update: employer asked me to interview at 6:45 a.m. on a Saturday

Remember the reader who was invited to come to an interview at 6:45 a.m. on a Saturday? Here’s the update.

I had sent you a brief update a while ago, but this one is more comprehensive and has new exciting info.

Life has been AWESOME. But first, the interview.

Some of the details got posted in comments on the original thread. I did end up going in at 6:45am, which sucked. They weren’t completely set up, either, so I waited about 10 minutes before getting called in. It was kind of bizarre, really. The VP of the company was there, but he wasn’t interviewing, just taking notes. The woman interviewing me was just reading questions from a packet and flipping the page as soon as she thought I was done with my answer, not allowing further elaboration or follow-up questions. She mentioned something off-hand about interviewing recently herself, leading me to believe she was a new hire there. I found out later that the company contracted with a separate HR-type company just to have someone conduct interviews for them. Also the job was hourly, minimum wage, and not even a possibility of salaried until 6 months into the position, despite being quite skilled work. I don’t remember everything about this anymore — my update from that time can be found here.

They eventually emailed me a rejection a few weeks later. There was much giggling among my family and friends, and the prevailing opinion is that I was too assertive and asked too many questions while the company was looking for someone more malleable, but we’ll never really know.

However! Just before that interview, I got a call from a friend of mine saying that his company wanted to hire me for two weeks to cover for their receptionist, who was going on vacation. The HR people felt kind of bad that my application to a previously open position had been eaten by the black hole at the center of their awful online process, and if I took the job, it would save them from having to search out temp agencies at the last minute. Also, it was the exact kind of company I wanted to work for, in the exact industry I wanted to work for, even if a receptionist isn’t my dream job. So I snapped that up. While I was there, a new position opened up in the department I applied to previously, which I got an interview for, and then was offered the job!

It’s been pretty awesome so far. It’s only part-time at the moment, but I’ve been a rock star, the head department manager and supervisors are seriously impressed with me, they’ve put me on a specialized team of awesome people, and they do like to bump their good employees up to full time after a few months. The supervisors and manager are also helping position me to transition into my dream department (currently in chocolate teapot quality control, would like to transition to chocolate teapot design), completely of their own volition and without me needing to request it of them.

Also I recently got engaged.

Life is good.

interviewing while pregnant — but I’m not the mother

A reader writes:

I’m currently employed, though attempting to change careers. I have a few great job interviews set up for positions I would love to have. My only hiccup in the interview process is that I’m four months pregnant, but the baby isn’t mine. I am a gestational carrier for a lovely family who just needed a little extra help to bring their child into the world.

That being said, I will not be having a baby come home from the hospital with me, nor will I have late night feedings, the need for a room to pump in, nor maternity leave. I’m expecting to just need to take a few days off for the delivery and a small amount of recovery, and then be right back in action.

I know I am in a very unique position. This is my third pregnancy and I’m already showing, and I’m at a loss as to how to broach this topic with a potential employer (or not to at all). I don’t want to turn off a potential employer since I am pregnant, but I also don’t want to not mention it and therefore ruin the groundwork of a trusted employer/employee relationship.

Are you showing to the point that you can’t hide it with business clothes?

If so, I’d mention it. Otherwise, you run the risk of them either consciously or unconsciously letting the pregnancy negatively affect your chances, since they’ll be calculating that you’ll be out for a few months not all that long after you start. At some employers, that’s not an issue at all, whereas for others it could indeed be a deal-breaker, or at least a deal-weakener. (And no, that’s not legal — or at least it’s not legal if they have 15 or more employees and thus are covered under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but it’s pretty common.)

If they’re going to realize you’re pregnant whether you mention it or not, I’d fill them in on the rest of the situation so that you’re not at risk of that kind of bias. You can bring it up by saying something like, “I should mention the elephant in the room,” and then explain the situation.

You don’t want your underlying message here to be “Unlike all those other pregnant women who you might be afraid to hire, I’m going to be right back at work.” That’s bad for other women, and it’s potentially insulting to your interviewer. Rather, the gist of your message should be “I realize a piece of this situation is clearly visible and I want to fill you in on how it will impact my schedule.”

Some people will be a little uncomfortable that you brought it up at all, but I think that’s outweighed by the benefits of raising it.

That said, there’s plenty of room for disagreement on this, and I think a reasonable argument can be made for not raising it at all … so it probably comes down to what you’re most comfortable with.

Also, what an amazing thing you’re doing.

our office is having a water cooler emergency and is staffed by loons

A reader writes:

Yesterday afternoon, my supervisor called our entire team of about 10 people into an “emergency meeting.” She explained that the bill for our water cooler was now $400. The bill hadn’t been paid in months, so it accrued late fees, and the company had sent us to collections. She then stated that we would all have to split the bill and foot it ourselves.

Let me give you a little background. When I started with the company, I was vaguely aware of a water cooler, and a few months after I started I was told by a coworker that it was optional. You don’t have to partake if you don’t want to. And that’s exactly what I did, because I’d rather bring in my own water rather than pay a fee. There is a specific person in charge of collecting money and paying the bills for the water. She neglected to do so, and thus the bill just grew and grew each month. She claims she “feels bad asking for the money” and just ignored the problem, hoping it would disappear on its own.

In the meeting, our supervisor told us that the water was “all or nothing” – either everyone participates, or no one does. In a previous meeting, the team voted yes to the water. I was not in this meeting, nor were the other 3 admin assistants. She basically said that even though we weren’t there (and were never made aware of this decision), we better pay up, regardless.

I’ve never even touched the water cooler. Two other people spoke up in the meeting and said, “I’ll gladly pay, but I don’t use it.” Our manager said, “Good, because that’s what I’m requiring you to do.” I feel like I am the only one who finds this ridiculous, and I feel like the admin assistant who screwed up and neglected to pay the bills should be the one to rectify the problem.

How would you handle the situation? I feel that I will most certainly be ridiculed if I speak up (the boss can be an intimidating bully), and I am surprised that everyone else is okay to go along with this. Should I just go ahead and fork over the $40? I feel like since I was never aware it was a requirement, nor did I ever use the water, this isn’t something I should be paying for, but I seem to be the only one feeling this way.

What utter BS. (Do I have to abbreviate that or can I write it out? This situation calls for the full, unabbreviated term.)

Your manager is a buffoon. Requiring you all to pay for something you don’t use? If she wants to offer water to employees, then the company should pay for it. If that’s not an expense the company is willing to shoulder, then she has no business dictating to people what arrangements they use to get their water paid for. Although if she’s going to dictate it one way or another, it should be to eliminate the group-financed cooler since the person managing it is a deadbeat — not to require people to chip in when they don’t want to.

And speaking of that coworker, what the hell is up there? She feels bad asking for money and hoped the problem would go away? Unless she is an inhabitant of some magical fairyland where bills go away if you ignore them (perhaps she is here on some kind of exchange program from said fairyland?), she is also a ridiculous person.

In any case, as for what to do … what are the repercussions of saying no? It’s certainly reasonable to say, “I don’t use this service and I wasn’t involved in racking up late fees, so no thank you, I’m choosing not to participate.” However, if everyone else is going along with it and you’re going to be the one hold-out, then you need to know how that’s likely to go over. In some offices, that would be absolutely fine; it wouldn’t reflect badly on you at all (in fact, it could even reflect well on you for not being a pushover and paying someone else’s late fees). But in other offices, it would be A Thing, and it would be worth 40 bucks as the price of making this idiocy go away. So you just need to know the dynamics of your office well enough to know the likely consequences of saying no.

(Unfortunately, the fact that your manager handled the situation this way makes it more likely that she’s one who would penalize you for not forking over the cash, but you’d know better than I would what she’s like.)

If you do decide to suck it up and pay the $40 penalty fee for working with a lame manager, I’d insist on knowing how this is going to be handled in the future, so that you’re not having a similar conversation in another few months.

my office hid the Christmas party from us, hostess gifts at office parties, and other holiday questions

It’s five short answers to five short questions: the holiday questions edition. Here we go…

1. My home office hid their Christmas party from us

We just found out that our home office had a swanky Christmas party for their entire office and only select members of my branch office. The worst part of all of this, is that the people who were invited and attended from my office, kept it a secret from those who were not invited. Three out of the seven people in our office were not invited. The people who were invited were salaried and generally “higher up on the food chain” than the three of us non-invitees are. However, everyone at the other office was invited regardless of their position in the company. Oh, and their spouses were invited too.

We found out a couple days later, when it came out through the grapevine. One of those invited was our immediate supervisor / office manager, and he has never said a word. Should we call him on it? We really feel lousy that we weren’t invited, and it makes us feel like we’re not appreciated or valued as employees. Should we say something?

That’s lame and obnoxious, and especially silly since we’re only talking about an additional three people. I don’t know what your company was thinking — they missed a opportunity to build good will and instead created bad will.

You could certainly ask your manager about it (although don’t take the approach of “calling him out on it”; that’s overly adversarial). I’d say something like, “We were disappointed when we realized that the home office had a Christmas party and invited some people from our office but not all. Do you know what the thinking was?”

Read an update to this letter here.

2. What gift can I give the awesome managers under me?

I am a store manager for a retail chain store. I supervise a team of six managers. I want to get them all a nice, thoughtful holiday present — the holidays are brutal on retail workers, and they all are awesome and have gone above and beyond. I especially want to show my appreciation because I while I was recently in a temporary position at another location, their interim supervisor was less than stellar, and it was a challenging few months for the managers here.

Things that are off the table: cash (our retailer already provides bonuses); time off (I wish!); wine (I’m unsure if everyone in the group drinks alcohol). I have already done several smaller gift/ gestures for the team to kick off the holiday season/ show my appreciation after I stepped back into the store– gift cards for coffee, brought in cookies, handwritten individual notes, a silly grab bag of holiday gifts.

Any ideas? A party is also off the table, as 1) we don’t have time for that during the holidays and 2) I’m not going to ask the staff to attend a party outside of work hours!

Do you know them well enough to pick out thoughtful, personalized gifts that would be different for each of them? If not, I’d go with gift certificates to a reasonably nice area restaurant, or delicious food in the break room while they work, or gift cards to places you know they like (these can be different for each person).

But that’s if you’re set on giving a “thing.” The nicest thing you could do, the thing that would likely be most appreciated, is to tell them each in clear and specific terms what they’re doing well at and how much you appreciate them and why, and ask them what you can do to make their lives easier (and then act on the feedback to whatever extent possible).

3. Do I need to bring a hostess gift to an office party at a partner’s home?

My company’s holiday party is this week. It is a fairly formal dinner normally held at a fancy restaurant, but this year it will be at the home of one of the firm’s partners. It will be catered though. I am having a disagreement with a friend over whether I need to bring something (like a bottle of wine, for example). I say no because it’s a work party that is 100% catered (and to be honest, if I had a choice I would rather not attend). My friend says I should treat it like a regular dinner party at someone’s house, in which case of course I wouldn’t show up empty-handed. My feeling is that this is different; if it were at a restaurant like last year I would be under no obligation to bring anything or pay for anything. What are your thoughts? For context, it is a small company (~16 employees plus spouses/significant others attending the party). I have been there for about a year and a half and am one of the most junior employees.

I agree with you that you’re not obligated to bring something … but I also agree with your friend that it would be a gracious thing to do. Yes, this is a work party and it’s being catered, but the partner hosting it is still opening her home to you, and so it’s a nice gesture to bring something — a bottle of wine, a box of fudge, or whatever. That said, it’s not the sort of thing that will raise eyebrows if you don’t. It’s more a question of whether you want to make a little extra effort to be particularly gracious — and either decision is fine.

4. Pushy assistant is trying to make us kick in cash for cards and gifts

I am the E.A. to a VP and do not work for or report to my boss’s boss’s E.A, who is very old-school and insists on birthday cards, coffee, cakes, parties, etc.

She is making the other assistants participate in a “holiday” party and calling it volunteering. When one of the assistants had to opt out, this woman bullied her, face to face, at the admin’s cubicle, into “volunteering” anyway. Her definition of not-mandatory and volunteer is different from the rest of the world.

This unpleasant woman wants everyone give $20 per person in cash to buy a present for *her* boss and cash for a gift for the custodian, whom I’ve never actually met before. She will not let anybody sign the Christmas cards that she got unless they give her cash. She also is soliciting face to face to do this. Nobody is given the chance to avoid her on this.

I am broke, the company has zero salary increases this year, I just had to fix plumbing in the house, my car needed repair, and I have enough stress trying to get food for the Christmas dinner and presents for family. I am vehemently opposed to buying gifts for the boss (it is currying-favor, brown-nosing, kissing up), not to mention he’s wealthy and wants-for-not! Also, my mother just died and I’m really not feeling it this year.

So, how do I politely say, “I’m not giving you money to kiss up to your boss or to a person who I’ve never even met before”? She always makes me feel like I’m the rude one, like I’m the jerk.

Say, “I’m sorry, it’s not in my budget.” If she continues to push, complain to your boss or hers.

5. Vacation time and pay when the office is closed

The organization where I work has a new policy that says that if the organization is closed for more than one day, employees have to use a vacation day or take an unpaid day after the first day of closing. This is certainly not fair, but is it illegal?

It’s legal to require you to use a vacation day for days that the office is closed. Whether the option of taking unpaid time for those days is legal depends on whether you’re exempt or non-exempt. If you’re non-exempt, it’s legal. But if you’re exempt, you must be paid your normal salary for any week in which you performed any work (so if they closed for a full week, they could do this; for less than week, they couldn’t).

update from the reader who was job searching without a college degree

Remember the reader back in October 2012 who asked about how to interview well when you’ve been successful without a college degree? Here’s her update.

In April 2013, my husband of 25 years had a stroke. After a few months of recovery where I had taken significant time off (and he was released as a full recovery), I went back to my job which I more or less enjoyed, and realized I hated – I mean absolutely despised, disliked and didn’t trust – my boss. This wasn’t new news – she had completed what could only be called a hostile takeover on my prior boss about 18 months prior and I had known her for years as a back-stabber on a power trip. What changed was my willingness to put up with that crap. And after seeing firsthand that work and stress can seriously affect your health, in addition to your bad habits or genetics, it was time to take action. After reviewing every expenditure, debt, obligation and hobby we had, I decided to quit my well paid position to find greener grass.

Thus began the Great Job Search. I have worked in employee benefits for nearly 25 years now. But you see, there is no degree in employee benefits. And while it is insurance, an insurance or risk management degree is more “the other side” of insurance. My side is very personal and there is no such thing as “best” or “worst” – it all depends on a particular employee’s situation. Instead, I have years of experience. I read laws. I read legal reviews. I ask questions and get answers. I pester insurance carriers to no end. I have been on the agent/broker side and the employer side. I really love what I do. I have great references and a great reputation. Yet I do not have a college degree.

My kind of position is 1-to-a-company. There aren’t going to be 2 or 10 of me. Just one. And I see all these positions available and some not only require a bachelor’s degree, but some want a Masters. In what? “Related field.” Seriously, what the heck is that? I have a friend in the same line of work who has a degree in speech therapy. How is that related and make her a better candidate? I love her to death, but seriously!

Your advice, and those of your loyal commenting followers, helped restore my faith in the world. There are some really stupid companies (and company policies) that have no real purpose. And the right company is NOT one that has those policies that do not support you as an employee. I finally found a great company, in a different state, that valued what I could prove I knew, versus a pedigree which assumed I knew something. We moved halfway across the country and couldn’t be happier. Oh, not that everything is roses and sunshine, but it is manageable and with much nicer, upright, and ethical people than the former boss-from-hell.

So, here is what I have to offer to your readers. Quitting a job without another one is a risky proposition and not one to be taken lightly. But given the right circumstances and strength of character, you can survive. I repeat though, this is risky. In my situation, it was a great relief lifted off my shoulders and I came out ahead. I personally believe that any well-thought out decision is a good decision. Only you know if you have put enough thought into it. So, THINK! A LOT!

Second, and you say this a lot too – you need to fit your company as much as they need you to fit them. If your values do not sync up with the company values, it is a recipe for disaster. It is one thing to be unemployed and need a job so you leap at anything (almost everyone has been there), but it is quite another to sell your soul to the devil. In my case, I had a great job, great manager, and great company that changed dramatically over time. I needed to find my happy place again and know I am lucky enough that I did. If you are good at what you do, that company is out there. Don’t give up.

That degree? I have tried a few times to restart and get that generic business degree. Maybe even a finance degree since all insurance in corporate America involves finance. You know what? I have no interest in a degree. I am at a point in my life where I value my free time. If my current employer wants me to have a degree enough, they are going to have to ease up on current expectations because this is not an 8-5 position. I think this company would do that, but as long as I continue to perform, I also think they respect my experience in the University of the School of Hard Knocks.

Thanks for being out there Alison! I have referred a lot of people to your blog and they love it, too.

do I really have to attend my office holiday party?

A reader writes:

I’ve recently gotten a job at a nice company and everything’s great, except this upcoming Christmas there’s a holiday party and, well, truthfully I don’t want to attend. It’s not because I dislike any of the people there, I’m just not really a social animal and I don’t really enjoy those sorts of events.

Firstly, can a company mandate its employees to attend social events of this nature that have absolutely no relevance to the employee’s work? I can understand if they require I attend, say, a work luncheon with an important client, or a business trip that included a bit of golf to get to know executives. Personally, I hate such events. And as a technical person I’m never asked to attend anyway, but I can understand why they might be mandated. Honestly the people that are asked to attend such things tend to enjoy them anyway. But a Christmas party? That occurs after hours, no less? Can they really get away with mandating attendance to something like that?

If they can, how much of a risk do I run declining anyway? Now, when I say I’m not going, I got… looks. As though I had committed some sort of social faux pas, which I very well might have but I didn’t know how to decline! I mean, people would come up to me and say,”So what did you get for the Yankee swap?” or “So what kind of beer are you taking to the holiday party?” And when I tell them I’m not going, they look at me reproachfully like I personally insulted them, and ask why not, or if I have anything else going on. I don’t have anything else going on, I just don’t wanna go! How do I say that in a way that doesn’t insult anybody?

Now, my boss hasn’t yet approached me about this, but I get the feeling he soon might. I’m not even sure if I’m allowed to decline and even if I was, how I’d go about doing it. I’ve “soft declined” by telling everyone else I wasn’t going, but from their reactions I get the idea that it’s not usually done. Please help me out here!

First, yes, it’s certainly legal for them to mandate your attendance at social events outside of normal work hours. If you’re non-exempt, you must be paid for that time unless the event is truly optional. But either way, they can require your attendance.

Now, as I’ve written here many times before, I’m a staunch opponent of making office parties and other social events mandatory. When an event is intended to be a morale-building treat, requiring attendance is counter to that aim. However, that’s advice for employers. On the employee side of things, you’re still left trying to figure out how to navigate this without negatively impacting the way you’re perceived.

I do think that it’s fine to bow out if doing so is no big deal at your company. In that case, you can simply say that you have a scheduling conflict and unbreakable plans that night. However, there are other companies where you’re really expected to attend and you’ll be penalized if you don’t. And even managers who claim the parties are  optional often do care at some level if you don’t show up — so if you’re sensing any pressure, it’s usually wise to assume that you should treat this as a professional obligation like any other.

(And I should note here that while I think this is BS much of the time, it’s a more reasonable expectation if you’re in a management role. The higher up you go, the more you’re expected to appear at these things, so that you don’t create the impression that you’re too important or simply don’t care to mingle with those under you.)

In any case, given what you’ve said about the reaction you’ve been getting, you should go. You don’t need to stay for the whole thing, though — show up, spend an hour there, maybe two, and then leave. Look at it like any other part of your job that you don’t love but which you do because it’s part of staying in good graces with your company — like attending a really boring all-staff meeting. At only a couple of hours a year, it’s actually far less onerous than most boring requirements of any given job. Plus, this happens to be your employer’s attempt to show you hospitality. In general, there’s an argument for accepting such an invitation from the people who sign your check, particularly when it’s only once a year.

Alternately, you can decide to bow out, but you should realize that there might be a cost to doing that — and I’d question whether it really makes sense to pay that cost just to avoid a few hours of eating cookies and listening to bad holiday music.

8 ways you’re annoying your coworkers during the holidays

The holidays at work can be jolly and festive, but they’re also full of opportunities to inadvertently be the office Scrooge. Here are eight common ways people alienate their coworkers at the holidays.

1. Pushing people to contribute to an expensive gift for the boss. Gifts in a workplace should flow down, not upwards, but too many stories abound about employees being pressured to contribute money for gifts for their managers. Often these gifts are pricey ones – more extravagant than what the employees will buy for those closer to them – which is especially inappropriate. Workers shouldn’t have to return their hard-earned money to the people who hired them.

2. Insisting on knowing why your coworker isn’t bringing a date to the holiday party. Your coworker might be going through a divorce or other break-up, dating someone they don’t think would enjoy attending someone else’s office social function, dating someone they’re not serious enough about to bring along, or not dating anyone at all. Regardless of the reason, it’s none of your business, and you will make people uncomfortable if you demand to know why they’re coming solo.

3. Claiming all the good vacation days for next year before anyone else does. If your office approves vacation days on a first-come, first-served basis, you might have the technical right to claim all most popular holidays in the upcoming year before anyone else does, but you can be sure that your coworkers notice that you do this and resent you for it.

4. In the office gift exchange, giving a gift of no value when every else is exchanging real gifts. You shouldn’t feel obligated to participate in an office gift exchange, but if you choose to, you should honor the customs of the exchange. If everyone else is exchanging nice trinkets, you should not give a gag gift like a bag or coal or a box of sawdust (real gifts people have reported receiving). You might think it’s funny, but you risk hurting the recipient’s feelings or making them resent the work they put into picking out something more thoughtful.

5. Giving an extravagant gift that’s well over the dollar limit set in your office. If your office sets a dollar limit on gifts, it’s there for a reason. If you significantly exceed it – for instance, giving a cashmere sweater or an iPod when the gift limit was $15 – you’ll make everyone else participating feel awkward.

6. Pressuring people who aren’t merry enough for you. Bugging people about why they’re not going to the holiday party or participating in Secret Santa – or worse, signing them up for Secret Santa without their permission – is a good way to alienate coworkers. Keep in mind that for every person who enjoys holiday rituals at work, there’s at least one more who doesn’t – and that’s especially at a time of year when budgets are often already stretched thin and people don’t want the office to become another holiday expense.

7. Offending people of different religions than you. Not everyone celebrates the same holidays, and even those who celebrate the same holidays as you might not celebrate them in the same ways. Don’t push people to celebrate in ways they’re not comfortable with.

8. Getting drunk at the office holiday party. While it might look an awful lot like a social function, the reality is that the office holiday party is still a business event. You’re there to mingle with coworkers and higher-ups, not to get drunk or otherwise act in a way that calls embarrassing attention to yourself. Raise your visibility by being smart and engaging, not by being the person who slurs Christmas songs from the top of a table or passes out in the bathroom.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

shady bosses, badly-received resignations, and more

It’s five short answers to five short questions. Here we go…

1. Did my boss pass off someone else’s work as his own?

I have been in my position for a little under a year, as a science researcher in a small high tech start up. In a recent meeting, my boss asked if I was familiar with a specific technique, and I said I wasn’t. He said he would send me the details of the technique after the meeting was over, no big deal.

After the call, I did a quick google search and came across a write up in PDF form that was put together from a university (first hit on google). I thought that was perfect because I just needed a summary to familiarize myself. A couple hours later I get an email from my boss sending the specifics of the technique to me, and a couple other colleagues. It was the same document – again, that is no big deal (we weren’t citing it in a patent/paper, etc). But what I found bizarre was the fact that it was stripped of the university affiliations at the top, and also a brief acknowledgement at the bottom. I did a quick search to see if one of the higher search hits were the same document without the affiliations, but I can’t find it (not saying it doesn’t exist because Google creeps all of us like crazy, making different things pop up in different orders).

So, do I mention it? It appears he stripped the authors so that it looked like he spent the hours between the meeting and the email typing it up. I know not to assume malicious intent if it can be explained otherwise, but if it was actually intentional, that makes me feel very questionable about my bosses ethics. I don’t care that we sent the information to summarize the technique, but I do care if he was modifying the document to make it look like his work.

I am not really in a position to change positions at the moment, so I don’t really want to ruffle feathers. I just feel so uneasy about it. It was such a small thing to try to claim as his own that it makes me wonder where else this might be done. Thoughts?

I would let it go. You don’t actually know if your boss did what you suspect him of; it’s entirely possible that he had the same document already stored on his computer and it originally came to him that way, or that he found his version using different search words than you did, or something else also perfectly innocent. Given that the facts here are in no way conclusive about wrongdoing, this isn’t something it makes sense to bring up. (I’d go even further and say that you should stop worrying about it in your own head too, since that could end up being toxic to your relationship. If you see other signs of integrity problems, look into those — but I wouldn’t put this one on the list.)

2. My employer is handling my resignation terribly

I recently submitted my resignation notice to a job I’ve been at for 3 years. I’m currently the only person trained in my department and I know it’s a key job in the company. Along with my 2 weeks notice, I also added that I’d be happy training a new person in the evenings and weekends until the transition was complete.

The response was terrible. First, I was told no, that I couldn’t leave for at least two months. And then, when I told them two weeks was all I could offer, my boss said, “You can go, I’ll decide what to do with you later.” Then a few hours later, they told me I would have one week remaining to work with the company and to have 4 months worth of work done by the end of this week. Followed quickly by, “stay off your damn phone and get this work done for me” while she was walking away.

Do I stay and do it? I love this company and I loved working here, but I really expected better when I told them what a great opportunity I had been offered. I would also like to add that I was NOT looking for work. The new employer pursued me based on reputation.

Do you stay and do four months of work in less than a week? No, that doesn’t sound possible. You do what you’re able to do and you leave your work in as good of shape as you can with the amount of time you have left. You don’t do anything beyond that, because (a) it doesn’t sound like they’re paying you to do anything beyond that, and (b) they’re being horrid to you and so you don’t owe them special treatment beyond the normal things that are expected when you’re leaving (which is to work out your remaining time without slacking off and leave your area in good order).

If you find your resolve weakening, read this and this. ANd if they try to convince you to do more work after your last day there, read this and this.

3. Writing a grant to fund a job that I want

I’m looking at working for a new nonprofit. At an interview for a different position (which we agreed was not a good mutual fit), they shared that they desperately want to hire someone to do other work (which we agreed WAS a good fit), but they don’t currently have funding to create the position. I offered to help them write applications to secure grant funding, on the condition that they hire me – that is, I proposed to secure funding for myself. I have an emailed “of course” but no signed guarantees or anything. I also didn’t ask (and they didn’t offer) for them to pay me upfront for any of the time I’m spending writing the grant.

When I tell people about the situation, some are impressed that I may have found an “in,” and others are concerned that I’m currently working for free as a grant writer with no guarantee of being hired under the grants I might secure. And your recent answer about an interviewee performing 30 hours of work for free gave me pause. So I could use some additional perspective: are they taking advantage me unfairly? Should I take some additional steps to prevent them from taking advantage, e.g. ask for a signed guarantee that I’m the one they’d hire in the event of securing funding, ask them to pay me as an intern while working on grant applications?

I don’t think they’re  taking advantage of you — you offered to do it, it was your idea, and they seem to have agreed to your condition.

Frankly, they’d be unwise to give you an ironclad guarantee that they’ll hire you if the grant money comes through; after all, what if they learn more about you during this work and realize that you’d be a bad fit? That probably won’t happen, but it could and so they’re wise not to lock themselves in with a contract. If you want to pursue this, you pretty much just need to accept that you have an informal agreement on this but not a binding one.

I also wouldn’t ask to be paid for this — they’re a nonprofit, they made it clear that they don’t have a ton of available funding, and you’re the one who proposed doing the work. Going back now and asking to be paid for it (essentially changing the earlier terms) is likely to result in them simply deciding not to pursue the project with you.

4. My boss violated a non-disclosure agreement with a client

I work for a small company where I’ve been managing a large digital services project for about a year. My client has been mostly happy with our work, and has shown off some of the content at trade shows and to a few pilot users. However, we’re still bound by an NDA since the client hasn’t made the product publically available. I conformed the project’s confidential status with the client last week on behalf of some of my freelance team members, who would like to include this project in their portfolios, and was told in no uncertain terms to maintain confidentiality for the time being.

We’ve been pursuing some bigger clients over the past few months, including some direct competitors to the client I’m working with. Yesterday, my boss presented some of my project’s work to one of the client’s competitors, as part of a broader presentation of projects we’ve worked on this year. I found out what he’d shown after the presentation, and I’m fairly certain he violated the non-disclosure agreement in our contract. I alerted him to the problem this morning, since he left the office right after the presentation yesterday.

As far as I’m concerned, we’re both contractually and ethically bound to alert the client about what happened. My boss, as you might guess, thinks I’m overreacting. He believes that since the content has been shown to pilot users and at trade shows, it was fine for us to use in a presentation of our work, especially since we’re not making the product widely accessible to our potential clients (or anyone else). He firmly insisted I should not tell my client, to avoid causing any “undue concern.” Since my boss is one of the company’s owners, I can’t escalate my concerns about this to a higher level of management.

This whole situation makes me deeply uncomfortable. If my client finds out my company violated the NDA and covered it up, I’m worried my professional reputation will be damaged–but I also can’t alert them to the problem without defying my boss and hurting my company’s reputation. What are my ethical obligations here, to both my own company and my client?

I think this one is your company’s call. You did the right thing by bringing it to your boss’s attention, but from there it’s really up to him.

If you disagree and decide to tell the client, I’d think you’d need to be prepared to part ways with your company for directly ignoring your boss’s decision on this.

5. When teachers are required to pay to chaperone

I am a school teacher, and my school will be taking students on a field trip to a movie theater. Teachers are required to go to chaperone (as it is during school hours). I was informed today that teachers are also required to pay the $6 ticket price to attend the movie.

I have done some research on this, but have been unable to find any information regarding what employers can and cannot require. Is it legal for my employer to require me to pay to perform my duties?

I can’t think of any law this would violate, but that doesn’t mean it’s not horrible practice — it is. It’s pretty common for teachers to have to buy their own classroom supplies (which is also a huge problem), but this seems like a new level of wrongness. Any teachers out there have advice on this one?

update: asking for a raise when your job changes in your first month

Remember the reader wondering if she should ask for a raise because her job had changed after only a month and she was asking to take on additional responsibilities after the receptionist and office manager left? Here’s the update.

I didn’t end up asking for a raise, but I did talk to my manager extensively regarding my comfort level working with the financials. As a result, I was given a small amount of training, which really helped. Of course, as soon as I started to feel truly comfortable (about 6 months later), we found a way to juggle the responsibilities of several different existing positions and now I no longer have to deal with that!

We also received a grant which has allowed us to fund a receptionist position temporarily until the money comes through in July! We hired a receptionist in September (about 6 months after I was hired) and things have been going well ever since. I recently spent a day covering the phones when she was out and it reminded me of just how lucky we are to have her around; answering phones all day is exhausting and time consuming!

The first 9 months I’ve spent in this position have been frustrating, exhausting, and overwhelming, but we seem to be rounding a corner. Lately I’ve had a lot more time to focus on the duties I was hired for and have been able to take on additional responsibilities related to my desired career path. As a result, I’m enjoying my job a lot more and have realized just how lucky I am to have it in the first place! My manager and co-workers have been very pleased with my performance, which is not terribly surprising since I actually know what I’m doing these days.

I’m so grateful to you and to all of the commenters for your valuable advice! So much of what you said and what the commenters brought up really helped me to clear my mind of the “this isn’t fair” mentality and to focus on the bigger picture. Ultimately, I learned a lot and am now known as the “go to” person around the office because I have been cross-trained in so many different areas and have gained a reputation for having all the answers. And who knows– maybe I’ll be able to translate that to a raise in April after all!

I’m worried a client isn’t going to pay me

A reader writes:

In October, I started a job working as a freelance journalist for a local newspaper. The managing editor would communicate with me via email, sending me leads for stories. I would go to events, interview people, and take pictures. She was very nice and always responded to my emails within minutes. According to the contract, written by the newspaper, I am to receive $50 for each full length feature article, less money for shorter articles.

The month of November, I was busy with writing, and then a bunch of red flags were raised up that I knew indicated things had taken a wrong turn. The last assignment she had sent me on was to cover an event on Thanksgiving Day (grumble, grumble). She has given me no assignments the entire month of December. I asked her if she had any work, and it took her a few hours to respond, finally she said “Things are pretty quiet right now.” Hmm, okay. I noticed she hired another reporter, who has basically taken over the coverage area that I was writing. So, she replaced me.

I sent in my invoice for all of the articles I had written for the month of November. I sent it in at the beginning of the month, as stated in the contract. It’s now the 16th and I have not received payment. I sent her a nice email asking when I could expect payment of my invoice. She did not respond. (And she normally responds to my emails within minutes….) Okay, great, so now she’s ignoring me. I re-read my contract and it says that “(Newspaper) shall pay the undisputed amount of each submitted invoice within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of the invoice, starting in bi-weekly increments upon timely receipt of the billing submitted.” I think that is just crazy. I freelance for plenty of small businesses who are able to get me a check the very next day. So what should I do? Do I just wait 60 days (until February) to see if she actually pays? Should I continue to contact her? If so, how often? Should I send another invoice? Should I contact the Department of Labor?

When I started reading your letter, I was ready to be outraged about a client not paying you, but … she hasn’t violated the terms of your agreement yet!

You signed a contract stating that they have 60 days to pay you. It sounds like you submitted your invoice about two weeks ago. They’re only a quarter of the way through the time you agreed to let them take. If you think 60 days is crazy, the time to raise that was before signing a contract agreeing to that. By signing, you indicated your acceptance of those terms. (That said, while 30-60 days is pretty typical in my experience, I’m not sure what that biweekly increments part is about. Are they supposed to start paying you $125 every two weeks for a $500 invoice, and if so, why? I’d want clarity on that part, but for now I’m going to ignore it since it’s odd.)

I can see why you’re somewhat alarmed that she didn’t respond to your email inquiring about payment if she’s normally very responsive to email. However, (a) many people are out of town at this time of year and she could be one of them, (b) since answering may have required her to first check with her accounting department, she might have put the message aside to respond to later, or (c) responding might be low on her priority list since she figures that the answer is in your contract and they’re nowhere near the payment deadline.

I would not continue to follow up on this right now, since pressing for payment well before it’s due isn’t something that will reflect well on you (and definitely don’t send another invoice before then!). I’d just mark your calendar for 61 days from when you submitted the invoice (the day after the due date), and follow up if you haven’t received payment by then.

If you haven’t received it by then, send her an email checking on it. If you don’t receive a response to that within a few days, then call her.

If you still don’t receive payment, then send another invoice, this time with late fees added. Ultimately, if you’re not getting paid in accordance with the terms of your contact, you’d need to go to small claims court to collect (the Department of Labor only enforces pay arrangements in employer-employee situations, not independent contractors) … but you’re a long way away from needing to think about that.

To avoid this in the future, take a look at payment terms before signing a contract. You can also build in late fees, which is a pretty effective way to get most people to pay on time. (But again, 30-60 days is pretty common.)

I also would try to get out of the habit of reading anything into it if someone doesn’t respond to emails within minutes, even if that’s their normal habit. People go to meetings, work on projects that require concentration, take time off work, or simply take a break from email. Do not freak out over not getting immediate responses, even if someone has trained you to expect them!

Read an update to this letter here.