my coworker keeps leaving his desk to do schoolwork during our shared shift

A reader writes:

I work at the front desk of my university library and on a few of my shifts, I have a coworker. He’s constantly leaving the desk to go do other schoolwork while still on the clock. It’s not a huge issue in that I get slammed with extra work, since we aren’t that busy, but when he’s gone, I can’t leave the desk to use the restroom or anything since he’s not there to cover for me.

The main shift we work together is a Sunday so our supervisor isn’t here. My question is, do you think this is something I should mention to her? It just feels sort wrong that he’s doing this while still getting paid to work at the desk. The job is great since we’re allowed to do schoolwork while sitting at the desk but he’s not even here. I know we’re adults, so it feels dumb to tattle on a coworker, but at the same time, it’s a great job for students and I know a bunch of classmates who would like the job and would actually perform it the way we’re supposed to.

It’s absolutely appropriate to mention this to your manager — but before you do that, have you tried saying anything to the coworker directly?

That’s the place to start — both because it’s the professional way to handle it and because your manager is likely to ask you if you’ve tried speaking to him about it yourself.

So start there. Say something like this: “Bob, when you leave the desk to do schoolwork, it means that I don’t have any coverage when I need to use the bathroom or otherwise leave for a minute. Could you stay up here while you’re working?”

If that doesn’t change anything, then at that point you can and should alert your manager.

That doesn’t mean that you have to go to your boss and say, “Bob leaves the desk the minute you’re gone.” You can use the old “frame it as asking for advice trick,” by saying something like : “During our joint shifts, Bob is often away from the desk for a good portion of the shift in order to do schoolwork, which means that I can’t leave the desk to use the bathroom and we sometimes end up with a line of people waiting to be helped. Could we ask people to stay at the desk during their shifts?”

The idea with that language is that you’re not just reporting wrongdoing; you’re framing it as a problem to be solved, and you’re doing it in a collaborative way.

And that’s always a good way to look at this kind of thing, rather than “tattling.” In fact, “tattling” isn’t really a concept that applies in the workplace, at least not with things like this. Yes, you shouldn’t be running to your manager with petty complaints about things that don’t affect anyone’s work (“Bob leaves two minutes early every day” or “Jane will not stop whistling”), but when something has a real impact rather than just being mildly annoying — and this one qualifies as that — a good boss will want to know about it.

how to manage a negative, complaining employee

A reader writes: 

I have an employee who is very negative. For instance, when other departments make mistakes, she becomes intensely frustrated and immediately accuses them of not doing their jobs. She also keeps score; if we need to do something extra to help another department, she asks why we should help them when they can’t do X,Y,Z. And she speaks negatively about other departments to her own employees, and isn’t helpful to me in trying to improve things because she’s so focused on being angry.

She isn’t wrong when she complains about the failings of other departments. But they aren’t being malicious, it’s just a struggle to find common ground because we all have different needs. I feel like that’s a pretty common theme at work and I need her to tone down the negative a little.

Normally I’d talk specifics, I’d tell her how I need her to behave, I’d try to help her work through the process problems causing the errors, and I’d set up consequences for bad behavior. Thing is, there is no ultimate consequence because she’s not going to be let go. I can’t even begin to describe the dysfunction related to this, but it’s a fact, at least for now. Despite this, I have to speak to her about the problem, because I can’t do nothing. But she’s so buried in negativity that I don’t think she’s even capable of being objective anymore. Is there a way to talk to an employee like this?

Well, here’s the thing: You can try all sorts of strategies with her, but at the end of it all, you need to have the authority to set and enforce consequences. And if you don’t have that, you at least need her to think that you do. You haven’t explained why that’s not possible here, but without that authority, you can’t do your job, and whoever has put you in that position is cutting you off at the knees.

That said, you can try talking to her and see what happens. Try this:

* Be clear about your expectations and how she is falling short of them. Explain that the complaining has gotten out of hand, and that you need the person in her role to get along well with and be helpful to other departments and to minimize drama, not create it. And state clearly that the complaining needs to be dramatically scaled back (if not stopped completely) and replaced with a more helpful and accommodating approach to work and to her colleagues. Be sure to add that complaining to her own staff is 100% unacceptable — and so far afield from what a manager should do that she’s jeopardizing your confidence in her ability to manage.

* Be clear that the concern is a serious one. Your words and your tone should convey that this is a serious problem that will damage her career if it’s not fixed.

* Be clear that fixing this is a job requirement. Present this as a performance issue like anything else; it is part of her job to be pleasant and helpful to others, whether she’s feeling pleasant or not – and choosing not to is no more acceptable than deciding she’s not going to do some other crucial part of her job.

* Talk about consequences. I know you can’t let her go, but you should certainly be able to tell her that these issues will impact your assessment of her  performance (and thus her formal evaluation), her potential for raises, the types of assignments she gets, and her reputation in and outside the company.

But at the end of the day, if she doesn’t respond to this, you’ll need to talk to whoever is standing in the way of you letting her go. You need to explain the damage she’s causing – particularly to her own staff members, who are surely being impacted by this – and the opportunity cost of keeping her in the role without significant improvement.

does my boss hate that I leave at 5 p.m., paying for LinkedIn, and more

It’s seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Does my boss hold it against me that I leave work at 5:00?

I work at a small company(~15 people) and many employees work longer than 8 hours a day. I’m in the lowest position in my organization but feel I have about 8 hours of work a day on average. When I leave work after 8 hours, my boss looks at me like I’m insane. I was told during the interview that this job would be a primarily 9-5 job with some exceptions of longer hours some days.

The strangest thing is my boss made it very clear during my interview that the most important thing to him was that I got my work done on time and thus far I haven’t had any problems. I can’t tell if I’m just imaging things, but I’m terrified my boss thinks I’m lazy. Help!

If all you’re basing this on so far is a look, there’s plenty of room for misinterpreting. Sure, the look might mean “how dare you leave at 5?” but it also might mean “I had no idea it was 5 until I saw you leaving — where did the day go?” or “I envy your ability to leave at 5″ or who knows what else.

So why not ask him about it? Ask for feedback about how you”re doing overall, and as part of the conversation, say something like, “I might be misinterpreting, but do you have any concern about the hours I’m working? I generally work 9-5 but stay later if I need to in order to get my work done. I want to make sure we’re on the same page about your expectations there.”

2. A job that fired me says I can use them as a reference

I was recently discharged from my job, and the director of HR said I could use her as a reference. I was only employed for about 90 days from when I was hired and I wasn’t a temporary hire. I am confused why she would offer this to me when I was fired. Can you tell me if it would it be wise to use her name as one of my references or not a wise move?

I wouldn’t. First of all, you were only there 90 days, so they’re not going to be able to speak with any nuance about your work. Second, you were fired, so whatever nuance they do have isn’t going to skew positive. She probably offered because it felt like the kind thing to do, but I wouldn’t put her (or anyone from that job) on your reference list.

3. Is paying for LinkedIn worth it?

Is the premier Job Seeker membership tier on LinkedIn worth it? It’s pretty pricy, but I’d probably be more inclined to pay for this than some scammer job board site.

I don’t think so, but maybe others who have tried it can chime in. It does let you see who has viewed your profile, though, which is interesting information (although not especially useful, since you have no way of knowing if they viewed it and thought you were a great potential candidate or thought you were sadly lacking).

4. Is being introduced to the team a good sign at a job interview?

I have a question about a job interview I just did. Is being introduced to the team a good sign? I have read that it could be a good sign or that it does not matter. The hiring manager could do that every potential employee, right?

Yep. Some hiring managers do it with every candidate, some do it only with candidates they think are strong, some do it when they have time to kill during the period set aside for the interview, and some don’t do it it at all. You can’t really read anything into it.

5. Telling an employee that she’s disliked and should look for another job

Are there any ramifications to a manager and a supervisor for pulling in a current, good employee who they don’t like and telling them that they are not liked in the team and they should probably look for employment elsewhere?

Legal ramifications? No. (Assuming their action isn’t based on the person’s race, religion, etc.) Other ramifications? Sure. The person is probably going to feel horrible and start looking for another job.

Are you the manager or the employee in this scenario? If you’re the manager, you need to be more direct and give the person feedback on what the issues are (and agree on a transition out if that’s how you want it to go). If you’re the employee, take it as writing on the wall and start job searching.

(I should note that “you’re not liked here” is BS feedback … but in some cases it could be reasonable to say, “You’re having problems integrating into the team, which is causing problems X, Y, and Z.” So I’d want to know which it was before fully condemning the manager.)

6. Will a background check reveal that I quit my job recently?

I quit my previous job where I worked only 5 months because of an abusive manager. I was offered a new job contingent upon a background check; however, during the interview process I let them assume I was still working there because I didn’t want to say anything negative about why I left without finding a new job first. Now I am afraid they will verify my employment and find out I already quit a month ago. How should I handle this?

Did you lie to them about it, either on your resume or when talking to them? If you didn’t lie but rather just didn’t mention that you’d left that job, it’s not a big deal. You weren’t under any obligation to update them when you quit.

However, if you did explicitly lie, that’s a problem. Part of the point of a background check is to check your integrity and make sure the information you provided is accurate. If it wasn’t … well, yeah, that’s going to understandably be an issue. You’re better off owning the decision and not trying to hide it.

7. Should I mention I needed to revise an answer on a hiring exercise?

After an initial phone screen, I was asked to complete a timed technical exercise. The problems were emailed to me and I had to send back my responses within a certain time frame. That same evening, while thinking about the exercise more, I realized with horror that I had misinterpreted one of the questions (of only two) and submitted an incorrect response. I quickly sent a revised answer with a brief note explaining that I had realized my error and hoped my revision would be taken into consideration. I figured it was likely that I would never hear back.

The next week, I was asked to interview by phone with the hiring manager. I was prepared to discuss why I made the mistake and how I would prevent a similar error from happening while on the job. But it didn’t come up in our conversation, though the hiring manager did ask what experience I have doing the technical aspects of the job (this is actually the part of the job in which I am least experienced, but think I would enjoy).

Now, I’ve been invited to interview in person. My question is whether you think it would be useful to bring up the technical exercise, or if I should just not mention it unless they do?

They thought you were strong enough to invite to interview after that happened, so they presumably saw your revision and were satisfied by it. That said, I’d still probably say something anyway, just because it would bug me if I didn’t (and because it’s possible that saying something about it could move you from “barely made the cut due to that weird answer on the exercise” to “strong candidate with no reservations.”

So if there’s an opening to do this naturally, I’d say something like, “I hope you got the follow-up I sent to the technical exercise. I was mortified when I realized I’d misinterpreted the question originally.”

I worked all weekend and then got charged a vacation day

A reader writes:

I started a new job about a month ago as an exempt employee in a professional services firm. A major project in my department was due this past Monday. As of Friday afternoon, the project was nearly complete but needed a few finishing touches. Unfortunately, the person who had been working on the project was going out of town that weekend for an event that could not be changed (family wedding), so my boss asked for another volunteer from the department to take care of the final details. Figuring this would be a good opportunity to learn more about the department’s work, and also build goodwill with my boss and new colleagues, I volunteered.

We agreed that I would come in on Saturday morning at 8 am, and that the project should be finished by about noon. However, around the late morning, my boss abruptly decided that he was unhappy with the work my colleague had done, and that everything would need to be redone from scratch. I quickly cleared my schedule for the weekend (canceling a couple of my own personal commitments) and worked as quickly as I could, straight through the weekend. I finally finished at 6 am Monday morning (46 straight hours of work with no sleep and only a few short breaks of 5-10 minutes to get some air and clear my head). My boss was extremely happy with my work and thanked me profusely for my efforts.

Here is the problem: after completing the project, I headed home to get some rest (after confirming with my boss that it was okay to do so). I crashed and slept all day until the late afternoon, and then logged on remotely around 4 pm and worked until 9 pm. The company policy is that to avoid being charged leave for the day, exempt employees need to work at least 4 hours between the core hours of 10 am and 4 pm (either remotely or in the office). I assumed that an exception would be made given that working during those hours on Monday would have been pretty much physically impossible given my marathon work session, but was informed on Tuesday that I would be charged a vacation day. My boss is also upset with me – he stated that when he said I could go home and get some rest, he assumed I would just clean up, take a nap, and start working again by noon (he didn’t explicitly state this expectation; I assumed, obviously erroneously, that I was entitled to a reasonable rest period after working for nearly two days straight).

I definitely feel that this situation falls under the “no good deed goes unpunished” category. If this situation arises again, how should I handle it differently next time so that I don’t end up with an angry boss and/or lost vacation time? I really want to make this job work, but I honestly don’t know if I’m physically capable of meeting these kinds of expectations.

Wow. Your boss is thinking really short-term here — if he thought more carefully, he’d realize that he just destroyed (a) the good feeling that you were left with after pitching in, doing a good job, and being vocally appreciated — something that builds loyalty and generally drives people to do a good job in the future, and (b) your willingness to ever work like this again.

As for what to do about it now…

Ideally, when he told you that Tuesday that you would need to take a vacation day for that Monday (a day that you worked five hours — hardly a vacation day), you would have raised this then, saying something like: “I understand the normal requirement on this. However, I worked 46 straight hours over the weekend without sleeping in order to cover for someone else. And then I worked another five on Monday. Charging me a vacation day for Monday doesn’t make any sense to me, and doesn’t seem to recognize that I put in a total of 51 hours between Saturday and Monday. 51 hours of work shouldn’t equate to me being charged a vacation day. Is there a way to resolve this?”

When you have this conversation, I’d start with the assumption that he hasn’t fully thought this through and/or processed exactly how many hours you worked that weekend, rather than believing he has — since you want your tone to be collaborative, not pissed off (even though you have every right to be pissed off — who wouldn’t be?).

It’s now a week later, but you could still have that conversation if you wanted to. You could go to him now and say, “Now that I’m better rested, I wanted to talk to you about this” and then say the above.

If he has any sense at all, he’ll realize how absurd his earlier statement was, and you’ll get your vacation day back. If that doesn’t happen, you’ll have just learned something very valuable about your new boss, and can factor that into your thinking the next time he asks for volunteers for ungodly amounts of weekend work.

(By the way, I’d recommend against ever working for 46 hours without sleeping. That’s a recipe for overlooking errors, crashing your car on your way home, etc. Unless you are a surgeon saving lives or Vince Gilligan, work rarely warrants that. Get some sleep.)

why employers won’t name a salary range first

So why the hell do so many employers refuse to name a salary range but insist that job candidates do so? Why not just list a salary range up-front in the job ad?

Employers who advertise a job but refuse to say what it pays are one of the biggest frustrations of job-seekers

Adding to the frustration, many employers expect job-seekers to name the salary they’re looking for – some even requiring it before an application can be submitted online. This, of course, puts applicants in an incredibly unfair position, and makes most of them worry that they’ll lowball themselves or ask for so much that they’ll be removed from the running. It’s particularly infuriating when you consider that most employers have a salary range budgeted for the position. They just won’t disclose it.

So why do employers make such a secret out of what they’re willing to pay? What not just list a salary range up-front in the job ad?

Employers who play coy on salary will tell you that it’s because if they list a salary range, all candidates will assume they should be at the top of the range … and will then get upset or be disappointed if their offer comes in lower because of the level of their qualifications. In other words, if an employer advertises that a job pays $50,000 to $60,000, they fear that every applicant will think, “Great, low 60s. That works for me.” But if an applicant ends up getting an offer for $52,000 because that’s where his or her experience places him or her, he or she will feel that he or she is being lowballed because, after all, he or she knows the employer is willing to pay up to $60,000. The applicant may have been happy with that offer if he or she had never heard about the full range available.

Now, a good employer will be able to explain how the scale works and why the candidate fits into it where he or she does. But employers who don’t want to disclose their full range believe that too many people still won’t be satisfied, and that they’ll be creating dissatisfaction that otherwise wouldn’t exist.

And that’s not all employers worry about. Sometimes they don’t want to list a range in their ads because they’d be willing to pay more for the right candidate – but not for most. For instance, if they list a salary range of $50,000 to $60,000, the candidate who won’t consider anything below $70,000 might never apply. And if that person is good enough, the employer might be willing to meet those salary demands. But since they wouldn’t pay it to most candidates, they don’t want to put it in the ad. As a result, they conclude it’s better not to list a range at all.

So what can candidates do in the face of so many employers who won’t reveal the salary for a job, when salary happens to be a major consideration for most job-seekers? One key is to know what jobs like the ones you’re applying for typically pay. You can often get a solid sense by talking with recruiters, checking with professional organizations in your industry and even just bouncing figures off of other people in your field. Once you come up with a range for your experience level and in your geographic area, you can feel more confident naming a salary figure first, without the worry that you’ll be wildly off in either direction.

And second, assume that at some point the employer is likely to ask you about what salary you’re looking for, without telling you their own range first. Too often, job-seekers assume that the employer will name a figure first and they can then respond to it – but by knowing that often isn’t the case, you’ll be better prepared, less likely to be caught off-guard, and more equipped to negotiate a fair salary for yourself.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

do companies keep do-not-hire lists, I don’t have any work to do, and more

It’s seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Do companies keep “do not hire” lists?

Do companies maintain a no hire list and is it legal to do? I asked because I applied to two positions with this company that are an exact fit for me. In addition, I know the hiring manager of the department. Unfortunately, I was never contacted. There is an employee at this company who I worked with for 11 years at a previous company. Before she was laid off from the company, she and I had a little disagreement. Could she have contacted personnel and besmirched my reputation?

Some do, most don’t (but most do know of candidates they’ll never hire, just without keeping them in a centralized list somewhere). And yes, such a list would be perfectly legal.

It’s possible that your former coworker has blacklisted you, but it’s more likely that you simply didn’t get contact for the same reason that the majority of job seekers don’t hear back from a single given company — they have tons of qualified candidate and are only going to interview a few of them.

2. Manager is asking me to find work to do — but there isn’t any

I’ve been in my current job at a university for about 13 years. Initially it was busy, as we were building a new program from scratch, but after a few years, I calmed down, and then eventually, other centralized departments started offering the same services that I provided. For the past few years, I have had nothing to do. Literally nothing. Last year my position was RIF-ed to half time due to underutilization. Before it happened my boss asked me to “come up with other things I could do for the department”. I’ve been re-educating the last 4 years, and have new skills, but none of them translate to this job. I had nothing to offer. I have a new boss, and I asked to meet with her to see if she had any ideas of what I might be able to do, and got the same thing – “come up with some ideas”. I thought of a few things, but they are so far from anything I know how to do or that I could get caught up on, I feel like I’d be setting myself up for failure.

Is it normal for managers to ask people to “think of something to do”? All of the responsibilities in my job description have been taken from me by other departments. I don’t think it’s right that I’m expected to come up with new things on my own. I’ve been trying to find other work for a long time, and I get no callbacks. Both in my old skillset, and my new one. The depression that this job causes affects my education and the rest of my life and it feels like I’m on the cusp of falling down a hole of unemployment and permanent homelessness. (I’m filing bankruptcy because at half time, this job doesn’t pay enough to pay my mortgage) I don’t know if I should quit and go work in food service to get out of the bad situation, or if I’d just be jumping out of the frying pan and into the fire.

It’s not unheard of for a manager to ask an employee to figure out how their time can best be used, but the bigger point here is the one you’ve already come to on your own: You need to be looking for other work, because this position might not be around much longer if the work is no longer needed. I wouldn’t quit with nothing lined up though — both because of the income and because it’s often easier to find work when you’re already employed. There’s no point in leaving prematurely just because you know the job is likely to go away at some point. Plus, if/when it does, it will be a layoff, which means you should be able to collect unemployment benefits (which you can’t if you quit).

So stay there but keep job searching, and do it as actively as you can. I don’t know what your resume and cover letters are like, but if you’re not getting interviews, it would be worth taking a look at the advice here and seeing it if helps. Good luck!

3. Was my boss hinting I can take extra vacation days off the books?

I’m in my first real professional job and recently accepted a new position at my company in a different department. I was previously part-time, so I now get paid vacation days, but it’s a very slim amount. The other day, when my new boss was telling me she would be out of the office the next day, she asked if I would be in. I said, “Of course,” and she replied that she is very bad with keeping track of days out. I kind of nervously laughed and she said, “Seriously, I am.”

Was she implying that I can take off more days than technically allowed? I’m not trying to pull one over on my company and would finish all my work in the same way I would if I took an official day off. Also, since this is my first real job, I don’t understand much about how PTO works. The man previously in my position is at a new company, but I do know him so would it be inappropriate to ask him how flexible my new boss is on this policy?

Assume that there’s no flexibility on PTO unless you’re told that there is. It would be pretty unusual for for your boss to hint to you that you can take extra vacation days beyond what’s in your benefits package rather than just coming out and telling you that’s the case. So no, I wouldn’t assume that she was hinting at that at all, and I wouldn’t contact your predecessor to ask about it, since you risk that getting back to your boss and looking bad. Assume the number of vacation days you were told you have is in fact the number you can take.

4. Can I ask to do a second interview by Skype rather than traveling again?

I am writing you because I need your expertise! I am currently interviewing for a position that is in another city (five hours away). I had my phone interview with the HR manager, and then she invited me for a second interview. I took off of work and traveled to the city where I would be interviewing the day before so that I would be prepared for the next day ( the interview was 8:30 am). The HR manager sent me an email the day before the interview to let me know that two of the panelist were unable to make it and that she and another manager still would like to interview with me. However, I would need to come back and interview with the other members of the panel (there was no way around this).

Would I be wrong to ask if they can do a Skype interview with me for that second interview? I do not want to keep going back and forth. I spent a lot of money for gas, food, and hotel that I’m not getting reimbursed for.

Sure, you can ask that, and it’s not an unreasonable question for them. However, be prepared for the possibility that they will want to meet you in person (especially if the actual hiring manager who you’d be working for wasn’t in the first interview). Also, be aware that there’s some research coming out showing that candidates who do video interviews are perceived as less likable and are less likely to be recommended for hire. So if you really want the job, it might be in your best interests to go back in person, even if they’re willing to talk by Skype. (And yes, that is unfair, but it’s one of the realities when you’re looking at non-local jobs.)

5. I want the job that I turned down a few months ago

After graduating from college, I received an offer from a PR company. At the time, I did not want to work in PR and was unaware of the clients, so I turned down the offer since I had interviews with 3 other companies where I would have been offered a better package. Unfortunately, the companies turned me down and I was left jobless. This has been the most horrible 4 months of my life trying to find a new job and thinking about the PR job that I would enjoy now.

Would it be appropriate to reach out to the team again at the PR job and ask about a new position? I never gave them a reason as to why I turned it down and asked to stay in touch, but they just responded with “I’m sorry to hear you aren’t joining us.” I really believe that I made a mistake as I had gotten along with the team, enjoyed their client list and could see myself grow with the PR company now.

Sure, you can absolutely do that. Be prepared, though, for them to ask you why you turned them down last time. You don’t want your answer to be “I thought I could get something better” — you’ll want to have an answer that doesn’t sound like they’re your last choice and/or that you’ll be likely to leave them if something better comes up.

6. Should I tell interviewers about an internship I was offered but which got canceled?

Three months ago, I got accepted for an internship in a very big cosmetics company in Germany. (I’m a Vietnamese national studying in Finland for a bachelor degree in International Business). However, the timing was not good for both of us and my visa application for internship took longer than usual. They weren’t able to be that patient and decided to cancel the internship. It was a pity, but the internship was only optional for me (I completed the first and compulsary internship before that).

Now, I’m about to graduate within three months and have started applying for several companies in recruitment positions. I wonder if I should mention that I was accepted by such a big company like that in the interview or simply put it aside?

Don’t mention it. It’s not being accepted that really impresses people; it’s working there and having real accomplishments you can point to.

7. My biweekly paychecks don’t add up to my annual salary

I recently was calculating out my gross biweekly pay into my annual pay. My company is on a 26 biweekly pay period schedule. But when I multiply my paycheck amount by 26, it’s about $150 less than my annual salary. I emailed payroll, and they told me I have to multiply my biweekly paycheck by 26.1, to account for an extra paycheck every ten years. This made no sense to me since my office letter dictated a salary “annually.” Is this a common practice? I was paid monthly at my last job and am new to biweekly pay.

That’s not common, at least not in my experience. And their explanation is ridiculous — if there’s an extra paycheck every 10 years, they could simply adjust your biweekly checks in those years, rather than keep $150 of your money the other nine years.

my coworkers joke about my predecessors being fired, the impersonality of email rejections, and more

It’s seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Are email rejections impersonal? Should I use postal mail instead?

I like to respond to applicants who do not get the position they have applied for. I think it is just the right thing to do, as that way it is a point of closure for people. I was wondering however, is it somewhat impersonal to send an email rejection or as I call them “Thin Letter,” versus a mailed letter? Do you have any suggestions on how to make them less impersonal? I am moving from mailed letters to emails, but I just think it is still somewhat cold.

Actually, most applicants prefer email. It’s faster, and it’s a common mode of communication. It’s also kind of weird to apply online or by email, and then get a rejection letter in the mail. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if people felt the postal letters were more impersonal than an email.

What really matters is your wording. That’s where you have the opportunity to ensure you’re conveying warmth rather than chilliness.

2. My coworkers joke about my predecessors being fired

I’m relatively new at my job, and occasionally my coworkers joke about the people who have had my position before me who have gotten fired, including the details of escorting each person out. Am I paranoid to think I could be next?

Why not ask them what’s up? Pick the one who you have the best rapport with and say something like, “You guys have made so many comment about people in my position being fired that it’s hard not to wonder what that means for me. What happened with the previous people?” You’re hoping for a response like, “Oh, they were terrible and there were obvious warning signs, and we can all tell you’re different for them.” But you want to be alert for things like “there’s no way to please the manager,” “the role is set up for failure,” “people think they’re doing fine and the next day they’re fired,” etc. But just ask — they’re making comments, so the subject obviously isn’t off-limits … and it actually might be weirder NOT to ask in the context of those jokes.

3. Should I send a less-than-perfect work sample?

A job to which I’m applying wants five work samples. It also asks me to “Tell us about why you selected the samples of your work to submit.” This is a journalism job, and photography, while secondary, is becoming more and more a part of the online work I do. My photos have good composition but the lighting was not good and my camera is older. Is the poor lighting something I should acknowledge when submitting a particular work sample? In other words, is it okay to say, “While the lighting here is not ideal because I was indoors, this photo tells the story of the event”? Or should I just ignore the not-great parts of the photo and trumpet the positive?

I’d absolutely include the caveat about the lighting, because otherwise you’re likely to come across as someone who doesn’t realize it. It’s much better to acknowledge that you do get that than to seem oblivious. (Although if you had additional, stronger photos you could send as well, that could be helpful. And of course, if the job you’re applying for includes photography as opposed to just reporting, you’d definitely want to find better samples of that, because in that case the photos would be a much more relevant part of your work sample.)

4. Is my book deal hurting my job prospects?

I’m underemployed right now, in a somewhat complicated situation. I’m a writer. I do freelancing when I can, but most of my writing (that wasn’t for my previous job) is blogging I do in my spare time. I have a sizeable audience — enough that I’ve garnered a contract for a book coming out in a couple years.

I’ve put this information on my resume, because what’s better for a writer than to say “Hey, look, a book!” right there upfront, right? And I’m looking for writing jobs in fields similar to what my book is on (it’s nonfiction). But I realized after a few months of only getting a couple calls for interviews that my book deal might be hindering my search more than helping it. I may be giving potential employers the impression that I’m more concerned about my writing career and will leave as soon as that takes off.

I’ve tried to be as upfront about the book as I can in my job search and framed it (in cover letters and interviews) as “Writing is something I’m passionate about, and X position would help me in that endeavor and challenge me as a writer by Y and Z.” Am I approaching this in the right way? I don’t want to come off as someone who’s just looking for a day job to support her hobby, but I’m worried employers get that impression simply because I have a book coming out! Are my concerns legitimate?

Actually, I think the problem is less your upcoming book deal and more how you’re framing it. Look what you’re saying to them: “Writing is something I’m passionate about, and X position would help me in that endeavor” (employers aren’t interested in helping you in that endeavor; they’re interested in you helping them in their work) “and challenge me as a writer by Y and Z” (they’re not interested in challenging you as a writer; they’re interested in you getting their work done well). You’re presenting this all as YOU YOU YOU, when at the cover letter and interview stage of the hiring process, employers are much more about THEM THEM THEM. And if they did have any minor worries about whether you were more committed to your blog and book than to the job with them, that framing is going to blow it up in a major way for them.

Try refocusing on how your skills will help them and see if it doesn’t get you different results.

Read an update to this letter here.

5. My son is being treated unfairly at work

My 23-year-old son works in a manufacturing plant. He is very diligent and has a great work ethic. He has also been written up for items he was never told about. He was not made aware of the write-ups. He’s in school for electrical engineering right now and works third shift but works over often and is called in on nights that he is suppose to have off. He has learned all of the machines in the plant and comes in handy when they break down and is called upon to do this job. He is even asked to oversee testing of new machines.

Recently he has put in an application for mechanic and is being denied the job because of the write-ups. In my opinion, they’re working him hard and paying him minimal ($12.50/hour) because they have him between a rock and a hard place. He’s been with the company now 3-1/2 years. Something needs to give here. Any ideas?

If your son isn’t happy with his pay or his hours, and his employer isn’t willing to change those things, then your son would need to either accept that and decide he can be reasonably happy with the job anyway or start looking for a job somewhere else.

But keep in mind that this is his career, not yours. You can certainly give advice if asked, but he needs to steer this, not you. And meanwhile, be careful to avoid the “my kid is being treated unfairly” trap, which can be easy for parents to fall into when they’re only getting one side of the story — or even when they’re getting all of it, if they tend to think their kid is great and others should do a better job of recognizing it. (I’m not saying that’s the case with you — just throwing it out as something to think about.)

6. How should I list language proficiency on my resume?

I was recently certified at the Intermediate Mid level in a Spanish oral proficiency exam. I’m looking for advice on how to add this information to my resume. When I do a Google search for how to indicate language skills on a resume, I find most mention language ability in terms of being conversant, proficient, or fluent but rarely specify oral proficiency vs written proficiency. While I believe my skills are equal in terms of my reading, speaking, and writing ability, my certification is specifically for Spanish oral proficiency. Also, my certification was completed with a computer based exam but there is also a non-computer based exam, should I indicate that as well so that its clear which exam I took? Or is that overkill?

The certification is through the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages which is a respected organization but I don’t know that its well known outside of the fields of education or language testing. Because of the lengthy name, I’d like to use an abbreviation (ACTFL) instead but I’m not sure if this is appropriate when I’m unsure if it will be recognizable to the person reviewing my resume.

Finally, I was rated as Intermediate Mid. This rating is not redundant as they have Intermediate Low, Intermediate Advanced, Advanced Low, etc. I don’t know if this will be understood if I put it on my resume as Intermediate Mid. Should I simply state Intermediate?

I’m thinking that it will ultimately look something like this and might appear to be overly wordy and redundant:
Certificate in Spanish Oral Proficiency – Intermediate Mid Level, American Council for the Teaching of Foreign Languages Computer Based Oral Proficiency Interview, 2013

You’re including way too much information. Unless you are in a field where everyone will know and be impressed by that particular test, I’d just state it in terms of conversant, proficient, or fluent, just as your Google search suggested to you. You can add “oral and written” if you prefer.

7. Which post generated the most comments?

I noticed that the letter regarding the racist Halloween costumes has now generated 746 comments. I myself have been checking back to it for the past couple of days. The response activity made me wonder…what post (if not this one) has generated the most response from us?

That was the third highest ever, leaving out open threads (which have generated 900+ comments on occasion). The two that topped the Halloween costume post are:

bad interviewers and weird candidates – (858 comments — although to be fair, this was a request for stories)

can I expose this terrible interviewer? (771 comments)

do I have to give my ex-girlfriend a job reference?

A reader writes:

I have been asked for a reference, in my capacity as a manager, by an ex-girlfriend.

The relationship ended very badly for me (depression and on-going anti-depressant medication), so I’m quite gobsmacked/angry about this. I was her line manager’s manager at the time of her employment, but unfortunately she was made redundant at the same time, or otherwise it could of gone to her.

I’m sure I could be objective (well, I think), but this feels like a massive liberty. I’m hoping a generic HR reference will do, but is it reasonable for her to expect me to do this (frankly nothing surprises me from her)? And do I have a legal obligation?

Well, first, do not date people in your line of authority, even if there are other managers in between you and them.

Do not do it!

It is Very Bad Practice.

But you’ve already done it, so that doesn’t help. The pickle you’re now in is one of the many, many reasons this type of dating is a bad idea. Of course she should be able to ask her manager’s manager (you) for a reference, without you feeling like it’s a “massive liberty.” And at the same time, of course you shouldn’t be in the position of needing to give a job reference for an ex. Such is the pickling that results from manager-subordinate relationships.

But ideally you’d be able to be objective about your ex-girlfriend’s work and give her a reference that’s unbiased by your relationship with her. You should do this because you want to be a mature and civil person, and the type of manager who doesn’t let personal biases get in the way of professional assessments. There’s no legal obligation to provide a reference (assuming you’re in the U.S., which you might not be, since you said “gobsmacked”), but there’s a professional one, assuming the person did good work.

But if you can’t do it, or if it’s too painful for you, you can tell your ex that you wouldn’t be a credible reference since the two of you dated — which is true. Reference-checkers don’t want references from exes (or best friends, or spouses, or so forth).

And frankly, she should be using her direct manager anyway. It doesn’t matter that the direct manager was laid off; your ex should track her down and use her as the reference, and that would be true whether you dated or not. It’s just extra true since you did.

should I become a subversive wellness committee member?

A reader writes:

I believe that you’ve expressed your opposition before to cheesy workplace wellness initiatives, and I agree with you that it’s not really my employer’s business what I eat/drink/do outside of work. However, my company recently started a BIG push with one of these, which to be fair seems to be motivated by a push on them from our health insurance carrier. Some of it is good (offering free flu shots at the office), some annoying but harmless (sending info about eating healthy food, as if people don’t know that eating healthy food is good for you), and some is rather invasive (encouraging and rewarding employees who voluntarily fill out a wellness survey that includes personal health information).

They are also looking for volunteers from all levels and departments to form a wellness committee, to serve as “role models” for other employees’ healthy behavior and brainstorm ideas for the wellness initiative. Would it be ridiculous for me to volunteer to join the committee, so that I can basically say, “The wellness initiative is kind of a joke. Let’s not do things that insult our employees and pry into their personal lives. If we must do something, let’s do things that are actually valuable, like make sure that we are staffed so that everyone can leave with enough time to go to the gym and/or cook a healthy dinner if they choose, rather than working until 8 p.m. and eating a pizza on the way home?” I sort of like the idea of being the subversive wellness committee member, but I’m wondering if I’d just be wasting my time.

You should absolutely join and do this! This is exactly the way to have an impact; it’s much easier to change the tenor and substance of these sorts of things if you have a voice on the inside … and not only would you be able to play a valuable role in arguing against intrusive suggestions, but you’d also be able to push for good things that don’t nanny employees or cross inappropriate boundaries.

For instance, you could push for things like:

  • good insurance with strong preventative care
  • healthy food in the vending machines and healthy snacks in the kitchen
  • subsidized gym memberships
  • flex schedules
  • stand-up desks for anyone who wants one
  • organizational support for people taking real vacation time where they truly disconnect from work

You must do this, letter-writer! So often, the people organizing these programs just don’t think critically about their substance — especially if they’ve been plied with promotional materials from awful wellness programs like this one — but when there’s a voice of reason on the inside, you can have a real impact.

If you find over time that the rest of the committee ignores you, you can always drop off (and tell them why), but I wouldn’t be surprised if you’re able to dramatically influence what they roll out.

Read an update to this letter here.

open thread

OliveScissorpawsIt’s our biweekly open thread!

The comment section on this post is open for discussion with other readers on anything you want to talk about. If you want an answer from me, emailing me is still your best bet, but this is a chance to talk to other readers.

Pictured: For those of you who pointed out the similarities between Olive’s expression and Edward Scissorhands, I present Olive Scissorpaws.