a possible coworker turned out to be my date’s wife

A reader writes:

I’ve been reading your blog for a few years, and this is undoubtedly the weirdest situation I have ever been in professionally and I have absolutely no idea what to do about it.

I ballroom dance as a hobby. Recently, a gentleman began showing up to my dance classes and started flirting heavily with me. We made several dates, found out we had a lot in common, and made out, but didn’t have sex. Four weeks later, he called me, with his wife listening in, to tell me that he was married and could no longer see me. Of course, I was angry and read him the riot act for being deceptive. His wife then emailed me, complaining that I was being too hard on him (what?!) because she had already had two affairs, he had had only one, and he was looking to even the score, and I seemed like a nice girl who might be open to that sort of thing (WHAT?!).

We had a long email conversation in which I shared why I was definitely not a good choice for that sort of arrangement, and she replied that she understood but hoped I would give him another chance to demonstrate how nice he was (*head explosion*). I gave her my views on the situation: that it seemed to be problematic to say the least and I thought if they were having troubles in their marriage they should get counseling and work things out on their own, perhaps read a book that I found had helped me–I tried to be as reasonable and kindly as I could, because it sounded like they really were having serious troubles, but I did tell her that I thought both of them had exercised poor judgment and were not communicating well or thinking through the ramifications of their actions. I’m recently divorced myself after my spouse had a destructive affair; I’ve been through marital problems and I feel some sympathy for both of them on that front.

She didn’t take the criticism well, but agreed that for the sake of their child they would try to work on their relationship with each other, and we talked about how we could avoid accidentally running into each other, particularly since she would like to join in her husband’s hobbies more often so they could bond more. I offered to meet her for coffee if she would like to talk further, but said that I was definitely not up for that sort of affair for lots of reasons, and she said no thanks, she didn’t need to talk anymore and was frankly tired of the drama and being judged and all that. And then she casually mentioned in her last email what field she was in, sort of in the course of, “yeah, I have work to do, thanks but no thanks.”

My heart dropped out of my chest. Not only does she work in my industry, she works for the company where I am currently interviewing for a contract job, under a consulting company that would like to hire me. She would not be the interviewer, or likely even know that I was interviewing. The consulting company would be my actual employer, but this is one of their major clients and they like interviewees to meet with clients to be sure the clients approve of the person managing their project before they place anyone. And she is in a position where we definitely have a high chance of bumping into each other, even collaborating on a project.

I quickly shot her an email saying that I wanted to make sure there were no hard feelings in case we run into each other accidentally through work, that the offer to chat over coffee stands if she ever wanted to take me up on it, and that I wished her well and hoped she and her husband could work things out happily.

And of course if I ever do bump into her, I will certainly act professionally and courteously, but other than that…wow. I feel like if we run into each other I should probably just pretend it never happened, maybe say something like, “It’s so good to finally meet you” and explain to any other colleagues that she is a friend of a friend without mentioning even a hint of anything else. I have a pretty good poker face and I don’t think I would give away any clues that we know an awful lot of very personal stuff about each other. Do I offer to start over in our acquaintance and try to deal with the awkwardness by driving right through it? Do I not breathe a single word? Is it some sort of conflict of interest I should be concerned about–I mean, it isn’t really because her position doesn’t control which contractor gets the bid, but she has to work closely with the contractors for regulatory reasons and approve the final reports, and I’m worried that it would become an issue. I am really gobsmacked here. I did get the impression from her last two emails that she was embarrassed, resentful, frustrated with my responses, and wasn’t expecting so much conflict over the situation (not to get all Judgy McJudgersons, but really? you thought this would be no big deal?).

But wait, it gets worse: If I get the job (and it’s looking good, so far I’ve had two interviews that have gone smashingly and the hiring manager and I really clicked, and I am close friends with respected colleagues in other departments of her employer who are happy to spread the word that I am awesome), it would be to remediate shoddy work that her department had performed a couple years ago: this contractor was hired specifically in response to a regulatory agency shutting the place down, and after the announcement of the shutdown, there was a hostile takeover by a larger company and tons of layoffs. Her specific department and her specific position, where she was working when it all went down, is notoriously incompetent, but by a quirk of the senior management changes during the takeover, kept their jobs (for now, though it’s not looking good for them in late 2014). My position would be automatically antagonistic to hers. I have held management positions before that had a lot of inter-departmental conflict to work out, and I can be pretty darn charming and inclusive, but this is all a bit much. I feel like I have done all I reasonably can do, but…? I don’t even really have a moral advantage in the rumor mill if everything got out, we both know WAY too much dirt about each other. Aaargh!

This is a clusterfudge of epic proportions.

For what it’s worth, I think it was a mistake to get so entangled in conversation with the wife to begin with, rather than simply saying, “I didn’t know he was married, thank you for telling me, goodbye.” It’s easy to say that from afar, of course, but it’s worth throwing out there (not that you’re likely to find yourself in quite this situation again).

In any case … as I said, clusterfudge. I don’t think there’s a clean, easy answer here, but given that the problems started with over-involvement, I think the smartest course of action lies in doing the opposite of that now.

Which might actually mean walking away from this potential job altogether. I get that that completely sucks — why should you have to, if the job is otherwise right on both sides? But if your sense if that this situation is likely to cause problems if you get the job, then the job isn’t the right one. No matter how ideally suited you for the work and how much you like the prospective manager and the culture, if this person is going to cause issues for you, that’s not a good situation or a job you’d enjoy. It could easily go from “great job where I love the work and the culture” to “nightmare job with a crazy coworker spreading rumors that harm my professional credibility and make it hard to get things done.” And that could end up being the case even if you weren’t going to be working closely with this person — but it sounds like you’ll be in a role that will be somewhat adversarial to hers. It’s easier to imagine this going badly and being filled with drama than it is to imagine it going well.

And to be clear, I’m not saying that because the wife of someone you went on a date with works there. I’m saying it because this particular wife has shown herself to be a bit unhinged.

I’d stay far away from that, especially when it comes to your career.

Read an update to this letter here.

my boss’s wife makes me do her schoolwork, how to make more money, and more

It’s seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. How to praise a coworker to her manager

I have been working closely with a colleague at my university who has been doing a stellar job. I really appreciate the work she has done – both in speed and quality! I would like to email her supervisor to let him know how much I appreciate her efforts. Are there guidelines I should follow before sending an email (for example, should I let her know first?). How should I structure the email? I want to be sure I don’t make any faux-paus when sending the email but I do want to be sure she’s recognized for all of her hard work!

No special protocol needed, and no need to tell her ahead of time (although you might forward it to her after you’ve sent it). In the email just be straightforward, and be as specific as you can. For instance: “I’ve been thinking lately about how much I appreciate working with Jane and figured I should tell you how great she is. She’s always happy to help with X, even when it’s at the last minute, and her ability to edit my writing to make it more concise without losing substance or voice has left me incredibly impressed. She’s a pleasure to work with.”

Also, people should do more of this.

2. My boss showed us a photo of himself using cocaine

My boss showed some of the staff a picture on his cell phone of himself using cocaine at a party. Multiple staff members have now heard about the incident and it has had a bit of a butterfly effect on staff morale. I am wondering if there are any implications of us not reporting the behavior? Are we legally compliant or liable in any way?

Your boss is a tool, but no, you’re not legally required to report him or liable for not doing so. (In fact, assuming we’re talking about reporting him to the police, it’s highly unlikely they could do anything at all about it if you did. It’s just a photo, not a report of something else they could act upon.)

3. Will I make more money through raises at my current company or by changing jobs?

I have been told by a couple of mentors (within my company) that you make more money and get more responsibilities by staying with one company, as opposed to moving jobs for modest raises. I have 10 years of experience in my field and I am currently working for my second company, where I’ve been for 5.5 years. When I moved from the first company, I received a 35% increase. My current raises have only averaged approximately 3% and the recent promotion I received was only 6% (with more responsibilities). Should I stay and hope more money will come with seniority or is it better to change and get more money in the short term? I could easily move to another company an immediately get 10-15% increase, but I am not sure if loyalty will pay off in the long term. Any guidance on this subject would be much appreciated.

What? No. That is backwards. It’s widely accepted that most people get significantly higher salary jumps by changing jobs than they do through company raises. Some companies are exceptions to this, of course, but it doesn’t sound like yours is.

Any chance these “mentors” in your company are just trying to get you to stay there?

4. My boss’s wife makes me do her schoolwork

I am an executive assistant to the chairman and CEO of a major firm and I need help. My boss is a real creep. A sneaky, unethical and cheap individual. Rarely acknowledges me, let alone says two words. However, he sits back and allows his wife to use me as her personal assistant. For years now the wife has imposed her schoolwork on me. Just today, she shows up to the office with thick textbooks, so I can work on her essay – create footnotes, bibliography and appendix, etc. He knows this is happening. My colleagues laugh at me and tell me, “I hope you are getting the diploma.”

To make matters worse, I have been putting off surgery (gallbladder removal) because of my workload, and when I reminded her today that I am scheduling for Nov. 6, she responded with, “Well, if that is the case then, since you live in the same county as I, when P is away (my boss) on business on the 30th, I want you to work from the house to help me with a big project of creating files for the past 7 years of home repairs.”

When is it going to stop? Just recently, they gave salary increases and as expected did not bother providing me with one…in nearly 7 years one increase of $3K and that is it. I am disgusted and tired of the abuse. He knows this is happening and says nothing. He doesn’t value me, so whom do I turn too? I was never hired to do personal work especially not for the wife.

That’s ridiculous. You could try telling your boss that you’re uncomfortable doing personal work for his wife when you were hired to work for him, but it doesn’t sound like you have much rapport with him or that you think he would care. And since he’s the CEO, it’s unlikely that you can do much about this.

So the answer to “when is it going to stop?” is probably that it’s going to stop when you leave, which is what you should probably be thinking about doing. You’ve been there seven years so it wouldn’t be a bad idea to be looking at other jobs anyway — but in light of all this, it would make a ton of sense to be actively looking.

5. How to start an email

I often find myself starting emails with “I hope all is well with you…” To be honest, I hate using this line, and I sometimes really don’t care how some people I am addressing are feeling. Do you know of a neutral way of asking this question? How can I start off my email without sounding discourteous?

You don’t necessarily need to open with a substitute for that line. In many contexts, especially for internal emails, it’s fine to go straight into what you’re writing about — for instance, “Hi Jane, I’m sending over a write-up on Jesse Pinkman that I thought you’d find useful,” or whatever. But if it’s someone you haven’t talked with in a long time or who you otherwise feel the need to use opening niceties with, “I hope you’re doing well” is pretty standard.

6. Interviewer wouldn’t tell me how many people they’re interviewing

I just had a full-day interview, and my interviewers knew I had been offered another position and had to make a decision. They had yet to interview the remaining candidates, but the interviewer wanted to be up-front with me about the time frame. She said I was still in the running and wanted me to make whatever decision was best for me. I asked her if she could tell me how many candidates remained to be interviewed and she told me she could not because it was illegal. However, she then went on to tell me that they had received 50 total applicants for the position and that these had been screened with phone interviews down to the current pool (I’m assuming so I could make an educated guess about how many were in the full-day interview stage).

Is this actually illegal? If so, why? And why was she still able to tell me how many applicants applied in the first place? If it’s not illegal, why would she tell me it was or be hesitant to provide the number of other interviewees? If she really is interested in me “doing what’s best for me,” it seems that knowing how many people I’m competing with would be a pretty important factor. This was in the state of Louisiana if that makes any difference.

No, that’s not illegal. That’s an interviewer who has no idea what she’s talking about. I have no idea why she told you that — but I’d guess that she really believes it, just like loads of other people think things are illegal that actually are not.

7. How can I show my increase in responsibility on my resume?

I’ve been in my current position for 5 years. Two years in, I was given an increase in responsibility but it caused no change to my title. (I became the one in charge when my boss was out for the day or on vacation, meaning I was responsible for handling emergencies, bringing in additional staff if we were short, locking up the building, and signing off on any reports that had to be handled ASAP.) Two years after that, another person left and I took on half of what she did (Job B) and my boss took on the other half.

How can I show on my resume the increase in responsibility for the last 3 years, even though there was no change in my title? So far, I’ve put something like:
Job A: 2008-present
Job B: 2012-present.

Saying I’m the “#2 behind my boss” feels phony even though it’s the truth and everyone in my department (and management) knows it.

If you weren’t trying to specifically show an increase in responsibility, I’d say that you should just put all of it in a single bucket, but since you are, the way you have it here works fine. And you could include something like, “Served as acting manager in director’s absence: [details here of what that entailed].”

I have a missed call from an unknown number — was it an employer?

A reader writes:

I sent my application through email after seeing a job opening on the company’s website. Six days later, I missed a call from an unknown number (I don’t have Caller ID). I’m almost positive this was the company calling as I usually never receive calls on my cell phone, and I have not applied to any other jobs.

Now I’m panicking because I do not have a number to call and I’m worried they will not call back. I thought I would send an email apologizing for not taking the call and reinstating my interest in the position, however I’m scared this could backfire on me if it was not them calling. Do employers usually call back after a phone call isn’t answered? Or should I go ahead and send the email?

Don’t do this.

First of all, this call was from an unknown number. There’s absolutely no reason to believe that the call was from the company you applied with. It could have been a wrong number or all sorts of other things.

If you call them and explain that you think they called and they in fact did not, you’re going to look odd.

But for the sake of argument, let’s say that it wasn’t an unknown number and it was actually the company’s number. It still wouldn’t make sense to call them back, because if they wanted you to call, they would have left a message. That is what the message-leaving function is for.

Plus, if you called them, there’s no guarantee that you’ll get the person who called you. You could get a main switchboard and end up talking to someone who has no idea who called you or what they wanted. This is annoying.

However, at least in that case, you’d know that it was them who called you, and it wouldn’t be the worst thing in the world to say, “I see I have a missed call from you. I’d love to talk with you about the position if you’re still interested in speaking.”

But when you don’t even know if it was them? I think you’ve got to chalk it up to wishful thinking and let it go.

after I turned down a job, the hiring manager asked me out

A reader writes:

After I declined a career opportunity at a company, the hiring manager emailed me and asked me out for dinner and drinks, in a way that he clearly didn’t intend as professional networking.* I tried to read the message every which way, hoping it wasn’t what I thought…but basically I feel totally creeped out and disheartened. I’ve never been in a situation like this professionally. How do you recommend responding to this advance? Is ignoring the best way to go in this situation?

* Note from me: The letter-writer quoted the email to me, but asked me not to print it for privacy reasons. The email is indeed clearly asking her out on a date.

Ugh. I’d bet money that he thought that now that you were no longer dealing with each other in a professional capacity, there was nothing wrong with trying to make the relationship a social one — but it misses the point that there’s still a power dynamic in play: he’s a hiring manager and a professional connection you might have hoped to call upon in the future, and he has basically just told you that he was assessing you physically/sexually during your interview with him.

Anyone who doesn’t see what the problem is here would be well-served by reading this excellent essay by Hannah Waters about her own experience with “not quite harassment” — situations that might not seem particularly bad or troubling if it weren’t for the fact that the man involved is in a position of power and the woman isn’t. (That essay is part of a larger situation that’s been playing out in the online science writing world, a saga that’s interesting to read as well.)

To be clear, I’m not saying that it’s impossible for people who meet in this type of situation to ever develop a mutual romantic or physical relationship; of course it’s possible. But if you’re hitting on someone in this context, you need to be damn sure that they’ve already signaled it would be welcome.

As for your question about what to do now, I think it would be perfectly reasonable to ignore the email if you want to. You’re not obligated to respond, and that might be the best option if you’re not interested in having additional professional contact with this guy.

Another option is to handle it the same way that you would any other social overture that you weren’t interested in — say no thanks and move on.

And still another option, of course, is to also tell him that he should rethink asking out job applicants. While this carries the risk of making him defensive, it has the advantage of saying “hey, this isn’t okay,” which is a message more people on his side of this equation could stand to hear. But that’s really your call — it depends on what you’re comfortable with and just how creepy you found the situation.

What do others think?

job-searching is the real fright show

It might be Halloween, but for plenty of people, job searching is the real fright show.

(Bad puns like this are also scary.)

Here are eight scares you should hope to avoid if you’re in the job market this Halloween season.

1. Discovering that the job you’re interviewing for is completely different than the one in your ad. The ad seemed perfect for you – but when you show up for the interview, the job description has changed so much that the role now requires software that you don’t know or other skills you don’t have or work you aren’t interested in doing. Of course, by this point, you’ve taken time off work to interview, put an hour or more into preparing, and bought a new suit – and it turns out it was all for nothing.

2. Employers who don’t give you the full picture. As bad as it is to show up at an interview and realize the job is nothing like what you’re looking for, it’s worse to accept a job that you think is the right fit and then discover once you’re working there that the job isn’t what was described to you.

3. Online job application systems that seem to exist only to torture job seekers. More and more companies are switching to endlessly long online application forms that are often riddled with technical problems – meaning that you might spend an hour filling out a complicated form and then encounter an error that means everything you’ve entered is lost.

4. Interviewers who seem uninterested you. From checking email or texting to just plain looking bored, interviewers who make it clear they’d rather be doing something else can be the sign of a bad or disorganized interviewer of of one who has already determined you’re not right for the job. Either way, they leave candidates wondering why they were brought in at all.

5. Interviewers who know your current boss. If you’re like most job seekers, you go out of your way to make sure your job search stays below your current employer’s radar, so that you don’t get pushed out earlier than you’re ready to leave. That’s why it can rattle even the most composed job candidate to discover that your interviewer knows your current manager. Most interviewers will be discreet if you ask them to, but no job seeker likes having to risk that danger.

6. Recruiters who say you’re perfect for a job and then disappear. Anyone who’s been job searching for a while knows this drill: A recruiter reaches out, bubbles with enthusiasm and says that your resume is ideal for a job opening, and says she’ll be back in touch about an interview … and then never gets back to you or returns your calls. This frustrating experience is a normal part of today’s job market – but never gets less infuriating.

7. Flaky employers who can’t make up their minds. Does this sound familiar? First the job description seems to be a work in progress that keeps changing. Then you’re told that you’ll be reporting to Finance but later it changes to Administration and then back to Finance. And when the hiring manager tells you that she’ll confirm your interview time within 48 hours, a week later you’ve still heard nothing. If you’re frustrated now, guess what it’s going to be like to work there?

8. Employers who pull job offers after you’re already accepted. Easily the scariest of all are employers who make you a job offer and even set a start date – and then retract the offer, even if you’ve already resigned from your old job. Fortunately this doesn’t happen often – but it can happen, and it leaves job seekers in a terrible spot.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

how to screen out candidates who just want a cool job, birthday cakes for some but not all, and more

It’s seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. How can we screen out job candidates who just want to work here for the “cool” factor?

I work at a small (8-person) creative media company that is considered “cool” in our industry and tends to attract job candidates who want to be associated with our brand and company. But when they realize it’s not all fun and games, they either lose interest or discover they aren’t a good fit or that they don’t actually possess the skills that they said they did.

After one such hire, we’re trying again to advertise for our first receptionist / office manager position, a crucial yet junior role in our business. Leaving aside any potential issues with our hiring policies or company culture, what sort of questions/puzzles/brain teasers can I ask in our online application form or phone interview that can potentially screen those candidates who are motivated by providing great work and service, rather than those who want a “cool” name on their resume?

This isn’t really the place for puzzles or brain teasers. You might, in certain hiring situations, use those to test a candidate’s critical thinking, but they’re not suited to ensuring that people are interested in your company for the right reasons. Instead, you’d be better off probing into their past experiences — what have they done successfully in the past that’s hard? Do they have a track record of the skills and traits they’ll need to be successful in the role? What do their references say about them? That’s going to give you far more useful information than letting them define their own interest level for you.

In addition, make sure you’re being explicit about the reality of working for your company — even overly playing up the downsides if people are typically blinded by the upsides. Talk about the hard or boring or unglamorous elements of the job and gauge their reactions. No one is going to say “oh, then I’m not interested,” but you’ll be able to tell a lot from how they do react: Are they really processing what you’re saying or are they clinging to their blinders about your work?

2. I don’t like to share my personal life with my coworkers

My question is probably a strange one, but here goes: Early on in my career, I had a couple of very bad experiences with forming friendships with co-workers. After those experiences, I decided that I wouldn’t befriend my coworkers anymore. I consider myself friendly and outgoing, and I have a lot of friends outside of work, but am starting to feel that it is hurting me in my career. I try not to let my coworkers know too many details of my personal life, but I am still friendly, if that makes sense. Another reason I don’t share too many details is because I have been unfairly judged (i.e. young and unmarried, childless, religious) in my past jobs.

My manager asked me recently why I don’t like to share my personal life, and I gave him an honest answer (i.e. bad past experiences, unfair judgments against me, etc.), and I have the feeling that he thinks I’m weird. Am I being too cautious, or is this a smart strategy?

A bit overly cautious, probably. You certainly don’t have to share details about your personal life if you prefer not to, but if you don’t share anything, you do risk coming across as cold or odd, which can impact things you care about at work. Why not share things that are innocuous and unlikely to cause you problems — such as that you went to the beach with friends this weekend, or that you follow a particular sports team or that you share your coworker’s love of a TV show? You don’t need to open up about religion or your relationships; just stick to neutral topics of the sort you might discuss with, say, your dental hygienist.

3. We’re not allowed to call out our managers for breaking rules

This week, my manager came up with new rules that supposedly applied to everyone, including managers. One of the major rules is no online browsing or looking at pictures or videos or any social networking, and if you are caught it’s an instant write-up. The other rule is that you can’t “call out” a person who’s ranked higher. For example, if my supervisor got on Netflix while on the clock, I can’t say anything to him about it; for him to get in trouble, his manager has to see him. But if I told him to get off Netflix I would get written up.

Is this legal? I can’t tell them to stop breaking the rules and work? This is a very small department; it only has usually 6-7 people working, so one person, slacking off is a big deal. Also, it happens that the next day my supervisor was on his phone browsing the Internet and the manager got there and they both started talking about the celebrities on the website and no one got in trouble. I want to know if not being able to call them out is legal?

Yes, it’s legal. No law requires your employer to treat everyone the same or fairly or not to have double standards for managers versus non-managers. And no law requires you to be allowed to call someone out for breaking a policy.

The concept you’re looking for is “unfair” and perhaps “silly,” but not illegal. Although I wouldn’t even really call it unfair — it’s pretty normal not to be expected to tell your manager what she can and can’t do; that’s part of the relationship. The silly part is that they felt the need to codify it.

4. What does it mean that my interviewer gave me copies of the employee handbook and benefits plans?

I have gone on 3 different job interviews for one particular company in the past week and a half. At the beginning of the third interview, the HR manager hands me the employee handbook and the benefits guide (breakdowns of medical, dental, and vision insurance and their prices) and then tells me to familiarize myself with these because it took her two weeks to thoroughly read through them.

Is this a for-sure sign of getting the position? Is this common to give these types of confidential documents out to interviewees?

No, it’s not a sign that you’ll be offered the job at all. Some companies do this for all candidates at this stage of the hiring process — which is smart, because it broadens your understanding of what policies and benefits you’d have if you ended up working there, which is info that should be hugely relevant to deciding whether or not to work there (and far too often companies don’t offer that information up at all). But don’t read anything more into it than “we are now at the third interview and we give you these documents at this stage.”

5. Some coworkers get birthday cakes and other celebrations and some don’t

I work for a fairly large company, but my “team” is around 30 members. We tend to celebrate life events, like birthdays, weddings and baby showers. My issue is that there’s a big discrepancy between certain employees (and it has nothing to do with hierarchy or seniority). For example, it was decided that we (as a team) would throw a baby shower for an employee. The employee got a ton of gifts and a very expensive cake (nearly $100) was purchased. Another co-worker is expecting now, and as far as I know, no one is planning a shower for her.

Another example: Some people’s birthdays are celebrated and some are not. (If the person has expressly said they don’t want to be recognized, that’s fine – but that’s not what I’m talking about here.) Usually, a cake/cookies/pie is purchased from a bakery and a card is given. This year, an employee’s birthday was totally forgotten. To add insult to injury, that person was asked to coordinate the “A-list” baby shower, which was the same day as the forgotten employee’s birthday. Ouch!

Do you have any thoughts on how to handle this?

Yeah, unfortunately leaving this stuff informal can lead to exactly what you’re describing — and hurt coworkers who feel like they’re not as much a part of the team than other people. It sucks because it would be nice to be able to be informal about this kind of thing, and it seems silly to have to introduce bureaucracy into it … but based on what you’re seeing, you should probably put someone in charge of coordinating all of these events so they can make sure stuff like this doesn’t happen. (And that person would ideally be given guidelines like: Check with people to see if they want a celebration before you plan one, make contributing money for this stuff opt-in and not opt-out, and so forth.)

6. Including company descriptions on your resume

I’ve seen some resumes with company descriptions on them. An example would be:
XYZ Company
Nonprofit organization whose goal is…Received award for “Being Awesome,” 2011, 2012.

What do you think of adding company descriptions? If I kept my descriptions in, my resume would be three pages. I know enough not to send a three-page resume out and only send out a two-page resume, which is edited to suit the job I’m applying to. Are company descriptions necessary or helpful for hiring managers?

Nope. They take up space and they’re not needed at this point. An interviewer certainly might want to know more about the places you’ve worked at some point, but the time for that is in an interview, not on your resume. Your resume should be about you, not your company.

An exception to this if if you’re including something about the company that better explains your role or achievements there — but don’t include company descriptions for their own sake.

7. I lied on a job application and now face a background check

My cousin made me a CV with false info on it (school, job experience) and now I’m facing a background check in my application. What happens if the employer finds out I didn’t go to the school and have these job experiences?

You will have the job offer pulled and be ineligible to work there in the future. (Or, even worse, if they find out after they’ve already hired you, you’ll be fired.) Most places verify employment and check references, so this is likely to happen again. Stop doing it.

I’m the company bad cop and my job makes everyone hate me

A reader writes:

Just wanted to get your thoughts on how to deal with people who take things personally at work. I am a natural hard-ass at work, precisely because I roll out policies and procedures in my current company. I am good at what I do, and I get great feedback from my bosses in my assignments. Trouble is, because of the policies I create, I impact the whole organization in a negative way (my policies are around cost control and expense management which naturally make me Public Enemy #1, but they will be good for the company in the long run).

I am just doing my job the best way I can, but people in my company have associated me personally to what I do. I get pouts, snobs when I enter the elevator. People do not respond to my emails when I need to have a question answered. I am basically shunned! It kind of hurts that people do not see this as purely business, that this is my job.

How do you think I should deal with this?

Hmmm. Aside from their behavior toward you, how are you acting toward them? Are you being warm and friendly, showing camaraderie, and working to get to know them?

I ask because I suspect the reactions that you’re getting aren’t simply part of the package with the role you’re in; I suspect it’s something about the way you’re going about the role — your style with people.

And I say that because this is a role where your style really matters. Because the work you’re doing can easily position you as the bad cop, you need to make a point of ensuring that your style doesn’t reinforce or feed into that. If all people know of you is that you’re the person who issues edicts that make their lives more difficult, then yeah, they’re not going to feel especially warmly toward you. But if you’re warm and friendly toward people — possibly more than what might come naturally to you — it’s going to be harder to see you as the grinch.

And it will also help if you educate people about what you do and why (if you’re not doing this already). For instance, rather than simply rolling out a new policy or procedure, make sure that you take the time to explain why — what alternatives were considered, what the consequences would be without the new policy, and so forth. That too makes it a lot harder for people to see you the way they might if all they know of your work is that it seems to lack empathy for or understanding of how it impacts them.

When you’re good at what you do and you’re getting good feedback from your manager, it’s easy to feel like this kind of thing shouldn’t matter. But it does — both because you’re hurt by the response that you’re getting from people and because it will almost certainly make you even better at your job. Having policies that benefit the organization is a good thing, but having buy-in on those policies from employees — or at least understanding of why those policies exist — is even better.

If you feel like you’re doing everything above and still running into this, then at that point you might consider soliciting feedback from people around you about what they might see that you don’t. It’s possible, after all, that it’s something entirely different from the above. But the above is where I’d start, before resigning yourself to the idea that the job itself will make people dislike you.

I want to stop eating lunch every day with my employee

A reader writes:

I have a direct report, “Dan,” who expects to eat lunch with me and another colleague, “Amy,” every day of the week.

We were friendly and ate together a lot before I became his boss, and I would say are generally still friends. I do work hard to be clear on when the boss/buddy line starts and stops.

At any rate, in the name of variety in my week and keeping the aforementioned line intact, I simply can’t eat with him every day. The other colleague mentioned feels the same, although the reporting structure has nothing to do with it for her. How do I encourage him to reset his expectations about us eating together every day? How can I encourage him to venture out without feeling “ditched”?

More background in case it helps:

We sit on the same floor, but most of the communication before lunch occurs over our instant messaging software. It’s a very quiet environment/culture, one where three of us in the lunchroom causes too much noise (and we eat with the door closed). IM allows us to say things without a “shh” repercussion. Maybe some context is lost in this communication platform.

Sometimes Amy will let me know ahead of time that she is not available for lunch. She’s got other plans, or she’s got a meeting, whatever. She will usually let me know as early in the day as possible, and she usually lets Dan know at least one hour before lunch. Dan will let me know anywhere between 15 and 5 minutes before the expected time (11:30) that “Amy is ditching.”

Since I usually know this in advance, I feel like I can’t “ditch” him too. So, I usually eat with him alone then. There are times where it is reversed and I do the ditching and Amy eats alone with him (although she says he never refers to it as ditching when I am not there). If I do know ahead of time that I have a meeting or something, he will generally offer to wait for me until I am free. Or, if I am for sure not going to be available (last week I had lunch with my mom one day), he says “Ok, have fun!” I think when he knows as far in advance as possible, he doesn’t feel ditched or neglected.

He will ask if I’m ready to eat by a simple “Ready?” question around 11:30. Or sometimes, a “I’m heading in.” I guess I just wish it were more a “Hey, can you eat lunch today?” and less expected that it just happen.

Dan is one of the nicest people you’ll ever meet. Very sweet, very positive. Sometimes even unaware of his own performance (or lack thereof). That’s actually something that I know for me is an underlying cause of why I don’t want to eat with him everyday. Now that he reports to me, and I see more of his performance issues, it’s hard to want to walk in the lunch room and have a pleasant/friendly lunchwhen I know I have to address something with him soon. He’s so nice and friendly with everyone; it surprises me that he doesn’t ask others to lunch.

I suppose I should ultimately be flattered that he enjoys my company so much. And it’s not a huge problem in the grand scheme of things, just one of those things that I would love to feel in control of, and not feel guilty for “ditching.”

I think you’ve actually made this into a bigger problem in your head than it needs to be, although I understand how that’s happened.

It’s hard to change a pattern once it’s established without feeling like you’re somehow slighting the other people who are part of that pattern. But I also suspect you’re reading too much into Dan’s use of “ditching.” I doubt he means “ducking out of a presumed obligation to eat with us”; it’s far more likely that he’s just using it to mean “deviating from what we normally do.”

In any case, this really doesn’t have to be a big deal. You just need to explain to Dan that you’re going to change the pattern and why … and as long as you don’t act like it’s a Huge Serious Deal, it’s pretty unlikely that Dan will take it that way.

So just let Dan know that you’re going to be eating with him and Amy less and give a reason. Anything like this would work:

  • “Hey, I’m going to be eating less with you guys because I’m going to walk during lunch / try to unwind from anything work-related during lunch / eat at my desk while I read over XYZ.”
  • “Hey, I’m going to spend more lunches trying to catch up with other departments because I’m realizing that it’s helpful to me to get to know their work better, so don’t plan on me for lunch for a while.”
  • “I know we’ve gotten in the habit of all eating lunch together, but I’m going to pull back a bit so that you’re not stuck always having lunch with your manager.” And if he protests that he doesn’t mind, you can add, “I’d still love to join sometimes — I’ll let you know on days that I can.” (Or even more candid: “I feel that I need to pull back a bit because of the changed relationship, although I’d still love to join you on occasion” … as long you say it in a way that makes it clear that this is about being thoughtful about your relationship and not you being snobby because you now have a more important job.)

And then, after that, if Dan IMs you to say he’s heading to lunch, just tell him to enjoy or say “okay” or whatever. If he asks if you’d like to join him, say yes on occasion and the rest of the time say “no thanks, but go on ahead” or “I have plans today but enjoy” or anything else along those lines.

All of this is just about (a) being straightforward with him so that he understands that you’re changing the pattern — as opposed to just changing it without explanation, which is more likely to leave him feeling bad — and then (b) doing him the courtesy of assuming that he won’t be devastated. Because really, he probably won’t be. (And if he is, then you can explain head-on that yes, the relationship does need to change now that you’re his manager. But again, I don’t think you’ll need to.)

Read an update to this letter here.

how to disagree with your boss and keep your job

When you know you’re right and your boss is wrong, figuring out whether to speak up can be tricky. But if you handle it adeptly, disagreeing with your boss can actually make you a more valuable employee. Of course, if you do it wrong, it can make you a less valuable employee, or even an employee without a job – so it’s important to do it right.

Too often, people who disagree with their boss handle it badly in one of two ways: They either stew about it silently and don’t speak up at all, or they disregard their manager’s instructions and do things their own way without surfacing the conflict.

Both of these are bad options. If you disagree with your boss over something substantive, it’s worth speaking up about your own point of view. Here’s how.

1. Recognize that you might each have different information. Workplace disagreements often arise when two people have different pieces of information about something. It’s possible that you know something your manager doesn’t, so figure out what that might be, tell her, and see if that changes anything. At the same time, be open to new information she might give you that might change your own viewpoint.

For instance, if you’re frustrated that your manager hasn’t approved your request to bring in a temp to help process a backlog of database entries, it’s possible that your manager doesn’t realize that the urgency you feel is because the backlog will grow even larger when the results of next month’s customer mailing start coming in and your assistant goes on a long-planned vacation. Alerting her to this context might change her stance. Or, alternately, you might be the one who doesn’t realize a crucial piece of information – such as that the department is already over-budget. Talking it out can help bring this type of information to the surface.

2. Ask for a limited-time experiment. If step No. 1 doesn’t resolve the disagreement and you feel very strongly about your viewpoint, in some contexts it makes sense to say something like, “I really feel strongly about this. Would you be willing to allow me to try it my way and we can see how it goes?” (You want to do that sparingly though. You shouldn’t greet every decision with push back – save this for things that are truly important to you.)

3. Pay attention to your tone. Tone really matters when you’re disagreeing with your matters – it’s the difference between sounding adversarial and difficult and sounding collaborative. You want your tone to be one of collaborative problem-solving, not one of frustration, venting or hostility. And you’ll get the best results if you frame the conversation in a way that demonstrates that you understand that in the end your boss is the one who will need to make the final call.

4. Decide how much you care. Once you’ve spoken up about your viewpoint, your manager may or may not come around to your way of seeing things. If she doesn’t, then at that point you need to decide how important the issue is to you. If you disagree strongly enough, you can always exercise your independence by leaving – but in general, it usually makes sense to accept that sometimes you and your boss will simply see things differently (just as you probably don’t agree with any other person 100 percent of the time), and that’s mostly OK.

Now, one last note about all of this: All the advice above assumes that your boss is sane and reasonable. If that’s not the case, and if you know from experience that dissent is likely to be punished, then modify your actions accordingly.

I originally published this column at U.S. News & World Report.

naked work retreats, singing coworkers, and other delights of the workplace

It’s seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Our team retreat included a naked sauna trip

I work for an international NGO, and I’m the only woman on a team of 12, mostly North American employees. We recently held a team retreat in a country where gender roles are behind the times.

My director, who is from the country where we were, announced that one of our team-building activities would be a trip to the sauna – men only. I objected, and he grudgingly said I could go, but my colleagues would all be naked. Feeling very uncomfortable, I opted not to go, and some colleagues stayed behind with me so I wouldn’t be sitting around by myself all night.

I’m still feeling bothered and excluded (It doesn’t help that my colleagues had a fantastic time and can’t stop raving about it). Do I just let it go and chalk it up to cultural differences? If I do choose to deal with it, how can I do so sensitively and professionally?

To some extent, this can be part of the deal with traveling to countries with different cultures; they have different norms that will govern. However, if your organization is headquartered in the U.S. or another country where gender-segrated work activities don’t fly (let alone nudity among coworkers), your manager or someone else in a position from authority from a region with the same cultural norms as ours should have addressed this. If that didn’t happen, it’s worth advocating that this be handled differently in the future — but beyond that, I think you’re best off chalking it to cultural differences. (And yay for the presumably male colleagues who stayed behind with you.)

2. At what point do cover letters get read?

At what point in the applicant screening process do cover letters get read, if at all? I slave away on crafting my cover letters, especially for jobs that I really really want, and I know it’s better to submit one than not. I am just wondering if it’s even being read at all or if they decide whether they like you or not before even considering looking at your cover letter.

It depends on the employer. Some don’t read them at all, and others do. You can’t tell from the outside which hiring manager will and which won’t, so you should assume that they all do and include a good letter. As for when in the process they’re read, generally in the initial screen, either right before or right after the resume.

A great cover letter won’t (generally) make up for a resume that severely lacking, but when there are dozens or hundreds of candidates who are all about as qualified as you, it can be what gets your application pulled out for an interview.

3. My sister’s boss is demeaning to her

My sister is currently working as a cashier at a fast food chain and has been employed in this position for about 6 months. She recently divulged that her manager has been making what I consider to be degrading and inappropriate comments to her. To be more specific, he says my sister “rides the stupid bus,” as well as refers to her as “Ms. Frizzle, driver of the Magic School Bus.” The other day, my sister overheard her manager call her “Ms. Frizzle” to HIS boss.

Obviously, I am upset by this, but I’m 99 percent sure that there is nothing I personally can do (right?). My sister herself is very shy, and adverse to confrontation, but is there any advice I can give her to help make this situation better?

Lovely. Your sister’s boss is clearly an ass, and his own boss clearly doesn’t care (and thus is probably a bit of an ass as well). I’d encourage your sister to realize that your boss is the problem, not her, and to change jobs … and to see this as a lesson in getting herself out of bad situations.

4. Coworkers won’t stop singing and shouting

I work on a production line with 20 other people. We work in a space with lots of machines running with a lot of background noise. There are 3 guys who at any time will break into singing, whistling, and shouting at each other. This can last from 30 minutes to more than 2 hours without stopping on any given day. They will repeat the same tunes day in and day out.

This has a huge effect on me and some of my coworkers, but others don’t seem to mind. They have been asked to stop, and their answer is that they’re only having a laugh. Management doesn’t want to help. What can be done in this situation?

Well, probably nothing, it sounds like. You’ve asked them to stop and they’ve refused, and your manager isn’t willing to tell them to stop … so it sounds like this is part of the work environment there. Which would mean that you’ll have to decide whether it’s a deal-breaker for you or not (or whether you can wear headphones or otherwise block out or distract yourself from the noise).

5. Boss scheduled me for Christmas Eve, after approving me to be out

I work part-time in a position that would normally be full-time (I’m a graphic designer and there’s a lot of work around here). Since I receive no benefits, I must work extra hours to make up for holidays and vacation days. With all the winter holidays and my need to focus on night-time grad school for a whole week, I created a schedule for the next three months. Boss took a close look at it and approved it two weeks ago.

Today, however, he said he’ll “need” me to be on “standby” on Christmas Eve and the day before that, which I’d clearly marked as vacation time. I told him I could not work those days because I’d be with family, and he went on about how I’m not showing loyalty to the job. Meanwhile, I know I am an asset to the team and there is a very large demand for my skills at other potentially more pleasant workplaces.

This is the second time a manager of mine has reneged on his approval of my time off over Christmas. Having managed people myself, I can’t imagine being so crass. What is the appropriate response?

I don’t think “crass” is quite the word you want…? In any case, this does suck, but the reality is that sometimes people are indeed needed to be available on certain days. Yes, he shouldn’t have approved the time off before he was sure, but sometimes things do change — and he’s at least giving you two months notice (which doesn’t help, of course, if you already made plans to be out-of-town). Your can tell him that you made unbreakable plans after he approved the days off earlier and see what happens … but unless this is part of a pattern of disrespect or sloppy management, I’d try to just work it out. However, if you’re sufficiently unhappy with your manager, there’s no reason that you can’t explore one of those “potentially more pleasant workplaces” as an alternative.

6. Did I destroy my chances by sending in a new application?

I recently noticed a typo from when a I applied for a job a week ago. I decided to clean it up and re-word the whole thing and send it again. I hadn’t heard anything in a week, so I figured that I don’t have much to lose as I suppose I won’t get an interview anyway. By doing it, have I destroyed all of my chances of getting the job or have I improved my chances?

Well, it’s sort of weird to submit a whole new application just one week after your first one. It’s likely to look like you didn’t realize that you’d already applied. If you want to correct an error, the best way to do that is with a follow-up email (if their system allows it; if not, you need to just let it go).

In general, don’t draw any conclusions just because a week has gone by since you applied for a job. Hiring takes a long time, often months.

7. Coworker with shingles

I have a coworker who came to work with shingles blisters and is refusing to cover the blisters . My managers are refusing to do anything. There are people who work with her who are pregnant and are now furious with her. I am a high-risk patient and am very angry with her for what she did. I work at an amusement park. How can someone be so dumb?

How people can be so dumb is a question I’m not qualified to answer. But your managers should have asked your coworker to cover the blisters to help prevent transmission.