after I resigned, my boss asked me to drive 1,000 miles at my own expense

A reader writes:

I put my notice in a few weeks ago. We have a slow season come May. Knowing my boss’ history of being overdramatic, I offered to work until May to give her some extra time to find a replacement, as she has to attend a few conferences taking her away from the office.

I was trying my best to be gracious with my exit and was willing to train my replacement. We are a small company (3 employees total, including my boss, who is the owner). However, I run all aspects of her business for her, so she wouldn’t know how to train my replacement.

I work in a remote office in Georgia, and she is in Michigan. Now she’s saying I have to drive all the company property to her office and spend a week in that city training my replacement all at my own expense.

I am financially unable to do that and think that is completely unreasonable. I already packed everything up and offered to ship it via our company FedEx account. I of course planned to return everything, but not on my own dime. We even have an office in Georgia that she won’t let me return the property to.

I now want to cut my time here and just walk away now. It’s been three weeks since I’ve given notice. I refuse to go to the headquarters at my own expense to train my replacement. Is that acceptable?

What?!  She’s being ridiculous.

Out of curiosity, is she the type who tried to get you to do things on your own dime previously, or is this twist just a petulant reaction to you leaving?

In any case, she can ask for whatever she wants, and you can decline to give it. Certainly it’s not normal to expect someone to do what she’s asking, so you should have no qualms about saying no.

However, I would not walk away now. You gave notice for May, which means she’s planning to have another month-plus for your transition, and if you cut that short without warning, you’ll be stooping to — well, not to her level, but you’ll be ceding some high ground.

Instead, say something like this, “I’m not able to come to Michigan in my final weeks, nor am I able to personally pay for any transition expenses. I’d be glad to ship things via our FedEx account or return things to the Georgia office. Please let me know what you’d prefer.”

If she becomes hostile or continues to be irrational, then say this: “Jane, asking an employee to spend their own money on work expenses like these is extremely unusual, and I want to be very clear that it’s off the table. But more importantly, I gave you a good deal of extra notice because I value our relationship and wanted to make things as easy as possible on you. But you’re pushing me to do something that I’ve already made it clear I’m not willing to do, and something that isn’t reasonable to expect of me. I’d like to stay here through May and help you transition. But if it’s going to be contentious, it will be better for both of us if I were to leave sooner.”

If she calms down, great. If she doesn’t, then you say, “Given this situation, it would be better for both of us if I give a standard two weeks, instead of a longer notice period, so my last day will be ___ (two weeks from now). Please let me know where you’d like me to send these items.”

If she doesn’t tell you where to send them, then you make that call yourself and send them to one of the two offices.

But you should give two weeks if you’re going to leave earlier than your original exit date — because otherwise you undo a large chunk of the usefulness of early notice periods (which are about transitioning work) … and allow her to tell future reference checkers that you essentially walked off the job.

The only exception to this is if she becomes outright abusive, at which point you could say, “I’d like to work the remaining two weeks and I don’t want to leave you in the lurch. However, I need to be treated professionally during that time. I had planned to use the next two weeks to put my projects in order, write up documentation to leave behind, and so forth, but I do have a bottom line as far as respectful treatment. If we can’t work together without the hostility, then I will need to leave now.”

Good luck, and congratulations on moving away from this.

Read updates to this letter here and here.

terse answer Thursday — 7 short answers to 7 short questions

It’s terse answer Thursday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. How soon is too soon to reject a candidate?

I have a question about hiring timelines. Sometimes we screen a candidate, and know pretty much immediately that the person won’t be a good fit. But I feel like it might be discouraging to be on the other end of such a situation (to interview and be declined the same day). Right now, I’ve been waiting a day or two before passing on a candidate in these cases. Does this seem like an acceptable timeline, or should I be sucking it up and letting a candidate know right away that they haven’t made the cut?

I usually wait a week, because I agree — many people find it insulting to be rejected so quickly after an interview. The reality is that very few candidates require days of consideration before you decide they’re a no — the people who make it to the end-stages often do, but early on in the process, you often know as soon as the phone interview is completed (or during it) that you won’t be moving the person forward. I’d love to be fully transparent and tell them that immediately, but too many people feel slighted or argue the decision or just feel dejected (like “I’m so awful that they didn’t even have to think about it”). So I wait a week, which seems like a perfectly reasonable amount of time.

(And I know that some people will object to hearing that and think I should tell them faster, but a week is not an unreasonable amount of time to hear back — and plenty faster than many places.)

2. CEO gave my personal cell phone number to clients without my permission

I’m a production coordination trainee at a small company. I’ve been working for them for a little over 1 year, and although I’m still a trainee under the contract, I have business card and email signature with “Project Manager” as the job title which I’m forced to use. Besides that, I also do sales related jobs such as communicating with some clients, submitting quotes/invoices and getting new jobs because actual account executive for those clients is also the company CEO and he can’t do everything.

The CEO gave my personal cell phone number to clients without my permission. He told me afterwards and said I should be prepared to receive calls anytime. His email to the client listed my cellphone number and noted that they should contact me directly on my cell especially after 5 pm (our office operates 8-5). I have direct number at my desk during the day, and I’m not allowed to work overtime without prior permission from my supervisors. Is it ok for a company / boss to provide an employee’s personal phone number without her permission? I have a feeling this is not illegal and only an ethical issue, but I’m wondering if there is anything I can do about it. Clients indeed call me on my cell and it is becoming a part of stress I feel from the job.

No, that’s not cool. Legal, but not cool. But if the CEO isn’t willing to budge, then the message here is that this is a job that requires you to be on call. You’ll have to decide if you want that job or not.

However, if you’re non-exempt (and it sounds like you are), you need to be paid for any time spent answering these calls. Start tracking your time, and since you’re supposed to get advance permission for overtime, ask the CEO how he wants to handle this since you can’t predict in advance when calls will come in.

3. Forgot to bring copies of my resume to an interview

I just had a second round interview today for a position I’m really interested in. I prepared all night for the interview, and in my rush to get out the door the morning of the interview, I forgot copies of my resume! When the interviewers asked if I had a copy, I said no but I could speak to it and then just proceeded to discuss my experience. Totally my fault, but is this a deal breaker? In my thank you email I sent immediately after, I attached my resume and said please reach out with questions. I’m so upset I may have lost this opportunity due to this silly mistake!

This irks the hell out of me — at them, not at you. It’s ridiculous that they came into an interview without copies of your resume, and that they didn’t offer to find your resume in their system when it became clear you didn’t have them either. Yes, bringing your resume is a nice thing to do, but it’s not your responsibility — it’s theirs to have it, and they should have reviewed it before the interview anyway. The only way this is okay is if they were pulled into the meeting at the last minute and given no time to prepare.

It shouldn’t be a deal-breaker, especially since you immediately emailed it to them afterwards.

4. Hiring contact has left the company

I’m a retail sales and merchandising professional who wanted to respond to a job posting on a website for a position with a design company. The job description lists an email address/specific contact to send a cover letter and resume to, which I promptly did. Being my investigative self, I looked up the contact on LinkedIn. Her LinkedIn profile states that she ended her tenure with this company in 2013 and lists her occupation as “Seeking Next Opportunity.” I would really like to work with this company, but does this mean my application just got sent to oblivion if she no longer works there? Should I contact her via LinkedIn to inquire whether or not I should try to contact someone else about the position?

It’s possibly that someone else is handling her email now that she’s gone, but you can certainly call the company’s main number and ask who is now handling the hiring for that position. I would not contact the former employee; she no longer works there and no doubt doesn’t want to field questions about their hiring process.

5. Where’s my raise?

I started a new job back in December. When negotiating salary, I was told (via email, so I still have it) that it is company policy to provide a small raise along with obtaining licensure. My licensure paperwork came through the end of January, and I have been waiting for something to happen — but nothing has. The HR manager told me that the paperwork I sent her was what she needed to make the raise happen, but now 4 pay periods have passed with no changes. I contacted payroll to ask how long those changes usually take, and she told me that she has heard nothing about it and that she would be able to make that change instantly. I’ve emailed and called HR, but she is not responding to me (it has been almost 2 weeks since my last email). Should I try to track her down in person? She is at a different location than me, which is why I haven’t done it yet, and I am so nervous about coming off as a crazy person. Then again, perhaps I am expecting this to move too fast.

Talk to your manager, not HR. Your manager can advocate to push this through more forcefully than you can.

6. Using “sic” on a resume

I had a friend look over my resume and he was confused with my use of the phrase/grammar shorthand “sic.” Two of the companies I have worked for used lowercase letters in their names as a stylistic choice, and my resume reads like this:

tiny teapots (sic); Anytown, USA; Chocolate Design Engineer
Teapots R Us; Anyville, USA; Chocolate Engineer

I had to look up how to credit a lowercase company, but I want it to be clear that I am not submitting a resume riddled with typos. Is (sic) a dated or confusing term? Is it acceptable in some fields but not others (for instance, academics might recognize it, but it stumped my architect friend)?

I’ve been surprised on a few occasions by people who didn’t know what it meant, so your better bet might be to simply go ahead and capitalize the name. You wouldn’t do that in an official publication like a newspaper article, but it’s not a terrible crime to do it on your resume. (Unless you’re applying for a copyediting job, and then maybe it would be. Fortunately you design chocolate teapots instead.)

7. Applying for a job when I want more than the posted salary

I’m interested in applying for a position but the top of the salary range is still $3,500 under what I would like. Should I still apply for the job? Is there any hope of maybe getting them to offer more outside of their top range? (If it helps, the highest salary offered is only $2,500 more than the lowest salary they offer.)

Sure, you can try negotiating for more. There’s no guarantee that you’ll get it, but it’s not crazy to try. It would be if what you wanted was significantly above their posted range, but $3,500 isn’t that much.

But speaking of that, $3,500 a year breaks down to about $218/month after taxes. It’s not going to make a huge difference in your paycheck.

new assistant already missed work her third day on the job

A reader writes:

I have just hired a part-time administrative assistant that started on Monday. She works for us in the morning and cares for her mother in the afternoon. This morning, I recevied an email from her stating she was unable to come in today because of something she needed to help her mother with. While I sympathize as I’m sure caring for an ailing mother is not an easy undertaking, I’m not at all excited about her calling in after only two days on the job.

Should I address this with her tomorrow morning when she arrives or wait to see if this is an isolated incident? Also, any suggestions on how I talk to her about this? I need to communicate to her that I need reliable people on my team and right now, I’m uncertain she is a reliable team member.

You should probably talk with her.

While it’s certainly true that emergencies can come up during your first week on the job, most people are mortified when they do — because they know that they’re still proving themselves, that it’s not a great idea to miss work during your first week, and that an employer is likely to have exactly the worries that you’re having. So most people in this situation will stress that they’re mortified, that this is out of character, etc. — they won’t sound cavalier or matter-of-fact about it.

The fact that your employee didn’t handle it that way — it sounds like her email was pretty matter of fact — is much more troubling than the fact that she had to take the morning off. After all, you’d probably be having a much different reaction if she’d called you rather than emailed, sounded mortified, and assured you this wouldn’t be a regular thing, right? (You’d still probably be a little concerned because that’s human nature when you don’t yet have a ton of data points on someone, but you probably wouldn’t be quite as uneasy as you are now.)

So, while you could certainly wait and see if there are other problems, the way she handled this strongly suggests that there are going to be other problems, and so it’s worth talking with her when she’s back tomorrow.

I’d start by asking her if everything is okay, because that’s a kind thing to do in this context, and then say something like this: “I realize that sometimes things come up and it’s just bad timing, but because we so rarely have people miss work in their first week — their first month, really — I want to make sure that the scheduling needs of this role are going to work for you going forward. I want to be up-front with you that I generally need the person in your role to be here every day, unless it’s pre-planned vacation time or a very rare absence that can’t be planned, such as sickness. We can’t easily accommodate more than a few unplanned absences per year. And again, I realize that on occasion something will come up, and sometimes it’ll have the bad timing to do it during someone’s first week, but since we’re just starting to work together, I wanted to raise this and make sure it works for you.”

Make sure to use a kind and sympathetic tone during this conversation. If she’s truly a conscientious employee who just had bad luck during her first week, you shouldn’t come down hard on her, and keeping your tone kind can help with that. And if she’s not really a conscientious employee, using a kind tone isn’t going to detract from the substance of the message.

But here’s the thing: If she’s not an especially conscientious employee and therefore needs to hear this message, it’s already over. There are going to be more problems with reliability and more problems with work ethic (and maybe other problems too, like quality of work, because they often — although not always — go hand in hand).

So why have this conversation at all then? Why not just wait and see if those other problems appear and address it then (by letting her go and hiring someone better)? You could — that’s one option. But by addressing it up-front now, you’re making your expectations clear and ensuring that you won’t be starting from scratch the next time there’s a problem. If she’s not the right employee for you, then you want to end this as soon as possible before you’ve invested more time in training, etc., and by having this conversation now, you’re setting the stage for moving quickly in the next few weeks if you continue to see problems. (Plus, it’s possible that this conversation could lead to her deciding on her own that it’s not the right fit.)

And if she is a conscientious employee and this was really a legitimate emergency that isn’t indicative of a problem with her work ethic or reliability, she’s going to understand why you’re raising this. (That said, you still might make a point of being particularly kind and welcoming to her the rest of the week so that she doesn’t feel misunderstood or like she’s been chastised and sent to the corner, because a conscientious person will be wondering if she’s just ruined her standing in your eyes. So show her that she hasn’t.)

If I had to bet money on the most likely outcome, I’d say this isn’t going to end well and you should be preparing yourself for that … but that’s not a guarantee and it’s possible that she’s a conscientious person with one piece of bad luck. This approach accounts for both, but you’ll know soon enough which you’re dealing with. Good luck.

Read an update to this letter here.

why is it bad to sound naive when applying for jobs?

A reader writes:

I’ve seen you throw around the word “naïve” several times in your How-Not-Tos for cover letters and resumes. I actually find it a really helpful insult when I recognize things that I’ve been doing wrong. But still, being 22, I am kind of professionally naïve. Surely there’s got to be something beneficial about showing my sincerity and eagerness in a cover letter, but I also don’t want to sound like an intern.

Here’s the more pragmatic question: In several of my cover letters I’ve directly addressed that although I’m technically qualified, I understand that I’m not going to be the most experienced. And then I say something like, “what I lack in experience I make up for with an eagerness to learn.” Most recently I said, “If ability is driven by energy, I may still be your most qualified candidate.”

Good? Bad? Should I fake it till I make it? Or should I beg?

Well, first, sincere and eager aren’t the same thing as naive. Sincere and eager are good things. Most employers want them. Naivete, though, is something different; it’s the lack of knowledge.

Now, of course when you’re new to the work world, you’re starting out with a certain amount of lack of knowledge, and there’s no way around that.

And some forms of naivete aren’t bad at all, and can even be kind of charming. For instance, I once hired a recent grad who insisted on calling me “Ms. Green” for his first few days before I could get him to stop. He was naive about typical forms of address in most offices and the fact that professional adults generally call each other by their first names (with some exceptions), but that was fine. He was inexperienced, it did no harm, and it was easy to smile at.

But the kind of naivete that we usually talk about here — when it’s in the context of Don’t Do That — is different. Those forms of naivete can signal to an employer that you’re going to require more hand-holding or be higher-maintenance or just be more of a pain than they’d ideally like to take on.

I figured it would be useful to talk specifics, so I searched for past posts where I warned someone that a behavior would seem problematically naive. Here are a few of them:

* In this case, a reader wanted to call a company that had frozen their hiring and try to personally convince their CFO to restart the hiring for the position he wanted. I told him he’d come across as naive (and overstepping and presumptuous). Being naive about something like this isn’t likely to get dismissed with an indulgent smile; it’s likely to make the company think that you have such a lack of understanding of professional norms that you’re likely to continually alienate coworkers and clients.

* In this case, a reader wanted to ask for a raise after only two months on the job because she regretted not negotiating initially. I told her that she would look naive and like she didn’t understand how business works (and that her employer would be annoyed that she didn’t think through the salary before accepting it). Being naive about something like this is a problem because the person’s lack of understanding of business conventions is directly causing a problem for the company: Now they have someone asking for something totally unrealistic, thinking it’s realistic to get it, and probably being dissatisfied when they can’t. As a manager, not only is that a pain in the ass to deal with, but it also makes you wonder what other unreasonable expectations the person has that you’re going to need to fend off too.

* In the recent letter from someone whose mother was telling her to call employers daily to ask for an interview, I said that doing that would come across as naive at best and and rude at worst. In this case, “naive” wasn’t horribly damning (although “rude” was), but the point was that she wasn’t going to portray herself in a way that would be helpful. You don’t want to take an action where the best that could be said of you is that you seem naive. When you’re trying to convince an employer to hire you, you want to seem attractive to them. Standing out by displaying a total lack of understanding of how hiring works isn’t going to be appealing. It’s going to be a negative, not a plus.

Now, as for your question about language in your cover letter, there’s nothing wrong with “what I lack in experience I make up for with an eagerness to learn.” You’re going to need to back it up with more compelling specifics, but there’s nothing problematic about that statement. And it’s not naive — it’s eager, but like I said above, those are two different things, and eagerness is good.

And your second sentence — “If ability is driven by energy, I may still be your most qualified candidate” — isn’t too bad either. I don’t love it, because I dislike anything where an applicant claims that they’re the most qualified candidate for the job (since they can’t possibly know), but it’s a reasonably engaging way of saying something about your energy and enthusiasm.

Neither of those really sounds naive; they sound eager, and that’s a good thing. They’re very different from the examples of problematic naivete above.

red flags on your resume are turning employers off

As you’re probably well aware, most employers spend only seconds skimming your resume before making a quick decision about whether to reject you or consider you further, so it’s essential that your resume doesn’t contain the red flags that will turn them off during that short initial scan. Here are eight red flags that will often put you straight into the “no” pile without further consideration.

1. A history of job-hopping. If you have a history of moving quickly from one job to the next without staying very long, employers will wonder whether you get bored easily or can’t keep a job. If you do have good reasons for the job changes (such as having a spouse in the military), make sure to fill in employers up-front so they don’t draw wrong conclusions.

2. Grammatical or spelling mistakes. Mistakes like these can get your resume immediately tossed, because they convey to an employer that you don’t pay attention to detail. Employers assume that you’ve polished your resume more than you will most documents, so if you have mistakes in it, they assume your work will have even more errors.

3. Bad writing. Even for jobs that don’t require flawless writing, employers still want to see evidence that you can communicate well. If you don’t write clearly and concisely, they’ll worry about how you’ll communicate once on the job – and many will take your resume writing quality as a shortcut to drawing conclusions about your intelligence.

4. Overly aggrandized self-descriptions. Hiring managers generally frown on language like “visionary thinker,” “creative innovator,” or “respected leader” – because these are the sorts of things that others can say about you, but you can’t say credibly about yourself. Putting them on your resume signals that you’re either naïve or arrogant – or both. Stick to objective experience and accomplishments only.

5. Lack of evidence of achievement. If your resume lists nothing but your job duties at each job – rather than what you achieved there – you’ll signal that you never did more than the basic requirements. Hiring managers are looking for candidates with a track record of achievement – not meeting minimum requirements, but going above and beyond and accomplishing things that an average candidate wouldn’t.

6. No overarching theme to your career choices. If you’ve moved from one unrelated job to the next, without a clear pattern, employers will be skeptical about your commitment to the roles you’re applying for now. Most employers want to be able to scan your resume and get a quick understanding of how you’ve progressed within one or two fields, rather than trying to work out how you’ve moved from tech writer to salesperson to nurse’s assistant to video editor.

7. Lack of professionalism. If your resume includes information about your spouse and children, or other information unrelated to your qualifications as a candidate, most employers will conclude that you’re naïve at best and unprofessional at worst.

8. Large gaps between jobs. When employers see gaps of unemployment, they wonder what happened during that time. Did you leave the previous job with nothing lined up, and if so, why? Were you working somewhere that you’ve deliberately left off your resume, and if so, what are you hiding? Gaps raise questions that you don’t want on a hiring manager’s mind.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

wee answer Wednesday — 7 short answers to 7 short questions

It’s wee answer Wednesday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Do I have to provide my employer with a copy of the reference I gave a former coworker?

My ex-coworker is in the process of looking for a new job, and she put my name as a reference without asking me. However, unaware that she told the hiring company that I was her supervisor, which I am not, I decided to help her and provide a reference. The company sent me a form in an email to fill out, which I did and emailed it back to them. I did not lie; I stated that I was her coworker, which was an option on the form.

The hiring company then called my company and spoke with her supervisor. My supervisor is now questioning me and asking me for a copy of the reference that I gave to the ex-coworker. Am I obligated to provide the reference I give for my ex-coworker to my supervisor? I don’t have an issue sharing the reference with my manager, but because I think it was a personal reference, I feel I am not obligated to share this information.

It wasn’t a personal reference, even if you look at it that way; it was a professional reference because you were a coworker, or at least I can pretty much guarantee you that the reference-checker sees it that way.

Your employer is entitled to want to see a copy of what you provided, since as long as you’re employed by your company, you’re representing them to some extent when you give references for their former employees. But even if that weren’t the case, taking a stand on this is unlikely to go well for you. At best, it will negatively impact your standing with your manager long-term, and at worst it could be insubordination. Do you really want to take on that battle for a former coworker who tried to get you to lie on her behalf?

2. Cutting hours for chronically absent employees

I have a manager who wants to make it a policy that if an employee is chronically absent, their hours will be reduced. Is this legal? Wouldn’t you have to give them warnings first?

There’s no law in the U.S. that requires that employees be warned about disciplinary action before it occurs — whether it’s cutting their hours or firing them. As long as the manager is talking about non-exempt employees (rather than exempt employees, who must be paid the same amount each week in which they do any work, regardless of how many hours they work), there’s no legal issue here. And it’s understandable that she might want to schedule them less often, if they’re not reliably at work.

3. Withdrew from a hiring process but now I want to get back in

I had an interview and was told I would hear from them by week’s end or beginning of the new week. I had a change of heart (or so I thought) over the weekend and considered staying with what I have been doing. I emailed the interviewer and told him this. He emailed me back and was very nice and wished me luck and thanked me for letting him know.

Now, I have had another change of heart and regret my emailing him. Is it acceptable to call him or email him to let him know I would still like to be considered?

No. You’ll look really flaky, and they won’t be able to trust that you won’t change your mind again. You really want to be sure before you withdraw from a hiring process, because it’s hard to reverse.

4. Listing multiple temp assignments on a resume

Since I was laid off back in 2009, I’ve worked many temp assignments. Now I’m having a hard time finding permanent work because it looks like I’ve bounced around a lot. How can I make my resume look more appealing so I can finally land a permanent position?

Rather than listing them all as separate jobs, list them all under one heading — Contract Work, Temp Work, or whatever is appropriate.

5. Changing fields when my resume doesn’t show my qualifications

I am looking to change the field I currently work in. I have the education in the field I want to pursue and extensive experience in the field I currently work in. I currently work as a paramedic and I want to move into health/preventive education and wellness programs. I have an MPH in this field. The problem is my resume doesn’t speak for my true qualifications for the new career move. I obviously don’t want to falsify my resume, but how do I make changes that won’t have a recruiter or HR department just toss it in the trash?

Why doesn’t your resume speak to your true qualifications? That’s the problem. It needs to.

If it can’t because these qualifications aren’t anything you can objectively demonstrate, well, you can’t really expect an hiring manager to pick you over someone who IS demonstrably qualified. You can try to write a really compelling cover letter, but it’s hard to change fields in this economy because employers don’t have incentive to pick less qualified candidates when they’re flooded with qualified ones.

That said, having an MPH and experience working with a paramedic sounds like a pretty good background for moving into health and wellness education. You might find it useful to talk to people in the field you want to move into about how you could play up the qualifications that you do bring.

6. What should you include on a reference list?

A library application is asking for my references up front. When I send the names, what else do I include besides name and contact information? I was going to separate them according to type, manager and professional colleague. Do I include job titles? All of the references are managers, but only one is my manager.

Names, contact info, job title when you worked together, and a short explanation of your relationship to them (one sentence or less). Unless the employer has specified otherwise, they’re going to be more interested in people who have managed you than people who haven’t.

7. Not allowed to keep employee handbook after leaving company

My company just rolled out a fancy employee policy book that looks like it cost some money to produce. Of course it has that section that requires you to sign and return a page that confirms you received it, read it, and will comply. But here’s the kicker. It states that when I leave the job, whether I quit or they fire me, I have to return all company property, “including this Staff Member Handbook. Otherwise the company may take action to recoup any replacement costs and/or seek the return of company property through appropriate legal recourse.” It’s got a lot of pages so photocopying would be kind of a pain.

In my opinion, I think that anything I sign my name to, I am entitled to a copy of. But my manager doesn’t see it that way. Is this legal? I’ve seen employers try to dissuade workers from copying employee personnel reviews as well.

Yes, it’s legal. While you should have a copy of any contract you sign, employee handbooks generally aren’t considered contracts (and most contain a disclaimer to that effect). Documents where you sign to acknowledge some fact (like the receipt of a handbook) aren’t obligational or contractual; they’re more akin to signing a sign-in sheet at a meeting, which you wouldn’t be entitled to a copy of either. And companies often do consider their handbooks to contain proprietary information about their operations.

But if you think there are particular policies that you might want to reference once you’re no longer employed there, photocopy those and keep them at home. Otherwise, this is not a battle worth waging.

my employer might drop our health insurance — what can I do?

A reader writes:

Yesterday, I overheard a conversation between the owner of the company and our accountant where they discussed dropping the company’s health insurance plan. (Note — we were in an open area, they were being loud and speaking openly, and I said hi when I came into the area to alert them that I was there, so I wasn’t snooping!)

Apparently, rates are being increased again, and they are leaning towards just dropping the plan altogether. If past experience with the way the owner handles things like this is indicative of future behavior, it is likely that she’ll tell us just a few days before the change, and offer little or no compensation to make up for it. It’s upsetting on a lot of levels — when we negotiate raises, the owner is always making a big deal about how our health insurance is part of our compensation and how she’s such a generous person to offer it to us, so I am going to feel like this is a pay cut if this happens, and of course, like everyone, I have basic healthcare needs and want to make sure I am protected.

If it does happen, what is the best way to try to negotiate additional money so I can pay for my own insurance? I am searching for another job for other reasons, but as the process may take a while, I am concerned about losing healthcare in the meantime. Another issue is that if she really does not tell us until a few days before, as she has in the past with changes like this, do I have any obligation to warn my coworkers or confront the boss earlier so it’s in the open? I am generally healthy, but I worry about a few coworkers who have some minor health issues that might bankrupt them if they lose insurance coverage, a few who are parents of young kids, one who is a cancer survivor who needs yearly checks, etc. I am sure many of us would appreciate the chance to get one more physical in or one more prescription filled before we lose coverage.

Why not ask directly, since it’s clear that you were right there when they were discussing it?

Yes, it’s not polite to eavesdrop or comment on conversations that you weren’t a part of, but sometimes you can’t help overhearing things, and sometimes those things are alarming enough that it wouldn’t make sense to pretend you didn’t hear. After all, if what you’d overheard was “today is Jane’s last day,” and you were Jane, you’d probably ask about that, right? (Actually, some people wouldn’t even ask about that, but they should.)

Say something like this to her: “When I was in the room with you and Bob yesterday, I couldn’t help overhearing that we might drop our insurance plan altogether. I don’t mean to intrude on a private conversation, but since that would have such a significant impact, I wanted to check with you and see if that’s something you’re considering, especially since it’s the kind of thing that it would help to have as much advance notice of as possible.”

No matter what her answer — whether she says yes or no or that she’s not sure, or whether she doesn’t answer you at all, and even if she bristles at you asking — you should then follow up by, “If things do go in that direction, I’d like to ask that we get as much notice as possible, so that we can use the coverage while we have it.” She may be clueless enough that you actually need to point that out to her.

Depending on how the conversation goes and what kind of rapport you have with her, you can also point out that insurance is a requirement for many people when deciding whether or not to accept a job, that it was part of the benefits package that you signed up for when you were hired, and that eliminating it is likely to cause significant hardship and morale problems for people on staff, as well as make it hard to hire good people in the future. You could also suggest that people might strongly prefer to simply pay an additional portion of the premiums themselves rather than lose the coverage altogether.

And if your company does end up dropping the insurance coverage, you can certainly try to negotiate for additional money so that you can purchase your own, pointing out again that insurance was part of the benefits package that you signed up for when you were hired, and that it factored into your initial salary negotiations. You might not get it, but you can and should make the case for it … and if you don’t get it (or even if you do), then you can decide whether you still want to stay under these new terms.

Given the way the U.S. health insurance system is structured, an employer deciding to drop their coverage is a Big Deal Big Thing to do to employees, particularly when they have employees who took their jobs there with the understanding that insurance was part of the package. I hope you don’t have to deal with it — and if it does happen, I hope your boss hears loud and clear that it’s unacceptable, in the form of people going elsewhere and telling her why.

Read an update to this letter here.

is it okay to apply makeup in the bathroom at work?

A reader writes:

I work at a large university in a building of about 300 people. There are two floors and I know almost everyone on my floor by face, if not by name.

After a long winter, I’ve recently started biking to work. I bring my makeup with me and put it on in the women’s bathroom about 10 minutes before official working hours start. It only takes me 2 or 3 minutes; this is not a fashion level routine, just some foundation, mascara, and eyeliner. Is that weird? Should I get a makeup mirror for my cube? So far no one’s said anything and all my coworkers in my office know I’m biking to work (and are encouraging and positive about it).

It would be weirder to apply it in your cube, so don’t do that. Your cube is more of an open space than the bathroom is.

I don’t think what you’re doing is any big deal, particularly since people know you bike to work. It’s not ideal — foundation, mascara, and eyeliner is a bigger production than a quick swipe of lipstick, and it’s more grooming than you usually expect to see in an office bathroom — but it’s not a big deal. Certainly not a big enough deal for you to stop biking to work.

As a side note, years ago, I worked with someone who carried a full makeup case to work — one of those big metal boxes with shelves and compartments on the inside — and every afternoon after lunch, she’d stand in front of the bathroom mirror and do a full makeup reapplication with foundation, powder, eye makeup, lip liner, different brushes, etc. That’s something I’d say not to do, because it made her look so preoccupied with her appearance at work that it was hard to take her seriously; her priorities seemed off-kilter.

But that’s very different than what you’re doing, so I think you’re fine.

Anyone want to disagree? Or share their own workplace grooming habits?

tiny answer Tuesday — 7 short answers to 7 short questions

It’s tiny answer Tuesday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Company offered me a job, then called me back to meet with the owner

I’ve been searching for a job and think I’ve finally found the one that I want and luckily it seems as though they want me too … I think. I have had a phone interview and an in-person interview over the past several weeks and then Friday they called and made a verbal offer. They said they would send over the written offer today or tomorrow (Monday/Tuesday). Today, the person with whom I’ve been interviewing asked me to come in for an interview with the owner. I was caught off guard but offered up my availability. I’m scheduled to meet the owner later this week. I haven’t received the written offer yet. Does that mean they’re re-thinking their decision? What should I expect from meeting with the owner, whom I met once briefly last week, and should I bring up the verbal offer with him?

They should have been clearer with you when they called to ask you to meet with the owner! Since they weren’t, ideally on that call you would have said, “Just to clarify, we’d talked on Friday about you sending over a formal offer. Is that on hold pending this meeting?” Since you that easy window to ask has closed, at this point I would just go to the next meeting and not ask about it (although it’s still your prerogative to call them now and ask) — but either way, assume that there’s no offer yet, since it sounds hazy enough that you shouldn’t rely on it until it’s formalized. Certainly in your meeting with the owner, if it doesn’t become clear what’s going on, before the meeting ends you can ask about it. I’d can say something like, “Can you tell me your timeline for next steps? When I spoke with Jane on Friday, she had offered me the position — but I’m less clear now where things stand in your process.”

2. Company removed my name from my work after I stopped working there

I wrote a bunch of blog posts for a digital marketing agency’s corporate blog while I worked there, and now that I have left, they took my name off of all of the content I contributed. I’m sure they legally own the content, but is it even worth reaching out to them to ask about it? I ask because I work in online marketing and writing relevant blog content is important for my portfolio. It’s probably not worth it, just bummed to have spent the time on writing posts (10+) and not getting any credit.

Sure, you can ask. They do indeed own the content since you produced it as part of your work for them (and in fact they could have chosen not to byline it with your name even while you were employed there), but there’s no harm in asking them. They can say no (and really, a company that removes your byline when you leave probably has some reason for doing it that isn’t going to be reversed by you asking them), but it’s certainly no inappropriate to say something like, “Hey, I’d love to show this work in my portfolio. Is there any way to return my byline to it?”

Keep in mind, though, that even if they say no, you can still include that work in your portfolio because you did indeed produce it.

3. Withdrawing from a hiring process when your interviewer knows your current manager

I just walked out of a second interview for a position and decided that the chemistry just isn’t right and that I want to withdraw my candidacy. Normally I would handle this in the post-meeting thank-you email so that they can quickly move on to other candidates (“thank you for taking the time to meet with me, but the position isn’t right for me at this time,” etc), but there’s a thing. I work fairly frequently with the hiring company in my current capacity. Hell, the hiring manager and my boss are on a first name basis. When I submitted my resume, I did write “resume submitted in confidence, please don’t contact current employer at this time,” and of course I only spoke good things about my current employer, but I’m a little nervous now that I know for sure I don’t want the position.

Should I email them now with my withdrawal or wait and hope they sensed what I did and reject me? If I email them my withdrawal, should I reiterate my need for discretion, or not mention it and hope they’ll be discreet (and bite my fingernails for a few weeks)? As background, the hiring company is a very small one, with no HR department, and my second interview was with the head of the company.

Well, if they’re going to be indiscreet, they’re probably going to do it whether you withdraw or not. So I would proceed however you normally would, and not worry that a withdrawal email is going to send them into a fit of pique that will cause them to tell your boss you applied. Just make sure your email is particularly gracious and doesn’t sound like the decision is because of some failing on their part. If you want to be extra safe, you could even say that your withdrawal is because you’ve decided to stay in your current role, thus mitigating any potential “Jane is job searching” gossip that might be passed on.

4. Boss interrupted me in a meeting

I’m in a job that demands the most of my resources. I’m a pretty good thinker, but I never planned to end up in business analysis, and I’m surrounded by people who have majored in this stuff and gobble it up. It’s challenging, to say the least — and just like people who speak English as a second language, I’m often out to sea when they’re all running ahead. I’m afraid I’m being seen as less competent than I’d like to be. Last week in a meeting, when a particularly tricky analysis was being discussed and it just, just didn’t make sense to me (and thinking of it over the weekend, it still doesn’t, and I’m wondering if maybe I’m right!), I started to voice a train of thought — paused — and right in the middle of it my normally polite boss just picked up and changed the subject. Also, the supervisor has said in meetings, “what Jane is trying to say…” and I’m not the go-to person for answers. But one-on-one I’m fine! It’s scary, and it’s frustrating.

How do you privately address a boss who interrupted you in a meeting and it’s still burning you up??

Hmmm. I think the issue here is less about talking to your boss about interrupting you and more about figuring out the bigger picture here. Is this the right role for you, and the right company? If you’re struggling and not following along in meetings, and your boss has stopped waiting for you to work through your thoughts and you feel less competent than others, these might be signals about overall fit. That means that being irked at your boss is a side issue; the bigger one is what all this stuff is telling you about your long-term success in this role.

If you have good rapport with your boss, it might be worth talking with her about what you’ve noticed and saying that you’re trying to figure out what feedback to take away from these instances. Don’t do this if you’re not prepared for hear fairly critical feedback, because you might … but on the other hand, you might hear that you’re doing fine overall and these thing are minor in the overall scheme of things, and that could give you more peace of mind.

5. Job postings on job boards that aren’t on the company’s own website

Sometimes I come across interesting job postings on external job sites (like Monster), but when I go to that company’s own careers webpage, the position is not listed. The external site prompts users to apply through their own system instead of pointing to the company’s website to apply. Is something like this worth pursuing? Or is something sketchy/unreliable about it? Any idea of what’s going on here?

It often means that the position is no longer open, but the external job sites haven’t removed it. However, sometimes it means that the company didn’t post the position on their own site and is relying solely on external sites to advertise it. This could be because they don’t post any jobs on their site (some places don’t) or because they’re not publicizing the site internally yet (because someone doesn’t know they’re leaving yet, for example). It’s hard to know from the outside which it is, unfortunately.

6. Addressing spiritual requirements in a cover letter

If a job description (for a religious higher ed institution) lists “Spiritual Requirements,” do I need to address these in my cover letter? I don’t think I’m exactly the religious person they are looking for (although I do think I’m a good fit for the actual position, which has nothing to do with religion), but would rather apply and see if I get to the interview stage before addressing it (where I would be honest about my personal religious views if they asked). Does this seem like a bad idea?

Nope. You’re under no obligation to address any particular requirement in your cover letter, unless they specifically tell you to.

7. Books for new managers

I start a new IT job in 2 weeks where I will be managing a small team of technical people. I’ve managed project teams and technical teams, but direct people management will be new to me. I’m so excited and really want to be a success. I’m engaging with an HR leadership coach. I also wanted to do some reading on my own. I’ve heard good things about “First Break All the Rules.” Are there others you or your readers would recommend?

Well, there’s mine — which, uh, is awesome. It’s geared toward nonprofit managers, but 95% of what’s in there applies to managers in every field, and I wish I could make it required reading.

what to do when you lose out on a promotion

A reader writes:

I recently applied for an internal promotion to be manager of the small team I serve. I was unsuccessful. Two questions. First, I was “let down easy”–the hiring manager said things like “it was close” and “we want to keep you.” But isn’t being turned down for the role essentially a repudiation of me? If they really wanted to keep me, I feel like they would have considered offering me some incentive to remain. I am reading it as a clear sign that I should move on.

That notwithstanding, how do I establish rapport with the new manager, an external candidate who I was in competition with and lost out to? Do I specifically acknowledge that I applied for his role but that now I am ready to be a great team member, colleague, and partner? The truth is that I might have a hard time being an enthusiastic team member now that I’ve been rejected for this particular advancement.

First, no, being turned down for a promotion isn’t a repudiation of you! Firing you from your current role would be a repudiation of you, but you were explicitly told that the promotion decision was quote and your employer wants to keep you. That’s no repudiation.

After all, imagine if you were hiring for that position and had a good internal candidate, but a much stronger external one. You’d have to make the decision that was in the best interests of the organization and hire the stronger candidate – but that wouldn’t mean that you didn’t value the internal candidate. Not at all!  In fact, hiring managers have to deal with this all the time; if they have one slot but multiple great candidates, that means that they’re going to be rejecting some great candidates. It’s just the reality of the math when you only have a single open slot.

So it’s key for you to stop feeling that you’re being nudged to move on. It sounds like just the opposite of that. But if you let yourself continue to feel that way, it has the potential to make you feel bitter and could even cause you to leave a job that you were happy in before this happened. That’s not necessary to do to yourself – and it’s something within your control.

As for getting along with your new manager, you don’t need to acknowledge to her that you applied for her job, although you certainly can if you’d feel better having it in the open. The best thing you can do, though, is to show that you’re ready to be a great team member by … well, by demonstrating it. Be to her ideas, do great work, and continue to contribute to the team at a high level. If you’re doing that, she’s not going to worry that you’re uncomfortable with her – because your work will speak for itself.

Now, if you find that you can’t do that, then you might be better off looking for a different position somewhere else, before you harm your reputation with your coworkers and your current company. Right now, they think highly enough of you that were a serious contender for a promotion, and you shouldn’t risk that good reputation with them by allowing resentment to affect the way you operate at work.

But I’d give it a good faith effort before you conclude that you need to go in that direction. And meanwhile, why not ask the hiring manager you interviewed with for feedback about what you can work on to have a stronger chance at promotion in the future?