yes, government interviews suck — but here’s how you can do well in them anyway

I complain with some frequency here about how awful most government interviews are: They often stick to a pre-set list of questions that they ask all candidates, don’t deviate from the list at all (which is crazy, because some of the most useful information comes from digging in with follow-up questions about a candidate’s answers), refuse to allow themselves to consider information about the candidate outside the formal interview process and application, and otherwise insist on treating everyone the same to a degree that hamstrings them in making good hiring decisions.

A regular reader who frequently sits on government hiring panels decided to shed some light on these practices. She writes:

I’ve been a fan of your blog for quite a while, and a couple years ago you were kind enough to answer my question about my fiance (now husband) getting hired by my employer. So, I’m hoping I can give back. I work for a government entity that does those terrible panel interviews, and as a hiring manager forced to use this system and a not-infrequent panel member, I thought I could offer some tips that you may find useful for your readers.

First, here’s a bit about how my municipal government does interviews:

* All interviews are done by a panel. The hiring manager is on the panel but at least two members of the panel have to be in different areas of the organization than the hiring manager. I am an attorney and have recently sat on panels for engineers and heavy equipment operators.

* Each applicant for a position has to be asked the same questions, and the panelists must rank each answer on the same numerical scale. The panelists will have a cheat sheet of suggested answers to compare the applicants’ answers to. Applicants may not be hired if they score below a 70 out of 100, even if the hiring manager scored them much better than the rest of the panel. (This is to fight the corrupt hiring practices from many years ago – “good ol’ boys network” doesn’t even begin to cover it – but at this point it goes way too far.)

* Technically, we are not allowed to deviate from the script at all, but enforcement of this is dependent upon the HR person in the room, and personally I ask all sorts of follow-up questions as long as I can get away with it.

Here are some tips for people who find themselves in this sort of interview.

1. See if you can find out ahead of time whether this will be your interview format. If you’re interviewing with a government entity, odds are pretty good that some version of this is what’s going to happen. When HR is scheduling the interview, ask about the format so you’re less thrown if you walk into it.

2. Don’t shut down! A panel of people with weird job titles can be totally intimidating. Do your best to maintain the pleasant, professional demeanor you would in any other interview.

3. If you can get in other comments about your relevant experience, DO IT. If the question is “Do you have experience in Microsoft Excel?” tell us how you’ve used Excel extensively for three years and can do pivot tables, but ALSO tell us about how you used Excel to analyze a massive amount of data and solve a critical problem at your current job. The risk here is that a checked-out panel member will mark you down for talking too much, but I think that risk is definitely outweighed by the potential benefit of being able to communicate important information about your abilities that will likely be appreciated by the hiring manager and anyone else on the panel who is invested in the process.

4. Do your best to read the room. When you are introduced to the panel, remember who the hiring manager is and pay the most attention to the vibes you’re getting from that person. If everyone else seems to be picking up what you’re putting down, but you’re only getting angry stares from the hiring manager, you could end up in a position where your future boss was forced to hire you when she didn’t want to. Do your best to bring her around during the interview. At the same time, don’t get discouraged if you seem to be losing one of the non-hiring panel members. A lot of times after the candidate leaves the room, the panelists will ask the hiring manager how close an applicant was to the “ideal” answer if they lack the expertise to judge a given answer.

5. Ask questions at the end! Even though this is a highly formalized process, that does not mean that you should leave without gathering the information YOU need to determine if the position is right for you. Even though there might not be a formal way for the panelists to score you on this, I will go back to my scores and adjust upwards if someone asks good, intelligent questions that show interest and motivation at the end of the interview.

6. Send a thank you note to the HR rep. It will have absolutely no impact on whether or not you get the job, but the person who scheduled your interview is probably the gatekeeper to how quickly you get information about the hiring decision and it might improve your chances of getting timely responses to any follow-up questions you need to ask.

7. Do not try to guess how it went or whether you got the job based on the interview. Alison advises against over-analysis of comments made during or after an interview and I cannot stress that enough in these situations. In addition to the numerical scores given on the interview itself (which you will never be able to see, don’t even try asking), there are likely additional scores based on your resume and weighting factors like military service and prior experience with the government entity. I have been on a panel where all the panel members ranked one candidate the highest (and I’m sure he could tell that we were really happy with his answers) but another candidate got the position due to the other weighting factors.

A couple other thoughts…

Does this process suck? Yes. Totally. Completely. It sucks for the candidates, it sucks for the panelists and it really sucks for the hiring managers. As a hiring manager it can be wholly infuriating. It takes forever, and at the end you don’t really know that you got the best candidate for the job.

Does anyone actually think this process is good? As far as I can tell, in the government I work for, no. But there is a fear of returning to the bad old days of croneyism or looking like you want to return to the bad old days of cronyism.

Should this interview process turn you off from government work? NO! If there’s a job that sounds like a good fit, stick it out! This hiring process is not necessarily a reflection on the organization you’re interviewing with or the manager you would be working for. But this is why it is especially important to ask questions since it will be hard for you to pick up cues about fit from the interview. Also, if you’re still not sure about fit at the offer stage, don’t hesitate to ask the person extending the offer (usually HR) if you can speak to the hiring manager directly. You might just get a phone call with them, but a short meeting might not be out of the question depending on their schedule. Before you make a decision, get as much information as possible about whether the job is a good fit for you.

the right time to bring in personal belongings to a new job, I was told to bring a pay stub to a job interview, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. When’s the right time to start bringing in personal belongings to a new job?

When’s an appropriate time to start bringing your personal belongings to a new job? First day? End of second week? I’m talking about belongings like a personal mouse pad, calendar, pencil cup, desk fan, or an umbrella I’m planning to keep at work.

I think any time from the second day onward is reasonable. I wouldn’t do it the first day because you want to get a look at your space and figure out what will be appropriate. You also don’t want to do it on your first day because you might not be taken straight to your desk in the morning; sometimes there are orientations and other meetings that happen first, and you don’t want to be lugging around a pencil cup and fan all morning. But by your second day, it’s fine to go for it.

That assumes that you’re really just talking about the types of items you listed here. If you were one of those people who goes all out with throw rugs, numerous framed pictures, and an entire fleet of Battlestar Galactica figurines, I’d give it a week or two. It can seem a little weird to have already moved in your whole life when you still don’t know where the bathroom is.

2. An employer asked me to bring a recent pay stub to a job interview

I am currently looking for a job doing marketing at a professional services firm. I’ve been interviewing at several firms, and one firm made a strange request. They asked me to bring in a recent paystub! In the same email giving me directions to the building and attaching their employment application, they asked me to bring a recent paystub, saying it was to provide verification of my income. This was for the initial interview with the hiring manager. I brought the pay stub, but it they didn’t ask for it at the interview. I didn’t end up handing it over. I chose not to get into a stand off with this employer, but it really didn’t seem right to me. Have you ever heard of this before? What do you suggest we do in this situation?

Yep. Some employers insist on verifying your past salary, so that they can (a) make you a salary offer that’s built on what you’ve been making, and (b) make sure that you’re not lying about. But usually it’s done much later in the process; it’s particularly weird to do it with a first interview.

I happen to think that your salary history is no one’s business but yours, so they’re already overstepping … but to just casually throw in a request for such personal, not-any-of-their-damn-business information along with the directions to their office — as if it’s just some barely consequential detail — is particularly obnoxious.

I’m a fan of explaining that your salary is covered under your confidentiality agreement with your last employer (which is often the case, if you read your employee handbook) or just bluntly saying that you don’t share personal financial information, but you’d be happy to talk about the range you’re seeking, which is $X.

3. After being laid off, can I ask my company to send an email to my contacts from my old work account?

I was unexpectedly laid off two days ago. I was pulled into an office at 10:10, told my job had been eliminated, and was out the building by 10:30. No histrionics on my part, which I’m proud of. It’s a fairly decent severance package (6 weeks salary, 2 months paid COBRA, paid career placement services).

I’d like to send out a farewell email from that email account to professional contacts, telling them I’d moved on from that place and how to contact me. I don’t want to just disappear or vanish under a cloud. Is this reasonable? (I don’t have access to the account, but I’d be fine with them sending the message through the account as me with text written by me and approved by them. I just don’t want it to seem like I disappeared.)

Also, I want to send out a short email update to my contacts about this change, encouraging them to send me their tips for unemployment and send me leads. Any suggested language to use?

You can absolutely email your professional contacts from that job, but it’s unlikely that your old employer will agree to do it from your old email account — sending message on the employee’s behalf is just not something that’s typically done in this situation, and I think it’s likely to strike them oddly. But you can still email; it’ll just be from your personal account rather than your old work one.

As for what to say to contacts about the chance, I’d just say something like, “I wanted to let you know that I’ve moved on from Company X. I’m actively looking for work doing XYZ, and I’d love any advice or leads you’re able to suggest.” That said, rather than sending a mass email, you might have better luck if you do individual, personal emails or call to people — people tend to pay more attention to / get more invested in contacts that are clearly personal and directed to them, as opposed to ones that they can tell went to a large group.

4. Is the job market any better than it was a few years ago?

I read this post from 2011 where you talked about how the math of the job market was working against candidates. I was wondering – now in the year 2014 – if the same situation of more candidates than positions is still apparent to you as a hiring manager or has the gap lessened? Is math still working against job applicants?

I think it’s a lot better than it was at the height of the bad job market. This is purely anecdotal and not based on actual data, but I’m seeing many more employers hiring, many more people getting interviews, many more people getting hired, and more candidates feeling like they have options. It’s certainly not a strong job market again, but from what I see, it’s much better than it was at its worst. What do others think?

And now here’s actual data for you: When I wrote that post in 2011, there were five times as many job-seekers as job openings. In July of this year, that number was down to 2.1. Having twice as many job seekers as job openings still isn’t great for those job seekers, but it’s a hell of a lot better than three years ago.

5. Should I mention in my cover letter that I can’t start working until a certain date?

Is it a good idea to include somewhere in my cover letter that I wouldn’t necessarily be available to start a job until a certain date? I’m currently working for an organization that will cease its operations at the end of this calendar year. I feel that I should probably start looking for a new job sooner rather than later, but I’d want to see the rest of this organization’s days through. Would including that I wouldn’t be available to start working until the beginning of next year in my cover letter be too presumptuous of me? Would it sound like I’m assuming that I’d get the job? If so, when would be a good time to start applying to jobs?

The issue isn’t that it’s presumptuous; that’s relevant information to prospective employers, and it’s not presumptuous to include it. The issue is that it’s going to knock you out of the running for some jobs — potentially a lot of jobs, depending on what your field is. (The more senior or specialized you are, the less of an issue a three-month wait time is likely to be.) Are you sure that you’re willing to pass up a potentially good job just to stay with your current organization until the end? Depending on your role there, that might be more of a sacrifice than it makes sense to make.

That said, a month from now, it’s going to be much less of an issue (since then the wait will only be two months). In fact, at that point I probably wouldn’t even mention in your applications at all because it’s a short enough time period that it doesn’t require you to give special warning, at least not at the application stage.

Sunday free-for-all – September 28, 2014

Lucy bathes OlivesIt’s the weekend free-for-all.

This comment section is open for any non-work-related discussion you’d like to have with other readers, by popular demand. (This one is truly non-work only; if you have a work question, you can email it to me or post it in the work-related open thread on Fridays.)

Have at it.

my employer made me a contractor without telling me, sitting down at trade shows, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My prospective new employer is wary of hiring me if it will piss off my current employer

My current employer is a 10-year client of a large web development company that I reached out to and have interviewed with. I recently led the redesign of our new company website, which was developed by this company, so I naturally made some well-placed connections. Their HR recently informed me that the only thing holding them back from extending an official offer is that I work for one of their clients. Because they don’t want to sour their relationship due to bringing me on board, they want me to make sure that my current employer is okay with me leaving to work for them.

The problem is that my employer is not aware that I am looking elsewhere and I do not want to let them know without a written offer in hand. I also fear that if I tell my employer I want to go work for their web provider, and they do not “approve,” I am now without an offer and my employer knows I am looking to leave so what’s to stop them from simply letting me go? Please help! This new position would be a great career and salary boost for me.

Yeah, this isn’t uncommon, unfortunately — the other company is understandably concerned about making sure that they don’t lose a client, if your employer feels like they poached you.

Any chance that you can somehow frame it in a way where it doesn’t sound like you were actively job searching? You shouldn’t lie, but could you frame it as, “I got to know them so well during the website redesign that we started talking about working together?” For some reason, that type of natural evolution of a relationship often bothers employers less (not that they should be bothered at all when someone talks to other companies, but many take it weirdly personally).

At the same time, though, you could also try to negotiate a more formal contingent offer from the other place — explaining that you’re uneasy about broaching this with your current employer if they’re not making you a definite offer yet.

2. My employer made me a contractor without telling me

I was a part-time staff member for a distributed company for about two years. I started out as an intern and became permanent part-time. At some point near the 18-month mark, they switched me to contractor status without informing me. I found out because I saw it on my check. They stopped paying me and when I asked about it, the check came to me without taxes taken out. My question is: can they switch my status without telling me?

After another six months, my boss said to finish up my projects because we were done with them and then I was never assigned anything new. I was fully paid and I am still on friendly terms with my boss but I feel like I was kind of phased out. I chalk it up more to a small company’s disorganization than to my relationship with them, because they offered me a full-time position a little while later, but I didn’t take it because I was pursuing another position. Anyway, I do still feel odd that they never informed of the status change and then phased me out without much notice.

I don’t think that there’s any requirement that they inform you if they change your status, but there is a requirement that they assign you the correct status, and I’d be curious to know if you met the legal definition for an independent contractor or not.

Legalities aside, though, it’s completely weird and rude to change your status without talking to you about it. That change has a major impact on your tax obligations! It’s not a minor change, and there should have been a conversation about it. (That said, it sounds like you didn’t talk to them about it either. Ideally as soon as you noticed it, you would have asked what’s up. If you didn’t, it’s even possible that it was a clerical snafu that should have been corrected.)

3. How can I ask my new employer for breaks to sit when I go to trade shows?

I recently accepted a new position as a marketing manager. One aspect of this job, which I haven’t had to do in previous positions, is to travel to and staff our booth at trade shows about 5-6 times per year. I’m fine with the travel, but concerned about the pain I will potentially be in from standing on my feet all day at these events.

I have pretty bad plantar fasciitis and have had various ankle and joint problems over the past few years. It’s something that normally isn’t an issue in my daily life or job, but I could see it becoming an issue a few times a year during these events. I’m still totally willing and able to go to all these events, just might need periodic breaks or to ask for shorter periods of standing on my feet. Whenever I push myself to stand for many hours at a time, it often results in a huge amount of pain and limited mobility the next day, and these events sometimes last for several days.

When and how do you think is the appropriate way to approach this with my new employer? I suppose in a perfect world I should have addressed this when I received the job offer, but am so excited about the other aspects of the job that I didn’t want that to get in the way. Basically, if need be I can deal with this issue I just don’t know how bad or how frequent it will be.

This shouldn’t be a big deal. Frankly, plenty of booths are set up for you to sit a good portion of the time anyway, so it might be a complete non-issue. But you can certainly say to your manager, “I have some foot issues that mean that I’ll be in pain if I stand all day without periodic breaks to sit. Is it feasible for me to set things up at trade shows so that I can sit for a bit after every few hours of standing?”

Read an update to this letter here.

4. Am I disadvantaging myself by telling employers not to contact my references before interviewing me?

In several recent online applications, the employer asks if they may contact my references before they interview me (assuming I am shortlisted). I have been checking “no,” as I am applying for several jobs and I would like to give my references a copy of the job description, my resume, and examples of past work that I have completed that make me a good fit for the position. Would checking no penalize me in any way? Also, I am applying for jobs both in the UK and the US and have references from both countries.

Potentially, yeah. It’s silly for employers to check references before they interview people; it’s a waste of their time and a waste of your references’ time, since they might not even be interested in you after they talk with you. But if they’re asking for permission to do it, it might be something they care about, and you’re potentially disadvantaging yourself by saying no. (To be clear, it’s totally normal and reasonable to say no in regard to your current employer, but not for previous employers.)

I wouldn’t worry too much about not being able to give your references a copy of the job description, your resume, and examples of past work; that’s a lot more information than references generally need — more of a nice-to-have than a must-have.

5. Listing contracting positions when I stayed in my role but the contractor changed

My last two positions have been at companies that provide services to a government agency. The companies have had contracts with the client, and I have worked as a regular, full-time employee of the company holding the contract. When the client very recently awarded the service contract to a different company, I moved along with it. Essentially, day to day I’m doing the same work for the same client, but my actual employer changed.

I understand that this is fairly common with these government contracts, but I’m having trouble finding examples of how to list this work on a resume. Since I’m an employee and not a consultant, it doesn’t feel accurate to list them as contracts under a single heading (and the company holds the contract, not me). I could list them as separate positions (I suppose, technically, they are!), but I’m starting the process of looking for new positions. I want to portray this in the best light — I’m not job-hopping after a short stint, as I’ve actually held this position and done this work for several years.

List it like this:

Teapot Maker, Government Agency Name (as employee of Contracting Company A, May 2011-Dec. 2012, and of Contracting Company B, Jan. 2013-June 2014)

how do I ask my new job to let me use a pseudonym?

A reader writes:

I got hired for a freelance writing job, and I don’t want my real name on the articles, which will be published online. How do I go about asking the job for permission to use a pseudonym?

My reasons are: 1) I am estranged from my family for reasons of safety and emotional health, and I do not want to be virtually findable. And 2) I adjunct teach college classes, and I don’t want my students googling me (which they do) and seeing me associated with this work. And I suppose, 3) I need the money, so I took the job. I don’t care about the content at all and don’t really want to be professionally associated with it.

Can I just say: “I’d rather not use my real name; is it alright if I choose a pseudonym?” What if they push back? I fear that it’s weird to tell them those reasons. Also– do I then forfeit the right to put this work on a resume? How do pseudonyms work for that? And perhaps most importantly, how does one choose a pseudonym?!

Asking to work under a pseudonym in any other kind of job would probably go over oddly, but with writing work, it’s a much easier sell since writers have a long history of writing under pen names. So I’d start by simply saying, “I prefer to write under the name Falcon Plufferton (or whatever name you pick). Will that be okay to do?”

It’s likely that you’ll be asked why, so you’ll want to be prepared to answer that. You could simply say, “It’s my pen name and the name I’m building a writing portfolio under.” Or, you could also say, “I’ve had a safety issue in the past that’s still necessitating me not being findable online.”

All that said, though, if you don’t want to go through the pseudonym rigamarole, an alternative would be to use your middle name instead — something that might be easier to explain to your employer, since it’s so common: “Oh, I actually use my middle name, Fergus, when I write professionally.”

Whichever path you choose — middle name or pseudonym — you definitely don’t lose the ability to put the work on your resume. You can always explain that you used a pen name, which presumably this current employer would verify. That’s another argument in favor of using your middle name though, if it’s an acceptable option — it potentially makes this part of things a little easier. (Although if you don’t want to be professionally associated with the work, this might be a non-issue.)

As for how to choose a pseudonym … I think you basically go with something you like the sound of, and that accomplishes what you want it to accomplish (such as being generic enough not to stand out, or sounding folksy, or being memorable, or being available to purchase as a domain name, or whatever fits in well with your particular writing context). But if you don’t plan to make this your permanent pen name (and it sounds like you don’t), the stakes aren’t particularly high and you might as well just go with something you like the sound of — and won’t mind being associated with if you decide in the future that you do want to use this writing as a work sample.

open thread – September 26, 2014

Lucy upside downIt’s the Friday open thread!

The comment section on this post is open for discussion with other readers on anything work-related that you want to talk about. If you want an answer from me, emailing me is still your best bet, but this is a chance to talk to other readers.

my coworkers keep venting to me about things I can’t help with, not hearing back from a client, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My coworkers keep venting to me about things I can’t help with

I work at a large university. Professors here wield a lot of influence in academic and administrative decisions. Although I don’t always agree, I accept this is the way things get approved and done. I have two coworkers (who report to professors) in student services roles who must get permission for much of their work from professors. I hear about this frustration because they will come to my office to tell me what their latest roadblock or hold-up is. I am sympathetic and truly wish that processes were easier for all of us.

However, I am seeing a pattern where their venting to me is becoming more frequent, and despite my response that I have no authority to help them out (I am a middle manager), they are asking if I can somehow streamline the approvals process for their work. Again, I am sympathetic to their situation but there is no way my modest position can overrule tenured academics. I am also uncomfortable that these venting sessions are getting kind of emotional (on their end) and I worry about their mental health and well being. How can I support them but at the same time look after my own priorities and my own work?

First, tell them clearly and explicitly that you don’t have the authority to change the approval process for their work, and that this is the way things work there, and that while it’s not ideal, you don’t believe it’s something that will change.

From there, you can say, “I’m concerned by how frustrated this is making you. Knowing that it’s not likely to change, what makes sense for you in the situation?” You can even add, “Can you stay and be reasonably happy, knowing that this is part of the package?” You asked about supporting their mental health and well-being, and that’s the most direct way to do it — by helping them cut to the chase: This is the situation, it’s not going to change, and are they okay living with it or not?

If continues after that, you can also say, “I’m so sorry, but I’ve got to finish up X. I’m sympathetic, but I’m on deadline.” Or you might point out that over time, venting has a way of making problems feel even worse, and you might suggest taking a break from it and see how that goes. (And if she resists, you could be direct and say, “I think it’s starting to make me grumpier, and I’m generally pretty content here.”)

2. I submitted freelance work and haven’t heard back from the client

I’m performing some freelance editing work for a few clients. I submitted my completed work to one client about two and a half weeks ago. They said they were looking forward to reviewing the work I completed. I still haven’t heard anything from them, including about payment. I didn’t sign a contract or fill out any forms for them. I already followed up earlier this week to check in about the work I did for them, and I asked about how they pay their freelancers–kind of a nudge to figure out where they’re at. No response, though. I don’t want to be too pushy, but I also want to get paid. What should I do?

Send an invoice. There’s no need to wait for them to get back to you about payment procedures; it’s normal to just go ahead and submit an invoice, and that’s what you should do. I’d email it to your contact there, along with a note that says something like, “Hey Jane, hope everything worked out well with the work I submitted a few weeks ago. I’m attaching my invoice here. Thank you!”

Also, in the future, sign a contract! It doesn’t have to be fancy, but it should lay out your payment terms (and ideally either include late payment fees or an early payment discount, to provide some incentive for paying you on time.)

3. Would it be weird to share this blog with a struggling employee?

I have an employee that I am about to put on an improvement plan. I would like to send her a link to your blog. Is that weird? We’ve already had the difficult conversation and will be putting together a formal plan, but I want to include this site as a resource since I’ve found it so helpful.

I’m probably biased, but I think you can offer up resources — whether it’s this blog or others — without it being weird. I’d frame it as, “Hey, it occurred to me that you might find this blog interesting and useful. In addition to covering all kinds of workplace craziness, there’s often good information there about ___ that I have found to be personally helpful to me, and which I think could be a useful resource to you too.” Fill in that blank with whatever you think will be most useful to her — navigating workplace politics, establishing good work habits, or whatever.

(I think the key here is to use language that doesn’t signal, “You’re a mess, maybe this blog will help,” but rather to share it in a way similar to how you might with someone who was doing perfectly fine at work. Handle it like you would any resource that you wanted to share with someone who you thought might find it useful.)

4. I just realized that I’ve been getting slightly underpaid for 18 months

I work in retail, at a specialty big-box store (you’d recognize the name). My position is full-time and paid hourly. While I’m not technically in a leadership position, I have expanded my duties and responsibilities to the point where I’m often referred to as the “acting manager” when my boss isn’t available. After I received a stellar performance review from my department manager, he told me I’m being given the biggest raise corporate policy allows.

The problem: I’ve been getting paid at an hourly rate $0.50 less than was promised when I accepted the job. I didn’t realize there was a problem until now because it’s such a small discrepancy that any one paycheck would only be off by less than $40, but it accrues over time to be a significant underpayment over the past 18 months since I started in this position. But I also don’t have any written record of what I was told I’d be earning, just a clear memory of two particular conversations with the store manager when he hired me. I realize now I should have confirmed with HR or meticulously verified my first paycheck was calculated correctly. What should I do?

Ugh, there might not be much that you can do now since it’s gone on for so long and you don’t have any record of what it was originally supposed to be. Ideally, as soon as you noticed it, you would have brought it to your manager or your payroll department’s attention to get it fixed. You can still try — but the chances it will be changed are lower, unless it’s going to be clear to them that it is indeed an error (which is possible — it’s just hard to know from what’s here).

I’d say this: “I feel foolish about this, but I recently took a look at my pay stubs and realized that my wages since I started have been getting paid at a lower rate than the rate we set originally. I’ve been getting paid $X rather than $Y. Is there any way to fix this retroactively?”

5. How can I repay my friend for his professional help?

I am in the process of transitioning careers and going to school for my Master degree. A friend of mine works for a well known technology company in the area and I have been in communication with him as a mentor during the transition to get advice. I have expressed that I would love to work for the company because of what they do with volunteer work, celebration of employee milestones, and the caliber of individuals employed.

My friend has put me in touch with a department director to help me gain experience in the technology field and aid the career transition. I have met my friend for lunch a couple of times to discuss my future and he has bought lunch even though I told him I would buy the second time so we can be even. After I have contacted the director of the department, I sent my friend an email asking how I can repay him for all he has done for me, and he replied that I did not need to repay him. Would it be against any professional conduct to send a letter of thanks even though there has not been a formal interview for a position? I think this would be more of a thank you note than a follow-up note because he is not the individual that is hiring, but does have influence on if I would be qualified for a potential position opening.

A letter of thanks would be okay, but it feels sort of duplicative because you already sent an email asking how you can thank him … which means the thank-you is already out there. But why not just tell him you’d like to take him out to lunch or drinks or something? You don’t even need to explicitly connect it to his help; you can just issue the invitation.

For what it’s worth, if you ask someone how you can repay them, few people are going to say “buy me dinner” or “I’d like that watch you’re wearing.” Most people will tell you there’s no need. That’s why if you want to give back to someone, you’re often better off coming up with a specific thoughtful idea and then either doing it or asking them if you can do it. But an open-ended “how can I thank you?” often won’t produce much.

can I ask for an extra week of vacation, even though I’m entry-level?

A reader writes:

I work at a very small organization (less than 10 employees). I’ve been working here full-time for just over a year, though I was a part-time intern for the preceding year. I currently get two weeks of paid vacation. There is no rigid policy regarding approval or recording of vacation days.

This is my first full-time job out of college, my position did not exist before I started working here, and I’m essentially entry-level, so two weeks of vacation seems reasonable in that sense. However, the only other full-time employees here are two senior vice presidents and the CEO. They all get significantly more time off than I do. I am not sure exactly who gets what, but I know my boss’s vacations for this year will add up to at least four weeks. (She’s one of the two SVPs.) All the other employees are part-time with very flexible hours. They are paid on an hourly basis.

So here’s my dilemma: I would really like to ask for an additional week of vacation (paid or unpaid). Part of me is thinking that this is an unreasonable request, as I’m just out of college and have only been working here for a little more than a year. The other part of me is frustrated that over the course of the year, I spend much more time in the office than any other employee, since I’m the only full-time person without extensive vacation. Does this caveat make my request any more reasonable?

I would love to get your take on this. If you think it’s worth asking for another week, I’d also really appreciate your advice on how to approach this topic with my boss. One reason I’m hesitant to ask is that I’ve only used one week and one day so far this year, so I don’t know if asking for more time will seem silly given that I have four unused days.

I don’t think it’s crazy to ask.

That said, I also think you’re probably looking at through the wrong lens. It’s not unusual (in the U.S., that is) for entry-level employees to get two weeks of vacation a year while more senior people get four — or more — weeks. That’s pretty common, actually; vacation time is often based on seniority (with people earning more the longer they’re with a company) or is negotiated as part of an offer (with more senior people able to command more, just like with salary). So I don’t think that you should get frustrated that over the course of the year, you’re in the office two weeks more than SVPs; that’s a pretty normal thing.

If you were at a large company, I’d tell you to accept that this is how their benefits work and that asking for the same benefit levels as SVPs and the CEO wouldn’t get you anywhere. But you’re at a small company with only four full-time employees; that means that they likely have a lot of flexibility with PTO, and if you’re doing awesome work, they might be perfectly happy to give an extra week off each year. So I don’t think it’s outrageous to ask. (But again, that assumes you’re doing awesome work. If you’re not, all bets are off.)

And I wouldn’t worry about the fact that you’ve only used a week and a day of your time so far this year — in fact, you can even cite that when you ask for more, explaining that you find yourself hoarding your time and hesitating to use it at all, since there isn’t a lot of it.

However, if you’re asking for it to be paid vacation, you’re essentially asking for an increase in your compensation package. In that case, I’d approach this very similarly to how you’d ask for a raise. (You can find advice on that here.)

But if you’re willing to take it unpaid, which it sounds like you are, that’s often an easier sell. Just ask your boss if she’d approve it. I’d say something like: “Now that I’ve been here a year, I’d love to talk to you about my vacation time. Would it be possible for me to have three weeks of vacation a year rather than two? It’s okay with me if the third week is unpaid; I’d just like the flexibility of having that additional time off available.”

At such a small company, your boss probably has the flexibility to approve this. But if she doesn’t approve it, at least knowing that it’s not a horribly different arrangement than lots and lots of entry-level folks have* might help.

* In the U.S., that is. Everyone outside the U.S. finds this outrageous. As someone in need of a vacation, I lean toward agreeing.

how a 20-minute meeting after every project can help you do better work

When you wrap up a major project, do you most frequently (a) immediately turn your attention to other pressing items on your to-do list, (b) file away some lessons for next time in the back of your head, or (c) schedule a meeting to debrief with others who were involved with the work?

If you’re most people, you do (a) or (b). But doing (c) instead can make a huge difference in your work.

In reality, most people don’t debrief nearly enough after a project is over, particularly when a high workload makes you harried. But there’s enormous value in making the time for it, because research shows that simply talking through what went well, what could have gone better, and lessons from next time can dramatically increase the quality of your work in the future.

After all, even when things have gone well on a project, you’ve likely learned from the experience and picked out things that could be done differently next time to get even better results. Writing those up, even as just a quick bulleted list, can be an invaluable resource to have on hand the next time you conduct a similar project.

One compelling example: Harvard Business School researchers studied a group of surgeons learning a new operating technique and found that those who discussed each case in detail and debriefed with team members after procedures managed to cut their operating time in half. Those didn’t discuss and debrief hardly improved their time at all.

Of course, in practice, it can be tempting to skip a formal debriefing when new projects loom. One way to make debriefs more likely to happen is to build them into your project plan from the start: When you’re scheduling out a project, include a 20-minute reflection meeting on your calendar at the end of it – either with the project team if it’s a multi-person project, or even just with your own manager if you’ll be working on it relatively independently. If you have it on your calendar as part of overall project schedule, you’re more likely to do it when the time comes, rather than racing on to the next thing.

I originally published this at Intuit QuickBase. 

how can I prepare my teenager for the workforce?

A reader writes:

My daughter has just reached the minimum legal age to get a job (13 where we are) and she’s very eager.

I of course want her to do really well in any industry — both the ones she wants to be in for a lifetime and the ones she’s in short-term for the money and experience. What can I do as a mum to foster good work ethics and reasonable expectations? What would/do you and the readers to to prepare younger kids for the workforce?

I’m going to throw this out for readers to weigh in on, but here are some initial thoughts from me:

* Talk to her about your own job and workplace. Talk to her about other jobs you’ve had and what those workplaces were like, what you liked about them and didn’t like, and what your coworkers were like. (In general, I think it’s great for parents to do this from the time kids are small, so that work stuff isn’t such a mystery. And this old post has a ton of interesting discussion about how people are helped by what they absorb about work from their parents when they’re growing up.)

* Talk to her about what makes someone a good employee in any job, but especially the sorts of jobs she’s likely to have as a teenager: work ethic, pitching in, being friendly, being reliable, following through on commitments, using common sense.

* Brainstorm with her about what she’d want from her employees if she were running a business. Also, what wouldn’t she want?

* Talk to her about mistakes you’ve made at work — why they were mistakes, why you made them, and what you’d do differently now.

* Talk to her about what it means to commit to a work schedule and what it means for the people who will be counting on her … and how to handle it if she needs to call in sick, has an emergency, or otherwise needs to alter her schedule.

* Warn her that on some days work might suck, and that on those days it helps to remember that you are getting paid.

* Educate her about workers’ rights. Also educate her about the fact that many employers aren’t up to speed on labor law, and it’s not uncommon for them to have practices that Aren’t Quite Legal.

* Talk to her about how people get better and better jobs — helping her to see that doing well at early jobs can lead to better and better opportunities.

This is too much for one conversation, of course, or even one week. But lots of it can be woven in when you spot opportunities.

Readers, what advice do you have?