tiny answer Tuesday — 7 short answers to 7 short questions

It’s tiny answer Tuesday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. When should I follow up with this internal recruiter?

I had submitted my résumé for an open position with a company that I’m very interested in working for. A few days later, I was contacted by an internal recruiter to set up an initial phone screening. We set up the screening, which went well, and the recruiter asked for my availability to set up a phone interview with the department manager and a few days later I had the phone interview. I heard back from the recruiter a few hours after the phone interview, saying that he got great feedback and that the next step was to bring me in for an on-site interview and asking what my availability was. I responded to his email early the following morning with my availability but haven’t yet heard back. The recruiter and I have done all of the scheduling to this point via email and he has been very prompt, replying to my emails within a few hours. I’m getting a little bit antsy waiting to hear back, so my question is, how long should I wait before I follow up with the recruiter? I don’t want to seem over anxious but I also want to make sure my email didn’t get lost in cyberspace.

I’d give him three full business days before you follow-up. If you still hear nothing, try again in another three full business days.

If you don’t hear anything after that, unfortunately I’d move on. Sometimes recruiters stop responding when the hiring manager is moving forward with other candidates and looking likely to hire one of them. It’s rude, but it’s common. Hopefully that won’t happen here.

2. “Dear Sir or Ma’am”

I’m very confused about the advice you give in a recent article you wrote about cover letters. Since when is the “Dear Sir/Ma’am,” salutation such a faux pas? I’m 34 and feel that “Dear Ma’am” sounds much better than “Dear Hiring Manager.” Does that make me antiquated? So if I’m not supposed to write “Dear Sir” and don’t feel comfortable writing “Dear Robot”, could you provide a third alternative?

Actually, I wrote about “Dear Sir or Madam,” but my answer is the same here. Yes, it makes you sound antiquated. In what other part of your life would you open a letter with “Dear Ma’am”? You should talk to hiring managers the same way you’d talk to colleagues, which for most people in most industries is going to mean that “sir” or “ma’am” is way too formal. “Dear hiring manager” or “Dear (hiring manager’s name, if you know it)” is just fine.

3. Recruiter removed my contact information from my resume

I recently was contacted by a recruiter about a position at a company I’d really love to work for. I sent her my resume, and she lined up an interview, which I am very excited about! However, the recruiter changed my resume just slightly. She removed my contact information! I’m guessing this is so the corporation will have to go through her to hire me for any positions, but I’m worried it might hurt my chances of being hired for other spots if I don’t get this job. Should I put my contact information back on my resume, or just go with the flow? I don’t want to undermine my recruiter at all, but I don’t want to be overlooked for missing contact information.

This is very normal for recruiters to do, and yes, it’s because they don’t want the company to contact you directly, because they earn their living by placing candidates. They’re not in the business of connecting candidates and employers for free. If you want to work with recruiters, you have to play by those rules.

4. Which of these references would be best?

I know the reference checker can call whoever they want from my resume, but of the references that I provide who would be better: a recent manager (Sep-Nov 2012) from an internship in a similar industry, where the work I did was the same as I would be doing in the role I’ve interviewed for, or a current manager (with only 1.5 years work experience) from a non-related industry, but where I’ve been a full-time temp for 2.5 years?

And would you frown over including a professor from a recently (Dec 2012) completed graduate program, if the graduate studies are applicable to the role and the interviewers made a point of asking me to explain how I would use these in the role?

Of the two proposed references, use the one who will speak about you most glowingly and most specifically. (Although you probably need to provide more than one, so this is probably a moot point.) Don’t include the professor unless an employer specifically says that academic references are fine; most hiring managers want to talk to your managers, not professors. (And their interview question about your studies doesn’t change that.)

5. Is it illegal to ask for free work samples during the hiring process?

I am currently trying to land an entry level job in the surface design field. Some positions I’ve applied to as an intern, and some were entry level. My question is: Is it legal for companies to have me submit designs to them as a sort of test? Several times I’ve done this and each of the times after checking on my submission I’ve been told they’re still making a decision, and then I hear nothing. I have no way of knowing if my design was used for their benefit, but it still seems fishy.

Yes, it’s legal and very common. It would be illegal if they were fraudulently misrepresenting their request for your work — such as not really hiring and only asking to see your work so that they could steal it. And while some of that certainly does happen, it’s far outnumbered by legitimate instances where companies really are hiring and really do want to see your work.

That said, plenty of designers don’t do work on spec, and instead offer existing work from their portfolios as examples of their work. You might want to consider doing that if a company seems at all sketchy.

6. Shoes for interviews that aren’t high heels

What are other acceptable options for interview shoes besides heels? I’m 5’10 with bad ankles, and I need shoes that are solid, preferably
with some ankle support. Most flats make me feel like I’m barefoot, and even trying to walk in heels terrifies me because I constantly worry I’m going to fall and break an ankle… again. Internet is telling me far too many conflicting things!

What about flat or close-to-flat loafers? They’re sturdier than a lot of other flats, and they come in lots of professional options. You can also try shoes with a low, chunky heel, many of which don’t feel like you’re walking in heels at all (because they provide close to the same support as flats).

7. I can hear my dad’s receptionist complaining about her job

I know you have touched upon loud coworkers, but I have a situation that is a little different. I work at my dad’s company (half of the time for him, half of time just using the office for my other job). My dad’s receptionist is a nice gal but on the louder side. My office is right next to her desk and I can hear her sighing, talking, and joking around with other employees in her loud voice. The real problem isn’t tuning her out, but rather, recently I’ve noticed her enthusiasm and productivity dwindling and she continually complains she has nothing to do but when my dad or her manager give her projects to work on, I hear her huffing puffing about how it isn’t her job, etc. Another example was my dad forgot to reimburse her for something and she was moaning and groaning about that and then I heard her whisper to a coworker that they have to be careful what they talk about since I’m here.

Do I mention any of this to my dad? Without a doubt, she will know I told him and I have a feeling she will have no problem confronting me. Do I just tell her that I’m looking out for my dad and his company or do I just let it go? I should mention this office is physically very small, so I haven’t encountered any of this by eavesdropping.

Would your dad want to know? I sure would, if I were him. Assuming you think he’d feel the same, tell him that you’re in awkward situation because you feel you need to tell him what you’ve heard, but that you’re concerned about how the receptionist will handle it if she knows that you said something to him. Let him decide how he wants to handle it from there.

coworker smells and invades people’s space in meetings

A reader writes:

I am a woman working for a large university, performing a particular IT function for a local department. There is an organization-wide email discussion list for people performing this function, and an informal networking group that meets for coffee.I had previously heard gossip from women that there was a man in this networking group who smelled bad and would sit uncomfortably close to them, so that they stopped going. Recently I went for the first time and I think I met the guy! A poorly dressed man who smelled bad sat down so that his thigh touched mine. I inched away and he responded by inching closer. He basically chased me across the long bench we were sitting on throughout the whole meeting, until I ran out of room to get away from him. It was incredibly uncomfortable. I didn’t know most of the people there, and I wasn’t sure he was even aware he was doing it, so I wasn’t comfortable confronting him.

I was familiar with this man’s name from the email discussion list, and my impression of him was previously positive. The smelliness and poor appearance were unpleasant, but pretty common among male IT people here. I sense he is a well-intentioned nerd-type who lacks social awareness.

That said, his behavior is out of line and makes me hesitate to return to the group — and it seems he may have driven other women away before. I am considering sending him an email about the close-sitting behaviour (I will leave the grooming issues out of it), in which I describe the behaviour as neutrally as possible, state that it makes me uncomfortable, and advise him to take care to stay out of women’s personal space in general. What do you think of this as a strategy?

I don’t want to humiliate this man, nor do I want to start drama. He is better connected than me and I am mildly concerned about political consequences if he reacts defensively. But I do want to be able to network without unwanted physical contact from some smelly dude.

P.S. My supervisor is a really conflict-averse so I think I need to handle this myself or not at all.

Someone should at least address the personal-space-invasion issues — not only is he sitting too close, but he’s inching closer to you even after you’ve moved away? Something isn’t right there.

While I’m thrilled that you want to be direct with him about this (because so often that’s the only solution to this stuff, and people don’t want to do it), I’m not sure that doing it in a letter is the way to go. That makes it a bigger deal than it has to be, and it would probably be less of An Event if just do it in-person the next time it happens.

For instance: Go to the next event and if he sits next to you, say, “Excuse me, I need a little more space than that,” and move yourself away from him. If he follows, say, “I deliberately moved away, because I don’t want to sit so close that we’re touching. Can you please move back?”

(There are more passive methods too, of course — like not sitting down until he’s already taken a seat, so that you can sit somewhere that isn’t near him. That one has the additional advantage of giving you more space from the smell issue.)

In addition to that (or, if you prefer, in place of it), it’s also worth your talking to someone who’s in a position to do something about this more generally. If he’s really driving women away from these meetings, that’s a problem that someone in the management of your organization should care about. You mentioned that your manager is conflict-averse, which doesn’t necessarily mean you should let her off the hook for dealing with things that should fall into her purview, but you could also talk to this guy’s manager, or whoever organizes these meetings, or someone above all of you. You could simply say, “I’m concerned that this guy is driving women away from these meetings, resulting in them not getting the professional advantages that they’d get if they could comfortably attend.”

(Frankly, you might even replace “women” with “people,” unless you really think it’s only women who are avoiding dealing with this guy.)

And good for you for wanting to take this on instead of just avoiding it.

5 things you might not have on your resume but should

If you’re trying to write an effective resume, here are five things you might not be including, but should add.

1. A profile at the top of your resume. Profile sections or summaries have replaced objectives at the top of modern-day resumes. This is a quick list of the highlights of your strengths and experience, summing up in just a few sentences or bullet points who you are as a candidate and what you have to offer. A well-written profile or summary can provide an overall framing for your candidacy, setting the hiring manager up to see the rest of your resume through that lens.

2. Accomplishments at each job. If you’re like most people, your resume lists what you were responsible for at each job you held – but doesn’t explain what you actually achieved there. Rewriting your resume to focus on accomplishments will make it far more effective, and more likely to catch a hiring manager’s eye. That means getting rid of lines like “managed website” and replacing them with lines like “increased Web traffic by 15% in six months” – i.e., something that explains how you performed, not just what your job was.

3. Volunteer work. Too often, candidates don’t mention their volunteer work on their resumes, even when it’s relevant to the jobs they’re applying for. If you believe that volunteer work doesn’t count because you don’t get paid for it, think again! Employers want to know about all the experience you have that might be relevant, whether you received pay for it or not. Hiring managers have plenty of stories of nearly rejecting a candidate for lack of experience before discovering that the person simply hadn’t mentioned their relevant experience because it had been gained as a volunteer.

4. Relevant hobbies and side projects. As with volunteering, too many people neglect to mention relevant experience that they’ve gained through hobbies or side projects, mistakenly thinking that it doesn’t count because it’s not “real work” or it’s just for fun. But to the contrary, it can help flesh out your skills and experience and can demonstrate a passion for the work that paid jobs can’t always do. For instance, if you’re applying for an I.T. position and you run an online software discussion group in your spare time, mention that! Or if you’re applying for a teaching job and you review children’s books for your website, that’s important to mention too. These types of details help paint a stronger picture of you as a candidate.

5. Bullet points. Too many job candidates have resumes that are filled with large blocks of text. Hiring managers will only skim your resume initially, and big blocks of text are difficult to skim (and not to mention, they often make employers’ eyes glaze over). An employer will absorb more information about you with a quick skim if your information is arranged in bullet points rather than paragraphs. And after all, that’s your goal – to have your information read and processed, not to cram as much in as possible.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

my boss won’t answer my emails

A reader writes:

I started working for a company 6 months ago and I mostly work offsite.

The manager I report my work to is extremely unresponsive on email. He doesn’t answer back on work proposals that we verbally talked over, requests for a meeting, or joint work with one of his staff that he himself brought up. I lost a seasonal internal job because I was counting on his reply and lost major prestige out of it.

He is very open and communicative on verbal talk when we come across each other or when I poke my head in to his office. It isn’t that he is cutting me off on certain things. That was the first thing that came to my mind, but it isn’t the feeling I get. He is very open, cheerful and outgoing.

I haven’t checked about this with others he manages. From what I see, they are poking their heads in his office when he is in.

I never confronted him about this. I don’t think it would help if I did — this is his way of doing things and I am not in a crucial position in the company. I’m not well-connected either and am not yet as comfortable — I don’t want to be giving this out about the boss. However, this lack of communication is costing me big. It is also very annoying.

I would appreciate your help.

There’s a very simple solution here: Stop trying to use email to communicate with him. He doesn’t communicate over email.

Look, I love email. I’d live most of my life over email if I could. It’s easy, it’s efficient, I can write it and answer it when it’s convenient for me, others can answer it when it’s convenient for them — what’s not to love?

But not everyone feels that way. Your boss is one of them.

You know from experience that your boss isn’t responsive on email. You can wish that he was different and you can be annoyed by it, but the reality is that that’s not how he communicates. If you want answers from him, you’re going to need to talk in person.

When you’re managing people, you can decide how people communicate with you. If you want a lot done through email, you can ask for that (within reason). If you want it mostly done in person, you can ask for that too. People can certainly make judgments about whether those preferences are the most effective, but it’s the boss’s prerogative. And reasonable or unreasonable, effective or ineffective, if you want to get responses from this guy, you’re going to need to talk to him in person.

You can completely eliminate this problem today by just doing that.

returning to work after being a stay-at-home-mom

A reader writes:

There are some high-level MBA type moms who have made a business giving career advice for moms who want to “relaunch” themselves back into the paid workforce. I am just wondering if you agree with this advice, which includes unpaid internships and per-project contract work, on the basis that getting a foot in the door of a company is going to be extremely difficult unless you have a champion on the inside.

I have a master’s degree (not an MBA) and was a career changer (and never at a high level) before I received it, and in the ten years I’ve been home with my son and since getting my degree I’ve been doing what I (and others who I’ve consulted) would consider high-level volunteer work (public speaking, legislative lobbying, writing, so that makes up the gap on my resume). On the other hand, I think that may mark me as “overeducated mom of a kid with an issue” and may turn people off. I am trying not to get more terrified with each new headline that talks about how long-term unemployment hurts your chances for reentry. Thoughts?

It’s definitely true that having been out of the workforce for a while makes it a lot harder to get back in, especially in this job market, where employers generally have tons of well-qualified candidates with more recent experience to choose from.

Networking becomes extra important in this context, because being a known quantity often lets you leapfrog to the front of the line, ahead of applicants who they don’t know. One way to position yourself well for that is to stay in touch with past managers and colleagues while you’re out of the workforce — including doing occasionally freelance work for them when that’s feasible.

If you haven’t done that, though, and you’re re-entering the workforce without a great existing network — or hell, even if you have done that and you have a good network — it is indeed a good strategy to take on project work. That gets you more recent work to put on your resume, and it also will start building up a group of new contacts who might eventually hire you for full-time work, or refer you to it somewhere else.

I’d be skeptical of the unpaid internship idea though, unless you’re changing fields and starting at the bottom. Volunteering for legitimate nonprofit organizations, yes — but not unpaid interning unless the paid jobs you’re targeting are entry-level. Otherwise, you’re devaluing your work and skills in a way that won’t send the right message to prospective employers who see that on your resume.

It’s absolutely difficult to re-enter the workforce in this job market. (This job market is hard for everyone, re-entering or not, so of course it’s extra difficult without recent work experience.) But contract work is a good way to get yourself back on the playing field, at least.

where did I go wrong in this interviewing process?

A reader writes:

I credit your advice on resumes for helping me get a recent interview with a company for my dream job: a small publisher (~12 employees), in a city I want to live in, as an assistant editor (I am trying to get into publishing,) working on book topics I am interested in.

I had the interview last Thursday, and it seemed to go well. I spent about an hour each with the CEO/publisher and his senior editor talking about the position, my interest in it, larger questions about publishing, etc. After a few minutes of initial nervousness, I felt things went great and left feeling buoyant and looking forward to the next two things they wanted me to do: write a acquisitions topic proposal and take an editing skills test. I thanked them that night via email and everyone seemed happy.

Well, the next day over email, when I was discussing the topic proposal (it was made clear that I should feel free to consult them, as part of the exercise was seeing what it would be like to work with me), the CEO rearranged things; instead of doing the editing skills test on Monday, they wanted to see the topic proposal first. Well, one of the things I had been clear about during the interview was that I had no experience and little interest in acquisitions, but since everyone was expected to contribute there (because it’s a small shop) I was willing to step up and work at it. So I was a little worried about this new plan, but went ahead and spent the weekend researching and writing up a brief topic proposal, about a page and a quarter. I sent it in Sunday night and then waited.

Monday, and Tuesday I heard nothing back. So after business hours Tuesday I sent a brief email saying I was nervous and asking for an update. About an hour later I received a reply that they “didn’t feel they had a good fit.” I thanked him for getting back to me, and asked for any feedback. I have not received any.

I am wondering how I could have handled things differently. I knew that whatever topic proposal I came up with would be weak; I have no experience doing acquisitions work, and I am trying to move into publishing after only graduating in 2010. (I have had two different jobs in the meantime, which have given me reasonably applicable skills. Especially for assistantships.) Is there anything in this narrative that catches your eye? Do you think it’d be wise to more vigorously pursue feedback? Should I have tried to do the editing skills test first, and had the test I’d be weaker at come second?

I think you’re looking for things to read into in all of this, but what’s most likely is that they just didn’t think you were the right fit. It’s often no more complicated than that.

But no, you should not have tried to do the editing test first, when they specifically told you they wanted you to do the topic proposal first. And if the topic proposal was a deal-breaker for them, it was likely to be a deal-breaker even if they’d seen a flawless editing test first. (It’s also possible that they rearranged the order of the tests specifically because the topic proposal was what they had the most doubts about, and they figured they might as well have you do that first and save everyone time if that showed it wasn’t the right fit.)

I also think you shouldn’t be crushed that the topic proposal might be what took you out of the running, because you yourself say that you “have no experience and little interest in” acquisitions, and that you told them that in the interview. It’s a small shop where they expect everyone to play a role in that, so it’s not terribly surprising that having no interest or experience in it could end up being a deal-breaker — it’s likely that they figured they’d see how that lack of interest/experience played out on a simulated work assignment, and ultimately decided that, indeed, that just wasn’t the right profile for them. Which means that it’s not the right fit for you either, because you don’t want to end up a job that you struggle to do well in or to stay engaged with.

One more thing: While I doubt this was a deciding factor on its own, I wouldn’t have sent that email on Tuesday saying that you were nervous and asking for an update. First, pushing for an update only two days after sending in your exercise is a little too much — most employers are busy and have lots of things going on other than hiring, and this is especially true in publishing, where people tend to be really overworked; two days is just too soon. And second, saying that you’re nervous in an email like that comes across … well, not especially professionally. It’s not that employers expect you to be some sort of superhuman with no nerves, but mentioning it your email comes across a little like asking for hand-holding, or asking them to modify their time table to accommodate your nerves, and most busy employers aren’t enthused about signing up for that.

In any case:  Don’t continue to ask for feedback — you asked once, they declined to respond, and that’s the end of that. You can’t force feedback; it’s optional for an employer. At this point, I’d just move on. Not every job will be the right fit, and that’s okay.

short answer Sunday — 7 short answers to 7 short questions

It’s short answer Sunday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Eagle Scouts and resumes

A jobhunting friend is in his early 40s and wondered if his resume should include his Eagle Scout-yness. While he has achievements that
are far more recent on there, he thinks that achievement is too old. I think it’s sort of like a fraternity membership, in that other Eagle Scouts are likely to take care of their own. What do you think?

I could argue it either way. Some hiring managers might find it too old to be relevant, but others will read it as signs your friend is squeaky clean and will like that (and yes, other Eagle Scouts might bond with him over it). It might help or it might not, but it’s not likely to hurt him.

2. Should my resume include work I’ve done for a friend’s band?

I’m a music student searching for a part-time job. Realistically, I’ll probably end up in retail or food service, but I’ve been keeping an eye out for low-level part-time jobs and internships at record labels and music publications. I’ve been doing a lot of work to help out a friend’s band, including coming up with and executing promotional ideas (ones that go beyond “hang up flyers the week before a show”), researching venues to contact in new cities, and running their merch stand at their gigs. I think the experience that I’ve gotten from this has been relevant to several jobs to the point where I’ve considered listing it on my CV, but I’m worried that hiring managers will see that I’ve essentially listed “volunteered for a punk band” and dismiss me as being naïve and not actually experienced. From a hiring perspective, what would your reaction be?

You should absolutely list it! Especially for the music industry jobs you’re applying for, where listing it will demonstrate work experience in the field — but for other jobs too, because it demonstrates responsibility, organization, initiative, etc.

3. Should my blog go on my resume?

I started a food/home design blog last spring that I’ve been considering putting on my resume to support my writing/web experience (plus food is my passion, I’d love to get into that industry). I know it’s technically more recent than my current position, but I don’t want to bury the “real” job and experience I have. List it second? Mention in cover letter but not resume?

I’d list it on your resume in a different section — Other Experience, Volunteer Work, or something like that. Unless it’s your only writing/web experience, and you’re applying for writing/web jobs — in which case I’d list it first, front and center.

4. I don’t want to report to my old bullying boss again

Last year my former boss went on a year’s leave, and I covered many of his responsibilities. During that year, the company restructured, and I was promoted to manager for one of the brands our company sells, and report to a new boss. My old boss did not want or help his employees to succeed. He was a bully and if not for this restructuring I had decided I could no longer work for him and would leave when he returned.

However he is now returned and trying to negotiate a larger role for himself as he only has one brand, and no direct reports. I know his end goal is to have some say in all brands including mine, and perhaps to even get dotted line responsibility from me and others. He continues to be belittling and critical even though I no longer report to him. I am respectful but take no crap when dealing with him. But I can see his behavior escalating.

My new boss is amazing! He is a true mentor and I am blossoming under his management. I have been given a high level project along with my regular duties and doing an excellent job. My new boss doesn’t know my old boss or that I would have left if I had to keep reporting to him. Should I let my new boss know how I feel — that I couldn’t continue in this company if I have to officially report in any way to my old boss? I know he is lobbying right now for an expanded role. If that role includes any authority over my brand, he will continue to belittle, criticize, interfere and ultimately affect my good performance and results.

Talk to your new boss about your concerns. Don’t issue an ultimatum (that you’ll leave if this happens), but explain your experience working under the old boss previously and your extreme concern about working closely with him again. Be diplomatic, but be careful not to be so diplomatic that your message is lost.

Your new boss might not be able to do anything about it, but he might be able to, and it’s worth having the conversation.

5. Is this start-up job really going to come through?

I have been offered a job as a Business Development Manager (home-based global sales) by someone I know from childhood who has a startup business that is poised to become a subsidiary of a very large company (they currently own a minority share). The technology this startup company is producing is a game changer, and this position will get me back into a field that I have not been in since college, that I love and miss.

I’ve just explained the reward. Here’s the risk. The job start date has been put off until three weeks from now — I was originally told I would start last week. In the meantime, they wanted me to come out to the main office and meet the rest of the team — he keeps telling me that the documents are going out the next day, that the trip will be the following week, a week comes and goes, nothing. Now, I have had no response for two days, after I told him that it is difficult for me to plan the rest of my life when I keep being told to keep an entire week open and then nothing happens. This company is less than 25 employees right now. The CEO/friend seems to either have too much on his plate, which is why he needs to ramp up with professional staff to delegate (he literally does the sales calls all over the world himself), or he is completely full of it, made a bogus offer, and does not know how to back out.

How do I tactfully approach this, or should I not at all? Should I just ignore the job offer I accepted and move on? Should I tell him that I rescind my acceptance? I am at a loss, and worried that now that I haven’t been job hunting for the last two weeks, I will lose my unemployment.

Return to job hunting. You don’t need to write this job off or rescind your acceptance, but you shouldn’t count on it coming through. If it does, then great — but right not it’s not solid enough to count on, so you need to act as if it’s not firm — i.e., continue job-searching — until you have evidence that it is.

6. How should I bill my time from a business trip?

I am an hourly worker. (My boss is pushing for me to be full time.) I am on my way back from a week-long business trip. My boss came with me, so hotel, meals, etc. were paid by him on his company credit card. How do I account for my time? (I am a temp through another company.) How do I account for my time? I know I add the time I travelled (train, which my boss purchased the ticket), and obviously the time I spent working, but do I add when we went for meals (sometimes these things went for 3 hours!) Do I count when we left the hotel until we get back? Where’s the line between company time, and company funded personal time?

Ask your boss. Different companies handle these things differently. It’s fine to just ask him how he wants you to do it.

7. When should I expect a written offer?

Got a verbal offer from CEO via email for a San Fran startup on Monday. Accepted via email same day. My start date is tentatively set for the end of March. When should I expect a written offer? And to clarify, the offer is pending references, but neither has been contacted. Currently work on east coast corp strategy. Just getting paranoid.

You might not ever get a written offer; not every place does them. You can certainly ask for one though — or you can simply summarize the terms of your employment (title, salary, start date, etc.) in an email, send them to the CEO, and ask him to confirm. That might feel less legally binding than a formal written offer initiated by the company, but they’re basically the same — neither obligates the company to stick to those terms going forward (although they can’t change your pay retroactively), but it’s helpful to ensure that you’re both on the same page and there aren’t going to be any miscommunications.

short answer Saturday — 7 short answers to 7 short questions

It’s short answer Saturday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Employer won’t let me tack vacation time on to a work-related trip

I work for a national lab. I pay my salary out of my grants. I pay for conferences I go to out of my grants. I pay overhead to the national lab for the lab/office, administrative and security support for working here out of my grants. The national lab pays my vacation and sick time and I have 5 weeks vacation.

I am required to go to a European conference this year by contract signed on a collaborative grant. The lab has told us we can not tack on vacation to our business travel or it may not be more than half the time of the conference. Of course, I want to take an additional week vacation after the conference and have offered to pay the return flight out of pocket. But they still say no. The conference is 3 days so I’m allowed to take only 1-1/2 days vacation after.

These new rules are to protect the taxpayer from researchers taking unnecessary trips and charging their grant. But if I pay the return flight I’m saving the taxpayer money. (I can list a million ways in which unnecessary overhead costs at this lab cost the tax payers excess money.) Is this really legal? And do other private companies do this?

I can’t think why it wouldn’t be legal. Companies can make whatever rules they want around work-related travel and how you use your vacation time. In fact, because no federal law requires employers to give vacation time at all, companies can structure it as weirdly as they want — they can say you can only use it on Tuesdays, or only on odd-numbered days of the month, or only after 18 days have elapsed since your coworker took time off, or whatever else they want. You can certainly advocate for changing their policy, though.

2. I want to be non-exempt

I am a salaried exempt employee (I get paid the same amount every pay period, regardless of hours worked). Office hours are 9-6 with an hour for lunch, but about 30-40% of the office stays until 6:30 or 7 every day. I don’t mind staying late on occasion, but recently I’ve been staying about 3 hours late every day and coming in for one weekend afternoon. (like I said, I’m not alone when I stay late – this seems to be a company wide and possibly field (architecture) wide issue). If I’m going to be working 10 or more extra hours a week, I’d like some form of compensation. Is there anything I can do to change my status from exempt to non-exempt? Is it even worth asking?

I think what you actually want is compensation for working overtime, and you’ll muddy the issue if you ask to be treated as non-exempt. If you’re treated as non-exempt, your employer will need you to track every minute worked, will need to pay you overtime for all hours over 40 in a week, and will have the option of lowering your paycheck on weeks where you work less than 40 hours. You might find that you’re prohibited from working overtime at all, or even from answering work emails from home at night or on the weekends (which may not even be feasible for your position). That’s overcomplicating a situation where you really just want more pay for working longer hours.

These sorts of hours may simply be part of the deal with your position, in which case you’re unlikely to be successful in asking to be compensated for them. (There are many exempt positions where hours much longer than you’re talking about are normal, and there’s no additional compensation for them.) But you could certainly ask about something like comp time for weeks when you work, say, 50 hours or more … but again, make sure that that’s reasonable in your industry, because in lots of industries where putting in the time it takes to get the job done is just part of the expectations — law, nonprofits, and others — that would just come across naively.

3. Should you handwrite writing samples?

When an employer asks for a writing sample, do they want it to be written longhand or typed?

Typed. Or more specifically, they’re expecting it will be typed on a computer and printed out, in most cases. Unless they specifically say that they want to evaluate your handwriting, which would be unusual (but does occasionally happen).

4. Employee doesn’t want to work alone at night

We hired a part-time employee to cover 3 shifts a week, all of which are closing shifts. The last hour of the closing shift is covered solely by the closing person; they are in the store alone. The person we have working this shift now, six months into her position, is saying that she does not feel comfortable working in the store alone because she is afraid of being robbed. We haven’t had any incidents or previous problems and we’ve been open 21 years. There hasn’t been any indication that she has been threatened in any way, other than there are customers who “creep her out.” She wants to switch shifts with other employees and work earlier in the day (these are of course the more desirable shifts to be had). My question is this: am I obligated to keep her on the schedule? I don’t really want to take an employee who has worked their way up into the more desirable shift and put them on closing because someone feels uncomfortable doing the job they were hired to do.

No, you’re not obligated. You can certainly tell her that the job you’ve hired her for is the night-shift position, and that moving to other shifts isn’t currently an available option. If she declines to work those shifts, you can replace her. (Make sure whoever you replace her with is comfortable with working night shifts alone, of course.)

Before you do that, though, I’d talk to her a little more to find out if there are real security concerns that you could be addressing. That’s something you’d want to know, if so.

5. Is this legal?

Before Christmas, my employer gave me a note to say that my employment after Christmas would be reduced to a 3-day week. I did not agree to this change to my contract and have recently found out that others within the firm have been doing my job. I am a delivery driver and management has been using their own cars to deliver goods. Is this allowed? Not all members of the work force have had their working week reduced. Is this fair?

Unless the decision was based on your race, religion, gender, national origin, or other protected class, your employer can absolutely change your schedule, decrease your hours, or take you off their schedule altogether.

If they’re decreasing your hours and managers are doing work you used to do, it sounds like they’re trying to conserve costs.

6. How far back should references go?

How far back in my job history should I provide references? I’m still on very good terms and in contact with coworkers and managers from previous organizations from as far back as 5 years ago, but I’m not sure if I should provide them as references anymore and focus on references from more current coworkers and managers.

Leave the coworkers out of it altogether; most reference-checkers want to talk to managers, not peers. Five years back isn’t too long, although I wouldn’t leave the more recent managers off either, or that will raise questions about why you’re not as eager to have them spoken with.

7. Will this look like job-hopping?

Last May, I relocated to another city for a job. After 4 months, our entire department was laid off. I ended up finding another job, where I have been for a little over 3 months but I am unhappy with the culture, amongst other things. I’d really like to look for another job but I don’t want this to affect how potential employers might perceive me since I’ve only been here for such a short time. Should I just suck it up for a while longer so I don’t look like a “job hopper”?

Two short-term jobs in a row isn’t great — it’s likely to raise red flags for future employers. So unless you’re really miserable, I’d stick it out for at least a year if you can.

job-searching when you’re a single parent

Throwing this one to the readers to help with. A reader writes:

I’m a single mom of a 2-year-old and am currently looking for a full-time job. Normally I pick him up at 3 pm from school/daycare, which, if I find a typical 8 am – 5 pm job, would make me unavailable during part of those hours. I can still work from home later in the day after he goes to bed (~ 8 pm) so I can still put in an eight-hour-day, but I wonder several things about this arrangement:

Is this reasonable to ask from an employer who does not know me or my work ethic and who therefore does not, understandably, trust me? What are, if any, reasonable expectations to have for someone in my situation?

How do most people deal with this type of situation, given that a lot of employees have young children and/or are single parents?

And how do I bring this up tactfully and professionally, and when is the right time to bring it up? Is it appropriate to hint at it during the interview so that they know beforehand? Or after a job offer has been made?

Readers, what advice do you have in this situation?

speaking up when you’re unhappy and overwhelmed at work

I thought I’d print this exchange I recently had with a reader, to demonstrate why it’s often helpful to speak up when your unhappy. Here’s the reader’s initial message to me:

I left my job of five years — right decision. I accepted a new job. It’s a better cultural fit, I love my team, and I’m proud of the work we’re doing. The boss is brilliant and I’m learning a lot. High-prestige position, one of the senior members of the company. In many ways, it’s a dream job. I’ve been there for a month.

Unfortunately, despite me asking questions in the interview process about work/life balance — and explaining that if this is a “no personal life” job, I’m not the right candidate — but there is none. NONE. I’m pulling 70-hour weeks, which is not what we discussed during interviewing. I am so busy that I eat only two meals a day (delivery—yech), I barely have time to go to the bathroom, and I still can’t finish the tasks in front of me. I don’t read websites or go on Facebook, I don’t chit-chat with coworkers, I just WORK all day. Very fast pace.

I’m becoming depressed, I’ve snapped at my boyfriend (who I love dearly—I NEVER snap at him), and I’m perpetually exhausted and anxious. I get maybe half a day off each Sat/Sun and I spend most of that time trying to catch up on sleep. I cry at least a few times a week. This is not who I want to be.

I just need more time to adjust, right? Except the other people are working similar hours, even those who’ve been here for a year or two. There are problems in processes and in the inadequate staffing. The only silver lining is that a new high-ranking colleague wants to create work-life balance. She understands that this workload is not OK, and I have calmly told her that I’m happy to be there, but that I physically and mentally cannot continue to work like this. She’s wonderful — if it weren’t for her, I would have quit in the first week. I know she can’t change things overnight, but I also don’t know if she CAN change the culture there. Sometimes, it’s just the way a place is. Staffers have told me that “a lot of people quit after two or three months” because they cannot handle the pace and workload.

I love the work and I like the people. But I don’t like working all the time and on a fundamental level… while I work hard, I don’t live to work. My gut tells me that I should leave now before I become miserable; I’d like to stick it out for at least six months, but I don’t know if I can keep going like this. And if I quit, I worry that my professional reputation will be damaged.

What do you think I should do? Leave now, inflame my boss, and eat the $2,000 moving stipend I’d have to repay? Wait it out until, say, June, and hope that the sympathetic bigwig can effect change by then? My ego, reason, and pride (ok, and bank account) all say “stay in the job” but my gut says “run like hell.”

I replied: “If you’re going to leave anyway, I don’t think sticking it six months is any more useful than just starting to look now. But I’d talk to them about that fact that you were clearly told one thing in the job interview process and another is true, and that you’d like them to waive the repayment requirement because you were very clear that they shouldn’t offer you the job if it was this type of thing!”

Here’s her response:

I wound up talking with my boss and pretty much laid it out (without implying that I was going to quit immediately). I took your suggestion to heart and mentioned that in the interview process, I’d specifically been told that the hours were NOT 75-80 hour weeks. She agreed that my workload is too heavy, and she posted job listings for two new staffers who should be able to help me out. She’s already been interviewing people, and she’s been checking in to see how I’m doing.

So, for the time being, I still feel like this is not going to be a long-term job, but since she is clearly trying to improve things, I’m going to stick it out and see if things improve. And if not, then…time to move on for sure.

Thank you again for your smart thoughts. You really helped me get perspective.

Speaking up often gets you what you want, or at least closer to what you want. Not always, certainly, but enough that it’s an option that you should at least be considering when you’re unhappy — not assuming it’s not even on the table, as so many people do.