I work with my boyfriend, I’m allergic to my office, and more

It’s seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Managing a low-performer who keeps improving every time she’s warned, but then slips again

I have someone on my team who I hired a few years ago. I have struggled since she was hired with getting her to pull her weight. Most of the rest of the team give her the easy part of projects so that the project gets done and that hopefully she won’t mess it up. Every six months or so, she makes a mistake that is big enough that we have to do a written warning and performance improvement plan (PIP). We set out criteria for improvement, we set a deadline and she improves (and saves her job in the process). Then a few more months go by and she starts to slip up again and the process starts over (since she successfully completed the performance improvement plan we have to start the verbal warning, written warning with a PIP, final written warning cycle again).

I don’t know that this person has the ability to be successful at this job. How do I break the cycle of PIPs and either get her performance up permanently or where I can let her go? My boss is pressuring me to just fire her already, but she keeps meeting the terms of her PIP so I can’t fire her.

You’re locking yourself into overly specific terms in the PIPs, it sounds like — or in your own head. Instead, you need to be clear that she needs to not only meet the terms of the PIP during the timeline while she’s on it, but she needs to sustain that new level of performance going forward even once the PIP ends. Make it clear — both in your meeting with her and in the written plan — that if her performance slips back once the PIP is over, you won’t be starting with a new one from square one, but rather will need to let her go at that point. Use language like, “I need to see this level of performance sustained over the long-run, and if the problems recur, we will not go through this process all over again.”

And I agree with your boss that it sounds like you need to just fire her at this point. If you’re bound to policies that require you to do yet another PIP (although you shouldn’t be, in a good organization), then do it now and make it a short one — like one month, not three months.

2. Talking to coworkers about my boyfriend, who works with me

My boyfriend and I work in the same department. This is not an issue; everyone knows (we were a couple before we started working together) and we manage it professionally well.

However, my boyfriend is having conflicts with a colleague of his. As the department staff tends to be quite friendly with each other, it is normal for people to ask about the significant other of a colleague. The issue is that his colleague sometimes asks me where he is at a certain time and although I know where he is, in my professional capacity I do not, so I dont really want to tell them and I think they should try to email him to find out where he is or what his work schedule is for the day.

Also, my boyfriend is looking to find another job elsewhere. I am sure that if he does move on his colleagues will try to ask me “what is he now doing?” or “where is he now working?”, etc. I dont want to answer their questions (as they are just being nosy jerks) but I dont know how to say it without sounding rude. I practically want to say “that’s none of your business” but I know that saying this will then ruin my relationship with his colleagues. How do I do this?

Well, first, don’t make your boyfriend’s conflicts with a colleague your own conflicts. You should have your own separate relationships with people and not take on his battles for him. That said, it’s perfectly reasonable to respond to questions about where he is today exactly the same way you’d respond if they were asking about any other coworker — “I’m not sure” or whatever. At work, you’re his coworker, not his keeper.

As for how to answer questions about him once he leaves, you’re going to really sour your own relationships there if you refuse to answer harmless questions about how he’s doing or where he’s working. You’ll be far better off giving quick answers and moving on than taking an adversarial approach with people.

3. Applying for a job at a science museum when I just graduated from a university that teaches very literal creationism

I’m a job-hunting recent grad, and I’m applying for jobs all over the place. One of the more interesting openings I’ve seen is at a science museum working as an educator. I’m a communications major, not a scientist, but I think I’d do well at the job and I’m hoping I’ll get an interview.

The problem comes from my educational background. I’m a graduate of a decently-sized Christian university that puts heavy emphasis on a literal 6-day creation week. These are the sorts of folks who believe that the earth is no more than 8,000 years old, that fossils are the result of a catastrophic world-wide flood, and that evolution only happened on a small scale — like wolves and dogs, but no further than that. The fact that all their professors agree to teach this is a big selling point for the school, and it’s advertised quite prominently. Anyone who googles my university will realize this within about three minutes. My high school and elementary school (the application asked for those as well) are much the same.

For the record, I went to this school because my parents agreed to pay for a significant portion of my tuition — which was a big sacrifice for them and a great help to me. The school is fully accredited, and I felt like I got a good education, but it had the opposite result that my parents intended — I came out pretty turned-off to an exclusively literal belief in creationism. I now believe that evolution can be compatible with faith, and at the very least students should be exposed to an accurate, respectful explanation of both sides of the issue (something I didn’t receive growing up).

Do you think this is something anyone will even notice or care about? If so, how should I go about addressing this? I understand that my religious beliefs are protected by law, but I also suppose that the museum is interested in hiring people who agree with the science they teach. Ultimately, I hold different religious beliefs than my educational background would lead someone to assume, and I don’t want to be discriminated against because of them.

Yes, many people will notice and care, so you’ll likely need to address it head-on in your cover letter and possibly be prepared to talk about it in an interview too. But even then, having graduated from a school that requires its professors to teach things that are fundamentally at odds with the mainstream scientific community is going to be a fairly significant obstacle for you in applying for work at a science museum, especially as a recent grad without lots of secular work experience to balance it out.

4. Will having an out-of-state phone number hurt you when applying for jobs?

I currently have an out-of-state phone number from Pennsylvania, and I was laid off from my job a year ago and I had no choice to move back to Georgia with my family until I can get back on my feet.

I have been searching for a job since day one when I got here and it has been a year of extensive searching, even to other counties around me. The only thing I was able to find is a temp agency job that I was only able to work on and off, along with the frustration of not finding something steady.

Which now brings me to my question. With the hundreds, possibly thousands of applications I filled out, could having an out-of-state phone number possibly be affecting someone seeking employment?

Eh, these days people are pretty used to seeing cell phone numbers with area codes from all over the place. I wouldn’t worry too much about it as long as you have a local address on your resume. I would, however, take a fresh look at your resume and cover letters to see if those are the issue — because when someone isn’t getting interviews after hundreds or thousands of applications, it’s usually those two things that are to blame. Read this and see if you spot yourself here.

5. Explaining that I’m leaving a new job due to salary cuts

I’ve been at a new job for about four months. It deals with X and Y, but is heavily focused on X. I’ve discovered that I really prefer working with Y and honestly hate X (and think I’m bad at it). I know it will look bad to have been here only a few months if I apply for a new job. However, my company also just announced salary cuts due to budget issues. I feel like this gives me an out — does it? And if so, how do I mention this in a cover letter as to why I’m looking so soon?

Salary cuts? Hell yes, that’s an out. You agreed to take the job for a certain salary, and now that’s been changed on you.

It’s tricky talking about this in a cover letter — since a cover letter should really be about you and why you’d excel at the job you’re applying for and not problems at your current employer. In fact, you might even consider leaving this job off your resume altogether, particularly since four months isn’t long enough to have any real accomplishments there anyway, and that way you won’t have to deal with the instant red-flag of why you’re looking again so quickly. But if you decide not to do that, your best bet is probably to say something like “My new company is undergoing significant budget cuts, so I’m looking for something more stable.”

6. Should I really give my manager feedback when he asks for it?

Typically during my annual performance evaluation, my supervisor asks me how I think he is doing as a supervisor. In past years, I have always been positive. This year, however, there have been some issues that have cropped up, mostly involving micromanaging and his apparent desire for his employees to be “yes” (wo)men. Anyway, my performance evaluation is coming up, and how am I supposed to answer his question this year? Do I just tell him I think everything is going fine? Is it ever worth it to come up with constructive criticism? Or, perhaps I could ask him why he is asking me about his performance?

Don’t ask him why he’s asking you — he’s asking for feedback because that’s what thoughtful managers do. If you have a good relationship with him and he’s generally proved himself to be open to dissent, then yes, talk to him about your concerns. Just frame it a little more diplomatically — instead of talking about micromanaging, talk about the specific ways that you’d like more autonomy and propose strategies for making that work while still keeping him in the loop. And instead of saying he seems to want yes-men, explain what’s given you that impression.

Of course, if he truly only wants yes-men, that might be a flag that he won’t be open to hearing any of this — so, as is always the case, you should use your judgment based on what you know about him from working with him — to figure out if he’s reasonable enough to discuss this without penalizing you for it later. Good managers will be, bad ones often won’t be.

7. Am I allergic to my office?

I work in an office (no place industrial) and have been having severe reactions the past few months. It started out as tiny hives that would come and go, but the past few weeks the hives turned into huge itchy, stinging, red welts over 90% of my body. It was so bad I had to go home from work several times.

I had no idea what it might be, so I went to my doctor and had allergy testing done. I am moderately allergic to a couple types of dust, but not enough to cause a reaction like this. The doctor has said that in many cases, people never find out what they’re allergic to, because they can only test for certain known, common allergens and there’s a million things (limitless, really) that one could be allergic to. I was given some strong allergy medication which has really helped, but what I’m noticing is I only get flare ups when I’m at work. On days off, I rarely flare up at all. I’ve tried dusting my office area but I’m starting to wonder if it may be a cleaner or chemical housekeeping is using. I haven’t started using or eating anything new. I’m trying eliminating certain foods and soaps/lotions one by one to see if any of them are the cause. I can’t think of anything else.

What can I do about this? I can’t keep taking days off just because I’m flaring up. I’m going crazy with itchy, unsightly hives, which make it uncomfortable/embarrassing to work with my colleagues or customers. I work in a large building and I can’t really ask the cleaners to switch to a different cleaner (if that’s even what it is). Our office area carpets are rarely washed or vacuumed, so I’m going to ask about that, but otherwise I’m stumped.

Ugh, that’s awful. I’m throwing this one out to readers, who may have ideas for you.

my office will not stop freaking out that I take the bus to work

A reader writes:

I’m writing because I have an issue that I haven’t seen addressed on your site before, and it’s giving me a lot of trouble. Recently, I started a new job (a promotion at my current company). During the interview, they asked about driving for an optional part of the job, and I was forced to mention I didn’t have a license. Ultimately, it didn’t turn out to be a problem, but it alerted them to the fact that I don’t drive. Because of this, and incidental talk about my commute, my new office is now aware that I take the bus to and from work.

This seems to really bother them. They’re constantly commenting on the type of people who ride the bus (which is really insulting to me), the area we work in, and how they can’t believe it, and continually offering me rides. My boss constantly worries about whether or not x or y start times or commutes will be “too long” or “too early” because I take the bus. She tries to reschedule things, even when I tell her it won’t be a problem and not to worry about it. When a coworker overheard me refusing a ride by telling them that the bus was perfectly safe and I had had no problems, she interjected and asked if I had had much experience with the bus in a disbelieving tone. She’s tried to come up with ways I can “make people not sit with me” on the bus.

Every time we close up, someone brings it up and I have to refuse a ride home and then listen to 3 people worry and reiterate the offers. I just want to be treated like everyone else. I can make sure I can get to work on time, and I can get myself home. I’ve been taking the bus to work for 2 years now, and I’ve been late once. I’ve never had any problems with the bus, ever. It’s not dangerous, it’s not particularly hard for me, and it’s not unreliable.

However, they seem to be obsessed with telling me how dangerous or unreliable or inconvenient it is. They just will not let it drop. I’ve tried telling them that it’s not an issue. I’ve tried politely refusing the rides. I’ve tried to avoid the subject. Nothing works. It keeps getting brought up, and people keep making it an issue when it isn’t. It would be one thing if riding the bus had ever interfered in my work in any way, but it hasn’t. Our company even promotes bus riding by offering a 50% subsidy and brags about its integration with the community and reducing pollution.

Part of this is, I’m sure, that everyone who lives in this area and takes the bus is a minority. Without fail, all of the staff who obsess about me taking the bus are white. Part of it is that they’re higher income, and this is a low income (although not particularly rough) area. I’m also white, and very petite and young looking, so I think there is some mother instinct going on. I’d just like to get through a closing shift without listening to my coworkers needlessly concern themselves with my transportation.

How can I get them to stop?

At a minimum, that’s both weird and annoying, and it might be racist too, so I can see why you’re frustrated.

It sounds like you’ve tried nearly everything anyone could recommend to get them to stop — but not everything. You’ve told them it’s not an issue for you, you’ve politely refused the rides, and you’ve tried avoiding the subject. But what I don’t see on your list of things you’ve tried is telling them directly to stop. And it’s time for that, if indeed you want this to stop.

So the next time it comes up, clearly tell them to cut it out. You don’t have to be rude about it, but you should be direct. Say something like this: “I appreciate your concern, but actually I would prefer it if we could stop commenting on my taking the bus. You probably don’t realize this, but I hear opinions about my riding the bus from nearly everyone in the office, multiple times a week. I would really appreciate if it we could stop discussing it.”

Say that once to each person who brings it up. Then, if any of them bring it up after that, simply say, “I’d rather not continue to discuss my taking the bus. Thanks for understanding.”

(Frankly, if you’re pretty confident that’s there’s a race element here, you could also say, “Does your concern have anything to do with the fact that I’m white and most people on the bus aren’t?” I’m betting you’re going to get a lot fewer comments after that.)

One exception to this: You shouldn’t lecture people when they’re offering rides. They’re offering you a favor, and you should answer that with a simple “no, thank you.” If they continue to persist, you can say it more forcefully. But I wouldn’t lump the ride offers in with all the above (even if it has the same motivation), because you’ll look unfriendly and ungracious to people who genuinely may be just trying to save you from some inconvenience. You can, however, smile and say nicely, “I’m really fine. But thank you.”

Also … have a separate conversation with your boss, since she’s fretting about various start times and rescheduling things for you. Say something like this to her: “Jane, I really appreciate how considerate you are about whether my commute will interfere with start times for things. But I wonder if you’d be willing to trust that I’ll be here when I need to and to proactively tell you if I ever foresee an issue. I know you don’t intend it this way, but all the concern over me taking the bus is making me feel different from the rest of the staff, and I’d be grateful if you’d be willing to put my commute out of your mind and just rely on me to be here when you need me!”

If she responds to that by expressing concern about the bus again, then directly ask her to stop, using the language above for your coworkers (“You probably don’t realize this, but I hear opinions about my riding the bus from nearly everyone in the office, multiple times a week. I would really appreciate if it we could stop discussing it”).

At that point, you’ll have done everything you reasonably can. If the comments continue anyway, then your office will have proved itself (a) impervious to all reasonable efforts to change it, and (b) remarkably hung up on something they should let go. And at that point the solution is going to have to be about you tuning it out, rather than convincing them to behave differently.

how to handle angry emails from a coworker when you’re at fault

A reader writes:

Last week, my coworker (who is senior to me but not my boss) asked me to help format some documents. I did so, but apparently made a mistake in the formatting which required my coworker to then go back and re-do my work.

I didn’t know about my mistake until I received an angry (think all-caps, “this was a simple request,” etc.) email from my coworker yesterday. Realizing my mistake and feeling genuinely mortified that he had to go back and re-do my work, I apologized and assured him that I would take certain steps in the future to make sure I didn’t repeat the error.

Later that day, I received another email from my coworker that said: “In the future, let’s stick to a simple philosophy – if you do something, do it right the first time. Aim for anything you do to be the final version.” I completely understand his frustration about having to redo my work, but given that I’ve had some particularly horrible (as in depression/anxiety/PTSD-inducing) work experiences in the past (in previous jobs, not this one), his response has thrown me a little.

Until he sent me these two emails, I was under the impression that he was happy with my work, having received nothing but positive feedback so far (I’ve only been here a few months so haven’t had any official performance reviews, but I have no reason to believe either he or my boss have been unhappy with my performance until now). That said, these emails make me worry that he possibly has had other issues with my work. I realize that the best course of action is probably to just talk to him about it, but this experience has triggered some anxiety and I’m having a hard time figuring out what to say. How do you think I should handle this? Talk to him (and if so, what do I say)? Or let it go?

Well, the first thing to know here is that your coworker sounds like a jerk. Sending someone an all-caps “THIS WAS A SIMPLE REQUEST” email is overkill and inappropriately aggressive. Following up later with a second email chastising you is way over the top. (Not to mention, his whole “let’s stick to a simple philosophy” thing is really condescending.)

You’re assuming that his over-the-top response indicates that he’s had other problems with your work. But I wouldn’t assume that at all — I’d take this as a signal that something is wrong with him, not with your work. Because reasonable people don’t talk to each other this way. If a reasonable person had been having issues with your work and felt this was the last straw, they would have approached it much more constructively — as in, “Jane, I’ve been having to make a lot of corrections to your work. Can you be more careful about doing ___ in the future?”

(They also would have talked to you in person rather than firing off angry emails, frankly.)

So I suspect you’re simply dealing with the office jerk. You’ve only been there a few months, so that would explain why you’re blaming yourself rather than him, but I’d bet money that he’s talked to other people this way too.

In any case, as for what to do about it, I think it’s fine to just let it go and move on to if you’d prefer to do that. But if you’d get more peace of mind by talking to him, then say something like this: “Bob, I know you were upset with the formatting mistake I made the other day. I’ll be more careful in the future to make sure it’s correct before I send it to you. However, your emails made me concerned that you might have had other concerns about my work too, and if you do, I’d really like to hear your feedback so that I know what I need to do differently.”

This will accomplish two things: First, it will get you additional feedback it there really have been other issues. Second, it will show him that you’re someone who will calmly and assertively ask what’s up when he’s rude to you, rather than just taking it (and if he’s not utterly unredeemable, might subtly shame him too).

But I’d bet money that the issue here is him, not you.

interviewers behaving badly — the world’s 8 worst job interviewers

I recently asked readers to tell us about the weirdest and worst job interviewers they’ve ever encountered. Here are eight of my favorites.

1. It’s not a real fire

“I was in an interview once and in the middle of speaking, the lead person on the interview panel suddenly yelled ‘FIRE!’ and the entire panel got up and started running around the room like crazy people. I promptly got my phone out and dialed 911.

They stopped dead in their tracks when I was on the phone to 911 and got upset because it wasn’t a real fire. They were just trying to see what my reaction was to emergency situations (which was not part of the job by any stretch of the imagination), and their policy was to get people out of the building first. I explained they did a really poor job of following their own policy and that they could explain to law enforcement, who should be there shortly, why they decided to do what they did. Then I left.”

2. HR gone horribly awry

“Here are a few choice quotes from my interview with the HR director for a company:

‘Our workforce is mainly male, which I like, because women take more leave and use more FMLA to care for children. Women are the caretakers and they should be.’

‘I want this position to be female though, because I have to talk to women and I’m not a woman. Also minorities.’

‘A French company owns us, but they let us do our own thing. We don’t have many French in this location. Our CFO is here and he’s a French, but he’s okay.’

I can’t help but wonder if this was all a test to see what I’d do, though, because I never heard anything back from them. Maybe they wanted me to point out how awful he sounded?”

3. Asked to reprimand the interview team

“I had a nightmare interview experience with Fancy Consulting Firm, Inc. First, they flew me across the country for an 8-hour day of interviews. Six of the eight hours of interviews were on Skype with a team in a different city, much closer to my home.

Second, I showed up in a suit (of course – it’s an interview at Fancy Consulting Firm). Everyone in the office was wearing jeans. They teased me for wearing a suit. When the interviewer asked me about my impressions of their office culture (remember, he was on Skype), I mentioned that they were ‘more casual than I expected.’ He became very upset and said, ‘They’re not supposed to be wearing jeans in the office!’ and asked me to call the office manager in to reprimand everyone.

Third, there was an earthquake in the middle of the interview, and everyone in the office ran up and down the halls screaming.

I do not currently work for Fancy Consulting Firm, Inc. I was never so happy to get out of an interview in my life.”

4. Stranded in a strange city

“In grad school, a certain state university invited me for an interview. I confirmed the date with the professor inviting me, and I was told that since it was a long trip (about six hours of driving), I could just drop by the secretary’s desk and she would hunt him down, and then he would show me my hotel room, etc.

When I got there, the professor was away at a conference, the secretary had no idea I was coming, and I had no place to stay.”

5. Topless interviewing

For a position in a private school that served toddlers through sixth grade, I was interviewed by two people, one of whom had her toddler with her, just playing quietly in the background. About halfway through, the toddler wandered over, and the interviewer whipped her shirt completely off, tossing it on the floor. She wasn’t wearing a bra, so it made it that much easier for her to start breastfeeding the toddler. After she was done, she let the child toddle back to the toys and continued asking questions, topless.

We finished the interview with me trying to keep my eyes above shoulder level and I was very relieved to get a ‘thanks, but no thanks’ from them.”

6. Looking for a mover

“One interview seemed to be going very well until the last few minutes, when the hiring manager asked me what kind of car I drove. I answered honestly (‘a Honda Civic’) and she made a face. She then asked me when I would be able to start (‘2 weeks from the time of offer,’ since I was currently employed), and again she made a disappointed face.

She thanked me for my time, but said the company was moving to a new office Monday so it wasn’t going to work out. When I appeared confused, she explained that she was really looking for someone who could start on Monday (it was a Friday afternoon, and she knew I was currently employed!) and had a large vehicle so they could save money on movers and moving trucks.”

7. “You need a makeover”

“At one interview, the woman interviewing me said my ‘look was outdated,’ gave me her husband’s business card (he was a hair stylist) and suggested I contact him about getting my hair cut/styled, then went on about how handsome he is.”

8. Interviewer on the attack

“The worst interview I had was when I applied to a medical device startup for a design engineer position. Everything was great until the VP interviewed me. She:

  • Walked on her treadmill for most of it, while watching TV.
  • Answered the phone twice.
  • Saw a friend outside and went out to chat for a few minutes.
  • Asked my high school and insulted me for going to ‘that farm school.’
  • Asked if I knew her company’s process. I guessed. ‘You’re wrong, but I can’t tell you because it’s proprietary. But you should know it.’
  • Ridiculed my undergrad college: ‘I’d like you a lot more if you went to MIT like me, instead of some party school.’ (The closest things to parties my undergrad had were the art students’ galleries.)
  • Recommended I drop out of my project management program: ‘You won’t be able to use that here.’
  • Told me, ‘Go work at McDonald’s or someplace easy for a few years, then re-apply. Your work gap is inexcusable.’ Mind you, I had five years of experience in engineering, and the gap was for extensive disease-related hand surgeries. When I explained this to her, she responded, ‘Obviously nature thinks you’re weak, so why would we want you?’

At that point, I walked out, thanked the secretary at the front desk, and went home to continue the job hunt. Perhaps ironically, a few years later, I ended up being the project manager for the construction company that demolished their building.”

 

paying for lunch for my famous boss, requiring an employee to get a hearing aid, and more

It’s seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Should I pay for lunch with my famous boss?

My new boss is a famous sports figure (Olympics, NBA, etc.). I feel as if people are always expecting him to do things for them — sign an autograph, pay for things, etc. I feel bad. He invited me out for our first lunch together next month (we have to schedule weeks in advance) and I would like to pay. I think it’s a humanitarian thing to do, but I don’t know if this is bad etiquette or if he’d be offended.

That’s a kind thought, but managers pay when they take employees to lunch, not the other way around. He almost certainly won’t let you pay because he’s your boss, and it has the potential to create an awkward moment. Be gracious and let him act like every other boss by picking up the bill — and show your appreciation for him by not treating him as a celebrity but rather as a normal person, which is going to be worth a lot more to him than a $50 lunch tab.

2. How should I make amends after behaving badly at work?

My father helped me get a job at a company that’s owned by people that he’s known for ages. In fact, my direct supervisor is one of his good friends. The culture at the company is pretty dysfunctional. Employees are afraid to openly disagree with leadership, don’t bring up difficult subjects, and behave passive-aggressively when they’re unhappy with something. As a result, the company is struggling financially.

I have had a really hard time there. I was bullied and suffered from serious depression after turning that negative energy inward. That said, I’m not blameless. I didn’t talk to my supervisor or HR about the bullying or the depression and during the worst of it I basically shut down and stopped doing my job. I called in sick a lot and let projects slip through the cracks while I surfed the Internet. I was only able to skate by because of the dysfunction and because the owners of the company like my father. I’m doing better and am doing my job now, but I’ve trashed my credibility and reputation.

I feel guilty for taking advantage of the situation for as long as I did. I like a lot of the people there and want to make amends, but I really don’t know how. The company’s planning to lay people off soon and I’m pretty sure my name is on the list. I get it and am as good with it as anyone facing unemployment can be. There isn’t much time left. My job isn’t salvageable. I just want to let my boss and other folks know I’m sorry. What would you recommend?

I’d actually talk to your father about this, since he knows the people who run the company and will be able to give you advice that’s specific to them. But in general, there’s no reason you can’t talk to your boss and say, essentially, “I know I haven’t performed well here and I’ve let you down. I feel terrible about it. I appreciate you bearing with me, it means a lot to me that you did, and I want you to know that it didn’t go unnoticed.”

But I’d apologize to your dad too. His reputation was probably impacted a bit by this as well.

3. Can an employer require you to get a hearing aid?

Can an employer make (or even suggest) someone get a hearing aid? Recently, a director has requested that a certain employee be asked to get a hearing aid because she has a bad ear. Mind you, she isn’t deaf; she can still communicate fine and talk on the phone. The only reason the director is insisting on this is because it’s an inconvenience to him. He doesn’t like that sometimes you need to repeat something or get her attention first before you say something. Clearly something that can be accommodated easily for. The kicker is, our insurance won’t even cover the hearing aid process, so this would be all out of pocket for this low paid employee. I’m quite floored by this request and feel we have some ADA issues going on here.

Wow. Someone needs to educate that director and tell him to lay off.

The ADA seriously restricts the circumstances when an employer can ask about an employee’s medical condition or require a medical examination (or medical equipment, like a hearing aid). If an employer has a reasonable belief that an employee’s medical condition is the cause of performance problems or may pose a direct threat to the employee or others, you can ask questions about the impairment or require a medical examination — neither of which seems to be the case here. Tell that director that the company expects him to deal with hearing-impaired employees sensitively and that if he has to get her attention before speaking, so be it.

4. Is it odd for candidates to send hiring-related emails in the middle of the night?

I just came across your post asking how applicants perceive job-related emails at night or over the weekend, and I was wondering what your thoughts are if the roles are reversed.

When I was working straight night-shift, I once sent a follow-up email to a hiring manager at 1:30 am. In the interview, it was mentioned that the supervisor had commented on the odd time for the email, but the manager knew I worked nights and clarified that. It didn’t hurt me (I got the awesome job just days after my oddly-timed correspondence), but you’ve now got me wondering how hiring managers perceive emails at off hours. Also, for those still working weird shifts, would there be an appropriate way to mention that an email sent during usual business hours is actually being sent during an applicant’s off-the-clock hours?

I wouldn’t worry about it all. When it comes to submitting applications, almost no one is paying attention to the time they were submitted. It’s more obvious with actual emails that you’re sending to an actual person, but even then, most people aren’t going to read much into it. Any reasonable person will figure that you might be a night owl, or up for some other reason. And yes, there are unreasonable hiring managers out there, but it’s hard for me to imagine that you’d want to work for someone so oddly judgmental that they’d be aghast that you emailed at a late hour. (Plus, if you get late enough, it circles around into early, and then you just look like some incredibly industrious person who wakes up early.)

That said, if you’re concerned about it, there’s nothing wrong with saying, “Excuse the odd time on this email; I currently work the night shift / am a night owl / get a lot of work done at night” or whatever.

5. My recruiter asked me for all the upper level management contacts at my new job

Back in 2000, I landed a permanent job at a tech firm through an external recruiter. About two or three weeks into my new gig, she emailed me at my company address, asking for the names and contact information of the CEO and all upper management! I sent a reply asking why she needed the info since she presumably was already in contact with the HR manager, and she sent a really snippy answer. I forwarded the whole convo to my manager and never heard anything else about it. I was wondering if you or your readers had heard of recruiters thinking it was OK to get new hires to divulge personal information like that.

Yep, some recruiters will do that to try to mine for new contacts who they can then reach out to. It’s definitely not uncommon, although you have lots of company in not being comfortable helping them with that.

6. Managing an employee who’s devastated after the loss of a pet

I have a new employee who has been working for me for 3 months and is a total superstar. She’s doing great work and is lovely to work with. Last week, her dog had to be put down and now she’s really upset and keeps crying at work.

I have told her how sorry I am (genuinely, I would be be devastated if anything happened to either of my doggies) and helped her reorganise her workload so she’s working on something she can manage while she’s feeling so upset. I feel bad about making her work, even though she wants to be here and needs the job.

Is there anything else I should be doing? I feel like I’ve been more of a friend than a manager, but she’s been really conscientious about her work even though she’s clearly not ok.

Hmmm. I’m as obsessed with animals as they come and agree you should be compassionate, but you also can’t have her continually crying at work, because that’s going to have an impact on the rest of your workplace.

Your best bet is to probably express sympathy, tell her that you know she’s grieving, and ask if she’d like to take a few days off. Whether she does or doesn’t, if this is still going on at the end of the week, you’re going to have to talk with her about what she needs in order to focus at work. (If you have an EAP, you might refer her to that.) What do others think?

7. Subject lines when staying in touch with hiring managers and references

I have a quick question about keeping in touch with potential employers when you don’t get the job. I’ve already read about staying in touch periodically about future opportunities and sending the add-value, but what type of email subject line do you recommend so that they’ll know I’m not trying to cold-email them?

Additionally, what email subject line is appropriate when keeping in touch with your references? I’ve only been writing to my former supervisor when I have submitted her contact info because I don’t want to clutter her inbox. This doesn’t happen often (once every few months) but I don’t want to leave too many gaps in communication.

Really, the same rules apply here as apply to subject lines in other contexts: Make them descriptive of the content of the email. So if you’re emailing an article you think the hiring manager might be interested in, that’s what your subject line should be about — for instance, “great HBR article on X.” Or when you’re alerting a reference that they might be getting a call about you — “possible reference call from XYZ company.” Just a direct summary of the point of the email.

my coworker is covertly taking photos of me and mocking my appearance on Facebook

A reader writes:

About a month after I started a new job, my boss informed me that a coworker had taken photos of me my first two days on the job and posted them to Facebook and had made very nasty comments about me and my physical appearance. And he self-admits in the Facebook posts that he had to be “sneaky” about how he captured the images. I have dwarfism, and stand 4’4″ tall (but that seems like it shouldn’t matter in this story). When a fellow coworker had notified my boss about the photos, she went straight to HR about it to report him for harassment and bullying.

HR then told my boss she could not tell me about the images, as she would then be causing a hostile work environment for me. She wasn’t happy with that response, but respected their orders. But, she also wasn’t going to let the issue go. She wanted them to take some sort of disciplinary action against the guy who took the photos. Eventually HR said that she could tell me about the photos, but she could not do so as a representative of our workplace, only as a friend, on her own time.

So, that’s what she did. I then filed my own complaint, looking at the workplace harassment policy and defining areas under which I felt this action qualified as harassment. I met with the office that handles such claims, and they basically said they couldn’t do anything about it. That by my boss telling me about the situation, she was the one creating a hostile work environment. If she hadn’t told me, apparently I would never have been affected by this. I responded by suggesting that other coworkers who I have to work with now have to deal with this as well. I was told that the guy who took the photos was talked to about this situation. But for privacy reasons that’s all they could tell me. Also, since this happened on Facebook, and not in a physical space (even though I was at work, in my office, and he was at work, in a company building on company time) that company policy didn’t cover what happened on social media. And that was the end of that situation.

It is now two years later, and in that time this guy has moved to another part of the company and works in another building. But just last week I saw him again, and walked past him. He was holding his phone low and at his waist.. and kept looking at it, then looking up, then down again at his phone. I’m 99% sure he was taking a photo of me. Later, when I looked him up on Facebook, I can’t see most of his profile, but I could see that he uploaded a mobile photo (timestamp) just about the time I passed him on the sidewalk. Again, I can’t prove anything … that he was taking a photo of me. But I feel extremely uncomfortable when I’m around him.

I am generally secure in myself, and in my size and disability/ability issues. However, the posts on Facebook are different than the general stares I’m used to getting, and name calling and fingerpointing. The fact that it was done in writing, with comments from other coworkers, in my place of work, makes me feel like something was done to me that I had no say over.

It’s extra-troubling because I really do think there’s nothing that can be done here. It’s not illegal to take photos of people in a public place. It’s not illegal to talk bad about people in social media. However, how far out can the line be drawn when the harassment policy defines some forms of harassment as:

“Other Forms of Harassment
• Physical threats
• Intimidation, ridicule or mockery
• Insulting words or slogans
• Offensive objects or pictures”

What are your thoughts about this situation? What can I do as a worker when I pass this guy again? Can I say anything to him?

Friends of mine want to take his photo and post it all over social media and say bad things about him. But I don’t play that way. Besides, that’d be considered “retaliation” and our harassment policy says a LOT about retaliation.

Whoa. Your HR department is incredibly bad.

Saying that your manager created a hostile workplace by alerting you to this guy’s behavior? What the hell?!  That’s like saying that someone caused a hostile workplace by alerting you that a coworker was taking photos looking up your skirt. It seems pretty obvious that the whistleblower wouldn’t be at fault in the second situation, and your manager isn’t at fault in the first either. So your HR department is incredibly incompetent.

Moving on to the next way they’ve messed this up, of course they can take action against this guy, and if they’ve made you feel that they can’t, that’s another huge mistake on their part. They absolutely can take action against anyone whose behavior they object to for any reason, whether there’s a policy on it or not, as long as it’s not based on that person’s race, religion, disability, or other protected class, and as long as it’s not retaliation for engaging in legally protected activity, as well as a small number of other legally protected things. So it doesn’t even matter if their harassment policy includes this kind of behavior … but as it so happens, the policy actually does cover this kind of thing, based on what you quoted here. And it doesn’t matter if the behavior was at work or outside of it; they’re allowed to address this, including firing the guy if they want to.

That said, it sounds like they did take action against him last time — it sounds like they did talk to him, and it wasn’t crazy to not give you details about that conversation; it’s actually pretty normal not to share details of disciplinary conversations with other employees. But I can certainly see why you don’t have confidence in them, given the rest of the way they responded to this, and the fact that it sounds like they’ve given you the impression that their hands are tied to some extent, when that’s BS.

As for what to do now, I’d say you should go back and formally report this again. It might be a little tricky if no one can prove he actually took the photo, but even if they ultimately can’t conclude anything definitive, I think it’s worth having a record of complaints against this guy if his behavior is continuing.

And as for saying something to him, hell yes, I think you should. If you feel safe doing it, I’d call him out in the moment if you see anything that looks like it might be him photographing you. I’d even follow him back to his desk and talk to his manager about it right in front of him, if you’re willing.

Aside from all that, I’m sorry you’re dealing with this jerk. He sounds like an utter ass, and your employer should have been more proactive in putting a stop to this crap.

my boss gave me a choice of offices, but is punishing me for the one I chose

A reader writes:

I have recently interviewed for and received a new promotion. It is an auditing position in the compliance department in a bank. (A little background on the compliance department in a bank for those who don’t know: we are responsible for testing the bank’s practices and procedures to make sure we/they are complying with all the laws and regulations set down by the government.) This promotion has come with a private office and, as the building is currently undergoing some remodeling I was told I could choose from the 2 offices available. The first office is of fairly good size, and right next to my new manager’s office. It was, however, originally a supply closet and it does not have any windows or air movement at all. The second is slightly smaller, on the other side of the building and contains a window that I would be able to open to let a breeze in every now and then (which is very important to me).

Naturally, I chose the second option solely because of the window and have since moved in. This seems to have upset my manager and she has begun passive aggressively making comments about the other office “not being good enough for me”. She is now expecting me to come see her to ‘check in’ when I come in every day and before I leave each night. As far as I know, this has never been required for the position in the past and is perceived as new and kind of ridiculous by other people that work with me. Based on my job description, we are supposed to be in the same department but not directly involved in the specific work we each are doing. This allows us to test each other without being biased. It’s hard to know exactly what her role as my manager is supposed to be, because while she can approve or disapprove leave requests, she isn’t supposed to be involved in any of my work. It seems like a flawed system from the get go. But, because she’s my boss, I walk from one side of the building to another, just to let her know I am going home. She doesn’t even look up to say goodbye and barely acknowledges me, despite requesting me to do this every day.

She is condescending, takes forever to get back to me about questions I have, and it has gotten back to me from others that she’s been telling people she isn’t sure if I should be working in compliance at all.

Considering all of the hassle I seem to be getting since choosing the office farther away from her (previous to this, she seemed very amenable and conscientious to me for the year I worked at the bank before moving to her department), should I just suck it up and move to the window-less office next to hers (where she obviously would prefer me to be)? Why was I given a choice if I didn’t really have one at all? And, how do I tell the office manager that I decided I want the other office instead? Won’t that make me look flaky to all of the other “important” people (i.e. the C.E.O, President, etc.) I work around?

Your manager is ridiculous. If it was important to her that you be located closer to her, she should have simply assigned you the office next to hers — rather than presenting you with a choice where only one option was going to be acceptable to her.

But it looks pretty clear that she would rather have your office closest to her — whether it’s so that she feels like she has a general sense of when you’re there and when you’re not or for some other reason, who knows. But she does, clearly. As for why she didn’t tell you that originally, I have no idea. Maybe she’s a fuzzy thinker (many people are) and hadn’t fully thought it through and then was annoyed when you made a choice that to her is clearly the wrong one. Maybe she plays mind games. Maybe something else happened, and this isn’t about your office choice at all, but rather a reaction to something else. Or maybe she’s just volatile. I can’t tell from here — but I can say for sure that she’s not handling this well at all, and right now she has enormous power over your job security.

And the reality is, it’s probably more to your advantage to maintain good relations with her than it is to have a window. So if I were you, I’d go back to her and say one of the following two things:

1. The direct approach: “Jane, I’m getting the sense that you’re unhappy that I chose the office further away. I picked it just because it had a window, but if it’s causing problems, I’d be glad to switch.”

2. The less direct approach, to be used if you think the first approach will just trigger more mind games from her: “I have the sense this might work better if my office was closer to you. I’d thought I really wanted a window, but I’d be willing to forego that to make sure that you’re able to spot me when you need me. Would it be a hassle if I picked the closer office after all?”

In general, direct is better, but if you’re dealing with someone who won’t respond well to it (and you know better than me if that’s the case here), the second approach could be more effective.

Now, obviously, her behavior isn’t okay and indicates that something is Not Right with her — with her head and with her managerial abilities. So I think you’ve got to assume that this isn’t going to be last craziness you encounter from her and start thinking about what that means for your interest in and longevity in the position. But for now, if your priority is repairing the relationship — at least to give you some time to decide if you want to continue working for this loon — then that’s the safest path.

And I wouldn’t worry about how changing offices looks to others. You can say it worked out better to be closer to your manager, and no one is going to think much of it. That’s the least of the worries I’d have in this situation.

Speaking of worries you should have …. she’s telling people she’s not sure you should be working in your field. That’s a big deal, coming from your boss. That’s definitely a bigger deal than the office question. That’s an indicator that you might have an awful lot of trouble progressing under this particular manager — or even holding onto your job at all. So I’d get this office question out of the way and start focusing more on whether this is a relationship that can/will work for you at all.

Good luck.

Read an update to this letter here.

10 things job seekers hate about recruiters

Recruiters are often the gateway to a company you’d like to work for or a particular job you’d love to win. But recruiters aren’t always easy to work with, and often come with a whole host of aggravations that you don’t see as commonly if you’re talking directly with a hiring manager.

First, a quick vocabulary lesson: A hiring manager is the person who would be your manager if you got the job. A recruiter, in contrast, works solely on filling positions, and often works for a recruiting firm and has many different companies as clients. The hiring manager will make the final decision on the hire, but when a recruiter is involved, you often have to go through the recruiter’s own screening process first.

It’s important to note, of course, that there are plenty of great recruiters out there. But there are also a lot of bad ones, and they have their own special ways of frustrating job seekers:

1. Advertising jobs that don’t exist. Staffing agencies are notorious for posting boilerplate ads for jobs that don’t really exist in order to build a database of candidates who they can call on in the future. Agencies defend this by saying that they fill jobs that are similar to the ones advertised all the time – but many job seekers are frustrated when they arrive for an interview, only to discover that there’s no job to be had.

2. Calling candidates at work. You’d think that recruiters would understand why candidates might not want to tip off their employers that they’re job searching, but they regularly call candidates at work without their permission – leaving candidates try to disguise who they’re talking to and why.

3. Contacting candidates about jobs that they’re not remotely suited for. While good recruiters can read a resume and get an initial sense of whether someone might be worth talking to about a particular job, less skilled recruiters sometimes take a more scattershot approach. As a result, they end up pushing graphic designers to interview for programming jobs, researchers to interview for sales jobs, and other obvious mismatches.

4. Misrepresenting jobs. Too many job seekers have been told that they’re interviewing for a position working on A, C, and C, only to meet the hiring manager and discover that she’s really looking for someone to do D and E. Bad recruiters don’t always understand exactly what a hiring manager is looking for or what the work really entails, which leads to frustrated and disappointed candidates, who spent their time interviewing for something that clearly wasn’t a fit.

5. Scheduling phone interviews and then not calling. You cleared time on your calendar, prepared for the interview, and maybe even found child care to ensure that you’d have a quiet time to talk – and then the recruiter doesn’t call at the scheduled time. Recruiters and others involved in hiring who do this to candidates are behaving as if only there time matters, and it’s incredibly inconsiderate. And on the other end of the spectrum…

6. Calling for an unscheduled phone interview and expecting the candidate to drop everything to talk. It’s fine to call a candidate to see if they have a few minutes to discuss a position, but too often recruiters expect the person to drop whatever they’re doing and are put out when they can’t or won’t.

7. Changing candidates’ resumes without their permission. You should maintain control over your resume at all times, but some recruiters will change key details on it without your permission, sometimes even rewriting it inaccurately. This, of course, can result in an awkward moment if you’re meeting with the hiring manager and she asks you about a project you never worked on or thinks you were at your last job longer than you were. (Even good recruiters will remove your contact information from your resume, to ensure that employers can’t go around them and contact you directly, but they shouldn’t be changing anything else without your okay.)

8. Acting excited about a candidate but then dropping out of contact. The ranks of job seekers abound with people who are weary of hearing recruiters describe how perfect they’d be for an open role – only to then never heard from them again. It’s frustrating to be told what a great match you’d be for a position and how excited the recruiter is to have found you, and then be dropped with no explanation or follow-up.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

my coworker is married to a con man, warning an employer about bad credit, and more

It’s seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Should I warn this employer about my bad credit?

Today I got a conditional job offer. The offer was made in person, and that point I was told that the background check I need to pass includes a credit report. This wasn’t a huge surprise, given that the position is with an insurance agency, but it was the first time that had been explicitly stated. I didn’t want to bring my credit problems up early in the process and torpedo myself before I had the chance to impress them. The other wrinkle is that it’s not the agent running the credit check but the insurer for which he sells exclusively. This agency does their own hiring, but the mama company gets to sign off on all the new producers.

Should I let the agent know ahead of time? The criminal part of the background check will be fine. And I don’t have a bankuptcy, but I do have a considerable amount of accurate, negative and current information on my report. I can honestly point to an external cause (loss of income), as well as some poor youthful decisions on my part. I can also share a number of steps we’ve made in the right financial direction if given the opportunity to do so. Some mistakes do take a long time to fix. I’m just wondering whether I should be preemptive or wait for the phone call.

Yes, I’d tell them preemptively, because otherwise you might not get a chance to explain at all. I’d say something like, “Since I know you’re checking credit as part of your background check, I want to let you know that mine isn’t perfect right now, due to some bad decisions when I was much younger and, more recently, loss of income. I’ve been actively working on cleaning it up and am committed to keeping it strong once I do, but I didn’t want you to be surprised by it.”

2. Why is my supervisor hesitating to let me manage staff until I can attend a training?

I am a young professional in the library field who started my first full-time position in April. My probationary period will be ending in early October, and I had a mini-meeting with my supervisor this morning to see where I am with accomplishing the goals I had set for myself. All appears to be in order, and I have been working hard my first few months to feel out the office culture, policies and procdures of the system, etc.

However, when I mentioned that I feel confident to begin my supervisory duties for two career staff members in October, my manager told me that we will “revisit that after the probationary period is completed.” I know she would like me complete a supervisory training course that is required for all supervisory staff (but not scheduled for the near future), and she is known for being conscientious about not piling everything on at once. I do not believe it is a prequisite to me taking on the supervisory duties outlined in my job description. As there are no performance issues I have been made aware of, she seems pleased with my progress, and I work hard to be seen as professional as possible (which is hard, since I am the youngest person here by far), is she just being cautious? I gave her ample opportunity to tell me if there are any concerns she might have, and she did not have any. She is generally good at communicating, so I am wondering if she is just waiting to get word about the additional training and for me to be out of the probationary period.

I have not managed in a formal capacity, so that may be part of her hesitation. I am currently supervising non-career staff (part-time hourly workers); judging by how the organization is (tons of in-house training), I feel that a large part of her reaction is the fact I’ve not had my scheduled training yet. Just wanted to know if I’m reading the situation right.

Managing people is a completely different skill than doing the work yourself, and even with extensive training, most managers take at least several years to get competent at it. (And some never do.) So your manager is absolutely doing the right thing by waiting until you can take a training course. After all, would you yourself want a brand-new manager who hadn’t even had any training? You would not. (Frankly, most people wouldn’t want a brand-new one with training, either, but there’s no way around that and training can at least help a bit.)

I do know that you’re currently managing part-time hourly non-career stuff, but my hunch is that they see that as much more low-risk than setting you loose on managing other staff.

3. How should I stay in touch with my new team during the 2-1/2 months before I start?

I have been offered a position which requires a somewhat lengthy clearance/on boarding process: around 2.5 months before I am cleared and actually start. (Many thanks to you and your blog — the advice on here has been priceless!).

I am kind of confused as to how to maintain contact with my team in the meanwhile. We had a great rapport during the interview process, and it feels kind of strange to cut off communication for 2.5 months and then jump on the scene. It also feels strange to just send emails saying “hi.” Should I ask what types of activities I can engage in while I wait to officially start? Or could I end up in trapping myself and working for no pay?

Yeah, you’d be inviting a situation where you could end up working without pay. You can certainly ask if there’s anything you can read in the meantime to prepare yourself, but I wouldn’t ask for more than that. As for how to stay in touch, two and a half months actually isn’t that long, so I don’t think you need to go way out of your way to stay in touch. You might send the email inquiring about reading material a month before you start, and another a week before your start date to tell them how much you’re looking forward to working with them all, and leave it at that.

4. Can I alert my boss that one of my coworkers is married to a con man?

I would like to know if I should or can legally inform a boss that one of her employees is married to a convicted felon. This employee is fully aware of the fact that her husband is a con man/crook who has been stealing from good people for his entire life. It is my feeling that he will at some point target the boss’s business as a potential source of revenue.

There’s no law stopping you from doing that, but you do risk coming across as simply spreading gossip rather than as looking out for your boss, unless there’s some real reason to suspect the husband truly has plans to scam her.

5. Should I quit my job so that I have more flexibility for jobs in my field through staffing agencies?

Currently, I have a full-time job, which I have had for a little over six months. This job is a low-paying position and has nothing to do with what I went to school for. I am trying to get an entry-level position in my field. It seems, however, that the only way to get an entry-level position or anything that I am remotely qualified for in my career field is to go through staffing agencies. Unfortunately, I have had two staffing agencies so far tell me that my being employed is a problem because they need someone right away for their clients and cannot wait two weeks for me to leave my current company.

I am strongly considering resigning from my current position just so that I would have the flexibility in my schedule to start whenever the staffing agency needs me to. Is that a really foolish idea? I don’t know how else to get an entry-level position in my field. Thank you in advance for your advice.

Well, first, are you sure that this is really the only way to get a position in your field? I’d be pretty skeptical of that, unless you’re hearing it repeatedly from people actually in your field who either do what you want to do or hire for those positions. So if you haven’t already, I’d start by reaching out to people in both those groups (try LinkedIn to locate them) and asking them for their opinion on this. If they confirm it, then I’d follow up by asking for recommendations of particularly good staffing agencies they like to work with. And then, talk to those staffing agencies to get a sense of how strong a candidate you are (and what you can do to become a stronger one if needed). I’d do all that before quitting your job for an agency that can’t even wait two weeks for you to give notice.

6. What should I expect from a day-long interview?

I had a phone screen a few weeks ago for what is basically my dream job at this early stage in my career. Earlier this week, I finally heard back from HR asking me to come in for an in-person interview (they have yet to respond to my email about my availability, but let’s hope they do). I talked to my friend who works there in a different office and she warned me that this company does one huge day of interviews with 12-15 people, but then no additional interviews after that. She also said it was really, really tiring when she did hers, but it’s a good sign because not very many people make it to that stage.

What should I expect and how should I prepare for something like this? Do you have any special advice for interviews that take this long and cover meetings with so many different people? If they don’t specify in advance, am I expected to bring my own lunch or go out somewhere on my own?

See this post and especially the comments on it for information about day-long interviews in general, but regarding lunch, assume that they’re going to take care of it. Generally with a day of interviews like this, they’ll take you out to lunch — and make sure you don’t forget that you’re still being assessed then, even if the conversation seems more casual. Keep it professional and don’t say anything that you wouldn’t say in a formal interview just because it’s over food. (And if for some reason they don’t provide you with lunch, take that as a flag that they’re fairly thoughtless — although you could always stick a granola bar in your bag in case that happens.)

7. How can I leverage support from my coworkers when applying for an internal position?

The position of manager over my current team is open. Unsolicited, a member of my own team and two people from the team under that position’s boss have encouraged me to go for it and said other supportive things. Is there a way to leverage that support appropriately in a cover letter and interview?

I don’t think I’d mention it in a cover letter because there’s no way in a letter to distinguish genuine support among your coworkers from the kind things people sometimes say in that situation, but you can certainly encourage those coworkers to recommend you. Go back to people, tell them that you decided to apply, and ask if they’d be willing to proactively reach out to the hiring manager and explain why they think you’d be a strong candidate.

avoiding fake job interviews, will I have to return my bonus, and more

It’s seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. How can I avoid fake job interviews with staffing agencies?

I just read your post about the “fake” job posting. I had a national agency call me directly and ask me to show up for a preliminary interview no less than four times over the past two years. Each time, I drive 30+ minutes to hear that there was no job for me. Is there a tactful way to decline these?

I don’t think there’s a foolproof way of spotting these beforehand, but one thing you can do is to ask explicitly, “Is this interview for a specific job that you currently have open, or is it a more general interview in case I’m a good fit for something in the future?” (You’d only ask this for interviews with staffing agencies, not if you’re interviewing with an employer directly — as employers don’t typically do this.)

Some agencies will be willing to lie to you, ridiculously, but some will either answer you directly or hem and haw (hemming and hawing should be taken as “there’s no real job”).

2. I shared with my staff that I have cancer and am not sure that I should have

In a moment of panic, I’ve overshared at work and I’m not sure of the most professional action to take now; I’d appreciate your advice for moving forward.

Yesterday, I found out I have ovarian cancer. I see an oncologist next week to schedule surgery and have a rough several months ahead. In addition to telling HR and my manager, I also told the 6 people I supervise directly. My thinking at the time was that this was happening very quickly, I’m going to be out for several weeks after surgery, and I needed to get a plan in place immediately. Yeah, okay, I panicked.

In hindsight, I think I should’ve waited until I have a date scheduled and just told them I was having a medical procedure done and would be out a few weeks. But I didn’t, and I can’t take it back. So what should I do now and for the next few weeks? I want to handle this professionally, at least from now on. I like my team, we’re a close group, but this is my issue not theirs to deal with; I just didn’t want them to hear rumors. What should I do now?

Don’t panic; I don’t think this is a disaster at all. I’d just be very explicit with them about how you’d like to proceed. For instance, if you don’t want a lot of concerned checks on your well-being, tell them that — explain that they can help you most by helping you stay focused on work when you’re at work, and that at least for now, that’s what you’re finding most helpful. They will be worried about you, of course, so if people express concern, let them know that you’ll let them know if you have anything important to share, but for now you’d love their help in staying focused on work. (That said, be aware that you might not be able to pull that off 100% — people will be concerned and want to check in, and you may have days where you aren’t working at full speed — and that’s completely fine.

I’m sorry you’re dealing with this, and I hope it all goes as smoothly as we can hope for.

3. Will I have to return my bonus if I get a new job soon?

I’m in the middle of a job search and already have interviews lined up for next week. Earlier today, my boss came into my office, shut the door, and told me I was getting a bonus of a generous amount (a few thousand dollars). He said it was to thank me for all my hard work, and he asked me to keep this to myself, etc.

Assuming that I get an offer from one of the companies I’m interviewing at, what is the likelihood my company will ask for the bonus money back?

Just for a bit of insight, bonuses in my company are never guaranteed and are at the discretion of management. There’s no mention of bonuses in our company handbook or in my offer letter. I would think that the worst that’ll happen if I get and accept an offer elsewhere is that my company would be pissed, but are there any legal ramifications?

Assuming that you don’t have a contract with wording to the contrary, any bonus you get is legally your money to keep. It’s very unlikely that your company would ask for it back (or expect you to give it back), and if for some bizarre reason they did, you wouldn’t be legally required to comply.

It’s important to remember that while bonuses are certainly retention strategies, they’re also recognition of work you’ve done previously.

4. Should I include a brand-new consulting job on my resume?

I am currently working as a consultant for a nonprofit, which I haven’t even been doing for a month. I started out as an intern for a few weeks, then they eventually offered me a full-time job but I declined the offer because the pay was horrible and it wasn’t really the field I was interested in. Anyhow, when I declined the full-time position, they hired me on as a consultant, where I am working only 10 hours a week (from home).

Since this is not a full-time job and since it is a job that I can do on the side, I am looking for other full-time work. However, when I apply for new jobs, I am not sure if it is worth putting this consultant position on my applications. I think it might look peculiar since I have been barely working there for a month and now I am looking for work again. I state on all of the applications that is a 10-hour job done from home. I am just not sure if stating it in my applications is helping or hurting my applications.

Include it, and make it very clear that it’s part-time consulting work. No one will think it’s odd that you’re still looking for work if you include that context.

5. Will my reason for moving sound flaky?

I am planning to move in about 6 months from southern California to Chicago, and I plan to begin my job search briefly before I move. I am not moving for any particular reason other than I am looking for a change of pace in a different city. If someone were to ask me in an interview, “Why Chicago?” does “change of pace” seem too flaky? I don’t want to sound flighty.

It sounds a little flaky, yes. If you wanted a change of pace, you could have picked any city. What they want to know is, why Chicago specifically? And they care about your answer because they want to ensure your decision to move is well thought-out and that you’re not going to change your mind and move back three months into your new job. (Because of that, good answers are ones that speak to roots — family and friends there, etc.)

6. I resigned before accepting a job offer, and then the offer was revoked

I was recently offered a position for my dream job. After seeing the offer, I pled my case for more money. I said how excited I was about the job, but with my experience I thought I warranted more. I assumed the compensation would be higher. I asked the recruiter if she could let me know what she could do. We spoke the next day and she said she would go to bat for me to the director and accounting. I went ahead and resigned from my job. Big mistake.

The offer was withdrew and when I said I would talk the initial offer they still rescinded it. I’ve tried repeatedly to get the director and recruiter on the phone, but without a doubt they’re ignoring my phone calls.

I went back to my company and they said they’d have to honor my resignation, because I was looking for a new job that offered more money and variety (the reasoning behind my new job search). Those are two things they can’t offer. I pled my case with the results I’ve brought to the team and they said it would be putting a Band-Aid on the situation.

Now I don’t have a job. Since this is usually one of the first questions asked in an interview, I wanted to see what the best way to approach this is. I have tangible results from all my jobs. I was thinking I would tell about the situation, then go on to what I did great for the company. Your thoughts are greatly appreciated.

Ooooh, that’s not good. I know you’ve just learned this, but it bears repeating: Never, ever resign your job until you have a formal job offer that you’ve accepted (and ideally a start date).

As for what to tell prospective employers now, this is tricky because if I heard that your old company wouldn’t take you back, I’d think, “That’s an employee who they weren’t too devastated to lose” (particularly since they hadn’t replaced you yet, it sounds like). I think you’re better off simply explaining that you had a job offer that fell through after you’d already left your old job, and not getting into details. Good luck.

7. How should I handle an internal job offer when I have an upcoming vacation?

How should I handle an internal job offer when I have an upcoming approved vacation?

The same way you would with a job offer outside your company — by explaining that you have a planned vacation for those dates before you accept the offer and making it part of the overall negotiation process. You don’t want to wait until afterwards, or it will come across as if you’re presenting it as a done deal, which she almost certainly won’t see it that way.