I’m wondering about if and how I can ask for another raise. I know that I’m making less than some colleagues with my former title (my manager’s manager told me so directly, and gave me advice on negotiating for the future) so I do think I should get a raise, but given that I got a 10% raise less than a year ago and a big end of year bonus, it feels inappropriate to ask again. Any advice?

If they’re promoting you to a new role with more responsibility*, it’s absolutely reasonable to renegotiate salary at the same time. The fact that you got a raise less than a year ago and a big year-end bonus doesn’t come into play here now; that was compensation for your old position. I’d approach your boss and say something like this, “Since I’m taking on a new role and increased responsibilities, I wanted to talk with you about the salary. What did you have in mind for the position?”

* The exception here is if it’s not a promotion in the “new role/new responsibilities” sense. If the change is more about the title and not the work (like getting a title bump from Teapot Maker to Senior Teapot Maker with no change in actual work), then it’s harder to justify an increase.

2. How to explain a firing when interviewing

I was fired from my last job for breach of confidentiality. When I asked my employment counselor how I should approach the “Why did you leave X company?” question in an interview, she suggested that I stick with a generic answer such as, “We were going in different directions.” In all honesty, we were and I suspect that had a lot to do with my termination, but I feel like that is lying. The fact that I feel nervous to say that and then have a potential employer find out the exact reason is a pretty clear indication to me that it would be wrong to use that explanation in the first place.

I am not thrilled about having to tell a prospective employer why I was let go, but I’m also not that person who lies or dances around the truth. I’m human, I made a mistake, and I genuinely feel like honesty really is the best policy. Anything but that would make me feel like I can’t be trusted because I wasn’t open about it in the first place. What would be your advice on how to handle this in an interview?

My first advice is to get a different employment counselor because your current one doesn’t understand anything about how interviewers think. If your answer is “we were going in different directions,” your interviewer is going to question you about what that means and what the nature of the parting actually was (voluntary or a firing); she’s not going to just accept that initial vague answer and move on to the next question. Moreover, when the employer checks your references, she’s likely to discover the truth, and the lying is going to be more of a deal-breaker than the fact you were fired. So get rid of that counselor.

Anyway, as for what to say, your instinct to be honest is the right one. Keep it brief and don’t sound defensive, but a clear, non-defensive, non-obfuscatory statement of what happened and what you’ve learned from it is going to serve you best. I have more detailed advice here.

3. Interviewing when I’m happy at my current job

For the first time in my career, I’m being recruited by an exciting new company with a lot of potential, and I wasn’t looking at all. I enjoy the work I do, the people I work with, and heck, I’m even getting strong recognition from my manager. My current company is also exciting, with a lot of potential.

After a few email exchanges, I spoke to the recruiter, and she was essentially selling her company to me. We now have an interview set up during the time she’s in my area, and I’m not sure how this all works from this point. The only other time I’ve interviewed for positions, I’ve been actively looking and wanting a change. Now, I’m happy where I am, but open to at least knowing more about the opportunity. I was very honest with the recruiter, letting her know exactly that, and she still wants to move forward. What’s your best advice for approaching an interview, being in the position I’m in? The job would be a lateral move, although I think the work would be structured differently.

It’s fine be straightforward about what you said here: You’re happy in your current role and not actively looking, but open to hearing about other jobs. You don’t need to hide that or pretend you’re eagerly looking. In fact, candidates are often the most attractive when they’re in your position.

That said, I’d be really cautious about leaving a job you really love for a lateral move. It can be hard to find a job, boss, and coworkers you like, and I’m not sure I’d leave that without the move being a significant step up.

Read an update to this letter here.

4. My boss wants me to work a double shift while I should be sleeping

Is there a tactful way to tell your boss that you can not fill in for another shift? Specifically the one that happens when you’re usually asleep? I work the late afternoon to middle of the night shift on weekends. Someone on the morning shift that starts three hours after I leave has had an emergency and I may be scheduled to fill in, in addition to my regular shift. I’ve looked and learned that there are no laws that say there’s a minimum time required between shifts, but common sense suggests time to sleep. Would it be reasonable to point out that this would have me on the road driving when my body is usually asleep and will be begging for it if I have to do this?

Absolutely reasonable. More than reasonable. Your boss just might not have thought this through, and it might be as simple as speaking up: “I’d be glad to cover for Jane while she’s out but I can’t work two shifts in a row when they cover the time I’d normally be sleeping; I wouldn’t trust myself to drive safely afterwards. Would you rather me take her shift and have someone else cover mine, or just stick with mine and have someone else cover for her?”

5. Putting roller derby coaching on my resume

I’m trying to update my resume. I also am a coach for my roller derby league two days a week — I come up with lesson plans, work one-on-one and in groups to help students learn new skills, coordinate with coaches who teach different levels to make sure that our practices flow together, etc. It’s a lot of work, and a lot of organization, and I’d like to put it on my resume.

Is that inappropriate? I’m not paid for it, so it’s not a job, but it does showcase my organizational and people skills pretty well. The jobs I’m applying to — mostly administrative assistant and personal assistant jobs — require both, so I feel like it’s relevant.

It’s not inappropriate at all. I’d put it in a separate section (volunteer work or community involvement or something like that), and call out the specific activities that you mention here so that someone unfamiliar with roller derby can picture what you’re doing and see how it might translate.

weekend free-for-all – February 7-8, 2015

NightThis comment section is open for any non-work-related discussion you’d like to have with other readers, by popular demand. (This one is truly non-work only; if you have a work question, you can email it to me or post it in the work-related open thread on Fridays.)

Book Recommendation of the Week:
You must read The History of Love by Nicole Krauss immediately. It’s beautiful and engrossing and charming and wonderful.

* I make a commission if you use that Amazon link.

will blending my name with my fiance’s hurt my career, breaking bad news to someone who’s helped me, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Will combining my and my fiance’s last names into a single, blended name hurt my career?

I’m going to marry this year. I know you have written in the past about professional women changing their names, and I’m very new in my career so I don’t think I will be impacted by a name change, but my fiance and I are thinking about combining our names into a new, single word name (like if Sansa Stark and Tyrion Lannister became Tyrion and Sansa Starrister). Does this have any more potential to backfire than a normal name change– especially in more conservative circles where it might seem silly or feminist? (It is feminist, but I don’t want that to hurt my career.)

It might feel like an exotic choice to some people, but as long as you’re matter of fact about it, people aren’t likely to dwell on it terribly long. If anyone hassles you about it, you can respond with a bland “It felt like the best choice to us” and then move the conversation along. And even if you encounter a few pearl-clutchers, it’s unlikely to impact your career.

2. How can I tell someone who’s helped me that I’m taking a job with a competitor?

I recently moved back to my hometown, which is relatively small (50,000 people) with my partner to save money towards our own business. There’s a big company here with many different shareholders who all have different stakes in restaurants and bars. I was offered casual work by one shareholder until something else came up; at the time, I didn’t realize that despite being under the same umbrella company, all of these people are fiercely competitive.

I’ve since been offered a full-time position with this shareholder but I turned it down as I didn’t enjoy my trial there. Despite this, the shareholder is still very keen to keep me on board at her three businesses and wants to find somewhere for me to slot in. Nothing in her portofolio is that suitable for me, however.

I’ve since been offered a position that I really want at one of her competitors who still works for the same umbrella company, who I’m meeting with next week. How on earth do I break it to this woman who’s given me casual work to tide me over and offered me full time work since that I don’t want, that I’ve chosen to go and work for a competing business?

To quote the Godfather, It’s business, not personal. (This is where I admit that my knowledge that that came from the Godfather actually comes from You’ve Got Mail.) You’re not abandoning a boyfriend for his best friend; you’re taking a job that you judge is best aligned with your interests.

So just be straightforward: “Jane, I really appreciate the help you’ve given me and your interest in finding me another role that might be a good fit. After giving it a lot of thought, I’ve accepted a job with X doing Y. I think that’s better aligned with what I want to do long-term, but I’m really grateful for how generous you’ve been to me.”

3. Can I ask my company’s external recruiter about other jobs?

I have developed a good relationship with a recruiter. I am this person’s client – she has filled many positions for me when I have openings on my team. She also has developed relationships with a couple other people in my company – and those people are senior to me.

I’m interested in potentially seeking out new career opportunities. I assume it would be a conflict of interest, potentially stupid, and wildly inappropriate to ask her about potential opportunities elsewhere. Am I correct in that assumption? Is there ever a time when something like this would be ok?

Would it be ok after I left the company I currently work for (be it the company’s choice, assuming it was on good terms, or my choice, again assuming it was on good terms)? Would it be ok if the recruiter did not have relationships with anyone else in my company?

Some companies have arrangements with their external recruiters that the recruiters won’t work to place any of their current employees somewhere else. Other companies don’t. But one thing that’s nearly universally true is that recruiters understand the importance of discretion, and that you could ask your recruiter about this directly. I’d say something like, “If I’m ever beginning to think about my next steps, would it be inappropriate for me to talk to you about that? I don’t want to create a conflict for you with Warbucks Corp., but you’re such a good recruiter that I’d love to work with you when that time comes.”

4. When to contact a helpful employer after a rejection

If you’ve had a couple interviews but did not go further in the selection process or were one of the final candidates but were not chosen, sometimes you get an especially nice email back from the employer and sometimes you don’t. But recently there were two instances where I was told I was a very good candidate or the employer stated they were “really impressed” with my skills. One employer gave me a personal cell number if I ever needed to call him to inquire about jobs.

I said I indeed would be interested in any new openings and thanked them both for the opportunity. One person said they’d contact me and another said I should contact them, but I’m unsure what the correct amount of time is in regards to getting in touch with the second person. Would it seem desperate to contact them just a week afterwards? There are tons of openings there, but I’m thinking maybe I should wait until the “right” one pops up so I don’t appear to be willing to do any job, that way I seem especially enthusiastic for the next one I interview for. What are your thoughts?

A week is waaaayyyy too soon, unless coincidentally there’s already another position that’s truly the perfect match for you. But it sounds like that’s not the case, so wait until something really is a strong match for you and contact them then.

5. A story of post-rejection feedback success

I’m a regular Ask a Manager reader and find it a very helpful resource in general, but I want to especially say thanks for the posts you’ve written on how to react to a job rejection.

I was turned down recently after a final interview for a position that I’d been very excited about. After moping around for a couple hours, I took your advice to reply and nicely ask for feedback. I used your past examples as a general guide (but just a guide! I wrote my own email, I promise!) and my interviewer replied with some very helpful, constructive feedback that clarified for me how I was coming across and how I could improve. She even shared books that had helped her when she was starting out in her career, which was just really, really nice of her. Not to mention useful–the books seem spot-on in terms of what I want to improve on.

Even though I knew I’d made a good impression/gotten along well with the team in the interviews, I don’t think I’d have felt confident enough to ask for feedback without seeing your posts and examples of how it can work out. Which I can now see would have been a wasted opportunity. So, like I said, thanks!

my boss has banned hot take-out food at lunch

A reader writes:

I work as an administrator in a sales office with a lot of unspoken rules, varying from black shirts being banned from the dress code (“it looks like you work in a phone shop”) to all staff must attend mandatory month-end events and splash a large amount of money on alcohol, despite different salary levels and commitments.

One of the new rules that have come into place is absolutely no hot take-away food. I can imagine this would work fantastically for an office surrounded by a variety of places to pick up less offensive, lack of greasy food. However we are essentially in the middle of nowhere. The closest places to grab lunch are a fish and chip shop, a “dirty chicken” shop (I wouldn’t even class it as food; it makes KFC look gourmet), and a butchers/sandwich shop that opens while we are not allowed to leave the office and closes before I can even step foot outside for my break. Anything that staff could get to with their vehicles would make them completely go over their allocated lunches and is a huge no-no in our company.

The reason for the rule is a combination of the director wanting a healthier office (he’s joined the gym and gotten a bit into shape) and wanting no offensive odors from takeaways. It’s started to border on bullying as one person who was absent last week popped out and picked up a breaded chicken wrap. The director saw the bag and well…went a bit mad to say the least. The rule was loudly reiterated and a few backhanded comments about rising obesity within the company.

A lot of people are very angry. A lot of staff feel very belittled and treated like children in regards to some of the rules already in place. I’m lucky in the sense that I have different hours from the rest of my colleagues (standard 9-5 job) so I have time to swing by a nice deli near my home before work.

A few things have cropped up:

* I’m seen as a voice on the shoulder to the managing director and unofficial HR, so a lot of the staff (even senior management!) are asking me to try and bring it up with him to persuade him to change his mind.

* Unofficially the idea is being thrown about by the managing director and senior management that I do a lunch-run before work, which I’m extremely unhappy about. I don’t drive so I’d have to struggle with 13+ people’s lunches on foot. A few colleagues who have excellent working relationships will on the odd occasion ask me to grab a couple of things, which I’m happy to do (and the favour is returned in and outside of work). There is an unspoken statement that hey, if I do it for those two people, why not the whole office?

What would you recommend as a diplomatic way to go about this? I can’t really put into words how angry this has made staff here. This new rule has tipped the scales and there is a lot of grumbling this morning. And it’s made me download a few cooking book apps for making my lunch before work!

It’s not crazy to have guidelines about particularly strong-smelling food, or eating in areas frequented by customers. But if he’s really just banning all hot take-out food because of his own desire to be healthier, that’s not really reasonable, especially in an office where your lunch options are as limited as you describe.

It sounds like your boss is confused about rules he’d like in place for himself (eating healthier) and what he can reasonably push on other people without being overbearing.

I think your best bet here is to talk to him as a group and explain that the rule is overly onerous — that the office is located in an area with limited lunch options and that unless he wants to authorize you all spending a lot longer at lunch so that you can eat elsewhere, it’s putting you in a difficult spot.

If you know from experience that he’ll respond better to this coming from you than from a group, that’s fine too — but in general, presenting this as “this has become an office-wide concern” (if you can say that accurately and with the permission of others) can have more of an impact.

As for the idea of you doing a pre-work lunch run, just say no. You could point out that you don’t have a car and thus it would be way too much of a burden, or that you don’t have time in the morning before arriving at work, or that you don’t want to be in the position of juggling people’s orders and dealing with their money, or even just that getting lunch is an individual responsibility, not something that you’re willing to take on for the entire group.

Your bigger problem, though, might be that you’re working for a small organization run by a dude who sounds like he doesn’t understand what is and isn’t appropriate for him to control (and the fact that people’s weight, diets, and alcohol expenditures fall in the latter category).

Read updates to this letter here and here.

open thread – February 6, 2015

It’s the Friday open thread!

The comment section on this post is open for discussion with other readers on anything work-related that you want to talk about. If you want an answer from me, emailing me is still your best bet*, but this is a chance to talk to other readers.

* If you submitted a question to me recently, please don’t repost it here, as it may be in the to-be-answered queue :)

my company just hired back the person I replaced, how to choose who to take to a conference, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My company just hired back the person I replaced

At a recent staff meeting, my boss announced that our organization is rehiring the woman who I was hired to replace. From my boss’s remarks, it seems that this was not her decision, but that the former employee went directly to the CEO, with whom she is on good terms. Although my boss assured us this was not going to have any effect on our positions (they are giving her the promotion that she turned down last summer), I’m still nervous about how this is going to affect my job.

My first instinct is to begin looking for another job, but I’ve only been here for five months and most of my previous professional experience has been temp work with gaps in my employment history. When I was hired for this position, I was given the impression that the organization was interested in nurturing my professional development. Is there a way for me to bring my concerns up with my boss? And if it does seem like I should start looking for a new job, how do I explain why I was here for such a short time?

They’re hired her back, but not to replace you — she’s not being hired back into her old role/your current role but into a totally different one. Unless you have reason to believe that she’s going to meddle in your work, I don’t see any cause for alarm here and job-searching absolutely isn’t warranted. Hiring former employees into higher level roles isn’t unusual or bad practice; in fact, it’s actually often a good sign that former employees want to return.

That said, if you’re concerned, you can certainly ask your boss about it. I’d say something like this: “Will Jane’s return impact my role in any way? Do you expect her to become involved again in the projects that used to be hers but have since moved to me?”

2. How to choose who to take to a conference

I’m the senior-ranking member of a group of analysts in my company. As such, I’m responsible for training, some general oversight, and being a first escalation point for questions or issues. There are four other analysts on my team. Two just started with the company within the last quarter, and two have been on my team for about two years.

I recently discovered that the company who created my business’s primary tool is hosting a conference this spring. When I asked my manager about budget to go, she enthusiastically said yes and then asked me who I thought should go with me.

I’m stymied. It would be good for all of us to go, but it would likely be cost- and coverage-prohibitive. All four are technically savvy (the newer ones slightly less so but we’re training them from scratch). Should I pick the two who’ve been here longer, and assume the other two can go next year (it’s the first year of the conference)? What criteria do you recommend?

Well, since you don’t sound entirely certain that you can’t take everyone, figure that out first — because if you can, that would be good to do. But if you can’t, it’s reasonable to offer to take the two most senior people, and explain to the other two that the budget only allowed for two people so you’re taking the two most senior — but that you’ll be looking for other opportunities for the in the future (and then do that).

3. “Tell us what makes you unique in 150 characters or less”

I am in the process of filling out a general application to a company I am interested in. It’s a tech start-up and I feel like I have crafted a great cover letter. However, this is the last question on the application:

“In 150 characters or fewer, tell us what makes you unique. Try to be creative and say something that will catch our eye!”

*Cringe* I feel like this may be a case of style winning over substance. What are your thoughts on this? Some quick research showed that this is not unique to this company and is just a hallmark of the Resumator service. It’s your typical young, edgy start up, so I am wondering what the deal is. I guess I better get started writing a haiku about why I’m awesome.

I could have sworn I answered something like this recently but I can’t find it, so: Yes, it’s gimmicky and a bad way to hire, unless the job involves writing very short, catchy snippets of text. And even then, they should come up with something other than “what makes you unique” — ugh. What matters in hiring isn’t what makes you unique; it’s what indicates you’d excel at the job, which may or may not be unique to you. And asking you to answer in 150 characters or less is an attempt to reference microblogging platforms like Twitter and look hip, so yes, style over substance is a good way to put it.

4. Should I be paid for my whole resignation period if my employer has me leave earlier?

If you submit a written resignation letter with a last date included and your manager lets you go before that date, are you supposed to be paid through the date on resignation letter?

It’s up to the employer. The law only requires that you be paid through the date you actually worked. However, in many states, you can apply for unemployment benefits for the time between when they had you leave and the date you intended to leave (since in the unemployment agency’s eyes, you were involuntarily separated from employment for that period, even if it’s just a couple of weeks).

5. How to handle less relevant jobs on my resume

Say I’m applying for a job and I have relevant work experience, but it was several jobs ago. Including all of the in-between job information would significantly increase the length of my resume and, I fear, “water down” that relevant experience because there’s more text and details to absorb. Leaving them off, however, makes it appear as though I have a gap in my resume.

I’d do a Relevant Work Experience section with the relevant stuff, followed by an Other Experience section with the rest of it. Also, you don’t need to go into a ton of detail about those less relevant jobs; depending on your resume as a whole, it might even make sense to just list job title, employer, and time periods for those.

you need a “waiting for” folder

If you don’t already have a “waiting for” folder in your email, you need one.

This is the folder I keep in my email where I drag sent messages that I’m waiting for a response on.

I go through it basically daily, and it’s fascinating to see how often I haven’t heard back about something and need to follow up on it, and which I otherwise might have forgotten about until the lack of answer popped up as a problem.

I do this not just for work emails, but personal ones too, like the person in my homeowners association who was supposed to get me an answer to a question about dues but didn’t, or any other question that I need the answer to but might otherwise forget that I’m waiting on until months later.

Yes, this does make me the annoying person who will follow up with you when it’s been a week since I emailed you a question and I haven’t heard back. It also makes me the person who gets the answers I need and doesn’t discover weeks later that some crucial bit of info never arrived.

The key is that you must check it regularly, at least a couple of times a week.

Set yours up right now.

what to do when you can’t focus at work

Ever have a day where you just can’t seem to focus on your work? Maybe it’s your coworker’s distracting phone calls, or the lure of social media, or thoughts about an upcoming vacation, but for whatever reason, we all have days where our concentration is shot.

Ever have a day where you just can’t seem to focus on your work? Maybe it’s your coworker’s distracting phone calls, or the lure of social media, or thoughts about an upcoming vacation, but for whatever reason, we all have days where our concentration is shot. Here’s what to do when it happens to you.

1. Change your location. If your environment itself is posing an obvious distraction (like a meeting happening on the other side of your cubicle or an annoying rattle coming through the vent), changing locations will obviously help. But even if your environment isn’t at fault, sometimes simply changing venues can help reset your brain and bring back your focus. Try temporarily moving to a conference room or a coffee shop and see if your focus returns.

2. Make your work area and computer distraction-free. If changing locations isn’t an option or isn’t helping, try eliminating distractions from your immediate work area and your computer itself. For instance, shut down your email program, turn off notifications, file away those papers that are littering your desk, change your IM status to “busy,” and see if your mind feels clearer.

3. Tell yourself that you’re going to work on a project for 10 minutes and then will take a break. Committing for only 10 minutes is pretty easy, and often you’ll find that once you’ve started, you’re able to keep going. And if you need that break 10 minutes in, you’ve still made some headway that you wouldn’t have otherwise done.

4. Stop fighting it, and turn to activities that require less focus. If you try both of the above without success, your brain might just need a break right now. Rather than fighting it, see if you can use the time to do activities that don’t require intense focus, like filing, cleaning out your desk, dealing with expense reimbursements, or anything else that needs to be done at some point but which doesn’t tax you mentally.

As part of doing that, you should also…

5. Prioritize ruthlessly. It’s all well and good to spend the day on low-focus activities if nothing is pressing, but that might not be realistic for the whole day. Ask yourself what the absolute most important things are you for you to accomplish today. Are there tasks where you’d feel terrible if they were undone at the end of the day? Tell yourself that you’re going to do those now so that they’re not hanging over you, but that you won’t pressure yourself to go beyond that if your brain is rebelling.

interviewer sent me the name of the other 7 candidates in the running for the job

A reader writes:

I have been interviewing for an junior level position at a nonprofit for the last two weeks. I was excited when I saw a third interview invitation this week, only to discover that the interviewer had sent a scheduling tool that showed all the interview slots available and what other candidates were already booked. Not only could I see that there are seven other candidates also getting a third interview, but I was able to see their full names and times they selected as well.

The letter-writer sent me a screenshot of the scheduling form that looked like this. I’ve changed the names for anonymity.

Originally I was going to write an email stating how uncomfortable this situation has made me, especially since I would be missing work for the third time for a job I probably won’t get. However, I did manage to get my first time request (after work hours) so I decided to hold back on my email since I don’t wish to hurt my chances.

Is this highly unusual for a company or organization to do? I want to ask my prospective employee if it is traditional for them to disclose names to job candidates, because if it is, I am not sure if I want to work for this organization if that is common hiring practice. I have a small gut feeling that the guy who sent this (a young fresh out of college grad) had no idea that this was a bad idea, and just thought it would make things easier for him. (He’s not the manager I’d report to if hired, but someone I would work very closely with day to day.)

Should I let his boss know when I interview with her this week that it made me uncomfortable? Or should I let it go in case it hurts my chances? Also, eight candidates for a third interview?

Ick.

It’s definitely not typical to share candidates’ names with other candidates. It’s supposed to be understood that there’s a certain confidentiality in hiring; you don’t go sending the names of the other candidates all over the place. What if you’d known one of the people on the list? What if you were unethical and used the information to somehow hurt their chances or out their job search to their current employer?

I think it’s likely that this isn’t an organization-wide practice, but rather just this one guy, who thinks that he’s found a way to add efficiency to the process, without realizing that there’s a reason employers don’t do this. If he doesn’t have much work experience yet, he could easily just not fully realize the wider implications for this kind of thing (and there’s a good chance he’d be mortified once it was pointed out).

As for whether to say something to his boss when you interview with her … I wouldn’t at this stage. It’s done and can’t be undone at this point, and having an uncomfortable conversation about it carries the potential of hurting your candidacy (even if only unconsciously on your interviewer’s side). But certainly if you get an offer, it would be reasonable to ask about it. You could say something like: “Could I ask you a question about something in the hiring process? I noticed that when scheduling the third interview round, Jarvis sent each candidate a scheduling sheet that contained the names of seven other candidates who were also interviewing. I felt a little uneasy having that shared outside your organization, since I’m being discreet about interviewing and imagine others are too.”

You want to say this nicely, and with some understanding that it was likely just a rookie mistake. But the response might give you a better feel for how the organization operates, and how they handle having mistakes pointed out. (And if nothing else, it will alert them that this isn’t great to do.)

As for having eight candidates for a third-round interview: It’s absolutely a lot for a late stage. By a third in-person interview, they should have narrowed down their pool of finalists. That said, I don’t know that you can conclude for sure that there are eight candidates left at this stage. Those other names you saw could be interviewing for other positions. Hell, they could be other meetings that he’s scheduling that aren’t interviews at all. It’s hard to say, but I’d be hesitant to draw conclusions from it.