what do you wish you knew before you started hiring people?

Want to win a $150 Amazon gift card? Modis, an IT recruiting and staffing company that connects IT pros with great opportunities at leading companies, is offering a $150 Amazon gift card to the person who leaves the most useful or interesting advice here.

A very busy friend who’s about to start hiring employees for the first time asked me recently what I wish I’d known about hiring when I first started doing it. I told her:

* You’ll be really drawn to candidates who remind you of yourself. You have to resist this impulse because it can mislead you — making you blind to to their weaker spots or other candidates’ strengths — and can result in an overly homogenous staff.
* Likability matters, but it isn’t everything. Being the most likable person in the world won’t make up for a lack of skill in what you need done.
* Experience isn’t everything either. Having an incredibly talented jerk on your staff won’t be worth it in the long run.
* The longest interview process in the world won’t get you as much information as actually seeing candidates in action, doing simulations of the sort of work they’d be doing on the job, will.

I want to know what you wish you’d known before you started hiring people — and to make it extra fun, we’re going to turn this into a contest, with the person who leaves the most interesting/useful comment winning a $150 Amazon gift card, provided by Modis!

To enter: 

  • In the comment section below, share what you wish you knew before you started hiring people. If you’ve never hired people, you can still enter — just share something you wish hiring managers knew.
  • Make sure to leave your email address in the box that asks for it when you leave your comment, so that I can alert you if you win. (I’m the only one who will be able to see it.)
  • Leave your comment by 11:59 p.m. EST Wednesday, April 16. I’ll pick the winner on Thursday.

my manager threatened to kick my ass, using vacation time when my company closes early, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My manager said she’d kick my ass after I dropped some equipment

I was helping help pack things in on a video shoot, when, I had unnoticed that I dropped a small lens cap on the street. It got pretty dirty and I apologized to my supervisor. As she was attaching it to the camera, she said in a serious tone, “Eric, if you do this again I’m going to kick your f’ing ass,” in front of a coworker. I didn’t respond to this, but I was boiling on the inside. I have been working with this person for about a year and a half, we have no problems between each other.

I couldn’t help but be flabbergasted. How, exactly, do you respond to this, if at all?

I’ve got to think this wasn’t serious — what previously normal-seeming person gets that upset over a dropped lens cap?

But if you’re really sure it wasn’t a misinterpreted attempt to be funny, then say something like, “Jane, I was pretty surprised by your response to me when I dropped the lens cap. I’m not sure how to interpret what you said.” If her response confirms it wasn’t a joke, then you can say, “Obviously I want to be careful with our equipment, and I’m not cavalier about that.” Optional add-on, if you’re comfortable with it: “A threat to ‘kick my ass’ doesn’t really seem appropriate to me.” Whether or not that last part will do any good — or whether it will do more harm than good — depends on your boss, so proceed accordingly.

2. During a long background check and approval process, I found another job I might want more

I’ve been on the hunt for a new job for about 6 months and am very ready to leave my current place ASAP. I applied to a job at a government agency back in January, was told in early February they wanted to hire me, and due to paperwork and background checks I am still waiting on an official offer I’m told is coming sometime soon, but I have no idea when. Of course, I continued looking because nothing is real until it’s in writing and you have a start date, and another opportunity seems to be a very strong possibility.

If I turned down the government agency at this point, I feel that I’ll have led them on for months and then left them in the lurch. But, I never got or accepted an offer from them with a number attached; I just said I was excited to review the offer when it came. I know their crazy bureaucratic process is not my fault, but how much should I weigh the time they invested trying to get me on board if I end up getting both these offers?

Their massively bureaucratic process is not your responsibility; it’s theirs. If it causes them enough problems, they can look into changing it, but you don’t bear any obligation to be extra accommodating to them because of it. It would be utterly unreasonable for them to expect you to forego other offers when they haven’t even made you a formal offer yet themselves — when you haven’t agreed on a salary or other details, and when they could end up not hiring at all.

Go with the job that you want the most.

3. My manager keeps giving me work outside my part-time hours

I’m currently employed part-time at a small business and receive and hourly wage. I really enjoy the work I do when I’m there, which is 2 days of the week, but my boss has been contacting me almost every day of the week either through texts, calls, or Facebook messages, to do something. While they are small tasks, they really intterupt and affect my day because she wants it to be done immediately, and I do not get compensated. She will even contact me at my other part-time job, which she knows about, to do something and ask me to do her task then and there. She gets upset if I or the other employees (all of which are part-time) don’t check Facebook or her texts, even on our days off. She will also point out mistakes everyone has made on this Facebook group she created, and scold us on it as well. When I recieved this job offer, I was not told about being contacted outside of my hours.

I’m intimidated by her, but at the same time it’s really affecting my personal life, and I’m making a lot of mistakes at work. I am searching for full-time job elsewhere but in the meantime, is there anything that I can do to help the situation?

“Could we talk about my hours? We had talked about a part-time job, two days a week, and that’s what I’d planned for, so I have other commitments the rest of the time and I’m not always able to respond quickly — or even at all — when you send me work requests outside those two days. Should we talk about changing my schedule so that I’m working additional hours, or should I just save up those items for when I’m back at work?” If she says that she just wants them done and doesn’t want to increase your hours, then say, “Because I’m part-time, I’m filling the rest of my time with other commitments. I can save up these tasks and do them when I’m back at work, or I can occasionally put in an extra hour or two outside of my normal hours, but I can’t be two days a week and available the rest of the time too.”

And if the tasks keep coming outside of your regular hours, track how much time you’re spending on them and say something like, “How would you like me to track the time spent outside of my regular hours and report it for my paycheck?” (And assuming you’re non-exempt, she’s legally required to pay you for that time. It’s not optional.)

4. Using vacation time on days that my company ends up closing early

Occasionally our company closes early the Friday before a long weekend or the day before a holiday — say 3-ish and everyone gets full pay. Bu if I have a scheduled vacation day, I am charged a full 8 hours. Does this pass the smell test?

Yes, that’s pretty normal. You’re using your vacation time in exchange for a sure thing — the certainty that you have that time off.

5. Is this hiring manager not interested or just busy?

A hiring manager at a company I see as my “dream job” contacted me last week. My resume was sent through an internal referral, and the hiring manager emailed me wanting to set up a quick call about the role. He sent me the job req and I even noticed he checked my LinkedIn profile too. I had replied within hours and informed him I was interested. However, after that email, I have yet to hear back before we can even speak. It’s been over a week and I’ve followed up with a couple emails. Is it likely they’re just not interested or just too busy to reply?

Could be either, but for your purposes, it doesn’t matter — it’s time to move on. You’ve made it clear you’re interested, It’s in their court now, and if they want to get back to you, they will.

how to tell someone their email font is unprofessional, letting a company know about their bad reputation, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Should I let a company know why I don’t want to interview with them?

I’m a freelance feature film VFX artist. Staff jobs in VFX are rare, even for well-experienced artists, so when I was approached directly by a hiring manager about a staff job at a relatively young company, I was quite excited. I agreed to come in for an interview (currently planned for next week). Since agreeing to that interview, I’ve talked to several people who have worked there (small industry, news travels fast) and the stories have ranged from bad to genuinely horrible. People I trust have accused them of lying during interviews about how their contracts are set up, forcing people to work lots of unpaid overtime (which may violate the law), and shaming underperformers in company-wide emails as “motivation.”

Needless to say, I don’t want to work at a company like that. My question is, should I tell them what I’ve heard? I have no desire to turn my nose up and tell them I’m too good for them — but I wonder if they know how bad their reputation is, and how badly that will affect their ability hire good people. Their careers website focuses heavily on the cool-factor of working in film, which won’t be a big sell to anyone with more than a couple years’ experience. I’m not sure if I should just stay away and let them figure it out, or if I should mention what I’ve heard.

My question for you would be: What do you hope to gain by explaining why you’re withdrawing? There are some risks to being candid (such as burning bridges with people who you might want to work with in the future if they turn up at a different company), and probably not much gain to you. Because of that, the safer approach is to simply cancel the interview and say you’ve decided it’s not the right fit for you. That said, knowing that their practices are costing them good candidates is something that can push a company to reassess how it operates, so there IS value in being candid, as you point out. But ultimately, it’s just not your responsibility to give them feedback about their reputation at your own (possible) expense, particularly when it’s something that should be able to figure out on their own, if they cared to do it.

Read an update to this letter here.

2. How to let someone know their email font is unprofessional

What would your advice be for someone who has their email signature in Comic Sans MS (plus a smiley face), and for their coworkers? This is someone in the manager role at my organization. It just surprises me that for the year that she’s been here, no one has let her know how childish and unprofessional it may look, especially coming from a manager.

My advice for her would be to stop using it, since it’s unprofessional. My advice for her manager would be to say, “Hey Jane, you probably don’t realize that that font that you’re using in your email signature is widely used as the poster child for unprofessional fonts. I’m not normally going to nitpick your email font choices, but in this case it’s probably distracting from your otherwise professional image.” My advice for the rest of her coworkers would be to give her a similar heads-up if you have the kind of relationship that makes it likely it would go over well (receptiveness to humor would be a plus here), or to ignore it if you don’t.

3. Is it bad to explain I’m job-searching because my company is moving?

I’m looking to leave my current role for two reasons: (1) I’m looking for a more senior position with greater responsibility (not possible in current company), and (2) my company is relocating to a distant state.

When I’m asked why I’m looking to leave, should I focus solely on my desire to grow into a bigger role and leave out the relocation factor? My concern is that saying, “I’m leaving because my company is relocating” is akin to saying on a date, “I’m interested in dating you because my now-boyfriend is moving out of state and I don’t want to move with him.” It’s not really expressing an interest in the new job, but rather, something wrong with the previous one.

I’m also concerned that the relocating factor might mar the primary reason I’m looking – i.e., make it look like that the “looking for greater responsibility” reason is just a pretext and the real reason is “I need to find a job in this state.” What do you think?

Well, this is one area where job hunting and dating aren’t similar. It’s okay to say that you’re looking for a new job because your old one is leaving. It’s a widely understandable reason and not one that reflects poorly on you. So it’s fine to say that. It’s also fine to add that you might have been thinking about moving on sometime soon anyway because you want to move into a more responsible role. (Although, obviously don’t say this if you’ve only been in your current job for a year or some other small amount of time where that statement would make you look flighty.)

4. Thank-you notes when you already have another interview scheduled

I know how important it is to send thank-you notes after interviews but am unsure if/when to send one during a hiring process with multiple interviews. I just had a first interview with a manager and was called back for a second interview within hours. The second interview will be with the same manager as well as a director. While I certainly have some thoughts from our interview to follow up on in the thank-you note, I worry it will sound strange since we both know we will have a chance to discuss the thoughts in a week. What are your thoughts? Should a note be sent after each interview or only when there is no concrete plan to meet again?

Meh, I could go either way on this one. Since you already have a meeting scheduled for a week from now – and will presumably be sending a thank-you note (or follow-up note, which I think is a better way to view these) after that one — I think it’s fine to wait. But there would also be nothing wrong with sending them now too. I leave this one to you.

5. Is this a polite excuse to reject me?

I recently put in for a transfer for the same position in a different state. I did very well on the phone interview and was asked to drive up there to meet the team. The drive was 5 hours away, and I took that as a very good sign. The manager expressed her appreciation for my willingness to drive up there and than said she needed to speak to my current supervisor and would get back to me. Shouldn’t she have done that first before asking me to drive up there? Is this just a polite excuse to let me go without making an offer?

Yes, it would have been more considerate for her to do that before asking you to make the drive — but it’s also possible that she wanted to wait until you were a finalist before alerting your manager (which could also be considerate of her, depending on how your manager is likely to handle it).

But no, I wouldn’t assume that it’s just a polite excuse not to hire you. Polite excuses not to hire you generally contain clear statements of rejection, not an announcement of another step in the process. Another step in the process is … another step in the process. Not a rejection.

I’m still emotional after a bad performance review

This was originally published on August 15, 2009.

A reader writes:

Some background: I am in my mid-twenties and I work as an assistant for a small, nationally renowned non-profit. I love a lot about my job: I get to research topics I love, and I get to apply skills that satisfy me. I have a heavy workload that has increased substantially over the past few months. I often work straight through the day without a lunch break, stay late when I need to, bring work home when I need to, and check my work email from home constantly.

I had my first ever annual performance review last month. Before this formal meeting, my boss and I had met sporadically, and our discussions tended to focus on particular projects she had planned for me. The only explicit feedback I received about my work was in November, and it was that I was “doing excellent work.” Since that comment, I had not received any pointed feedback about my performance, negative or positive. Instead she would casually ask, “How’s it going?” and I would say something like “I’m working on a lot right now, but I feel good about everything.” As my review crept closer, I was naturally somewhat anxious, but felt I had reason to believe that I was going to receive generally good feedback.

Boy, was I in for a surprise: my boss told me that there was an issue with follow through, citing a few examples of minor tasks I had failed to execute, and said she was worried a pattern was emerging. She said I needed to participate more at staff meetings, and that I’m not a team player. My grade was “needs improvement.” I felt completely blindsided, and was so shocked and hurt by the feedback that I burst into tears. She also asked me if I’m really serious about working in this field. In my emotionally vulnerable and unstable state, I admitted that, while I do value a lot about my job, I sometimes think about other paths. My boss told me we would meet again in a month to reevaluate my standing.

I took the review really badly: I was on the verge of tears for the remainder of the workweek and couldn’t sleep at night due to anxiety. I felt like I had been working quite hard, that for each of her examples of my failures, there were dozens of things that I had executed well and promptly. My job can be very stressful, I put a lot of pressure on myself to perform well. I thought I was succeeding; to be told the opposite was demoralizing and mortifying. Looking back on my tears makes me cringe; I fear that I came off unstable and incapable of hearing criticism.

I’ve reflected on my feedback and concluded that some of it was valid. The next week I requested a follow-up meeting with my boss: I told her that I had let some things slip due my increased workload, and that I was going to make an extra effort to make sure nothing falls through the cracks in the future. I asked her for more regular feedback, suggesting that she call to check in with me like she does with my colleague (my boss works three-day weeks). This plan seems to be helping, and I’ve gotten some good feedback related to my areas in need of improvement.

But my despair persists: my department is very small, and I’m now concerned that everyone perceives me in the way my boss described me. I feel sheepish and embarrassed around my colleagues. I’m also worried that my boss shared my emotional response to her criticism with them, which compounds my paranoia. Finally, I’m concerned that my admission to considering other lines of work set off an alarm in my boss’s head. Is there anything I can do, besides doing my job well, to improve my standing? I’m worried about being blindsided again.

It sounds like you’re doing all the right things here, aside from being really, really stressed out about it. Being open-minded about the feedback, asking for a follow-up meeting, and requesting more feedback were all exactly the right ways to respond to this.

Based on your boss’ feedback, it sounds like you were doing the big things well, but forgetting about some of the little things. If you were letting smaller tasks slip through the cracks, she was right to point out that it was becoming a pattern — but this is exactly the kind of performance issue that’s really easy to fix, and she probably knows that. I cannot tell you how many people I’ve had to have that conversation with — it’s probably the most common issue I have to address with people. The vast majority of people are able to fix it once they’re focused on it — and you sound like someone who’s fixing it.

Now, I’m not sure what she meant by “not a team player,” and if you’re not sure either, get details from her about that one so that you know specifically what she’d like to see you do differently.

But remember — this is what bosses do: they give feedback and tell you about ways you could do better. It’s normal.

It can also be a shock if you’re not used to it. I think many smart people go through this right around your age: If you’re like a lot of smart people, up until now you’ve been used to hearing exclusively positive feedback. You were smart, school and peers affirmed that, and it’s part of your self-identity. And then when you start working and come across a boss who sees areas where she wants you to improve, it can be really jarring. It can make you doubt yourself or think you’re in the wrong job. Don’t think that way. Instead, take the feedback for what is it: matter of fact information about areas where you need to focus your attention more. Take that feedback and use it, and you’ll find that stretching yourself to grow in that way can be pretty gratifying.

Seriously. Don’t freak out. You’re on the case here, and it sounds like it’s going to work out fine.

About your two other concerns —

It’s unlikely that the rest of your department has even noticed or thought much about the points your boss made. Your boss’ job is to pay attention to your work and think about these things; theirs is not, and I promise you they’re not scrutinizing you like that. Most of the time when I talk to an employee about performance issues, the issues are ones that their coworkers wouldn’t have much way of knowing about. It sounds the same here. And unless your boss is hugely unprofessional and a jerk, she didn’t tell them that you had an emotional response originally — I can’t tell you how inappropriate it would have been to do that, and unless you have some specific reason to believe she did, err on the side of assuming she conducted herself normally in that regard (meaning that her conversation with you is none of your coworkers’ business).

And last, regarding whether your boss is alarmed that you acknowledged that you sometimes consider other lines of work — unless you’re working in the mafia or something, this is not a big deal. If it’s bothering you, go back to her and tell her that your conversation made you realize how much you want to stay in this field and ask her for her continued help via feedback and advice.

But really, I think what’s going on here is that you’re smart and conscientious and horrified by what I suspect is the sort of feedback you’ve never encountered before. Keep telling yourself that this is normal, bosses have these kinds of conversations with people all the time, and generally the issues raised get fixed and people just roll forward. Not a disaster, not even close to a disaster. You’re doing all the right things, and now you just need to stop beating yourself up.

Good luck!

me, talking about how to manage

photo 1Holly Worton recently interviewed me for her Socially Holistic podcast. We talked about what good management is, how to move into a management role, why it’s important to have difficult conversations, and much more — including how I started Ask a Manager, how I started working for myself, and how Ask a Manager has helped me screen out clients I don’t want to work with. You can listen to it here.

Also, as you can see by the photo on the left, I’ve been in Arizona. At a dude ranch. It was awesome.

open thread – April 11, 2014

goatIt’s the Friday open thread!

The comment section on this post is open for discussion with other readers on anything you want to talk about. If you want an answer from me, emailing me is still your best bet, but this is a chance to talk to other readers.

a company I want to work for blocked me on social media, my mentor declined to be a reference for me, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. A company I want to work for blocked me on social media

I became interested in a different industry a few years ago and have been trying to get in ever since. However, sometimes I have issues balancing my patience with my eagerness to make something happen. In one of my weaker moments, I wrote a blog post about my interest in the industry. Although I mentioned no specific companies in the blog, I posted the blog link on Twitter. The post title was “Why I Have a Crush on X Industry.” The whole thing was basically an analogy between a crush and my how X Industry had caught my attention. There are parallels, like unexpected attraction to something you have no personal experience with yet, etc. And when I posted it to Twitter, I tagged two prominent local companies in it.

I went to check one of those two companies and saw that their page no longer had an indication that I was following them (which I had been for awhile). Thinking there was a technical error or something, I clicked the Follow button, only to get a popup notifying me that I had been blocked from following them. Embarrassed, I quickly deleted the Twitter post and the blog post before something worse could happen.

After that, this company posted some other openings from time to time, but I didn’t apply, thinking it would be too soon. I didn’t want to become a nuisance or embarrass myself further. This company recently posted another opening. The position is low-level; it would definitely be entry level. But, it would also be an “in” into the industry. However, I’m wondering if I should apply, considering the past situation (which happened over a year ago). If I do apply and make it to the interview stage, do I need to address the issue or have a response prepared? Or do you think nobody would remember?

“Why I Have a Crush on X Industry” doesn’t sound like a terrible faux paus that should get you blocked — assuming your dating analogy didn’t cross lines into anything, uh, adult. So either someone over there just has really odd judgment, or it was a mistake (it’s actually pretty easy to mistakenly block someone on Twitter, so I wouldn’t discount that). In any case, I highly, highly doubt that they remember it (again, unless that blog post was truly inappropriate, but it doesn’t sound like it was), and you certainly don’t need to address it until directly asked about it. I’d go ahead and apply and not worry too much about this.

Read an update to this letter here.

2. My mentor declined to be a reference for me

I am planning to apply for a couple of positions and recently contacted a former supervisor to ask if I could list her as a reference. She was my direct supervisor for a year and instrumental in getting me promoted to my current position. After my promotion, she served as my mentor until her retirement several years ago. Since then, she has worked part-time in our profession and we have stayed in touch. Much to my surprise, she turned me down. She felt that she’s not qualified to be a reference for me because of how long she’s been retired, and thinks that I should use more current references.

The thing is, I DO have more current references and plan to use them. The reason I want to include her is that she has always spoken very highly of me and is someone whose opinion I have always valued. Also, I do not want to use my current supervisor for a number of reasons and she is the only other recent supervisor I could use. Although we have not worked together for the past few years, I think she can certainly speak to my strengths and weaknesses. Besides, she has always indicated that she would be happy to help me with my future endeavors and this certainly qualifies.

I am surprisingly upset by her rejection, and have not yet responded to her message. Would I be out of line to ask her to reconsider? Or should I just thank her for her honesty and leave it at that?

It’s not out of line if you make the request nicely, explain a little more of your thinking, and make it clear that you understand if she’d still prefer not to. And it’s possible that she thinks she’s doing you a favor by declining; she might think you’ll be better served by using other, more recent references, so giving her some context might change the way she’s looking at this. So, for instance, you could say something like, “I absolutely respect your decision either way, but in case your concern is simply recentness, you’re actually the most recent manager I’d feel comfortable using (I don’t plan to ask Jane for a reference while I’m currently working for her). Any other references I offer won’t be as recent as you are — so I’d still love for you to be one if you’re willing to, knowing that. But if not, that’s of course fine, and I really value our relationship either way.”

3. How much time should we let employees make up when they’re late?

We are a family-owned business and have around 70 employees. We are wondering if you have any information about allowing non-exempt/hourly employees to make up their time lost in the same week? This is referring to employees who leave early or come in late for appointments or personal obligations and even arriving late to work due to traffic, car trouble, etc.

Currently, it is up to supervisors if they want to allow their employees to make up time they lost (versus simply not earning wages for that time). However, we realize this is not fair if some allow time to be made up, while other supervisors do not. Should we only allow time to be made up for appointments or prescheduled absences? Should we allow employees to make up time if they are late due to traffic? Should we set a limit like 15 minutes late or less can be made up?

It’s really up to you, and it’s not inherently bad to have some managers allow it while others don’t; after all, different teams are working within different contexts, and managers should be the best judges of how that plays out on their teams. However, as a general principle, I’d say that you should allow people to make up time up to whatever point that will become disruptive. For instance, it might be perfectly feasible for someone to make up a hour by staying late on Thursday, but not possible for them to make up four hours that way because their work requires other people to be around, and the office will be empty at that point (or whatever). Or maybe you want to put limits on it because you’ve found that otherwise people won’t take their start times as seriously, and it’s important to you that they do. Or maybe none of this is true and you can give people a lot of freedom in this area — and maybe even some more than others, depending on what their particular job is.

Basically, don’t have rules for rules’ sake, but rather because it’s directly tied to a business need.

4. I can’t get the money my old employer owes me

I was on maternity leave and received a check from FMLA. The check was lost and payroll reissued the check as a direct deposit. The problem is when they reissued the check they put the gross amount as the net amount from the previous check. For instance original check Gross = $100, Net =$50. Reissued check Gross = $50, Net = $25. I was shorted over $700 in my case.

I have since stopped working for the company and trying to get the difference paid to me is impossible — I’m being bounced between payroll and benefits department and both are arguing that the other owes me the money, not them. Then it was escalated and I was told, “We owe you no money.” However they will NOT provide any sound reasoning. This is from a HUGE corporation. What do I do?

Contact your state labor agency and pursue it as a wage complaint. Your company is required to pay you the money they owe you, and they’re required to pay it within a specific time period (for most states, no later than the next scheduled payday, and for some either earlier then that), and some states also will impose penalties for late payments. You could also hire an attorney to handle this for you. I suspect a letter clearly spelling out the law and how they’re in violation of it — from either your state labor agency or your own attorney — will get this cleared up pretty quickly.

5. Can I ask my interviewer about their strengths and weaknesses?

My interviewer asked what is my greatest strength and weakness. Can I ask my interviewer the same question?

Sure, if you (a) ask it during the part of the interview when you’re asking your own questions, not as a comeback right after they ask it of you, (b) couch it in terms of asking about their management style specifically, and (c) are the type of person who ask this in a friendly, non-adversarial way that isn’t likely to alienate a reasonable person.

update: how can I back out of a mentoring relationship?

Remember the reader wondering about how to back out of a mentoring relationship that was more like intensive remedial coaching? Here’s the update.

I’m truly grateful for your help and that of the readers. The blog and your advice provide a tremendous opportunity to both try on others’ shoes and step out of my own, if that makes any sense. As with the problem I originally wrote about, sometimes, especially when you’re personally involved, it’s difficult to step back and get some objective distance; ultimately, that’s the problem I was having with my situation.

I’m not sure I have much of an update when it comes to the person I was mentoring. She seems to take one step forward and then suddenly it comes to light that she’s taken a step and a quarter back. In the grand scheme of things, I suppose that’s progress, considering that it used to be one step forward and three steps back, but…it’s still not overall improvement.

Based on the comments and your advice, I did work to think more objectively about my role in all of this; I placed myself in it, and I did allow my liking for the person to influence the amount of effort I put into trying to help her. I don’t regret it, because out of that I’ve learned several things about myself as a manager and a mentor–for one thing, I am more more comfortable as a coach than as a mentor. I am very good at identifying specific paths for improvement and take huge satisfaction out of watching someone improve. That said, I now recognize that I need to define specific objectives for a coaching relationship (vs. a mentoring one–the goals are different for those two roles) so that it’s not so amorphous and enveloping. I need to acknowledge to myself when there’s not much left to be gained by a continued time investment so that I can be comfortable with changing or ending it.

The person is still with the organization, but is under scrutiny; I don’t know if she’s on a PIP but I think it’s getting close. The organization overall is undergoing a slight reorg that won’t really trickle down this far, but it’s an opportunity for my boss to change roles within that person’s group to try to capitalize on her strengths. (Another thing that the advice from you and the commenters made me think about is that my boss may have a bit of a problem with cutting dead weight. It wouldn’t be hard in this climate to find someone who could kick serious ass in that role. I’m not sure where his hesitation comes from, other than that he’s fond of this person too and really wants to see her succeed.)

Along with the personal growth out of the experience, I did get kudos at review time for my efforts. Others in the organization, both within my group and outside it, have noticed those efforts as well; sadly, because this person has poisoned the stew so badly with her ineptness, I usually get those remarks in the context of “I know how hard you worked with her; too bad she just doesn’t get it.” That’s a shame, but it’s not untrue, either.

Ultimately, I took a lot away from the experience and appreciated the push to be more reflective about things. Thanks to you and the commenters for your advice and support–it’s a tremendous community.

am I overstepping when I try to be emotionally intelligent?

A reader writes:

Is it inappropriate to leverage emotional intelligence in the workplace? I am a part of a team that is tasked with changing the way my company approaches analytics. As such, we are often in the position of reworking old ways of measuring effectiveness and proposing new perspectives and KPIs. Sometimes people are excited and willing to change, and in other cases people are hesitant or even approaching defiance. One of the primary challenges of my job other than the technical side of things is managing human relationships and promoting constructive change.

One of the tools I use in my day to day is emotional intelligence. For example, if I can sense that a person is uncomfortable in a meeting where we are proposing replacing a spreadsheet that they developed and have been using for years, I’ll advise my team to considerate of the fact that person feels a lot of personal ownership of the old process. I’ll propose that we should reinforce what worked about that solution at the time it was developed rather than only discussing its flaws and why it must be replaced. In my experience, this gives the person time to come around and feel included in the solution.

There is one member of my team who has been scolding me when I make these sorts of comments, asserting that it’s none of my business, and that it’s rude and inappropriate to speculate on how someone might feel while in the workplace. I’m trying to take this criticism constructively and consider if I’m somehow overstepping my bounds, but at the same time, I feel like this approach yields good results and that people seem happier with the results when I consider the emotive dimension. In fact people are more willing to collaborate when they’re not steamrolled by change — and the more people are willing to collaborate, the more we do actually change! Additionally, the person who is offering this criticism has a pattern of offending people and setting up work relationships in a needlessly adversarial manner.

I’m not interested in criticizing this person’s style, and I understand that a diversity of opinions helps a team thrive, so I’m happy for them to take a different approach. Honestly I do not think I am being inappropriate at work, and it seems like I would be ignoring useful data to not consider these sorts of observations. I’m willing to adjust the way I communicate about it if it’s indeed “none of my business” that someone is having a bad day and that we should ask them to sign off tomorrow instead of today. This seems perfectly normal to me. What do you think? Am I being inappropriate? Should I just keep it to myself?

Emotional intelligence absolutely is useful in the workplace, and in fact most people who are successful employ it in one way or another (at least in roles that involve working with others, which most do). You can find exceptions to that, of course, but generally those exceptions are people who achieved success despite having low emotional intelligence. In other words, it’s relevant and it’s useful.

That said, there’s such a thing as taking it too far — or, perhaps more accurately, misapplying it. You need to be sure that the comments you’re making aren’t inadvertently undermining the people you’re talking about, or treating them too delicately, or implying that they need to be treated delicately. I’d be pretty dismayed to find that a coworker told someone to hold off talking to me about something because I was having a bad day, if in fact I wasn’t having a particularly bad day — or if the topic in question was important or time-sensitive.

A good test is to think about how the person would likely react if they overheard the comment, or if it was repeated to them. Would it feel condescending or like you’re managing their reaction too heavily? If so, that’s a signal to reframe the way you’re presenting it. It’s the difference between something like:

“Jane worked really hard on creating the old system, and she’s going to be upset that we’re changing it. Let’s be sure to emphasize how valuable it was for a time, and try to give her some time to come around on the change.”

versus

“Jane worked really hard on creating the old system, so I want to be sure she understands why we’re moving to the new system.”

All of which is to say, use emotional intelligence about the way you’re using emotional intelligence.

5 abuses of email that will destroy your productivity

I adore email. I can barely remember life before it. It lets me manage information more efficiently, field requests at the times most convenient for me, and store records of important details and decisions. But email is also ripe for the kind of abuses that can harm your productivity instead of helping it.

Here are five big ways email can slow you down and make you less productive.

1. Reading every news article someone sends you. Just because a news article shows up in your in-box, it doesn’t have a higher claim on your time than your other priorities. Too often, people spend time reading everything friends and colleagues suggest for them, without considering whether it’s the best use of their time, relative to everything else on their plates.

2. Not deleting anything. Does your in-box contain thousands of messages, including junk email, invitations to meetings from three months ago, funny memes your sister forwarded you, and your manager’s out-of-office reply from her vacation last summer? If so, you’re highly likely to lose track of emails you need to act on. Start deleting, or at least taking advantage of the fact that email offers you folders to organize messages in. And speaking of folders….

3. Not organizing things by folders. If your in-box is just one vast bucket, with no sub-folders to organize your messages, chances are good that you’re losing track of important messages and struggling to find older emails when you need to reference them later. Folders organized by topic or by the needed action (like “to read,” “to act on,” “to follow up on,” and “as time allows” can bring order to a chaotic in-box.

4. Checking email every time you have a new message. The new message indicator can set off a Pavlovian response, where you automatically stop what you’re doing and check to see what new email has arrived. Rather than being a slave to these interruptions, consider turning off the message indicator, so that you’re checking email only at set intervals, and not every time a message arrives.

5. Emailing and then calling or coming by in person to make sure your message was received. Part of the point of sending email is that allows the other person to respond when it’s convenient for them – and/or to read over your messages and think about it before responding. If you follow up email with an in-person visit, you’re negating that benefit and spending your time delivering a message twice (as well as probably annoying your coworkers). If it’s essential that your message be received immediately, then email isn’t the right medium to use; you should call or talk in person.

I originally published this at Intuit QuickBase.