fast answer Friday — seven short answers to seven short questions

It’s fast answer Friday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Mentioning money when asked where you’d like to be in a year

I’m a program coordinator at a prestigious university and have held my position for a little over seven months. My question is this: when a self-evaluation questionnaire asks you where you’d like to be in a year, is it okay to mention that you’d like a raise in addition to the greater responsibility that you of course hope to be taking on?

It’s not really the place for it. They’re asking where you’d like to be in terms of your job and career, not financially. If you do end up taking on more responsibility, you can certainly talk about money as part of that, but that’s not what this questionnaire is asking about.

2. Manager isn’t enforcing the rules on account stealing

I have a situation at work that has happened repeatedly and my boss has not yet enforced the rules within the organization. The rules are as follows — if there is a note in our sales database that another salesperson is currently pursuing the account, then no other salesperson can contact them for at least one year since the last follow-up activity. I have a coworker who repeatedly pursues my current large potential leads, and when I go to the boss for back-up, he does not do anything. I play by the rules because this is a small business and the other sales rep who I mentioned (who pursues my prospects) is married to the VP of Operations. Any suggestions on how I could encourage my boss to stand up for me?

All you can really do is ask. Point out that the company has clear rules on this that aren’t being followed — to your detriment — and ask for help in addressing it.

3. I don’t want my resume to be in Word

I work in a very technical, non-Microsoft field (Unix mostly), and as such I prepare my resume using the skills I know best. The end result of my resume is either plain text, HTML, or a PDF. The style is typically clean and easy to read. However, I’ve noticed two things in my job search — recruiters often demand I put my resume in a Word document (which I can never seem to make look as good), and many online applications use text boxes that make it hard to format the content in any meaningful way (like using simple bullet points).

Of course, content is king, and I spend most of my time worrying about what I write and not how it looks, but I do wonder: when my resume gets delivered to a hiring manager and has been filtered to the point of looking ugly, does that hurt my chances of gaining an interview?

If it’s hard to read or quickly skim, sure. But there’s no reason for that to be the case in Word or text. Keep a plain text version of your resume (using asterisks instead of bullet points, for instance) so that you have something you can easily copy and paste from for online applications. And as for recruiters, they want it in Word because they often strip out your contact information before passing it on to hiring managers — because they “own” your candidacy and don’t want employers contacting you directly (or they may not get paid for connecting you).

4. Should I resend my resume in a PDF?

I have been sending my resume out as a word document, and just realized I should probably be sending as a PDF. Can I resend the resume as a PDF to jobs I’ve already sent it to as a .doc? Should I forget it and move on?

Forget it and move on. Sending it in Word isn’t a horrible thing — plenty of people submit their resumes in Word — and you’ll annoy employers by sending it a second time.

5. Explaining frequent moves as a military spouse

I married very young to a man in the military with about a year of college and limited professional experience. Somehow I managed to get a nice professional gig for 2-1/2 years. Then the moving started … needless to say, I have had 6 different positions in the past 7 years. I completed my degree in 2011, moved a fourth time back to my hometown, got a great job, and got a divorce. Unfortunately, I have been advised that my great job (it’s state government, been here for a year) is being eliminated and I will need to find a new position by May.

For the past two months, I have been editing my resume, submitting short cover letters, and applying my heart out. I’m getting NO response…not even a nibble. I don’t think telling potential employers I am recently divorced (and therefore wont be moving/leaving any positions) is good protocol. Do I have a scarlet letter on my forehead because of my many positions and frequent moves? How do I explain this so I can even get a call?

Say it right up front in your cover letter, because otherwise employers will assume you’re simply a job hopper. You don’t need to get into the divorce, but you can certainly say, “For the last seven years, I’ve been a military spouse and thus had to move frequently. That’s now behind me; I’ve settled down for good in ___ and am looking forward to finding a job that I can stay at for a significant period of time.”

(At the same time, though, make sure the problem isn’t one of the more typical problems with resumes and cover letters. Read this.)

6. Asking for feedback after starting a new job

I started a new job (part-time, temporary) a bit less than a month ago. I love the organization I work for and really want to see this job turn into a full-time position by being as awesome an employee as possible. In doing so, I want to ask my new manager for feedback on how I’m doing so far, but I don’t know when would be long enough to have worked with me for her reliably critique my work. The position is only 15 hours/week and is slated to end in August. I would ideally like to meet with her a few times to discuss this, but am wondering when the first meeting should be. Three months in? Longer? What’s you’re take on this?

Ask now. It’s entirely reasonable to ask after a few weeks how you’re doing and if there’s anything you should focus on doing differently or better.

7. Where have you found jobs?

I was thinking perhaps your readers would like to share where they have found jobs (I am so over craigslist and indeed) so am curious if others have come across additional sites to share.

Sure, I’ll throw this out to readers. One tip from me: Most fields have niche job sites (Idealist for nonprofits, PRSA for communications, Roll Call for politics, Chronicle of Philanthropy for foundations and fundraisers, and so forth), so you should try a search for the name of your field plus the word “jobs.”

stop freaking out over Yahoo’s teleworking announcement

Jeez, Internet, stop freaking out over over Yahoo’s announcement that they’re ending their work-at-home policy and asking everyone to work in the office. Here’s why:

1. It’s reasonable to change a policy that’s not working, and this one wasn’t working. Look, I love teleworking policies when they’re done right, but the media is full of reports that Yahoo employees had been abusing their policy for years. One Business Insider article reports a source told them that Yahoo has a huge number of people in multiple divisions who work remotely full-time and aren’t at all productive. In some cases, they’re so unproductive that “nobody knew they were still at Yahoo.”

CEO Marissa Mayer was brought in to turn a struggling company around. If a policy isn’t working for the company, it’s reasonable that she’d tackle it. And she presumably knows far more about the situation there than the many hysterical not-employed-by-Yahoo people on the Internet who feel qualified to judge.

2. Yahoo’s new policy doesn’t even prohibit teleworking. Despite all the Internet’s hand-wringing, the new policy allows the occasional teleworking day as needed, just not as a full-time arrangement.

3. This isn’t going to end telework as you know it. Companies are going to continue to do what they find benefits them. If teleworking helps their staff be more productive and helps them attract and retain high performers, they’re not going to end that just because Yahoo changed a policy. What’s more, Business Insider’s source notes that the type of arrangements that Yahoo is ending have never been common at other Silicon Valley companies like Google or Facebook anyway.

4. The Internet’s focus on Marissa Mayer in this story is sexist and gross. Much of the commentary is focusing on the decision coming from Mayer: She’s a woman!  She betrayed working moms!  Um, what about all the working dad CEOs, who I guess aren’t expected to be able to understand? (Plus, no responsible company lets you work at home full-time without having separate child care anyway, so this really isn’t about working parents at all and is just a bizarre non sequitur because look, the CEO has ovaries!)

And it’s not exactly a feminist viewpoint to assess Mayer’s decisions as a woman first and a CEO second. So thanks for that, Internet.

I’m being asked to apply for the job I’ve already been doing

A reader writes:

I work for medium-sized specialty manufactuer. I started just over one year ago. The position for which I was hired was a bit of step back in pay and responsibility, but I took it wanting to get back into corporate marketing after being in the nonprofit arena for over 15 years. I like my job and hoped the responsibility level would grow.

I was part of a team of 2.5 — myself, my manager and her manager who oversaw two departments (hence the .5). After being hired, I was told that my manager was pregnant and would be going on maternity leave in six months. She was very organized and prepped me, but only to the extent of things I would need to cover during her leave. Two weeks before she left, her boss left to take another position. So after six months with the company, I became the only person in the department.

Well, fast forward six months, my manager decided to stay home with her baby and I am still doing all of the work for no additional pay, to very good reviews based on my new manager’s feedback. I have been told I am professional, a team player, and produce quality projects.

They finally have posted my manager’s position, which I had to “apply to.” I am more than qualified based on the posting, with 20 years experience and a degree in marketing and an MBA. I then found out that it is company policy to post externally as well as internally. It is out on LinkedIn and Monster and in this economy, I am sure they will have tons of applicants.

Frankly, I do not know what I will do if they actually hire someone from the outside in above me. Would they expect me to train them? Any advice on how to handle would be great.

Well, first, stop being insulted that they’re advertising the position. They have a responsibility to ensure that they’re hiring the best candidate possible, which means looking at a larger pool of candidates than just one person.

And … well, it’s possible that they will find someone who’s a better fit for the job. And if that happens, it would be silly of them to be obligated to turn that person away out of appreciation to you for filling in the past six months. They owe you appreciation, certainly, and probably a salary bump when raise time comes around (in recognition of your value in being able to fill in when needed), but they do not owe you a promotion if someone else is a better candidate.

It’s easy to think, “I’ve been doing the work of 2.5 people and doing it well, so this is unfair.” But it’s pretty unlikely that you’ve really been doing the work of 2.5 people. You’ve been keeping a 2.5-person department going with only one, yes, but that usually means that the work output changes during that time. While the key things for those jobs are getting covered, they’re generally not getting covered in the same way that they would if the positions were fully staffed. You’re doing as much as you’re able to do, but if you’re juggling three things, you’re necessarily giving each less attention than if you were juggling one.

That’s in no way meant to take away from the work that you’ve been doing. My point, rather, is that it’s not useful to think, “But I’ve been doing all of these jobs.” You’ve been doing one restructured position during a period where they needed you to pinch-hit. And they absolutely should appreciate  and recognize you for that … but it doesn’t automatically entitle you to the manager position now that they’re ready to fill it.

It does entitle you to serious consideration from them as they consider who to hire for the manager job, and they should give you that. But if they ultimately end up hiring a candidate who they think will get them better results, that’s fair and you’ll want to be prepared for that.

And yes, that would probably mean that you’ll be expected to take on some of that person’s training. That’s not too unusual; when a new manager comes in, she usually relies on her new team to help her learn the pieces of her job that they can teach. Again, it’s not an insult; it’s how businesses work.

If that happens, I’d recommend trying to objectively understand why the person was hired, and giving her a chance to see whether she’s someone you can happily work with. If you decide she’s not, you can always look elsewhere.

But don’t be insulted. It’s not insulting; it’s just the way this stuff works.

interviewer asked me to rate my interview on a scale of 1 to 10

A reader writes:

So, I had a second-round interview this morning with the finance director (the hiring manager’s manager) of a multinational company. I have a pretty dynamic and open personality and I think this came through during the interview, especially since we had a rather free-flowing, back-and-forth type interview and I felt that we had rapport. Anyway, towards the end of the meeting, the director asked me, “How would you rate your interview on a scale of 1 to 10?”

I’ve never been asked this question before, and that threw me a little. I answered that I thought it was for him to rate me instead, and I tried to turn the question back to him. He declined to answer saying no, no, he’s the one asking the question, and when he pressed, I told him I thought my interview was not perfect, but certainly not the worst.

After we’d wrapped up and he was seeing me out, I mentioned that I would be really interested to know his answer. He laughed and said then that I should call him.

What are your thoughts on this? Should I be reading any significance into it, and did I shoot myself in the foot with my answer? In this case, I thought the interview was overall quite good even if I know I could have worded some answers much better. But I was hesitant to say “7” because I didn’t know how it would be interpreted.

Should I really call/email him to get his interview rating? I do not have any of his contact information and would have to call HR in order to obtain it.

Your interviewer was an ass.

It wouldn’t have been unreasonable for him to ask you for your thoughts on the job and your fit for it at the end of the conversation, based on the new information you’d learned. But asking you to numerically rate the interview itself serves no purpose, other than to illustrate that he has no idea how to interview and is probably a bit of a buffoon.

Don’t contact him to “get his interview rating.” If you want the job, you can certainly follow up with him or the hiring manager to reiterate your interest and ask about the timeline for next steps, but don’t revive this ridiculous rating game.

Ask a Manager is a finalist for the 2013 Bloggie Awards

The Bloggie Awards announced their final nominees just a few days ago, and Ask a Manager is nominated in the Best Topical Blog category. (Thanks to everyone who nominated me!)

Unlike a lot of award lists, this one is actually a Big Thing, and I’d love to have your vote.

Would you take a minute to vote here? Thanks!

(Note that after you vote, you’ll receive an email message with a link that you need to click on in order for your vote to be submitted.)

terse answer Thursday — 7 short answers to 7 short questions

It’s terse answer Thursday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Alerting other employers when you’ve received an offer

I was wondering about what to do with other job possibilities in various stages after one receives an offer. I have been unemployed for a few months, but all of a sudden things have really picked up, and I have scheduled a bunch of interviews within the last two weeks. One of my potential employers has moved forward with reference checking and wants me to start as early as next week after they work out payment logistics and draw up an offer letter. In the meantime, I have 3 other interviews scheduled this week. Of course I don’t want to complete my job search until I have something in writing, but I don’t want to string anyone along either — one interview is a second round, and they sound very excited about me as well. Do I go to all of my interviews this week, knowing that the other company is moving forward, or do I cancel? Whenever I end up withdrawing my applications, how do I do this gracefully?

Yep, go on all your other interviews and continue your job search exactly the way you would if this weren’t happening. First, offers fall through all the time, and you should never count on one. But second, it’s possible that they’ll make you an offer for far less than you’d accept or that you won’t be able to come to terms on something else. Keep up your job search until you have an offer — and not just an offer, but an offer that you’ve accepted.

Once that happens, only at that point should you alert other companies that you’ve accepted a position and thus are withdrawing from consideration with them. (You can do that with a short email.)

2. Telling employers that you’re not seeking rapid advancement

I have been working for about 8 years, and in that time I’ve realized that I am much more of a “work to live” person as opposed to the “live to work” type. I am an asset to my company — I’m hard-working, dependable, conscientious and have a great rapport with coworkers and clients. I recently earned a masters degree. But I dread the “Where do you see yourself in 5 years?” question, both from my boss and potential future employers. To be honest, I’m content with a stable, somewhat challenging job that offers cost-of-living salary increases. I am not interested in being in my boss’ position someday or getting rich and powerful. I am not inclined towards a high-pressure job (or one with more pressure and responsibility than the one I’m in now). But I sense that employers view this with suspicion if not disdain.

I am looking for new employment and find that many employers want to hire workers who seek rapid career advancement. I really don’t know how to present myself out there (or “in here”). I don’t want to lie because I don’t want to be groomed for a more advanced position but I also don’t want to be rejected for appearing apathetic or lazy. So far I’ve mostly been skipping the openings that blatantly mention the rapid-advancement thing but it’s still an issue in my current job and I expect it would be in interviews and future jobs. Can you offer any advice or insight?

If you just want a job, any job, then yeah, you could skip saying this, so that you avoid being screened out by the hiring managers who might not like it. But if you want a job where you’ll be happy and have a good fit, then be candid about it. Plenty of managers will be happy to find someone who feels like you do — and screening for them will ensure that you’ll find a job you’re comfortable in, rather than one that expects you to be someone you’re not.

3. Should I complain about this HR person?

I interviewed for a Fortune 500 company and was told I would hear back by Friday of that week if I got the job or not. When I heard nothing, I called back the following Monday and was told they were still deciding and I should hear back from them either later on that day or the following Tuesday morning. Interesting enough, that Tuesday morning, I got a letter from that same exact person dated Thursday of the week before I did not get the job, so basically I was lied to by that HR person when I called Monday knowing last week they typed that letter to me. Should I complain about this to her superiors as this is unethical?

Uh, no. She gave you wrong information. Maybe it was a mistake, maybe she couldn’t remember off the top of her head who you were and just guessed, or maybe she didn’t feel like rejecting you on the phone. Regardless of the reason, this isn’t a big deal. If you complain about it, you’ll only succeed in being marked as a high-maintenance crazy person and never getting considered by that company again.

4. Listing year-long travel on a resume

A friend of mine is updating his resume as part of an ongoing job search, and we can’t agree on how to put a positive spin on a one-year gap he has.

A while back, he was unemployed for a long period of time. Sick of staying home, he decided he would take this time off to grab his backpack and see the world. In a year, he visited 19 countries across six continents. He calls the experience in his resume “Project Management” because he was on a budget, carried out all sorts of negotiations across cultures and language barriers, bought and sold vehicles along the way, worked with local government agencies, dealt with medical emergencies in rural parts of the world, etc. I feel that the term “Project Management” is misleading because people expect it to mean something completely different, but I might be wrong.

How would you suggest that he present this on his resume? Should this fall under the “Other Experience” section? How do you even call this?

This isn’t “project management.” If I saw that on a resume, I’d be turned off — because it would seem like the person was either trying to spin me in a really disingenuous way, or like they had no idea what project management actually entails.

This might be something he could talk about in his cover letter or list in another section on his resume, but it sure as hell shouldn’t be called “project management.”

5. Including college acceptance letters on your resume, long after you’ve graduated

I’ve just started my first hiring job, and I’ve come across a couple of resumes that list college and high school GPAs. One even listed all the scholarships she won to colleges that she did not attend, even including “Harvard acceptance letter.” Is that normal to list GPAs ? It’s completely unrelated to the job post, and most of these candidates are at least 4 years out of school.

High school GPAs don’t belong on a resume after your freshman year of college. College GPAs should come off if you graduated more than five years ago. And acceptances to schools you didn’t attend never belong there, unless you’re trying to proclaim “I’m pretentious and a little naive.”

6. Current employer asked for my resume

I’ve been in my current position for 6 months as of tomorrow. Last Friday, my boss’ boss asked if he could have a copy of my updated resume. I sent it to him Monday morning, but felt it to be weird to ask him why he needed it, so I ended up not asking. Is this common? I have never been asked to provide an up-to-date resume when not job hunting before. Googling showed that this is common for contractors, but I’m not a contractor; I work in a library. Any insight into the mind of manager for this scenario would be appreciated.

It’s not uncommon. It can be used for grant applications, professional bios, and all sorts of other things. Why not just say you’re curious what it’s for and ask him?

7. Will shoplifting harm my future job prospects?

A few weeks ago, I was caught shoplifting at a store. They banned me from that store for the next 5 years and I’ll be paying a fine. This is the stupidest thing I’ve ever done in my life, and I don’t know why I did it…why I almost ruined my future over some stupid merchandise. I regret it, but I realize I’m so so so so lucky because cops weren’t called, and this coupled with other things has made me seriously consider going into counselling for my issues.

Could this affect my future job prospects? Even though cops weren’t called, my social security number was taken. Would it come up in a background check? I’m currently unemployed but actively searching and I’m worried if this may follow me around.

Nope. If police weren’t called, you’re not in any system but the store’s own system (if that). If you didn’t have police contact, there’s no central database where this kind of thing can be accessed, even with your social security number.

should I apologize to my boss for crying in front of her?

A reader writes:

I cried in front of my boss during our one-on-one weekly meeting yesterday. I got some feedback on what I need to do to improve and was told I’m not where she wants me yet after two weeks of fairly neutral feedback but a growing sense that I was stressing her out.

I haven’t had this type of feedback very often in my past, since I’m usually good at my job, but it has happened. I’ve never cried before though. I’ve just gotten quiet, nodded, taken notes and thought about it on my own later. I asked follow-up questions at another time if need be.

But yesterday, I just started crying and couldn’t stop. I think it was almost relief just to know what they want of me, combined with a bit of surprise and fear. I know I should have excused myself or bit my lip. I feel like she was kind, but it is still an awkward position to put someone in and I don’t want it to reflect badly on me in the future (if at all possible).

Considering I don’t have a time machine, should I apologize to my boss or would she probably be just as happy to pretend the tears never happened?

I’d send her a quick email saying, “Despite my reaction yesterday, I want you to know that I really appreciate your giving me that feedback, and it’s incredibly helpful to me to know where I should be focusing on improving. I’m a bit mortified that I got emotional about it, and hope that you’ll excuse it (and ideally wipe it from your mind forever!).”

The danger with crying during feedback conversations, of course, is that it can make your manager think that you have trouble hearing and accepting critical feedback. It can make her more hesitant to give you feedback in the future, and it can make her worry that you’re too thin-skinned to talk about where you could be doing better (which is a pretty normal part of work life and one that you have to be able to do, painful or not).

So by assuring her that you do in fact really appreciate the feedback, you’re addressing much of that. And by giving her a concise “ack, that was embarrassing and I’m sorry about that,” you’re signaling that it’s not a typical reaction for you, or a reaction that you don’t realize might have made her uncomfortable.

Don’t dwell on it, though. Quick email, and be done with it.

(And I say this as someone who has seriously considered getting tear duct surgery, if such a thing exists, because my eyes well up far too easily — life insurance commercials, weddings of fake people in movies, and all sorts of other things will set me off. It is quite ridiculous.)

wee answer Wednesday — 6 short answers to 6 short questions

It’s wee answer Wednesday — six short answers to six short questions. Here we go…

1. Asking to come back to an interview question

I’ve always been told (and told others-eek!) that if you can”t answer a behaviorally related question (“Can you think of a time when you’ve XYZ”) immediately, it’s perfectly fine to ask to come back to this question. My mother is very strong on this and has been in charge of hiring for her organization for several years, and I also do recruitment as part of several of my roles, and prefer this to a flubbed answer, but as I think you have said before, it’s all about how the applicant handles it.

However, I recently interviewed for another position that I appeared to be well qualified for, and when the company finally contacted me back to advise I was unsuccessful, the feedback was that this made the interviewer uncomfortable: she found it “highly unusual” and “sometimes you just have to give it a go.” I was extremely surprised to hear this, as during the interview I said “I’d really love to give you a work related example so could I take a second to get back to you on that one,” and then I voluntarily came back to the question and gave what I thought was a really good answer which demonstrated my performance and success in a similar role.

I’d be very interested to know your thoughts — have I had bad advice, or is this interviewer just a weird anomaly? The only other thing I could think of was that I came across as “pushy” by choosing when I wanted to ask the question, but I did ask reeeeally nicely!

Weird anomaly. If you don’t have an answer on the spot, it doesn’t make sense to make the interviewer sit there for five minutes while you try to come up with one. What you did is perfectly fine, as long as (a) you really do come back to the question on your own, and (b) you don’t do this when the question is one you should have been prepared for (like questions about why you’d excel in the role or what you’re looking for in your next job).

2. Do employers have to provide the same benefits to all employees?

Are employers legally obligated to provide the same basic benefits to all employees? Can employees be selectively denied benefits (such as health insurance, paid time off, or education assistance) that are available to other employees? What if the other employees work in a different position or department?

Employers can offer different benefits to different classes of employees, such as: part-time and full-time employees, employees working in different geographic locations, employees with different dates of hire or lengths of employment, and exempt employees and non-exempt employees. They can’t treat employees differently based on any protected class, like race, religion, or sex, of course — but differences like the ones I described in the first sentence are pretty common.

3. My boss is having an affair with my estranged wife

My small, high-skill company has few formal policies. A year ago, they allowed my best friend of 24 years to hire me as a direct subordinate. As my boss, he’s been an excellent manager, and our productivity and work quality have impressed the executives. As my best friend, he naturally became well acquainted with my common-law wife from the day I met her 7 years ago. When she packed her bags last month, my life became agony. I sure felt lucky that my boss could tolerate my low (zero) productivity, and that my friend stood at my side as adviser and confidant.

Three weeks after she left, my friend/boss comes to my home to confess that they had been dating for a week. During that week, he used my outpouring of personal confidences to formulate advise that served his purpose of getting me out of his way. He admitted that he deliberated carefully. A potential wife for him at the cost of (1) throwing his best friend under a bus at the height of the most heart-wrenching pain of my life, (2) losing a valuable corporate asset (me), which would lead to my immediate homelessness. Mind you, there had been no prior personal friction that might explain his betrayal. He simply, out of the blue, decided that dating this fine woman made all these consequences palatable. This is not the man I knew for 24 years. I don’t know who he is anymore.

But job opportunities in my specialty are precious few these days, and I have no savings. On the other hand, my productivity is still abysmal with no foreseeable improvement. My ability to conduct business under this man’s supervision has been broken in a way that may not be fixable. How can I keep my job? Should I? (Really, living in a shelter could be no worse than this.) What would a (higher) manager do if this unfolded in a lower part of the hierarchy? Has misconduct occurred? Abuse of an employee? Living this ongoing nightmare day-by-day is beyond my endurance. But what can I do except endure?

How terrible. I’m so sorry. It’s possible that your company would consider this misconduct by your boss, although I’m not sure that that will really help you in any tangible way if they do. I think your best bet is to start job searching, and move to a new job as soon as possible. Good luck.

4. Required to take time off for lunch

I work in Massachusetts as a temp, and was wondering if I can be required by my boss to take time off for lunch. The email I recently received (after having my hours cut due to lower work volume in the office) said, “Please take a 30 minute lunch if you work over 5 hours. It needs to be shown on your timesheet.” My (limited) understanding was that I’m entitled to lunch if I work over 6 hours, but that I need to be compensated if I agree to work through lunch and remain on the premises.

However, I’m wondering if mandating unpaid lunches falls under the “these are the conditions of employment, take it or leave it” category. What are your thoughts?

Yes, you can be required to take an unpaid lunch break. You’re correct that your state law requires a break to be offered if you work more than 6 hours, but it doesn’t prevent an employer from requiring a break earlier than that, or requiring additional breaks.

5. Listing classes on LinkedIn

LinkedIn keeps asking me to list my classes taken at university, high school and independently. Is there value in having those listed? I have a number of independent courses and two college degrees, so they are asking for a rather large time investment to put all those in. Do you think employers want to see every class you’ve taken? Just the ones related to your degree or the job you’re applying for? Or should I not even bother?

Don’t bother. With the exception of a very small number of fields, employers don’t care. (And even in those few exceptions, no one cares about high school. No one.)

6. Male coworker seems to be hitting on me

There is a very social male coworker in my office. I, on the other hand, am an extremely shy introvert. Since he joined the company he visits me at least once a day. He also visits other coworkers, but his visits with me consist of asking about my weekends or how work is going. He also compliments me on my outfits, compliments I’ve not heard him give to other coworkers. The compliments aren’t inappropriate or anything — just “you look great in red” or “your hair looks nice.” I’ve always thanked him and then changed the topic or went back to my work.

Two months ago, he started to put his hands on my shoulders. Having this happen, much less having to confront him was mortifying. After the third time I pulled away and made it clear that it wasn’t appropriate. After that, I *thought* he got the picture that we could be friendly with professional boundaries. On Valentines, I found a very nice box of chocolates and two pink roses on my desk. It is an open environment, so everyone in the office noticed (much to my embarrassment). He confessed to leaving them. I thanked him and then changed the subject. See how much I like to avoid rather than addressing it?

Last Friday he emailed me an invitation for a lunch meeting for this Friday. The meeting is to discuss some freelance work (something I said I was interested in before the chocolate and flowers incident). Everyone I’ve asked thinks he has an ulterior motive for the lunch — that the offer for freelance work is just a way to get me to go to lunch and he’s really testing the waters. Would you recommend that I go to the lunch? Or would it be best to politely withdraw? If I do go, should I prepare for the possibility of him asking me out or am I just over thinking it?

You can certainly go to the lunch, but go with the full knowledge that he’s going to see it as an opportunity to advance his romantic agenda with you. No one gives chocolates and roses on Valentine’s Day to someone who they’re not pursuing. He’s pursuing you; it’s not business. Proceed with that in mind.

5 tough career lessons

When you’re starting out in the work world, it’s easy to think that your career will be straightforward: you’ll find jobs that interest you, work hard, and be rewarded for it. But it’s rarely that simple. Along the way, you’re going to learn some tough lessons about your career. Here are five of the hardest but most common.

1. You have to advocate for yourself; you can’t count on others to do it for you. Too many workers assume that their company will notice their talents and accomplishments and reward them, through raises, promotions, or better assignments. And while this certainly does happen, it’s naïve to rely on it. Instead, assume that you are your own best advocate, and that you’ll need to speak up – whether it’s asking for more money or tracking your accomplishments throughout the year to raise when your performance review comes around.

2. Your reputation matters – a lot. People sometimes wonder why they should work hard and go out of their way to excel at work, when their employer may not show them the same commitment. The reason? You’re not doing it for your employer; you’re doing it for yourself. Building a reputation as someone outstanding at what you do means that you’re creating a safety net for yourself: You’ll have people excited to hire you when you need them to be, former managers clamoring to recommend you and connect you with job openings, and the ability to command more money. Conversely, if your reputation isn’t good, it will become increasingly hard to do the things you want with your career. So it’s key to cultivate and protect your reputation; it’s one of the most valuable currencies you have.

3. A bad boss can ruin the greatest job. You might love your work passionately and adore your coworkers, but if you have a bad boss, none of that will matter. A terrible manager can make your daily life miserable, so it’s crucial to assess your likely management before accepting a job. Don’t get so excited about the work you’d be doing that you miss danger signs about the person you’d be doing it for. Speaking of which…

4. There’s no such thing as a dream job. Or, at least there’s no such thing as a dream job that you can spot from the outside. As much as think you might love a particular job or to work at a particular company, you never know what it will really be like until you’re there. Legions of people have discovered that their “dream job” came with a nightmare of a boss, or awful coworkers, or hours so long they could barely see their family. And feeling that an opening might be your dream job can lead you to miss crucial danger signs during the hiring process – causing you to accept a job that turns out to be nothing like your dream.

5. Your degree might not help you as much as you thought. College and graduate degrees no longer open doors the way they used to, and too many new graduates are surprised and frustrated to discover that even with a degree, they have trouble getting the jobs they want – or, in many cases, any job. Work experience is more and more crucial, and students who don’t start getting real work experience before they graduate are at a significant disadvantage. This is a tough lesson that you can avoid if you plan early enough – and it would help if schools and parents started helping students see this too.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

how to tell your manager that your team’s work quality sucks

A reader writes:

I need advice on discussing work quality with my manager, but it’s our department’s collective work quality that I have a problem with.  After 20+ years as a software engineer in a large variety of industries and companies, I am now an IT business analyst on a team that does back-end software, not client facing.  I am very familiar with the business concept that quality only has to be good enough, not gold-plated, so that’s not my issue.  My issue is that my team has a very immature sense of what constitutes “good enough.” They use excuses for putting out poor quality:  it’s not client-facing so doesn’t have to be pretty, everybody here has a technical background so it doesn’t have to be easy to use, etc.

Over the year and a half that I’ve worked here, I’ve watched very carefully for indications of what the other departments think of us and our work. Everybody is diplomatic, but I clearly see that they think we’re “THAT team” — the team that’s hard to work with, that doesn’t document our systems, etc.  So I’m pretty sure my feelings about our work are justified — we could do better!  And as the person who gathers requirements and interfaces between my developers, the quality assurance folks, and the business folks, I feel this also reflects very poorly on me professionally.  I’m very embarrassed by our software.

How do I convince my manager that we need to improve?  I know I need to couch it in terms of how we could be better and be as positive as possible.  I’ve tried, but he keeps using those poor excuses.  I’ve tried using my work to improve things surreptitiously, for example by writing better documentation, but feel thwarted in that, too. They design the software for their own convenience, users be damned.

How do I discuss this with my manager without making him defensive?  So far, our 1-1 sessions have been entirely him coaching me on how to be a good business analyst as if I was fresh out of school.

You can try, but you should be prepared for the possibility that you might not be able to do anything about this.

The thing is, if your manager hasn’t seen this on his own or isn’t concerned about it, it’s likely that the problem lies more with him than with your team. Yes, your team are the ones actually producing the mediocre work that is concerning you, but your manager is the person presiding over all this and giving it his stamp of approval. In fact, the very nature of his job charges him with evaluating the team’s work and deciding whether it’s meeting a sufficiently high bar. And from what you’ve described here, it sounds like he thinks everything is just fine.

That said, you can certainly approach your manager and make a case for specific changes and improvements. When you do, don’t frame this as a general “we do middling work and need to do better” stance, since that’s likely to put your manager on the defensive. Instead, explain the feedback that you’ve heard about your team and make specific suggestions about what could be done differently.

Those specific suggestions are going to be key. Tell your manager exactly what you think could be done differently – and how and why – so that he has specifics to consider and react to. And even if you have a dozen things you’d like to change, you’ll probably have better success if you start with just a few key proposals. After all, implicit in this conversation will be the message that he’s not running things well enough, so you want to approach it with some emotional intelligence and give him some room to save face. (And while you may not want to do that on principle, it’s in your best interest – people often react by blaming the messenger when they’re not given the opportunity to save face.)

If you try that and it doesn’t get you the results you want, at that point you’ll face a choice: Accept that these issues are unlikely to get resolved under this particular manager, or decide that you’re willing to escalate your concerns. The latter can be full of land mines, but if you happen to have the ear of a higher-up who you know to be reasonable and likely to be concerned about this kind of thing, you could consider speaking discreetly with them about your observations. Proceed with caution, of course, because this option can backfire. You only want to do this if you’re confident the higher-up will handle it well and give you some cushion from any fall-out with your boss.

Good luck!

Read an update to this letter here.