how to explain why I want a lower-level, lower-responsibility job

A reader writes:

For most of my life, I have held positions that were high-stress, take-it-home with you type jobs. I was laid off in December after 4 years of being “on call” all the time. I was required to answer emails and phone calls at all hours, was expected to attend and or host 6 events a month, and was not allowed to take a real vacation. I could take 1 day off, but never a Friday or Monday. It was stressful for my husband and my children.

Now I am back in the job market, and what I really want is a decent-paying job that I do not have to take home with me. I will be there on time and do my job to the best of my ability, but have no aspirations or, rather, delusions of grandeur! Been there, done that. I was the important person and found I hated it.

I have been turned down for 2 positions. One because I was overqualified; the recruiter told me that I was more qualified than the manager I would work under and he was afraid I would take his job! The other I was turned down for because the hiring manager said that I was likely to get bored. That may be true, but I will take boredom over stress any day. I am sure many of the low stress, low skill jobs I have applied for are viewing me with the “she will get bored and leave” mentality. I really want to stay home and take care of my family, but that is not feasible with our current expenses. How do I market myself as a hard-working yet un-ambitious employee? I know the pay will not be as exciting.

Turn it into a strength: You’ve done higher level work and know that it’s not for you — but that experience has left you with a deeper understanding of what it takes to be a great employee; you know what managers are looking for. Because I bet that that’s true, particularly if you managed people — once you manage people yourself and you see things from that perspective, you get a much greater appreciation for what makes a good employee. You’re much more likely to have a better understanding what matters and what doesn’t, and why certain trade-offs are made, and how to raise issues in a rational way, and how to work around your busy’s manager’s schedule, and what to take to her versus fielding on your own.

And that’s hugely valuable in an employee. You don’t want the higher-level work, but you know how to work well with those who are doing it.

That’s a big plus, as long as people really believe you mean it and that you’re not just saying it because you’re desperate for any paycheck.

And that’s the next key: You need to be explicit about why you don’t want those jobs anymore, because otherwise people will tend to assume that you secretly do. So let them know clearly that that’s not the case, that you are actively searching for a lower-responsibility position (and that those are the only types of jobs you’re looking at), you’re clear about the lower pay that comes with it, and you’d be thrilled to in a position to support someone doing the more senior-level work. And be prepared to share the reason why — that you tried it and it wasn’t a good fit for you.

You might also try talking explicitly about the parts of the job that appeal to you — ideally, the ones that the hiring manager is going to be worried will bore you most. Hiring managers are going to worry that you have rose-colored glasses on about the job, and that you don’t fully realize what work you’ll be doing. So show them that that’s not true:  “It might sound odd, but I’m really pleased that data entry is a big part of the job. I know few people say that, but I’ve always loved doing it; I get a huge sense of satisfaction from that type of routine.”  Or, “The thing that really appeals to me about the role is handling the phones. I love helping callers get the information they need, and leaving them with a positive feeling toward the place they called. I know how important that is, and I appreciate it so much when it’s done well.”

So be clear about why your background makes you a stronger employee at the level you now want to be at, be explicit about why you prefer that, and address their concerns about boredom or ambition head-on. And do that proactively, too — don’t wait to be asked, because you might not be.

A side benefit of this approach is that it will screen out bad managers who can’t understand why someone wouldn’t want capital-P Power, and will screen for managers who have the sense to appreciate someone with your background and mindset.

Good luck.

when your Google Reader dies … because it’s about to

A lot of you read this blog in Google Reader.

But as you probably know, as of July 1, Google Reader will be no more, and you’ll no longer be able to find Ask a Manager posts there.

I am seriously upset about this for two reasons: First, I adore Google Reader and I obsessively check it throughout the day for new content. Second, I’m worried that I’m going to have a major drop-off in readership when it goes away, and I do not want that.

So if you follow this blog through Google Reader, the time is now to start switching over to another RSS reader — so that you don’t miss any posts when the terrible end comes in a week and a half.

Some alternatives that are getting strongly recommended in other quarters, all of which look reasonable to me:

Newsblur
CommaFeed
Feedly
The Old Reader

All of these are pretty plain and basic (like Google Reader), with the exception of Feedly, which is flashier. Personally, I believe flashiness has no place in a reader, but you might like it. And most (maybe all?) of these sites will import your feeds directly from Google Reader so you hardly have to do any work to get them set up.

I’m leaning toward CommaFeed, which is the most basic one I’ve found.

Let us resolve to take this terrible step together, right now, because I still want you here in July.

boss doesn’t attend staff meetings, managing teenagers, and more

It’s terse answer Thursday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Asking for a week off when company asks to extend my contract

I started my job 4.5 months ago. At that time, I was told I would work for a 6-month trial period, after which my contract would either terminate or be extended to one year. After one month of working, I was told my trial period would be shortened to 3 months. Then, I was told my contract would end, but after 4 months of work (due to a lack of business, not because of my performance).

During my 4th month of work, my mother-in-law booked a family vacation for the second month of July, thinking that I would be unemployed at that time. The week before my four months were up, I was asked to work for one more month. Now, it’s possible that I’ll be asked to work an additional month at the last minute again, but I have this week-long vacation already paid for next month. I have asked my bosses about the possibility of working next month, but they have not committed to anything.

Would it be appropriate to request this week off if I’m asked to stay on for another month? I’m hesitant to ask because I will have only been working for this company for five months by that time, and I’ve been advised to not ask for vacation time until I’ve been working for a year. (However, I am technically allotted 15 days of PTO per year.) I also have already asked for a day off here and there to attend interviews for other, more stable jobs. I don’t want to lose favor with my bosses because the job market in my field is absolutely terrible right now and obviously I’d like to avoid becoming unemployed. However, I had been told definitely that I wouldn’t be working for them at the time my mother-in-law made our vacation plans, so I feel like it could be fair to ask for this time off in light of that. What do you think?

You can absolutely say, “I’d love to work the additional month, but when I thought my contract would be ending on DATE, I booked a trip for one week in July. Would it be possible for me to take that week off while working the rest of the month?” No reasonable person is going to have an issue with that. They might tell you that they can’t approve the time (at which point you’d need to decide whether you want the trip or the extra month of work more), but they shouldn’t have a problem with you asking.

2. Can we do anything about our awful company?

I’m currently employed at a company that has a history of casuistic activities when it comes to their dealings with employees. I was recently copied on an email where a former employee was sent a request from our CEO, requesting they give back a necklace purchased for them earlier this year. The CEO was clearly careful not to use the word “gift” in the communication, though what would you really call a necklace being given to another person if not a gift? Similarly, we often have employees who after calling in sick will be requested to resign due to their “possible” health issues (our executive team wants to see employees in the office, even if they have a cold and may infect others). We have had eight employees come and go within the last six months — our total company is less than 40 employees. In addition, former employees who have left are often talked down about in passing by the senior members as people who “couldn’t cut it” or were “dead weight.” Besides this, employee bonuses are often reevaluated each month so that the company does not have to compensate for them; for example, a goal may be set to accomplish a certain amount of sales within a given month, yet midway through, if it looks like the target may be hit, a new higher goal will be set and the bonuses go unpaid.

Is there anything we employees can do besides quit?

No. Changing this type of thing has to come from the top.

Your company sucks and isn’t going to change. I’m sorry.

3. Coworkers aren’t happy that I’ve been promoted

I’ve recently been promoted at work. The position that I landed wasn’t posted, and no one else was given the opportunity to apply for it. I reached out to the department heads to inquire about any possible openings, set up a meeting with the department heads, gave a presentation, and a few days later was offered the position after one of the department heads resigned and there was an immediate opening.

I’m over the moon about it and can’t wait to start. However, my coworkers are pretty upset about it. I get it; they don’t know all the work I put in and think that this position was just “given” to me, but they are going out of their way to let me know just how upset they are about it. Is there a classy way to tell them to quit ruining this moment for me? I wrote a post for my blog about it…but I’m afraid to post it, because I’m worried about the backlash I might receive from anyone in the new position. How can I make my co-workers realize that I was not given this position…I worked crazy hard for it, while not burning any bridges?

Well, first, it doesn’t matter how much behind-the-scenes work you put in. Even if you didn’t, it would have been perfectly feasible for your managers to decide you had earned the position through your work and qualifications and offered it to without all those preliminaries. Your coworkers are out of line in complaining to you — and if you’re going to be supervising any of them, prepare now for how you’re going to make it clear that those types of comments aren’t okay. Otherwise, though, just be calm, pleasant, and professional: “I worked hard to get this promotion, and I’m excited that it’s being recognized.” That’s it — you don’t need to explain or defend yourself. But you also can’t demand that they “not ruin the moment for you” — that’s not really the point here.

And do not write a blog post about it. That’s passive-aggressive. (In fact, if you’re going to be managing people, eliminate all such tendencies now. You’ll need to be direct and straightforward, and not take things personally.)

4. My boss keeps missing our staff meetings

My boss hasn’t attended our last 7 staff meetings (now held about every 6 weeks, reduced in frequency from monthly) — she has something else arranged or is on holiday or whatever. I think this is very strange, not to mention rather rude given that she decided we should meet monthly, then less frequently, and she sets the dates (about 12 months in advance). Is it odd or is it just me?

I’m not sure; it depends on what the purpose of the meetings is. If it’s to update each other on what you’re working on so everyone’s in the loop, she may not need to be there, since she probably is in the loop already from her individual work with each of you. If it’s to do project planning or something like that, it’s possible she doesn’t need to be involved. That said, why not say something like, “Do you want us to continue having these meetings without you, or should we reschedule when you’re unable to attend?”

I’d be much more concerned about her repeatedly missing one-on-one check-ins with people; those tend to accomplish a lot more.

5. My boss keeps promising me things that he never delivers

I was hired in a continuous improvement type of role, as an engineer. When I got the job, I was so excited since it appeared to be my dream job. However, due to the poor economy, many of our raw material suppliers have cut off their supply to our company and I am not doing work I was hired for.

I have expressed to my boss that I am not utilizing my talents, and while he recognizes this, he says that business needs come first, which I completely understand. So here’s the problem. He has promised many things to me — training, conferences, etc. — that he never delivers on. I was to go to a conference this year, but instead he and his boss went. He told me they wanted to send me to training but there was no money in the budget for it. Lately, he involved me in an all-day meeting with another division for a project that would utilize my skills, I brought a lot to the table but I was not invited to subsequent meetings and now he says he can run the project himself.

I find him dangling a carrot in front of me constantly, only to renege on his offer, saying he will do the opportunity (training, run a project, etc.) himself. He tells me that I am a highly valued and respected employee, but I am getting tired of him saying things and not delivering on them. I recently came up with a cost-cutting idea that could save the company quite a bit of money. My boss turned around and told me what a great idea it was and “I gave the project to Bud.” I don’t feel as if I have the energy to have another heart-to-heart talk with him since I don’t want to come off as complaining, but does it seem to you like this guy has a hidden agenda or a tad bit of a narcissistic side?

I have no idea if he has a hidden agenda or a narcissistic side, but I do know that he’s sending you very clear signals that you’re not going to get what you’re asking for any time soon. Stop believing what he’s saying to you — believe what his actions are telling you. And his actions are saying that this stuff just isn’t going to happen. So knowing that, what do you want to do?

6. Employer hasn’t checked my references after saying they would

After a second interview, I was told a reference check would be conducted the following week. It’s been nearly two weeks and I have heard nothing. I asked around to my references and they confirmed that no one had contacted them. My previous employer has not been contacted either! Is it safe to assume that I did not get the job? I am a recent college graduate, so I am thinking that maybe they thought I was too young and just didn’t want to tell me. This entire process has left me feeling very frustrated and dejected.

Ugh, I’m sorry. The frustrating answer is that there’s no way to know what it means. It might mean that they chose a different candidate instead and haven’t bothered to tell you. Or it might mean that you’re still in the running but things are moving much slower than they anticipated (a decision-maker or reference-checker is out of town, or busy with higher priorities, or they need to rethink some aspect of the position before they move forward, or someone just quit and they’re dealing with that vacancy first, or whatever). There’s no way to know, unfortunately.

However, you can absolutely email your contact there and say that you remain very interested in the position and wonder if they can update you on their timeline. That may or may not get you a response, but there’s a decent chance that it will. Good luck!

7. Managing a teenage stepson

I don’t know if you’ll be horrified or pleased to hear this, but I wanted to tell you a story. I recently moved in with my beloved, who happens to be blessed with a 17-year-old son who is here summers and for a few weeks every winter. I have younger kids, who are girls, and have no idea really how to relate to a kid who I haven’t known long enough to be in a parental role. My fiance’s been trying to get his son to do yard work for the last 3 summers straight for at least a little bit each day, but I doubt he spent three hours out there in the last three years. The son is a good kid, but would prefer to watch Doctor Who reruns on Netflix 18 hours a day, if left to his own devices. I don’t blame him, I could probably do the same if I didn’t have to work and parent and live in a clean house. But anyway.

I realized that A: the kid needed to do something productive. B: Nagging never works on anyone. C: A managerial role was probably something he would respect, much more than a substitute parent. So I’m using your principles, and getting results. Each day, we cover the (attainable) goals for the day. I’m holding him accountable to them — he gets rewards (dollars, plus extra TV time) if they’re completed. He has well-known consequences (I change the wifi password) if they’re not. It’s only been three weeks, but after the first consequence, he started asking me for his goals for the day as soon as he’s up, gets his work completed, and is free to watch The Doctor and his hijinks for the rest of the day.

I don’t know if that means your next foray should be a parenting (or a step-parenting) manual, but it seems to be working really well, and I thought you might like to know. :)

Ha! I suspect that your success here has a lot to do with your own skills at presenting this plan to him.

Also, this is pretty funny, considering my roots as an obstinate teenager who could not be cajoled into doing chores.

how to fit into office culture during an internship … when you’ve been disinvited from the staff retreat

A reader writes:

I’m in the midst of a career change and have been interning part time at a local university. It’s been a great experience so far for me — I enjoy the work and my colleagues a great deal, but I can’t shake the feeling like I might not be fitting into the office culture. I’ve only been interning there for a few weeks, and so part of me just thinks that I’m just experiencing regular awkwardness when you’re getting to know a group of people. The office isn’t exactly tiny for a university — there are fifteen full time staff and we also employ about 300 student employees over the course of the academic year, so while it’s fairly intimate and flat it’s definitely possible to go a whole day without seeing folks, particularly with the number of meetings we have. I’m also not able to attend many of our staff meetings due to other commitments (such as my job and another internship), so the scheduled face time with all my coworkers is somewhat limited.

There are some spatial barriers to me getting to know my colleagues as well. I have a fantastic office space, particularly for an intern — one of the full time staff left a few days before I started so they set me up in his old office across from my supervisor. I prefer it to having a cube or a common desk shared by multiple people (often students) throughout the week, but I do feel sequestered. My work habits are such that I like to stay focused on my task areas, and while my office door is always open and I will always greet visitors warmly, I tend to stay in it and busy while there is work to be done. I don’t think this is strange workplace behavior in general, but I worry that I’m not making an impression on most of the staff and that they do not know me. Since one of my goals for this internship is to network and become a known quantity in the office, and also because I’m only interning here until the start of August, this is pretty important to me, but I still need to make getting my work done a priority.

The office culture seems similarly warm but still focused on the work to be done and so I’m a little unsure about the best way to engage with them in a way that is appropriately sociable and professional without seeming weird or forced. I’ve made a point to schedule informational interviews with my colleagues to get their insights on our field, the work they do and their challenges, and any pieces of advice for me as I’m seeking entry-level employment in the area. I think there’s space during those moments to build rapport with colleagues I don’t often see, but it still feels a bit stiff. I feel strange and like I might be monopolizing their time by inviting them to have coffee with me just to chat or having a lunchtime interview. I thankfully seem to have a good relationship with my direct supervisor and the director of the office respectively — which seem to me the most important relationships to build during my time — but the majority of my interactions in the office are with them.

Beyond the general feeling that I’m not quite geling in the office, there is one particular instance that sticks out at me. The director of my office originally invited me to the annual staff retreat when I started — at the time I thought it was a very decent gesture to make me feel included as a member of the staff and an above and beyond one for someone who was only interning in their office part-time. Near the end of last week, the director approached me and stated that after speaking with the staff she’d decided that she’d rather I not be present — she is stepping down after twenty years of service here, and apparently it is likely to be an emotional moment for the staff because it is the last time the whole staff will be together. She assured me that the decision was not personal — one of program coordinators they recently hired is also not attending for the same reason, apparently — and apologized to me. This seems like a legitimate reason to me, particularly since I was surprised to receive an invitation in the first place, but it still speaks to my niggling doubts that I’m not quite “fitting” here in the way that I’d like. I plan on casually asking my supervisor for ways to get face time with the staff beyond those interviews and solicit her advice to becoming more known at our next meeting but I don’t want to look like I don’t have enough social sense to navigate office norms on my own either.

Do you have any insights or advice on normal ways to build rapport and become known in an office when your stay is pretty short and your work is fairly silo-ed? My usual M.O. is to build a reputation of being a good performer without being a jerk, but it seems harder to build that reputation in a way that’s meaningful to colleagues when you’re working short term and viewed as fairly transient. I could also be completely in my own head about this, but I figured this is a common enough worry to be helpful to someone else and that it was worth asking an expert.

Well, you’re actually doing exactly what I would have suggested: scheduling conversations with your coworkers to ask about their work and your field and for advice as you make the career shift. I actually wish more interns would do this (or anyone new to an office, for that matter).

If those conversations are feeling stiff, you might look for ways to work on that. For instance, if you’re running down a formal list of questions, you might inadvertently be creating a stiffer feel than what you intend. You could try loosening up the format of these conversations. You could also try being explicit about the fact that you’re having trouble getting to know people — for instance, you could start off the conversation by saying something like, “I’m hoping to get your insight into X, Y, and Z, but to be honest, I’m also hoping to simply get to know people here better, since my work is fairly silo-ed and hasn’t naturally put me in contact with many people in the office.”

Simply saying that explicitly might better tell the person you’re talking to what you’re looking for and how they can be most helpful to you. It’s easy to think that it should be obvious that you’d like to get to know people better and that you shouldn’t have to say it, but actually, it’s often not intuitive to people at all … and saying it up-front can sometimes change the tone or the conversation or spark overtures that people otherwise wouldn’t have thought to make.

Similarly, you might mention this to your boss too — that you’re having trouble finding ways to get to know people in the office and ask for advice. You might get some insights that help — like that they all grab drinks together after work on Thursdays and you’re welcome to come along, or that Jane tends to be a good connector type in the office and you should reach out to her, or that Karen loves talking about her work with anyone who asks.

Speaking of your boss … Disinviting you from the annual staff retreat was bizarre. And kind of rude. And it’s even more bizarre that she’s not inviting the new program coordinator, who’s presumably full-time and not an intern. Your boss wants to have an emotional moment with the staff because it’s “the last time they’ll all be together”? This isn’t a group of friends graduating from high school and singing Fleetwood Mac’s “Landslide” while getting all teared up that things just won’t be the same from now on. It’s a workplace. And it’s a staff retreat — the whole staff should be there. Someone above her should intervene and tell her to stop using it as her own personal send-off. This is so bizarre that you absolutely shouldn’t take it personally or as a reflection on you.

Anyway, staff retreat weirdness aside, don’t feel awkward about this stuff. It’s normal for it to take a while to get to know coworkers, and especially so when you’re there short-term. But you also shouldn’t feel like you’re imposing if you ask people for a conversation — getting to do that is part of the value of an internship, and most people will be perfectly willing to spend some time talking with you.

Read an update to this letter here.

I’m getting a big raise — how should I manage my money?

A reader writes:

I’ve read a lot of your posts about interviewing and negotiating over the last few years. I was recently offered an exciting opportunity to run a brand new nonprofit program. I negotiated my salary and ended up accepting the job with a significant salary increase! And I’m only in my mid-20’s!

So now that I’m here, what do I do with all this money? Any advice on how to wisely budget my money so I can keep living within my means?

I’m going to let other people speak to budgeting and other things you might want to do with your money (readers, that is your sign to chime in), but I’m going to give you one big recommendation: Save, save, save.

Savings are amazing.

Savings provide you an incredibly powerful peace of mind, in part because they minimize the ways life can screw you over. They don’t eliminate it, of course; bad things will still happen. But having savings makes an awful lot of life’s normal hardships much easier. Car breaks down? No problem; have it repaired that day. Ceiling starts leaking? You can have a plumber there within hours. Emergency dental work? Done. That type of peace of mind is so much more satisfying than dinners out or fancy vacations.

Plus, bringing this back to a work context, having savings gives you options. They let you act from strength, rather than from desperation. If you’re job searching and have savings, you can take your time and be more choosy than someone who needs a paycheck coming in next week. If you’re in a job that’s making you so miserable that it’s impacting your health, having savings will make walking away a real option.

In fact, because savings can have such a major impact on your life, one of the smartest things you could do would be to not change your standard of living when your new salary goes into effect. If you’ve been getting by okay previously, continue living as if you’re still earning your old salary, and put all the rest into savings. A common mistake people make when they get a big raise is that they raise their expenses commensurately — and as a result they don’t really better their financial security. Don’t do that.

Sure, have a splurge or two to enjoy your success — but sock most of that money away until you have a big stash of it. Make it your goal to save a year’s worth of living expenses if you can. This will be a far better gift to yourself than most things you could buy.

Also: Charity. Find some causes you support and donate to them. It doesn’t have to be big when you’re just starting out, but if you get in the habit of donating to causes important to you, it can become something you do as a matter of course over your lifetime, and you will be a happier person for it.

What other advice do people have?

what to expect if you’re looking for a job this year

If you’re planning to search for a job this year after being off the market for a while, you might be in for a rude awakening. Today’s job market is very different than ones from the past, and new job seekers are often startled to find out how conventions have changed and that what used to work can backfire today.

Here’s what job seekers can expect today.

* It will take a long time. In the past, you might have expected your search to take a few months, but today, job searches take much longer; many people search for a  year or even more before finding a new position. This means that you should start your search as early as possible, if you can. If you know that you’ll need a new job in, say, December, don’t wait to start searching until the fall; you should start right now.

* You might need to send a lot of applications. Some job seekers in today’s market complain that they’ve applied to 20 jobs over the course of a few months without any result – but 20 applications is nearly nothing in this environment. In fact, many people would consider you lucky if you got a job after only 20 applications. Today, you’ll generally need to plan on applying for many, many positions before you get interviews and offers.

* You’ll be lucky to get rejections. If the last time you were searching, you heard back from employers to let you know that you were no longer under consideration, prepare for a rude surprise: These days, employers often don’t respond to candidates at all when they’ve been rejected – even after multiple interviews with them. Instead of sending a quick rejection notice, candidates often face only silence and are left to wait and wonder what happened.

* You’ll be mostly applying online. Gone are the days when you’d print out your resume on thick paper and mail it off, or even drop by an office in person with your resume in hand. Today, most jobs direct you to apply online, often using an electronic application system. Many of these don’t even accept resumes at all and instead require you to painstakingly enter the information from your resume into their own systems – which are often tediously long and bug-filled.

* It’s harder to get someone to take a chance on you. Even the kindest employers who in the past might have taken a chance on someone inexperienced are today finding it hard to justify the risk, when they have so many experienced candidates to choose from.

* Salaries and benefits are lower. With a glut of job seekers crowding the market, employers have lowered salaries and in many cases cut benefits – and still have a sea of candidates willing to take those terms. As a result, many job seekers today are finding that their new jobs pay less than the ones they left behind and offer less attractive benefits.

* A degree isn’t what it used to be. A degree used to carry the promise of certain employment, but they no longer open doors the way they used to. Too many recent graduates are remaining unemployed or under-employed for months or even years, as employers opt for more experienced candidates. Even graduate degrees now longer promise an easier job search; in fact, in some cases, they can even make the search more difficult, as many employers are wary when they see newly minted masters holders searching outside the field they studied.

* It’s tough to get a job out-of-state. If you’re looking for a job outside your local area, hunker down for a longer search. Many employers will consider only local candidates, since there are plenty of them and they’re more convenient. (After all, out-of-town candidates generally can’t show up for an interview within 48 hours or start as soon as someone local could.) And when employers do agree to interview out-of-town candidates, many expect them to cover their own costs to travel to the interview.

On the other hand, some things haven’t changed: Employers are still looking for the best qualified candidates, those with a track record of achievement, and they still appreciate the basics: a strong resume, a compelling cover letter, and candidates who are friendly, responsive, thoughtful, and enthusiastic.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

nose rings at work, letting your boss be your landlord, and more

It’s wee answer Wednesday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Should you let your boss be your landlord?

I am asking a question on behalf of a friend. Her lease at her apartment is about to be up, and her boss, aware of the situation, offered up his rental property for her. I was hoping you could give me/her some insight into the serious cons of such an arrangement. At this time, she is only seeing the pros (low rent, no background check, familiarity with her landlord). She’s always in a precarious financial situation and I’m afraid this set-up could come back to haunt her professionally if she defaults on rent. Any insight you could provide would be great.

Oh no — this is a terrible idea! Please try to talk her out of it. Does she really want to face her boss at work when she’s several months past due on rent or end up in a conflict with him when he won’t fix the air conditioning? Does she really want tension with him if she generates noise complaints from neighbors or ends up needing to be evicted? And if her finances are precarious, that’s all the more reason not to jeopardize her standing with her boss — she needs to stay on good terms at work and protect her income.

By the way, her boss is the one making the really big mistake — he’d be in an awkward position if she wasn’t paying. They’re both crazy to be considering this.

2. How to tell a receptionist she can’t wear a nose ring to work

I have had a wonderful front desk receptionist/medical biller for 6 years. She always goes out of her way and is extremely dedicated. Well, yesterday she came in with a nose ring. I don’t know how to handle it without hurting her feelings. She’s had a tough life. Please let me know how to get rid of the nose ring.

“Jane, we don’t allow facial piercings here, so unfortunately I have to ask you not to wear your nose ring to work.”

Add it to your dress code if you want something clearer to refer to in the future, but it’s perfectly legitimate to define “no facial piercings” as part of overall professional appearance, particularly for a customer-facing role like a receptionist. Just be straightforward.

3. Fox’s TV show “Does Someone Have to Go?”

Have you watched Fox’s show “Does Someone Have To Go?” What do you think of it/ the concept? I can’t imagine why a good manager/ owner with problems in the work force would want to air it all out in public — even if they get rid of the worst employee, the revelations (salary, personal issues, etc.) would cause more damage that is solved.

I’m purposely avoiding it, but from what I understand about the concept, it’s a reality show where a business is handed over to the employees to run and they decide whether to punish their coworkers with pay cuts, demotions, or firings. I’m pretty grossed out by the concept, since I’m not a big fan of putting people’s livelihoods on the line for entertainment (and it seems to completely miss the boat on what good management means and instead turns the workplaces into Lord of the Flies type debacles).

I assume the business owners who agree to go on to the show do so not for any business reason but rather because they’ve succumbed to the terrible American hunger for the spotlight.

4. Do I have to stop using my company-provided transit card if I buy a car?

For about a year, I have been provided with a transit card by the company I work for. I hope to, within the next few months, purchase a vehicle. In the event that I do get a car, I plan to continue to use public transit to get to work because it’s a relatively short commute. Would it be unethical for me to continue to use my company issued and paid for transit card or should I return it upon getting a car?

Not at all. Absent some statement to the contrary, assume that it’s a benefit your company is providing you to cut transportation costs and keep you from having to drive (and sometimes the reason is environmental as well; many companies have initiatives to encourage public transit use since it’s greener).

5. Can I ask my child’s teacher not to post online about him?

I have a number of Facebook friends who are teachers, and some of them will post “funny” or “cute” stories about their students as status updates (sometimes even wrong test answers that they find hilarious). I’m concerned that my chid’s teachers will be doing the same thing once he starts school. Even if they don’t mention him by name, I don’t love the idea that they might post something he says/does/writes online for all their friends go comment on.

I tried googling “teachers posting about students online,” hoping to find that school districts were developing social media policies tackling these issues, but didn’t find much. I do support teachers having the right to free speech like anyone else, but I also think I have to advocate for my child’s right to privacy since he’s too young to say, “Hey, I’d appreciate it if you could refrain from talking about me behind my back on the internet.” Is there any way for me to make this request without coming across as a fascist kill-joy?

I’m not sure this is a workplace question, but I’m going to answer it anyway: It’s perfectly reasonable to ask that your child’s name or photo not be posted, but it sounds like the types of posts you’re talking about don’t identify the particular student. So while you could certainly make the request, I think you’d be over-stepping and would end up coming across as one of those parents.

You could certainly ask his school administration what policies they have on that issue generally, but I think making this request specifically about your child isn’t likely to solve the problem and is likely to get you marked out as a pain. Anyone disagree?

6. How to tell a former coworker that I won’t recommend her for a job

I recently started a new job and ran into a former colleague in the ladies room. I made the mistake of mentioning that there may be an opening in my department — just as a point of conversation, not because I was trying to recruit her. Quite the contrary. She was a problem at our former company and she is really aggressive. If she should ask about the position (I had heard she was unhappy in her department), how do I decline tactfully? (I was telling her how much I liked this company, my boss, and my coworkers, and when I mentioned the open positon, she paused and she seemed to have that “Hmmm…” look like she was thinking more about it, so I want to be prepared in case she asks me to “sell” her to my boss. I would never recommend her.)

If she decides to apply and asks you to recommend her, you can certainly tell her that you’re not involved in the hiring process at all and she’d be better off just applying directly. Or, you can tell her that you’ll pass her resume along and do so — but with a note to your manager that while you’re passing her materials along at her request, you would not recommend her for the position. If your manager wants more information (which she almost certainly will, if the resume looks like a potential fit), she’ll ask you for it.

7. How to prepare for an interview without a specific job attached

I’ve been called back by a company that previously rejected me for a role (without telling me, but that’s another story). They’ve asked to set up an interview just to “have a chat” — they said that they don’t have a role on offer as such, but just wanted to see where I was at. I have no idea how to prepare for this interview, given that I don’t have a job description to work with, but it’s a bit more formal than a networking meeting (the interviewer is bringing along another manager she wants me to meet). I’ve had a look through the archives and I’ve read your book, and I was planning on bringing a few copies of my updated resume. Is there anything else I can do to prepare for this kind of interview?

I’d actually prepare very similarly to how you would for a regular interview, minus the job-specific parts. So spend some time thinking through the skills you have to offer, practicing talking about times you’ve used those skills and what you’ve accomplished, and so forth. If you have the name of the other manager you’re meeting with, figure out what she does in the organization, since that may give you some clues into what they’ll be interested in talking about. But mainly, go into it the way a consultant would go into a meeting with a potential client — thinking “this might lead to new business, and I’ll tell them about what I do and why I’m good at it, and hear what they’re looking for and what they have to offer.”

my boss won’t let me edit his terrible writing

A reader writes:

I’m the only communications position for my company, so a part of my job is writing, editing, and posting things to our website. My boss, who leads the company, wants to author pieces of writing and editorials for the company. The writing is always overly complex, unclear and riddled with grammatical errors. It’s hard to read and does not succeed in getting a message across. I have received more than one complaint about the quality of his writing, but have been too afraid to tell him.

I can usually make the case for fixing the obvious errors, but I still try to make suggestions that I think would make the writing read better. On more than one occasion, my boss has taken offense to this and has accused me of tampering with his writing style. I can understand that he is defensive and cares about authorship, but in my mind, I’m “doing my job” by making suggestions and trying to put forth the best piece of communication.

Do you have any advice for how to respond to people who are emotional/defensive about being edited when it’s your job to assist with editing? Should I simply avoid making suggestions and let things go?

Ugh, people who are enamored of their own writing when they’re not in fact great writers are difficult at any time, but when they’re your boss? It’s a complete clusterfudge.

Ultimately, you’ve got to figure out what your job is — not the job you want to do, but the job your boss has hired you for. If it turns out that he doesn’t want you to edit his work more than minimally, then that’s what the job is … even if it means that you’re charged with posting things that are poorly written and embarrassing. Of course, that’s going to reflect on you to some degree, as the communications person, so you’d then need to decide if this is a job you’re interested in.

But first get clarity on what the job is, in that regard. Talk to your boss and say something like, “I’m hoping to get better clarity on what you’d like my role to be when it comes to editing things that we publish online. With others here, I clean up the writing for grammar and usage if needed, but I also reword things when something isn’t clear or could be stated more concisely without losing meaning or nuance. But I’m getting the sense from you that you’d rather I not do that with your pieces. I do think there’s value in having a communications person give things an edit for clarity before they go online, and I’m hoping you’ll let me make the case for that to you. But I wanted to figure out what the boundaries are of what you’re looking for from me in this role.”

Hopefully your boss won’t be so ridiculous as to tell you that no, he doesn’t even want suggestions from you. But if he does make it clear that he’s absolutely not interested in being edited … well, that’s his call, misguided as it would be.

And yes, it’s frustrating and the wrong decision for the company. And it will have consequences — anything from turning off potential customers and business partners to driving away prospective job candidates to even making him a laughingstock if the writing is bad enough. But it’s his decision. All you can do is lay out the case, as you would with any other business decision that was ultimately his call.

At that point, you’ll need to assume that’s the job and decide if it’s something you’re interested in continuing with long-term. Do you want the job as he has presented it? Sometimes, just looking at it that way and recognizing that this is just how it is and you can’t alter that can be enough to make you live with it reasonably contentedly. Sometimes it’s the battle that makes things so frustrating, the feeling that you need to be solving this problem, and realizing that you don’t and can’t is a relief. Other times, though, you might realize that if this is the way things are going to be, you’re not interested. Either one is legitimate. The key is to just get utterly clear about what you can and can’t change, so that you’re able to make the right decision for yourself.

However, whatever you decide, stop shielding him from complaints about his writing. Pass them along, because he needs to hear them.

And at some point, you might use that to revisit the issue more broadly: “We’ve been getting complaints about the pieces on our site. I’d love to take a stab at making some of them more web-friendly and see if we get a different response. Would you be willing to let me try that over the next month?” (You could also suggest running different versions past a handful of people he respects — the original draft and your edited one — and gathering feedback from people. But in order for this to have any impact, he’d need to be truly open to hearing feedback. If you know that he’s not, you’d be wasting everyone’s time and energy.)

But ultimately, you want to get clear on what you can and can’t control, and then figure out what you want to do with that.

did I make the right call in rejecting this job candidate?

A reader writes:

I am a training manager for an independent cell phone retailer. Basically, I make sure all new hires in my district have their new hire paperwork filled out so I can fax it to our home office, and train them on store operations and customer service at my store location before we shift them out to other stores to their home location. In the case of new store managers, I travel to their store and train them on managerial operations. It’s a good system, and works rather well as I’m assisted by our district manager (in terms of chain of command, the store managers report to the DM; I report to the DM also, but also have authority over store managers).

We have fairly high turnover, unfortunately, and it’s because it’s an hourly + commission position. Store managers also make a percentage of their store’s profit once it reaches a certain (obtainable) tier. But when sales go down, upper management (above the district level) really starts to pressure salespeople to sell more, and people quit because they aren’t making as much in some months as they do in others.

Recently, we started looking to hire a new store manager for a particular location with up and down sales. We received a resume from a young man who was presently employed by my former company, holding my former position (customer service manager for a mass retailer). I scheduled an interview (for store managers, I interview the first round and my DM interviews the second round). The DM ultimately makes the hiring decision. First interview went fairly well. He was a bit quiet and reserved, but I didn’t see any red flags.

I’m still on great terms with the people I worked with at my former company, so between interviews (his second interview was a different day), I went to talk to some people he works with. I didn’t give any indication it was “reference checking” and I didn’t indicate that he was looking for employment at my current company. What I found out was… interesting.

The young man had been fired the day before I went in there for slacking off, and going out to his car on breaks and drinking on the job. He apparently came back from lunch so drunk that the upper management could smell the alcohol on him. This was repeated by every person I asked,”Hey, Jim’s a customer service manager here, right?” (The reply back was usually, “He used to be; he got let go yesterday?” “Why?!” “Because —- “)

I called my DM and told him that I had found out our candidate had been fired for performance and misconduct (because he was drinking on the job). He immediately told me to call him back and thank him for his time, but that we will not be moving forward with his interviews.

Word got out in both companies that this incident was the sole reason we decided not to move forward. I had been told repeatedly by other coworkers and former coworkers that we “can’t do that,” to which I reply, “Why not?” It’s perfectly legal to not hire someone as long as it’s not because of an EEO protected class. I’ve been told we “can’t do that” because it was an “off-the-record” discussion therefore it can’t be used against him. Again, I remind them that we can totally do that, there’s nothing illegal about it, or unethical for that matter.

As a hiring manager, would you have made the same call?

I sure would have.

Assuming these are people you know to be credible, and that there wasn’t any chance that their comments to you were part of some kind of widespread ruse. (Unlikely, but the caveat is worth giving.) If there was any such chance, then I would have verified it more formally with his manager.

As you wrote, it’s perfectly legal to choose not to hire someone for any reason at all, as long as the reason is not their race, religion, sex, national origin, or other protected class. And you absolutely can use information in your decision-making that comes from off-the-record conversation; in fact, good hiring managers do it all the time — reaching out to mutual contacts for an off-the-record assessment of someone’s work. It’s part of good hiring; you’d be negligent not to talk to mutual contacts if you had them, and sometimes off-the-record conversations are what’s required to get candid information.

(Frankly, if anyone took on any risk here, it’s your former company, not your current one. If they misrepresented the facts and that misrepresentation was responsible for him being denied employment, that would be a potential problems for them. But if they told the truth, they didn’t do anything wrong.  And either way, there are no prohibitions on you using the information you heard.)

Are your colleagues really suggesting that you should have moved forward with this guy and ignored that you’d learned that he’d just been fired for drinking on the job? That’s insane, and you should suggest that they educate themselves on workplace law.

how to manage former peers

A reader writes:

I was recently promoted from within my team to team manager.

I formed friendships with many of my coworkers prior to being promoted and would occasionally participate in game nights and the like with them. Now, however, I find myself in the position of being a supervisor for some of these coworkers.  I have tried to establish the “manager barrier,” if you will, but often find myself receiving pushback or being ignored when I give them a task or assignment.

I would like to maintain relationships with these employees, as many of them are great connections and share similar interests outside of work. But is this even possible? Having never been in a managerial role before, I have no idea how to approach this.

Being a new manager is hard under any circumstances, and it’s especially difficult when you’re managing people who used to be your peers.

Here are five keys to making it go more smoothly.

1. Recognize that the dynamics have changed and you can’t have the same relationships with them that you used to have. Your job is now, in part, to judge your former peers’ work, and that means that a true friendship is impossible the power dynamics don’t allow it. And believe me, they recognize this even if you don’t. So you need to have a professional boundary that you didn’t used to need. That means no gossiping, no complaining about work, and very little outside-of-work socializing. (Some is fine, especially if it’s company-sponsored or the whole department, but you can’t have the sort of close friendships that lead to regular after-work drinks or regular lunching with just one or two people anymore.) Close friendships outside of work just aren’t smart when you’re managing people’s performance and making decisions about raises, promotions, assignments, and even layoffs and firing.

2. Be direct about your expectations, and be assertive when people are behaving inappropriately. For instance, if you find yourself being ignored, you need to address that immediately and make it clear it’s not acceptable. For instance, you might say: “Jane, I asked you to finish this report by yesterday and it’s not done. What happened?” And then follow up with, “I need you to do assignments by their deadlines.” Be calm, but be clear and assertive.

3. Address the big picture if you’re seeing a pattern. If an employee is repeatedly pushing back on your decisions, speak with them about it. For instance, you might say, “I’m getting the sense that you’re skeptical of my decisions in general. What’s going on?”  Listen with an open mind and then respond that you’ll take it into account but that you’re going to be making lots of decisions, and that you expect that they won’t push back on each one. Say that if they have a big-picture concern, you encourage them to take it up with you, but that in general you also expect them to understand that you’ll be making the final call.

4. If problems continue after you’ve addressed them, handle that the way you would any serious performance issue: by clearly stating your expectations, explaining where they’re falling short, and warning them what the consequences will be if you don’t see improvement.

5. Make sure you’re managing well overall. In order to effectively take on the sorts of problems you’re encountering – and to have credibility while doing it – you have to be managing well in general. That means educate yourself on things like how to delegate effectively, how to give feedback, how to establish a culture that’s both positive and rigorous about results, how to ensure people feel heard but also understand that you’re the final decision-maker, and so forth. Those things are essential for any manager, but especially when you need to establish your credibility with a team of former peers.