Want a better company intranet? Check out Igloo.

And now a break to talk about a sponsor…

If your company intranet is basically the place where documents go to die, you should check out Igloo, a much cooler corporate intranet than what you’re used to.

Igloo is crazily interactive, incredibly easy to use, and super customizable. You can use it to have a very simple intranet if that’s your thing, or you can use it to create something complex that pulls together team calendars, project information, working documents, wikis, task management, document collaboration, secure file-sharing, and real-time updates from all your teams. It even has a Twitter-ish internal micro-blogging system, so people can share quick, real-time thoughts across the organization.

And because you don’t need to be especially tech-savvy to configure it, you can even set it up and maintain it on your own, rather than needing to send over change through your overworked I.T. department and having it languish for weeks or months.

In fact, after I wrote about Igloo last fall, I received an email from a reader (shared here with permission) who wrote that her company had been on the verge of signing a contract for intranet services with Sharepoint, “which was going to be pricey.  I forwarded your blog post to the team that was working on this project, and they just informed me that they’ve decided to contract with Igloo and are thrilled with the product.” 

I thought I’d highlight the update she sent in afterwards: “I work closely with those folks (doing the implementation), and they are very happy with our decision to use Igloo. I can also vouch for the fact that our ‘all in’ cost saved us a good bit of money over Sharepoint. Also — I’m going to step on out on a limb and say that future support calls to Igloo, if needed, will be much less frustrating than they would be calling Sharepoint … Our company is quite small (40 or so employees) and the Igloo support team has, I’m told, bent over backwards to assist in our implementation.”

So if you’re looking for a better intranet solution, check out Igloo. (It’s also surpringly affordable: $12 per user per month, which is about a quarter of what you’d pay for Sharepoint. And it’s free if you have fewer than 10 users.

You can learn more about Igloo here.

how interviewers judge the questions you ask, are degrees in “general studies” worth getting, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Will I be judged on the kinds of questions I ask at an interview, or on asking no questions at all?

At the end of interviews, we are asked if there are any questions. How much weight is placed on the kind of questions asked or saying “I have no questions”?

Lots of weight. The types of questions you ask can reveal all sorts of things about you — what motivates you, what you are and aren’t most interested in, what kind of judgment you have, whether you’re enthusiastic about the work, whether you’re realistic about the work, and plenty more.

Here are some questions you should never ask, and here are some questions to get you started on what you might want to ask.

And really, why wouldn’t you want to ask questions? You’re considering spending 40+ hours a week at this job; aren’t you hungry for all the information about it you can get?

2. Should I give feedback to a pushy, problematic job candidate who keeps applying?

I’m the funnel for graduate assistant applicants for my school. All applicants go through me because I assist faculty members in the hiring process, it gives HR a single contact, and it saves the faculty members from being bombarded by emails. I simply forward applicants as I receive them.

One of our students knows that I operate in this capacity and that I employ graduate assistants myself. “Jane” has come to me 3-4 times, asking me if I could pass along her resume, if I know of any openings, or if my own positions are filled. The problem is that this student has a reputation for being incredibly unreliable, needy, and divisive. She’s never been hired by my department, but word got to me from others she’s worked for in the university, and when she’s helped us out with events in a student capacity, it hasn’t been pretty. In short, I’m not inclined to pass her resume to anyone without serious disclaimers, and I’ll never hire her myself. My question is whether I should explain any of this to her, or if I should continue to nod and smile and give generic responses?

It sounds like your role in the hiring process isn’t one where you’re doing any screening or making decisions on who does and doesn’t move forward, so I think your best bet is to just continue doing that and not try to give her feedback.

If you did have a more involved role in hiring decisions, though, I’d still probably say not to say anything in this particular case. It’s tough to give give feedback that’s just about reputation rather than problems you’ve seen first-hand. Since she HAS helped you out with events, you could talk about that though — “I’ll be honest, when you helped on Events A and B, I had some concerns about X and Y. To consider you for a job here, I’d want to see real evidence of change and growth in those areas.”

3. My bonus was much smaller than coworkers in different roles from mine

I work part-time (filing, reception, phones, extra projects) for a financial advisory office and received a year-end bonus of $750. I’m pleased with the bonus, but I discovered – quite inadvertently, honestly – that there were other bonuses paid to full-time colleagues ranging between $10,000 and $24,500. They are not doing the same type of work as me. My work is basic receptionist/filing/phones/special projects – it’s part-time, about 30 hrs a week. The others in my firm are 5 financial advisors and my office manager. It isn’t that I would have expected anywhere near those dollars in a bonus – after all, I am only part-time, my work is nowhere near the same level as the officers/advisors. But I think I’m feeling a little insulted and I don’t know if I should be. I mean, I believe my feelings are valid – but are they appropriate to the circumstances?

I hate to appear ungrateful, but am I wrong to feel a little bugged by the huge difference in bonuses?

It’s very normal for people who work in finance to make large bonuses, and very normal for someone who’s doing part-time admin work to make a much smaller bonus. So I’d stick with your initial assessment (when you were happy with the amount you got) and not compare the amount to people who are in very different roles, with very different pay norms.

4. How are degrees in “general studies” perceived?

I lucked into a great career: internet marketing. I joined this industry when it was new and no college courses were offered in this field. Fast forward 20 years and I’m ready to move to the next step in my career. But a larger percentage of companies have online applications and require a bachelor’s degree. The cheapest, fastest path to a bachelor’s is finishing a degree in general studies (B.S.G.) online at my old university. How much weight would a B.S.G. carry in the workforce?

It’s … seen as kind of a bullshit degree. It’ll let you answer “yes” to the question of whether you graduated from college, but it won’t be particularly impressive to rigorous employers who are looking for evidence of strong critical thinking skills.

On the other hand, you’re doing the degree as kind of a perfunctory check-off-the-box measure at this stage in your career; it’s not like you’re doing it to get rigorous academic training to prepare you for a career, and that’s going to be clear to employers since you already have a career.

And that’s why the whole thing is silly. 20 years into your career, you have enough of a track record to show far more than a degree ever shows. At the start of a career, when you have little to no experience, degrees can be a shorthand that tells employers that you have at least some basic education and the wherewithal to stick with something for a few years. But employers don’t need that shorthand with more experienced candidates since they have their actual track record of work to look at. And you shouldn’t need to go through the time and expense of going back to school just to check off a box.

But if you do, I’d go for a more specific degree if you can.

5. Can my employer decide not to pay me for this month because of financial hardship?

As an exempt employee (director level) in a California nonprofit, is it legal for the CEO to tell me two weeks before payday that we are not getting any salary for the month of January? Our organization gets paid once a month on the last day of the month, and today I was told that due to financial hardship no director will receive a salary for January. Furthermore, this is not a salary deferral, it is a forfeiture of salary.

Nope, it’s not legal. They’re required to pay you your agreed-upon salary for any work you’ve done. Moreover, they’re required to pay it within a certain amount of time or penalties accrue. In California, wages earned between the 1st and 15th days of the month must be paid no later than the 26th day of that same month, and wages earned between the 16th and last day of the month must be paid by the 10th day of the following month. There’s no option to just not pay earned wages.

I’d say this to them: “I realize finances are very tight right now, but not paying people would violate federal and state law, and will trigger financial penalties at the state level. We could get in a lot of trouble with the state department of labor if we don’t pay people.”

my boss is making threats about the Mafia to me

A reader writes:

I have an unusual situation with my manager. My manager has on several occasions issued indirect threats, for lack of better wording. There have been several times over the last two years, but this past year has been awful and to the point that I’m having difficulty trying to do my work.

In January I did mess up badly and tried to fix it. I should have brought it up but didn’t feel comfortable because of the “shoot the messenger” culture here, unless you are a select few who can get away with anything. My manager told me a story about a former business partner who sued for monetary compensation and later approached the manager and his spouse while they were out shopping and confronted them about the lawsuit and there were accusations of lying. After telling me this story, his next words were, “I told him to never approach us again. You don’t mess with the mob.”

The most recent event was after we disagreed on something that would have resulted in heavy fines for the business if discovered. We were at a stalemate, so I asked another manager for an opinion. My supervisor was livid and told me to never go to another manager again over our issues. A few weeks later, we were headed to a conference, alone in the same vehicle, and this time I was told, “You shouldn’t piss off people with connections.” It was the manner of speech, body language, and the tone with which the words were spoken that sent chills through me. This individual isn’t known for being highly ethical, but I never thought staff would have intimidating comments directed at them.

I’m job searching and am fairly certain my manager is going to push to have me let go. We don’t have an HR department and I don’t think going to another manager will help. Our company is less than 30 people with three owners. Any advice until I find another job/they fire me?

Your boss is an incredible ass. But unless you have real reason to fear that he’d sic the mob on you — which seems fairly unlikely, unless you’ve seen evidence to the contrary — I’d internally roll your eyes and ignore them. The type of person who makes this type of remark is usually someone who wants to appear more intimidating than they actually are. And dropping comments like “you shouldn’t piss off people with connections” into work-related conversations is so far beyond the line of reasonable behavior that I’d just write this guy off as a complete buffoon. (I’d also be tempted to respond to any future threats by playing dumb and asking, “What do you mean?” and seeing how far he’s willing to go with this discussion.)

Alternately, you could just say directly, “Bob, it’s hard to have a work conversation with you when you threaten me with mob connections. Do you really mean that you’d like to have someone break my kneecaps over a work issue?” I tend to think that directly calling out ridiculousness will often put an end to it.

how to ask to resign instead of being fired

A reader writes:

My friend has been put on a PIP after about eight months at his job – his manager says that he “doesn’t have the skills” to perform the job to her standards. After three months on the PIP, it came up that his manager hasn’t seen the improvement she’s been looking for and so he’s likely to be fired any day (the manager hasn’t given him a date yet).

My friend would like to resign so that he can avoid having to forever check the “Have you ever been fired from a job?” box on future applications; however, he would also like to negotiate what his manager will say about him if she’s ever contacted to give a reference (obviously he wouldn’t list her as one, but we know that potential employers can reach out to whomever they want).

I swear I’ve seen this discussed on your site in the past, but after extensive searching this morning, I can’t find any posts about it. Would it be appropriate for him to approach his boss and say something like, “Obviously this isn’t working out for either one of us, so I’d like to be able to transition my work and leave here on good terms. Can we agree that my last day of employment will be [whenever] and that if you’re contacted in the future for a reference that you will only verify employment dates?”

It feels like there’s a slightly more graceful way to ask for that, but I’m drawing a blank. I love your advice, so anything you can provide here would be so appreciated (even if it’s just a link back to the post where you’ve talked about this in the past, because I swear it exists!).

Yes, that’s totally reasonable to say, and many, many managers will receive that kind of statement with relief. It’s a rare manager who enjoys firing someone, and most employers would much rather work out a mutual separation if it’s possible. In addition to firings just being tough emotionally, there are practical reasons for preferring a mutual separation — primarily that the exiting employee is much less likely to leave with bad feelings, which means that they’re less likely to badmouth the company (to other employees, vendors, clients, etc.) and much less likely to try to find something to sue over.

I’d say something very similar to what you suggested: “I’m hearing what you’re saying and I want to be realistic about my chances for success here. I wonder if you’d be open to a plan for me to transition out of my role and leave on good terms. We could set my last day for (date — probably 2-4 weeks out) to give me a little time to job search and you time to get a head start on hiring a replacement. In return, I’d ask that you not contest my unemployment benefits since it sounds like I was likely to be let go at the end of this process anyway, and that we come up with an agreement for what to say to future reference-checkers and how my departure is reflected in company records.”

Most managers will hear this with relief and will agree — and that’s the smart thing for them to do. However, he should be prepared for the small chance that his manager could say, “You know, I was just getting ready to talk to you about this. I agree that it’s not working out, but I’d actually like to set your last day for (some earlier date than he had proposed — or even today).” If that happens, he could still try to negotiate the other pieces of this; I just want to make sure he’s prepared for the manager pushing back on the question of his last day.

Also: He should get any agreement about unemployment benefits and references in writing, in case there are any questions later. (Plus, this manager may leave the company at some point, and he wants to be sure that the agreement survives even after she’s gone.)

my boss was about to promote me but just got fired, I can’t afford my coworker’s fancy retirement dinner, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My boss was about to promote me, and then he got fired

My boss has promised me a promotion throughout the last seven months. He emailed the proposal to me that he gave to HR. While he was figuring out details, they ended up terminating him. He is the dean of the school. Every day I have worked for the last seven months, all I have heard is “when you get promoted into the new position…” And now he is gone! I’m not sure if I should bother going to HR or not. They have known about his plan to promote me into the new position. Am I SOL?

It’s totally reasonable to talk to HR — or your boss’s boss — about what this means for your planned promotion. I’d say something like this: “Percival had put together a plan to promote me to ___, and I know he’d been discussing a formal proposal with HR. While I realize that things may be up in the air right now, I wonder if you can tell me what’s likely to happen with that. Is it something that will still move forward?”

You might hear that they want to wait to hire a replacement for your boss first, or you might hear that they’re moving forward with it regardless, or you might hear that everything is in the air right now and they just don’t know. But it’s very reasonable to ask.

2. I’m not sure if I can afford my coworker’s fancy retirement dinner

I have a colleague who just retired, and a dinner has been planned for the group of us to go out with him and his wife. The dinner is at a fancy seafood place near his home (our group is spread out in our state, so driving more me will be 90 minutes each way). While I don’t eat seafood at all, there are a couple things on the menu that I will eat so that’s not so much the issue. I am one the most junior of the group in terms of age (I’m 34; there is one other who is 33 and everyone else is fairly older), and the most junior in terms of position even though I have been at this position for 11 years. I earn the least of the group (everyone else earns at least twice of what I do, which is $35k). My meal alone will probably cost no less than $75, which is WAY more than I would ever spend on myself, but it’s a retirement thing, so whatever.

However, it hasn’t been made clear who is paying, whether I’m paying for myself (I’m expecting this), or whether or not we’ll be asked to contribute for my retiring colleague and his wife? I hope that the latter isn’t the case because if it is, then I think it’s more than I’m comfortable spending. What would be normal in this situation? And if we’re expected to chip in, what should I say without offending anyone, that I can’t afford to help?

You could talk to the person organizing it and ask something like, “Is the company is covering our meals, or we should be planning to pay for ourselves? And maybe plan to chip in to cover Percival and Clementine too?” If the answer is that yes, everyone will be covering your retiring coworker and his wife, you could then say, “I’m hesitating a little because I’m on a tight budget. I’d like to go but may not be able to cover more than my meal.” I think there’s value in being explicit about this even if it’s a little uncomfortable, because whoever organizes this stuff should hear that it’s not a comfortable price point for at least some participants.

But also, any chance you can just not go? Driving three hours total and spending more than you’d like to spend on a meal you don’t particularly want to eat doesn’t sound ideal. Have you considered just having a conflict that prevents you from going, and instead giving your retiring colleague a card telling him how much you’ve enjoyed working with him?

3. My boss jokes about people getting fired or laid off

My boss regularly makes jokes about job security, people getting fired, layoffs, wage cuts, etc. We’ll be looking at a new copier, for example, and he’ll say, “We’ll be cutting your salaries back to make this purchase!” I’m not insecure about my job, but office morale is consistently low due to poor management. These jokes are abrasive and unwelcome and no one is laughing. This morning I told him that I really don’t like it when he makes those jokes. He said that it was because I’m insecure and don’t have a good sense of humor. Not the case! I just think it’s inappropriate for an employer to make light of topics that his employees likely don’t find funny – like getting fired, laid off, or having their livelihoods shrunk to pay for a new copier. Am I crazy? Missing the joke?

Yep, it’s dumb and inappropriate, but you’ve said your piece and he disagrees, so I would assume those jokes are going to continue and just ignore them. Sounds like you’ve got bigger issues with the management there anyway.

4. I was rejected because I wasn’t going to be available when a company was scheduling final interviews

It’s my dream to work in Company X, and I’ve heard that it’s nearly impossible to get in without interning there first. When I submitted my application for an internship around September, I informed the firm beforehand that I would be overseas for a week on holiday in December. I specifically highlighted it clearly in my cover letter and also emphasized this fact to my interviewer.

I made it all the way to the final round – and yes, as Murphy would have it, they called me exactly when I was overseas. Naturally I was extremely upset, and told them I would be happy to do online interviews, but it was a group round and I had to be physically present. Thus, I was automatically dropped out of the running.

I understand that companies don’t have much time to read through cover letters, so is there a way to prevent this from reoccurring? In the meantime, I don’t want to give up on Company X. Is there something I could do to salvage the situation?

It’s not that they’re not reading your cover letter; it’s that weeks later, they’re not retaining information about specific dates you’ll be away. There’s not really much you can do about that when it happens, other than reminding them when your time away is getting near (“I want to remind you that I’ll be out of the country for a week starting on the 15th; if that will conflict with steps in the hiring process, I’d be glad to try to arrange something right before I leave or right before I get back”). But if they have interviews scheduled during specific days and don’t have flexibility on that, it’s just sort of bad luck.

In this case, its sounds like they weren’t willing to be flexible (which could be because they’re overly rigid, or because they had they had legitimate scheduling constraints, or because they weren’t sufficiently excited about you as a candidate to alter their schedule — it’s hard to know from the outside), and there’s not really anything you can do about that, unfortunately.

5. Asking a business contact about jobs in their organization

I like my work, but the environment around here is pretty toxic these days. I sincerely doubt the company will last the year. We’ve lost all our senior employees as it is.

Ive been job hunting but my education and skillset isnt really suitable to most jobs in the industry I’m in. My ideal is to work for the department of the government who I work closely with in the course of my duties and whose responsibilities I am sure I’m qualified for. It’s very hard to get hired by government here without help on the inside though.

I do have a very positive working relationship with several file managers there, one in particular who is my go-to person for advice and answers and the occasional friendly chat. Would it be appropriate to ask her about job openings or passing along a resume for me, and if so, how would I word that request?

Yes, as long as it’s the sort of relationship where you wouldn’t worry about her mentioning it to your current employer. I’d say something like this: “I’ve been thinking a lot about what I want to do when I move on from this role, and I’d actually really love to work with your office. I’d love to pick your brain about it at some point or even send in a resume if you think that might make sense.”

awkwardness over paying the bill at a dinner with coworkers

A reader writes:

I had an awkward group “per diem dinner” moment with three unfamiliar work colleagues not long ago and thought I’d see how you would have handled it.

Four employees each get a set per diem (let’s say $30) for dinner while they’re out of town, to be expensed later. At a group dinner, two of the four — let’s call them Tightwads A and B — duly spend at the per diem cap, while two others — let’s call them Spendthrifts C and D — enjoy a couple glasses of alcohol apiece and go over the per diem.

Bill comes; awkward calculator math ensues. After a few minutes, Spendthrift C says maybe it’s just best to split the bill evenly four ways. Tightwad A pipes up and mentions he’d consciously stayed under the per diem and would rather just pay his part of the bill because money is tight. Tightwad B says nothing, but his body language seems to indicate he agrees with A.

So Spendthrift C suggests still splitting the bill evenly but having C and D give some cash to A and B to help even things out. But D balks at giving cash for unstated reasons, quite possibly because he’s tired of fussing over $15-$20 changing hands in one direction or another. What was the right way to have handled this?

(Spoiler alert: It ended up getting handled in about the most awkward way possible. Spendthrift C gave back both C and D’s portion of the overage to Tightwads A and B.)

I’m with the Tightwads on this. (And I’m assuming we’re using Tightwads/Spendthrifts as amusing shorthand, not because we think really they’re either of those things.)

If someone says clearly that they’d rather not pay for someone else’s meal, no one should balk at that, especially in a situation where you’ve got four coworkers eating together during a business trip, as opposed to a social occasion among friends. The group should have immediately acquiesed and had people pay for their own meals.

It’s totally reasonable for people not to want to pay for their coworkers’ drinks (or desserts, or more expensive entree, or whatever.) No one should even have to explain their reasons for that, but when someone explicitly says that money is tight, it’s the height of rudeness to do anything other than make it easy and comfortable for them to stick to their own food bill.

And sure, in social situations, many groups do split everything relatively evenly. But that’s different, because (a) it’s a social situation, not a work one, and no one is obligated to be there, (b) people often find it easier to speak up when there’s no potential workplace cost to doing so (people shouldn’t have to risk causing tensions with coworkers just to keep their own wallets from being raided for someone else’s meal), and (c) the norms among social group are often different than among work groups — there’s a greater emphasis on conviviality, for one thing.

Meals in a work context are different. People should really pay their own costs unless there’s a clear group agreement to split it evenly and you know everyone well enough to know no one is agreeing just because they feel pressure to. The minute you see someone balk or even hesitate, that’s a sign that you really need to switch gears and have people cover their own costs.

Read an update to this letter here.

4 workplaces trends that are making you less productive

You’d think that workplace trends would help us be more productive, and they’re usually heralded that way. But in reality, many modern workplace trends can actually impede your productivity rather than raise it.

Here are four current trends that might be making you and your coworkers less productive.

1. Open office plans. Workplaces that consist of wide open space – no private offices and not even any cubicles – are gaining popularity, even though most workers hate working in them. While companies that have made the switch have promised improved collaboration and team work, most workers dislike the loss of privacy and the distractions that make it hard to focus.

As it turns out, those complaining workers are on to something. A flood of new research shows that open layouts increase stress, raise blood pressure, and cause workers to take more sick leave. A Harvard study found that whatever collaboration benefits these layouts provide were outweighed by workers’ dissatisfaction with noise and privacy issues. Noisier work settings undermine both motivation and productivity, according to research in the Journal of Applied Psychology. And “workers in two-person offices took an average of 50 percent more sick leave than those in single offices, while those who worked in fully open offices were out an average of 62 percent more,” reports a recent study of more than 2,400 employees in Denmark.

Adding insult to injury, that collaboration promised by open-office proponents isn’t even happening: Collaboration dropped by 20 percent between 2008 and 2013, while time spent alone has increased by 13 percent, according to a survey by design firm Gensler.

2. Constantly being on call. Before email and cell phones became so ubiquitous, most people could disconnect from work at the end of the work day. (Remember when it used to seem that doctors were the only ones in danger of being contacted by work during a weekend or evening?) Now people in all sorts of jobs and at all levels are expected to stay connected and respond to calls, texts, and emails 24/7, meaning that some people never really get to turn work off at all. While this is supposed to raise productivity – after all, if you’re working at 10 p.m., you must be getting more done overall, right? – in the long-term in tends to lower productivity, as people become burned out and miserable.

3. Email. I say this as a lover of email, but while email has made many things easier and more efficient, it has a dark side too. We field way more messages via email than office workers in earlier eras ever fielded via memos, phone calls, or in-person conversations. It’s so easy to dash off quick questions to coworkers or send FYIs or otherwise fill up our colleagues’ in-boxes that we all do it without thinking about our collective abilities to process all these messages and still get our core work done – or rather, still get our core work done within a reasonable number of hours and unplug at the end of the day.

4. Group work. Modern companies are fond of organizing employees into teams, but some research indicates that group work can actually lower productivity. That’s because people in groups tend to exert less effort than they would individually, partly because they’re less accountable for results. In fact, studies consistently show that as a working group size increases, work capacity declines.

Making matters worse, research finds that creativity can be stifled in groups because of the pressure to conform to the majority opinion. If that makes you wonder about the utility of group brainstorming, you’re on to something: A study published in the Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology found that group brainstorming generates far fewer ideas than the combined efforts of several individuals working alone.

It’s something to consider before assembling your next project team.

ask the readers: starting work after being a stay-at-home parent

I’m throwing this one out to readers to weigh in on. A reader writes:

Do you have any general advice for a stay-at-home parent going back to work full time after 5 years of staying home with the kids? I’m fine socially at playgrounds and PTA meetings. I’m a little worried that I have mom brain though when dealing with this new job and new coworkers. I think most of my coworkers will be younger than me and don’t have kids. I know I should try to not talk about my kids all the time, but do you have any other general advice? I start next week!

Readers, what advice do you have?

Read an update to this letter here.

is it demeaning to refer to “my team,” asking whether I’d have to work with a rude interviewer, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Is it demeaning to refer to “my team” or “my assistant”?

I’m a relatively new manager supervising a team of 20. Over the holidays, a cousin told me that one should never refer to people you supervise as “my team” or “my #1 salesman” (using the possessive). He said that you should only use a possessive vertically upward, such as “my boss” or “my company VP.” I’d never want to make my team (see, there I did it) uncomfortable, but also never imagined that this might be an issue. Can you weigh in?

Your cousin is overthinking things. It’s totally normal to refer to “my team,” “my staff,” “my assistant,” and so forth, just like you’d say “my company,” “my friend,” or “my kid.” It’s a way of expressing the relationship, not ownership or possession. How does your cousin refer to people who work for him — “the salesperson on my team”? That’s unnecessarily convoluted.

That said, there’s nothing wrong with taking the opportunity to say “we” instead of “my team” or “our salesperson” instead of “my salesperson” when you have the option. But not every sentence lends itself to that, and it’s fine if it doesn’t. What matters far more than any of this is how you treat people and how effectively you manage — do that well and no one will worry about this stuff; screw it up and your team is far more likely to bristle at wording choices.

2. Asking about whether I’d have to work with the rude person who interviewed me

I recently had an interview where I found out that I am one of two final candidates. In the interviews I have had with Jane, who would be my direct manager, I really enjoyed our conversations and thought that she seemed like an excellent manager. However, my last interview was with Lisa, the head of the department, who was incredibly rude, dismissive, and confrontational. In debriefing with a friend/colleague who has worked with Lisa, my impression of her was confirmed – she is really difficult to work with. If I am offered the job, is there a tactful way to ask how much contact I would actually have with Lisa (or how much her abrasive personality affects the entire department) before making my decision?

I’d say something like this to Jane: “I really enjoyed getting the chance to talk with both you and Lisa. Can you give me a sense of how my role interacts with Lisa? How closely would we be working together, if at all?” Your tone here matters — it should be neutral, not have an undercurrent of “I really don’t want to work with Lisa.” Jane will probably be able to figure out why you’re asking, but you’ll come across as much more professional if you handle it neutrally.

But also, regardless of Jane’s answer, give real thought to whether you want to take a job that ultimately reports up to someone you describe as” incredibly rude, dismissive, and confrontational.” Even if you don’t have regular interaction with her, those characteristics tend to really impact a team’s culture and how they operate.

3. Do I have to invite my coworkers to my wedding?

In September, I started a new job. The managers that hired me were very vocal about how happy they were to have me on board, and they believed in me from the start. Also, the people at my new job are very kind-however, no one really hangs out or communicates outside of work.

I recently became engaged over the holidays, and many people at work have been really sweet about it. I received cards and gifts, which I did not expect at all. The thing is, I’m not sure if I should invite them to my wedding. I wasn’t planning to, because I’m still kind of new (although my wedding is next January, so I’m sure I’ll get to know my co-workers better over the next year) and also as I said, no one really hangs out outside of work. I just don’t want to obligate them. Also, I am not sure if I should mix work with my personal life. It is also one of those things where I wouldn’t know where to draw the line…..like I could invite the three other people only in my department, but then I’m not sure if I have to invite my manager, too? I also am concerned that they now expect an invitation, considering they gave me gifts and cards. I was very surprised and touched over these gestures, because the people at my last job didn’t do things like that.

You don’t need to invite coworkers; it’s not expected, at least in most offices. The fact that your coworkers have already given you cards and gifts doesn’t change that; it’s very, very normal for coworkers to do that (and even potentially throw a shower!) and still not expect to be invited. If anyone asks, it’s fine to just say, “Oh, we’re keeping it small.” But polite people won’t ask or be upset that they’re not invited.

4. LinkedIn when you’re taking time out of the workforce to raise kids

I have just left the workforce to stay home with my children full-time. I have a 3-year-old and one due in a few weeks. I will return to work at some point, though I don’t know when. (I have some close contacts and a mentor in my professional network and I plan to keep my professional memberships current). What is the best way to update my status on LinkedIn to reflect this?

I wouldn’t. There’s no reason that your LinkedIn profile needs to explain that you’re taking time away. It can continue the way it always is, just without indicating a current job. Any other alternative just calls attention to the fact that you’re taking time out, without any real reason to need to highlight that. (And it’s not that you need to hide that, of course; it’s just that I don’t see any particular benefit from highlighting it.)

5. When family members of the owner are treated differently

My husband, who is a manager, is a salaried employee. His assistant manager is the wife of one of the owners of the business and is also a salaried employee. She is not an owner. Both are supposedly full-time employees. My husband is required to keep track of how many days off per year he uses – down to the hour. If he exceeds his allowed days off during the year, he is required to deduct an hourly wage from his pay for the days missed until the end of the year. The same is not the case for the assistant manager. She rarely works a full week, taking 2-3 hours off each day, not showing up whenever she wants, takes months off from work to travel, etc. and always gets her full wages. The owner states that it is a perk of being an owner, but she’s not an owner. She’s an employee. What can, if anything, he do about this inconsistency?

Probably nothing. It’s not unusual for family businesses to treat family employees differently than non-family employees. It’s often part of the package with family businesses, and it’s really up to the owner if he wants to hold his wife to a different standard. Your husband might find that too frustrating to want to deal with it (and I wouldn’t blame him), but then the solution would be to find a job somewhere else; it’s unlikely that the owner is going to be persuaded to manage his wife differently.

I can’t even…

From Consumerist: Summer’s Eve To Ladies: If You Want A Raise, You’d Better Douche First

I really hope we see an equivalent ad from a jock itch product soon.

Related: Ladies, be dainty when asking for a raise