where are you now? (a call for updates)

At the end of each year, I publish a slew of “where are they now” updates from people whose questions I answered here in the past. In past years we’ve had several hundred each December and it’s been magnificent.

If you’ve had your question answered here in the past, please email me an update and let us know how your situation turned out. Did you take the advice? Did you not take the advice? What happened? How’s your situation now?  (Don’t post your updates here though; email them to me.)

Note: Your update doesn’t have to be positive or big to be worth submitting. We want to hear them all, even if you don’t think yours is that interesting.

And if there’s anyone you especially want to hear an update from, mention it here and I’ll reach out to those people directly.

Posted in Uncategorized

how do people find the career path that’s right for them?

It’s the Thursday “ask the readers” question. A reader writes:

I have been in my professional career for just over 10 years, and I am still trying to figure out what to be when I grow up. I have never had a clear idea of the “right” career for me, and the standard advice of “follow your passion” has never worked — I am interested in almost everything, but don’t have a defining passion.

I fell into my first job when I was offered a full-time role after completing an internship. It was a good job and I worked with great people, but I never considered it my long-term career. I eventually switched focus areas for similar companies due to some family issues that required me to move back to my hometown. I have diverse skill sets that have helped me do well in these roles, but I never got into one specific area with a clear career path. There have been a lot of changes at my current company that have made me realize it’s time to move on, but I don’t know what to do next, or if I want to stay in my current industry.

I am limited to fully remote work (due to the area where I live, and moving isn’t an option) and am 100% sure I don’t want to manage people, but I don’t know where to begin beyond that. I have read many books and articles about finding the right career without success, and have researched career coaches, but am hesitant to invest in working with one due to a lack of industry standards or required qualifications. A lot of people recommend informational interviews, but I am very reluctant to ask someone for their time without having a specific purpose.

How do people choose a career that is right for them? It seems ineffective to just continue scrolling job boards and applying to things that may be okay for awhile, but it also seems wasteful to invest years in a career that I may not ultimately be interested in. I want to decide on a solid path and work on acquiring the skills I need to excel, but there are so many options that it’s hard to know where to begin. Having a good career is important to me, and I’m worried I will get to retirement age and feel like I wasted my professional life. Any advice?

Readers, what’s your advice?

someone insulted my grieving coworker and made it look like I did it, getting a job offer after only one interview, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Someone insulted my grieving coworker and made it look like I did it

Recently, one of my coworkers who is on the same team as me lost her cat to cancer. Her manager set up a virtual greeting card for our team to sign. I signed the card today and left this message: “I’m so sorry for your loss, you and Fluffy were lucky to have each other” and left it at that.

A few hours later, another coworker slacks me with this message: “Just a warning that everyone can see what you wrote. You still have time to change or it, or you can own it, I guess.” I had no idea what he was talking about, but figured it was about the greeting card since the only other things I had written that day were emails or reminders that he wasn’t included on.

I clicked back into the greeting card and saw that the message I wrote had been replaced with one insulting my coworker and her cat. However, when I went to change it back to what I had actually written, my original message was in the draft field. I sent it again and saw that it was the right message, but now I’m worried. What if someone else besides the coworker who Slacked me saw the offensive message? I told the person in charge of the card what happened, but I’m worried she won’t believe me and will think I’m just trying to cover my butt. Was I right to let her know? Should I also let my boss know?

Also, other teams have set up virtual cards on the same site for other coworkers, but now I’m scared to sign those cards in case this would happen again.

You should let your boss know because one of your colleagues did a really horrible thing and tried to make it look like you did! Who sends an insulting message about the death of someone’s cat? And tries to pin it on someone else? That’s seriously messed up behavior, and if I were your boss I’d sure as hell want to know that someone on my team did something so crappy.

You can frame it this way: “This is such a weird thing, but after I left a condolence message in the card for Jane, someone changed it to something absolutely horrible, insulting Jane and her cat. Somehow they made it look like it was mine. I was disgusted and changed it back to my original message, but I didn’t know it was possible for someone to do that so I wanted to flag that for you, as well as the fact that someone on our team did such a cruel thing to someone who’s grieving. I figured you’d want to be aware of it.” As long as you let your natural horror at their message show, and as long as you aren’t known in your office for being the kind of person who insults people in condolence cards, it’s very unlikely that your boss or Jane will think this was an elaborate plot by you to insult her and then backtrack.

2. Can I go over my manager’s head to ask that she have a lighter workload?

I’ve worked at my company for about a year and a half. My manager started in our department a few weeks before I did and is a first-time people manager. She’s great at her job, friendly, gives clear advice and feedback, and really wants me to grow in my role. We get along well. We’re both in our late 20s.

My issue is that she’s very clearly extremely burnt out. I have a good glimpse (but not a full picture) of her workload, and it’s just too much for any one person to handle. She’s mentioned that she feels burnt out and, from our one-on-ones and daily chatter, is clearly very stressed and overwhelmed nearly daily. My own workload is fine; it’s a lot of work, but I come from a related industry known for harsh deadlines and no work-life balance, so I’m comfortable here in comparison. I’ve asked to take more off her plate to even the load and I’ve been able to take on a little more, but there’s not much more within the realm of both our roles that I can do.

I know my overall company is kind of a mess and I think the only reason my workload is as comfortable as it is is because of her. I know she’s advocating for herself but, from my viewpoint, her workload is only getting heavier. I’m really worried she might burn out or need to quit. Selfishly, I’m worried that my job here will be way more unpleasant if she leaves, but also, I’ve experienced burnout and I wouldn’t wish it on anyone.

Would it unreasonable to talk to her manager and express concern that too much is being asked of her? I don’t want to make it seem like she’s doing badly at her job (she’s not!) and I don’t want to seem patronizing or anything like that. I think if I ask her first she might insist it’s unnecessary; she’s talked along those lines before. I just wonder if another voice advocating for her would be helpful or harmful.

Don’t do it! This is very much between your manager and the people above her; trying to advocate for her is highly likely to come across as undermining to her. If she wants to address her workload with her manager, she needs to do that herself. Having someone she manages go over her head will make it look like you don’t think she’s capable of accurately assessing and addressing her own work situation, or like she’s been venting inappropriately to you, or even like she asked you to advocate for her. If someone who reported to me did this without my knowledge, I’d be pissed — you don’t know how it might blow back on her or make her look like a weak manager.

I know you’re not seeing it that way — you’re seeing “I like this manager, know she’s overworked, and want to make sure we don’t lose her” — but the hierarchy will make it play out really weirdly.

3. Is it alarming to get a job offer after only one interview?

I had a zoom interview last Thursday. I thought it went well. Yesterday I got an offer letter. Salary and benefits are good, however being an Xer, I was a little taken aback by an offer after a 45-minute interview, especially when I hear horror stories about seven rounds of interviews.

It is a young company (2021) with founders who seem to be very driven. There have really been no other red flags.

Am I being paranoid or is there any cause for alarm? They gave me a week to sign the offer letter and I would start two weeks after that.

A lot of places still hire after only one interview! It’s not uncommon. But the big question for you is whether you have the information you need to make a decision. Do you have a good enough understanding of the job, the team, the manager, and the culture? Do you have big questions that are still unanswered? Have you had time to do other research on the company to make sure you know what you’re getting into (like what I describe here)?

If you don’t feel like you have enough information to make a decision on your side, it’s completely fine to say something like, “Would it be possible to set up a call this week so I can ask some remaining questions? I didn’t get a chance to ask everything at our earlier meeting and I want to make sure I have a full understanding of the job and the team.”

Related:
should I be worried by a hiring process that’s just a single 30-minute interview?

4. My laptop is disgusting

I just started a new job I am very excited about! The laptop given to me when I started was clearly used before. I just sat down to clean it up with some rubbing alcohol today.

It’s filthy. I didn’t notice because I dock it at home and at work. I am talking greasy film over all the keys on the keyboard. There is dust. I pried out some food stuck under the keys. It smells. IT SMELLS.

This is a decently resourced organization. How would you handle this?

My laptop is also disgusting but at least it doesn’t smell (and somehow it’s less gross when your own grubby fingers are the source of the mess). But sometimes I see it through someone else’s eyes and am horrified and then immediately clean it.

But laptops should be cleaned in between users!

In any case, it weren’t for the smell, the most practical thing would be to just clean it yourself — but I’m assuming there’s nothing you can do about the smell on your own. Can you go to IT/whoever issued you the laptop and say, “This came to me in really bad shape, with greasy film on the keys and food stuck in it. I’ve cleaned it as best I can but it still smells. Can I swap it for a different one or can we get it cleaned?”

5. My interview is tomorrow and I’m sick

I have a (virtual) job interview on Friday, but I’m currently sick and sound it. I’m hoping that I will sound better by Friday, but what’s the threshold for sounding congested/hoarse in an interview? Obviously if I’m still coughing up a storm every time I try to string two sentences together by the time the interview comes around, I need to cancel, but I’m unsure about what to do if I feel fine but still sound sick. I suppose the question here is twofold:

1. If I am too sick to keep the interview, how much notice should I give to reschedule and what should I say? And how sick is too sick? If I can talk fine, but still sound congested, is that okay? Or should I wait until I fully have my voice back?

2. If I’m well enough to have the interview at the current time but still sound a little hoarse/froggy, do I acknowledge it at the beginning of the interview? “I’m getting over a cold, so apologies that I still sound a little hoarse, but I’m excited to meet you….” or something like that?

If you feel well enough to do it (no brain fog, not exhausted, etc.) but just sound hoarse or congested, you should be fine proceeding. Just briefly and cheerfully address it at the start of the conversation — “excuse my voice, I’m getting over a cold but excited for this call” or similar.

If you’re too sick to keep the interview, try to give a day’s notice if you can (but if you can’t, then as soon as possible the morning of the appointment). And you can simply say, “I’m so sorry about the late notice — unfortunately I’ve gotten sick and am looking increasingly unlikely to be better in time for our interview tomorrow. Would we be able to reschedule for next week?”

If it weren’t virtual, my advice would be different; in that case, even if you’re confident you’re not contagious, your interviewers won’t be and it’s not a good idea to make your interviewer worry you’re exposing them to an active infection.

the overheard self-talk, the shoplifting, and other times you mortified yourself in job interviews

Last week I asked you to share stories of bombed interviews and other job search mortifications. It turns out … there were a lot of stories. So many that I couldn’t fit my favorites in one post. Here’s part one, and part two is coming next week.

1. The coffins

An interviewer once asked how long I planned on staying in the role if I got the job, and I said, “Forever. Does Office Depot sell coffins? I could order one because that is how long I will stay.”

That was not a testament to how much I wanted the job or my loyalty to any role, but more to how much I DID NOT WANT to look for another job. I do not know if it counts as a bad interview because I ended up getting the job, but I do think in the future I will not mention WORKING TO MY GRAVE at an interview.

2. The shoplifting

This is making me remember the time that I interviewed for a retail position when I was like 17. The interviewer asked me what I would do in the event of discovering a shoplifter. I proceeded to ramble about how everyone makes mistakes, how I would talk to the person that I saw stealing and ask them about why they were doing this, and the cherry on the disaster sundae was saying, “Not everyone who steals is bad, I have several friends who have shoplifted before!”

I’m full-body cringing just typing that out.

Quite clearly, I didn’t get the job.

3. The honesty

After getting my degree in chemistry, I interviewed for an entry level bench chemist job at a CMO. The manager who interviewed me asked something like, “Since you’re new to the workforce and this will be your first post-graduate role, what’s something that you worry about with that transition?”

My mind went blank (that’s not a question I prepared for!) and I answered with the first though that popped into my head, “I’m afraid I’m going to hate it.” The manager gave me a quizzical look so I started rambling, “Like, I just spent four years earning a degree in a subject that I love, and what if I start this job and it turns out that I hate it? What am I supposed to do then?”

The manager chuckled and said, “That is the most honest answer I have ever gotten for that question” and kept rolling with the interview. I wanted to melt into the chair and disappear forever. However, the manager hired me and I worked there for three years before going to grad school so I guess it all worked out okay.

4. Miller Time

“In the 90s I worked as an HR generalist for an addiction treatment and recovery outpatient center. We were interviewing a peer-to-peer addiction specialist. They’d need some minor credentialing as they’d spend time with our clients in recovery in our sober rec center in the evenings.

He interviewed so well until he asked at the end of the interview if his shift could end 30 minutes earlier than we had scheduled. I asked why, he said “because the beer store closes at 10, and that’s Miller Time for me.” We all just kind of nodded and moved on. When we saw him leave he had a huge 420 bumper sticker on his car.

5. The last name

I scored an interview for a director position at an animal hospital; my experience and skillset fit their criteria so well, it was as if they tailored the job for me!

One of their requirements was that I prepare marketing information on expanding their client base or I pitch ideas on reducing overhead costs, given assumptions I would make regarding a practice their size. Embracing the obnoxious side of my personality, I decided to wow them with ideas on both subjects. I worked days on my proposals, including polishing support docs which both my husband and dog agreed would seal the deal.

Then … I got a haircut, manicure, new pantsuit/shoes/attaché. I am mortified to admit I even bought new underwear, should tragedy strike and they have to conduct my interview in an ambulance. I mulled over getting a colonoscopy, but I didn’t want to over-prepare.

Interview day arrives! I pull into the parking lot exactly nine minutes early, stride through the door, and glide my way to the front desk.

“Good morning,” I practically sing. “I’m here for my 10:00 interview!” [Broad smile, friendly, but not overly so. Needn’t look too eager!]

The attendant smiled back and said she would notify the doctors. Then she said, “Can I get your name?”

I replied, “Stella….” At this very moment, my fatigued brain decided some downtime was well-earned and quite literally, powered off.

The attendant smiled again and said, “Stella…What?”

My head was so unoccupied by thought, all I processed was the sound of my heartbeat and the sweat droplets starting to burst from my pores.

“Excuse me, Stella. What is your last name, please?”

As God is my witness, I hadn’t the slightest clue in that moment what my last name was. Not only that, I could not think of a single last name of anyone I had ever met or heard about. I couldn’t think of a fruit or a vegetable or plant or a mineral. It was just me and my alarming warp-drive heartbeat, which was making me feel like the paramedics would get a chance to appreciate my new underwear after all.

Like the professional I am, I recovered quickly and said, “No last name. Just Stella. LIKE CHER!” [Weak smile. Needn’t look too pitiful!]

Attendant: Blank look.

Me: “Madonna?”

Attendant: Concerned look.

She excused herself and stepped into the back. I was soon escorted to a conference room with four veterinarians, all clearly eager to spend time with an applicant not able to recall their own last name. The interview actually went downhill from there, and I was not chosen for the job.

However, I am proud to assure you that since then, I’ve been able to recite my entire name – when asked – with a success rate of 100%. Why I am not running Apple or Google by now mystifies me.

6. The bubble baths

I was in my early twenties, interviewing with a middle-aged man. He asked me how I dealt with stress. I said I like to take bubble baths. I even talked about adding “lots and lots of bubbles.” I did not get the job. I still cringe thinking about it.

7. The fart

I farted in an interview and we just ignored it. I did get that job.

8. Tim Gunn

I once interviewed for a teaching position and one of the questions was essentially “tell us about a good teacher you had in the past and what you learned from them.” Again, this interview was *for a teaching position*, I absolutely should have been prepared for this kind of question, but every teacher I had ever had just completely flew out of my head. I had nothing. I talked about Tim Gunn on Project Runway. (Somewhat surprisingly I did get moved to the next round of interviews, although I did not get the job.)

9. The candle

Not my story but I had the misfortune of witnessing it firsthand. We had a job candidate giving a job talk at our all-lecturer writing center at a R1. This was during the pandemic so it was over Zoom. This person had 50 minutes to give us a sense of how they would be a good fit as a director for our peer writing center. All 18+ faculty and 6-ish support staff, along with our director and associated director, made space in our schedules to attend this job talk. The person started it off with a “centering moment”/mindfulness thing – which was to project a flickering candle, and we were all to “center” ourselves before the talk.

IT LASTED FOR TEN MINUTES. The guy spent 20% of his job talk making all of us silently stare at a video of a flickering candle.

I spent most of that 10 minutes pinning all of my colleagues horrified faces and trying not to laugh.

10. The intoxication

I was right out of college and interviewing for management consulting positions. They tend to have many interviews and I was talking to a few companies, so I was doing quite a few of them, and probably not giving the process the attention it deserved. Anyway. One night I went out with friends, and the night got a bit out of control … Woke up the next morning still very drunk, went to my interview and did a TERRIBLE job. Surprise, surprise, I didn’t get the job. The interviewer said I wasn’t “structured” enough and that it was “hard to follow my train of thoughts.” Ahem.

11. The crying

I was interviewing for a job right out of college and they asked me how I deal with high stress situations. I said, “Well, first, I cry.”

Did not get the job. Which was great, because I ended up in one at a different institution, and am still there (with a pension) 21 years later!

12. The confidence

When I was a grad student, a candidate came in to give a faculty job talk about their research. They posted a single slide with a bunch of graphs, sat down, put their feet up on the table, and said, “Any questions?”

13. The brain freeze

I was interviewing for network engineer positions. Ya know, “making the internet work” sort of stuff. One interview, after a few general questions, they handed me markers, gestured to the gigantic whiteboard that took up one entire wall floor-to-ceiling and 20 feet long, and said, “Draw the Internet – use the entire board”. My brain FROZE. I had been a network engineer for 10 years at this point, I knew exactly how the internet worked – but my brain just stopped functioning and I had no ideas ready on how to translate my knowledge into a drawing the size of a billboard. After a few very awkward moments of silence, I drew a cloud and wrote “I” in it, and sat down. No one said anything. I said, “I guess we’re done!” and walked out.

14. The enforced will

In an interview I probably should have bombed, but instead got hired from, I was asked how I managed working in a group.

I have a leadership diploma, and do actually do really well in groups, so I talked about building consensus, allowing time for discussion, clear communication, blah blah blah. However, at the time, I was taking extra courses to upgrade my degree and was the only student over 30 doing a group project with a bunch of 17-19 year olds, and really grinding my teeth through that particular process.

When the interviewer asked me after my discussion of positive group work “what would you do if that didn’t work?” some sort of spirit of dictatorship came over me and I said quite strongly, “Then I would enforce my will upon them.”

15. The self-talk

On the way to the interview, I encountered two accidents that tied up traffic badly so I just barely skated in before the interview time despite having left my house plenty early. I asked to use the restroom before we got started, and when I was looking in the mirror I noticed that a huge zit had appeared on my nose. I said to my reflection, “Nobody’s going to hire you looking that, too old, gray hair, an enormous zit, and overweight. You should just turn around and go home now.” I’d been looking for three months after having been laid off and was feeling very defeated in the moment.

At that point, the recruiter popped out of a stall and, to her credit, acted as though she hadn’t heard all that. I was mortified.

Fortunately, I wowed the hiring manager and got the job. But, lordy, I cringed every time I saw her in the hall for the first six months I was there.

16. The mute

I interviewed under the STAR format and was woefully unprepared for it. After the first question, I sat there in silence. The three interviewers returned the silence. After a full minute someone said, “I believe she’s on mute.” I piped up, “Nope!” and the silence resumed.

17. The coding

I was in the final stages of a job I really wanted and they asked for a technical interview, needing to solve coding problems live on a virtual platform. Between knowing I was being watched and judged, the new program, and general anxiety about coding, I panicked. I misunderstood the first question, tried to overcomplicate it, completely blanked on how to write code in a language I’ve used almost daily for 10 years, and in a grand finale, gave up for a few minutes and put my head in my hands trying to calm down, forgetting that I was still live on Zoom and the interviewers could see me. I will be reliving this for a long time but life goes on and I have a better idea of how to prepare for any future interviews like this.

18. Not a narc

The very first time I was interviewing for any job, I was looking to get a retail position at Victoria’s Secret. I was in high school. When the manager asked me what I’d do if I saw another employee stealing, I said I’d confront the employee about it “to find out if she needed money to borrow” but that I wouldn’t tell management because I was “not a narc.” Remarkably, the thing that would earn me respect from my fellow socialist high schoolers didn’t impress the hiring manager and I did not get that job.

Eight YEARS later, I got a notice in the mail that I was entitled to compensation as a part of a class action lawsuit because that branch had engaged in “working interviews,” having us fold bras and such for no pay. It made me laugh when I cashed my check to realize the people who were actually stealing at that job were the people interviewing me, not the hypothetical coworker in the example they gave.

this is how you can protect your local library

After I printed a letter from a librarian being harassed by patrons, a lot of you wrote in to ask what you can do to help protect your local libraries from threats and book bans.

Peter Bromberg, the associate director of EveryLibrary, an organization that defends and supports local libraries, was kind enough to write up the following about specifically what you can do to help.


Communities across the country are seeing a huge spike in book challenges and bans in their school and public libraries.  Censorship is on the rise, and libraries and librarians are being personally attacked, threatened, and fired, while libraries are seeing their funding threatened unless they remove books written by BIPOC and LGBTQIA authors and/or books that have BIPOC or LGBTQIA protagonists or themes.

BOOK BANS ARE UNPOPULAR AND DRIVEN BY A TINY MINORITY

Amidst the unprecedented wave of book banning, there is some good news. Poll after poll after poll after poll after poll after poll show that Americans are overwhelmingly opposed to book banning. Even the very conservative American Family Survey, administered by the Deseret News and Brigham Young University (both of which are part of the LDS Church) found that only 16% of Americans believe public school libraries include inappropriate books on their shelves and that just 12% of Americans think that books should be removed from libraries if a parent objects.  At the same time, there has been consistent reporting that there is a small minority of people who are behind book challenges. The Washington Post reported in May that “an analysis of book challenges from across the nation shows the majority were filed by just 11 people.” In Utah, KUTV reported that a “small group of parents utilizing new law to help ban books in Utah school libraries,” noting that in the Granite School District, “a West Valley City couple was behind nearly every complaint filed with the district.” Of the 205 filings, one couple were behind 199 of them.

SHOW UP AND SPEAK UP

That means there is a lot of space for Americans to push back, stand up for libraries, and advocate for the values of freedom of expression, freedom of thought, and the freedom to receive information. What do we do?  In short, we need to show up, and speak up.  Show up to school  and public library board meetings, to legislative committee hearings, to city and county council meetings.  Speak up for your own love of ideas, and books. Speak to your own feelings and beliefs around the inherent dignity of all people. Speak to the impact specific books — maybe books dealing with difficult topics —  have had in your life, and the lives of your friends and families. Let decision-makers know that your kids are not snowflakes who need to be protected from books. You can also speak up by writing letters to the editor, Op Ed pieces, and posting in social media.

ORGANIZE: “FIGHT FOR THE FIRST” IS A POWERFUL FREE PLATFORM

While our individual voices are powerful, joining with others to speak with a collective voice is the only way to build the sustainable political power that is necessary to protect libraries and turn the tide of censorship. In many communities, the only long-term solution involves voting in good board members, city/county council members and mayors, and voting out the ones who wish to systematically pull books from shelves, thereby erasing or silencing people’s voices and experiences from shared public spaces.

Most Americans don’t have the skills and tools they need to effectively organize, which is why earlier this year EveryLibrary launched Fight For the First, a powerful, free platform to support grassroots organizing and action. Fight for the First empowers community members who want to support their library and librarians and oppose censorship to find each other and take collective action quickly. Fight for the First offers robust modules including groups, petitions, and events modules that enable people to do rapid supporter identification and activation – including a way to quickly build a contactable list of people in your community who care and are willing to take action (lists that can also be used in the future for things like building support for pro-library candidates standing for board seats and other elected offices).

EveryLibrary also offers free coaching and consulting on organizing, messaging, strategies, and tactics. Everyone that starts a group or petition on Fight For the First will be given an initial consultation and access to a national group of over 80 people who are leading anti-censorship fights in their local communities. EveryLibrary staff are available to answer questions, provide guidance, and offer support through text or email or live video chats morning till evening, seven days a week.

BUILD YOUR COALITION

As mentioned above, standing and speaking together is always more powerful than speaking alone. In every community, there are organizations that share common cause and common concern around book banning. By asking, “Who else cares?” you can begin to identify organizations and leaders in your community who may be willing to stand with you, sign joint statements, issue joint press releases, and amplify your messaging to their constituents through multiple channels. Who else cares about equity? Civil liberties? Civil rights? Civil society? Marginalized populations? Ethical government? Student success? Create a shared spreadsheet of these organizations, and reach out to request a meeting. There are always organizations that have existing lists of supporters and an overlapping set of values or concerns that can be tapped as coalition partners.

DANGER ZONE: DEFINE YOUR AUDIENCES, TAILOR YOUR MESSAGING

When messaging your support of librarians and opposition to censorship, it is helpful to think about the variety of different audiences you are speaking to, and the variety of messages that may or may not resonate. One trap that some groups — even large, national groups — fall into is the “preaching to the choir” trap. Often, groups that form to fight book banning have a progressive worldview, and wind up only sharing messages that appeal to other progressives. But Americans broadly support libraries and oppose censorship, and many of them will either not respond to progressive messages or be actively turned off by such messages.

Those with a more libertarian political ideology are often staunch supporters of civil liberties, free speech and the first amendment, and generally oppose government regulations. They may respond very positively to messages that focus on letting people think for themselves, letting parents parent their own kids, and keeping the government out of it — especially since book bans conflict with the first amendment.

Community members with a more traditional conservative ideology may be responsive to messages that call out official decisions by boards or councils that are being made in the dark, or in violation of the law or policy. And they may also respond well to messaging that calls out extreme political rhetoric as not reflective of the traditional goodness of our community, and the community we want to be in the future. It may also be effective to point out that extreme political rhetoric, attacks, and bad press due to illegitimate government decisions or perceived bigotry is bad for business, and may lead businesses to locate in communities that seem more peaceful and free from extreme rhetoric or shady government actions.

TAKE THE FIRST STEP

Remember, if you oppose censorship, you are joined by the majority of Americans and likely by the majority of people in your community. While it may seem daunting to start a local grassroots group, it is easy to post something to your social media asking if there are others who care about what’s happening. Starting a petition/campaign at FightForTheFirst.org can be done in 15-30 minutes, and staff at EveryLibrary are usually available within hours to meet with you and offer support and guidance. You are not alone. If you take the first step and show up or speak up, you will quickly find others that want to stand with you in support of libraries, librarians, and the freedom to read.

my coworkers have all but disappeared since the pandemic

A reader writes:

Recently, you shared a letter from someone who wrote that they don’t want to talk about their life outside of work with their colleagues, and it got me thinking about the dynamics of the team I work in.

I’ve been at my company for many years. I empathize with the writer of the original letter to a degree – I don’t see work as a means to have my social needs met, and I enjoy working the sort of job that allows me to log in and log out without taking work home with me. I’m not someone who would typically invite coworkers to my wedding or baby shower, or go to a coworker’s house for a housewarming or Christmas party. However, I do like feeling like I know my coworkers and that I’m part of a team. Pre-pandemic when everyone was in the office, I enjoyed talking with coworkers, feeling a sense of camaraderie with them, and knowing what was going on in their lives (broadly! – I’m talking “How is your son doing in his first week of school?” rather than “So how is your son’s bedwetting phase going?”). There were occasional social events and after-work drinks; I would participate around one-third of the time, depending on the event and whether my own circumstances made it convenient. While I enjoyed these events and the time spent socializing with coworkers, my personal life or “real life” would always take priority, and often I’d honestly just rather go home. All of this is to say, for context of what I’m about to write, that I like to think I’m friendly and social, but I’m also an introvert who enjoys the separation of work and home.

Cut to the pandemic, and everyone moved to WFH. My entire team still remains primarily WFH. We all have the option to go into the offices in our various cities, and very occasionally most of us do, but this is typically not something any of us do day-to-day.

Here’s my dilemma, and why the original letter got me thinking about my own team’s dynamics: About half of my team seem to be intensely private and/or camera-shy, and I don’t see or hear from them other than if they ask a work-related question in the work chat. Like: at all. They don’t turn their cameras on during meetings and stay silent towards the end of the meeting when our manager asks us questions about our weekends and tries to get us to chat. In a team of 10-15 or so, only a few people actually speak up during this time. Before the pandemic and in the early days of WFH, our team was structured differently and had more oversight, and these coworkers would usually participate at least a little. Now, we have different managers and more autonomy, and that combined with how long we’ve been WFH means people have stopped caring about the appearance of being “unapproachable.”

This is starting to get to me, more than I’d like and more than I would have assumed would be the case. I like keeping my camera off and staying silent sometimes too when my social battery is low, so it’s not that I don’t relate, but feeling like the few of us who regularly speak up in meetings are speaking to a bunch of brick walls is incredibly demoralizing. This has caused me to realize that I do much better as an employee when I feel in some way connected to my coworkers, which is something I never had the opportunity to realize about myself before the pandemic. When there’s a sense of familiarity there, it’s easier to want to jump in and help someone out on something, or speak up about things, or ask a quick work-related question. When I was regularly coming into contact with my coworkers – not just in my own team but company-wide – in the elevators or in the break room, it instilled in me a greater sense of responsibility and work ethic, as it led to caring more about the bigger picture. Now, I’m finding that I’m only really worrying about my own tiny slice of the company pie. Which should be fine, I guess! But I do better work when I care about the rest of the pie as a whole. The more narrow-sighted I get with my own work, the more I find myself doing the bare minimum and caring less and less. It feels a lot like burnout, but it’s less about the work itself and more about feeling like I’m working within a void.

I’ve spoken to my manager about struggling in this area. He’s quite social and has been trying to get the team to engage. He’s tried multiple ways to encourage a more social dynamic, but every time it’s just the same brick wall, and at this stage he senses it won’t ever change unless he requires participation, which he won’t do. He’s reluctant to require cameras on and I tend to agree with that (and also enjoy that I can leave my own off on days when I look more like Snuffleupagus than a professional human).

A solution we’ve come up with is for me to go into the office semi-regularly, but the only other person on my team who lives in my state has no interest in going in, seemingly ever again, not even for once-off events. I’d worked with this coworker for years before the pandemic and considered her a work friend. She was lovely and social while we were in the office and we had a lot of great conversations. She brought me a souvenir back from an overseas trip and would show me photos of her kid. Now I haven’t seen her face in years and have no idea how she’s doing — and I still work with her every day! Additionally, not many other people go into my office anyway as everyone prefers to WFH, so while it’s nice occasionally running into someone I used to see regularly in the “good old days,” the reality is that I’m still working from a hot desking space with pretty much nobody around. It doesn’t really help. I’m increasingly unsure who even still works at the company anymore.

I suppose my questions are:

1. In response to the original letter writer’s assertion that they don’t want to talk about their personal life at work, and speaking more broadly about people like my coworkers who have basically fallen off the grid since the pandemic: what is your opinion on how much we “owe” our coworkers when it comes to socializing? Shouldn’t a degree of social interaction be expected in any job? Of course, preferring to stick to work talk primarily and not discuss anything private or political is a reasonable boundary to have at work, but doesn’t working in an office environment – online or offline – require understanding that you will occasionally have to make small talk about TV or sports or come up with something nice that you did on the weekend? I don’t want to know how my coworkers vote, whether they get on with their parents, or if they’re in the middle of a divorce, but am I wrong in thinking that I should at least be able to ask my coworkers something innocuous like, “Have you been following the World Cup?” and get a friendly response? Or ANY response?

2. Considering that I now know I work best when I get in some face-to-face time with my colleagues, how should I approach this? Is it simply the case that now that the pandemic has led to a rise in WFH across the board, that this will become the new normal for workplace dynamics, and I need to adjust my expectations and find new ways to feel connected to my work?

I think you are super normal, and your voice has been disproportionately left out of the discussion around remote work. But a ton of people feel like you do (probably at least a plurality, in fact).

It’s normal to want, need, and expect to have relationships with your coworkers that include pleasant conversation beyond a strict work focus. Until remote work became as common as it is now, I don’t think that would have even been questioned — of course a healthy work environment includes building relationships and having some amount of social interaction. There will always be people on both ends of that spectrum (people who want very little interaction with colleagues and people who want more of it than most) but the majority of people are somewhere in the broad middle of that. (It’s worth noting that people on the less social end of that spectrum tend to be over-represented in internet commenting sections  — I see it here all the time — but that’s not reflective of real life. And at least here, those voices are usually outliers but tend to be so vociferous that they feel like they’re a larger proportion of people than they really are. I once looked at actual numbers on this and it was fascinating to see how in the minority they really were.)

In any case, let’s state it clearly for the record: relationships at work matter! Not only do they make work more pleasant, but they have substantive work pay-offs too: When you have good relationships with colleagues, they’re usually more willing to go out of their way to help when you need it (beyond the bare minimum of what their job requires, like if you need something expedited or if you need help getting something fixed quickly rather than next month). They’re more likely to give you the benefit of the doubt, toss ideas around with you, and approach you with questions. Good work relationships can also give you the context to understand someone’s actions/mood/tone, and can help you access mentorship or support that might otherwise be less in reach. Good work relationships also mean you’ll be more likely to hear useful information outside of official channels, which could be anything from “That job you were interested in is about to open up again” to “The reason your travel costs are getting more scrutiny now is X.” Plus, when people know and like you, you’re more likely to come to mind when they’re thinking of someone to lead an interesting project or recommend for a job. And on and on.

I do think you’re somewhat off-base, though, to frame work relationships in terms of what colleagues owe each other. Colleagues do owe it to each other to be reasonably pleasant to work with, and should expect that in a workplace they’re going to encounter some amount of social chit-chat and shouldn’t recoil when it happens. If someone is rude or chilly in response to a coworker asking if they’ve been following the World Cup or how their weekend was, that’s a problem. But it doesn’t sound like you’ve been getting rude or chilly responses; it sounds more like those social conversations just aren’t coming up organically now that most of you are remote. When you’re in person, it’s natural to chat at the start of a meeting or when you run into someone in the kitchen. When most of a team is remote, those things aren’t happening — and if you don’t work somewhere that’s deliberate about creating opportunities for them or happens to have gregarious employees who create those opportunities on their own, those interactions can disappear altogether.

It also sounds like your team meetings aren’t being run well. I’d argue it’s generally fine for people to have their cameras off — there are lots of reasons for why someone might prefer that, including not having a private enough workspace at home — but it is a problem that only a few of you talk in meetings and you don’t get any response from the others when you do (assuming these meetings are ones where you’d normally expect fuller participation, which sounds like the case). That’s largely on your manager, who needs be clearer about what kind of participation is expected in your meetings.

But ultimately, I think this just isn’t an ideal job for you anymore. There are lots of jobs where remote teams do engage and build relationships and chat with each other; this just isn’t one of them. It also might be that you’re someone who doesn’t thrive on a team where most people are remote and you’d be happier with one where most people are in the office more. There are also people who would love how your job works, so it’s not necessarily a failing of the job itself; it’s just not an optimal fit for you.

employee had drugs in her desk, I sent an embarrassing message to a group Slack, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Should I go over my boss’s head about an employee who had drugs in her desk?

I work in an office that is separated in two sections. My section (Group A) has 15 employees and the other section has 35 employees, and then we have the owners, a husband and wife.

The Group B supervisor (the owner’s nephew, Bob) and assistant supervisor (Roger) are absolutely horrible. No one in either group likes Bob because he is an A-hole and no one likes Roger because of the way he acts like Bob. However, I am Group A’s assistant supervisor and I’m being trained by my supervisor, George, who everyone on both teams loves. George is very low key and lets our employees be who they are, and our small number of employees outperforms Group B, due to everyone being happier.

But I found out something George did that should have been brought to the owner’s attention but wasn’t because one of our employees might have been fired for it. When an employee on our team, Melanie, was taking her daughter to school, her daughter left her sweatshirt in the car and later that day Melanie was cold and grabbed the sweatshirt from the car and put it on. When she reached into the pocket, she found drugs, which she took out and put in her desk so that she could bring it home later and confront her daughter. Everyone on our team knows that her daughter has had a drug problem in the past. Well, later that day, George needed something from Melanie and she told him to grab it from her desk. He goes to her desk and opens it up to find the drugs. She explained the situation and said it wasn’t hers and even said she would go to the store and buy a drug test to prove she is not taking any drugs (which she did and passed). I ended up finding out and so I’m at this dilemma of letting it go or bringing it up to the owners. If I do, I’m afraid that George and Melanie would be fired and then my team would think that I did this just to get his job, and the entire dynamic of our team will be messed up with having every employee in group A hate me if that happens. Or if Roger becomes our supervisor, everything will change and become less productive. Either way, it’s a lose-lose, and all for something where I believe George did the correct thing in the first place. I would have done the same thing, but I also don’t want any of this blowing back on me if it does come out and it’s found out that I knew about it.

It sounds like this is George’s problem to handle, not yours, and he has handled it in the way he judged best. You’re not obligated to go over his head with it (especially when you say you would have handled it the same way he did anyway). He’s responsible for deciding the appropriate response, and he’s done that. Assume everyone can simply move on from here!

If you’re questioned about it later, you can honestly say that you’ve always found George to be reliable and responsible and you trusted that he had it covered.

2. I accidentally sent an embarrassing message to a large group on Slack

I work for a large company in the sales division. We were in a meeting that was repetitive and annoying simply because it’s an hour long, on a Friday, and it’s Q4. This is a mandatory meeting throughout the month of October. During the meeting, I meant to Slack my best friend / coworker. We work remotely on Fridays so we were both on Zoom. I was watching Real Housewives of New York before I hopped on the meeting, and while I meant to message my friend, I sent a Slack to a sales group with 200+ people that read, “I’m talking now so they don’t call on me later and I can continue watching Real Housewives.”

Three people messaged me about it. One of them was a manager on the team adjacent to mine. He just sent a screenshot and said, “No explanation needed, just thought I’d let you know.”

Then, I see him in person in office the following week, and we always joke around with each other and poke fun. He gave me a silly look and I just laughed and said, “Don’t look at me!” He replied with, “It’s your career, not mine.”

So now I’m overthinking it and wondering how bad I actually messed up. My coworkers around me are all laughing and no one even saw it except for a handful of people. But his comment has me anxious. To be fair, we always poke fun at each other and he knows I can take it, but this one seems different. Thoughts on the interaction, what I should do, or just in general if he’s thinking of me differently?

I … don’t think you’re overthinking it. That’s potentially a pretty bad message to have sent, especially if anyone with any influence over your job sees it! I don’t know enough about the context with the manager who messaged you to say for sure, but I’d consider bringing it back up with him and saying, “Seriously, though, I’m embarrassed that happened and there’s no excuse. It won’t happen again.”

Is there any chance your own manager saw it? It’s tricky because if she didn’t, you don’t want to call her attention to it, but if she did see it, it’s not great not to address it. Hopefully since she didn’t say anything about it, it’s safe to assume she didn’t see it? Either way, one of the best forms of damage control you can do is now is to make a point of being actively engaged for the entire length of each of the remaining meetings.

For the record, it’s not unreasonable for your employer to expect you to attend meetings on Fridays. Even hour-long ones, and even boring ones!

3. Job postings on LinkedIn with tons of applicants

I recently was informed that my department is likely going to be laid off, so I am job searching. When I look at jobs on LinkedIn sometimes the amount of people who have applied makes me not want to bother applying. The roles I’m looking at generally have 30 up to over 400 (!) applicants. Do you (or the readers) have any experience hiring on LinkedIn and know about what percent of applicants are actually viable candidates for these popular jobs? I feel like I would be wasting my time applying for something even if I think I’m qualified if there are already more than 50 applicants.

Every job I’ve ever hired for has always had at least 100 applicants and usually more (sometimes many times that). What’s different here is just that you can see it, whereas normally you don’t. It’s also relevant that LinkedIn makes it particularly easy to apply, so you’re going to get a larger-than-normal number of people who are just applying for whatever they see, even if they’re not particularly qualified. All of which is to say, ignore the numbers you see there and don’t let them get into your head; if you would have applied before you saw that, go ahead and apply still.

4. What’s the point of such a short Zoom interview?

When you get a call for a phone or Zoom interview and it’s scheduled for 30 minutes, but they ask like two basic questions and it’s over in less than 15 minutes after they read the job description, are they just fulfilling some legal requirement? Like they already have their person, internal or otherwise, and just have to “interview” three people or something and count the BS phone or Zoom “interview” that was clearly performative, but they can say they interviewed or screened several candidates? Like why waste anyone’s time or get their hopes up?

There are a bunch of possible explanations: the interviewer was terrible and had no idea what they were doing (and could even have been a relatively junior staffer who was handed some questions and asked to do initial screens without sufficient training), or they realized you’re not competitive with candidates they’re already moving forward but your interview was already scheduled, or something in the first 15 minutes of the interview convinced them you weren’t a strong enough match so they wrapped it up early … or sure, it could be that they have internal rules requiring them to interview X number of people but they already know who they want to hire (as we saw yesterday!). Candidates tend to be quick to assume that last one, but any of them are possible and there’s no way to know from the outside which it is.

5. Employee assistance programs — a success story

I thought you’d like to hear that as a result of your Interesting Jobs series interview with the employee assistance program (EAP) person in 2021, I realized that my employer’s EAP might be able to help me navigate a medication shortage. And they were! It was indirect help — they weren’t able to give me direct guidance on what local pharmacies had the meds in stock — but because I’d read the interview and seen the references to the wide range of situations they deal with and flexibility they have, I knew they would be able to help me figure out a plan to track down the meds other than “call all the pharmacies in Large Metro Area and ask, one by one.” I’d already struck out asking for help from the pediatrician’s office, my healthcare provider, and our usual (excellent!) local pharmacy, so when I called the EAP I said, “This isn’t really a standard scenario but I need help thinking it through because I’m completely overwhelmed.” Everyone at the EAP I spoke to was extremely kind and affirming and supportive.

Background to this is that there’s been an ongoing ADHD medication shortage for months. My daughter has pretty severe ADHD and pediatric stimulant prescriptions have additional hoops to jump through: providers can’t call in refills, I have to ask the doctor’s office to call in a refill every 30 days, and I can’t refill her prescription early. My own ADHD meds are also impacted by the shortages so I’m trying to hold down my job and make a million phone calls to track down her meds, and I’ve got much less executive function than normal as a result, hence my overwhelming paralysis — so the EAP was a godsend because I basically needed someone to help me calm down and figure out a plan and they were there for me.

I never would have thought to call an EAP with such a curveball question without your interview, though, so thank you so much for publishing it and thank you to the person who gave that very informative interview! Fingers crossed we won’t have too long a gap in medication coverage.

my brother-in-law shares TMI on LinkedIn

A reader writes:

My brother in law was laid off in March. He was part of the mass layoffs in the tech industry. Since then, he has applied to a lot of jobs. Like, A LOT. As of one week ago, he has applied to exactly 700 jobs. I know the exact figure because of his LinkedIn activity, which is what I am writing about.

Basically I am wondering if his LinkedIn activity is affecting his chances of getting a job. Every week or so, he posts an image saying something like this: “200 days of searching, 700 applications, 27 recruiter screens, 292 rejections, 76 referrals, 46 interviews, and 1 offer.” (Those are real numbers. He turned down the one offer.)

Now, I’m not in tech, nor do I hire people. I’ve neer been subjected to layoffs, and I’ve never interviewed around for a position. But, if I were hiring people and I looked through his LinkedIn I would be … let’s say surprised to see all that data.

On the one hand, it shows he is driven and clearly committed to finding a job. On the other hand, it looks like there must be some red flags if he’s been rejected nearly 300 times — not to mention that I would feel like I’m his 700th choice! I might pass on him based on that alone.

On top of the regular images of job-search data, his LinkedIn also contains a lot of posts — upwards of five or so each day. It just seems like too much activity and too much information that could hurt his chances.

So, what do you think? He’s clearly getting some interviews and he consistently gets good feedback. I know tech is rough right now, but is the LinkedIn stuff hurting or helping?

It’s definitely not helping! At best it would be a neutral — but a lot of recruiters and hiring managers are going to have the exact same reaction that you did, which means it’s going to hurt him.

There’s nothing shameful about a long job search, but I’m curious about what his goal is with posting the weekly data. If he just wants to keep track for his own sake, I could understand that — but why is he posting it?! What does he hope to accomplish with it, other than sowing doubts about him in potential employers’ minds? I assume he’s not looking to generate sympathy (since sympathy doesn’t get you hired). Is it a commentary on the state of tech hiring? Hiring in general? What’s the end goal in doing this? It boggles my mind.

And separately, yes, five posts on a LinkedIn a day is a lot and, especially combined with the weird data dumps, will make him look like he doesn’t have great judgment about where to invest his energy.

Any chance he’d be open to feedback from you about it? If you’ve got the sort of relationship that allows for it, you’d be doing him a favor if if you can suggest he pull back on some of this and see if that changes his results.

how should I respond to a complaint about my employee’s behavior outside of work?

A reader writes:

I was in a popular online fitness forum last night when several posters complained about being doxxed by a popular Instagram fitness/weight-loss account. The influencer was looking up accounts that she felt had trolled her, trying to find their employers, calling the employer, and asking to speak to person’s manager. She complained to the managers about their employee’s online comments on her account and used language indicating that they should be ashamed to have this person working for them.

To my knowledge, no one was fired but several posters admitted having embarrasing talks with their managers. Most said that they had not posted anything overtly hateful, threatening, or obscene. From personal experience, I was blocked from that account just for “liking” a legitimate question that someone had about her fitness regiment.

I work in a blue collar industry, and I’m pretty sure that we would laugh our heads off if we received a call like this, but I can imagine that in some industries, calling into question an employee’s online activities/reputation would be pretty serious. What is the best course of action for managers who receive a call like this?

I answer this question over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and sometimes updating/expanding my answers to them). You can read it here.

my employee is disrespectful of patients, refused an assignment, and told us “nice try though”

A reader writes:

Can you help me tell my employee that I am not harassing him as he stated by telling him to do his job and also to cut the snarky, un-professional comments?

For background, I am a mid-level manager for clinicians who go into patient homes and provide very essential, highly skilled needs.

“Ross” is an overall good clinician; however, he has a lot of personal drama that he brings to work, as well as somehow always managing to see less patients than everyone else in his territory. He also has a lot of sick calls and sudden short medical leaves of a few days and missed the last two mandatory meetings. Ross has a history of thinking if he says he doesn’t feel comfortable with a certain type of patient he can indefinitely get out of these types of home visits. He has been told at his previous annual reviews that these are things he needs to work on to feel confident. It is a common occurrence for the patient scheduler, “Monica,” to have an urgent need come up in the day, send a group Teams message to the clinicians working that day to see if any clinicians had something fall through/can pick up an extra visit/ would like overtime, etc. It is common for Ross to respond with comments like “Type X patients are scary and I don’t know how to do them.” Or “Oooh gross, I would vomit if I ever had a Type Y patient.”

Ross’s annual review is coming up and my plan had been to meet up with him prior and have him give me a list of patient types he doesn’t feel comfortable with, put it in the goals section of his review, and help him find patients to do co-visits for on-the-job training. He will also be getting more clear “needs improvement” marks in his attendance and assignment management/patient load sections.

Monday evening, as Monica was finishing scheduling, she sent Ross a Teams message as a courtesy letting him know she had to assign him a new rural “assessment” patient and that if he needed to offload some of his four other patients due to drive time for the rural patient, the clinicians’ assistants had a lot of room in their schedule for Ross to pass his non-assessment visits that are within their scope. His response was that he just emailed the on-call scheduler to remove the rural assessment patient because he would NOT be going, “Nice try tho.” I was cc’d in the response from the on call scheduler. Ross’s email subject heading was, “I will not be going to ‘Timbuktu.’” I responded early Tuesday morning, stating, “Sorry, we can’t remove the rural assessment but the clinician assistants will help with the four other non-assessment visits.”

What followed still blows my mind. Ross continued to respond via email/Teams with different excuses just refusing. First it was because Tuesday, Wednesday, and Fridays are difficult for him to be too far from home. I ignored that and repeated that this rural one was most urgent. Then he said he had already confirmed times with his other patients. I politely reminded him that in our line of work, certain patient care is a priority and we have to change things at a moment’s notice sometimes and I would be happy to call those patients and reschedule to different times to make room for his drive time to the rural patient. He then responded that he just couldn’t make it work because he had to be in his home town by 2 pm to pick up his child from school. I gently told him work days don’t typically end at 2 pm and we needed him to see this patient and repeated my other offers of help. When I reiterated he needed to go, he then responded, “Please stop harassing me.” And he again refused to go. I stopped contacting him at that point, removed the patient from the day’s schedule, and forwarded it all to HR and my boss.

They were also blown away and HR told me that I was in the right by expecting him to do his job and that he was using scary words to try and get out of the rural patient. HR said to have a sit-down with him this week after emotions calm down and make sure he understands that refusal is not acceptable and all the clinicians take turns with rural patients and our job is to take care of patients, no matter where they live. She also said to tell him there are no guarantees that he will be done by patient visits by 2 pm every day. She said let’s try for a coaching session but if ends up being belligerent, then it might end up a write-up.

Ross has since sent me a very long email titled “a little background” explaining about a lot of his personal drama and needing to always be close by his child’s school for … reasons. I did his job for years in the field before being a supervisor and had three young children myself when I did so, and I can say the reasons should have zero impact on seeing any patients, even rural. I haven’t replied yet but sent him a separate message stating we need to meet this week to discuss this situation.

I feel fairly comfortable being straightforward and matter of fact in that area. What I’m not sure how to tell him is how snarky and unprofessional his other communications are — the “nice try tho” and when he talk about patients being scary and gross. (Honestly I don’t know why Ross is in this profession if he feels that way about it.)

Whoa. Your HR person just thinks this warrants a write-up?

I’d say it warrants a clear and final warning about the requirements of the job, and a clear statement that if he’s not willing to meet those requirements, you’ll need to part ways.

Is this really the guy you want serving your patients? A person who calls their medical conditions “gross” and calls sick people “scary” and says they make him want to vomit?

Everything Ross is saying and doing says this isn’t the right job for him … and he is not the right person for you to employ.

To be clear, if it was just the thing about him insisting he needed to be back by 2 pm to pick up his kid, that would be different. Emergencies happen, and miscommunications happen. That might call for a conversation where you explain that while you can accommodate occasional emergencies, in general he should assume you’ll need to schedule him for the entire workday and can’t plan around a school pickup schedule unless that’s something that’s worked out in advance.

But that’s the least of this! The bigger problems are Ross being so adversarial with your scheduler (“nice try though”? what the hell?) and disrespectful in the way he speaks about patients (so basically just … a jerk).

Even before this latest incident, it sounds like you were being way too accommodating with him. You were on the right track with insisting he train for the patients he says he doesn’t know how to handle, but instead of that just being something you address in the “goals” section of his annual review, it needs to be accompanied by a serious conversation explaining that the job includes treating patients with the conditions he’s spoken pejoratively about, that you expect him to speak respectfully of patients at all times, and that not doing that is a firing offense … because it needs to be. Sample language: “It is a non-negotiable requirement of your job that you speak respectfully of patients at all times. Saying that certain patients are ‘gross’ or make you want to vomit is fundamentally out of sync with the values we expect you to display as a clinician, and it calls into question your ability to treat patients respectfully and empathetically. Can you tell me how you align that sort of comment with your responsibilities as a care provider?” … and then, “I need to make it clear that we will not tolerate any further occurrences of that way of speaking.” You can add that it’s a requirement of his job to speak respectfully to coworkers too.

But even if he stops because he doesn’t want to get fired, you’ve got to give some serious thought to whether it’s fair to your patients to saddle them with a clinician who was comfortable speaking that way about them. If you have to force Ross to handle their cases, are they going to get the type of empathetic and respectful care you presumably want them to receive?

In fact, the deeper I get into this answer, the more I question whether you can responsibly keep him on at all, even with a warning in place — not because he was a jerk about scheduling, but because the way he talks about patients is so unacceptable.

So I think the real conversation you need to have here is with your boss and HR about that piece of it. This is well beyond write-up territory.