I don’t want to go on a company cruise — can I be required to work instead?

A reader writes:

I work for a private medical practice with 12 employees. My employer just decided (three weeks ago) to take all employees and their spouses on a cruise next week (company paid).

While I would have loved to attend, my husband and I just returned from a week-long pre-planned personal vacation, so my husband does not have additional PTO for this. I decided not to go alone, as I would not be comfortable doing so.

The cruise is Thursday to Monday, and my employer just informed me that since I was not going on the cruise, I would be required to work normal hours at the office. I am the only one not going, and therefore the only one who will be working three days that everyone else is on paid (and paid-for) vacation. I feel like I am being punished, but assume this is the employer’s prerogative?

Yes.

And not only is this perfectly legal, I’d argue that there’s nothing too terrible about doing this.

Think of it this way: If they wanted to take everyone on a team-building trip to, say, an amusement part or on an overnight strategy retreat and you declined to go, you wouldn’t just get those days off. You’d be expected to continue to show up at work.

And yes, this is more like a “vacation,” but they’re almost certainly doing it for business reasons, not altruism: They’re assuming it will be a team-building thing. That’s why they’re not just giving everyone the week off to use as they sit fit, or giving everyone a certain amount of money to spend on whatever vacation they want.

It’s not punishing you to say that if you’re not going to attend this event, you should continue to work as normal. That’s pretty reasonable.

And sure, there might be some employers out there who would give you these three days off anyway (and that would be a really nice thing to do, and arguably one that could increase your loyalty to the company), but there’s certainly nothing wrong with the way they’re handling it.

confess your awkward work moments!

Inspired by a recent commenter who shared a story about the time she accidentally slapped her boss in the face, we need to hear from others about awkward messes you unintentionally (or intentionally?) caused at work.

Did you insult your company president to her face? Trip a client in the hallway? Come out of the bathroom with your skirt tucked into your underwear? Get caught in flagrante in the conference room? This is the time to get it off your chest. Confess to us, and your soul will be cleansed.

8 benefits employees wish employers would offer

Forget the foosball table in the break room and the gourmet snacks in the kitchen. What employees really want from their employers is much more basic – and in many cases centers around being treated like trustworthy adults capable of getting their work done without so much oversight.

Here are eight of the benefits employees most want from their employers.

1. Being able to use vacation time without guilt. Too many employees don’t take all the vacation time they earn, either because they can’t get time off approved or because their manager and workplace culture signal – subtly or not so subtly – that if they take time off, they’ll be seen as a slacker. As a result, employees often discover that the vacation package that looked so generous when they were being hired is just a mirage.

2. Being able to use sick time without having to prove you’re sick. Instead of treating employees as adults, some companies require employees to present proof of illness when they need to take a sick day. Having to go to the doctor’s office when you have a cold just so that you can get a doctor’s note to show your employer is insulting – and it also drives up health care costs by pushing people into doctors’ offices when they really just need rest and Tylenol. It also encourages people to come to work sick, since sometimes that’s easier than getting a doctor’s appointment just to obtain a note.

3. Being allowed to telecommute when the work allows it. While many companies are ramping up their use of telecommuting, plenty still won’t consider it at all, even for employees whose jobs could easily be done from home. Companies that allow telecommuting – particularly when a staff member is slightly under the weather but can still work or when someone needs to wait at home for a repair person or delivery – go a long way toward earning employees’ loyalty.

4. Professional development and training. As the economy has pushed companies to try to do more than less, budgets for training and development have taken a major hit. As a result, employees are often expected to produce results without getting much (or any) training … and in many cases, you can forget about professional development opportunities like outside classes and workshops.

5. Flexible schedules. Forget the old 9-5 standard schedule. Increasingly, workers are looking for flexible schedules that will allow them to more easily juggle work and home – and some employers are responding by allowing good workers to work untraditional schedules like 7-3 or 8-4 so they can be at home with kids in the afternoon or go to school in the early evening. Allowing workers to choose their own schedules, within reason and as long as their work is being performed at a high level, is a key way to attract and retain strong performers – who are often at a place in their careers where they’d pick flexibility over a raise or promotion.

6. Meaningful roles with real responsibility. Employees who are able to have a real impact on the organization’s success and who “own” their areas and its successes or failures are more likely to feel satisfied with their work – and to stay focused on the challenges in front of them rather than seeking out new challenges somewhere else.

7. Open appreciation. Employers often underestimate the impact of simply making sure that great employees regularly hear that they’re valued. Managers who let good employees know that they see their accomplishments and value what they’re contributing are more likely to have employees who stay.

8. Good management. Nothing drives employees away faster than bad management behaviors, like yelling, creating a climate of fear, or letting serious problems go unresolved. Managers have a pervasive impact on employees’ day-to-day work environment, and an employee’s relationship with her direct supervisor is one of the factors that most strongly influences job satisfaction. And no matter how much a staff member likes her job or her company, if she has a bad relationship with her manager, it will seep into her quality of life every day and eventually drive her in search of something else.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

do I need an outgoing voicemail message, pay transparency, and more

It’s seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Do I need to have an outgoing voicemail message when job searching?

I don’t have an outgoing voicemail message on my phone — I gave up trying to record a normal-sounding message after several tries, and never got around to actually recording one. Is this a Bad Thing, or not really a big deal? I’m job-hunting right now and am wondering if it would reflect negatively on me if an interviewer called and got my generic-robot voicemail.

I don’t think it’s a big deal, but I do think it’s better to have a message with your name that confirms the caller has reached the right person so that there’s no uncertainty on their side.

2. Am I being taken for a ride?

I recently discussed the possibilities of starting up an online store for my employer. I also suggested that, with my background in running an online store as part of my own business (in the same industry), that I could design and implement it for them, including all graphic and web design, marketing, product research, etc. They were not aware I had these skills when they hired me.

I submitted a proposal and presented a mock-up store to our dealer principal, who was very impressed, and we had another meeting (my manager, the dealer principal, and myself). As part of this meeting, they wanted to know my expectations regarding remuneration. I gave them an idea of what I thought was reasonable if the position was full-time, and they basically said that they couldn’t justify paying me any more without seeing results, which is to say: “Get the site up and running, and when we start seeing some growth, come and talk to us.” On top of this, they want me to continue doing my current job as they “can’t afford to let the retail business suffer.” They also said “if this project is successful, we’ll make sure everyone knows it’s yours” and that “there’s huge potential for you to progress within the company.”

Later that day, I told my boss that I wasn’t really comfortable putting my extra skills to use without any extra remuneration. He said that his hands were tied and that I would have to accept this is the way it’s going to be, and that I’d be in a better position to negotiate for a pay rise when the site is up and achieving good growth.

What’s your opinion on this? Is it unreasonable for me to expect extra compensation while using these skills? Am I being taken advantage of, considering it could cost them upwards of $40,000 to have someone else set it up? On one hand I think this would be a great project and would give me something to sink my teeth into, as well as a great addition to my resume if it’s successful, but on the other hand, I feel like I am being taken for a ride.

Hard to say without knowing more about your employer. Some would mean everything they said to you, and some wouldn’t. What do you know about your employer that can help you evaluate this?

I can say that if they’re planning on hiring someone to do this work regardless of whether or not it’s you, then yes, you should expect to be fairly for it. But if they weren’t planning on doing this and you’re the one pushing the idea, then it’s not surprising that they’re not willing to hand over a bunch of cash that they’d never budgeted to spend for a project that hasn’t been a priority to them. In that case, their stance is more reasonable than it would be if they were seeking a solution for this work on their own.

3. Should I mention on my resume that I’m represented by a literary agent?

By day, I work full-time at a media company, but in my spare time, I write novels. While I have yet to achieve my goal of being published, I do have a fairly well-known literary agent who represents my work (a quick Google search will show she has many successful clients). Is this something to include on my resume or is it more likely to scare people off (i.e., I will not be fully committed to my job because of my writing)? Of course, a search of my name on the internet will bring up this information, as my Twitter is mostly dedicated to my writing. I’m just not sure how big a deal to make of it. While I do want to be published, I do not plan to stop working full-time when/if that day comes, as mid-list debut authors certainly do not make enough money to support themselves.

In summary, would you recommend including this somewhere on my resume/cover letter, and if so, where?

Unless it’s relevant to the work you’re applying for, I wouldn’t include it. Simply having an agent isn’t going to be considered enough of an achievement that it belongs on a resume and you risk looking a little naive for including it. And yes, you also risk turning off employers who will assume that your heart will be with your novel writing rather than the work they’d be hiring you for (which it may well be, but there’s no need to highlight that fact).

4. Quitting without notice because of a seriously ill relative

I’ve been working for my company for only about 5 months and I just got made permanent last July. My dad is in the Philippines and he’s in a critical health situation right now. I asked my supervisor if he can give me two weeks unpaid vacation. If he approves my vacation and while I’m in the Philippines I realize that I can’t leave my dad in that situation (because my mom told me that anytime he might forget us because of the infection in the brain), can I quit my job or it would give me a bad record?

Yes, you can if you need to. This is one of the few situations where quitting without notice is understandable. You would simply explain that your father is critically ill and you need to stay with him, and apologize profusely for not being able to give notice. Any reasonable employer would understand that.

5. Interviewing for a job with politically sensitive responsibilities

I’ve been asked to interview for an administrative assistant job at a university’s medical school. When I was phoned by the department to interview, they brought up some of the services they do for patients, and said that occasionally part of my job would be scheduling appointments with patients. Some procedures are very politically sensitive, and so I was asked on the phone if I was comfortable talking to patients to schedule those procedures. I’m a pretty apolitical person, so my initial reaction was to just say yes, so I could at least have a little bit more time to consider it.

Now, my own feelings about the topic aside, is it smart, career-wise, to work in this department? I know that even if I’m not politically invested one way or the other, future employers might be.

Unless the name of the department or your prospective job title make it clear that sometimes you scheduled whatever the procedure is, I don’t see how a future employer would even know about this or why it would come up unless you raised it yourself. And no reasonable employer is going to say, “I see you worked in the women’s health department. Did you ever have to schedule abortions?” So in that case, I wouldn’t worry about it.

If the name of the department or job does make this clear, then yes, you’d need to decide how you feel about some prospective employers in the future potentially having strong feelings about it.

6. My employer is now telling me I’ll need training I don’t have

I was hired five years ago at a nonprofit childcare for a job that required a college degree or commensurate life/work experience. I did not and do not have a degree. My past job experience with more than 15 years experience qualified me for the position and I was hired.

My employer just informed me that I would now be required to hold a status in a childcare registry in my state. The registry is not a required thing for childcare workers. In order for me to hold the required status, I will need to take 20 units of college classes or 200 hours of training. If I refuse to do this, I have been informed it will hamper my ability to keep my job. Is this legal?

Yes. They can change their job requirements at any time, and it sounds like they’re doing that here. If they’ve decided that they want to have (and want to be able to tell parents they have) all registered childcare employees, that’s not unreasonable of them.

7. My company gives all employees access to everyone’s salary information

I just started working at a company that sells basic home electronics and appliances. I recently, by accident, discovered that I can go into our computer system, enter my employee number, and see details about my earning (past, present, future). The problem is so can any other employee/coworker! And I can enter their employee number and see all the details of their earnings anytime I want to.

Does this not seem to you as a legal privacy issue? I don’t like coworkers coming up to me and saying “loan me $20, I know what you made last week.”

Legal issue? No. Privacy issue? Maybe, depending on your perspective. But some companies — including yours, apparently — do make people’s salaries public (at least within the company), and some people actually like this and want to see more companies doing it, so that it’s easier to see how various employees and types of work are valued, whether there are patterns of discrimination based on things like gender or race, and so forth.

But if your coworkers are hitting you up for money based on knowing what you made last week, your problem is rude coworkers, not pay transparency.

my boss is burned out

A reader writes:

My boss is big-B burned out. He’s one of the most inspiring people I’ve ever worked for, and normally an excellent manager; but lately, he’s visibly tired (and will tell you so, when you ask him how he’s doing), and “off” — he’s abrasive, argumentative, impatient, disinterested, unfocused, and not the guy I’ve been working for for a lot of years before now.

He’s also a straight shooter – not the kind of boss who will use his staff as his therapist, but definitely the kind of boss who will give you a straight answer when you ask him what’s going on. I’ve said to him “I’m worried about you. I notice that you seem like you’re in a slump. You’re smiling less. You seem tired. When I give you an update on a project that I think you’ll be really excited about, you seem uninterested, or bored. Or, if I bring you a question I need some help with answering, where you would previously take interest in that and give me great advice, now it seems like more of a nuisance to you, something you’d rather not be dealing with. Is something going on?” And he answered yeah, he is tired, and he’s been doing this job for a long time now, and maybe he’s ready to be doing something else, something that would let him have more time at home with his kids.

He’s also the big boss, in charge of the whole shop. And while the idea of him moving on stresses me out, I understand that change isn’t bad, and sometimes people need to do what they need to do. I get it. I want him to be happy, wherever that is. But in the meantime, until he decides to make a move, I still look to him to do his job – manage the rest of us, you know? I need him to do his job and stay engaged with the work and with his staff. And lately, I’m not always so sure how to ask for what I need. I try not to bring him problems without solutions in mind, but we never seem to be able to move those solutions forward. I try not to bother him with the insignificant stuff, but there’s a major personnel issue I need his advice on how to manage, and he doesn’t have any to give, saying “yeah, that’s hard, you’re right, I don’t know what you should do.” I know he’s going through stuff, and I’ve got sympathy – real sympathy – for that. I don’t want to add more stress to his life, I want to relieve his stress by continuing to do a good job and take things off his plate and manage my own work successfully. But there are some things I’m responsible for where I need his buy in and support, and it’s not there. It’s making me feel stuck, and sad. And it’s also making me pull back – things where I could normally use his help I’m just handling on my own, and I’m not sure I’m always handling them the right way. I miss his leadership. And I don’t know how to ask for it in the middle of everything he’s working out – but I feel myself starting to get resentful that he’s not leading us the way he used to. I want my boss back.

What should I do?

It doesn’t sound like there’s anything you really can do.

You’ve spoken to your boss about the issue and he acknowledged that it’s a problem, but he hasn’t changed his behavior.

You’ve asked him directly for the type of advice you need for your work, and he’s not giving you any.

You can’t make someone give what they can’t or won’t give, and right now he’s not giving it.

So your options are to accept that this is now the way your job works, at least for the foreseeable future, and either stay under those changed conditions or decide to look elsewhere.

I suppose that you could have one more conversation with your boss about the issue, but I doubt it’s going to change anything and might only succeed in irritating him (since you’ve already brought it up and received a “yes, I know” in response). If you wanted to try that, though, I’d change the focus a bit from what you said the first time. The first time, you made it about your concern for him. This time, you could be more explicit that it’s making it harder for you to do your job as well as you used to.

It’s possible that would nudge him into realizing that he has to change something and can’t just continue on with the status quo. But it’s also possible that you’ll get a response that says, essentially, “deal with it.”

And if that happens, then you’ve got to adapt your thinking and realize that this is how the job works now. Do you still want it?

how can I alert people to the unprofessionalism of the organization that revoked my job offer?

A reader writes:

For months, I have been planning on joining a nonprofit organization in another country, starting in September. We negotiated terms and I was told I had the position back in June. Since then, I have communicated frequently with the director of the organization, as well as several other staff members, to prepare the documents I need for my visa, etc. The director also asked me to meet with people in several organizations in Washington, D.C., while I was still here in the U.S., and even wrote introductory emails for me to some of them. These meetings were conducted on my time and dollar.

Suddenly my job offer has been retracted. I get the sense that it is not a budgetary issue, but that the director has developed a personal problem with me. During the salary negotiations, we had agreed on two possible packages, one of which was a higher salary, and the other a lower salary plus reimbursement of some expenses. She recently indicated they planned to go with the second option, and I wrote back saying I preferred the first option, if at all possible. After receiving no response for a week, I was told they cannot meet my requirements and therefore they have made the final decision not to bring me on. I immediately requested a phone call to discuss the issue, and have been strung along for nearly two weeks now, as the director has rescheduled the call several times and has finally ceased to respond to my request to talk at all.

I am stunned that my request for one compensation package over the other elicited such a strong response, and I am even more upset by the fact that I cannot seem to make this person talk to me to smooth things over. At this point, I would like to contact the people with whom I met in D.C. (and to whom I had been introduced as a new member of the organization) and inform them that I will not be taking the job after all. Several of the people I met with work at organizations that are currently funding projects at the nonprofit I was about to join. How can I tactfully tell them about my predicament in a manner that will clue them in on the lack of professionalism at the organization they are funding, while also putting myself out there as a job seeker open to any leads they might be able to provide?

You can certainly reach out and let them know that you won’t be working with XYZ organization after all, but I wouldn’t try to clue them in on anything about the organization’s professionalism. There’s too much risk of it reflecting poorly on you — because often when someone badmouths an organization, however subtly, they’re the one who ends up looking bad. And in this case, they barely know you, but it sounds like they do know the organization. So you’re already at a disadvantage in a he-said/she-said.

You’ll come across much better if you take the high road. Let them know that you won’t be working with the organization after all, but that you’d love to work with them in the future. You can even add, “In fact, I’m currently looking for a role doing ___ for a similar organization, and would love to talk with you if you know of anything that might be the right fit.” (Or you could make it more general and suggest a less-specific coffee or something, if that feels appropriate.)

Some people may ask you what happened. Your best bet then is to keep it very simple and keep bitterness out of your response — so something like, “Unfortunately we weren’t able to agree on final terms.” Resist the impulse to go into the details. You might succeed in raising questions in their mind about the organization, but you’re even more likely to end up raising questions about (a) why you’re sharing dirty laundry, and (b) whether there was something on your end that caused the organization to pull the offer. Neither of those help you.

Now, as for what happened itself … I’m going to go out on a limb and say that I’m not sure there was ever a final job negotiation that you should have been counting on. When compensation hasn’t yet been finalized, negotiations are still in process. And you hadn’t finalized things — you had agreed on two possible compensation packages, but ultimately you wanted one and they wanted the other, and things fell through. So I’m not sure this is quite like having a finalized job that then gets pulled — it’s more like having offer negotiations aborted. They shouldn’t have been having you introduce yourself as a new staff member to people outside the organization, but nor should you have agreed to do it — because you hadn’t come to terms yet, and things were still up in the air. I realize it’s not quite that straightforward, because both sides clouded it up by moving forward with other elements before they should have — but ultimately, if you haven’t fully agreed on final terms, nothing is official.

I realize that doesn’t help you now, but it might be useful to keep that in mind as you process what happened here.

how not to reject job candidates

You’ve screened resumes, interviewed candidates, and now you’re ready to make a hire. But wait – while your attention might be focused on the new person who will be joining your staff, don’t forget about all those other candidates who are waiting to hear back from you.

Yes, it’s rejection time. No one likes doing it, and candidates certainly don’t like receiving it – but it’s far better than letting them continue to wait and wonder if they’re still in the running, as too many companies do.

But when it comes time to reject job candidates, there are four big No’s to remember. Don’t reject candidates in any of the following ways.

By phone. You might think that it’s polite to phone candidates to let them know they didn’t get the job, but resist that impulse and send an email instead. Phone calls put candidates on the spot: They have to react to the rejection while they’re still in the immediate moment of disappointment. It’s awkward. And the call often creates a moment of false hope, which then dissipates when the candidate has to pull it together to be gracious about disappointment seconds later. (Besides, email is better on your side too, since some candidates will try to argue your decision.)

With an email so convoluted the applicant isn’t sure what it means. When you’re letting a candidate know that she is no longer under consideration, be sure to state that clearly. Sometimes in an effort to be diplomatic, rejection emails leave job candidates unsure what you’re actually saying to them. Just be direct: “We appreciated your time and interest in working with us, but we have decided not to move your application forward.”

With silence. Most candidates put a lot of effort into preparing for a job interview—reading up on your company, practicing answers to interview questions, and thinking about how they could best offer something of value. They might take a day off work and spend time and money traveling to the interview. If you decide not to hire them, they deserve to hear that. But too often, employers never get back to them with an answer, leaving them waiting and wondering what happened. Give your candidates the courtesy of a clear rejection when they’re no longer under consideration.

By announcing the new hire. Too many job seekers have stories of waiting to hear back about a job they interviewed for, only to get online and see an announcement from the company of their new hire – in a press release, on LinkedIn, or on Facebook. That’s no way for someone to find out they didn’t get the job – and it’s a recipe for creating bitter candidates who won’t apply with you again, refer friends, or in some cases even use your product. So before you announce your new hire publicly, make sure you’ve gotten back to the candidates you’re not hiring.

I originally published this at Intuit QuickBase. 

my boss punched me, my new hire quit after three days, and more

It’s seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. My boss punched me in the arm

I’m a 36-year-old woman who is in relatively good shape and had recently lost about 60 pounds, all from changing lifestyle and working out. My boss (an older man) was joking around with me. He was poking fun and made a comment that my arms looked strong. He then pretended to box around me and then actually punched me in the arm. It stung, and I said, “Ow.” He told me that it didn’t hurt. I told him it did. I went into my office, and he said that I had been hit harder before because I played ice hockey in high school. I said I had.

I don’t feel good about the situation at all. Today he scolded me for no reason and when I walked away from him I started crying. I don’t usually do this. I don’t like what happened and I don’t want it to happen again. My boss is NOT the kind of guy who I can go to and say this. He would be defensive and blame me that we were kidding around. What would you do?

Assuming you believe that he really was joking around and didn’t realize he’d gone too far (and it doesn’t sound like there’s reason to believe otherwise), I’d say this was an unfortunate interaction that you could simply move on from, and assume it was a mistake and won’t happen again. Obviously, if anything like this did happen again, at that point you’d need to sit down and say directly, “I know you think it’s just joking around, but to me it feels like being hit. Please stop doing that.” But for now I’d assume it was a one-time error in judgment and won’t recur.

(And yes, I know there are people who will tell you this was outrageous and you should report it — hell, there are even people who will tell you that you should have reported it as assault — and responding like that is certainly your prerogative, but it seems to me like an overreaction that won’t get you the outcome you want … which presumably is to have a good relationship with a boss who respects boundaries.)

2. New hire quit after five days — should I alert her references?

I recently hired a young woman for an entry-level job in the small (8-person) office that I manage. Five days into the job, she apologetically informed me that she had heard from another company in a different field, in another state: they had offered her a job that pays better than we can, and she had accepted.

I told her it was unprofessional of her not to have informed them that she had already accepted a job (she should have withdrawn from their search as soon as she accepted our offer, and at the very least should have told them when they called to make this offer), and I asked her to wrap up her work in our office as quickly as possible so I could re-start the hiring process.

I’ll be able to fill the position, but I’m very frustrated by the situation. It’s genuinely disruptive to have turnover since there’s so few of us, we had just spent 3 days training her, and I had already told all the other applicants that the position was filled. Would it be appropriate for me to tell her references about what happened, especially since several of them told me all about her reliability and conscientiousness? Should I just accept it as a fluke and leave it alone?

This stuff happens. Yes, it was unprofessional of her, for the same reasons it wouldn’t have been okay for you to have found an applicant you liked better and fire her on her fifth day so that you could hire them instead. But proactively reaching out to her references to badmouth her? I can understand the impulse, but it’s punitive and unwarranted. Don’t do it.

Instead, let this go and be glad she did it on her fifth day rather than her fifth week or fifth month.

Read an update to this letter here.

3. Did I alienate my new coworker?

I’ve been in a new job for two months. The first day I was brought on, I was told I was an equal to another woman in the department–that we both have the same role.

I think our personalities are clashing a bit, and I think I handled something incorrectly. Almost immediately after I started, she would come into my office every few days and ask, “What are you working on?” I’ve answered her, but as the questions continued, it started to grind on me because I was told we are equals and it feels like she is micromanaging me. One day recently, I lashed back and said, “It feels like you are checking up on me.” She said no, but I feel otherwise.

I don’t think I handled that well, and that I came off rude. What do you think I should have or should not have done? And what can I do now to rectify the situation–things aren’t terrible, but I feel like our relationship isn’t great!

Ideally, it would have been better to simply ask her why she was asking you those questions — something like, “Why do you ask?” There might have actually been a reason for her questions — maybe she’s supposed to help train you or wanted to give you advice when you got to a particular piece of work. Or maybe not, and she’s inappropriately meddling. But asking her why she was asking would have given you more insight.

As for now, just be pleasant to her, ask for advice when you genuinely think it would be helpful, and maybe ask her to coffee or lunch. What you said doesn’t sound dreadful and should be easily smoothed over if she’s at all reasonable.

4. Should I let recruiters know I accepted a different job?

After a year of searching (and reading your blog), I’ve finally landed the ever elusive paying job. As I make preparations to begin my job, I received emails from three different recruiters for three different companies in the span of two weeks. The irony is hilarious and sad at the same time.

Should I contact these recruiters and let them know that I’ve already accepted a job but had circumstances been different, I would definitely be interested in their company? The thing is that the positions they were hiring for are much more in line with my interests than the position I accepted and I would love to be considered as a candidate sometime in the future.

Yes, absolutely. That’s a good way to maintain the connection and let them know you’d welcome contact in the future.

5. My employer won’t give me a pay stub

My husband I are trying to get a home loan, but my employer handwrites paychecks and does not give pay stubs. I know that there isn’t an Alabama state or federal law the requires this, but she won’t give me the information. The FSLA requires an employer to keep this information on file, but does it require her to give it to me when I ask? We are about to lose out on our dream home because I cannot produce a pay stub.

In most states, including Alabama, employers are required to give employees a pay stub each time they are paid (although it can be electronic in some states). If your manager is refusing, you can contact your state labor agency to report it … although I’d be concerned about why she’s refusing and whether it might indicate that she hasn’t been properly taking out taxes or submitting payroll taxes on your behalf.

6. How should I list this job history?

I worked on and off for the same company for 10 years. Sometimes I worked part-time, sometimes I worked full-time, and sometimes I didn’t work at all. I had the same job title every time I worked. Here’s the history:

9/2003 – 12/2004 (16 months): Full-time (40 hours per week)
1/2005 – 1/2007 (13 months): Part-time (20 hours per week)
2/2007 – 5/2008: Not employed
5/2008 – 8/2009 (16 months): Full-time (40 hours per week)
9/2009 – 3/2011 (19 months): Part-time (10 hours per week)
4/2011 – 1/2012: Not employed
2/2012 – 6/2013 (17 months): Part-time (less than 10 hours per week)

How do I list this on a resume? And how many years of experience can I claim in this field with this work history?

I’d list it this way:

Job Title, Employer
February 2012 – June 2013
May 2008 – March 2011
September 2003 – January 2007

It doesn’t matter that you were part-time during some of it and full-time during other parts; these are the dates that you were employed there doing that work.

As for how many years this all adds up to … roughly seven. I mean, you could calculate it all kinds of different ways because sometimes you were working as little as 10 hours a week, but it’s basically seven years of experience.

7. How should I approach my manager about my internship’s end?

I recently finished a diploma in my field and decided to take a year off of school before going back to finish a degree. This summer, I began an unpaid internship that is related to my field and which has been an amazing learning experience with many benefits. Because I have bills to pay, I applied for other jobs and eventually got a full-time job. They were on board with me finding a part-time job, but full-time ended up being what was available at the time. I have been balancing both all summer. Because I’m often in the office late or on the weekends, I haven’t had as much interaction with my direct manager or other management staff. It’s a start-up, so it’s an informal environment without any “systems” in place and there has been a lot of ambiguity. In the beginning, it was agreed upon that the internship would be for three months, with good prospects for getting hired and that if the prospects were not good, I would know well before then.

Well, three months is just about up and no further conversation has been had. I have wavered all along about wanting to be hired or not and I think at this point I probably would not want to continue regardless. However, there has been no talk of my “last day” or anything else. I’m not sure how to broach the subject at all — I would be flattered to hear some honest feedback and see if I was offered a job at this point, but I doubt I would be or that I would take it. I would like to receive a reference in the future.

The person who I would talk to about these things has either not been around lately or if has, completely engaged with other things and unapproachable on the subject. I’m not sure if I should just send an email saying, “looks like my last day is coming up on ____ date, it was a wonderful experience, thank you and I hope in the future you would be comfortable acting as a reference for me,” but I don’t know if I just want to take myself out of the running without any word on their end first. At the end of the day, I have no idea how to approach my rather unorthodox boss about the situation, as he is either deep in work with others around or playing video games/watching movies. Neither time seems good.

Sometimes you need to be the one to raise this stuff, because you’re the one most focused on it — other people are often busy with things that are (to them) higher priorities. If you sit and wait to be approached, it may never happen.

However, if you know you wouldn’t accept a job there, don’t invite an offer that you’ll just turn down. Send an email saying, “The end of my three months is approaching — could we talk soon about what I should be doing to wrap up?” And then in the conversation that should hopefully result from that, ask about the reference — but don’t lump that all in to the first mention of this.

If you might consider a job offer, then adjust that initial email accordingly: “”The end of my three months is approaching, and I’d love to schedule a time to talk about where we might go from here.”

can I ask about flexible hours in a job interview?

A reader writes:

I have a tight time window to work since I need to bring my son to daycare every morning and pick up him every afternoon (I am a single mom and nobody can help me with this). My previous job’s work hours were suitable for me, but I got laid off and need to find another job.

I got several interviews, and one company gave me an offer, but I had to reject it because their work times can’t fit mine and they won’t allow flexible work hours. To save my time, I want to know if I can ask work hour questions during an interview so that I will know if I can accept the job at the beginning. Is it okay to do that? Is there any difference to asking an employer or a recruiter? What is the best way to ask this kind of question?

Theoretically, you should absolutely be able to ask this sort of question right at the start — along with salary and everything else that could be a potential deal breaker about a job. In practice, though, many employers frown on employees asking this type of question right at the start of the hiring process, feeling that it reflects a focus on the wrong things when they want to see that you’re focused on the work itself. That’s silly and unrealistic, but it’s the convention — and so you do put yourself at risk by bringing up benefits and hours early on. Plus, you’re more likely to get them to agree to flexible hours once they’ve already decided they want you, so to it’s your advantage to wait.

There are two exceptions to this:

* Recruiters. You can often ask external recruiters this kind of thing up-front, when you wouldn’t if you were talking to the employee directly. For whatever reason, the conventions are different with external recruiters.

* Retail, food service, and other schedule-driven jobs. In jobs where varying schedules are a big focus, it’s pretty normal to start discussing hours right up-front.

Aside from these two exceptions, I’d wait until you either have an offer or are at least at later stages of the interview process (not the first interview) before raising this stuff.

when your boss is a raging alcoholic

A reader writes:

I’m an avid reader of your blog, and a friend of mine has a situation that has left me bewildered, so we’re coming to you for help. He works as an administrative assistant for a very large, successful company, but his boss is a raging alcoholic. He goes out at lunch about 3-4 times a week and comes back absolutely hammered. I’m not talking a few drinks over a meeting; I’m talking so drunk that everyone knows (and gossips about it). The worst part (in my opinion) is that he drives home every night, and there is just no way he is fit to get behind the wheel. On top of that, we work in the core of a REALLY busy city, so even driving sober can be a challenge (not that drunk driving in any location is acceptable, but it just adds another layer).

Not only is he an alcoholic, but he comes in late every morning/takes 4 hour lunches/leaves a lot of his responsibilities to my friend to complete (I don’t mean regular admin stuff , I mean high level responsibilities). He has also missed numerous meetings with staff and clients, and has even come back to meet with them wasted (slurring words/smelling heavily of it/lots of giggling). They do actually have a stellar relationship and my friend loves the boss, but it’s getting to the point that the absenteeism/drunkenness is really bogging him down. The boss’s boss has turned a blind eye to it, so he has gotten away with this behavior for quite some time now. Finally, HR is involved in this in the sense that they are drinking buddy’s with the boss, so there is no point in even going to HR about it.

What should he do? He loves his job, and isn’t going to quit over it, but there really doesn’t seem to be anyone else he could really go to (except maybe the CEO, which would be the level above the boss that is turning a blind eye). Thanks for any insight on this!

There are a few different issues here:

1. The manager is maybe slacking off on his job (coming in late, taking 4-hour lunches, and leaving lots of his work to your friend). I say “maybe” because he could be working hours that your friend does see, and some people do manage to produce at a high level despite stuff like that. It sounds unlikely here, but it’s possible. In any case, this one isn’t really your friend’s business to raise; this is between the manager and his own boss.

2. The manager is behaving unacceptably with clients (missing meetings and showing up drunk) and with staff (showing up drunk). Unlike #1 above, this one is so far over the line that it’s appropriate (I’d even say necessary) for your friend to raise it with someone.

3. The manager is driving drunk. This is absolutely your friend’s business, and he has a moral and practical obligation to speak up about it.

So, your friend needs to speak up about #2 and #3.

As for who to talk to, I’d talk to the manager’s manager. He can say something like this: “I really like Bob and enjoy working with him, but his drinking has become a work issue. He shows up for client and staff meetings clearly drunk, returns to work drunk after lunch, and is driving home drunk in the evening. It must be impacting what clients think, and I’m worried it’s only a matter of time before he has an accident and hurts himself or someone else.”

He also, frankly, could say something to the manager himself, at least about the driving drunk. He could also intervene when he sees him leaving work clearly intoxicated — he could refuse to let him drive and insist on calling him a cab.

And if the company doesn’t intervene and resolve this issue after your friend brings it to their attention, your friend should seriously consider looking for another job, regardless of how much he likes his current one. If nothing else, it’s going to eventually harm his reputation to work for this guy — and it would be helpful to be able to clearly state to the manager and the company when he leaves that he couldn’t stand by and watch this.

Read an update to this letter here.