an employer sent me rude, critical emails but now wants to interview me

A reader writes:

I work as an associate director for a Jewish nonprofit. I have been employed with this nonprofit for 5 years, and while I do love what I do, I have reached a glass ceiling as far as how high I can go.

Although I am NOT desperate for a new job, I would like one very much and have been looking on and off for 3 years. I have it good now, but most of the time I am not challenged and have very little to do, I have very little growth opportunity, and, well, I think the organization is seriously falling apart for several reasons, all having to do with dirty politics.

When I apply for a new job, it has to meet the following criteria: I have to be passionate about the mission, I would have to have a better financial incentive that I have now (with flex time and work from home options; I have it good now); I would have to feel as if I fit in; and I would have to love the job description.

Recently, I applied for a job where I fell in love with the job description because I identify with the mission and the job is one that would keep me very, very busy and happy by utilizing my strengths.

The first thing I did after I sent my resume was to check on LinkedIn to see if I was connected with anyone who could help me connect to someone affiliated with the organization. I found such a person: my former president, who knows the president of the organization I was applying to. He agreed to serve as a reference, as had worked well together.

Well, the next thing I know, the executive director called me for an interview. I know that it’s because she received my resume and not because she heard from the reference. She asked me when I would be available for an interview. It was a Wednesday, and I said I would be in the area the following Tuesday. She said that wasn’t good for her, so I suggested the very next day and she agreed, but then she changed it and asked to talk by Skype the following day. I suggested Facetime instead because I prefer it over Skype, but she didn’t know what that was, so I agreed to Skype.

However, she then canceled on me with this email:

“Actually, let’s put the interview on hold. I’ll let you know if I want to reschedule.”

I replied, “Okay.” She then sent me this:

“I’ll be honest. I don’t think you have the right interpersonal skills for this job. You should give some thought the professionalism of your personal presentation and communication.”

I sent this back:

“I appreciate your candidness and just wanted to suggest that you are making quite an assumption about me without ever having met me. And all because I asked for Facetime instead of Skype? Best of luck to you in finding the right candidate.”

She emailed me this in return:

“No, it was every interaction. You’re too aggressive and pushy and unnuanced and unaware of your own subjective context. Too many assumptions, not enough listening, not enough gentle professionalism. No professional demeanor at all, actually, that I can tell, in the sense of knowing how to communicate with a potential employer. And I say that despite the fact that on paper, you look great. Your resume got my attention. You know how to present facts in an interesting way on paper. But in person, I felt like I wouldn’t want you coming near a donor…. That was my impression. I’m taking the time to tell you just in case it will be helpful to you in your job search. First impressions are important. If I change my mind, I’ll let you know.”

Then, three weeks after this exchange, she called me because she had received an excellent reference from my contact who reached out to her, and wanted to Skype an interview. It went well and she asked for my writing samples. I sent them to her, and she said someone would contact me about the next steps.

In case we move forward and I interview more and even get a job offer, what is your advice on how I should handle her earlier comments? I want this position, but I don’t want her to supervise me and she would be my direct supervisor. How would you handle this?

I would handle it by getting in a time machine and going back three weeks ago and turning down her request to interview you after she’d heard from your reference, because at that point you already knew everything you needed to know about her.

Look, for all I know, her assessment of you is right on the money. Maybe you are “too aggressive and pushy and unnuanced” and all the rest. (And frankly, asking to use Facetime just because you like it better doesn’t thrill me, and your single-word “okay” response to her original cancellation wasn’t the most professional or eloquent communication in the world. So it’s possible she was picking up on something that’s worth giving some thought to.) But her emails to you were unnecessarily nasty. There’s a way to give feedback to a candidate without being gratuitously harsh, but her language was the opposite of that — it reads as if she was practically taking glee in giving you a talking-to.

(And I love “If I change my mind, I’ll let you know,” as if it’s entirely up to her and she can lay into you like that and then reserve the right to change her mind and expect you to still be interested.)

This is someone who’s a little too comfortable laying into strangers. And if she’s like that with strangers, guess what she’s going to be like to work with? So yes, you’re absolutely right not to want her to manage you. But she manages the role you’re interviewing for, and you can’t get a job offer and say, “sure, I’ll accept, but oh — you’ll need to give me a different manager.” It doesn’t work like that.

You’re very clear that you’d only leave your current job for something that meets some very specific criteria, and this job fails that. It fails it because you’d be working with someone who has shown herself to be fairly nasty.

This one is poisoned. Move on from it.

how to take vacation when it’s never a good time to leave work

If you’re like lots of Americans, you’ve accrued vacation time that you’re not sure when you’ll ever use. You might feel guilty about taking time off when there’s so much work to be done, or just not foresee a slower period that will allow you to get away, or have a boss who discourages you from scheduling time away. But taking occasional breaks from work is crucial to maintaining your quality of life – and sometimes your quality of work too, since many people become burned out when they’re never able to get away.

If you’re one of the many who doesn’t know how you’ll find time to go on vacation, here are five tips for making it happen.

1. Stop waiting for a “good time” to go. The nature of many jobs is that there will never be an easy time to take time off,no matter how well you plan for it in advance. But that’s no reason to not go at all. It’s in your employer’s best interests to have well-rested and recharged employees, and vacation time is a benefit that you’ve earned, just like salary, so you should use it. So instead of waiting for the perfect time – which may never come along – decide that you will be using your vacation time this year, and make the question one of what accommodations should be made, whether than whether accommodations can be made.

2. If your manager balks, be assertive. It’s certainly your manager’s prerogative to say that you can’t take time off at a certain of year (because it’s the company’s busiest time or because two other people on your team will be gone then), but she shouldn’t say that you can nevertake time off. If you’re getting the sense she doesn’t want to approve vacation time, no matter when it is, address the issue head-on. Say something like, “I haven’t been able to have a vacation in two years because it’s so hard to get away, and obviously that’s not sustainable in the long-term. Time off is part of my benefits package, and I’d like to use it. Can we talk about how to arrange things so that I can plan for some time off with confidence?” Sometimes some bosses are so caught up in the day-to-day rush of work that they need prodding to step back and look at long-term needs like this. (And good managers know that great people will eventually leave if they’re working in a culture that doesn’t support their quality of life – and good management is about getting results in the long run, not just the short-term.)

3. Be sure your office is prepared to handle anything that might come up in your absence. This means making sure that you’ve documented how to do the key elements of your job that could be done by someone else in a pinch; enlisting coworkers in helping cover pieces of your job that will need to be covered while you’re gone; informing your boss about those arrangements so that she’s in the know; and making sure that your outgoing voicemail message and email auto-reply both let people know that you’re away, when they can expect a response, and/or who to contact for help in your absence.

4. Try to unplug completely. Much of the benefit of vacation time comes from truly being away from work – mentally as well as physically. If you’re still checking work email and taking work calls, you’ll lose this benefit, especially since it takes most people a few days of doing no work to get out of work mode completely. So don’t be tempted to check in to make sure you’re not needed. In all but the rarest cases, your office can survive without you for a week or two.

5. But if you really can’t unplug completely, limit the ways in which you’re checking in. Don’t offer your office constant availability; you shouldn’t be taking work calls when you’re relaxing on the beach or getting interrupted at dinner. Instead, if you can’t unplug altogether, let coworkers or your boss know that you’ll be checking voicemail or email once a day (or once every two days) and only responding to messages marked “urgent.”

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

how to use a foot in the door, quitting a job you like, and more

It’s wee answer Wednesday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Do I have to be paid for attending meetings outside my regular hours?

I’m working at a restaurant part-time while I do a bunch of contract work. It’s an hourly + tips job with no benefits in Washington, DC. (We’re lucky enough that they at least pay us $8.50/hour + tips and are really good employers in almost every sense, which makes the job worth it.)

Every month they close early to have a mandatory meeting from 9-11 pm. I’ve worked a lot of part-time jobs like this and never not gotten paid for meetings–but when I went in today and asked if it was time to clock in, they said “we don’t clock in for meetings here.” Is it legal to require hourly employees come into a meeting at work for two hours a month without paying them?

When I mentioned that this might be violating labor laws to another employee, she said that pointing something out was likely to make the owner angry and was likely to result in “scheduling consequences.” Personally, I think that the management has been pretty reasonable about most things up to this point and just might not know that this is an issue–but then, I’m also pretty new around here.

Nope, it’s not legal. If it’s a required meeting, it’s work and they need to pay you for it. I’d say something like this to the manager you have the best rapport with: “Since it’s a required meeting, I think it counts as work time according to the laws on this stuff, and we should clock in, right?” Start with the assumption that it’s just ignorance of the law (as more often than not, it is), and proceed from there.

2. How to quit a job you like

I have only quit jobs when I was unhappy, and in those cases you suggested resigning by saying something like: “I want to let you know that after four years with Chocolate Teapots Inc., I’ve made the difficult decision to move on to a new role outside the company.” But how do you quit when you like your job? I have been invited to apply for a new job that I’m pretty excited about (my closest friend recommended me for a job with her company, and it’s a great fit). Of course, I have studied your interview guide, and I wouldn’t dream of quitting until I have an offer in writing. And I need to give two weeks’ notice.

I plan to talk to my manager directly in a formal meeting. I’ve been with the company for more than 12 years, and she has been very supportive of me. I am one of the senior team members, and she relies on me a lot. The timing is kind of crappy for her — the offer could come right after our biggest annual client event, and my boss has a planned vacation after that that would happen during my notice period.

What do you recommend I say during the meeting? How do I break the news to her? I will offer to help with the transition as much as possible; in fact, I’m already training our newest hire. Should I also mention that I wouldn’t entertain a counter-offer, or is that presumptuous?

Just be straightforward: “This was a hard decision for me, but an amazing role was offered to me, and I accepted it. I’m ready to do whatever I can to help with the transition during the next X weeks.” More here. And don’t mention preemptively that you wouldn’t accept a counteroffer though; that’s premature. If she makes noises in that direction, you can certainly let her know it’s not something you’re open to before she goes through the work of getting one approved, but there’s no need to mention it before that.

Also, remember that there’s never a good time to leave most jobs. The timing always sucks in one way or another. That’s okay; most managers understand that, and they’ll make do.

3. Employer asked me to interview but hasn’t gotten back to me

I sent a cover letter and resume to an employer (a winery) for an assistant manager position on Thursday afternoon. On Friday, the general manager replied, provided me a more detailed job description, and asked if I was available to come interview at the winery on Tuesday or Thursday this week. I thanked him for his quick response and let him know I was available any time Tuesday. Since then, I’ve heard nothing. I followed up Monday afternoon and included the three people he CC’ed with his original email (I didn’t reply-all in my first response) to let them know I was still available this week and still nothing.

From searching your site, I think this is the point where I stop following up. Others have told me it couldn’t hurt to call today if I don’t hear anything by late afternoon (around 4:30 pm). I’m really lost as to what I should do. The quick reply and interview offer, followed by silence, has me completely confused as to how I handle this. I really hate the idea of giving up, because it seems like a great position for where I want to go in my career.

I’d wait until later this week — probably Friday — to follow up, and I’d do it by email for all the usual reasons (less intrusive, etc.). Hiring often takes longer than employers think it will, and we had a holiday at the start of this week. You’ve made your interest clear, and the ball is in his court. One more follow-up would be fine, but doing it now would be too soon — you’ll look pushy. Do it at the end of the week.

4. How should I use this foot in the door?

I’ve been a small business owner for over two years now and it has become a self-sufficent business that only requires a few hours a week of my time. I’m trying to get back into the corporate world and am having trouble.

I am focused on one particular large corporation in my area. I’ve recently started a temporary position at this corporation. It’s great because it’s steady income, everyone is nice, and it’s “a foot in the door.” It looks like the job could turn into a permanent position. The problem is it’s not in my department of interest and it’s not a very challenging job. It’s a step or two down from my previous work experience and where I want to be.

My question is, what do I do with this “foot in the door”? How do I leverage being inside the corporation to get a job in the department and at the pay-grade I want? Also when I apply for jobs at the company is it smart to list this job on my resume or just mention it in a cover letter?

Talk to people at the new company and tell them what you’re interested in. Working there as a temp means that you now have in-person access to people you couldn’t have had access to otherwise — lots of employees of the company, including possibly people involved in hiring for the roles you’re interested in. Talk to them face-to-face, tell them what you want to do, and ask for their advice.

And yes, include this job on your resume. They’ll be interested in knowing you’re at least something of a known quantity to some of their employees.

5. Should I leave my job because of my boss’s favoritism toward others?

I’d really appreciate your thoughts on how to respond to potential favoritism on the part of one’s boss. I don’t believe my manager is treating me unfairly in any explicit way; it’s more the sense that if she favored me, I would be more in the loop on things that relate to my job and would have more opportunities that interest or develop me. My manager puts more value on the business-related opinions of those on her team who are good personal friends (and those are the people she reaches out to for their thoughts). I believe that she will advocate more strongly for those people during promotion discussions as well. We don’t have a bad professional relationship, but I don’t believe we will ever be “friends.”

I’m a good performer. I have a good track record of bringing large and complex projects to successful completion, I think more so than the majority of my peers. Do you think this is a time to start looking for another job? I otherwise enjoy what I’m doing.

If you’ve been there less than two years, I wouldn’t leave so early just because of this. But if you’ve been there longer than two years, I’d weigh how much you feel you’re getting from this job (despite your manager’s problems) versus what you think you’re likely to find by leaving. That’s of course hard to predict; the next boss could be worse, after all, or there could be some greater problem with the next employer. But the idea is to get really clear in your own head on how much this bothers you — and how you weigh it relative to the advantages you see in staying.

6. I can’t start my new job until I move or start driving

Recently I got a job offer, and over the past few weeks I have been screened for my background, drug use, and physical condition. I expect the company to call me back very soon to discuss my starting date. The job is not far from where I am living (30 minutes of driving), but I have neither a car nor a driver license at this point (I’m working on it though and will get my license in a month). Therefore, I would have to move closer to the company in order to work in the short run. I found apartments that allow me to move in after 3 weeks — a month but none allows me to move in right away. I’m afraid the company would ask me to go to work right away, which I wouldn’t be able to. How should I address my problem to them on the phone so that they won’t be turned off?

Well, it’s pretty normal to set your start date at least 2-3 weeks out, so unless you’ve told them that you can start immediately or they’ve said that they’ll need you to, I would assume they’re expecting you to take a few weeks before starting.

It seems silly to move just because you won’t have your license for 1-2 weeks after starting, if the problem will be solved once you do. I’d look into either getting your license sooner or finding alternate transportation for those 1-2 weeks, rather than planning to move for such a short-term problem. (Of course, that assumes you’ll buy a car at that point — but buying a cheap used car is probably cheaper than or at least equal to the cost of a move anyway.)

7. Can my employer fine me for arriving late?

Yesterday, I arrived about ten minutes late to my shift at my serving job (at a non-chain restaurant in a big city), due to some train trouble. Normally this isn’t seen as a big deal by the managers (and I still made it in before the rest of the servers on schedule), but yesterday the owner happened to be there checking in and demanded that I pay him $100 at the end of my shift in retribution. I was shocked, but thought it would blow over and got to work. At the end of the shift, the manager on duty reluctantly tried to collect a bargained down $50 from each of the servers, and everyone but me caved in and paid it. I have only been at this job for two months, but my coworkers tell me that this is not the first time this has happened.

Of course I’m wondering about the legality of what he did (although after reading your blog nothing would surprise me), but also if there is anything I can do if this happens in the future. (Part of me is worried that when I come in for my next shift I might be told to pay up or get out.) I’d sure appreciate any advice!

What the hell? No, employers can’t make deductions from your pay for any reason other than deducting time that you’re weren’t there — i.e., they don’t need to pay you for the 10 minutes you were late, but they can’t make an additional deduction on top of that. The only exception to this is if this was written into your employment agreement; otherwise, it’s retroactively changing the pay rate you and they agreed to, which isn’t allowed.

You might say to your manager, “I understand that you want me to take our arrival times seriously, and I’ll be more vigilant about that. But the law is pretty clear that we can’t fine employees, and I don’t want us to get into trouble over that.”

when there’s an error on your paycheck — in your favor

A reader writes:

My sister earns $400/week at an office job, but her first deposit for two weeks of work was $3,000. If she doesn’t mention it, would you expect any repercussions on her job if the over-deposit is later discovered? Would you recommend that she just bring it up to her employer ASAP?

Yes, she should point it out to them.

If they discover it later — and they likely will — she’ll have to pay the money back anyway. And when that happens, not having mentioned it will look really, really bad.

Think about what this would be communicating: “I am willing to take money that’s not mine if I think I can get away with it.”

While it’s possible that someone might have simply not noticed their check was for the wrong amount, $800 and $3,000 are pretty different. If I discovered this had happened and the employee hadn’t spoken up about it — especially a new employee, with no track record of integrity already built up — I’d assume the person was trying to get away with it and that would destroy that person’s credibility and trustworthiness.

Once someone makes it clear that they’re not at all looking out for the company and are willing to stay quiet in the face of something like this, it’s pretty much all over.

my coworker sent a hostile resignation email to our team, and now wants me to attend a going-away party

A reader writes:

I have a dilemma that I’m not sure how to approach. Recently, one of my coworkers submitted a resignation letter to our manager, then emailed a going-away party invite to me, the manager, and two other coworkers. This employee has worked closely with me and the other coworkers for a while, and wanted it to be a close-knit going away party (which is understandable — there are a lot of people in the group who the employee did not get along with). Oddly, though, the employee didn’t show up on the day he sent this message at all.

This seemed quite out-of-the-blue. This person is incredibly dedicated to work and even voluntarily work weekends/holidays to get products completed, and had seemed entirely normal the week before. Even our manager had been caught off-guard by the notification. I suspected that personal issues at home were the reason why he was resigning, but I didn’t want to look like a busybody and thus didn’t email him or call to inquire. 

However, late afternoon that same day, he sent a strongly-worded email to our whole group. The tone of the email was arrogant — touting that the employee was indispensable and vital to the group and that without him, we would be crippled. Usually, most people’s going-away emails are in a nice, “you guys have all been a pleasure to work with, etc, but I’m moving on” tone. This one felt hostile in a “you all suck” way. To me, it felt vindictive.

The next day, the employee didn’t show up again. I had “accepted” the invite for his going-away party, but after my coworkers and I talked with our manager (we were trying to figure out a plan to distribute projects and work that would be dropped in our laps after the employee left), our manager thought that the tone of the strange email was a power-grab, trying to tell people that the entire place will fall apart without said employee and that we should bend to the employee’s ways. I started to have doubts about accepting the invite.

The reason for my doubts, however irrational they may be, is because several years ago, in another building on-site, a disgruntled employee took his manager hostage and killed him.  Since then, we’ve had to take “Violence in the Workplace” training each year. Considering the tone of the email and out-of-the-blue resignation, along with him not showing up or answering our manager’s emails (our manager is trying to work out a two-week notification plan/transition with the employee and told us that the employee has not been as responsive as he had hoped), I had a sudden fear of him becoming a bit deranged and had a fear sweep over me about meeting the employee for the going away party. I’ve voiced this concern to our manager, but the manager says that its probably not like that — just the employee not realizing that everyone is replaceable.   Am I just being paranoid? Should I even go to this going-away party or fake an excuse?

I don’t know if you’re just being paranoid, but if you don’t want to go to the going-away party for any reason — even if it’s just an unexplained bad feeling — don’t go. That would be true no matter what, but it’s especially true in this case, because of the hostile note to your whole team. (Frankly, attending his party after that note could come across as a show of alignment with him and a bird-flipping to your team, anyway — totally aside from the other concerns.)

But if this is someone you’ve been friendly with, why not email or call him and say that you’re concerned and want to make sure that everything is all right — that his email to the group took you by surprise, that you’ve always enjoyed working with him, and that you’re concerned about how he’s doing.

As for fears of potential violence … I can’t say either way, and I don’t think anyone could from the outside, but what I can tell you is that if you have those fears, you shouldn’t just brush them off, and you should consider saying something to someone in charge of this stuff at your workplace (not your manager, who blew you off when you raised it to him). I’m not saying that you should proclaim that he’s a danger — which obviously might be entirely wrong — but rather that you should alert someone that the situation is making you uneasy and has at least some of the signs of trouble.

It’s worth noting, by the way, that people do sometimes get these sorts of hunches before sometimes bad happens, by noticing various clues that add up to trouble — whether they can piece together why they’re getting that feeling or not. In fact, in Gavin de Becker’s book The Gift of Fear (yes, I’m recommending it again), he says that in many/most workplace violence situations, other employees had often picked up on predictive signs of violence earlier but weren’t comfortable saying something to someone in charge because they couldn’t prove it.

Of course, people often get these hunches and nothing comes of them, too.  And ultimately I have no idea if you’re picking up on something here, or just reacting to the fact that this is aggressive and out-of-character behavior. But I’d think that a workplace that cares enough to do “violence in the workplace” trainings every years would want to hear your concerns — and soon. Let someone trained to figure this stuff out hear what’s going on and figure it out.

Read an update to this letter here.

how can I coach an annoying employee?

A reader writes:

How can I talk to my employee about her tendency to annoy people? She likes to work collaboratively to develop ideas, but it has begun to be burdensome for her colleagues. She seems to be high maintenance, mulling over minor little details and dragging things out unnecessarily. Is there a tactful way to tell her she needs to build a better rapport with her colleagues? They’ll all need to continue to work together.

The need here seems less about building rapport with her coworkers and more about eliminating annoying habits. (Of course, ending the annoying habits is likely to help build rapport, but it’s modifying the habits that should be the goal.)

I’d have a straightforward conversation with her:  “Jane, I’d like to give you feedback on some things I’ve noticed when you’re talking over ideas with people. I love that you are so collaborative, but I’ve noticed that you often have a higher tolerance for mulling over the details. Details are important, but when you’re using your colleagues’ time, these meetings will go better – and people will be more willing to join them – when you keep them focused on higher-level decisions. I’d like you to try tightening them up, so that people feel like their time is being respected. For instance, your planning meeting last week took more than an hour. I’d like to see you get meetings like that down to 30 minutes, tops. How about before the next one, we review your agenda together and I can help you find places to tighten it up?”

From there, monitor this like you would any other performance issue – checking in on how she’s doing with it, praising any improvement, and addressing it if the problem continues.

It might also be worth coaching her colleagues – if you manage them as well – about how they can respond to this situation too. For instance, you might help them find language to use when they want to cut longwinded brainstorming short and re-focus her on action items.

tiny answer Tuesday: 7 short answers to 7 short questions

It’s tiny answer Tuesday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. The person who I replaced 15 months ago now wants her job back

I applied for an internal lateral move 15 months ago and got the job. The vacancy was there because another worker bid on a higher job and got it. Soon after she started her new job, she asked if we could go back to our old jobs because she hated her new one. I agreed to, just so she wouldn’t be miserable. HR told me not to worry, I didn’t have to go back, and they would get her some help with her new job. Now 15 months later, they tell me she is coming back to her old job, booting me out, and I can’t go back to my old job, I must take the only job currently open, which is not a desirable position.

Shouldn’t there be a time limit on her being able to get her previous position back? Shouldn’t they allow me my old position back if they are so willing to make provisions for her? There is nothing at all in our handbook about job bidding or placement or anything like that, and we are non-union, so I feel very mistreated and have no one to back me up since we don’t have a written policy.

There are three standpoints to look at this from: what’s fair, what’s legal, and what’s good management. It’s clearly not fair — you accepted a position she had vacated, and it’s ridiculous that 15 months later she can reclaim it just because she wants to. It is, however, legal; employers can shuffle employees around any way they want to, fair or not (as long as it’s not based on race, gender, or other protected categories). Whether or not it’s good management isn’t entirely black and white — on the surface it obviously seems like it’s bad management, but if they feel that she’ll do a significantly better job in the role that you have been, and they’re not especially worried about retaining you in the long-term, it’s not as bad of a decision as if they were doing it simply because she asked them to … although even if that’s the case, they should care how it will look to other employees. Because it will look pretty bad to anyone who hears about it.

2. I don’t like my campus career center’s resume recommendations

While my college career center liked my resume, nobody else did. It started with an objective, education, work experience, and other or relevant experience, which the career center suggested. I think that this left the most relevant information, my skills and experience, where it is least likely to be read, and left the irrelevant information, my BA in a subject unrelated to the jobs I’m applying for, where it is most likely to be read. This did not make sense to me. And like I said, nobody outside of the career center was particularly happy with it.

Now I have removed the objective and changed the order of the sections of my resume. The order is: skills, relevant experience, work experience, and education. I think that the new structure shows people what they are looking for, possibly in the order that they’re looking for it, with as little junk as possible getting in the way. What do you think? Should I go back to the earlier structure or make any other changes to it?

Yep, your changes are absolutely right for most fields and what I would have suggested. (The only exception would be where the specifics of your education truly are the most important qualification for recent semi-recent grads), but those fields are very, very few.)

The fact that campus career centers are still telling students to use objectives — let alone telling them to bury their most relevant qualifications beyond less relevant ones — makes me want to spend the next month calling up every career center in the country and screaming at them.

3. Are these scheduling habits rude?

I have begun doing freelance work for someone, which requires occasional in-person meetings. This client is aware I have limited availability due to my full-time job as well as other freelance projects I am involved on. I make an effort to schedule our meetings with enough notice for both parties to plan adequately.

Almost two weeks ago, we set a tentative plan to meet this Saturday (time TBD), agreeing he would follow up closer to the date to confirm. On Thursday, having not heard back, I emailed a polite, informal “just want to see if Saturday still works, and if so what time?” He responded Friday morning saying, “still on tomorrow, details to come.” It is now 4pm on Friday and he hasn’t followed up yet.

I can be accommodating to this client so I’m not going to create an issue where there isn’t one, but my question is whether this is bad form or just par for the course for busy people? I am 4 years out of college, and he is an independent film producer who has been in the industry for some time. Is this just the way people work? Is it fair that in our roles I should be the one who has to be accommodating to his schedule? (I feel like it is, but perhaps I am being a pushover here.) And, to that end, what are the etiquette rules for giving people enough time to prepare for a meeting?

It is indeed bad form, and it’s also the way some people work. You can often head this off, however, by structuring your plans with them differently. For instance, this might have gone differently with this guy if during the original plan-making you’d said, “Let’s plan to confirm details by Thursday” — and then if you hadn’t heard from him by late Thursday, followed up with him, saying, “I may not be accessible tomorrow so hoped to confirm these details now.” In other words, being explicit with them about when you want things solidified by, and then following up to make that happen.

As for whether you should be the one to accommodate his schedule, maybe. It depends on the relative power of your position versus his. Do you need him more than he needs you? If so, yes, be prepared to accommodate — but you can still use the tactics above to make it easier when you do.

4. Is it okay to Google your interviewer?

What is the protocol on googling and doing LinkedIn searches on potential interviewers or organizations? I assume they are doing the same about me. I work in a field (communications, PR, marketing and advocacy) where I am expected to be up on technology and especially with advocacy and politics to have some awareness. Is it ok to admit this and if not, in this day and age why would it be creepy? 

It’s fine to Google your interviewer, and it’s pretty much assumed you’ll do so for the organization itself. It’s only creepy if you mention things to your interviewer that have nothing to do with her job — like the recipes she has on her Pinterest or the award she won in high school.

5. When job applications ask for your Social Security number

On several job applications recently, I’ve been asked for my Social Security number, and I’m not thrilled about having to put it there (two were online, one was a paper application). Is this legal (I’ve heard differing things)? And are there ways that I could go around applying without putting my SSN on there?

It’s legal in most states, although a few prohibit it. It’t ridiculous that they ask for it at this stage though, since they don’t need it until they’re paying you or doing a background check, and most people these days know that it’s not the greatest idea to give it out willy-nilly. If the form requires it and won’t let you proceed without entering something, one option is to put all zeros — which should signal that you’re declining to provide it at this stage.

6. My first paycheck is short

I was hired as a nurse for $30 a hour in writing. When I received my first paycheck, they had paid me $10 an hour short without any communication and shorted me 2 hours. Can they decrease my pay? I have the official letter stating my offer. My co workers are getting $30 and more a hour with less education and experience. What can I do?

What your coworkers are getting isn’t relevant to this; what IS relevant is that you were paid less than your agreed-upon rate and you were shorted two hours. You say that they haven’t communicated with you about it, but have you communicated with them? The first step is to go to them and point out the discrepancy; it may be a simple error that they fix on the spot. If not, you have a wage claim; they’re legally obligated to pay you the agreed-upon rate (and can’t change it retroactively, although they can change it going forward) and to pay you for all hours worked if you’re non-exempt.

7. Negotiating a 4-day-per-week schedule

I am in the process of negotiating a job offer that will require me to move to a relatively nearby city. Unfortunately, this company of a couple hundred people and nearly two dozen locations has a nepotism rule, so my spouse (who also works in my field) will not be able to work with this company. We’re not keen on the idea of contracting from two incomes to one. The job description stated that the job carries office hours of 8-5, but I’m wondering whether it would be appropriate to ask during the negotiations whether working 10 hours\day from Monday-Thursday would be an option so that I could be “back home” with my spouse Friday-Sunday?

You can ask that, but I wouldn’t do it until you have an offer, and I’d be prepared to hear no. Some companies allow flexible schedules like that and some don’t. (Some, for instance, consider it an inconvenience not to have employees around of Fridays for meetings, ad hoc questions, etc.) Also be prepared for the fact that they may be wary of hiring someone who will continue to consider “home” to be in a different location — that’s often interpreted as a risk factor for not staying around long.

cold-calling companies and showing up in person to submit a resume

A reader writes:

I have read your articles about cold-calling here and here, but I think today’s market is somewhat tougher and I would love to know your thoughts.

I am currently looking for a graduate position in architecture field. It is tough without any local experience. Having tried applying advertised jobs and reaching contacts but to no avail, I would like to cold call companies to see if they have any openings (most jobs in my field are not advertised).

What do you think would work best to approach companies for a job given that I would tailor each application with a good cover letter? Phone call, email, walk-in or send hard copy by post?

I understand that the best strategy would be email, but I could imagine the amount of job inquiry emails they receive every week in today’s job market. That is the method everyone is using and the application would be just looked away. By phone call or walk-in, I do not mean asking to speak to the hiring manager but probably just politely greet the receptionists and ask if they could pass my resume to the right person. And then follow-up with an email. I would appreciate if you could advise me on this.

The best way to apply for a job is the way the company has told you to do it. And that usually means applying online.

Cold-calling and walking in without an appointment hasn’t become a better idea just because the job market is tighter now. In fact, to the contrary, it’s a worse idea because the job market is tighter now.

Employers have tons of candidates to choose from — candidates who follow the employer’s directions on how to apply. Ignoring those directions and deciding to call or come by in person because you want to “stand out” says that you value your own convenience and preferences over theirs, and that’s basically a deal-breaker at the very early stages of a hiring process, when they know little else about you and have no reason to overlook that kind of rudeness. Because it is rudeness, even though you’re not thinking of it that way. They have an application process that they’ve directed candidates to use because it’s the one that makes it as efficient as possible for them, and you’re essentially saying, “Too bad, I like my way better.” And when they have tons of qualified candidates who aren’t doing that, it’s easy to simply discard you — or at least to consider it a major strike against you.

And while you might think that simply delivering your resume in-person and asking for it to be passed along isn’t such a big problem, the reality is that (a) you’re going to annoy them, and (b) you’re very, very likely to just be told to go online to apply anyway. Companies that direct you to apply online want you to do that because they want to get your materials in their electronic tracking system. Hard copies make that harder for them, not easier.

Just follow their directions.

I understand that you want to stand out and get their attention, but the way you stand out in a job search is by being a great candidate:  having a resume that shows a strong track record of getting results in the areas that the employer is hiring for, writing a compelling cover letter that doesn’t simply regurgitate information they can find on your resume, and being professional, friendly, and responsive when they contact you. It’s not about finding ways to circumvent what they’ve asked you to do.

my boss is always making out with his girlfriend at work

While visiting my nieces (ages 9 and 12) this weekend, they asked to take a stab at answering an Ask a Manager question … and then clamored to have their answers posted. So the following question has answers from all three of us.

A reader writes:

We work in a fairly small division of the company. The last few months, our boss has been dating a woman, and she is always in his office, despite not working for this company. She has basically taken up residence there. They are often snuggling or making out with the door wide open.

This makes it uncomfortable for us to go and talk to him about actual work-related things because it feels like we’re intruding. The other issue is that she is always in his office while he is on business conference calls on speaker phone and when he is going over payroll. He is a VP and is privy to information that we shouldn’t know, and she especially shouldn’t know since she does not even work here. This seems extremely unprofessional to all of us.

We have brought it up to his boss, but he turns a deaf ear because they are friends. Is it ok to talk to him about this or should we talk to HR, or is it best to leave the matter alone? Any advice you can give would be greatly appreciated.

The answer from 9-year-old niece A. (unedited):

Yes, I think you should just talk to your boss about this. Don’t just barge into his office whithout any warning, just simply call him up and say you would like to talk to him WITHOUT his girlfriend. Say you think that his girlfriend is disrupting the other workers and soulden’t be in his office as it makes you uncomfortadble.

You may also say that you think that she should not be hearing about your privet information, pay checks, warning noteses, etc., as it makes you uncomfortable . If he objects to this, yes, you should tell H.R. Explain that he is with his girlfriend most of the time and that it makes you uncomfortable. Good luck!

The answer from 12-year-old niece M. (also unedited):

First of all, your boss should realize that at work, one has to be professional. If you, your coworkers, and your work quality were not being directly affected by this “snuggling”, I would say that it is your boss’ business, and his life, and although it is extremely unprofessional, you have no right to ask them to stop, but rather should ask them to perhaps close the door while they are kissing. However, since you and your colleagues feel as if you can’t ask/ talk to him while she is there, you need to talk to him about it… when she’s not there to interject or influence his actions.

You — with some coworkers — could gently tell him, “It is hard to tell you this, but some people have expressed their concerns about (insert girlfriend’s name) spending so much time in your office. We have been worried about intruding and have not been able to ask you questions. We are also worried about (insert girlfriend’s name) seeing our private information. We know she would never do anything with it, but we feel it is a violation of our privacy. We were just wondering if you could remember to act professionally so that we do not feel so uncomfortable.”

I am disturbed by his boss’ reaction to your concerns, especially if it has been brought up with him more than once with various employees. But that is another problem in itself if your manager’s boss won’t listen to you about issues in the workplace. Being friendly with your manager should not make it harder, but easier to talk to him about this. You could suggest he say something similar to what I wrote above. Talking to HR could help, too, but I recommend addressing the issue with your boss first. Maybe he truly doesn’t realize how everyone feels about this, and would quickly change his inappropriate actions. If you talk to others before him, he might feel as if you are going behind his back, and become defensive. If he refuses and denies all you are requesting, it is time to go to HR or your manager’s boss again. I hope this unprofessional issue gets resolved.

The answer from 40-year-old Ask a Manager:

What?! Making out with someone at work in front of employees (let alone regularly – what the $%&?!) and having a girlfriend basically camp out in his office day after day are so far over the line of what’s acceptable that I have to wonder if he’s some hormone-ravaged teenager on some kind of work apprenticeship through his high school, since I’m having trouble imaging a post-pubescent adult thinking this is okay (and as you can see above, even non-adults don’t think it’s okay).

In any case, normally and ideally, the first step would be to talk to your manager, since he’s the person who’s making you uncomfortable. Ideally, you’d find a moment when his girlfriend isn’t there and talk to him privately and say something like, “Hey, it’s hard to talk with you about work-related matters when Jane is here – is there some system we can set up to ensure that we have time with you when we need it?” (And I love that M. and A.’s instincts were to just talk directly to the guy rather than instantly turning to some higher authority to step in.)

However, this guy sounds removed enough from reality that he might just tell you to come on in and talk with the girlfriend there and not worry about her. And of course, in an ideal world, you’d be able to respond, “I feel a little weird about that, and about someone who doesn’t work for the company being in the room for conversations that might be sensitive or confidential” … but the reality is that this is your boss and there’s a power dynamic in play, and he’s already shown that he’s not adhering to normal standards of professionalism, and so there’s no reason to be confident that having this perfectly reasonable conversation won’t come back to bite you if he’s resentful or annoyed by the request.

Because of that, your best bet might be to skip this step – as much as it pains me to say it – and instead go straight to HR. Which also pains me to say, because I don’t really like recommending going to HR about much. But since his boss doesn’t care (which is also absurd and calls into questions the boss’s judgment and ability to manage as well), someone with more sense than this duo should be aware of all of this and put a stop to it.

Read an update to this letter here.

ask the readers: who should replace the office water cooler jug?

This one is interesting, and I’m throwing it out to readers to help with. Here’s the letter:

I’m not exactly sure how relevant this is to management, but I’m guessing this is a common source of office drama and was wondering what you and your readers think/do about it.

The office water cooler: Who should replace the empty jugs?

My previous office had about 40 employees in it that shared one very heavily used water cooler. It was also a very female-heavy office–just one or two of the staff were male. I was the Unofficial Water Jug Replacer there for 2 years, as no one else would chip in and do it. Sometimes one of the women would ask one of the men to replace it, which they did, but I was the main Replacer. And it certainly was not easy for me; I’m a small five-foot-tall woman. I spilled water everywhere and smashed and bruised my fingers many, many times trying to haul that jug to chest level to get it on the cooler. One time I dropped the jug and very nearly broke my foot. But I did it anyway, mostly because there was no other option besides getting drinking water from the bathroom sink (blech).

Fast forward to a few years later, and now I’m in a different job in a different office. I told myself when I got my new job that I wouldn’t let myself become the Unofficial Water Jug Replacer again and that I had more than fulfilled my quota of water-jug-replacement for one lifetime. I took the tact that everyone else did; if I saw the jug was empty, I just went back to my desk and waited for someone else to replace it, and eventually, someone would. I didn’t know who actually did it–I never saw my coworkers around me replacing the jug.

Recently, my manager emailed my team and said that replacing the water jug was “our responsibility” and that someone from another area of our department had been doing it up until now out of the kindness of their hearts. Since that email was sent out a week ago, the jug has been sitting empty on the cooler, unreplaced. There is a silent standoff going on, and I’m certainly participating in it. I do NOT want to replace that water jug; I have been physically injured too many times by now to do it again. I would rather drink water out of the tap than have to deal with the cooler (which is actually possible in this new office–it has a kitchen area in it). I also have possibly sexist opinions on it it, because unlike my previous office, this one is quite full of tall big men who would have a much easier time replacing the jug than someone like me.

How do other offices deal with the water jug? Does every office have an Unofficial Water Jug Replacer? Am I doomed to become this person again?

Readers, what do you say?