I can’t fire my awful assistant, people keep asking how old I am, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. I have an awful assistant who I can’t fire

I’m a nurse and I work with several nursing assistants. I have no authority to hire them, fire them, or implement any kind of substantive rewards or consequences, but I am responsible for their work.

Most of them are great. One, however, is extremely unpleasant to deal with. If I ask her to do something, she will scowl and mutter darkly about how busy she is and how unreasonable I am. Sometimes she yells at me and sometimes she outright refuses simple requests. I do a lot of work that should be hers because it’s easier than having a fight every time. She also bullies the other nursing assistants, talks inappropriately to patients about her personal problems and weird conspiracy theories, and the entire atmosphere of the unit is tense and miserable when she’s around.

I am at my wit’s end. Every time I try to initiate a conversation about her attitude, she scowls and mutters and walks away. I have talked about this issue with my manager and the director of nursing, but all they ever do is talk to her, and it doesn’t change anything. I would fire this woman in a heartbeat if it were my decision, but it’s not, and I don’t know what to do. Do you have any ideas?

Talk again with her manager. Say this: “I know that you’ve spoken with Jane multiple times about issues like X, Y, and Z. But it’s continuing. I think we’re at the point where we need to escalate this — putting her on a formal improvement plan with a clear warning that her job will be in jeopardy if this continues.”

If her manager refuses, ask this: “I’m at the point where I simply can’t get what I need from her, and she’s resisted everything that I can think of to change the situation. Since I’m responsible for her work, I need something to change. What do you suggest?” You might also ask, “If you don’t think it’s at the point of a formal improvement plan and warning, can you tell me what would bring it to that point for you?”

If this gets you nowhere, you’re dealing with horrible management, and they’re actually more the problem than this particular nursing assistant is.

2. People keep asking how old I am

I have been with my organization for almost 2 years. Although I am only 22 years old (graduated from college early), I gained a lot of respect in my field in a relatively short period of time, and do a lot of networking and presenting with various organizations the national level. There is also a training component to my job where I am the instructor. In my field, most of the people I am interacting with are male, and around 35 years old or older. Despite dressing professionally and wearing makeup, I have a bit of a baby face and I am often asked some variation of “how old are you?” by peers or clients I’ve just met. Although I think most people are just curious (though one or two have actually been rude), to me it comes across as unprofessional and makes me feel like I need to justify my position and experience level. Is there a light-hearted way to not respond to this question?

You could try “oh yeah, I know I look young” … “older than I look” … “I’ve been out of school for a few years” … or “85.” But you might be better off just owning it — “I’m 22.” Say it confidently and then move on.

Some people are going to be skeptical about your experience level, and that’s probably true no matter how you answer the question. But the best way to respond to that isn’t by feeling like you need to justify anything; it’s by demonstrating that you’re awesome at what you do. Show them that (and don’t get rattled by the age questions), and the age stuff should fade away pretty quickly.

3. My boss doesn’t want me to use a fan at my desk

It’s winter in Scotland and our office seems to be overcompensating by having the heating on at least 25 degrees. I realise I tend to run far hotter than my colleagues so I have a fan on my desk to try to combat this. I dress in the minimum that is decent, drink plenty of water to try to keep cool, and regularly visit the warehouse (which has no heating and feels lovely) but I can’t get through my day without nasty headaches and feeling nauseous due to heat.

Lately, my manager has started telling me to turn my fan off (it points only at me and I have no coworkers near by to get hit by the blast) because other people are cold and even resorted to turning it off when I leave my desk. I’m at the end of my tether; I understand other people are cold so I don’t complain about the ridiculous level of heat, but every single day people who don’t generally work in our office visit and make comments “it’s like an oven in here!” and yet it seems the cold blooded get listened to more simply because they whine louder. I’ve spoken to both my manager and my supervisor but all I get is a shrug or the more usual “you need to see someone, you’re not right.”

I’m at the end of my tether here and can’t think of any more reasonable steps to take. Why can’t I have a fan on if the heating is on 24/7?

Welcome to the universal thermostat wars, in which no one can agree on the right office temperature.

I’d say this to your boss: “I don’t want to impact the temperature for other people, but I’m warm to the point of it making me feel sick and being to focus. I keep my fan pointed only at me so that it doesn’t impact others, and it’s the only way I’ve found to be physically comfortable without asking for the overall temperature to be lowered. Can I continue using my fan as a compromise?”

4. Will I be judged for using two spaces after a period?

I have always used two spaces after sentence ending punctuation. I know the norm is now to use only one, but habits are hard to break. I have read several articles recently that say this can make you look old and outdated, like a relic from the typewriter era.

What is your take? Personally, I am in my late 20s and am otherwise extremely confident with my work/email writing style. Do you think anyone is judging this minute detail? I would be interested to hear what your readers have to say about it.

No one is judging you on it because so many people still do it, but it’s outdated and if you’re someone who cares about such details, you should train yourself out of it.

(And because I’m bracing for an outcry: It’s true that lots of us, including me, were taught to put two spaces after a period in our seventh grade typing classes. But the practice came from typewriters, which used monospaced type, meaning that each letter took up the same amount of space. Double spaces after a period were used to give a visual pause so you could see that the sentence had ended. Now that we have computers with proportional fonts, a single space after a period is the rule and has been for a while. Change with the times! More here.)

5. Asking whether a job is still open before applying

Is responding to an online job ad, asking whether or not the position is still open prior to actually applying or sending them a resume/cover letter etc. likely to hurt my chances of potentially being hired for the job?

The question is meant to pertain to any job situation, but in my particular case, the month-old ad in question instructs applicants to demonstrate ability by thoroughly editing and source checking a lengthy article. (A cover letter and resume are still required.) The position would be a great fit for me, but I also need to secure a job yesterday. I know myself well enough to realize that this particular application process will consume at least several hours of my time, and wasting time is something I can ill afford to do at the moment. (Perhaps this process shouldn’t take me so much time, but I’m just working with the facts.)

I don’t want to throw away that time if the position has been filled, but I can also see how contacting the employer with only that question could come across in an unattractively casual manner, & create the impression that I’m not a “go-getter,” or that I’m not properly enthused about the job being offered.

It won’t hurt your chances. But you might not get a response, and while you’re waiting for one, the position might close. Some employers just don’t respond to questions about their openings, especially from non-applicants. So if you’re strongly interested, I’d go ahead and apply.

For the record, asking applicants who haven’t passed any initial screening yet to spend several hours on a test is really poor form. (It’s rude because the majority of applicants won’t even get interviewed. The employer should spend 15 seconds considering whether a person is a reasonably promising candidate before making a request like that.)

employers want workers who they don’t have to train

The Washington Post has a great piece from Peter Cappelli about how the “skills shortage” that people like to blame on schools (and on college students’ choice of focus in their studies) is BS … and that the real issue is that employers just don’t want to train people anymore.

He rightly points out that the argument that there’s a skills shortage because schools aren’t properly preparing students for work falls apart when you realize that the reported “skills gap” is about all levels of hiring, not just for entry-level roles. And if employers are having trouble finding people at all career levels with the right experience, then the issue isn’t about what schools are doing.

He concludes: “What employers really want are workers they don’t have to train … Companies simply haven’t invested much in training their workers. In 1979, young workers got an average of 2.5 weeks of training a year. While data is not easy to come by, around 1995, several surveys of employers found that the average amount of training workers received per year was just under 11 hours, and the most common topic was workplace safety — not building new skills.”

Oh, and he also notes that 30% of U.S. employers acknowledge that job seekers were looking for more pay than they were willing to offer. Which might have something to do with an employer’s inability to find the right people.

It’s a great piece, and you should read the whole thing.

do you feel tele-pressure when you work from home?

The flexibility of working from home is usually a boon for workers … but regular work-from-home’ers know that this flexibility comes with a dark side too: “tele-pressure,” or the urge to respond to emails, texts, and voicemails as fast as you can, so that you appear connected and responsive. That leads to people doing things like interrupting evenings and weekends to respond to emails that aren’t actually urgent, or even neglecting their biggest priorities during the workday itself in order to remain continuously responsive to a never-ending stream of emails and other communications. Over time, it can lead to workers being less productive, burned out, and even experiencing health and sleep problems.

“Employees pick up on both subtle and not-so-subtle cues in the work environment that imply that fast response times are needed to be perceived as productive workers,” says Larissa Barber, a psychology professor at NIU and lead author of a new study on tele-pressure. “This may leave employees feeling like they technically have the option of not being continuously accessible, but that unplugging—even for short periods of time—may be damaging to their careers.”

So what can you do if you’re feeling pressure to show at all times that you’re responsive and productive? These six steps may help:

* Turn off new message notifications on your phone and email so that you’re not getting distracted by the constant “answer me!” ding of every new message. Instead, check your messages several times throughout the day when you’re at a good breaking point in the rest of your work.

* Schedule work blocks for yourself, several-hour chunks of time where you’ll work distraction-free on your biggest priorities, and consciously choose to stay out of your email during those periods.

* Don’t assume that your manager expects instant responses to every email. Plenty of managers send emails in the evening or over the weekend but don’t expect responses until normal work hours. If you’re in doubt, ask your manager:“Hey, I’m assuming that it’s fine for me to wait to reply to emails sent over the weekend until I’m back at work on Monday, unless it’s an emergency. Let me know if that’s not the case.”

* Resolve to disconnect from work email altogether once your work day is over. Not every field allows this – there are some jobs that truly require you to be available and responsive at all times – but the majority don’t. Unless your job explicitly requires you to be constantly connected, try simply not checking your email over the weekend for one week’s worth of evenings and see what happens. If everything seems to go fine, try it for a second week and see what happens. Still fine? That’s probably a sign that you can truly disconnect going forward – and should.

* Remind yourself that if you don’t get an answer within a few hours every time you query a colleague, you don’t assume that person is slacking off; you assume they’re busy with something else. The same is likely true of how your colleagues think of you – and that’s doubly true if you have an established track record of getting back to people and doing good work.

* If you’re a manager, do your part to combat tele-pressure on your team by (a) creating norms around response time that make it clear instant responses aren’t expected unless something is truly urgent, (b) convey specific, non-urgent timelines in your emails when you can (such as “would you let me know by Thursday?”), and (c) explicitly telling people that you don’t want them to feel pressured to prioritize email above other work or disconnecting at night and on weekends.

is there a best time of day to fire someone?

A reader writes:

I know there have been a lot of discussions on your blog about the kindest ways to fire someone. I was wondering what your opinion is on the time of day it’s done.

Recently one of my coworkers was let go. At the end of the workday, another manager ushered everyone else who was around (we’re a small office) into a fake meeting so that the employee would be able to pack up his desk in peace. This is how I have seen several other firings happen, and I thought that it seemed fair.

However, several of my coworkers were upset about the way it was handled, and said that it should have happened at the beginning of the day. I can see their side; maybe it’s better to do it first thing in the morning and get it over with. However I personally think that it could cause more commotion because everyone is arriving in the morning, saying hi, making coffee, etc., and the poor employee has to pack up and leave with everyone staring.

You’ll find arguments for any day of the week and any time of day you can think of.

The argument for doing it at the start of the day is that it can feel like a slap in the face if the person has just put in a full day’s work, not knowing that they’re about to be fired.

The argument for doing it at the end of the day is that the person can pack up their things and leave in peace, without a lot of questions or awkward conversations.

The argument for doing it in the middle of the day is that many people will be at lunch and comings and goings aren’t unusual then.

And just to complete this list, we can throw in days of the week too: The argument for doing it on Friday is that the person will have the whole weekend to process the news; this is actually thought to reduce the risk of workplace violence (such as an incident where the person angrily returns the following day). The argument for doing it on Monday is that the person can start picking up the pieces right away, rather than having to wait through a weekend before being able to conduct various pieces of business (although I think that’s less relevant now that you can do things like apply for unemployment online).

Everyone has their own views on this. But ultimately what’s most important is whether the person was treated fairly and with dignity. If they were, it doesn’t really matter what day of the week or time of day it happens. If they’re not, there’s no day or time that will make that better.

It sounds like your company was thoughtful about logistics around your coworker’s firing in order to preserve her dignity. That’s what I’d focus on.

asking sick employees to stay home, I don’t want to do the intern hiring, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Can I ask employees to stay home if they’re sick?

I’m the head of a team of 15-20 part-time employees who are paid hourly and do not get benefits or paid leave. It’s flu season, and some of them have been coming to work clearly sick–some to the point that they look like they can barely stay awake. Is there any reason I would not be able to instate a “if you’re sick, you can’t come in” rule to keep the germs from spreading around? I understand these guys want their pay, but when someone brings a disease into the office it spreads like wildfire, and the overall effect is detrimental to both productivity and morale.

You can indeed implement such a rule, and in general it’s good guidance to give people, both so that people aren’t spreading germs to others and so that they’re staying at home resting and taking care of themselves. However, it’s pretty hard to do this in a situation where people don’t have paid sick leave. If people have to choose between coming to work sick or paying the rent or the electric bill, most people will choose coming to work sick. In that context, you risk just driving it underground (i.e., people will still come to work sick but will try to hide it from you) and/or creating resentment about the lack of paid sick leave.

I know these are part-time jobs without benefits, but I bet you’d get better results if you offered paid sick days even to your part-timers.

2. Asking to be absolved of intern hiring duties

I work in a small design firm of eight people. I am squarely in the middle of the hierarchy; there are three people with more seniority (the owner, the director, and a senior designer) and three people who are more junior than I am.

Recently, the task of hiring interns for the office has fallen on me. I have been asked to review resumes, conduct interviews, and advise the office manager about which candidates to send offers to. The owner actually came to my desk the other day and told me that it was unacceptable that we didn’t currently have more interns and that this couldn’t happen again. So it would appear that he believes that I am in charge of hiring interns.

This makes me very uncomfortable for a number of reasons: 1) This is not part of my job description; 2) I have absolutely ZERO training in HR matters; and 3) I am not compensated additionally for performing these duties.

Additionally, I have a feeling that some employment laws are being broken. The office is very informal and questions about candidates’ ethnicity and sexual orientation are made post-interview, and this strikes me as not being kosher. Furthermore, the position that I have been tasked with filling is — to my understanding — illegal. It is a freelance/contractor type position (1099) but the interns are required to be in the office during specified hours, use company-owned computers, do not set their own rates, etc. Do I have a case for asking to be absolved of these duties?

Most people who hire interns don’t get paid extra for it, even if it’s not part of their job description; in small offices, it tends to be a duty that falls to the person who has the time and can reasonably do it. And unfortunately, most small offices don’t have a ton of HR training, if any, so that part isn’t outrageous either, although you can certainly ask for specific training.

However, you’re absolutely right to be concerned about discriminatory remarks and whether the structure of the position itself violates the law. But rather than asking to jumping straight to asking to removed from the work (which will leave those problems unaddressed), why not point out what you’re concerned about? For instance, you could say, “I have some concerns about how we’ve structured the position and how we’re assessing candidates and think we’re running afoul of the law — both by treating it as a 1099 position when the law greatly restricts when we can do that, and by remarks that people are making about candidates’ ethnicity, sexual orientation, and other areas that can get us into legal trouble (and shouldn’t be coming up regardless).”

If your manager isn’t open to changing course or — ideally — consulting with an employment lawyer, at that point it would be reasonable to say something like, “I’m not comfortable breaking hiring-related laws. For me to do the hiring work, we’d need to comply with the law. Otherwise I’d like to move it to someone else.”

3. Explaining a career shift that’s due to autism

I was recently diagnosed with high-functioning autism as an adult, and so I’m looking to transition from an HR people-focused role that I’ve struggled with, into a more data analytical role where I wouldn’t need to interface with people as much.

I don’t want to just say in my cover letter that my recently discovered autism is the reason that I’m looking to make a career change, since it is a disability that’s protected under the ADA. I don’t want it to either 1) cause them to not want to work with me, thinking that I can’t do the job, or 2) cause them to give me a chance simply because I’m disabled, since I don’t want special treatment.

However, I’m not being considered for these data analytical type roles because I only have 3 years of similar experience and that’s in an HR systems role only.Is there some way that I can explain why I’m looking to make the career change, without specifically talking about my disability?

I’d explain your reasoning without tying it to autism. For example: “After working in both people-focused roles and data-focused roles, I’ve found that I particularly shine in the latter. (Fill in specifics and evidence that you’re good at the data stuff here.)”

4. Can I ask my old employer to disable my old email account?

I recently left a mortgage bank. They still have my email address active with my name at the company, which means they’re still representing me as working there. Can I request that they no longer use my email as an email account?

You can certainly ask it, but they’re not obligated to change it. It’s not uncommon for employers to keep former employees’ email addresses active, so that they don’t miss messages that are sent to that person. It’s unlikely that they’re actively representing you as working there; unless you’ve actually seen that happening, I’d let it go.

5. My wages are being withheld because my boyfriend owes money

I was employed with a franchise McDonald’s in California. I went to pick up my paycheck and the general manager said she was keeping my paycheck and my boyfriend’s paycheck to pay back money he owed to her. Is she legally allowed to do that? I had nothing to do with their verbal agreement on the money she was loaning him from the company safe, nor did I sign any paperwork saying I would be responsible for his debt. My boyfriend didn’t sign anything as well. Please let me know what I can do.

No, she absolutely cannot withhold your pay because your boyfriend owes money. Say this to her: “I haven’t authorized you to allocate my pay to someone else, and under California law my wages need to be paid to me on our regular payday. I’d like to pick up my paycheck today, please.”

If that doesn’t work, contact the California department of labor and report that your wages are being withheld. California is pretty aggressive about intervening when something like this happens.

my boss will be angry that I didn’t tell him a coworker was job-searching

A reader writes:

I am in a bit of a dilemma over what to do. A colleague of mine, “Deb,” who I like and respect (and who is getting treated pretty poorly) is looking for another job and has asked me to be a reference. I agreed and I feel good about it – she is not getting anything good at her job now and is smart and should find a better job. I am not her manager, but I am senior to her in our organization.

Last year however, someone else from our job, “Jane,” left and that person’s manager was a reference for her (so the manager knew she was job-hunting). When Jane got the new job, our boss went crazy – how could the manager not tell the boss that Jane was job hunting and had gotten to the point of checking references, and he felt betrayed and could not trust said manager, and things really soured for a long while between them.

I don’t feel it is my place to tell my boss that Deb is job hunting. Actually, I think if you look at how hard she works, how frustrated she is overall, and how few rewards she gets, it should be pretty obvious that she would be job hunting (but I don’t think my boss is really good at noticing people’s frustrations). Now she actually is a finalist for a job that has some real possibilities, and I will be talking to the hiring manager later this week. I understand that knowing someone is thinking about or about to leave is helpful for planning purposes but at the same time, but I feel like it’s still not a done deal and I have no way of knowing what might happen, so my gut feeling is that I should just stay quiet and let Deb deal with her whole job transition if she gets and takes this other job.

What is my responsibility here? Do I owe my boss a head’s up? If so, when? Do you have good language if I don’t tell him and he accuses me of hiding things from him? This particular job is within the same system, so even though we are totally independent organizations (within that system), my assumption is that my boss will find out I was a reference (people talk, hint, gossip).

No, I don’t think you’re obligated to out Deb’s job search. Moreover, I think you have an obligation to Deb to be discreet about it — or if you for some reason feel you can’t ethically do that, to give her a heads-up about it before agreeing to be a reference.

Your boss has a point that senior leaders, as part of the leadership team of the organization, have some conflicting obligations in a situation — their obligation to the person who confided in them, plus their obligation to loop the organization in about serious personnel issues, including possible upcoming vacancies. And there are cases where a manager would have real conflict between these competing obligations. For instance, if a major project was being planned that depended on Deb being there for it, and you knew that she was actively seeking to leave, someone could argue that you’d have an obligation to speak up. But even then, you wouldn’t just spill the information — you’d go back to Deb and explain that you were in a difficult situation and figure out how to approach it from there. (And you’d also presumably remember that Deb could be planning on leaving without you ever knowing about it, and that’s part of the risk employers take when they depending heavily on one person — and that in those cases, they’re well-served by thinking strategically about how to retain that person. Which it sounds like your employer is not in the habit of doing.)

In any case, when their obligations to an employee and their obligations to the organization are in conflict, leaders need to make judgment calls about how to cause the least harm. The idea is to hire managers who can navigate that line with good sense.

Your boss was out of line for his reaction to your colleague. “Going crazy” because he wasn’t informed about someone’s confidential and sensitive conversation about a job hunt isn’t reasonable.

You’re entitled to keep your conversation with Deb private. If your boss confronts you over it later, I’d suggest saying something like, “She talked to me in confidence and it wasn’t my information to share. Plus, employees moving on is a normal part of business that we can’t put a stop to. But I do think that if you’re bothered by it, we could look at ways to retain people before they start job searching.”

how should your office handle snow days?

With much of the east coast dealing with a major blizzard, you might be wondering how to handle work when you’re snowed in. Should you get paid even if your office closes? What if your boss is pressuring you to come to work despite the road conditions? Do you have to use PTO for a snow day?

Here are the answers to these and other frequently asked questions about how to handle work during major snowstorms.

Can your employer require you to come into work even if the roads are hazardous?

Yes, your employer can require you to come to work despite severe weather. That said, a reasonable employer – and even employers that aren’t generally reasonable in other situations – will make allowances for employees who cannot safely make it in.

But if your employer is requiring to you to get to work and you don’t believe you can safely travel, or if authorities are telling people in your community to stay inside and off the roads, you should push back and point out the safety hazards. Try saying something like, “The roads I’d need to travel on are not safe for driving right now, and I don’t think I can safely make it in. Authorities are asking people not to drive unless it’s an emergency.”

What if your company says you should use your own judgment when deciding whether to come in during severe weather? Will you look bad if you stay home?

If you can’t safely drive to work, take your employer’s guidance at face value and stay off the roads.

If the roads aren’t hazardous enough to pose a safety issue but you’d rather not drive on them, this is case of “know your manager.” Is your boss a generally reasonable person who means it when she tells you to use your judgment? Or is she someone who gives lip service to concepts like telecommuting but really means she wants you in the office?

If you’re unsure, try asking your boss directly: “Is it really fine to stay home during the storm if I’m concerned about the roads?” Pay attention to how she answers. “Yes, please do stay home” can probably be taken at face value. On the other hand, “Well, I don’t want you to feel unsafe, but we could really use you here” probably means that she wants you to try.

If your office shuts down for a snow day, must you still be paid?

The answer to this depends on whether your job is classified as exempt or nonexempt.

If you’re a nonexempt employee (someone who is required to be paid overtime when you work more than 40 hours in a given week) and your office closes because of the storm so you don’t work on those days, your employer is not required to pay you for those days. Some employers will pay you anyway, but the law doesn’t require it; it will depend on your employer’s policy.

If you’re an exempt employee (salaried and not required to be paid overtime) and if you work any portion of the week, your employer must pay you your full salary for the week, even if your office closes because of the weather.

If your employer shuts down for a snow day, can it require you to use a vacation day for the time even though it wasn’t your choice to stay home?

Yes. Employers can indeed require employees to use a vacation day when the office closes for weather, even though it’s often frustrating to workers who don’t like to see their time off “wasted” on snow days. However, many employers choose to cover the day off for everyone rather than forcing people to use their vacation time.

What if you work from home on a snow day? Do you have still need to use a vacation day in that case?

If you’re working a full day from home, that’s a work day, and you shouldn’t need to use a vacation day for it. If you’re working sporadically from home, between shoveling, drinking hot chocolate and lounging on your couch, it will depend on how much of the day you’re really working – and on your employer’s internal policy for this kind of thing.

If you’re already on vacation and your company shuts down for snow while you’re away, do you still have to use a vacation day for that time, even though your company was closed?

This is up to your employer. Some companies won’t require you to use the vacation time since you wouldn’t have been at work anyway, but others will – figuring that you benefited by being able to plan on the certainty of the day off, whereas your co-workers had to rely on the whims of the weather.

If you’re not sure how your employer handles this, it’s reasonable to simply ask.

Say something like, “I’m uncertain how my planned leave works with the snow day. Should I still count the day we closed as a vacation day?”

This column was originally published at U.S. News & World Report.

 

I don’t know if my boss did anything after I reported a coworker’s plagiarism

A reader writes:

I work in an office where our primary role is to conduct research and write reports. A few months ago, I was working with a colleague on a report and found out that he had plagiarized large parts of one of the sections for which he was responsible. I caught this purely by accident while proofreading his section when I googled something to get more clarification and found that he had lifted entire paragraphs, verbatim, from other sources without providing proper attribution. I took this information to my boss, along with print-outs of the original sources and a copy of my coworker’s draft for comparison. My boss seemed very dismayed and disappointed in my coworker, and was very thankful to me for coming to him. He assured me he would talk to my coworker about it, though he said he wasn’t sure at that time how he was going to handle it. I figured that was fine and that he needed some time to think about it before proceeding.

I want to be clear about one thing without going into revealing detail: the plagiarism that I fortunately caught before we published the paper would absolutely not have gone unnoticed had we published it. My coworker plagiarized from some VERY well-known sources. The reputation of our entire office and my boss in particular would have been jeopardized by this.

It has now been about two months since I told my boss about the plagiarism and I still don’t know what, if anything, has been done about it. All I know is that my coworker still works here. While it’s my boss’s prerogative whether or not to fire him or just to discipline him in some other way, I know that my boss is definitely the type to avoid confrontation, and I’m really concerned he just didn’t say anything at all to him. If that’s the case, I obviously wouldn’t feel comfortable working in an environment where plagiarism is tolerated.

I understand that my boss isn’t obligated to share with me any details of how he chose to discipline my coworker, but I am wondering if it would be reasonable for me to follow up with my boss to ask whether he did *something.* Can I ask my boss what he did about the situation or is this overstepping my bounds? And if I do ask, how should I phrase it so that I don’t sound nosy about the punishment, but rather concerned about how our office treats plagiarism?

Eh, I think you probably need to trust that your boss handled it and let it go.

Unless your boss is pathologically unassertive and has a track record of not addressing serious issues, there’s pretty much no reason to assume that he didn’t talk to your coworker about it. The issue was a serious one, your boss sounded concerned when you brought it up, and it’s the kind of thing that’s generally going to be a no-brainer for a manager to address with an employee. If he didn’t, you have a huge manager problem, one that goes far beyond this particular incident.

But if you’re only worrying that he might not have addressed it because you didn’t hear anything else about it … It’s actually very normal that you didn’t hear anything else about it. Your part of this really ended once you brought it to your boss’s attention. A good manager would then go handle it directly with the employee involved, and it would be very normal not to then circle back to you to tell you how it was resolved, because that part of it isn’t really something that affects you.

As for why your coworker is still there … Plagiarism is a big deal, especially in a job where the primary work is researching and writing (and where, therefore, people should really know better). But in many offices, it’s pretty rare for someone to be fired over a single instance of bad behavior, especially if they’re otherwise doing good work. I mean, yes, if you’re caught embezzling, you’re probably going to be let go without warning — but for most other stuff, even when it’s bad, you’re more likely to get a serious talking-to and possibly a formal warning than to be fired for one instance of something. I’d assume that your boss had a very serious conversation with your coworker, is satisfied that it won’t happen again, and hopefully is watching his work a little more closely for a while.

As for whether it would be reasonable to ask your boss whether he took action … I don’t think so. It would be so odd for a manager to not take action in this situation that asking is almost insulting (by implying that maybe he didn’t), and ultimately it’s really between him and your coworker. I’d trust that it was handled and move on.

maternity leave and hurt feelings, penalizing employees who won’t participate in wellness programs, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Penalizing employees who don’t participate in wellness programs

My company plans to penalize employees who do not take care of themselves by denying them the privilege of purchasing low-cost insurance. I understand the need to control costs and that the cost of insurance is significant, but my employer is asking employees to do things that, while in the employee’s best interest, are fairly intrusive (tracking your weight, coaching if you have an addiction, taking a lifestyle questionnaire, getting regular checkups along with all other sex or age appropriate tests).

Of course this is the employer’s right, but I’m wondering if this is a trend that is likely to become commonplace. In five years, can everyone expect to have their employers this involved in what, up until recently, were very private issues?

Probably. Your employer is likely presenting it as a “discount” for employees who do participate in various “wellness” programs, rather than as a penalty for those who don’t, but yeah, it’s a growing trend as employers look for ways to control their health care costs. Of course, you might have the option of dropping your employer’s plan (and thus their subsidy, and thus their privacy invasions) and instead buying your own coverage from the insurance exchanges set up under the Affordable Care Act.

2. I was hurt when the person I’m covering for maternity leave attended our Christmas lunch

I’m filling a maternity leave role with the agreement in place that I will be hired full-time. Over the holiday season, our unit had a Christmas lunch and when we showed up at the venue, the person I’m replacing (who is still on her maternity leave) was there waiting to join us for lunch. I think it’s quite nice of my employer to include her, but I felt a little taken aback as I was not expecting her to be there. I have never worked at a company where they invited people who were on leave for any reason to events like this. Maybe that’s because this is the first office that I’ve worked in where within a month of starting I haven’t felt “accepted” within my unit’s circle. I’ve had very positive feedback from my manager on my work performance, but I feel very lonely at work. Perhaps this is why it felt insensitive to me, as I don’t feel accepted, yet any time “Betty” shows up it’s a big deal.

Again, I think it was nice but I can’t help feel this was a little insensitive towards me. I would be interested to read your reply.

It’s not unusual to invite former employees or employees who are on leave to office social events; it’s actually a really nice gesture! I’m sure that no one meant it to make you uncomfortable; after all, she isn’t your competition or someone who got you fired or anything like that. People might have even thought you’d enjoy the opportunity to talk.

I think the bigger issue is that you’re feeling lonely at work — but I wouldn’t take offense at their invitation to someone who’s still officially part of their team or see it as a reflection on you in any way.

3. Late pay for independent contractors

My husband recently accepted an independent contractor position. He only works for this company, as there is plenty of work to keep him busy. We live in Illinois, but the company is based in Iowa.

When he started, they told him the pay week ended Saturday night at midnight and started again on Sunday, with the cutting of checks on Monday. So, as long as all completed orders were submitted by Saturday night they would make that week’s pay. My husband has never missed that deadline. He was also told that printed checks would be mailed on Monday (with the exception of holidays) and most often be in our mailboxes on Wednesdays. This has only happened once in the last 2-1/2 months. Over Christmas and New Year’s, we anticipated a delay and didn’t speak up. However, on Monday he was told that checks weren’t printed for mail on Tuesday because the office gal was out. Assuming she would bust her behind Tuesday to print and mail checks, we didn’t get too excited. However, it is now Friday and the mailman has come and gone, leaving no check. My husband called the office gal and she indicated that his may have been forgotten and not mailed with the others (who we have now confirmed with have received their checks) and it should be there tomorrow, she hopes.

If he was told that his check would be cut on a certain day every week, does he have any actions he can take against the company, considering he is independent?

Not unless he has a contract that requires payment within a certain time frame and establishes penalties for late payment.

Employees have a lot more protections than independent contractors, including state-level laws that require that paychecks be issued by certain dates. For independent contractors, it’s just governed by whatever it says in their contract (which may or may not even be in existence).

4. Cover letter when applying for a job for the second time

I’m a relatively new grad, having finished my graduate degree about a year ago. Around that time, I made my first application to a job in my field. The interview went well, the managers were enthusiastic about the possibility of me joining the team… but ultimately an internal applicant got the job.

I bought your book (it’s great!) and maintained a connection with one of the managers. Lo and behold, the job was posted again! I followed your advice in the book about reaching out to my contact to see if they had suggestions as to how I could make my application stronger. My contact has given me lots of valuable info going forward, but I can’t find anything on your website or your book about writing a new cover letter in this instance. Should I mention my previous application? How do I make this cover letter seem fresh?

Yes, mention that you applied previously and that you continue to be strongly interested. I’d say something like, “I applied and interviewed for this position last February, and I’d love to be considered for it again. Our conversations last year only solidified my interest in the role, because…”

5. How long does it take for questions to be answered here?

I’ve always wondered how long it takes you to answer a question on your blog. It seems like some of the questions people submit a highly time-sensitive. Do you answer those questions right away? Just wondering.

It varies wildly. Sometimes a letter might get answered the next day, sometimes it’s more than a month later … and sometimes it’s never, unfortunately, because I’m answering 6-7 questions a day here but receiving 40+ daily. I used to try to ensure that everyone got an answer, even if it was just a few private lines, but that stopped being possible at some point, and I’ve had to make peace with that. Anyway, I do keep a backlog of questions that I’m excited to answer at some point; some of them are embarrassingly old, unfortunately.

But there’s an auto-reply that goes to everyone explaining that I can’t answer everyone, so hopefully people know not to wait on a response if something is time-sensitive.

are there legal issues with volunteering at my yoga studio in exchange for free classes?

A reader writes:

I volunteer a few hours a week at my local yoga studio as a front-desk worker, and was recently made aware of an opportunity to pick up a part-time manager position at the yoga studio. When discussing this with the owner, I stated that I would want some sort of compensation for my time, especially if I would be working for the studio in an official capacity.

The studio owner offered to compensate me by putting any hours I worked (at a rate to be determined) towards a teacher training program that she offers at the studio, and that I would be taking next year. In practical terms, this would give me a substantial “discount” or if I put in enough hours, would make the program itself free when I eventually enroll.

This sounded like a perfect solution to me, but I want to make sure this wouldn’t get our studio / the owner of the studio in trouble, legally. If I were to sign a contract stipulating the terms of my employment as previously stated, would this work? Or do I need to request compensation in the form of actual payment to make sure the studio doesn’t get into legal trouble?

If the yoga studio is a for-profit business, it’s actually illegal for them to use volunteers for anything; for-profit businesses are required to pay people at least minimum wage for all work that they perform. That’s true even if the people in question are happy to waive their right to be paid.

I realize, though, that it’s pretty common for yoga studios to let people volunteer a few hours a month in exchange for discounts on classes, and if that’s a trade you’re happy to make, I tend to think that’s your call. But in theory, yes, the yoga studio could get in trouble for it. If they were reported (by you or someone else), they could be fined and ordered to pay volunteers back-pay for their time.

In practice, are they likely to be reported? Probably not, especially considering how common a practice this seems to be among yoga people — but it’s certainly a risk. If nothing else, it would be smart (and kind) for you to make the studio owner aware of it, since she probably has no idea.

This is one of those laws that’s so commonly ignored that often people genuinely don’t realize it, especially in fields where volunteering despite the law is pretty common and especially in places that can feel more like a club of like-minded people than a profit-generating enterprise.