stuff for you to read

Three good articles that you should read —

1. This article from Harvard Business Review has great advice about how to deal with a screamer or an over-explainer — two frustrating types you might encounter at work at some point. It’s pretty insightful advice that wasn’t intuitive for me.

2. I’ve been known to try to provide help where it’s not wanted and thus completely recognized myself in “Don’t Inflict Help, Provide It” — also from HBR. If you too are occasionally tempted to be inappropriately “helpful,” whether at work or in your personal life, you should read this.

3. I am irrationally annoyed by out-of-office auto-replies that provide too much information, so loved this piece on the worst kinds of email auto-responders.

ask the readers: how can I have more energy in interviews?

I’m throwing this one out to readers to weigh in on. A reader writes:

I’ve been out of work for over a year, taking some freelance work (mostly unpaid) here and there.

Recently, I’ve received feedback from a few interviewers that while my credentials and interview question answers are all stellar, they felt I lacked enthusiasm and energy during the meeting. In term, this issue is read as a lack of interest in the position.

I have tried to think of ways to counteract this, to appear engaged and positive without seeming unprofessional or immature. However, I can’t seem to get over this hurdle. Do you have any advice?

Readers, what do you say?

 

is it wrong to take a sick day when you’re not really sick?

A reader writes:

So luckily (?) I’m the kind of person who is never ill enough to take time off work. I’ve worked in my current position for 4 years and not taken a single day of sick leave. (I’m not coming in and spreading illness, by the way, and I’d take the leave if I had to — I’m just not ill.)

Everyone else at work seems to take 3 or 4 days of sick leave a year. So you can guess where this is going… I’d like another day or two of holiday as much as the person. And once in a while (rarely) I wake up and REALLY don’t “feel” like going in (but do anyway).

So… How big a crime is it morally/ethically to call in “sick” on one or two days a year? Do people “expect” you to use all your leave? Part of me feels wrong for thinking of this… But the other part of me feels like I’m missing out on something everyone else is benefitting from. Sorry if this seems naive!

Most employers do not expect you to use up every single allotted sick day each year. They expect you to use it as a safety net, so that it’s there for you when you truly need it. You’re not expected to look at it the same way that you look at vacation days — as a benefit that it makes sense to try to use all of. When they’re in separate buckets, that’s part of the reason why. (If your employer buckets vacation and sick leave into one overall PTO bucket, that’s different, and it’s much more common to expect you to use all of it.)

But if you’re not using any sick leave the rest of the year, I don’t think it’s a big deal to take a couple of “mental health days,” as long as you’re thoughtful about when you do it and don’t choose days that will cause problems for your employer or coworkers.

Anyone want to disagree?

5 hiring practices you should stop today

Think you’re good at hiring? See if you’re committing any of these five hiring no-no’s.

1. Conducting “courtesy” interviews with no intention of hiring the candidate

Most people who hire know the feeling of wondering if you need to interview a particular candidate for reasons other than the person’s qualifications – for instance, because she’s the friend of a board member, or came referred by your manager, or lives next door. But interviewing someone who you know doesn’t have a real chance just as a “courtesy” is the opposite of courteous: It wastes time on both sides, leads the person to believe they have a real chance at the job when they don’t, and puts them through the time and anxiety of preparing for the interview (and perhaps spurs them to take time off work or incur expenses like a new suit or briefcase).  It’s far kinder to be direct from the start and simply explain that you’re looking for qualifications X and Y and so it doesn’t appear to be a match.

2. Not using phone screens before in-person interviews

If you’re in the habit of inviting candidates in for in-person interviews without first conducting phone screens, stop! Phone screens can save you (and your candidates) an enormous amount of time. Just 10-20 minutes on the phone will often rule people out immediately; you might quickly discover that their experience in a key area is far less than you thought from their resume, or that their social skills aren’t a fit with the role, or that they can start until three months after you need someone. It doesn’t make sense to bring people in to meet in-person – when you’ll generally spend far longer than 20 minutes talking — until you’ve established basic suitability for the role and ruled out obvious deal-breakers.

3. Requiring a degree when the work doesn’t necessitate it

There’s a reason that many employers are moving away from requiring college degrees for many jobs, when candidates are able to show other qualifications: It’s because degree requirements too often screen out candidates who have all the qualifications really needed to excel in the job.

It makes far more sense to look at the totality of what candidates have achieved – degrees, work experience, all of it. Of course, if your candidate pool is made up of candidates new to the workforce, and you therefore don’t have much real data on their work performance yet, degrees can be a useful proxy to signal what someone might be able to achieve. But when you have more experienced candidates, you can look to their actual track record at work. And it makes no sense to rule out experienced candidates who have excelled in their fields just because they didn’t graduate (particularly when they made that decision some 20 or more years ago).

4. Asking softball questions instead of probing into track record

Getting to know a candidate is important – you want to know who you’ll be working with every day, after all. But too many interviewers spend most of the interview asking softball “getting to know you” type questions – like why the candidate applied for the job, what their preferred work culture is, what they’ve liked most and least about jobs in the past, how this role fits into their desired career path, what kind of person they work best with, and so forth. While these questions can certainly elicit useful information, they should make up only a small portion of the interview. You will find out far more by (a) probing into candidates’ past experiences deeply – getting into the nitty-gritty of what the candidate has accomplished and how they did it, and (b) finding ways to see them in action, by having them simulate the type of work they’d be doing on the job.

And of course, while you should indeed be nice to your candidates, it’s crucial to not to allow your desire to be nice prevent you from digging until you have a really clear sense of a candidate’s strengths and weaknesses. Pushing as much as it takes to get into the details is key to making an accurate assessment – and besides, good candidates actually appreciate challenging questions.

5. Checking references after making a job offer

If you don’t engage in this practice yourself, it probably sounds ridiculous to you, but there are plenty of employers who don’t bother with reference checks until after a candidate has accepted an offer. This is a terrible practice, for two reasons. First, most importantly, you’re putting your new hires in a terrible position. It’s not reasonable to expect candidates to resign their current jobs (thus severing times with their source of income) when you haven’t completed your vetting process and might pull the offer if you find something you don’t like. If you want them to commit to your offer, you need to commit fully yourself – not add contingencies that could cause serious problems for them.

Second, reference checks shouldn’t just be about rubber-stamping a decision you’ve already made. Rather, reference checks can play an important part in your decision-making process, if you ask the sort of nuanced questions that will get you more information than a simple thumbs-up or thumbs-down. Someone might be a great employee, but you might learn from references that they don’t have the particular qualities you’re seeking for that particular position (or that someone else has more of them). You can also learn about what kind of management a candidate works best with, where they might need additional support, and other information that can help you make your hiring decision, rather than just validating it after the fact.

If you’re a manager who is guilty of any of the above five offenses, vow to reform your ways right now – and you’ll make better hires for it.

I originally published this at Intuit QuickBase. 

my boss holds it against me that I cried 6 years ago, asking to sit in on interviews, and more

It’s seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. My coworker won’t let me get involved with work that my boss told me to do

My boss decided that I should be a part of the social media team. Like I always do, I learned as much as I could on how my organization uses social media and checked out all the guidelines. I realized some of the stuff we’re doing and posting doesn’t exactly go with my organization’s guidelines. I set up an informal meeting with my coworker who leads up the social media team to discuss this. I even brought a print-out so she could review it. She shut me down and shut me out. Since then, she’s been pretty chilly toward me. She continues to do whatever she likes. In front of our colleagues, she appears receptive to my ideas but when its the two of us, she could care less.

Going to my boss isn’t an option, as she has a very hands-off approach. She doesn’t do conflict management. (My coworker probably doesn’t know what my role is supposed to be, since my boss isn’t one for giving directions of any kind.) How do I handle being shut out by a coworker for a team project?

Well, yeah, if your coworker doesn’t know that your boss has asked you to work on this, it’s not surprising that she didn’t react well to you sitting her down and telling her what she should do differently in work that — as far as she knows — you’re not involved in. Ideally, you would have started off differently — by telling her that your boss has asked you to work on social media with her and asking how you can best become involved.

At this point, I think you need to go back to her, apologize for not giving her the full context earlier, and explaining what your boss has asked you to do. If you continue to encounter resistance, then you’d need to go back to your boss, explain the situation and ask for advice on how to proceed. (And I hear you about your boss, but she needs to know that there’s an obstacle in the way of the work she’s assigned you.)

2. Can I ask to sit in on my employer’s interviews?

I’m 24 years old and have been working for one and a half years in my current career. After graduation, I went to my first job interview and they hired me. I had no chance to do any interviews after my first. I know I’m a little bit lucky, but the problem is that I have a phobia about interviews, and I really don’t have any idea how I passed my first one!

My office is in front of my department head’s office, and I noticed that they are doing interviews monthly. I really want to ask him if it is possible to attend the interviews with them as interviewer, without mentioning the reason behind that. I want to attend many interviews to try to get over my phobia. Can I do something like that? I know he will ask me for a reason but I don’t want to tell him the truth!

Nope, you can’t really ask to sit in on interviews when it’s not your job without explaining why.

But even with an explanation, I wouldn’t ask. If interviewing isn’t your job, your employer is unlikely to want you to spend work time in interviews (particularly in order to increase your skills at interviewing with other employers!). Plus, sitting in on interviews is a semi-big deal; it changes the dynamic with the candidate to have another person present (and candidates will likely direct some of their questions to you, etc.). A better bet would be to practice interviewing with a friend or relative (ideally one with some experience conducting interviews, but that’s not essential).

3. Why won’t the company I’m temping for hire me on as an employee?

I was hired through a staffing agency at a big corporate about nine months ago. My main duties were data entry (writing copy and inserting new products into a database). Soon, I found out that there were many really old, repetitive, and time-consuming processes that took multiple people hours to complete. Because of my background in programming, I was able to automate these tasks to take minutes or even seconds.

But seeing as it is nine, almost ten months in and their workload doesn’t seem to be slowing any time soon, it is kind of disheartening that I haven’t been hired on full-time yet. As a temp, I don’t get benefits or an employee discount, and I don’t get to go to company events and conventions. I know I have added great value to the company, yet they are keeping me on as a temp. I haven’t been compensated, nor have I asked for any, for any of the extra programming-related work I have done. I thought maybe if I did something special and out of my way they that would think I was worth being hired full-time. I am to the point where I have decided to not offer to do any programming or go out of my way anymore because it doesn’t feel like it is appreciated. I have even been told by a coworker that it costs more for them to pay the staffing company than it would to pay me benefits and a higher wage. What’s up with that?

It’s possible that they haven’t hired you full-time because they’re not convinced there’s a long-term need to hire someone full-time for the work you’re doing — particularly when they can fill the need just fine with a temp (and not pay benefits or deal with the hassles that employees bring that temps don’t). It’s also possible that only the second part of the sentence is true: that they’re planning on permatemps, as many companies do. Either way, they don’t feel there’s sufficient incentive for them to take on the costs of making you permanent. That might be a legitimate business decision or it might not be, but it’s hard to judge unless you have the full set of business facts that only they have.

Regardless, though, why not (a) talk explicitly to someone there in a position of authority about your interest in being hired on, if you haven’t already and (b) start actively searching for something else since you’re not getting what you want from them?

4. My boss suggested I take a three-day weekend, but I didn’t know it would come out of my leave balance

In the accounting industry, many firms offer assistance to accountants who are CPA candidates. It is common to pay for study materials and testing and licensing fees, allow studying during the work day when billable work is not available, and give paid time off for exam days. The firm where I work does not offer any assistance. Sadly, I did not have the gumption to negotiate this with my employer. I did ask if it were okay that I study at the office during my down time and was told I had to to study on my own time. I have used PTO for exam days, studied on my own time and paid thousands of dollars for exam materials and testing fees.

Last week, my boss suggested that I “make it a three day weekend. Unless you have some work scheduled.” So I took Monday off, thanked him and mentioned that I appreciated the extra day off to study. Apparently I misunderstood his intentions and recorded it as holiday time, he has since deducted the time from my PTO bank.

While I understand that he isn’t required to give me time off for test days or a day that he suggested I take off, I would like to address the issue. As a result of taking the day he suggested, I have only 6 hours left of vacation/sick time. We earn PTO with OT hours worked which I don’t expect to happen until February sometime. I want to let him know that I misunderstood his intention when I took a day off last week, but also that if I were to get sick in the next few months it’s possible that I may have to take unpaid time off. I also want to mention that by the end of this year I would have taken 5 days of PTO to sit for exams while many firms offer to cover exam days. My boss is fair, sometimes generous, but mostly thoughtless when it comes to HR issues. What might be a tactful way address both the confusion regarding his suggested day off and paid time off for exam days?

Hmmm, yeah, generally if your boss suggests you take a three-day weekend, it means “things are slow right now, so why don’t you take advantage of it by using some PTO?” — not “I’m giving you a free day off that won’t come from your PTO.” I suppose you could explain to him that you misunderstood his suggestion and as a result are worried about your dwindling PTO balance … but you risk looking a little naive and ultimately doing yourself more harm than good. So I’d let this one go, and just address your PTO balance if you do get sick and it poses an issue.

I do think you could have a different conversation with him about how your firm’s benefits differ from industry norms and ask for more flexibility there … but I would make that its own conversation, unconnected to the day you took last week.

5. Manager won’t promote me because I cried six years ago

In 2007, I had been covering up to three full-time positions in our department alone for about a year and a half. One morning, a VP yelled at me and I started to cry. I cried for about ten minutes, had a meeting with my boss, and we agreed I could take a day off. I went to the doctor and explained I was exhausted and got a doctor’s note for five days of rest. My boss and department head expressed a good deal of concern and finally found some help for me in the three roles I was covering.

Fast forward six years. I requested a meeting with the department head to ask what I would need to do to qualify for a promotion. He said that I wasn’t promotable based on that event — that I was unable to handle pressure. I left that meeting, thought for a week and then emailed him a note pointing out that I had $2.6B dollars in assets under my supervision, second only to his liability, and that in just the past year I had completed a graduate degree while working full time and supervising 53 people, while nursing my mom through cancer, and all the while being the top performer in my team and without missing a single day of work. And that it seemed only fair to rethink the idea that I couldn’t handle pressure. He responded by calling me into a meeting, telling me he didn’t like me, that we weren’t friends, that I was cold and distant, and that I should get professional counseling.

Should I go to HR? I don’t think they can change his mind and he was recently given a seven-year commitment and bonus package. So he’s not going anywhere. But it eats at me.

I don’t see much point in going to HR. It’s unlikely they can change the reality that you’re working for a manager who doesn’t like you and won’t promote you. Plus, there’s a semi-high risk that once he hears you went to HR (which he likely will), you’ll just increase the tensions in the relationship. If you want to move up (and maybe even if you don’t), you’d be better off looking for a promotion outside the company, so that you’re no longer at the mercy of this relationship.

Read an update to this letter here.

6. Interviewing on crutches

I have reason to believe I will be called for an interview this week. If they would like to schedule it this week, there is a good chance I will be still be using crutches. If I’m not on crutches, I will still be wearing an aircast. No matter what, I can’t find shoes that I would normally feel acceptable to wear to an interview that fit with the cast. Should I say something when we set up the appointment? Apologize that I might have to wear sneakers (I do have dark brown ones that would match an outfit, sort of)? Even trying to push it off a week, I will probably still need to be wearing the aircast.

Don’t push an interview back over this. It’s fine to wear the dark brown sneakers, and just explain when you get there (at which point it’s going to be obvious why you’re wearing them). If it makes you feel better, you can certainly mention it in advance, but I’d keep it short and light — no detailed explanation is necessary, and you don’t want to make it sound like a bigger deal than it is.

7. How rigid should a store closing time be?

I would like to get your opinion on how rigid a closing time for a store should be, as I cannot figure out what the right thing to do is in the following situation. I am a retailer working in a specialty boutique, where we are open for six days a week (closed Sundays). Often we get customers coming in during the last five or ten minutes that we are open for the day, and, even with informing them that “we will be closing in five/ten minutes” (after they have been properly greeted and asked if they needed assistance, of course), often they will want to stay late.

I see both sides of the situation. They are people who want to come to our store and buy from us, and we want to respect that and give them the best customer service that we can. The flip side is that stores have set hours, and I want to let our employees go home, as I respect the fact that they have lives outside of work and may have somewhere else to be. It happens more than a handful of times a year that our owner will allow certain customers to stay more than 45 minutes past closing. While these customers have been loyal to our boutique for years, I have to wonder if this is fair to other customers. My question is, where do you draw the line between “I’m sorry, we closed at 6” and “Sure, come on in”?

This is really more of a question for a retail expert — which I am not — but my personal opinion is that no reasonable customer should get offended by hearing, “I’m sorry, we’re about to close and I have to let our staff go home.” And from a management standpoint, I think you have more to gain by treating your employees’ time with respect than by allowing the occasional unreasonable customer to dictate your hours.

But if you are going to let customers stay late, you should let employees know up-front when you’re hiring them that this is sometimes a possibility, so they know from the start that they might end up staying later than the times they’re scheduled for.

can my micromanaging boss be rehabilitated? she makes me take all calls on speaker phone…

A reader writes:

My new boss started about six months ago. I am very productive and excel at my job (and I’m not just saying that; I have only received stellar performance reviews for the last three years since I have been here, most recently by this new boss in question). The boss, however, is a textbook micromanager. When she started, she insisted I show her my emails to colleagues and to donors, she asked me where I was at for all of my projects on a daily basis, and even had me put my phone on speaker when I spoke to anyone. She also rewrote everything I wrote, even though she is a terrible writer (with awful grammar, made-up words, etc.). She is that way with her other direct reports, too.

I followed your advice on your blog. I maintained the quality of my work, I informed her about everything I was doing, and copied her on all emails. Eventually, I had a conversation with her, asking her what I could do differently, since I felt that she didn’t trust me. I also said that I work best when I have a sense of autonomy and ownership over my work, and that I would be happy to update her frequently. She appeared chagrined and apologized, saying she had just wanted to learn the ropes and see what we were doing. She promised to back off. However, she hasn’t. Instead, now she is even more rigid and difficult. She tells me she trusts me 100% and that she is pushing for me to get a promotion. But the micromanaging continues. I think it is partly because she is in over her head; she managed to bluff her way into this position, but it has become clear that she doesn’t have the experience needed to head our division.

This past week, she saw me chatting to a colleague (her direct report). She sent both of us an email immediately, telling us that if we have downtime, we should recreate our database on Excel sheets so she can decipher it (she has refused to learn how to use the database, even though everyone, from the most junior to the most senior employee, is required to). That was the breaking point for me. I feel like she is treating me like a five year old! This isn’t my first job, either; I have extensive experience from other nonprofits, with very exacting, controlling bosses. I can deal with difficult personalities and micromanaging, but this is on a level I have never seen before. I have thought long and hard and I don’t think it’s about me; she is inexperienced and insecure.

Essentially, my question is: can micromanagers be rehabilitated? Will she will back off once I am promoted? I have been working hard and lobbying for a promotion for about a year, and the new boss is behind it 100%. I have a very good chance of getting it. I like the work I do, I’m very good at it, and I like the organization and the people. The commute is a dream. I have some flexibility in my work schedule. I would, unfortunately, still be reporting to her. Since she would have helped me get a promotion and she knows and values the work I do, will this finally make her give me more autonomy? Or is this a case of cut loose and run while I can? I am hesitant to bring it up again with her, because nothing changed after my first serious talk with her, and she has on another occasion told me that she takes criticism very personally. There is an opportunity for a lateral/lower move to a different department (different work) in the organization, but then I wouldn’t be able to hold on to my promotion (if it happens). And if I do want to do the lateral/lower move, I would have to act pretty fast, within the week.

Can micromanagers be rehabilitated? Sure, but they have to have to either want to change or be forced to change by someone with authority over them.

Now, before we get into that, whenever we talk about micromanagement, it’s important to consider two big caveats:
Caveat 1: Is it really micromanaging? Dictating exactly how to do the work, watching over every step in the process, and refusing to truly delegate any decisions is micromanaging, and it’s bad. But being heavily involved in setting goals, checking in on progress, and getting more involved when the stakes on something are very high isn’t inappropriate; that’s good management. Sometimes people complain about “micromanagement” when it’s just good, hands-on management.
Caveat 2: Have you given your boss reason to use this level of scrutiny? If you drop the ball on things more than very occasionally, forget details, don’t follow up on things, miss deadlines, or produce work that requires a lot of changes from others, a good manager would get more closely involved.

But neither of these caveats are the case with you. What you describe sounds like egregious micromanaging. Requiring you to take all your calls on speaker phone? That’s crazy.

In fact, it’s so crazy that even if you’re able to get her to back off in some ways, I doubt she’s ever going to be a good boss — because someone whose instincts lead her to do this kind of thing isn’t likely to turn into a good manager even if you or someone else gets her to stop specific behaviors. (One exception to this: If she goes through some kind of training or intensive coaching, she could absolutely get better — but so far, there aren’t signs of that happening.)

So I’d think long and hard about whether you want your current job or the promotion if it means working closely with her, even if you win concessions on some of the craziest stuff, like being forced to use speaker or have her rewrite all your emails.

That said, there’s no reason not to try to talk to her about this and see where it leads. If I were in your shoes, I’d sit down with her and say something like this: “I want to talk to you how we’re working together. I’m struggling with the level of involvement in my work that you’ve asked for. I have X years of experience doing this work, consistently glowing feedback and strong performance reviews, and I’m used to being trusted to write my own emails, handle my own phone calls, and get my work done without daily checks. If you have concerns about my work that are leading you to manage me this way, I very much want to hear them. But if you don’t have those concerns, I’d like to revisit your level of oversight. When we talked about this a few months ago, you agreed you would pull back, but that hasn’t happened. I’d like to propose that we return to the level of oversight that I had under previous managers, which would mean that we’d agree on annual and quarterly goals for my work, I’d update you on my progress toward those goals monthly, and we’d meet once a week to talk about the work as it unfolds. I’d manage my own time and handle my phone calls and emails on my own, unless there’s some specific problem that we need to address. Would you be willing to try that and see how it goes?”

If she says no, well, there’s your answer. And if she says yes but then continues her same behavior, well, that’s probably your answer too. But there’s a chance that laying it out like this will actually push her (or shame her) into truly backing off. And if she does, then you’ll have some room to see whether you can work with her after all.

Aside from all that, there’s one more thing to think about. Is there anyone above your manager who you trust and have a good rapport with? Because if so, this is a situation where it might make sense to have a discreet conversation with that person. Not every manager will intervene when a manager below them is screwing up like this, but plenty will — and this is exactly the kind of thing that I’d want to hear about if I were your manager’s manager. But the key — and this is crucial — is knowing whether the person you’d be approaching is open to hearing feedback about the managers under her and competent enough to act on it in a way that doesn’t destroy your relationship with your boss.

And if none of the above works, then it’s a safe assumption that your manager isn’t likely to one day be magically rehabilitated and you’ll have to decide whether you want to stay under those conditions or not. Good luck.

Read updates to this letter here and here.

my boyfriend’s company doesn’t invite non-married partners to their holiday party

A reader writes:

The major hospital my boyfriend works for throws a swanky holiday party at a trendy restaurant downtown every year. We were both excited for me to meet all of his colorful coworkers, until he found out that only married employees are allowed to bring guests. This strikes me as really odd. It seems like either everyone should be able to invite a guest or no one should, or, at the very least, it should be based somehow on professional status, not marital status. Am I just being a whiny millennial, expecting invites and pats on the back when they aren’t justified? Or is this a weird company policy? I can’t help but wonder how this would feel if I were 35 instead of 25, and the only unmarried person in my cohort, or if I were a dateless manager chatting with the husband of my married 23-year-old assistant, or recently divorced… This list goes on.

I know as far as work problems go, this isn’t a bad one, and I would never ask my boyfriend to insist I be invited or anything crazy, but I really want to know: Are my expectations too high? Or is this in poor taste?

The short answer: Nope, this isn’t that unusual.

I’ll give you a longer answer too, but first I need to address the idea that this would be especially bad for a dateless or recently divorced manager who ended up chatting with the husband of her 23-year-old assistant. Because … it’s very unlikely that this is upsetting for them. Plenty of people are unmarried by choice, or at least perfectly content about it, and even those who aren’t are unlikely to get angsty over it from an office party. (In fact, many of them will be glad that they at least got out of dragging a date along to the event.) So the unmarried people will be just fine. (And I know you mean well here, but you want to be careful about not condescending to uncoupled people, and especially about not assuming that their feelings on their romantic status are tied to their age.)

Okay, now that that’s out of the way, the longer answer to your question:

This isn’t uncommon. Certainly many companies do allow employees to bring unmarried significant others to holiday parties, or to bring any type of plus-one, but many other companies restrict it to spouses. For that matter, some don’t even allow guests at all.

And if you look to formal etiquette, this isn’t outrageous. The formal etiquette rule says that you invite spouses together because etiquette treats married couples as a unit, but otherwise doesn’t typically recommend supplying a generic “plus one” invitation. Plenty of people have updated that rule to also include long-term partners, but the general concept of just inviting spouses doesn’t come out of nowhere.

And keep in mind — this isn’t really a social event, no matter how much it might be packaged that way. It’s a work event, designed to strengthen bonds among coworkers, and it’s reasonable for them to put whatever limits they want on who attends.

It’s also worth mentioning that, precisely because these are work events rather than true social ones, these parties aren’t usually a treat for the significant others who go. An awful lot of people see their significant others’ office holiday parties as an obligation to be borne, not a social event to look forward to.

So sure, your boyfriend might take note of this as a sign that he’s working at a somewhat traditional company, at least in this particular way, but I wouldn’t read it as a sign that they’re terribly gauche or even particularly out of line with what’s done at many companies.

what to say when following up on a job interview

I probably get more questions about how to follow up on a job application or job interview than any other other topic.

If you’re like most job seekers, the post-interview stage of the job hunting process can cause a lot of stress: If you follow up, what should you say? How can you be sure that you’re striking the right balance between interested but not desperate? And what exactly should you be asking for, since presumably you’d know if they’d already decided to hire you?

Ideally, you planned ahead for this moment by asking in the interview itself what the employer’s timeline was for next steps. If you did that and the timeline you were given passes, then you have a ready-made reason for politely following up. In this case, you can write a quick email saying something like this:

“Hi Jane, you’d mentioned that you were hoping to be ready to move forward on the Communications Manager position by the end of the month, so I wanted to check in with you. I’m very interested in the role, even more so after our last conversation, and would love to know what your timeline looks like moving forward.”

Now, if you didn’t think to ask for a timeline in your interview, you can still send a similar email. Wait about two weeks from your interview before checking in, and say something like this:

“Hi Jane, I wanted to touch base with you about the Communications Manager position. I’m still very interested in the role. Do you have a timeline you can share for the next steps in the hiring process?”

 Note in both these examples that you’re not simply asking for an update on how the search is going. That because that isn’t as likely to produce the information that you’re really interested in, and it’s also easier to ignore, especially if the hiring manager doesn’t have anything definite to share yet. You’re also not just asking, “Did I get the job?” (After all, if they’ve decided to offer you the job, you’ll know – because you’ll be contacted with a  job offer.) Instead, you’re asking for something quick and easy to provide, and something that will give you a better sense of what to expect next: an updated timeline.

Other things to remember when writing your follow-up note:

  • Keep it short. Hiring managers are generally busy, so don’t send three paragraphs when a few short sentences will do. Be friendly and polite, but get straight to the point – and remember that you’re demonstrating your communication skills here just as much as you were in your cover letter and your interview. Be direct and concise. (Plus, you’re more likely to get a response is the recipient doesn’t have to wade through long paragraphs of text to find out what you want.)
  • Be conversational. You want the hiring manager to be able to picture working with you, so write the way you’d write to a colleague. Your tone should be warm and not overly formal or stiff. (Don’t go overboard in that direction, of course; you still need to be professional. But there’s no need to take on the overly formal tone of an old-fashioned business letter.)
  • Don’t be demanding. You might be frustrated that you haven’t heard anything back, especially if the employer’s own self-imposed timeline for getting back to you has passed. But don’t let it show. Hiring takes time, and other work often gets in the way. Sounding annoyed or pressuring the hiring manager to make a decision before she’s ready to is a good way to have that decision be “no!”

Want more help finding a job?
Get my e-book:  How To Get a Job / Secrets of a Hiring Manager

how to get a job If you’ve ever wished that you could look into the brain of a hiring manager to find out what you need to do to get hired, this e-book is for you. I’ll give you step-by-step help through every stage of your job search, explaining at each step what a hiring manager is thinking and what they want to see from you. Learn more here.

my company won’t pay for bathroom breaks, nicknames when applying for jobs, and more

It’s seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Another department is pushing me to do work that I don’t do

I am being “loaned” to another department for some design work for a month. During the month, I will report to another person, but I’ll still have duties and meetings in my own department and that person is in no way my boss. The person I will be working with has indicated that they will want me to do things outside my skill set – tasks like data entry. I’ve been trying to politely shut them down, saying things like “that’s not really my area of expertise,” but it’s obviously not working as I’m still getting emails indicating they expect me to do tasks outside my skill set. Both my bosses are in agreement I should not do things like this. This person has also been hinting they want more of my time outside the month, but that’s easier to handle, because my time is already booked for several months for other projects.

How do I politely shut this person down about some tasks without sounding like an uncooperative whiner? I’ve tried hard to eradicate “that’s not my job” from my vocabulary, but I also feel I need to stand up for myself or he will continue to walk all over me and others in my department. I’m meeting with him early next week to start work, and I want to make it clear from the beginning what I will and won’t do but am just lost on how to be firm without being a jerk. If needed, I can kick this up to my bosses to shut him down, but I would like to avoid that.

Since your boss agrees that you shouldn’t be doing that work, cite her: “Jane has been clear that while I’m helping you, I shouldn’t be spending time on things like XYZ. I’m here to work on ABC.” If the person continues to push, say, “I think there’s been a miscommunication about what I’m here to help with. Let me go back to Jane and figure out how to proceed.” Then go back to your boss and bring her into it. There’s no shame in doing that once you’ve tried to handle it on your own and are still running into problems; she probably wants to know about it at that point.

2. I was an hour late to an interview

I went to an interview earlier this week, and because of a road accident was one hour late. It was in a different city about a two-hour drive away and the interview was scheduled at 9.30 a.m. I gave myself three hours to get there, so I did plan ahead, but because of the accident, I also hit rush hour in the city, which made me doubly late. I called HR (the only contact number i had) to let them know.

On arrival, I apologized and explained the situation to them, and they gave me the interview. But I have a feeling that HR did not pass on my message to the interviewers. I am really worried that this has cost me big time. Any tips on what I should do?

Did you explain the situation to your interviewers yourself, on the spot when you met them? That would have made sense, and if you didn’t do that, they likely took note of it — even if HR had already explained it to them. When you mess up someone’s schedule, you’ve got to explain and apologize yourself rather than leaving it to someone else to do. In any case, you can certainly email them a thank-you for the interview and and apologize in that note.

3. My company won’t pay for bathroom breaks

The company I work for recently sent out a site-wide email explaining that due to too much off-phone time (this is a call center), any unscheduled bathroom breaks will involve filling out a form detailing to the minute how much time was spent off the phone for the bathroom break; anything over 4 minutes will not be paid. At a team meeting today, we were informed that they’re skipping the form and any bathroom breaks at all will now be unpaid. Our supervisor gave us a speech about how we “already get scheduled breaks and [we’re] not children so [we] should be capable of holding it until then.” I think the speech was mostly because in order for this policy to work, our supervisor has to manually remove the unapproved minutes from our timecards so that we won’t be paid for them (paying a supervisor to spend 10 minutes removing 5 minutes from a subordinate’s pay doesn’t work out for me in a cost/benefit sense but that is the sort of logic we’re dealing with at this place).

I’ve been through the archives of your site and everything I can find says breaks of less than 20 minutes have to be paid. Also my understanding of the Fair Labor Standards Act is that they shouldn’t be doing this. Anyone I’ve seen who pushes back/questions the policy is told some variation of “someone checked with a lawyer when they came up with this, so don’t even worry about it.” I don’t believe that. I think management (and specifically our site director) is exactly stupid enough to have skipped consulting with the corporate lawyer about the legalities of docking employees’ pay; this company has had compensation policies result in a class action lawsuit once before that I’m aware of. Any suggestions for how to approach this (keeping in mind that management is not interested in hearing any of it)? Other than RUN. Obviously. :)

Yes, it’s illegal. While no federal law requires paid breaks, the Department of Labor does say, “Breaks from 5 to 20 minutes must be counted as hours worked. Even though they are not required by the FLSA, if you permit your employees to take breaks, they must be counted as hours worked. This includes short periods the employees are allowed to spend away from the work site for any reason. For example: smoke breaks, restroom breaks, personal telephone calls or visits, or to get coffee or soft drinks, etc.”

It also says: “Note, however, that you need not count unauthorized extensions of authorized breaks as hours worked when you have expressly and unambiguously advised the employee that the break may only last for a specific length of time and that any extension of the break is contrary to your rules and will be punished.” My reading of that is that if they were sticking to their original policy of paying for bathroom breaks that don’t go over four minutes, that would be legal, because they’re clearly warning you of the time limit. But when they decided to throw out that policy and make all bathroom breaks unpaid, they ran afoul of the paragraph above.

I’d go back to them and say, “Federal labor law requires that short bathroom breaks be paid. I know we want to be careful to follow the law so I want to make sure we’re handling this correctly on our paychecks.” Do this by email so you have a record of it in case you’re later retaliated against, and include a link to the government factsheet on this. But yeah, your management sucks.

4. Is my boss taking credit for my work?

I have been on this job for many years, but there has been a re-org and now I report to a new person. My new manager has not been in this unit long, so there are times when she refers to me regarding questions on unit procedures and policies to respond to others in the company. She will then send out emails with the information I gave her, with some edits. I am always cc’d on the emails, but is that taking the credit for my work if I put together the initial document?

No, that’s pretty normal. It would be nice for her to acknowledge you and say something like, “Here’s some information that Jane put together on this,” but there are times when the work involved in pulling the info together wasn’t significant enough to make it a huge oversight that she isn’t doing it. And either way, it’s not really “taking credit for your work” if she’s just sending out info on policies and procedures — that’s more about passing along information than doing work that could be taken credit for, in the sense that people normally think about credit.

5. Asking for a job description before applying for a job

Is it appropriate before applying for a position in the nonprofit sector to request a job description? I have a disability and it is important to know that I am able to carry out the duties of the position before applying. In addition, I find it helpful to gear my cover letter to the skills and duties I have performed, which are often not stated in the job posting.

The job I am currently serious about applying for does not offer a job description to candidates applying for the position. Is it frowned upon to ask for one? If not, what is the best way to ask?

I wouldn’t. The info in the job posting is the info they’re comfortable giving candidates at this stage, and most employers don’t want to take the time to supply additional information until they’ve determined that you’re a candidate who they’re interested in talking further with. (Plus, the job posting may be identical to the formal job description; many are. And if that’s the case, your question will just cause confusion.) That doesn’t mean that you can never ask for more information — but you should wait until they’ve reached out to you after an initial screening to do that.

(And regarding wanting to be able to better tailor your cover letter, you definitely don’t want to ask them to give you special treatment just so you can write a better cover letter. Write the cover letter based on the info they have provided.)

6. Using a nickname when applying for jobs

Though my given name is Margaret, I have always gone by Maggie. So, everyone calls me Maggie but it says Margaret on all my official documentation and my email address. I am graduating from library school in May and I am in the process of building myself a personal website and getting ready to apply for jobs. Do you think I should “brand” myself as either one or the other to save on confusion? What is the simplest way to do that? I’m worried that future employers will call past employers and they won’t recognize my name, or my resume/website/etc. will look messy if I have tons of different names all over everything.

You should use the name that you go by and that you plan to go by at work — so it sounds like that would mean using Maggie on your website, cover letters, resume, etc.

Sometimes new grads think it’s unprofessional to use anything but their full first name, even if they go by a shortened version. But it’s disconcerting to go through a whole interview process with James, get to know him as James, and then discover on his second day of work that he’s really Jim (or even more disconcerting, that he uses his middle name, Paul). There’s nothing unprofessional about shortened names. Just tell people what you go by, and don’t worry about it at all.

7. Including a book club I run on my resume

For the past year, I have run a professional book club at my job via our women’s affinity group. We meet approximately once every two months over lunch to read and discuss a book related to our professional development — i.e books on leadership, business, creativity, productivity, etc. I select the books, promote the meetings, and facilitate the discussions. I’d like to include this experience on my resume and/or LinkedIn profile for two reasons: (1) My regular role at work offers few leadership opportunities, so founding and leading the professional book club is an opportunity to highlight a leadership role, and (2) I plan to use the knowledge I’ve gained to launch a professional book club website on the side as a personal project, and listing my leadership of the book club at work will help me establish a history in that field.

Would it be appropriate to include this experience on my resume and/or LinkedIn profile? If so, how would you list it?

Sure, either or both. You could include it as a bullet point under your current job, but it might make more sense to include it in a more miscellaneous section at the end.

3 more reader updates

Three more updates from readers who had their questions answered here this year!  This is the last of the updates in this round.

1. The reader wondering whether to tell her manager why she’d been behaving oddly at work (a fall-out with a coworker and the break-up of her marriage) (#4 at the link)

I took your advice and just concentrated on keeping my head above water for a while, and as things went from bad to worse with my family situation, I definitely let some things slip at work. I acknowledged to coworkers when I dropped the ball, and I’m now concentrating on rebuilding my reputation, taking on more responsibility, etc.

Because it was hard for me at the time to distinguish my feelings from my behavior, I think an apology to the boss would have complicated and exacerbated the circumstances. I tend to think fixing your behavior is the best apology anyway.

I also think one of the comments hit it on the head. I was pretty jealous of my manager and coworker for their good relationship, and needed to reset my expectations to reasonable boss-employee and coworker-coworker relationships, and stop worrying about their relationship with each other.

Thanks for your advice, it was one of the best things that happened to me at the time.

2. The reader wondering if mentioning her book deal was hurting her job prospects (#4 at the link)

I just wanted to let you know that you were absolutely right and I switched around the framing, and it’s been successful. While I don’t have a job yet, I’ve had two interview requests and things are looking much better. Thanks for your help!

3. The reader wondering how to fit into office culture during a part-time internship and whose invitation to the staff retreat had been rescinded

I had written to you over the summer regarding my summer internship and the strange office culture/general unfriendly vibe that I was experiencing there. Shortly after I wrote to you, and after taking some of the advice of commenters, I found that my experience with the staff became much warmer. I don’t think that anything particularly changed about my behavior – I do believe, as many folks assessed in their responses, that much of the feeling had to do with the fact that being a short term, temporary employee in an office often means that it feels a little stiff.

In any case, shortly thereafter, the Associate Dean took me aside and apologized to me for rescinding her invitation for the staff retreat. She explained that it had not been a smooth planning process and she really felt at the time that, per what I would get out of the experience versus the cost of me taking public transportation out there and time away from the office, it wouldn’t have been a good time investment. She then said she realized that that could have made me feel uncomfortable, which wasn’t her intent. Shortly after that, I started connecting more intentionally with my colleagues and was really pleased by the relationships that I was able to build.

I walked out of the experience with some very great project work under my belt, and some incredible contacts. Plus, I think I have a very strong chance of being hired at the institution and might even consider working at that office again if the opportunity presented itself. I know, a very different situation from where I had began in the office, but I was very much impressed with the latter part of the experience. That said, I haven’t forgotten the short-term weirdness and I would definitely be discriminating if I find myself with multiple options.