a bomb scare made me late to an interview, agenda for meeting with a new boss, and more

It’s seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. A bomb scare made me late to an interview

I had an interview on Wednesday for a job that is very promising for me. I left with what should have been time to spare, but the traffic and construction was pretty terrible, to the point that simply walking to the interview (which is about a 15-minute stroll) was difficult and I was about 3-5 minutes late to the interview.

It turned out that there was a bomb scare to a U.S. Congressperson’s office and because it was also around at least two other government buildings (including one that got a different bomb scare about two years ago), that backed up traffic because of all the detours, since both the police and FBI had to do an on-site investigation.

What do I tell the interviewers? Do I tell HR and have them pass along the word? I don’t want these people to think that I’m a chronically late person and I’ve been out of work for a while. I did apologize at the start of the interview and mentioned the traffic and construction delayed me and they seemed fine with it. The interview seemed to have gone great, they really appeared to like me but I worry about this one thing. Do I send them another email bringing up the bomb scare or will they think I’m making excuses?

Eh, I could argue this either way. On one hand, following up days later about a 3-5 minute delay could be taken as overkill. On the other hand, there’s not really anything wrong with saying, “After getting home on Wednesday, I learned that there was a bomb scare at the Capitol, and thats what caused all the delays that made me a few minutes late. I feel compelled to mention this because I’m neurotically punctual.” You’d need to say this in the context of a thank-you note though — it doesn’t warrant its own note.

2. Will filing for unemployment cause my former employer to vindictively back-date my insurance?

I just recently ended a messy conflict with my ex-employer. Long story short, they were trying to back-date my last day of employment to retroactively cancel my insurance (I was out on FMLA and then not able to return to work because I moved for my husband’s job). I spoke with a lawyer who said that my last day of employment for insurance purposes was the day that we spoke about me not coming back, and they immediately corrected the date and stopped trying to retroactively cancel my insurance (which I had used for my medical condition). They sent me a fairly nasty email though, afterwards.

I was told by this employment lawyer that I do qualify for unemployment in this state since I moved for a spouse’s job. However, I’m afraid that if I apply, my ex-employer will vindictively try to cancel my insurance again and make me retain the attorney I hired. Is it silly to be afraid to file for unemployment? I’m not sure if I’m being irrational to be so nervous that they might go after me. Should I just leave well enough alone? I’m looking for a new job and I’m already afraid that they’ll give me a terrible reference despite 7 years of stellar performance reviews and promotions.

There’s never any predicting what people will do, but in general an employer who has already back-tracked on X in response to a lawyer’s intervention is unlikely to try X again just because you file for unemployment.

3. Should I prepare an agenda for meeting with my new boss during my first week on the job?

I just recently landed a great position as an Executive Assistant for the COO/President of a great company, and your website has been extremely helpful during my job search over the last few months.

I am excited about this new role and want to make sure I hit the ground running. During our last meeting before I was offered the position, my boss mentioned that on the first couple of days, she would clear her calendar and we would spend time together to “ramp up.” One thing I am thinking about doing is outlining an “agenda” of sorts for this meeting. This would include something that outlines some questions I have regarding her preferences for various things (travel, meetings, etc.) as well as some ideas for organizational systems to put in place (she mentioned this was a top priority for me during our interviews). What do you think? Any ideas?

It’s a great idea to prepare something like this, but don’t use it as an agenda — since she may already have her own agenda for the meeting, and you don’t want to override that. But you can certainly keep it as a list of topics you want to be sure that you cover — you just don’t want to appear to be taking over the meeting if she seems well in control of it.

4. Covering a ton of qualifications in a cover letter

I’m sure you’ve heard this before, but I am agonizing over a cover letter. I’ve seriously spent 3 hours revising, researching online, and trying different styles for a cover letter for a really cool job. It’s a small community college job, and like a lot of those types of jobs, the “required qualifications” list is 15-20 bullet points because the job covers everything from student career advising to marketing. And I really think I have all of the qualifications, so I’m trying to cover everything between my letter and resume.

My cover letter was getting bulky (still less than a page though), so I gave it 3 bold paragraph headings in the middle to make it look more readable, and bundle some of the related qualifications. When I hold it at arm’s length, it looks way better. Do you think headings in a cover letter is okay?

Sure, that’s fine. More importantly, though keep in mind that you don’t need to address every single qualification they listed in your cover letter. Plenty of that should be covered on your resume anyway, and you absolutely don’t want to just repeat what’s already available from that. If you try to cover 15-20 qualifications, you’re going to drain all the life out of your letter.

Also, don’t agonize. Get it written and send it out. You have no idea where they are in their hiring process, and your window of opportunity may closing while you’re agonizing. Send it today.

5. Why did this position suddenly become temporary when I was hired for it?

I began the hiring process for a well-known, mid-size international company in mid-May. After 2.5 months, the original position I had applied to was changed to a *temporary* position for half a year. The HR person encouraged me to apply anew to this position, which I did. Just a day later (a Saturday, mind you), she informed me that an offer was in the works, and indeed it came through a few days later. After some deliberation and despite the drawbacks of a temporary position, I decided to accept the offer. It’s the best option I have at the moment and is a position I’m very much interested in.

What I’m left wondering about is why the position suddenly became temporary. My hunch is that they’ve decided to try me out for 6 months, because though I do bring a unique body of knowledge to the position, my experience is lacking in other respects. However, in my conversation with the HR person, she denied that this was their intent and said that it was due to a restructuring in the company. I find this explanation dubious — the position is well-established at the company, in a growing field, and it would be a bizarre coincidence that the restructuring happened just as they were about to complete the hiring process with me.

Have you ever heard of such a six-month trial period? Is it conceivable that the HR person could not tell me that such a trial period exists (for example, because they don’t want to set a precedent)? Any other thoughts or comments you might have about my experience would be greatly appreciated.

Yep, companies do trial periods all the time, often without telling candidates they’re doing that OR that the job is only a temporary commitment. I have no idea if that’s the case with this job or not, but at least they were considerate enough not to mislead you into thinking it was permanent. (Well, as permanent as any job is.)

But rather than dwelling on this and trying to figure out their motivations, the fact is that it’s temporary, for whatever reason, and you can proceed with that knowledge in mind.

6. Do I need to be paid for my whole resignation period even if they have me leave early?

I submitted a resignation giving four weeks notice to my employer as requires in our employee handbook. They accepted my resignation. After two weeks, they told me that they moved up my resignation. Do they have to pay me through my resignation date?

They do not. They only have to pay you for the period you actually worked.

7. Did I ruin my chances of ever being hired at this company through too much follow-up?

Your blog has been equal parts helpful and terrifying to come across. I recently graduated from graduate school and I’m new to the job hunt, and I admit I fell for the follow-up with phone calls/be persistent advice — even though all the positions I apply to seem to have “Thank you for not calling” attached to it. There is this one place in particular that I would very much like to work for, and over the span of 2-3 months I have applied to four different positions in their organization. For the very first, I contacted them once by email. In their response, they said that all job postings are online until someone officially accepts the position, which I understood to mean the position might be listed even though they are past accepting new applications. Therefore, before I submitted my second application, I called multiple times to ascertain whether they were still accepting applications for it. I called 3-4 times to one HR person (I never got through; I left one message), and 2-3 to another HR person, leaving one message. I never got through to a person.

Once I learned that that was not the desirable thing to do I clearly stopped, but I fear that none of my other (more recent) applications will be looked at because of those earlier mistakes. Should I stop applying to that organization? Are those of us who have called in the past written off as undesirable candidates?

Nah, I don’t think you need to assume you burned your bridges, since you fortunately only left two phone messages (despite calling more than that). It’s not ideal, but if it’s been a few months, it’s entirely possible they won’t even remember you as the person who called.

my employer encourages everyone to get drunk at company events

A reader writes:

I have an odd situation at my new job. I recently started working at a small company in a major metropolitan area. My company sponsors happy hours during work hours (typically they start at 3:30/4PM in the kitchen in our office and can go until 10 or 11 at night) where lots of alcohol is provided. These happy hours often get very raucous — in short, everyone gets stinking drunk. This happens about twice a month. There are never any incidents or fights or anything that typically happen in a room full of drunk people — it’s just a good time with coworkers.

In addition to that, a few times a year my company hosts outings (professional sports games, picnics, boat rides, etc.) where copious amounts of alcohol is available and the general idea is for everyone to get drunk. They provide bus service to the event and it is strongly encouraged that a friend or family member pick you up afterward. I have been to several of the happy hours and I have drunk well beyond what is typically acceptable at a professional function — but I am also confused because everyone is drunk and they are encouraging it.

An outing is coming up soon and this is the first non-happy hour that I will be attending. It is a picnic on a dock. I have been hearing stories recently of the funny moments from years past which include such tales as the woman from accounting who vomited all over the floor of the bus, the senior exec who got so drunk he ran headfirst into a post, the junior exec who started addressing every woman as “bitch,” the administrative assistant who took all of the food and ran off with it, etc.

I am wondering if this is something I should be attending? I don’t want to embarrass myself in such a way, but I feel as though if I decide not to go then I will look like I am not a team player or do not want to interact with my coworkers. How does one behave in professional situations where it is encouraged that employees get drunk?

Your company has questionable judgment.

While I have nothing against anyone drinking if that’s what they feel like doing, a company encouraging drinking to excess at its own events is asking for all sorts of bad things to happen — from unprofessional behavior, at a minimum, to sexual harassment, drunk driving, injuries, fights, and other problems. Sure, probably not all of those, but spin a wheel and pick randomly from the list. None seem good. And that’s to say nothing of simply alienating employees who don’t particularly want to get drunk or be around drunken coworkers.

(That said, it’s clearly provided you with delightful stories about bad behavior, and I would like to hear more of them.)

In any case, I’m curious about whether you might find that there are others in your office who either don’t go to many of these, go but abstain from the drinking, or don’t go at all. I’d ask around and see if you can find other people who aren’t as gung-ho about this, and also try to find out whether there are any unofficial repercussions to not showing up or leaving early.

And if you do decide to attend, that certainly doesn’t obligate you to drink or get drunk. It sounds a bit like you drank more than you were comfortable with because you felt expected to … but this is not a fraternity hazing. You should feel perfectly comfortable not drinking or not having more than one or two drinks if that’s your preference. Stop when your judgment tells you to stop, totally regardless of whatever antics are going on around you.

If it turns out that people make you uncomfortable about that (aside from one or two loony outliers, whose opinions you can dismiss), that’s a signal that something is indeed very wrong here.

stop telling me you’re a great writer

It’s Flashback Friday! Here’s an old post from March 2009 that we’re making new again, rather than leaving it to wilt in the archives.

It’s not a great idea — nor is it necessary — to brag about your writing skills in your cover letter or on your resume, via subjective assessments of yourself like the following that I’ve seen recently:

“Outstanding writing skills”

“Highly conceptual and great at expressing ideas in a fresh, new way”

“Able to present strategic concepts in clear, persuasive, technically sound writing”

Here’s why. If you have great writing skills, I’m going to see them in the cover letter. You don’t have to tell me they’re there. If I care about candidates’ writing skills (and oh, how I do), I’m going to be looking for them in your cover letter and other communications anyway.

But all too often, candidates give me their own assessment of their writing skills. And when it doesn’t match up with the not-so-great cover letter they’ve written — which is often the case — now I’m doubting the other subjective statements they have on their resume too. If they’re wrong about their writing skills, why wouldn’t I think they might be wrong about other skills they’re claiming for themselves?

Frankly, I don’t like any subjective statements on a resume. As I’ve written before, resumes should present factual information about what you’ve done, not subjective self-assessments. That’s because I don’t yet know enough about you to have any idea if yours is reliable or not.

Telling me that you’re a fantastic writer when I can see that you’re not pretty much answers that question for me, and not in a good way.

Now, you might think, “But since I know that I am a great writer, it’s okay for me to do this.” And maybe you really are (although a lot of people think they are when they’re not). But you still shouldn’t do it. If you’re a great writer and you want me to know that, write a great cover letter. That’s how I’ll know.

my employer wants me to remove a sticker from my truck, over-sharing anxieties, and more

It’s seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. I got promoted and now have less work to do!

After 6 years with my company I was finally granted the promotion I had been wanting. Basically I went from “Junior X” to “X”. For the last three years or so I have been doing the work of both the “Junior X” and the “X”. It was a lot of work, but I was able to handle it without issue. So now that I’m just “X”, many of my previous responsibilities have been delegated to a new hire, and frankly… I’m bored! I’ve made an effort to “slow down” and even created a new project for myself (I’m in a creative field so this is easy to do) but I’m still finding myself with down time. I really don’t want to leave this job as I like the company’s philosophy, the people/culture, not to mention the fact that jobs in this somewhat niche field are few and far between. Is there a good way to ask my boss for more work, without coming across as “expendable”?

What’s the next step above X, and what will you need to do to get there? Can you start taking on some of that work now, or building the skills that will allow you to later? Since it’s easy for you to create new projects for yourself, I’d do that — and might even be explicit with your boss about what why you’re doing it. (Make sure you don’t sound like you’re expecting to move up in an unrealistic amount of time — if it normally takes people three years to get to the next step, present your plan within that framework.)

2. My employer wants me to remove an offensive sticker from my truck

I recently broke up with my girlfriend and to retaliate, I put a sticker across the front windshield of my truck that says “Lift it! Fat girls can’t jump.” (My truck is raised or “lifted” really high. You have to climb up to get in. The sticker makes fun of fat girls not able to get in my truck.) It was funny to me and my friends.

I drive the truck to work every day, and about the end of the first week, my manager came and asked me about it. I explained and he asked if I would take it off since some people had told him they found it offensive and embarrassing. I said I would park at the end of the lot and face it away from building. He came back next day and asked again if I would remove it. I said I would cover it up when coming on the property. The next week, HR approached me and reminded me of the anti-harassment policy. I am holding my ground on offering to cover it up but not removing it. I spent $150! I am waiting on what will be decided but what do you think I can expect?

I think you can expect to be seen as an ass, since you’re acting like one. And yes, acting like an ass is a fireable offense. It’s also one that destroys your reputation and harms your ability to get promotions, raises, and references. Is this really the hill you want to die on?

3. I can’t attend a required training because a medical condition prevents me from traveling

As part of my 2012-2013 goals I am to receive technical training. Getting this technical training is not only beneficial to my company as it gets them discounts and having trained people on staff is required for support of the product, but is beneficial to me as it would guarantee me a job at many other organizations. My manager is really pushing this training because it needs to be scheduled, approved, paid for, etc. all in advance.

My problem is that this software company only has training for my certification track at their location. It is quite far away from where I live and the training is about 2 weeks long. I have a medical condition that prevents me from traveling and staying away for extended periods of time. I have not told my management of this problem because doing so could directly affect my employment (even though it is not supposed to). I work in an environment where anything less than extremely professional is not acceptable.

I have tried to get the company to train me online. They do it for many of their other training classes. The people that I have interacted with are unwavering in their stance that this training is at their location only.

How can I address this issue with the company or my management that will show that I am not getting this training because I can not go there to get it… not because I don’t want to? I feel like emailing up the food chain at the company to see if I can get something accomplished. I feel like they are discriminating against people who can not travel to their location. It is known that they have the capability to train remotely, they just wont.

The company that offers the training is under no obligation to offer the training in specific locations. They may have decided that it’s not profitable for them to offer this particular training in your location and that it’s not as effective to do online. Those decisions are their call.

Instead of focusing on them being unfair, talk to your employer about your situation. You don’t need to disclose the nature of your medical condition, but explaining that it limits your ability to travel is going to be key if you want them to understand why you can’t go to the training. Otherwise, you’ll look like you’re resisting traveling for no reason, and that’s much worse.

4. Can I bring up my concerns about a company in an interview?

I applied for a position with a company that, after doing a bit more research, I’m unsure about. The position is great in that it’s the direction I would like to see my career go in, the money is good, and the commute is very reasonable. I found the position via Indeed, so I looked around the website before applying and it seemed fine. After having a very successful phone screen, I researched the company a bit deeper for a second in-person interview and I’m having a few reservations.

There appears to be a lot of turnover within the company, they’ve gone through a handful of CEOs over the past few years, and there have supposedly been issues where the company hasn’t necessarily met the goals it sets out to do. The position itself is a great fit for me overall, but I’m really wary of this company’s future. As it is, I’ve been laid off twice within the past two years due to the economy and I’m very, very wary of possibly accepting a job with yet another unstable company. I do have a few other options in the pipeline (thankfully), but this position in particular is a really good fit. Is there a proper way to bring up my concerns in a second interview? I did get a good portion of my research from Glassdoor, so it should be taken with a grain of salt. Either way, there are enough red flags going up to make me question this position. Any advice on how to go about this?

Ask about it. Good employers know that good candidates have options and that as a result they’ll do some research and some critical thinking before accepting a position. It’s completely reasonable to say, “I read that you’ve had issues X and Y, and I wonder how the company is handling that internally, and what the future looks like in those areas.”

5. Company contacted my references before an interview, and now I haven’t heard anything

I am a recent grad and I applied to an entry-level job this July across the country. I’m willing to move — it’s almost expected in my field and I said as much in my cover letter. They asked for three references which I gladly gave. I got an email two weeks ago from my former supervisor with whom I have a great relationship — she told me they had called and she’d given me a glowing review. And then I heard absolutely nothing from them! They haven’t emailed or called about an interview or any type of follow-up. It’s now been two weeks since they called her and I’m starting to get somewhat anxious about it. Is it normal to call people’s references before contacting them or interviewing them?

The listing said they would contact appropriate candidates for the job, so I am worried that if I email them it might come across as pushy. Is there an appropriate way to follow up? I’m worried they’re put off by my being currently located on the east coast.

No, it’s not typical to contact people’s references before an interview. It’s a waste of time, since there’s no point in talking to references if it turns out in the interview that the candidate isn’t someone you want to hire. Most employers wait until afterwards. (Although academia might be an exception to this, as they often are.) However, two weeks in nothing when it comes to hiring. Many hiring processes take months.

However, since they’ve expressed interest by contacting your references, it wouldn’t be unreasonable to email them and ask about their timeline for next steps and reiterate your enthusiasm about moving to their location.

6. How to avoid over-sharing anxieties with people I manage

I’ve over-shared with my assistant in the past, and realized why telling the people who look to me for support that I’m troubled is unfair to them. I was manager of one department in an annual convention, so I worked with two assistants sporadically over several months, then intensively for a few day of the convention. I had untreated anxiety that was making me overexcited and causing me to second-guess a lot of things. Mid-convention, I confided some of my worries to one of my assistant managers. Once I’d done that, I was able to envision the new situation I may have created for her, so realized why it’s bad for supervisors to do this to their employees.

Despite my limited managing experience and the personal drama, I really like organizing and watching out for all the people above and below me. So if I get to manage people again, when and how is it ok to ask for critical feedback without causing them to worry about me? I don’t want to cross that line again.

You can certainly ask them for feedback without divulging your own anxieties. You just need to keep it about the work and not about your worries. For instance, you can ask what you could be doing differently/better as a manager and whether there are things they think could be done more effectively. You don’t want to ask them this all the time, of course, or it will come across as anxious — but periodically checking in on how things are going is good to do.

It’s also worth remembering that part of the role of a manager is to minimize drama, so you want to make sure that you’re not contributing to it or causing others to worry unnecessarily. Tell yourself that part of your role is to be a calming influence!

7. Applying for a position working with Irish students when I’m passionate about Ireland

I come to you today with a question for a cover letter I’m working on. Specifically, the position is an administrative coordinator that works with Irish students who come to the US on J-1 work visas. I’m attracted to this position for two reasons. First, it’s related to my field and career goals. The second draw is that I have a particular passion for Ireland. I’m of Irish descent, and in college, I took Irish Studies courses. I worked as a teaching assistant for one of these courses and also took a non-credit Irish language course. In my post-grad life, I play Gaelic football on a local team, where many of my teammates are Irish students here on J-1 visas.

Is there an appropriate way to frame this experience in a cover letter? I feel like it’s important to touch upon that I understand Irish culture, and already interact with students on these work visas, but I also don’t want it to come across as “fangirl-esque” (for lack of better term) and that I’m only interested interested in this position because it’s related to Ireland.

Yes, you should mention all of that! Don’t frame it in an “intense fan of Ireland” way, but rather as evidence that you have an interest in Ireland and an understanding of and appreciation for its culture.

if an interviewer invites me to contact them with any questions, does it look bad if I don’t?

A reader writes:

I landed an interview for an awesome job last week. I pretty much killed it (not to toot my own horn) and they called me within a few hours to ask me to come back next week and to ask what my salary range was. The phone call was a little awkward…mostly because the hiring manager asked me right off the bat if I “had any more questions or issues for her.” I wasn’t prepared to ask any more questions about the job, seeing as how they’d told me in the interview they wouldn’t be calling their final choices back until the following day. I told her I had no issues at the time, we discussed my salary expectations and she gave me a run down of what the second interview will entail. She ended the call with “if you have anymore questions this week, please feel free to email me.”

Well, now I feel obligated to think up some questions. Do you think it would be a good idea to touch base sometime this week about something? I don’t want to look like I’m not thinking about the position all week.

I sort of hate the expectation that you, as an applicant, will have endless questions for the hiring manager. I do have a lot of questions, it just seemed as though none of them were prudent for the quick phone call we were having (I’d like to save most of them for the second interview). And of course it seems too early to be asking about benefits, vacation time, etc. etc. I have a feeling I’m majorly over thinking this, but I figured I would ask expert advice.

Please don’t come up with questions just for the sake of asking questions, especially if you’re going to email them to her rather than waiting for the second interview.

People say things like “if you have any questions, feel free to email me” because that’s polite. Half of them aren’t even thinking through what they’re saying, and the other half mean that if you truly have a burning question that you really need answered before your next interview, it’s fine to email and ask. But no one — no one — who says this means, “Good candidates will have questions before their interview, so I expect to receive yours soon!” They’re assuming that the vast majority of what you’re wondering can wait for the interview, because it can.

So no, you are not obligated to think up some questions. Moreover, if you do that, it will likely backfire because those types of questions almost always result in a transparently insincere attempt to look thoughtful and interested by asking questions that obviously aren’t crucial ones and that will be annoying because you’d be asking her to spend her time writing out answers to questions that she can tell aren’t genuine.

Yes, you do want to have substantive, thoughtful questions for the interview. But you can save them for that meeting.

I need to fire an employee, but I’m afraid her family will become violent

A reader writes:

One of my direct reports has two sons who are affiliated with gangs. Both of them are going through the court systems now for weapons and drug charges. Even my employee’s mother is going through the court system for being under the influence of prescription drugs while driving, and she has had three incidents where she has pulled a gun on someone.

My issue is that this employee is not a good fit for our company. Her mother used to work here and hired her (15 years ago) and covered for her all those years. I really want to terminate her employment and bring on someone stronger, but I have two problems: (1) She is truly unemployable and overpaid and losing this job will translate into becoming homeless, and (2) because they’re involved with gangs, I’m afraid her sons or their friends will show up with guns blazing.

I do feel bad for her. She is always kind and tries so hard to be helpful, but I can’t assign anything to her and what she does do has to be double checked (even something as simple as making sure she stamped all the outgoing mail). I need to bring in someone who is useful to me, and the company has already declined my suggestion to simply make her a receptionist and bring in a fourth person; they are not willing to do that.

I think something as life-changing as losing her job could send her and her sons over the edge. They are 21 and 26 years old and neither one of them has ever had a job outside of drug dealing. They both live with her. So, all of them would be affected by her termination, and I fear for my safety if I terminate her. Her sons have lost several friends to gun violence and one was so severely injured that he no longer has the use of his arm. They aren’t just a couple of wannabe punk kids, they are knee deep into the gang culture.

Before I answer this, I want to note that I’m not going to address whether your fears of violence are warranted; I’m not in any way equipped to know if they are. But it’s worth remembering that even people in gangs deal with adversity in their families’ lives without turning to violence, and so your best bet is probably to proceed with caution but not terror.

Fortunately, the best way to avoid violence stemming from a firing is the same way that employers should manage all firings (but too often don’t): by treating the person with as much kindness and dignity as possible throughout the process. That’s always important, but it’s especially key in situations where you fear violence.

That means going through a process of progressive discipline, where you provide clear feedback about your concerns with her performance and what you need to see change, are explicit about potential consequences as you move through the process, and give clear warning before letting her go. And throughout this, you’re kind but firm, offering her a chance to improve, but not misleading her about what it will take to remain in her job.

So you don’t just jump into a “you’re fired” or even a “you might end up getting fired” conversation out of nowhere; if you haven’t already had serious feedback conversations with her about the problems, you start there. And then if you don’t see the improvement you need in a few weeks, then you talk again, this time with a more serious tone to the conversation. The idea is that you’re clear and direct, but the conversation gets progressively more serious if you don’t see improvement, eventually ending with a clear statement that you will need to replace her if she doesn’t meet the bar you’ve laid out in a certain amount of time. At each stage, you’re giving her the opportunity make the changes you’re asking for. If she doesn’t, you move to the next stage.

Additionally, each step foreshadows the next (“If this doesn’t get better, we’ll need to talk about a more formal plan”), so that she’s very clear about where she stands and isn’t surprised by negative consequences. Too many managers give lots of critical feedback to a struggling employee but never explicitly say that the person’s job is in jeopardy — and then the person ends up shocked and often angry when they’re ultimately fired. That’s unfair to the employee, who deserves to know the severity of the concerns and the potential consequences, and it’s far more likely to lead to bad feelings.

If you follow this process, when you have to do end up having to fire someone, the person will have been clearly told about the problems and what needs to change, warned that the progress isn’t what it needs to be, and explicitly told that her job is in jeopardy if specific changes don’t occur. So when the firing conversation happens, it’s more of a wrap-up than anything else; it shouldn’t be a surprise.

And I want to emphasize again: Throughout this process, you are kind and compassionate. You make it clear that you care about her as a person and want to see her succeed — but you’re also honest about what that will take.

You should also offer severance — several months worth if you can do it. Not because you’re paying her off, but because she’s worked for your company for 15 years and it’s the right thing to do.

Employees who are fired in this manner are far less likely to feel they were treated unfairly. They’re far less likely to leave angry or bitter, and you’re far less likely to be a target of any hostility.

In your case, that also means that her family is less likely to be outraged on her behalf. But that’s not guaranteed, of course, and so you should also take additional steps since you’re concerned: You should talk with your manager, as well as HR if you have an HR department and whoever deals with overall administration at your office if you don’t. You should be direct about your security concerns, and you should come up with a plan together — whether it’s having additional security present in the days after the firing or talking with an expert on workplace violence to get more targeted advice. (In fact, both those things might be a good idea, if you’re truly worried.)

Good luck. Please let us know how it goes.

Read an update to this letter here.

my friend lied to me about a job, rigid interview dates, and more

It’s seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. My friend applied for the job I wanted and lied when I asked her about it

I am planning a cross-country move to a city a good friend lives in. My good friend just happens to be unemployed and looking for jobs. I scheduled an interview with this awesome opportunity and shared the details with my friend. (It was for an assistant to a family, and I shared the family’s name and occupations days before my interview.) When the interview came, they asked the name of my friend in town and I told them, and their response was “Oh, we just met her!”

I thought the interview went well. I texted my friend the details and that they thought they knew her, and she replied, “I interviewed with them today and I didn’t realize it was the same position you have been talking about until my interview,” which I don’t believe. I said, “Oh well, I just wish you would have told me.”

The job was offered to her and she accepted. Now I am debating moving to this city as she is my only good friend there. I’m totally in love with the town and have other interviews set up. I feel conflicted/concerned as my friend and I would be roommates and she would be helping me out a lot since I’d be new to the town. How should I proceed? How would you feel? I don’t mind she applied at all, but going behind my back applying is the issue.

I can’t tell you whether you should move or not, or whether you should live with her if you do … but if you’re confident that she lied to you, this is a friend with major integrity issues who’s willing to lie to you if she thinks it’s to her advantage. Proceed with caution, at least.

(I can tell you though that if you’re sold on moving to that town for reasons that have nothing to do with your friend, there’s nothing to stop you from following through with your plan and simply not living with her. Years ago, during my extreme youth, I was supposed to move to Portland with a friend, who ended up getting a great job offer in another city at the last minute. I went ahead and moved anyway — on my own, to a city where I knew no one — and it was one of the best things I’ve ever done. So your plans don’t have to be linked to her, whatever you decide.)

2. What’s up with California labor law?

I always notice you making exceptions for the state of California when you talk about labor laws on your blog. Really interested in this but I don’t understand it at all. Is there any way you could explain the differences for outsiders to the US, and why they exist?

The way it works in the U.S., different states can set their own laws on all types of topics, including employment. They can’t pass laws that lessen any of the protections offered at the federal level, but they can pass laws that offer more protection. So you’ll sometimes see states have more employee protections than what is offered federally. California, in particular, does this quite a bit.

3. Mentioning my company’s financial issues in a cover letter

Currently, I’m an in-house attorney at a small subsidiary office of a large, multi-national corporation. We’re not doing very well business-wise, and our CEO (my direct manager) is talking paycuts for managers. I’m not paid very much, and I really can’t afford a paycut, so I’ve been looking for other jobs.

My title and responsibilities usually belong to someone with many more years of experience than I have (as in, I have 2 years, others usually have 7-9 with my title), but I’ve been able to overcome the steep learning curve and be pretty successful.

My niche industry is quite small and gossipy, and so I haven’t mentioned my company’s financial woes in my cover letter as reason for why I would want to leave my otherwise awesome-sounding job and company that apparently thinks I’m great. Instead, I’ve focused on how I’d like to do more client advocacy than what my position allows (and would ever allow) and move into a law firm setting. However, they seem like softball reasons to leave compared with “I may not get paid in Q4” (and there are other, managerial and political, reasons why I’ve been looking, but I’m making money the reason to not burn bridges). On the other hand, I’m not sure about the etiquette of saying “I’m looking for a different job because we can’t make payroll,” in a cover letter. I’m also applying for positions that don’t have anything to do with my industry, so I could mention the financial woes for those people.

Is it improper to mention the company’s financial issues in a cover letter as the reason why I’m looking away from an otherwise awesome-sounding job? Or can I come out and say that I’m looking for other jobs because we’re experiencing some major financial difficulty?

I actually don’t think you need to get into it in your cover letter at all. Someone may wonder why you’re thinking of leaving your awesome-sounding job, but if they want to know, they’ll just ask you in the initial interview — not reject you over it without talking to you. And once you’re talking in person (or over the phone), if you’re not comfortable revealing that your company is having financial issues, I think your other reasons (wanting to do more client advocacy work and in a different setting) are perfectly compelling.

4. What do interviewers mean when they ask about leadership?

What does “leadership” mean to employers? What are they looking for when they ask applicants to “describe one thing that demonstrates your leadership skills” or describe what leadership means?

I always get thrown by these questions, perhaps because it is not clear to me how “leadership” is different from “being a good employee.” My current understanding of workplace leadership comes down to:
– treating everyone they way you would like to be treated (with kindness, respect, and the benefit of the doubt),
– doing what you say you are going to do (aka being responsible in all matters),
– being consummately hard working and dedicated.

Is the point for employers to learn how the applicant defines leadership? Any guidance you have in this area would be greatly appreciated!

Leadership is a bit different than just being a good employee, because it’s about how you lead a group, not just about your own work habits. It’s about how you lead a group to get something done — so things like communicating a vision, motivating people, influencing people, ensuring your team performs effectively, and creating change.

However, it’s so broad a concept that interviewers who ask the questions you talked about are pretty much setting candidates up for confusion, just like you’re experiencing. Instead, they should ask about the specific trait they’re really interested in, like “tell me about a time when you had to motivate a group of people” or “tell me about a time when you brought a group to an agreement when there had previously been differences.”

5. Employer won’t offer me an alternate interview date

I recently applied for a job that I want so badly it hurts! I got shortlisted for an interview and was really pleased! However, the interview is on the day the I’m flying to my brother’s wedding on Italy, and I wouldn’t be able to do both. I asked to reschedule but was told they could only do interviews that day and I would be considered if the post reopened.

I’m so upset! I even asked if they could swap my time with another candidate so maybe I could make the interview and my plane. I have been told that under employment law, they have to offer an alternative date. Is this true?

No, that is not true. They can offer interviews only for 90 minutes in the middle of the night on Christmas Eve if they want to.

Go to your brother’s wedding and don’t agonize over this — first, because if they truly thought you were the best candidate, they’d probably try to be more flexible with you (at least letting you swap your time with another candidate, as you requested), and second, because at this stage you know next to nothing about what this job is really like and your “wanting it so badly it hurts” is based on what you imagine, not anything you know for sure. (Or even can know for sure at this stage — read this.)

6. Job-hunting as a military spouse who has to move all the time

I am a military spouse who has lived in 5 different states in a 6-year time frame. I was a chemistry professor before we started the major moves more recently. As this wasn’t a very portable job, I did a career change to a drug/alcohol counselor position by going back to school for more education. Now I run into a situation where my resume looks like a written “Where’s Waldo” game. I have job positions in different fields, in different parts of the country, for months at a time. Every one of my past managers has loved me working for them, and they are happy to provide references, but I feel I don’t get a lot of response from my resume because of my “shoddy” employment history.

I don’t like to start a conversation off with strangers that I am a military spouse because I know they are legally not suppose to ask this at interviews. I am not sure how to overcome this hurdle. I would love to have a stable career, but stability is not a possibility with my husband’s career! I have applied for lower level positions and I get the “you are too qualified for this position” speech because of my multiple advanced degrees. So I feel I am stuck between a rock and a hard place. I don’t know how to approach future employers with this situation.

You should explain that you’re a military spouse. Otherwise, you’ll just appear to be a job hopper who can’t or won’t keep a job for more than a few months. That looks much, much worse than simply explaining that you’ve moved so much because your husband is in the military. (And by the way, it’s not illegal for them to ask about that — and there’s certainly nothing wrong with you explaining it yourself.)

If you’re truly moving every few months, it’s true that it will be very hard to get many employers to invest in training you, only to have you leave. In that case, you’d want to look at other types of employment, like temping and contract jobs. Either way, though, this is one of the few scenarios where it would be worth having letters of recommendation from previous employers to offer; seeing previous managers rave about you and how it was worth having you even for only a short time will be useful here, because it will address some of employers fears right up-front, whereas otherwise it will be too easy for them to reject you without even talking with you.

7. How do I network with a new contact?

I am a graduate student who recently attended a convention for my field of study. While presenting a poster for my research team, I met a professional whose background and research interests are similar to mine. He gave me his contact information and seemed sincere in wanting me to keep in touch. Although I enjoy what I do and felt enthusiastic about making this contact, situations like this fill me with anxiety as I am pretty introverted and I don’t know how to network.

I thought it would be a good idea to send him an email with my info and thank him for his interest as an icebreaker. Beyond that, I’m kind of at a loss.

Go a little bit beyond just sending him your information. Tell him how glad you were to meet him and why — explain what it is about his background and interests that are similar to your own and why you’re excited about that. Ask if he’d mind if you bounce a question or two off of him occasionally — and then do that. Think of what you might ask a mentor type; that’s the kind of advice you want to ask him for. (But be alert to signs from him about how much he’s willing to give — don’t overwhelm him with a bunch of questions all at once, unless he clearly welcomes it. Also, read this.)

 

what to do if a coworker stops by your table during a job interview over lunch

A reader writes:

In one of your recent blog posts, there was a question involving day-long interviews — and the possibility of part the interview taking place over lunch.

In my current job, I often have vendors and sales reps take me to lunch in fairly close proximity to my office. It seems that quite often we will bump into someone I know who stops by the table to say hello. Generally, I feel completely comfortable introducing my dining partner, chatting for a few minutes, then excusing ourselves to return to our business lunch.

But, how would someone handle this situation if it happened during one of these interview lunches? You can’t give someone “the stink eye” from across the room to discourage them from approaching you. What kind of conversation or introduction do you give to an acquaintance — or even a coworker or boss — if you don’t want it to be known that this is an interview?

There are two different approaches you can use here, depending on who’s doing the interrupting.

If your table is approached by someone who doesn’t currently work with you and who you’re not worried will wonder if you’re on an interview, you can handle these interruptions close to how you currently do with your lunches with vendors and sales reps. Say hello and introduce them, but then quickly signal that you need to get back to your conversation, by saying something like, “It was great seeing you! Enjoy your lunch here.” People will understand that you’re in the middle of a business meeting and need to return to it — but if the occasional odd person doesn’t, then you can say more directly, “We’re having a working lunch, but I’d love to catch up later.”

However, if the person approaching you is a current coworker — or god forbid, boss — then I’d add one modification to the above: When you introduce the person to your interviewer, be specific about the relationship — e.g., “Jane, this is my manager at Los Pollos Hermanos, Gus Fring.”* Your interviewer is going to understand the situation and will be able to help you be discreet, if needed. Even here, however, you should be able to use the tactics above to quickly wrap up the drop-in and get back to your conversation … but it will be useful to have your interviewer understand the situation, since it will instantly provide context if you seem rattled.

Of course, even once the person walks away, you might be worried about what they might overhear from another table, and so it’s also useful for your interviewer to hear what the relationship is, so that they realize that they shouldn’t ask you questions within the person’s earshot like “why are you thinking about leaving your current job?” and others that make it obvious what kind of meeting this is. (Of course, this all assumes a minimum amount of intelligence and judgment on the part of your interviewer, but most people are going to get it.)

Fortunately, lunch interviews are generally more for getting to know each other better rather than hard-hitting interview questions, so even if your manager ends up overhearing some of your conversation, it will ideally sound like a networking lunch or other catch-up rather than a job interview.

I’m sure that someone somewhere has a nightmare story about this scenario (and I would like to hear it if so!), but in general, you should be able to recover pretty well by doing what’s outlined above. And you’ll look calm under pressure and reasonably socially adept as well, which is a plus.

* Don’t try this if your manager is really Gus Fring though. He will have you killed.

8 things you must stop today in your job search

Every job searcher faces different challenges, but hiring managers see some of the same mistakes over and over again. Chances are good that if you’re looking for a job, you’re making some of these errors – and can have an easier search if you resolve to change your ways.

Here are eight job search missteps to put an end to today.

1. Trying to read into every word or action from your interviewer. Because job searching can be so stressful, many job seekers try to find clues about their chances in everything an employer says and does. This leads to frustrating and generally fruitless attempts to parse every word from an interviewer – “Was she signaling I didn’t get the job when she said they had more candidates to interview?”“Is it a good sign that he shook my hand and said he’d be in touch?” More often than not, these “signals” don’t mean anything at all, and just drive candidates crazy trying to read between the lines.

2. Stressing out over elements of your job applications that really don’t matter. Employers really don’t care whether you spend time tracking down the hiring manager’s name or just address your cover letter to “dear hiring manager,” so don’t put time into that. Similarly, most hiring managers really don’t care what your resume design looks like as long as it’s organized and easy to skim, or whether your post-interview thank-you note is handwritten or emailed. Don’t sweat the little stuff; put your energy into showing your qualifications and why you’d excel at the job.

3. Scrimping on the cover letter. If you’re applying for jobs without including a compelling cover letter, one that’s customized to this specific job, you’re missing out on one of the most effective ways to get a hiring manager’s attention. A cover letter is your opportunity to make a compelling case for yourself as a candidate, totally aside from what’s in your resume. You’re doing yourself a disservice if you don’t write one tailored to each job you apply for.

4. Thinking that you have the job before you have an offer. Too often, candidates see good signs from an employer and think it means that they’re going to be getting an offer – only to be crushed when the offer never comes. And not only does this regularly lead to disappointment, it can also lead you to make bad decisions for yourself – like not continuing to apply for other jobs or even turning down interviews, because you think your search is over. Never assume that you’re getting the job until you have a formal offer.

5. Not explaining why you’d excel at the job. If you’re simply submitting a resume that runs down where you’ve worked and what your job duties were, it’s no wonder if you’re not getting interviews. Hiring managers aren’t nearly as concerned about what jobs you’ve held as they are about what you accomplished in those jobs. Your resume needs to list specific accomplishments (like “increased Web traffic by 25 percent over 12 months” or “regularly recognized for highest number of customer compliments”), and your cover letter needs to explicitly address how your track record shows that you’d excel if hired.

6. Taking advice from people with no experience hiring. There’s tons of advice on job searching out there – from your friends, your relatives, and plenty of self-styled experts on the Internet – much of it contradictory. Before you take any job searching advice, think critically about the source. Is it someone with significant experience hiring people? And recent experience, at that? If not, that advice might not be worth much.

7. Taking it personally. It’s easy to become personally invested in a job you think you really want and then be devastated when you end up not getting it. Many job seekers start to question what’s wrong with them and what they were lacking – but most of the time, these decisions aren’t personal at all. Often candidates get rejected not because they weren’t well qualified but because someone else was simply a better fit. When there’s one open slot and multiple qualified candidates, lots of great people will be getting rejected. You can’t take it personally.

8. Forgetting to evaluate potential employers just as much as they’re evaluating you. In the anxiety of an interview, it can be easy to focus only on whether you’re impressing your interviewer, but it’s crucial to remember that you should be thinking about whether you even want the job. The interview process isn’t one-way; you should be using the time to think about whether you’re the right fit for the work, the manager, and the workplace culture. Otherwise, you can end up in job where you don’t excel or aren’t happy. So interview that employer right back before you make any decisions.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

when an interviewer asks, “If I offered you the job, would you say yes?”

A reader writes:

I had a job interview yesterday. It was a panel interview of 3 potential colleagues and the supervisor. When I arrived, the office manager welcomed me and handed me a list of questions that would be asked in the interview and gave me 5 minutes to look over them and prepare a little bit.

The interview went well and we were winding down and chatting about the answers to the questions I had for them. The supervisor was about to stand up and usher me out when he said, “Oh, and the question I like to ask every candidate — If I offered you the job, would you say yes?'”

I was taken aback because A) I thought the interview was over and B) I’d never been asked that before. I quickly said, “Oh, yes!” I don’t remember his reaction because I was so flustered.

As I was walking away, I couldn’t help but think that the question was more of a “test” and I should have answered differently. Maybe I should have asked more questions. Why would he ask at all because wouldn’t most people say yes? What do you think? Do hiring managers often ask this question?

I’ll tell you who sometimes asks this question:

Interviewers who don’t understand that candidates are no more obligated to answer that question on the spot than interviewers are obligated to tell you on the spot whether you got the job.

Interviewers who don’t consider that whether or not you’d accept the job is going to depend on what salary is offered and other aspects of the job offer.

Interviewers who don’t consider that perhaps you, like them, might like to go away and think on such a major decision for a while rather than deciding right now, this very second. And who don’t understand that that’s a good thing, and they should want to hire people who don’t make major decisions lightly.

Now, some interviewers who ask this lame question really mean, “How interested in this job are you?” — as opposed to, “Would you definitely accept?” They’re trying to get a sense of whether the position is what you’re looking for and how enthusiastic you are.

And that’s the question that you should answer, regardless of the bad wording. So in the future, if someone asks you this, you should feel free to say, “I’m very interested.” If they press you for a more specific answer, (a) they are an ass, and (b) you can say, “I’m extremely interested, although with any job I’d of course want to look over the offer.”