getting to know your coworkers when you can’t hang out after work

A reader writes:

I just started a new job a few months ago at a great company — it’s a well funded start-up, and I’m really excited about the opportunity. The only issue is that most of my colleagues are in their early to mid-20’s, live in the city where the office is located, and hang out together frequently — go to the gym, go out for drinks after work, etc. On the other hand, I am in my mid-30’s, married, with young children, and live about an hour-and-a-half away from the city by a very-limited bus and ferry schedule, and thus really need to bolt out the door right at 5 pm so I can be home by 7.

I’d like to find some way to bond with my colleagues, and get to know them on a more personal level. Any suggestions?

Ask people to have lunch with you, or to grab coffee.

Also, be an awesome coworker — helpful, responsive, and good at your job. That goes a long way.

And if you can swing it with the limited bus and ferry schedule, you could go to the occasional happy hour — not every month, but maybe once or twice a year.

But beyond that, I wouldn’t worry too much about joining in this social extravaganza. Yes, it does help to have good relationships with colleagues, and getting to know people in a more relaxed environment can help with that — it’s generally easier, after all, to feel cheerful instead of resentful about fielding someone’s last-minute, could-have-been-avoided-with-better-planning request for help when you’ve shared a beer with them and discussed your mutual crush on Kit Harington than if you only know them as the guy down the hall who always wears khakis. But the reality is that you’re at a different stage of life than most of your coworkers, your interests are probably going to be somewhat different, and you can accomplish a perfectly reasonable amount of coworker bonding through the stuff above, without feeling like you need to leave your spouse home with your kids while you do shots (or bench press, or whatever) with your coworkers.

Anyone want to advise differently?

dealing with a coworker who hoards all the work

A reader writes:

I perform the same job functions as a couple other people in my office. There’s one person who consistently does more work than the rest of us combined. She works late into the night, sometimes late into the next day, she gives up most of her weekends and always makes sure we know how stressed and busy she is and how much she’s working.

My problem? I want to do work, too! I like to be busy. But she hoards almost all of it. I’ve asked her for stuff when she complains about how stressed she is, but she says she has trouble delegating.

I also have let my boss know that I’m low on work, and I have also let her know that I am free and available and eager to take on others’ work to lighten their loads. Nothing really changes, though.

The part that kills me is that the hoarding colleague gets all of the praise for sending emails at 3 a.m. on Saturday or for the very long hours she works and her incredible rate of output. I don’t even have enough work on my plate to put in those kinds of hours. And frankly, it also seems like she’s being rewarded for something that is completely unnecessary. She’s working such long hours because she won’t pass off work that others could tackle for her. It’s starting to make me feel both angry and not very valued here. I go home having little to show for my days sometimes.

At this point, my boss is risking losing two people: one of us will burn out, and the other will leave out of boredom.

Is there anything you could suggest I do? Or is this just one of those things that won’t change? Maybe I need to start looking elsewhere? I’m tired of spending my days surfing the internet and trolling the office for tasks while my colleague drowns under a mountain of work and gets praised for it, while I feel like a useless slacker.

I should also add that I am good at my job and knows that my boss thinks so, too. This isn’t because I’m seen as incompetent (at least, to my knowledge!). This colleague has just been here longer and has a far deeper understanding of this place. I’m very happy here otherwise, but if this continues, I feel like I may need to think about other options.

Talk to your coworker, and if that doesn’t work, talk to your boss.

To start, you need to lay out the problem more directly for your coworker than you already have. Don’t just ask for work when she’s complaining about being stressed — that makes it sound like you’re offering to help her with a problem she has, and that it’s up to her whether she wants help or not. Instead, you need to make it clear that this is a problem for you — and that’s the crucial distinction.

Schedule a meeting with her — and possibly with the other people performing the same function as you two, depending on where they stand on this — and say that you’d like to discuss a better system for dividing workload. Then, be explicit. Say something like, “I do not currently have enough work to keep me busy, and it’s very frustrating to me. I need more work to do. At the same time, Jane, I see that you’re very busy. Since we’re all charged with performing the same work, we need a better system to divide workload so that it’s more evenly spread between us.”

If she resists, say, “My job is the same as yours, and yet our workloads are very different. And while I understand that you prefer to do this work yourself, I need to take some of it on, both because it is my job to do so and because it is my strong preference to have a fuller plate.” (And frankly, if you’re willing to, you might consider adding in that you’re at the point where it’s affecting your satisfaction with your job, because you are and it might be helpful for her to hear that.)

Come to this meeting prepared to suggest a new way of dividing up work. For instance: “My thought is that I can take everything related to A, B, and C, while you handle D, E, and F.” Or if the nature of your work doesn’t lend itself to that, “Let’s meet at the start of each week and figure out how to evenly divide that week’s projects.” Or just simply, “I’d like to start handling A, B, and C.” Or whatever — just come prepared with a proposal and share it.

If she argues with your proposal, then say, “Okay. What division would you prefer?”

If she absolutely won’t come around, then you say, “Okay. I think we should talk with (manager) about this and see if we can figure out a better solution.”

Then you talk with your manager. And you should be fairly candid about the fact that you’re frustrated with this, and that you’ve tried to solve it to no avail. That’s something your boss needs to know. After that conversation, you should have a better idea of whether this is going to change or not.

One other thing, though — it sounds like there’s a dynamic where you’re asking your coworker to share work with you, and she’s talking about not wanting to delegate it to you. But if you’re equals, how is she getting all this power over the work to begin with? How is it hers to delegate or not?  I don’t know what type of work you do and how it’s assigned, but it’s worth looking at how it’s all ending up with her in the first place. If someone else is assigning it directly to her, that’s an issue to tackle too. Or if it’s up for grabs but she gets to it first, you may need to change your habits in that area. It’s hard to say without knowing how the work is generated in the first place, but don’t neglect this piece of the issue.

Good luck.

Read an update to this letter here.

you’re probably irritating your employees

If you’re like most managers, chances are good that you have at least some habits that irritate your employees. And if you’re like most managers, you might not realize what they are.

Over at the Fast Track blog by Intuit QuickBase today, I talk about 10 of the most common ways that managers frustrate and annoy their employees — including changing your mind about projects when they’re partway through, not dealing with problem employees, complaining about your own boss to the people below you, and more. See if you recognize yourself (or your own manager) in the list, which you can read here.

tiny answer Tuesday — 7 short answers to 7 short questions

It’s tiny answer Tuesday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. What to wear for a Skype interview

I had my first Skype interview on Saturday. I got an email on Friday saying the position I applied for was a “hot” position and they wanted to know if I could interview on Saturday morning. I’d never done it before, but said yes. I set it up and did makeup and hair and put on a nice blouse (yoga pants on the bottom) and did the interview from my dining room table in a very quiet environment. The interviewer was in an office and in a suit. It went okay, but it was a bit awkward for me, mostly because it was my first time using Skype. Also, the job is in fundraising for a nonprofit (fairly casual unless dealing with donors in person, more casual than not). Are you expected to be in full-on interview attire for a last-minute Skype interview, especially on a Saturday morning? It felt like a test (more so than most interviews are), but maybe I am being paranoid.

Well, all interviews are tests, by definition — but yes, generally you should wear full-on interview attire for a Skype interview, regardless of when it takes place. Basically, if you agree to interview, you agree to the full interview enchilada, even if it’s on a Saturday morning, unless they tell you otherwise in advance.

Not wearing a suit jacket isn’t likely to be a deal-breaker though.

2. Employee calls out sick due to self-inflicted sickness

We have an employee who has a diagnosed chronic illness which is manageable by diet, lifestyle, and medication. However, the employee misses work being out sick to the point where they are being docked pay. The real issue is when the employee shares any “stories” from their weekend (and then missing half a day the following Monday for sickness), it is evident that they are making diet and lifestyle choices that are leading directly to them missing work, as well as not taking any medication (or improperly taking it) to alleviate the symptoms. I know it sounds harsh and no one doubts the existence of the illness, but it seems the real problem is the employee’s attitude towards their well-being. Any suggestions?

Stop judging her reasons for being out as either legitimate or self-inflicted. It’s irrelevant, and it’s not really your place to judge. Your employee’s attitude toward her own well-being isn’t your business. What you need to do instead is to focus on whether the employee is sufficiently reliable and at work enough of the time. She could have the most sympathetic reasons in the world or the least sympathetic, but ultimately the question is whether she’s there reliably or not.

Respond to is the overall picture — she’s there enough or she’s not; she’s reliable enough or she’s not — and don’t get hung up on the reasons.

3. Can my employer make me train a new employee?

I am a front desk representative at a hotel. I’ve been working here for about 7 months. I was told to start training a new front desk representative. I have no experience on training, and quite frankly, it’s stressful. Is it legal to get an employee to train new employees rather than a manager doing this? Or are we at least in the right to get some type of bonus from doing this?

It’s perfectly legal. Employers can assign employees any tasks they want, with the exception of work that’s government regulated, like performing surgery on someone or writing a prescription. And not only is it legal, it’s pretty common to be asked to train coworkers. You don’t typically get paid extra for it; it’s part of the job.

4. Manager sleeps on the job and gave me a bad review

I have been in the corporate world for 12 years — 5 with my current employer — and have always received solid, if not stellar, reviews. This past week, in my annual review, I was given a “partially meets” review and was stunned as it does not reflect the work I’ve done. My manager even said that as he was giving the review! HR has changed requirements so that everyone on a team can’t receive “meets” or “exceeds” even if they do. I understand that, but I am having a really hard time with this especially as I had been told all year what a good job I was doing.

Compounding the problem is the fact that my manager sleeps at his desk every single day! I am always answering the emails and phone calls I get when employees can’t reach him, in addition to my work. It’s a running joke on our team (his boss doesn’t know he does this) but it’s very hard for me to not be resentful of this review in light of the fact that he is literally asleep on the job. (No, he does not have a medical condition.) How do I act professionally and not let this review ruin my career? Right now I am angry, sad, etc. because I know I do good work. And do I report his sleeping to any higher-ups? I don’t want it to look like revenge for my review, but I also have been tired of it for a while and feel like this was the last straw.

You have a manager who sleeps on the job every day and an HR department that directs your manager to give you misleading feedback on your performance review. You’ve been there 5 years, more than enough time to put it before it’ll look like you left too quickly. Rather than trying to find a way to feel good about the situation, why don’t you look for a job somewhere better managed?

5. Where on your resume should you include references?

I graduated from college almost a year ago. My career advisor told me to keep my resume to one page (which I saw you also recommend to recent grads). She said I can put references on a second page, which I’ve done. Is that acceptable, or should the references be included on one page? If a second page with references is okay, can I submit the two together (they’re in the same document), or should I keep them as separate files?

Keep your references on a separate page from your resume. Your resume shouldn’t include references at all; they should be provided only when an employer specifically requests them. That’s partly because you want to know when your references are going to be contacted so you can give them a heads-up, and partly because it can look a little naive to send them along with your resume if they weren’t requested.

6. Company asked me for an interview but then never responded again

Almost exactly a month ago, I applied for a position and received an email back from the hiring manager expressing an interest in having me come into the office and meet her and the rest of her team for an interview. She emailed me on a Thursday afternoon, asking me for my availability for the following week. I politely and enthusiastically responded (without being obsequious) giving her a few dates and times I was available in the following week.

Then I never heard back from her. At all. Not a peep. I sent her a follow-up email about a week later, reiterating my interest in the position and giving her a few more potential dates/times in the week following. Nothing in response then, either.

WHAT GIVES?! Well, no, that’s a silly question that you’ve covered ad nauseam on your website: sometimes people are just unfathomably rude/sometimes people just get super busy/sometimes people are disorganized. Or any combination of, or all three. That said, I’m wondering if it wouldn’t be worthwhile to follow up one more time before officially writing this position (and company) off. If so, how do I word my email? I don’t want to come across as grovel-y and desperate, but I also don’t want to seem snotty or demanding, either (not matter how irritated I am about them vanishing without a word). What do you think?

Well, you’ve got nothing to lose by trying one more time, as long as you’re not going to be devastated if you once again don’t hear back. You could certainly say something like, “You reached out to me about interviewing for the X position on February X. I’d still love to talk with you if you’re still interviewing. I’m attaching my materials again for you reference, and hope to hear from you.”

7. Explaining why I’m leaving my job over pay

I have been with my company since 2009, starting out as HR assistant and subsequently promoted in 2011 to HR director. I knew at the time of my promotion that I was accepting a low-end salary for the position because I was still completing my degree and had only two years of HR experience (I later discovered through an archived company email that I was getting paid $10,000 less than the low end of the pay scale — that was depressing). Because of these shortfalls, I accepted the salary in 2011 and have since received two “exceptional” evaluations in the position with consistent good feedback from my boss. However, as I am coming across student loans and some other personal expenses that were not present a few years ago, I am barely making ends meet with my salary. Even though my pay did increase slightly with the completion of the degree, it does not even cover half the cost of my monthly student loans.

Aside from the pay issue, I am happy in my position, but I am beginning to apply to jobs in the hopes of a better financial future. Unfortunately, my company is experiencing tight budget constraints, so I am sure they could not match any reasonable offers out there. What should I say to potential employers during the interview when asked why I am leaving my current job? I do not want to come across as just looking for a fatter paycheck (it’s just necessary to pay the bills now!). I am not sure how to frame my reasoning for leaving that sounds positive to employers.

“My company is facing a difficult budget situation right now, so I want to explore other options.” Don’t get into any of the other details.

update from the reader whose interviewer asked her to rate the interview on a scale of 1-10

Remember the recent letter-writer whose interviewer wanted her to rate the interview on a scale of 1-10? Here’s her update.

I just wanted to write to give you a quick update on what happened following the interview.

HR called me today to inform me that they would not be pursuing my candidacy any further. The lady was very gracious and told me that the primary reason was that they had reservations regarding my communication skills. I asked her if she could give me any details or examples as this would be extremely helpful to improving myself, and she said that the director had been concerned that I did not respond to his question on the rating and thought it might be an indication of certain gaps there.

I was quite surprised, especially when she wondered why I was not able to give an answer. I told her when I’d responded (that I thought it was for him to rate me, etc), and it eventually turned out that the director had wanted to know how I thought I’d done with respect to the objectives that I’d had prior to the interview (i.e., did I feel I had accomplished what I’d wanted in the interview). Needless to say, I wish he’d actually said those missing words, or that I’d thought of that angle (I didn’t…the only context that jumped to mind was him wanting to know my rating of my own performance). It would have made such a difference!

I’m of course disappointed about how things turned out, but I’ll use this as a learning experience for my next interviews and hopefully things will go much better next time!

The only thing you should learn from this experience is that people who seem like jackasses generally are.

And there are two of them here: the interviewer who asked you an unclear and fairly useless question in the first place and then rejected you for not answering it in the way he wanted, and the HR person who thought this was legitimate enough feedback to pass along.

(And to recap: It wouldn’t have been unreasonable for him to ask you for your thoughts on the job and your fit for it at the end of the conversation, but he asked you a question that was unclear, unlikely to provide useful information, guaranteed to make most candidates uncomfortable, and that put you on the spot. And he refused to answer the same question when you asked it back to him.)

Not all feedback is useful, and there’s a danger in drawing lessons from experiences like this. If you heard that your interviewer rejected you because you wore a blue tie, you wouldn’t conclude that you should avoid blue ties from now on; you’d conclude that that person was ridiculous and you wouldn’t want to work with them anyway. The same applies here.

my company promised me benefits that I haven’t been allowed to use

A reader writes:

I’ve worked at my current job for 14 months. There are 17 people in my division: 4 managers, 4 admin assistants, and the rest are professional staff. I am professional staff.

It goes without saying that it is the job of the admin assistants to cover the phones during office hours. However, years before I started here, the managers decided that the admin assistants, as the lowest paid in the office, should have the additional benefit of leaving between 3:30 and 4:30, when the office does not close until 5. The reasoning is because they have families to care for and long commutes and need the additional time. I have no problem with this part of the arrangement.

I was not hired to answer phones…at all. I’m an analyst. I work with numbers, not people, and I like it that way. I also have no skill for customer service. Knowing this, I asked during my interview if I would need to answer phones. I was told no. Also during the interview, I asked if I would be able to work from home 2 days a week. I was told yes. I was also told I would have flexible work hours. I did not get this in writing, but none of the three people I interviewed with are disputing my claim.

Flash forward to my first day of work: I was told by my manager that I need to temporarily cover the phones from 4:30-5 until they could hire someone to take over. So, I have to cover phones and my “flexible work hours” must cover 4:30-5, which I wasn’t planning on. I also can’t work from home, but that was because of policy that says all teleworking employees must have one year of service.

I’ve been covering the phones all this time and I finally have my year of service, so I decide to revisit the issue with my supervisor. All I’m getting is “this isn’t a good time for that.” He’s not wrong. Everyone is strapped for time and resources. But from my point of view: I left my previous job solely for those three benefits. My pay is the same. My work is the same. I wanted greater flexibility with my time and to never need to talk on the phone as part of my job again.

What should I do? I’ve told my manager that I’m unhappy with the arrangement and that I expect a timeline on when I can use these benefits that I was guaranteed in my pre-employment period. Other than this, I like where I work and who I work with.

Grrrr.

Despite the fact that they probably didn’t intend to pull a bait and switch on you, that’s what they’ve ended up doing. They lured you into switching jobs with promises that they’re not keeping. It’s really unfair — and it’s also not good management, because organizations need a staff that believes managers will keep their word. Moreover, getting a reputation for making promises during hiring that they don’t keep once you’re actually working there will impact their ability to attract good candidates in the future.

In any case, the basic steps in a situation like this are to: (1) explicitly say that you were made promises that aren’t being met, (2) see how the organization responds, and (3) decide how much of a deal-breaker it is to you if it doesn’t change.

I can’t tell from your letter how much of #1 you’ve done so far. You’ve met with your manager and asked to stop covering the phones, but have you been explicit with your manager about the fact that you were promised these benefits before taking the job, that you left your previous job specifically for these three benefits (this is key to say), and that you haven’t been allowed to use them in the year since starting? If you haven’t spelled that out, it’s an essential part of addressing this now. You’d want to say something like, “I specifically asked about these areas before being hired, and I left a previous job that I was happy with in large part because of these three benefits, which I was promised. Everyone agrees that I was indeed promised these things; that’s not in dispute. I appreciate that there’s no easy solution for this and so I’ve been flexible in helping out in this area. But it’s been a full year now, and I’d like someone else to cover these areas, so that the company can honor the original agreement it made with me.”

From there, though, it’s up to your manager to decide whether to act ethically or not. If he refuses to change anything, then you’ll need to decide whether this is a deal-breaker for you or not.

order lunch for your office without hassle

And now a break to talk about a sponsor…

Food plays a big role in the workplace – from catering for client meetings and employee events to group lunches and meals for people working late, food is on an awful lot of our minds at work. But if you’re ever charged with managing these food orders, you’re well aware of what a pain it can be to keep track of who needs their food vegan, who always wants extra pepperoni, and who doesn’t like anything from the deli and always wants sushi instead … as well as processing invoices, chasing down budget codes, and filling out expense reports. At some point you’ve probably thought to yourself that there should be an easier way to manage it all.

Enter Seamless. With a corporate account from Seamless, all of your office food ordering hassles are about to end. Seamless streamlines the entire process with online ordering, access to hundreds of local caterers and restaurants, easy capture of all billing and budget codes, complete enforcement of all your budgets and rules …. and you get only a single invoice for all orders, no many orders and no matter how many separate people are ordering.

The group ordering option is basically the holy grail of office food management: You can send your coworkers a link to use and let them place their own orders without involving you at all. All the orders get aggregated and sent to the restaurant, and then they arrive all at the same time, individually labeled and bagged.

And it’s all done online, so you don’t have to talk to anyone. Which is ideal if you’re like me and hate the phone. And you can log in whenever you want to run expenditure reports, etc. — again, without ever having to talk to anyone.

It. Is. Awesome.

You can use Seamless for catering, group orders, individual meals, and more. And businesses that use Seamless say that they save up to 30% in food ordering costs because it streamlines the whole process.  (They even have a savings calculator here if you’re skeptical.)

I’ve used Seamless for a couple of years now, and it’s on my list of Top Services That I Love. Seriously, get started right now.

Disclosure: This post was sponsored by Seamless. All thoughts and opinions related to Seamless are my own.

how to keep your sanity when you’re job searching

Searching for a job, especially when you’re unemployed, is one of the most stressful and anxiety-producing experiences adults face. Here are eight ways to keep your sanity during your search.

1. Don’t obsess over one particular job. If you tend to agonize about particular jobs – did they like you? when will you hear something back? – stop it! The best thing for your state of mind is to move on mentally after sending off your application or having an interview. There’s nothing to be gained by obsessing and waiting and wondering. Instead, move on. Pretend you were already rejected, or that you never applied. If the employer calls you, great. If they don’t, you’ve already moved on anyway. And there’s nothing to be gained from stressing yourself out waiting.

2. Stop trying to read “signals” into what interviewers do and don’t say. Job seekers often try to read between the lines of all sorts of things: If the interviewer didn’t say they’d be in touch, does it mean you didn’t get the job? They sent back a nice response to your thank-you note; does that mean your chances are good? Most of these “signals” don’t mean anything at all, and looking for meaning in them can drive you crazy.

3. Don’t feel you have to give perfect interviews. If you play over every interview in your head and kick yourself for not giving better answers – or if you’re terrified before interviews because you might mess up – know that interviewers don’t expect you to be perfect. In fact, there’s no such thing as a “perfect” interviewee, and your competition isn’t giving perfect interviews either. You’re not a professional job interviewee, and employers don’t expect you to be. They know you’re human. And they are too.

4. Don’t agonize over why you didn’t get a job. There’s generally no way to know from the outside why you didn’t get hired. Sure, maybe they hated your interview answers, but more likely, someone else was simply a better candidate. Or they hired the CEO’s niece, or promoted someone internally, or canceled the position altogether. There’s no way to know, and you’ll drive yourself crazy trying to figure it out.

5. Don’t stress over things that don’t matterThe way you name your resume file, the fact that you can’t find the hiring manager’s name to put on your cover letter, whether you wear the grey suit or the navy one – these things don’t matter. Focus on the substance: using your resume, cover letter, and interview to show that you’d excel at the job.

6. Remember that interviews aren’t a one-way street. People get anxious when job searching because feel like they’re being judged – and worse, judged by employers who holds all the cards because they have something that the job-seeker really wants (a job). You can combat that by changing the power dynamics in your own head – by remembering that you may not want to work for this particular employer, for all you know, and that part of the point of the hiring process is to allow you to collect your own information and decide if you even want this job or these coworkers.

7. Focus on things other than your job hunt. Give yourself a break from thinking about jobs and do something fun or relaxing. Take a walk, read a book, see a movie, cook dinner with friends, or whatever lets you stop thinking about your search – and especially about unemployment. And if you find yourself feeling bitter or depressed, that’s a sign to close that resume file and go do something else until you can return to it more refreshed.

8. Know that it may take a while. Job searches these days can take a very long time, so don’t freak out if you don’t find a job right away. While you should obviously make sure that your application materials are as strong as they could be, don’t assume that a few months of searching without a job offer means you’re doomed to unemployment forever. Do plan for a longer search, and know that it’s normal for it to take longer than it did in the past.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

mini answer Monday — 7 short answers to 7 short questions

It’s mini answer Monday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Do I have to disclose my relationship with a student?

I recently started a new job at my alma mater, working in a business school (part of a large university) after having graduated 1 year ago and worked a first job elsewhere.

Before applying for the job (but after graduating), I was involved intimately with an undergrad student who started the program a couple years behind me and whom I originally met while I was still enrolled as an undergrad. I have continued to be involved with her since. I am now fully in my role working for the school, and the undergrad student and I are dating.

My role is in a business development capacity with graduate level programs, meaning I am not a professor, instructor, grader, or even working with the program in which she is enrolled. I am still involved in unofficial and informal capacities with undergrad aspects as an alumnus (coaching, mentorship, informal advice to those involved in the programs which I was involved in – this includes working with the student in question). I am curious if I have any obligations to report this relationship to HR or the union which represents me. Or even worse, if this could get me in trouble.

Normally I’d say to ask your manager or HR, but since you have a union, ask them. Universities are notoriously squicky about relationships with students. In your role, it may not be an issue, but given that you’re in a university setting, you’re far better off disclosing it up-front than being confronted about it later on.

2. Does this mean I didn’t get the job?

I went on an interview today, and I thought it went well. I got a business card at the end and felt very comfortable with the interviewer. However, when I asked what the timeline was for hiring, she mentioned that the interview process is going to take a while because she wanted to give all the great candidates a chance, but that she would be in contact with me. Does this mean I didn’t get the job?

Nope. It means that they have other candidates who they’re interviewing and it’s going to take a while. Take it at face value. Take all of it at face value — the feeling comfortable and getting the business card doesn’t mean anything either.

3. Are these application directions non-negotiable?

I generally send my resume as a PDF, because I’ve found that some computers and/or versions of Word tend to screw up my formatting. Generally, this isn’t a problem, but I found a job posting that I am very interested in, and they mention that they want a “Word resume.” From an HR perspective, would that be non-negotiable? Would this be one of those “applicant can’t follow directions” things, and should I rework my entire formatting to make sure that it works no matter what?

Yes. If they’re asking for it in Word, you give it to them in Word. Or you get discarded for not following directions.

4. Should I give my company feedback about their management?

For the last 4-5 years, I’ve received a .2% average raise (accounting for inflation). After benefits, I’m actually making less than I did in 2008. Last year I was written up for offering some constructive criticism of leadership’s vision and given no raise. I have tenaciously studied leadership for the last few years while accomplishing all my normal duties (and doing an awesome job at it). I’ve applied elsewhere, but the competition for leadership positions seems to be very high. I am not willing to risk my income to offer feedback that is perceived as unwarranted, unnecessary, and “won’t be tolerated.” I could write a lot more, but it is enough to say that the culture where I work is quite toxic and I honestly wish I could work to change this. Do I dare bring up more conflict or should I continue sticking my head in the sand?

They’ve made it very clear that they’re not interested in hearing it, and that they’re willing to penalize you for offering it. There’s no upside to going out on a limb on this (other than that it might feel good on principle, but it will feel less good if it jeopardizes your job).

For what it’s worth, studying leadership (by which I’m guessing you mean, at least in part, management) is no substitute for actually leading and managing, and in general companies aren’t thrilled to be told that they’re doing it wrong by people without experience running companies themselves. That’s in no way intended to defend your company’s actions, because it’s ridiculous to respond to feedback the way they did, but it’s worth factoring into the way you’re looking at this, overall.

5. Coworker is rude and dismissive when she reviews my work

I have a colleague who used to be my supervising manager and is no longer. Her role still dictates that she review my work and provide feedback, but I am now directly supervised by her supervisor (the president/owner of our small company).

When I present my work, ask questions, explain how I came to solutions,etc., she is often extremely disrespectful — texting or talking on her phone, yawning, looking at the clock, interrupting me and/or answering me as though my questions/comments/etc. were poorly conceived or downright stupid. After almost two years of this, I have lost confidence in my work, in my ability to articulate information and in my respectability as a professional and as a human. My supervisor’s solution is for me to “toughen up” and ignore her, but I’m not sure I can continue doing that. Should I try to have a conversation with her about how disrespectful and hurtful her actions are? Is there another possible solution?

Keep hurt feelings out of it. Instead, you could say, “I get the sense that you’re frustrated when we speak, especially when I ask questions. You often seem in a rush to end our meetings. Is there something you’d like me to be doing differently?”

She might tell you something you didn’t know (like “you take an hour with this stuff when I can only allot 15 minutes for it” or “you don’t seem to pay attention to feedback I gave you in the past, requiring me to repeat it again”), or she might be jolted into realizing she needs to behave differently. Or not — she might continue totally unchanged. She might just be a jerk.

The thing is, though, you don’t have any control over her; you only have control over how you respond to her. Do you really want to give random jerks the power to make you feel this horrible? That brings us back to your boss’s advice, which I think is meant to tell you that you’re taking her behavior way, way too personally. I know it’s unpleasant to deal with someone like this, but it’s about her, not you. Because someone professional and not-a-jerk wouldn’t treat you that way, no matter what you were doing to provoke it. Therefore, it’s not about you.

Sometimes we end up working with jerks; you’re giving this one too much power over how you feel about yourself.

6. When a company keeps interviewing but not hiring

What is happening when companies go all the way through first and second stage interviews but then change recruiters and start the process all over again? I have gone through the second stages and twice now there has been silence, then the job has been re-advertised with new recruiters (with no changes). I am then always the first to get a call for the role from the new recruiter as I have some fairly niche skills that are an exact match.

All second stage candidates are being rejected, so I am not losing out to someone with a better fit, and while racking my brains what I could have got so badly wrong, I just can’t see it — and due to the silence there is no feedback to go on. I know that some interviews do turn out just to be fishing expeditions, or the jobs get pulled, but that doesn’t feel like the case here.

Is it possible I am unknowingly doing something at the second stage that is so awful I am wiped off the map? I am not new to the interview process, and this is the first time I have come across this. It seems perversely picky, as the jobs remain unfilled, with all candidates rejected.

Sure, it’s possibly that you’re not interviewing well, but it’s also possible that the company simply doesn’t think any of the candidates that have been presented to them are quite what they’re looking for. Some positions are hard to fill for various reasons — either the job requires some tricky combination of skills, or they really care about culture fit and are going to be picky for that reason, or the manager is hard to work for and they’re looking for a personality match … or sometimes they’re just very picky. There’s no real benefit to speculating since you can’t know for sure. You’re better off just moving on.

7. Turning down a coworker

One of my colleagues asked me out on Facebook via a private message, and I avoided the question. What makes this problem worse is I secretly like another one of the coworkers! And I am not attracted to the one that has asked me out. The workplace is a very close family-like environment. My normal comeback is “sorry, I’m taken,” but on this occasion it won’t work, as I like the other guy. How do I let the one that has asked me out down without making it uncomfortable to return to work with him? And if I let the one I like know, what can I say to the one that has asked me out without making work become awkward?

First of all, “avoiding the question” is unkind. You need to straightforwardly say no to this guy. And”sorry, I’m taken” isn’t ever a good response because it implies that you’d be open to dating the person if you weren’t committed elsewhere. “No, thank you” is the response I’m looking for … following by “I’m sorry, but I’m not interested in dating you” if he persists.

But I’d reconsider whether you should be dating anyone you work with if it’s a “close, family-like environment,” because that will be uncomfortable if things don’t go well.

short answer Sunday — 7 short answers to 7 short questions

Ugh, it’s the dreadful Daylight Savings! How I despise it, with its end to winter and all that is cozy and wonderful.

In any case, it’s also short answer Sunday, and so we have seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. When a company encourages applications without specific openings

What do you do when a company doesn’t advertise actual job openings on their website? They simply say “Think you’d be a good fit? Apply here!” and it opens a blank email for you. How do I apply to something I don’t even know exists?

You write a cover letter based around the type of work you do, and why you do it well. What type of opening would you want to see them have? That’s the one that you write your cover letter about.

2. Do I have to tell my manager the reason for my doctor’s appointment?

I have a . . . shall we say, “lady problem.” I assumed/hoped it was the kind of lady problem that could be resolved with an over-the-counter treatment, but since it hasn’t gone away and an at-home screening kit showed a potential issue, I may have to see a doctor to resolve it. Not sure yet, I’ll keep an eye on it over the weekend, but if the problem’s still there on Monday I’d like to see a doctor ASAP.

Of course, this isn’t something I want to tell my manager about, since my manager is a guy. Heck, my team lead is a woman and I don’t even think I want to tell her. But I’m afraid if I don’t disclose the reason they’ll think I’m up to something (or that I’m dealing with something much worse and possibly reprehensible), or that I was just faking. Is there a way I can remain vague without raising suspicions? Or should I just come out and tell my manager the reason?

There’s absolutely no need to tell your manager the reason! Person medical things are no one’s business. You can just say, “I have a medical thing that I need to deal with right away, so I need to leave early this afternoon for a doctor’s appointment.” Your manager isn’t going to think you’re “up to something” unless you have a pattern of last-minute absences or unless he’s bizarrely paranoid (in which case, you have bigger issues to deal with).

3. Unexpected reference call for a peer

I was called out of the blue by a recruiter asking me to give a reference for someone who I’ve worked with as a peer. We aren’t close, but we have done a few things socially in the past. The problem is, she was let go from my current company over a year ago for poor performance. I was not her supervisor or in any kind of position to comment on her work, so I really have no idea what she expects me to say as a reference. (And no, she did not give me any kind of a heads-up that she was using my name either!)

I feel somewhat indebted to her, however, because she referred me to my current position. We trained together for a job about three years ago. She seemed competent and intelligent and, as I said, we did go to a few social things together. But after the training we went to different departments and a year later she accepted a position at my current company. When my company had a position open, she thought of me and passed my résumé along to the hiring manager. About a month after I was hired, she was let go. I’m not even sure on the specifics because I was not working closely on her accounts, but I know it was performance related.

I pretty much told the recruiter that I was her peer, not in a position to comment on her work, but she was a reliable person and I did enjoy working with her. I did not mention that she was let go. What else could I have said in this situation? And how can I politely ask her not to use me as a reference in the future? I don’t want to damage the relationship or connection, but the situation made me very uncomfortable!

I think you handled it well. Saying that you were a peer and not in a position to evaluate her right is exactly the right thing to do.

Some people do put down references without alerting those people, and some people do use peer references (although they really shouldn’t — reference-checkers want to talk to managers, and when I see peers on a reference list without managers, it raises a red flag). But you can certainly steer her away from doing it again. Say something like this: “I don’t feel like I can give a useful reference, since we only worked together for a month and I wasn’t in a position to evaluate your work.”

4. Explaining why I don’t want a management job anymore

About a year ago, I was promoted to a supervisor role, which I have since realized is not a good fit for me. As a result, I’m looking to return to a senior analyst role, but I am finding a lot of resistance from prospective employers. In a recent interview for a position that was eerily similar to the position I had before becoming a supervisor, I told them I was looking to return to a role that allowed me to use my analytical skills and that I truly enjoyed that type of work more. But I could tell the hiring manager was worried I may up and leave, as there were no future opportunities in the department, and I think that is why I didn’t get the job, even though HR said my references were great. How can I make it clear in an interview that I have no management aspirations, at least not in the near future, without it sounding negative? Is there a good way to say you feel more comfortable as a worker bee rather than a supervisor?

You have to be straightforward about your reasons, and you have to be convincing. Interviewers are programmed to suspect that you’re just saying that because you need a job, so you need to be believable. Explain whatever it is that you prefer about non-management roles, and be persuasive. For instance, “The whole time I was managing, I was constantly thinking about how much I wanted to get back to an individual contributor level, which is where I’m more comfortable. I’m really excited about this job because ____, and I’d be thrilled to stay in a role like that for a long time.”

5. Correcting executives’ grammar when proofreading

I am a veteran administrative assistant with years of experience supporting executives at all organizational levels. The one thing they seem to have in common is a preference for using the reflexive pronoun “myself” when “me” would be correct (i.e., “Please feel free to contact Jane, Tim, or myself if you have further questions”). At times, with supervisors with whom I am particularly comfortable, I have made the edits and let them know that in similar cases that they should use “me” instead of “myself” (with a brief explanation of the grammar rule), and am generally ignored. Complicating the issue is that many people seem to think that “myself” is the correct pronoun, so when they see “me” used in memoranda and/or email, they assume it to be a mistake. This drives me bonkers. Is it worth trying to explain the rule to a superior while editing and revising documents and/or communications? Can you recommend a tactful (and perhaps more successful) way of framing the conversation, or would it be best to not die on the reflexive pronoun hill?

Stop trying to educate them. Make the correction when you’re proofreading something, but don’t bother with the explanation. Unless you think they’re going to change it back because they’ll think YOU’RE wrong, in which case I’d put a note in the margin, but you should be as un-schoolteacher as possible about it. Don’t deliver a lecture on the rule. Just say something like, “I know people think ‘myself’ is correct, but it’s actually ‘me’!” … and that’s only to ward off the likelihood of them thinking you’re mistaken and changing it back if you don’t explain.

But as for educating them in general? Not the hill to die on.

6. Help, I’ve been put on a PIP!

I work in a company and recently got a bad review from my manager. He mentioned that I will be put on a performance improvement plan (PIP), and also suggested that I find another position. This comes out of the blue, and he has been acting regularly or even nicely in the past few months.

He said this is the decision from both him and HR. When I talked to HR, the HR manger was reluctant to explain the policies and rules to me, and now I feel that everyone around me seems to know about it and act differently. I am actively looking for a job but I just need some time. What is my best strategy now?

Try as hard as you can to meet the terms of the PIP (it should spell out specifically what improvements you need to make), and if you’re unclear about its terms or how this works, you can ask HR to explain it to you again, and they should. But more importantly, be actively looking for another job — because often once you’re put on a PIP, the writing is on the wall and you’re likely to be let go at the end of it.

If you think that’s a foregone conclusion, you could also try saying to your boss, “I think it will take me X months to find a job. Would you be willing to give me that long?” Sometimes managers will agree to that because it’s emotionally easier than firing you (and often cheaper too, if it means the company isn’t paying severance and unemployment).

7. Closing early on Fridays

The president of our company often allows all salaried employees to leave early on Friday. This is normally announced by email at 1 pm or later.

Our normal ours are 7 – 4 or 8 – 5 (with an hour lunch). If it’s not announced till 4, this means some people do not get the free hour, while others get to go home early, although just by an hour.

Is this okay by law? Where some get the hour and some don’t? If an employee had previously posted 8 hours of PTO, should they get their 1 hour returned to them, or is all this based on the discretion of the company? The president of the company has that right to close shop early, right?

Yes, there’s nothing illegal about this. It’s true that the people who work the earlier schedule are missing out on the free hour on the days that the office closes early … but that’s how early closings work. They might look at part of the package that comes with choosing the earlier schedule.

And PTO is up to the company’s discretion, so they can make any rules they want on that. But really, this is an awful lot of clock-watching for exempt employees (assuming you’re exempt, which is sounds like). If people complain, their best bet is to appreciate that the company occasionally closes early, not resent it when they don’t benefit from it, and accept that sometimes they might have a day off scheduled that day and will miss out. They might miss out on a free lunch that day too, or doughnuts in the morning. This stuff happens.