why employers don’t want to hire overqualified candidates

When you’re applying for jobs, being told that you’re being dismissed because you’re “overqualified” for a job you know you could do well is incredibly frustrating. After all, having higher qualifications than what a job requires should be a good thing, shouldn’t it? To job seekers, being told they’re overqualified can feel like being told by a date that they’re too funny or good-looking – and leaves them wondering why it’s a deal-breaker.

So why is being overqualified so often seen as a bad thing? It’s understandable to be rejected if you’re not qualified enough, but what’s the concern about the overqualified?

When hiring managers label job candidates overqualified, here’s what they are thinking.

1. We can’t pay you enough. Employers will often assume that if you have more experience or education than the job requires, your salary expectations are probably higher than the role pays too.

2. You don’t really understand what the job is. Hiring managers will worry that in your quest to get hired somewhere, you’re being overly optimistic about what the work will be like – for instance, that you think you’ll be doing high-level office administration when what they need is someone to run the front desk. Or that the ad might say data entry, but you’ll assume that surely you’ll be able to quickly prove yourself and take on more interesting work – when they really just need someone who will do data entry and be happy with it. Related to that…

3. If you take this job, you’ll be bored. Hiring managers often think that someone used to do higher-level or more interesting work can’t possibly be happy with less challenging responsibilities, and they assume that you’ll quickly get bored, then frustrated, and then want to leave.

4. You won’t be happy working for a manager with less experience than you. If you have significantly more experience that the hiring manager, she may worry that you won’t be happy or comfortable taking direction from her, and that you’ll think you know better. What’s more, if the hiring manager isn’t entirely secure in her skills, she might worry that you do know better and that you’ll be judging her decisions – which can lead to her passing on your candidacy altogether.

5. You’ll leave as soon as something better comes around. Because hiring managers often can’t understand why someone would want a lower position than what their background might qualify them for, they often assume that you’re only interested in the job because you’re feeling desperate. They figure you’ll take it for the paycheck, but that you’ll leave as soon as something more suited to your background comes along.

So what do you do if you’re hearing that you’re overqualified for jobs you actually want? The best thing you can do is to understand the concerns above and address them head-on. And you can do that by explaining why you’re genuinely interested in the position. For instance, you might explain that while your kids are in school, you want a job with stable hours that doesn’t require the level of responsibility you’ve had in the past – or whatever is really true for you. (And that’s key – it needs to ring true for you; don’t make something up.)

And if you know hiring managers are likely to worry about your salary expectations, you can also say explicitly that you’re clear about the lower pay that comes with the position, and that it’s fine with you.

Ideally, you’d address this in the cover letter, to avoid having your application discarded before you’ve even had an interview. But once you get to the interview stage, be prepared to discuss it again, and probably in more detail.

Overall, the idea is to understand what worries managers about overqualified candidates and address their concerns head-on, proactively, and genuinely.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

being told you’re lucky to have a job at all, helpful HR people, and more

It’s seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Creating a development plan when I’m hoping to leave my job in a year

In my department we have semi-annual check-ins with the boss to discuss individual goals. The mid-year meeting is coming up, and the boss wants everyone to fill out an individual development plan to discuss during the meeting. It includes a list of leadership competencies, and you choose a few competencies and describe what steps you can take to improve in those areas. You also have to describe your “ambitions” for the next few years. I feel like the whole thing presupposes that the employee will be doing the same or similar work at this large company forever.

I am planning on going back to school and making a career switch to a completely different field in the next few years. (Let’s say that currently I work in marketing for medical supplies, but I want to design and build eco-friendly houses.) My partner and I will likely be moving in a year, and while I’m happy to be at this job for now, I’m excited to get out of here and start doing what I really want to do. I have not shared my plans with my boss and I’m not comfortable telling her the truth now when I’d like to stick around for another year. I just want to do my work well for as long as I’m here, but that’s not good enough for this conversation. What can I say when I have plans and ambitions that have nothing to do with my current job?

Assume that anything can change between now and the next year, and answer the questionnaire as if you’re staying with your company. Anything can change, after all, and even if you had an ironclad guarantee from the universe that you’re going to leaving this job in precisely a year, this would still be the practical way to handle it if you’re not ready to reveal your plans yet.

That said, I wouldn’t invite any major development steps that would require significant energy that you wouldn’t otherwise be spending … unless you’d be kicking yourself for not including them in a year if your plans do fall through or get delayed.

2. Should HR prep candidates before interviews?

I found my latest phone screen with the HR manager for a prospective company different than most I’ve encountered. When he asked me what I was looking for in terms of compensation, he immediately interjected before I could answer and told me the salary range “…in an effort not to pigeon-hole yourself with your answer, in case we were out-of-sync.” I told him I was fine with the range he quoted. Then at the end of the screening, he asked to set up an interview, gave me the name of the hiring manager who I will be interviewing with and advised me to check out her LinkedIn profile an suggested certain questions in addition to my own, all the while advising me to keep the interview more conversational with her.

Is it normal for the HR rep of a company to give this much help to a candidate? In the past, I’ve got nothing more than a series of questions from them before scheduling the face-to-face interviews.

It’s not unheard of. Most of this — not all — is the sign of a thoughtful HR person: Making sure that you don’t feel lowballed on salary is in the company’s best interests (if they want to retain good employees in the long-term) and suggesting you keep the interview more conversational is pretty basic guidance.

But I do take issue with him suggesting questions to ask the hiring manager, who will be assuming that those questions reflect your own thought process — I’d be pretty irked about that part if I were the hiring manager. (Unless the questions he was suggesting were designed to get you more insight into things he felt it was important for you to hear more about.)

3. After mistakes, should I tell my manager I’m having some personal issues?

I am usually a top performer at my job and pride myself on submitting great work. However, recently I have been a bit distracted by personal issues outside of work (my parents are getting divorced — it’s very messy and I am in the middle of it, as well as problems with my long-term boyfriend who I live with). As a result, in the past two weeks I have made two very small (read: easily fixable) mistakes.

I feel really silly – they were mistakes that never should have happened. I have a great relationship with my boss and he has assured me that both instances were small mistakes and told me not to worry about them, but I can’t help feeling like he may be questioning my work. I have apologized and made it clear I understand the mistakes and neither will happen again.

I know I shouldn’t dwell on the past, but I’m wondering if I should tell him I’ve been dealing with outside issues, or is that TMI? I guess I just feel horribly because both mistakes happened within a week of each other and I want to be sure he knows I’m not just being careless.

If they were truly very small mistakes, then there’s no need for that — not unless you’ve gotten the sense that your manager is concerned. But if it will bring you peace of mind and if your manager isn’t the type to punish people for occasionally having stresses outside of work, there’s nothing wrong with tipping him off that you’re going through a difficult period and that you’re trying to make sure that it doesn’t impact your work.

4. When a manager tells you that you’re lucky to have a job at all

What is meant by “you’re lucky you have a job” as stated by supervisors and managers in response to employees who complain about unfair treatment by management/supervisory staff?

It means “you should be grateful that you’re employed during this bad job market and not complain about the circumstances of your employment.” It’s usually said by bad managers who don’t know how to deal constructively with staff feedback.

5. Bringing a heating pad and seat cushion to a new job

I’m about to start a new job that I am very excited about. However, I am really concerned because I have some pretty intense back pain. My colleagues at my current company have always been open about their health issues (we had a company Advil bottle) so I have always felt comfortable bringing in my heating pad and seat cushion. The company that I’m about to start at is a bit larger and I’m not sure if it’s appropriate for me to bring out my heating pad. What should I do?

Don’t feel weird about bringing it in. There’s nothing inappropriate about it, and it’s a medical accommodation.

That said, if you can get by without it your first few days, I might do that, simply because every data point someone gets about you when you’re new looms far larger than it does once they know you. Not that there’s anything wrong with being known as the heating pad person from the start, but you might prefer to avoid it until you’ve first established yourself as something else.

6. What message to leave when someone doesn’t answer our scheduled call

I’m job searching and find myself often doing informational interviews or other interviews by phone when I’m responsible for being the caller. Sometimes, even when I confirm, the person forgets or doesn’t answer. When I call, I want to leave a message to show that I haven’t forgotten to call them. But I always struggle with what to say in the message — “Hi, remember me? We had plans?”

“Hi, it’s Jane Smith, calling for our 3:00 interview (or “appointment,” if it’s not an interview). If you get this in the next hour, you can reach me at ____; otherwise, I’ll email you about rescheduling for a better time.”

7. Listing four jobs in the same timeframe on your resume

In the year after I got my bachelors, while searching for a job that fit with my career goals I worked 4 part-time jobs concurrently (every day of the week; my sole time off was on Monday evenings and Sunday mornings). The job market wasn’t in my favor, and I had massive student loan bills, so I sucked it up and worked my butt off. For some context, three of these were hostess jobs at restaurants, one was office-based, as a loan processor at the mortgage branch of a bank.

I’ve started a 3-year grad program to get the degree that I’ve come to realize is necessary in my field (MDiv). When preparing my resume for my field education internships, would it be a red flag in any way for hiring managers to see 4 jobs listed in the same timeframe? If asked, I can explain very well how the skills I developed in these jobs translate to the positions I’m looking for, plus I have a few significant accomplishments at the mortgage office job that I can include, but I worry that just seeing 4 concurrent jobs might weed me out as a candidate.

Four jobs in the same timeframe isn’t inherently a red flag, but it’s an awful lot of information to take in — so since three of them were hostessing jobs, I’d combine those under one listing, like this:

Restaurant hostess, 2012 – 2013
Los Pollos Hermanos , April 2012 – May 2013
Bluth’s Banana Stand, February 2012 – May 2013
Merlotte’s, March 2012 – January 2013

not a good idea: applying for jobs from your current work email address

A reader writes:

Is it okay to send out my job applications through my current office email address?

It is not.

Applying for jobs from your work email account says the following to employers:

* I’m applying for jobs on my current company’s time (and will do the same to you).

* I’m applying for jobs using my current company’s resources (and will do the same to you).

* I don’t realize that there’s anything wrong with the two things above.

Plus, your work email account is not private. It belongs to your employer. If they happen to access it for some reason and come across job applications, I cannot tell you how awful that looks.

Get a gmail account and apply for jobs when you’re not at work.

my internship advisor mocked me and is now freezing me out

A reader writes:

I’m a summer intern in a very relaxed office at a very friendly but large company. There’s a full-time employee who informally advises the team of interns — he’ll check in on our project, offer his advice, help guide us to the information we need, etc.

He’s got a very dry sense of humor and is very sarcastic. Unfortunately, he turns the joking behavior on and off very quickly and it’s hard to tell when he’s being serious. Additionally, he likes to use the naive interns as the center of his humor and ended up playing a prank on me that made me the laughing stock of another department.

After that incident, I swung by his office and told him that I enjoyed the humor he brought to the office but would appreciate if it wasn’t at another’s expense. Since then, he’s stopped talking to me or making eye contact with me at all. Unfortunately, this means I don’t get his guidance the way the other interns do.

Should I just learn to take a joke? Would there have been a better way to approach the situation afterwards? How can I avoid this in the future?

Without knowing all the details, it sounds like you approached it just fine. You stood up for yourself calmly and (it sounds like) without being inappropriately aggressive.

The person who sounds in the wrong here is your coworker. His role as an informal advisor to your team of interns is at odds with his desire to “use naive interns” as the butt of his jokes. If you and the other interns are going to come to him with questions and problems, you need to trust him not to mock you. He’s creating the exact opposite of the environment he should be establishing.

That’s bad enough on its own, but his reaction when you asked him to tone it down took his mishandling of his role to a new level. Refusing to talk to you or even make eye contact now? That’s not an okay reaction for any colleague to have to another, but it’s especially inappropriate when he’s charged with giving you guidance.

And sure, I suppose it’s possible that you badly botched the conversation and were offensive in what you said to him (I suspect not, but it’s possible) — but then his job would be to sit down with you and tell you, “Hey, that’s not a great way to approach these issues, because it comes across as ____. Instead, in a situation like this, you should ____.” That’s what it means to give people guidance. You don’t freeze them out when they handle something differently than you would have liked.

Now, in answer to your other question — should you just learn to take a joke? Without knowing what this joke was, I don’t know. It’s certainly true that some people would benefit by lightening up. It’s possible that you’re one of them. But I wouldn’t use this particular guy or this particular situation to draw those sorts of conclusions about yourself, since he sounds too problematic to use for that sort of calibration.

If there’s someone else in your organization who you have good rapport with (like your direct manager or someone else you work with and respect), you could run the situation by them and ask them for their candid assessment. (And if you frame it that way — as seeking feedback about yourself and advice for the future — it would have the side benefit of alerting someone to this guy’s behavior without actually complaining about it. And that’s a nice side benefit.)

But I wouldn’t let this ass rattle you too much.

how can I become more comfortable in work social situations?

A reader writes:

My manager knows that I want to become a manager myself at some point, and is working on mentoring me in the skills I’ll need. One piece of feedback he’s given me is that I need to become more comfortable in semi-social situations (networking lunches or event dinners, and the like).

I’m not a terribly social person by nature, so I tend to feel a bit shy and out-of-place in situations like that. I’ve decided the career I want is worth it, but do you have any advice for a fellow introvert who needs to learn to be more social?

You can read my answer to this question over at the Intuit QuickBase blog today.

Plus, three other careers experts are answering this question there today too. Head over there for all four answers…

my boss fired me but will probably change his mind, fringe hobbies on resumes, and more

It’s seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. My boss fired me but will probably change his mind

How do you handle a situation where a boss tells an employee early in the month that he will be fired at the end of the month? This is happening to me and I am prepared to leave, but I have a feeling he may “allow me to stay” at last minute. I was given such warning about being laid off at the end of the month twice, but only verbally and in private. Can I apply for and collect unemployment if I don’t show up next month? How should I handle this?

I’m not sure from your letter whether this is a firing for cause or a layoff for business reasons, or why you think your manager will change his mind in a few weeks, but I’d think that you’d need to decide whether staying is something you’re interested in doing. You’re certainly under no obligation to stay if you don’t want to; it would be perfectly reasonable to say, “Thank you, but when you told me you were letting me go, I moved forward with other plans.”

As for whether that would make you ineligible for unemployment, you’d have to check with your local unemployment agency, but my assumption is that it would (since you’d be turning down work).

2. My manager told my coworkers I was hospitalized for “a mental breakdown”

I work for a small business, where immediate supervisors take on the role of HR. Recently I was voluntarily hospitalized for mental illness under the recommendation of my therapist. I was as vague as possible about my hospitalization when I alerted my supervisor that I would be taking some leave time, and I only used leave time that I had earned. Besides 2 personal leave days I took off for the hospital, I have been working full time and completing my deadlines and projects.

Nonetheless, my supervisor guessed the reason for my absence and told the office gossip that I had been hospitalized for a mental breakdown, and now the office is full of chatter about how I can’t handle the stress of the job. Several people have come up to me during work time to recommended “cures” consisting of dietary changes and homeopathic herb pills. Other coworkers are calling me unstable and gossiping about me to clients.

I am disappointed that the job and work environment I liked have turned so suddenly on a dime to a place that I dread going to every day. My wife says that my supervisor’s disclosure of my hospitalization is a breach of confidentiality and that I should look for legal recourse. I am looking for another job. Do I have any legal standing regarding confidentiality? And for the future, what should I have done differently? (I have bipolar disorder and will struggle to mange it for my entire life.)

Your employer isn’t bound by the same medical confidentiality laws that, say, your doctor would be; it’s not illegal for them to share information about your health. It is, however, incredibly thoughtless, particularly given what it led to. And it’s possible that if you’re now being harassed based on your medical condition, there could be some legal issue there, but you’d need to talk to a lawyer to find out for sure. Regardless, though, I’d go back to your manager and explain that you’re taken aback that she shared such personal information with others and explain what it led to. I’d even ask her what she intends to do about the gossip about you that’s now occurring with clients, etc.

As for handling it in the future, I’m not sure what you can do differently, since I don’t know how your manager “guessed” the reason for your absence … but working for a more mature manager would be one big preventative measure. Sorry you’re dealing with this.

3. Why was our direct deposit temporarily disabled?

Is direct deposit being “temporarily disabled in our payroll software” actually code for “we don’t have money in the bank to cover your paychecks”?

Maybe. But it could also just mean that there’s some technical issue they’re working out. Have you seen other signs of financial instability?

4. Can I ask to be paid as a consultant for training my replacement after I leave my job?

I recently gave my resignation at my current job as I am now starting a new one in a few weeks. I gave my notice to my boss – giving her 9 days instead of the usual 10 days because of a pre-planned vacation. She failed to come into the office to have a conversation with me after I submitted my resignation (via email cause she is never in the office) and now wants me to come back and train my successor (they are going to promote my assistant to take over my responsibilities) in a few weeks because she is going on vacation again and won’t be back in the office until the end of August.

Can I ask them to pay me for this time as a consultant? I am giving them notice and will do my best to get all my files organized and write up a document with transition information, but I feel as though it is not my fault the timing on this is bad and because she is going on vacation, I have to come in after I have already started my new position to help train my assistant.

Not only can you ask to be paid for that time, but you absolutely should. And it shouldn’t be a request — it should be a factual statement, as in, “I can do that, but since I’ll no longer be on your payroll, I’d need to be paid as a consultant. I think a fair rate would be $X.” (And that rate should be more than what you previously earned working for them, since if they’re not paying you through their payroll, payroll taxes won’t be coming out of it. Plus, you’re doing this as a favor to them and on top of a different job.)

You also should feel free to set whatever limits you want on this — as far as which hours you’re available and for how long. And you should feel free to decline it entirely if you’d rather focus on your new job (and if you decide to do that, you can explain it by saying that you’ll be too busy with your new position). Keep in mind that the only thing you’re strictly OBLIGATED to do here is to leave everything in good shape and work hard through your last day. Anything after that is optional.

5. Could having a letter published here jeopardize your job?

Do you know of any cases of a reader’s job being compromised by writing in to you? Do you forsee any situation where anonymously asking a question about a fairly specific work scenario might get someone in a lot of trouble? I was browsing your archives and read a post in which the OP’s coworker quickly chimed in in the comments section, which surprised me. I would never let another coworker know that I had written at length about potentially sensitive workplace issue online, even if I trusted them and I knew they shared my opinions. Maybe I’m paranoid? To be clear, I think your blog is awesome and should exist, but I wonder people have accidentally gotten themselves in trouble being not discreet enough.

If anything, I think it’s the opposite — I often get people writing in with questions who are concerned they’ll be recognized, when in fact the question is pretty common or generic. That said, it’s not impossible that someone could be recognized if their letter was about a very unusual situation with lots of specific, identifying details included. But thinking to the typical letter that’s published here, it’s fairly unlikely. (In the post you mentioned, my impression was that the letter-writer had told the coworker about the letter herself, not that the coworker had just stumbled upon it.)

An exception to this would be something like the letter from the person whose ex-coworker was throwing a mean-spirited party for some, but not all, employees of the company. That was uniquely weird enough that I’d think someone else who worked there would recognize the situation if they came across the post (although I’m not sure they’d know who specifically had written the letter).

But if all the stars aligned and someone was outed for writing a letter, whether or not they got in any trouble would depend on what the letter said. A request for advice on getting your coworkers to stop interrupting you? Unlikely to get you in trouble. A complaint about your horrid boss who you’re plotting to get fired would be a different risk level. But again, unless you include tons of really specific identifying details, your boss is unlikely to spot you.

6. Is my sci-fi book review blog too fringe for my resume?

I have been writing for a blog for around two years, doing daily updates on Twitter, interacting with commenters, setting up giveaways, etc. This has given me a lot of experience with WordPress and social media in general, along with enhancing my writing skills. The blog is a collaborative effort among a few other people. This blog is pretty large and I’ve had some of my own reviews mentioned in a few books on the review blurb pages that are at the beginning of books.

When I sat down with a resume consultant to fix up my resume, I asked about mentioning writing for a blog somewhere on the resume. When asked about the type of blog I write for, I mentioned that its is a book review blog mainly reviewing urban fantasy, sci-fi, paranormal books.

She told me that I should probably not mention what type of blog it is as it is “too out there” or too much on the “fringe.” I am looking into public relations and nonprofit work, and I think my experience with social media and blog writing would be a good asset to mention for a position that requires blogging and social media experience. Is my blog experience to bizarre for conservative business minded professionals to handle?

No, you should mention it. It’s good experience, and really, someone who would take issue with you reviewing sci-fi and fantasy books is the one who’s “on the fringe” not you.

7. Expressing continued interest in an internal position

I interviewed for an internal position back in February and ended up being the second choice candidate and did not get hired for the position. I heard through the grapevine that the same job in the same office has opened up and I am still interested in working there, however I do not have any idea how to approach expressing my continued interest in the job considering that the interview was so long ago. Do you have any advice on how to approach this?

Just be straightforward: “I heard this position may be opening up again, and I’d love to be considered for it again if you think I’d be a strong candidate.”

what IS a cover letter, anyway?

A reader writes:

This is a long email to ask a very short question: what is a cover letter?

I know it’s really basic, but that’s why it’s throwing me so much! How would you explain what a cover letter is, to someone who had never heard of one? I just ran into this situation at work and I thought it might be a good post for your blog (so, selfish disclaimer, I can just pull it up for people next time this happens). I actually tried to do this, but I realized that while you have covered writing a good cover letter, they weren’t quite what was needed.

Context: I work in a library, and I had an immigrant student from a very different cultural background asking for help with navigating a job website. I discovered as we were doing this that not only did he not have a cover letter, but had never heard of such of thing. He was South African, and they just don’t have them there (apparently :D ).

I tried to explain what they were — that basically, if someone picked up your resume it should explain why that resume is there (i.e. what they’re applying for), why you’re interested, and any extra information that wasn’t appropriate for the resume itself, and a few other things. I also got him to turn his objective into part of the letter, getting rid of that — but he honestly had no idea what I was talking about, and had trouble believing that it was required here and in a whole bunch of other countries.

While his computer literacy wasn’t ideal (which was why I was helping in the first place) and his English wasn’t perfect, he was definitely not stupid, and could understand me perfectly well. So it was clearly the foreignness of the concept (and/or my explanation) that was the problem.

So, basically, can you help me out with the next one? What IS a cover letter? Why bother to write one? How do you explain it to someone who has quite literally never heard of such a thing and doesn’t understand why you’d need something other than the resume, or why the hiring company would even expect it?

A cover letter is a letter outlining why you’re interested in the job and why you’d excel at it.

And the reason we use them is because people are more than just their work experience. They have personalities, motivations, habits, and all sorts of reasons they’d be great at a particular job that aren’t as easily seen from a resume as they might be from a short letter making the case. Otherwise, employers wouldn’t even need to bother to interview — they could just screen resumes, verify that candidates’ experience and accomplishments were accurate, and then hire the person with the best resume.

But that’s not how it works. Employers aren’t just hiring experience. They’re hiring people, and there’s a lot more to most people than just what their job history shows. And when done well, a cover letter takes a first step at explaining that additional piece of what you’re all about.

The example I always think of is when I was hiring for an assistant job and a candidate mentioned that her friends always teased her about her obsessive organization because she color-coded her closet and used a spreadsheet to organize her CDs. Those aren’t the sorts of things you’d put on a resume — but it instantly gave me a sense of who she was and how she might approach the job. (And I needed an obsessive organizer in that job, so it was hugely effective, and we actually ended up hiring her.) That’s a perfect example of a how a cover letter can flesh you out and explain why you’d be a great fit for the job by addign something new and not just relying on summarizing what’s already on your resume (which is the number one mistake I see with cover letters).

Another way to explain it to your student: Think about what you might say to a friend in explaining why you’re excited about a job and why you think you’d be great at it. Does that explanation add anything that your friend couldn’t get from just looking at your resume? It probably does — and that’s what you want to convey in your cover letter too.

should I have to take vacation time for this day when I regularly work extra hours?

A reader writes:

I got a new job about two months ago, thanks in large part to the excellent advice and resources on your blog. The company is a small start-up, so they don’t have a lot of procedures established. I was hired as the first middle manager between executive and administrative staff already on board. I have been working hard to establish myself as a top performer – staying late or arriving early to finish projects, establishing a rapport with my coworkers, and focusing on learning the job thoroughly as quickly as possible. My efforts are recognized and appreciated by those above and below me.

I am classified correctly as an exempt employee. This week I had a personal appointment come up which should have taken 2 hours but ended up taking most of the day (cable guy was a no-show). I know it’s legal for the company to make me use my vacation time to make up for the time I missed, and I’m fine with that.

Here’s the issue: my boss thinks I should use vacation time for all 6.5 hours I was out that day. My position is that since I had already worked an extra 5 hours that week I should only have to take the difference of 1.5 hours. Who’s right here?

You are, at least in terms of what’s sensible and fair, as well as good management.

Legally, yes, your company can make you take vacation day for all the time you missed that day, despite the hours you worked the rest of the week. But they shouldn’t.

On many other days, you put in extra hours instead of thinking, “Well, I’m done with my 8 hours so I’m out of here,” but where’s the incentive for you to continue that if the company is going to have a strict hours-per-day view on their own side of it? Their policy will nudge you and other employees to take the same strict policy toward hours yourself — and not be generous with your side of things if they’re not going to be generous with theirs.

If I were in your shoes, I’d go talk to your boss and say, “Look, I understand it’s your prerogative to do this. But I regularly stay late or come in early, and it’s disheartening to be told that the company doesn’t recognize that and is going to dock my vacation time for a few hours, when I’m working extra hours beyond what’s required all the time. If I’m going to continue working the hours I often do, cutting into the rest of my life, I’d like there be some recognition of that on the rare occasions that my life cuts a few hours into work.”

If they won’t agree, they won’t agree … but you’ll have learned something key about how they operate.

Read an update to this letter here.

5 things you should know about HR

What the hell happens in HR anyway? What kind of power do they really have? Are they your advocate? A proxy for your manager? Do they keep confidences? Whose side are they on? Here are five important things that you should know about HR.

1. HR isn’t there to be your advocate. HR’s function is to serve the needs of the business; its loyalty and responsibilities are to the company. Now, in some cases, that means advocate for employees against bad managers, because it’s in the best interests of employers to retain great employees, identify and address bad management, and stop legal problems before they explode. But plenty of other times, what’s best for the employer will not be what’s best for the employee, and the best interests of the employer will always win out. That’s not cynicism; that’s simply what HR’s mission is.

2. HR isn’t obligated to keep what you tell them confidential, even if you request their discretion. HR staffers aren’t doctors or priests, and you shouldn’t assume confidentiality when talking to them. If HR reps hear information that they judge needs to be shared or used to address a problem, their job obligates them to do that. In fact, in many cases they would be being professionally negligent – or in some cases, even breaking the law – if they didn’t act.

Now, that doesn’t mean that you can never talk to HR in confidence. But you should work out the terms explicitly beforehand – and should stay aware HR is still required to report certain things, like harassment or illegal behavior, even if they agreed to confidentiality before hearing your report.

3. HR knows things that they aren’t telling you. Whether it’s that major benefits changing are approaching, or why some departments get significantly more resources than yours, or who in the organization is essentially untouchable, or who is on their way out, HR learns things in the course of their work that they’re not allowed to relay to you. If an HR rep who you normally know to be responsive is stonewalling you or seems resistant to explaining something, it’s possible that they’re simply not allowed to share something confidential. (That said, if you’re regularly not getting what you need from HR, consider pushing back or talking to a different rep.)

4. HR’s job is to support the company’s managers, not to dictate how they operate. Some companies give HR more power than they should – such as letting them control how other departments hire or make promotion decisions. But in general, if you’re a manager and your HR department is creating obstacles to your work (for instance, making it harder for you to hire great people or hire as quickly as you need to, or making it difficult for you to address performance problems forthrightly), you should push back. Escalate the situation, or find an ally higher up in the organization who can overrule HR or push for different procedures.

5. Your HR department might be great, or it might be awful. Some HR departments are tightly synced with the company’s culture and goals and do excellent work – ensuring, for example, that managers are well-trained, benefits are strong and well-administered, and salaries are benchmarked to industry and market norms and increased when needed, and are a help rather than a hindrance to the company’s managers. Others, though, focus more on holding office parties and then get in the way when managers need to hire, give feedback, and handle sticky personnel issues. A good HR department can help a company get more done. A bad HR department will just get in the way.

But there’s a huge amount of variation in HR, so don’t assume that what was true at a company you worked at previously will be true at your next.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

convincing a friend to get a job, asking to have my salary info hidden, and more

It’s seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Asking to have my salary information removed from our database system

I recently started working for a nonprofit that utilizes an extensive, online tracking and storage system (Salesforce). While I was exploring our database as part of my training, I discovered that all of my email exchanges with the organization from when I was a candidate are not only saved but published. This includes the email exchanges about my salary and benefits with an email attachment including my final offer letter. This information is currently accessible to everyone in the organization. In addition to not being comfortable having this information readily accessible (not every employee’s contract information is published, only the most recent hires), the fact that some of the new hires, including me, have a higher starting salary then some of the more veteran employees has been a source of unnecessary drama.

Would it be completely inappropriate for me to ask to have this information removed? Who would be most appropriate person to ask — the Salesforce admin, my manager, HR?

No, it’s perfectly appropriate, and I’d approach it from the assumption that it’s a mistake, since not everyone’s is in there and that whoever should be in charge of this doesn’t even realize that it’s there. I’d ask either your manager or HR, but not the Salesforce admin, who probably needs to be directed by someone with more authority to remove it.

2. My coworkers hear my joints cracking all the time due to a medical condition

I can’t believe I’m asking this, but here it is. I have Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, a disorder that has a lot of serious and less serious effects. The least serious effect is that my joints make loud cracking noises while I work in a small, quiet office. I know that I have disturbed people, and there is very little that I can do to stop it. Any ideas for dealing with an uncontrollable but gross and disruptive thing like this?

Have you told people what’s going on? You’re under no obligation to, but if you’re comfortable doing so, that’s probably the best way to handle it. If people think you’re a chronic joint cracker, they might be annoyed, but if they know that it’s the effect of a condition you’re struggling with, most people will be sympathetic.

3. How can I convince my friend to get a job?

A friend of mine has not worked for 2+ years after finishing grad school. Her parents support her by letting her to live by herself in their extra property in the same city. She’s willing to work, but idealizes how hiring should be done. Her parents, who run a successful business, told her that she should accept only the jobs that she wants to do. She has told her friends that “the employers should see through her potential,” “people get jobs because of their ‘charm’ but not by merit,” and “employers should approach the candidates instead,” etc. She has tried to get a job, but told me that “one government job opening attracted thousands of applicants.” She has had odd jobs occasionally.

How can I tell this friend to get a job to at least to pay her bills? She’s constantly broke. Some businesses nearby have “help wanted” signs, but she’s unwilling to settle for a less ideal job. My friends and I have forwarded job postings to her, but those conversations have gone nowhere. I’m not connected anywhere insofar to get her a job.

You can’t, and it’s not your job to. It was her parents’ job, which they apparently failed spectacularly at, and now it’s her job. It’s not yours.

When she says ridiculous things about how job-searching works, you can certainly correct her, and if you’re close to her you can have one serious heart-to-heart about your worries … but beyond that, she’s going to have to learn this one on her own.

4. How to solve a conflict between two strong-willed employees

What do you do when you have two very strong-headed and opinionated employees working closely together, one a team leader and the other a newer employee, who have a personality conflict? The team leader has been with the company for five years and feels as if the newer employee talks to her in a condescending manner. The new employee has knowledge in the industry and has done the job for many years but is learning a new way and tends to ask lots of questions and wants specific details as to why our company does it such and such a way. This employee now feels that she asks too many questions so she stopped asking and then feels like she is looked at as a show off. I don’t think either of them is right; it’s just a power struggle.

Is the issue that the newer employee is doing too much of “we did it a better way at my old job?” If so, that’s genuinely annoying after a point, and it would be worth your talking to her and telling her that you encourage to ask as many questions as she needs to learn the job, but that at the same time she should be sensitive to making your existing staff feel that she’s criticizing the way they do things or questioning their own knowledge. Tell her also that you’d welcome her ideas about how your team could do things differently, but that she should bring them to you, not the team leader. (If it becomes necessary, you can also ask her to spend the next few months learning your set-up before you two talk about possible changes.)

Meanwhile, tell the team leader that you expect her to find a way to get along pleasantly and professionally with the new employee, period. If she has concerns, she can bring them to you — but she needs to make sure that her manner doesn’t discourage the new employee from asking the questions she needs in order to learn her job.

5. Should I take time off work when my boss is very sick?

I’ve been making a plan with my doctor to have a medically necessary but non-emergency surgery. For a number of reasons, but primarily financial, it is better for me to do the surgery this calendar year. My plan has been to schedule it for mid-late November/early December when we are not as busy but before everyone takes time off for Christmas. I’m expecting to be out about 2 weeks, the second week of which it’s reasonable to assume I could log on from home a little and keep up with emails, but not be at full capacity. We have a good telecommuting policy in place, though it’s not often used.

My boss was recently diagnosed with cancer. I found out today that the cancer has spread (it’s in her blood and bones now), there is very little the doctors can do for her, and she has a life expectancy of around 2-3 years. She’s understandably very upset, as are all the folks in our office. She is missing a lot of work, and I have taken on a lot of responsiblity. This is fine (as previously my primary complaint has been lack of work/responsibility). However, this leads me to wonder if I should put off the surgery, or go ahead. If I do go ahead, when and how do I tell the remaining manager that I’ll need to take 2 weeks off when he’s already down a significant support person? We are 3 people of a 6 person team, but there is some separation of duties, meaning that the remaining 3 people are not really prepared to step up in the way that I am. Am I overthinking this? Part of me thinks I should just cancel the surgery, put my head down, and wait this out. Given the new information, waiting it out may not be an option, as the longer I wait the sicker she is likely to get.

Go forward with your plans for the surgery. As you point out, it’s not likely that it’s going to be any easier to take time off later; in fact, this may be the easiest time for you to take off for a while, if your boss is going to be increasingly out. But even if that weren’t the case, I think it would make sense for move forward. You can never predict if it will really be a better time later (someone else could get sick or leave or who knows what else). Yes, it might a tricky two weeks for your office, but they’ll get through it — this stuff happens, people accommodate it, and it’s rarely as bad as the person who needs to be out fears it will. Work will go on, and two weeks is very little time in the scheme of things. So go ahead and tell your managers. When you do, just be straightforward, note the timing isn’t ideal, and offer to do whatever you can beforehand to make it as easy as possible on the offer.

I’m sorry about your boss.

6. Should I send a post-interview thank-you note even though I didn’t get the job?

I recently had a successful group interview with a company recruiter, followed by a not-as-successful face-to-face interview with two store managers at the location to which I applied. I didn’t send thank-you notes to any of my interviewers for a few reasons — the foremost of which being that a decision was very, very likely going to be reached before any thank-you notes would be received through the mail. Probably not the best strategy, but it made some sense to me.

Anyway, I got a phone call from the recruiter who explained to me that another candidate had been selected for the position, but that since my interview went so well, she would like to keep me on file for similar openings. Obviously, a thank you note for the recruiter is in order for keeping me in future consideration. Should I send something to the two managers as well, or is it weird at this point since the position has already been filled?

Send them a note! Tell them that even though you didn’t get the position, you appreciated meeting with them, that talking with them made you even more interested in working with them and for their company, and would love to stay in touch, and wish them the best of luck in their work and with the new hire. It will make you look gracious, and you never know what seeds it might plant for the future. (Also, it’s totally fine to send this and any other thank-you notes in the future by email; you don’t need to use postal mail.)

7. Can I ask an interviewer about a preferred skill that I don’t have?

On Friday, I applied for a position at my alma mater, from which I graduated last spring. I have three years of experience doing the kind of work involved from an on-campus job I had while I was in school, but I don’t have a few of the “preferred but not required” skills, which include speaking a second language (no language in particular was specified). Since I’m pretty familiar with the work, I’m surprised that I can’t think of how being bilingual would be particularly useful in this position.

I have no reason to expect to get selected to be interviewed, but if I do, would it be odd if I asked about this? I’m really curious about how it fits into performing the duties of the role, but I wonder if bringing it up if they don’t bring it up first will only serve to emphasize that I lack a skill that would like in a candidate for this position.

Sure, you can bring that up. It’s fine to say something like, “I noticed in the job posting that you mentioned it would be a bonus if candidates spoke a second language. I don’t, unfortunately, but I was curious about how that might end up being used in the role.”

You don’t really need to worry that you’re going to draw their attention to the fact that you don’t have this skill. If it’s an important one, they’ve already noted it (and are interviewing you anyway) or would have asked about it.