how to fire an I.T. director who has passwords to everything

A reader writes:

Do you have any experience or stories about firing an I.T. Director? That office has the keys to everything. It’s not like another position where when someone is let go, we disable their account and that’s it; they’re disabled and can’t get in.

Excellent question. When I’ve had to do this, there have always been other I.T. staff who I’ve been able to coordinate with to help with the process ahead of time, but your I.T. director does indeed hold the keys to the kingdom and if you didn’t have other I.T. people around to help you, you’d need to worry about basic logistics at a minimum and potential sabotage at worse. I turned to our regular commenter and I.T. expert extraordinaire Jamie, for an answer to this one. She says:

“Ideally there is a protocol by which the passwords were stored in a secured database, because even lone ITs get hit by busses, and a company has to be prepared for that eventuality. There should also always be redundancy for the important tasks, either on staff or with an outsourced consultant — again, so that you aren’t completely lost when the bus hits. One of these tasks is changing passwords — it’s a simple process.

So in the ideal situation, you’d give the passwords to someone trained to change them before you go into the meeting in which the I.T. Director is being let go. Once the door shuts, they are signaled to make the changes before the meeting is over. (This isn’t as James Bond like as it sounds; it’s best practice when letting someone with network access go.)

Unfortunately, people aren’t always dealing with best case scenarios, and far too often you only have one person with the keys to the kingdom. In that case, have someone else on hand who knows how to change passwords and get them before the person leaves. They need to give them to the company, just like they would turn in their company-owned phone or laptop, and having someone on site to change them means that you can verify they are correct before the person leaves.

And don’t forget to change all the passwords. It isn’t just the network and the servers, but everything from Twitter to online applications, firewall support, corporate accounts, etc. Even a small business will have 100+ passwords, and it’s a tedious process.

If they won’t turn them over, get a network consultant to come in and change them manually. You’ll pay for it, but they will be able to do it and will do so in order of importance, security-wise.

And when you hire a replacement (which you should have lined up, if possible, because this is a position you really don’t want vacant) make sure they are documenting the passwords properly so this doesn’t happen again. No IT professional with any integrity would balk at documentation … because good ITs don’t need to build in job security by holding passwords and information hostage.”

I asked: “If you end up having to have a consultant come in manually to change passwords, and/or the exiting I.T. person refuses to give them to you, is there anything you can do to protect against sabotage in the interim?”

Jamie’s answer:

“Preventing sabotage is key (it’s unlikely as the majority of fired people aren’t crazy, but it’s frequent enough to prepare for it, and in this position the damage can be catastrophic). They should take the network down for the brief time it takes to manually reset the passwords. It’s just a blip in uptime. Make sure to clone the drives before you begin the recovery -– so you’ve got your data preserved if something goes awry.

The key to remember is that the only power the person has is to make it more inconvenient for you to change the passwords. They can’t bring you to a halt for more than a little downtime to do it manually. If you do think they are attempting to sabotage after termination, make sure you check your logs to see if someone is trying to access the system. Unlike many things in the workplace, this is indeed illegal.

And if any disgruntled ITs think this would be a good idea, they need to think again. It’s a position that has serious ethical requirements for a reason — because of global access — and sabotage or withholding information would ruin your reputation faster than anything else. Those are career-ending moves.”

how to answer “Where do you see yourself in five years?”

No matter what field you’re in, if you’re interviewing for jobs, you’re likely to encounter interviewers who ask some version of, “Where do you see yourself in five years?”

It might sound like a straightforward question on the surface, but job seekers routinely struggle over how to best answer it. Often the struggle is because they have no idea where they see themselves in five years. Or they have some hopes about where they’ll be, but are acutely aware that even the best-laid career plans can change, and so they feel odd about giving an answer that implies certainty. Or they feel that their goals aren’t very specific; they want to do interesting work and hopefully make more money doing it, but most figure that’s not a strong answer and that the interviewer< is looking for a clear plan with commitment behind it. So let's start by translating the question. "Where do you see yourself in five years?" is another way of saying, "How does this position fit in with your overall short-term and medium-term career goals for yourself?" In other words, interviewers who ask this question aren't asking you to write your plans in stone or commit to them with certainty. They're asking you how you see this job fitting in with your overall plan for your career. If it helps, you can also think of it as, "How does this job fit in with where you see your career going?" Interviewers want to know this because they want a better understanding of your overall goals for yourself and how this job is a part of that. That matters to them because they want to hire someone who will be excited about the job and where it will lead them, whether that's to a higher-level position or just increased accomplishment or satisfaction. They want to know that you're not just applying for jobs randomly and taking whatever you can get, because if you are, you're more likely to get bored or leave as soon as something else comes along. By showing your interviewer how the job fits in with your overall goals, you can show that you'll be excited to do the work and aren't likely to leave prematurely. So what might a good answer sound like? Here's one example: "In five years, I'd love to have increased my skill level enough that I'm able to train others how to do this work. I love this work, and I've found that I really enjoy mentoring colleagues, so I'd be thrilled to be able to combine the two—continuing to work in a role like this one, but with a training or mentoring component to it." But to be clear, that's just one example—not a suggested answer if it's not true for you. Your answer should speak to whatever is really true for you, while still making sure the interviewer will be able to see how the open role fits in. And if you're really not sure of the specifics of what you'd be doing in five years, it's fine to say that, but talk about what you do know you'd like to do. For instance, you might say, "You know, I don't have a specific plan, but I do know that I want to stay in this field, doing work at increasing levels of responsibility and skill, in an environment where I feel like I'm playing a meaningful role. One of the reasons this position excites me is because I think it will move me in that direction." In other words, be genuine and help the interviewer understand why this position would be a great next step to you on your way to wherever you're going—even if that destination isn't mapped out in detail yet.

mini answer Monday — 7 short answers to 7 short questions

It’s mini answer Monday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Asking for non-money perks in lieu of a raise

I’ve been with my current company for three years now. I received a raise after my first year, but I have not been able to get any pay increases since then. They did give me a small bonus last year and told me they would work to get me an actual raise, but the company has since frozen pay rates for the foreseeable future. They are very appreciative of the work I do for the company, but I doubt I’ll see a raise any time soon.

I am considering asking for some kind of office perk to make up for the lack of a raise. I’d like to ask to be moved from the front desk to an office, or to be able to work more flexible hours, or both if I’m really lucky. Do you think this is a reasonable request? If so, how should I go about asking? Would it be appropriate to do this through email? My supervisors are in the same building, but I feel that I would be better at asking through email.

You can absolutely ask for things other than a salary increase, although you should do it in an in-person conversation, not email (just like if you were asking for a raise).

However, if you’re at the front desk, it might not be feasible to move you somewhere else (if your job involves greeting visitors, signing for packages, and other typical receptionist responsibilities), and the same might be true of flexible hours. So before you ask, make sure you’re considering whether the specific things you’d like to request are realistic for your role or not.

2. Is this legal?

I am a salaried exempt employee. I was forced to use PTO because the office was closed two days for snow. We also had a computer virus and they closed the office for a day and I was forced to use PTO. Then my daughter spent two weeks in ICU, and I ran out of PTO time and have not been there long enough for FMLA, but I was still required to answer emails and phone calls and meet prospective clients for lunch but was told I was not being paid. Is this legal?

No, it is not legal! If you’re exempt, you have to be paid your full salary for any week in which you do any work (with some exceptions, like your first and last week in some cases). And if you weren’t exempt, they have to pay you for all time you spend on work, so they’d need to pay you for those emails and phone calls — so either way, they’re breaking the law.

3. Employee won’t stop staring at people and asking them what’s wrong

I have a question about one of my employees. I have noticed recently that anytime you engage in conversation with her, she is always asking “what’s wrong?” with a very uncomfortable stare, almost like she is trying to see through you. After you answer her that nothing is wrong, she never looks away and then asks, “Are you sure?” This whole time staring at your eyes, never breaking. It is starting to become a problem at the office because it’s making other employees uncomfortable. What do you think could be causing this sudden change in behavior and how should I handle it?

This is weird. But it’s also weird that no one has asked her what’s up. The next time she asks you what’s wrong, say, “I noticed you’ve been asking that of me and others a lot. What’s going on?” And if she’s truly staring other people down in ways that are making them uncomfortable, talk to her privately and ask her to cut it out.

4. Is there any harm in taking a later start date?

I was offered a position in a major firm earlier this year. I informed them that the earliest I could join was in June of this year. The HR manager was pretty flexible about this. I contacted him recently to confirm my start date in June and he gave me 4 options, two in June and two of these dates are first week and last week of July respectively.

Looking at this email, I am now thinking of taking a longer break off of my current position as I want to visit family out of country. Would it be okay for me to accept the late July date as a start date for my employment. Is there any perception problem with me deciding to accept the most later date as a start date for my employment?

Theoretically, it should be fine. In reality, however, there’s a small chance — very small, but still a chance — that the later start date gives them room to decide they aren’t going to move forward after all, which does sometimes happen. It’s rare, but it happens. But they’re offering you the later date (you didn’t request it), and it’s not unreasonable to assume that you can take them at their word.

5. Smokers are getting more breaks than non-smokers

I work in retail. The smokers seem to have more breaks than us non-smokers. How do I let my job know that I want a break too?

You can talk to your manager and point out that smokers are being treated differently than non-smokers, but a manager who’s already allowing this might be a manager who doesn’t care. Still, it’s worth a conversation.

6. How can employers screen out candidates who lie about their job history?

What are your thoughts about how we, as employers, can get around sites that let job applicants fake their job history (complete with fake references), to be sure we are hiring qualified candidates, not just those who are willing to pay to lie to gain employment?

Don’t stick to just the reference list the candidate provides you with but look for other people who worked with the candidate, look up reference phone numbers yourself rather than using the ones provided to you by the candidate, be alert to signs of integrity and honesty throughout the hiring process, and do skills testing and job simulations before ever making any hire. Beyond that, it’s still possible someone could lie to you, but if they can’t do the work, you’ll find out soon enough if you’re paying as much attention to their work as you should be!

7. Reapplying for a job when the instructions change

I applied to a position online. At the time I applied, the site only had a job description and an email address with no further instructions. I sent my resume and cover letter to the email address they provided. I make it a habit to see if the posting is updated, because this seems to happen often. Turns out It was updated; I checked back four hours after I originally applied. Suddenly there were instructions and an added “please mention this to let us know you’re read the whole posting.” I really want the job so I re-applied.

Does reapplying hurt my chances for being considered for the position? When I originally applied, those specifications were not there. What’s the deal?

Well, ideally when you re-applied, you included a note saying something like, “I applied earlier today, but at the time you hadn’t yet added instructions to mention your note, so I’m reapplying to let you know that I did see it.” But if you didn’t, it’s not a big deal; they’re probably going to figure it out on their own.

short answer Sunday — 6 short answers to 6 short questions

It’s short answer Sunday — six short answers to six short questions. Here we go…

1. Out-of-town job is flying me in to interview — what if I accept another job and have to cancel?

I have a job interview scheduled in another state. The potential employer is booking paying for the flight and a hotel stay for my husband and me. It is two weeks away. In the meantime, I have another job interview with a second employer — a job I want more. If the first employer books the flight, and I cancel it because I accepted the second employer’s offer, what happens? Should I offer to pay for the flight?

Well, to some extent, it’s a risk they took when they agreed to pay for your flight (and the hotel, but that’s nearly always refundable). It’s a cost of doing business — or at least a cost of interviewing out-of-town candidates. There’s always risk built in; they could end up hating your interview, or they could offer you the job and you could turn it down. That said, it’s not ideal and you’d at least want to acknowledge how very sorry you are.

2. Managers will only reward based on seniority, not merit

I work in a medical office with five other people, two of whom are the owners. I am a very hard worker and I push the limits of my position wherever I work, which is personally rewarding to me. Starting as a weekend replacement to them four years ago, I have since worked my way “up” to more responsibilities then any other employee. I have many back office tasks and responsibilities that are undefined but solely mine; like being the only employee who interviews new hires, I do all of the training, handle all patient complaints and disputes, and am asked by my bosses to coach my coworkers in sales and patient care, etc.

I enjoy all of these tasks, but the big problem… They have reiterated that we, the four staff members, all have the same position and that pay is primarily based on seniority. They refuse to assign any different title for me or to define my differences to the other staff members but still ask me to act as superior. It feels clear to me that I should stop taking on these tasks if they are not in the job description that everyone shares.

I don’t want to “turn off” my aggressive work ethic and my bosses have never expressed disagreement with me being so proactive, but I feel it is to a point where they need to choose: 1) I continue working to the same expectations with a title change and change in pay grade -or- 2) I stop doing the extra tasks and work to the level of my coworkers. I have lost faith in the fact that my hard work would pay off and now feel I’ve been used for whatever they could get from me. Am I seeing this clearly? Should I be taking a different approach? How can I affectively communicate my frustrations and show them my perspective?

You should be searching for another job, because a workplace that rewards solely based on seniority and not on work quality, and which refuses to distinguish between great work and okay work is not a workplace where you will thrive. Nor is it one that deserves the type of employee you sound like.

3. Should I mention I’m seeking career counseling in my cover letter?

I am a job hopper. The following is a brief work history (from least recent to most recent): 2 years and 9 months (part-time workstudy), 3 years and 4 months (part time, full-time, part-time retail), 6 months (internship), 4 months (temporary position), 4 months (regular, full-time), currently 4 months and wanting to leave (regular, full-time). I unintentionally keep accepting positions that require a certain ability, personality, or traits that I don’t have.

I realize my lack of self-awareness is a big problem and have been considering seeking a career counselor to help me figure out my strengths and weaknesses and the jobs that would utilize those strengths. Is that something I would be able to put on my cover letter to show potential employers that yes, I know I have a problem and am working to fix it, or is that not a good idea?

Nope, that doesn’t go in your cover letter. First, it draws attention the problem, and second, it’s an inappropriate over-share that has nothing to do with your ability to excel at the job they’re hiring for.

By the way, the only job hopping I see in your history are the two most recent jobs. Internships and temp positions that are designed by their nature to be temporary don’t count as job hopping. It’s just the two recent ones that might be an issue.

4. Interviewer asked if I had any pending offers

I had a phone interview recently and was asked if I was in the interview process with any other company and did I have any pending offers. Do they really care?

Yes. They’re asking because they want to know if you have time constraints they should be aware of — like if you were likely to receive an offer next week. Sometimes if you’re a strong enough candidate, they’ll expedite things on their end when that’s the case.

5. How to follow up on a rejection that left the door open

I went for an interview last month with a small organization. I got through the first round and met the executive director for a second round of interviews. I thought they went well, but I ultimately didn’t get the job. The primary interviewer for both interviews sent me a really nice email saying how much they liked me and thought I’d be a good fit for their organization but that I didn’t have the experience they needed for that position. At the end of the note, she did say that there might be another job posting in a couple of months that I would be more suited for and I should let her know if I would be interested. I replied back with a thank-you note and said that I would be interested in the position.

After that, our messages have stopped and the job hasn’t been posted yet. Should I be trying to keep in touch with her in some way or should I just keep my eyes open for the posting? And if I should keep in touch, how should I go about doing that? Alternatively, if I don’t keep in touch with her now and the job is finally posted, should I send her a message after applying or just apply and trust that she will see the application?

In six weeks, email her and say you wanted to follow up on the position she mentioned they might be posting soon. Tell her you’re really interested and would love a heads-up when they’re ready to talk to candidates.

And yes, once you apply, send her a quick email letting her know that you did.

6. Does “a couple of weeks” really mean two weeks?

I had a final round interview with my dream company exactly 2 weeks ago. After the interview, I asked for the timeframe for the next step and the interviewer said, “We will contact you in a couple of weeks.” I’m getting jittery now. Should I send them an email asking for an update now that 2 weeks have passed? Or should I wait more? If they say “a couple of weeks,” would they be annoyed that I contacted them after only 2 weeks?

Wait until it’s been three weeks and send over an email reiterating your interest and asking if they have an updated timeline.

Hiring nearly always takes longer than the people involved in it expect it to. Really, you should mentally double any timeline you’re given, at least as far as adjusting your own expectations go. (Plus, “a couple of weeks” in this context really means “a few weeks, more or less, maybe more.”)

short answer Saturday — 6 short answers to 6 short questions

It’s short answer Saturday — six short answers to six short questions. Here we go…

1. Did I handle my resignation badly?

I’m a trades student right now. I moved to a city 30 minutes away to go to school. I agreed with my manager that I would keep working on the weekends until the end of May, since she is short on people and I needed work anyway. Then I found work related to my trade for the weekends, which doesn’t require as much of a commute and pays far better. I gave two weeks notice (and apologized profusely), but I’m wondering, was it unethical to quit when I had agreed to stay until the end of May? Or was it okay because I still gave two weeks notice?

That sounds fine. You agreed to stay longer when she asked you to, but your circumstances changed and you gave appropriate notice. Leaving without notice would be a problem, but this is not.

2. Asking for extra vacation time instead of a raise

I work for the largest health insurance company in my state. Of all the companies I’ve worked for, their policies seem the most reasonable and the most considerate of their employees, except for how much PTO is granted.

I have been with them for almost seven years now, and my annual reviews have been great every year. I’m at a point in my life where I’m making enough money to pay my bills and save for emergencies, vacations, retirement, etc. I would much rather at this point be rewarded with an increase in the amount of PTO I can earn per pay period than additional salary. Is there any way for me to phrase this request that sounds professional? I would have to take it up either with my VP or HR or both because neither my supervisor nor manager have any say according to the administrative policies I’ve read.

Absolutely! Your company may or may be willing to do it, but it’s a completely reasonable request. I’d say something like, “I’m really interested in earning additional PTO and wonder if you’d consider giving me an extra two weeks (or whatever) per year in lieu of a raise this year.”

You still might start with your manager though, which is usually the appropriate protocol even if your manager needs to go up the food chain to get approval.

3. Company says I used to work for them, but I didn’t

I’m in a little bit of a situation with my employer. I have recently started working for them (~1 month) and everything seemed to be going well… until today. When they entered my information into their system, corporate said that I already had an employee number and that I worked for them at a different location for 2 years between 2008 and 2010. This doesn’t make any sense because I have never worked for them. I have reached out to the other location but they are not required to keep any records for longer than a year. Asset Protection is now handling it as an “investigation” and if they find what they have already essentially “found,” even though it’s false, I could be terminated, as it is falsifying a document. Please help.

It’s hard to advise on this without knowing the specifics of the situation, but if you didn’t work there, you didn’t work there — and your social security number should make that clear. Ask specifically what they’re finding that indicates that you did since clearly there’s been a mistake somewhere, and ask Asset Protection to check your social and see if that helps.

4. When will this temp job turn permanent?

I am currently working as a temp at a large company. The position is temp-to-hire and I have been told that there is no doubt that I will be brought on permanently with the company I am temping at. Initially they told me it would only be a couple weeks to a month more of temping, but now they are telling me it will be three or four more months. I was okay with one more month, but three or four really puts a burden on me. I have already been a temp for over four months.

How can I convey the burden this puts me under to my boss in a professional manner? I have made it clear that I am hesitant to stay on as a temp that long and each time it comes up, my boss is dumfounded as to why and I am asked to explain my hesitancy. I have said it is because I am looking for something that provides stability, but in reality the issue is that the temp salary is barely enough for me to get by and it also does not include any benefits, including sick and vacation days. Additionally, I feel like my status as a temp has led to people treating me with less respect at the company. I realize that saying all of that to my boss is unprofessional, so how can I get the message across in an appropriate manner?

Also–is it wrong for me to be upset with the company over them dragging their feet to bring me on permanently? How they have treated me during this process is raising doubts as to whether or not I actually want to stay with the company in the future. While I enjoy the work I do not enjoy how they treat their employees. I feel like I have been abused because I am desperate and they know that.

You can’t force someone to understand something. If she doesn’t get this pretty basic concept after an explanation, give up on trying to force the issue.

Instead, assume that there’s no regular job to be offered until the day you see a job offer in writing, and continue to conduct an active job search. This will be far less frustrating than continually expecting something and being annoyed that it’s not happening. (It will also be less frustrating to not assume they’re “abusing” you, but rather are dealing with higher priorities, disorganized, working out budget issues, or any of the other explanations for the delay that have nothing to do with you.)

5. What job search info should I track?

I keep an Excel spreadsheet to monitor jobs I’ve applied to. What data do you think is most important to track (beyond point of contact, position description, dates, etc.)?

Make sure you’re keeping the actual job description somewhere, not just the URL for it, because job postings get taken down, even when the job is still open. I’d also track any actual contact you’ve had with anyone there.

6. Can you accept a job offer contingently?

Have you heard of people contingently accepting a job offer based on what happens with the open position that they’d directly report to? In this situation, the management position it would report to is also open and one of the interviewees would create a conflict of interest if they were hired. Is contingently accepting an offer something people do?

They should do it more often, frankly, given what a major impact your manager has on your quality of life at work, but it doesn’t happen too often. Although there’s no reason someone couldn’t reasonably say, “I’d love to accept the job, but I’d like to hold off on a formal acceptance until you fill the manager role, since rapport with that person will be so important.” You’d need to be willing for them to refuse that, though.

However, in your case, where you’re worried about a potential conflict of interest, it’s a little different. I’d just be direct: “I’d love to take the job, but I know that you’re considering Jesse Pinkman for the manager role. Jesse is my husband, and so obviously that would be a conflict. In light of that, would it make sense to wait to see how that role is filled first?”

I talk too much in meetings!

A reader writes:

I am a fairly young professional in a fairly casual office at a fairly small nonprofit. Recently, I received some feedback from my manager that I need to be “cautious of meeting etiquette,” that I should work toward not taking over or dominating the conversation in meetings and not feel as though I have to share everything that I know in a meeting.

As well, I know from prior conversations that my manager thinks I sound like a know-it-all (I’m paraphrasing, she didn’t say that) in meetings with vendors, particularly tech/IT vendors. This is likely because I often re-state or clarify aloud what the vendor has just said, for two reasons — one, to solidify it in my own head, and two, because I can see that several of my coworkers, who are all senior to me, older than me, and by their own admission not very tech-savy, are getting lost.

I know this feedback is warranted — I am definitely a talker, and I grew up in a household where if you didn’t interrupt someone else you never spoke because there was never a lull in the conversation. I have had similar feedback before and though my manager acknowledges that I am getting better about not interrupting my (all senior to me) coworkers, apparently this is still an issue as I am still receiving this feedback.

I’ve tried to simply remember to stay quiet and let other people talk, but then I get excited about something and forget. Do you (or your readers) have any advice about specific or concrete things I can do in order to kick my over-talkative/over-explaining habit?

Well, first, it’s great that you recognize this is something to work on, and it’s great that your manager was willing to give you the feedback. When this really becomes a problem is when someone isn’t aware that they’re doing it or resists hearing feedback about it.

It might help to do some deliberate thinking about how much you should be talking in a meeting, because it sounds like your norms might be off there. Let’s say that you’re in a meeting with six people. Assuming you’re not leading this meeting (and often even if you are), let’s say that you shouldn’t be talking more than anyone else, so no more than one-sixth of the time — that’s fair, right? (There are some exceptions to this, but given the issue at hand, let’s go with that formula.) Then, you also need to factor in who else is in the meeting with you. You’re the most junior person in these meetings, so you should nearly always be talking less than everyone else. (Because, in general, most office cultures assume that the more senior you are, the more valuable your contributions … with some obvious exceptions, of course.) So let’s say that takes it to one-tenth of the time … meaning that 90% of the time in meetings you probably should just be listening.

This isn’t a precise formula, obviously; there is no precise formula, and different meeting contexts call for different behavior. But because you know this is a problem, you’ve got to start somewhere, and the idea here is to get you recalibrating your norms about how much talking is appropriate so that you can start thinking about it in a different way.

So, how do you make sure you stay in listening mode most of the time? For starters, you can decide to speak up only when you believe that what you’re going to say will truly advance the conversation in some way. No more summarizing for others (let them ask if they don’t understand something), and no more speaking just to share your thoughts. The litmus test is this: Is what you’re about to say necessary for others to hear as part of this conversation? And are you the only one likely to say it? (On that second question, try waiting to see if someone else makes the same point, rather than rushing in to make it.)

I want to be clear: These aren’t blanket rules that I’d encourage everyone to use in meetings. More often than not, I’d like to see people speak up more, not less, especially at junior levels. So these rules are only relevant in your particular case, because you are being told that you need to alter your behavior in this realm and because you agree it’s a problem. I don’t want it to be misconstrued as me hushing people generally.

One last thing: If you are interrupting anyone, you have to cut that out, 100%, right now. That never goes over well, and especially not when you’re doing it to people more senior to you. And the only way to fix that one is to genuinely believe that it’s rude to do and be vigilant about not being so eager to speak that you’re willing to plow into what someone else is saying. You’ve got to monitor yourself like a hawk on that, because that can do real damage to how you’re perceived. (Honestly, so can the rest of this, but this one in particular you Just Cannot Do.)

Anyway, I think it’s great that you’re committed to taking this on, and I bet that you’ll kick this habit if you really try to. What other advice do people have?

Read an update to this letter here.

open thread

SamIt’s our April open thread!

The comment section on this post is open for discussion with other readers on anything you want to talk about.

If you want an answer from me, emailing me is still your best bet, but this is a chance to talk to other readers.

fast answer Friday — 7 short answers to 7 short questions

It’s fast answer Friday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. My comments in an interview might have lost my company a contract

I made a huge mistake in an interview a month ago. I have been working part-time in a restaurant while getting my degree. The restaurant is an awesome place to work, and I have a really good relationship with the owners, who are family friends. They have been really supportive and know that I am looking to transition into my chosen profession.

I interviewed at a really big company three weeks ago. During the interview, they asked what I liked best about my current position, and I talked about how I love that the management at the restaurant want to give people second chances so they work with a nonprofit and employ people who have criminal histories and really try to be an active part of the community. Through the partnership between the restaurant and the nonprofit, the people recently released are reconnected to society and have an outlet that is not part of the patterns that got them into trouble in the first place, and the program they are in really reduces the likelihood they will become a repeat offender by about two-thirds. I thought the company i was interviewing with knew this information and supported it because there was a branch of the restaurant on-site and that is how I developed the connection to get the interview.

Fast forward two weeks… the company is now requiring that any person who works at the location not have a criminal history within the past 7 years, and the restaurant is close to losing their contract as a food vendor. The company that I interviewed with has a great reputation and was known to do a lot of outside work within the community, so I am really confused why they are taking these actions. Should I tell the restaurant what I think happened? I feel horrible and am not sure what I should do.

Tell the restaurant. This isn’t your fault — this surely isn’t a program that they keep hidden; it’s one that they’re rightfully proud of, and the company you interviewed with almost surely could have found out all sorts of other ways if you hadn’t mentioned it. You mentioned it because you were proud of the work and had no reason to think it would cause problems. So tell your restaurant — to clear your conscience because you’re feeling at fault when you’re shouldn’t be, and also so they have a fuller picture of what might have happened.

2. Is this a work assignment or vacation?

I work in a hospital in a specialty position. The good is, I have really good job security and hours. The bad is, I have a difficult time getting time off because there are few who can cover my job. Asking for time off becomes a big deal.

There is an educational seminar I could use to improve my productivity. When I asked 3 months in advance, I was told I would have to use vacation time to attend. I was OK with this. However, now my manager wants me to take notes and give a condensed version for the rest of the staff in my department. Should I at least ask for mileage or ask to not use vacation time since this is now becoming a work assignment?

Either this is vacation time — when you shouldn’t have to do work — or it isn’t, in which case you shouldn’t have to use vacation time. Say something like this to your manager: “I wasn’t clear if you were asking me to do that as a work assignment, since I’m planning to use vacation time while I’m gone. Should I not be using PTO for it and instead treating it as work time?” (However, make sure that your manager was truly assigning you this work, not just casually mentioning that it would be something nice to do if you happen to think of it. Will it be held against you if you don’t? If so, they shouldn’t be making you take time off for it.)

3. Boss keeps calling me by the wrong title

I was hired at my place of employment as an Office Manager. Because of the amount of input I provide to the organization, I asked for a title change to Executive Assistant, which was granted. I feel that my input has been very significant to the organization and I have even contributed to other areas without any additional stipend or bonus. (Also, I might add, I am being paid below what I feel I should be considering my experience and successes. But I take responsibility for accepting the position under the salary condition….)

Recently, at the organization’s annual meeting, my boss, the Executive Director, announced me as the Administrative Assistant, and today at our staff meeting, he announced that it was Administrative Assistant appreciation day to thank me for the good work I do. He took me out to lunch and bought me a lei (I live in Honolulu, and they do that here).

Somehow, it strikes me less as being a compliment, and more of an insult. Am I wrong to feel this way? Why would he decide to change the way I am addressed and not discuss it with me first? So far, no one has discussed this point yet. I was thinking to address it to him directly myself. So, there are two points which seem contradictory, on the one hand, my work is being appreciated, on the other, he has verbally “demoted” me, or is there a more positive way to see this?

Lots of people see office manager, administrative assistant, and executive assistant as being similar or even the same thing — and at many organizations (especially smaller ones), they are. So I think you’re reading far, far more into this than what it really means.

If it really bothers you, you can say to him, “I noticed you’ve been referring to me as an administrative assistant. I know it might not seem like a big deal, but I’d really prefer it if you’d use executive assistant as my title.” But really, many people see very little difference between the titles and I’m sure it’s not meant as an insult. I’d pay far more attention to how he actually treats you, not what titles he uses.

4. Told to use vacation time for the day our office was closed after the Boston marathon bombing

I was told to stay home on the day of the Boston bombing because all businesses had to be closed for safety. Should I be paid for this day and not be forced to use vacation time?

It’s up to your employer. They can require you to use vacation time for closures (same thing for closures due to weather), although it would certainly be a nice gesture if they didn’t in this case.

5. Applying for a job where I don’t know a required computer program

I have a question about job fit. I usually apply for jobs where I fit at least 80% of the job description. Today I came across a job I think would be very interesting and that I am a good fit for. I match all of the requirements except one, which is a computer program I am familiar with but have no experience with. Is it worth addressing in my cover letter (i.e., I am familiar with program x, I do not have any experience but am willing to take my own time in order to get caught up or I am quick learner, etc). If your hiring someone, would you even consider someone who had never used the program before?

I wouldn’t even necessarily address it up-front. Apply and see what they say if it comes up. If you get all the way to an offer without being asked about, you can certainly ask at that stage if it’s an issue. But employers are often flexible on the job requirements they list, so I wouldn’t worry too much about it until/unless they tell you it’s a problem.

6. What is this style of management called?

There is a style of management where a company will purposefully assign a manager/supervisor to a group of workers, knowing the workers despise the manager in order to make them “grow” and mature. What is this called?

Stupidity.

If that’s really the whole story. If, rather, the workers dislike the manager because she holds them to a high bar when they’ve been held to a low one in the past, sometimes it’s called good management. So the details matter.

7. Asking for accrued vacation time to be paid out when leaving a job

Tomorrow is my last day at my current job, as on Monday I start a sparkly new one. My mother has suggested I ask my company to pay me the vacation time I have earned while working there as, at this moment, I have 40 hours of accrued vacation time.

I personally feel this is a bit strange to ask as it makes me slightly uncomfortable. However, as this is the first time I’ve had accrued days at my disposal, is asking to be reimbursed for your unused vacation days when you leave a position a common practice? Is it even legal?

It’s very, very common. Not every company does it, but many do. (And in some states, like California, states are required by state law to pay out accrued vacation time when you leave.) Check your employee handbook; there’s a good chance that this is addressed in there. If it’s not, you can certainly ask. Usually your company will have a policy that they either do or don’t, and it’s completely normal to ask how they handle it.

why do companies make it so hard for employed candidates to interview?

A reader writes:

If companies would rather hire people who are currently employed, why do they make it so hard to interview around a job?

I clearly state that in my cover letter than I’m currently a “Junior Teapot Designer at Hatter & Hare” and email is the best way to reach me, yet I’ve had recruiters call me at 3 p.m. and others ask me to interview at 11:00 a.m. with just two days notice.

WHY are they doing this?

Also, I was venting to a friend about this, he advised me to take the day off from my current job and not inconvenience the prospective employer, but two days is really short notice for a time off request. How much can I ask them to accommodate me?

Note: This is not all hiring managers. Several places have been very accommodating, offering to meet in the morning or late afternoon so I can slip out for a “dentist appointment.”

Well, first, you’re assuming that they’re requiring this of you, but they’ve simply asked if you can do it. You can offer a different alternative: “I’m booked up this week; would next week work instead?” or “Mid-day interviews are hard because I work during the day; could we meet first thing in the morning or in the late afternoon?” It’s utterly reasonable to ask this. They might tell you no, but plenty will be perfectly accommodating once you tell them what you need. But don’t get irked before you’ve proposed an alternative.

It does make sense to offer the soonest possible day you could do it though and not put it off until the perfect time, if the perfect time is more than a week away. It’s simply in your best interest to talk with them fairly soon, since many companies do have hiring deadlines, a vacancy they’re itching to fill, and/or are interviewing people on a rolling basis and will make an offer as soon as they find someone they like for the job.

And the reality is, many candidates are able to accommodate these requests, so it’s not crazy that they’re asking in the first place. After all, why wouldn’t they ask for what would be most convenient for them? They’re figuring you’ll say something if it doesn’t work on your end.

Of course, there are certainly some employers who will tell you that it’s their initial scheduling proposal or nothing at all. And there are plenty more who can be flexible on the day, but who won’t meet earlier or later than normal working hours.

But those who operate that way do it because they can. They have enough good candidates who are willing to meet with them on relatively short notice during normal business hours that they don’t have sufficient incentive to come in early or stay late for others.

Now, a great hiring manager who knows how much it matters to get the right person on her team will do what it takes to talk to strong candidates, even if it means coming in early or leaving late or meeting at an unusual time or delaying the interview for a week or two. (If you truly look like a top candidate; if you don’t, it’s less likely. And you don’t always know from the outside if you’re likely to be considered a top candidate or not.) But plenty of other hiring managers figure that if they have lots of good candidates who will meet on a schedule that’s convenient for them, there’s no reason to put themselves out.

It’s useful to realize that the answer to questions about “why do employers do ___?” is often simply “because it works just fine for them.” If they have plenty of good candidates willing to do X (whether it’s interviewing during the workday, or accommodating last-minute interviews, or accepting a lower salary range), then they don’t have incentive to inconvenience themselves for candidates who can’t or won’t do X.

Hiring isn’t about being fair to everyone, after all; it’s about an employer finding someone to do the job well in the way they find most efficient or easiest to accommodate on their end. A smart employer will ensure that they’re not putting up barriers to hiring the best people (and that means ensuring they’re making it easy for great candidates to talk with them, not just good candidates), but in this job market, they often have a lot of flexibility in doing that. And sometimes that means that their practices will align well with what works for you as a candidate, but other times it doesn’t — that’s just the reality of it.

I think I went to a fake job interview

A reader writes:

I applied for a job on Craigslist online three weeks ago. I was called to come in for an interview and learned it had been posted by a temp agency. So I went in for the interview and I thought it went really well. The recruiter who interviewed me told me that that particular position had recieved many applications and she wasn’t sure if they would be doing any more interviews. She said she thought they were close to hiring someone, but that she would keep me in mind for any future opportunities.

This was on a Friday. After the weekend, I got up and logged onto my computer to start my job search again. Lo and behold, the exact same ad had been re-posted that Monday morning.

Now I don’t know what to do. The recruiter lied to me about the availability of the position and now I think the whole thing was just bait for them to sign me up with their agency. Should I email the recruiter who interviewed me and tell her I’m concerned? Or will that minimize my chances of finding a job with that temp agency in the future? I find this really frustrating.

There’s a strong likelihood that it was bait to sign you up with their agency, because this is how many, many staffing agencies work. They post boilerplate ads for jobs that don’t really exist (although they’d probably tell you that they have many jobs similar to it that they fill all the time) in order to build a database of candidates who they can call on in the future. Sometimes they call on them for jobs that are indeed similar to the one you applied for. And sometimes they aren’t. But yeah, they’re often fake ads.

It’s also possible that that’s not the case here. It could be a real job, and they are indeed close to hiring someone for it, as the recruiter told you — but most places keep their job ads active until they’ve made an offer and had it accepted … because offers sometimes fall through: candidates turn them down, they can’t come to terms over salary, etc. So you do sometimes see this happen, and it doesn’t indicate anything deceptive is happening. But when you see it from a staffing agency, odds are good that it was just a bait ad.

By the way, staffing agencies that do this don’t see anything wrong with it. If you asked about it, they’d tell you that since they fill similar jobs all the time, there’s nothing devious about the practice. (Of course, that conveniently ignores the fact that they make up lies like “Oh, that job has just been filled.”) So I wouldn’t bother complaining to the recruiter — first of all, she won’t agree with you that there’s an issue, and second, yes, she’ll just discard you as a pain in the ass after that. (And third, if they actually did tell you the truth — which is possible — then you’ll look crazy.)

If you don’t want to work with a staffing agency, you of course don’t have to. But there’s no harm in hearing from them in the future about what they might be able to offer you. You’re always free to take it or leave it.