I’m filling in for someone on leave who left me tons of rules for what I can and can’t do while she’s away

A reader writes:

I have recently accepted a one-year maternity cover contract at a large multinational firm. I’ll be covering the head of an extremely busy department with 5 managers, 2 deputy managers, and 40 staff. I’m extremely excited ( and nervous) as it will be my first time heading up a department. I have 8 years of senior management experience, but this will be a huge step up. I was looking forward to a smooth transition with the person who’s leaving but unfortunately it’s all gone very, very wrong!

On my first morning, she took me for coffee (outside the building) sat me down and explained her “rules” for me covering her:

1. I’m to only introduce myself to clients, answer emails, etc. as ”Miss B, who is covering Miss A, the head of the teapot department.”
2. I’m not to make any new contacts or new clients without her express permission.
3. She has instructed that appraisals, performances reviews, etc. must wait till her return.
4. I am not allowed to change my LinkedIn to “head of teapot department.”
5. I am to stick to her schedule of meetings, etc.
6. Any important emails to be sent to her (now my) PA, who will forward them to her.
7. I am under no circumstances to assume she will not return from maternity leave ( in one year), but if I play by her rules, ”she will see I’m taken care of’.”

I can totally understand that she is nervous handing over her department for a year, but this seems very extreme, I was planning on speaking to her and to try and explain that in order for her department to run smoothly for year, such rules just aren’t practical. However, when I came in this morning, HR informed me that she’s taken her leave early and won’t be in, and she has apparently told HR that she has fully prepped me for the role.

I’m now at a loss of what to do. Are her rules weird? Is this normal for a maternity leave contract? I really want to do well in this role and make a great impression with the company.

No, this isn’t normal. It sounds like she’s having some pretty major control issues at the prospect of leaving her department in someone else’s hands for a year. And while to some extent that’s understandable, what she’s proposed doing isn’t practical or reasonable.

Some of this isn’t totally crazy — it’s not unreasonable, for instance, to want clients to know that she’s not permanently gone. But that doesn’t require you noting it in every single email, and it’s ridiculous to imply that you should. Similarly, I can see why she doesn’t want major personnel moves made until she’s back, but it’s not reasonable to make staff members wait a year for formal reviews of their work (unless they all just had them), and regardless, you’re going to need to be giving regular feedback to people throughout the year. And dictating what you can and can’t put on LinkedIn? Really not her business — and more worrisome is the fact that she felt the need to bring it up preemptively, which is indicative of the broader problem, which is that she’s approaching all this as “how can I contain and limit my replacement,” rather than “how can I set up my replacement up to succeed while I’m away?”

At this point, I’d talk to either HR or your manager about the rules she’s asked you to follow, and express your concern that you won’t be able to fully perform the job if you adhere to them. The company will probably overrule her on at least a few of these. At that point, you should ask about the best way to handle this with her — because you don’t want to get into a situation where they’ve told you to handle things differently but she doesn’t know and is having mini blow-ups from her leave when she sees things going differently than she thought they would.

And if for some reason the company doesn’t overrule her on most of these, then I’d seek additional clarification about exactly how they see your role. If you’re not allowed to take on new clients without her okay or even modify meeting schedules, you’re not really leading the department — the role is something else, and everyone involved needs to be clear about what it is and isn’t (and you can decide at that point if you even want it).

Read an update to this letter here.

my new coworker noisily sucks on candy all day, wearing company-branded items after a buy-out, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My new coworker noisily sucks on candy all day

A woman who recently joined our office sucks on candies all day long and makes terrible, loud sucking noises. Is there a way to politely ask her to be quiet? It is driving me absolutely bananas.

Well, are you comfortable being pretty direct about it? That’s really the only way you’ll be able to do it. For instance: “Jane, I wonder if there’s a quieter way to eat those candies? For some reason, I’m able to hear you sucking on them and it can be distracting.”

If that feels too awkward or confrontational, then you have to decide whether you’d rather risk the awkwardness or keep dealing with the noise. If it’s really bugging you, I’d risk the awkwardness — and perhaps keep in mind that most people would want to know if they were doing something like this that was driving others crazy. (Not all, certainly, but most.)

2. Wearing company-branded items after a buy-out

Our company was recently bought out by a much larger organization. The buyout was a mutually beneficial one, and the integration has been relatively smooth. One of the hot buttons for our new owners is branding. The sign in front of our office changed just weeks after the deal was complete. It’s like the name of our old company has been completely wiped out.

I have a number of pieces of clothing given to me over the years (polo’s, oxfords, and a great ski jacket) as reward for different things I have done. The common denominator on all of these items is that they have the old company name on them. Should I stop wearing them? They mean a lot to me, especially the ones that relate to a specific project where the team really accomplished something amazing! At the same time I want to show support for the new company.

It should be okay to wear them, but it’s not a bad idea to take a wait-and-see approach until you have a better feel for whether it would be interpreted as misplaced loyalty to the old regime. A healthy workplace wouldn’t care, but there are plenty of not-so-healthy workplaces out there, and sometimes people have weird feelings about this stuff. At a minimum, don’t make them a centerpiece of your wardrobe there; confine them to occasional work use until you’ve gotten a better feel for the situation.

Meanwhile, though, you can certainly keep wearing those items outside of work.

3. Interviewing at a company where an unethical former coworker works

I’m about to have a phone interview tomorrow with a company that has a promising opportunity for me. As I was looking on the Internet, I noticed that one of my former coworkers who I’ll call Rose, who was higher in my company and was in a related role, is at the new company in a higher related role.

Rose resigned from my company in lieu of being fired for ethical violations, including stealing work from others and taking credit. When I gave a private presentation to my VP, the VP confronted me, asking why I was presenting Rose’s work. I was dumbfounded and said it was mine and was able to delve into all the details that Rose couldn’t because I kept all the details and the other critical information out of the PowerPoint that I was previously asked to share and had them in a separate document that nobody had seen until that meeting. My VP then understood because Rose could not answer those questions and had instead gave an “I will get back to you” response to questions. After this, when it got back to Rose through the VP’s chain of command that it was known that she stole my work, my life became much more difficult till she left the company. This all happened about a year ago, and the whole environment of about 100 people was toxic because of Rose and there was a collective sigh of relief when she left.

Although it’s early in the process with the phone interview happening tomorrow, I’m concerned if I even want to move forward knowing that if successful I will have to work with Rose again. Thoughts?

Yeah, this sounds like a job you don’t want. A higher-up with a grudge against you — and possibly an interest in discrediting you — isn’t someone you want to work with. That’s the kind of thing that has the potential to turn a great job that you’d normally love into something hugely problematic. I’d pass this one up.

4. My boss tries to force me to work while sick

I work 2-4 shifts a week, 5-8 hours each (I’m a student). I called in sick a few months ago and my boss told me that I had no options if I couldn’t get anyone to cover my shift. At that time, I didn’t know what else to do so I just went in. My throat was extremely sore and my job is to talk to people all day, so by the end of the day, I had lost my voice entirely.

Today, my throat is sore again and I called in sick for one of my shifts. I got the exact same response and now I have to go into to work. What are my options? Why do they keep forcing me to work sick?

See what happens if you hold firm. “I’m sorry, but I won’t be able to come in because I’m sick. I’m also too sick to look for someone to cover my shift. I expect that I should be better by (next scheduled workday), but if that’s looking unlikely by (day before next scheduled workday), I’ll let you know right away.”

This is a reasonable stance to take. If your boss is so unreasonable as to threaten your job over it, at that point you’d need to decide if you want to work for someone so unreasonable or not. But before you look at your options as working while sick or losing your job, see what happens if you just firmly explain that you’re not able to do what she’s requesting.

5. Employer told me that they’re bringing in one more candidate

I’ve been through two interviews at this company and was told that the decision was to be made early this week and that I was one of two candidates. They contacted my references and I was expecting an offer. Now they are telling me that they are bringing in one more candidate Monday and are delaying the decision until the end of next week.

I really want this job, but I’ve not had this experience before. Should I assume that I did not get the job, or take them at their word?

Take them at their word. In general, there’s never any reason not to take people at their word on this kind of stuff. If they want to reject you, they will; most employers don’t make up convoluted excuses to avoid doing that. It’s certainly possible that there’s something else going on — like that they’ve made an offer to their first choice and are just extending the timeline while they wait for an answer from that person — but in that case, employers usually are just vague, rather than making up specific scenarios like this one.

But also: when you find yourself trying to read tea leaves like this, and wondering whether you should be doing anything other than taking an employer at their word about hiring timeline stuff, it’s a signal that you’re overly invested. Hiring timelines change all the time, for all sorts of reasons, and nothing is ever guaranteed, no matter how promising things seemed earlier. The best thing you can do (always) is to assume that you didn’t get the job and let it be a pleasant surprise if you did.

update: I accepted a job without finding out the salary

Remember the letter-writer who accepted a job without first asking what the salary was (#1 at the link)? Here’s the update.

They eventually told me a salary, in terms that sounded non-negotiable. However, it was well below the bottom of the range I’d agreed to. At the same time, I was interviewing for a different position elsewhere at a place I knew and respected. I knew I had a good shot at the other position and was equally interested in it and the company–plus their salary range was higher. Because of those two factors, I felt more comfortable in putting my foot down and telling them I was willing to walk away. Things got a little bit tense (they said the last offer was an error and insinuated that I was being hostile). In the end, they honored the bottom of original range. I still considered walking away, but my previous experience with them had been entirely positive and I thought that their jumbled hiring process wasn’t indicative of the rest of how they operated. So I took the position and decided to go into my first day with a blank slate and hope they did the same.

And it seems like they did! The organization isn’t perfect, of course, but oddly enough, outside of hiring, they operate much more transparently and in a more egalitarian way than anywhere else I’ve worked. Since I started, we’ve added a bunch of new staff, and from conversations with the ones I’m close with, they went through similar mis/uncommunications during the hiring process. It does make me worry it about our reputation or that people with more options might get scared away–one of our new staff almost did give up during the hiring process. (We’re lucky that good jobs in my field are pretty scarce.) However, that’s a conversation I’m not in a position to start right now, and that issue doesn’t impact my work. As far as I can tell, the other new staff feel similarly. In general, I am very happy there and after a few previous miserable job experiences, I feel very lucky to finally work with coworkers I adore, at a place I respect, doing work I find meaningful. I hope to not have to write you for quite a while!

update: how do I tell my boss that our new hire needs to be fired?

Remember the letter-writer who was responsible for training her new coworker and who was concerned that the new person wasn’t cut out for the job? Here’s the update.

I was honest with my boss and told her directly that I thought my new coworker needed to be let go. I provided her with written examples of my coworker’s mistakes and other examples that showed how difficult she was to deal with.

My boss initially suggested that we gave my coworker more time, but luckily she asked for my opinion and I told her that it would be easier and less stressful for me to do both jobs by myself, and that I believed she should be let go as soon as possible.

My coworker was let go on her 60th day and her replacement is so much better in every aspect. I think what helped the most to influence my boss was my documentation and solid examples of things that my coworker had (or hadn’t) done.

4 signs you just don’t like your boss

You might think you don’t need to be told when you don’t like your boss, but sometimes managers become such an ingrained part of our work lives that you might not even realize when a personal dislike is impacting the relationship – and along with it, your happiness at your job.

Here are four typical signs that you just don’t like your manager – and what you can do about it.

1. You’re much, much happier when your boss is on vacation or traveling. It’s normal to enjoy the times when your boss is away; after all, a boss’s absence will often result in less work, fewer interruptions, and lower stress. But when you’re only happy when your boss is away, it’s a bad sign about the relationship.

2. You avoid talking with your boss, even when you need to. Do you find yourself putting off important conversations with your manager or avoiding them altogether, even when you know that you really should be touching base with her? People frequently do that when they dislike a manager, since they find the conversations so unpleasant. This is something to guard against, though, because it can result in you doing a worse job, not getting important input, or leaving your boss out of the loop when you shouldn’t.

3. You’re disappointed when your manager is included in meetings or when she joins a conversation you’re in. If you have a sinking feeling when your boss joins your conversation in the break way or when you see her name on a meeting invite list, you probably don’t have a great relationship. Most people don’t want their managers included in every conversation they’re involved in, but if the relationship is healthy, you shouldn’t be devastated to see her included.

4. Everything she does annoys you. Sometimes when you’re aggravated with someone, everything about them starts to annoy you, even things that wouldn’t even register if someone else did them. If you find yourself thinking, “I can’t believe that she ate a candy bar in that meeting” or “What nerve to have a conversation right outside my doorway,” you’re probably at this stage.

What you can do about it

So what can you do if you find yourself saddled with a boss who gets under your skin?

Well, for starters, get clarity in your mind about what the problems are. Do you dislike her management style? Is she a jerk who criticizes people publicly and can’t be pleased? Do you just not click? Getting clarity about the problems might sound obvious, but often people let their dislike build to the point that they can’t even quite tell exactly what they object to.

Then, decide whether you can change anything about the situation. For instance, if you can’t stand the way your boss micromanages your work and doesn’t seem to trust you, you might be able to broach the issue with her, asking if she’d be willing to experiment with giving you more autonomy. Or, if you realize that your dislike is more personality-based and not about anything she’s doing wrong as a manager, you might resolve to look for the good in her and try to give her the benefit of the doubt for a while, to see if that changes anything about how you feel. Or, in some cases, you might realize that there’s nothing you can do that will make the situation palatable to you. But even that – although it sounds dismal – is useful, because if you know you can’t change the situation, you’ll be better equipped for the next step, which brings us to…

Ultimately, you’ll need to decide whether you can do your job reasonably effectively and happily, despite your dislike of your boss. If you conclude that you can’t, there’s no shame in that – not everyone works well with everyone else. But if that’s the case for you, you’re better off coming to terms with it and deciding how you’ll proceed, rather than just staying miserable. That might mean that you work toward a transfer, or decide to job search outside of your company – but once you have a plan of action for moving away from the situation, you’ll probably find your boss easier to handle.

all the party planning in my office always falls to women

A reader writes:

I’ve noticed in my office that nearly all of the holiday planning responsibilities fall to women. This is in a traditionally male-dominated industry where there has been progress in hiring/promoting women, but we’re still generally underrepresented. However, in the party planning efforts, usually all, or all-but-one of the representatives are women.

This isn’t some vast management conspiracy. Usually what happens is a call for volunteers goes out, everyone ignores it, and each component organization either designates a representative or a woman volunteers. I don’t think it’s intentional in any way – however, I can’t help but be frustrated that these types or roles always seem to fall to women.

So my questions are:

1) Is this actually a problem?
2) Whose responsibility is it to ensure a diverse representation in these things?
3) How do they best do that?
4) How do I, as a low-level manager in this organization, approach it with my leadership?

The first thing to look at is the roles of the women who end up doing the party planning. If they’re all in junior-level, admin-type roles, and if no men are in those roles, it may make perfect sense that they’re the ones getting stuck with the planning. (However, if that’s the case, you probably have a totally different problem on your hands: the question of why those roles are exclusively filled by women. But that’s a different question than the one you’re posing, one that gets into much more deep-rooted societal challenges related to why our career paths still often tend to be gendered.)

But if that’s not the case — if the women in jobs where organizing parties doesn’t make particular sense or if there are men in the same roles who never end up with it — then yeah, your party planning systems are all mucked up with sexism.

To answer your first question about whether that’s really a problem: Yes. It’s a problem for everyone when women continue to be pegged into house-keeping/care-taking roles that aren’t inherent parts of their jobs. Too often, it’s the women in the office — especially younger women — who find themselves always being the ones to take notes at meetings, straighten up the kitchen, plan the parties, order lunch, and do other “care-taking” work, while the men in similar jobs get to focus on doing work that’s more highly valued. That can have long-lasting ramifications for who gets what projects, who gets what recognition, and who builds what reputation, and ultimately how their careers progress.

As for what you can do, one of the best things is to simply point it out. Not an accusatory, put-everyone-on-the defensive way — at least not yet — but in a “hey, I’ve noticed this work always falls to women; can we change that?” way.

As for whose responsibility it is to be noticing this, pointing it out, and addressing it, ideally that would be happening at a high level. Actually, ideally it would be happening throughout your culture. But since it’s not, it’s reasonable for anyone in your organization who notices this to say something. The fact that you’re in a management role, even although only a low-level one, gives you additional standing to bring it up.

posting about a new job on Facebook, my coworker is a harlot, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Should I wait to post about a new job on Facebook?

I recently accepted an offer for a new job – yay! I waited until I got it in writing, then notified my boss and coworkers, etc. Everything’s all set – my last day at my old job is in 2 weeks, and I start my new job a month from now. Now I’d love to share the good news with my friends, so I’m thinking about posting to Facebook about it – something generic like “It’s official – I’ll be starting a new job in January!” I feel like that couldn’t hurt (especially if I don’t name the company), but my gut tells me that somehow I shouldn’t, though I can’t quite say why. Should I follow my gut here?

(I am not connected with my current boss or coworkers on social media – not that it would be a problem since they know already – or anyone from my new job.)

Once I start the new job I’ll also update my LinkedIn profile, but that seems like it would be weird to do ahead of time. What are your thoughts about posting to Facebook?

I think you’re right to wait to post to LinkedIn until you’re actually in the role you’d be listing there, but I don’t see any reason you shouldn’t post about it on Facebook. That said, if you’re feeling uncomfortable about it, there’s no reason you need to — you can always wait until just before you start if you’d rather (or not post about it at all, for that matter).

2. I think my coworker is a harlot

I have a married female coworker who continues to have relationships with multiple men in the office. She periodically has different men in her cubicle. Many people around can hear her giggles and such. None of the men she has been with are her superiors but are peers, but one was our civil rights manager, who was also married. When a new guy starts, she doesn’t waste time in “introducing herself.” Employees have complained they saw her having sex in exam rooms and they saw her in a too close for comfort position in her cubicle several times. Many of us at the office are tired of her office sexcapades. What can we do?

Well, who she’s involved with really isn’t your business. If someone has seen her having sex at work, they can certainly report that (to her boss or to HR) because that’s wildly inappropriate and presumably something the company would want to put a stop to, but beyond that, her relationships with coworkers are not your business unless they’re affecting your work in some specific way.

By the way, I assume you’re judging the men who are involved with her by the same standards, right? All your ire here seems directed at her, but it sounds like other coworkers are involved too. If you’re just throwing a scarlet letter at her and having a double standard for the men, that’s a problem.

3. Am I wasting my time as a new grad applying for jobs that want two years of experience?

I’m going to be graduating soon (like, two weeks soon), but I’m just now starting my job search (I know, I know) and realizing a lot of listings are asking for two years of experience. I’m working in an industry (mass communication) where there aren’t many relevant job openings out there; there are many ideal possibilities, but not many actual possibilities. My question, and maybe it’s a dumb one, is am I wasting my time applying for these two-year-experience listings? I’ve searched around your website (and the entire Internet), and have seen that if they’re looking for five years and you have a few, then apply, but nothing for recent grads who are seeing listings with just a couple years required.

As an example, one company that I would love to work for has a couple listings open for which I think I could be well suited. One of those roles is a deputy editor position, which should probably go to someone more seasoned (they state they’re looking for someone with two years experience at a news outlet or a blog). That said, they’ve advertised these two jobs in our school’s student newsletter. That, to me, says they’re open to recent grads.

I’ve got an internship under my belt, but what I think is more relevant is that I’ve been volunteering with a local nonprofit for most of this year and basically spearheaded their social media marketing. I’ve also been blogging since I’ve exited the womb (to very moderate success—but success nonetheless!). They also list desirables I have (like videography skills), that the responsibilities require a lot of social media competency, and “blog” is a repeated buzzword. Would mentioning these successes and saying I admire their company culture make up for no formal experience? Or, again, should I just give up with these one- and two-year experience listings?

It’s true that “X years of experience” requirements aren’t usually totally firm, but there’s a bigger difference between new grad/2 years of experience than there is between 2 years of experience/4 years of experience. “No real full-time work experience” is a bigger hurdle than “not quite as much experience as we were originally envisioning.” And yeah, in general, most employers would be pretty unlikely to hire a brand new grad for a deputy editor position, particularly if the role has managerial authority over other people.

That said, you don’t have anything to lose other than time you’ll spend applying, and since you’re new to job searching and don’t yet have a sense of how your application materials will go over with employers, why not give it a shot and see what happens? Make sure you’re also applying to plenty of positions that aren’t as much of a stretch, so that you’re not putting all your eggs in a possibly out-of-reach basket — but there’s no reason you can’t try these too and see what happens. It’s not like people will be outraged to see your application; the worst that can happen is that you’ll get rejected, which is going to happen plenty in any normal job search.

4. My manager demanded to know if my engagement means I’ll be leaving

I recently got engaged. I am living/working in Seattle, but my fiancee lives 1000 miles away (central coast of California). A week or so ago, one of my coworkers casually asked me if I had set a date for the wedding yet, so I told them it will be at the end of June.

This morning, my boss asked me to step into the conference room. When she closed the door, she (figuratively) cornered me by asking, point blank, “So you and your fiancee are getting married in about 6 months, right? Do you know yet if she’s moving to Washington or if you’re going to California?” And, being the brutally honest (to a fault) person that I am, I answered, “Well, it is looking like I’m going to be moving to California.” Then she said, “So, do you have any idea how long you will be here before you leave? Because we’ve invested a lot of time in you so far, but if you’re going to be leaving soon, then I don’t want to invest a whole lot more just to have you leave.”

I was taken aback, so I took the political route: “Well, we’re still figuring that part out, so no.” Then she asked, “Okay, do you think you could come up with an answer for me this week?” Again, I was surprised, so all I said is that I’ll have an answer for her by the end of the week.

Is she even allowed to do that? I understand her concerns, but really? I mean, sure, we don’t usually see eye-to-eye, and sure, I have been looking for another job for a couple months – I had planned to resign at the end of the month anyway before she cornered me, but I have a decent poker face. Regardless, is it even legal for her to ask those sorts of questions, despite me being too honest with my responses?

100% legal, although she certainly was jerky about it. It’s understandable that the question is on her mind, and it wouldn’t be outrageous for her to have asked you if you knew your plans yet, but she was weirdly abrasive about it.

5. Who can be a reference?

Who can write a reference besides a manager?

Anyone who can speak knowledgeably about your work can be a reference (people who have worked reasonably closely with you, like coworkers, clients, etc.) — but not people with personal bias toward you, like friends, relatives, or significant others. However, savvy reference-checkers will want to speak to former managers, who are usually in the best position to assess your work.

Also, most reference-checkers want to speak to references, in the form of phone calls. They want to ask their own questions, hear the reference’s tone when answering, and be able to ask follow-up questions. Because of that, letters aren’t especially useful, so I wouldn’t put any energy into getting them unless they’re specifically requested.

Sunday open thread – December 14, 2014

Sam with treeIt’s the weekend free-for-all.

This comment section is open for any non-work-related discussion you’d like to have with other readers, by popular demand. (This one is truly non-work only; if you have a work question, you can email it to me or post it in the work-related open thread on Fridays.)

Have at it.

another four reader updates

Four more updates from readers whose questions were answered here this year —

1. My colleague works around the clock and I’m concerned it will impact management’s idea of realistic workload (#2 at the link)

Things ended up working themselves out, though not in the best way. Unfortunately, all the overtime caught up to my colleague, and they ended up on almost a month of stress leave. There were private, extenuating circumstances to it all to which I wasn’t, rightly so, privy to.

Our manager is monitoring workload much more closely and opened up a productive dialogue about our hours and made rules around overtime clear. The main one being in the government you can’t just decide to work overtime, it has be to approved in advance, which means if your workload is too much you have to have a conversation with her, and as the manager it is her job to manage the team’s workload and outputs. I have actually been assigned some of their files, and like some commenters deduced, it turns out that despite the hours, the actual work being done wasn’t very efficient. They are back at work now, and have definitely taken a step back.

2. My CEO wants us to wear pants with the company logo on the butt

Alas, I haven’t got an update yet. My boss hasn’t said another word about those pants since he first mentioned it, and I don’t want to say anything unless he brings it up again. I don’t know, maybe he has nixed the idea all on his own and letting it die a quiet death? A girl can dream!

3. Interviewing when obviously pregnant (#5 at the link)

I asked for advice when interviewing at 6 months pregnant. I found an open position in my field and applied. I didn’t mention the baby bump at the first interview – I’m not sure if the employer actually noticed. At the second interview, I did bring it up and the employer responded with an instant congratulations, when are you due, etc.

He had no problem with my situation and offered me the job on the spot. I even ended up with a partially paid maternity leave.

Thank you again for your advice. Your articles have great information!

4. Interviewers keep commenting on my height (#3 at the link)

I haven’t needed to use your advice or any of the great tips left in the comments. I went on a few more interviews, where no one commented on my height (or any other aspect of my appearance), before landing my current job.

I’ve been at my current position over 6 months – I love it! And the only time my height becomes a topic of conversation is when I ask for help getting something down from atop our tall cabinets.

update: my office is fighting about overhead lighting

Remember the letter-writer whose office was warring about overhead lighting, and half the office wanted to work in darkness? Here’s the update.

We got a new manager and we moved to a different floor, two unforeseen variables that changed the whole atmosphere.

A couple posters brought up a few things I wanted to address: AAM, you were on target when you said this was some kind of referendum on other things that bothered people. Reading that line alone was worth the effort of writing. The cubes all have under-cabinet lighting and people could certainly have brought in lamps for more illumination, but the issue was overhead lighting. Some nooks and crannies were nearly pitch black, as dark as a movie theater. One needed a miner’s helmet to navigate. And my favorite post was the person who said “handwritten faxed forms–really?” That made me chuckle because that is your U.S. federal government, my fellow Americans. Make people use technology from the 90s.

After our move, the new manager reiterated that if people wanted some of the overhead lights directly above their new cubes turned off, we would accommodate them, but the policy was that overhead lights were turned on. There would be no light-free zones declared. Actually, that went over pretty well as I think many people – even those who preferred the dark – wanted to know what the rules were.

All was going pretty well until an overtime project started, with quite a few people coming to work a few hours on the weekends. The same woman who exploded at the senior manager (the same woman!) got mad at her coworker “Susie” for – yes – turning on the overhead lights on a Saturday. A few people had been working for a few hours already with the lights off. Susie got there mid-morning and turned on the lights, prompting “Old Yeller” to loudly challenge her for doing that on a weekend. Susie, a reserved and introverted woman, was caught completely flatfooted. She was angry and mortified at being made a semi-public target. (By the way, no manager was there at the time.)

Then, in a truly self-destructive move, Old Yeller fired off an email to the new manager in the mistaken belief that he would back her up by agreeing that the policy did not apply to the weekend OT project, and cited Susie’s actions. Wrong move. Instead, the next Monday, he sent out a strongly worded blast email to everyone reiterating what the lighting policy was – weekday or weekend, it made no difference — and he expected no more drama over this. If it happened again, then he would get personally involved in any ensuing actions. He made sure all his direct reports spread the word to their staff, and he revisited it in an All-Hands meeting.

So we’re rubbing along for the time being, but I just don’t get this woman and the battles she chooses. Honestly, she is an AAM submission all on her own.