can my wife and I apply to do a job jointly, what “thanks for coming in” means, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Will I be rejected for not uploading a video interview?

I tried to apply to a position this afternoon, and part of the online application is a “video interview.” I couldn’t complete it because I’m using an old PC which doesn’t have a camera. I also tried on my iPhone, but it requires Flash which is unsupported. So am I automatically disqualified from the position because I don’t own the technology for the interview? Is it worth it to track down a webcam to do this thing? I never experienced this before. The position, which I am highly qualified for, is photography teacher.

Ugh, ridiculous. Employers have no business requiring this type of effort from candidates before they’ve even made it past a first cut. After all, in a typical hiring process, tons (usually 100+) candidates are going to be rejected without further screening, and it’s so horribly inconsiderate to ask people to jump through this sort of hoop when so many won’t even be spoken with further.

In any case, I’d include a note in your cover letter explaining that your computer wouldn’t allow you to complete the video portion of the application, but that if you move along in the process, you’d be glad to make arrangements to do it at a later stage. On the other hand, if you’re truly lusting after this job and would be devastated if you were rejected over this, then yeah, I’d suck it up and borrow a webcam.

2. Can my wife and I apply to do a job jointly?

My wife and I want to apply together to the same job (as co-applicants). It’s for a house manager position. It’s advertised for one candidate. We both have different qualifications but together it would be perfect. I would be the one to be there for the day to day and she would be on a part-time basis (at least that’s what we are thinking). The position is mostly managing a household of a staff of 3, which I have great experience in and there are some financing and expense responsibilities as well. Our thoughts are they would get two for one basically. (It’s actually a well-paying job for one person. It’s more then enough for both of us. It can pay for two full-timers in a sense.)

Is this unheard of or is it a great thought? Not only for how we are thinking, but for the homeowners as well.

For any other job, I’d say absolutely not, but something like a house manager, it might be fine. There are some disadvantages to be aware of — for instance, having staff report to two people rather than one has the potential to be inefficient and confusing (so you’d probably want them only reporting to one). Also, what if they’re dissatisfied with one person’s performance but not both of you? Overall, though, I don’t think it’s out of the question for a position like this — and it’s certainly not patently ridiculous on its face. I’d go ahead and propose it and see what they think.

3. When should I ask employers about subsidized transit and working from home?

I am currently looking for jobs in my city and a neighboring one. I’d prefer a job in my city because it’s about a 3-hour total daily commute (via train) to the next city. However, I would take a job in the other city if the company subsidized public transportation passes and especially if they allowed me to work from home 1-2 days per week. Should I even bring this up at all and if so, how and when?

The problem with asking about those things before you have an offer is that it makes you look unduly focused on things that most hiring managers don’t want you to be unduly focused on. Asking about subsidized transit passes is a little too nitty-gritty before the offer stage; it’s like asking about nuanced details of the 401K plan before you have an offer. And asking about working from home 1-2 days is a week before there’s been an offer signals to many hiring managers (rightly or wrongly) that you’re more focused on avoiding the office than being in it. Neither of these is helpful when a company is still assessing you.

So I’d wait until you have an offer — when they’ve already decided they want you and now you’re negotiating the details — and ask about it then.

4. “Thanks for coming in”

Is the phrase “thanks for coming in” at the end of an interview always the kiss of death? Thanks for any insight you can provide.

What? No. It means, quite literally, “thank you for coming in,” no more and no less.

5. Asking about full-time work at the end of a contract

I’ve been a contractor at my work since May and my bosses have mentioned to me several times that they want to bring me on as a full-time employee. Before the holiday season, my boss told me it will most likely happen at the beginning of the new year. Well, it’s getting close to the end of my contact and I really want to work for this company, but how do I bring this up with my boss in a professional manner?

“We’re approaching the end of my contract, so I wanted to follow up with you about the possibility of bringing me on full-time. I’d love to stay, but otherwise I’ll need to start lining up other work soon.”

when an employer calls me at work, can I ask how long the call will take or to reschedule?

A reader writes:

When a recruiter/manager of a job I’ve applied to calls me back, I almost always let it go to voice mail — mostly because I work in an open space and can’t drop what I’m doing right away and take the call in front of my boss. They leave a message asking if I have some time to talk about the job. In past experience, “some time” can mean anywhere from a few minutes to a 20-minute phone interview. I can step away from my desk for a few minutes to discuss some details, no problem — but when it’s closer to the the 20-minute mark in the middle of a work day, that’s something I really need to schedule into my day, plus prepare for a bit.

Is it okay to ask at the beginning of the call how long this is going to take and what is going to be discussed? Is it unreasonable to ask to reschedule the phone call for a different time?

It’s absolutely reasonable to say something like, “I’d love to talk. I’m at work right now and only have a couple of minutes — will that be enough time or should we schedule a time for later?”

However, be aware of the following drawbacks to this plan:

1. Some people will tell you that it will only take a couple of minutes but end up taking much more. I think these are the same people who tell you that they’ll be at dinner/the movie/wherever in “just a few minutes” when in fact they haven’t left their house yet.

2. Some people will reschedule for later, but then never call you back. This is actually a widespread phenomena with these calls, where employers say they’ll get back to someone but meanwhile find other strong candidates, move forward with them, and never get back to the earlier person.

How should you as a candidate respond to this? Ideally, you’d decide that you’re going to handle these conversations the same way you would in other part of your professional life, which means that if you don’t have time to talk, you’d explain that and ask to reschedule for later, and if the employer is rude/disorganized enough not to reconnect with you later, then they’re not a desirable employer anyway. But while that’s easy to say, it’s harder to do, especially if don’t have the luxury of lots of options.

So, like many things with job-searching, this ultimately comes down to how well-positioned you are to not care if you end up screening out a rude or disorganized employer. If you don’t feel like you have a lot of options, you might calculate that it’s not worth the risk of screening them out, because you need a job. On the other hand, if you do have options, you might be quite glad to screen them out.

employers that ask for high school transcripts from 30 years ago

A reader writes:

Why would an employer ask for a high school transcript from a person who been out of school for over 30 years and when the job does not have anything to do with what courses you had in high school?

Idiocy.

how do I address a glaring weakness in an internal interview?

A reader writes:

I’m the sole internal candidate interviewing to be my work team’s manager. This team is newly formed, and the person originally tapped to manage resigned before actually holding the position (no drama: it was for family reasons). Subsequently, the job description was changed to include some technical expertise that neither the original manager nor I possess (my knowledge in this area is at a very basic level, though I’ve been actively learning more since joining this team). I harbor few illusions about my chances–if they want someone with the tech experience, then that’s who they’ll hire. However, I am well-qualified in other areas of the position, think the interview is a good opportunity to remind management about what I have to offer, and hope that perhaps they’ll consider reversing their revised expectations for the role.

My one worry: I’ve learned that part of the interview requires a review of my technical portfolio, which is colossally weak. How do I gracefully address this glaring weakness without looking foolish? I don’t mind being honest with verbal questions, but am a bit freaked about pulling out a physical thing and having it look so amateurish compared to the other polished portfolios they’ll likely see from external candidates.

Well, here’s the thing: You don’t want a job that you can’t do well at. So if the work you can show in your portfolio is a deal-breaker for them, you want to know that now — not after you’re already hired. Otherwise, you can end up in a job you’ll struggle in or even get fired from.

So I’d actually address this head-on; don’t try to disguise it or gloss it over. Say directly: “As you can see, I don’t have a ton of technical experience with X, although I’ve been actively working on learning. Are you looking for someone who will come in already having a higher level of knowledge in this area?”

You’ll look far stronger if you present an accurate inventory of your own strengths and weaknesses and appear more interested in whether you’re the right match for what they need than in simply getting the job offer.

when can you use someone’s first name, when to disclose salary, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. When can you use someone’s first name?

I’ve been wondering for years – what is the appropriate way to address someone once you’ve had an initial exchange? The first email typically says Ms. Blank, but once they respond, do you keep addressing them as Ms. Blank in every single email until you have an offer? Seems strange, especially if there are a few emails back and forth in the span of a day and they address you each time by your first name and also sign with their first name.

In a professional setting, when someone is addressing you by your first name, you can address them by theirs. You don’t need to put yourself on unequal footing. (In fact, I’d argue that in most professional settings in the U.S., you can start out with the person’s first name. There are some exceptions to this — the military, some parts of the government, some particularly formal workplaces — but in general, most adults these days call each other by their first names.)

Plus, when someone signs an email to you with their first name, that’s the equivalent of “Please, call me Alison.” They’re calling themselves by their first name in their interactions with you and expecting you to do the same.

2. I wasn’t included in a meeting I’d asked to be a part of

I asked a colleague to include me at a meeting to discuss an idea of mine to compliment our overall strategy for a particular project I am partially responsible for. She did not and I received a detailed list of directions from one of her colleagues as a follow up to the discussion I was excluded from. I am disappointed and feel undermined. What would you do in my situation?

I’d say this: “Jane, I heard from Apollo with a list of instructions that came out of the meeting on X. I was surprised I wasn’t part of that meeting, since we’d talked earlier abut making sure I was there.” Then see what she says. Depending on her response and the context around your project, the next step could be any of the following:

“Could you be sure I’m part of any future meetings on this?”
“When are you likely to meet about this next? I’d like to be there.”
“Before work moves forward, I’d like to sit down with both of you and work out Y and Z.”
“Apollo’s note raised some concerns about Y for me. I think we need to go back and revisit that before moving forward.”

In other words, direct, calm, and to the point.

3. Is there ever an okay time to disclose your current salary in the hiring process?

Is there ever an okay time to disclose your current salary in the interview process? I am paid about 30% under market value for my current job. I am looking to make a huge pay jump into my next one and obviously trying to avoid giving current salary information as much as possible. I’ve heard some employers will ask for pay stubs, not for your salary information but to verify your employment. If I’ve already negotiated my package and salary, is it okay to handover a W2 or pay stub? Is it possible that the company could come back and try to renegotiate my salary to a lower number?

If you didn’t disclose your salary earlier, it would be shocking and unlikely for an employer to try to lower your offer just because they later learned your salary.

But I’d also be surprised if you were asked for W2s and pay stubs as employment verification; typically verification is done by contacting the company directly, and those items would only come into play if for some reason they couldn’t (like if the company had closed down).

4. Avoiding toxic workplaces

I want to avoid joining another toxic workplace. I think a key indicator of a toxic workplace is when people leave frequently. I’m finishing a fixed term contract at the moment and will look for something new soon. In future job interviews I want to somehow ask “Why did the last person leave?” Or even better, “Why are people leaving the company?” It’s a tough question, but I’d like transparency and honesty. Leadership is becoming very important to me. A high turnover rate indicates bad leadership and toxicity.

I’d also like to request a lunch with the other members of the team, or the manager, to get a feel of the culture and the team. Does that seem reasonable? If they say no, I will probably turn down their offers.

Sure, you can ask, “Why did the person previously in this position leave?” It’s a normal question. So is, “What kind of turnover does the team have? Why do people normally move on?” But be aware that incredibly toxic companies can have perfectly reasonable-sounding answers to these questions, so it’s one data point but it’s far from everything, so here’s more advice on how to assess company culture.

Once you receive an offer, you can also ask to meet with others you’d be working with (but generally not before that), although how reasonable that request is will depend on the specific job (it’s probably not reasonable in a call center, for instance).

5. Interviewing when the job posting has disappeared

I’m actually asking this for a friend of mine. She got an interview with a company she really wants to work for, but the job description has disappeared from their website! She did not receive an automated confirmation when she applied and the HR rep called her to schedule the interview so she doesn’t have any email contact info. Should she call? What should she say? She feels like she had a good idea of what it was when she applied, but that was weeks ago! She wants to be prepared. What should she do?

Yes, she should call and ask if they can email her a job description ahead of time, noting that it’s no longer on her website and stating mildly apologetically that she doesn’t seem to be able to find her copy from when she applied. (Ideally she’d email this, but if she can’t find email contact info, then it’s fine to call.)

In general, it’s good to keep a copy of any job postings you apply to on your own computer, since they can indeed be taken down like this.

do you need multiple versions of your resume?

A reader writes:

I’ve had a few people ask me if I have more than one version of my resume. I have tried to draft completely different versions, but have found it daunting and so have stuck with the same version, save for minor tweaks to the wording of the brief objective statement. I have had difficulty re-imagining old roles and have largely stuck to the specifics of the job, rather than discussing specifically how a particular job relates to the position I’m applying for (especially if it doesn’t). Functional resume efforts seem to become too generic as well.

I’d appreciate any advice you have on how to constructively write different versions of a resume, especially when having to manually enter information on a “Powered by Taleo” site or having to paste a resume into an electronic system that only allows for plan HTML text instead of a PDF attachment that would allow for boldface type and bullet points.

You don’t need to have multiple versions of your resume, but it makes sense to have multiple versions if you’re applying for a few different categories of jobs, because in that case you’d want to emphasize different things. So if, for example, you do both editing and theater work, and you’ve also done some admin work to pay the bills, you might have an Editor resume, an Theater resume, and an Admin resume — each focusing on the relevant skills. But if you’re only applying for editing jobs, then you only need one version.

However, even if you only have one main version of your resume, it still generally makes sense to tweak that main version based on the job you’re applying to. If the job has a heavy emphasis on X, and your resume only mentions X in passing but you actually have more experience with X than you’ve mentioned, then it makes sense to tweak it to better highlight X for that particular job. You probably don’t need to do that for every single job, but I’d be surprised if there were never any opportunities to modify your resume a bit to better show how you’re a strong match for some positions you’re applying for.

Also, some people find it helpful to keep one “master” resume, which lists everything you’ve accomplished everywhere you’ve ever worked (which could be pages and pages) but then pare that down into one actual resume to send (which should be 1-2 pages), pulling the  pieces from the master version which will present the strongest case for the job they’re applying for. This is a smart way to do it.

Now, some advice you didn’t ask for. You mentioned that you have an objective statement. You need to get rid of that because it’s 2014 and they’re horribly outdated. And you’re right that you shouldn’t be using a functional resume, because those are awful and scream “I’m hiding something” to hiring managers. What you need is a straightforward resume, no objective, organized reverse-chronologically, with bullet points describing what you achieved at each job — with the emphasis on accomplishments, not just job duties.

If you’re in doubt, start here.

how to avoid giving employers your salary history

Few parts of the job searching process cause job seekers more anxiety than discussions about salary: How much money should you ask for? Why won’t the employer name a number first? And worst of all: Will the employer want to tie your salary offer to what you’ve earned in the past, even if your past salary was low for your field?

This last one is cropping up more, with employers increasingly including salary history as a standard part of their evaluation of a candidate. And it’s no secret that employers are using this information to figure out what salary candidates would accept from them, which puts candidates in an unfair position and raises worries about leaving money on the table.

Of course, employers who inquire into salary history generally claim that they need to know what you’ve earned in the past because it helps them figure out how much you should be earning now, or so that they can screen out candidates who are earning far more than the position pays and presumably won’t want to take a pay cut. But neither of these reasons holds water. First, companies should be able to determine a candidate’s value for themselves; they don’t need to look to their competitors to tell them a candidate’s worth. And second, if they’re concerned that you’ll be unhappy with the salary they’re offering, they can solve that by posting their range up-front or ask you about your salary expectations rather than salary history. Demands to know your past salary are designed to give employers the upper hand in salary negotiations.

But the fact remains that they’re asking, so how should job seekers respond?

The best thing you can do when an interviewer asks about your salary history is to reframe the question into what salary range you’re seeking. After all, this is the more pertinent question! For instance: “I’m looking for a range of $45,000 to $55,000.” In some cases, this answer will be accepted and the conversation will move on. But in others, the interviewer will insist on knowing your previous salary. If that happens, you can try responses like:

  • “I keep that information confidential, but the range I’m looking for now is…”
  • “My previous employers have always considered that information confidential, but I’m seeking….”
  • “That’s not something I share with anyone but my accountant, but I’m seeking…”

Most interviewers are going to stop pushing at this point. But if an interviewer insists, you’ll need to decide whether you’re willing to hold firm (and potentially risk losing the job opportunity over it) or if you’ll give in. If you’re in a situation where you have plentiful options, you might decide that you’re not interested in working for an employer who would reject you for not disclosing your personal finances. But if you don’t feel you have many options, then you might decide that – annoying as this is – you’re going to play along. But with most interviewers, it shouldn’t come to that point.

However you decide to handle this, keep in mind that there’s one option that you shouldn’t risk: lying. If you decide to talk about your past salary, you need to be accurate, since if employers find out later that you lied, they can and will yank job offers over that. In fact, an employer can even fire you after you’ve been hired if someone finds out you lied in your application materials. As part of their offer paperwork, some companies will ask candidates for W-2s or other documentation of the salary numbers they gave. So if you do decide to tell, don’t lie.

 I originally published this article at U.S. News & World Report.

how much money do you make?

That’s a pretty crass headline, isn’t it?

Which is exactly the point. People don’t like to be asked what they make, and so it’s hard to find real-world information about what jobs pay, tailored to a particular industry and geographic level. Online salary websites are often inaccurate, probably because they generally don’t account for the fact that job titles can represent wildly different scopes of responsibility. You can ask around in your field, but that doesn’t always pay off, and it’s especially hard if you’re just starting out.

So, as suggested by a commenter last weekend, let’s take some of the mystery out of salary.

If you’re willing to play, leave a comment with the following information:

  • your job (the more descriptive the better, since job titles don’t always explain level of responsibility or scope of work)
  • your geographic area
  • your approximate years of experience
  • your salary
  • anything else pertinent to put that number in context

Update: Please put your job title as your user name, which will make it appear in bold, which will be easier for people to scan. 

(Assuming you want to be anonymous, don’t put your email address in the email field if you don’t want it linked to your Gravatar, if you have one.)

And if you’re willing to note whether you’re a man or woman, that might be interesting too!

And no snarking on anyone’s salary, because that is rude.

leaving a job off your resume, greeting coworkers by name, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Can you really leave a job off of your resume?

In one of your postings, you mentioned that it is okay to leave jobs off your resume if they aren’t relevant to the position to which you are applying. Does this mean it is okay to have gaps in your employment history? I had always thought you need to show that you had been consistently employed.

You don’t want to have big gaps on your resume. (A couple of months is fine; longer raises questions.)

As with anything that you consider putting on or leaving off your resume, you need to consider how it fits in with the overall package of your particular resume. A six-month gap 10 years ago? No one is going to care. An two-year gap 18-months ago? You’ll get questions. You may judge that the questions are preferable to including that job, or that they’re not, or all kinds of other judgments that will be specific to the details of your situation. But as a general principle, it’s fine to leave a job off your resume that you judge will hurt more than help (or that will just take up space more than help). But that judgment part is key to do — it’s okay to do, but you want to balance its impact on your resume, not on resumes in general.

2. Greeting coworkers by name when they don’t actually know me

I have kind of a daft question for you today, but here goes. I’m trying to develop the habit of using people’s names whenever I greet or thank them for something, and also when apologising, for example, for almost bumping into someone by accident at the tea station or something. It helps me to remember names, and I’ve noticed that I appreciate it when other people do the same. Obviously when greeting / thanking people, they know who I am so that’s fine, but saying “excuse me” / “sorry,” it might be anyone. This means that sometimes I do know the person’s name, because they’re a senior manager for example, but they might not recognise who I am in person because we’ve only exchanged emails or met very briefly (it’s a large department). Is it weird for me to use someone’s name in passing if they might not know exactly who I am?

I know it’s not a huge issue, but I just wondered what you thought.

No, it’s not weird! You work together, so it’s assumed that there’s a good chance that you know who they are. (It’s also a good way to nudge someone who thinks you are an anonymous, nameless, faceless coworker into recognizing you in the future, which is good for the cause of warmer, friendlier workplaces.)

3. My coworker asks me to get her a soda at lunch, every day

I am a doctoral student and administrative aide at a university. Last semester, a coworker had a medical issue that left her unable to drive so I would pick up lunch for her sometimes. I didn’t mind this at all and was actually very happy to help out a coworker when she needed it.

Fast forward a few months, medical issue long resolved… This coworker now frequently asks me to get her a soda on my lunch break, at least 3 or 4 times a week. I usually go home for lunch, so I have to go out of my way. She doesn’t even try to make it convenient, as my choices of where to “pick her up” a soda are limited to certain gas stations because she only wants to spend a dollar. “Fountain sodas at Place X are only $1, so you can get me one there”.” Thank you so much for not only giving me a personal errand to do for you on my one hour break, but also dictating where I am to go to further meet your needs! (End sarcastic rant.) Even if I am going somewhere for lunch, I still have to make another stop to get her soda unless I want to pay the difference. But it’s not about the price; it’s just the point. She just calls my office and casually says “Hey, could you pick me up a soda while you’re at lunch, thanks,” as if that dollar soda machine is in my home, just right on the way to my own refrigerator. To top it off, we have soda machines in our building! However, she apparently needs a big 32 ounce to make it through the day.

I never thought by helping her out last semester that I would have an additional task forever added to my daily schedule. I am baffled as to how she does not see how rude this is. I wouldn’t care about doing this occasionally, but it has gotten completely out of hand. I feel like it is just expected of me now and am unsure about how to handle the situation. I don’t want to seem petty, as it is just a soda, but I am very tired of feeling like I have to do this almost every single day.

It doesn’t sound like you’ve told her that you can’t, which is the solution to this. The obvious solution, too, if I can point that out — so it’s worth asking yourself if there are other areas of work life where you sometimes feel taken advantage of or resentful but haven’t actually spoken up to assert boundaries. (Apologies if I’m reading too much into a short letter — but you could end this so quickly by just explaining you can’t that I’m wondering it’s a larger pattern.)

In any case, it sounds like any of these: “Sorry, I’m going home for lunch.” Or, “Sorry, I’m not going to be anywhere with cans of soda for sale.” Or, “Sorry, I won’t have time today.”

4. Does this email mean that this company doesn’t want me to work there — ever?

I recently applied for a position with a start-up company and received the following rejection email. This isn’t the first time I’ve applied to this company (I really like the product and love the company and would one day love to work there). However, I think the email I received is basically saying that they don’t want me to work there … ever. Am I right or should I continue to apply for positions I’m a great fit for?

It said: “Thank you so much for applying for the role. It’s such a pleasure to hear from you again. We take it as huge compliment that you’d be willing to align your path with [the company]. :) There’s nothing greater for a company. We’ve made the tough decision not to bring you on board, but please do keep in touch in the future. Any one who would volunteer to make [the company] users happy is a great friend of [the company]. :) We’d love to hear what you’re up to down the road!”

Yeah, it’s a bit ambiguous, but it does sound like they’re basically saying “we evaluated you and it’s not the right fit; we feel warmly toward you but it’s unlikely to ever result in employment.” That might feel insulting, but employers — especially smaller employers — can reasonably reach that conclusion about smart, talented people who just aren’t aligned with what the company needs in one way or another. And it’s a tricky message to deliver, which could explain why it’s somewhat ambiguous.

That said, it’s not entirely clear that that’s what they meant — it could just be an confusingly written rejection for this one position — and it’s not like you have anything to lose by reaching out in the future if they have an opening. But I’d be prepared for the possibility that this company and you just aren’t the right fit.

5. Should I tell my mentor about my upcoming career change?

I recently landed a job in a field related to my master’s degree. While this is my first job in my industry, it is not my first job, as I’ve worked in related fields, struggled, and then went to graduate school to learn new skills and network in this new industry. Because of this, I am still pretty close with my graduate school network, including trusted professors, especially some who were my bosses or mentors at one point or another.

While I was in my master’s work, I participated in a six-month student research program funded by my current employer. Completion of the research program turned into the entry-level job I have now. The students in the program were mentored by the same professor, who was very integral in our job hunt before and after graduation, as she had a network of former students and colleagues that she could refer us to. This same professor also taught some of my master’s courses, and I consider her a great mentor, and probably my strongest reference in my grad school community.

After about a year into my new job, I have realized I’d like to work in a related area in my industry, a career that would really use the skills I learned in my master’s program. However, I am uncertain as to whether or not I should inform my professor of this career move before I land at a new job. Since she is also mentoring the same research program that my employer funds (and the program funnels graduate students into entry-level jobs at my company), I am worried I risk the likelihood of future students being placed at my company. I also worry that she may feel burned for helping me in the past for my job search. However, if I do not tell her, I feel like she may wonder if something is amiss in my company (and would want to know for the future of the research program), and I may miss out on networking opportunities if she knows that I am looking. If you have any insights into how to frame an email message to her (if you think one would be appropriate), I’d really appreciate it.

Tell her! If she’s at all reasonable, she understands that people sometimes switch their professional focus, and she’ll appreciate hearing an update from you, along with your thanks for the help she’s given and the role she’s played in your career thus far. It’s unlikely that she’ll stop placing students with your employer in the future, or even that she’d stop being a reference for you. Career changes aren’t personal, and any good mentor knows that.

However, is the relationship one where it would make sense to call her rather than emailing her? Giving her a call would allow you to have a warmer conversation with real back and forth.

how far in advance can you request time off?

A reader writes:

I know it’s awkward to request time off too late (since it may be hard to find cover, etc). But what’s the etiquette about making leave bookings ages in advance (like a year in advance)?

I like booking as far ahead as possible (to get the best deals on flights, miles, etc.), and I am wondering if this puts managers in a difficult position (i.e. no reason to say “no” to the leave, but would they rather work to a 3-month forecast when they know what projects are coming up)?

What’s your opinion on this – or is it highly specific to the workplace involved? Sometimes surprise is expressed when I book leave a year ahead (jokingly – as in “woah – any plans for 2016 while we’re at it?” or something), but I’ve never been asked not to do it and it’s always been approved. Would appreciate your guidance!

To some extent, I think this is dependent on individual workplaces. In some, it wouldn’t get a second thought, and in others you might get told that it’s impossible to approve it with confidence that far ahead.

But generally, I’d say this is fine to do. In the majority of cases, it’s going to be a non-issue. If anything, many managers will appreciate that you’re being so organized and planning-oriented.

There are some circumstances I can think of where I, as your manager, might need to say something like, “You know, that’s generally a busy time for us and it’s hard to predict this far out whether it’s going to end up being an easy time to be away” — but then we could talk about it and figure it out. A reasonable manager isn’t going to be judging you for making the request; they’ll just tell you if it’s a problem.

In fact, with everything of this sort, if you’re in doubt, the best thing to do is just ask your manager. In this case, you could say just, “Hey, I usually like to plan out my time off pretty far in advance so that I can get good deals on tickets, etc. Does it cause any problems on your end if I do that?”