my interviewer wants to meet over lunch, and I’m freaking out!

A reader writes:

I have been networking to try and find a job as an attorney or two years! Finally, one of my contacts has been able to get me an interview with one of the most prestigious law firms in Utah. At first I thought this would give me an inside track on getting the job offer, then the interviewer asked to do the interview during lunch. This has caused a lot of anxiety. Is this a serious interview or is he just doing a favor for my contact? Is this such a hassle that he can’t take time during his normal work hours to do it? What if he asks me where I want to eat? What type of place should I choose? What if he takes me to McDonalds? How should I deal with the check (I assume he’s buying)? You can see the thoughts I have been having. What do you think?

You are freaking yourself out unnecessarily, to the point that you’re not going to be able to eat without instantly vomiting on this poor guy. Take a deep breath!

First, no, I would not assume that a lunch interview means that it’s not a serious interview or that it’s such a hassle that he can’t take the time to do it during his normal work hours. Some people just operate this way — if there’s a candidate they’re interested in talking to, sometimes their default is to meet over lunch or coffee, particularly if they don’t interview a lot of people as part of their normal job. It’s not uncommon.

If he’s like most lunch interviewers, he will probably suggest a place to eat. But if instead he asks you, just suggest a mid-priced place near his office. While some people do hold interviews in more casual restaurants (although usually more along the lines of a Chipotle rather than a McDonald’s), the more common option is to do it in a sit-down restaurant with service at your table, so if you’re put on the spot, you should suggest a place like that.

Assume that he is picking up the check. This is a business expense for his company. This is always the case with any lunch interview, but you can be extra confident that it’s the case with “one of the most prestigious law firms” in your state. Seriously. They’re buying.

Let’s see, some other things that you should keep in mind:

* If you’re concerned about what’s appropriate to order, take your cues from him. If he orders an appetizer, entree, and dessert, do something roughly the same. If he orders water and an appetizer and no entree, restrain the price of your own meal accordingly. Either way, don’t be the only one ordering dessert.

* Don’t order alcohol.

* Don’t order anything that’s really messy to eat, like barbecue or tacos, or anything that you know from experience gets stuck in your teeth, like spinach.

* If you know where you’re eating in advance, look at its menu online ahead of time, so that you can decide what to order in advance, rather than spending a lot of time deciding when you’re there.

* Be unfailingly polite to the wait staff. (You should always do this, of course, but in case for some reason you don’t, now is the time to start.)

This probably won’t be the last lunch interview you encounter in life. Don’t agonize over it, and prepare as you would for a normal interview, and you’ll be fine.

fast answer Friday — 6 short answers to 6 short questions

It’s fast answer Friday — six short answers to six short questions. Here we go…

1. Sending a handwritten thank-you to follow up on your emailed thank-you

I’m a recent grad who’s been going through a battery of interviews lately. Usually, I’m the type of girl to send a handwritten note afterward to follow up, but the companies I’ve been interviewing with all have short time frames for making hiring decisions so I’ve been following up with emails instead. I would still like to send handwritten notes though, but I don’t want to come off as redundant. Do you have any content advice for a post-email thank-you note so that I don’t end up repeating what I’ve already said?

It should be blank, because you shouldn’t send it. Sending two thank-you notes for the same interview is going to come across as overkill. It’s too much. Sending them by email is fine to begin with, and there’s no need for another. At this point, your job is to sit tight and wait to hear back. (And good luck.)

2. Asking to telecommute to an unpaid internship

If an internship is unpaid, is it ok to ask if you can telecommute? I think this is a reasonable request, but I have found that many managers I asked to do this were either perplexed or slightly offended that I asked. I don’t want to pretend that I don’t live in the real world and that I don’t have bills to pay, because I do, and I would like hiring managers to recognize that. I want the experience, but I have eat. What is the best way to articulate this request?

Well, a lot of them aren’t going to be amenable to it, as you’re discovering. Many internships are designed to be based in the organization’s office because they involve interaction with other people, going to meetings, being available for ad hoc conversations, and other work that’s more easily done in-person. Moreover, with very entry-level work where part of the point is to provide feedback and development, managers usually find it easier to have a face-to-face relationship. So you can ask, but realize that a lot of them will say no — so make sure you do it at the very beginning of your conversation with any employer, because if you wait until the end of the hiring process, many are going to be irritated that you didn’t bring it up earlier (so that they didn’t invest further time in the hiring process if it’s a deal-breaker for them).

3. I’m being told to donate my time to our CEO’s second organization

I am the assistant to the CEO of a large nonprofit. As such, I not only help my boss, but also help out where ever needed. He recently started another nonprofit that is completely separate from the agency I am employed with. They keep different accounts, have different staff, and are a completely separate entity. I am not an employee of theirs, and their employees are not listed on our payroll.

Saying that, my boss who heads both organizations often asks me and a few other staff members to help out with things for this organization. They currently rent a space in our building. I love helping out, but the work is interfering with the already large work load I have. They are basically getting free labor for our agency staff, and aren’t reimbursing for any hours that we put in. Our accounting department and our independent auditor have discussed billing for our time, but there haven’t been any action made to remedy the situation.

I want to approach my boss about the extra workload and how I am confused about how these separate agency fits into our own (we provide completely different services). Any suggestions? Or should I just suck it up and do the work hoping the problem will eventually fix itself?

Talk to your boss. Tell him that the work for the second organization is interfering with your ability to put your own organization first. Tell him that you’re uneasy about essentially volunteering your services for the other organization during time that you’re being paid by Organization 1, and that you’re not comfortable continuing to do it, at least not without a formal arrangement where Organization 2 is billed for your time.

You can also go back to your accounting department and push them to handle this, since … well, since they should. And out of curiosity, does your nonprofit’s board know that the CEO is diverting the organization’s resources to his own separate organization? If not, they probably won’t be pleased to hear it.

4. Is it normal for contractors not to get feedback or performance reviews?

I have been a government contractor working on-site for a large national institution for over 2 years. I like my job, but am becoming increasingly frustrated by that lack of feedback I receive from my manager. There are no performance reviews performed by my actual manager, who is a contractor from a different contracting company. I have the same position as eight other people and am losing my motivation to do a good job.

My superviser will casually say that I am doing a good job and thanks me for my work on various projects from time to time. He has even said that they couldn’t afford to lose me. The contract company I work for has almost no idea what I actually do all day and rarely communicates with me. They do an annual performance review where they basically check in with me for 10 minutes and give me a small raise, which I believe is given at the same rate to all of their other employees. I’m sure if there were a problem that was relayed to them from my supervisor I would hear about it, but positive feedback is never really relayed. I feel I am not being rewarded, financially or verbally, for doing work that is in some cases better than others who have my job. I watch one of them play video games for most of the day and ignore emails, while I work late to make sure my clients are happy. But we are treated the same.

This may be a fault, but I recognize that I do better and stay motivated by positive feedback. Is it normal for contractors not to recieve feedback or have a performance review with their on-site supervisor? What can I do to ask for a raise when the people who grant it don’t know what I do or how well I do it, really?

Yes, it’s pretty normal. In fact, it’s a widespread problem even among non-contractor employees and their managers … but among contractors, it’s often considered not even a problem, but rather par for the course with contracting.

You can certainly make a case for a raise by pointing to your achievements, just like you’d make a case for a raise normally … but realize that in the environment you’re working in, they may find it more efficient to treat you all as a group, without much individualized attention.

5. Negotiating when a company has just been acquired

I recently interviewed for a job with a start up. I was told that there would be no equity/stocks or options as my compensation, only the basics salary, med, 401. I agreed. My final interview is next week.

The company got acquired yesterday. They are eager to hire me. However, as I see it, we are now part of a larger org and my duties will increase and my initial negotiation had been with a start-up but that has changed. This situation is new to me and I would like to know what I can negotiate to get the best package due to this changed situation. Can you please advise?

Yeah, it’s a different situation now. But it doesn’t sound like you’d already discussed salary, only benefits, and being acquired doesn’t mean that they’ll necessarily be offering equity now (in fact, it might be less likely). In any case, if they make you an offer, you can certainly ask about the changed landscape in light of the situation, and you then proceed with your negotiations accordingly. You’re not locked into anything yet.

6. Putting church community outreach work on your resume

I was just asked to help out with a community outreach committee at my church. My dream job would be to do community programming in the museum field, so it’s something that I want to do. I’m wondering if I do end up helping with community programming at the church (something I have done in the past), would it be OK to add to a resume? The community outreach is more in the way of helping people and events, not pushing the bible down their throats (ew).

Sure, you can absolutely put that on your resume. In general, assume that volunteer work can always go on a resume. Just be specific about exactly what you did, since volunteer work is often described in a vague way that doesn’t really convey what the person actually did.

update on the reference for the brilliant but abusive former manager

Remember the letter-writer last month who was wondering how and whether to give a reference for a brilliant but abusive former manager? Here’s here update.

I called my colleague on the phone and told him that I had both some positive and negative things to say, and asked that it stay off the record. He was totally cool about it, so I laid out basically what I wrote in my post: I think she could have great vision for the institution, but that she was sometimes hard to work with as she could be very sharp with her reports. I suggested that her skill set (grant writing, visioning, tech planning, etc) would potentially be really useful, but that her personnel management was weaker.

My colleague listened carefully and said that the position had actually been explicitly designed to have the director position be someone who could schmooze with the bigwigs, write grants, and provide vision and that his position would be actually be the one managing the employees. Great! Except he was concerned that all her “sharpness” would fall on him as the only report to her! I told him that I actually managed to have a really good working relationship with her and thought that it might not be as problematic if she only had one report to work with.

Anyway, it gave him some food for thought. I tried my best to be honest about the potential drawbacks and also be positive about the potential advantages. Some people in the comments suggested that she doesn’t deserve any kind of management job, but others commented on the possibility of putting her in a position where her strengths could be capitalized on and weaknesses minimized. My position is that I certainly don’t want to scuttle anyone’s career, but I also don’t want her damaging future institutions or employees.

It may be that if she’s hired they could simply be honest about what they heard? e.g. “We heard from various references that you have a history of anger management issues and while we think you’re great and want to offer you the job we need you to understand that that kind of behavior won’t be tolerated here. ABC are the consequences for such behavior.” I haven’t heard of that happening, but who knows.

should you be earning more money? these 3 people want to know.

I figured I’d bundle three somewhat-related salary-related questions into one post. Here we go…

1. Should my promotion come with a higher raise?

Today I accepted a promotion at work after waiting for the formal offer/salary for almost two weeks. The salary is about $5,000 less than I wanted (and I was aiming for $15,000 less than online pay scales state).

The thing is, it’s a decent raise from my current wage: 20%. It is also my first management position. However, I do bring skills that no one else in the company has and have produced work over the past year for which they would normally pay a consultant twice my wage. Am I being greedy in wanting more?

I feel foolish because I didn’t negotiate: the director who called me phrased it as though it was a great salary and I should be happy. I was stressed after waiting to find out the salary for so long (they told me right after my interview that they planned to offer me the job and they advertised for my current position a week ago). I felt like I had no choice but to accept.

They built this role up to sound very high-profile (significant responsibility nationally) and so I expected a salary closer to those I see online. Have I just accepted a much lower wage than this role would normally receive?

I don’t know. But it’s your first management position, so you represent a risk and you’re guaranteed to need to learn on the job, and so it probably makes sense for them to pay you less than they’d be paying a more experienced and tested candidate.

As for salaries you see online … are you talking about salaries that you see in job listings, or salary websites like salary.com? Salary websites, unfortunately, aren’t going to give you very accurate information; they generally don’t account for the fact that job titles frequently represent wildly different scopes of responsibility, or vary significantly by type of company or geography. (You can get a far more accurate idea by simply bouncing figures off of other people in your field, checking with professional organizations in your industry, or talking with recruiters.)

But what’s most useful is knowing what salary you can command on the market — you, with your particular set of skills, experience, and ability to market yourself. That’s very different from what knowing what a huge swatch of people all performing vaguely similar duties with very different skill levels at wildly different companies around the country can command.

2. MBA working as executive assistant, disappointed in raise

I’ve been an executive assistant at a large and prosperous firm for about a year now. Although being an EA wasn’t my original plan, when I graduated from my MBA program and spent many months applying like a madwoman and interviewing to no avail, I decided to take this job because of the security and great benefits.

I’ve ended up loving my job and excelling at it. I frequently have to ask if there is any more help I could offer because I finish my regular tasks quickly. I received shining evaluations from the two executives I work under, and was called in to talk about my “raise” at the end of this year. It was $1,000. I was disappointed because I have received nothing but praise since starting here, and was hired at nearly $10,000 less than what I initially asked for. I figured that after a year of proving myself, they would at least try to meet me in the middle. Now I know that I should have advocated for myself more, but I was in shock at the time and unsure how to react.

I’ve researched and even after my “raise,” my salary is significantly lower than even the low range of EA salaries listed on websites such as glassdoor.com. I have an MBA and finance/accounting experience, and now make even less than I did before I received my graduate degree. I am frustrated because I love my job, my firm, my coworkers and the company culture and don’t want to leave, but I also feel like I have sealed my fate by accepting what I was initially given and then this small cost of living raise. It’s now several months later and I feel it would be awkward to bring it up now. I don’t want to settle for less than I deserve, but I also don’t want to leave. Is it too late?

Well, again, websites like glassdoor or salary.com aren’t going to give you very accurate information. See #1 above. But you could probably get more reliable information by talking with recruiters or people with similar jobs at similarly sized companies in your area.

However, what you definitely don’t want to do is to base your raise request on having an MBA or on what you made before your graduate degree. It needs to be based on the value you bring to the company. Simply having an graduate degree doesn’t generally warrant a higher salary in most fields, particularly in a role that doesn’t require one; salary is about the value of the work you’re doing to the company. Are you using the MBA in significant ways in your role? If not, then you can’t reasonably expect that it will factor in to what you’re paid. (Although if you are using it in significant ways, and if that’s not something generally expected of the person in your role, then it can become part of your case.)

Keep in mind, too, that depending on what percentage it is of your total salary, $1,000 might not be such a paltry raise. The average raise nationally is 3%. I don’t know what you earn, but if you’re earning close to the national average income of $43,000, 3% is $1,290, or pretty close to what you got. Of course, if you’re not an average performer, you deserve more — but it might be useful to know that it’s not the shocking insult that it might have seemed at first.

In any case … It’s not too late to go back and say that you think you’ve earned a larger raise. Here’s some advice on how to make that case. Just make sure that you base it on your value to the company in your current role and what you’ve achieved there.

3. Boss doesn’t care if people leave over money

I have worked in the accounts department of a property management company for 5 years. There are approximately 45 employees. I am happy in my job, most of my coworkers are great, the hours are flexible, and it’s close to home.

My boss is the owner of the business and is very tight when it comes to paying anyone what he should or what they are actually worth. Four years ago, I spoke to him about a raise and questioned whether he does performance reviews because I had been there over a year and nothing had been mentioned. Prior to speaking to the boss, I asked a coworker about the procedure for a review and pay raise, etc. and they told me not to bother, because “the boss doesn’t give raises.” I was really surprised, but I didn’t let it stop me from asking for one anyway. So, when I spoke to the boss and stated my case as to why I deserved a raise, he confirmed he doesn’t do annual reviews, but would consider my request for a raise. A month went by before he told me he had decided to give me the raise, but it was a very small one.

Since then, I haven’t approached him about another raise, but I know I certainly deserve one! Mind you, the company has had quite a few employees leave because they have asked for more money and the boss has knocked them back. He thinks everyone is dispensible, so he doesn’t care if they leave. So, recently, I have been thinking perhaps I should state my case again, but instead of asking in person, should I put it in writing? I’m not sure if it’s going to be worth my while even though I know he doesn’t pay me what he should. I feel stuck inbetween a rock and a hard place — I don’t want to leave my job but I am finding it hard to earn so little. It also makes me feel unappreciated too. I’m not afraid to ask him for a raise in person but I feel like it would be a waste of time. What do you think my next step should be?

There’s no advantage to putting in writing over asking in person. In fact, asking in person is usually the better route, since it allows for an actual conversation.

But, you know, you’ve been there five years. If your boss won’t give you the salary you want, it would make more sense to either move on or accept that you’re staying for reasons of your own (whether it’s liking the work, your coworkers, the flexibility, or whatever). This is what your employer pays for the work you do and it’s up to you whether to accept it or not accept it, but it’s not really fair (or good for your own state of mind) to accept it and then complain that he’s cheap and not paying people what they’re worth.

So either you want to stay under these terms, or you don’t. But trying to have it both ways is going to frustrate you endlessly, and probably won’t get you what you want.

update on the networking group with the high-pressure sales tactics

Remember the reader whose new networking group used high-pressure sales tactics, including requiring members to promote and buy from other members’ businesses and pushing members to get friends to attend their meetings? Here’s her update.

You were right – SCAM!

I joined this so-called “networking group” in mid-October and by early February, members started dropping. In November, we were at 9 people, and although another chapter in our city kept claiming they had 4 or 5 new applications per week (yeah, right), our growth seemed to stagnate. When we were at 5 remaining members, we met with our chapter’s coordinator (a paid position, working for this company) and expressed our concerns. She tried to rev us all up about re-launching the chapter, etc., which frankly seemed like a lot of work for little return.

We questioned her pretty intensely about the future of the chapter and the promises made to all of us when we paid our membership fees, including whether some of us could transfer our membership to the other, supposedly more-successful chapter. She finally got angry and told us that none of us could transfer to the other chapter without paying the membership fee again and that none of us were getting our money back for any reason, “because that’s just not how the company works.”

I spoke to my boss and offered to pay back my membership fee; she said that wasn’t necessary, just find something else that works better. Since I left the group, I have spoken to several other current and former members, and learned a lot about this company and its “founder and CEO” — none of it good, but we did seem to do some bonding during these information-sharing sessions!

It was a good decision to leave, I just wish I had researched it more before I joined — lesson learned. I’m spending more time with the community and volunteer groups I like and with whom I have interests in common — people who already know me and trust me, and are likely to send business my way when they remember I’m around.

terse answer Thursday — 7 short answers to 7 short questions

It’s terse answer Thursday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Manager wants to know if I’m looking for another job — and I am

The company I work for is very small. Salaries are significantly below market rate and turnover is high. I have been in my position for almost two years. The majority of our department has left in the past six months and another employee just recently resigned. My boss is new to the company and is surprised by constant turnover. He just pulled me aside to ask if I was looking as well. I am.

I didn’t answer outright. I was honest that many in my age bracket (entry level up to a few years of experience) don’t stick around long-term because promotions here are awarded based on tenure and not performance (another post altogether but trust that this is true and not speculation). I told him I had doubts about my ability to move up within the company.

He had good reason to ask; he wants me to take on accounts that have been shuffled around to five different people in the last year and doesn’t want to have to reassign them again. It’s worth mentioning that these accounts had not been previously handled by an entry level employee until staff turnover necessitated it. Although he’s new, I do really like him so far and don’t want to mislead him, but how can I handle that without putting my current job in jeopardy? Also, I’ve been looking for several months and am finally getting calls for phone interviews (thanks to your blog!) So I will (hopefully) have to deal with this sooner than later.

Well, first, I’m a big proponent of being transparent with your manager when you’re ready to move on — but only if your manager makes it clear that it’s safe for you to do so. So you’ll have to judge whether or not that’s the case here, and since it sounds like he might be new enough that you don’t know that, it’s fine to err on the side of safety rather than potentially jeopardizing your own job. That doesn’t mean promising him that you’re absolutely not looking, but you can go with a middle-ground answer instead. For instance: “If someone came to me with an opening that gave me opportunities that I don’t have here, I’d have to consider it, but I don’t have any current plans to leave.” And when it does come time to leave — well, things change and people do move on when the right opportunity arises.

2. Should employers offer more flexible interviewing arrangements?

I’m curious to know your thoughts on whether firms should allow for flexible interviewing, like giving candidates the option to request first round video interviews or out of hours interviews at evenings or weekends.

My thought is that employees are typically expected to be at work during a certain time frame (8 to 5, etc), and as such, they should be willing to interview during the company’s standard hours. In all of my years interviewing for jobs, never have I asked to do it after hours. It seems to me that, while yes we would want the candidate to want to work for us, we also want them to work for us, which would mean following the basic rules. I don’t know that I’d necessarily want to hire someone who wants me to bend the rules for him or her, especially in something as simple as interviewing. I’m on board with occasionally having off-times for interviewing if a candidate just can’t get away from their current job, but I’ve always managed to do it. I’m more flummoxed by idea of offering first-round video interviews. If it were an out-of-town candidate, I can see that; it saves money for both company and candidate. But if it’s a local candidate, I fail to see why the candidates can’t be expected to use initiative. Lunch break, using PTO, and so on. Is this more of the bending-over-backwards that the younger generation seems to expect, or is it becoming the new norm?

It depends on the candidate, and it’s important to keep in mind that your job is to hire the best people out there. So for a desirable candidate who I really wanted to recruit, or for a hard-to-fill position, I’d be as flexible as I could and do a first-round interview by phone or Skype (although if we moved forward, I’d want to meet in person), and I’d try to work around their work commitments (especially given that the most desirable candidates are often already employed). But on the other hand, if I’m already skeptical that someone is the right candidate, particularly relative to others, I’m not likely to come in on a Saturday or arrive before breakfast.

I don’t see requests to meet at a non-standard hour as a candidate not following the rules, but rather as a reality of what might be an inflexible work schedule. You don’t have to accommodate the request, but you shouldn’t hold it against them for asking.

3. Translating application materials for a spouse

My husband is applying for some engineering jobs in Spain that specifically emphasize fluent English skills. Spanish is not required, but is mentioned as a plus (among other languages). My husband doesn’t speak Spanish, but I am a Spanish teacher. He asked if I could translate his resume and cover letter so that he could submit them in both English and Spanish. His thinking is that providing the Spanish would be helpful to anyone at the company who doesn’t know English well. I think that not only is it a little presumptuous, but it also might inadvertently misrepresent his language skills. There are no specific instructions for this on the job postings. Who do you think is right? Also, would it be okay to mention in the cover letter that his wife is fluent in Spanish, or is that a taboo topic?

You are right, and your husband is wrong. It would indeed misrepresent his language skills (and if the company needs applications translated, I’m sure they’re prepared to handle that on their own, so it’s not likely to come across as “considerate” but rather as “look, I have Spanish skills”).

He also shouldn’t mention in his cover letter that you’re fluent in Spanish, because it’s not relevant to his qualifications for the job. It will come across as if he thinks it is, and that will be confusing. (Is he implying that you’ll translate things for him if he’s working there? Or just that he has some exposure to Spanish? It’s not clear, but either way, it doesn’t belong on his application.)

4. Managing people older and more experienced than you are

After some company restructuring and a few people leaving, I’m being promoted to a (newly created) supervisor position. I’m one of five writers on our production team, and most of them have been there longer and are ten years older than I am. Our team is fairly tight-knit, and I’m friends with several of them outside of the office. I was hoping you could give some advice on managing a team of people older and more experienced than you, especially when you have worked with them as a peer? I’m not a confrontational person by nature, and I really have to fight “asking” people to do things rather than telling them “this needs to be done.”

Coincidentally, my book co-author Jerry Hauser and I just wrote about this topic over at The Management Center. Rather than repeat it all here, I’m just going to link you to what we said there:
http://managementcenter.org/managing-older-staff

One other thing I’ll add is that you don’t need to be “confrontational” to manage people. You just need to be matter-of-fact about what needs to be done (as opposed to being overly hesitant or overly aggressive) and believe me, your staff will appreciate you being straightforward rather than making them guess what you want. (And speaking of things that I’ve written with The Management Center, chapter 10 of our book — the chapter on exercising authority without being either a wimp or a tyrant — might be really helpful to you.)

5. Am I applying for jobs too early?

I want to get a job (nothing special, probably just data entry), but can’t start until mid-May because of prior commitments. I started applying to jobs yesterday, figuring if anyone called me it’d be in a few weeks or months. But someone called me about one of the jobs this afternoon. I’m assuming that since they’re calling so quickly it means they need someone right away and won’t want to wait until mid-May.

I’m not sure what to do. Am I applying too early for this type of job? Talking on phones is really stressful for me, and now I’m afraid that I’m going to have to keep making phone calls just to find out I can’t be considered because of when I’d be able to start working.

It’s really hard to time this type of thing perfectly. If you wait, you might not have found work by the time May comes around, so it really does make sense to start looking now. But that also means that you might hear from employers who want you to start sooner than you can. And that’s fine — you can simply let them know your timeline and ask if that works on their end. Frankly, it’s not that far off — only seven weeks, and many hiring processes take longer than that … even when they start out moving quickly in the early stages.

6. Leaving a job early to work overseas

I graduated from undergraduate last spring and in November, I was lucky enough to start my first job at an international nonprofit, which was exactly the kind of place I was hoping to work.

Ever since I studied abroad in China, though, I have been itching to go back. I just found out I got into a selective two-year Peace Corps-like teaching fellowship in rural China, which is a dream opportunity that would certainly help my Mandarin language skills, likely relate to potential graduate study, and would allow me to work for a great cause with a solid alumni network. I’m pretty sure I want to accept, and I feel that it would be much more difficult to do something similar in a few years when I am more settled in the US with such luxuries as furniture I didn’t get used off Craig’s List and maybe even a car. (I also have a pile of student debt, but I could defer my loans while I am on the fellowship.) However, I might have to be in China as early as mid July or August for this program, which would mean that I would leave my job after less than a year of being there.

I feel very grateful for my job, and I do not want to let down my supervisor or burn any bridges. The job is definitely administrative and I expect that the basic tasks of the position would remain the same if I stayed on for longer, and I gather I would have to stay at the organization for several years before I would move into any other position. How heavily would leaving my job early weigh in the future?

It’s not the end of the world, and you can do it once. You may or may not burn the bridge with your organization. (Leaving after three months, you almost definitely would; leaving after nine or ten, you’re more likely to get away with it, but they won’t be pleased.)

This is not license for people to take jobs intending to leave them in a short period of time that they know the employer would never have agreed to up-front, because that’s still not okay. This is a bit different though — I assume you didn’t know that you’d get into this program when you applied and otherwise were planning to stay in your job for a while.

7. How important is it that your resume and LinkedIn profile match?

How important is it to have your resume and LinkedIn profile be similar? I understand that LinkedIn can be a platform to highlight more skills and attributes for past/current jobs.

Also, is it important to have your LinkedIn profile open to the public? I am still wary of having personal information on the Internet, let alone my resume. Do you have to list every job on LinkedIn as you do on the resume while searching?

Your resume and LinkedIn don’t need to be identical. In fact, LinkedIn gurus would tell you that what’s appropriate for a resume format isn’t appropriate for LinkedIn, and that if you really want to take advantage of LinkedIn, you should be presenting your information in a format better suited for the site anyway. That said, obviously if your job dates and titles don’t match up, that’s going to be a red flag. But sure, you might choose to mention one job on your resume and not on LinkedIn if you don’t care to highlight it there.

As for making your profile public, you certainly don’t need to, but you’ll really be missing out of the point of LinkedIn if you don’t.

does working for a small company harm your job search?

A reader writes:

Here’s the deal: I work for a small nonprofit. There are currently 10 of us. I like the work I do but am on the lookout for new positions, as the organization is looking to merge with another organization at some point and I might be out of a job then anyway.

I had an interview a few weeks ago and I mentioned offhand that the company is small (I can’t remember the context, but it seemed relevant at the time). The woman I was interviewing with wrote down that there were 10 people in the company, and underlined it many times. I noticed, so I quickly followed up with “even though it’s a small organization, we are a consulting firm so I work with dozens of clients at any given time,” and made a mental note to never mention company size again.

Fast forward to last week, where I was asked by a recruiter what the bonus structure is at my current company, and I said that we don’t have one. He was taken aback by that, so I said “it’s a small nonprofit, so no bonuses,” and he asked how many people there are. I hesitated for a moment before being honest, since it would take about 30 seconds of research to see the staff listings on our website.

So, does size really matter? Am I hurting my chances at getting another job because the company is so small? I’ve worked for very large companies in the past, and can’t really see how a small company would be damaging. I work with the same number of people (probably even more in my current company, since there are fewer people to do the work) and am busier than I have ever been. I’ve been here for 3 years, and would like to move on at some point, but part of me thinks I should push to leave faster, since staying here long term might work against me. Any thoughts?

Size can matter or not, depending on the type of work that you do.

If you’re, say, a therapist working one-on-one with clients, then it probably doesn’t really matter whether you work for a small 10-person practice or a large state agency. The meat of your work is basically the same, regardless (with some exceptions, which I’ll get to in a minute).

On the other hand, if you’re, say, an HR director, then size does matter. Your job is going to be very different if you’re dealing with HR issues for a 15-person company versus a 3,000-person company. You’re going to have more people reporting to you, a larger budget you’re responsible for, a broader and deeper range of issues to handle, and you’re going to be working with more stakeholders, many of whom are very senior themselves. Similarly, managing I.T. for 40 users is very different than managing it for 4,000. Doing media relations for a small trade association is different than doing it for a large and high-profile union. And so forth.

That’s not to say that bigger equals better. It’s just different. If you’ve been at smaller companies, you might know how to thrive in a more agile culture and be comfortable with more flexibility in your role. That can be attractive to an employer. On the other hand, you might chafe at the structure of larger companies, and that can be a concern as well. The reverse is also true: Smaller employers often worry that someone coming from a large, very bureaucratic environment will have trouble adjusting to a fast-paced culture where decisions are made in minutes instead of months and where they’re expected to wear multiple hats. (And actually, this is a reason that company size might be noted even in the therapist example above; even when company size doesn’t affect the actual work you do, an employer might wonder how you’ll adjust to their differently-sized culture and environment — but again, that’s more about cultural adjustment than the actual work you were doing.)

And yes, some interviewers do see “large company” as shorthand for “this person was able to excel in an environment with more competition” and “small company” as shorthand for “this person hasn’t yet been tested in a large, complex environment.” And sometimes that’s accurate, but often it’s not.

Good interviewers will look at what you achieved wherever you were … but — as the examples above show — sometimes the size of where you’re working really does impact the work that you do, and it’s helpful to be realistic about whether that’s the case for you or not.

my new employer is funded by my old employer — and they’re making me still work for them

A reader writes:

I have a significant problem with my former managers that is coming to a boiling point, and I could use some advice how to tread the political waters.

In my former role, I was the technical lead in a project that soured because it fell behind schedule when I had to leave the company for a few months on medical disability. When I returned to my role, my manager tried to cut corners at every turn and harassed me daily for results, but never involved himself or allowed me the resources to train anyone else to assist me. Needless to say, I went looking for and found another job due to the poor working environment, even though I loved the project.

I received a job offer at a nonprofit group supported by my former employer, but my now-current employer made a significant error in publishing my name in a presentation as an employee before I had signed an offer. When my former employer came across this error unbeknownst to me, I was “highly encouraged” to leave in order to stay on good terms. I was not given sufficient time to finish the project or train anyone else, nor were adequate replacements found; i.e. the people offered to cover my roles had no knowledge of the programs the data is stored in. I estimated that I needed a month to finish my work and train a new employee, and I was given 5 days.

Nevertheless, I wanted to make sure that this project was successful, so I set a written agreement with my current manager and my former director that I would spend no more than 5% of my time to assist with questions or remaining work items. Given that I had some time in the first few weeks on the job, I worked more like 20-50% on my former employer’s work to try to reduce further obligations. I cannot get my former manager to agree to compensate me for this time.

I have at least 40 hours left to come to a deliverable for my former employer, but spending any more time on this will prevent me from meeting deadlines at my current job. I could not meet a recent deliverable because I was out with the flu for almost a week, but apparently this isn’t a reasonable excuse to my former manager or former director, as both are now breathing down my neck for me to work on my former project against the terms set in my agreement.

Should I go back and play hardball and require that I be compensated for any further work? Even though I have continued to work for the company in this limited capacity, I lost my annual bonus for last year by being offered the position at the time. Given that the non-profit I work for receives donations from my former employer, I fear that angering these people by requesting a reasonable timeline or compensation will only burn bridges.

I wrote back and asked:

Did your agreement with them spell out compensation terms?

Did it specify an end date?

And what’s your current employer’s stance on you still doing work for the old employer and the possible complications you’re encountering?

Her response:

I asked for a consulting arrangement when I left, and my former director refused at the time. Given that his company funds my nonprofit, he cites that he’s “paying me regardless of what I work on.” However, he said that as long as we remained on good terms, then he would look into a consulting arrangement for large-scale work.

I think he’s being unethical in using his political leverage with my current employer to ask me to work for free (even if it is 5%, but particularly for this large update) but I don’t know how to approach this without burning bridges on both sides.

There is no end-date to the agreement as it was meant to offer limited sales assistance and training if/when the project moved forward.

The major problem is that my current employer does not communicate well. I have informed them of these conflicts and received no response from them — no reply whatsoever. So, I continue to get heated emails from my former employer with no recourse.

I am at my wits end here. I feel as if I have no choice but to hire an employment attorney, but this could really set fire to the situation.

Okay, this is all kinds of messed up.

First of all, you have no obligation to your former employer to work for free. None. Zero. Even if they were paying you — which they aren’t — you wouldn’t be obligated to continue working for them as long as they chose it; you have control over who you work for, for what pay, and for how long.

The problem here is that your current employer is dependent on your old employer for part of their funding, which puts them in a subservient position to your old employer and probably makes them reluctant to make waves. That’s understandable to a point — but only to a point. There’s some point where this has gone far enough that they’re going to need to be willing to take a stand … or they’ll need to be willing to lose you over it, but that would be pretty crappy of them, given that it was their error (publishing your name as an employee before you were) that put you in an awkward position with your old employer to begin with.

Your former employer’s claim that they’re “paying you regardless of what you work on” because they fund your employer is ridiculous. That’s not how grant-giving works. There’s also probably some legal regulation in play here about one nonprofit donating staff time to another (and your organization will need to report it), but I’m just guessing there — and really it’s beside the point anyway.

You have two choices: You can accept the situation and let it continue to play out, for as long as that takes, or you can speak with your current and former employers and insist that this arrangement come to an end. However, because of the funding situation between your current and former employer, you’re going to need to coordinate your actions with your current organization … and if they’re not willing to back you in taking a stand, then you’re out of luck. At that point, you’d need to either accept it or look for another job.

Here’s where I’d start: Talk to your current employer. You say that you’ve tried in the past and have received “no reply whatsoever,” which makes me think these conversations were over email, rather than in person. You need to talk in person. Schedule a meeting — an official one, with whoever has decision-making power in this situation; get it on that person’s calendar. Then sit down with her, and say something like this: “When I left Old Organization, I agreed to continue to help them finish up this project, using up to 5% of my time on it. It has now been X weeks/months, and I’ve spent far more than 5% of my time on it — closer to X%. They have refused to compensate me for this work. At this point, it’s interfering with my ability to do my job here, I’m unhappy with the way Old Organization is pushing me to do more than I’m able and refusing to pay me, and I need to tell them that I’m no longer able to continue working for them. I think this is more than reasonable, and that I’ve done far more than most former employees do when they’ve left an employer. However, I’m sensitive to the relationship between New Organization and Old Organization, and so I want to alert you to what’s going on. I plan to let Old Organization know this week that I can’t continue our arrangement.”

(And by the way, if for some reason you can’t get a meeting with the person you need to talk to, and they stick to their previous “no response” stance, then you should simply put the words above into an email and send it to them. That will give them fair warning of what you intend to do, and they can talk to you about it if they object. Make sure you do give them a few days to respond before you move forward.)

Now, here’s the risk here: Depending on how worried your new employer is about their funding from your old employer, they may tell you to simply consider this work part of your job for them. And then you’re out of luck — because if it’s part of your job for them, you have no real argument to use. You can, of course, ask them to decrease the rest of your work so that you have time for this other project, but that’s the only option you’ll have at that point.

But if that doesn’t happen, then it’s time to talk to your old employer (or email them, so you have it in writing). Let them know that you need to curtail your work on this project due to your other obligations. Hell, mention your health if you want — you said you were out sick recently.

Normally I would say to simply tell them that you’ll transition it over to whichever contact person they designate … but in light of the funding situation, you’re going to need to be more accommodating than that. Instead, you probably need to tell them that you can do X more hours of work over the next X weeks, but no more, in order to give them time to come up with another arrangement. The reason for this is that — as ridiculous as this arrangement is — you actually did agree to it. And while it’s an awful enough arrangement for you that normally you could just pull out without guilt, in this case the fact that your current employer depends on their good will means that you’re going to have to be nicer about it, and not give them the chance to argue that you already agreed to this.

But honestly, what’s most likely to happen is that your current employer is going to direct you to do this work under the auspices of your job for them. But that will at least be better than your current situation.

(I should also add that there’s a small but not inconceivable possibility that your current employer will decide that you taking a hard-line stand on this is more than they want to deal with and will simply decide to part ways with you, so you need to factor that into your thinking as well before you proceed. You mentioned you were considering talking to a lawyer, which you might want to do simply so you understand the lay of the land if indeed that happens. I don’t see any legal issues here so far — and bringing in a lawyer while you’re still working there is guaranteed to ruin your relations with both employers, which will make it hard to continue working there — but a lawyer could potentially advise you in the background, as well as advocate for you if your current employer did decide they wanted to part ways. Which, again, is only a small possibility, but one you should be aware of.)

And here’s to being very, very careful about taking a new job with anyone who’s financially dependent on your old boss.

Read an update to this letter here.

how to check on the status of your job application

When you’re job-searching, waiting to hear back from an employer can be agonizing. Are you still being considered? When should you expect to hear from them, if ever? Is it okay to check in and ask?

While in general, it’s best not to nag employers to respond to you, there are times when it’s okay to check in and see where your application stands. The rules are different, though, depending on whether you’ve simply submitted an application or you’ve been interviewed.

After you submit your application. It can be tempting to contact the employer after you’ve submitted your application and ask where things stand. But while it’s an understandable question, it’s best to resist the temptation to ask, at least for a while. Once you’ve submitted an application, the ball is in the employer’s court. It might take them a while to sort through applications (and they may not even start that process until weeks after you sent yours in), but they’ll get in touch if they want to talk with you.

If you absolutely must follow up at this stage, wait at least two weeks after applying, and then send a short email saying something like this: “I recently applied for your __ position, and I just wanted to reiterate my strong interest. I think it might be a great match, and I’d love to talk with you about it when you’re ready to begin scheduling interviews.” Note that you’re not asking for a response – you’re simply highlighting your interest. That’s because most employers don’t like to field follow-up questions before they’ve even decided if you’re a strong candidate, and it’s not good to annoy employers at this stage.  Note, too, that you should use email for this rather than calling, for the same reason.

If a month has passed and you haven’t heard anything, assume that you’re not being considered and mentally move on. It’s still possible that the employer might contact you, but you’re better off not agonizing about it and instead putting it out of your mind.

After a job interview. The first thing to do is to realize that it may take a while to hear something after your interview, even if you felt like you had momentum. Hiring often takes much longer than applicants expect to it – and even longer than the employers themselves expect, and employers are notorious for leaving applicants hanging after interviews.

The best thing you can do is to end your interview by asking what the employer’s timeline is for next steps. If you do that and that time passes, then you have a perfect opening to follow up with a  quick email, explaining that you remain very interested in the job and asking if they have an updated timeline.

But if you didn’t remember to ask that at the end of your interview, then within a week or two of your last contact, it’s fine to send a short email asking when they’re likely to move forward with next steps.

Keep in mind here that you’re not so much asking for the status of your application as you simply asking about the timeline for next steps. The reason for that is that they might not be able to give you an answer about your “status” – they might be waiting for feedback from other interviewers, or waiting to meet with other candidates, or a decision-maker might be out of town, or the person you’re asking might simply not know. Or, the company might have a policy of not notifying candidates about their status until final decisions have been made. As a result, this type of query can lead to you getting no response, or a response that isn’t useful. So instead, ask about the timeline; that’s a query that’s easier to respond to with information that you’ll find useful.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

wee answer Wednesday — 6 short answers to 6 short questions

It’s wee answer Wednesday — six short answers to six short questions. Here we go…

1. Giving notice when your job has changed

Up until 4 months ago, I loved my job. I was hired for a very specific channel of communication and I was passionate about the work I was doing. I thought I was doing a good job, and I was meeting my benchmarks. But then I was told that since I had been in my role for 2 years (as had my colleagues) that we were to switch responsibilities and I watched my passion and love go to a colleague while I took on a new role. Had the new role been advertised on a job board I would never have applied. I had literally no interest in my new work and unfortunately my poor attitude showed. I take responsibility for showing my disdain and lack of interest in learning my new role. Due to that, during my review I was put on probation/performance review for the end of the year where I struggled with the new role.

I had been looking for a new job ever since the role change. I am very close to receiving an offer, we are working out the details. At the same time I have a review to for my progress in 3 weeks. Do I still give the normal 2 weeks notice? If I am already on probation, is it likely I will get canned immediately? Also, my boss will be away for the next two weeks on assignment. I don’t find it fair to push my start date back for my new employer based on her being out. If it was already planned on her part, can I still give two weeks even if she won’t be in?

Your employer just assigned you to a whole new job because you’d been in your old one for two years and it was “time to rotate”? Did you have any warning that your company operated this way, and have you seen them do this with others? Because that’s bizarre if you didn’t know that was part of the deal when you accepted the job.

In any case, yes, you should still give two weeks notice, because not doing so is generally seen as unprofessional and would give them legitimate reason not to give you a good reference in the future (which hopefully you can still get for your first role there). That said, you should be prepared for them to tell you that there’s no need to work out the full notice period and to leave earlier. But you certainly don’t need to delay giving notice until your manager is back in the office. Call her, or if you can’t do that, give your notice to her manager or HR.

2. Should you list your desired salary when it’s optional?

I just applied for a position at a large, internationally known nonprofit. The competition to work there is intense. On their web application, they have an optional box to fill out your desired salary. I left it blank since it was optional, but now I’m wondering if I cut down my chances to work there. I understand that there are probably many people applying for the position and I may not get an interview based on others being better potential fits. But I do want to know for the future — should I list my desired salary, even if it’s an optional choice?

I wouldn’t list it. If you name a number without having even spoken with them about the job yet, you might potentially under-cut yourself and end up with a salary lower than what you might have obtained if you had waited until you could negotiate later in the process. Or you might be taken out of the running altogether for asking for too much or too little (the latter sometimes signals that you’re at a more junior level than they’re seeking). They made it optional, so I’d treat it as truly optional.

3. Do I have to take my break when my boss tells me?

I arrived to work for a 8-10 hours shift, and my boss said that I have to go on break an hour after I get there. I said to him, “Doesn’t that defeat the purpose of a break?” He said, “It doesn’t matter, go on break.” I said, “I want to take a break when I’m tired a little later when I need one.”

I went on break but am not happy with this as it happens a lot. I was wondering if this was ok. It doesn’t seem right and we don’t like when it happens. I live in upstate NY.

Depending on the time and length of your shifts, you might be in luck. New York’s laws on breaks are a lot more specific than many other states’ break laws. (And many states don’t require breaks at all.) In New York, you have to be offered a 30-minute lunch break between 11 a.m. and 2 p.m. for shifts six hours or longer that extend over that period, and a 45-minute meal break halfway through your shift for shifts more than six hours starting between 1 p.m. and 6 a.m. (If you’re a factory worker, the breaks have to each be 60 minutes.) For shifts that start before 11 a.m. and last later than 7 p.m., you’re also entitled to an additional 20-minute meal break between 5 p.m. and 7 p.m.

That’s pretty unusual though. In most states, your manager can tell you when to take your break, whether that’s when you want to take it or not.

4. Interviewing for your own job during a restructure

Due to the current financial strain at my current employer, our department is to be restructured. We are reducing the number of staff but will be performing the same duties, requiring the same skills. Nothing else will change. How do you approach a competitive interview where you already know the candidates as they are all your work colleagues? They know you equally well. We all have the same strengths and skills. We are all highly qualified with equivalent qualifications. We can all perform the job very, very well and have all been very successful in our careers.

Do you have any advice on how you can be successful in a competitive interview under these circumstances?

Prepare for it just as much as you’d prepare for an outside interview; don’t make the mistake of thinking that because you know the job and the organization well, you don’t need to do much preparation. Spend some time following the advice here on how to prepare for behavioral interviews — you want to do a lot of advance thinking about how you’ve excelled in different types of situations related to the job: how you’ve handled difficult customers, how you’ve taken initiative to solve problems, how you’ve handled a large workload — whatever specific situations are relevant to the job. You want to go in prepared with a bunch of examples of how you’ve done these things awesomely. You also want to think about why you should be one of the people hired — what is it about you that’s fantastic? Figure out how to communicate that as well. And last, you might be asked for your thoughts about internal matters that you know about first-hand (related the company’s operations, challenges, etc.), so come prepared to talk knowledgeably (to the extent possible) about those types of things as well. Good luck!

5. Why didn’t this hiring manager get back to me after I was personally referred and she said she’d schedule an interview?

Last month, I applied for an opening that I’m highly qualified for. I have experience working on the organization’s issue and I meet both the general and preferred qualifications. The hiring nonprofit also happens to be a coalition partner of the nonprofit I recently interned for. Three people from the organization I interned for recommended me to the hiring manager — the president, a department director who is also my former supervisor, and a mutual contact. The mutual contact also introduced me to the hiring manager at an event we both attended. When we spoke, she asked me to send a follow-up email. She said she would review my application materials and schedule an interview.

I followed up that same day. Five weeks have passed and I haven’t received a call or email. I haven’t followed up again because I don’t want to seem pushy. What should I do and what do you believe is going on?

She’s disorganized, or she decided to move forward with other candidates instead, or the job is on hold, or all kinds of other possibilities. It’s not being pushy to send a follow-up when you’ve been personally referred to a job or when the hiring manager told you she’d be in touch to schedule an interview. Both of these things are true here, so you have double reason to not feel pushy. Follow up right now, today, with an email telling her that you’d still love to talk if the position is still open and she thinks you’d be a strong candidate.

6. Can employer forbid me from drinking water until my break?

Is it legal for my boss to tell me that I cannot drink water until my break? I work in a factory that gets extremely hot, and recently my boss implemented a rule that we can’t drink anything until we go on break. We already have people passing out from the heat and several other questionable rules.

OSHA worker safety regulations require that employers to maintain safe working conditions, including access to drinkable water. However, OSHA makes determinations in this area on a case-by-case basis, rather than having one blanket rule. A receptionist in an air-conditioned office with regular breaks may not need to drink water at her desk, and in most cases employers could legally prohibit it. On the other hand, in a hot factory without frequent breaks, OSHA would probably require that you be allowed more frequent access to water. (Although that’s strictly a guess on my part; a lawyer could tell you more definitively.)

One complication: OSHA regulations also require that employees NOT be allowed to have beverages in an area where they could be contaminated with toxic or infectious materials, so if that’s your manager’s concern, it would make more sense. (Although then OSHA would presumably require that you be given more frequent breaks to drink water, given the heat.)