when your team constantly back-burners your priorities

When you work on a team that has to collaborate on competing priorities and yours always seem to be the last to get added the to-do list, how do you influence your team to give your work priority? Do you just say, “Hey, it’s been two months and I still haven’t gotten any support from team member X to finish the Acme project. Are you going to have some time next week?” And if you do, what if they say, “Sorry, I’m still working on the Jones project, maybe next month”?

You can find my answer to this question — and answers from three other career experts as well — over at Intuit QuickBase’s Fast Track blog.

should I give my colleague feedback on her employee, written reference questionnaires, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Should I give my colleague feedback on her employee’s manner?

My role is quite specialized, and my education and work experience make me uniquely qualified within our organization for the work that I do. We are a very egalitarian organization, and I do my best to make myself available for special requests from anyone. Last week, I received a request from a coworker to join her and her subordinate on a conference call to address questions the subordinate has about a new system that we’ve put in place. The coworker’s subordinate is a bright young woman who’s one year out of college; by all accounts, she’s doing a great job, and her curiosity does her credit. Her boss – my colleague – helpfully forwarded a list of questions that they would like me to address, some of which are rather presumptuous demands for justifications about the new system that’s been implemented (e.g. if there are cheaper and/or “better” alternatives, when neither the young woman nor her boss make purchasing or financial decisions for our organization – this is just to satisfy their curiosity).

I want both the coworker and her employee to continue to feel comfortable reaching out to ask questions, but in this case I feel that my coworker should have vetted the questions before forwarding them to me and given her employee guidance about what questions are appropriate (and/or how to couch them). My plan is to address their questions during the call, and then follow up later with my colleague. I don’t feel it’s my place to instruct my colleague’s employee about what is and is not appropriate. Do you think I should take this up with my colleague, or should I let it pass without feedback, and hope that the young woman in question doesn’t go on to rub someone else the wrong way?

I wouldn’t make a big deal out of it unless it starts to become a pattern. That said, there’s nothing wrong with saying something on the call like, “I wasn’t sure about the context for some of Jane’s questions, like the ones about costs of alternatives. Can you tell me more about why you’re exploring that, so I can make sure I’m giving you the most helpful information?” And then, if it does turn out it’s just curiosity, you could certainly point out that balancing the pros and cons of different systems is a more complicated process than you could do justice to in your current conversation (and perhaps also that your X Department did carefully vet that question and considered factors like __ and __, not just cost, before this system was decided on). That said, it’s hard to do this without coming across as defensive or overly turf-protective, and in general you want to err on the side of being more open, not less open.

But ultimately I’d leave the larger issue — the “stop being presumptuous or you will annoy people” issue — to her manager, until/unless you start seeing multiple recurrences.

2. Being asked to fill out a reference questionnaire instead of giving a reference over the phone

An intern who worked for us last year recently asked me to be a reference for her. She just did okay at our company….I think that ultimately the internship wasn’t a good fit for her, but since she had some good skills and qualities and I could see her doing well somewhere else, I agreed to be a reference for her.

She recently interviewed at a company that she really wants to get into, and I think she would do well in the position. Her potential future supervisor sent me an email asking me to fill out a reference questionnaire. I’ve never had to do this before and was expecting to have a phone call. This might not bother me this much usually, but I just got back from my industry’s biggest trade show of the year and will be buried for the next two weeks, and then will be out of town again after that. I’d like to ask to do a phone call instead, especially as some of the questions I think would be better handled over the phone (like the ones about would you hire the candidate again; do you think I should hire the candidate, etc). I don’t want to hurt her chances of getting hired, though. Is this a normal hiring practice?

It’s not uncommon, but you’re right that it often takes up references’ time unnecessarily and puts them in an awkward position when they don’t want certain feedback in writing. Moreover, it’s a huge missed opportunity for the employer doing the reference-checking, because you get a ton of information from people’s tone over the phone — how enthusiastic they are, where they hesitate, etc.

You can certainly reply that you’d prefer to talk over the phone, but you do run the risk of harming her chances if they won’t entertain that option, unfortunately. You could minimize that chance, though, if you framed it as something like, “I’m excited to be a reference for Jane, but my workload right now means that a phone call will be much easier for me. If you call me at ___, I’d be glad to tell you about Jane’s strengths.” That way, you’re still saying something positive even if they don’t ultimately call you. (Note: If this intern actually did great work for you, I’d push you to just fill out the questionnaire — both because I believe that doing that kind of thing is part of the deal when someone gives you great work, and there would be fewer issues around not wanting to put sensitive feedback in writing.)

3. My coworker is pushing me to be friends with her friend, and I’m not interested

I’m the sort of person who likes to keep my work life and my personal life separate, for various reasons. However, someone I work with who is sort of in a position above me (I work as the front desk receptionist for a small medical practice and they are one of the practitioners, so not directly above) today met their friend for lunch. After lunch, they both came in and the practitioner introduced us, saying that they were really excited for us to meet and was confident we would be good friends.

The practitioner then proceeded to exchange our numbers for us (giving their friend mine and vice versa) without really asking permission. The practitioner’s friend grew up in the town I just recently moved to and I think this is why they are trying to force this friendship on us – they think I need friends in the area. However, I am not comfortable with this association. The friend is considerably older than me, and due to their association with my coworker I wouldn’t feel I could truly relax in any situation. How should I navigate this? I will ultimately want to turn down this friend’s offers to hang out. Is there a tactful way to do so?

For now, I think you can do nothing; the friend may not even reach out to you (and may be similarly rolling her eyes about your coworker’s match-making). But if she does contact you, you can always plead scheduling issues — as in, “It was great to meet you. My schedule is really busy these days so it’s hard for me to get together, but it’s great to know about another person from FormerCity in the area!”

4. Interacting with a company on social media when you’re applying for a job with them

I have been interviewing with a company for over five months now and I have still not received a firm “yes” or “no” from the hiring manager. The time that the interview process has taken doesn’t shock me because the company is not necessarily hiring for the position that they’re looking at me for. The problem I am asking about is social media etiquette between myself and this company.

I am an avid social media user and so is the company and my interviewers. I am consistently getting followed by members of the company on various social media channels and I haven’t met a majority of these people during the interview process. Do you have any idea what this might mean? How much should I interact on social media with the folks who are looking to hire me? (I’m currently employed elsewhere.)

I wouldn’t read much into them following you, and I don’t think you need to interact with them on social media at all. If there’s a natural opening to do so and you want to, then sure — but I wouldn’t go looking for opportunities to do that as a particular strategy.

5. Listing amounts of time at each job on your resume

Someone recommended including timetables in parenthesis for each job on my resume like LinkedIn does, to help hiring folks quickly see how long you’ve been at each job. For example:

Chief of Staff
December 2013 to Present (7 months)

Communications Director
January 2012 to December 2013 (2 years)

Good or bad idea?

Nothing wrong with doing that, but it’s not really necessary — employers are used to quickly making those calculations themselves on the 99% of resumes that don’t do this — and it will clutter your resume a little. I wouldn’t do it on mine or recommend a friend do it, but if you’re dying to do it, it’s not like you’re going to get rejected for it.

who was your best boss?

We hear about bad managers all the time here — the mean, the crazy, the incompetent, and the rude. But I’m curious to know about the good managers you’ve had. Specifically: What made them so good? What was the impact on your work?

(And this isn’t just someone you liked personally; in fact, it’s even more interesting if you didn’t really like them. Let’s define “good boss” as someone who was good at the job of managing.)

how to evaluate a job offer

So you have a job offer – congratulations! You’re probably pretty excited, but don’t let your excitement get in the way of evaluating the offer objectively and making sure that you fully understand the terms being offered to you before you accept it.

1. Salary. It sounds obvious, but don’t let your excitement to have a job offer get in the way of rigorously thinking about the salary you’re being offered. You’re going to have to be happy with it for at least a year (since it’s very rare to get a raise before 12 months), and possibly longer. Ideally, you should have a salary range in mind before you get to this stage. If the offer is below this range, now is the time to negotiate a higher salary. Make sure you base any negotiation on your research about market rates for this type of job, for someone with your skill set and background in your geographic area, and not on an arbitrary number that you’d just “like to get.”

2. Benefits. Beyond salary, it’s also important to evaluate benefits. A great benefits package can make up for a lower salary, especially if you’re saving money on health care, allowed to work a flexible schedule, or getting more vacation time than you’d anticipated. And don’t underestimate how much a bad benefits package can end up costing you — if you’re paying thousands out-of-pocket for health care each year, that’s a big bite out of your salary that you need to factor in. When you’re evaluating benefits, make sure to look at:

  • Health insurance: What will your monthly premium be? Is there co-insurance (where, for example, you pay a certain percentage of all costs)? Is there an annual deductible that you must pay, and if so, how large is it? What are the co-pays for routine care visits, specialists, out-of-network doctors, and prescriptions? Are dental and vision insurance included?
  • Retirement plan: Does the employer offer a retirement plan? If so, does it match your contributions or otherwise fund it? Up to what amount?
  • Time off: How much paid vacation and sick leave does the employer offer?

Also, ask when benefits kick in. Some employers don’t start your health care coverage until you’ve been there six months, or make you wait a year before you start getting matching funds in your 401K. That’s not the kind of thing you want to find out after you’ve already started.

3. Hidden costs. Will you have a much longer commute? Need to buy a fancier wardrobe? Be expected to schmooze in your community on your own dime? Even if the job is a salary increase for you, it might be eaten up if you suddenly have big expenses in these areas that you didn’t have before.

4. The day-to-day work. Are you absolutely clear on what the job is that you’re being hired to do? It sounds obvious, but too often people accept jobs without truly knowing exactly how they’ll be spending their time, what their most important responsibilities will be, and how their success will be judged. As a result, you can end up finding yourself in a role that doesn’t match up with the hopes you’d had. While you’re thinking through the role, ask yourself: Will I be able to excel at this work? Am I excited to do it? Is it moving me forward on a path I want to be on? Depending on your circumstances, you might not always have the luxury of choosing jobs based on the answers to those questions, but at a minimum you want to be clear-eyed about what you’re signing up for.

5. Other items that are important to you. Do you need to ensure you can leave by 6 p.m. to pick up your child from daycare? Care passionately about having your own office? Need relocation assistance in order to move for the job? Do you know what working hours are common in the office?

Ideally, by the time you receive a job offer, you should have already explored other key factors that will affect your decision, like the company culture or the manager’s style. But if you still have outstanding questions on those fronts or any others, now is the time to ask! You’re considering signing on to spend a large portion of your waking hours at this job for probably at least the next several years, and it’s a decision that can have long-ranging impacts on your career even after you leave, so it’s important to get all your big questions answered.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

my employer heard I was interviewing and confronted me

A reader writes:

I was approached by HR and my new supervisor last week during my lunch hour. She acknowledged that I have been doing excellent work for the last year and a half. HR explained to me that she received word that I went on an interview with another company and for that reason they have decided to post my position to eventually hire someone else. I was floored that they found out, but I did not deny the fact that I did indeed interview with another company. During the application process with this company, I did in fact request that my current employer NOT be contacted, but now that is all hindsight. What is even more troubling is that the company had no plans to hire me anyway, nor did I really consider leaving just yet.

HR also added other irksome statements to me saying that I “broke their trust,” “I failed to let them know I was unhappy,” “you’re calling off sick to interview,” and “I am requesting a two-week notice.” I defended my position by stating that I was actually quite happy with my role and that I haven’t made plans to go anywhere. I also defended my time off by stating that what I do on my days off is my business. When I call off sick – which is rare, it is because I am actually sick. The truth is that I used a vacation day to interview and it was approved in advance.

This conversation really got out of hand as they were both grilling me on specifics like “so what made you go to an interview?,” “did you use time off to go?,” and “how did the interview go?” Again, I reiterated my point: I do not have plans on leaving anywhere or anytime soon. I understand your concern but I will not be questioned on the specifics of my time off from here. If you post my position, I will consider this a direct threat and will make plans to leave.” I also asked was this the only single reason why they are considering posting my position – no answer. With that being said, they stated that they will let me know their final decision next week. I am pissed.

I understand that I work for an at-will employer, but this situation is clearly large assumption by them and they are reacting rather preemptively. I requested to speak to the CEO (who gave the directive). He told me that he will talk with me later. What’s your take on this? How would you handle this and come out a winner?

Ouch. This might not be salvageable, actually — that conversation sounds way too adversarial.

This is an area where your interests as an employee and their interests as your employer are in direct conflict. It’s (often) in your best interests to be able to look for another job without your employer knowing about it, but it’s in their best interests not to be blindsided when you leave and to be able to hire a replacement before you do.

Smart employers handle this by making it safe for employees to give generous notice periods. They create an environment where employees can speak up when they’re starting to think about moving on, because they know that they won’t be badgered or pushed out early — and as a result, those employers often get months of notice, which allows them to structure the hiring of the replacement so that the new person starts with a week or two of overlap with the exiting person, which both helps with training and eliminates the vacancy period they’d otherwise have. But more typically, employers don’t do that and so instead end up with just the standard few weeks of notice, which leaves them scrambling to cover the vacancy and rushing to hire. And that creates a situation where their interests and yours are at odds: You want to keep your job search secret, because you’ll be penalized for it, and they want to know about it in order to keep their business running as smoothy as possible.

Anyway, back to you. Your company didn’t handle this well — but, well, neither did you.

Let’s tackle them first: Accusing you of breaking their trust is over the top, and the whole interrogation was silly. They could have sat you down and said, “here’s what we heard, and we want to talk to you about what’s going on. Is there anything that’s driving you to search that we can address? And if not but you are thinking about leaving, we need to start planning for that.” Or they could have not mentioned what they heard at all, but still looked at ways to retain you (if you’re someone they care about retaining, which you may or may not be) and/or started planning for the possibility of you leaving sometime soon. (The last part isn’t necessarily great for you, but it’s certainly their prerogative to do and sometimes necessary.)

But you missed an opportunity to smooth things over. Saying things like “what I do on my days off is my business” and “if you post my position, I will consider this a direct threat” didn’t help the situation. That’s an adversarial posture, and while you may have been perfectly right on principle, you lost on politics. A response more likely to get an outcome in your favor would have been something like: “You know, I did interview. It fell in my lap and I figured there was nothing wrong with hearing them out. But I’m very happy working here, which I told them, and I’m not planning to leave.” (And I’d couple this with an understanding of why they might be concerned that you’re job searching after only a year and a half in the position.)

Once you’re at the point that you’re saying things to your manager like “if you do X, I will consider a direct threat,” the war has pretty much been lost.

Again, they were out of line. Not in bringing it up with you at all, and not in wanting to begin searching for your replacement if you’re about to leave, but in the way they talked to you about it. But your stance escalated things rather than defusing the situation.

As for what to do now, well, you can’t go back in time. You could initiate another conversation where you try to backtrack a bit — perhaps saying something like, “I was taken aback the other day and reacted more strongly than I should have. The reality is that I’m not actively searching and I’m very happy here and have no plans to leave.” However, I’d only say that if it’s basically true. If you say this and then leave in the next few months, it won’t reflect well on you (and will harm the relationship, possibly even burning the bridge somewhat — or at least charring it).

However this goes, though, I’m not sure your tenure there looks great. It’s going to depend a lot on the feel of your next conversations, so if you do want to stay there, I think your best bet is to be fairly conciliatory (whether or not you feel you should have to).

Some related posts:
what to do when you overhear an employee job-searching
can a prospective employer tip off my boss that I’m job-searching?
how much notice should you give when you resign?

how to reject an internal candidate, I can’t afford interview travel, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. How to reject an internal candidate

I am a new manager at a small nonprofit (less than 10 employees). We have an opening and two internal candidates applied. I don’t know them well since I’ve only been with the organization for about two months. Based on my observations and interviews are comparable in skills and experience. They both are unfulfilled in their current positions and there isn’t any way for me to change their roles if they don’t get the promotion (they currently fill essential administrative positions). I know that at least one of them will quit if she isn’t selected. Do you have any tips on what to say to the one who doesn’t get the job?

“I think you’re great — particularly your strengths in X and Y. This was a very tough decision, but we’ve decided to offer the role to Jane, who has accepted it.” (If there’s an easily articulable skill or trait that Jane brings to the job, you can mention that here — for instance, “Ultimately Jane’s track record of successful grant writing was a deciding factor.”) “You’ve done an amazing job on __ and __ , but we only had one slot open. I want to be clear, though, how much we value your work, and we’d be glad to talk about future openings with you as they come up.”

(You should only be that positive if that stuff is really true, of course. You shouldn’t be disingenuous.)

Of course, make sure that one of them actually is highly qualified for the job. If they’re not, the organization will be better served by interviewing external candidates; you don’t want to promote someone just because they’re already working there and interested, particularly in a small organization where each role is crucial. That’s true even if you risk losing someone for not promoting them — you need top performers in each job, and you can’t hand out promotions to keep someone who won’t be great at what you’re promoting them to. (You can, however, look for ways to help them grow professionally in other ways — or should be honest with them if there isn’ room for that.)

2. I can’t afford to travel for interviews

I’ve been searching for jobs in my current location but haven’t had a lot of luck, so I’ve recently started looking in my hometown as well. Relocating (or, well, returning) to my hometown would be no problem. I’m familiar with the area, I know of some good apartment complexes, and if I can’t find a place right away, I can stay with family temporarily until I get that sorted out. That being said, I don’t have set plans to relocate; I only intend to return to my hometown if I find a job there.

The problem is, I don’t know what to do if I get asked to interview in-person and the company won’t pay for it. I know that you’ve advised people to be willing to pay their own way for this, which I completely understand. It’s not that I am unwilling, but I simply cannot afford the $400+ airfare (possibly more than once if I had multiple interviews) right now. Am I doomed to being thrown out of the running if I’m only available for phone/Skype interviews? What should I say (or not say) in a cover letter or long-distance interview about this?

This is tricky. You can certainly ask to interview by phone or Skype; some companies will be okay with it and others won’t. Some companies will be okay with it at an early stage but will want you to fly out before they make a final decision. Of the companies that do allow you to do it all by phone or Skype, you risk being at a disadvantage to other candidates. The bar is going to be a little higher for you, someone they can’t meet in person, and lots of people don’t build the same rapport over Skype that they so in person. Then throw in the fact that long-distance job searching is already much harder than local job-searching (which isn’t exactly easy these days either), and it’s not a great scenario. Honestly, if it’s at all an option to move now and then start looking, your search might be easier.

Of course, there are also plenty of companies that do pay to fly candidates in — it depends on what field you’re in and how in-demand your skills are. It could end up being a non-issue for you.

In any case, I wouldn’t get into any of this in your cover letter; that’s the place to convince them to interview you, not to throw up obstacles. Wait until you’re invited to interview and then see if there’s anything they can do.

3. My supplier ends his emails with “blessings”

I have a supplier who insists on ending his email signature with the word “Blessings” after every email. He said he is religious and this is a free country, etc. I find that very offensive and very non-business-like. I would like your opinion.

I don’t quite understand why you find the word “blessings” offensive (and I say this as someone utterly unreligious). It’s not like he’s trying to convert you to his religion or telling you you’re going to go to hell. It’s pretty damn mild, as subtly tinged religious stuff goes. I’d recommend he not use it in something like a job-search email, but this is his business. If he wants to reference blessings, he’s welcome to; he doesn’t work for your company, and he can sign his emails however he wants. You, in turn, can choose not to do business with him if you don’t like it — but that would be a pretty bizarre reaction to something this innocuous.

4. Shouldn’t managers’ resumes specify what size teams they manage? (Why, yes, they should.)

Recently I interviewed candidates for a manager level position of a technical team. This position currently has 3 full-time reports and 3 interns. The job listing specifically states this position supervises others and is at the manager level. Many of the candidates mentioned “leading teams” on their resume, but none wrote down number of reports, size of team, etc. Am I incorrect in thinking that this should be something to include on the resume?

Yes, ideally they’d include it, because there’s a big difference between managing two people and managing 18, as well as between managing individual contributors and managing other managers. The thing is, though, there aren’t really standards that dictate things like that’s it’s up to people’s own judgment, and as a result some do and some don’t. It’s generally in people’s best interests to be specific though — at some point interviewers are likely to ask, and if they’re looking for someone with experience managing large teams and you’ve only managed small ones or contractors or something like that, it’s a waste of your time not to surface that before you interview.

5. When should I say I’m graduating?

I will finish my university program in August 2014, but graduation is not until November 2014. Should I list the degree on my resume as “Expected August 2014” or “Expected November 2014”? I will be finished all of my program requirements by August and would like to start working immediately, but I will not officially have the degree until November.

What would your school say if someone called the registrar in, say, September to confirm that you’d graduated? You want to make sure that you’re not saying you’ve graduated and the school is saying that you haven’t. But absent some issue there, I think it’s reasonable to say “Expected August 2014.” If you’re not sure, though, you could write “Last class August 2014, diploma expected November 2014.” The point is that you want employers to know that you’re in school through August and free after that, without misrepresenting anything.

Sunday free-for-all

samIt’s our first Sunday free-for-all.

Since we limited Friday’s open thread to work-related discussions, this comment section is open for any non-work-related discussion you’d like to have with other readers, by popular demand. Have at it.

coworker never tells us when she’s working from home, employee refuses to track mileage, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My boss’s boss’s debt collectors keep calling me

For the last three weeks, debt collectors have been calling my work phone three times per day looking for my boss’s boss. I have no idea how they got my number; I’m not a receptionist, and my number is not listed online. I’d love to not answer the phone, but these jurassic era telephone relics have no caller ID, and I’d hate to miss a call actually related to my job. I keep telling the debt collectors that I won’t give out contact information to a third party, but they have started to get very rude and have insinuated that I am lying, and that I am actually who they are looking for.

Since it’s my boss’s boss, it’d be pretty uncomfortable for me to bring up the subject with my boss (not really any of his business anyways), or his boss. I may already know the answer to this one, but just to confirm…this is one of those situations where I just have to suck it up and deal with the distractions, right?

Nope! There are two things you can do: First, I’d talk to either your boss or your boss’s boss and explain what’s going on. (If you have a great relationship, go straight to your boss’s boss and say, “Hey, I wanted to let you know that this is happening, and I’ll handle it however you’d like me to.” If you don’t have a great relationship or otherwise feel too awkward about it, talk to your direct manager instead.) This is not a “suffer in silence” thing; it’s okay to discreetly let them know about it in a “this is happening and I want to make sure I’m handling it the way you’d like” kind of way.

Second, you can actually tell the debt collectors to stop calling your number. It’s illegal for them to continue calling a workplace after they’ve been told to stop.

2. Coworker never tells us when she’s working from home

I have a coworker who seems to take advantage of the ability to occasionally work from home. For the month of May, I don’t think she has worked a full week in the office. She “worked from home” for 3 days with a sore throat when she admittedly felt fine, worked from home for a school spirit day for her children, the last day of school, and more. Despite that I feel like she’s taking advantage of this, I realize there is nothing I can do. My point is, it’s not in a once in a blue moon type of thing for her.

That being said, what I find frustrating is that we never know when she is not showing up to work. Of course her boss knows, but no one else seems to know where she is. She accepts meeting invites and conference calls for days when she is out of the office, only to end up not showing up or not calling in. This is a waste of time. What would be a good way of addressing the fact that I wish she would give us a heads up when she was going to be working from home, so we would not waste our time scheduling meetings she won’t be attending? I’m not her superior, so it’s not as if she should report to me. Still, it would be nice of her to let us know.

Be straightforward: “Jane, we sometimes end up running around trying to locate you or delaying meetings because you’re not there when we don’t realize that you’re working from home. Could you start letting us know on the days you’ll be telecommuting? Also, you sometimes miss meetings that you had accepted invites for — what can we do to make sure that we’re not scheduling things when you won’t be able to attend?”

Of course, that last part is really a bigger issue and something her manager should be addressing — and you might ask that your manager do so.

3. Will this statement work to explain a firing?

From a hiring manager’s standpoint regarding termination, I was curious if a short statement like this would suffice: “My company and department went through several changes, and although I learned a great deal from my position, I did not see an upward career path with this company. I spoke with my boss and we came to a mutual agreement to part ways.”

In short, I was let go because I was not a good fit for the company’s culture. My boss and I knew this, discussed this, and this was the result. I was given a small severance. I was advised that if I was truly fired that the company would not give you a severance. Is this true?

No, that’s not true. Many companies routinely provide severance to people fired for cause, so the severance itself doesn’t demonstrate anything about the nature of the firing.

If I were interviewing you and asked why you left your last job and you told me what you have in your first paragraph, I’d probe for more details … and also would ask directly if you were fired. If it was a culture fit issue, you might be better off simply saying that, and explaining how … although if the explanation is going to reflect badly on you or if you can’t actually talk in specifics about where the fit problem was, that’s not a good option. Ideally, you want to be able to say something like, “My strengths/interests are X and they’re really looking for Y.”

4. Approaching my boss about a weekly therapy appointment

I am struggling with depression and anxiety, but in the process of working through it with therapy. I live in a place where getting appointments in after work time slots can be next to impossible. Furthermore, I consider it essential to get on well with your therapist, which makes this even more difficult. I have found a therapist who seems a good a fit, but would need to leave work an hour and a half early once a week to make the appointment. My boss can be pretty understanding about these things, but considering the frequency and length of time I would need to leave early, a general “doctor’s appointment” explanation might be insufficient. However, I’m not sure it’s a good idea to come clean to my boss about my mental health issues. Any advice on how to approach this? If necessary, I will just continue trying to find a doctor, but this process has been going on for months already and I would rather not continue to postpone treatment of issues that may get worse.

“I have a recurring weekly medical appointment for at least the next few months, possibly longer. I’ve scheduled it for as late in the day as I could, but I’ll need to leave at 4:00 every Thursday to make it there. My plan for making sure it doesn’t interfere with my work is ____.”

That’s it! Your boss shouldn’t ask what type of medical appointment it is.

5. Employee refuses to track mileage

We have a superintendent who we have asked to keep a log book (mileage only) for getting a handle on expenses. We are NOT asking for hours on the job. We have also told him that all gas receipts must be turned in before the end of each month so he can be reimbursed, and if they are not, he will not be paid for expenses for that month. We are located in Arizona and as of yesterday he told us that he will not be keeping that logbook as it is illegal. This person is salaried. Can you help, as I didn’t think this was an irrational or illegal request?

There’s nothing illegal about asking an employee to log mileage (!). In fact, how else can you reimburse mileage if you don’t have mileage records? (By the way, it’s also not illegal to ask exempt employees — which is what I think you mean by salaried — to track their hours. You’re allowed to have people track their hours for all sorts of purposes; you just can’t deduct from exempt employees’ paychecks based on those hours.)

Something’s up with this dude.

my new employee wanted to quit and now wants to stay

This was originally published on December 22, 2011.

A reader writes:

I have had a new employee for 3 weeks. Our jobs involve analysis and project management, and thus the skills needed, as well as the range of tasks we do, are broad. We are hiring due to growth in our small branch office in a market that began in 2001 and is constantly changing, and there is still a lack of standard operating procedures both in house and across the industry.

The new employee today asked me if she should quit, and had a wide range of grievances – no training, being given busy work, not understanding why she is doing what she is doing, not doing what she was hired for. This came as a surprise for 3 reasons. One, I have been explaining the start-up nature of our branch since the first interview. Second, I have devoted considerable time to formal trainings, writing SOPs, and detailed emails on tasks. Third, she expressed a concern that we talk to her as if she has industry experience, which I do not.

As I am out this week, my boss met personally with her. At the end of the meeting, she emailed me “everything is fine.” It is not for me! I feel like I now have a high-maintenance whiner on staff. Instead of just learning and working, she has apparently been putting a lot of mental energy into analyzing the politics of her work, which she can’t even understand yet. Further, she disrespected me today by assuming I lacked a training plan, and has disrespected me a few times by over-questioning why I am giving her certain tasks. Someone else in the same position would be thanking me for the all-inclusive training on our industry.

She may very well be a high-maintenance whiner. Or she might be a bad fit for an environment where people need to be able to tolerate uncertainty and change, despite your efforts to screen for that in the hiring process. Or your training and management style and her learning style might be a bad fit for each other. Whatever the explanation is, there’s a problem to address.

The first thing you need to do is to sit down and talk to this employee. Someone who works for you had such strong concerns after three weeks that she was listing grievances and considering quitting. So it doesn’t matter if she now feels “fine”; you haven’t yet had a chance to talk with her, and you need to. Ask her to tell you what happened last week and why she’s now feeling okay about things. It’s possible that her explanation will make sense to you once you talk. Or maybe it won’t and you’ll still feel uneasy, which we’ll get to in a minute.

But you don’t want to go into this conversation with a chip on your shoulder because you feel disrespected. In fact, I recommend that you drop the whole disrespect thing entirely; it makes you look weak, as if your authority can be shaken by someone questioning you.

So instead, if she’s questioning you too much about why you’re giving her particular tasks, don’t just get irritated by it; talk to her about what’s up. For instance: “You seem concerned that you’re being given work outside of your job description. Let me tell you why I’m giving this to you.” And then: “This kind of thing is definitely a part of what you’ll be doing. Does that bring up concerns for you?” (If so, it’s better to bring this to the surface and deal with it now.)  And when she assumed you didn’t have a training plan: “It sounds like you’re worried there’s no plan for training you. Let me tell you how we’re going to structure this over the next few weeks and what you can expect.”

In other words, identify the issue, calmly and straightforwardly give her your take on it, and then check to see where she is in response. If you’re picking up on worries or weirdness, ask her about it. Don’t be a jerk, but don’t stew silently either; be straightforward. That’s the best way to get this addressed now rather than having her implode in a month or two.

I’d also say to her at some point in this conversation:  “Given what we’ve talked about and what you’ve experienced of the job so far, are you having second thoughts? If the fit just isn’t right, I’d rather we figure that out now rather than having you stay unhappy and quit later on.” And say this in a nice tone, even if you’re incredibly frustrated on the inside that this new hire might not work out and that you might have to go through all the work of replacing her. Because if you make it safe for her to admit she doesn’t think it’s working, she’s more likely to tell you now, and that’s in your best interest.

But she might tell you that this was all just a misunderstanding and she feels comfortable now. In that case, then you keep moving forward, but you stay alert for continuing signs of problems and you address them immediately if they come up again. What you don’t want to do is be quietly annoyed or feel it’s not working out but not talk to her about it. It may end up working out, or it may end up that it’s not the right fit — but you’ll only make the right decision in the right timeframe by having ongoing open conversations with her, and encouraging her to do the same.

At the same time, take a hard look at yourself and be honest about whether her concerns might have any merit. Is it possible that you didn’t clearly convey the job during the interview process? Is it possible that your training has been haphazard or difficult to adapt to?  Every manager should ask themselves these things anyway, and these are the types of problems that it can be hard to see in yourself, so really consider it with an open mind. You might spot ways you can do your own job of training and managing her better. Or you might decide that yeah, your training hasn’t been ideal (and you’re probably not the perfect manager, because no one is), but you ultimately need someone in the job who can work well in those conditions. But make sure you take an honest look at this part of it too.

By the way, it’s legitimate not to want a whiner on your staff. But you also want to be glad that she spoke up about her concerns, rather than keeping them from you. If this turns into a pattern of her constantly having complaints, then yes, it’s probably not the right fit. But being honest about her worries isn’t in itself a bad thing.

open thread – May 30, 2014

Lucy appearsIt’s the Friday open thread — with a difference: This post is for work-related discussions only. Please hold anything off topic for the free-for-all open thread that’s coming this Sunday.

This is an experiment. My hope is that by confining this post to work topics, the number of comments will become more manageable and it will be easier for people to read and engage. But for people who enjoy the non-work-related conversations, you’ll get your chance with a separate post over the weekend.

So, have at it. The comment section on this post is open for discussion with other readers on anything work-related that you want to talk about. If you want an answer from me, emailing me is still your best bet, but this is a chance to talk to other readers.