update: after I resigned, my boss asked me to drive 1,000 miles at my own expense

Remember the letter-writer last year who had resigned and whose boss was insisting that she drive 1,000 miles at her own expense to return company property to their headquarters, as well as spend a week in that city training her replacement, also at her own expense? Here’s the update.

It’s been over a year since I’ve successfully moved on from that terrible working atmosphere… what a nightmare! I have been able to land an incredible position while finishing school. I feel like a valuable and appreciated member of a team again, and I work hard to exceed any expectations. It’s very true when they say people will work twice as hard when they are appreciated.

But the bigger update in all of this is that the former company I worked for that caused me so much distress closed down! Yup – I had a feeling it was coming – but it finally happened! Probably for the best… no one should have to work for someone like that!

open thread – September 5, 2014

Olive with ribbonIt’s the Friday open thread. This post is for work-related discussions only. Please hold anything off topic for the free-for-all open thread that’s coming this Sunday.

The comment section on this post is open for discussion with other readers on anything work-related that you want to talk about. If you want an answer from me, emailing me is still your best bet, but this is a chance to talk to other readers.

should I resign without notice since I’m making so many mistakes, how far out can I push my start date, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Should I resign without notice since I’m making so many mistakes?

I’ve recently started my first full-time job and have been working there for approximately three months. Two months in, my responsibilities piled up (disperate and having little real relation to my education in accountancy) and I started making mistakes. These continued to snowball, presumably because of the malaise that kicked in because of the stress and frustration. It has gotten to the point where I now associate work with failure and embarrassment.

My immediate supervisors have not caught onto these mistakes (or only have a small inkling), and I was hoping to resign (without notice) to prempt the awkward termination talk and the conniption fit my boss will have. I’m sure the company is better off without me. The only reason I’m even considering this is the short term of employment and already murky conditions of my departure would preclude me getting any positive recommendations from this place of employ even under ideal conditions. In this case, would resigning without notice be the ideal choice? Or at least, not as damaging to the company in most situations?

Don’t resign without notice. That will make a bad situation worse. You might think you won’t be using them as a reference anyway, but you never know when someone from there will pop up somewhere else you’d like to work in the future. Moreover, it’s just not a mature, professional thing to do.

Talk to your boss, explain the situation, say that you think you should resign if you’re really set on that, and offer two weeks of notice.

2. My company says managers can’t be Facebook friends with employees

Can a company tell you who you can and cannot be friends with on Facebook? My company recently adopted a policy that states that a supervisor cannot be friends on Facebook with someone who is not in a supervisory position. I was recently promoted and was told I would have to de-friend all of my former coworkers. Some of these people I have been friends with for years. Some are people I happen to work with – but have been friends with for years outside of work – long before I began working for this company. As long as I am not posting about work, do they have a right to interfere with social networking? As a side note, there is no policy regarding going out socially with people who are on different levels within the company and you are allowed to be connected through LinkedIn.

It’s legal.

A small number states, including New York and California, explicitly ban employers from mucking about in your private, lawful off-the-clock activities. But companies are absolutely allowed to make rules regarding relationships between managers and employees, and often have good reason to do so (bias, appearance of bias, conflict of interest, sexual harassment, and all sort of other complications that can arise from blurred boundaries between managers and employees).

While it feels like an annoying overreach when your company could instead hire managers who it trusted to use good judgment, it’s actually wouldn’t be a terrible thing to de-Facebook people you’re now going to be managing. You don’t need to see their bar photos from the night before they called in sick, hear them vent about work, or otherwise be exposed to the myriad ways Facebook can make this dynamic weird.

3. Hiring someone who doesn’t meet all the posted requirements

I just started a graduate program, and while my career services office seems well-intentioned, there have been a few situations where they’ve spread misinformation, like saying that asking about age or marital status is illegal (obviously ill-advised to ask, and discrimination is illegal, but they stated that asking at all was illegal). Recently my advisor told me that hiring someone who didn’t have a PhD was illegal if the job was advertised as requiring a PhD. This doesn’t sound right, and I can’t get a definitive answer on the internet. What say you?

No, that’s not illegal. There’s no law that binds you to the qualifications you list in a job ad. (It would be ridiculous if there were such a law — employers adjust job requirements on the fly all the time as they talk to candidates, the needs of the role evolve, and/or they find someone who’s great in ways slightly different from what they anticipated when writing the ad, and it would be craziness if they were prevented from doing that.)

I suspect the source of your advisor’s misinformation is this: If an employer appears to have a pattern of discriminating against candidates based on race, sex, religion, etc., and you’re able to show that they regularly lowered the job requirements for Race X but not for Race Y, you could potentially use that as part of your pattern of evidence. But outside of that context, there’s nothing at all wrong with hiring someone who doesn’t meet all the job posting’s requirements, and there’s certainly no law whatsoever against it.

At what point do we get to revoke college faculty and staff’s right to talk about career stuff, since they so often get it wrong?

4. How far out can I push the start date for my new job?

If I am moving across country for a job, how long can I ask the new employer for in time before starting? I know the typical timeline is two weeks but I’m wondering if it’s reasonable to ask for more time if I’m moving from Chicago to San Francisco, for example.

Sure. The amount of time they’ll give you will be vary by employer, the role, and how urgently they need someone to start, but it’s not uncommon or unreasonable to ask to set a start date for a month out. If they can’t do that, they’ll tell you — but it’s totally reasonable to ask.

5. Should I call to see what’s up with this job?

Last Wednesday, I had a second interview (in person) for a position. It followed a telephone interview a week earlier and went really well.

When I inquired about the timeline for a decision during the second interview, I was told that they would know by the end of the following week because they want the position to start during the week of September 8. I sent thank you notes (by mail) to both managers on Friday and haven’t yet received word back.

I would think that they would have told me earlier than Thursday or Friday of the week before, if they expected me to start next week. I also realize that one or both managers could have taken a few days off for Labor Day. Should I call today or tomorrow?

No. If they want to hire you, they’re not going to forget to tell you.

Hiring timelines are notorious for being pushed back from whatever they’re originally envisioned as. Wait two full weeks from your interview before following up (and then do it by email, not phone; phone is a bigger interruption). Other than that, put it out of your mind, or even pretend you didn’t get it and move on; you will be happier that way.

10 weirdest things you’ve seen at work

You’ve probably had your share of mild frustrations with coworkers – the guy who takes all his calls on speaker phone, the woman who monopolizes meetings and makes them take twice as long as scheduled, and the other typical characters who show up in the majority of offices on a regular basis.

But when I recently asked readers to share some of the weirdest things they’ve seen coworkers do at work, we ended up with some stories far beyond routine coworker oddities. I’ve rounded up the 10 weirdest of all the outrageous things you’ve witnessed.

1. Living in your office

“The office I used to work in had a bedroom in it – fully furnished, with a bed and sheets and a dresser and side table (but no windows). At one point, the (very scary and extremely hated) manager was living in the office with his wife and their two dogs. She would walk around the office in her house robe and slippers, carrying one of those dogs. She’d page her husband over the loudspeaker to come to his office, where they’d proceed to argue very loudly for the whole office to hear.

When the HR manager tried to call the company insurance company to see how much of a liability it was to have an employee and his wife and dogs literally living in the office, the manager slapped the HR manager hard enough across the face to leave finger-shaped welts and give him whiplash. The manager was not fired or reprimanded in any way.”

2. Undressing in front of you

“My boss, the CEO, has changed in front of me, top to bottom but leaving his underwear on, twice during conversations. The second time I saw it coming and tried to back away, but he followed me because he still had more to say. He does this to everybody, it’s just more uncomfortable for me because I’m a woman and he’s a man and I don’t know where to look. For anyone thinking this is some form of sexual harassment, you have to take my word for it that it’s not – he’s simply the weirdest person I’ve ever known.”

3. Bathing in the showroom

“I worked with a guy who biked to work and felt the need to clean up before going to his office. We had a showroom with lots of plumbing displays, including whirlpools filled with water, working sinks, showers, and toilets. There was even a water heater since some of the displays featured temperature related features. They were set in mock-ups of real rooms, so full bathroom suites were set up in rooms that would look like a typical customer’s bathroom.

He got there a full hour or more before the showroom opened to the public, so he used one of the bathrooms for his morning routine. The kicker was that this wasn’t plumbed potable water. It was all connected to a re-circulator so that we didn’t have massive water bills from running the displays every day. He showered in his own filthy grey water for months before anyone caught onto what he was doing.”

4. Claiming to be your own twin

“At an old job, we had a temp who was fired. A few months later, when everyone from the team she worked on had moved to a new office, she came back as a temp on one of the teams left in the old office. After a couple days, the HR manager recognized her and let team manager know. When he confronted her about it, she claimed to be the twin of the original temp. She couldn’t produce any identification, and it was obvious she was lying. She was fired, of course, but the woman who claimed to be her own twin sister became a company legend.”

5. Eating frozen meals, still frozen

“One of my coworkers eats a frozen meal for lunch every day. And I mean frozen. She doesn’t bother microwaving them. Even when the food in the tray still has a thin layer of ice on it, she will not heat it up. One time she broke the tines of her plastic fork trying to stab it through a vegetable that was frozen solid, but even that didn’t deter her. She kept eating, broken fork and all.”

6. Brushing your teeth at your desk

“I used to work in a cubicle across from a guy who brushed his teeth at his desk. He would go fill a coffee mug with water, then brush his teeth, dipping his toothbrush into the mug, and spitting into it. I was so shocked I couldn’t even say anything at all. I couldn’t figure why, since he was getting up to put water in his cup and then getting up to dump it out, couldn’t he just go in the bathroom to brush? I didn’t know him very well and wasn’t sure how to tell him to quit it because it was revolting.”

7. Aggressively promoting your self-published adult novel to your team

“One of my coworkers wrote and self-published a book. He actually gave out free copies to everyone in our department and all of management. I can ignore the quality of the writing of the book, but what I (and now the rest of the office) can’t ignore is that it is incredibly sexually explicit. It invents euphemisms that are as awkward as they are confusing while describing activities I would not normally advise discussing with your boss.

I hoped the book would become old news, but he is really promoting it. We’re talking emails about book-signing events, telling everyone about how it’s going to be turned into a TV show and a play and maybe a movie, and other things for which etiquette demands congratulations but everyone knows will never happen.”

8. Stripping down in the bathroom

“I used to work with a guy that did triathlons and biked 12 miles to work in the Texas heat. He’d wear his Lance Armstrong wear on the way to work, strip down in the staff bathroom, use a wash rag to take a bath in the sink and get dressed for work. He didn’t wear underwear under his bike stuff.”

9. 10 minutes of cat noises

“I have done some voice work for video games, which includes things like making 10 minutes of cat noises. I spent half an hour once trying to make noises for various deaths in response to instructions like, ‘okay now … like you’ve been stabbed in the stomach’ … ‘umm, can you give me a hit in the head with an axe noise?’”

10. And finally, one thing you wish your coworkers would start doing

“There was a thing at one of my offices called ‘breakfast club’ where groups of people brought in breakfast on Fridays. It started out simple, like donuts or quiche, but some groups took it pretty far. There was definitely a manager in one of the groups that brought in a waffle iron, batter, fruit toppings and bacon for his weeks and set them up in the empty cube next to his desk. Breakfast burrito bars and crockpot oatmeal bars also made appearances. Then that empty cube got a blender and the people in that group started making smoothies regularly. I was just waiting to see what small appliance showed up next in that cube.”

I originally published this at Intuit QuickBase’s blog.

does a quick rejection indicate that a human never saw my application materials?

A reader writes:

I recently applied with a tailored resume and detailed cover letter to a company I was really excited about, but within one day I received a rejection email. I know technically I was not the perfect candidate (I’m a recent science Ph.D. grad trying to move into entry level energy/science business), so I understand being rejected.

However, now that I think about the rapid rejection, I’m beginning to wonder if a person ever saw my application or if I was just rejected immediately by a resume screening bot program. I had already talked with an acquaintance at the company to gain insight about the position and tailor my application materials. Do you think it would be wasting everyone’s time to further tailor my resume and cover letter and ask my friend to forward it to a real person to make sure someone actually considers my application? I never seem to hear back from any jobs I’m applying to, and I’m wondering if my lack of interviews is me not being or presenting myself as a qualified candidate or I’m getting screened in all these online applications before anyone actually sees my resume.

The fact that the rejection came after one day doesn’t indicate that a human didn’t look at your materials; usually if you’re going to be rejected in the first stage of screening, the person who makes that decision makes it in less than a minute from a quick scan of your materials. Most places still don’t send out the rejection note instantly, because it feels rude to reject people so quickly, but tons of rejection decisions — as opposed to notifications — are made in about 30 seconds, if not less.

I know everyone wants to believe that employers are carefully considering their applications, perhaps mulling them over for a while, but when you do a lot of hiring, it’s really easy to very quickly identify applications that aren’t quite right — or simply aren’t as right as some of the others.

Since you’d already talked to your friend about the role, I’d forward him your materials with a note that you received a quick rejection, and ask her if she’d be willing to give you any feedback on what you can do to be a stronger candidate for roles like this one in the future.

interview with a former receptionist at a legal brothel

Last week, I answered a question from a reader wondering how to list her job as a receptionist at a brothel (which is legal in her state) on her resume. Since that’s an industry not typically discussed in the context of workplace advice, I thought it would be interesting to talk to her about how she fielded some of the work situations that came up there, and she graciously agreed to let me interview her for a post here.

Here’s our Q&A. Warning: Given the subject matter, there’s some mild discussion of the existence of sex.

What was the interview process for the job like?

I had heard about the open position through an acquaintance, so I think that my interview was a bit more low key than it would have been for others. Generally, though, it’s not the kind of job that you put a resume in for.

Does that mean that it’s typically filled through people the business knows (or someone connected to the business knows)? Why do you think that is?

In my state, brothels aren’t allowed to advertise for any kind of position, so if you’re a sex worker or a licensed brothel manager (read: receptionist) and you’re looking for a job, you’re relying on either word of mouth or just calling around to find somewhere. There’s enough turnover that it’s not that hard to find something. I think that there’s a lot of competition and a bit of animosity between businesses, so I don’t think that business managers call each other to get references about receptionists, hence not really bothering with a resume.

There’s still so much stigma around the industry, which I think leads to prejudice like thinking that everyone else in the industry is not to be trusted, so I think that’s why business managers like recommendations from people they trust. And I trained some unsuitable people while I was there, so I totally understand that line of thinking. Not everyone is has the right personality for reception work and some people are just batshit crazy no matter where they work.

What were your basic responsibilities?

Answering the telephone (the most common question was “Who’s on today?”), making sure that the rooms were tidy and that laundry was being done by the ladies throughout the shift, buzzing the rooms to let the lady and the client know that their time was almost up, letting ladies know when their “Doctor’s Certificate” was due (they are required to be tested for all STIs every three months and then to give their workplace a certificate to show that they have been tested).

Note: I don’t generally like to refer to adult woman as “girls” and I’m not much of a fan of the word “lady” either, but these seem to be common industry-speak. They’re short for “working girl” and “working lady.” The official term is apparently “Service Provider,” but that sounds pretty clinical. 

What did you find most challenging about the work?

There was a period of time where I was switching between day and night shifts and that was hard on my body and mind. I eventually switched to night shift and embraced my unusual hours, but night shift comes with its own challenges. If you work day shift, you can build up a rapport with lots of the regulars, but the clients who came in during night shift were a wild card. Some of them really lovely, but some of them very drunk or on drugs, or otherwise difficult. Sometimes the girls were difficult too, and that was hard to deal with at 3 am.

Difficult in what sense? And what was your role / how did you handle it when that happened?

For the most part, what society tells you about sex workers (at least here, in a legalised industry) is completely wrong. Most of the girls are normal and trustworthy and a joy to work with. But this means that the rare few who were on drugs were so much more difficult to work with in comparison. There are very strict laws against having drugs or alcohol on premises, so when there were ladies on drugs on shift, I wasn’t just worried about their safety (in terms of potentially overdosing, or not being in the best state of mind to be working) but I was also worried about the business potentially losing its licence if the police happened to stop by. Businesses will generally have some processes in place like random bag and locker checks (we had to mention this when a lady started at the business) and the owner and business manager were supportive of me and trusted that I would manage my shift how I had to.

I wanted to be on great terms with the ladies I worked with, but I also had to be assertive and stick to my word. I sent a lady home once because she was drunk and she refused a locker check. When she realised that I was going to send her home, she agreed to the locker check. After she had hidden her vodka elsewhere.

What did you like best about the job?

I learned some really excellent ways of communicating with people about difficult topics. I’ve had to tell clients that their regular lady doesn’t want to stay with them anymore and I’ve also had to tell a guy that he had terrible B.O, and that’s why no one would stay with him. He kept coming in and actually dealt with the B.O!

I’m completely impressed that you told someone about his terrible B.O. That’s hard to do! And it was a successful outcome too. On behalf of all the managers who are uncomfortable dealing with this, what did you say? Any advice for doing it well?

The whole story is that he had already tried to book a couple of girls and they both said no. A third lady, who was very experienced and said that she could deal with anything, took him upstairs and then sent him down again because she could absolutely not deal with it. So, he knew something was up. I said to him, “Hey, this is really hard to tell someone, but the reason that the ladies don’t want to stay with you is because you have very strong body odour. Please make sure you wash really well and use deodorant and we’ll see you again soon, okay?”

Let’s talk management. In some ways, I’d think that good management would be even more important in this type of business, because sex is so fraught with the opportunity for people to behave weirdly. Comparing it to other jobs you’ve had or jobs people you’re close to have had, would you say the management practices/systems were pretty similar, or did you see things done differently from a management perspective than what you’ve seen in other sectors? (I don’t even know what I’m thinking of here, specifically. Just wondering if anything stood out to you as different/unusual/notable.)

I think compared to other industries, there is a lot more importance on getting to know the girls on your shift and how they tick, so that you can work with them best. I’m sure this happens everywhere, but not quite to the same extent. As a receptionist, you have to keep the girls, the clients, and management happy. That might mean making sure that you ring the pizza place on behalf of one of the girls, to make sure that she can have lunch on time, so that she doesn’t keep her regular client waiting, because if you upset him he’ll only book for two hours and not three! It might mean co-ordinating everything around letting a girl who is having a really busy day have cigarette breaks.

The nature of the work does add an extra element to it, I would try to always check in with the girls to make sure that they were comfortable and that they knew they could talk to me and we would find ways to work around issues. I think one time I told a client that his regular lady was running late because I was a “hard ass” and had made her fold some towels. He laughed and waited the five minutes. She was probably actually still with another client, and I never liked telling a client that.

With most jobs, no matter how exotic or unusual, at some point they start feeling mundane. For instance, I used to work on marijuana policy, but was focused the administrative work of running the organization, not thinking “hey, this is about WEED.” Did you have a similar experience, where after a point you stopped thinking “hey, sex is happening!” and were exclusively focused on just ensuring things were running like they were supposed to? If so, how long did that take to happen?

I don’t know if I ever thought “sex is happening!” I think that as a straight woman in a brothel, from the start I was just shown the business side of things and I just either never thought that much about what was going on upstairs or I could never really think of what was happening as sexual. My only concern was that the ladies were safe and had been paid by the client.

my manager’s daughter’s wedding will separate men and women, job searching soon after starting a new job, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My manager’s daughter’s wedding will separate men and women

I am a physician at a small office. I am the only female physician, and our support staff consists of both men and women. The owner of the practice is a religious man whose religious beliefs require him to completely separate seating at weddings (separate at the ceremony, separate for dinner and dancing with a partition down the middle of the room). When his daughter got married, he invited the entire practice, and all of the male physicians and male support staff sat together at one table, while I was assigned to sit with the female support staff and the wives of the physicians. It felt like my actual colleagues had the chance to hang out and bond, while I entertained their wives and chatted with our support staff (who are lovely, but they aren’t exactly my colleagues).

His other daughter just got engaged, and he invited the entire office to the wedding. I appreciate that the office has such a collegial feel that he invites us to family events, but I am dreading sitting at the wives and support staff table again while my colleagues who I work with on a day to day basis all sit together and bond. It was especially awkward that the male support staff got to sit with my colleagues while I didn’t.

Is it proper etiquette to decline to attend? I am the most junior doctor in the office, and don’t want to insult him, nor do I think it is reasonable that he create a table for men and women to sit together if that is religiously or culturally inappropriate at these events. I have a lot of respect for my boss, but this is just awkward. Any advice on how to handle this?

It’s totally reasonable to decline to attend — for any reason, really, but this one is certainly a good one. Etiquette does not require you to attend the weddings of people you’re not close to, and it definitely doesn’t require you to suck it up and deal with sex segregation when you could instead politely decline to attend.

Of course, as with declining any other social event that you’d just rather not attend, there’s no need to explain that; it’s fine to simply say that you have another commitment that day and to give him your best wishes for his daughter’s marriage.

2. My company asked me to write a review on Glassdoor

I have worked at my current employer for fewer than six months. A couple of weeks after I received an award (whoop whoop!), a senior executive approached me personally to review my employer on Glassdoor. 

My manager and director know some of the stumbling blocks in recruitment, and those are imposed from the top (compensation and time-off packages). I personally am happy here so far, even with those caveats.

The request made me uneasy. An executive known for “playing politics” asked me to submit a review that, due to its timing, would be less anonymous. And following so closely on the heels of an award — well, it felt almost transactional and definitely a political minefield. I declined, saying that I had just not been here long enough. Any tips should this come up again? It surely will.

Yeah, that would make me uneasy too. And your company really shouldn’t be putting you in that position; there’s an implication that you have to write something positive, which is contrary to the whole point of anonymous reviews.

If it comes up again, you could try saying, “Oh, I never use those sites; I’ve never found them reliable,” which would then require him to directly order you to write a review if he really wants to push it, which most managers aren’t going to do. Or you could say something non-comittal, “Oh, maybe I will” and then never follow through (which would then require him continually hassling you about it, which is also unlikely). Or, of course, you could write one, if you feel like you have genuinely positive things to say about the company. But I wouldn’t let them push you into it if you don’t want to.

Read an update to this letter here.

3. Is my employer’s new expense policy normal or legal?

My job (professor) requires a lot of travel to conferences and other places, all on my own credit card and sometimes I can get it reimbursed. (Sometimes there is money available you can compete for to get expenses reimbursed; sometimes you know you are on your own dime.)

That is fine (well not “fine” but definitely understandable), but now the department in charge of reimbursing expenses is requiring not only a detailed and itemized receipt (no hotel fees will be reimbursed as they do not explain what the fee is, for example) with our names on them, but we also have to provide our credit card statements to show we we really charged for the items on our receipts.

Is this legal? And do other organizations do this?? No notice was issued about this – we only found out as our reimbursements were being denied. I’m so angry about it, I’m starting to look for another job; but thought I should find out whether this is common or not.

Requiring credit card statements and an explanation of expenses is pretty standard (and definitely legal), but the part about not reimbursing hotel fees that the hotel doesn’t explain is pretty weird. That said, I’d just start telling hotels that you need fees spelled out (which isn’t an unreasonable request). The big issue I see here is that they didn’t give you any warning of this and started applying it retroactively, which is unfair since you may have lost the opportunity to get that documentation. I’d try pushing back on that piece, pointing out that you shouldn’t lose money for following a policy that changed after your expenses were incurred.

4. I’m not sure I want to continue interviewing with this company

I recently interviewed for a small startup by responding to a social media status they posted looking to hire full time positions for their company. The status basically asked for a “Jill of all Trades” type of person and said to email their company for a full description. As the company sounds like a fun place to work for, I sent in a cover letter and my resume to the email and inquired for more details. A day later, the founders asked to have a phone interview with me.

The interview went well and the conversation was not awkward, but then one of the cofounders mentioned that the position is paid hourly and has no benefits except for discounts off their products since their finances aren’t very stable yet. This was all news to me since they did not post this information on their job opening ad on their Facebook. I’m currently working full time, paid in salary and have a generous benefits package. I’m looking to relocate to the city this startup is in, but I’m already hesitant about the position since I’m not sure if I’m willing to forgo health insurance and paid vacation.

They sent me an email today asking to have a Skype interview on Friday, but I’m not so sure if I should go through with it. If I don’t, would I risk angering them? Should I go through with it anyway to see how much they are willing to pay hourly, if I receive an offer? If not, how do I decline going through with the next steps politely?

It’s totally reasonable to withdraw from their hiring process if you decide the job isn’t for you; in fact, that’s more considerate than wasting their time (and an interview slot that could have gone to someone else) if you know you wouldn’t take the job. It would also be polite to explain your reason, since it’s useful for them to understand why candidates might lose interest. If you’re not 100% sure and it hinges on the hourly rate, you could also reach out now to discuss that — saying something like, “Before I take up more of your time, I should mention that I have some concerns about the compensation you mentioned when we last spoke. I’m currently in a salaried position with a generous benefits package; I’d be unlikely to leave it for an hourly role without benefits, although that would of course depend on what that hourly rate was. Are you able to tell me the hourly range for the role?”

Generally, asking directly salary at this stage is frowned on (which is ridiculous, but the convention nonetheless), but in this specific case, you’re framing it as (a) following up on information they already gave you and (b) trying to figure out if that information makes the role prohibitive for you, so reasonable people in their shoes shouldn’t have a problem with that (and should appreciate your candor).

5. Job searching soon after starting a new job

I applied to a job which was opening new facilities in my town. When I was hired, they asked me if I could start at their headquarters until the new facilities opened. I agreed even though it is a long commute since it was suppose to be temporary. They said it would be for three to four months max. We’re approaching the three month mark and things are looking grim. In fact, they have temporarily closed facilities which just opened. Supervisors and HR cannot give me a clear answer. I cannot afford to do this commute permanently and wouldn’t have even applied if it was to work at the current location. Should I start looking for a new job so soon? How do I frame this new job in resumes and interviews for prospective employers?

It sounds like you should be looking, since they can’t promise you that the job you were hired for will even exist. And if they keep you on, it might be at a facility with a longer commute than you want.

As for framing it to prospective new employers, “Unfortunately, the new facility they hired me to work in may not open after all” has the benefit of being both true and entirely understandable.

my manager won’t manage and tells us to “police our own ranks”

A reader writes:

What does one do when their manager gives them mixed signals and contradictory orders?

My manager runs my department as well as another. He is quite qualified for the other department. He understands how it runs, and how it should run. My department, however, is something with which he has no experience and very little understanding.

The problem with my department is that out of 15 people, we have 5 hard-working employees and 10 people who are just there to do the bare minimum. A lot of times, they don’t even do that. Essentially, those 5 workers are carrying the weight of the entire department. When approached about the issues, our manager tells us to “police our own ranks” and ask the person to start pulling their weight. A few are uncomfortable with this.

As instructed, I recently sent an email to someone who let their duties fall onto my plate after the person failed to do it. I started my email off with a positive note, ended it with a positive note and made sure to remain professional and not accusatory in the email, such as saying “We need to be sure we are handling things in a timely manner” rather than “You need to…”

The person reported to our manager that they were made uncomfortable by my pointing out that things weren’t done in a timely way, and felt it was aggressive for me to go to directly to her since I’m not a manager.

My manager then tells me that I should not be asking people to handle their responsibilities and that it’s not my job to pay attention to who is/isn’t pulling their weight. I tend to agree, it’s not my job. But this same manager told me to “police my own ranks” and he certainly isn’t paying attention to who is actually working or not. I did point out to him that I felt I was following his own instruction, but I immediately let it go, as I didn’t want to seem argumentative.

I still do not know how to handle this ongoing situation going forward. He doesn’t want to be bothered with handling it himself but now seems to have decided he doesn’t want us to handle it either. My only conclusion is that he wishes for us to just not acknowledge the fact that a few of us are doing our own workload along with the workloads of those that refuse to do their own. Any advice for dealing with this issue?

Your manager sucks.

I think your conclusion is absolutely right: He doesn’t want to deal with under-performers himself and he’s hoping you’ll somehow deal with it on your own — but you need to deal with it in a way that doesn’t bug anyone, because he doesn’t want to hear about it. In other words, he doesn’t want to do his job … and he’s hoping that you’ll use magic to do some of it for him.

As you are not in fact a magician, and as his job is actually to manage people, this won’t work.

There aren’t a lot of options for you here: You can stay and resign yourself to the fact that you have a manager who won’t manage, which in turn will mean that you’ll have a bunch of coworkers not doing their work … or you can look for a job where you don’t need to own a magic wand.

California will require paid sick leave, how to change the font size here, and more

A few random things —

1. People who like to zoom in or out to increase or decrease the font size here: There’s now a built-in feature of the site that will let you do that more easily. If you want a larger font size, scroll to the bottom of the right-hand sidebar, where you will see an option to “change default font size” (right below the category listing). On phones, you’ll see the option in the main menu. It should save your font size preference in a cookie after you choose it once.

(This should also solve the problems that some people were having with functionality after zooming in, like needing to click the comment submit button twice.)

2. California has just passed a bill making it the second state (after Connecticut) to require employers to offer paid sick leave. Assuming it’s signed by the governor, which it’s expected to be, the state will require employers to provide at least three paid sick days a year (although it has a few exclusions).

3. Nick Corcodilos has an interesting piece on why you shouldn’t bother with Glass Door. I tend to think that Glass Door has some (limited) usefulness if you look for patterns among the reviews, and it’s not terribly hard to spot fake positive reviews. And in general, I think that anything that gives you more information when you’re job-searching is good. But Nick makes some interesting points.

I’m frustrated by my office’s constant Nerf gun battles

A reader writes:

I’d love to know your take on what seems to be a ubiquitous addition to every startup: the arsenal of Nerf guns and ammo.

About two months ago, one of our C-levels invested in a large number of nerf guns and several packs of darts, and now they’re becoming flat out office supplies with new orders coming in regularly. Nerf battles break out not quite daily, but they do happen with alarming frequency.

I would get frustrated because my old desk was in the middle of Nerf Alley, though we have open plan of course, so nowhere is safe. The aforementioned C-level took a shot at me one day, nailing me in the back of the head (“Your hair [bright red] makes the perfect target”), which I made clear I didn’t appreciate. The day that I got two darts to the face (one in the jaw, one in the temple) while just sitting at my desk trying to concentrate on something was the day that I kind of lost it. Not in a yelling screaming kind of way, but in a holding up the dart saying “Really, you guys?!” kind of way. My boss says I need to grab a gun and fight back. I say no, because I don’t want to be involved in any of those shenanigans.

My new desk is more isolated, but I still get a few that find their way into my realm. I also know that once this row fills, I’ll be more in the line of fire. I’m starting to get really testy about it, which I know I shouldn’t be. It’s just so frustrating and annoying when you’re trying to concentrate on something and, even with headphones on, you’re constantly distracted by flying missiles and loud clacking of the guns themselves.

I enjoy fun in the workplace, but getting whacked with flying missiles, no matter how harmless, is not my idea of a good time, and those guns are crazy crazy loud. How can I handle this more graciously and not be the office bitch?

I think I’m going to have nightmares about this tonight.

I get that this would be the height of fun for some people (and apparently is for many of your coworkers), but you know, it would also be the height of fun for some people to blast opera at high volume all day but they don’t do it at work because of consideration for others.

In any case, I’d look at this from two different perspective: the immediate question of what you can do to stop getting hit in the face, and the broader question of whether this is a culture you want to work in.

On that first question, I’d start with telling people directly that you’re not into it and don’t want to be shot at. As in, “Hey, shoot each other to your hearts’ content, but it’s really jarring to me to be shot at. Can you leave me out of it?”

Other possibilities:

* You could see if anyone else shares your dislike of this, and if so, consider banding together with them to either (a) speak with a louder voice (as groups can) that none of you want to be shot at, or (b) see if you can all sit together in a demilitarized zone that’s off-limits for Nerf attacks.

* You could see whether there’s a way to set up some sort of physical barrier around your workspace that will block most of it.

* Hell, you could even try putting up a white flag to signal that you’re unarmed and not to be fired upon.

But beyond that, there’s the broader question of whether this is a culture that you like and want to work in. From that perspective, it’s just like if you were working somewhere that had constant potlucks or rampant profanity or something else you disliked but which most of your coworkers liked. This is more aggressive, yes, since you’re getting hit in the face by flying objects, but it’s ultimately the same principle: If this is the culture that your company’s leadership wants, you have to decide whether you can live in that culture reasonably happily or not.

I do think the organization is probably disadvantaging itself by creating an environment where whole demographic groups are less likely to feel comfortable than others — older people, for one thing, and people with some types of disabilities, and I’d bet an awful lot of women (and start-ups already have a problem attracting women). To be clear, I’m not saying this is true of all women or all older people — I’m talking in generalities here. But those types of generalities matter when you’re running a company that will benefit from not having a homogeneous workforce (i.e., pretty much all of them).

If you have credibility and some political capital to spend, you might talk to someone in a leadership role about why that’s bad for the company if it eventually wants to grow up.

Or you could try this.

Read an update to this letter here.