how to deal with an overly eager junior colleague

A reader writes:

I’m the senior non-manager on a team of ten, and I work closely with a new hire (three months). She comes to me with a lot of questions, which is great, and (quickly after the questions) suggestions about how we could improve the process she’s asking about. However, the suggestions tend to be be a little bigger in scope than it’s reasonable to do.

For example, last week I emailed another team to clarify one small part of a process we do weekly, copying her in so she’d know what was going on:

Me: “Hey teapot team! I’ve noticed that when we’re assembling the teapots, sometimes you guys send the spouts first and sometimes the bowls first. This has a small effect on the way we do things — do you have a preference? We’re happy either way, but it would help us a bit if it were consistent.”

Her: “Jane, I’ve been making sure to put them together bowls first, because that’s what it says in this [3-year-old training documentation on an obscure part of the network she found on her own]. We should probably arrange a meeting to discuss our department’s documentation generally and the way we communicate with the teapot team — shall I see when everyone on their team is free? As well as the head of the chocolate household items department and the managers, so we can talk about the broader documentation issue?”

I am trying to figure out how to communicate a few things, like:

• Our company culture is to sort questions of that complexity and importance level (ie, not very) out through emails, not meetings
• If I (and probably other people at the company, although obviously I can’t speak for them) ask another team for their input, it’s because I want to hear from them and possibly have a brief conversation about whether it’s the best way to do things, not (necessarily) because I don’t know “the answer”
• Small problems generally don’t deserve an exhaustive discussion, meeting, and possible overhaul of every single part of the procedure involved, and it’s okay to just have a quick chat about the small problem and get on with things.

And how to do that without going “OH GOD PLEASE BREATHE IN AND BACK OFF,” which is how I’m starting to feel. I’m also starting to feel a little bit of pushback from her, like she’s losing respect for me because she thinks I’m not taking action on things. (In one case, this was my not asking our manager for a timeline on a medium-term project for the fourth time in one week — I was sure if there was anything to hear, we’d have heard it, but I got the impression she thought I was blowing her off or ignoring the issue, and I’ve been getting that impression more and more as I say things like “I don’t think we need to worry about that until we hear differently” or “I think the department head has that under control.”)

It’s her first job out of university and I think she’s not used to the way bigger companies work (i.e., slowly and with much management faff). I also think a lot of it is down to wanting to make a good impression (like looking up documentation on her own, and “proactively” problem-solving and looking for big-picture things to “fix”). I’m not sure how to say, “Thank you for your initiative, but…please please take it down a notch!” without reinforcing this image I’m worried she’s getting of me.

Well, this might be a job for her manager, but if you want to try to talk to her, you could say something like this: “Hey, I wanted to follow up with you about your suggestion that we have a meeting to talk about X. I didn’t want you to think that I was ignoring it, but we’re usually able to handle these things with a quick email or informal conversation, and usually save big meetings for times when we’ve determined something is a strategic priority. That’s not to say that documentation isn’t important — it is. But we have pretty quick ways to sort this type of thing out, so because everyone is so busy, that’s generally our default unless something really requires more attention.”

And the next time she does something like asking you to ask your manager for a protect timeline four times in one week, say, “I’m not going to ask her again because she already knows it’s an outstanding question and there are higher priorities for both her and us right now.” If you’re inclined, you could add, “If I asked her again, it would be annoying and would look like I don’t understand the relative priorities of everything we’re juggling.”

And if you’re up to it, at some point you could say, “Hey, we’ve had a bunch of conversations recently where you’ve suggested something and I’ve told you that it’s not something we need to worry about. Would it be useful to talk about this stuff more broadly, so that you can get a better understanding of when we do and don’t generally spend time on something?”

If she’s receptive to that, you can then explain to her how this stuff works in your office … and you can even say, “I think it’s great that you’re thinking about how to improve things, and you’re absolutely right that there are lots of things that we could spend time on improving, but we deliberately don’t spend time on all of them, because it would take our focus off other priorities. I know that when you’re new, something might seem like an oversight that should be corrected, but often it’s just a strategic decision to focus on something else. Even when something is a good idea, we’ve got to judge it relative to other priorities — and that’s especially true when it involves other teams, when you’re likely not to know all their other priorities.”

But also, realize that ultimately her manager is the one who can most effectively address all this, and — if her manager is any good — you’d probably be doing them both a favor by tipping the manager off to what’s going on and how it’s being perceived, so that she can talk to her about a more effective way to operate. A good manager will see this as a development opportunity for an inexperienced staff member and will be able to help her channel her energy in ways that will be more useful and well-received (as well as save her from alienating most of her coworkers if it continues much longer).

Read an update to this letter here.

when candidates no-call, no-show for an interview — and then reapply

A reader writes:

I’m wondering how you would handle this situation. For some reason, we have frequent no-call, no-shows for interviews. Probably 1 in 15 is a no-call, no-show. I’ve tried to lower this by following up on phone scheduling with email confirmations, but that hasn’t improved anything. I know you have written on your blog in the past that you follow up with no-call, no-shows with an email. I haven’t been doing that since I know the hiring managers have no interest in the candidate once they have no-call, no-showed. I just make a note in our database.

Half of the time we never hear from these candidates again. However, the other half of them end up reapplying in the future with no mention of the prior interview. We don’t own an ATS, so they are applying directly to me, knowing that I was the one that scheduled their interview in the past. I haven’t been responding to their new applications but I want to … It irks me that they think they can be unprofessional and then think in 6 months we’ll forget and it will be washed away. Should I let it go and continue to ignore their reapplying or is there a nice way to say “don’t bother after what you already did”?

I bet they don’t even realize that you’re the same company who they bailed on in the past. We already know they’re disorganized (or something else unflattering), so I think it’s a safe bet that they’re simply applying to jobs without tracking them or recalling what they’ve applied to in the past, and as a result don’t even realize that they’re returning to the scene of the crime.

In any case, though, you can either continue to just ignore their re-applications or you could absolutely point it out to them. Personally, I would say something, because I have a compulsion to point out things like this. I’d probably email back with something like, “We had an interview scheduled several months ago, but you never showed up and never contacted us.” You could add, “and as a result, I’m not able to consider further applications from you,” but that probably goes unsaid after the first sentence.

As a side note … This reminds me of a guy who I made a job offer to years ago. He asked for a couple of days to get back to me with an answer but never did. I reached out by phone and email, explaining that I had another candidate to get back to, but never heard from him again. Then, four years later, he applied for a job with me again. I asked him what happened to him four years earlier, and he said that it had been “too hard” for him to turn down an offer that he really wanted but couldn’t accept for financial reasons. $#@%&^*!!

Anyway, back to your situation. It’s completely reasonable to cancel an interview if you realize the job isn’t right for you, or you accept another offer, or you have a conflict, or whatever. But there’s just no reason not to call or email to cancel, and it would be entirely reasonable of you to nudge those candidates into realizing that.

terse answer Thursday — 7 short answers to 7 short questions

It’s terse answer Thursday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. My manager asked me not to get rides home from a coworker

I am a female and I’ve asked another female coworker for a ride twice because it was late and the buses stopped running already. She had no problem with it because I live 3 minutes away from the job. Our supervisor witnessed it both times, and today after my shift she called me into her office and asked me not to ask coworkers for rides anymore because it’s a liability issue. Is she allowed to tell me that even if the coworker and I are friends and the coworker clearly has no problem with it?

A liability issue? That sounds like total and complete BS to me. I’d ask her exactly what she means, and point out that people carpool all the freaking time — and tons of government programs encourage it.

2. Letting a recruiter know I have a deadline for receiving an offer

My significant other is deciding on law schools to go to and she needs to put down a deposit by the 30th. I’m currently interviewing for the job of my dreams, but I need to know if I am going to be hired this summer by the 29th or it’s pretty much useless because I want to end up in the same city as she does. How can I let the recruiter who is scheduling my interview know this without offending them? What should I say?

You can say, “We’re on a deadline to select a city by the 29th. Is that likely to work with your timeline?” But be prepared for the possibility that they might not be ready to make a decision by then.

3. Manager says I’m not friendly enough with coworkers

I have recently started a new job at a popular casual fine-dining restaurant chain. I have received criticism from my supervisors that I don’t appear to be friendly enough with my coworkers. They also state that this is never a concern with the tables I serve, and suggest that I treat my coworkers the same as I treat customers. I have taken their suggestion into consideration and have made an honest effort to smile, be friendly and greet fellow coworkers at every opportunity. However, the issue was brought up again.

I am a quiet person by nature, especially when working in a new situation where I haven’t established relationships with the staff. I also believe in focusing on the quality of my work and have never thought that socializing with staff would be used to gauge how competent an employee I am. I do feel fairly replaceable, given the industry I am in, and therefore don’t know how to approach my employers about how I feel for fear of being let go. I feel that as long as I am friendly and helpful I shouldn’t be asked to go out of my way to make close acquaintances at work. Should I express this to my employer? Or am I wrong for feeling this is unfair of them to request?

It’s ridiculous of them, but if this is their culture, you might be fighting an uphill battle. However, you can certainly say, “I really like my coworkers, but I’m a quiet person by nature. I hope that won’t interfere with your assessment of my work.”

4. Asking about the impact of rapid growth during an interview.

During a phone interview today, my interviewer mentioned that their nonprofit is growing very quickly (including this new position for which I’m interviewing). I know that growth can be exciting, but I’ve also had jobs where the organization grew too quickly and lost touch with the mission and culture that made them successful in the first place. I was offered an in-person interview next week and I’d like to probe a little more into how they approach growth. What questions would you suggest me asking? I don’t want to come across as anti-growth, but if growth will bring chaos and confusion this won’t be the right job for me.

“There are a lot of challenges that come with quick growth, like maintaining your culture, X, and Y (fill in with whatever you’re concerned about). How is the organization approaching those issues?”

5. What to ask for and think about when interviewing for a teleworking job

I recently interveiwed for a job, not knowing that the position will work from home. Do you have any advice/tips for things to ask for during the salary negotiation process as to what employers customarily provide (computer, phone, internet access at home, etc.) and maybe something special I should ask for if I get an offer? Also, any tips for evaluating whether working from home will be a good fit for me would be great. At first, the idea to work from home sounds great, but I think I might miss the social aspect of working in an office.

The employer should pay for any expenses that you incur because of the job that you wouldn’t have incurred otherwise — so depending on your situation and the job, that could be a computer, phone line or part of your phone bill, Internet access if you don’t already have it at home (although if you do, many won’t cover it, since it’s an expense you would have regardless), postage, supplies, printer, travel expenses for necessary trips to the office, etc. As for asking for anything special, most employers consider teleworking a benefit so I wouldn’t ask for additional benefits or compensation, other than perhaps working out precisely how often you’ll travel to the company’s office (if at all) and what expenses will be covered when you do.

But think carefully about whether working from home is for you — some people (like me) love it, but others go stir-crazy or find it hard to stay focused.

6. Is it better to have a gap or irrelevant experience on your resume?

I’m in the process of updating my resume and I’ve got a situation I’m not sure how to handle. My career is going on almost 15 years; as a result, I try to keep my resume lean and only focused on my most recent/relevant positions.

The problem is, a few years ago I moved cross country and it required that I take a job not directly related to my career for a year and half. Since I’ve been at my current job for so long, this detour creates a gap in my resume if I want to stay with my relevant experience.

My husband, who has done a lot of hiring, says I need to keep the unrelated stuff out of my resume and just fudge the dates of the related positions so I don’t have any gaps. I am very uncomfortable with that, so should I have an unrelated position or a gap? I absolutely believe that the resume is marketing tool so I really want to focus on my accomplishments in the related positions, but that is a pretty big gap and I don’t want it to scare anyone off from calling me.

Your husband may not verify dates of employment when he’s hiring, but lots of employers do — and lying about the dates you held a position will be an instant deal-breaker for most companies that check. Why not just put all your relevant experience in a Relevant Experience section and put the rest of it in an Other Experience section so that it’s clear what you were doing the rest of the time? You don’t need the less relevant stuff to take up a ton of space — you can just include the employer, title, and dates, and not get into details.

7. How much time does Ask a Manager take?

You’ve said you get a lot of email each day, and that you try to respond to everyone if you can. I also see that you post things late at night and early in the morning (e.g. you posted at 1:20 am and 8:45 a.m. one day earlier this week). So how much time each day do you actually spend reading/answering emails and writing posts? Are you seriously dealing with this stuff for 10+ hours a day (you must be exhausted from it!), or are you doing a couple hours here and a couple hours there? When do you fit in the time to write and edit your various columns? Are there other aspects of your work that you fit in the mix too?

Well, I set a lot of posts to automatically publish at particular times during the day, so sometimes while that’s happening I’m not at the computer at all. So that can be misleading. It’s definitely not a 10-hour a day job! I do a little here, a little there, a little more here, as I happen to have the time and the inclination. So it’s really just sporadic bursts throughout the day (and sometimes none at all, if I’ve pre-programmed everything to auto-publish). I’m a weirdly fast writer, so it takes less time than you might think (probably 15 minutes per post on average, plus random comments throughout the day, plus maybe an hour dealing with email each day). Actually, keeping up with the comments is the most time-consuming part of the whole thing — but also one of the most satisfying, and I’m not looking forward to the day when I have to accept that I can no longer read every comment.

That said, after I switched to 3+ posts a day last August, it upped the amount of pressure on days when I’m swamped with other stuff, but I’m convinced I can sustain that without completely losing my mind if I pre-write more often.

As for what else I do, the rest of it is consulting work for a handful of clients. I’d love to eventually do nothing but Ask a Manager, but y’all are going to have to buy an awful lot of ebooks to make that feasible.

recruiters are sneering at my work on a political campaign

A reader writes:

I recently worked on the presidential campaign and, needless to say, it was for the loser. My position was a higher-level executive administrator where I traveled full time with the candidate. Post-election, I have been looking for work as an executive assistant and I come across a lot of resentment for my prior work. It has ranged from recruiters asking me how I could possibly work for someone like the candidate, asking how they could “spin” the position so “I didn’t look that bad,” and asking questions like, “are you going to be able to work with people who have opposing political views?” and the condescending, “you should probably look for work in a different state, based on your political beliefs.” (I’m in northern California.)

Should this be an issue?

I thought the opportunity of a lifetime to see the insides of a national high-level campaign and work hard within my strengths would be a positive addition to my resume, not a determent. How do I field these questions and come out shining?

No, it shouldn’t be an issue. These people are being ridiculous.

Obviously, if you’re applying for positions with organizations that work on issues counter to those that you represented in your last job, it might give people pause. (Although even then, they should take the time to ask you about it, not be jerks.)

But assuming you’re applying to non-political organizations, some of these questions are obnoxious and unprofessional … and I say that as someone who voted against your candidate. I also say some of the questions, not all, because asking, “How do you feel about working with people with very different political views than your own?” isn’t a crazy question to ask if you’re going to be in a culture that they might reasonably assume you could be unhappy in. But suggesting you move to a different state is ridiculous.

In any case, you can try answers like, “I’ve never had any trouble getting along with people all over the political spectrum. My last job taught me X, Y, and Z, and I’m excited for the chance to use those skills in a non-political context.”

If that doesn’t work, then consider it a flag that you’re dealing with a small mind that doesn’t understand what does and doesn’t matter in hiring well.

interviewing when I look 5-6 months pregnant — but I’m not

I’m throwing this one out to the readers for suggestions. A reader writes:

I’m wondering if you can give me some advice on how to deal with a potentially awkward situation I deal with every day.

Due to some medical problems that do not affect my ability to work, I perpetually appear to be about 5-6 months pregnant. My doctors and their nurses even ask me how far I am along. Dressing differently, as others have suggested before, is like trying to cover a 700-pound gorilla in the corner of the room.

When confronted by strangers on a daily basis, I just make jokes when people comment on my “pregnancy” and tell the horror stories of the people who were much worse than them, we have a good laugh, and move on.

But how do you deal with this in an interview? I also don’t want to concern a future employer that I have a large number of health issues that will impact my performance.

Readers, what advice do you have?

why you shouldn’t follow your passion

If you’ve ever asked anyone for career advice, you’ve probably heard some version of “follow your passion.” Young people, in particular, are often told that they should figure out what career to pursue by building their work around whatever they’re passionate about.

The problem is, it’s terrible advice. Here’s why:

* Most passions don’t line up well with paying careers. If you’re passionate about poetry or salsa dancing, you’re going to find very limited job opportunities for those things. And other people’s passions are their friends or their family, or homemaking, or dogs, and again, there’s not much of a job market built around those things. Those are lovely passions to have, though – and often the best choice is to find a career that supports you enough to pursue those passions outside of work.

* Turning what you love into a career can ruin what you loved about it. You might love to bake, and your friends might regularly swoon over your cakes and tell you to open a bakeshop. But getting up at the crack of dawn every day, baking 100 cakes daily, and dealing with dealing with difficult customers and the stress and finances of running your own business might have nothing to do with what you love about baking – and might sap the joy right out of it.

* It leads students to study the wrong thing in college. Too many students pick their major without understanding what jobs it will (and, importantly, won’t) qualify them for once they graduate, and are then frustrated when they realize that the major hasn’t prepared them for the jobs they really want or are likely to be able to get. (To be clear, if you choose a major strictly for the love of it, with no expectation that it will help you get a job after you graduate, that’s one thing. The concern is with students who don’t realize how little their major will help them with employment, and who are frustrated after the fact.)

* “Do what you love” is privileged advice that ignores the fact that the majority of the world’s population works to get food and housing, not for emotional or spiritual fulfillment. And even among the most socioeconomically privileged piece of the population – the segment that this advice is usually targeted to – it causes an awful lot of angst and even shame over not loving your career when people are telling you that you should.

Now, of course some people are passionate about their work, and that’s a wonderful and lucky thing. If you can find a way to turn what you love doing into something that makes you a living, by all means do! But the point is that “do what you love,” for most people, isn’t a reliable way to find the right career – and can lead to anxiety, job-hopping, and dissatisfaction.

What’s more, often what makes people happy at work isn’t that they’re passionate about what they’re doing, but rather that they have a sense of accomplishment or impact, or they enjoy the autonomy they’re given, or they feel respected or useful. So a better goal than “follow your passion” is probably to do something that you’re good at, that brings you a reasonable amount of satisfaction, and that earns you a living. And know that it’s fine to save the things you’re truly passionate about for outside of work, if that’s how it happens to turn out.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

wee answer Wednesday — 7 short answers to 7 short questions

It’s wee answer Wednesday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Reaching out to a long-ago boss about a job he might be interested in

About 20 years ago, when I was an undergraduate, I had a part-time job on my college campus. For the sake of anonymity, let’s say I was a chocolate teapot maker. My boss was truly an incredible boss: he knew the work we did inside and out, was supportive as long as you were doing your job (he always, always had our backs when we were doing what we were supposed to), and addressed it when people weren’t doing their work.

Anyway, I didn’t really keep in touch with Old Boss after leaving school, although I did randomly run into him when I was on the campus for other reasons some years ago, and he remembered me and we talked briefly. Where I work now, I’m not a chocolate teapot maker. But I’ve just seen a brand-new position open up that is a Director of Chocolate Teapot Making here, which made me think of Old Boss. I think he’d be incredible in this position, or he might know someone who would be interested if he’s not wanting to make a move himself.

I googled Old Boss and found an email address for him (yes, I’m sure it’s him). Would it be weird to email him out of the blue, remind him of who I am, and mention this position? Normally I wouldn’t hesitate, but it’s been quite a long time since I’ve been in touch with him, and I wondered if you thought that would make a difference.

Not weird at all. First of all, previous bosses nearly always appreciate hearing from past employees, as long as you say nice things, and second, nearly everyone appreciates being referred to jobs they might be interested in (unless the position is far below what he’s qualified for, in which case it can of course be insulting, but then you could ask if he knows anyone who’d be interested). Write to him right now.

2. What to do when peers constantly miss scheduled meetings

I work at a college in a service function (I direct our grant activity, but my question could apply to a number of service functions). I’ve written you before because management here is weak, indecisive, wasteful, uncommunicative, and focused more on touchy-feely crap than actual results. I’ve had five managers six years. In the last year, my department budget has been cut; my grantwriter quit in frustration, and I’ve not been allowed to fill his position. Yet administration insists that my work is a priority and that I MUST increase funding, or face further cuts. There are many, many cues that it’s really not a priority, but let’s start with a simple, concrete example.

How do I manage the immediate issues of peers missing meetings, when it’s an uphill battle to schedule them in the first place? I just came back a colleague’s office, where he did not show up for a scheduled meeting. Others in his division have missed meetings with me or showed up 20 or more minutes late, often with little or no advanced notice. I understand that things crop up, but this sort of cavalier behavior is chronic. Is there an effective way to manage other people’s behavior, or at least my own reaction, while still doing my best to do my job? I am looking for other jobs.

Given your first paragraph, this is sort of like asking, “A volcano is erupting all over me; how do I make sure the lava doesn’t stain my shoes?” But in any case, you can only control the pieces of this that you can control. If people aren’t showing up at meetings, you can (a) talk to them and ask them to start, (b) talk to their managers or yours about the issue, or (c) find some other way to get the information you need. In your case, I might try to do (c) if at all possible. Can you get what you need from someone/somewhere else? Can you call or email for it rather than trying for a meeting? Find some way to go around your lame coworkers, rather than relying on them.

3. How to get feedback from a terminally hands-off manager

I’m a post-doc in a research lab at a university, and have been working there for a little over a year. Professors are notorious for being extremely hands-off managers, and my boss is no exception. He never, ever addresses problematic work performance (even in the case of a graduate student who essentially did no work at all for months), and he’s very open about the fact that his management strategy is to let his students and post-docs go about their business, and watch the ones who succeed thrive and find professor positions, and let the ones who don’t fizzle out and eventually leave academia.

For the past few months, I’ve noticed that my boss has been more cold and stand-offish with me than with other members of the lab, which makes me worry that he has found my performance wanting in some way. I want to ask him to give me feedback on how I’ve been doing and if there are areas where he thinks I can improve, but, frankly, I have no idea how to go about doing it, especially given his clear distaste for this part of his job. Should I send him an email asking to set up a time to discuss this? Ask him about it when we’re meeting about something else? Just walk into his office and ask him if it’s a good time to talk? We don’t have regular meetings–I only set up a time to meet with him when I need his input/advice on a project, and those meetings rarely last more than 15 minutes. I know that if there is something he’s unhappy with, it will make him very uncomfortable to discuss it, and I’m concerned that he’ll resent being asked to do it and it will make our relationship even worse. Any advice on how to handle this situation?

If it would damage your relationship to ask for feedback, then yeah, I guess you have to give up on getting any from him. But are you sure it really will? Because that’s pretty insane. It’s not like you’re going to go to him and demand to know his deepest thoughts or scream “why do you hate me.” You’re going to ask your boss how you’re doing and what you could do better. While he might be inept enough not to be able to answer that, if it would really harm your relationship, that’s a whole new level of dysfunction that we rarely see, and it makes me want to put my head down and take a stress nap.

4. Staffing agency is getting too much for my work

I’m told that if a organization controls when, where, and how someone works, then that someone is not a contractor but an employee.

I work for an organization that takes 50 percent of what I’m paid hourly and I feel that this is too much. I understand that, for example, a staffing firm will make a certain percentage off their employees’ hourly wage, but the 50 percent I believe is questionable. I do not work for a staffing firm but a organization that provides services to other organizations and pays me (taking taxes out of my check). And according to the law, I’m not a contract worker and don’t see why my employer should be getting 50 percent of what I’m paid hourly.

Since taxes are being taken out of your check, you’re not being treated as an independent contractor. You’re a regular W2 employee; you’re just an employee of the staffing agency, rather than the firm where you’ve been placed.

The staffing agency negotiated a wage directly with you, which you agreed to. It also negotiated a fee with the company you were placed at in exchange for its services to them (finding, screening, and placing employees and handling the administrative oversight of those employees). That’s a completely separate issue that the pay they negotiated with you. But if you don’t like it, you’re free to try to either negotiate for more or leave and strike out on your own.

5. Asking for a different title

An academic requirement of my Master’s program is a second-year field practicum to help students link theory and practice. I’ve secured my placement for next year and it’s a great fit with my academic and professional interests.

My practicum host organization is working on the terms of reference right now and have suggested “Intern” or “Program Assistant” as my official title. Before going back to school, I worked as a project manager with an international consultancy. Beyond ensuring that I’m actually doing substantive work and putting my degree to use, how should I broach a discussion about something as seemingly petty as a title? I want to show on my resume that that I’ve taken on more responsibility over the years rather than taking a step backward.

Well, I’m not sure that it will be more responsibility than what you had as a project manager, so I wouldn’t necessarily frame the discussion as a desire for that — because that might be unrealistic (unless I’m misunderstanding what the practicum involves). But you can certainly be straightforward about your desire for a different title: “Would it be possible to call the position X? It would helpful to me in the future to be able to convey to prospective employees that the position involved A, B, and C.” Just make sure that whatever title you do suggest is realistic and reflects the work you’ll be doing.

6. Did my typo make this HR manager stop responding to me?

I’m going through a hiring process with a great company and for a position that I dream about. The first interview with the HR manager happened 3 weeks ago, and the next interview (in-person with the director of the department) will be in the last week of this month. The HR manager and I have been in contact for about 1 month and it has been quite smooth with quick replies. However, in my last email I asked some questions about the company’s corporate structure in order to better understand how my position will play out and I didn’t receive any answer. Today, 2 weeks after sending that e-mail, I opened the message with the objective to send her a reminder of my questions and I realized that in this specific email I made a mistake when typing the HR manager’s name. Basically, I added one extra vowel in the middle of her short name (like from Victoria, I wrote Vicatoria). I checked all the other messages and I didn’t see the same happening, it was only on 1 email. Do you think that it will kill my chances to be hired? Do you think that this is the reason why she is not answering my emails? What should I do now, send a reminder for my questions or simply leave it? The interview though still scheduled!

No, I don’t think that’s why she’s not answering. I think she didn’t answer because you sent her an email with a bunch of questions that would take a while to write out answers to and which are better saved for an interview. (And also possibly because it sounds like you’ve been sending her multiple emails before this too.) So actually, it’s good that you made the typo because spotting it saved you from sending her a “reminder” to answer your questions, which would have been a mistake.

Save substantive questions for actual conversations. Email questions only when it’s imperative to ask — like confirming a interview time or checking on a hiring timeline.

7. Do I have a job offer or don’t I?

I am in the late stages of a job search in a different city than where I currently live. I had a few phone interviews with members of the Human Capital Team, plus a phone interview with the executive director. I was out in the new city on April 1st to meet with the ED and she offered me the position on the spot. When I returned home a few days later I received an email letting me know that they would like to check my references (which seems standard ) but also that they need me to speak to someone at their national office.

Scheduling with this person has been a little tricky and is leaving me in a lurch: the interview was supposed to be this week but is now moved to next week (which means we are approaching three and a half weeks since my conversation with the ED). I want to be understanding that things happen but it is making me question the position and my standing with the organization–was I really offered a position? Where do I stand with them? The ED made it clear that they want someone who can start soon, but understands that I want to give my current position as much notice as possible and also need to move across the country for the position. My question is, is there anyway to check in and see where they are with me, either with someone in Human Capital or the ED herself? Is there anything else I can do to be an advocate for myself in this process?

At this point, assume you do not have an official job offer. It would totally fine, though, to email the ED and say something like, “My conversation with Jane has been pushed back to next week. Meanwhile, I hoped you could clarify for me where we stand — I’m not entirely clear on whether things still stand as they did when you and I spoke.” Alternately, you can email HR to ask, but since the ED herself offered you the job, she might be more inclined to push things through when she hears that they’ve been delayed.

a candidate lied to me about salary (maybe)

A reader writes:

We recently offered a candidate a position and offered a salary that we know is fair for the experience and skill set she brings, as we know of 5-6 other similarly sized nonprofits in the same field and their pay scale. She came back saying she was excited, but that her current salary was $7,500 more than our offer. She said she can verify this.

I was very skeptical of the salary she gave, as it is way out of line with all my experience with this organization. I verified with a contact I have there, and she does in fact make only about $3,500 more than offer. It appears she inflated her salary by $4,000.

My initial inclination is to rescind the offer, but she claims she can verify her salary. Should I give her that opportunity? Be transparent about my hesitancy? We did an extensive interview process and I’m disappointed now because it’s such a bad sign if she did lie, but I’m not 100% certain she did.

Well, first, I want to note that, in general, basing salary offers on a candidate’s previous salary isn’t a great idea. You should determine for yourself what a candidate is worth to you, and that’s what you should offer. Is she suddenly worth $7,500 more to you just because you learned that’s what she’s currently making? Setting salaries this way is a recipe for paying people more (or less) than they’re worth to you, creating unwarranted salary disparities on your staff (will she be making more than others doing the same work just as well or better?), and relying on your competitors to set your salaries for you rather than figuring them out yourself.

That said, I get that this happens all the time — I’ve been there myself. You make someone an offer that you think is fair, discover that it’s less than they’re currently making, realize that you can’t expect them to accept a new job for less, and decide that you can find it in your budget to match or slightly top their current salary so that they’ll come on over. (And this is far more understandable with a sum like $7,500 than it would be with a sum like $20,000, of course.)

But I do want you to factor this into your thinking, because you don’t want to get so focused on getting her to accept the offer that you forget to ask yourself if you think it’s fair and reasonable to pay what she’s asking you for — whether she’s earning that now or not.

As for what to do now … if you’re willing to pay her that salary if she’s truly making it now, but you have suspicions about whether she really is, you’re in a sticky situation. If you accept her offer to verify it for you, you risk finding yourself in a situation where you don’t believe her “verification,” whatever it might be (documents that you don’t think are real, for example), and then what are you going to do? Alternately, you could tell her you’ll do your own verification and do a more formal verification — with her permission — with her employer (more formal than just reaching out to your contact there, like you already did) … but I don’t really like that solution, because I don’t actually think it’s appropriate for prospective employers to do that … although if you’re really going to base salary on what people made previously, that’s the position it sticks you in.

So you’re probably left with just being transparent. Say something like, “My understanding is that your role pays $X. What accounts for the discrepancy?” You might find out that she’s lumping in a bonus or something like that into her overall salary figure. (You can ask, “Is this all base salary, or does it include bonuses or other compensation?” to find that out.) Or you might find out that she’s talking about a raise she’s been told she’ll get in three months if she stays. Or, yes, she might be lying.

If she’s lying, it should absolutely be a deal-breaker. But I don’t see how you’re going to find out without engaging in actions I really don’t like (getting formal verification from her current employer). So I think we’re back where we started — offer her a salary that you think is fair and reasonable for the position, independent of what she’s making now.

Read an update to this letter here.

my employees are making mistakes, but I don’t want to micromanage

A reader writes:

I have two direct reports with two very different working styles.

One is more independent and usually runs with the project — she asks me for help or advice if something comes up. When she shares various projects with me, there are usually a couple of minor items that need correcting, which I share with her for next time. The next time she shows me a project, I see the same items that need correcting. I started to wonder if it was my communication style, so I also shared the corrections via email so it’s in writing. But the same thing happens again, regardless if I talked to her about it or wrote it down.

My second direct report needs a little more hand holding so there is constant communication. There are two extremes to his working style — he either gets wrapped up in the details and forgets the project objective so I need to bring him back on track or he rushes to finish the project, but neglects the details so there are multiple revisions and drafts. As with my other employee, I have communicated the project details and objectives verbally and also through email so he can refer to his notes, but I find him making the same errors or not paying attention to the details when we work on the next project.

One of the things I have wanted to avoid since becoming a manager was to not micromanage my staff. I understand there needs to be some micromanaging to make sure the team is on track with company goals and to make sure their priorities are clearly understood so they don’t waste their day working on unnecessary items.

Without becoming an uber micromanager, how can I communicate to my two reports that they need to pay attention to the details because the same mistakes are constantly being made and it is noticed not only by me, but the clients if they don’t show me the drafts?

I do not know if they are not listening to me or they are working too fast and forget. When I share my thoughts and offer suggestions I try to explain the reasoning so they both know, it’s not because “I told you so!” but actually the reason why we “use this terminology” or why we “decided to go with this format,” etc. I’m at the point where I really want to say (but never will), “This has happened multiple times and it shows that you are not listening to me — you need to start showing me every project you are working on because I no longer can depend that you are learning from past mistakes and putting effort into your work.”

It sounds like you’re so focused on not wanting to be a micromanager that you’re missing the fact that your employees have legitimate performance issues that you should be addressing.

It is not micromanaging to clearly explain what a work product or outcome should look like, or to ask that work be done correctly, or to expect people to incorporate your feedback into their work in the future. That’s managing.

And there are times when a good manager should manage more closely than that as well, such as when an employee isn’t moving work forward, or it’s not being done well, or results are disappointing. Of course, if your close involvement is needed for a long stretch, it might be a sign that you don’t have the right person in the job and you’ll need to address that — but the answer meanwhile isn’t to stay hands-off if the work isn’t being done correctly.

So it sounds like it’s time to have a conversation with each of these two employees about the pattern you’re seeing. This is the step that managers often miss when they have concerns about someone’s work — they continue addressing each instance of the problem, and they get increasingly frustrated and concerned about the pattern, but they don’t sit down with the person and say, “Hey, we have a pattern here.” They assume the person sees the pattern as clearly as they do, but they never spell it out.

But you need to spell it out, because your employee may not see it as a pattern or realize that it’s risen to the level of a serious concern.

So with the first employee, say something like this: “We’ve talked several times before about making sure that I don’t need to make corrections to X, Y, and Z, but work keeps coming to me with those same mistakes in it. It’s become a pattern. What can you do differently going forward to ensure that it doesn’t continue to happen?”

With the second employee, you need to have a bigger conversation, because the problems are more serious. You should not need to have so much handholding that there’s “constant communication,” and it’s a real problem that he forgets project objectives and neglects details to the point that there are multiples revisions and drafts required. With him, I think you need to consider that he might not be the right person for the job … but the place to start is by being very clear with him about the bar for performance that you need in the role (someone who doesn’t rush and make mistakes, someone who keeps their eye on the big-picture objective but still pays attention to the details, and someone who produces high-enough quality work that it can be finalized without so many revisions). Tell him what a successful performance in the role would look like, tell him where he’s not meeting that bar, and tell him that you need to see real improvement from him.

(And if the problems continue, at that point you’ll need to consider whether you need someone else in the role.)

The point here, overall, is that your job as a manager is to make sure that you’re getting the results you need. Part of getting great results in the long-term is hiring great people and giving them room to do their jobs well. But if you’re not getting the type of results you want — or if it’s taking an unreasonable amount of time to get them — then you need to step in and get more involved.

In your case, I think you’ve swung so far in the “I don’t want to be a micromanager! Eeeekk, it’s a dirty word!” direction that you’re hesitating to actually manage.

how can I develop employees who can’t be promoted?

A reader asks: 

I work at a relatively small organization (40-50 employees) that recently expanded from having two levels of management (executive director and department managers) to adding a third level of project managers.  Our project managers were all internal hires, but some of our employees who have more years with the organization were not promoted because they were not the right fit for these positions. The positions involved more people/project managing, and though these employees are very good at their jobs, they had never shown any interest nor strengths in more traditional management skills and thus those areas had not been developed with them.

At this point, I have a few employees looking for “their promotions” because they feel they have been with the organization a long time and want to see opportunities for movement for themselves. We are not that big of an organization — there is only so much vertical movement that can occur and keep it healthy and well structured.  Frankly, I am dealing with problems from two directions.  From the staff, I am trying to figure out how to develop employees and maintain their job satisfaction when there are few opportunities for upward movement. But I also want to make sure they are developing in a way that they are ready to move up when and if opportunities arise as the organization continues to grow.  From above, I have pressure to retain employees at all costs, even if that would mean promoting them into some random position I would have to create.

I personally don’t have a problem with employees deciding they need to move on to meet their professional goals.  While I don’t want to lose them, I can completely understand that someone might need to make that decision.  I just (a) don’t want to end up having to destroy my department because of forced restructuring in order to retain employees and (b) don’t want people to move on because I wasn’t doing my job in trying to develop them as best I could within their current positions.

Well, first, you need to push back on whoever above is telling you to retain people at all costs. Retention should not be a goal in and of itself; retaining your top performers should be, but many times you should actually want to see others transition out. If your goal is retention, you’ll make all kinds of bad decisions, like counter-offering with a higher salary when a mediocre employee accepts another job, or tolerating low performance because you don’t want to fire people, or yes, promoting people who aren’t actually good promotion prospects for the organization. Your goal shouldn’t be retention; it should be to create a high-performing team, which means retaining your top people and moving out those who aren’t meeting a high bar.

So you need to push back with your upper management and advocate for practices that meet that goal – not retention-at-all-costs, which will undermine it significantly.

As for the question of how to develop employees “in place” when there aren’t likely to be promotions available to them because of fit, you can absolutely find ways for people to grow without moving to a new role, if you’re committed to it. For instance, are there ways they can improve their skills in their current roles? Development opportunities to expand their skills in ways that will be useful in their current work? Ways to give them increased responsibility (and accompanying salary increases) or a greater role in your department without moving them?

At the same time, it’s important to be transparent with people. If it’s not likely that someone will be a candidate for promotion because appropriate slots simply don’t exist, be honest with them about that. It’s far better for people to know than to have false hope, and they’re more likely to be resentful if they keep thinking promotion is a possibility but it never materializes. So talk to them about the situation and explain why it’s unlikely (small organization, not natural growth path, etc.). But simultaneously, talk to them about how they can grow where they are and make it clear that you’re eager to assist with those efforts if they want to pursue that path.

Frankly, this is the more pro-employee approach anyway. It’s not kind or helpful to people to move them into roles they won’t excel at, or to contort your department trying to create positions the organization doesn’t really need just to provide a false path of advancement. Do people the service of talking with them honestly about the situation, and let them make the decisions they feel are best for them – with your support either way.