my boss seems annoyed when I stay home every time it snows

A reader writes:

There have been days when it is snowing when or shortly after I wake up. The weather forecast predicts the snow will continue all day and they have been accurate. So I call in or email to let the boss know I am staying home. I am salaried, so I say I’ll use a sick/vacation day.

The boss and a few other employees can make it in, and I can tell they are annoyed when I and others call out. On such days, typically schools have been closed also.

My reasoning is based on economics and probability. I have to go down three murderous hills en route to work, and you could argue my driving versus other’s does not make a difference. The way I see it, there is a high probability I will crash my car. I do not make enough in a full work day (let alone getting in for a few hours) to cover my deductible. My boss certainly won’t pay for it. So weighing those factors, I stay home based on that. What are the implications? Is my reasoning justified?

Well, I think you’re probably off-base in saying that there’s a “high probability” that you will crash your car. The vast majority of people who drive in snow don’t crash their cars. Entire regions of the U.S. deal with snow for months on end in the winter, and the people who live there go to work without crashing their cars. Even regions that are less used to snow, where drivers are therefore less experienced with navigating snowy conditions, are full of people who drive in snow without crashing their cars.

So yeah, if you’re calling out every time there’s a day of snow — as opposed to a major snowstorm that’s shutting down a city (not just schools*) — your boss and coworkers are likely to think that you’re being overly dramatic and/or shirking work. That is why they sound annoyed.

* Schools play by different rules. Here in the D.C. area, for instance, school systems shut down for snow far more quickly than county governments and workplaces do, partly because they’re concerned about sending kids outside onto icy sidewalks in pre-dawn hours. You’re not really safe using schools as your guide here.

employer offered me a job but said I offended half the team, my boss is overruling HR, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Employer offered me a job, but said I rubbed half the team the wrong way

I was recently told by email that I would be receiving a verbal offer, followed by a written offer. During the verbal offer call, the hiring manager volunteered interview feedback both critical and positive. The critical feedback was that half (!) the team who interviewed me were rubbed the wrong way by my “edge.” I thanked her for her candor and she said, “We can work on that one.” I expressed concern about whether this feedback would handicap me before I’ve even started to work for them.

I’m a bit perplexed about how to proceed. This information gives me some serious pause — regarding leadership style and office culture, namely. My expectation would be that this would be an opportune time to “white lie” to the candidate and express the team’s (albeit, democratically) enthusiasm for extending a job offer. I don’t know how this feedback benefits my work performance before I have even accepted an offer.

Yeah, that should give you serious pause, because it’s a sign that this place might not be a comfortable fit for you. And remember, the goal isn’t just to get a job offer; it’s to end up working somewhere where you’ll excel and be happy. I’m curious about how aligned you felt with their culture before that phone call; did these feel like your people, or were you already getting the sense that it might not be a perfect match?

In any case, as for what to do now … I wouldn’t take the job without getting a much better understanding of what the concern is and what “we can work on that one” means.

(Also, be grateful for employers who don’t indulge in “white lies” in the hiring stage; you want to know what you might be getting into. It’s the ones who sugarcoat who cause the real problems.)

2. Can an employer impose restrictions on when vacation days become available to employees?

If a salaried, non-exempt employee is granted 20 total vacation days per year, are there restrictions that an employer may impose as far as when and how many days are available throughout the year? We have a situation where the salaried employee has been on maternity leave since December, has depleted her 2013 vacation days, and now wants to use some of her 2014 allotment. My fear is paying vacation days before the employee has even reported back to work in 2014. It would seem logical that she is allotted the 20 vacation days spread incrementally over the year so as to not deplete in too short of a period (if she quits, the employer has paid vacation for the whole year!).

Yes, you can impose any restrictions you want. Typically companies don’t front-load all the year’s vacation days in January; rather, employees accrue them at a steady rate through the year. For instance, with 20 annual days, people might accrue 6 hours of leave with each paycheck (assuming you’re paid every two weeks). And typically people don’t accrue any PTO when they’re on unpaid leave.

3. My boss doesn’t want me including his telecommuting in an attendance report

I have a question and I think my dislike of this job in general is clouding my judgment. My office is a remote branch of a national company, and there’s one branch manager who’s my direct boss (I’m an admin). When I first started, I was told by HR to send them an attendance report with a record of everyone’s absences for the branch (including the manager). But he gets upset whenever I put that he’s out of office working from home. He only wants me to record when he’s actually out of town. I checked with HR, and they clarified the working from home format, but he still gets annoyed. I realize it doesn’t affect pay, but I’m uncomfortable recording something I see as inaccurate. He also implied that if I mark working from home, it means he didn’t actually work. (But seriously, I’m not sending value judgments of his week or writing that he was unproductive, just that he’s in the office or not). He comes in to the office significantly less than 40 hours so this is bound to come up soon. So, am I being a stickler? What should I do?

I agree with your boss that there’s no reason an attendance report needs to indicate when someone is working from home. Telecommuting is working, just as much as working in the office.

But are you saying that your HR department has specifically asked you to record when someone is working from home, including your manager? That’s bizarre and I can’t imagine why they need to know that. But in that case, you might send a clarifying message to HR saying something like, “Bob told me not to use the working-from-home category. I don’t feel comfortable overriding his instructions to me, but if it’s an issue on your end, it might make sense to work it out with him directly.”

4. Can I decline a job opportunity but recommend a friend?

I am a marketing major in the college of business at my school, and I have a friend who lives out of town who has been trying to get a job at a local bank so that she can move here. She has applied at every bank in town and hasn’t heard back from any of them. A couple of days ago, I was presenting an assignment in my Management class. I was passed a business card later that had a message on the back. It said I have great presentation skills, and that if I’m interested in a career in the banking world, I should email him. However, I still have a year before I graduate, and I have a summer internship that pays enough that I don’t have to work during school. So, I don’t really want the position. Would it be impolite to pass this person’s contact information on to my friend? Would it be impolite to bring her name up to him? I want to handle this as tactfully as possible.

No, that’s not impolite. However, to really help your friend, you should make the introduction yourself. Email the person who gave you his card and explain that you’re not currently looking for work but you can recommend a friend who’s great because of X, Y, and Z. Say she’ll be emailing him with her resume soon, and then make sure she does so. (Make sure that you can really vouch for her though; it will reflect on you if you recommend someone bad, or whose application materials will be a disaster. So you want to have some professional knowledge of your friend.)

5. My employer-affiliated doctors aren’t taking my pain seriously

I work for a large auto manufacturing plant in the U.S. I was injured on the job in October. I’m in constant pain and not sure how to proceed. Every time I go to medical to get treatment, I’m given painkillers, heating pads and a cortisone steroid shot and told to go back to work. The pain is getting worse. All recommended physicians work or are affiliated with the plant. What can I do?

Please see a doctor who isn’t affiliated with your workplace. You need an independent opinion from someone who isn’t any way beholden to your employer.

my parents say I should offer to work for free for a week to prove myself to employers

A reader writes:

I’ve read your posts about working for free (unintentionally) as part of the hiring process as a form of “spec” work for technical jobs, but I think I have a different question to ask in the same neighborhood.

I’m being “advised” by my parents that “five times as many candidates as job openings be damned!” and “Just go up to an employer (who may or may not even have a job opening advertised), tell them you’ll work for them for free for one week and if they’re happy with the job you’re doing, then they should hire you.”

Is this at all a reasonable thing to do? Some of my concerns are:

1. I live 15 miles outside of small college town. Gas obviously costs money, especially if I’m spending every day driving in for unpaid work. Also this prevents me from doing other things during the work week (job hunting, phone calls, being on-call for temp work).

2. I am actively looking for a job, but most of my actual experience is in retail and I’m trying to get more into clerical work (or really just out of the service industry in general). I’m not sure that I’d be impressive without any actual office experience. Sure, a week’s worth of experience at a time would be beneficial, but how would I indicate that?

3. How would (potential) employers react? Is this act better used to get my resume more attention, or after a reasonable amount of time of having no call-back?

4. This kind of aggressive selling is very much out of my comfort zone. Any tips here?

What your parents are suggesting is (1) illegal and (2) unlikely to work anyway.

It’s illegal because it violates minimum wage laws. Employers are required to pay people who do work for them. (There are some exceptions to this, like nonprofits, government agencies, and internships that are carefully structured to meet standards that this proposal wouldn’t.)

But even if that weren’t the case, most employers don’t want to mess around with letting people do a week of work to prove themselves. Bringing on new employees is a major endeavor; it takes an enormous amount of time and energy for training, among other things. Most people are still floundering by the end of the first week. The first week is a loss for the employer most of the time, because they’re investing so much time in getting you up to speed. So the idea of bringing someone on for a week’s trial run is a pretty unappealing proposal, unless that person is already a strong finalist for the job and it’s a role that doesn’t require much acclimation.

Your parents are probably suggesting this because 40 years ago, this was the kind of thing that impressed employers as “gumption.” It doesn’t work today. Things are different.

So you are hereby forbidden from taking job search advice from your parents, who have proved that their knowledge of job searching comes from distant days of yore.

What you should try doing is finding ways to get office experience, because until you do, you’re going to be at a disadvantage when compared to candidates who have it. So: Can you volunteer (for legitimate nonprofits who have real volunteer programs, not for the random businesses your parents want you to solicit)? Temp? Intern? Anything you can do to get office experience on your resume is going to help.

You also need an awesome cover letter.

What you do not need is a time capsule full of moldy advice from several decades ago.

Related:
Ignore your parents! They are forbidden from giving you advice.
is my parents’ advice destroying my job search?
more bad job advice from parents

12 ways to get the most out of attending a conference

Attending work-related conferences can be useful or useless, depending on how you approach them. Approach them right and you can pick up new skills, learn about trends in your field, and make valuable networking contacts. Approach them wrong and they can end up merely being long, boring days away from home.

Here are 12 tips for getting the most of conferences.

1. Read through the agenda ahead of time and figure out what sessions you want to attend. Realize that you probably won’t be able to attend a session in every time slot throughout the day, so prioritize the ones you most want to attend. If you’re attending with a coworker, consider dividing them up so that between the two of you, you’re covering more sessions. Similarly…

2. Read the exhibitors list ahead of time and make a list of people and companies you want to speak with. Otherwise, in a large exhibition hall, you may get overwhelmed and never make it to the people who you most wanted to talk to.

3. Ask questions in the sessions you attend. Don’t be shy about questioning the speakers about points you’re especially interested in or would like clarified. In fact, you’re actually doing the speakers a favor by asking questions; most speakers dread having disengaged audiences, and there’s nothing worse for a speaker than asking for questions and finding a silent room.

4. Practice introducing yourself in one sentence. You’re going to be doing this over and over when you meet new people, and you want it to be polished.

5. Bring business cards. You might not use cards much in the rest of your work life, but you’ll go through dozens at a conference when you’re meeting new people. And you’ll collect dozens too, so make sure to make a few notes on the back of each so that you remember who each person is once you’re back at your office.

6. Be approachable. Don’t spend all your time outside of conference sessions using your phone or immersed in reading material. By looking around you and looking open and engaged, you’ll make it more likely that someone else looking for someone to talk to will approach you.

7. Don’t be afraid to approach people yourself. Conferences are filled with people hoping to meet someone to talk to. You don’t even need an excuse; you can simply walk up and introduce yourself and ask about the other person. You can also ask whether they’ve been to any good sessions or have found any decent coffee nearby.

8. Wear comfortable shoes. You’re going to be doing a lot of standing around talking to people, and you might even end up standing in some sessions if they’re packed. And if the conference is in a large hotel or other large venue, you’ll be doing a lot of walking to get from your room to the conference halls, meals, and so forth.

9. Don’t make non-work plans for the evenings. You might think that traveling to a conference will be a great opportunity to catch up with your friend who lives in that city, but lots of networking will happen in the evening, often spontaneously. You want to be available for that last-minute dinner or outing.

10. Bring snacks in your purse or briefcase. Conferences often offer only overpriced convenience food, if even that. Plus, you might get caught up in a conversation with someone interesting and end up missing lunch; you’ll want to have snack with you to discreetly eat during your next session.

11. Stay away from alcohol. At most, have only one or two drinks. If you find yourself hanging out in the venue’s bar with other conference attendees, ask the bartender for a mocktail or a seltzer water with lime.

12. When you’re back at your office, follow up with the people who you met at the conference. Email them to let them know you enjoyed meeting them and perhaps reference something you talked about. (Those notes on the back of their cards are helpful for this!)

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

how to rewrite your resume to focus on accomplishments, not just job duties

If you’re like most people, your resume lists what you were responsible for at each job you held, but doesn’t explain what you actually achieved there. Rewriting it to focus on accomplishments will make it way more effective (i.e., “increased email subscribers by 20%  in six months” instead of “managed email list”), because that explains how you performed, not just what your job duties were.

However, most people really struggle with how to do this. And it’s especially tricky in jobs that don’t lend themselves to numerically quantitative achievements.

Here’s an example taken from the comments section on a recent post about resumes. Commenter Eden asked:

What constitutes an achievement, in this context?

I was the person the entire staff looked for to get on the phone or interact in person with any disgruntled client. I was also the person chosen most frequently by doctors to relay complex medical information to clients of all backgrounds.

Skill in dealing with irate, irrational people is not something I was born with, so acquiring it was very much ‘trial by fire.’ I’m proud of it—I made loyal clients out of people with gripes—but don’t want to sound like I’m bragging.

Another communications example: I was the person all the doctors and our practice manager came to for writing or editing of client correspondence or exam notes, or to write newsletters, or web content. Writing and editing was very much not what my position title entailed.

So are these achievements? Of course, I have references (boss, practice manager, clients) who would verify this, but to my ears these sound like hanging medals on myself that are hard to quantify.

They’re absolutely achievements. They speak to what you got done that someone else in your role might not have, and they speak to what kind of employee you are. The trick is just turning them into resume-friendly bullet points.

For instance:

* Built reputation for working successfully with previously unhappy clients
* Became go-to staff member for relaying complicated medical information to patients of diverse backgrounds
* Sought out by doctor and practice manager to write and edit client correspondence, exam notes, and web content

See? Now the person reading your resume knows a hell of a lot more about what kind of worker you are than if you just listed job duties.

More advice here:
how to list accomplishments on your resume when your job doesn’t have easy measures
the #1 question your resume should answer

Read an update to the original question here.

how many interviews do employers conduct for one position, should I warn my boss before I shave my head, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. How many interviews do employers conduct for one position?

I had an interview this morning, and towards the end, when we were going over the hiring timeline, the interviewer mentioned that they had to reschedule a bunch of interviews yesterday because of the weather and she had some more this week. I know these are vague terms, but it sounded like a lot of people. It got me curious — is there a ballpark number of candidates or percentage of applicants that hiring managers will interview for one position?

It varies by the position (and to some extent, by the manager and company). But for a straightforward position that the hiring manager knows she’s going to be able to fill pretty easily, interviewing three to five candidates in-person is pretty typical. For harder-to-fill positions, it can be fewer than that (when there are fewer strong candidates to pick from) or more than that (when a lot of candidates are good enough to make it through the initial screening but not well-matched enough to get an offer).

But that’s for in-person interviews. Smart managers will do phone interviews before those — usually 10-20 depending on the position, and again it can vary pretty widely based on the factors above.

And that’s for a single slot. If you’re planning to hire several people in the same role, you’d often want a larger pool of phone and in-person interviews.

2. Should I warn my manager that I plan to shave my head?

Next month, I will shaving my head as part of an initiative to raise money for cancer research, and I am seeking advice on how to navigate this with regard to the workplace.

For context, I’m female and work as an assistant to the managing director of a very small company and also complete occasional reception duties and administrative support to the office at large. I am a student, so I do this part-time during the semester, and full-time the rest of the year.

Is shaving my head something that I should be discussing with my boss beforehand or is it fine to go ahead and do? Is this something that a boss would even object to? Honestly, I have already decided to participate, regardless of my boss’s response. So, my concern is that if I “pretend” to ask permission, am turned down, and then do it anyway, that that would reflect more negatively on me than just showing up Lex Luthor-style. Do you have any advice?

Whether they’ll care or not will depend on the office. Some offices would care across the board, others would only care for public-facing positions like receptionist, and some wouldn’t care at all. Personally, I’d mention it beforehand so that you know if it’s going to be an issue or not — as in, “I want to let you know that I’m planning on shaving my head as part of a campaign to raise money for cancer research. I assume this is okay, but I didn’t want to just surprise you with it one day.”

If they have a problem with it, then you’ll hear that and be able to decide what to do (which includes the option of saying, “Since I’m committed to doing this, what’s the best way for us to proceed?”). But I think you’re better off knowing in advance if that’s the case.

3. My manager is bringing up my family commitments in my performance evaluation

I have a question about how far is too far when dragging family into things. One of my children was born with a severe birth defect and my wife stays home to care for 2 of our 3 kids. Since she’s often at appointments and therapies, I take our oldest son to pre-school, which is very close to my job. I arranged this with my manager, as it would make me 30 minutes late to work in the morning. The agreement was that I would work through lunch to make up the time, which I do. On my performance evaluation, my boss’ boss gave me a low mark for communication, writing “Personal obligations have kept x from interacting informally with his co-workers.” Is this too far?

In another instance, my son with the illness also caught the flu and spent days in the hospital. He was in considerable pain and discomfort. My job was having a large fundraiser on a Saturday and I got no sleep caring for my son the night before. Still, I showered and dressed at the hospital (at 5am), then drove an hour to the event. I worked very hard that day (for 9 hours), only to go home afterward to change and go back to the hospital. 2 weeks later, two of our directors called me into a meeting to discuss the event. I was told that several people gave negative reports about my “lack of energy and enthusiasm.” I apologized and explained the situation, noting that one of the directors knew about my situation. The answer I received was, “Well…perception is everything,” and they continued their criticism. Too far?

I don’t know, because I’m not there to see the stuff they’re commenting on. It’s possible that they’re being ridiculous, but it’s also possible that a reasonable manager would be concerned about the things they’ve raised. I don’t know which it is. But I do know that they’re telling you pretty clearly that this stuff is an issue for them. From there, you need to decide if it’s something that you can or want to change, and if not, whether you’re willing to live with it potentially holding you back there (or worse) or whether you’d be better off finding a job that looks on all of this differently.

Do keep in mind, though, that this isn’t about whether it’s fair for them to judge you on family commitments; it is fair for an employer to judge you on how present you seem at work. What’s at question here is just whether they’re applying that in a fashion that most employers would find unreasonable.

4. I don’t want my old coworker to be above me at my new company

After a decade at my current company, I applied for and was offered a job at another company in an industry I have always wanted to work in. The role is a two tier promotion with a generous compensation package. Now a colleague of mine, who I have been friends with for years, is thinking of applying as well. (This is a new team that has a lot of openings.) The issue I am having is that he would be applying to a role a tier above the one I just received.

We have both been in the industry the same amount of time, but I tried out multiple job paths during my time and he took the straighter narrower path. Therefore, he ended up at a higher position than I did at this point in our careers. I felt that this new job was a chance to bring myself back on par with my peers, even put me a little ahead of them. I don’t even know if he will get the job, but I can’t help feeling a bit deflated even though I should be proud of my ability to land this lucrative role.

Am I just being petty? Assuming he gets the job, the career person in me says I should put it aside, focus on my new role, impress the hell out of them and compete on my own merits while laying aside personal pride.

I don’t think you’re being petty, but I do think that you’re being … unproductive where your own interests are concerned. It’s always a little weird when a peer is suddenly above you, but there’s nothing you can do about it if it happens. Don’t waste the energy stewing over it; if it happens, it happens and you’ll adjust to it eventually. More importantly, you’re not in a race with this guy. You were happy with your new job before this happened, and you acknowledge that you took a path that means the job you got is an excellent leap forward for you. So why does this guy’s own, separate path matter? Keep your eyes on the path in front of you, and run your own race.

5. How to withdraw from a hiring process

I went for an interview today. After much consideration, I decided not to continue to be considered further. The problem is, I’m not sure if the company will ask me for a second round of interview or not. So, I assume it sounds pretty stupid to email and tell them I don’t want to be considered for the application, when they might not want to move me into the second round?

The manager did say she will arrange me to talk to someone from management when he returns, but nothing concrete about whether this will take place was mentioned. From her words, does that mean that I’ll move on to the next interview?

Also, how should I draft the letter about me not wanting to continue with the application. Should I include my reasons or can I just mentioned I don’t want to be further considered and thank them for their time? I feel very bad and guilty about rejecting them.

There’s no way to know if you’ll move on to the next interview or not, but it doesn’t matter. If you’re sure you’re not interested, email her now and withdraw, so that they don’t make decisions (like rejecting other candidates) on the assumption that you’re taking up a slot in their pool of finalists. Just email her and tell her that you appreciated the chance to talk but you’ve decided to pursue other opportunities and wish them the best of luck in filling the role.

And don’t feel guilty. Companies reject candidates all the time, and they’re used to candidates withdrawing or rejecting their offers too; it’s just business. It’s highly unlikely they’ll be thinking about it five minutes after receiving your email.

should you ever negotiate salary through email?

A reader writes:

I am in the midst of negotiating salary for a new position. My sister recently completed a salary negotiation through email, and suggested I do the same. We are in slightly different situations, as she accepted an offer from an academic institution and my potential employer is a private sector company. What are your thoughts on negotiating through email? My initial response is don’t do it, and I will be negotiating through a phone call. I’d be interested in your opinion though!

While I can certainly see why email might feel more comfortable — it takes some of the awkwardness away that many people feel when they have to actually have a conversation about salary negotiation — I think that generally it will put you in a weaker position.

Having a conversation — a real conversation over the phone, not a back and forth in writing — allows you to hear the other person’s tone, and where they pause, and how they react to what you say. It allows you to state what you want and then stop to force a response from them, right there in the moment. Email does none of that.

That said, some people certainly do negotiate salary over email, and there are probably some who do it perfectly effectively. But I think you’re sacrificing some opportunity there.

5 hiring regrets to avoid before you make a job offer

If you’ve hired more than a handful of people, you probably know that terrible sinking feeling when you start to realize that your new hire might not be the right person for the job. The costs of making the wrong hire are big ones; you’ll generally end up spending large amounts of time and energy rectifying the problem – not to mention the opportunity cost of not having the right person in the role while you’re fixing it. And you’ll likely start asking yourself, “What could we have done differently to avoid this?”

While hiring will never be an exact science, there are ways to minimize hiring regrets.

Here are five regrets that you can avoid having by taking the right precautions before ever making a job offer.

Regret #1: “We didn’t check references.”

Some managers skip reference checks because they figure that no one ever really says anything bad in a reference call. But this thinking has two major flaws: First, yes, people do indeed say negative things in a reference check. (I once learned from a reference that the candidate had been fired for theft and fraud – from a reference the candidate himself put on his list!) Second, reference-checking shouldn’t just be about hearing “yes, she’s great” or “no, don’t hire her.” After all, a candidate might be a great employee in general, but you might learn from references that she doesn’t have the particular qualities you’re seeking for that particular position. Plus, references can give you nuanced information about a candidate’s strengths and weaknesses, what kind of management they work best with, where they might need additional support, and other information that can help you make a good decision.

Regret #2: “We didn’t test the candidate’s skills.”

Would you football coach hire a player without seeing him play? No, of course not. He’d want to see him in action – just as you should see candidates in action before even thinking about offering someone a job. Using exercises and work simulations can give you a huge amount of insight into how someone will actually perform on the job. For instance, if you need someone who can write quickly under pressure, you might give your top candidates a set of talking points and give them 30 minutes to draft a press release. Or if you need a finance analyst who can explain financial matters in simple terms, you might send candidates your financial statements ahead of time and ask them to explain them back to you in plain language during the interview. Seeing is believing – so make sure you see beforebringing anyone on to your staff.

Regret #3: “We didn’t pay enough attention to soft skills.”

It’s easy to be seduced by an impressive candidate’s resume, but the greatest experience and skills in the world doesn’t always make up for an inability to get along with coworkers, lack of work ethic, or terrible communication skills. Don’t get so focused on impressive resume bullets that you forget to consider what it’s going to be like to work with the candidate day in and day out.

Regret #4: “We focused on how much we liked her as a person and not enough on skills.”

Remember: You’re not hiring a friend. You’re hiring someone to get a particular piece of work done – to meet certain goals. You might really click with someone as a person and think they’d be great to have around in the office, but that’s not a reason to hire. It’s crucial to put that personal preference for someone aside and really hone in on whether they have the skills to excel at the work you need done. If you fear you might have a bias about a candidate because of a personal rapport with them, try getting colleagues’ viewpoints on your top candidates to help give a reality-check to your assessment.

Regret #5: “We ignored red flags because we wanted to hire her.”

Ask any manager who’s made a bad hire whether there were red flags during the hiring process, and you’ll nearly always hear “yes.” But managers sometimes ignore these flags or rationalize them away – often because they urgently need to fill an empty position. But no matter how urgently you need to fill a vacancy, you’re nearly always better off keeping the position open and searching for the right person than hiring someone who isn’t quite right. You’ll spend far more time and energy dealing with the consequences of a bad hire than you’ll save by filling the position quickly.

our time off is being rescinded — Hunger Games style

A reader writes:

I work in an office with three coworkers in my department and a manager. We have a satellite office where I work every Wednesday. Six months ago, I requested my vacation for a particular week, which was granted. Three months ago, one coworker (Carly) requested the Wednesday and Thursday the same week off, which was also granted. Last month, another coworker (Regina) requested Wednesday off of the same week, again granted. Now, two weeks before our PTO, the manager sits the three of us in the conference room and states because of scheduling conflicts–meaning she forgot to transfer Carly’s and my PTO into her new calendar as well as three people off Wednesday–one request will be rescinded so someone will work Wednesday.

It is worth mentioning that Regina is notorious for being unreliable with attendance, and with her family beginning the stages of illness, it is a good chance she won’t be there and the main office will be empty, with that point being brought up to us by the manager as well. The clincher is, we have to decide among ourselves who will work. If we can’t, all of our requests will be retracted due to not being team players.

None of us wants to budge because its not our fault she did not organize the schedule or the last coworker has been allowed to have poor attendance. But we discussed it hypothetically. Here are the circumstances. I’m going on a cruise, which I have foregone four years of vacations to save for and will lose all of my money if I cancel. Carly’s husband is taking her out of town to celebrate her five-year cancer-free anniversary, and Wednesday and Thursday were the only days he could get off, as he works weekends. Regina turned in her time last, but is seeing her son off who is going on military tour, which is self-explanatory why she wants her time off. I was told that since I am single and don’t have familial duties, I should be the one to cancel. I don’t think me not having a husband or children should penalize me to always being the fall guy (which has happened a several times before now). This has resulted in some resentment on my end. Needless to say, this is an unfair position for us to be in because of someone else’s negligence. How would you handle this from our end and from the manager’s end?

Wow. It’s one thing to suggest working it out amongst yourselves if there were signs that you were likely to be able to do that and if the stakes weren’t so high for everyone. But that’s not the case here, and it’s unfair of your manager to abdicate her responsibility in this — and it’s especially ridiculous to say that if you can’t work it out, the solution will be that none of you get to take your time off. Your approved time off, no less.

The ideal approach here would be for your manager to find some way of letting you all take the time off that she approved. If that’s not possible — and it’s true that sometimes circumstances change — then she should apologize profusely to Regina but tell her that she approved her time off by mistake, due to a calendar error, and that she needs to rescind it. The reason that’s the right call is because if her calendar had been working correctly, that would have been the answer Regina would have received originally. (Or at least I assume it would have been, since you and Carly already had PTO scheduled for that time period.) She should then work with Regina to see what she can do to minimize the impact for her — such as letting her come in early or leave late that day, or giving her a different day off.

But since she’s abdicating her responsibility to manage the situation, the question becomes what the three of you should do. Assuming that Regina doesn’t respond to the logic of the argument above, then all you can really do is go to your manager and say something like, “I’d love to be able to work this out ourselves, but we haven’t been able to. I think the most logical thing to do is to handle this the way it would have been handled if your calendar error hadn’t occurred. In that case, presumably Regina’s request would have been denied since Carly and I were already scheduled to be out. I think it’s fairest to stick with that, and I hope that’s the solution you’ll choose. I would help if I could, but I can’t afford to lose $2500 (or whatever your cruise costs), when I booked it on good faith after receiving your okay.”

How she handles this will tell you a lot about who you’re working for.

Read an update to this letter here.

should promotions be based on seniority, my boyfriend’s accountant is flirting with him, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Should promotions be based on seniority?

I am currently in a department where a woman who was hired five months ago is already outperforming the rest of the team and has shown such efficiency that she’s getting special projects to do. It has been overheard that a supervisor position will be created by the directors and, because she needs to promote internally, the manager informed the directors she would like to put this woman in the position because she is the best qualified and has the most potential. I heard a few coworkers complaining that, while everyone on the team likes this woman and values her knowledge, attitude, and professionalism, several other women should be offered the position first because they have seniority, are older, would be respected more (she is 27), and they have expressed interest in a supervisory position, whereas this woman has never mentioned the desire to advance.

While I like them personally, I feel that many would make less than stellar supervisors because of their temperamental manner in answering team members’ questions, their tendencies to shirk responsibility, and their inability to follow through and meet deadlines. (The newer woman and another coworker were supposed to be training our two new employees, and the woman ended up training both employees by herself due to the team member coincidentally going ghost.) I believe the manager respects her because of her keen knowledge and understanding of concepts in our field, which is much better than anyone else on our team; her ability to collect monies the rest of us would miss; and her willingness to stop anything she’s working on to answer anyone’s question with no irritation towards anyone. Do you feel seniority should play a part when promoting internally? Is it fair to pass her for this promotion because she is new to the company?

People shouldn’t be entitled to promotions just because been there longer. Promotions should be made based on who would do the best job in the position. If two candidates are equally strong, then sure, it can make sense to look at seniority. But when the newer person is clearly stronger, it doesn’t make sense to promote a weak candidate instead just because the weaker candidate has been there longer.

That said, any internal candidate who’s interested in the role should be allowed to apply for it. If the rest of your team feels that someone was simply anointed as the new supervisor without giving anyone else being genuinely considered, it’s going to be a recipe for resentment. So your managers would do well to make the process reasonably open and transparent.

2. My manager keeps putting off the schedule change I was promised

I work for a community mental health agency with approximately 400 employees. My position is as a clinician on a child psychiatric crisis unit, and I love what I do. What I don’t love is my schedule. I’m the night and weekend person, as such a facility needs 24 hour coverage. When I was hired 9 months ago, I was told that I could transition to weekdays “quickly,” as there is fairly high turnover. But when I remind my boss of my desire for a traditional schedule, she says she’s working on it and drops the subject.

Just FYI, I get good performance reviews and I’m also cross trained for another department with 3 openings. It wouldn’t be a huge deal, but I’m a single mom of a toddler and my daughter is developing more cognitively everyday. She has 2 great babysitters, but I want her in a structured day care with a curriculum to maximize her growing mind and skills. I can’t afford both her babysitters and daycare, and there is no daycare where I am that operates nights and weekends.

There are numerous open positions at my agency. When I asked HR about applying for an open position, they gave me a form that I need my supervisor to sign in order to be permitted to apply for any of the current open positions. That seems like a bad idea in so many ways. First, I’m pretty confident my supervisor would be unhappy and limit my opportunities for training as well as deny requested time off. Second, all the open positions are on different campuses, so I have no idea if they are actively looking to fill the position, nor do I know the supervisors so I can’t informally feel out the situation. So to risk my manager’s ire and possibly being forced out of my position, without even the promise of an interview, seems unwise. Will I need to apply outside my agency to get a schedule that works? What are your thoughts?

I wouldn’t apply for a transfer from a job you love until you’re sure you can’t get the schedule you want. That means not just “reminding” your boss that you want a different schedule, but tackling it more assertively. I’d say something like this: “When I was hired, we thought I’d be able to move to a more traditional schedule quickly. My daughter is reaching the age where I need to put her in daycare, so it’s becoming more pressing. Is it possible to figure out a more definite timeline for making the change so that I can plan for it?” (And no, you shouldn’t have to cite your child care situation, but it’s useful when you’re pushing your manager for something to explain why you’re pushing for it.)

If she puts you off again, at that point I’d say, “I really love my job here, but knowing that I do need a different schedule, would you object to me looking at other openings in the agency if we’re not able to switch my hours in the next couple of months?”

3. What’s the best tone for a written response to a negative performance review?

My boyfriend has found himself in a difficult situation, and I am not sure how to help him. He recently had his performance review and it went very poorly. His manager had almost entirely negative criticisms of failure to meet goals (some legitimate, some not) and no positive comments. At this point, we are sure he is going to put on a performance improvement plan. He is currently finishing his paperwork for the review and has written a three-page response documenting all his disagreements and issues with the review. I read it and it is inappropriate and emotional and unprofessional. Although I am sympathetic to how much this sucks, I don’t want him to burn his bridges. He is stubborn and won’t be able to let this go without responding, but I want to help him respond in the most professional and mature way possible. Can you give me any advice on how he should respond in these comments?

Yeah, emotional is not the way to go here. Point out to your boyfriend that the response he wrote might feel satisfying, but it’s not as likely to get him the outcome he wants, and the outcome is the most important thing here. His response is going to be far more credible if it’s calm, sticks to the facts, and acknowledges any legitimate points his manager made.

Suggest that he think of the report an outside observer trying to solve the problems would write about the situation, and use that tone himself. Otherwise, any legitimate points he’s making are likely to be lost.

4. What’s the best way to confirm an upcoming informational interview?

I have an informational interview coming up next week, which was booked a month ago. We had communicated and set up the meeting time via email, and the last I’ve heard from her was a month ago when we agreed to and finalized the meeting place and time.

Because it was booked quite awhile ago and I’m semi-paranoid she’d have forgot about the meeting by now, I was wondering if it would be appropriate to share my personal calendar by including her in the time slot (where you insert all attendees’ emails, and they get something in their mailbox where you can accept or decline the meeting)? I hope this sends the message of “hey! remember me and our upcoming meeting?” (even though I might have seem more organized by inviting her shortly after it was arranged). I’ve had shared calendars for other informational interviews, but they were booked within the week, and they were initiated by the other party.

You’re over-complicating it; there’s no need for any calendar business. Just send her an email that says, “Just want to confirm our meeting this Thursday at 2 p.m. at Teas Unlimited. I’m looking forward to it!” Then, assume it’s on unless she replies back and tells you otherwise.

5. Is my boyfriend’s accountant crossing professional boundaries with him?

I am in a relationship with a very wealthy oil man. About the time I got involved with him, he hired a woman to take over his accounting in his office that he visits infrequently (maybe 10 times per year). Soon after her hire, she became flirtatious with him, professing her adoration of him and her new job. I understood how she would be grateful; she has a wonderful opportunity in a town where there is not much. She sent him a valentine saying she “loves” her boss, then about 6 months later asked him to help her buy a house, then sent flowers and a flirty note on “Bosses Day.” She also sends him notes on the weekends about the weather, etc.

I’m not generally jealous, but it just seems inappropriate. She is doing a good job at work though and getting better at it. I don’t know, but it is annoying and I would be more accepting of it if she were a female friend vs. an employee. I think my own boss is fantastic and we have both expressed mutual support, and respect. But we do not exchange cards of any type.

Is it appropriate to give your boss a valentine telling him you love him? Should you ask your boss to help you buy a house? (By the way, the woman is married with a semi-adult child; shouldn’t she be turning to her husband or at least including him in such a request?) What is this Bosses Day? I live in California and never heard of it.

No, it is not appropriate to give your boss a valentine or tell him that you love him. Nor is it a good idea to ask your boss to help you buy a house. Bosses Day is a recently made-up fake holiday that exists to sell cards.

But you don’t have any reason to be jealous, unless your boyfriend is returning his accountant’s flirtatious and inappropriate behavior. He’s the one whose behavior is relevant to you, not hers. Assuming this is a one-sided flirtation and he’s committed to you, jealousy shouldn’t come into play. (If it’s not one-sided and/or he’s not committed to you, then you’ve got bigger issues that are about him, not his accountant.)

However, from a good-management and sensible-person standpoint, your boyfriend should certainly (a) consider whether he has inadvertently signaled that this behavior would be welcome, and (b) figure out how to create better professional boundaries with her. But that’s really a management issue for him to resolve as part of his workplace dealings; absent some sign that he’s relating inappropriately to her, it should be a non-issue for you (or at least as much of a non-issue as any other management problem on his side would be).