update: how can I back out of a mentoring relationship? by Alison Green on April 10, 2014 Remember the reader wondering about how to back out of a mentoring relationship that was more like intensive remedial coaching? Here’s the update. I’m truly grateful for your help and that of the readers. The blog and your advice provide a tremendous opportunity to both try on others’ shoes and step out of my own, if that makes any sense. As with the problem I originally wrote about, sometimes, especially when you’re personally involved, it’s difficult to step back and get some objective distance; ultimately, that’s the problem I was having with my situation. I’m not sure I have much of an update when it comes to the person I was mentoring. She seems to take one step forward and then suddenly it comes to light that she’s taken a step and a quarter back. In the grand scheme of things, I suppose that’s progress, considering that it used to be one step forward and three steps back, but…it’s still not overall improvement. Based on the comments and your advice, I did work to think more objectively about my role in all of this; I placed myself in it, and I did allow my liking for the person to influence the amount of effort I put into trying to help her. I don’t regret it, because out of that I’ve learned several things about myself as a manager and a mentor–for one thing, I am more more comfortable as a coach than as a mentor. I am very good at identifying specific paths for improvement and take huge satisfaction out of watching someone improve. That said, I now recognize that I need to define specific objectives for a coaching relationship (vs. a mentoring one–the goals are different for those two roles) so that it’s not so amorphous and enveloping. I need to acknowledge to myself when there’s not much left to be gained by a continued time investment so that I can be comfortable with changing or ending it. The person is still with the organization, but is under scrutiny; I don’t know if she’s on a PIP but I think it’s getting close. The organization overall is undergoing a slight reorg that won’t really trickle down this far, but it’s an opportunity for my boss to change roles within that person’s group to try to capitalize on her strengths. (Another thing that the advice from you and the commenters made me think about is that my boss may have a bit of a problem with cutting dead weight. It wouldn’t be hard in this climate to find someone who could kick serious ass in that role. I’m not sure where his hesitation comes from, other than that he’s fond of this person too and really wants to see her succeed.) Along with the personal growth out of the experience, I did get kudos at review time for my efforts. Others in the organization, both within my group and outside it, have noticed those efforts as well; sadly, because this person has poisoned the stew so badly with her ineptness, I usually get those remarks in the context of “I know how hard you worked with her; too bad she just doesn’t get it.” That’s a shame, but it’s not untrue, either. Ultimately, I took a lot away from the experience and appreciated the push to be more reflective about things. Thanks to you and the commenters for your advice and support–it’s a tremendous community. You may also like:am I the only one excited to return to the office?how can I stop freaking out if I get a curt-sounding email?my boss and mentor runs hot and cold with me { 19 comments }
am I overstepping when I try to be emotionally intelligent? by Alison Green on April 10, 2014 A reader writes: Is it inappropriate to leverage emotional intelligence in the workplace? I am a part of a team that is tasked with changing the way my company approaches analytics. As such, we are often in the position of reworking old ways of measuring effectiveness and proposing new perspectives and KPIs. Sometimes people are excited and willing to change, and in other cases people are hesitant or even approaching defiance. One of the primary challenges of my job other than the technical side of things is managing human relationships and promoting constructive change. One of the tools I use in my day to day is emotional intelligence. For example, if I can sense that a person is uncomfortable in a meeting where we are proposing replacing a spreadsheet that they developed and have been using for years, I’ll advise my team to considerate of the fact that person feels a lot of personal ownership of the old process. I’ll propose that we should reinforce what worked about that solution at the time it was developed rather than only discussing its flaws and why it must be replaced. In my experience, this gives the person time to come around and feel included in the solution. There is one member of my team who has been scolding me when I make these sorts of comments, asserting that it’s none of my business, and that it’s rude and inappropriate to speculate on how someone might feel while in the workplace. I’m trying to take this criticism constructively and consider if I’m somehow overstepping my bounds, but at the same time, I feel like this approach yields good results and that people seem happier with the results when I consider the emotive dimension. In fact people are more willing to collaborate when they’re not steamrolled by change — and the more people are willing to collaborate, the more we do actually change! Additionally, the person who is offering this criticism has a pattern of offending people and setting up work relationships in a needlessly adversarial manner. I’m not interested in criticizing this person’s style, and I understand that a diversity of opinions helps a team thrive, so I’m happy for them to take a different approach. Honestly I do not think I am being inappropriate at work, and it seems like I would be ignoring useful data to not consider these sorts of observations. I’m willing to adjust the way I communicate about it if it’s indeed “none of my business” that someone is having a bad day and that we should ask them to sign off tomorrow instead of today. This seems perfectly normal to me. What do you think? Am I being inappropriate? Should I just keep it to myself? Emotional intelligence absolutely is useful in the workplace, and in fact most people who are successful employ it in one way or another (at least in roles that involve working with others, which most do). You can find exceptions to that, of course, but generally those exceptions are people who achieved success despite having low emotional intelligence. In other words, it’s relevant and it’s useful. That said, there’s such a thing as taking it too far — or, perhaps more accurately, misapplying it. You need to be sure that the comments you’re making aren’t inadvertently undermining the people you’re talking about, or treating them too delicately, or implying that they need to be treated delicately. I’d be pretty dismayed to find that a coworker told someone to hold off talking to me about something because I was having a bad day, if in fact I wasn’t having a particularly bad day — or if the topic in question was important or time-sensitive. A good test is to think about how the person would likely react if they overheard the comment, or if it was repeated to them. Would it feel condescending or like you’re managing their reaction too heavily? If so, that’s a signal to reframe the way you’re presenting it. It’s the difference between something like: “Jane worked really hard on creating the old system, and she’s going to be upset that we’re changing it. Let’s be sure to emphasize how valuable it was for a time, and try to give her some time to come around on the change.” versus “Jane worked really hard on creating the old system, so I want to be sure she understands why we’re moving to the new system.” All of which is to say, use emotional intelligence about the way you’re using emotional intelligence. You may also like:should I apologize for being a bad employee?my employer is asking invasive questions as part of a "wellness benefit"my boss gives me "constructive feedback" multiple times every day { 142 comments }
5 abuses of email that will destroy your productivity by Alison Green on April 10, 2014 I adore email. I can barely remember life before it. It lets me manage information more efficiently, field requests at the times most convenient for me, and store records of important details and decisions. But email is also ripe for the kind of abuses that can harm your productivity instead of helping it. Here are five big ways email can slow you down and make you less productive. 1. Reading every news article someone sends you. Just because a news article shows up in your in-box, it doesn’t have a higher claim on your time than your other priorities. Too often, people spend time reading everything friends and colleagues suggest for them, without considering whether it’s the best use of their time, relative to everything else on their plates. 2. Not deleting anything. Does your in-box contain thousands of messages, including junk email, invitations to meetings from three months ago, funny memes your sister forwarded you, and your manager’s out-of-office reply from her vacation last summer? If so, you’re highly likely to lose track of emails you need to act on. Start deleting, or at least taking advantage of the fact that email offers you folders to organize messages in. And speaking of folders…. 3. Not organizing things by folders. If your in-box is just one vast bucket, with no sub-folders to organize your messages, chances are good that you’re losing track of important messages and struggling to find older emails when you need to reference them later. Folders organized by topic or by the needed action (like “to read,” “to act on,” “to follow up on,” and “as time allows” can bring order to a chaotic in-box. 4. Checking email every time you have a new message. The new message indicator can set off a Pavlovian response, where you automatically stop what you’re doing and check to see what new email has arrived. Rather than being a slave to these interruptions, consider turning off the message indicator, so that you’re checking email only at set intervals, and not every time a message arrives. 5. Emailing and then calling or coming by in person to make sure your message was received. Part of the point of sending email is that allows the other person to respond when it’s convenient for them – and/or to read over your messages and think about it before responding. If you follow up email with an in-person visit, you’re negating that benefit and spending your time delivering a message twice (as well as probably annoying your coworkers). If it’s essential that your message be received immediately, then email isn’t the right medium to use; you should call or talk in person. I originally published this at Intuit QuickBase. You may also like:my coworker abuses our office IM programdo I respond to emails too quickly?what's up with people responding to emails with a phone call? { 160 comments }
my new employee started a client meeting without me, my managers wants a formal resignation before I’m ready, and more by Alison Green on April 10, 2014 It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go… 1. I’m annoyed that my new employee started a client meeting without me Due to unforeseen traffic, I was 15 minutes late for a meeting that was scheduled with one of my new employees and a long-term client at the client’s premises. When I arrived, I discovered my employee had entered the client’s building and announced she was there for the meeting and had started the meeting without me. This employee had only been in my department for 4-1/2 months. She had transferred from another department and had no experience with leading meetings or the subject matter. I was annoyed that she had not waited for me as planned (we had agreed to meet at the client’s premises) and felt she had not acted professionally as she had shown up/embarrassed me by drawing attention to the fact that it was I who was late. I have never experienced a situation where this was done by a colleague, let alone an employee, either by myself or others. Has business etiquette changed? Is it is now acceptable to embarrass your manager in the presence of a client? No, it’s not okay to embarrass your manager in front of a client, but the issue here isn’t really that; it’s that you simply need to give her more guidance about how to handle this type of situation in the future. She probably thought that she was doing the right thing in starting the meeting on time so that the client wasn’t delayed — and some managers would have preferred the way she did it, rather than having her wait outside for you, while the client was left waiting. This kind of thing is your call to make, you need to let her know your preferences. 2. I’m leaving sometime soon, but my manager wants a formal resignation now My husband was transferred to another city 4 years ago, and we have had a commuter marriage for that time. We are building a home in this city and it should be completed in 3-4 months. I have worked for my current employer for over 26 years and have always received “exceeds expectations” on my performance reviews. My boss and coworkers have known that I will be eventually moving for the past year and a half. Today my boss asked me if I could submit a written letter of resignation and give the approximate date I will leave. She said that by putting it in writing, it would give “us” the opportunity to interview the new candidate and train them in to my job before I leave. There are couple “red flags” that come to mind: First, in previous situations where an employee resigned, the boss has not been able to “post” an opening for a job before the previous employee leaves. Also, since the first of the year, we have a new “productivity index” tool and employees have been sent home early and forced to use PTO when business is slow. I cannot see how the budget/productivity tool would allow for 2 people to do the same job for a certain period of time. There were layoffs at my company in November and there very well could be more. If I give formal written notice of resignation, am I not allowing the company to terminate me without any compensation? Quite possibly. It’s also possible that your boss truly does need to formalize the fact that you’re leaving before the company will let her begin work to fill the upcoming vacancy, even if it hasn’t worked that way in the past. It’s also true that knowing that you’re leaving “sometime” this year puts her in a tough spot, because she has knowledge that she understandably wants to act on, to minimize the disruption to her department — and if you’re leaving in 3-4 months, this is the time she should start advertising if she wants you to help train the new person. That said, you’re certainly reasonable to be concerned. So why not just tell her your concerns? I’d say something like, “I’m hesitant to provide a formal resignation when I don’t currently know when I’ll be leaving, particularly since we’ve had layoffs recently. I’d be glad to talk with you informally about my plans, but those plans aren’t yet finalized enough to go beyond that. Would that work on your side?” (But again, keep in mind that it’s not crazy for her to want to start moving forward on this transition, given your likely timeline. In a non-dysfunctional company, she should be able to do that without a formal resignation from you, but that may or may not be the case here.) 3. How should I tell my company that they can’t prevent us from discussing wages? I started working my retail job as an hourly employee in October 2012. I, along with several other coworkers, was asked to remain with the company after the holiday season. This past October, my employer once again hired more people to help with the holidays. During this time, we found out that the new employees had higher wages than we did, even when including our annual merit raises. Those of us who were making less decided to go to our department manager to discuss the possibility of getting a wage adjustment, as we were doing the exact same job, had more experience coming into it, and had results that were at least as good (if not better) than the newer employees who were making more. Our department manager said that she would go to the store managers, as she would ultimately need their approval for the pay increase. It’s been four months, and our department manager just got back to us, saying that company policy prohibits us from discussing wages/salaries, and that attempting to get adjustments from the store managers on those grounds would cause problems for us. Thanks to your blog, I know that the policy goes against the National Labor Relations Act. I feel that going to my department manager first is the best idea, but how would you recommend pointing this information out? I’d say something like, “You know, I think the company might not realize that employers aren’t allowed to restrict employees from discussing wages. It’s part of a federal law — the National Labor Relations Act. I don’t want the company to get into any trouble for that, and I suspect they just didn’t realized that there was a law on this.” Your tone should be friendly and collaborative, not adversarial — it should sound like you’re looking out for the company’s best interest, not making a legal threat. That said, I’d be remiss not to tell you that this could potentially backfire if the company decides they don’t like people pointing out thing like, you know, laws. And if that happens, you’d need to decide how far you want to push the issue (which could eventually entail needing to talk to a lawyer or your state’s labor department, if your company handles this badly). 4. Interviewer missed our scheduled phone interview and then blamed me What to do when a manager sets up a time for a second phone interview after 3:00 but calls at 2:00 instead? I missed the call because I was out without my phone. When I noticed I had a missed call, I called back and tried to get ahold of her, but the answering service picked up. I say that I’m sorry I missed her call, etc. She calls back at the scheduled time to tell me she called me 2:00 and she had to proceed with interviews. She said she was heading out of town and will call when she returns. What should I do at this point? Wait or send an email? Or nothing at all? Frustrated! Well, there’s not a whole lot you can do. You could certainly send an email reiterating your interest in the position and saying that you’re eager to talk when she returns, but beyond that, it’s really in her (disorganized) court. 5. Company is rounding off our time worked in order to pay us less The company where I work rounds off our hours to 8 hours each day by taking off the 5, 10 or 15 minutes you punched in early or stayed late or worked through lunch, even though there’s no chance you’ll make 40 hours that week. Is this legal? Hell, no, that’s not legal. Time worked is time worked, and it must be paid. They can’t just lop off the chunks of time that they don’t want to pay you for. You may also like:how long should you wait if someone is late to a virtual meeting?my coworkers are annoyed when I'm 2-3 minutes late to meetingsmy employee lied about meeting with a client -- to take a nap { 340 comments }
update: my manager showed up at my house and beat on the doors and windows by Alison Green on April 9, 2014 Remember the reader whose supervisor showed up at her home and beat on her doors and windows, to try to wake her up to come in for an unscheduled shift at work? He even left dents. Here’s the update. When I returned to work on my normal shift, the harassing supervisor was not to be found, and after further inquiring with the other employees, I found out he was on vacation fishing with his wife. I did tell the manager/owner about what happened, and he said he believed that the supervisor’s intentions were good, but the way things were done was not appropriate, and he apologized. He never told me, that I recall, that he would say something to the supervisor, but I asked him if something could be said to him so that doesn’t happen again, and he nodded. Didn’t seem too concerned, and unfortunately, to my knowledge, nothing was done about the situation. Maybe a slap-on-the-wrist-no-no like you do with a child. Regarding the damages to my home, I do not own the trailer that I am staying in. I am renting from a landlord. I did inform the landlord and was recently asked if anything was said about the dents that were left and I informed my landlord they never said anything. I will leave what the landlord decides to do up to them. And, recently, my job has changed policy to require myself and one other night shift worker to be on call during the day on weekends when we worked the night before. So, now not only do I have to struggle to get up to get my necessary things done, (laundry, groceries, errands, etc.), I now have to include the random interruption of coming to work! Needless to say, I have applied to several different jobs since then and have heard from a few. I am working on getting another job and relocating at the moment and will probably submit my 2-weeks notice within the month. You may also like:we went to the home of an employee who didn't show up for work -- and it went badlymy boss sent a friend to spy on me at my housecan I report my boss for getting me sick? { 62 comments }
5 dangers in working for a bad boss by Alison Green on April 9, 2014 Bad managers come in all shapes and sizes – some are jerks, some are passive pushovers, some can’t delegate or give feedback or set clear expectations, and some are simply incompetent. And if you work for one of these bosses, you probably try to minimize the impact of these flaws on your own work – and may have found creative strategies to protect your quality of life. But working for a bad boss can impact you in ways you might not have thought about. Here are five of those less obvious dangers. 1. You will pick up bad habits that can hurt you even after you move on. If you spend too long in a dysfunction workplace or modifying your behavior to accommodate a bad manager, the experience can recalibrate your ideas of “normal” in ways that can hurt you personally. For instance, if you work for a manager who always shoots the messenger and punishes dissent, you might get used to keeping your head down, never speaking up, and even covering up mistakes when they happen. While that behavior might serve you very well in that job, those habits can be enormously damaging in a healthier workplace – and yet can be hard to let go of once they’ve become ingrained. 2. You are less likely to get raises, promotions, good projects, training opportunities, and other benefits that often accompany a good relationship with a manager. Poor managers often neglect to advocate for financial and other rewards for their top performers, or don’t have the political capital to do so. And without a strong track record of performance, they’re less likely to score the best projects and resources for their teams. A more skilled manager, on the other hand, is more likely to attract the types of high-worth projects that make careers – and to ensure her team is recognized in myriad ways for them. 3. You will miss out on the reputation-building that a manager who likes you can do for you — ensuring your work is visible to higher-ups in and outside of your organization, speaking well of you to others, and introducing you to people who can become part of your network, help you professionally, or even hire you in the future. Moreover, if your manager has a bad reputation herself, it can rub off on you; for instance, you might be directed to take actions that reflect poorly on you or simply become known as part of a lackluster team. 4. You won’t get useful feedback to help you develop professionally. Your peers might be able to give you positive feedback now and then, but it usually takes an invested manager to show you where you could be doing things better or differently – and to do it in a way that’s supportive and helps you develop, rather than merely being critical or even punitive. Working for a bad manager could mean giving up years of the sort of growth that comes from thoughtful, targeted feedback. 5. And most of all, bad managers will nearly always harm your peace of mind and self-image. Working for a bad manger can instill in you a defeatist attitude in regard to work, praise, and recognition, train you to value the wrong things, cause you to doubt your own abilities, and just generally make you miserable. And that cause end up harming your work as well. Great managers are few and far between, so you might be tempted to resign yourself to working for bad managers over your career – but for the reasons above, it’s worth doing everything you can to spot and avoid them when you’re job-hunting and to move on from them quickly if you find yourself working under one. I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report. You may also like:employee's dad called to see if we had "properly briefed him" on his travelwhen your boss has to correct your behavior, does it impact their impression of you forever?my boss's kids are incredibly distracting on video calls { 105 comments }
will I look like I’m goofing off if I take notes on a tablet at meetings? by Alison Green on April 9, 2014 I’m traveling this week, so here’s another question for readers to weigh in on. A reader writes: I just bought a new tablet that has a stylus and a note-taking app that translates handwriting to text. My company has a “meeting culture,” so I take copious notes with pen and paper and type the information for reports. I believe using my tablet to take notes would save time and help me organize information, but I’m hesitant to bring it to work. I’ve seen very few iPads in meetings (and they typically aren’t being used as a meeting tool), and laptop users are sometimes viewed as inattentive. I think the stylus will make it clear that I’m taking notes and not goofing off, but I’m concerned about causing distraction. Beyond checking with IT and my supervisor, what should I consider before trying to go paperless with my notes at a workplace where everyone carries padfolios? So, what say you? You may also like:have your kids take notes at your meetings, and other weirdly out-of-touch advice for the quarantineI stood up to a sexist coworker who wanted me to take all the notes for a team I'm not even onyawning at work, asking for a fancier computer, and more { 280 comments }
work lunches when you’re fasting for Lent, my husband’s retirement party still hasn’t happened, and more by Alison Green on April 9, 2014 It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go… 1. My new office invited me out for lunch, but I’m partially fasting for Lent I started a new job around two months ago, and everything has been going really well so far. I just received an email saying that they want to have a welcome lunch for me and another employee next week, and suggesting a local restaurant I would normally like a lot. The issue is that I’m on a partial fast for Lent, and have given up a number of foods, including meat, desserts, and most beverages. I don’t want to make a big thing of my religion in this workplace, but I also don’t want to just say, “I’m vegetarian,” and then be eating meat a week later. Should I ask if they could hold the date until after Easter? Ask for a vegetarian restaurant? Or just suck it up and order a salad? It’s not making a big thing of your religion to simply say, “That sounds great! Since I’ve given up a number of foods for Lent, I wonder if we might wait a week?” But if you’d rather not, it would also be fine to go and order something you can eat, like a vegetarian entree or a salad. Both of those are normal enough orders that no one is likely to think anything about it. 2. Can I ask a recruiter if they’ve really been hired by the company they’re filling a job for? Can I ask a recruiter if they have been retained by the company they are attempting to fill a job for? I don’t know if it is just my industry, but I get the feeling recruiter see job postings and reach out to anyone in my field to attempt to fill a job with the hopes of being paid a finder’s fee. It’s a waste of my time and my colleagues if they don’t stand any real chance of getting called for an interview. Am I totally wrong on this? Some particularly sketchy recruiters do sort of thing (although definitely not the majority of them) — but there’s nothing wrong with saying, “Have you been retained by the company to work on the search?” Any reputable recruiter worth working with will have no problem answering that — so if someone balks, that probably tells you everything you need to know. 3. Am I an exception to the “don’t call to follow up” rule? I received a “can we set up an interview” call from the founder of a small company whose position I would be filling. Unfortunately, I am 5 states away so I couldn’t come immediately. She seemed a little discouraged that I was not local since they were looking to fill her position quickly. I told her I was hoping to relocate and could do so immediately. She loved my resume and talked enthusiastically about my projects I linked on my cover letter. The phone call turned into an interview, and by the end she was telling me the daily tasks I would do and talking about scheduling a time for me to speak with her co-founder in the next two days. She went in-depth about her co-founder, telling me about his personality and giving me a heads-up about the questions he might ask so I could prepare. She said he was away in Hawaii but she could set up a Skype interview or phone call since they wanted the position filled immediately. She even converted the time difference and asked if I would be free to talk to him at 8 p.m. in a few days. She ended the phone conversation by telling me that she called me on her cell and that I should call back if I thought of any questions. After two days and and no response, I emailed her a thanks for talking/I did more research on your projects/ can’t wait to follow up. However, I had to email through the generic email that I applied for the job because I couldn’t find her specific email, though it is only a 5-person company. I have not heard back, but I realize that they may have found someone local or had difficulty getting in touch with the co-founder. She did say to call if I had any questions, so would it be unreasonable to check in when it has only been a week? If it is a good idea, should I mention that I would be willing pay the travel expenses for an in-person meeting if the other phone interview went well? (I didn’t say anything about paying for travel in my original cover letter like many AAM readers do.) Maybe calling is the obvious answer and I am just hyper-aware of being annoying since I have been binge reading your posts on follow ups. I think in a case like this — where you don’t have an email address for her, haven’t heard back through the generic one, and were specifically invited to use her cell phone number — it would be fine to call her to check in. (Note: This is not carte blanche for anyone to call people to check in outside of a situation like this! This is about your specific situation.) If you’re willing to pay travel expenses to come interview in-person, I’d definitely mention that — if they weren’t planning to consider local candidates, they may not have budgeted for that, and offering to cover the cost will remove one possible obstacle from advancing in their hiring process (and is often the reality of what it takes to get hired long-distance these days). 4. My husband’s company is several months late in throwing him a retirement party My husband retired after 30 years at the same company as of December 31. It is customary that as employees of his company retire, the company throws them a dinner at a nice restaurant for 30 or so close associates. His boss took him to lunch in December and they discussed where he would like his party. Now it is April and no word has been said about a gathering. I think this is very rude of the company and the boss that my husband’s retirement has gone unrecognized by the company. We have several close friends there who we would like to celebrate this accomplishment with. I don’t think it is my place to call his boss and inquire. Should I just throw him a belated retirement party at our expense and invite those with who we wish to celebrate? He didn’t receive any cards or well wishes because that usually happens at the party. He did leave on great terms and still goes in to help and teach on occasion, but I think he would feel akward bringing it up to them. Yeah, if he retired in December and the party hasn’t happened by now, I would assume it’s unlikely to and proceed with whatever sort of celebration you’d like to have, rather than trying to nudge them to throw one now. For whatever it’s worth, this was probably more oversight than slight, although I imagine it doesn’t feel great either way. 5. Will this train operator ever find another job? I read a recent news article about a train operator who admitted to dozing off before the train ran off the tracks and onto the platform. She was fired last week, and my immediate thought (probably because I’ve been reading your blog a lot lately) was, “Wow, I wonder if she is ever going to be able to find another job.” So, do you think she will ever find another job? If she came to you, what would your advice be to her? While a single mistake doesn’t usually preclude people from finding another job, this one is different. Major safety related mistakes this like are so serious, and can be so hard to overcome when there’s been news coverage about them, that this might be a case where her best bet is to look at other types of work. Rightly or wrongly, I think an employer would be pretty skeptical about hiring her for another train operator job — in part because if she messed up again, they’d be responsible for having hired her despite track record. That said, the part of this that is similar to others who are fired for legitimate cause is that she’s going to need to come to terms with why it happened and take ownership for it. That’s going to lead her to the right way to talk about it with future employers (as opposed to ducking responsibility, which usually makes a firing far more concerning). You may also like:can I have a drink before a work flight, fasting during team lunches, and morecan I turn down business lunches as an intern?my coworker is always dieting -- do we have to accommodate her? { 232 comments }
update: does the admin in my new office have boundary issues? by Alison Green on April 8, 2014 Remember the reader whose new administrative assistant after a merger was generally amazing at her job but was rearranging people’s offices and being a bit heavy-handed in sending out company-wide emails? Here’s an update. The admin and I are both still here. The bulk of the problems have subsided. What I’ve learned is that where you sit determines a lot. I sat right where the admin had to look into my cube every time she got up, so I moved when I had a chance and everything except the emails has stopped. Before I moved, she tried to implement a “confiscation policy” for the space heaters, and mine was the first and only one confiscated. I came in one night shortly after and was working when I found three other space heaters on. I sent her a quick email around midnight letting her know that I was working late and found the others still running, and that I was concerned about the practicality of her being expected to police the personal space of everyone in the office. I also said that while I respect her role in the office, the space heater is a personal item and I expect it to be returned. She was great about it. I came in the next day and it was back and there’s been no discussion of space heaters since (plus the weather is finally warming up). She still sends out emails, but they’ve become a sort of office-wide joke. It turns out a lot of people felt the same way I did. At the moment, people either laugh about them or just delete them. We were off campus the other day and she sent one out and the president of the company leaned over to me and said, “I don’t want to be petty, but I’m getting a little tired of these snarky emails.” I told her I agreed, but our admin was very good at her job otherwise. I even used a line from one of the comments on your post: “Nobody likes an email about dishes being left in the kitchen sink, but they don’t mind an email when they’ve left their wedding ring on the bathroom sink.” We agreed that neither of us knew how to handle it, so we’d just ignore it for now. Me again. Her manager should really give her some feedback on the emails — she probably doesn’t realize how they’re coming across, and it would a service to her to let her know, since they’re affecting how she’s perceived. I don’t fault the company president for not dealing with it, as she presumably has higher priorities, but maybe you could mention the conversation to the admin’s manager and suggest that some guidance could help (while emphasizing that you otherwise think she’s great). You may also like:my coworkers come by my desk to check on emails right after sending themis "secretary" a demeaning title?my new boss treats me like his assistant ... which isn't what I was hired for { 35 comments }
how to manage work when you don’t have authority over the people doing it by Alison Green on April 8, 2014 As challenging as managing people can be, managing work when you don’t have formal authority over the people doing it can be even more challenging. Managing sideways – or influencing the performance of people who don’t report to you – takes special thought. Here are four keys to doing it well. 1. Be sure to explain the “why.” While you should always explain the larger context when you’re delegating work, it’s especially key to do this when you’re managing sideways. As a peer, you lack the authority to simply assign work – but your requests will go over a lot better if you contextualize them and explain why what you’re asking is important. For instance, if you’re explaining why something needs to be done quickly, you might say, “I know it’s a time crunch, but the printer says that we can’t send them the file any later than Friday if we want to have it printed before the gala.” 2. Communicate roles clearly. When you’re delegating to a peer, it’s easy to inadvertently miscommunicate what you’d like her role to be, as well as what yours is. For example, your colleague might assume that she’ll be the final approver of the content of a web page you’ve asked her to create when in fact you’ll be making the final call. This can create more awkwardness than if you just clarify roles from the start. In this case, you could say, “Once you have proposed content, I’d like to sign off and might make some changes before we finalize it, because there are some political sensitivities that I want to make sure we navigate.” 3. Don’t hide the message. When you feel awkward about managing sideways, it can be tempting to soften the message, sometimes to the point that the other person doesn’t realize what’s being communicated. For instance, if you need a press release by May 1 but feel awkward about being directive to a peer, you might end up saying, “I’d love to have it by May 1 if we can.” But because you didn’t convey a hard deadline, your coworker might understandably think you have more flexibility than you do. That’s not fair to her; you want to make sure that she’s as clear about the needs of the work as you are. 4. Act with confidence – or fake it until you make it. If you feel uneasy about managing sideways, it will probably show and make your coworker feel awkward too. Things will go more smoothly if you instead act with confidence, treating the interaction as if it’s perfectly normal (even if you feel anxious or awkward inside). One tip for doing this: Imagine someone doing it smoothly and what that would look like (ideally even thinking of someone you’ve seen execute this type of interaction well), and then act as if you were that person. It might be cheating, but it works! I originally published this at Intuit QuickBase. You may also like:advice for first-time managersmy boss says I ask "why?" too oftenmy boss wants me to do her dirty work { 51 comments }