should you refuse to sign a performance improvement plan?

A reader writes:

A peer and I both are HR managers, and we were discussing whether, if we weren’t in HR, we would sign a PIP (performance improvement plan).

I said that if I was the average employee, I would not sign a PIP, because the verbiage (in most PIPs) basically states that you agree with the negative assessment of your performance. The signed PIP can (and will) be used against the employee at unemployment hearings, cause of terminations, EEOC lawsuits, etc. Although most states are at-will and can terminate at any time, I’m against signing a PIP that may cause more damage once the employee is separated from the company.

My peer feels that by the employee not signing the PIP, it may cause more of a difficult work environment, which may cause management to watch the employee more closely and create more of a reason to terminate the employee at the end of the PIP cycle, whereas otherwise the employee might have been able to save their job at the end of the PIP cycle. She also feels that the employee could use this opportunity to search for another job; while agreeing to the terms of the PIP.

What are your thoughts?

If I asked an employee to sign something to acknowledge that they’d received a document (a PIP or anything else) and they refused to sign, that would such a hostile and adversarial move that I can’t imagine the relationship being repaired at that point. How could it not be over at that point?

On the other hand, if I asked an employee to sign something stating that they agreed with a performance assessment, and they didn’t actually agree with that assessment and thus declined to sign, that would be entirely reasonable. No one should push someone to sign something that they don’t actually agree with.

So it’s the difference between signing to indicate agreement with the assessment versus signing to acknowledge receipt. Most PIPs that I’ve seen, if they require a signature at all, ask the employee to sign only to indicate that she’s read the document and understands its terms (which often include that she will be let go if the terms of the PIP aren’t met). If your organization is asking employees to sign that they agree with the assessment — as opposed to agreeing with the plan — that’s problematic, and I’d change that wording.

(And anyone who’s ever asked to sign to indicate they agree with a PIP’s assessment should feel free to add a note saying, “signing to indicate receipt only.”)

And really, the signature requirement itself is a bureaucratic detail; it’s not essential. You can proceed with the PIP without ever asking for a signature.

But yeah, an employee flat-out refusing to sign to acknowledge receipt is a big deal (even courts in California have ruled that it’s misconduct and a disqualifier for receiving unemployment benefits), and a sign that that relationship isn’t going to be salvaged.

5 qualities you really need in your coworkers

When you’re hiring for an open role on your team, you have a list of qualifications that you’re screening candidates against. But in addition to whatever job-specific requirements you’re looking for, there are some other qualities that you want in any new hire, no matter what their position is. Here are five key qualities that you should screen for in building your team.

A determination to get results. You want team members who care about the real impact of their work, rather than appearances. You want people who will persist when they run into roadblocks that might deter the average person, who will scrutinize ideas to make sure that they’ll get the best outcome, and who will hold themselves accountable to getting done whatever they’re there to get done.

Decency. You want people on your team who will treat others as they’d want to be treated themselves – people who won’t be rude, dismissive, arrogant to clients or colleagues. You want people who give others the benefit of the doubt, who respect opinions that differ from their own, who can handle disagreement civilly, and who genuinely care about other people.

A desire for continuous improvement. You want team members whose determination to be successful will lead them to being fairly ruthless when it comes to identifying ways they could perform better. You’ll recognize this trait when you find people who are open about their flaws and fairly obsessive about learning from experience – people who want to incorporate those lessons into practice and be as effective as possible.

Communicative. If you’re ever worked with someone who didn’t speak up about problems or made it difficult for coworkers to approach her to talk about work, you know why this one is important. You want team members who operate with transparency, seek out input from others, and welcome the interaction that makes teams function more smoothly. You don’t want a team member whose instinct is to bury a problem and hope no one will notice – or who will figure, “Well, if they wanted to know that we were way over-budget on this project, they should have asked me.”

A sense of possibility. You want people who are engaged in their work and approach it with a sense of possibility, rather than people whose first instinct is to say “we can’t do that.” (This doesn’t mean that “we can’t do that” is never the right answer; sometimes it is. But you want team members who don’t start from that assumption.)  This will get you a team more likely to embrace rather avoid challenges and to persist in the face of setbacks rather than giving up easily.

I originally published this at Intuit QuickBase. 

I was told not to attend a former coworker’s retirement party

A reader writes:

I used to work for a health care organization that managed several hospitals and research institutes. I left the organization in 2012 to pursue another opportunity in another field. This month, a senior director in this organization is retiring. I will call her Sally. I heard from a current employee at the organization that a retirement tea party is being held for Sally. As a courtesy, I emailed the organizer of the tea party to say I would like to wish Sally well in person and give her my best at this function.

This is the reply I got from the tea party planner: “Thanks for the note and I am sure that Sally would like to hear from you and your well wishing. Due to security requirements and numbers, this event is for current employees of [company name].”

Is this reasonable? I am dumbfounded, as I saw in an earlier email from this woman who is planning the tea, that she asked people to circulate the invitation to others who Sally has worked with. I simply want to stop by, say my well wishes and wish her all the best on her retirement.

Do you think that this tea party planner just isn’t comfortable with former employees being there, even though it’s supposed to be a party for Sally? If that was the case, I would argue she should have made that clear when telling people about the event.

I have no idea, but I wouldn’t take it personally.

What I can tell you is that it’s absolutely true that some events like this are intended for current employees and not former ones. Obviously one extra person isn’t too hard to accommodate, but hey, some people are sticklers for rules. And it’s not totally crazy for the people hosting and/or paying not to want to deal with “Jane Smith came to Sally’s party last month, so why can’t former employees Apollo Warbucks and Percival Montblanc come to Lucinda’s this month?”

Regarding the fact that the invitation suggested inviting other people Sally has worked with, that could easily mean other employees. And sure, she didn’t spell out “NO FORMER EMPLOYEES, FOR THE LOVE OF GOD,” because it probably didn’t even occur to her to think about that, if their parties are usually just their coworkers.

Regardless, she’s told you it’s just an internal party, and that’s that. I wouldn’t spend any more time thinking about it — and definitely don’t sulk about it. File this away in the Not a Big Deal bucket.

And if you want to wish Sally well, there’s nothing stopping you from stopping by on your own at a different time or calling or emailing her with your well wishes.

contacting people who had my job before me, am I overqualified, under-qualified, or just right, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My controlling coworker wants us to have weekly update meetings, and I don’t want to

I have a colleague who does basically the same work that I do – we’re in the same unit, have essentially the same job functions, the same bosses, and we share an assistant. More importantly, we’re in the same pay grade. I have been in this job longer, but she is older and therefore has more work experience in general.

We have several progress meetings with our various bosses, but she wants us (the two of us and our assistant) to meet once a week to give each other status updates. She generally likes to be the one in charge, and I cannot shake the feeling that this is another attempt by her to exert control and set herself up to be in a position of “authority” over me. These meetings may very well be useful, but I don’t want to be a part of them. Am I being paranoid?

I don’t know if you’re being paranoid, but why not just be straightforward with her and say that you’re not sure the weekly meetings are necessary and ask what problem she’s trying to solve with them? If she can make a reasonable case that the meetings will be useful, then you really should go ahead and try having them. But you can preempt any attempts by her to use them to exert control over you by exerting some control from the outset yourself — for instance, send around an agenda beforehand, start off by leading the discussion, and/or take the lead on wrapping up. In other words, act aggressively like an equal, not someone she can push around.

Alternately, if the meetings really won’t have value, it’s fine to just say something like, “I think everything is going smoothly, so rather than adding in another weekly meeting, let’s just plan to talk ad hoc when we need to.” But don’t resist them just on principle, or you risk appearing obstructionist or unhelpful.

2. Should I contact people who had my job before me to find out what happened to them?

I work in facilities. Most people have worked here for a very long time – some up to more than 40 years, mostly men. The women are vicious. I am the third admin for the landscaping group in so many years. I support a supervisor who is classical textbook passive-aggressive. My boss is a nice guy but is afraid of her. This supervisor hates me. My boss’s admin is a bully. She used to like me but now doesn’t because of the passive aggressive. My boss has been out of the office on and off for the past 5 months; his wife had cancer and died. While he was out, passive-aggressive made a power grab, collaborated with the bully, and together put me on a PIP, which my boss didn’t sign but is going along with.

The reason I am writing is that the admin before me and another admin got fired. They seem to have gotten another job at the college in another department, which they call the land of misfit admins. This department takes admins fired from facilties because, from what I hear, they know there are problems here. I want to contact the ex-admins secretly. I want to find out what happened, but most of all I want to get the hell out of here and I want to reach out to them for help. What do you think I should do? Do I contact them? If so, what should I say?

Noooo. Don’t do that. That’s inviting and creating drama. If you’re not happy there, and it sounds like you’re not, start looking for another job. But secret contacts with people who got fired before you is drama town, and it sounds like your situation needs less drama, not more.

3. How can I keep quick informational staff meetings from turning into debates?

I work as a manager in a retail environment. Each day, we have small group meetings to share information, whether it be new processes, upcoming events, expectations, or new products with the crew. The meetings are led by a supervisor or manager. I lead about 9 of these a week (for various shifts). I do a great job for the most part, but the problem I run into is that the crew loves to get on their soapbox and share their side of the story when I am introducing a new system or expectation. I want to be perceived as a good listener so I let them say their piece, but I feel like it puts me on the spot in front of everyone who is looking to hear my response. Honestly, sometimes I just don’t have a response to what they are saying. I’d like some tips on how to respond when this happens.

Also, these meetings are only about 5-10 minutes long because of the fast-paced environment of the store, so when someone does get on their soapbox it takes up valuable time that I could be sharing other information. Again, it is an expectation from my boss that my people see me as a great listener so I need a way to quiet them down when I have other issues I need to get the crew up to speed on.

Well, keep in mind that you don’t just want people to see you as a good listener; you want to actually be a good listener, because that’s part of managing — as well as retaining good employees. Plus, you’ll make better decisions when you truly hear people’s input (which means not just tolerating their input, but actively seeking it), and your staff will be more likely to support those decisions when they feel their input has been heard and genuinely considered (even if the ultimate decision goes a different way).

All that said, it’s reasonable that sometimes you just need to relay information quickly. So I’d say something like, “If you have thoughts about this policy or a suggestion for improving it, please talk to me separately so that we can stay on track here and finish quickly.” But then you really need to hear people out when they come to you outside of these meetings and not make it impossible for them to talk with you.

4. Am I overqualified, under-qualified, or just right?

I’m a recent college grad who is having an extremely hard time finding a job and I was wondering if it might have something to do with my qualifications or lack thereof. I received my BS with a double major, then did a year with AmeriCorps in my field of study, and then got my MPA from Columbia University, graduating May 2013. I’m only 24. All told, I have about 2-1/2 years of combined experience (the 1 year of AmeriCorps, a 5-month client project for a non-profit which was part of my graduation requirement, a 6-month internship at the UN, and another 5-month internship at a nonprofit).

I still feel like an entry level candidate, so I’ve been applying to entry level jobs–some that ask for the masters, most that just ask for a bachelor’s degree–and I don’t know if I’m under/overqualified. On the one had, I don’t have years of salaried, full-time job experience so I don’t feel qualified to apply for a position asking for 3-5 years experience. On the other hand, I have a masters degree and I worry employers won’t hire me for something entry level based on that. Would you say that I’m over/under/just-right qualified for entry level nonprofit jobs that want 0-2 years experience? Any advice on how to downplay (or play up) the MPA? I feel like it’s more of a hindrance than a help.

On a related note, I’m applying to secretarial and clerical work (office receptionist, bank teller, etc.) because I desperately need a job, and again, I’m worried that even with a functional resume, I won’t be hired because I either don’t have enough experience in those fields or I have too much education. What would be your take on that?

Applying for jobs that ask for 0-2 years experience sounds about right, but it’s going to depend on the job. If it’s a receptionist job, I’d leave your masters off, since it’s going to hurt you more than help with those jobs. There’s no requirement that you list every qualification that you have, and listing a masters when applying to receptionist jobs is like announcing “This job isn’t what I want to do and I’ll be waiting for something better to come along” (whether or not that’s true).

When you leave it on (and actually the rest of the time too), make sure you’re explaining in your cover letter why you’re applying for the job you’re applying for — what excites you about it and why you’d be great at it. Otherwise, if the job doesn’t match up with your background, employers will assume you’re not be thoughtful and are just resume-bombing, and that’ll get you quickly discarded. Thoughtful, truly customized cover letters are going to be your friend here.

(And don’t use a functional resume at all; those are annoying and red-flaggy to employers.)

5. My manager makes me pick up my paycheck from her house

Is it appropriate to have to pick up my paycheck from my manager’s house? She lives in a sketchy part of town with her boyfriend that is really out of the way for me to have to drive to, and sometimes it’s her BOYFRIEND–who I don’t even know and is not connected with the company in any way–who gives the check to me instead of her. She is the CEO of her own branch of a company that sells Direct TV. She also has an office in town that she could use instead of her house, but chooses not to.

I’m the new guy and am afraid to say any thing, but I really am uncomfortable going to her house to pick up the check, and even more uncomfortable with her boyfriend giving it to me sometimes.

No, it’s not appropriate. But there’s no federal law governing precisely how your paychecks are distributed to you, and I don’t know of any state with a law addressing that either. However, why not ask her to either provide direct deposit or to hold your check at work for you? You don’t need to explain that it’s because of her sketchy location or her sketchy boyfriend; you can simply point out that it’s more convenient. (If it’s because she’s cutting the checks from home on her day off or something, then you could tell her you don’t mind waiting a few days until you’re both in the same location.)

my boss is constantly urging me to stay at my job, even though I’ve shown no signs of leaving

A reader writes:

I’ve developed a somewhat close relationship with one of my bosses, who is not my direct supervisor. I talk to him for about 15-20 minutes every day.

About once a week (sometimes more), he finds a way to turn a conversation from general work stuff to how — even though my job is far from ideal, the pay is low, and the company is terrible (his words) — I should stick it out here for a couple years. Sometimes this happens after I casually mention a small work issue, and sometimes it just happens out of nowhere. This has been going on for about 3 months now, so I’ve had this same conversation with him probably close to 15 times.

I’ve been here about 9 months, and while I agree with everything he’s said, I have begun job hunting. I’m not desperate to get out, but when I see something that feels right, I’m going for it. I’m not sure if he knows I am job hunting, but this conversation is getting awkward and really annoying. I usually just say, “I totally agree. I’m learning a lot and getting experience I wouldn’t get anywhere else,” which is true. However, I’m starting to feel like that is only encouraging the conversation to continue. Now I’ve tried simply nodding my head and smiling, but I’m running out of ways to respond. I’ve tried to avoid bringing up issues I’m having at work, but it’s pretty difficult to do in my office.

I really like this guy, so I don’t want to say something too off-putting. Is there something I can do to avoid this awkward conversation from repeating itself?

Maybe, maybe not.

Him mentioning it once or twice, I could see — but 15 times? I wonder what’s going on that makes him feel like he needs to say this all the time. Any chance it’s one of the following:

* Possibility 1: You seem more unhappy than you realize, and he’s responding to that by trying to convince you to stick it out.  You don’t say whether you agree with his assessment of your job, but nine months is a pretty short stay, and I wonder if he’s trying to point out to you that you’ll be better off staying than hopping to another job so soon. (Which might or might not be true, depending on the details.)

* Possibility 2: He’s  talking to or about himself as much as about you; he’s trying to justify (internally or to you) why he’s staying in a situation that isn’t ideal.

Both of those are just speculation though, so why not just ask him what’s up? The next time it comes up, why not  say something like, “I’m curious. You’ve mentioned this to me a lot lately. How come?”

If nothing else, the fact that you’re asking about it will probably decrease the amount he brings it up in the future — because you’ll explicitly have noted that it’s a little unusual that it comes up so much.

And in general, when you find yourself confused by what your manager is getting at by saying/doing, it’s usually fine to just ask. Frame it pleasantly, of course, but it’s usually okay to say, “Hey, I’ve noticed ___ and was wondering what’s behind it.”

does the admin in my new office have boundary issues?

A reader writes:

My company last year acquired another company in the same industry, and we’ve finally merged offices. As it happens, the acquired companies offices were larger and less expensive, so we moved in with them. As a senior team member in our old place, I had my own office. But we went from 10 team members to 60 when we moved, so now I have a little cubicle. I’m not bothered at all by the change. As long as I have an electrical outlet and wifi, I can work from anywhere.

In our new office, one of the perks is that we have an administrative assistant who is amazing. She makes coffee, orders food, sets up for meetings, cleans common areas, orders supplies, liaises with the building manager, and makes sure things like cable and phones stay on. At my old office, all of those responsibilities were divided up among my few colleagues and me, in addition to our client work, so I feel especially grateful to have this woman around in our new space.

However, I’ve noticed she may have some boundary issues. I came in earlier this week to find she had added a lamp to my area (lamps aren’t standard issue, this one was just sitting around unused). She said when she saw me, “I left a gift on your desk.” I just let it go. Things on my shelves have been moved, and I have a space heater that automatically turns off for safety and energy efficiency and I came in to find a company-wide email from this admin demanding space heaters be turned off, and mine had been unplugged, presumably by her.

In fact, this company-wide email approach is common with her. The other day I was in a hurry to get a client settled into a meeting and I grabbed two used glasses off the conference table, ran to put them in the kitchen sink and ran back to welcome the client. When our meeting was done, there was a company-wide email in my inbox demanding that glasses not be left in the sink.

I try to be very direct with people, so I can’t help feeling like this approach of email blasting every time you don’t like something is both distracting and unprofessional. First, it doesn’t solve anything (if it did, she wouldn’t have to send so many of them repeatedly). Second, it creates an environment of suspicion and uncertainty, and opens the door for gossip (Coworker 1: “Do you know who she was talking about?” Coworker 2: “I bet it was _____, she’s so messy.”). Also, she’s not anyone’s supervisor, so she really has no business asserting authority over people via email.

Am I off base? How should I approach her about it without making her feel like I don’t appreciate her?

Yeah, a little off-base, I think. A lot of this is standard stuff for admins.

Giving you a lamp isn’t really a boundary violation. If you don’t want it there, say no thanks and that you’re not a lamp person, but you appreciate her thinking of you.

The space heater — well, some companies have space heater policies that they take very seriously because they can start fires. You can debate whether or not that’s reasonable, but in places where this is serious business, it’s not uncommon that they’d unplug yours — and that the office admin would be the face of that policy (or its executioner).

Rearranging your stuff? Yeah, that’s legitimately annoying. But you could simply say, “Hey Jane, I appreciate how much work you do to make our space look nice. Would you not rearrange the stuff on my shelves though, since it makes it harder for me to find things?”

As for the company-wide emails … sure, they’re annoying if they’re generated every other day. But in the scheme of things, they’re pretty minor. If this woman is otherwise pleasant, efficient, helpful, and good at her job — and it sounds like she’s all of these things — I would write this off to “no one is 100% perfect, but she’s pretty damn good” and just let it go. (And I don’t think your coworkers are really going to get into heavy gossip about who prompted the email about the glasses in the sink. If they do, it’s kind of about them, because that is one boring topic for gossip. Perhaps get them an US Weekly subscription.)

More broadly, it’s appropriate — in most offices, at least — for admins to to assert authority over the general office area. Not over the people in it, but over the space itself. Within reason, of course, and not in such a way that process becomes an obstacle to people getting their jobs done, and certainly it’s appropriate for people to push back if the admin’s governance of the space causes issues for them.  But when you question whether it’s appropriate for her to be issuing edicts on the kitchen sink in the first place, the answer is: Yeah, it’s probably part of her job.

Of course, if you ever feel like the company-wide emails are being spurred by you (like you did with the glasses you moved to the sink from the conference table), there’s no reason you can’t just address it with her straightforwardly. For instance, right after receiving that “no glasses in the sink” email, say something like, “I think I might be the cause of that email about leaving things in the sink. I left some glasses there earlier today because they were in a conference room I needed to quickly prepare for clients. Sorry about that!” (Note that in this case, you can say “sorry about that” and still do the exact same thing again if you need to in similar circumstances, because it was reasonable in that context.) In other words, be direct, be cheerful, and be unbothered.

Overall, though, it sounds like you have an awesome admin, and that’s where I’d focus. That’s not to say that you can’t ever ask a generally awesome person to do something different — you absolutely can — but you should pay them the respect of being straightforward about it and not stewing. And conveniently, part of being a generally awesome person is that they’ll usually strongly prefer that.

Read an update to this letter here.

my manager doesn’t give us input on new hires, my manager shared a coworker’s medical details with us, and more

It’s five short answers to five short questions. Here we go…

1. My manager hires new people without consulting with the rest of us

I work in a team of 4 full-time employees. We are a small web and software development team. My boss didn’t bother asking for our input on the last hire, nor did he ask us to sit in the interview. He didn’t even tell me that he chose someone. I only found out because there was someone new when I returned from a conference. But when I was hired, my future coworkers even sat in my interview.

He currently has a position open, and the only way I found out is through our job listings online. What is your thought on this? I find it to demonstrate how low he thinks of us.

As a manager, it’s good practice to involve staff members in hiring processes because it can help you make better decisions — because candidates may reveal different information to would-be peers than to the you, or staff members may simply pick up on different things than you do. But certainly plenty of managers hire without doing that; your manager isn’t terribly unusual in that respect, and it’s not a sign that he holds you in low regard. (There might be other signs of that, of course, but this on its own isn’t one of them.)

But why not ask him if you and your coworkers can play a role in the hiring process? You don’t want to sound like you’re asking for decision-making authority, of course, but you could point out that it could be useful to have additional people assessing the top candidates, as well as that you’re in a good position to answer candidates’ questions about the day-to-day of the work.

2. Manager accidentally emailed a coworker’s personal medical details to our division

A manager two level above me had mistakenly sent out an email to our division instead of his direct reports. The email disclosed the details of a coworker’s upcoming visits to a doctor and procedures that needed to be done. My coworker is extremely embarrassed and has only received a halfhearted email as an apology. There has been no acknowledgement to the division of the mistake. Any suggestions on how this should be handled?

How the manager should handle it, or how the rest of you should? The manager should profusely apologize to the coworker who the email was about, should send a follow-up apologizing for inappropriately disclosing details that weren’t meant for others to read, and should rethink his habit of discussing details of someone’s medical procedures with other people (because I can’t see why it even needed to be shared with his intended audience). There’s not really anything for the rest of you to do though; your manager made a mistake, he apologized to the person it affected, and that’s about all that can be done.

3. Should I keep a waitressing job on my resume?

Last year, 2 years after graduating from college, I was finally able to land a full-time job. Before that, I had a part-time job related to my field and was a restaurant server to make some extra cash. I left my serving job off my resume, but it would usually come up in interviews — mostly when asked about time management and how I handle stress. A lot of interviewers would ask me why I left the job off my resume since serving teaches you so many transferable skills. Many told me they thought it was the hardest job out there and I should definitely have put it on there. While I 100% agree with that, I had 3 college internships plus a part-time job, so I felt it was best to just leave it off. I’m still employed, am looking for jobs again and am curious on your thoughts. I no longer serve there, but should I put the serving job on or leave it off?

Sure, it won’t hurt you to have it on there, and it can certainly demonstrate customer service skills and the ability to juggle lots of things under pressure. That said, you’re probably gaining more work experience that demonstrates those same things within a context more relevant to your field, so I wouldn’t leave it on there indefinitely — maybe until it’s about five years old but not beyond that.

4. My coworkers constantly share their inappropriate, bigoted, and hostile views with me

I work in an absolutely toxic environment and I’m not really sure how to deal with it. My coworkers frequently have loud and inappropriate conversations. We have an open work plan that doesn’t allow me to block it out and headphones only help so much due to the volume (and they’ve backfired some as coworkers have told me they assume I’m not listening or can’t hear them).

One coworker described the exact details of sexual abuse that her young relative had undergone in order to get advice on the situation, as if knowing that specific acts would help. Another coworker complained that she was kept up late the night before because a neighbor was beating his wife and he needed to keep it down. She even imitated the woman begging for help. Coworkers have told me all the reasons I need to have children right now and why as someone in my mid-20s, it’s going to be too late if I don’t. They’ve had loud discussions about Jesus and the Bible knowing that I’m not Christian (I’m an atheist but I don’t talk about my views at work). They’ve complained about people abusing welfare and “illegals” using medical resources. One said being gay was a choice and yelled at me for disagreeing. She then went to a gay coworker and lied about what she had said. People talk about beating their kids and threatening other people with violence when they’re angry. There are plenty more stories. I never know what I’ll walk into on a given day and it destroys my mood and productivity.

I’ve tried talking to my boss about it and all she did was have a staff meeting where she told me not to say anything and then told everyone to “be professional.” The head of HR told me that I’m doing the “same thing” as my coworkers by telling people what they can or can’t say at work. When I said that I don’t tell people what to say, she told me that I was “judging them in [my] head.” She told me I needed to work on dealing with my frustration with the situation. I tried to remind her that our customers/patients could potentially hear these things too but she didn’t seem bothered.

Everyone tells me to go to HR (tried it twice), find a new job (easier said than done) or to just not be bothered by it (way easier said than done). What am I supposed to do in a place like this?

Your company sucks and isn’t going to change. I’m sorry. You’ve raised the problems and been told, in essence, that they don’t see it as a problem that they plan to do anything about.

You can choose to live there with this BS or you can find another job — which yes, is easier said than done, but you’ll have to leave there eventually, assuming you don’t intend to stay there for the rest of your career, so why not do it now?

Read updates to this letter here and here.

5. Which business books should my team read?

I work in human resources, and each quarter our team does a book review. We all read a business-related book and discuss it at one of our staff meetings. It doesn’t have to be long; our last one was a 45-minute read, but it’s supposed to have something useful that we can apply to our professional lives or behavior. I sort of volunteered (since no one else was) to research suggestions for the next book we’ll read. Our team is smallish but consists of HR, payroll, benefits, the building manager and admins. I love your blog and think you give great advice (I think your blog helped me get my current job which I love) so I was wondering if there are any books you’d recommend?

Well, on the nuts and bolts of how to actually manage — as in, what does managing well really look like day-to-day, what are the words you use for the conversations you have to have, etc. — it’s probably no surprise that I recommend my own book, Managing to Change the World, which I co-authored with Jerry Hauser, the former COO of Teach for America and founder of The Management Center. It’s written for nonprofit managers, but 99% of what’s in there applies to every sector.

I’d also take a look at the excellent First, Break All the Rules by Marcus Buckingham, which early on helped me shift the way I looked at struggling performers; Switch: How to Change Things When Change is Hard by Chip and Dan Heath, which shows you how to make difficult changes stick — socially, organizationally, and personally; and Mindset: The New Psychology of Success by Carol Dweck, which argues that intelligence and abilities aren’t pre-determined as much as they’re  the result of learning and hard work … which has implications for tons of things in the workplace.

* I make a commission if you use those Amazon links.

housekeeping: mobile version of Ask a Manager?

I figured I’d crowdsource this one: We need a mobile version of Ask a Manager so people can read it on their phones and tablets more easily. Which means I need an easy WordPress plugin that doesn’t require tons of customization to work. I’d been hoping WPtouch Pro would be the solution, but they don’t support threaded comments (so comments would just appear chronologically, rather than making it clear what was a reply to something else) and they don’t know when they’re going to add it, so that’s a no-go.

So … if you have a WordPress site and a mobile version you’re happy with, what are you using? Or if you’ve seen it done well somewhere else, what are they using?

Right now I’m looking at Obox Mobile, but would love other suggestions…

I don’t like the restrictions on my severance, employer is changing pay rate every week, and more

It’s five short answers to five short questions. Here we go…

1. My coworker won’t stop commenting on my clothes and shoes

I work in a very small office that also has a warehouse. Fewer than 10 people work for the company, and I come in contact with everyone every day. The dress code for the office is business casual (and for the warehouse, it’s VERY casual). There is someone in the warehouse who continually makes comments on my choice of clothing or shoes, which is always work-appropriate. They aren’t compliments and while they’re not direct insults, they definitely lean more in that direction. The comments usually happen at least once a week. Some examples: “Oh, you’re wearing your hooker shoes today” (just for regular high heels, not 6″ stilettos or anything), or she’ll burst out laughing at me and make a comment like, “You’re wearing witch shoes today!” if the toes are pointed.

While I don’t take them terribly personally, I would like the comments to stop. My current approach has just been to ignore it completely but that doesn’t work. She often has temper tantrums or over-reacts to things, so I’m not sure how to phrase my request for her to stop without making it into a huge issue. Do you have any suggestions, or should I just leave it alone and ignore it?

It sounds like you have to decide between (a) ignoring it but allowing the comments to continue and (b) telling her to cut it out and risking that she reacts poorly to it — which would be her fault, not yours. If you decide to say something, I’d just say, “I’d really prefer it if you didn’t comment on my clothes or shoes. Thank you.” If she wants to have a tantrum in response to that, let her — she’s going to look really absurd. (But it’s perfectly reasonable if you decide you don’t feeling like dealing with that and can instead just happily ignore her.)

Oh — one other option would be to simply say “Wow” or “That’s rude” when she says something that truly crosses a line, like the hooker shoes comment.

2. My severance offer requires that I keep working a certain amount of time

I received a request for a phone conference three months ago on Nov. 5. I and two of my fellow coordinators were notified at that time that our jobs were being eliminated and that our final day would be Jan. 21. The company we work for has been holding our severance package over our head – if we remain employees in good standing until the end of the time, we receive the package. Of course, we are not able to apply for other jobs because we can’t afford to leave money on the table. Is this legal for them to do this? Is there any recourse? It is now down to the wire and we are getting ready to sign seperation papers. I just still have questions about my rights being violated.

This is very normal and perfectly legal. They want you to work out that full period, through January 21, and they’re offering you a financial incentive to do it — if you stay the whole time, you’ll get a bonus in the form of severance when you leave.

But you’re not required to stay that whole time or to accept the severance. You should absolutely be job-searching during this time, and if you’re offered a job that starts before January 21, at that point you can decide whether to take it (and forego the severance) or to turn it down (or to try to negotiate a later start date). That’s 100% your choice; no one is going to force you to do anything, and no one is violating your rights. (No law requires employers to offer severance, and they can put conditions like this on it if they want to.)

Personally, unless the severance package is a huge one, I’d say that a secure job offer and giving up the severance is worth more than a small amount of severance, which will run out pretty quickly and leave you without a job.

3. How can I thank my boss for hiring my friend?

My boss had an available position to fill, so I suggested she speak to a friend of mine. He ended up hiring her recently, and I wanted to send an email to thank him, but didn’t know if this was necessary/appropriate or what even to say. Any suggestions?

Don’t thank him! You don’t want to imply that he did you or her a favor — that implies that she wasn’t the best person for the job, so it’s a little undermining to her and a little weird for him. In fact, you did him a favor, by connecting him with a good candidate. So instead of thanking him, I’d say something like, “I’m so glad that Jane ended up being the right person for the role. I’m looking forward to her starting.”

4. Applying for a promotion when my partner might be taking a job in another state

My partner was approached about a job in Tampa (we currently live in Atlanta). She is about to have her final round of interviews early next week. All feedback has been extremely positive and it is very likely that she will receive an offer, which is GREAT… For her. It is a huge opportunity with a great salary and benefit options. Also, we both have family in Tampa, so the plan was to relocate there, eventually. We weren’t expecting it to happen so soon, though.

I’ve recently (just yesterday) had an opportunity to apply for a position within my current company. The position is only being offered within my current team, and isn’t even being posted on our intranet. I have been in discussions with my boss for a couple of months now about this exact position, specifying that this is exactly what our team needs, and that this is exactly what I want to do. So, pretty much, I feel like the opportunity was created just for me. This position is one that could be done remotely, but, I struggle with how to approach my boss with that option. I know it is probably going to be a difficult argument for her to make to her boss, so I’m not sure how detailed I should get when I bring it up, to make the argument a valid one.

Do I just keep the question high level, asking is there a possibility that this position could be a remote position? Or do I get detailed and explain my circumstance? I don’t want to make her nervous and make her feel that I am a flight risk, but I also don’t want it to seem like I just want to move to Tampa for no significant reason.

This isn’t a deal breaker, as I want the job either way, but I don’t want to miss a potential opportunity for me to relocate with her by possibly not explaining the situation enough. As a manager, what are your thoughts? Keep it high level or explain my personal situation?

Apply for the job, now. Don’t mention Tampa. If, and only if, your partner is offered and accepts the Tampa job should you raise the question about whether doing the job remotely would be possible. You don’t want to raise concerns about you leaving the area before you know that you really need to.

5. Employer is changing my pay rate every week to avoid paying overtime

My employer changed me from salary to hourly because my job is non-exempt. I was told my pay would stay the same. Everything is cool!

I worked my week just as I normally would to get my job done and of course I had overtime. My employer reduced my hourly rate so my paycheck stayed the same. And the next week I worked less hours and my pay again changed so I got paid the same. Is this legal?

What! No. They cannot muck around with your pay rate in order to avoid paying you overtime. They cannot change your pay rate retroactively either. It sounds like they don’t quite understand what non-exempt means — or that they understand only half of it.

Go to your manager and say, “Hey, I looked into this, and we can’t change my pay rate each week to avoid paying overtime. Do you want me to just limit myself to 40 hours a week so that the company doesn’t end up needing to pay for overtime?”

I’m annoyed that I got an automated rejection for a job I was invited to apply for by an old boss

A reader writes:

I recently interviewed for a senior (10+ years experience required) position at a large media organization. The most senior of the 4 panellists was an old boss. He had emailed me to invite me to apply for the position following an earlier catch-up where I asked about potential work with the organization.

I wasn’t successful, but I was still a little put out to just get an automated rejection letter thanking me for my “application.” Is it bad form not to phone the candidates in these situations – or am I being overly sensitive?

I’d say a little overly sensitive.

I mean, yes, ideally your old boss would have contacted you himself to tell you of the decision rather than allow it to come via form letter (although I’d have no problem with him using email to do it, as long as it was a personal email from him, not a form letter). That’s just good manners when you know a candidate well.

But if he’s not running the search himself or isn’t the head decision-maker within it, I can see how it didn’t happen. People don’t always think each stage of the process through in the way that they ideally would.

I think you’re better off choosing not to be miffed and just writing it off as not a big deal.