how’s the new layout working for you?

Now that the new site layout has been up a week, I want to know how it’s working for you. Specifically:

1. If you’re having technical problems with the site…

First, if  you’re having any issues with the site, please clear your cache and then try again. That may fix the issue on the spot.

But if that doesn’t work, please let me know below what problem you’re having, ideally including:

  •  the problem (please be as descriptive as possible — whatever you remember about what happened and what you were doing on the site when it occurred — for instance, loading the page, trying to click a link, trying to post a comment, etc.)
  • what browser you’re using
  • if at all possible, what day it started (we’ve changed a few different things but all on different days, so if you happen to know if it started Friday when the new layout first launched or more like Monday/Tuesday, that’ll be helpful)

2. If you’re not having technical problems with the site…

If you had a problem earlier but you’ve noticed that it has since resolved, it would be helpful to know that too (and when you noticed that it was fixed, if you remember).

3. Any other feedback?

For instance, one change we made is that any comments from me in the comment section are now highlighted in blue. Too much?

how to terrify your new employee

You’ve just made a promising new hire. But when she shows up to start work, all that effort that you put into recruiting the right person can go up in a puff of smoke when her first weeks aren’t well planned out.

At Intuit QuickBase’s Fast Track blog today, I tell you how you can ensure that your new hire gets off on the wrong foot – and possibly never recovers. You can read it here.

 

my boss slapped my hand, I was fired and then invited back, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My boss slapped my hand

I’ve been at my job for a couple months now. I made a minor reporting mistake and quickly corrected it, no big deal. My supervisor, who sits next to me, slid his chair next to me, said “give me your hand” and then lightly/jokingly slapped it, as if he was disciplining a child. I know I shouldn’t have offered my hand, but in the moment I just laughed it off because I was so taken aback by this creepy gesture, when what I really wanted to do was tell him I don’t want him touching me and that this was not appropriate or funny. I also thought it was a pretty embarrassing thing to do to an employee.

I didn’t say anything to him about it, but if it happens again I will say something along the lines of “I don’t want you touching me, please” (he touches my arm/shoulder occasionally sometimes too, which I hate). He is otherwise a nice person but sometimes gives me a weird vibe. Does this just sound like bad judgment (which everyone has occasionally) or an indicator of behaviors that need to be addressed sooner rather than later?

Yes, it was bad judgment. It sounds like he meant it entirely in jest — but it’s not a good idea to even jokingly do that kind of thing at work, especially when you’re the boss. In this case, it sounds like he did it lightly enough and jokingly enough that he didn’t actually HIT you — but play-slapping your hand as if he’s your disciplinarian isn’t appropriate.

Ideally you would have addressed it in the moment; even just a “did you really just slap my hand?” probably would have gotten your point across. It’s not your fault you didn’t — few of us could figure out how to respond well to that in the moment. But I think you’re right not to go back and address it now, unless something like it happens again.

As for occasional arm/shoulder touching, “I don’t want you touching me” is a pretty adversarial thing to say, and it’s hard to deliver without causing some tension in the relationship. It’s absolutely your prerogative to say it, but you might get a better outcome with a softened version of it. For instance: “Hey Bob, I’m weird about being touched on the arm or shoulder — I know you mean it warmly, but I’m just not a touchy-feely person. Thanks for understanding.”

2. Explaining my daily phone call to my kids to a new employer

I have a question on how and when to bring up a real-life problem I worked through this last year – which is that the only way I can keep my two learning-disabled kids on track during the school year is to call and have a 5-15 minute conversation with them about their assignments when they get home at 4 pm. (I can’t emphasize enough how hard I’ve worked to find non-work-day solutions and this really truly is the only right answer for my kids right now and quite possibly for the next few years.)

Currently my office is very flexible and I drop over to the break room to make the call and come back to my desk without any issues, so this question is more related to anxiety about the new school year and having a new job. I want to be proactive (assuming I get the job) since the job I’m interviewing for has an open floor plan. I know not to bring this up in an interview, but to discuss sometime after I actually get the job. I’d love to hear how a manager would like to have me broach this subject.

Having a 5-15 minute conversation once a day shouldn’t be an issue, particularly assuming you’re in an exempt position. That said, you don’t want to take the job and then discover that it is, so I’d bring it up once you receive an offer. Not as a major negotiation item (because I wouldn’t expect it to an issue), but in a pretty casual, “by the way, I want to let you know I do this and make sure it won’t be a problem” type of way toward the end of finalizing the offer details.

3. I was fired for a false reason and then offered my job back

I was terminated two weeks ago and was simply told that it was because I made derogatory comments to and about coworkers. No other information was given to me, at regional or HR level. I am an on-site property manager, which means my apartment is part of my salary, and I had two weeks to move. I tried to contact several superiors in the company to explain that the reason they gave was not true at all, but no one would speak to me. This was a very hard situation for me emotionally, as I have never had any negative interaction with anyone in the company.

I received a call today from HR apologizing and offering my job back, but they still will not give me any information pertaining to my termination. Is this typical practice and should I be leery?

No, that’s not typical at all. I’d say something like, “I really appreciate the apology and the offer of my job back, but can you help me understand what happened? I’d love to come back, but I’m still completely in the dark about why I was let go in the first place and why no one would explain it to me. Before thinking about coming back, I’d want to understand what happened.”

4. Asking for time off for a funeral when starting a new job

I’m starting a new job in three days. I received word last night that my mentor is receiving hospice care and is not expected to live much longer (it sounded like it is a matter of days). He and I are very close and I’m devastated. One of his final requests is that I speak at his funeral, which would be an honor. However, he lives 3000 miles away from me and I would likely have to miss at least a day of work.

What’s the proper protocol here given that it’s my first week? Is it acceptable to ask, very apologetically, for a day off to attend to this issue if needed? Or would that be unreasonable given that I’m brand new? To add to my concerns I’m not sure precisely when the travel would be, which makes it hard to know exactly what to ask for.

Be straightforward with your new manager: “My long-time mentor, to whom I’m very close, isn’t expected to live much longer. I’ve been asked to speak at his funeral. The timing is uncertain, but it’s likely to be soon. Would it be possible for me to take a day off work when it happens, in order to travel to X to attend?”

Unless it would cause a serious problem, most managers are likely to want to try to work with you to make this happen.

5. Should I apply for a more junior position after applying for a stretch position?

I applied to a “stretch” position at a small company that I’m really interested in. I met the majority of the requirements they listed, but I knew I was likely competing with candidates who were more qualified. I haven’t heard back regarding this position, but I’m still interested in working for this company. Recently I saw a posting for a similar job that had lower requirements (1-2 years instead of 3-5 years of experience; I have 3). Should I reapply to the newer position? Or would the hiring manager already have contacted me about this position if they thought I were a good fit since they have my resume on file? Alternatively, would it be okay to just apply to the new job with an updated resume/application?

How long has it been since you applied to the first position? If it was very recent and you might still be under consideration, you risk undercutting that application with the second one to someone more junior. But if it’s been a while and/or you’re confident you’re no longer being considered, you don’t have anything to lose by applying for the second one. It’s possible that the hiring manager would have contacted you if she thought you were a good fit for it, but it’s just as possible that she’s not someone who looks back through recent applications to reach out to people. Either way, there’s no reason not to give it a shot. Make sure you write a new cover letter that explains why you’re so interested in them, and make sure it’s awesome (personalized, conversational, doesn’t summarize your resume) so that you increase your chances of being called this time.

my assistant let us believe she has a key certification that she doesn’t actually have

A reader writes:

Last year, I hired an employee at the insistence of my boss. It was basically, “Good news, I was able to get the approval for you to hire an assistant. You really need to hire this person. By the way, she starts Monday.” My new assistant is a personal friend and past coworker of my boss. She wouldn’t have been my first choice, but by the time I knew, it was pretty much a done deal. Part of the reason that, in my boss’ eyes, she was so qualified for the position is because she had a certification very specific to our line of work. To earn this certification shows that you have a very clear and deep understanding of the concepts related to this work and can fully apply them to the job.

Having earned this certification myself and knowing what’s involved with getting it, I started to become suspicious when some of the things she told me didn’t line up. For instance, she doesn’t remember when she got it, there are a few different designations of certification you can earn and she can’t remember which one she got, and she doesn’t have a grasp on some of the basic concepts that would be almost second nature to someone who studied for and passed the test.

Recently, the society that administers the certifications added an online verification system that allows someone to check a person’s membership and certification status, and no surprise to me, there were no records found under her name. I confronted her about it, and she neither confirmed or denied, but instead was indignant that I didn’t trust her word and checked “behind her back.” I turned it over to the HR manager, who also spoke with her about it. She revealed to HR that some time ago in a conversation with my boss, this cert came up and somehow my boss assumed that she had it, and she never bothered to correct her assumptions. She claims that she never put this on her resume or application, and so therefore she didn’t get the job under false pretenses. The HR manager says that while her trust and credibility is destroyed, that yes, because she never claimed she had it on her application, she doesn’t feel I can take any disciplinary action against her.

The manner in which she was hired made the resume and application a formality, but I still say that by letting my boss believe she had this certification, she basically lied about her qualifications. In many companies that would be grounds for dismissal, and I think my company should do the same. Who is right here?

Without knowing exactly what was said between her and your boss, it’s hard to say for sure — but it certainly sounds like she was deceptive. “Not bothering to correct” someone’s incorrect assumptions about your qualifications, when those qualifications are central to the reason you’re being hired, is a pretty big deal. And then getting upset when confronted about it (and not even coming clean with you then) makes it worse.

HR is being silly here. Telling you that you’re stuck with an employee who they agree you can no longer trust is the mark of an HR department that has its priorities in the wrong place and that doesn’t understand that they’re there to serve the company and its managers, not to throw up road blocks.

You might point out to them that her hiring was a mistake — she was hired specifically because she had the certification and now that she doesn’t, you need to address it. In other words, if the person in the role needs to have the certification and she doesn’t, it’s reasonable to conclude that she doesn’t meet the requirements of the job after all and that you need to replace her with someone who does.

And even more to the point, if she needs to have a clear and deep understanding of particular concepts necessary to the work and does not in fact have that understanding (regardless of the certification issue), it’s reasonable to conclude that she doesn’t meet the requirements of the job after all and that you need to replace her with someone who does.

And make sure your boss knows about the situation too — she should know what she got you into. And if nothing else, don’t let her hire assistants for you in the future.

Read an update to this letter here.

the 7 biggest mistakes managers make

Managers receive remarkably little training, given how important the role is to a team’s success and how many people managers impact daily. In fact, the vast majority of managers end up in their jobs because they were good at something else – communications or programming or operations or whatever they were doing before getting promoted into a management role. And once there, they’re often left to figure out for themselves what good management looks like, receiving little training or support from their companies.

So it’s not surprising that managers tend to make mistakes – and because of the nature of their roles, those mistakes tend to be high-impact. Here are seven of the most common mistakes I see managers making over and over again, and how they harm their teams.

Not giving feedback.

One of the most powerful tools managers have for getting results from their staff members is providing direct feedback about what people are doing well and what they should be doing differently. In fact, simply articulating the areas in which you’d like to see an employee improve or develop can go a surprisingly long way toward making that change happen.

But far too often, managers neglect to give regular feedback. Or they give it but flub the execution: They only give critical feedback without mentioning what people are doing well (or vice versa), or they sugarcoat what they say to the point that the message is missed, or they’re so vague that the employee isn’t left with anything useful that they can act upon.

As a result, employees don’t get alerted quickly when there are problems with their performance, don’t get the opportunity to develop professionally, bad habits become ingrained, and the team’s work suffers. Or, when it’s positive feedback that’s lacking, employees usually become demoralized and feel unappreciated – and the best will eventually leave for jobs where their contributions are valued.

Not setting clear expectations.

One of a manager’s most important responsibilities is to communicate clear, concrete goals so that everyone knows exactly what success will look like in their jobs. But too many managers neglect to communicate clear goals, instead forcing their staffs to guess (sometimes incorrectly) about the most important things for them to achieve, or allowing their teams to simply tread water or get pulled in too many directions.

A good test for managers is this: If you and your staff members were asked what the important things for them to achieve this year are, would your answers match? Often when I ask this question, it turns out that the answers don’t match up at all – which is a recipe for frustration on both sides.

Avoiding tough conversations.

Whether it’s rooted in fear of conflict, a desire to be liked, or simply not wanting to have awkward conversations, many managers avoid dealing with problems head-on. As a result, hard decisions don’t get made, staff members don’t hear about where they need to improve, and course corrections don’t get made when they should.

If you want to be a good manager, you’re going to have to have difficult and even awkward conversations; it comes with the territory. And ironically, while managers who shy away from these tough interactions often do it because they don’t want to rock the boat, over time the opposite will happen: As problems go unresolved and difficult decisions go unmade, staff members will grow frustrated and complain, and the best among them will leave if it goes on long enough.

When your job is to solve problems, you can’t value preserving harmony above all else.

Evaluating the wrong things.

Great managers keep the focus on results. They assess staff members’ performance based on what they’re actually achieving, rather than being overly influenced by whether someone schmoozes with big names over lunch or just keeps quietly to themselves.

Weaker managers often pay a lot of attention to the wrong things, like staff members’ social skills (even in jobs that don’t require outgoing personalities), or the face time they put in at the office, or what their academic pedigree is, rather than taking a clear-eyed look at what each person is achieving. As a result, they end up rewarding the wrong things, overlooking people who might be achieving at a high level, and driving away good employees who resent having their performance assessed by the wrong measures.

If you find yourself judging employees on how fun they are to talk to at your weekly check-ins or whether they embrace your weekly team-building exercises, that’s a flag that you’ve lost sight of what you’re there to achieve.

Not being clear when something is a directive, not a suggestion.

Managers who feel uncomfortable with their own authority often have a “tell”: They’ll present expectations as suggestions rather than directives. While a confident, direct manager might say, “Please show me a draft of the proposal before it’s finalized,” an insecure manager will often say something like, “Feel free to show me the proposal before you send it out” – leaving the employee with the mistaken impression that it’s optional and that the manager has no preference.

Unsurprisingly, this style tends to leave everyone frustrated. Employees end up confused about the manager’s expectations, and the manager ends up wondering why her “suggestions” aren’t acted upon. Worse still, this sometimes causes the manager to then swing too far in the other direction – becoming overly heavy-handed and starting to micromanage, rather than just being clear and direct from the start.

Not being willing to let low-performing employees go.

One of the biggest mistakes managers make is not addressing it when someone isn’t pulling their weight – and if you’ve ever worked somewhere where laziness or shoddy work was tolerated, you know how frustrating and demoralizing this can be. Good people want to work with other good people, and they want to know that their boss is discerning when it comes to results.

Firing people is one of the hardest things managers have to do, but it’s also one of the most important. If you’re serious about having a high-performing team, you’ll have to be willing to fire people. You can do everything else right—setting clear goals and expectations, delegating effectively, giving feedback, and so forth—but if you aren’t willing to let people go who aren’t performing in the way you need, you’ll never accomplish what you otherwise could.

Getting defensive.

If you’re ever worked with a manager who routinely got defensive when her decisions were questioned or when people shared dissenting viewpoints, you probably saw what happens next: Over time, people stop suggesting new and different ways of doing things or sharing alternative perspectives, which usually results in weaker decisions overall.

Ironically, while responding defensively when your decisions are questioned is generally an attempt to protect your authority, it will actually make you come across as less confident. After all, confident people are open to the possibility that they might be mistaken or that there might be a better way of doing something, because it doesn’t threaten them and they recognize thatsometimes other people’s ideas are better than their own. That’s a goodthing – that’s part of the value of having a team.

I originally published this at Daily Worth.

can my employer install spyware on my personal computer I use for work?

A reader writes:

The CEO of our company has recently expressed some concerns with worker productivity and time card fraud. To mitigate this, he’s found a spyware/time card program that uses mouse movements, keystrokes, and screenshots to measure productivity and monitor us. We just tested it out, and as you can imagine, the software appears limited in its ability to track actual productivity, and it’s incredibly discomfiting to feel like you’re constantly being watched.

I know that employers absolutely have the right to monitor company equipment, and they absolutely have the right to fire you for just about anything. But here’s the thing: everyone who works at our company is a remote independent contractor, and everyone uses his or her own equipment. As such, many of us use personal computers for this role, which also contain sensitive personal information. I can’t believe I’m asking this question on your blog, but…is this legal? If it is, do people actually use these programs? Are they effective?

I respect and understand that productivity is important, but I’m deeply concerned about installing software such as this. Perhaps you know of some alternatives that could allay my CEOs concerns?

Your CEO has a limited understanding of how to monitor productivity, and an even more limited understanding of appropriate boundaries.

You probably already know that in most cases it’s legal for your employer to monitor what you do on work-issued devices while you’re at work — even down to the level of logging every keystroke. But you might reasonably assume that when you’re on your own personal device, at home, your employer shouldn’t have the right to spy on your movements … but you’d be wrong.

To get you an answer, I turned to employment lawyer Donna Ballman, author of the awesome Stand Up For Yourself Without Getting Fired (which you should buy; it’s great). She delivered bad news: Employers are getting away with this, for the most part.

She pointed me to this detailed analysis of cases in this area, and this discussion too. She also has some good articles of her own on legal ways your employer might be spying on you, and how your employer might be permitted to track your location on your personal devices.

So there’s the law.

But as for what companies should be doing, and how your CEO should be approaching this? Nothing justifies this level of intrusion. If your CEO wants to pay more attention to people’s productivity, he could try looking at what work they’re producing and what results they’re getting — you know, the fundamental work of, uh, managing.

But there’s also this (as pointed out by commenters below): The law is very clear on who does and doesn’t qualify to be treated as an independent contractor. This kind of control over how you spend every minute of your time is utterly at odds with that. If there’s a law being broken here, it’s that one. So you might say to your boss, “Because we’re independent contractors, this kind of set-up is likely to jeopardize that status and could get the company in a lot of trouble for misclassifying us. If we’re to stay contractors, the company needs to be careful to follow the federal regulations that limit this type of direction and control.”

* I make a commission if you use that Amazon link.

I can’t get a job because of a mistake I made at 17, resigning when my boss will explode, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. I can’t get a job because of a mistake I made at 17

When I was 17, I made a mistake and got into a fight with my father. The end result, even though he never pressed charges, is a permanent violent felony conviction. I’m 19 now. (The idea was that they didn’t want to saddle my father with the cost of a lawyer, so they charged it as a felony, which bumped it up into adult criminal court, which meant I was eligible for a public defender. The state’s attorney herself said she thought it was a load of bull, but state law says she must prosecute it, under one of the domestic violence laws.)

I’ve actually been offered very good IT jobs, but all of those offers are always rescinded after the employer runs a background check. When they see the word felony, suddenly my skills and qualifications and experience go right out the window, and I go from “When can you start?” to “Please leave.” The problem is, even after telling someone the whole story, they usually understand, but I run into the big P word – Policy. Or, I’m told, “I don’t handle that decision, but I’ll talk to the guy that does, and we’ll call you right back”, and I never hear back from them again.

Am I forever barred from a corporate IT job? Am I destined to ask “do you want fries with that” for the rest of my life? What can I do to assuage the fears of hiring managers that are running away from an imaginary boogeyman?

It can’t be sealed or expunged, after any amount of time, for any amount of money. That’s not an option. The plan right now is to petition the governor for a pardon, but my biggest fear is that, even if granted, it might still show up in the NCIC (FBI’s big computer) and still show up in a background check, and then I’ll get the cold shoulder for not disclosing it. It’s just a little depressing for all of my talents to become a moot point because of something stupid I did when I was a kid.

If you haven’t talked to a (good) lawyer about sealing or expunging it, that’s the next move here. A good lawyer might be able to do something others said wasn’t possible. And while you’re waiting to see how that plays out, I’d recommend (a) applying to smaller employers, because they’re much less likely to do background checks and so it might never come up at all, and (b) networking your ass off, because once people know you and your situation, they’re going to be much more likely to bend the rules for you than relative strangers will.

You might also see if that state’s attorney who told you it was a load of bull would be willing to write a letter for you to that effect, which you could then show to employers.

Good luck with this. Please keep us posted.

2. What’s the best way to resign when your boss will explode?

I work for a very small nonprofit and love my work, my colleagues, and the external partners I get to work with. My supervisor, who is the ED, is the reason I am leaving and the reason for the high turnover.

I have been offered a government contract position, but am unable to start until the background check is complete. I have been warned by all my colleagues of the ED’s behavior when someone resigns. She has fired employees immediately, or if she has allowed them to stay, has created horrible working conditions, become (more) verbally abusive, and in one instance, physically assaulted someone. A former colleague said after she turned in her notice, the ED trapped her in a room, pushed her up against a wall, and screamed at her because she was paranoid that external partners don’t like her and she wanted their names. She was right – her reputation is well known; I am asked constantly by external partners about the work conditions and her behavior. She demonstrates irrational, volatile, and unethical behavior; she is a bully and an abuser. While the entire staff support one another, no one has any trust or confidence in her, everyone is job searching, and all of us experience intense anxiety and stress – one colleague even miscarried because of the stress put on her at work. My health has seriously declined while working here and I have taken more sick leave than I probably have in my entire career.

As I quietly look forward to the day I am able to leave, I wonder what is the best strategy to depart? I want to be professional and support my colleagues, but I have been put through so much abuse that I want to quickly and quietly depart by turning in an immediate resignation, simply because do not think I have the emotional stamina to endure a final three-weeks under even worse conditions.

Give two weeks notice because that’s the professional thing to do and you don’t want to cede the high ground. However, be prepared to leave immediately if she tells you to or if she’s abusive to you. If she’s abusive, you should simply say, “I’d like to work the remaining two weeks and I don’t want to leave the organization in the lurch. However, I need to be treated professionally during that time. I’m not willing to continue to be berated. If we can’t work together without the hostility, it would be better for everyone if I left now.” And then follow through on that if the poor treatment continues. (Make sure that you’re prepared for this possibility, which means having all your things all packed up, personal stuff removed from your computer, etc.) There’s more advice on doing this here.

Read an update to this letter here.

3. Replacing someone who was killed at work

I’m starting a position soon that replaces one of the people who was killed in a recent workplace shooting. Is there anything I should say or do differently when I start? While I obviously won’t be asking questions like, “so what happened to the person who used to work here?” I’m sure that opportunities will arise where I might ask “How did Wakeen do this?” or “Do you know where he would have put this file?” I could possibly also see some resentment or possibly bringing up some bad memories now that there’s someone there to replace them. For what it’s worth, there is an EAP program, and I know they had counseling available after the incident, and I plan to ask my HR person (as opposed to my direct colleagues/supervisors) if there are resources available should I feel it’s needed.

That’s going to be tough for all of you. One of the best things you can do might be to go in knowing that — don’t define success as “no difficult moments around this,” because there surely will be some. And I think it’s okay to ask how the person before did things when you really need to; there might not be a way around that, and I don’t think most people will want you to pretend the person before you never existed (in fact, doing that would be likely to upset people too). But people are unlikely to resent you; they’ll get that you’re in a difficult spot.

And once you get to know people a bit, you might feel comfortable saying something to people directly something like, “This is a tough role to come into, obviously. If there’s anything I’m inadvertently doing that’s making things harder on you, please let me know.”

4. When I traveled for an interview, the employer’s credit card was declined at the hotel

I recently traveled for a job interview in which the potential employer paid for the flight and was supposed to pay for the hotel. It’s a small company so a VP made both arrangements, and provided his credit card number for the room at a first rate hotel. Upon checking in, the hotel said the person’s credit card company was denied. I paid for the room, and collected the room receipt indicating the last 4 numbers of my card. I did not raise this before or after the interview, and left to catch my flight. I know this company is good for the expenses, and I expect there was simply an entry error. I would appreciate recommendations on how to proceed.

Email your contact there with a copy of the receipt and say, “Unfortunately the company card that Bob put my hotel room on didn’t go through, so I put it on my own card when I checked out. I’m attaching the receipt here. Could you help me arrange reimbursement?”

5. Should I visit the job fair booth of a company I just applied for a job with?

I found a government job and the deadline for the online application is August 8. On September 16-17, they have a booth at a job convention. I plan to attend to see them in person since it is so hard to actually meet a recruiter from that department. I’ll be equipped with my resume that I sent online. At the convention, should I mention to the representatives that I’ve already applied online, or should I act like a curious passer-by? What are the chances of them actually taking interest in me as an applicant or as a passer-by?

You definitely shouldn’t act like a curious passer-by who has just stumbled upon them, because you’re not! Walk up, introduce yourself, and explain that you recently applied for the X position, and that you’d love to talk more with them about it if they have time. They might not be equipped to talk with you about that particular job on the spot, but if nothing else, you can expect them to be willing to talk with you about the company in general, its hiring process, and roughly when you might expect to hear something back.

my manager doesn’t want me to meet with clients unless I lose weight

A reader writes:

I’m a 30-year-old woman, and I’m a size 10/12. I’m not obese by anyone’s standards – except for those of a New York modeling agency. (But I don’t work for a New York modeling agency; I’m a management consultant in Pennsylvania.) I had a mid-year review today in which one of the chiefs at my company told me that she would really like to send me out to do 1×1 consulting with our clients (the primary purpose why I was hired) but that she has less confidence in my ability to make a difference with our clients because of my weight. She asked me if I would be willing to be “thin and edgy” and told me it’s a representation of our brand.

The senior leadership at my company have an extreme focus on health, well-being, and weight. In fact, my CEO was walking by me last year and told me, “You need to lose weight.” I know they’ve said the same to people who are both bigger and smaller than I am.

Do I have any rights here? I’m incredibly upset and heartbroken – as I love my job. But I don’t know if I can handle having to have conversations about my weight with my bosses. It just doesn’t seem right to me.

How incredibly obnoxious.

Legally, this is probably fine. Appearance and weight aren’t protected classes under federal law, and only a few jurisdictions in the U.S. have protected appearance at the state or city level. Pennsylvania has not. In some circumstances, obesity can be protected under the Americans with Disabilities Act, but you’re not obese — far from it, it sounds like.

I think if this were me, I’d go back to your manager and seek clarification. I’d say something like this: “Can I ask you more about what you said the other day about needing to be ‘thin and edgy’ in order to meet with clients? I’m a pretty average size, and I’d like to understand more about what your concern is.” And then depending on her answer, I’d probably say, “This isn’t a field in which I expected to be told to be model thin, or where clients seem to care as long we’re polished and professional looking. Can you help me understand how big of a deal you see this as, and what the likely ramifications are? I’m unlikely to alter my body as long as I’m at a healthy weight, and I’d really rather my weight not be up for discussion at work — but I want to understand your thoughts here.”

What you want to get a better sense of is whether (a) this woman is an ass but this isn’t likely to have a major impact on your success there or (b) she’s an ass and it’s likely to impact you in ways that will hold you back if you stay there.

Read an update to this letter here.

how to have more influence at work

When you want to raise your influence at work — with your manager, with leaders of other teams, and with your coworkers — what are the most important things for you to do?

You can read my thoughts on this over at Intuit Quickbase’s Fast Track blog today. Plus, three other careers experts are answering this question there too. Head on over there for answers…

how long of a work gap is bad for your resume, my boss makes me do his grocery shopping, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. How long of a gap on your resume is too long?

Your blog entries helped me get through a job search, and I just accepted a new position. I’m excited about the new job, but burnt out from the old one. Fortunately, my new boss is flexible with start date, and I am hoping to take some time to recover and travel before I start my new position. Will an employment gap of one month (e.g. leave old job in August, start new one in October) be a red flag on a resume in the future? On LinkedIn? How long of a gap is acceptable before it becomes a red flag?

One month won’t even be noticed. In general, gaps don’t stand out until they’re five or six months or longer, and they don’t become potential red flags until they’re longer than that. The concern on a hiring manager’s side isn’t “oh no, this person took a couple of months to travel / relax / care for family!” They don’t care about that. The concern is, “Does this person have a work gap because they were fired and unable to get re-employed in their field / went to prison / had some sort of spectacular flame-out / ended up being such a weak employee that they couldn’t get hired / lost motivation to work entirely and are only now returning out of desperation / worked as a pimp for that time / otherwise did something concerning?”

A couple of months? Totally fine and unlikely to raise any questions.

2. My job has evolved into doing grocery shopping and child care for my boss

I’ve been with my boss for a couple of years now and was hired under the title of receptionist (then later assistant) and knew that any errands I had to run were solely work-based. However, lately it has become more of me doing personal errands like going to grocery shopping (for the house), picking up their child to and from (many) places, taking the car to get washed, handling their personal home projects that has nothing to do with me or what we do, and even sometimes babysitting during my work hours. Any work that I have to do gets either postponed or I have to do it in half the amount of time.

It has been going on for quite a while now and I’m afraid I am becoming more of a nanny who happens to help at the office. Is this typical for those who are assistants? Or is my boss taking it too far? If so, how do I stop it? The company is just the two of us, which makes it very hard for me to say no or show that I am unhappy with work.

It’s not uncommon in very small businesses like this for the owner to blend business and personal work, and you’re getting dragged into that. A little of this might be the price of working for this particular two-person business, but it sounds like this has gone well beyond the occasional, emergency favor and has become a routine part of the job.

I’d try talking to your boss about the fact that you’d like to stay focused on business tasks only, saying something like, “I’ve been asked to help out with child care and household errands quite a bit lately. While I didn’t mind helping in an emergency, it’s become a regular part of the job. I’d really like to stay focused on assisting the business rather than becoming more of a household employee. Is there a way for us to keep those separate?”

In addition, I’m pretty sure that there’s a legal issue with them doing this — the IRS doesn’t generally allow household employees to be paid through a company payroll (because while businesses are allowed to write off some or all of the cost of employee salaries, individual household employers aren’t), and you might point that out. You could say something like, “In addition to wanting to focus my career on work like XYZ, I think we might be running afoul of tax laws too: The IRS says that businesses can’t take tax deductions for the wages of people doing household work.”

3. Telling a friend I’d get a referral bonus if she’s hired

Is there an etiquette to telling a friend about a referral bonus you could get if they’re hired? I told a very good friend to look at our website, she applied, I referred her, and now she’s got her second interview scheduled. I assume she’d find out about the bonus anyway if she is hired. When/how should I discuss it with her? Should I be expected to share it with her?

No, you’re not expected to share it. Companies use referral bonuses to encourage employees to refer good candidates. If she’s hired, you’re entitled to the full amount. It’s highly unlikely that she’d expect you to share it; you did her a favor by connecting her with the job, and if it’s a rational person, she’s going to be glad that you got a reward out of it. I don’t think you even need to make a point of mentioning it, but if you’d feel better about saying something, just work it in when there’s a natural opening.

4. How to reject internal candidates

I’m an HR manager working in an NGO. A few weeks ago I posted an internal posting for job vacancies we have within our organization. I’ve decided to reject some of the internal applicants because they just don’t fit what we’re looking for. How do I communicate the rejection to them positively? I don’t want to lose any of them.

You’re right that you need to deliver rejections differently when you’re dealing with internal applicants. I’d recommend at least offering to talk with them in person, and being as specific as you can about why they’re not going to advance in the hiring process — and also talking to them about what they might work on developing in order to be competitive for a promotion in the future. You want the basic message to be “we think you’re great because of X / this isn’t the role right now because of Y / I think you can work on Z and better position yourself for consideration down the road.” (Don’t blow smoke up their asses though — if they’re unlikely to ever be serious candidates for promotion, it’s not kind to mislead them.)

5. What’s the difference between HR and Employee Relations?

What is the general/basic difference between HR and Employee Relations? I realize that Employee Relations is usually an extension or leg of HR, but what is the basic difference in most companies?

Employee relations is a subset of HR. HR is a pretty general term that covers compensation, benefits, some hiring assistance, personnel policies, compliance, administration, and sometimes things like employee relations, training, and performance management systems (like evaluations and progressive discipline policies). So technically, employee relations is a piece of that — the piece involved with managing the employer-employee relationship, such as aiding communications between managers and employees, working with managers on disciplinary actions, and helping communicate employer policies. However, HR departments are known by a variety of names, and some organizations call the whole enchilada “employee relations.”