asking about mental health in an interview

A reader writes:

I’ve just been put in charge of hiring a group of staff for a summer camp.I began managing this group of staff last May (and was thus not involved in the hiring process) and discovered that a couple staff members had some mental health issues that interfered with their job responsibilities. Two of the most extreme examples involved one worker with an eating disorder and cutting; another had PTSD. This really impacted their ability to be good counselors — the first as a role model to impressionable junior highers; the second was afraid of the dark and would have serious flashbacks, making overnight campouts impossible.

Now that I’m playing a more significant role in hiring, I’d like to know what I can do in the interview process to find out about these sorts of things. While both of these girls underwent extensive reference checks, this isn’t the kind of thing that regular employers would find out about. Is it prudent for me to ask direct questions about a potential counselor’s current mental health? I want to hire emotionally stable people, but I’m worried about being discriminatory.

Oooh, this is tricky. The law doesn’t allow you to inquire into someone’s medical health, but you can ask whether they can perform specific duties.

I asked employment lawyer Donna Ballman (whose book, Stand Up For Yourself Without Getting Firedis a great guide to your rights at work and well worth ordering) if she’d weigh in on the best way for you to proceed. Here’s her advice:

“Pre-employment, the employer may not ask questions that will disclose the existence of a disability. What they can ask are questions about their ability to perform specific tasks. For instance, it’s a legitimate question to ask what they would tell a camper who became fearful on an overnight camping trip, what their favorite things to do on a campout are, and what activities they like to do with the kids. They could be asked what experience they have helping kids work through problems, what they’d do if they encountered a camper who clearly had an eating disorder, or why they are the best person to supervise children.

The appropriate thing to do when in doubt is make a conditional offer of employment. After the conditional offer is made, the employer may do some things that may help under these circumstances, as long as they are done for all employees who get the conditional offer. They could do a physical agility test requiring them to demonstrate their ability to perform certain skills, as an example. They could require the individuals to demonstrate skills such as the ability to start a campfire in the dark, how to make s’mores, or other basic camping skills. If the post-employment inquiry discloses the existence of a disability, the employer can now ask how the applicant will be able to perform the essential duties of their job and what accommodations the employer may need to provide.

The main thing I’d caution is to not make assumptions about someone’s abilities just because they have a disability. For instance, the employee who had an eating disorder might well be able to recognize a camper with the beginnings of one and help get them through their problem or know when to call in a professional for help. The employee who was afraid of the dark might be able to help campers through their fears. If it is clear the applicant will not be able to perform the essential functions of their job, even with accommodations, then the offer may be withdrawn.”

This is excellent advice.

This is also probably a situation where “tell me about a time when…” interview questions will be especially important. For instance, ask about past overnight camping trips (and what has made them most anxious during those times, and how they handled that), about experience identifying and helping struggling peers, about their own experience in overcoming challenges (of any type), about how they’d model healthy eating habits for campers, and about any other behaviors and traits you want to make sure they demonstrate. This should actually help you make better hires across the board, and not just in the sorts of cases that you’re asking about here.

What other advice do people have?

* I make a commission if you use that Amazon link.

an interview with me, nominations, etc.

A couple of me-centric things —

1. Unmana Datta, a marketing specialist who sometimes comments here, just published an interview with me about some of the behind-the-scenes workings of Ask a Manager, and how the blog led me to start working for myself. It includes the biggest challenges I’ve faced as an entrepreneur, my least favorite part about running the site, and more. You can read it here.

2. Back in 2008, when I’d only been blogging for a year, this site somehow ended up getting nominated for a Bloggie award. While most of these award lists are kind of silly, this one is actually a Big Thing and helped drive some early traffic to me. So I’d love it if you’d take a minute to nominate Ask a Manager this year. You can submit your nomination in the Best Topical Weblog category here. (Note that you have to nominate three sites for any one category you vote in.) Thank you!

ask the readers: how can I work better with recruiters?

I’m going to throw this one out to the readers for advice. A reader writes:

I’m hoping you or your readers have some wisdom for me on this. I work in a creative field, at a senior level, mostly in the digital realm. Up until now, I have found jobs on my own—good jobs. But my last employer sold off the division I was working for as part of a financial restructuring, so I find myself in the position of looking for a job. For the last 6 months, I have been contracting at a previous employer, but that contract is about to run out.

By and large, creatives in my geographical area (San Francisco Bay Area) seem to get work through recruiting agencies, so, though I’ve never needed to before, I have started working with agencies. So far it has been an awful experience! They call frantically about openings, get miffed if I am not interested for a valid reason such as the commute, pay or my interest level in the company, then they forget about me for a few weeks until I remind them I exist, then the whole thing starts over again. Apparently no one in my field just hires a full time employee anymore, it appears to be all “contract with a “possibility” of going “perm.” The recruiters are flaky, don’t make appointments (say, for a phone screening) when they say they will, don’t return calls, and they get a lot of information wrong. I’ve been up-front, telling the recruiters that I am really looking for a good fit, what my areas of interest are, and what my starting pay needs to be. Today I was blown off by 2 potential employers for one month contract jobs, which might not directly be the recruiters’ fault, but all of my experiences have been with flaky, frantic recruiters so it’s hard to not somehow connect the two.

I want to know: How can I be a better client to recruiters? Is there a way to get them on my side, and to really care about what I want, and to treat me and my schedule with a bit more respect? And, also, is there such a thing as a recruiter who is really interested in helping you find a great fit, or are they just interested in cramming people into positions as fast as possible to make money? And, finally, I’m hoping some of your Bay Area readers might know of some great agencies that are not on my radar.

I should note that I am immaculate in my work and in my timeliness when dealing with the recruiters, and anyone they send me to. I have great experience, wonderful references, and a pretty great portfolio. I think I’d be a great employee!

Readers, what advice do you have? Have you ever cracked the code to working well with recruiters?

My overall sense is that if you get a good one, you don’t really need to crack any code … and if you get a bad one, no code will help. But feel free to refute that!

10 most embarrassing networking stories

Some people love to network, and it comes as naturally to them as talking to a close friend would. For others, networking can be far more formidable, full of the potential for mistakes and even outright humiliation.

Here are 10 of the funniest and most embarrassing networking stories readers have shared here.

1. Doused in champagne

“I once was asked to attend a dealers forum for our company. This was very early in my career, and I had never attended a conference like this at all. Most of the others attending were all company owners or C-level executives, and I was just a low-level new employee, but the only one in my company who was able to fly out on short notice. I’m very quiet and reserved to start with, plus new to the industry and was surrounded by people who ran companies. I felt completely out of my element the entire time I was there, so I was thrilled when the final lunch was being served and everyone would be leaving for the airport afterwards. I slip in to the luncheon, find an open seat at a table, smile politely, and I’m just counting the minutes to slip out and get home. Part of the final luncheon is a “champagne toast,” so the waiters begin bringing around glasses of champagne for everyone. As the final closing remarks are being made, a waiter dumps the entire tray of drinks he is carrying directly on my head and suit. Obviously the entire room reacts to the crashing noise, and literally 10 hotel staff members rush in to “assist” me. Mortified does not even begin to describe my feelings. To top it off, our suitcases had already been collected and sent ahead to the airport, so I got to fly from the West Coast back to the East coast in a suit drenched in champagne. I shudder just thinking back on it.”

2. “So, are you in high school?”

“Our bank was in the process of merging with another bank. During the merger process, all the teller managers had to attend meetings with people from other banks going through the same process. During the first meeting, I did my best to get to know the other teller managers and branch managers (I’m an introvert and was very shy at the time).

I started talking to the woman who was running the meeting. She was the equivalent of a district manager and was around my age (early 20s). I was really impressed with the fact that she was at this stage of her career at such a young age, because I was aspiring to rise to the same level. I asked her how she got started, what were her responsibilities, etc. During our talk, she mentioned how she was thinking of going back to finish up school (she said “school” not “degree”). Stupid me asks, “Oh? High school or college?”

Thankfully she just said “college” and moved the conversation to another topic. Even though she didn’t acknowledge my gaffe with so much as a blink, I still was praying a sinkhole would open up below me.”

3. At least it wasn’t 50 Shades of Grey

“I went to a conference two years ago when I was just starting my Master’s degree in order to get to know some of the leaders in my male-dominated industry. In between going to talks and walking around and looking at company booths, I had a book that I needed to read for my English class called “Bonk: The Curious Coupling of Science and Sex.” It was an interesting book, but I perhaps should have been more careful about where I was reading it.

Sitting in the conference hotel lobby, I was approached by several men I recognized from the talks. They asked what I was reading and there was really no way for me to explain the concept of the book without looking a little awkward. They all seemed very interested, though. But now I’m extra careful about what I bring with me to read at a conference to network; some possible connections might get the wrong idea.”

4. Questionable mentoring

“I signed up for a mentoring program to be matched up with a local executive. I was matched with a guy, and we went to lunch. When I let him know I was pregnant, since it might effect scheduling during the 6-month program, he let me know how much kids ruined his marriage and his wife’s career.

Awesome, mentor.”

5. Name calling

“I am very bad at names. I often recognize people, but can’t remember why. I was at lunch one day with a coworker who usually works at another building, and I said to her something about how she knew So-and-So (an older portly gentleman), who was sitting at a table right next to us. She turned and looked, and said, “That’s not So-and-So.” The gentleman, who had heard me, also turned and said, “I’m not So-and-So.” I had mixed him up with another older, portly gentleman. I was greatly embarrassed, especially because he seemed to find the mix-up insulting.

From then on out, every time I saw this guy, I made sure to say his name, repeatedly, so that he would know I knew who he was. But a year and a half later, I found out I had still been calling him by the wrong name.”

6. Breakfast splash

“I attended a multi-day conference that provided all meals for attendees in an effort to have everyone network during said meals. Breakfast each morning was held in an area accessed by walking down a flight of stairs. I was headed down the stairs, looking into the room to see who was already at breakfast and thinking about who I might eat and chat with. I lost my footing and rolled/bounced all the way down to the breakfast area with my laptop tumbling behind me. Of course, everyone stopped eating and talking and started gasping and staring. Everyone knew who I was after that!”

7. Unwanted dieting advice

“I was serving myself some layered cheese spread at a reception for one of Canada’s top poets. I was chatting with said poet and a couple of professors I hoped to work with in the future. As I scooped the cheese onto my plate, the poet reached over, patted my stomach, and said, ‘Girls like us have to watch how much rich food we eat, don’t we?”

8. Unwanted raffle prize

“I got over my crippling social anxiety and attended a blogging/networking event on behalf of my employer – a children’s educational company. I got in touch with a few people, made a few friends, started passing my business card around. I got invited to an event that evening, and threw my card in the fishbowl for the raffle – a bunch of the sponsors had put in gift baskets.

Lo and behold, I won! Oh, did I win. About $300 worth of sex toys. My name was gleefully plastered all over the twittersphere, along with pictures of my bounty. Needless to say, I was not able to capitalize on my newfound fame on behalf of my incredibly mortified and ‘how can we erase the internet?’ employer.

9. When your bladder doesn’t want to network

“I had been trying to connect with a very senior member of a field I’ve been considering entering. We were vaguely connected by a friend of a friend, but every time she emailed me, it was to say some variation of “we’ll have to get together, but I don’t have my schedule with me right now.” After a couple rounds of this, I assumed that she was trying to politely dodge me, and I gave up. Then, at about 11 p.m. one night, I suddenly got an email from her that said, “You can call me tomorrow at 4:15. I have 20 minutes.” This was great news…except for the little annoyance that I had just developed an extremely bad bladder infection, and had spent the last two days running between my desk and the toilet.

I debated telling her that I had an infection and might need to step away to take care of business, but I decided that I was unlikely to have a problem with only a 20-minute phone call. Unfortunately, “I have 20 minutes” really meant “I will talk to you for 20 minutes, and if you prove interesting I will happily talk to you longer.” By about 45 minutes in, I was bursting and in pain, and all I could think of was hanging up and running to the loo. We had moved in to the point where she was inviting me to ask any follow-up questions of her, but I was so distracted I could barely even get myself to read the questions I had pre-prepared, much less come up with an elegant way to end the call, or to explain my situation. After several bouts of awkward silence and her encouragingly telling me I could ask her anything, I finally got to the point where I couldn’t wait any longer, so I gasped out, “I’m sorry, but I really, really have to go to the bathroom!”, threw down my phone, and ran. When I returned to the phone, she had hung up. THAT made for an awkward follow up/thank you email!”

10. Pantyhose malfunction

“During my last semesters of college, I was participating in campus interviews, and attending office tours of the Big 6 accounting firms. These events always required proper business attire. I was your typical starving student, completely broke all the time, so to save a few pennies, I purchased a super cheap pair of generic store-brand pantyhose to wear with my one classy suit. The first time I wore them, during the office tour, I felt the waistband of the pantyhose fold over, which is normally a sign that your pantyhose are about to start creeping down and will require an adjustment. Not this time. As soon as that waistband folded over, my pantyhose rolled down like lightning, and I had to quickly stick my hand into the pocket of my blazer and grab them before they ended up around my ankles. The only restroom was out in the elevator lobby, and badge access was required to get back into the office area. So I spent the entire office tour, including a meet-and-greet with various members of the firm, with one hand in my blazer pocket holding up my pantyhose. After that, no matter how broke I was, I would always pay the extra money for good pantyhose!”

short answer Sunday — 7 short answers to 7 short questions

It’s short answer Sunday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Discrimination in health care benefits?

I recently applied for a job, and received a tentative offer after several rounds of interviews. During a discussion with the head of human resources, I asked for a copy of the company’s benefits. I was very surprised to see a huge discrepancy between the premiums for a single employee versus an employee with a family. The premium for an employee wishing to gain coverage for herself and her family was slightly more than 18 times time higher than for a single employee.

I am wondering if this policy would be considered discriminatory, or if this is a common practice.

Well, family coverage does cost significantly more than single coverage. It sounds like there’s a good chance that the explanation here is that the employer is covering the same dollar amount of the premium regardless of which plans employees have. For instance, let’s say that the total cost of the premium (combining the employer and employee’s contribution) is $410 for single people and $1400 for families. If the employer pays $350 toward whatever plan you get, that leaves person with single coverage paying $60 and people with family coverage paying $1050 … about 18 times more than people on the single plan. That’s a big difference, but is it discriminatory? The employer is paying the exact same amount for each, so I’d say no, it’s actually pretty fair.

2. When an employers asks for a letter of introduction rather than a cover letter

I just came across a term in a job application with which I am completely unfamiliar. This application is asking me to upload a “Letter of Introduction” but says nothing about a cover letter. A quick Google search later, and I found a questionable forum post that describes letters of introduction as follows:

“A letter of Introduction is a letter written by a person of standing that introduces you to the future employer. It can be written by a person in any profession, For example you can have a professor, a teacher, a doctor, an office worker to write a letter of introduction for you, all they really have to write is that they know you are a person of upstanding character and that they are willing to recommend you to the employer.”

Is this true, and is it thus necessary for me to ask a reference for a letter of introduction? Or are cover letters and letters of introduction actually the same thing?

The page you found is describing something different than what’s intended here. The employer you’re applying to almost certainly means a normal cover letter (in which you introduce yourself to them, so hence their weird term).

3. Did this recruiter lie to me?

A recruiter reached out to me about a job at a major brand. I was interested and thought it wouldn’t hurt to go on the interview. I thought she would screen me, but once i arrived, they had me fill out paperwork and sent me off to their client (the aforementioned major brand) for the position that she reached out to me about before. The only thing is, when I got there, the name of the woman who I spoke with wanted to interview me for another position, which has me thinking that the recruiter didn’t disclose the actual information because she didn’t want me to find the position myself online. I am very much turned off by the lie, and am worried that if I were to like this place (which I think I will), then the agency wouldn’t want me to get hired full-time. I have already accepted the job offer from the client, but am really starting to get cold feet about the agency. I guess my question is–is it worth staying on with a dishonest agency and sticking it out to work for an amazing company? Should I reach out to my future employer at the company and tell her I’m concerned about the agency and its practices?

I don’t think you have reason to conclude that the recruiter lied to you. It’s completely feasible that the client simply decided to interview you for a position that they thought you’d be a better fit for. Absent some further evidence that the recruiter was lying, I’d just move forward and assume this was all above-board.

4. Can I ask for an interview that I previously turned down?

I’m so mad at myself for turning down an interview after my husband talked me out of it. Now i regret it. Does it look bad to tell them i would like to interview? Will i look unstable or flaky? I really would love this job. I had told them I couldn’t do the job because of my husband’s traveling and the kids’ activities, but i think i could work something out with carpools, etc.

You don’t have anything to lose by reaching back out to them, but unfortunately you’ll need to be prepared for them to pass — or to have a lot of questions about your ability to reliably do the job, given the concerns that you raised initially. Basically, if you share with an interviewer that you have concerns about your ability to reliably show up for a job, and then you later change your mind, assume that those concerns are going to remain very much on their mind … so while it can’t hurt to reach back out to them, realize that some damage might have been done here. (But more importantly, it sounds like you and your husband might need to get on the same page about these issues before you’re talking with employers.)

5. Why don’t employers do more skills testing?

Why don’t companies do more skill testing as part of the hiring process? I have come across this only rarely in my current job search. Implementing something like an timed skill test (either online or in person) would seem to be a cheap and effective way to separate the wheat from the chaff. As it stands my gut feeling is that the job search is too subjective on both ends. In interviews I feel like I have to persuade hiring managers that I truly do possess a given skill. Wouldn’t it be more effective if applicants could simply prove it to them before they get to that point? Maybe there is something I’m overlooking.

Yes, employers should absolutely do more testing and job simulations before hiring people. It’s crazy to hire someone without actually seeing them do the work they’d be doing on the job. My co-author is fond of pointing out that a football coach holding try-outs wouldn’t ask players if they could tackle; he’d ask to see them do it. It’s the same thing here: You need to find ways to see people do the work if you want to minimize bad hires. For instance, if you’re hiring a communications director, you should see them write a press release and do a mock interview. If you’re hiring an admin who will be managing busy calendars, you should give them a timed calendaring exercise. If you’re hiring a financial person, you should have them look at financial statements and explain them to you in layperson’s terms. And so forth — whatever the work would be, see the person in action.

6. What to expect from a second interview

I finally have my first second interview (all thinks to your wonderful blog and my newly acquired awesome cover letter writing and interviewing skills). I’m a recent grad and have had several unsuccessful phone interviews, and have finally nailed my first second interview. I’ve never had a second interview before and I really have no idea what to expect. On my phone interview, we went over the basics: why I want to work for the organization, why I want the position, my background and how it would help me in the position, my skills, and my experiences abroad (it’s an international organization). I pretty much went through all of the questions I had prepared answers for already (except for my weaknesses). Other than meeting the rest of the department (it’s small, only 4 people), and going over with them about my skills and background, I have no idea what to expect and am totally at a loss on how I should prepare myself. It’s an administrative type of position, so doing a lot of data entry, mailings, contacting people and coordinating projects with other coworkers across the country. Any advice would me much appreciated!

Second interviews are generally just more in-depth conversations. More probing into your background and past experiences, more discussion of the job, etc. I’d plan for lots of behavioral questions (“tell me about a time when…”), since whether or not you end up getting them, the preparation will have helped you a lot), and I’d do all the stuff I recommend in my job interview preparation guide.

7. Is this a bad sign?

I recently applied for a position at a large company. I had a phone screen with somene, then a phone interview with a Team Leader, and then an in-person interview with a panel of managers. For the panel interview, I had to prepare a presentation about myself and why I would be a good fit for the firm. That part went very well, but the questions that came after were tough. I left feeling that I did not do well.

However, the next morning they asked me to come in for another round of interviews. I was pleasantly surprised. So I scheduled it.

But then the morning after that, they said they are making the interview a phone interview instead, with someone from HR. What does that mean? Is that a bad sign? Why would they backtrack? I’m concerned at what’s going on.

You can’t really read anything into it. It could be as simple as that they realized that they stuff they wanted to cover with you could be covered by the HR person, so they’re having her handle it. Or who knows — there are tons of other possible explanations too, including some that we’d never be able to guess. As with everything involving job searching, try not to try to interpret things that you don’t have enough information to interpret and just take it at face value. You’ll know soon enough how it plays out. Good luck!

I’m afraid I’m going to be assigned to the wrong work team

A reader writes:

Just before the holidays at my workplace, a manager casually mentioned that sometime soon, staff members (of which I am one of the longer-term ones at my level but all of us have been there under a year) will be divided into two different “teams”: briefly put, “client/public-facing/informational” and “non-public-facing/long-term technical projects.” They did not have discussions with any of us as to our goals or preferences, and we have still not been told who they’ve decided will be on which team. I’m getting nervous.

From what I can tell from my experiences and interactions there, my particular preference and leanings —based on my skills, temperament and career path/goals/needs— should be abundantly clear, and my being on my preferred team would clearly be a good organizational fit for them. And, more selfishly, working on that team could be something I could more easily parlay into my future goals (within or outside the organization) with maximum respectability and “sellability.” Someone with the opposite bent and career track, though, would find more potential to excel in working on the other team. So it’s not a status difference based on actual fact, but it kind of IS a status difference relative to each employee’s particular career path. (This is the reason I’m not disclosing my preference in this question— because both have equal merit and I don’t want to suggest either is “beneath” the other in anything but personal preference.) I’m optimistically assuming my employer will recognize all this as obvious and assign me accordingly, but communication there isn’t always great and there’s a chance this won’t happen.

I’m afraid I’m going to be quite upset if I’ve been assigned to the other team, because to me that would indicate that they’ve made a poor management decision because they’ve not paid enough attention to obvious cues about the goals, strengths and aptitudes of their employees– which really goes beyond just bad management and into the realm of personally dismissive. Again— I have no idea if this will be my fate, but if it is, how can I best phrase that I’d like them to reconsider without coming off as petulant or inflexible? How could I make them recognize the benefit to themselves of making sure they’re getting “fit” right without insulting their judgement? Other than a continued paycheck and a decent reference, is it of any advantage to me to suck it up if I’m put on the other team?

Why, why, why would you wait for them to make decisions before you bring this up? Talk to them now.

People often assume that their career goals must be obvious to their employers, and then get upset when their employers seem to be ignoring those — for instance, passing them over for a promotion that they never told anyone they were interested in, or not assigning them to a project that they never mentioned wanting. Employers are not mind-readers, and what might seem obvious about you to you is not always obvious to managers who have dozens of other things to be thinking about and juggling.

You’re already envisioning getting upset if you’re assigned to the wrong team and wondering how to get them to reconsider, but the time to speak up is now, before assignments have been announced. If you don’t do that, you’re really forfeiting any moral high ground or rational claim to complain about them being “personally dismissive” or even poor managers. If you don’t tell them what you want, you’re setting them up to disappoint you.

I’d be pretty irked if I told employees in advance that these changes were coming and someone who hadn’t expressed any preference to me had this type of reaction once the teams were announced. And it would reflect on their communication skills and judgment, which could potentially factor into future decisions like this, which you really don’t want.

Go talk to them. And do it immediately, like Monday, because they could finalize or announce these decisions at any time, so you shouldn’t keep waiting.

is this employer signaling that they plan to offer me a job?

A reader writes:

I had an interview with a large company at the end of November. I think the interview went great and that they liked me a lot. At the interview, they said that all interviews would finish by the end of the same week as my interview. The following Monday, they contacted me and said that some of the interviews were rescheduled and to remain patient as they will “personally contact me at the end of the hiring process.” Due to the holiday season, I didn’t hear back from them at all until last Thursday. They contacted me then and said that they are updating some specifics about the position with HR, and that once ready they will directly contact me. Also, they were really nice and apologized for the delay at the end of the email.

After reading the last email, I became hopeful since they said once ready they would contact me; its hard for me to believe that someone has to be ready to reject the offer! But a week has passed since then and I haven’t heard anything. What do you think about my situation? Am I probably right in assuming that they are hoping to offer me the position based on the email?

Don’t read anything into it at all. I know it’s really tempting to try to interpret employers’ communications in situations like this, but you really, really, really can’t.

There are just way too many possibilities here for you to be able to know which one is correct. For instance, they might indeed be planning to offer you the job. Or they might be planning to offer it to you, but something will change at the last minute and it won’t happen. Or they might not be planning to offer it to you. Or you might be their second-choice candidate, and they’re waiting to see whether their first choice accepts their offer or not. Or they might have decided not to offer it to you at all, but they have a policy of not rejecting candidates until the position is accepted by someone else. Or they might be revamping the position entirely and re-posting it for a different skill set or with different requirements. Or they might have no intentions at all, and they’re planning to review all candidates and make a choice next week. Or all sorts of other things too.

In other words, when they said they would contact you “once they’re ready,” that doesn’t translate into “once they’re ready to hire you.” It means “once they’re ready to make a decision and inform candidates of it.”

People drive themselves crazy trying to read things into what employers say to them in this type of context. The best thing you can do is to take their words at exactly face value: They are getting ready to make a decision, and they’ll contact you when they have. That’s really all!

my boss retaliated against me in my performance evaluation after I talked to H.R.

A reader writes:

I wrote to you shortly after Hurricane Sandy regarding being written up by my boss for an unscheduled absence because I didn’t “specify that it was because of the hurricane.

[Editor’s note: Here’s the original letter, which I answered privately at the time:  “When my area was hit by the hurricane, the guidance from my office was that it would be open but that employees were to use their judgment on whether to come in or not. I chose not to brave the storm and understood that I would need to use eight hours of PTO. When I returned to the office two days later (it was closed the next day due to the storm), my supervisor was waiting with a Performance Improvement Plan. In my company, taking three or more unscheduled days off in a six-month period will result in a PIP, and I had taken an unscheduled day in May and one in July. Management had sent out an email, however, informing employees that time missed during Sandy would not count toward a PIP, so I asked my supervisor why I was receiving one. She said that it was because I did not specify when I called out that it was because of the storm, so for all she knows I was sick or just didn’t want to come in. To be honest, I don’t recall exactly what I said when I called out that morning (I left a message on her voicemail, which is within company protocol), but I didn’t think it mattered.”]

I did end up taking that up the ladder, as you suggested, and not only was my PIP dropped, but my boss and HER boss (who signed off on the PIP) met with me and apologized for the incident (I would guess not on their own free will, but that’s fine).

I was assigned to a different group (not because of the unscheduled absence incident; we get switched around every year or so), and I thought I was done with my now-former boss until it came time for annual reviews. Even though I had a new boss, former boss wrote my review because I had been on her team for most of the review period.

Well, former boss hammered me on my review. She gave me very low scores on things such as “positive attitude in the workplace,” “professionalism,” “performs job with enthusiasm,” etc. Things that there are no quantitive ways to measure. All of the “1 out of 4s” she gave me completely overwhelmed the things like accuracy and productivity (I am a medical coder) which she had no choice togive me a good score on. Also, her boss signed off on it.

I’ve been with this company for 4-1/2 years and every review I’ve ever had has been outstanding. I’m worried that this review will affect my raise and bonus. I know you hear a fair amount of “It wasn’t faaaaaaaaair! My boss haaaaaaaates me!”, but I truly believe that she is getting back at me for crossing her.

My new boss says that, since my low scores have been entered into the computer system (UltiPro if you’ve ever heard of it), nothing can be changed but she will adjust my raise and bonus when the time comes to reflect the fact that my review was unfair.

I hate the idea of having this horrible review on my record, especially since I’ve always been an outstanding performer. I’m also not sure I trust my new boss to adjust my raise and bonus since there’s no way of knowing if a certain percentage raise is because the company is scaling back on raises or because my review was so poor.

Do I have any recourse? Is this something under HR’s purview?

Wow.

Well, first, that’s great that your HR department handled the hurricane absence the way that they did, and that they pushed back against your manager and her manager. And that gives me hope that they’re likely to handle this new issue well too.

Because, yes, retaliating against someone in their performance review is a big deal. It’s a big deal on two counts: First, because it’s a performance review. That’s not something you mess around with, and if that’s really what happened here, it’s such a profound betrayal of their core job responsibilities that it should be treated as a major performance problem on their part. Second, it’s a deliberate attempt to undermine the action that HR took, and since HR in this case is representing the interests of your employer, it’s like your boss and her boss were saying “F you” to the management above them.

These are both two huge problems.

So yes, please do talk to HR about this. Talk to the person who you spoke with about the initial hurricane write-up issue, and be very clear that you think this is retaliation for going to HR about that. Point out that all your previous evaluations have been outstanding, and use the word “retaliation,” specifically, because that tends to perk up HR’s ears. Good luck.

Read an update to this letter here.

coworker is collecting women’s phone numbers under false pretenses

A reader writes:

I work at a university. There is a young man — a student worker — who works at the front desk of a different office at the university, but in the same building as me. A few weeks ago, he sent an email to my coworker asking for her cell number for an “emergency contact” database. She gave it to him, and since then has been receiving texts and phone calls (including one at 7 a.m. telling her to “have a lovely day”) from him. She has shrugged off his advances and he is now leaving her alone.

However, I just received the exact same email asking for my cell number for emergency purposes. I am tempted to write back saying I have already given my personal contact and emergency info to HR and to cc the HR manager into the message so she knows this man is asking for personal numbers on our work email.

Is this appropriate to do? I am a little annoyed and creeped out and I’m afraid he is going to keep doing this to every young woman in the office if it isn’t nipped in the bud now.

You could, but it’s a bit passive and the HR manager might not pick up on the full problem. For all she knows, he really might have been directed by his manager to compile an emergency contact list. (And in case anyone is wondering if he really might have been — I highly doubt it. That’s a project where you send one mass email, not individual ones over a period of weeks.)

Instead, be more direct. Forward the email to the HR manager with a note about what happened when your friend gave him her phone number for this list. Assume it’ll be taken care of after that.

For what it’s worth, I wish your friend had handled it more directly too, by telling him directly to stop the first time she got one of his texts or phone calls (and especially after that 7 a.m. one). True, she’s not under any obligation to educate this guy that his behavior is inappropriate, but there’s something to the “it takes a village” philosophy when it comes to addressing bad behavior.

fast answer Friday — 7 short answers to 7 short questions

It’s fast answer Friday — seven short answers to seven short questions.

1. What to put on your resume when you have no job title

What do you list on your resume if you have no job title at your company? I work for a very small company and while some people have formal titles, many of us do not. I am more or less the only person in my department, so I manage the department but don’t manage any people. I can come up with a title that I think adequately describes my position, but is it deceitful to list an informal title on a resume? It’s not the type of place who would come up with a job title for me if I asked, either.

List whatever title you think is most accurate. The key thing is that it needs to be accurate enough that won’t be refuted if a reference checker calls your employer.

2. Can I work with my new boss?

I just started a new job (January 14), in a leadership position that requires me to supervise a small staff of 6. The previous person put a bad taste in my supervisor’s mouth, so I think I’m having to suffer. My boss, who is the CEO, has very high expectations for me and has come by my office on several occasions and subtly mentioned that I need to keep in mind that I need to make some sort of changes within my 90 days or I’m gone. He also mentioned this in my interview and I should have run then. But it’s only been a few days and now I’m starting to feel like if I can really do this. I’m walking into a mess and learning my job at the same time and having to deal with him, his high expectations and subtle threats, I’m seriously thinking about putting my résumé back out there. I like the job and I can see myself doing it, but I’m not sure if working with him is something I can do. Please advise.

It sounds like you and your boss need to get aligned about how you plan to proceed. He’s antsy because he feels changes need to be made in your department, and he wants to see signs that you agree and have a plan to do it. Sit down and talk with him and let him know what your plan is — for example, maybe you’re going to spend a few more weeks getting the lay of the land, and then you’ll begin developing a strategy for how to move forward, and you expect you’ll begin implementing that strategy in X amount of time, etc. In other words, communicate with the guy and see if that changes anything.

3. Have I been blacklisted?

I was laid off from my job 3 years ago. I’m in constant contact with headhunters who tell me that things are slow, yet I see their job postings that I’m very qualified for all the time. When I call them about these posted positions, they completely ignore my question of whether or not the job is still available. Is there a “blacklist” between headhunters? I can’t recall upsetting anyone. If there is, how do I get off of it? It is so frustrating seeing all these jobs pass me over, for reasons unknown.

It’s highly unlikely that you’ve been blacklisted. What’s more likely is that you’re not coming across as an especially strong candidate for the jobs you’re contacting them about. In a tight job market like this one, it’s not enough just to be qualified — in many fields, you need to be extremely strong to get much attention. It’s difficult to give nuanced advice without knowing a lot more, but this post may help.

4. My boss’s memory and detail-orientedness are making me feel insecure

I’ve worked in several different work environments and for many different bosses. In previous environments, I was always the “go-to gal” and the “overachiever.” I was usually the one who kept on top of my boss’s calendar, to-do lists, etc.

About a year ago, I started working a new job and came to find out that my boss has a wonderful knack for remembering tiny details, catching any type of error, and an amazing memory! Although she’s overwhelmed by work most of the time, anything she does is essentially flawless. You would think this would be a good thing … but it makes me feel inferior and a sub-standard employee. She’s not necessarily a micromanager in that she directs everything, but she is a devil in the details type of person. She also can recall important dates, times, numbers, etc. at the snap of fingers, while I’m still saying, “I don’t recall” or “I’ll have to check that report.” Perhaps she’s a robot?

I’m grateful to finally have a boss that doesn’t slack on their work, but find that myself and others in the office have this same issue — feeling less than. I don’t think my boss has ever blatantly said that she expects us to be the same as her. But there’s definitely a feeling of insecurity.

Why not sit down with her and ask for feedback about how you’re doing? You might find that she thinks you’re doing a great job, and that your fears are only based on your perceptions, not hers. Frankly, if you have a good rapport with her, you can tell her a little about what you’re feeling — she might be able to set your mind at ease.

(And I have to say, I’m someone who remembers things like a robot most of the time, but I don’t expect others to be the same. You probably have something that you’re great at but which you don’t look down on others for not having equivalent talent in themselves, right? Same thing here.)

5. Rejected for a job in the office I do contract work in

I have an odd situation. I have been a long-time contractor (by choice) for a branch of the federal government. I am self-employed with years of experience and command a high hourly rate, so I’ve been happy doing contract work. However, some of the work that I had been doing, and which I enjoy the most, was bundled together into a full-time job, and I was invited to apply for it. I applied in October, interviewed in December, and one month later was getting a nagging feeling that if they wanted me, they would have notified me. As it turns out, they have offered the job to someone else. Needless to say, it is quite awkward around the office. We’re all trying to be professional, but I am embarrassed and feel somewhat betrayed, which is sort of irrational, but sort of not when you consider that I have been contracting with this organization for almost a decade, have never received anything but stellar reviews, and am the go-to person for many technical questions, even though I am not an employee. I have scheduled a follow-up with the person who did the hiring in hopes of getting some constructive feedback about why I was not chosen for the job. What specific questions should I ask?

Well, first, don’t be embarrassed. Great people end up not getting hired for jobs all the time, for reasons that really don’t reflect poorly on them — often someone else simply is a better fit in one way or another: They have more intriguing experience in X, or helpful connections in Y, or expertise in Z, which wasn’t even part of the job, but it’s going to be helpful to have it so that was the deciding factor, or all kinds of other things. Most hiring managers will tell you that they regularly end up with multiple candidates who they’d be glad to hire, but when they only have one slot, they have to reject all the others. So there’s no shame in this. But if you act like you feel awkward about it, others will feel awkward too, so be as matter-of-fact about it as you can.

When you meet with the hiring manager, avoid demanding to know why you weren’t hired. Simply ask if she has any advice for you for how you can make yourself a more competitive candidate for similar jobs in the future.

6. When your school changes its name

How important is it to keep up with name changes of schools attended years ago on your resume? Of the schools I’ve attended, one has grown from a college to a university (fine), the other from an institute to a college (fine). The second one mentioned here has also moved to a different state (okay) and as of this year has completely changed its name. Do I risk not appearing “current” if I don’t make this name change on my resume and LinkedIn profile? As it is, no one has “found” me or otherwise associated with me with the name as is. No one has directly asked about my education during interviews. Would something like this matter to a hiring manager, or could I leave things as they are and just mention during an interview “when I attended, it was ‘ABC Institute” in Mytown, NY, now it’s called ‘Best University Ever’ in Timbucktu, AZ”?

It’s not really a big deal either way, but I’d change it to its current name, because I like accuracy. That said, you’re not obligated to track its name changes proactively — but if it happens to come to your attention that the name has changed, I’d update it on your resume accordingly.

7. Toilet trauma, part 2

I work in a small, technical library in a private college. The office consists of me (the head librarian — female) and a part-time assistant librarian (male). There are two rooms in the library. The front room has the service counter, our collection of materials, copier, and desk for the assistant librarian. The back room has two work counters, a micro-fridge, my desk, and a small private bathroom.

The assistant librarian, with whom I have several managerial issues, is rather socially awkward, which brings me to my particular problem. The private bathroom is 4 feet from my desk and not terribly well insulated. Several times a week, he will retire to the bathroom for 10+ minutes to do his “business.” Now, I’m no delicate flower. I grew up with two older brothers and have two young boys and a husband at home. Everybody poops. The problem I have is that it feels like he is sitting right there in my office firing away. He has no qualms about this, but I feel very uncomfortable sitting there waiting for him to emerge. I will usually try to busy myself in the front room once he goes in there, but that is not always possible. On more than one occasion, I’ve had a faculty member, and even the Provost, come to speak with me in my office while he is in there (unbeknownst to them) only to have him come out mid-meeting, in a cloud of Lysol. On many mornings, after he has worked an evening event, I find reading materials from my reference collection on the shelf in the bathroom. I realize my discomfort is probably compounded by my other issues with him, which could fill up a whole other email.

Is there any way to deal with this without coming off as a prudish, bathroom fascist? (“You cannot use my bathroom for number 2. Ever.”) Should I just break the tension with humor? (“SO! How did that go in there?”) All I do now is vent to my husband, who finds this hilarious.

Gross. I hope this is the last bathroom-related question I receive FOR A VERY LONG TIME.

In any case, is there another bathroom he can use? If so, your choices are to (a) say something to him, knowing it’s going to be awkward no matter how you word it, or (b) say nothing and accept this is part of having a bathroom right by your office. Personally, if I was going to say something, it would sound like this: “Dude, sorry to be gross, but I sit right by this bathroom and am sensitive to Lysol. Maybe the other bathroom is better to use?” That’s seriously how I’d say it. Reword as needed to fit your comfort level.

But more importantly, if you have managerial issues with this guy, start dealing with them. That’s the more pressing issue here.