terse answer Thursday — 7 short answers to 7 short questions

It’s terse answer Thursday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Follow-up from the reader wondering about legal action if his transfer is denied

A few weeks ago, I posted a question about an internal transfer and if I had a legal basis to some degree demand my move. It was obvious from the many replies that I was dead wrong and I should count the reasons why… I understand. Now, here is my new question. I was informed of my interview time and date and I’m the very first interviewee of about 50. Would you think this order is an indication of good or bad news? Typically, I try to interview the applicant I’m most interested the very last time available to be able to give an offer on the spot with everyone else out of the way… What do you think? Also, I have more personal reasons why I want to move. Should I explain these or stick to the what my move can do for the company?

First I have my own question! 50 interviews is a ton. It’s an insane number of people to interview for a job. What on earth are they thinking?

In any case, I wouldn’t read anything at all into whether they talk to you first, last, or somewhere in between. Scheduling order rarely means anything; it’s generally random or based on who’s available when. (Also, please reconsider offering people jobs on the spot! You need time to think things over, talk to references, etc.)

While you shouldn’t make your personal reasons for wanting to move the focus on the interview, you should definitely mention them — because if you’re a great employee and they know you really want to move back, they may factor that in because they care about retaining you in the long term.

2. Coach receiving two salaries

I have argued with a few friends and my husband about this issue and it was a hot-button topic on talk radio here the other day. The head coach at the University of Wisconsin quit last week. The athletic director, Barry Alvarez, who was at one time both head coach and athletic director, agreed to coach the team for the Rose Bowl game.

Which is what I would expect — Alvarez is the manager and his subordinate quit, so he needs to make sure the subordinate’s job is done, even if it means he does it. What I did not expect is that Alvarez would be paid the coach’s salary in addition to his own AD salary. (It’s actually some of both salaries, but he comes out almost $120,000 ahead.)

Have I been in the wrong industries? I have never worked in a situation where the manager picked up the subordinate’s pay after the subordinate quit. Is this common? Or does this happen only when your regular salary is over a million dollars a year?

No, this is definitely not common outside of sports. The sports industry seems to play by its own rules when it comes to stuff like this.

3. What did this confusing interview mean?

I went to this interview about 3 days ago, and I can safely say it was one of the stranger interviews I have had. The company is well established, and doing quite well financially. But when I went to the interview, it seemed one of the interviewers had not even read my resume and looked totally bored. The other — who was the senior manager — seemed to have gone over my resume in detail. But most of the interview consisted of them telling me about the job, and the only questions they had were on how I felt about negative aspects of the job (I said I had no problems and substantiated my answers with examples from past jobs).

Here is the confusing part. The interviewers left the room and the senior manager came in after 5 minutes and told me he felt I did well in the interview and that he had no reason not to hire me. But he also said they had several other people to interview, and he emphasized that last point it seems. I began to say that it is understandable that they will hire the best person, but the manager stopped me from finishing. So what do I make of all this ? Did I fail to impress ? Also, should I be concerned that I didn’t hear back at all ? They did say I would have to come in at least two more times this week but I havent heard anything so far.

Don’t read anything into it. They told you that you did well, so you should take that at face value and assume you did well, and they told you that they’re still interviewing others, which you should also take at face value and expect that they’re interviewing others. The fact that you haven’t heard from them by the time they said you would isn’t terribly concerning — hiring nearly always takes longer than the people involved with it think it will take — but it gives you a reason to follow up with them and ask for a sense of their timeline for next steps.

4. Will this employer forget about me?

I have been doing a series of interviews with Company A (1 phone, 2 in-person). The latest interview was with the director of the department the position is under, but she isn’t the person I’d report to if hired. At the very beginning of the interview, she mentioned that there will be another round, and I’ll know if I’ve been shortlisted to move forward by Monday (interview was on Friday). It’s Tuesday now, I haven’t heard anything, should I be worried? I already sent the HR manager and the Director separate thank you emails on Saturday, so they’d get it on Monday. Should I send the HR manager a followup email?

Normally I wouldn’t worry unless it’s more than a week, but this time she specially said I’d hear back by Monday regardless. The HR manager has always been very punctual the past few times that she had to follow up with me. So this seems a little out of the ordinary. Also it’s less than a week away from Christmas, I’m afraid if I don’t act now, they might forget about me, and just hire someone else. Is that a reasonable assumption?

See the answer to #3 above. It’s very, very common in hiring for next steps to take longer than an employer tells you. But you can email a follow-up inquiring about their timeline for next steps.

However, no, they will not forget about you if they’re interested in you. People do not forget candidates who they’re seriously interested in hiring.

5. Short interviews

I was told that my interview will only be about 30 minutes or so. I’m wondering why this would be? I’m going for a managing editor of a state bar journal position, so I was thinking they might give me a copy editing test. I’ll be prepared for that, but I just thought, as a hiring manager, what you think this could mean.

It either means that it’s a first-round interview and there will be more in-depth conversations later, or it means that they’re not very good at hiring (since you should never hire someone after only a 30-minute conversation)!

6. Did I just throw a grenade?

While digging around on a few of my soon-to-be-former company’s servers over the years, I’ve found that there’s quite a lot of sensitive information publicly available and not password protected. This includes things like salary information, performance reviews, raise recommendations, disciplinary and termination letters, executives’ email archives, and financial information related to a recent acquisition. It’s mostly a bit buried, but also not terribly hard to stumble across if you’re not quite sure where the thing you are looking for is located. It seems to be mostly a failure of some individuals to understand that everything on a public server is public unless it’s password protected, not an IT failure.

I never told anyone about it because I didn’t want it coming back to me if the people who mishandled these things got in trouble for it. But I had my exit interview the other day, and I figured, well, why not say something now?

So my question is: how big of a grenade did I just throw? I’ll be out of there after next week, so I probably won’t get to see the fallout, but after all of the garbage they’ve put me through over the years, I wouldn’t mind knowing that a few heads might roll. The HR rep seemed pretty calm and noncommittal about it when I told her, but I guess that’s how they’re supposed to be.

Not that big of a grenade. They’re likely to just fix the problem. I would have just alerted them the first time you discovered it, not waited until you were leaving. It’s certainly a mistake, and an embarrassing one, but I doubt anyone is going to get fired over it.

7. Managing a low performer

I own and run a small company with 3 employees and I find I clash with one of them, my Administration person. She does a good job with some tasks but she’s not organised, makes quite a few errors and doesn’t like processes (by nature). Once when we talked about her scheduling tasks in her Calendar (because she forgets things) she commented that she didn’t like using Calendar because she felt that it would run her life, or it’s too regimented).

She cares about the business and her strengths are probably showing initiative and diving into new tasks. Because the business is small she also has to do quite a range of tasks (e.g. packing orders and making up samples for despatch) which she is happy to do. I’ve tried to teach her to be more prcoess orientated but I often feel there’s resistance and she’s not very good at communicating and when I tell her to document things in the manual (or do other things) ½ the time she doesn’t do it and I have to check. I find her very difficult to work with at times and it’s affecting my performance at work. Do you have any advice?

Um, manage her? Tell her what you need her to do differently and why, give her a timeline for fixing it, and hold her accountable to meeting your expectations. If she doesn’t, then you need to replace her with someone who can meet the bar you’ve laid out. You can’t really have an administration person who isn’t organized and doesn’t like processes. So be clear with her about what you need, and be prepared to replace her if she continues not to provide it.

This is your business. You can’t afford to have someone, let alone one-third of your staff, not performing their job well.

can you refuse to work with an unpleasant coworker?

A reader writes:

My department just underwent a massive restructuring and my boss is trying to sell me on a new position that would be doing more of what he knows I want to do. However, the new role would mean working more closely with a manager I absolutely cannot stand.  He is rude and dismissive and treats me (and many others) like I’m something he wiped off his shoe. 

It would make sense for me to take the position, since it is more of what I want to do than what I do now. But how do I say, “I know I said I want to do this, just as long as it’s not with this guy”?  Is there a proper way to say that I don’t work well with someone?  The two managers have worked together in the past at a different company and I can’t imagine, based on their personalities, that they are best buddies.  But my manager has never said anything bad about him and I don’t want to badmouth another manager.  Nor do I want to work on fixing our working relationship, I just want to avoid him altogether.

If you have a good relationship with your manger, you can explain your concerns, but you need to go about it carefully.

* First, your own standing matters – a lot. Managers generally wish that everyone would put personality differences aside and just get the work done, even though the good ones will understand that it’s reasonable not to want to work with jerks. But if you’re a highly valued employee who produces excellent work, your manager is more likely to take your concerns seriously and respect your stance than if you’re not an especially high performer.

* Don’t make outright demands about who you will and won’t work with. That means that you shouldn’t say anything like, “I’ll do this job, but I won’t work with Bob.” The reality is, working with Bob might be part of this new job, and it might not be an option to alter that. If you sound like you think you can structure a job to work only with people you like, you risk sounding out of touch with the realities of how businesses work.

However, you can express reservations about working with Bob and can explain that your concerns are a factor as you consider the job. For instance, you could say, “I’m really interested in this role and I so appreciate you working to create it. However, realizing how closely I’d be working with Bob is giving me pause. Between you and me, I’ve found him to be dismissive and challenging to work with, and I’m not sure I’d be eager to take that on.”

(Only say this if your manager is both reasonable and discreet. You don’t want to share things like this if you think you’ll be penalized for your candor or that it might get back to Bob and cause problems for you.)

* Third, realize that you might not have a choice. Some jobs do require working with people you can’t stand. You can carefully share your preferences with your manager if you do it in the way described above, but if the job requires working with the Director of ABC, there’s probably nothing you can do about that, no matter how sympathetic your manager might be. (You can leave or turn down the job, of course, but often that’s the only alternative.)

* Fourth, it’s worth considering working with the person you don’t like anyway. You’re never going to be able to eliminate difficult people from your work life entirely (unless you’re astoundingly lucky), and sometimes figuring out how to minimize their impact on you can be really valuable. After all, if you leave for another job, you might encounter a coworker just as unpleasant, or even more so.

Sometimes simply realizing that difficult people’s behavior is about them, not you, can make them easier to deal with … and sometimes knowing that you’ve dealt with a difficult person well can be surprisingly satisfying on its own. It’s worth considering, at least.

update from the reader whose boss wanted her to do contract work after she left for a new job

Remember the reader whose boss kept pressing her to do contract work after she left for a new job? Here’s her update:

I tried to tell my old boss in person that I would not be doing any contract work but he kept pestering me until I ended up just emailing him to let him know I would not do it and he never brought it up again. Fortunately, I left the job on very good terms despite that bit of tension.

I have been at my new job for almost four months and I really appreciate my new boss. She is encouraging and helpful and I also have a lot more autonomy. It’s a great fit. Since I left my last job, I have kept a good relationship with my old boss and my old coworkers; I even sat down for lunch with the person he hired in my place and answered a few of her questions. My old boss also hired another person for the department, which I am not sure would have happened if I had stayed.

update from the reader working for a boy band fan site

Remember the reader who was working for a boy band fan site and was wondering whether to include it on her resume, or whether it was too embarrassing? Here’s her update:

I actually have really exciting news to update everyone on after writing in about whether or not I should include my work for an *NSYNC fan site on my resume — IT GOT ME A JOB!  I put in my two weeks notice at my current position on Monday and am really excited for my next venture. I’m not going to go so far as to say it’s my dream job, but it sure as heck sounds like it.

I know my experience running Still *NSYNC isn’t the ONLY reason I was hired. I cannot even express how important networking is in job searching situations. I’m an incredibly introverted person and it takes everything I have in me to walk up to someone I’ve never met before and introduce myself or to email anyone out of the blue to ask for an informational phone call even if I have an alumni or personal connection to them. But I was at a conference in April and the director of the department I’m going to be working for was there and I somehow worked up the courage to introduce myself. We’ve been talking ever since and they basically created my new position for me!

In terms of the *NSYNC fan site, I want to thank everyone for their advice about putting it on my resume. It’s difficult to sit back and see it for the experience that it really is. I’m still growing the site hand over fist with some new initiatives to involve the fans and it only took a commenter pointing out that that’s fairly impressive for a fan site revolving around a boy band that hasn’t appeared together publicly in 11 years. Though I have to admit, Justin Timberlake and Jessica Biel have helped out a ton with the site visits by getting married and all.

You provide an invaluable community here, Alison! I lead all of my interns to your site to learn and grow in their job searches. Thank you!

when your older male coworkers are condescending

This is from a friend of mine, who agreed to let me use it as a question here. She writes:

I work in a male-dominated field, and don’t have the same technical background that many of them do. I was hired for my communications, organizing, and project management skills, but have noticed it takes some uncomfortable and awkward time for some of the new, older male members of my team to “accept me” for my leadership role. In most cases, the relationships have improved over time, but not after I had to uncomfortably speak up for myself and prove myself to them.

A new guy who just started last week reflects a similar situation. He waltzed in and started criticizing existing processes and speaking in a condescending manner about just about everything. He refuses to look me in the eye when I’m talking to him, and has already treated me in a subtley offensive way.

I’m 30 years old and have worked my ass off for the last decade and have the resume to prove it, as well as a boss who specifically recruited me because I worked for him previously and he knows I’m great. Apparently, my face looks like a 23-year-old’s and this may be a factor in older men being uncomfortable with accepting the fact that I’m an equal.

I don’t want to type too much here, but I think there’s enough here for you to get a basic grip of what I’m dealing with. I’m tired of it and it makes me angry, sad, and upset.

Dr. Phil says “You have to teach people how to treat you”, and I’m trying to figure out how to apply that to this situation without causing a stir. Any advice?

I once found myself in a similar situation — in my late 20s, I was working in an office staffed nearly entirely by much older men. I’d been brought in by the head of the organization specifically to make changes, and they Did Not Like It. Frankly, they probably wouldn’t have liked it if I’d been a 55-year-old man either — these were not people who welcomed change, regardless of the face of it — but it really didn’t help matters that they saw me as a little girl.

I decided I didn’t give a crap. I was going to do my job, I was going to do it well, and they could either get on board with it or not, but I was going to do what I was there to do. I ignored the condescension and their assumption that anything I said was rooted in inexperience, and I just went about my work. In time, some of them changed their attitude toward me and began treating me like a peer, and a few didn’t. I decided I didn’t care; I wasn’t going to let my ability to do my job well be held hostage to their attitudes about my age (or my gender, if indeed that was part of their issue), and my work would speak for itself. They could change their minds or not; it wasn’t my problem.

Now, obviously, it becomes your problem if they’re actually getting in the way of you doing your job. And if that happens, you need to speak up — just like you would do if someone were obstructing you for reasons that had nothing to do with your age or gender. You’d call them on it — pleasantly and professionally, but assertively. You’d tell them clearly what you needed, and if talking to them directly didn’t solve the problem, then you’d escalate it appropriately. In other words, go about this just like you would if it wasn’t about your age or gender at all, and instead were just about a coworker being obstructionist or difficult.

But the stuff that isn’t actually getting in the way of your work and is just annoying, like the condescension, the mistrust before you’ve proven yourself, or the not looking you in the eye? That more subtly offensive stuff you ignore, because that’s their problem, not yours, and it only has to bother you if you let it. Instead, you act as if of course they respect you, of course they’re behaving normally, because why the hell wouldn’t be they be? And you act that way until it’s true (or until you’re sick of it and go somewhere else).

Now, is it a pain in the ass that you have to do this? Of course. But it might be helpful to keep in mind that some of this — possibly a lot of it — is really about age and experience level, not about gender. And that can be pretty easy to overcome once you show that what you have to contribute doesn’t line up with their preconceptions about your age and experience level, as long as you’re dealing with at least semi-reasonable people. (And if you’re not, that’s a whole different issue, and raises fundamental questions about the organization where you’re working.)

You have the support of your boss, and you know that you’re awesome at what you do. Ignore the condescension and focus on your job. Eventually they’ll either come around or look ridiculous, or you’ll get sick of it and go somewhere where people look you in the eye.

is it okay to let your organization manage you out of a job you hate?

A reader writes:

Is it ever ok to let your organization manage you out of your current job? I am in a position which has seen a significant increase in both tasks and expectations and yet has made no staffing or salary accommodations to support this situation. In short, I feel as though I am in a firefight which is rapidly becoming an inferno, the hose is out of water and it is taking everything I have on a daily basis not to put it down and walk away. If you knew me in real life, you would know this is so not who I am — I am an extremely dedicated worker who gives it all I’ve got — I have simply allowed this job to squash my soul and now have nothing left to give to it. (My boss has told me I am numb and also a whiny babyhead, and the phrase “I’m done” keeps ringing in my head so I’m guessing it’s time to move on.)

I am starting my job search but would like to take my time to find the right position. In the meanwhile, there are tasks (goals — nonsense goals that to my mind only serve to put management in a position to receive a bonus, not actually effect any change to the service of our customers — not bitter, just sayin’) which I have no interest whatsoever in completing. Should I decide to let them truly drop, I suppose they could start the process of terminating my employment (large corporation which moves at the speed of a glacier, with an additionally bad track record of managing out bad employees so at least I would see it coming for a mile before it actually happened) but at this point, I’m not sure it matters to me what they do. All I want is to be left alone to do the best work for our customers and for my coworkers until I find something else.

In order to not be too much of a trouble maker in the interim, shall I just let it ride and see what happens with my current gig or would you recommend I give notice and take up temp work while I look for something permanent?

It tends to be easier to find a new job while you’re still employed, so if you can stomach staying where you are while you search, I would. Yes, you can take up temp work, but getting full-time temp work (or even part-time temp work) isn’t as easy as it used to be. We’ve had plenty of reports here from people who have tried to temp and never gotten any work. So don’t count on that as a sure thing unless you have reason to be certain of it. And even if you do temp full-time, it won’t give you the same job search benefits that staying at your current job will — you won’t be considered “currently employed” in the way that you would in a non-temp job, you’ll be facing questions about why you quit with nothing lined up, and it might even be harder to take time off for interviews (since temp jobs are often less flexible than others).

However, in the meantime, you can’t “let things drop” at your current job and allow them to start the process of managing you out. You might think that it’ll take a long time and you’ll have a new job before they get to the end of the process, but there are several pretty big problems with that thinking:

1. You have no way of knowing if you’ll have found a new job by the time they’re ready to fire you or not. Job searches in this market are often taking a really long time — in some cases, a year or more.

2. More importantly, you will do fatal harm to your reputation. You don’t want to be known — to coworkers, managers, vendors, and others who interact with you — as the person who fell apart, let goals drop entirely, got sloppy, etc. You may think you don’t care what they think of you, and you might not right now — but reputation has a way of following you about. You don’t want to make your escape from this job only to find that your reputation at it gets in the way of you getting a job you really want in the future. Your reputation has a huge bearing on what options are available to you in the future — don’t cripple yourself by letting yours slip.

So if at all possible, stay where you are and continue to do a good job while you look for another. Do not decide that being managed out — i.e., fired — is a solution, because while it might solve your immediate problem (a job you hate), there’s too high of a chance that it will cause you far more in the future.

5 interview mistakes you can easily avoid

If you’re interviewing for jobs, you know the feeling of kicking yourself for hours after an interview because you flubbed an answer or got the interviewer’s name wrong. But no one is perfect, and most interviewers don’t expect candidates to give perfect interviews. However, there are some interviewing mistakes that are easily avoidable, and which you can navigate away from with just a little bit of thought.

Here are five interview mistakes that you can avoid if you know about them ahead of time.

1. Not preparing. This is probably the number one mistakes most job candidates make: They show up for the interview without thoroughly preparing in the days before. Preparation doesn’t mean a quick skim of the job description and a glance at the employer’s website; it means at least several hours spent thinking through likely questions and practicing your answers to them, as well as thinking back on specific examples you can pull from your past to illustrate how you’ve excelled in previous jobs.

2. Not researching your interviewer. A quick glance on LinkedIn might give you advance warning that your interviewer used to work with that old boss who hated you, meaning you won’t be caught off guard if asked about it in the interview. Or simply reading your interviewer’s bio on the company website might tip you off that she has a background in the software you used to work with and you might get a lot of questions on that.

3. Being late. You might think that you’re playing it safe by leaving for your interview a few minutes earlier than you need to. But hit a traffic accident, and that buffer will fly out the window, and you could end up arriving late for your appointment. When you’re heading out to an interview, it’s smart to give yourself a huge buffer – meaning an hour or so – because it’s nearly impossible to recover from being late for an interview. You can always kill the extra time in your car or a nearby coffee shop if you arrive early.

4. Wearing the wrong outfit. In most industries, you should wear a suit to a job interview. (I.T. is sometimes, but not always an exception.) It doesn’t matter if your interviewers are more casually dressed themselves; wearing a suit, as the candidate, is still typically an expected convention. But aside from picking out the right clothes, you also need to make sure that you look polished and groomed – that your clothes fit you well, that your hair is neat and in place, that your makeup is professional and not heavy-handed. And it’s also key that you feel comfortable in whatever you’re wearing; you don’t want to be constantly adjusting your neckline or fidgeting with your cuffs.

5. Not being ready to talk about salary.Job seekers are often more uncomfortable with conversations about salary than anything else, and as a result, they often don’t prepare for how they’ll handle questions about it. This is a huge disservice to yourself! If salary does come up and you try to wing it, you’re likely to end up with less money in your offer than if you were prepared. So don’t leave it to employers to manage salary discussions for you; do your research and thinking ahead of time so that you can field salary questions confidently.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

what’s the etiquette for hanging out with coworkers on business trips?

A reader writes:

I travel for work about once a month, sometimes domestically and sometimes internationally. I’m lucky enough to have friends in many of the places I travel, and I often make plans to see these friends either in the evenings (if there’s no possibility of a work-related event or meeting) or by staying the night if the meeting adjourns in the afternoon/evening and my job will pay for an additional hotel night. I’ve had the awkward situation a few times where I’ve had a colleague from work who is also on the trip and who doesn’t have dinner plans when I’ve made arrangements to see my friends. It’s especially awkward when I’ve taken the trip with just one other person from my job. In that situation, had I not had a friend in that city, my colleague and I would have had dinner together.

If my colleague asks if I want to have dinner, is it okay to say something like, “I’m actually meeting up with an old friend,” and leave it at that? Or is the right thing to do to invite them along? I would much prefer to have one-on-one time with my far-flung friends, but I don’t want to damage work relationships either.

Absolutely, it’s fine to simply say that you’re meeting up with a friend, and you’re not obligated to invite your coworker along if you don’t want to. Your off time is your off time, whether you’re traveling for work or not.

That said, if you’re traveling with someone who you think is likely to assume you’ll be having dinner together (or who will want to), it’s kind to let them know ahead of time — for instance, as you’re going over arrangements for the trip, mention, “By the way, I’m going to meet up with a friend on Tuesday for dinner.” Or, if you aren’t meeting anyone but just know you’ll want to have time to yourself, you can say, “I should warn you — when I’m traveling, I usually go straight back to the hotel and crash in my room after the work day.” That way, they have advance warning and can make other plans if they want to, or at least aren’t caught off-guard by it at the last minute, their dreams of bonding over sushi and karaoke shattering into the cold hard reality that you are in your room reading Sense & Sensibility for the fifth time. (Not that I’m speaking from personal experience here or anything. Actually, I’m currently reading The Godfather, and it is fantastic.)

But even if you don’t have opportunity to mention your plans ahead of time, it’s still fine to go off and do your own thing once you’re no longer working.

new boss expects me to respond to work emails over the weekend

A reader writes:

I work a 9-5 job in the creative industry. I am fairly low down in the pecking order, so to speak. The company recently employed someone to be my new boss, who has now started emailing me on the weekends and expects me to reply to him immediately. I have my own personal phone (which i pay the bill for), which I link my work emails to so I receive them, but can I really be expected to respond to work issues on the weekend that could honestly wait until Monday? How do I approach this issue with my boss without causing aggravation?

Well, first, are you sure that your new boss does expect you to reply immediately? Many people, myself included, like to do some work over the weekend, but that doesn’t mean that we expect immediate answers to our emails. But of course, when it’s the boss emailing, a lot of people assume a quick response is expected, unless the boss explicitly tells them otherwise.

Now, obviously, if your boss is saying things like “let me know today” or following up on Sunday to ask why you haven’t yet responded to the email he sent on Saturday, then it’s pretty clear that he does expect responses over the weekend. But if this isn’t the case, then I would either (a) ignore the emails until you’re back at work on Monday or (b) ask him — as in, “Hey, I’m assuming that it’s fine for me to wait to reply to emails sent over the weekend until I’m back at work on Monday, unless it’s an emergency. Let me know if that’s not the case.”

That alone might solve the problem. But if it doesn’t — if your manager makes it clear that he does indeed expect weekend responses — then you have the usual choices: accept it or try to change it.

If you want to try to change it, that means talking to your manager. Say something like, “It’s new for me to be expected to answer work emails over the weekend; we haven’t typically done that. I don’t mind responding occasionally if it’s an emergency, but I wonder if there’s a way to save everything else for when I’m back at work. I use the weekends to recharge so that I’m refreshed on Monday, and I’m often somewhere where I can’t easily answer work emails.”

You don’t want to say this in a complaining tone, like the subtext is “I hate my job and resent being asked to think about it on weekends.” You want your tone to convey “We’re both professionals here and obviously we both recognize the value of time away from work, so let’s problem-solve this.”

This might solve — or at least cut down on — the emails. (Make sure, by the way, to recognize the difference between receiving emails on the weekend and being expected to respond to them on the weekend. If your manager is working over the weekend, it’s not reasonable to ask him not to email you. Rather, what you want is an understanding on both sides that you won’t be responding until Monday, and an agreement that that’s fine.)

However, if your manager tells you that, yes, in fact you are expected to respond to emails over the weekend, then you need to decide if you want the job under these terms, knowing that this is part of the package. Jobs do change over time, especially when a new manager comes in, and if he wants to require this, ultimately that’s his call. (Of course, if you’re non-exempt, you need to be paid for any time you spend working on the weekends, including answering email.)

Some people will also tell you to try things like removing your work email from your phone (not a bad idea) or telling your manager that you’ll be somewhere without Internet access for the weekend. These are options if you want them, but I’d rather see you address it head-on and try to get aligned about expectations on each side.

So start with a conversation. You’re going to learn plenty from that, and then can decide how to proceed.

secrets of a hiring manager (and a holiday gift)

As a holiday gift, this week I’m offering you 40% off my e-book, How to Get a Job: Secrets of a Hiring Manager. Put in this discount code and you’ll get a massive discount: holiday2012

Written from my perspective as a long-time hiring manager, this e-book gives you step-by-step guidance through every stage of your job search … explaining at each step what a hiring manager is thinking and what they want to see from you … from getting noticed initially, to nailing the interview, to navigating the tricky post-interview period, all the way through your offer.

You’ll learn things like:

  • what hiring managers are looking for when they ask common interview questions
  • how to talk about sensitive issues when you interview — firings, bad bosses, “overqualification,” and more
  • how to avoid companies that aren’t a good fit
  • 6 ways you might be sabotaging your job search
  • 2 ways you can turn rejection to your advantage

Learn more about it here, or buy it here:

You can also give the book to your job-hunting friends and family — email me privately before you purchase to arrange for a gift message to be included.

Happy holidays!