will asking for a raise after 3 months make my awful job more tolerable?

A reader writes:

This will end up making you laugh at me for being a fool, but here goes: Can I ask for a raise three months after I started a job?

I took this job, knowing it a) was for a company I did not respect much and b) involved long hours and c) involved work I cannot stand (staring at a computer screen for 10 hours/day). I took it because I had the skills for it and it paid much more than my previous job, which I took in a low-self-esteem moment and basically made me have to seek additional part-time work, it paid so low. One job versus two and three seemed an improvement.

So I am now in the new job and have found out I am at the lowest end of pay in my dept (although my skills are mid-range, I would say), and I do not like how much of my life is lost to the extra hours. It is obvious this job is a bad fit, but I wonder if, say, a few extra thousand a year might not make it tolerable [I think it won’t, but hey, I’ve never actually made enough to live on (student loans)] and maybe I’d be a whole new person, and able to tolerate my misgivings/boredom/eyestrain/headaches/no personal time.

I guess that’s the bottom line: I don’t think I’m getting paid enough to suck it up, and I want to be, at least until I can find a healthier job.

There’s also the bad-faith question, but I really have no tender feelings for this company and watch them waste money in a variety of ways every day and think I ought to get in on that, if I’m stuck here. (Not that I waste anyone’s money, I am a super-hard-worker-conscientious, etc., but it is a waste if I have no plans to stay.) I do happen to know that, as I am being trained to replace a senior member who is leaving in a month, they would be in a terrible position if I walked. Which if I can find anything that pays equal to what I’m making now and has better hours/better culture/better job description, I will.

So, does anybody do this? Does it even work or just cause ill will?

I hate to say it but, the company I work for is so known for disorganization and sloppy practices that it wouldn’t really be burning a bridge, to act in bad faith with them. I took the job strictly for money though, so maybe I should learn from that lesson and not try to make things right with another wrong?

I realize after writing this that I really just want to quit, but of course who does that without a job lined up? Not me, not yet anyway.

Yes, I think you do just want to quit. And yes, you should get another job before doing that, of course.

I’m skeptical that an extra few thousand a year will make this more tolerable: You’re talking about work that you hate, a company you hate, and hours you hate. I doubt very much that that’s worth an extra $187/month to you. (Because that’s roughly what a $3,000 raise will come out to after taxes.)

But perhaps more to the point, no, you can’t really ask for a raise after three months, not unless there are very exceptional circumstances (like the job dramatically changing). The most likely outcome of that is that you’d looking naive, and with an annoyed manager and no raise.

I will apologize in advance for turning your plight into a lesson for others, but this … well, this is why you it’s not a good idea to take a job you know you won’t like, just in order to get out of a bad situation. You end up miserable all over again. Or at least, if you’re going to do it, you’ve got to go into it really clear-eyed about what you’re doing and why, and what it will mean for your quality of life, and how long you’re willing to do it for, and what your exit strategy will be.

Speaking of exit strategies, that’s what I’d recommend you focus on now. Start thinking about what your next move should be after this one, and what you can do now to position yourself as strongly as possible for that when the time comes. Fixate on that, not the situation you’re in currently. Good luck.

can my company prohibit coworkers from dating and fire us if we do?

A reader writes:

My company’s handbook says that if employees have a relationship, we have 3 months to report it and then one of us would have to find a new job.

I carpool with a male coworker, and he and I have become friends. He would like to hang out and possibly go to the movies and such things together. Two of my coworkers have warned me to be careful, as there have just been rumors of people in the past possibly having relations and the woman was always the one to be terminated.

Can a company honestly terminate you just for reasonable suspicion or do they need proof? Also, what would qualify as reasonable suspicion if they are allowed to do that?

It is indeed legal to prohibit dating between coworkers (with a few exceptions, such as in California, where courts have ruled that the state constitution provides broader privacy protection in employment matters). And you can indeed have a policy that requires one of the parties to move on if a relationship happens.

What’s not legal, though, is to always have women be the ones who have to leave. If indeed that’s how your company does it, that’s sex discrimination and is illegal. (Or at least it’s illegal if your company is big enough to be covered by federal discrimination statutes — meaning that it has 15 or more employees.)

As for the question of whether they need reasonable suspicion, employers don’t generally need “proof” before taking disciplinary action against employees in any matter, but because the issue of romantic relations is a sticky one, I turned to employment attorney Bryan Cavanaugh to weigh in. He says: “As for reasonable suspicion, the law does not impose any sort of standard that the employer must meet before taking action. That is to say, the employer does not need admissions from the employees, or explicit emails, or video evidence. The employer can act on its suspicions and circumstantial evidence.”

This is basically the same as if your employer suspected you of violating any other policy (or even doing something they didn’t like, whether prohibited by a policy or not): If, for instance, your employer suspected you of being rude to clients or watching too much YouTube at your desk, they wouldn’t need to present you with evidence. They could simply take action.

In this case, though, Bryan goes on to say that they’d still be wise to only act if they have solid evidence: “Acting on flimsy suspicions would only serve to alienate employees, lower morale because they fear ‘big brother’ is prying into their personal lives, and risk losing good and loyal employees without a good reason. If an employee was let go under this policy without solid evidence and that employee came back and alleged the real reason for the discharge was gender, race, age, etc., then the employer would have a weak defense since its ‘legitimate business reason’ for the termination was so flimsy.”

So there are the facts on legality.

Now let’s talk about the rest of it. From the employer’s side, there are all kinds of reasons not to want couples in your organization — but banning dating upon penalty of firing is a very old-fashioned policy and out of touch with how most modern workplaces operate. Throw in the fact that they have a pattern of firing the women in these couples but not the men, and there’s something pretty disturbing there.

I’d say that you have to decide if you want to work for a company that operates that way. (And that’s not a loaded question; you can certainly decide for plenty of legitimate reasons that you do.) But if you decide that you do, then yeah, I’d avoid hanging out with your male coworker socially, unless you’re prepared to potentially lose your job over it.

(In addition to facing dismissal for fraternizing with a man, you also should not appear unescorted in public or dress immodestly. Oh wait, that’s Downton Abbey.)

5 things to know about taking time off work

Here are five things you should know about taking time off work.

1. No federal or state law requires that you be given vacation leave. Of course, most employers offer paid vacation days anyway to be competitive and attract good employees—but there’s a difference between what’s smart and customary, and what’s legal.

2. No federal law requires that you be given sick leave. A very small number of jurisdictions require paid sick leave, but the majority of Americans live in places not covered by those laws. (The Family and Medical Leave Act, or FMLA, does require some employers to give some workers up to 12 weeks off per year for serious illness or to care for an ill family member or new child, but that time off is unpaid.) Of course, as with vacation time, smart employers offer sick leave anyway in order to attract and retain good employees, but some employers don’t — and some entire industries, such as restaurant work, are known for not offering it.

3. If your office closes for the day because of weather, a natural disaster, or even just because they decided to give everyone the day off, they can deduct that time from your leave balance – even though it wasn’t your choice. Alternately, if you’re non-exempt, they can dock your pay for the day.

(What does non-exempt mean, you ask? The federal government divides all types of jobs into one of two categories: exempt and non-exempt. If your job is categorized as non-exempt, your employer must pay you overtime at time and a half your regular pay rate for all hours you work above 40 in any given week, but can also dock your pay when you don’t work at least 40 hours. If you’re exempt, your employer isn’t required to pay you overtime but also cannot dock your pay, except in limited circumstances.)

4. No law requires your office to leave you alone while you’re on vacation. Because no law requires employers to give paid vacation time at all, employers can structure the time-off they offer however they like: They can say that you can take the time as long you answer your cell phone, or as long as you check email once a day, or as long as you get that report done while you’re away.

So yes, you might be on a cruise or hiking in the mountains or just relaxing at home and officially not working, and your employer can still bother you with work calls and emails. A smart employer won’t do this because they recognize that having time to truly disconnect is important, but many others do anyway. (Of course, a smart employee might be conveniently “out of cell phone range.”) However, if you’re non-exempt, you would need to be paid for any time you spend working on your vacation.

5. Your employer can revoke its approval for your time off at any point. No law prevents your employer from changing its mind and denying your vacation time, even after it’s already been approved – even if you have nonrefundable airline tickets or even if you’re already on the beach sipping a mimosa.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

could this rejection email be a mistake, typos on an employer’s website, and more

It’s wee answer Wednesday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Could this rejection email be a mistake?

I have had two interviews for a position at a very large health services nonprofit organization. Both interviews went very well, and ended with meeting the team and the supervisor. After the second interview, which was on a Friday, the interviewer instructed me to call her towards the end of the next week for an update. When I finally got in touch with her, she said that the organization was undergoing a surprise audit the following week and that I should, once again, call her towards the end of that next week. Today, which is the Monday following that phone call, I received an automated, form rejection email from the organization.

I have read much of your archives section and I understand that one does not have a job until an offer is in hand, but it seems strange to me that an interviewer would encourage me to continue to follow up, only to have HR send me a rejection 2 business days later. Is it worth trying to follow up with the interviewer? I know this sounds ridiculous, but are form rejection emails ever sent out by mistake (say, to the entire list of applicants for the position, without removing the pool of candidates who have been interviewed and are still being considered)?

Occasionally, sure. But it’s more likely the the email was correct — it’s entirely plausible that you were given a genuine, sincere “we’re still deciding” on Friday, only to receive a rejection on Monday. It doesn’t usually take days to decide; the delay is generally about finishing interviews or making the time to sit down and compare candidates. Once you do that, you can make a decision very quickly, which is why it’s perfectly reasonable that she could have no answer for you one day and a rejection the next.

That said, if you want to be certain, you can email her to let her know that you received the rejection but want to thank her for the time she spent talking with you and that you wish her the best in the search. If for some reason the email was a mistake, that will alert her.

2. Should I point out typos on a company’s website when applying for a job with them?

I’m interviewing with a company soon and I was just looking at their website. I found quite a few typos. Should I tell them? Of course not on the first interview, but should I mention something, or is that too risky? I think they could be losing business if there are errors on their page; it makes them look unprofessional.

Also, recently I interviewed with a company whose address was marked at the wrong spot on Google Maps. It took me a while to find it (good thing I left home early), and when I got there, the interviewer told me that people always have trouble finding the place because of the error on Google Maps. After the interview, along with my thank you note, I sent a printout of how to fix that, with a quick note saying: “Not sure you’ve tried this, but if the Google error bothers you, this is how to fix it, it should be pretty simple.” On a side note, I’ve worked for Google and we discussed that in the interview, so I didn’t think it would be too obnoxious. But since I never heard back from them, I wonder if that hurt my chances.

I don’t want to sound like a “know-it-all,” which I’m not, I’m actually pretty quiet and more on the reserved side, but I catch on these little details that are an easy fix and it drives me crazy not to say anything.

It depends on how you do it. There’s a longer discussion of this here, but basically, it can go over well or it can go over poorly, depending on your framing. If you don’t get the tone right, it can backfire on you. I would think your tip on fixing Google Maps would have been really appreciated though, at least at the right company.

3. Explaining why I’m not using my last and best job as a reference

I was hired on a short-term contract of 6 months. For various reasons including being requested to engage in fraud by my supervisor, un-stimulating work, and low pay, I was not interested in extending my contract, nor had I received an offer to extend it by my employer.

A week before my last day my supervisor scheduled me to attend a meeting a month later. When I pointed out that my contract was to terminate in a few days and that I was not going to extend it, she called me into a meeting with HR staff, who tried to threaten me into extending the contract by saying that they would ruin my professional reputation if I did not extend my contract (amongst other nasty threats and accusations). Basically, I cannot ask them for a reference.

The problem is that they are by far my most relevant work experience and a major gem on my CV for the jobs I am currently applying for. I learned a lot of useful skills that I want to point out in future applications. However, how do I explain to potential employees why I am not using them as a reference? How do I explain the situation I had with them without coming across as trash-talking my past employer? I asume that I was doing a good job at my previous work place since they were so eager to keep me (only they tried making me stay by using a whip rather than carrots), so how would you suggest I try to bring that forward?

“They became angry when I declined their offer to extend my contract, and unfortunately it soured the relationship.”

You might also follow the advice here on what to do when a previous employer will give you a bad reference, in case a prospective employer calls them anyway.

4. When a job is posted by multiple recruiting agencies

I applied for a job a while back at a major employer through their website. I am now seeing the same job posted by a decent amount of agencies. Do the agencies have an agreement with this company or are they hoping to find a candidate and present that person to the company hoping to get a contract with them?

Could be either — no real way of knowing unless you talk to the agency, at which point you can ask whether they’re working on contract with the company.

5. Changing my desired salary range after learning more about a job

I recently found a job posting on Craigslist. It was pretty vague, and didn’t even really give a title, but it sounded like something I could do, so I applied. They also asked for salary history. Instead of that, I followed your advice and sent them the range I was looking for. They called me and talked to me a bit more about the position, and when I learned the details and title, I really feel like I low-balled myself (it’s a director level position). If I were to get an offer, is there anyway I could negotiate a higher salary than I stated? I don’t want to look like I wasn’t being honest, but I really think the responsibilities deserve more money than I originally stated.

You can certainly say something like, “After learning more about the job’s responsibilities, I think a salary of $X is fair and in keeping with the market.” You’re at somewhat of a disadvantage because employers tend to think of salary numbers as what you’re willing to live on, rather than what you’d need to perform a specific job at a specific level, and they already have your “what I’m willing to live on” number. But you can absolutely try, and might be able to get more.

6. Asking for a raise when my company isn’t giving them this year

I have an annual performance review coming up this week after a year at my company. About nine months ago, there was a large round of layoffs, and my role was expanded to cover two campuses, effectively doubling my area of responsibility. All the other employees with my job description manage one campus. Each of my quarterly reviews has been glowing, and I’ve implemented several new programs that have been incredibly successful.

That being said, it’s widely known that any sort of substantial raise will be off the table for this year no matter how good an employee’s performance has been due to the company’s position. We’ve received emails asking us what sort of thing incentives us, with options ranging from company merchandise to professional development opportunities.

Knowing all this, should I ask for a raise? If there’s no chance for a raise at all, is it reasonable to ask for the company to fund a trip to an industry conference or something similar? I love my work, but I do feel like over the last year my position has changed enough to justify something in terms of compensation.

If you can make the case that you’ve made significant contributions and performed at a significantly higher level than what’s generally expected in your role (and it sounds like you can), then yes, ask for a raise. You may or may not get it, but exceptions are sometimes made to across-the-board raise policies for exceptional employees, and it’s absolutely reasonable to argue that your work deserves it.

And yes, if you can’t get it, then certainly ask for the conference trip.

7. Explaining why my summer job is ending due to political unrest

My question is how to deal with the fact that my summer job in a foreign country (running the summer season of an artist residency) has been dramatically effected and by course basically ended due to political unrest in the country. I am in Istanbul, and with the protests earlier this summer, several resident artists slated to come for the summer have changed their plans. With few artists coming to the residency there is not the same need for a residency coordinator (me) to be here. I need to find another job ASAP (preferably one in a country with less civil unrest).

I am now starting to look for jobs earlier than anticipated, and I will not have a chance to fulfill some of the other projects affliated with this position (such as creating a guide book, and assisting in the production of several small exhibitions). Should I mention this in my cover letter, and on my resume (position terminated due to political unrest sounds a bit dramatic) or should I refrain from putting the job on my resume. if so how do I explain why I am currently in Istanbul and only contactable thru email or skype?

Yes, include it, and briefly explain why you’re leaving early in your cover letter. People will find it interesting, and it will give them something to talk about with you.

can I decline a video interview?

A reader writes:

I’m a college student about to get my degree this December. I thought I’d send out my resume to a few companies in advance, seeking entry-level positions or perhaps internships. One company responded to my application and asked me to fill out an online assessment form. After “passing” that stage, I was asked to do what I believe is called a “video interview,” where I have to record myself answering pre-set questions using HireVue.

I’m new to job hunting, and personally, I prefer the traditional face-to-face interview. Also, I’m very, very apprehensive and shy about recording myself (I don’t even take photos of myself!). I tried starting on the interview but somehow it felt fake or it felt like I wasn’t being sincere, simply because I’m talking to a camera. In the end, I didn’t do the interview.

I’m still very interested in the position though, but since they gave me a 3-day deadline to do the interview (it’s been a week now), I think I may have blown it. Do you think it’s a good idea for me to email them, explain myself and ask if I have any other options? Are video interviews going to be a trend, a natural part of the employment ecosystem?

Ugh, I feel your pain — I wouldn’t want to do that either.

You can’t really dictate the terms of an interview, though. If they want you to record a video of yourself, or talk to them over Skype, or whatever, that’s their call and you can’t really override it. (One exception would be if you didn’t have the right technology on your end, like if your web cam were broken. Although even then, while some employers would be willing to accommodate you, others would expect you to find a solution on your end.) So you’d need to figure out if you want the job enough that you’re willing to do something that makes you uncomfortable, or if you’d rather pass.

At this point, unfortunately, it’s probably a moot point. If they gave you three days and it’s been a week, you’re probably out of the running, because they’ll take it as initial evidence that you’re not responsive to deadlines or simply not that interested. (Unless you explained that you were, say, out of town and just saw the email or something like that.)

But personally, I don’t know why employers are using this type of technology, for two reasons:

1. Good interviewers don’t just run down a list of questions and never deviate from it; they ask follow-ups questions and build on what you just said. This technology doesn’t allow for that — it’s just you talking to yourself, with no interaction.

2. An interview at this stage should involve back-and-forth; it’s not an interrogation. At this stage, they should be giving you the chance to ask your own questions, not just answer theirs. You’ve already invested some time in their application process — writing a cover letter and filling out their assessment. It’s not reasonable to ask you to jump through another hoop before you’ve had a chance to ask your own questions and figure out if you’re even interested in investing further time.

The good news is that this type of screening isn’t yet widespread and probably won’t be. Good interviewers won’t do it for the reasons above.

what to do when you have moral qualms about your employer’s line of business

A reader writes:

I have a job that I mostly love. This is the first job I’ve had where I feel fully competent and even excellent at what I do. My manager is amazing, the office culture is everything I could ever hope for, the money and benefits are good, and the work I do is engaging and fulfilling. The industry, however, is not. You see, I work for a tobacco wholesaler.

Since day one I’ve been uneasy about the product. Obviously tobacco products carry a well-known health risk and stigma. We’re not “Big Tobacco” by any means, but we do profit off the sale and use of a product that is addictive at best and deadly at worst. But it was the first job offered to me after five months of unemployment, and everything else about it is great. I was mostly able to ignore my misgivings for about a year. But in February, my dad was diagnosed with Stage IV Lung Cancer. I almost didn’t go into work the next day and spent pretty much the whole week crying in the bathroom. I told my manager and the owner of the company, and they’ve both been incredibly supportive, encouraging me to take as much time off as needed and not to worry about PTO limits.

I nearly quit on the spot, but fear of unemployment and my dad’s encouragement convinced me to stick it out and see if I was able to see it a little different after a few weeks or months. Well, it’s been 4 months, and despite my best efforts, I’m still resentful of the industry, and it’s been showing at the office. Too many things remind me of my dad and his illness. At the very least I’m pretty good about going to my boss and saying, “Hey, I’m having one of those days,” and she keeps everyone off my tail as much as possible. But as accommodating as everyone has been, I’ve decided to search for a new job.

I let my manager know, as we have a good relationship and she had initially broached the subject when I first told her about my dad. When the owner found out, he offered me a raise, better hours, and even the option to start a fund for lung cancer research and support with company money to convince me to stay. He understood that it wasn’t about the money but said he still had to try because they would hate to see me go. I assured him that when I go I will provide at least four weeks of notice and I absolutely will not be leaving until the right job comes along.

So, I guess my questions are these: First, do you have any suggestions for how to deal with my resentment at the office? I’m usually really good at policing my emotions when I’m on the clock, but I’m past my limit here. I don’t want to be the Sally Sad Sack that brings the entire office down. Second, how do I tell interviewers and online applications why I’m leaving my job? I just don’t want to come across as a martyr trying to gain sympathy points (or start crying in the middle of the interview!). For that matter, how do I approach the potential time off issue? I don’t expect to get PTO right off the bat, and that’s fine, but whether it’s paid or not, I may need to take time off suddenly and don’t want to be seen as unreliable or demanding.

Thank you for any insight you might have. Sometimes I wonder if I’m being completely irrational about the whole situation, but it’s really difficult to remain objective while in the middle of something like this.

I’m so sorry you and your family are dealing with this.

Now, I say this as someone whose father died of esophageal cancer caused by smoking so I’m pretty damn sympathetic, but: You can’t walk around simmering with resentment at work. They’re paying you to work there, whatever you think of their product, you accepted the job of your own free will, and you owe it to them to perform at a reasonably high level — or, if you can’t, to acknowledge that and leave. Otherwise, you’re acting in bad faith toward them by not upholding your end of the bargain, and potentially harming your own professional reputation too.

I am no fan of the tobacco industry, no fan at all — but there are many legal products being sold out there that sicken and kill many of us: meat and other animal products (cancer and heart disease), junk food (diabetes and obesity-related diseases), alcohol (accidents and alcoholism-related diseases), and more. You should absolutely follow your moral compass in deciding where you work … but once you’re there, you need to own that choice and not penalize others for it.

So you’re right to be job searching, but if you can’t keep your resentment in check until you find another job, you might be better off leaving, even if it’s just through a leave of absence that you negotiate with your employer (which isn’t unreasonable if you want to spend more time with your dad right now).

As for what to tell interviewers about why you’re leaving your job, it’s fine to say that you thought you’d be comfortable working for the tobacco industry but realized over time that you weren’t. People will understand that and you don’t need to go into detail about your family’s situation.

If you get an offer, at that point you can explain that you have a seriously ill parent and know you’ll need some time off at some point, possibly without a lot of notice, and that you’re willing to take it unpaid but wanted to to make them aware of the situation. Most employers will be fine with that. (I had to do the exact same thing when I changed jobs while my dad was sick. My employer, like most, was very understanding. If they’re not, take that as valuable information about the work environment.)

Good luck to you and your family while you deal with this. I hope your dad is doing okay.

Read an update to this letter here.

what to do when an employee resigns

A reader writes:

What are the things I should do or think about when an employee resigns? In the past, I’ve generally been caught off guard and I’ve not always handled it as smoothly as I suspect I should, and I haven’t always known how to make the best use of their remaining time. Is there a protocol for what to do when someone gives notice?

You’re not alone in not being prepared for employee resignations! Most managers are caught off guard by them, but there are a few simple principles to remember to make them go more smoothly.

1. Take the news well. You might be panicking inside about how you’re going to deal with the vacancy, as well as finding a replacement and getting that person up to speed, but you should not take this panic out on the employee. Getting angry or guilt-tripping her about their resignation isn’t appropriate or professional. Instead, congratulate her on her new position and her them that she’ll be missed. And remember, your other employees will hear about how treat people who resign, and will take their cues accordingly.

2. Don’t make a counter-offer. Managers often make countoffers in a moment of panic (“We can’t lose Jane right now! We have that big project coming up!”), but they rarely work out well in the long-term. Your employee has decided to leave. If you try to lure her back with more money, you’re generally just retaining a dissatisfied employee, and kicking the problem down the road. Resist the urge.

3. Discuss logistics right away. Find out when her last day will be, what she thinks she can accomplish between now and then, and when and how she’d like to announce her leaving to the staff. That last one is important. If your employee is handling her resignation professionally and pleasantly – as most people do – you should leave it up to her to tell her colleagues (although make sure that happens soon, so that you can move forward with transition planning). On the other hand, if she seems bitter or unhappy, you might choose to manage that announcement yourself so that you have some control over the tone.

4. Create a transition plan. Sit down with your employee and make a list of everything she’s currently working on, including key client relationships. From there, figure out (a) what she should finish up before she leaves and (b) how you will handle those responsibilities before a replacement is hired. For the former, make sure that your staff member has a clear and specific to-do list … which should also include plans for transferring key knowledge and contacts before she goes, as well as how to alert outside contacts of her departure so that they aren’t surprised when an email to her bounces back one day.

But don’t check out once that plan is created. You’ll want to check in on her progress during her remaining weeks – don’t just trust that everything on that plan is getting done or you risk finding out on her last day that things aren’t being left in the shape you’d assumed.

5. Think about what you need in a replacement, and begin recruiting. Don’t just automatically post the same job description that you used last time. Take this opportunity to think about what you really need in the role and how it might have changed over time. Make sure that you’re hiring for what you need today, not what you needed when that dusty job description was first written. Once you’re clear on that, swing into recruiting mode immediately – hiring well takes time, and generally the sooner you start, the better.

my boss asked a reference-checker to move my start date, creepy coworkers, and more

It’s tiny answer Tuesday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. My boss asked a reference-checker to move my start date

A potential employer called my immediate supervisor that I had listed as a reference. have been very open with my boss about my job search, which means that I will be relocating to a different state. During the reference call, my boss asked the potential supervisor if she would move the start date to at least August 15 if she hired me. Does his asking that question hurt my chances for employment with this company? I emailed the potential supervisor to let her know again that the original start date is not an issue for me, as my company only requires 2 weeks notice.

Nah, it shouldn’t, especially since you followed up to let the manager know that the start date you’d talked about still worked. Your current manager was really out of line in doing that though.

2. My manager and I disagree about a department restructure

With a leadership change at the large nonprofit where I work, we have the opportunity to restructure some of our positions. My supervisor and I have differing philosophies about whether changes are warranted and I’m interested in how you weigh in. I have a large number of direct reports, all of whom have the title of “widget maker,” but about a third are “senior” widget makers. They all have the same responsibilities in general, but senior widget makers are assigned to larger departments where more widgets are needed. Their salaries, on average, are about 30% higher than the “junior” widget makers. Needless to say, when a senior widget maker resigns, I can be sure that at least one junior widget maker will apply for the job. In the past several years, every senior position has been filled by someone who was promoted. While it can be exhausting when the resolution to one search means starting another search, I’m satisfied with the structure because I’m happy to be able to reward good employees with a promotion.

My supervisor, on the other hand, wants to flatten the structure and make everyone a plain ol’ widget maker with the higher salary of a senior widget maker (we may have a one-time chance to increase base pay to make this happen). She’s sick of people leaving their positions after three years and wants to take away the incentive to move within the organization. I’m not sure that flattening the widget maker unit will accomplish this. My theory is that after a period of time, employees start to get itchy, even if they make a good salary — maybe they want a new challenge, maybe they want the recognition that comes with a better title, maybe their salary doesn’t feel like it’s enough anymore — and unfortunately, salary increases (beyond across-the-board cost of living increases) only come with promotions at our organization. Widget makers are in demand in our city. I feel that if we can offer at least some people a promotion, we keep them around a few more years and benefit from their institutional knowledge. Also, other junior widget makers feel like their may be a chance for them to move up. I haven’t challenged my supervisor about this because it’s all just been theoretical until the last couple of weeks. Now, it looks like I’m going to have to defend my position. Is it defensible?

I agree with you. People want opportunities to move up and see (and show) progression in their careers. If your manager is trying to avoid people leaving after three years, this is the exact wrong way to do it: People will still move on, but now they’ll leave the company in order to do it — because they’ll have to. Plus, if getting a promotion is the only way to get a merit raise in your company, then taking away the possibility of promotions in this role means that you’ll probably have even more people leaving — because people want to be rewarded for good work. Throw in the fact that they have an in-demand skill set, and what your manager is proposing is a recipe for less retention, not more.

3. Inappropriate coworker, part 1

I am the manager of a charity shop (paid). I’m in my late 20’s and one of my volunteers in his mid 50’s has sent me text messages telling me he is very attracted to me and misses me. I don’t know how to deal with this. He has mild autism/Asperger’s. It’s unnerving me because he constantly stares at me and compliments me about what I’m wearing and how I look, etc. Please help.

You’re his manager, right? Then this is simple: “Bob, it’s not appropriate for you to tell me that you’re attracted to me or miss me or to comment on my appearance. Please stop.” If it continues after that, then you say, “Bob, I asked you to stop this already. If it continues, we won’t be able to have you work here anymore.”

By the way, make sure he’s not doing this to any of your other employees or volunteers. It’s possible that he is and no one has told you about it.

4. Inappropriate coworker, part 2

I’ve been working at a restaurant for about six months now and always have been treated very respectfully by all of my male coworkers. In the last week or so, a new employee started who is either incredibly socially awkward with women or just creepy. I would like to think the former of him, but all of the other young women I work with (all three of us), as well as several of the male employees, have been made to feel uncomfortable or have noticed this employee is making the women feel that way.

Some examples of his behavior include staring in a suggestive manner, touching without permission, invading personal space, “helping” when help is not needed, trying to force conversations, etc. Is it appropriate to speak directly to the new employee before bringing the matter to management? I would hate for him to get off on the wrong foot if he really is just clueless about speaking to and looking at women. Is there any way to tell definitively whether somebody is just socially awkward with women or is indeed creepy?

The good news is that his motivation doesn’t really impact how you proceed here; the response is this same in both cases: “Bob, please do not touch me.” “Please don’t stare at me; it makes me uncomfortable.” “I can’t talk right now; I’m busy.” “I don’t need help with this.” In other words, a clear, direct statement of boundaries.

And if the problem continues after that, then yes, you should go speak to your manager.

5. Work assignments in the aftermath of layoffs

We have had a lot of layoffs this past year. Problems are continuously coming up because no one re-assigned (or even seemed aware of) some of the reports those people did. In addition to that, we had a complete restructure of our work assignments in our small (3 person) office. I am doing a work assignment that belonged to another person in this department, and our somewhat new director is blaming me for errors from last year or so, when the work was done by someone else. Also, she is asking me for reports that were previously done by people who were laid off.

If I made a mistake, I will accept the blame, but these were out of my hands. How can I explain this (over and over again) without sounding like I am trying to avoid responsibility? If it were one or two things, I’d suck it up and own it, but I’m taking about many, and major things. Any advice?

For the mistakes someone else made: “The work you’re talking about was done by Jane last year. I wasn’t involved in it. Would you like me to try to fix it now?” Repeat as needed.

For the work she wants you to do now that was previously done by others: “I’d be glad to try to figure it out. I wasn’t previously involved in this report and no one is able to train me on it, so it may take me longer the first few times, but I’ll work on it and keep you updated.” Repeat as needed.

6. Recruiter asked if I’m applying for other jobs

I recently applied for a job and received a call on the very same day from a recruiter, who asked me to change the file formats for my application (and to interview me, of course!). She stated that there were no openings at the moment, but one would be coming very soon. She also asked this: “Have you been applying for other jobs?”

I hesitated for a while, and replied while yes, I have been applying, nothing was set in stone as of yet. I didn’t see a point in lying — and after all, no one is going to put all their eggs in one basket for a single job. Did you think my reply ruined my chances?

Absolutely not. Of course you’re applying for other jobs. It’s a ridiculous question for her to ask — especially when she doesn’t even have an opening to interview you for.

7. Do I have to accept the offer if my temp-to-hire position goes permanent?

I am on assignment in a temp-to-hire position and am not sure if I want to stay with this company permanently. From what I have heard, the benefits package leaves a lot to be desired. I did not ask about benefits during the interview because I was not sure how appropriate the question would be for a temp.

The work environment is stiff and uninspiring and I do not feel like I fit in with their culture. Most of the employees are twice my age and married/settled. The company is growing quickly and I was told during the interview process that there would be growth opportunities. However, I have heard whispers from current employees that once you are in a department, you are stuck. I cannot see myself working here for a long time.

I know it is too early for me to think about going permanent but I can’t help but wonder what if? Now that I have been placed, I have to work through the assignment. What is expected of temp-to-hire staff once they have been offered a permanent position? What could be the consequences of rejecting an offer to go permanent?

You can absolutely reject an offer to go permanent, just like you can reject any job offer that you’re not interested in. If they offer you a permanent position, just thank them and let you know that you don’t think it’s a culture fit for you. (Be prepared for the possibility they’ll  move to replace you at whatever point this happens, however. Although these days many temp-to-perm jobs stay temp for an awfully long time.)

business expenses are cutting into our receptionist’s pay

A reader writes:

I’m the office manager for a pretty small office. We hired a receptionist a few months ago who’s really great, always willing to jump in and do whatever needs doing without me having to hold her hand (or even ask sometimes).

She runs a lot of errands for us–until she came to me recently, I didn’t realize how much it adds up. She does mail runs and gets our boss’s lunch every day, but the boss is always sending her after this or that besides. Two or three times a week, she drives to a store 15 miles away. She came to me recently because the boss won’t comp her for mileage–when she asked, she said he looked at her like she had three heads and told her she’s still on the clock even though she’s away from the office. But the receptionist showed me a spreadsheet of all her trips during the month of June, and at roughly .15 a mile (depending on gas prices), it added up to over $60. She only makes minimum wage to begin with and gets 32 hours a week.

I told her that I’d see what I could do but that since our boss had already balked, that might unfortunately be nothing. I know your advice is usually that this is the job and you have to decide whether you want it on those terms. But after I got home yesterday, I thought about it and realized that the boss is basically cutting her pay to below minimum. If she can only work there if she makes these runs, and has to pay out of her own pocket, even one mile puts her whole week below minimum wage. Am I right about this? I’d like to talk to the boss about it anyway because this woman deserves some reimbursement, but I’d be doubly concerned if we were actually doing something illegal here.

Please do talk to your boss about it. It’s not reasonable or fair to ask your receptionist to pay the business’s expenses out of her own pocket.

And your boss’s argument that the receptionist is still on the clock even though she’s away from the office doesn’t address the point at all; it doesn’t matter if she’s on or off the clock, because the point is that she’s incurring expenses in service of the business. You might point out to him that it’s very common for businesses to reimburse for mileage, and that most use the IRS mileage reimbursement rate.

As for the legal side of this … Yes, he should be worried there too. While there’s no law requiring reimbursement of business-related expenses (with the exception of some states, like California), if the non-reimbursement takes an employee below minimum wage, there very well could be a violation of the minimum wage requirements. In fact, there was recently a lawsuit over this exact issue: In 2009, Domino’s Pizza delivery drivers sued the chain, alleging that they were deprived of the federal minimum wage as a result of the company’s failure to fully reimburse them for vehicle-related expenses. I can’t find a final outcome to the case yet and think it’s still pending, but given that the case has been found viable enough to make it through four years circulating in the courts, does your boss really want to mess with that?

But really, the overall principle here to take to your boss is this: You don’t ask employees to pay the costs of running the business of their own pocket … particularly not someone already the lowest salary level in the office.

Read an update to this letter here.

should you post your resume on online job boards?

A reader writes:

I have a job I really enjoy, but with a few critical caveats. My boss is a little . . . recession-conscious (salary in bottom 5-7% of salary range for my industry and area), and also a tad nutty. Ok, very nutty. (Cameras installed throughout the office so he can monitor conversation, etc. while traveling; he also occasionally remotely accesses our browser history and any personal files employees save on their desktops. Oh, and a few weeks ago he “surprised” us by going in over the weekend and moving us all into different offices, going through all of our drawers and commenting on the contents when we came in Monday morning. Really.)

However, the work is awesome, but turnover is still very high. We’re constantly hiring as people cycle out–mostly through school job sites, but also largely through one particular recruiter, though she’s become less responsive as the turnover has stayed so high. I’m learning a ton so I want to stay awhile longer. However, mine is a really burgeoning field, so I’d also love to keep my ears open for other opportunities.

How does it work from the manager side when people post resumes on Careerbuilder and similar websites? I want to post my resume so I can be visible to recruiters and bigger firms, but I’m a nervous wreck my boss would stumble across it. My field is growing, but growth is starting with partner hiring (3-5 years out). With just one year of experience, I’m still too junior to make the right move, so as much as I’d like to move up, I can’t afford to be fired (or to quit). Do you recommend that passive job seekers post resumes on job search sites? Is “passive” job seeking a figment of my imagination? People get recruited away from my firm *all the time*. I just want to make sure to jump on every opportunity to make sure I can be recruited next!

I’m not a fan of posting your resume online, for a few reasons:

1. It can make you look a little stale or like you’re not being choosy. And hiring managers tend to love candidates who are being choosy. If you look like you’ve posted your resume all over the Internet, you risk turning off some employers — and there IS a school of thought among some hiring managers that only desperate or unfocused candidates post their resume on job sites, because if you were great at what you do, you wouldn’t need to. (You can dispute that logic if you want, but the mindset very much exists.)

2. You risk what’s known as a recruiter clusterfudge. If a recruiter spots your resume online and submits it for an opening, that recruiter now has the “rights” to your candidacy whether you know it or not, meaning that if that company hired you, they’d need to pay the recruiter’s fee. But if that company doesn’t use outside recruiters (and many don’t), they may automatically remove you from the pool of candidates to avoid that charge.

3. You’ll get a ton of spam. A ton.

But there is a more accepted way to publicize your information online — LinkedIn. And it has the advantage of not broadcasting your search to your employer, too.

But I’d rather see you conduct a carefully targeted job search anyway, rather than passively waiting for employers to find you. That allows you to be choosy about where you apply, to write a customized cover letter that will strengthen your chances far more than a standalone resume, and to avoid the issues above.