how much notice should you give when you resign?

You’re preparing to leave your job, and it looks like you’ll get a job offer any day now. When should you let your current employer know that you’re going to leave, and how much notice should you give when you do?

You want to proceed carefully here. While it’s an exciting time, there’s potential for doing real harm if you misstep. There are two cardinal rules that govern when and how to tell your employer that you’re resigning.

Cardinal Rule No. 1: Never Give Notice Until You Have Accepted a Formal Job Offer

Too many people give notice when they’re “pretty sure” that an offer is coming their way, or when they’ve only received an informal offer. This can be a huge mistake, because offers fall through all the time. No matter how promising things look with a prospective employer, things can and do change. The company might have a hiring freeze, or a new manager might come in and cancel the position, or the company might hire an internal candidate at the last minute. And if that happens and you’ve already told your current boss that you’re leaving, she’s under no obligation to let you rescind that notice. Your current company may have already started moving forward with plans for filling your position, and you won’t necessarily get it back.

What’s more, not only should you never, ever count on an job offer until you actually have it, preferably in writing, but you shouldn’t count on it until you’ve accepted it too. That’s because it’s possible that you won’t be able to come to terms with the company on pay or benefits or start date, and your negotiations could fall apart. So you want to make sure not just that you have an offer, but that you’ve formally accepted that offer. Only then should you give notice at your current employer.

(The exception to this is if you have an excellent relationship with a boss who you know will take the news well and not push you out earlier than you’re ready to leave. If you’re lucky enough to be in that situation, you can feel safer giving your boss a heads up that you’re thinking about leaving.)

Cardinal Rule No. 2: The Amount of Notice You Give

Most people know that professional convention requires them to give at least two weeks notice, but many people wonder about giving more. If circumstances allow you to give your company a more generous notice period, should you?

The answer depends 100 percent on how your manager and your company operate. How have they handled other employees who resign? Are people shown the door immediately? Pushed out earlier than they would have otherwise planned to leave? If so, it’s safest to assume that the same may happen to you and give two weeks and nothing more. But if your employer has a track record of accommodating long notice periods, has been grateful to employees who provide long notice, and has generally shown that employees can feel safe being candid about their plans to leave, take your cues from that.

Of course, both of these rules would be unnecessary if employers handled departing employees differently. It’s actually in employers’ best interest to make it safe for employees to give longer notice periods, but too few of them do. As a result, employees need to make sure they protect themselves.

I originally published this article at U.S. News & World Report.

mini answer Monday — 6 short answers to 6 short questions

It’s mini answer Monday — six short answers to six short questions. Here we go…

1. HR called to tell me they “couldn’t afford me,” then said that they could

I am currently employed in a managerial position at a major corporation. It is a good job but I feel like I have outgrown it in the 3 years I have been there. Recently a contact reached out and told me about a great position at a smaller, action-oriented company. I applied and had one phone interview with the hiring manager and a second interview with the other managers in the department. Both went very well and I am scheduled for an on-site interview next week. Up until last Wednesday, I was very excited about the opportunity.

Last week, after my second interview, I received a call from a member of the HR department. Before he even introduced himself, he bluntly asked what salary I currently made and what I was expecting. I gave my current salary and before I could get another word out, he stated, “We can’t afford you.” He then gave me a maximum salary of only about 70% of what I currently make. He said he thinks that the hiring manager was only interviewing me to please my influential contact and that even though they can’t afford me, he would be happy to give my resume to another larger company because “they would go nuts” for someone with my qualifications. I politely asserted my interest in this job and expressed my confusion because the hiring manager and I had discussed my salary requirements previously. He stated he would follow up with the hiring manager and would let me know ASAP if they could not afford me as he suspected.

A couple hours later, he calls me back and “good news,” they can afford me after all. But now I have this sinking feeling in my gut that by pursuing this opportunity I am stepping into a position with bad management. Am I being too sensitive to what seemed to be a very rude and confusing discussion? I had good experiences with everyone else in the company, but I can’t shake this interaction. Can you give me some perspective?

Ask your interviewer about it when you meet. Say, “Bob called me last week to tell me that he was sure you couldn’t afford me, but then called back a few hours later to say that it wouldn’t be a problem. I was confused by that, and wonder if you can shed any light on it for me.”

2. When do I tell an employer about my scheduling needs?

I’m in the process of looking for a new job and I’ve run into a bit of an issue. My young son is disabled and requires a lot of doctor and therapy appointments. My husband and I split this up as much as possible and always try to keep our time scheduled in the most effective way, but it is still not unusual to have to leave work for 2-3 appointments a month. It is very important that I work for an employer with flexible time-off and/or flexible scheduling. But it is also very important for me to be in a company with a culture accepting of my sometimes-crazy schedule.

I don’t want to set myself up for failure or find myself in a situation where – while everything looked great on paper – my coworker/boss is annoyed by my situation. What is the best way to deal with this? Is it appropriate to bring up my family situation in the later stages of the interview process? Is there a way to find out about this aspect of the company culture without scaring potential bosses away thinking I’m going to be chronically absent?

Wait until you have an offer, because at that point they’ve already decided that they want you (whereas if you bring it up earlier, you risk them being scared off). Talk in concrete specifics about the situation’s impact on your schedule (for instance, an average of X appointments per month, two of them without much notice, most requiring you to leave two hours early — or whatever it is). Then pay attention to the reaction. Do they sound hesitant? Worried? Annoyed? Supportive? They way they respond, as well as what they actually say, will tell you a lot.

3. Should I tell on my boss for working a side job from our office?

I noticed that my boss, the CFO, always has a laptop on his desk in addition to his regular desktop computer. I wondered why he needed two computers but didn’t think much of it. Today I found out that he has a second job and that’s what the laptop is for. When I walk by his office he is more often working on the laptop than on his desktop. The worst part is that we are a struggling non-profit and we desperately need a competent CFO whose only focus is on fixing the financial problems in our organization. He has only been with the company for four months and I haven’t been impressed by his management style, nor have I seen any changes or improvements. There are hundreds of people employed by this agency and we run important programs that the community depends on. I work for a nonprofit because I care about our mission and I’m appalled that someone who is so high up in the company would take advantage like this.

The CFO told another employee about his second job, and that employee told me. Should I tell the Interim Executive Director about this? We get along great and I don’t think there would be any backlash on me for telling, but I’m just not sure if its my place to do so. If you would tell, how would you approach that conversation?

Yes, because in a nonprofit, you have a responsibility to the issue the organization works on or the people it serves to speak up in this kind of situation. Now, it’s possible that the organization’s management knows about what your boss is doing and has given permission for it — but it’s also possible that they have no idea. I’d say something like this: “I feel awkward mentioning this, but I feel more uncomfortable not saying anything. I realize this might be something you know about and are okay with, but in case you don’t, I felt obligated to talk to you about it.”

4. Denying an employee’s training request

An employee has requested to attend an out-of-town training that I feel is beyond his scope of work, but I don’t want to discourage him by using this as an excuse in denying his request. This person has been a problem employee for years and will create a big incident if I refuse his request. I would appreciate your advice on how to deny this request gracefully.

Well, the bigger problem is why you’ve allowed a problem employee to stay a problem employee for years. You should be managing him out of the organization, not allowing him to stay on your staff and make you shy away from making responsible decisions.

As for the training, tell him that it’s not in the scope of his work, that you don’t have an unlimited budget for trainings, and that you need to save it for XYZ. And if he creates a “big incident,” use that as the starting point in tackling that problem — make your standards of behave clear, require him to adhere to them, and replace him if he doesn’t.

5. Salary negotiations when your salary is public record

I work for state government (Minnesota), and I am beginning to look for a new job. As I think about and plan salary negotiations, I have been reading your instructions to avoid telling prospective employers your current salary. The problem is that the state of Minnesota salaries for individual employees are very easily googleable, especially if you’re looking at my work history. How, if at all should I address this in salary negotiations? I have been saying “Because my salary is a public record, I’ll just tell you that the dollar amount is $X, not including any benefits or retirement.” Or should I just ignore it and let them find it if they know to find it?

There’s no reason to bring it up proactively. If they ask what you’ve been making, you can say, “As a state employee, my salary is public record, but I’m seeking a salary of $X, because of ____ (fill in with why you deserve $X).”

6. Including 360 comments on your resume

My current employer, like many others, has a 360 review process that’s performed annually for employees and their managers to get anonymous performance feedback from others in the organization they work with. What are your thoughts on including those comments on a resume? I’m on the fence because on one hand, the testimonials are a pretty strong endorsement which the recruiter would not have access to. On the other hand 1) it adds to the length of the resume and 2) the hiring company may have a similar program and consider it a violation of trust to turn around and use that data to get a new job.

I dont think it’s a violation of trust, but I don’t think it’ll be particularly effectively, because anonymous feedback rarely is — you need to know the source to know how much weight to put on it. If there’s something in there that’s particularly strong (like, really strong, not just pretty good), or if there’s a particularly theme to the commentary, you could briefly mention that in your cover letter, but I wouldn’t put it on a resume.

can you walk out of an interview before it starts?

A reader writes:

I have a unique situation that I ran into and would like your perspective on it. I went to an interview, and as soon as I opened the door, I knew it was not the place for me. I already had some reservations going in, but was trying to keep an open mind. But opening that door to the office shut it right away for me.

The first indication was the size of the office. I thrive in a medium to large environment and this was the exact opposite. I tried to research this beforehand but was unable to find exact information. The second indication was that I want a place with other colleagues to interact with, who aren’t afraid to talk to each other, that has a life to it, and this was definitely not the place for that. It felt more like the living room in a house that was just for show and not a place to be in.

The other thing is that, perhaps odd to say, I think you can tell a lot when you walk into a place by the energy/feeling around it. Are employees happy, is there a sense of life, etc.? When I opened the door, all I felt was despair and stress. It was just sad. Which confirmed my initial feelings from a phone conversation.

While waiting to be interviewed, I was debating even if I should go forward. What are your thoughts? Should I have just told the interviewer right away that I knew it was not the place for me? Or would that have been rude and it is proper to go forward with the interview?

I’d say to do the interview anyway. Announcing that just from looking at their offices you know it’s not the place for you is a pretty dramatic statement. I’m not saying it’s not a valid one — but it’s the kind of thing that’s going to be fairly shocking to be on the receiving end of, and that those people will remember forever. And you might not care if they do, but they also might be connected to some other job that you’re applying for some day, a job that you do want, and you don’t want them to say, “Oh, her! We were supposed to interview her, but she arrived at our office and immediately said it wasn’t the right fit, without even talking to us.”

Now, if this were an all-day interview or involved some other major investment of time and energy, then I’d say it would be more okay to back out … but even then, I’d still talk with them for a while before backing out, so that you could more credibly tell them — based on that conversation — you don’t think it’s the right fit, and then excuse yourself.

turning down an interview at a dysfunctional organization

A reader writes:

I recently interviewed with a nonprofit organization and was asked to come back for a second interview with their chief philanthropy officer.

During the first interview, I found out that a local colleague had done some work with the capital campaign. I followed up with him to get the inside scoop. Unfortunately, he told me about all of their internal dysfunction (board, governance and leadership). I am looking to move to a more stable nonprofit so it doesn’t seem like this would be a right fit for me. However, it’s an organization I would consider working for in the future — if they got their act together.

How do I decline a second interview without burning bridges? Should I mention speaking with someone (unidentified) who gave me more insight into the workings of the organization? Or should I just keep it general — have decided to pursue other opportunities, etc.

Do not say that you spoke with someone who told you that the organization is dysfunctional. That will achieve nothing other than making your contact there really uncomfortable. And, really, what are they supposed to say to that? “Yes, we are a mess”?

It also serves no purpose — because what are they going to do with that information? Someone anonymous said that they have problems. Either they do and they know it, and hearing it from an outsider isn’t going to change anything. Or they don’t know it, in which case this will just be annoying to hear. Or they’re actually fine and your friend is wrong, and now they have to worry about what’s being said about them. There’s no purpose to any of that. And it’s not like they’re going to fix their issues and call you in a year and say, “We’re all cleaned up now, so we’d love to talk to you again.”

Instead, keep it general. You’re focusing on other jobs that seem like a better fit for you right now, etc.

should you hug former colleagues when you see them at a job interview?

A reader writes:

A year ago, after a long tenure at a large corporation, I decided it was time for a change. The company had been undergoing significant turmoil, and a number of my peers had already been laid off or had left on their own. The position that I took is at a very nice company, and I like the corporate culture here. However, I am just not finding the role to be quite the right fit, and I find my manager unprofessional (at best). I’ve done some scouting around here to see if I could switch managers and that doesn’t seem to be an option, at least not any time soon. HR has given me some strategies to deal with my manager, and it’s helped a bit, but I’m a working mom with young children, and if I am going to have my little ones in daycare, it’s going to be for a job that I really like.

What I decided to do is to see if there are opportunities at companies where there are clumps of employees from my former employer. I’ve kept in touch with a lot of people and LinkedIn made this process easy. There are four local companies that fit the bill. One of these happens to have an opening which sounds like a great fit, and as an an added bonus, it’s very close to my home. I applied (and I took the time to write a cover letter only because of your blog, so thank you). I then right away reached out via email to the two most senior people at this new company who I know. They both immediately offerred to help me out, and one of them even walked my resume into the hiring manager’s office for me (the CFO). I had the phone screen scheduled within a few hours, and I am waiting to hear when an interview will be scheduled next week. In the phone screen that I had earlier today, the recruiter made it clear that she had already asked around about me, and that I have the support of several people behind me in my candidacy for this job.

Here’s my question: I know about ten people at this company. I’m friendly with a lot of my coworkers, but I tend (for various reasons, some of which have to do with my work role) to keep my work life and my personal life separate. I mean, I chat with my coworkers and we’re friends, but I don’t see very many people outside of work, and I tend to drink very little at company events. So when I go into the office for the interview, if I see old coworkers who I know, do I hug them hello? I don’t want this to be awkward, and have I mentioned how very appreciative I am of the support? But the idea of hugging people hello while in a new office on an interview … I am concerned how the recruiter might view this. I definitely don’t want to give the impression that I am taking it as a given that I am getting the job because I have connections. What do you think?

Don’t hug them.

Greet them warmly, look pleased to see them, ask them with interest how they’ve been — but don’t hug them.

I know there are lots of huggers out there, and there are even some offices where hugging is normal (to my enormous discomfort), but there are far more offices where hugging as a greeting — even when you haven’t seen the person in a while — doesn’t generally happen. So it’s certainly not expected, and it’s not going to look weird if you don’t.

Of course, if someone moves in for a hug to you, return it — don’t pull away in horror or anything. (Assuming it’s not this woman.) But there’s absolutely no need for you to go in planning on hugging anyone.

And no one will be offended by that. It’s an office, you’re former colleagues, not close friends, and you’re there for a job interview, not cuddles and embraces.

Read an update to this letter here.

asking your interviewer what’s next in the hiring process

A reader writes:

What is your take on the candidate asking the interviewer, “What is next in the hiring process” or “Where do we go from here” types of questions?

In short, I’m having a large disagreement with someone about the opinion and thinking behind this type of question. This person thinks that as a candidate, you have a right to know what the next steps in the hiring process are and when, as a candidate, you should expect a response by.

I don’t disagree with this, but I think asking this question ends up putting the interviewer on the spot and could therefore set up the candidate to be flagged as impatient and aggressive, which could cause problems later on.

I read your article on “closing” interview questions, but it seems those questions are more geared toward wanting to know where you stand as opposed to, in this case, wanting to know when you should hear back from a company (and possibly where you stand). I’m not sure if the specific type of interview question falls under this category or not. What is your take on these types of questions?

It’s totally reasonable to ask about next steps and a likely timeline for them. In fact, I strongly urge that you never leave an interview without having asked, “What’s your timeline for next steps?”

That’s because otherwise you’re likely to go home and agonize and wonder when you should hear from them, and if you should have heard from them by now, and what it means that you haven’t heard from them by now. Asking about their timeline means that you’ll have some idea of whether it’s likely to be days or weeks (or longer), and it also means that if that timeframe passes and you haven’t heard from them, you have a reason to email them to check back in.

Asking about an interviewer’s timeline isn’t at all putting them on the spot. It’s a reasonable question that you’d ask at the end of lots of business meetings, not just interviews, and there’s nothing presumptuous, impatient, or aggressive about it. If they don’t know, they’ll just tell you that they don’t know.

Now, questions like “did I get the job?” or “is there any reason I wouldn’t be a great candidate for this job?” are too aggressive and pushy, and they do put the interviewer on the spot.

But no reasonable interviewer is going to bristle at being asked for a likely timeline for when you should expect to hear something.

Your friend wins this bet!

open thread

photo 2It’s our monthly open thread!

The comment section on this post is open for discussion with other readers on anything you want to talk about.

If you want an answer from me, emailing me is still your best bet, but this is a chance to talk to other readers.

fast answer Friday — 7 short answers to 7 short questions

It’s fast answer Friday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Should I interview my ex for a job managing me?

I’m assisting in the hiring for an open position at my company. Unless I change departments (which is feasible), this new hire will be my direct supervisor. I’m mid-level and the position is senior but not executive level.

Someone I dated a few years ago is applying for the position and is likely to be a candidate we want to interview. We only dated for about 6 months and it ended amicably. I think he might be great at the job, and I’d be very comfortable working with him but uncomfortable with him being my boss. Do I interview him just like I would any other candidate? Do I excuse myself due to a personal relationship? If he is hired, is there a way to work out the situation without the whole office knowing we used to be together?

(My ex knows the situation, but he knows I am considering leaving the company within the next year or so for other reasons entirely. At this point, I’m most concerned about how to handle the interview process because I think there will be options for altering my reporting structure if it gets to that point.)

Stop keeping this to yourself, and tell whoever is handling the hiring for this position. If you don’t speak up now but end up having to disclose it later, it’s going to seem really weird that you didn’t say something earlier! Go to whoever is handling the hiring and say, “This is a little weird, because I used to date this candidate. I do think he’d be good at the job, but obviously I think I should recuse myself from interviewing him.”

If he does progress in the hiring process, then talk to whoever’s appropriate about ensuring that you don’t report to him — no one is going to have trouble understanding why that’s necessary (and frankly, it may be make his candidacy prohibitive, but that’s up to the hiring manager to decide).

2. Health risks with using a shared office phone

Are there any known health issues with being forced to use a workplace phone that 6-8 different people use daily for work and personal calls?

I need to use the phone to do my work. But my employer has cut back on allowing desk to have a phone. I’m concerned about whether there are health issues with this practice. Could I contract a communicable disease this way? I do recall many years ago when I worked in the telecom industry that a former boss said something to me one day that day about how germs live in the mouthpiece of the phone and she believed that was a health concern of no minor consequence. I am very concerned about this as I work with a group of people with varying degrees of cleanliness!

I have no idea, although I’m sure you could Google it and find out — but keep in mind that you come in contact with all kinds of germy things every day, like money, shopping carts, public bathrooms, and more. But since you’re stuck in this situation and it’s making you uneasy, why not carry disinfecting wipes and wipe down the phone before using it each time?

3. “Reliable transportation” when you don’t own a car

I’m applying to a job that requires “reliable transportation” and occasional travel. I don’t own or want to own a car. If I got the job, however, I could theoretically rent a ZipCar when necessary. That’s could get expensive quickly, though! Is it too tacky to ask about potential rental reimbursements in the interview/negotiations process, since they’re looking for someone with “reliable transportation” in the first place? Is this something that can potentially be bargained over if they really like me, or does it fall more into the range of “why the heck did you even apply to this job?”

They’re telling you up-front that it requires reliable transportation, and you’re saying that you’d want them to pay for you to be obtain the transportation that they require you to already have. You could certainly go ahead and try it, but I think they’re likely to be irked unless you’re a really, really phenomenal candidate who they just can’t allow themselves to pass up. And even then, asking for reimbursement (beyond mileage for travel, which you’d normally get anyway) is pretty over the top in this context.

4. Remaining eligible for re-hire after an unreasonable manager blew up at me

This winter, I picked up a part-time seasonal job in addition to my full-time day job. When I was hired, my manager and I agreed to a very specific schedule. However, one of the shifts we had originally agreed to was no longer needed and he wanted me to work a different shift instead. Even thought this new shift was very inconvenient, I agreed to do it, confirming a very specific schedule via email (including dates and times for every single shift I would work for the rest of the season).

However, these shifts kept getting longer and he also scheduled me for additional days I was unable to work. When I talked to him about this, telling him I am only available for the dates and times that we agreed to via email, he blew a gasket. He was angry and used unprofessional language. He also said that if I didn’t work those shifts, he would make me ineligible for rehire. He was so mad he demanded that I leave. Later, he called me to tell me he was taking me off the schedule for the rest of the reason.

While I have no desire to ever work for this manager again, the company is a large one and I would like to be eligible to apply for jobs in different departments. They have no performance-based reason to make me ineligible for rehire. How would you recommend I approach this situation?

Contact the company’s HR department, explain what happened (professionally and without malice), and ask how you can ensure that you’re eligible for re-hire in the future.

5. Are creative job titles silly?

I recently read some articles about employees creating their own job title and encouraging people to start doing that for themselves. For example, instead of “customer service representative,” one could call themselves “colonel of service.”

Personally, I can see doing this on your LinkedIn profile under your headline (I’ve done that for myself), but I’m not sure how I feel about changing my resume. What do you think? Is this innovative or silly?

Silly. Your title is supposed to quickly convey to other people what you do, with as much clarity as possible. Resist the temptation.

6. Telling future employers about a raise I would have received if I’d stayed in my old job

I recently decided to leave my current employment to move with my fiance to her graduate program. I helped hire my replacement, and in the process I learned that he will be paid considerably more than me and receive a job title more appropriate to the position. This was inconsiderate of my boss, since I have asked for these things in the past but been denied, partly because my boss and HR both knew that I would be moving on eventually. While I understand why they wouldn’t feel it’s a good allocation of funds at this point, I’m worried that it will hurt me in salary negotiations. I work in IT and am paid well at the bottom end of the pay scale (below the bottom end, in fact). My job was not initially IT, but my employer decided they needed me there instead of in my original position but kept my job description and salary the same.

My boss told me that even though I wouldn’t receive a raise to match my successor’s salary, I should say that I would have been eligible for that raise this summer had I stayed, and that he would mention it in my reference. Will that help? Will future employers care what I would have been paid, or is it all about my actual ending salary?

You can say it, but generally it’s not going to have a huge impact; when you’re dealing with companies that care about salary history, it’s more about your actual ending salary. However, you’re better off sharing not your salary history anyway, when you can avoid it. If you can’t, consider building a case for why you deserve more money anyway (like I talk about here).

7. Will recruiters tell my employer I’m looking?

I work in a mid-sized city and I am thinking of leaving my job. Due to LinkedIn, I can see that in some cases, recruiters at the major employers I am looking at have worked at my company in the past or have worked with current employees of my company. Therefore, they have connections with recruiters and management of my company. As a result, I am hesitant to submit my resume to these companies or contact the recruiter for more information without risking my manager finding out. What do you think? Is there an un-said rule not to contact the current employer?

Generally, yes, and recruiters have incentive to follow that rule because they want to place candidates and they want other candidates to be willing to work with them in the future. They don’t want to get a reputation for screwing people over like that. That doesn’t mean there’s zero risk, but it’s fairly low.

can you ask to meet future coworkers before accepting a new job?

A reader writes:

Is it appropriate to ask to get to know future coworkers before accepting a new job?

I have a second interview coming up shortly with the president of the company. During my initial interview, the panel of nine interviewers w­­ere all very nice and welcoming, except for one person … the person who I would be directly working with. She never once smiled and even gave an answer to one of my questions that I interpreted as a “back-door” comment in regards to my lack of experience (I am younger than this person with a higher degree).

I currently work part-time for a similar company where my coworkers and I work wonderfully together. Although the financial gain of being employed full-time would be highly beneficial, I am scared to leave a great and collaborative working environment for a possibly hostile one. If I am offered the position, is it out of line to ask if I could have lunch/coffee with my future coworkers in the department before accepting the position to see if my initial impression was correct? I understand that people rarely get to pick their coworkers, but the monetary gain of working full-time is not worth me giving up my current collaborate working environment for a hostile one.

It’s actually surprising to me how uncommon of a request this is. Considering how much of an impact your coworkers will have on your quality of life, you’d think more people would want to do this.

That said, it is a fairly unusual request, particularly outside of senior level positions. That doesn’t mean you can’t ask it, though — you can. But because it’s unusual, you want to pay attention to how you word it. I’d say something like, “I’m really excited about this position. Before I formally accept, would it be possible to talk with others in the department to get a sense of how everyone works together? I’d love to have coffee with the people I’d be working closest with, or even just come in to talk with them, if possible.”

I wouldn’t necessarily ask for lunch — that’s more of an imposition than some people would be happy about. (My own personal biases are creeping in here, but I’m not the only one who has them.)

Keep in mind, though, that even the most collegial lunch in the world won’t offer any guarantees against bad coworkers. You could love them, and then they could all leave over the next year and be replaced by horrible, incompetent people. Or they could be lovely to everyone in the beginning and horrid after that. There’s no way to guard against that — other than by making sure that you’re ending up somewhere that manages well, hires well, and fires when they need to. (Which maybe gives us the answer to why more people don’t ask to meet the coworkers — ultimately what matters is the quality of management.)

It’s also worth noting that a coworker who didn’t smile in your interview isn’t necessarily going to be a bad coworker. Some people are more serious than others, but are still great coworkers (defined not by warmness but by doing their jobs well, being helpful when needed, and otherwise staying out of your way). Yes, if she made a comment about your lack of experience, she might be indicating some skepticism about you, but that’s also the kind of thing that makes sense to bring up in an interview — you’re there to talk about fit and experience, after all.

Anyway, I do think it’s okay to ask for the meeting if it’s important to you … but keep in mind all the caveats above.

can you have blue hair at a job interview?

A reader writes:

I’m in the middle of applying for a job at a very large company, where I would do a fair amount of client-facing work. It’s a big deal for me. I’ve been a huge fan of this company for years.

I haven’t even submitted my application yet, so I don’t know that I’ll get an interview, but I do feel that I’m a strong candidate. I also know that if they do like me, it will be a pretty quick hiring process right now. They’re hiring a bunch of people for this position, the next starting date is May, and they’re making it clear on the site that if you’re applying right now, you should expect to start in May if you’re successful.

At the same time… I’m getting married very soon. Next week, in fact. And I’ve been planning for my “something blue” to be my hair. (Right now it’s pink, and my current job doesn’t mind at all, even when I go to conferences — hooray for tech startups.) I would be happy to dye it to a natural color after the blue, but doing that and actually having it look natural would probably require a couple weeks of fade time. So I would almost certainly be going to interviews with blue hair.

As I said, it’s not certain I’ll even get an interview, but I will probably have a similar problem the next time I look for a job too (it’s actually been joked about at my current work that they’ll know I’m looking elsewhere if my hair turns brown). Should I mention it in the interview, like “My current workplace is very casual/it went blue for an event, and I’d be happy to dye it to something ‘normal’ if I’m offered this job”? For the job I’m applying for now, a lot of the other applicants will be straight out of college (or still in it), so I expect they see some stuff like this, but … I don’t want to rely on that.

I also don’t want to dye it natural colors for my wedding just on the off-chance, and I don’t want to spook my current workplace. I’m not irreplaceable there, but my leaving would definitely be a big blow, so I really don’t want them to know I’m even looking.

Blue hair is going to be a deal-breaker in a lot of industries, and not an issue in others. So you really, really need to know your own industry on this. In the design or fashion world, for instance, it might be totally fine. In banking, no.

And you might be surprised by where it’s not okay. I spent many years working in advocacy nonprofits, and candidates often assumed that because we worked on “cool” issues, we’d be okay with non-mainstream appearances (blue hair, mohawks, facial piercings, long hair on men.). But we categorically were not — those things were banned on our staff, because we wanted the public’s focus (and reporters’ and legislators’ focus) to be on our message, not on the messenger. And even though you might think that it would only matter for positions that dealt with the public, it mattered for everyone. We didn’t want a reporter to be in our office one day, see a blue-haired I.T. person walk by, and include that detail in their story, because it played into perceptions that our issue was outside the mainstream, while we were working to mainstream the issue with grandparents, clergy, and conservative legislators.

On the other hand, there are businesses that you might expect to be more conservative about appearance that are actually more relaxed about it … but you can’t always tell from the outside. (And simply having a lot of recently graduated applicants doesn’t mean anything either way.)

So you really, really need to know your industry, and what’s generally accepted. And if your industry doesn’t embrace non-mainstream looks, and you want a particular job in it, then yeah, you probably need to adjust your hair to accommodate that.

You certainly shouldn’t alter your plans for your hair for your wedding though. But if you’re interviewing for a job before it’s had a chance to return to a natural color, and you’re not in a field known to be friendly to non-mainstream looks (again, fashion and design are the best known for this; some parts of tech too, but few others), then I’d address it up-front. Because otherwise you risk getting rejected when you otherwise wouldn’t.

Read an update to this letter here.