7 ways you’re annoying your manager without realizing it

Everyone gets annoyed by coworkers at times, whether it’s rolling your eyes at the guy who chronically monopolizes meetings or being driven to distraction by your cubicle mate’s loud chewing. To some extent, that’s just the reality of working with other people.

But when it’s your boss that you’re annoying, it’s worth paying attention. If you have any of the following seven work habits, you’re almost certainly annoying your manager – and could benefit from a different approach.

1. Presenting guesses as certainties. It’s fine to not always have the answer; a reasonable boss won’t expect you to. But you need to be up-front about it when that’s the case. If you take a guess but frame it as a certainty, there’s a risk that you’re giving your manager wrong information. That means that she’ll be making decisions or taking actions based on bad information – which is a really big deal. So if you’re not sure about something, just say so – and then say you’ll find out.

2. Responding defensively to feedback. If you get upset, hurt, or angry when your manager gives you feedback on your work, you’re making it hard for your boss to do her job. Worse yet, she might start avoiding giving you important feedback that you need to hear. You need to know what you could be doing better, and you’re more likely to hear it if you don’t make it hard for your boss to tell you.

3. Taking forever to get to the point. Your boss is probably busy. When you bring her information, or a problem, or a question, get to the upshot quickly. If you’re giving 10 minutes of background before you ever get to the point, you’re almost certainly frustrating her.

4. Missing deadlines without clearing it in advance. It might be perfectly okay for you to miss a particular deadline – but if you don’t clear that with your manager ahead of time, you’re likely to look really bad: unreliable, disorganized, and flaky. And that’s a recipe for your manager not trusting you in the future, which in turn is a recipe for your manager checking up on you more, which neither of you will like.

5. Neglecting to think about the big picture. Managers have to think about the big picture all the time – how something will affect the team and the organization as a whole. For instance, approving your request for new software might mean that she has to cut her budget somewhere else, plus explain to a different employee why he attend the training course he requested. If you only think about how things will affect you, you’re showing your manager that you don’t have a broad perspective and that you don’t understand the things she cares most about. That will harm you in everything from project assignments to promotion potential to the quality of the relationship overall.

6. Getting stuck in a negativity loop. Everyone has occasional frustrations at work. But if you get caught in them to the point that you’re becoming a toxic presence in the office or the constant naysayer, it’s time to make a fundamental decision: Can you find a way to be reasonably happy at work or is it time to do something else? No good manager will put up with a team member poisoning the atmosphere in the long run (nor will it do your reputation any favors).

7. Hiding behind email. Yes, it can sometimes feel easier to stay behind your computer to hash out difficult subjects. But sometimes you need to pick up the phone or talk to people face-to-face, and your boss will rightly get frustrate if you insist of sticking to email for complicated or sensitive conversations.

I originally published this at Intuit QuickBase. 

my employee keeps venting to other team members, I regret recommending someone for a job, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My employee keeps venting to other team members, but not to me

I have an employee with whom I have made every attempt to keep open lines of communication, be there for him, offer assistance, be a sounding board, etc. However he repeatedly confides in a coworker when he wants to vent about something, rather than coming to me. I end up hearing about his frustration or concerns secondhand, and sometimes his venting is misdirected or uncalled for, because he is making assumptions and building a story in his own mind without having all of the details. If he would come to me first, he would have a better feel for whether it’s something he really needs to get worked up about. When I have confronted him about this before, he has even admitted that he struggles with coming to me to vent, but he can’t explain why, and he says that it would be very difficult to change his behavior. I don’t have this issue with any other employees. They all feel comfortable coming to me about anything.

It is getting to the point where sometimes I find myself responding to his venting through his trusted coworker. I know I shouldn’t do this, but addressing it directly with him hasn’t helped, and I don’t want to affect his relationship with the trusted coworker, and possibly lose the only communication channel we currently have with him. The other reason I’m trying to handle this delicately is that he’s our most valuable technical resource, and he has his hands in everything. I firmly believe that no one is irreplaceable and no one is “above the law,” but the rest of my team and our customers would lose it if they ever got wind of something like a PIP or even worse, a separation, happening with respect to this guy.

What can I do to get my employee to open up to me and to see how his current MO is negatively affecting the team?

First, I think you need to get really clear in your head about how this actually affects his performance and the rest of your team. Whatever pieces aren’t impacting those things, let those go. But if you can point to specific, concrete impacts that his venting is having, it’s totally reasonable to address those. For instance, it would be reasonable to say (if true), “When you air grievances to the team without giving me the chance to address them or alert you to context that might change your assessment, you’re creating a negative environment that’s bringing the whole team down. You’re also inadvertently spreading misinformation, which I then need to spend time cleaning up. I am always willing to talk to you when something is bothering you, but I need you to change the way you’re handling this. When you have an issue, I need you to take it to the person with the ability to do something about it (which will often be me), not spread the frustration around to people who can’t change it.”

From there, you need to hold him to that, just like you would any other standard of performance.

But I think the key will be sticking to the actual impact this is having (which will help you both see this as a true performance issue and thus something you’re entitled to hold him accountable to) and not just about “venting” (which makes it sound like how he handles it is optional).

2. My daughter was told to pretend to be straight at work

My gay daughter was told at work (a Wal Mart in Alabama), by a supervisor, that she cannot be gay at work because it may offend customers. She was told to speak about her girlfriend as if she were a “boyfriend.” Is this okay? My daughter is sad and ashamed now and I am speechless.

She is only 18 and has been in and out of therapy for years. She has identity issues along with depression. She has been doing well until this. She feels that she did something wrong and is ashamed. She told me this in casual conversation, not realizing they were in the wrong.

No, it’s not okay. That manager is a ridiculous person. Unfortunately, the law is wildly outdated in this regard. No federal law prohibits employers from discriminating against gay, bisexual, or transgender employees, and only 21 states have state-level protection. As a result, LGBT people, including in Alabama, don’t have protection from on-the-job discrimination.

If you want to see this change, one thing you can do is to urge your congressional representatives to pass legislation ending this as-of-now legal discrimination. You can do that here.

3. I recommended someone for a job and now regret it

I’ve been at my new position for over 3 months now, and I found out that they were looking for an assistant. I knew of someone who could do the job. I was hesitant at first, since when I grew to know him personally, he was often late, and was easily confused when given direction. But there were other times when he was a stellar employee. Even though I felt apprehensive about referring him, I still did it because I knew he needed the job.

Fast forward and they’ve offered him the job, but nothing is final. I’ve been talking to him lately and it sounds like he has a lot on his plate and I worry that he might not do as good a job as I had hoped. I feel the pressure to say something since it will reflect on me how he does. Should I warn my hiring manager and tell them to rescind the offer? I plan on talking to him to make sure this is what he wants, but I feel like no chat will help him get his life in order.

Ouch. There’s no other way to say this: You messed this one up. You recommended someone whose work you know has serious problems, and now they’ve offered him a job. Pulling a job offer is a really big deal, and one that would reflect badly on your company. If you go back to your manager and suggest they pull the offer, you’re going to look … well, unreliable and flaky at best.

Your better bet would be talking to your friend, but at this point there may not be much you can do.

4. Can I reuse an editing test as an editing sample?

I interviewed, unsuccessfully, for a position as an editor at a think tank recently. Part of the interview was an editing test: they emailed me a brief report on some of their research and had me make corrections and queries. I still have their original document and my marked-up version.

What I don’t have are any before-and-after editing examples from my old job. I can’t share anything from it that hasn’t been through classification review, and we only ever submitted final drafts for the review process.

I need an editing sample for another job application, and the posting specifies that the sample needs to show my work; just a final draft won’t do. Can I submit the think tank’s editing test as my sample? I don’t have anything from before my old job. I’ve edited fiction for friends, and things like grad school personal statements, but those call for very different skill sets than the editing jobs I’m applying for.

In theory, yes, but if they ask you what it’s from, I think it’ll come across a little oddly to say “it’s from the hiring process for a different job I applied for.” You’re probably better off creating something just for this.

5. How should my resume explain that I repeatedly took on work beyond my normal role?

I have a question about workplace dysfunction and resumes, or more specifically, how I show that for most of the projects I worked on (research studies), I assumed key higher-level duties and instituted practices to overcome team inexperience and lack of expertise particularly at the senior management level. Generally, I simply write what I did – duties and accomplishments – on my resume. I’m moving to quantify those duties (e.g., instead of writing “developed analytical framework and analyzed collected data,” I might describe the framework and write “analyzed 4000 pages of transcripts…”), but I’m still struggling with how to say “I did the project director’s or team lead’s job and absorbed most of the tasks because project staff did not do their work.” This is not my imagination – senior officers from other offices are stunned by our inner-office workings and have said to me that I should get recognition for the work I am doing and have actively sought to go over my boss’ head to make this happen.

If it were just one project, I would note it and be done, but I’m concerned that by addressing it in each project description (typical resume format for my line of work), it may call into question the overall study or the company’s reputation, or worse, get me labeled as “one of those people.” I also don’t really know how best to do this. For example, do I write, “Assumed key project director/team lead duties” though the project director does not recognize that I am doing his work? Do I write, “Under limited direction …”? Or some other variant? I don’t want to sell myself as far more experienced as I am by just describing the work, but I’d really like to get credit for the senior-level duties I’ve assumed.

Am I overthinking this?

I think so!

I agree that you shouldn’t say something like “assumed director’s role” repeatedly (although it’s fine to say it once). Instead, simp explaining what you did, without specifying that you were assuming the director’s job each time. You could also include language like “broadened role to include ___” or “was only teapot polisher to take on ___.”

I think you’re getting sidetracked by the fact that this stuff happened because of dysfunction, when really you can just explain what you did without providing that context for it.

how can I ask whether I’m doing well enough at my new job?

A reader writes:

Is there an appropriate, non-annoying way to ask whether you are making sufficient progress during training?

At a previous job, I was given strictly positive feedback until about a week before my 90-day training/probation period was scheduled to end, at which point I was told that there were major concerns with my performance. At that point, I had formed a lot of bad habits from not being corrected, but I was told that it was too late for additional hands-on training. The number of errors I made reduced drastically after I was informed of the issues, but needless to say, I didn’t reach total perfection in time to make it off of probation. (Long story short, there were literally hundreds of opportunities to make errors during the day, and all it took to make one was to be distracted for 1-2 seconds. I knew I wasn’t reaching perfection but assumed that it was unrealistic.) When I expressed that I was confused because I had been told that I was doing very well up until that point, I was told that it’s policy to only give positive feedback during training. Apparently negative feedback is not given until it’s necessary because the employee is on the designed-to-fail improvement plan.

Fast-forward a few years—I just started a new job (though in an unrelated industry) with a similarly long and intensive training process and dozens of opportunities for errors of omission during the day. My severe inattentive ADHD is being treated now, and the type of attention to detail that this job requires is much more in line with my skills than the aforementioned one, but needless to say, I’m feeling a bit insecure. I’m getting good feedback but as I’ve learned, that’s no guarantee that I’m actually doing well, and I have no idea if the number of errors that I am making is below, at, or above average for my stage in the training process. Is there a way to ask how I’m doing that will garner a candid, honest answer? I know that I can’t straight-out ask “Am I doing well enough to reasonably expect to not be fired and to make it past my training?” but that is the question I would like an answer to. I have no particular reasons to assume impending doom, though they have extended the planned length of my training by a few days. With my ADHD I don’t always have an accurate sense of what a typical person would consider adequate/good/bad in terms of tiny details. I tend to overcompensate and obsess more than underestimate, but am still feeling a little anxious.

Well, the first thing to understand is that that previous company’s way of doing it (a) sucked and (b) isn’t universal. A decent manager will give you feedback and won’t lead you to believe that things are fine if they’re not. There are managers who function the way that old company did, and it’s wise to be aware that they exist, but you also don’t want to unnecessarily freak yourself out by assuming it’s happening unless you have some particular reason to believe it.

That said, there are certainly tons of bad managers out there, and so it’s also not crazy to want to be sure that you have an accurate understanding of how you’re doing.

While you can’t perfectly protect yourself against the possibility of a terrible manager who doesn’t give direct feedback even when there are serious problems, there are things you can do to increase the likelihood that you’ll hear if there are problems.

The biggest one is to simply ask directly. For instance:
“Is there anything I should focus on doing better?”
“Is this error rate in line with what you’d expect to see from someone at this stage of training?”
“How do you feel things are going overall?”

In addition, make sure that you’re hearing it when you do get less-than-positive feedback. Particularly when you’re new to a job, you might end up thinking that the corrections you’re receiving are a normal part of learning the job when in fact there’s a more serious concern underlining them. So make sure that you’re staying attuned to what kind of feedback you’re receiving and how it’s balancing out (i.e., how much is positive versus corrective). And asking the types of questions that I listed above can help get you some context that can help you figure that out too.

Also, in your case, since they extended the length of your training by a few days, it’s reasonable to ask about that. For instance: “I wasn’t sure if the fact that we’ve added a few days to my training indicates that I’m not picking this up as quickly as you’d hoped. Is there anything you’d like me to be doing differently?”

Read an update to this letter here.

is there a polite way to walk out of an interview?

A reader writes:

I am hoping you can offer advice about a bizarre interview situation I faced.

The job was not entry level – it was a directorship position for which I met all qualifications listed in the job description. When I showed up at the interview, it turned out that they had the other candidate in the same interview! The panel read each question and we were instructed to answer as we see fit, but we were also told we could not agree with each other (i.e., if the other candidate said something that matched how I would have answered the question, I had to stumble and come up with something else on the spot, and vice versa). I found that we were both rushing to try to answer “first” to avoid our individual ideas being “taken”!

When I was contacted about the interview, I was not warned that the other candidate would be interviewing at the same time so I didn’t have the opportunity to decide on the phone whether or not I was interested.

If this were to happen again in the future, is there any polite way to exit the interview? I feel that since it was not an internship or entry level, there was absolutely no reason for this kind of situation to happen. In retrospect, I wish I would have gotten up and walked out when I realized that the other candidate was there as well.

For the record, I did not get the job and had I been offered the position I would have declined anyway, based on the way they interviewed us.

Ick, yeah, I wouldn’t want anything to do with that either.

If you were absolutely sure that you didn’t want to stay in the running, it’s totally reasonable to decline to participate in this type of crappy interviewing process. In this case, I’m not sure at what exact point you became sure of that– as soon as you realized there was a second candidate in your interview or once they explained their ridiculous rules about not agreeing with each other? — but at either of those points it would have been reasonable to say, “Oh, I’m sorry, I misunderstood the nature of the interview. I don’t think is for me, so I’ll excuse myself now.”

You’re not under any obligation to explain beyond that, but if you wanted to, you also could have added, “I think we have a pretty fundamental difference in philosophy about how to hire well.” Personally, I also would add, “Not being allowed to agree with each other makes no sense to me” because that piece of this is the most ludicrous part, but it’s not really your responsibility to explain to them why they suck.

Frankly, I wish more people would decline to participate in truly ridiculous hiring processes — and especially when they’re part of a group, since seeing one person say “I’m not tolerating this” can be the nudge that makes others comfortable saying it too.

negotiating a sign-on bonus, my new coworkers chat all day long, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My new coworkers chat all day long

I’ve looked through some of your posts on dealing with chatty coworkers, but they’re mostly about when chatty coworkers talk to you. I’d like to know what to do about chatty coworkers who chat all the time to each other, not necessarily just to you.

I work in an open area and there are three other young women (20 to 30s) that I work with. They just yak all day about celebrities, gossip, Kate Middleton, food, fashion, boats that pass by outside (we have a waterfront office), the office temperature (It’s always too hot or too cold—I never feel the temperature fluctuations and I suspect they just like having something to complain about.), etc. It’s driving me crazy. One makes personal calls several times a day too for 15 minutes on average to her mother, friends, or just to arrange reservations or social activities. I have my headphones on while I work, but I don’t want to wear headphones all day, put my head down and do work while my coworkers hang around each others’ computers and chat and DON’T WORK.

I am the new hire though, and they’ve been like this before I came along. Should I still talk to my manager about this (even though she’s probably used to it) or HR? Or would I be seen as complaining and making a big deal since they’ve been like this before I’ve come along?

As the newcomer, you’re entering into a culture that is already established, and you don’t really have a lot of prerogative to try to change it if it’s working for everyone else. It’s unlikely that you’re going to be able to alter habits of the rest of an existing group, particularly with a manager who apparently doesn’t care much. As a new hire, the onus is more on you to try to find ways to work effectively within this context.

One thing I’d want to know in your shoes: Is the work something that they can excel at while chatting this much? Or is their productivity suffering? The answer will vary depending on the kind of work they’re doing, but if it is impacting their productivity, you’ve got a management problem on your hands, and that doesn’t bode well.

2. Should I ask if the essential oils I use to treat my headaches are bothering my coworkers?

Our office’s admin keeps making comments about some essential oils I use. Rather than taking aspirin, I like to use essential oils to treat my headaches. The blend that I use smells pretty strongly, and I use it occasionally at work. By occasionally, I mean maybe once every two or three weeks. Our office was just assigned a new admin. The past two times I’ve used it (the only times I’ve used it since she has been employed here), she has made a comment about how it smells. She uses the oils too, so she is familiar with the blend’s smell.

The first time she said something, I brushed it off. But now that she has said something a second time, I’m wondering what her intentions are, because I really can’t tell if she is just trying to make conversation or if she is actually bothered by the smell. Either way her comments make me uncomfortable. I’m also new in the office (I’ve only worked here one month longer than her) and worry that if she is bothered by the smell other people are too.

This last time she came to talk to me, she came and asked if I had a headache because she could smell the oils “all the way at her desk,” which is maybe 20 feet away. I said “Wow, I didn’t realize it was that strong, and I guess you’ll know every time I get a headache.” She hasn’t flat out said, “The smell bothers me,” nor has anyone else that sits around me. Should I address it, or should I just leave it alone?

Ask. If it’s bothering people, that’s something you want to know. So yes, I’d ask — and I’d even ask proactively since she’s commented on it twice. Just say something like, “I should have asked you the last time you mentioned being able to smell the oils. Is the smell bothering you, or have you heard that it’s bothering others? I’d want to be sensitive to that if so.”

When you’re in doubt about whether or not to inquire about whether something you’re doing is bothering others (when it comes to noise, smells, or other similar factors), err on the side of being considerate.

3. Negotiating a sign-on bonus when you have to repay your last employer

My husband’s job offers paid parental leave, so he took 12 weeks to stay home with our baby after I returned to work. He’s currently five weeks in.

He isn’t happy at his job and has been using his leave to search for new opportunities. However, his paid leave comes with a caveat that he has to return to work for at least three months. If he doesn’t, he’ll be responsible for reimbursing his company for the money they paid him while on leave.

If he finds another position before the three months are up, would it be inappropriate to attempt to negotiate for a sign-on bonus with the new company to help defray the cost of paying back his leave pay?

It depends on where your husband is in his career. For junior positions in most fields, it would be pretty hard to negotiate that, but for senior-level positions or in in-demand fields, sure, that’s totally reasonable to raise.

4. Can I contact our board about our change in benefits?

I work at a small credit union that employs 17 employees. The credit union has always covered 80% of our health insurance cost, including the coverage for the employee’s dependants. The CEO has announced that the credit union will no longer cover any cost of the dependant health insurance costs. This will cost my family around $500 per month. Currently I pay $141 per month for myself and my two dependants. I feel this change is going to cause me and other employees a considerable hardship. I would like to discuss this change with the credit union board of directors to ensure they understand how this change is going to negatively impact the employees. However, I am concerned the CEO will take it out on me negatively when she discovers I discussed it with the board. What is your recommendation? Should I discuss this change with the board?

Whoa, no, that’s not typically done. In most organizations, staff do not go directly to the board with concerns (with some clear exceptions, like if the CEO herself is the problem). It’s set up that way for a reason; otherwise, you’d have staff going around the CEO for all sorts of things.

There’s someone in your office who’s the appropriate person to voice your concerns to: It might be the person in charge of benefits, or your own manager, or perhaps the CEO herself. It depends on the internal workings of your particular office, and if you’re not sure, it makes sense to start with your own manager — but this isn’t something you should be approaching the board about. (And in most organizations, doing that would be a serious breach.)

5. How much detail should I go into in my cover letter about the reasons for a spotty job history?

After graduating college several years ago, a handful of bad circumstances required me to move back home, and since then, I’ve mostly been doing part-time, freelance telecommuting work when I can find it. I’ve recently started diving back into the job hunt full-force, and I realize my spotty job record (among so many other things) is going to work against me.

How much is too much when explaining things like this? Telling the whole truth in that I’ve been taking care of my sick grandmother round-the-clock as she struggles with breast cancer seems like too much to drop on somebody in something as preliminary as a cover letter (and I personally feel like it isn’t their business.) However, I would like them to know my somewhat thin job history isn’t simply because of laziness on my part (since I’m also aware I have that “Millennial” tag to fight off,) but that other things simply took precedence. How far can I go in explaining my complicated circumstances without going too far?

“Because I’ve been helping an ill family member since graduating college in 2011, I’ve taken on part-time and freelance work, but I’m now eager to commit myself fully to full-time work.”

That’s it. No need to get into the details of the explanation, just the category (“helping an ill family member”).

how your mate impacts your career, pre-cations, and more

Over at Intuit QuickBase’s Fast Track blog today, I take a look at several big work-related stories in the news right now: a new start-up trend of “pre-cations” — paid time off before you start a new job; whether your choice of mate can make or break your career; and more. You can read it here.

I’m training my replacement and worried she’s not right for the job

A reader writes:

I was recently promoted to a mid-level job in my department after 2.5 years as an administrative assistant. It’s a great change, but it’s also a very stressful transition: on top of learning the ropes, clearing my predecessor’s backlog and taking on brand new duties, I also have to train my replacement. We happened to have a temp in the office when I was offered the promotion, and my boss liked her enough to offer her the assistant position. Because of company rules regarding hiring temps full-time, she is my “temporary” replacement and her continued employment here will be re-evaluated later this month, which is an unusual occurrence.

When her evaluation time rolls around, I’m sure I’ll be asked my opinion, and I’m not really sure what to consider. I’ve been training her on and off since she finished her original temp assignment, which was about two months ago. I should add that this is my first time training someone in a job like this (a previous college job provided a clear structure for training newbies). In the beginning, I spent good chunks of time training her on everyday tasks of varying difficulty, most of which are repeated often, and I’ve done my best to accommodate her learning style even though it’s different from mine. Most of the job is learned by doing, anyway, so I started watching over her less and less. I’ve found that she still makes some mistakes and has a hard time remembering things we’ve gone over, even things she’s taken notes on. Her desk is a mess and I don’t know how she keeps anything organized.

I’m frustrated by a number of things: is she just thinking about the work differently than I would? Will she eventually know it all, and is that moment after she’s hired full-time? Will she reflect badly on me in my boss’s eyes, especially since I want to impress him with my new work? Am I even training her well or just overwhelming her with information?

Another thing that’s happened while training her is that my own skills are being highlighted, especially those in logic and writing — great for my self-esteem, not so great for my frustration levels (or my conscience) because I can’t help but feel like I’m smarter than her. It doesn’t help that I find her a bit annoying. She comes off as friendly but aloof, and her tendency to be vain and insensitive reminds me of overly-snarky ex-friends. Her crass reaction to Robin Williams’ suicide really put me off.

I want her to make the job her own, and I definitely don’t want to micromanage, but I also have trouble feeling confident in her skills. More than anything, I want to let her be and get back to my new work, which sorely needs my attention. Do I need to get over myself? I know I should wait until her evaluation time to have an opinion, but should I be worried?

It’s hard to say for sure from the outside, without knowing a lot more. In many jobs, it’s not uncommon or alarming that a new hire wouldn’t have everything down perfectly two months in — small mistakes and even forgetting things that you’d gone over previously could be normal. But so much comes down to the nature of those mistakes, and you’re better positioned than I am to know if the ones she’s making — and her work habits in general — are alarming. You’ve done the job yourself, and you probably have at least a decent sense of what the learning curve could be. If I had to bet money, I’d say your alarm is probably well-founded.

Here’s the good news though: You don’t need to know for sure. You just need to relay what you’re observing to the person who manages her.

And even if you’re not asked, you should do that — because as the person who’s training her, you’re well-positioned to see how she’s doing, and part of that responsibility is speaking up when you have concerns. Nor do you have to wait until an official evaluation period to speak up; if you’re seeing things that concern you, you should get your/her manager in the loop now.

I’d just lay it out all to her boss, similarly to how you have here: “I’m not sure if my expectations are unrealistic for two months in, but I’m concerned that she’s still making mistakes like X and Y and that’s she not retaining key things we’ve gone over, like A and B. She’s the first person I’ve trained in a role like this so I don’t really have a framework to assess her relative to other people — but I do know that’s she’s struggling more than I was myself at that point, and it concerns me. Right now, I don’t have total confidence in her ability to do the job without my help, but I also know that I can’t train her forever.”

And a bit about that last piece — your letter sounds a bit like you’re thinking that you’re supposed to just keep training her until she’s perfect, and it’s unlikely that that’s the case. Or at least, if that is your manager’s plan, it’s a bad one. That’s not how this should work; you should give her a reasonable amount of training, and then leave her to the work (staying available as a resource occasionally if she has questions for you — but even that shouldn’t be forever). So at some point soon, it would also make sense to say to your boss, “I’ve been working with her closely for two months now, and I think it’s time to see how she does on her own.”

One other thing: Make sure that you’re giving your replacement direct feedback too. Part of training someone is making sure that they understand when there are problems, and giving them direct feedback in general. So if you haven’t told her directly that by this point she should be handling X without your help or remembering Y without needing it covered again, you should. She may not realize that these things are problems, and it’s possible that she’ll pick up her pace of learning if you tell her directly that she needs to. (And if she doesn’t, she’ll at least have the benefit of understanding that there’s a problem. You don’t want her to be blindsided by that.)

I don’t want my staff to know how young I am, an ass-grabbing coworker, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Will connecting on LinkedIn make my staff realize how young I am?

I’m 24, and as a young manager I’ve made a point not to tell my employees my age. Up until this point, I think it’s been beneficial, but I now have employees requesting to connect on LinkedIn. I wouldn’t mind connecting if I could restrict information related to schooling and internships, but there isn’t a function for this. What would you suggest? Should I accept the request and show all my information? Should I change my entire profile removing internships and school years? Or do I not accept the request?

Well, it’s probably not like they think you’re 40 and this will unmask you. They know you’re relatively young. And even if you don’t connect on LinkedIn, they can probably already see the relevant dates anyway. (I just did a quick check and I can see job and school years on profiles of people I’m not connected to.)

You (presumably) have your role for a reason, so I say own it. You’re a young manager. If someone has an issue with that that gets in the way of work, you need to address it like anything else that gets in the way of work. But I’d say to trust your staff (and your own management behaviors) to be able to handle the information.

2. Coworker keeps grabbing my ass

A male coworker continues to touch my butt, and I have no idea how to make him stop. It started during my externship and at first I thought it was an accident (their isn’t a lot of space in a pharmacy and people always bump into each other), then while I was filling a prescription he did it again. I felt uncomfortable and I didn’t know what to do or say. After that, whenever he would come close to me, I would make it a point to make as much space in between us. I thought he got my nonverbal queues (I hate confrontations). Shortly after my externship, I got hired and have only been working at this pharmacy for 3 weeks as an employee. This guy is a senior tech who has been their for a few years, and seems to be beloved by all his coworkers.

Earlier today while helping a customer, he touched my butt as he walked by. I was horrified. I didn’t know what to do. I didn’t want to make a scene and now I’m upset with myself for not having the courage to say something to him. Can you please give me some advise on how to make him back off? I’m stressing out.

Go straight to your boss and report what’s happening: “Bob has touched my butt several times. It’s clearly intentional, not accidental. I haven’t said anything to him because I haven’t wanted to make a scene, which I realize now was a mistake, and if it happens again, I’m going to tell him directly to cut it out. But I’d like it not to happen again, so I want you in the loop.”

And then if it happens again: “Hey! Do not touch me there.” (And tone matters here — you need to be direct, assertive, and not apologetic. Don’t worry about making a scene — he’s probably relying on you not wanting a scene, and that’s making it easier for him to do it.) And at that point, you’d also go back to your manager and insist action be taken.

3. Owner suddenly wants staff to call him Mr. ____ “until they earn his respect”

I recently heard a weird request from one of the owners of the company for which I work. He had a discussion about respect with the sales people. One of the results of this discussion was that the sales people could no longer refer this owner as Bruce, which they had been calling him that for years now. He wants them to refer to him as Mr. Springsteen, until he tells them otherwise. Apparently once they earn his respect they can go back to calling him Bruce. In the mean time failure to call him Mr. Springsteen means a person could be sent home early.

I personally think this is beyond bizarre and has actually led me to respecting him less. Because if you are playing respect games…well I’m not going to really respect you anymore. Is there a good reason behind something like this that I’m missing? Or do I work with a loon?

You work with a loon.

4. Does my reference not want to recommend me anymore?

I had a really good reference who supported me throughout the process of getting a job in another city. He was excited when I landed the job and thought it was great.
Well, a couple months into the job I decided I was not a good fit for the company and vice versa. I was very honest and professional with my resignation. I wasn’t a superstar at the job, but I did meet standards I believe. After I resigned, I told this reference in an email that I had, explained it wasn’t a good fit, thanked him for helping me get the job and asked if he’d continue to be a reference for me.

This was three weeks ago, and I didn’t hear back. I may be overreacting but I feel he might be angry that I quit. I have nothing to base that on other than his non-reply. I am nervous, because he was a very solid reference for me and I’m worried I won’t have him for jobs I apply for in the future. Should I reach out again, or wait until I have an interview and ask him then? Should I move on? I have two other good references but his would likely hold the most clout.

You’re reading an awful lot into a non-reply. It’s far more likely that he didn’t respond for other reasons — like that he had higher priorities in his in-box, or put it aside to respond to later and then forgot, or just didn’t think it required a response.

5. Explaining to an old job why I took a different one

My partner and I moved a couple of years ago, and I found a job at a company that just wound up not being a good fit. I think I did a lot of good work for them anyway, but with much overtime and stress. I was never happy but I kept thinking it might improve after I’d been there longer.

I took maternity leave a year into the job. When I came back, work went well for about two weeks before everything at home went haywire. Life got so hard that after struggling for several months, I decided that I would stay home until the baby was older and had better daycare. I told them when I quit that I specifically wanted to quit, because I couldn’t guarantee that I would decide coming back was the best thing for my family, and I wanted them to feel free to replace me. I told them I’d get in touch if I wanted to try working again when my daughter was ready. They said they’d really like me back.

However, I decided I needed to at least look around before going back, and I wound up with an offer for far more money, way better benefits, and a culture that seems closer to what I liked at past jobs. I took it. Now I feel like I should let the old company know I’ve decided not to try to come back. Do you think I owe them that courtesy (I feel like I do)? They are nice people and the professional community is fairly tight. How should I approach this? I wish I had just told them I would not be coming back, but it took some distance to really see objectively how unhappy I was there. Again, they are nice people but it just was a bad fit for me.

Since you told them that you’d get back in touch if you decided you wanted to return to work, it makes sense to update them. You’re not obligated to, but since you want to maintain good relationships with them, there’s no reason not to. But you don’t need to stress too much over what you say; it’s pretty normal that people’s plans change, other opportunities, emerge, etc. I’d just say something like, “I wanted to let you know that I’ve recently joined Firm X as a teapots inspector. I’d been considering returning to work now that Cordelia is a bit older, and they offered me a role I couldn’t turn down. I’d love to stay in touch; my contact info here is ____.”

can your employer do that? probably — but you can still discuss it

I get a lot of letters like this — letters that ask, essentially, can my employer really do this?

I work in a industry where I sometimes work in the evenings after my standard 8 hours. I don’t mind at all, because it’s good money. Now to avoid paying overtime, my employer is telling me that I have to shift my hours. In other words, I have to come in late to work, then work into the evening to equal 8 hours with no overtime. Can they do this? This is not what I signed up for.

Here’s another:

I am an hourly worker for a company with 7 branches. My position is being terminated because customer service in the 7 branches is being centralized to the home office. I was copied on an email to my branch manager that I am going to be required to travel to St. Pete to train the CSR’s there ( my replacements) The company is paying my hotel, meals and gas. Can I be fired if I refuse to go? Especially if I have a doctor appointment scheduled during that time period?

The answer to both of these letters — and so many others — is:  Yes, your employer can do that, but they might end up handling it differently if you have a calm conversation with them explaining your concerns. Maybe not, of course, but many, many employers in many, many situations do respond to that.

So the relevant question in situations like these isn’t just “Is this legally allowed?” but also “Is there a way to address this that could produce a change?”

To be clear, laws matter. It’s important to know if your employer is doing something prohibited by law. But the majority of the time I hear this question, (a) what the employer is doing is perfectly legal, and (b) that’s not the starting place that’s going to get you the best results anyway. When you’re upset about something your employer is doing, it often makes sense to start by having a calm conversation with your manager where you explain what you’re concerned about and why.

It sounds like this:

“I wanted to talk to you about your request that I do X. I understand why you’re asking — it’s because Y. But to be honest, Z was one of the reasons I took the job — it’s important to me, and X would be a real drawback for me. Is there any chance of revisiting the plan?”

Or:

“Doing X would cause me real hardship because of Y. Are there any other options?”

Or:

“I understand why you want me to do X, but I’m concerned about Y. Could we take a look at other ways to approach it?”

In many cases, that’s all that it will take to get a different answer. Of course, other times it won’t work — but that conversation is where you should start, unless your employer has already given you compelling reasons to skip that step.

(And for cases where what your employer is doing or proposing doing is actually illegal, there’s information here.)

how to respond to an angry, profanity-laced email from a coworker

A reader writes:

The situation I’m writing about has happened and been dealt with (sort of), but I’m curious about what other paths I could have taken.

I work in a small branch office of a larger firm. There is one other person at my level. We have differing but complementary skills. On the whole, we have a decent working relationship; our projects don’t often overlap, and he’s one of those guys who would rather do everything himself anyway. (Which hey, that frees up more staff time for my use!)

Recently, he asked to review a document I was working on because it was relevant to a project of his own, and he had some changes he wanted to suggest. Fine by me, I’m not precious about my work and am generally willing to take anyone’s notes. I sent it to him. After three weeks and several follow up emails, he still hadn’t gotten to it. It got to the point where I could not wait any longer, and the document HAD to be finalized. I emailed Coworker (on a Friday) that I needed his comments that day, and if he didn’t think he was going to be able to get to them, then he needed to let me know so I could move forward. He replied in a very bitchy and condescending manner – and was also incorrect in his assumption that my deadline was a false one that I’d created. (It wasn’t at all, which was underlined the next week by a general email sent from our bosses to everyone at our level – not spurred by me, I don’t know why the email was sent, although I did feel a fair amount of malicious glee when I read it.)

There was some tedious back and forth which I will spare you, then the following gems from Coworker: “Here. I’m sending you my edits in text, now F— off for the weekend,” followed by a string of texts where he scribbled edits on a printout of the document and sent me pictures. He capped it with an email where he dropped the F-bomb again, told me I was acting like he didn’t know what he was doing, and was basically a condescending jackass. I was absolutely infuriated; I didn’t ask for his input to begin with, and his emails were way out of line.

I didn’t respond (I’d gotten what I wanted, and honestly his comments and edits were pointless anyway). I kept the emails, but did not inform anyone at a higher level. He sent an email apology that Sunday. He apologized again verbally that Monday. I didn’t really respond to any of this because I was still angry and wasn’t ready to “forgive and forget.” Any response would have been a lecture anyway, and I really don’t want to be “teaching” a grown man about appropriate office interactions. Also, I’m not confrontational by nature, especially with people I know and have to work with.

Since then, we’ve been fine and our work has been completely separate. I was wondering what you think about other ways this could have been handled.

I wrote back to this letter-writer and asked, “Any sign of this kind of thing from him before?”

The response:

He’s never gone off the rails like this before, but he’s flared up a few times. One of his triggers is – well, honestly, he’s one of those people whom technology hates. He’s the only one in the office who can’t work the scanner, he’s the only person whose email repeatedly messes up, etc. And even though he knows the staff leaves at 5:30 and he can’t scan, he’ll wait until after 6pm to do letters and such, and then get angry when he can’t send them out right that second. So he gets mad, I ignore it (I’ve given up trying to help him through these tech issues), and then he’s over it. And I think that’s really only happened two or three times over the past couple of years.

This outburst was crazy. I suspect part of it was guilt for putting off what took him all of 10 minutes to do, and part of it was his inability to be in the wrong about anything. He hates being questioned, and really likes feeling like he’s the one who knows things. In all fairness, he often does know things! He’s not a terrible person, he’s just kind of annoying to work with sometimes.

Well, he was wildly out of line. I mean, it’s one thing to be grumpy at times — which is still best avoided at work, but not a horrible crime — but telling a coworker to F off crosses a pretty serious line.

It would have been totally reasonable for you to come down harder on him — meaning telling him directly that what he did wasn’t acceptable and that he’s not to talk to you (or anyone else at work) that way again. It also would have been totally reasonable for you to loop his manager in. If I were his manager, I’d sure as hell want to know that he was sending crazy, abusive emails like that, and there’s an argument to be made that it’s bad for the organization not to know that someone is behaving like this.

Frankly, if you wanted to, you could even bring this up with him now, even though it’s been a while. You could say something like, “Bob, now that some time has passed, I want to talk to you about those emails you sent me when I asked you for edits on the X project. You basically exploded at me and told me to F off. I didn’t say anything at the time because I was so shocked. But I’m not okay with being spoken to that way, and frankly, it’s made me hesitant to work with you because you crossed such a line. What happened?” And depending on how that conversation goes, you might also add, “I’d like to know that you won’t speak to me that way again, and that if you have an issue, you’ll discuss it with me rationally. Can you agree to that?”

But I also think it’s your call if you prefer to just let it rest now.

Read an update to this letter here.