tiny answer Tuesday — 6 short answers to 6 short questions

It’s tiny answer Tuesday — six short answers to six short questions. Here we go…

1. When can I leave my job to join my fiance?

I started my first job out of college this August. I perform it well, it pays nicely, I have a friendly and compassionate manager, and it is all around pretty great. However, I also just got engaged to my college sweetheart, who is committed for 2 years to a job in New York. We’ve been doing long distance since August, but as you might know, long distance is horrible and we really want to move in together ASAP. I’m planning to tell my boss the news and ask if I can possibly work remotely, but if that isn’t possible, how long should I be working at my current job before I can realistically look for work in NYC?

I’d start looking now, using your fiance’s address, which is soon to become yours. It can take many months to find a job, so by the time you’re going on interviews, you may have been at your current job a year or longer. Just make sure you stay at your next job at least 2 years and ideally 3+ so that you don’t look like you have a pattern of leaving jobs after a short time.

2. Recognizing coworkers several levels above you

This is a nice problem to have. Sometimes my superiors will go above and beyond to do something that really helps me get my work done or feel motivated, and I’d like to recognize it the same way they do for me when they like something I’ve done. I’ve typically done it in the same way they do — on group emails — but what’s appropriate? Are there things I shouldn’t do?

Recent example — a remote manager emailed my group with a lot of tasks, and one person was asked to provide information, but she was on the road in a place where she didn’t have internet. And, she didn’t have the information. But, somehow, she still managed to contact someone at another organization, find it and get it to us ridiculously quickly. She could have just as easily said no, or even “here’s what you should do because I’m not there.” So in my response to manager and my group with some questions on these tasks, I called out this person.

Appropriate and appreciated? Not following appropriate boundaries? I’m about 2-3 ranks below this manager and the person who helped, and about ~14 years behind in experience. I do want to promote a positive team environment and am always looking for appropriate ways that I, as the most junior member of the team, can do that.

It’s nice to cite other people’s contributions publicly, but in at least some of these cases, I’d just thank the person privately. It’s really nice to recognize people’s work, but it doesn’t always have to be through a public message (just like your manager should be praising you privately some of the time; it doesn’t always have to be a public announcement). Plus, be aware that at 2-3 ranks below the person you’re praising, and many years in experience behind them, you may not be seeing enough of the picture to realize that what they’re doing is pretty normal for their job, and it’s potentially weird if you’re always publicly praising people for doing what’s expected of them — but that doesn’t mean you can’t thank them one-on-one when they make your life easier.

3. I declined to give 360 feedback on my boss

I received a request to give 360 feedback on my boss. I have heard that giving negative feedback to your boss is fraught with danger! My boss has only two direct reports (me and one other person). I declined this request for feedback.

Just yesterday, I discovered that if a request for 360 feedback is declined, whomever requested the feedback received a notice. The person that requested the feedback could have been either my boss or my boss’s boss. Either way, someone received notice that I declined.

How does this look? I declined the request because I had nothing good to say and was afraid of retaliation if I was honest. I am worried my boss would still retaliate because she knows the “if you can’t say something good, don’t say anything at all” rule. Did this make my boss look bad?

It’s true that declining to give feedback on someone usually implies that you don’t feel comfortable speaking negatively of them. What I want to know, though, is whether you have reason to fear retaliation from your boss if you gave honest feedback. If she’s never done anything to make you feel that way, and you feared that based only on hearing that this can happen, then you’ve done her a disservice. If, however, you have reason to worry about her reaction, then you were perfectly entitled to decline to participate.

4. My boss won’t keep meetings with me

I am a paralegal and my attorney keeps pushing back the weekly review meetings we are supposed to have. It’s been nearly two months since our last “weekly” meeting. His boss, the head attorney, has already admonished him repeatedly that he needs to have these meetings with me (otherwise, how will he know what’s going on with the case). I feel like I’ve tried everything I can think of — setting an appointment, emailing and texting reminders, asking nicely, explaining why they have a purpose, and even just standing inside his office tapping my foot impatiently. It’s not that he is intentionally putting off the meeting, it’s just that he always thinks whatever he happens to be doing at that moment is more important than the meeting, which is rarely true.

When we do have meetings, they are slow and painful because, instead of looking at the case file of discussion on his laptop, he’s responding to unrelated emails. This means I have to repeat myself often, gather him back on track, and an hour-long meeting takes a full 8-hour day and still isn’t done.

Our cases are suffering because of this — the cases that have MY name attached to them also. How can I truly make my attorney understand that, no, really, you do need to sit down and review the cases with me?

You can’t make him get that if he doesn’t get it on his own, especially after being admonished repeatedly by his boss. He’s a crappy manager, and it’s very hard to change that, especially from below. Your best bet is probably to go back to the head attorney and ask for advice about how to handle the lack of meetings and the lack of attention when you do have the meetings. (Note that you’ll be asking for advice, not complaining, but it should get you to the same outcome.) And if you can ask to be transferred to a different attorney in your office, that’s probably worth doing.

5. Employer is telling staff that I was fired, but I quit

I quit my job three weeks ago without notice. I know that is something you shouldn’t do, but it just got too much for me and was putting me through emotional distress. Anyway, I quit and have now found out they are telling other staff that they fired me for calling in sick too often.

Background: I took four days off for illness in May and June. I didn’t call in sick again until the day I quit. I was abused over the phone, saying that I do this too often and if it continued my position would be in jeopardy so I quit instead. Could this affect my future employment? I am currently in university with another 2 years to go so am not looking for a job straight away.

It’s hard to know what they’re saying to people when you’re hearing it second or third hand. It’s possible that people heard that you were told you were calling in sick too often and that it was jeopardizing your job, and they interpreted that as “and she got fired as a result.” Of course, it’s also possible that your employer is lying to people. We can’t know for sure from what’s here. However, the real question is what they’ll say to prospective employers who call for a reference, and the way to find that out is to (a) have a professional-sounding friend do a reference check for you there, and/or (b) call them up and ask them. If you find out through either of these avenues that they’re misrepresenting things, then it’s time to do #2 in this post.

Either way, though, you probably don’t want to use this employer as a reference when you’re applying for jobs anyway, because it doesn’t sound like they’ll give you a glowing reference, which is what you want from reference-giver. If you can simply leave it off your resume (which sounds like a possibility since you have another two years of school), that might be your best bet.

6. My coworkers aren’t responsive to me

There are several coworkers who do not get back to me in a timely manner, if at all. How do I deal with this? Because we are in home offices, our main method of communication is by email. Many times, the information I need keeps me from moving forward on my work, completing a project, appropriately scheduling my time or passing along information to customers who are waiting for information from me through these coworkers. I even tell them from time to time they are keeping me from completing something. Help!

First, talk to them: “I’ve noticed that I”m not always able to get the information I need from you when I email you for it. Is there something I could do differently to make it easier? Do you prefer phone calls rather than emails? Do you want me to follow up if I’m waiting on something? What would help?” If the problem continues after you’ve talked to them about it, then you need to alert your manager or theirs (depending on what makes sense in your particular office culture). The basic formula with any problem with your coworker that affects your work is to talk with them first, and then escalate if that doesn’t fix it.

my boss is a jerk and refuses to speak to me

A reader writes:

I am a science technician in a secondary school working in the Chemistry and Physics Departments. For the past 2 years, I have had to put up with belittling and rude comments from the Head of Physics on several occasions, often in front of other members of staff and even in front of pupils. Approximately a month ago, I finally decided to stand up for myself and reported the behaviour to senior management.

The Head of Physics was spoken to and rather than decide to improve her attitude, has decided to have no contact with me, effectively refusing me access to the Physics department to perform my job. I pointed out this flawed logic to senior management, that refusing me access to the department only affects the quality of practical lessons provided to the students and the upkeep of the equipment in the department will also suffer, but they seem reluctant to do anything.

As a science technician, my only real opportunity for career progression is by gaining access to the classrooms to demonstrate experiments on occasion to eventually move towards being recognized as a teaching/demonstrating technician. By being refused access to do this, I am effectively having my career progression blocked. Is it legal to refuse to speak to a colleague or block their career progression like this? What should I do?

Ugh, I’m sorry. That sounds absolutely horrible.

To answer your questions … Yes, it’s legal. People often think that when a manager or coworker is an astounding ass like this, it must be illegal because it’s so clearly unfair, but in fact it’s generally legal. If you were being targeted because of your race, religion, ethnicity, or other protected class, then there would be a legal issue, but that doesn’t sound like it’s the case here. In general, the government tends to avoid telling employers how to manage unless there are issues of discrimination or violations of other types of laws.

As for what to do, I’d start actively looking for another job. You can certainly go back and talk to your senior management, as well as HR if you have HR, but I’m not hopeful that it’s going to salvage this situation. You have an incredibly nasty and belittling manager who has shown that she’s not willing to change, even when told to, and you have management that doesn’t seem especially interested in dealing with the problem. That combination usually means that you’re not going to see meaningful change. Even if you get small changes, you’re still going to be working for someone willing to treat you like this — and generally only bad things will come of that.

So it’s time to start looking, unfortunately. Meanwhile, you can trying going back to whoever you’ve been talking to and ask specifically for what you want; for instance, “I need to be have access to the department to perform my job; can you please instruct Jane to ___?” (fill in the blank with the specific actions you need) since they don’t seem to be coming up with solutions on their own. But another job is your best, and probably, only way out of this. I’m sorry.

is it fair for an employer to refuse to hire smokers?

A reader writes:

I recently applied to two different hospitals for employment and found that both of them enforced strict anti-smoking policies that included nicotine tests upon hire. One website stated that if you failed the nicotine test, they would provide you with a program to help you quit and then you could reapply. The other stated that it would allow you to reapply again in 6 months.

Although I am not a smoker, I thought that this policy might be borderline invasive of someone’s privacy and choice to smoke. Do you think that this fair? I know that this is a hospital and that you have to take the patient’s health into account, but isn’t this overkill? I am on the fence with this.

Well, from a legal standpoint, there’s no federal law that protects smokers from employment discrimination. However, 29 states and D.C. do have laws that bar discriminating against smokers in hiring, although some have exceptions for nonprofits and the health care industry. And the health care industry seems to be where the trend is strongest — lots of hospitals are implementing the kind of ban you’re talking about. The reasoning among employers who do this is, of course, the impact of smoking on their health care costs, and for some is tied to an institutional mission to promote wellness.

That last part makes sense to me — after all, if you’re a hospital, it might seem as contradictory to hire smokers as it would for PETA be to hire meat-eaters. You want to hire people who are committed to your mission. On the other hand, is the hospital also going to say that they’re not going to hire motorcycle riders or the morbidly obese or people who eat a lot of bacon? I really doubt that the rest of their workers are all paragons of healthy living. Smokers are an easier category to pick on, of course, and as a society we’re much more in agreement that you shouldn’t smoke than that you shouldn’t eat bacon, but there’s a lot of room to poke holes in this whole practice.

In any case, overall, I don’t believe that employers should police your private life — whether it’s what you eat, what you drink, whether you engage in risky sexual behavior, or whether you choose to smoke a joint or a cigarette … both because it’s none of their business and because I don’t think it’s a sound business practice that will help them  hire and retain the best people. After all, if I were running a hospital, I can’t see how I’d justify turning away an amazing doctor or an all-star CFO because of what she chose to do with her body in her time away from work.

What do others think?

how to scare away your job interviewer

Most job seekers worry about making mistakes in interviews, but most interviewers understand that no one gives a perfect interview and will overlook the occasional flubbed answer. However, it’s still possible to scare off your interviewer with a single statement or action. Here are 10 of the most likely ways to spook your interviewer.

1. Not offering any past managers as a reference. If your reference list is stocked with peers, employers are going to wonder why you don’t want them talking to the people who supervised your work and whether you having something hide – and many will call your past managers anyway.

2. Mentioning that lawyers are working out your split from your last job. No matter how warranted your lawsuit might be, most employers are spooked if they learn you’re suing (or sued) a past employer. Fair or not, most want to avoid hiring anyone who they fear might be litigious.

3. Dismissing concerns about your experience. If an interviewer notes that you haven’t had experience with a key part of the job, don’t dismiss it with a breezy claim that you can learn anything. Savvy interviewers will be much more appreciative of a realistic view of the job’s challenges and an honest conversation about how you’ll approach them..

4. Being overly salesy in your pitch. Sales tactics are more likely to turn off your interviewer than to secure you the job. If you seem more interested in pushing your way into the job than making sure that the fit is right on both sides, you’ll annoy your interview and often kill your chances.

5. Constantly checking in and asking for updates. It’s easy to feel antsy when you’re waiting to hear about a job, but following up repeatedly with an employer is more likely to annoy your contact than to get you the outcome you want. If an employer wants to interview you or make you an offer, they’ll let you know; checking in weekly won’t speed that up.

6. Lying, about anything. You might think it’s minor to change your last job title or misrepresent your salary history, but to most employers, this will be an instant deal-breaker. Employers will assume that if you don’t show integrity in the hiring process, you won’t show it on the job either.

7. Explaining you’ve left more than one previous job because of the hours or workload. Interviewers understand that that these are understandable reasons for leaving a job – once. But if it’s a pattern, they’ll start to wonder whether you’re a prima donna who bristles at ever being asked to stay past 5:00 and who won’t help out with extra work when needed.

8. Being overly cocky. If you appear to have an inflated sense of your own abilities and value, any sensible interviewer is going to worry about what you’ll be like to work with. Will you take input and feedback, or insist you know best? Will you dominate meetings and alienate coworkers? Will you demand raises far beyond your value to the company?

9. Not having any questions about the job. If you don’t have any questions about the job you’re considering spending eight or more hours a day at, you’ll come across as cavalier or disengaged. Interviewers want to hear that you’re thinking critically about whether or not the role is the right fit, and that you understand what you’d be signing up for.

10. Sounding angry or bitter – about anything. Whether it’s anger at a previous employer or bitterness over your trouble finding a job, there’s no faster way to scare off an interviewer. Interviewers want to hire people who are upbeat and pleasant; if you sound like you have a sour outlook on life or work, they’ll likely steer clear.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

what should I look for in a job offer letter?

A reader writes:

I have a question about offer letters. I’ve received an offer that is pretty amazing (they pegged me at the high end of my salary range, put in a very generous potential bonus, a really nice title bump, and stock options) and I really feel like I can’t say no to it, especially in this economy and with my field being kind of small. That being said… I want to make sure all my t’s are crossed and i’s dotted before I sign on.

Are there specific things to look for in an offer letter, things that should be there (and if they aren’t to be sure and ask about), things that shouldn’t be there (and if they are, is it a worry)? Offer letters are kind of a new thing to me; most of my jobs have been just a phone call to say “you’re hired and here’s the start date.” This is my third job that has come with an offer letter and it’s the most complex I’ve ever seen. My first one was literally two paragraphs and a more formalized version of the phone calls I’ve gotten in the past. The second one was a bit more involved than that, but still a one-page letter. This one is seven pages long and reads almost like a contract [it even has sections about having to sign an NDA when I start, that employment is at-will (which is kind of a given in my state), etc.]. We’d discussed a telecommute scheme (3 days in office, 2 days at home) which wasn’t mentioned in the letter, though I expected it to be, and stuff like the at-will employment and NDA I did not. They mention that I’m eligible for all the benefits the company offers, but only mention health insurance (I’ll be asking about the rest, of course). Seeing a letter this complex, as it were, just has my head reeling a bit.

I know every company is different and will have different ideas about what can/should be there, but I do wonder if, outside of salary and such, there are any general things I should be looking for as I make up my discussion points on this offer (and future offers!). I’ve never really felt like I had agency in the employment process before, so this is a bit daunting.

Also, when I got my letter, my presumptive manager was sure to point out the stock options section as the part I should pay really close scrutiny to, saying that it could be the most “valuable” part of the offer (this is a start-up, they’re not public as yet), as well as giving insights into their thinking. I know nothing about stock options and frankly don’t really care about them a whole lot. If I ask about other things, and not this particular section, is it going to look odd?

Different employers handle offer letters differently. Some employers don’t use them at all — you hear the terms of their offer in a phone call. Others send fairly casual emails with the same information. And some do use formal offer letters, either short ones like what you’ve seen in the past, or longer ones, like the one you have now.

In any case, there’s nothing to be daunted by here — what you’ve described sounds pretty normal, including the at-will statement, which is in most offer letters. Take it piece by piece and make sure you understand what each section is saying. If you don’t, then ask for clarification. If you don’t particularly need clarification on something (like the stock options), you don’t need to delve into it further, and no one will think it’s weird that you didn’t. (But it’s good to understand how your stock options work, so don’t skim over that part just because you don’t care about it too much now — you might care quite a bit in the future.)

And you can certainly ask to see details on the benefits they offer other than health insurance, if that’s going to be a factor in your decision (or even if it isn’t — but if it’s not, you might rather focus on the stuff that does matter to you).

The fact that the letter doesn’t include the agreement you reached about telecommuting isn’t surprising, because the letter is almost certainly the standard boilerplate that they use for every position they offer, only changing the details like title, salary, and start date. You should absolutely get the telecommuting and any other details you’ve negotiated in writing so that there’s no question about them later, but it doesn’t have to be part of the offer letter itself. It could be as simple as you sending an email summarizing your telecommuting agreement and asking for their confirmation.

That said, keep in mind that getting this in writing doesn’t guarantee that they’ll never change that agreement; you could get a new manager in six months who doesn’t like telecommuting, or the company could decide that a change in your projects means that your job no longer lends itself to so much telecommuting. If that happens, having the agreement in writing won’t protect you. Rather, the point of putting stuff like this in writing is in case there’s a misunderstanding later about what the agreement was or if the person you worked out the agreement with leaves and no one else knows about it. In other words, it’s helpful for miscommunications or memory lapses, but not for them simply changing their mind.

And speaking of all that, you should also keep in mind that an offer letter isn’t an employment contract. It’s not a guarantee of employment, and it can be changed at any time (although not retroactively). It’s really just spelling out in writing what both sides have agreed to at this particular point in time.

Anyway, don’t be daunted by the complexity or length of the letter. Translate it into plain language for yourself, make sure you understand what each part is saying, ask when you don’t, and get a written agreement on anything you care about that isn’t there.

short answer Sunday — 7 short answers to 7 short questions

It’s short answer Sunday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Explaining doctor’s visits — and their side effects — to your manager

Recently, you answered a reader’s question about explaining frequent doctor’s visits. I have a similar situation, but mine causes significantly more disruption to my work and I’m not sure how to talk about it with my boss.

I’ve rewritten the paragraph trying to describe my situation without giving away my problem a bunch of times, but I give up. It’s warts! I have a several big, nasty warts on my foot. Ugh, so embarrassing. Anyway, so I have these warts. Had ’em for years. I’m finally getting serious about getting rid of them and it’s a real endeavor. The treatment (cantharidin) that is finally working requires biweekly application and is significantly debilitating: It’s very painful and as a result I am pretty sleep-deprived/loopy on painkillers the day after the treatment and can’t drive for four or five additional days. I just had my third treatment today and will probably need at least three more.

I work remotely, don’t manage anyone, and control my own highly flexible schedule, but my job requires me to be out and about in the community, attending meetings and events. So far, I’ve been able to schedule around my appointments (arranging to have the appointments late in the week, blocking off the couple of days immediately following an appointment for desk work, etc.) and it hasn’t had a direct effect on important meetings, etc. But it does limit the time I’m able to spend on outreach, and the pain is significant enough to be distracting for several days after each treatment.

I work in a Results Only Work Environment, and I’m months away from deadlines on my biggest goals, so I’ll be able to catch up once the treatments are done. But I feel like I need to loop my boss in a bit more. Do you have suggestions for how I can handle this conversation?

The key in situations like this is to distinguish between info that would be helpful for your manager to have (that your’e dealing with something medical, it’s nothing she needs to worry about, and that it’ll affect you/your schedule in X ways) and info she doesn’t need (warts). So you might say something like, “I wanted to let you know that I’m having a series of medical treatments over the next few weeks for something that’s minor, but that is going to impact my ability to drive and sometimes focus for a few days each time because of the painkillers they’ll be giving me. I’m scheduling meetings and work around it, but I wanted to give you a heads-up that it’s going on, just in case anything seems different than usual for the next few weeks. It’ll all be finished by January.”

2. Did my manager rob me of this internal promotion?

Recently an internal job was advertised through my manager for 3 positions. I applied for the role with my manager’s permission and had a successful interview. When my manager was told that both I and another member of my current team had been successful, she made the interviewer pick between us, as she said she could not give us both up due to resources. The interviewer picked my colleague.

I feel like I have been robbed of an opportunity to better myself and my career. My colleague will be replaced with a member of staff from a larger team (who I will train) and the interviewer has been told to pick another member of staff from one of the larger teams. Is my manager within her rights to do this? If they are replacing my colleague within the team, why could they not have replaced me as well?

Sure, your manager can do that. It’s often much harder to lose two people (and be training two new people) at once, so it’s not surprising that she didn’t want to lose both of you. This is often part of the deal with internal promotions: Your manager’s input counts for a lot more than it might if you were looking outside your company, and she can often control timing and whether a promotion happens at all. I wouldn’t look at it as being robbed — this is pretty par for the course with internal moves. You don’t always get them, for reasons that aren’t always entirely about your qualifications … which, of course, is also true with external moves as well. Stuff isn’t always fair.

3. My post-interview follow-ups were forwarded

I’ve applied for several jobs in the last three months; many of them I had phone screenings and a full interview, and then I followed up with an email sent to the interviewer. For three of the jobs, I received quick emails acknowledging receipt of my follow-up email, but I also noticed on the bottom of them they had been forwarded to human resources or the recruiter who made initial contact. I’m assuming in these cases I was not suppose to see the forwarded message that contained quick phrases such as “FYI”, “forwarded as per discussion” and a similar message about my follow-up letter, followed by a private conversation about the interviewer’s dog and personal relationship issues.

It’s one thing to see this once, but to see it three different times over the last few weeks seems very strange. Is forwarding follow-up emails to recruiters/HR standard? Is it a part of a file they keep on applicants? What would be the reasoning for forwarding a follow-up email to HR/recruiter? Should I email the interviewers about this, or leave it alone, especially in the case of the really long email about the dog and relationship issues?

All these interviews seem to have gone well, and the follow-up letters were very short but included two reasons I would do well in the position and touched on one or two points the interviewer had mentioned in the interview in terms of looking for a solution to an issue they were having (e,g. streamlining data entry, client relations, and event planning ideas), and to be honest they weren’t remarkable.

Yes, it’s normal to share correspondence like this with anyone involved in the hiring process and to keep it part of your overall file for that job. After all, you sent those follow-ups as part of your candidacy, and they’re treated that way. You shouldn’t email them about it; that would be weird. And you should simply ignore the personal message that you weren’t meant to see.

4. Leaving previous career experience on your resume when graduating into a new field

After high school, I spent a short time in college because I was unsure of which path I should take. I opted to explore my interests, and over a few months I tried a hodgepodge of jobs until eventually settling into a retail position I enjoyed. I worked with a major cosmetics company that promoted me several times over a 7-year period and gave me a tremendous amount of responsibility. But I decided I wanted to do more with my life, and I could only do that by finishing school. I left my job and returned to academia. This month, I will graduate from an Ivy League university with a degree in English. I am passionate about publishing and have been working in the industry for the last few years through various internships and freelance writing jobs. Now it’s time to move from an internship to something that actually pays. Suddenly, at 30, I’m applying for entry-level jobs that most people hold in their early 20s. Luckily the cosmetics experience kept my skin looking young, but I’m afraid HR will see my previous career as a red flag.

Should I take this off my resume? The professional experience I gained formed a practical basis for my academic career and I know that it will continue to serve me professionally. I just wonder if HR will see it that way.

Nope, leave it on there. For most employers, the fact that you have previous real-world work experience will be a plus, not a negative.

5. When should you send interview thank-you notes?

I have a quick question regarding thank-you/follow-up letters. I know you said to wait at least a few hours before sending a follow-up letter, but how long should I wait? If the interview was on a Friday, would waiting until Monday to send it look bad? I would send it today, but I take quite a while to write them as I tailor each one… and by the time I finish the interviewers will probably no longer be in the office. Anyway, your advice would greatly be appreciated.

Sending it on Monday is fine. You’re not expected to have these sent instantly. The whole idea is that you don’t want them to appear perfunctory; you want it to appear that you’ve thought about your conversation in the interview, digested it, and are still interested. You don’t want to wait too long, or they may have already made a hiring decision, but sending them on Monday after a Friday interview is completely fine.

6. PTO when converting from hourly to salaried

I am soon going to be converted to salary. I have been hourly for almost a year. What happens to my PTO earned? Can they just tell me that since they are converting me, I now lose it and part of the company’s salary vacation policy?

It depends on what state you’re in and what your company’s policy on PTO is. No federal law requires that employers give paid vacation time at all, so at the federal level, employers are free to handle their vacation policies however they want, including telling you that you’re losing all your accrued PTO when you transfer to a salaried job — although that would be both unusual and dumb. However, some states (like California) have laws that govern how accrued PTO is handled, so your state’s laws may require that they pay it out, leave it accrued, or otherwise handle it in a specific manner.

7. Using a title below your official one

I’m wondering what advice you have about using a job title below the title you’ve officially been given. I am a young professional (just finishing a master’s degree), working at a small non-profit with two staff members (me and the ED). A few months ago, my boss decided to give me the title COO. Since that is my title I’ve been using it, but I’m starting to look for a new job (I’ve been there about 18 months and I don’t see a growth path where I am now). As I said I’m a young professional working for a small organization and I think that title 1) doesn’t reflect what I do very well and 2) seems too senior for someone with my level of experience. Do you suggest I use the COO title and give an explanation when looking for other jobs, use a different title, or talk to my boss and change my title all together?

Don’t use a title different than the one that your company will give out to someone calling to verify your information. You’re better off trying to get a title that reflects your real responsibilities.

update from the reader whose paychecks were bouncing

Remember the reader whose paychecks were bouncing? Here’s her update:

The company I work at actually had me on assignment, while I was technically employed by the payrolling company who bounced the first two checks in October. This becomes important later.

My company told me they were paying the payrolling company. I know the people here well enough that I believed them. My company contact was able to help me connect with the vice president of the payrolling company. They confirmed my company was paying them and told me it was a technical error on their part because they had recently switched banks. The payrolling company reissued the checks, overnighting them, promising they would work this time. The checks bounced again. (I called the vice president of the payrolling company again, to let him know. He advised me to switch to direct deposit, because “checks are hard.” In retrospect, that probably should have been the moment I hied myself to the labor board). Then, the third check they issued for the month of October bounced as well. (And, of course, bank fees were added to all of this.) I was able to get my fourth check only because I had the presence of mind to go to the issuing bank and have it cashed. Then, my contract, which was originally up in October, was extended through the end of November.

The payrolling company decided they would directly wire the money for the checks and the fees into my account, eating the cost for it. (My bank charges for direct deposit, which is why I didn’t sign up for it in the first place.) They wired only the first two checks for October (instead of all three) and some of the bank fees (in the middle of November!). Then, their first check for November came and I went to the issuing bank to try and have it cashed. The issuing bank couldn’t cash it — there weren’t any funds in the account. That was the last straw. I made a trip to my state’s department of labor (since mine will only let you either mail documents in or submit them in person, I didn’t want to risk the documents getting lost in the mail). They said they would mail me a letter with a date for a conference . . . in six weeks. Which didn’t seem very helpful.

The company I’m on assignment with got fed up with the payrolling company’s lack of responsiveness and inability to pay me on time, and so they fired them. (I can’t find it in me to feel the least bit sorry about that). Since my contract is with the company I’m on assignment with, I got to stay until the end of November. They paid the checks I was owed, covered the bank fees I’m owed and a bit more, and give me a slight raise (though I’m now responsible for my own withholding). To no one’s surprise, the check of the company I’m on assignment with went through, no problem. [I told a friend about all of this — she said I have to be the only temporary, part-time employee she’s ever heard of getting a raise — of course, I was also the first person she’d ever heard of to have their work check bounce (though, since all this has happened, not the last!)]

I’m not entirely sure what this means for my department of labor case. If I wanted to, I could probably still go after the payrolling company for fines for keeping my checks from me so long. Whether or not I’ll want to do that in a few weeks, I don’t know. It will probably largely depend on my job situation. (If I’m working full time, I’ll want to put my energy into my job, not into taking time off to quibble over fines I may or may not be owed. If I’m only working part-time or if I’m unemployed, then I’ll have some free time on my hands and the fines they would owe me in my very pro-worker state could be useful to me.) But that is a decision I can put off until I get the letter with the date of the conference.

The company I’m on assignment with completely won my loyalty and I’d happily work for them any time. I learned that sometimes, companies are capable of expending more energy than you would think they were capable of to do the right thing. And I learned that if anything is even marginally fishy about your workplace, you should absolutely not procrastinate on getting into your local labor office. Oh, and I should find a bank that doesn’t charge for direct deposit.

short answer Saturday — 7 short answers to 7 short questions

It’s short answer Saturday — seven short answers to seven short questions! Here we go…

1. Having personal packages delivered to your office

I’ve had issues getting things delivered to my apartment (several items have been “delivered”… just not to me) and since I’m in a city there’s no back door or porch to leave packages (or doorman). How do you feel about having personal packages shipped to the office? I don’t mean all my Christmas and holiday gifts, but I’d maybe have something sent to the office once a month, particularly when a signature is needed.

I’ve always done this and think at most offices it’s completely fine, as long as it’s not daily deliveries that take up the time of the people in your mail room. I’d do it once or twice and see if anyone objects, or just ask whoever gets your incoming mail if they mind you doing it on occasion.

2. Which salary should I give?

I was recently laid off from a company because it went out of business, but for about a year and a half to two years before that, I (along with the entire company) was working on half-time pay (with commensurate half-time hours) due to poor sales and other funding issues caused by the economic crash. When asked by future employers about my salary at this position, do I give the full salary I was hired at (and that I received for half of my tenure there), the amount I was actually being paid at the end (since I was only working part-time), or something in between?

Give your full salary. If asked at any point to verify it, you can explain that the whole company moved to half-time hours when it ran into trouble but that your salary for full-time work was $X.

3. Is there any point in following up on the status of this job?

After a final interview, references checks, and an additional follow-up where I was told that the decision is waiting approval from the Board of Directors, does it benefit me at all to follow up again? I am getting mixed advice, I realize the only benefit would be to see if they have identified a timeline. Would it be better if I just sit tight and be confident that when the hiring manager hears I will hear?

Yes. There’s no way that you’re not going to hear about it if they decide to hire you, and meanwhile you should be continuing your job search unabated anyway, as you should always do when you don’t yet have an official offer that you’ve accepted. However, if you don’t have a sense of the timeline for when you’re likely to hear something, it’s certainly fine to get in touch and ask that (as long as it’s not right on top of your last follow-up; if you just checked in yesterday, wait a week before contacting them again).

4. Explaining why you left your last job, when it’s because you were dating a coworker

I want to know how to answer question, “Why did you leave your last position?” I left because I started dating a guy at work, which became serious and I did not want to work at same employer. No bad terms and I have never dated anyone from work before. Now we’re engaged. I was there one year, and I quit in September.

I’d just say, “A coworker and I got engaged, and I thought it would be better if we didn’t work for the same employer.”

5. Sharing work samples when interviewing with a competitor

I have a question that is broadly about protocol and expectations for interviewing with a firm that is a competitor to your current employer. I currently work for a professional services company that conducts strategic research on behalf of clients in a particular industry. I have been interviewing for a job with a firm that does consulting for clients in that same industry. It’s a relatively narrow field, so you can assume they’re competing for some of the the same clients, but the services they offer are reasonably unique.

With regard to providing competitive intelligence to the firm I’m interviewing with, is there a rule of thumb to keep in mind or a line I should be wary of in the interview? Would be unethical to send a copy of or excerpt from a report I completed for my current firm as an example of the type of work I do (and my writing abilities), or could this be seen as competitive intelligence for the interviewing firm? My concerns stem from a) a desire not to compromise the firm I currently work for and b) concern about whether the interviewing firm would view me as being an unethical employee.

Yeah, that doesn’t sound like the type of thing you should be sharing with a competitor. Basically, if it’s something that would be of benefit to the firm you’re interviewing with at your company’s expense, or if it’s something that your company wouldn’t share publicly, you can’t share it. I’d find a different writing sample to use.

6. Conflict of interest when a sibling works for a competitor

Can I be terminated for “conflict of interest” because a sibling works at or is a partner in a firm in the same industry?

Legally, sure. But practically speaking, it’s unlikely to happen unless there’s more to the story.

7. Should I quit my new job?

I recently moved to New York from San Diego in hopes of finding better opportunities to find a job in my career. I had spent the last two years in San Diego doing part-time jobs, having no luck landing a job in PR. I finally realized that I wasn’t going to get anywhere if I stayed where I was, so I decided to make the big move. Within two weeks of moving, I had interviewed for 2 jobs and had landed a job at one of the biggest agencies in the world.

It is such a great opportunity, but I don’t feel that it is a good fit for me. I don’t like the work I am doing, plus I don’t feel like I fit the company culture at all. The company rushed the hiring process and basically threw me in to projects without any real training. I’ve gotten my bearings, but I’m still not liking the work or the people. I really dread getting up and going to work everyday, which is unfortunate, because it really is a great company. I’ve been thinking of quitting, but I know how terrible that would look to both my current and future employer. I’d like some advice on the best way for me to go about deciding to quit or not. Should I wait a little while longer or should I just trust my gut and jump ship?

Instead of making the choice quitting vs not quitting, why don’t you instead start looking around again and see if you find another opportunity that seems like a better fit? That way, you’re not quitting with nothing lined up, you’re giving yourself more time to see if the current job gets any better while you look, and once you do have an offer, you can compare it against your current situation and decide which you prefer. That way, you’re comparing your current job against a real job, rather then your current job against “anything else at all.”

(And you can generally get away with one quick departure from a job, as long as it’s not a pattern in your career.)

I share an employee with a difficult boss

A reader writes:

I’m a program manager in a nonprofit and supervise one employee, our program associate. She’s great. Very productive, efficient, intelligent, and in general a pleasure to work with. She’s been with the organizaiton about 2 years and is eager to advance in her career. (This is her first full-time paid position after college.)

About four months ago, she started working half-time in another department due to budget cuts in my office. Her new supervisor has a reputation for not responding to emails, being a micromanager, and just being a difficult person to work with. Everyone in the office knows how she is, and my supervisee knew it before she accepted the 50% position in that office.(Granted, she would have gone to part-time if she hadn’t accepted the job.)

However, now my program associate cc’s me on emails to her other boss in which she says that she feels like she doesn’t have enough job responsibility, isn’t being allowed to work on specific tasks in her job description, asks to go to meetings that she feels that she’s being excluded from, etc. I don’t disagree that she should be working on this things, but her emails come across as not just assertive but quite demanding. Frankly, I feel that when she cc’s me, it may give the appearance that I’m condoning the emails when I’m not.

My supervisee ccs me because she and I have a good relationship and I think she feels like I should be in the loop. I haven’t asked her to stop cc’ing me, but maybe I should. I’ve sometimes tried coaching her through other strategies for dealing with her boss (such as aying, “I’m eager to work on XX project. What can I do to prepare myself,” etc). I’ve also reminded her that it can take time to get to know a new boss and figure out the best strategies for working with him/her. I’ve told her that once this busy time of year passes in in a few weeks that may be a better time to advocate that she be brought up to speed on the other projects she thought she’d be working on.

I’m not sure what else I should do, if anything. My direct supervisor is the head of the organization, so I feel like if I go to my boss for input, it just escalates the whole issue. Should I ask to not be put in the middle or should I be doing more to look out for my program associate’s best interest? Ultimately, I want her to stay with the organization. It would be a loss of my program if she decided to move on because of her frustration with her other boss.

The other boss might be a bad manager, but your employee doesn’t sound like she’s helping herself either. I would do three things, and maybe four:

1. Talk to your employee about how she’s handling the situation. Point out the following:

a. The tone of her emails to her other boss is coming across as demanding, not assertive. Explain that no matter how frustrated she might be, she needs to keep her tone professional when talking to coworkers, and especially to her boss, and that sending a slew of demanding emails is likelier to undermine her position and reduce her credibility than to get the outcome she wants. Give her specific suggestions about how to word things differently.

b. She can’t force the other boss to do what she wants. She can make her case for it, but ultimately she may not get what she wants. This probably isn’t going to be the last difficult manager she has in her career, and she needs to figure out how to deal with it professionally and productively. At some point, arguing for the same thing over and over is both pointless and potentially combative, and the more productive way to handle it is to think, “Okay, this is the situation and it doesn’t look like it’s changing. What do I want to do from here?”

2. Ask her why she’s cc’ing you on the emails she’s sending to the other boss. Hear her out, but let her know that it’s not appropriate and ask that she stop. Unless something truly involves her work for you, she needs to handle her relationship with the other boss independently.

3. Talk to your own manager, the head of the organization. Give her a heads-up that your employee is unhappy and frustrated with the other 50% of her job and explain why. Don’t present this as “I’m asking you to intervene,” but rather as “I want you to be aware of this, because it may come to a head at some point … and by the way, I really don’t want to lose Jane because she does great work.” (On the other hand, maybe you do feel she should intervene — and if that’s the case, it’s fine for you to make the case for that.)

This conversation is appropriate for you to have, both because you’re part of the organization’s management team and because it’s affecting one of your employees. You mentioned being concerned that talking to her will escalate the issue, but frankly it sounds escalated enough already that your manager should be aware of it.

4. This last one is optional, and without knowing the personalities involved, I’m not sure if it would be constructive to do or not, but you might want to talk to your coworker — the other manager — as well. After all, she knows you’ve been seeing all those emails, so it wouldn’t be crazy to talk to her about what’s going on.

However, don’t go into that conversation accusing her of anything or with a tone that says you’re there to advocate for Jane. Just tell her you’ve noticed Jane feels frustrated and ask what her take is. It’s possible that you’ll get some insight that might change your perspective on this. After all, Jane’s complaints — that she feels she doesn’t have enough responsibility, isn’t being allowed to work on specific tasks in her job description, and wants to go to meetings that she’s being excluded from — are all things that could have legitimate reasons behind them. (For example, for the sake of argument, maybe the manager feels that Jane wants more responsibility than she believes is reasonable for someone at Jane’s skill level or in her position, isn’t going to give her tasks X, Y, and Z until she’s first mastered A, B, and C or until the department’s busy season is over and she has time to train her on them, and doesn’t invite her to high-level meetings because it’s not appropriate for her job.) Or maybe not. But it might be worth talking to her about what’s going on, since you manage half of Jane’s time and are interested in retaining her.

Ultimately, though, it’s up to (a) the other manager to decide she manages Jane, (b) the head of the organization to decide whether she wants things done differently, and (c) Jane to figure out how she wants to respond to the situation, with the understanding that she can’t force things to change.

how can I handle interruptions when I’m concentrating?

A reader asks:

What is the best approach for handling interruptions (from colleagues or bosses) at work when you are either busy, in the middle of something else, or just plain unprepared because your mind is on a different project?

I sometimes find myself flustered when colleagues or managers stop by without a warning to discuss something that’s on their mind when I’m in the middle of something else. It makes me feel blindsided or incompetent when I don’t have a straight answer for it because I was unprepared for it. And since I work in an open space, I do not have the luxury of closing my office door or not answering the phone.

Some people seem to do just fine with interruptions, while for other people (like me, and apparently like you), it throws off us and makes us do a worse job on both the original work we were engaged with andthe item that interrupted us.

There are a few things that will help you manage these interruptions better:

1. Be straightforward. It’s often completely fine to say, “I’m actually just in the middle of finishing something. Can I stop by your office later, when I’m at a better stopping point?”

With people who aren’t your manager, this is nearly always appropriate; after all, you’re responsible for controlling your own time, not being at their beck and call, and if you judge that the document you’re in the middle of reviewing is a higher priority, then it’s reasonable – even necessary – for you to speak up about that. (And if you do it enough, you can even train people to start asking you, “Is this a good time?” … or to just stick their non-time-sensitive questions in email to begin with.)

And for interruptions with questions that you’re simply unprepared for, it’s fine to say, “I’d need to review my notes on that before I could give you an answer with certainty. Let me do that later today and I’ll get back to you.”

2. Create a signal to indicate that you’re busy. Depending on whether it would be appropriate in your particular office culture, consider using a signal to let people know that it’s a bad time before they’ve interrupted. Some people will post a sign in their cubicle entryway reading “on deadline” or “work block — free at noon” to let others know not to interrupt unless it’s crucial.

3. Recognize that some of this just goes with the territory. While you should absolutely let colleagues know when you’re busy and can’t be interrupted, you won’t be able to manage interruptions out of existence entirely. Some of them are part of the package of having a job. And that’s especially true when it’s your manager or other higher-ups doing the interruptions; in those cases, you’re often going to get better outcomes if you try to accommodate their schedule rather than asking them to work around yours. So while it’s smart to try to minimize disruptions, it’s also good for your mental health (and job security!) to recognize that some of them – not all, but some of them – are simply part of work life.