my coworker bombed an internal interview, letting a company fly me out if I’m unlikely to accept their offer, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Should I let a company fly me out even though I’m unlikely to accept their offer?

My in-person in interview with Company A was cancelled due to weather. However, I interviewed with several managers over the phone and they called me to tell me I should receive an offer within a few days. I mentioned that I would still like to come in-person and they are currently working on setting that up. I have not yet received the offer in writing (I’m wondering if they’re waiting until the visit).

I then had an in-person interview with Company B and I received an offer from them.

Due to the location and the managers I met during the interview (as well as a few other factors), I’m strongly leaning towards Company B, but I haven’t even had a chance to see Company A or meet anyone in person. Should I go ahead and visit Company A, even though it’s unlikely I’ll accept their offer (assuming I get the formal offer)? I feel like it might be pretty rude, especially since they’re paying and the visit is really only for my benefit (since they’ve already made their decision).

If you’re still genuinely open to accepting their offer, there’s nothing wrong with visiting so that you have more data to decide for sure (as long as you have time to do that before Company B needs an answer). That’s true even if you’re leaning toward the other company; leaning isn’t the same as having decided for sure. But if you’ve really made up your mind and deep down you know the visit isn’t likely to change that, then I’d save everyone the time (and them the expense) and skip it.

2. My coworker bombed an internal interview

We have an opening for a professional job, and I was a participant in one part of the two-day interview for a candidate who happens to be a colleague. This would be a good move for her, but she has been working for a long time in a different department with only some crossover of skills. In the part of the interview I was in, she didn’t seem to have done any homework on the areas where she’s less qualified. I mean none! She didn’t even mention any professional associations or journals in the new area of expertise, which would have shown she at least knew how to get up to speed. I work closely with that department, so I want to see the best qualified person get hired. And if not qualified, someone who will be eager to learn the ropes. I was very disappointed and told the search committee this.

I really hope she doesn’t get this job (still waiting to hear). If she doesn’t get it, I want to give her some constructive feedback. If she does get the job, I’ll be one of the people coaching her or at least working closely with her. Any advice?

It depends on your role in the hiring process, as well as your relationship with her. Ideally, the hiring manager should give internal candidates feedback if they’re not selected. If you suspect the hiring manager isn’t planning to do that, you could nudge her to, and give her some talking points that you think would helpful for your coworker. But otherwise, it’s not really your place to do it, unless you have a particularly close or mentor-like relationship with your coworker. (If that’s the case, you could certainly approach her with feedback in that context.)

3. We don’t want to be listed on our company’s website because of angry callers

I have been trying to find some information online that supports the concept of not putting employee names on company/organization websites to protect their privacy. We deal with a lot of very angry people and while it makes sense to have some of us listed on the company website, I don’t think the employees taking resident calls should be listed. People can be shockingly threatening about trash. We don’t give out our last names during customer complaint calls for that very reason. The employees really don’t want to be on the website, but we are facing push back from the person who ultimately makes the decision. Really, there is no reason for the public to know who the clerical staff is, so I don’t see the value in listing their names. Is there anything we can do about this?

You can explain your reasons as a group, calmly and logically, and if there have been unpleasant incidents with customers that support the idea that identifying employees on the website could cause problems, you can point those out too. Ultimately it’s your company’s call, but a good company will hear you out (and will explain why they disagree, if ultimately they do).

In general, though, there’s no specific business need to list employees on a website, unless they’re in customer-facing roles where people need to be able to look them up. And many businesses make the decision not to list them — some because it’s not particularly necessary, and others for exactly the reasons you describe.

4. Backing out of an offer to work over the summer

So I’ve been with a landscaping company for a year now (full-time in the summer, part-time during the year) and they’ve been very good to me. I’m transferring to another school in a different city next fall and I’ve been offered a situation where I can make close to $25,000 for the summer. This would comfortably cover all my living expenses.

The only problem is that I told my bosses that I’d stay for the summer because that’s their busiest time of year. I’d hate to go back on my word especially since they’ve treated me so well since I’ve been there. So I’m in sort of a dilemma because I’m not sure what I should do.

People’s plans change, especially when moves are involved. If you tell them now, they’ll still have plenty of time to prepare for summer coverage. Explain that your circumstances have changed and you’ll actually be leaving in June (or whenever); they’ll understand.

5. Can I re-use the same cover letter when applying for a job I applied for previously?

About 9 months ago, I applied for a job that I was really passionate about, and actually my CV and cover letter were picked up and I was contacted for a first round of selection, which consisted in a quick questionnaire about the subject of the job (usability research). Unfortunately I didn’t pass that test then, but long story short, now that company has again open positions for the exact same job, and I wish to reapply. Do you think it’s ok to use the same CV and cover letter I used the first time, since they were already successful in getting me a test, or I run the risk to look lazy this way?

Same resume is fine (assuming that nothing has changed since then and you don’t have recent accomplishments to add), but you shouldn’t use the same cover letter. It would be like meeting someone on an online dating service, going out with them a time or two, and then a year later reaching back out to them with the exact message you sent them the first time. Do a new cover letter.

should you list a fun but fake fact on your resume to intrigue an employer?

A reader writes:

I am currently job searching and have heard that sometimes people put one fun thing on their resume that normally wouldn’t belong, which might seem to make them more interesting to a job recruiter who would want to know the rest of the story. One such suggestion was to list that you are Time Magazine’s “2006 Person of the Year.” Now, this wouldn’t technically be a lie. Time Magazine listed “You, yes You!” as their person of the year in 2006, so technically everyone can say that. But as a way to get a foot in the door, do you think listing that is overstepping the bounds of what is professional on a resume, or is it fun creativity to create a discussion between you and a potential employer to help you get your foot in the door?

(I almost hesitated to ask you this, in case you use it on your blog for fear everyone will start using this trick if it’s legit).

Noooooooo.

I’m sure there’s some hiring manager out there who would enjoy this, but the majority will either know right off the bat that it’s not real, in which case they’re likely to be annoyed that you’re not just giving them the actual facts about your qualifications, or they won’t know and then are likely to be annoyed and feel foolish when they ask you about it.

The way to make your application stand out is very straightforward: write a compelling cover letter, have a resume that shows a track record of achievement, and be friendly, responsive, thoughtful, and enthusiastic. That’s the only path, at least if you’re screening for competent managers (and you should be).

If you’re trying to get the hiring manager’s attention via anything not related to the actual quality of your candidacy, you’re probably getting too gimmicky and losing focus on what managers care about when they’re hiring.

my interviewer asked me, “if I were to fire you, what would be the reason why?”

A reader writes:

I wanted to get your take on a recent interview question I was asked. Normally I’m prepared for most questions thrown at me from various interviews I’ve been on, but this one threw me: “If I were to fire you, what would be the reason why?” My interviewer even stated that it was a hard and unique question, but I honestly became very flustered! I had no idea how to respond. I tried to come up with an answer, but I got so nervous I feel like the rest of my interview may have suffered because of it.

This is a bad question. It’s probably the interviewer’s way of trying to get you to talk about weaknesses or possible fit issues, but it asks you to speculate on something that you really can’t realistically do. It’s not like you’re going to say, “Well, my past managers have given me serious warnings about my follow-through and I suck at staying on top of my to-do list” or “my ability to lay out a vision and inspire followership in others is pretty shoddy.”

There absolutely is value — lots of it — in having an honest discussion about the areas of a role that might be more of challenging for you, so that both you and the hiring manager are moving forward with your eyes open and can make educated decisions about whether those challenges are likely to be prohibitive in the role or not. That’s in everyone’s best interests — theirs so that they don’t make the wrong hire and yours so that you don’t end up in a job you struggle in (or even end up getting fired from).

But there’s a much more straightforward (and less defensiveness-provoking) way to have that discussion, like by simply asking, “What parts of the role do you anticipate being the most challenging for you personally or needing the most support or coaching in?” And, “Tell me about the parts of Job X that you found the hardest and how you approached them.” In other words, saying what you mean, rather than couching it in a question that feels like a gotcha.

But if you’re on the spot and have to answer this question, I might say something like this: “Well, I think I have a good understanding of the role and what you’re looking for, and I’m confident in my ability to do X, Y, and Z, but if it were to not work out, I could imagine it being because the needs of the role shifted and you ended up needing someone with more strengths in A or B, which aren’t particular specialities of mine.”

I might also add, “I’m curious about your own answer to that question. Are there things that you’ve seen harm people’s success in the role before?”

But it’s an annoying question. If you end up working there, hopefully you’ll develop enough of a rapport with this person that you can encourage them to frame whatever they’re looking for with this question differently in future interviews.

Random musing: I almost wonder if this interviewer is trying to apply a “pre-mortem” here. A pre-mortum is a crazily helpful business concept where you imagine that a project has failed and then work backward to determine why that would have happened, so that you can adjust your planning now to avoid that outcome. “If it’s the end of the year and this person isn’t working out, why would that be?” would be a great question for an interviewer to think about on their own or with colleagues. I just don’t think it works well when posed to the candidate, at least not with the framing that this interviewer used.

will my work be tarred by a co-author’s bad reputation, having a reference proactively call an employer, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Will my work be tarred by a co-author’s bad reputation?

I’m an attorney looking to change jobs in the next year or so and am updating my resume. When I was an undergrad (more than 10 years ago), I worked closely with a professor in a field tangentially related to law and wrote a few articles and a book chapter with him. I’m pleased with that work and have listed it in a publications section on my resume up until this point.

After I finished college, I didn’t have much contact with this professor except for an email exchange my first semester of law school where he said two of our co-authors on one of the articles were upset about the manuscript being submitted to a less prestigious publication. Ultimately, the two other co-authors alleged that my former professor had forged their signatures prior to submitting the manuscript and demanded to have their names removed from the article. (This resulted in some press and the ultimate removal of their names.)

This began a downward spiral for my former professor, who had been a high profile figure in his field. He was denied tenure, moved to a much less prestigious school, left there unceremoniously after a dispute about the accuracy of his CV, had a well-publicized affair with a grad student, and got some really bad press within his professional circles, among other misdeeds.

The last time I was job hunting, my former professor wasn’t in disgrace. Now, I’m thinking long and hard about whether I want to list these publications. A quick Google search of my name and my former professor’s will turn up his issues, especially the article where he and I are now the only two authors owing to the aforementioned dispute.)

I’m proud of the work I did and the publications are a point of distinction in my area of practice. (I also published an article wholly independently of my former professor several years after I worked with him.) I’m just not sure about including them on my resume going forward. Thoughts?

I’ll be interested to hear from people in law to see if they have a different take, but as long as your professor’s bad reputation isn’t based on the quality of his work, I wouldn’t worry too much about this. If he’s known to do terrible work, then you wouldn’t want to be associated with him — but if his bad rep is more about his behavior, then I don’t think your work is going to get too tarred by association.

2. Having a reference proactively call an employer

I’m currently one of two people being considered for a job. The prospective employer has already called my references. A friend told me that it could be helpful to have an additional reference call the employer to offer a reference on my behalf. He said that this could help sway their decision, but I’m worried that it would seem pushy. What do you think?

It entirely depends  on how effusively enthusiastic that reference is going to be about you. If that person is going to rave about you — like the “move heaven and earth to hire this person” kind of rave — then it can be helpful. Or, if the reference actually knows the hiring manager, that can be super helpful too. But if it’s a stranger who seems reasonably but not incredibly positive about you, then it risks coming across as unhelpful.

3. Am I being a doormat?

I’ve been in my job for about 2 years now and I really do love it. I finally have found a fulfilling job with great managers and an excellent work environment. There’s only one problem: my compensation. I am paid a salary way below market value for my work. Worse, I’ve taken on a few extra projects over the years (all with a good attitude and effort– whether I am excited to do them or not) and expanded my workload well beyond what I’ve started with. And I haven’t seen a raise yet, just vague promises of “some day.”

My boss is aware of that I’d like one and I’ve had a conversation with him at every quarterly meeting. He says he’d like to give me one, but it’s not in the budget. Meanwhile, other members of the company have indeed received plenty of raises and rewards. The company also has grown by leaps and bounds over the years I’ve been here.

At this point, I can’t tell if I’m being a doormat or patient. I know my work is valued and I’m praised pretty often. I’m also treated pretty well (and I deeply appreciate that– bad bosses are too common!). However, my compensation is just very low and I’m concerned that “some day” may never come. Should I start searching for new jobs? Or try having a candid conversation with my boss? I think they want me to be happy and I would really rather stay here than leave.

There’s certainly no harm in having one more raise conversation with your boss (framing it as, “We’ve discussed this many times before and at this point I’d like a firm timeline for getting my salary up to market rates”), but I wouldn’t count on any promises of “some day.” At this point, your boss is only credible about giving you a raise when you actually see a raise in your paycheck.

Until/unless you actually see that money, assume that you’re never getting a raise no matter what promises you hear — because that’s what all the evidence says — and proceed accordingly.

4. What should I say when introducing a job seeker to another contact by email?

I make email introductions for job seekers from time to time. As an example, let’s say that someone I worked with in the past is job searching, and they ask me to introduce them to someone I know who works at a company where they are applying. What is the etiquette in these situations? Who goes in the to: line, or cc: line, and who should you write the email to? How should the email be structured?

I don’t think it really matters that much; there are a number of different ways to do these. Personally, I tend to address it to both people, with both of them in to the “to” line, and then I write something like, “Persephone and Apollo, I’ve told you each a little about the other and I’m now I’m connecting you. I think you’ll enjoy talking to each other, and I’ll let you take it from here.”

Of course, note that that indicates that I’m not connecting them cold — I’ve already explained to the contact what the context is (and sometimes asked permission to connect them). If I hadn’t done that, I might address it to the contact and say something like, “I hoped you might be willing to talk to Apollo Montblanc, cc’d here, about his search for work in the teapot industry.”

5. Should I get extra pay for working on a day others had off?

I am a non-exempt employee and we recently had a snow day. The entire company was paid for that day. However, I handle payroll and so I was given a laptop and told to ensure that payroll was submitted on time. I had no problem doing this, but when I came back to work and asked my employer if I would be compensated for the time I worked, she laughed at me. I think its unfair that everyone got paid for the snow day but I was still expected to work. No one else (to my knowledge) was expected to work. Am I entitled to compensation for working on a day that everyone had off and worked?

You were paid for the time that you spent working, so you were compensated. I think what you’re asking is whether you’re entitled to anything extra, since everyone else got paid that day for doing nothing. Legally, no, there’s no requirement for that; the law only cares that you’re paid for the time you worked, which you were.

Beyond that, I get why this is frustrating, but sometimes it’s the nature of a job — that you’ll end up being needed on a day that other people aren’t. Some employers will recognize that by giving you additional pay or holiday time to use on a different day, and others don’t; there’s no “best practice” here that would dictate that you get paid extra for that time.

actually useful questions to ask in informational interviews

A reader writes:

You’ve written before about how NOT to behave in an informational interview (i.e. use it to try to get a job), but I wonder what you recommend to get the most out of them when you’re approaching the meeting with the proper mindset.

I’m about six months away from getting a masters degree, and another student in my program recently arranged for me to have lunch with her and a family friend. She organized the lunch because the family friend works in an industry related to the particular niche of our field I’d like to work in. This was an incredibly kind thing of her to do, but it was rather short notice, and I scrambled to come up with questions.

I asked a few specific things about the direction the industry is going in, and a few questions about a new side project her company has that’s of particular interest to me, but I fear that beyond that she was left to lead the conversation more than I would have liked. She did so wonderfully, giving us a tour of the building, asking me about myself, showing me the software she uses, etc. I wonder though, how I might have made more of this networking opportunity. Obviously some questions are specific to industry and situation, but do you have any across-the-board recommendations (beyond being prepared) for making the most of informational interviews, particularly ones you didn’t seek out?

Like with asking questions in interviews, my advice on this is to spend some time really thinking about what you genuinely want to know from this person who has experience in your field. That’s probably going to lead you to questions I’d never think of, like or “how do you handle the frustration of X?” or “how have the new regulations on Y played out in your work?”

In other words, don’t just focus on being impressive (which is the pitfall a lot of people fall into), but think seriously about what you’re really wondering about. I can promise you that this person doesn’t want to spend their time answering questions that you’re asking because you saw a list that suggested asking them; they want to answer the stuff you’re really dying to know. (I’m not saying that’s where you’re coming from — I just see it so much that I need to raise it.)

Now that that disclaimer is out there, here are some questions that I think are great to ask in informational interviews:

  • What do you wish you’d known about the field before starting in it? Do you think there are common misperceptions people have about this work as they’re looking to get into it?
  • What types of people do you think really succeed in this field? What types have more trouble?
  • One thing I’m worried about is ___. Do you think that has any merit?
  • Do you have thoughts on the best things I can do to stay current in the field — things to read, organizations to join, people to talk to?
  • Who do you feel are the best employers in the field? Why? Are there any you’d caution me to stay away from?
  • Are you able to give me a sense of what kind of starting salaries you see for roles like X and Y?
  • What are your/most people’s hours like? Are you able to leave work behind when you leave, or do you need to stay pretty connected in the evenings and on weekends?
  • Anything you see job candidates around my level doing that you think really hurts them? Or that you wish people would do differently?
  • Can I tell you a little about my background and experience so far, and see if you have any suggestions for things I might do to strengthen myself as a candidate?
  • Do you think I’m being realistic about the roles I’m aiming for in this next step?

What other suggestions do people have?

resisting delegating work? here’s how to move more to your team

If you’re like many managers, you sometimes find yourself resisting delegating a piece of work or a responsibility to someone on your team, because you’re worried that it won’t be done well enough. But in most cases, if you give in to this impulse, you’re forfeiting the benefit of having a team, which is to allow you to get better results – in part by having more people doing the work, but also in part to free you up to spend your time on things that only you can do.

Here are some of the most common reasons managers resist delegating and why you should delegate anyway in these cases – along with one time when you shouldn’t.

“They won’t care about it as much as I do.”

Ever feel this way? You might worry that if someone doesn’t care about a responsibility as much as you do, they might not do it with the same sense of urgency or attention to detail. Maybe they won’t put as much energy into it as you want them to. Or maybe you don’t trust that they’ll remember to take care of it regularly if it’s an ongoing thing.

If you have the right person in the role and you’ve correctly set up the task for them (including doing things like talking through how to do it well, what could go wrong, its importance and the context for why it matters), you should be able to trust them to care as much as you do – or at least enough that the work will be well done. If you don’t, that’s a flag to figure out why. Maybe you need to prep them better for the work, or maybe you don’t have the right person in the role.

“They won’t do it the same way I would do it.”

This might be true! And it might end up being to your benefit. Part of the advantage of having a staff is that you’re getting multiple brains to work on a problem and figure out the best way to approach it. Assuming you don’t think that no one will ever have a better, more creative idea than you (you don’t think that, right?), your best bet here is to encourage people to look for better ways to do things, even if they’re different from yours. Your role is to ensure that the outcome is what you need, but it’s often okay if someone takes a different path to get there (as long as they’re not sacrificing things like accuracy, final quality, or service to customers along the way).

“They can’t do it as fast as I can.”

This might be true too! But if you let them try their hand at it, they’ll probably start getting faster at over time.  But even if they don’t, it’s still often going to save your time, which can be better spent on work that only you can do.

“They can’t do it as well as I can.”

Another one that might be true! But if you want to make full use of your team – which will help you get better results in the long-term – you’re going to need to give people opportunities to develop their skills so that they can make larger contributions to the work. That doesn’t mean that you should delegate everything, of course, but it does mean that you should be vigilant about spending your time in the areas where it will pay off the most, not just in the areas where you might be a bit better than a staff member.

Otherwise, you could easily spend most of your days on small things where you add some value and never get to the work where you add the most value – and the latter is what will most powerfully drive your work forward.

“I really enjoy doing it.”

If you truly enjoy a particular task and find it fulfilling, it’s not crazy to hold on to it, as long as it doesn’t drain your energy or keep you away very long from more important work. If something energizes you and makes you like your job more, it can make sense to continue doing it yourself, traditional delegation advice notwithstanding. (But if you find yourself saying that about multiple tasks you should otherwise delegate, that’s a flag to do a gut-check.)

did my boss throw me under a bus, or did I screw up?

A reader writes:

I recently had an issue with a department that was not following through on their assignments in a way that directly impacted my work. This has been going on for a while, and I went to my boss with my concerns. He asked me for documentation on specific instances, and left it at that.

Later that day, the department head from the other department and two of his employees asked to speak to me (the ones who had mishandled the deliveries), and had the documentation I’d given my manager in hand and proceeded to be quite upset that I had not gone to them first. We resolved this despite them coming at me, outnumbered and “guns blazing” (they’re not bad people – just upset that I didn’t go to them first, though one reason I didn’t is because I don’t think they take criticism well at all… but that’s another story). I’m not concerned about that so much, but I feel like my management and their management threw me under the bus.

I agreed with the department head that I would go to her if I have problems in the future (she is at the same level as me, hierarchy-wise), and they agreed to a number of things I asked they do to make their side of the process more reliable, but I’m really bothered that my boss just chucked what I said to them rather than dealing with this, or even asking I deal with this myself. If he thought I should do that, I would have. One of the reasons I told him about my frustrations was so I could get his advice! I feel like I can’t trust him now, as he might just “tattle” me out when I’m filling him in on problems or looking for help/advice. What do you think?

Well, had you talked to them about the problems directly in the past? If so and if that didn’t resolve things, then you were right to involve your manager and the other department has forfeited the right to be bothered by it. But if you hadn’t already tried that, then they have a point here — in most cases, it makes sense to try to resolve things with someone directly before escalating things. (If there’s a major safety, legal, or ethical breach occurring, that would be an exception to this rule.)

Your manager really should have asked you if you’d talked to them directly yet and, if you hadn’t, suggested that you do that first. That said, not everyone manager takes that stance … and there are some issues that are serious enough — or chronic enough — that it can make sense for the manager to do the talking. Of course, in that case, a Perfect Manager would have given you a heads-up about how she planned to approach it. Sadly for all of us though, Perfect Managers don’t actually exist; managers fumble this stuff sometimes, even when they’re otherwise basically good at their jobs.

It sounds to me like everyone involved here erred a little bit: your manager, in the way I just described; you, by not talking to the other department directly first, if indeed you didn’t; and the other department, by being “quite upset.” (On that last point, they could have calmly said, “Please come to us if you have concerns in the future so that we can try to address them; we don’t always know when things are causing problems outside our team.” No need for any guns to be blazing.)

Anyway, I wouldn’t take this as a reason not to trust your manager, not unless there’s some larger pattern of outing you to people when you think you’re handling something confidentially. Instead, I’d just be very clear about what you’re looking for when you approach him about anything like this in the future. In this case, he may not have realized you were just looking for advice and thought you were asking him to address it for you (in fact, that’s what I thought from your opening wording, until you clarified later in the letter), so make sure you’re being explicit when that’s the case. For instance, you could say, “I’m hoping this is something I can handle myself, but I’d like to get your advice on the best way to proceed.” And when the conversation ends, if there’s any doubt that the next steps are completely in your court, you can say something like, “Okay, I’m going to do X and Y and then will come back to you if that doesn’t solve it.” And if your boss proposes that he step in, you can say, “I want to be careful not to cause tension with Draco and Malfoy. Is there a way to frame it so it doesn’t seem like I’m complaining to you about them?”

However, on that last point: There may not always be a way for your manager to address things without disclosing that you’re the one who raised the issue to his attention. Sometimes it’s not practical or possible to avoid that. What your manager should ensure is that you don’t experience negative repercussions for appropriately bringing issues to his attention. If you notice someone has a pattern of reacting poorly toward you for that, that’s something your manager should be in the loop on too. But sometimes your name does need to be attached to things in order for a manager to address it, so that he’s not going around making vague statements about how he knows things.

my company says I didn’t return their property, a client invited me to a sports event, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My company says I didn’t return their property on my last day

What can happen if you say you returned all company property after being terminated, but the company says you didn’t? My employer fired me on Monday, asked for my badge, cell, iPad, briefcase, and chargers. I gave them the badge and cell and went to my car to get the chargers, briefcase, and iPad and then left them in the office right inside the door and left. I then received a letter with my final paycheck saying that I told them I was going to my car and never returned.

It’s too late for this now, but ideally you’d want to give the property to an actual person; if you just leave it inside the door, there’s too much chance that it will get misplaced by someone who doesn’t know the context for why it’s there. If you told them you were going to your car to get these items and then just stuck them inside the door and left, and someone moved (or took) the items, I can see why they thought you just took off. And I totally get wanting to get the hell out of there after being fired, but you did kind of play fast and loose with that property, even if you didn’t intend to.

In any case, all you can do is explain what happened. I’d say something like this to them: “The day that I left, January 26, I left two chargers, a briefcase, and an iPad directly inside the front door of the building, right around 2:45 p.m. My understanding was that you wished me to leave after returning this property, which I did. I hope I didn’t misunderstand. In any case, if there are any loose ends still to be tied up, please let me know.”

Also, it’s not clear to me whether they paid you the full amount due in your final check or whether they’re withholding the cost of these items. In most states, they owe you the full amount of your final paycheck either way, unless you signed a written agreement to the contrary.

2. A client invited me to a sports event, but I barely work with them

I got an email a few days ago inviting me to a sports game with one of our company’s clients (another company). It was addressed to four people in my office. On the list, I am one of two junior people and was the least involved on the project for the client. On top of that, I have been having some performance issues unrelated to their project. I’ve never met these people at meetings or otherwise because until my performance issues are resolved, I will not be in a client facing role, although I have had minimal email correspondence with them. We do work with this client fairly often, so I may have contact with them in the future, but it feels strange for me to go to a social outing with them when I haven’t had much professional contact with them in the past and probably won’t in the near future. Should I go? And if so, what does one wear to this kind of event?

It’s pretty normal to go to this kind of thing even if you don’t work closely with a client — and for clients to issue this type of invitation broadly. If you’d enjoy going, don’t let any of these concerns hold you back. You could check with your manager just to make sure, but it’s not unusual for clients to issue this kind of invitation, even to staff members they might not know well.

As for what to wear, I’d assume that a nicer version of casual wear is fine, but if you’re unsure, check with the more senior people in your office who are going.

3. Can I find out if my company plans to change out some bad managers?

I have a tough decision to make; I recently received a job offer from a company that I’ve worked closely with in the past. The job is almost exactly what I’m doing now, the pay is comparable, and the company really focuses on work-life balance for its employees. The downside is that there isn’t much in terms of career growth at that company.

My current place of work is very fast-paced and high stress, and there are a lot of middle managers who cause issues (hiring/promoting based on favoritism, refusing to hold people accountable for their actions, etc.). The department head has expressed interest in my career at this company, but has been somewhat vague about what that path actually is. The work that I’m doing is interesting and if it wasn’t for these managers and lack of work-life balance, I would want to make a career here.

Several people have suggested that I go to the department head and explain my situation, and ask for a) a more concrete career path and b) find out if there will be any changes to the department in terms of these managers. Should I have this conversation at all? If so, do you have any advice about how to approach the conversation without it becoming an ultimatum?

It’s reasonable to talk about what your future career path there might look like — although unless you get a clear promise of a specific path with a specific timeline attached to it, I wouldn’t rely on it enough to reject a different offer. (Ideally this is the kind of conversation you would have had long before that job offer came up, so that you’d have had some time to see whether those promises looked likely to play out.) But asking whether managers will be removed from their jobs is really unlikely to go over well — it’s pretty unlikely that there are plans to do that, and even if there were those plans would be unlikely to be shared with you, and it’s going to look really weird to ask about it.

Your safest bet is to assume that everything is going to stay the same at your current job, and make your decision accordingly.

And for what it’s worth, I’d be a little wary of making a lateral move if you’re interested in moving up in your career — usually people use moves to progress up the ladder. And I’d be especially concerned that you’re jumping to a company where you say there’s not much career growth, if you happen to be interested in growth. If you are, why confine yourself to these two options, rather than finding other options to throw in the mix?

4. My paycheck deductions were wrong and now I owe more taxes

I was recently doing my taxes and I noticed that last year I paid very little throughout the year, so I looked at my paycheck and it said I claimed 5 deductions the whole year. I had been working at my current job from 2007 to mid 2011, left for about a year, and came back in mid-2012 and filled out a new W4 form. My old one from 2011 said 5 deductions but this new one said 2, so I took it to payroll and they said it was my fault for not looking at my paycheck for two years, so now I owe a lot of taxes. Whose fault is it? And what can I do?

It’s their fault for not changing your deductions, but they’re right that it’s your responsibility to look at your pay stub to be sure it’s correct. Ultimately you’re the one responsible for fixing it; you’ve been receiving more money than you were supposed to in your check and having less withheld for taxes, and that’s on you to both notice and fix, unfortunately. They should certainly be apologetic about the error, and it’s their responsibility to fix it now that you’ve pointed it out, but it would be very rare for an employer to pay the un-withheld taxes to the government; that’s still your personal tax liability.

5. Boss doesn’t want women working late at the office

My boss recently told me I am not allowed to stay late at the office. He says it is not safe for a woman to be out alone at night, but he allows men to stay late. Is that allowed? I want to work.

Is he literally saying that you aren’t allowed to stay late because you’re a woman? Or is he more expressing concern for your safety without actually stopping you from working late if you want to? If it’s the former, that’s not at all legal. An employer can’t give you different schedule restrictions simply because you’re a woman. In that case, I’d say this to him: “Federal law is really clear that we can’t schedule women differently than men. I appreciate your concern for my safety, but I don’t want to be treated any differently than my male coworkers, and I think we really need to pay attention to the law on this one.”

If it’s more just him expressing concern but not actually restricting what you do, I’d tone that down a bit, to something more like, “Thanks, I appreciate your concern, but I don’t want to be treated any differently than the men here.”

should I work for the government?

I’m throwing this one out to readers to weigh in on. A reader writes:

I got an offer from a state government office in the South for a role that makes about as excited as it does nervous.

Pros: the work sounds like it’s right in my wheelhouse but with opportunities to apply my skills in new environments and work with lots of different organizations and people. I’m excited about the work and everyone I’ve met in my interviews seems bright and kind. The salary increase is substantial, too, more than 25%+ than I earn now.

Concerns: I worked for the government a few years ago and found the strict protocols and inflexibility frustrating as I felt they were barriers to my team (and myself) operating well. I left for a private sector job that is exciting and fast-paced and have since “settled down” a bit, both in my personal and professional lives, so I chock some of my frustrations with the government job up to unrealistic idealism of my 20’s and adjustment to my first office job. Throughout this recent application process, little reminders of the joys of government work keep popping up: having to recopy my resume by hand into an official application, inflexibility in changing my start date to a week later due to an inability to stop the process once it starts, and an inability to call two of my references who can only be reached at international phone numbers.

My manager, who is new herself, has helped me circumvent some of the bureaucracy and has apologetically informed me when her hands are tied, so I think she’ll be an ally – or at least empathetic – if I get held back by red tape in my new role. For your readers who have worked for the government, how do they manage the rigidity of systems? Why did they chose government work? What should I be looking for from my boss to know she’ll have my back if I need it? What questions might I ask myself to know if I’m up to this big cultural shift?

Readers, what do you say?

5 ways employers discourage you from negotiating salary

While every job seeker looks forward to getting a phone call with a job offer, few candidates look forward to negotiating salary. Employers know that, and they’ve often developed ways of operating that – intentionally or unintentionally – discourage job seekers from assertively negotiating.

Here are five things employers do that often discourage candidates from negotiating salary. (To be clear, employers who engage in these behaviors often wouldn’t label them as deliberate attempts to squash negotiation – but they certainly have that effect.)

1. Not giving you an obvious opening to negotiate. Sometimes candidates, especially at the start of their career, end up feeling like the employer didn’t give them “opportunity” to negotiate, and they end up just accepting the employer’s first offer because it’s presented as a done deal. If you go into a salary negotiation for a new job expecting the employer to give you an easy opening to negotiate, the conversation may be over and done before you realize that you didn’t speak up.

How to combat it: Don’t wait for an employer to explicitly give you an opening to negotiate. It’s up to you to start negotiations yourself if you want to, by saying something like, “I’m very interested in the job, but I was hoping that on salary you could do something closer to $X.”

2. Getting you to agree to a number early in the hiring process. Employers will often ask for your salary expectations during an early conversation, before you’ve had the chance to learn the full scope of the job and while you’re still trying to sell them on your candidacy.

How to combat it: Qualify any early salary conversation by noting that your answer may change after learning more about the job. And if information you learn about the job as the hiring process progresses changes your assessment of what salary would be fair, don’t be afraid to say that during negotiations. If an employer tries to tie you to a number you named earlier in the process and you no longer think it’s fair, it’s reasonable to say, “Having learned more about the management responsibilities of the role, I’m hoping for a salary closer to $X.”

3. Basing an offer on what you’ve been making previously. Salary offers shouldn’t be tied to your salary history; a new company should offer you a salary based on the contributions you’ll be making in a new job. But it’s very common for employers to ask for your salary history and base their offer on what you were earning most recently, giving you a small but not substantial increase.

How to combat it:  If you can, avoid giving out your salary history altogether; after all, it’s really no one’s business but yours and your accountant’s. But if you can’t avoid it (such as with companies that won’t let you move forward in their process if you don’t share your salary history), address it head-on:  “I don’t believe my past salary lines up with the market rate for my skills and experience, and in fact that’s one reason that I’m looking for a new role. I’m seeking a salary in the range of ____.”

4. Telling you that they’ll make up for a low salary with a great benefits package. This may be true, but lots of companies have great benefits and still pay competitive market rates. (Of course, you might look at the full package a company is offering you and determine that some of the benefits do make up for a lower salary, such as unusually generous vacation time or the ability to telecommute.)

How to combat it: Be brutally honest with yourself about what benefits are and aren’t worth a trade-off in salary to you, and how much – and whether you’re likely to be able to find those same benefits somewhere else. And don’t be afraid to say, “You do have a great benefits package, but it’s important to me to earn a salary that’s in line with market rates.”

5. Saying that there’s no room for additional money now, but alluding to increases down the road. It may well be true that you’ll receive generous raises in the future, but if you don’t have an iron-solid agreement about when and how much, you’ll be leaving that solely up to the employer to decide whether or not to follow through on.

How to combat it: Get any promises of this kind in writing. If the promise of additional money down the road is a key part of your decision to take the job, it needs to be in writing or there won’t be anything ensuring that it really happens. If the employer balks at putting it in writing, that’s a sign to you that the plan is tentative enough that it shouldn’t be a factor you count on when making your decision.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.