10 things never to say to your coworkers

Whether you love your coworkers or hate them, you’re stuck with them for hours each day — and they’re stuck with you. If you’re not thoughtful about what you say to each other, you can make one another uncomfortable or even miserable — and can harm your professional reputation too.

Here are 10 things you should never say at work.

1. “Are you pregnant?” If someone wants you to know she’s pregnant, she’ll tell you. Until and unless that happens, assume it’s none of your business – and asking is a good way to offend most women, pregnant or not.

2. “You owe $10 for this gift for the boss.” Many workers don’t want to budget for going-away or shower gifts for coworkers and resent being asked to give up their hard-earned cash. That’s doubly true when the collection is being taken up for the boss, who presumably earns more than them. Besides, etiquette rules say that gifts in the workplace should flow downward, not upward.

3. “You’re so skinny! Why aren’t you eating?” Commenting on other people’s bodies should be off-limits in the workplace, even if you intend it as an expression of concern. Your coworkers are there to work, not to have their eating choices or their bodies scrutinized and judged.

4. “That’s not my job.” Protesting that something isn’t in your job description is a good way to plummet in your coworkers’ esteem – and your manager’s. Most people end up pitching in to help on things that don’t fall squarely within their job descriptions, and refusing to help with quickly earn you a reputation for being unhelpful and probably a little bit lazy.

5. “The new manager is a real jerk.” Snarking about the boss is rarely good for your career. Even if others join in, your comments may get back to your manager. And even if they don’t, you don’t want to become known as a wellspring of negativity.

6. “I heard Kim is dating Ryan.” If you spread office gossip, your coworkers might listen eagerly, but they’ll note that they can’t trust you to be discreet. It’s great to bond with coworkers over life outside the office, but the details of other people’s lives aren’t yours to share.

7. “You’re how old?” Whether you’re implying someone is surprisingly young or surprisingly old, keep your amazement to yourself. Show respect for your colleagues as professionals, and don’t baby the younger ones or make the older ones feel they’re one step away from retirement.

8. “Don’t ask me. They don’t tell me anything.” Complaining about how disempowered you are is a good way to undermine your own credibility and authority. If you don’t have the information you need to do your job, you should go ask for it – not complain to others that you don’t have it.

9. “Why are you so dressed up today? Got a job interview?” You might not be thinking when this pops out of your mouth, but there’s no outcome here that doesn’t put your coworker in an awkward position. If she does have an interview, you’re forcing her to either confide in you or lie. If she doesn’t, she now has to worry that you think she does.

10. “I’m so hung over.” Telling your coworkers about your long nights partying might seem like no big deal, but if you get a reputation as a lush, you’ll find your credibility diminishes – no matter how good your work.

I originally published this at U.S. News & World Report.

asking your office to ban fragrances in the workplace

A reader writes:

My daughter suffers from migraines related to most scents. Is there anything she can ask her employer to do about others wearing perfumes to work? When I was working it was understood that fragrances were not to be used, it was considered rude at the very least. 

There are offices that have implemented fragrance-free policies for reasons like this. I’ve always been curious about how they work — and how well — because so many things have fragrances other than perfume. Fragrances from laundry detergent, body lotion, hair products, and even soap can all linger, particularly if they’re strong to begin with. So I’m not sure one of these policies could ever be fully effective, although I’m sure they at least cut down on the problem.

That said, there’s wide variation in whether or not an employer will be open to trying a fragrance-free policy … to say nothing of the variation in how coworkers will respond to it. Some people think fragrance-sensitive people are overreacting and they should just deal with it (regardless of what the medical literature says). Some people take great offense to being told what personal products they can and can’t use. Others, of course, are more sympathetic … but your daughter should be prepared for a potential range of reactions.

There’s no reason she can’t ask, however. The key thing here, though, will be to stay away from framing other people’s scent choices as rude; she should frame it solely as a sensitivity issue on her side. If she starts arguing what others should or shouldn’t be doing, she’ll alienate people and come across as trying to control things that aren’t hers to control. If, however, she sticks to explaining the impact on her and suggesting some reasonable accommodations, she’s likely to get a better reception. And if she can stick to how it affects her, sometimes simply explaining the problem to other people is all it takes (and of course, other times it’s not.)

From a legal standpoint, how much she could push her office to take action probably comes down to how severely fragrances affect her. A federal court did rule earlier this year that an employee with asthma and chemical sensitivity to scented products could pursue an Americans with Disabilities Act claim against her employer for not accommodating her disability, but her reactions to fragrance were fairly severe (difficulty breathing, eventually resulting in emergency medical treatment). (And note the case hasn’t been decided at trial yet; she’s simply been cleared to proceed under the ADA.)

But your daughter probably doesn’t want to have to pursue this legally anyway and would rather her office just help her out on this. She might take a look at some of the resources out there on fragrance-free workplaces, like this one and this one, to help prepare her to talk to her employer.

What other advice do people have?

fine, you can use a cell phone for your phone interview

I’m officially retiring the “don’t use a cell phone for a phone interview” advice that’s still out there in many places.

I realized today that the vast majority of phone interviews I’ve conducted in the last year have been with people on cell phones. So clearly the world has moved on from the “use a land line if it’s important” advice, whether I think they should or not.

tiny answer Tuesday — 7 short answers to 7 short questions

It’s tiny answer Tuesday — seven short answers to seven short questions. Here we go…

1. Required to use vacation days for hurricane

I’ve got another Hurricane Sandy-related work question. My husband works at a post-production facility in Manhattan, though he’s actively looking for a different job. During the Monday and Tuesday of Hurricane Sandy, the facility was technically open, but as we live in Queens and all subways were shut down and bridges and tunnels were closed, he was unable to go to work. He was one of the few people to go in on Wednesday after the storm, and it took him 3 hours to drive the 4.5 miles into work. Now he’s been told that he is being docked for Monday and Tuesday, and that he needs to decide if he wants to take these as personal or vacation days.

I’m assuming that this is technically legal, but seems so completely unfair. His vacation and personal time is very limited to begin with, and losing 2 days will impact our ability to spend Christmas with our families. Is there any legal recourse? Or does he simply have to argue with his (completely unmoved) boss? This attitude is the exact reason they have trouble holding onto talented workers.

It’s legal. No law requires employers to give vacation time at all, so they can place whatever policies they want on it as long as they’re not docking exempt workers’ pay. However, he could certainly try talking with his boss about how other employers have handled the storm and suggest that they take care of their employees by doing the same. (Here’s a commenter describing a much more compassionate way of handling this.)

Read an update to this letter here.

2. Left a job after one month because of bullying

I’ve been reading through your blog and have noticed a number of the write-ins were about workplace bullying, but they all seemed to be people with full-time jobs. I’m a college student who just recently quit her waitress job after only working there a month. I felt that the work environment was not professional, the girls all talked about each other behind their backs, they were very fake to each other, it was all based on seniority, but the main thing that made me quit was I saw some of the girls talking bad about me on Twitter. I didn’t report names, I just told my boss I was leaving because I didn’t feel comfortable and I saw things about me on the internet. My question is what should I write in the “reason for leaving” section on future job applications?

I actually wouldn’t include it on future job applications at all, since you were only there for a month. In general, short-term stays on your resume do more harm than good. More here.

3. Asking contacts to recommend you for a job

I’m writing on behalf of my husband, who is a grad student. He recently applied for a job in his university’s administration. He also reached out to several different contacts within the administration to see if they would recommend him to the hiring manager. Two have emailed her directly, but the other two (who work together) sent him the hiring manager’s email address and asked him to write an email to her mentioning that they recommend him for the position. This seems like a really odd approach to us, and he can’t decide whether to email her or not. Do you think he should email her, or suggest to his contacts that they email her directly?

Neither. He already asked, and they didn’t take him up on it. Asking again risks being pushy, and it also risks them sending the hiring manager a lukewarm recommendation (since their enthusiasm wasn’t sufficient to do it the first time). What’s more, being suddenly inundated with multiple people recommending a person for a job (proactively without being asked) often looks like a campaign orchestrated by the candidate, which takes a lot of the power out of it. Four people reaching out before he’s been interviewed probably passes that threshold. One or two is better.

If he hadn’t already applied, it would make sense to mention these two people’s names in his cover letter, but since he already has, at this point I wouldn’t do anything more.

4. Can’t get promoted because I’m not 21

I am just curious if this is some kind of age discrimination. Two of my immediate supervisors have tried to promote me on two separate occasions for two separate manager positions, taking it up to the district level, where it was refused because I am 20 years old and not 21. I understand having an age requirement, but obviously I’m qualified for the job (except my age) so you’d think they’d make an exception. There’s nothing about the job related to the drinking age, ability to rent a car, or other obvious age qualification. I have thought about going directly to the company’s president and “pleading my case” so to speak. What do you suggest I do?

In most jurisdictions in the U.S., age discrimination laws only prohibit discrimination against people 40 and older, so this is legal. I don’t know why they have an age requirement, but they apparently they do so I’d ask your manager for advice on whether talking to someone higher up would make sense, and if so, who would be the right person to talk to. But if she doesn’t think it’s a good idea, there’s not much you can do other than waiting until you turn 21 and trying again.

5. Manager won’t let me fire a problem employee

I an fairly new to a very small business with national exposure. I inherited a problem employee from two previous managers, who are still in their roles. This employees has been on probation twice in a one-year period for numerous issues relating to attendance, job performance, and insubordination. I even found out she shredded documents to cover her tracks on some issues (for which I thought she should have been terminated), much to the knowledge of my bosses.

We agreed to start fresh noting her past issues, but now she is exhibiting the same behavior. We have addressed this in discussions with the HR rep present, but she continues. My manager insists we should keep her so they do not have to train another person. This has become frustrating to me as they do not have to manage her. I have seriously thought about moving on due to this issue. I feel they are moving her from one manager to another and not dealing with the fact that the is the common denominator and carries the same issues from one manager to another.

She should have already been fired, long ago, and this “fresh start” thing makes no sense. You don’t start fresh with someone who shreds documents to cover her tracks, to say nothing of all the other issues. If your managers won’t let you fire her, they’re sending you a powerful signal about how they operate — as well as how they expect you to operate. And believe me, this isn’t going to be the only problem; if they’re handling this so badly, they’re going to turn out to be terrible managers in plenty of areas too and will prevent you from managing well yourself too. The decision you have to make is whether you want to work someplace like that.

6. I don’t want to get my doctorate

I love my current job — they trust me with my responsibilities, I do what I love, I get great constructive feedback — but I know I won’t be in this position forever. I am in position for another who is back at school for a couple of years. While they might have the funds to keep me when he returns, this is a program where they encourage their employees to get their doctorate. When I was hired, I had all the energy/optimism to pursue this, but now I don’t think it’s right for me. I want to keep my boss informed of my goals/wants and make sure I’m not hindering the needs of the program, but I don’t want to give the impression that I will stop researching my field or that I don’t want to be there. How should I handle this?

Be straightforward! Say what you said here — that you love your job and why, that you’re no longer sure pursuing a doctorate is right for you, that you don’t want to give the impression that you don’t want to be there, and that you’re wondering if that’s going to be a problem. It sounds like you have a good boss who will be able to give you useful guidance.

7. Explaining why I left a past job

I interned and then volunteered at one organization for over two years. Without going into details, all the board members were horrible people, and they made being there incredibly frustrating and stressful. I ended up leaving because it got a point where the stress was affecting my health. Several other people have left because of the board too, so I know the problem wasn’t me.

A year later, I’m trying to find another organization in my field to intern or volunteer, and I’m worried that someone might ask why I left the first organization since I was there for so long. Should I just tell the truth (the board made being there too stressful and I had to leave) and say I’d rather not talk about it if they probe for details, or is there a better way to handle it? I considered saying that I didn’t have time for the volunteering anymore because I started grad school, but then they might want to know why I’m not returning to that organization now that I apparently have time to volunteer again.

Don’t say the board made it too stressful or that you’d rather not talk about it — both responses will raise more questions than they answer. I’d say that you wanted to focus on grad school, but that you’re now ready to take on an outside commitment again. It’s unlikely that they’ll ask why you’re not going back to the previous organization, but if they do, just say that you’re interested in broadening your experience. That’s completely normal; it’s actually more common to go somewhere new than to go back to a previous job.

my employer is docking everyone one day of pay

A reader writes:

Everyone in our company was just informed that all full-time employees (it did not specify exempt or nonexempt) will be docked one day of pay in the month of November due to financial hardship. However, to make up for it, they are going to give us an extra PTO day to take in December if our manager approves the time off.

I could see them making everyone take a mandatory unpaid vacation day or something like that, but it seems odd that they would expect us to work all of our hours, but not pay us for one of the days worked.

While I am happy that I still have a position and this effort may save people from being laid off, I am just wondering if this a normal practice?

It’s not normal, and what’s more, it’s not legal.

I confirmed this with the wonderful Donna Ballman, my go-to employment attorney who has helped us out here before. (And if you haven’t ordered her new book, Stand Up For Yourself Without Getting Fired, order it now. It’s a very reader-friendly guide to your rights at work and how to handle it when your employer isn’t following the law.)

Donna confirms: “Not paying for all hours worked is illegal under the Fair Labor Standards Act if an employee is not exempt. Employees must be paid for all hours worked in any pay period. It might also be a violation of their state’s minimum wage laws if the state has its own laws. They are being paid zero for those hours worked. The plan to give a comp day the following month is not in compliance with the law. Comp time is not permitted under FLSA for private employers.”

Now, it gets trickier when it comes to the exempt workers. (And if you’re baffled by all this talk of exempt and non-exempt, here’s a quick explanation: The government classifies all workers as exempt or non-exempt. Non-exempt workers must be paid overtime for any hours over 40 they work in a single week. Exempt workers are exempt from overtime requirements — but they must be paid the same salary every week, if they worked any portion of it, with a few narrow exceptions. Whether you are exempt or non-exempt isn’t up to your employer; it’s determined by how the government classifies the type of work you do. You can read more here.)

Okay, so back to exempt workers. Donna explains that an employer can reduce an exempt worker’s salary as long as (a) it’s not done retroactively, and (b) your pay isn’t reduced below $455/week (which is the minimum to quality as an exempt worker). But — and here’s where your employer has gone wrong — if it’s only reduced for a week rather than being a long-term change, then your employer can probably lose that exemption … meaning those workers are no longer considered exempt and suddenly are owed overtime pay for any hours they’ve worked over 40/week. And they’re not just owed that overtime pay in the future; they could be owed it for the work they’ve done in the past too. In other words, by doing this one-time pay docking, your employer is saying “we’re no longer treating you as exempt workers” and thus could be liable for all that overtime pay.

Wondering why it would be allowed if your pay cut were permanent instead of short-term? It’s because employers are allowed to change people’s pay based on long-term business needs (for instance, reassessing the value of your work, demoting you, or simply making permanent salary cuts across the board). But the Department of Labor says that “deductions from predetermined pay occasioned by day-to-day or week-to-week determinations of the operating requirements of the business constitute impermissible deductions from the predetermined salary and would result in loss of the exemption.” An overall cut to someone’s salary is allowed because it “reflects the long-term business needs, rather than a short-term, day-to-day or week-to-week deduction from the fixed salary for absences from scheduled work occasioned by the employer or its business operations.”

Donna adds, “The better practice for exempt employees would probably be to ask for volunteers (and they must really be volunteers) to take a day off for personal reasons. Then they wouldn’t have to pay for that day for any volunteers. This employer will likely be committing a serious violation of FLSA if they make people, exempt or non-exempt, work without pay for a day.”

* I make a commission if you use that Amazon link.

unemployed? get a spray tan!

It was bad enough when the state of Florida was offering unemployed people capes to tell them that they’re “superheroes,” but now a local job training office in the U.K. is offering the unemployed free spray tans. Because that’s how you find a job.

Seriously, professional career advice industry, just give up and admit you don’t know what to tell people.

when you catch a candidate lying in an interview

A reader writes:

I work in software development. As a part of our interview process, I ask a series of technical questions. In the past 5 years of interviewing, I’ve managed to catch two applicants bold-face lying/cheating (by looking up the answers online) during a phone interview. The first time, I didn’t say anything to the applicant and finished the interview like normal. The second time, during a short coding test we conduct with a little internet application, the applicant looked up the answer online and copy/pasted someone else’s code. It was pretty obvious he didn’t produce it and, before I could call him out on it, his phone died. I discussed it with some colleagues and they suggested sending him the link to the site he copied the code from to keep him from trying to bother to reschedule an interview.

I guess my question is, what do you or others do when you catch someone lying during an interview? Do you call them out on it? Or do you let it, and the candidate, pass?

There are two schools of thought on this, and both are legitimate:

1. Don’t call the person out, but just remove them from the running. The thinking here is, why bother? You’re not going to hire the person, and it’s not your job to explain why or teach them a lesson.

2. Raise it. Not in an “aha, gotcha!” tone, but simply be direct about why you’re questioning their answer. For instance, in the situation you described, you could say in a neutral tone, “Hmmm, it looks like that came from XYZ.com…?” When I’ve caught people plagiarizing on the written exercises I give when hiring, I’ve generally pointed it out by saying something like, “This answer appears to be taken word-for-word from XYZ online. As a result, I won’t be able to consider your candidacy further.”

I generally do #2 rather than #1 because I like to err on the side of being transparent, but either approach is fine. (Although if you’re going with #2, you’ve got to keep it matter-of-fact and not punitive, since punitive veers too close to unprofessional.)

By the way, I’m assuming here that you know for sure that the person cheated. If you only suspect it but aren’t sure, then I think the right thing to do is to ask about it before simply taking the person out of the running, in case you’re wrong. In that case, I’d say something like, “This is awkward, but your answer seems to be based on XYZ. Can you tell me more about how you reached that answer?”  Or, for a different type of possible lie, “This is awkward, but no one at ABC is able to confirm you worked there.” Or so forth. Occasionally something looks like it’s a lie but there’s an innocent explanation, so if the picture is hazy, I’d ask about it if you can.

the most important things to know before your job interview

One of the strongest differentials between job candidates who do well in job interviews and job candidates who don’t is whether and how they prepare ahead of time. Preparation is crucial to coming across well; if you simply wing it, you risk coming across poorly and losing the job.

When you’re preparing, these are the six most important things to make sure you know.

1. What is the job all about? It might sound obvious, but plenty of people interview for jobs without really understanding what they’d be doing all day. If you walk into an interview not fully clear on the details of the job you’re applying for, you risk looking as if you don’t take your career or the interviewer’s time seriously.

2. What will it take to do it well? If you don’t understand what it will take to excel at the job, you won’t be able to show your interviewer why you’re a strong candidate. That means you need to prepare by thinking deeply ahead of time about what skills, talents, and traits will make the difference between doing an okay job in the position and doing a great job there. One good exercise is to imagine that you’re a coworker of the person in the position that you’re applying for. What would you expect from them if they excelled at the work? Another exercise: If you were hiring for this position, what would you look for in candidates? What sorts of things would concern you?

3. Why do you think you’ll do the job well? This is different from the last question; it’s about why you will be good at the job. What’s in your experience or skill set that will equip you to tackle the job? What can you point to in your past that shows a track record of doing well at similar work? It’s key to be thinking about this question, because it will be the #1 thing on your interviewer’s mind.

4. What will the challenges be? Every job has its challenges, and showing your interviewer that you’re aware of and prepared for them will make you a stronger candidate. When you imagine being in the role, what do you imagine to be the most difficult or frustrating parts? How will you approach those or manage around them?

5. What is the company all about? How do they see themselves? While companies might all look relatively similar from the outside, internally they usually have a very clear self-image. For instance, they might see themselves as cutting-edge, conservative, zany, or warm and informal. Understanding how they see themselves will allow you to show how you’d fit in to their culture and their place in the market.

6. What are you most worried you’ll be asked? Nearly everyone has something they’re hoping their job interviewer won’t bring up. For some people, it’s why they left a previous job or if they’ve ever been fired. For others, any discussion of salary terrifies them. Figure out what you’re most dreading, and practice your answer to it over and over. If you avoid it in the hopes it won’t come up, you risk winging it if it does – and doing that on a sensitive topic is likely to produce an answer you’re not happy with.

I originally published this column at U.S. News & World Report.

what should be on my business cards?

A reader writes:

I am job-hunting and heading to a regional, industry-specific conference next week. My last position was seasonal and ended with October, and I will be brought back intermittently until the season starts again (pending finding other work).

At this conference, I would like to fully take advantage of any networking opportunities I can, and I would like to have a business card to hand out. However, I don’t have any from my last/current position, and I’m not sure what goes on it. Name, email, and phone of course. Should I have a “title”-esque descriptive line, like “Chocolate Teapot Professional”? Any graphics? Fonts? (I plan on printing these on my home printer, so I know simple is better.) All the examples I’m finding are extremely creative and flashy, and not at all helpful for my field.

As a nonprofit hiring manager, what would trigger you to remember that impressive person you met at a conference?

Name, email, phone number, and a title describing what you do.

I’m curious to hear if others disagree, but in my opinion, graphics and fonts don’t make a difference for people in non-design professions, unless they’re really, unusually good (like better than 95% good) — otherwise, they’re either a neutral or, depending on your choices, a negative. I’d go with basic and professional.

And keep in mind that you don’t want to rely on the look of your business card to make people remember you. The conversation and rapport you build — and your follow-up soon after the event — is what should do that.

short answer Sunday — 6 short answers to 6 short questions

It’s short answer Sunday — six short answers to six short questions. Here we go…

1. Coworker laughs loudly all day long

This is going to sound weird, and possibly also like I’m an 80 year old curmudgeon telling teenagers to get the hell off my lawn. I have a new coworker (she’s been with our company for maybe 2 months now) who laughs. A LOT. Like, all day long. It’s really more like a cackle. And it’s really loud. Apparently, everything is funny. Who knew?

It’s really, really distracting. I sit in a separate office from her, across the office, and I can still hear it if I close our door (we sit 3 or 4 people to an office). I feel so bad for the people who share HER office and cannot get away from it. Our direct managers don’t really have the clout to do anything personnel/HR related, and our boss is hands off (and out of the office in meetings a lot, and sits farther away/can close his door). I’m pretty sure he’d say to just learn how to deal with it.

It doesn’t feel like it’s any of our (coworkers on the same level) place to talk to her about it, and truly, though it is super annoying, I don’t want to make her feel bad. We just need to be able to concentrate and do work. It’s already become something we all kind of acknowledge, and honestly, talk about under our breath. Which is not good for office morale.

Laughing loudly all day long in an office falls outside the bounds of professional behavior, and you’re entitled to ask her to hold it down, so say something! In a very nice, possibly apologetic tone, say “Could you keep it down? Thanks!” Say it once a day if you need to.

If being asked to keep it down daily doesn’t cue her to rein it in, you’re dealing with someone especially oblivious. (At which point your choices would be to get more direct with her, enlist some of those equally annoyed coworkers in supplying additional pressure, involve your manager, or start wearing headphones.)

2. Company asked me to donate to its PAC

Recently I received a request from a high-level manager at my company for me to sign up for payroll deduction contributions to the company’s Political Action Committee (PAC). Are there corporate political implications to my decision? Who usually knows whether and/or how much an individual contributes?

There are only corporate political implications if you work somewhere flagrantly unethical. Try ignoring the request or simply declining and see what happens; if there’s going to be additional pressure, you’ll get a follow-up request soon enough. (And by the way, if your employer is coercing or outright requiring employees to donate, it’s an illegal violation of FEC laws.)

3. Telling a coworker he looks “kinda gay”

We were required to wear t-shirts given out by the company to work in today. (We usually wear business attire.) My male coworker was wearing a particularly snug shirt, obviously too small for him. I blurted out, “Your shirt is too tight. You look kinda gay.” Aside from a warning, does this statement warrant any serious action?

Not sure if it’s relevant, but our dress code says that we aren’t allowed to wear anything too snug, especially if our backs are bared when we bend down. This was the case with his shirt, so it was actually a violation of the dress code.

Pointing out that he was violating the dress code isn’t the issue here; using “gay” as a slur is the issue. Your second paragraph makes me wonder: Do you really not see that pointing out a clothing issue and using bigoted language are two completely different things?

If this is the first time that you’ve made a remark like this, you’re probably just going to be warned … but take this as a sign that it’s time to update your language and that you’re likely offending plenty of people around you.

4. Explaining why I moved without a job lined up

I recently moved from one major city to another, without having a job lined up. My lease was up on my apartment, and I was feeling a bit antsy with where I was in my current position. Not to mention, I was living in a rather pricey city for the past two years, and was ready to rid myself of the financial burden that comes with living in one of the nation’s most notoriously expensive cities.

With that said, how do I mention these details to an employer during an interview process? I am searching for jobs that are on a different, but almost similar path, to the two full-time positions that are reflected on my resume (one of my main reasons for relocating, wanting to break into a different line of work that reflects what I went to university for). I don’t want to come off as impulsive and rash when asked in an interview why I left a position without having something lined up. Any advice on how to bring up the issues listed above without seeming irresponsible?

I’d just say directly that you really wanted to move to the more affordable and livable City X and that you knew it would be easier to find a job there once you were actually living there (which is true).

5a. Letters of recommendation when you’re been working in a foreign country

For the past few years, I have been working with an NGO in Latin America, but I plan on moving back to the U.S. at the end of the year (I am a U.S. citizen) and have started looking for jobs. I know that you generally don’t like letters of recommendation, but should I ask my organization for letters before I leave in December? I have a hard time believing they are going to call my NGO for references, particularly since no one here speaks any English. This is my first job after graduating from college, and thus I don’t have any other professional references aside from short-term jobs and volunteering while I was in college. Or should I just not worry about it and let potential employers decide what they want to do?

It wouldn’t hurt to get a couple of letters in this case, as long as you understand that they don’t substitute for references. Employers can take them or leave them as they see fit.

5b. Which reference would be better — my short-term manager or a longer-term manager who’s worked with me less closely?

On a related note, I have had 10 different managers during my three and a half years with the organization. (I’m not kidding; in fact, only 3 of the 20 people in my area were here before me, and I’ve lost track of how many people I’ve seen come and go, and the situation is pretty much the same throughout the organization.) Should I get a reference from my most recent manager even if I have only worked with her for a few months? Or would it be better to get a reference from my boss’s boss who has been here for 3 years and has a very high opinion of my work but has less direct contact with me?

Someone who’s worked with you longer than a few months is better, as long as she can speak to your work in a reasonable amount of detail (which she probably can, if she knows enough about it to have a very high opinion of it).

6. Moving to a post-science career

I have been in a particular branch of science for my entire career. I majored in it in university, taking almost no other type of coursework. After school, I was extremely fortunate to take a research position at a really wonderful institute. I spent eight very happy and productive years there, doing a lot of great work, and enjoying the satisfaction derived from getting the opportunity to publish papers, present abstracts, help write chapters for textbooks and books, and speak at symposiums. Alas, my laboratory lost funding and with it, my position.

I have since taken a position at a prestigious big name university, but it’s been a very different story so far. Budgets are razor thin, morale is medium-low, pay is very low, and opportunities for publication inclusion have not been apparent (this is decided by superiors). I thought my previous experience would help me establish myself here, but it’s a tough work environment.

When I was hired, the HR representative said that the university preferred a year’s commitment before moving on. At the time, that seemed like nothing. But now that I’m here in the position, I struggle. It really makes me realize that I had a very special position at the institute, and perhaps I may not see that sort of opportunity again. I am now considering leaving science entirely.

Do you know of any resources for people considering moving on to post-science careers? Would your readers have any advice for me? Although I only have side projects and volunteer work that is non-scientific, I do think I could move on to other career paths if needed. The stoic part of me says to try to stick this out for at least the year, and then decide so I don’t get blacklisted at this university (a big employer in my state). But many if not most days I cry either going to work or coming home, and if I don’t cry, I feel like it.

I’m posting this here in the hopes that readers will have resources or advice that might help you. But I encourage you not to decide to leave science entirely just because of one bad job! Lots of careers that people find extremely satisfying have the occasional bad job within them — and that’s no reason to leave the career entirely. Why not look around at what other opportunities are out here before moving such a major decision, based on a single bad experience?

Read an update to this letter.