42 gift ideas for every type of employee on your team

If you’re the boss, finding the right gifts for your employees can be fraught with questions: How much do you spend? Should you spend the same amount of money on each person? And if you don’t know someone well, how do you make sure they like the gift while still keeping it professional?

For the record: managers don’t have to give their staff members gifts, but it’s a nice gesture if you want to do it, and in some offices it’s expected. (Although here is your obligatory reminder that because of the power dynamics involved, gifts at work should flow down, not up. Managers should never expect or encourage gifts from employees.)

A while back, New York Magazine asked me to put together a gift guide for bosses buying for employees, and I’ve updated it for 2024.

You can read it here.

Posted in Uncategorized

update: I was asked to take down a family photo

It’s “where are you now?” month at Ask a Manager, and all December I’m running updates from people who had their letters here answered in the past.

There will be more posts than usual this week, so keep checking back throughout the day.

Remember the letter-writer who, as the only gay man in his department, was asked to take down a photo of his baby? Here’s the update.

Shortly after I wrote to you, I talked to HR and asked if there were any rules regarding desk decor and photos displayed. There were not, and they advised me to talk to my manager. I was increasingly upset by the matter, and had several sleepless nights. So, I did ask my manager for a follow-up 1:1 to let her know that I complied and took down the photo, to ask if specific replacement photos were “acceptable,” and to convey my feelings of being targeted.

She was more nervous than I was at the meeting, but her response was largely that she was required to address the matter if someone felt uncomfortable. I asked her if she asked the person what specifically was bothering them about the photo, and she said that she did not. I told her that I’ve encountered prejudice before as a gay parent and that this felt similar. She encouraged me to put up any other photos as long as there was no nudity. I asked how nudity was being defined, because you could not see any butt or genitalia in the photo. I asked if a photo I had of him in a bubble bath was okay, that a nipple might be seen. That the tub blocked him from the waist down so as far as anyone knows he may be wearing a swimsuit. She said that was fine. What if I kept the same photo up but placed a “CENSORED” note over any parts that would imply nudity? She said that would be fine.

I said, “Isn’t it a bit ridiculous to try to parse out what someone else may be finding objectionable?” I said that I was disturbed that this person wasn’t questioned, that their discomfort was catered to, but no one seemed equally concerned how I might feel to be asked to censor a photo of my son.

I documented the discussion and had plans to put up several (non-nude) photos of my son in response. I fantasized about keeping the photo up but placing a note over part of it that read “I feel sorry for small-minded people” but ultimately my heart wasn’t in it. I didn’t want any more controversy.

Word spread among coworkers about my situation and everyone was very supportive of me. A few put similar “nude but no genitalia” photos of their own kids, or an Anne Geddes photo, as their computer monitor’s wallpaper. No one noticed or complained about that.

For about a month I felt sad, and angry, and paranoid, but eventually I let it go. I never did find out who complained. Despite all of that, I have continued to grow and thrive in my position at the company, and “exceeded expectations” at my last review.

Thank you for answering my initial query and for asking for an update on my situation. I had never seen the comments to my situation on your site before now. It was interesting to see the varied points of view, and I felt validated to see that most felt that there was probably some homophobia and prejudice at play, or at the very least it was badly handled.

vote for the worst boss of 2024

It’s time to vote on the worst boss of the year!

  • Today we’ll vote for the worst boss in each of four match-ups.
  • On Wednesday, the winners will go head-to-head with each other.
  • On Friday, we’ll vote on the finalists.
  • The winner will be crowned next Monday.
  • Voting in this round closes at 11:59 pm ET on Tuesday.

Voting is now closed. The results in this round were:

1. A Dreadful Duo – The Nominees:

my mother-in-law manages my sister-in-law and covers up her drunk driving – 67.07% (8,100 votes)

my boss says my work is bad, but it’s actually good – 32.93% (3,977 votes)

2. A Perfidious Pair – The Nominees:

our boss is a jerk about bereavement leave for miscarriages – 68.12% (7,916 votes)

my boss is having an affair with a coworker who’s engaged to another coworker – 31.88% (3,705 votes)

3. A Terrible Twosome – The Nominees:

my boss lets my coworker stab office furniture with a knife – 56.65% (6,381 votes)

my boss jokes about our bodies, our sex lives, and our pregnancies – 43.35% (4,882 votes)

4. A Detestable Dyad – The Nominees:

employer made us take fake lie detector tests to trap a stealing receptionist – 59.8% (6,684 votes)

my boss said I looked “unprofessional” when I wore a binder to work – 40.2% (4,493 votes)

I offended a client, asking a new hire to go by her last name, and more

I’m on vacation. Here are some past letters that I’m making new again, rather than leaving them to wilt in the archives.

1. I think I offended a client

I give private music lessons, often in people’s homes. About a month ago, I arrived and the youngest child didn’t know where her materials were, and said she hadn’t prepared. Normally I swallow this with a smile, but this time I chastised the child and brought the situation to the attention of her older siblings. This was obviously inappropriate and wrong! I should have brought it up with the parent, and only with the child in a polite, positive, or funny way. A few days later I emailed an apology to the mother (a real apology). I apologized directly to the child the following week (she said “thanks”) and a few weeks later apologized directly to the oldest child. However, the apology email was never acknowledged.

The mother is now giving me what seems to be the silent treatment — she does not show herself during lessons, she does not say hello or goodbye. The father now sits in the youngest child’s lesson (which is actually a win — I need parents in the lessons of young children). Since he never did before and now suddenly does every week, I imagine it was directed by her or decided by him, or both. He is pleasant and does not refer to the incident. The kids seem as happy and willing to play as ever, nothing seems wrong there.

What do I do? I would apologize to her directly if I could. I thought about finding her in the house, but I don’t want to create a scene. Background: I’ve been working with this family for six years, all without problems, in fact, they have been very vocally happy with me in the past. They do have a habit of leaving their children to work out their own practice, which is fine philosophically, but often frustrating practically. I think that’s probably why I snapped that day.

I’d let it go. You’ve apologized to everyone involved, and they might not think it’s as big of a deal as you do. It’s possible the mother has other stuff going on and you’re assuming it’s about you when it’s not. Or who knows, maybe it is about you! But you’ve apologized to her, and if she wants to be chilly for a while, hunting her down for another apology probably isn’t going to change that (and risks seeming very weird if she’s moved on).

It’s true that the father might be sitting in on the lessons to monitor you, but he also might be sitting in because the youngest child not being prepared made them realize she needed more parental involvement.

2019

2. Candidate didn’t tell us she’s been at another job for a week

I recently served on an interview committee for an entry-level staff opening in our office. We interviewed Sansa, a candidate we liked very much. Her resume listed that her last job was an internship that ended a few months ago. The next day, we interviewed Arya, another candidate we liked. Arya’s resume listed her current job at Company A and indicated that she had been there for two years.

Later, I was looking at the website of Company A to learn more about it, and found Sansa listed there as a current employee, despite the fact that this job had not appeared anywhere on Sansa’s resume and she never mentioned that she was currently employed.

My boss did some sleuthing and found that the Sansa on Company A’s website was indeed the same Sansa that we interviewed, and she had only worked at Company A for one week at the time of her interview with us. Our hiring committee has varying opinions on this — some now see Sansa as a liar, others want us to approach her with questions about the omission, and some are okay with it, guessing that Sansa felt silly including a job that she’d been at for such a short time on her resume. It might be the case that she started that job and immediately knew it was not a good fit.

How should we best move forward in this situation? Sansa and Arya are both top candidates, but we are concerned about Sansa’s omission on her resume.

This is a completely normal omission and not something you should generally penalize someone for! It wouldn’t have made sense for Sansa to put the job on her resume when she’d only been there a week (and may not have been there at all when she first sent you her resume), and in fact I regularly advise people to leave off jobs that they haven’t been at for long. A resume isn’t a legal document that’s supposed to be a comprehensive account of every job you’ve ever held; the point is to show how you’re a strong candidate for the job you’re applying for, and having held a job for a week is never going to do that. So no lying happened here, unless she told you she was unemployed when you spoke.

The worst thing you can say about her is that she may have taken a job with Company A without intending to commit to them for very long (which is indeed crappy) — but you don’t even know that it’s the case. For all we know, she could have applied with you before she got the job with them, started work there and discovered that she was seriously mismatched with the work, the boss, or the culture, and jumped at the chance to talk with you when your interview invitation came in. Who wouldn’t do the same?

At absolute most, you could say to her, “I happened to be looking at Company A’s website and noticed you’re listed as an employee there. It wasn’t on your resume so I wanted to ask you about it.” But really, it’s unlikely that there’s anything shocking to hear here. This is just not a big deal.

2017

3. Asking a new hire to go by her last name

My name is … let’s say Arya. And I recently hired someone who is also named Arya. During the interview process, we discussed the awkwardness and potential risk-management-related issues with us being mixed up due to the nature of our positions and the fact that she is reporting to me.

She agreed it would be very confusing, and said she’d be happy to go by her last name, Stark. I have been introducing her as Stark to everyone, but noticed she has been introducing herself to people as Arya. I don’t want to be a jerk, but she had agreed during the interview process to go by Stark, and I feel pretty embarrassed at how this makes me look to the other folks who report to me, as if I forced her to go by another name, when really it was mutually agreed upon … or so I thought.

We have other folks in our organization who go by their last names and it has never been an issue before, so there is a precedent for this. How do I broach this with her without being a jerk? I can’t imagine what a nightmare it will be to have two Arya’s reporting to each other in our line of work.

Is it really going to be such a nightmare? It’s very, very common for offices to have two people with the same first name working closely together. Usually people solve it by using last initials and referring to Arya S. and Arya W. or something similar to that.

If she doesn’t want to go by her last name (and I realize she said she’d be okay with it, but it sounds like she might not really want to), you shouldn’t force her to do it; it’s not fair for her not to be able to use her name just because you were there first.

I’d talk to her and say something like this: “Hey, I know we’d talked earlier about you going by Stark to avoid confusion. I’ve noticed you’re using Arya — do you prefer that? If so, let’s start using Arya S. and Arya W. so that it’s clear who’s who.” And then if you’re talking to someone who doesn’t know the importance of including the initial, say something like, “When you follow up, make sure to ask for Arya Williams since there are two Arya’s here.”

2017

4. My employer requires all employees to back into parking spaces

I work for a mid-sized corporation. A new parking policy has been introduced, which requires all employees to back into parking spaces. I don’t like this because it takes longer to park now and because I am terrified of hitting the cars on either side of me when I am attempting to back in. When I questioned the reason for this policy, I was told it was for employee safety and that it would prevent people from backing out of a parking space and hitting someone who was walking by or another car. I feel the odds of me hitting someone are something are greatest when I am trying to wedge myself and my car in a tight space, while in reverse. What do you think of this policy and do you think it is logical?

I have no idea, without knowing more about the parking situation. But regardless of how reasonable it is, if you make a big deal about it, it’s not likely to reflect well on you — most people will think this is a pretty minor thing, and major pushback on it will seem out of place.

For what it’s worth, I once lived somewhere that required residents to park that way and I was highly annoyed — but I discovered that it was pretty easy after the first week of doing it. (And then I never lost the skill, which has been handy.)

2014

weekend open thread – December 7-8, 2024

This comment section is open for any non-work-related discussion you’d like to have with other readers, by popular demand.

Here are the rules for the weekend posts.

Book recommendation of the week: All Fours, by Miranda July. What to say about this book! It’s about marriage and parenthood and sex and perimenopause and obsession and trauma and aging and understanding yourself and being female. It’s intense and uncomfortable and I couldn’t put it down. And I know that tells you nothing, but saying that it’s about an artist who sets out to drive across country when life takes a detour wouldn’t come close to touching what it really is.

* I make a commission if you use that Amazon link.

updates: CEO is furious about my joke, boss keeps saying he loves me, and more

It’s “where are you now?” month at Ask a Manager, and all December I’m running updates from people who had their letters here answered in the past. Here are four updates from past letter-writers.

1. My CEO is furious about a joke I made

Thanks for publishing my letter. I wasn’t able to respond to comments that day, but I read all of them. Some commenters speculated that the CEO initially thought I was serious and was alarmed; he definitely knew I was joking from the get-go and did not like being the butt of the joke. (Most of his jokes are intended to keep the subject a little off balance, but that is supposed to be a one way street).

A coworker later suggested that since another PM was in fact struggling with keeping up with her project, which was causing major problems, the CEO might have thought I was referencing her struggles and it hit a little too close to home. I wasn’t, but it would make his reaction a little more explicable.

I have also since learned from other folks in the industry that he has often responded disproportionately angrily to things you wouldn’t expect. Overall the joke probably helped my reputation amongst my coworkers since most of them disliked the CEO, so they found the situation amusing because it made him look thin-skinned and a little foolish.

I didn’t see the CEO for a while after this incident and while he clearly remembered the encounter, he didn’t mention it and congratulated me on how the project went. The division VP who’d reprimanded me started acting more abrasively towards me, but he was treating everyone the same way so I didn’t take it personally. My boss did mention the incident in my yearly review as a word of warning, although he clearly thought the CEO’s reaction was ridiculous.

Shortly after many people I worked with left the company, and I did as well. I ended up finding a much better-paying job, remote, with really good (and pleasant) bosses who have no issues with humor. So far I’ve been very happy here.

I’ve kept up with some folks from Old Job and it seems many are thinking of leaving. I would never, ever work for either CEO or VP again if I can possibly help it, so it’s not likely I’ll ever run into these folks again (but it’s a small industry so who knows!). Since things turned out okay, I don’t regret making that joke, although in a vacuum I wouldn’t do it again. The whole situation really opened my eyes to the importance of corporate politics; somehow I’d mostly avoided it before this but the amount of gossip and nepotism at that job was incredible. Overall, I’m happy with the way things turned out.

2. My boss keeps telling me he loves me

As many of the commenters guessed, my boss does come from a place where “I love you” or “love you” is a common way to end a conversation, although he doesn’t seem to do it with anyone else. He’s pretty much stopped, presumably due to me giving a weird look every time he said it. Our working relationship continues to be strong! He promoted me to the senior leadership team and I continue to be able to bring up challenging topics with him that others couldn’t. He does suffer a bit from lack of boundaries — just recently he mentioned to me that he had a prostate exam, but it was fine to tell me because “they do blood tests now, not the finger up the butt. Well, they still stick the finger up the butt later, but that’s after the blood test I think, they just don’t open with the finger in the butt any more” — but that’s just who he is. And frankly, it’s refreshing to work for a boss whose “finger up the butt” stories are medical. That’s progress for my industry.

– still don’t love him, but I like him just fine

3. Can I take off a full week when no one can cover for me? (#4 at the link)

Your advice was indeed very helpful and reassuring.

Here’s my update: The company hasn’t changed much, but I have:

· I’ve required that others provide information I need to fulfill their product needs on a timely basis, or it doesn’t get done.

· I’ve made it clear that because of my broad background, I can do almost anything, but not everything. We can do “A,B,C” but not “D,E.F.” If I’m clear and consistent, I don’t get heavy pushback. This has reduced workload.

· I insisted I be allowed to hire freelancers who can take on much of my back-office work, making it easier to get ahead before vacations.

Those three items above have made real vacations possible for me and for the company. I also made a logical case for raises. They weren’t large, but my staff and I got something, which improved morale here.

4. Our director left while my coworker was on vacation (#3 at the link)

The advice was spot on.

My update is that the coworker was fine learning about the news in a casual way when she got back. Unfortunately, I was not hired for the permanent position. There were a lot of red flags in the hiring process. The interview was scheduled at the last minute (on a Thursday when she pledged to announce who was hired on a Friday). The executive director also told me, verbatim, after my interview, “Well, you know I want to hired you, but I have to interview Jane to make sure she doesn’t get mad.” She took Jane on a 15-minute coffee interview the next day. She gave Jane the job. For reference, Jane has less experience, training, and credentials than me. I was given a smaller promotion but that wasn’t enough to balance out that Jane and my ED cut my most interesting tasks, removed me from all important conversations, and undermined me at every turn. After a long and frustrating summer, I got a new job in a related industry for a little less money. I am thrilled with the new job and excited for a fresh start.

The most interesting part about my new job is that I’m in a “project engineer” role (my smaller promotion was to “senior engineer”) so technically a step down, but the levels at my new organization are massively different. At my old org, my new director and ED were very young and inexperienced. The new job, people have way more experience. While that likely means I won’t make my way up to senior engineer in the near future as I hoped, I am actually a lot happier to be learning and growing with people who have something to offer in terms of professional growth!

more on AI attending meetings

A reader writes:

This may be cheating as an “update” since I am not the original person who wrote in about AI attending meetings, but I still thought it might be interesting/useful to you and your readers!

Today I was in a Zoom meeting: a regular small meeting to publish a paper. I noticed an AI notetaker logged in as a bot for one of the meeting regulars; this was the first time I’ve seen one in the wild. But because I read your blog and had seen a question about AI note takers as well as the follow-up, I knew that the person may have been totally unaware about it. The bot actually logged on BEFORE the person logged on themselves. The person apologized that they were having some computer issues. I asked if the bot was intentional as I had heard these have started joining Zooms with the “owner” unaware. Indeed she was not aware and asked me to get rid of it.

Once I booted it, I got two emails from the org that generated the bot. One was a summary of what we talked about before I booted the bot. It has a link to a “full summary” but you have to make an account and log in to see it. The person said DON’T DO IT. It turns out that’s how she got “infected” by the bot. She didn’t want it and it followed her from her work computer to her personal one. Presumably it got some sort of access to her zoom account, and she didn’t intend any of that!

So just an FYI: while these bots actually do seem to provide an interesting summary of the meeting, they also seem to be propagating almost like phishing and probably everyone should avoid logging in to any websites directed by “summary” emails they receive unless they too want a pseudo-viral bot.

open thread – December 6, 2024

It’s the Friday open thread!

The comment section on this post is open for discussion with other readers on any work-related questions that you want to talk about (that includes school). If you want an answer from me, emailing me is still your best bet*, but this is a chance to take your questions to other readers.

* If you submitted a question to me recently, please do not repost it here, as it may be in my queue to answer.

company asked if we’d donate a kidney, candy dish drama, and more

I’m on vacation. Here are some past letters that I’m making new again, rather than leaving them to wilt in the archives.

1. Our company asked if we’d donate a kidney to a board member

My previous workplace sent a company-wide email (via the COO) asking if staff would donate a kidney to a 70-year-old board member. The renumeration would be “any costs associated with the surgery and post op care.”

I’m from a different country, and I found this email to be abhorrent! I feel it grossly overstepped boundaries, and reinforced privilege barriers (the majority of the workforce at this company is African American or Hispanic, whilst the board and upper level management are almost exclusively white.) Through research and general knowledge, I found there can be long-term health implications with donating organs, and I don’t feel just offering to pay for a surgery that wasn’t necessary in the first place even scratches the surface in terms of compensation.

My colleagues at the time didn’t think this request was unusual. Am I totally off-base with my disgust?

In the U.S. and many other countries, it’s illegal to offer compensation for an organ beyond covering costs associated with the operation, so that’s why they didn’t offer more than that. (The concern is that paying for organs would exploit poor people and could even be coercive.)

But it was a wildly problematic and inappropriate request anyway. Hopefully no one is going to feel pressured to say yes simply because it comes from above, but there is an inherent pressure when you’ve got those power dynamics in play. Plus, if an employee did donate, what does that mean for their employment there? Will they be given preferential treatment? Will others think they’re being given preferential treatment, regardless of whether they actually are? If the person’s performance worsens, will the employer feel comfortable addressing it the same way they would with someone else? If their job is later cut, will the employee feel betrayed? There’s a ton of potential for messiness here, all of it amplified by power and race differences.

2019

2. I told a friend I’d help him, and now he’s bombarding me with urgent messages while I’m working

A coworker of mine recently left my company to head up a nonprofit organization founded by his late father. The organization has very limited resources and is just getting off the ground. I told him I’d be happy to help him out with any marketing-related tasks, so long as it did not interfere with my actual work. Since he left two weeks ago, however, he has been up my proverbial ass with requests and things he “needs” urgently. DURING WORK HOURS. This week, he had the audacity to email my work email address with the word “urgent” in the subject line. Other colleagues have been included on these emails as well, but nobody seems to be perturbed.

Mind you, I told him i would help, but we never had the discussion as to what his marketing needs are and what the time commitment looks like. He just assumed he could start sending me requests.

How should I field this? Should I just not respond to future requests, or should i set the precedence that I am happy to help, but he needs to be respectful of my time and work schedule? I also haven’t received a single please or thank you for anything I have done, and that bothers me too. Do you think it is worth it to say something? He is an adult and I don’t want to scold him, but come on, dude.

It sounds like he may have had a different understanding of what “as long as it doesn’t interfere with my work” meant. He may have thought it meant you’d do stuff for him when you had downtime at work, and not realized you didn’t want to hear from him at work at all. So if you’re still interested in helping him, be really, really explicit with him about what that means. For example: “I can help you with things like X and Y, but I’m not going to be able to do anything during work hours, including fielding questions. You definitely can’t email me at work, and generally I’ll need a few days to get back to you. If things are going to be urgent or need to be moved forward during the work day, that’s not something I can help with. Given that, does it still make sense for me to help out?”

Also, ask directly what kind of time commitment he’s envisioning from you in an average week/month because you might have wildly different expectations there too.

Of course, all that assumes you still want to help him. If you don’t — and it’s absolutely okay if you don’t, particularly given his apparent lack of appreciation of your work and your time — you can say, “I’ve realized this is more of a time commitment than I can take on right now so I should bow out.”

2019

3. People are upset that my candy dish is gone

For a couple years, I kept a candy dish on my desk filled with chocolate candies. It was something I enjoyed providing. Sometimes I got frustrated with the greedy ones and the fact that only one person ever contributed candy/money, but it was still something I enjoyed doing.

About a month ago, I saw a financial advisor who told me I needed to cut expenses drastically. I realized I was spending almost $1,000 on candy a year! Yes, that $20-$25 a week really adds up when you multiply it out. So I decided to stop providing candy.

The first week was easy, because I was out of the office. I figured that would give people time to get used to it. We are now into the second week since I have been back, and people are still going by and making comments! “No candy?” “When is the chocolate coming back?” Some want me to explain why it’s gone. One person suggested I could keep buying it but then ask the company to reimburse me! All the people making comments and demanding explanations are the higher-ups in the office. These people probably make four and five times what I make. And to top it all off, there is a drug store with candy for sale right in the building!

I have tried just saying “I’m passing the torch!” Or, as Miss Manners advises in such occasions, giving a tight lipped, weak smile. Still the comments and questions persist! Why do people think they are so entitled to spend my money? And how do I get the comments to stop?

People are thoughtless. Some of them probably don’t realize you were paying for the candy with your own money (versus the company providing it) and some just haven’t stopped to think about how the cost would add up. That’s not entirely surprising — I would have guessed you were spending maybe $5/week on it and never would have guessed it was $20-25. People know they’re taking it but don’t account for how many others take it too, which makes it easier to think it’s a much smaller expense. Which isn’t to say they’d be entitled to it then either, of course! It could be pennies and you’d still be on solid ground in deciding you didn’t want to provide it anymore.

But people complain when they’re used to something delicious being available and then it goes away. That doesn’t mean they’re truly demanding you bring it back — it’s just people being people and not realizing how pushy they sound. Just say, “I was spending too much on it” or “I didn’t want to keep buying it” or “my candy days have come to an end” and don’t let it get to you. If anyone pushes beyond that, you can say, “They sell it downstairs if you want to take over.”

2019

4. What do I wear to spend the night with 49 random colleagues?

My organization is sending the entire staff (split into 50-person groups) on overnight team-building retreats. This is not so much a trust exercises and team racing kind of team building as it is we all sit in a room for hours and discuss our mindsets and behaviors (i.e., low physical activity and probably inside).

What is the expected dress code for a work event outside of work, where you will be spending every moment both waking and sleeping with a random selection of colleagues? My workplace has no formal dress code, and outfits vary vastly depending on what department you are in. I have seen colleagues run the gamut from button-ups and ties, to cargo shorts and sandals, to off-the-shoulder flowery tops. I usually wear ankle length pants and bodysuits with a jumper over the top. I don’t wear my work clothes outside of work, as they are way too hot for me.

This retreat is going to be in a very hot place in summer. I assume after the “workday” is done, we will have free time before bed. I am hoping that I would be expected to dress work-like for the work part and could maybe change into a dress or something after, but perhaps I am wrong and I am expected to be work-appropriately covered at all times. Furthermore, the nature of this retreat is that everyone sleeps on mats scattered around a single large room (this is completely normal in my country, although something you would usually do with family and friends). What on earth constitutes work-appropriate sleepwear? I assume my loose tanks with the peek-a-boob baggy arm holes will not cut it.

My colleagues have not been much help when I’ve asked around; most have given me a verbal shrug, and my manager looked a little nervous and said she wasn’t really sure, but that she’d heard that the Big Boss brought a brand new silk pajama set for the executive team version of this retreat earlier in the year. I am getting increasingly worried as the days get hotter and the experience of sharing a hot afternoon and sleeping room with 49 colleagues gets nearer.

First, for the record, this sounds horrible.

I doubt you’re expected to be in business wear even in your free time after work activities are over. I’d say that regardless of your company’s normal dress code, but it’s especially true given that normal work wear for many people attending is already pretty casual. You’ll likely be fine in shorts (as long as they’re not super short), capris, dresses, or even sweats or lounge wear when you’re not in the work portion of the event. (Reasonably nice sweats, not ones with holes or rampant stains.)

As for sleeping … wearing pajamas around coworkers seems awfully seventh-grade-slumber-party-ish to me! (And frankly, loads of people don’t even own pajamas anymore.) I’d go with a t-shirt and sleeping shorts (or lightweight lounge pants if you want more coverage) or something along those lines.

2019

Read an update to this letter here.

updates: interviewer said my reading tastes were pretentious, problem employee lashed out at me, and more

It’s “where are you now?” month at Ask a Manager, and all December I’m running updates from people who had their letters here answered in the past. Here are four updates from past letter-writers.

1. Employer rejected me, then sent a list of everything I did wrong

Three or so years ago, I emailed you concerned about an interviewer who had sent me feedback for a job I didn’t get, including saying I lacked passion and some other stuff. (I was the one whose favorite book was Les Miserables and he said I was pretentious.)

As many commenters guessed, he WAS trying to hit on me in a negging sort of way. He later tried to ask me out via LinkedIn DMs. Needless to say, it did not work.

It took a while, and many other unsuccessful interviews (none of which were as rough as that one) but I eventually found a job in a field I had never considered, where I could put my writing skills to work with much less of a “bro culture” compared to writing for stocks/finances. I’m still in the job, got a huge promotion this year, and have even written articles about how great of a book Les Miserables is. It’s still my favorite and I still reread it regularly!

What prompted me to think of sending you an update is this: I recently as part of my job interviewed a long-time idol of mine, a celebrity I have looked up to for years, and he said to me at the end of the interview, apropos of nothing, that he had read some of my previous work and could tell how passionate I was about my writing and that he was so happy to be interviewed by someone so passionate about their work.

As for Mr. Interview Feedback, no idea how he’s doing, and no desire to know — but I’m in my dream job and happier than I ever thought I could be.

Thank you again for all of your advice.

2. Problem employee lashed out at me (#2 at the link)

The employee was laid off about a year after my email. He was very low-performing in hindsight, but I had very little to compare to at the time, him having been my first direct report. My boss several months later asked me if I thought he should be laid off, I said yes, and after a period given to the employee to job search while still employed (unsuccessfully), he was. (I believe he found a job within a year, but I think it was possibly a little lower level.)

It was somewhat of a shock to get your note that I wasn’t managing this person. It’s probably true that I wasn’t giving him strong enough feedback. But I did give him a LOT of coaching in work-related subjects, thus my shock. The loads of coaching didn’t help enough, though I sometimes wonder if it helped them later on with other jobs. In hindsight, your advice to manage more makes sense to me. Once I started giving stronger feedback, he reacted as you could have expected. One comment I remember is that he said, “You can’t compare me to twenty-something geniuses” after a comment I made that his performance was not measuring up to other (similarly compensated) analysts.

3. How to explain a family crisis to very demanding clients (#3 at the link)

I wrote in earlier this year wondering how to handle my emotionally needy clients’ reactions when I needed to be out-of-office sporadically while caring for a sick relative. Alison provided a great script, and the commentariat had a lot of helpful insight … and speculation on what, exactly, I was doing for work, where clients wouldn’t take “family emergency” for an answer.

I’ll get the sadder news out of the way first: I had to use this advice quite a bit, as my relative’s health declined and they passed away earlier this year. That said, I was shocked by how easy it was to deal with most clients, even the “needy” ones. I was massively overthinking this. I used Alison’s script almost word for word, but one commenter mentioned that these kinds of messages always felt “cold” to them, and I knew some of my clients would feel the same way. So for them, I’d start with “I wanted you to know,” so it felt more personal, before launching into the script. I’d end the messages with “… Since I’m back, I’m trying to get a bit ahead of schedule, so I know things are on track if I need to be away again.” And then I’d pivot into what I needed to keep their projects moving. I was anticipating a lot of responses hoping to help somehow, so framing “don’t ask questions and let me do my job” as a favor to me was wildly effective.

As for my industry: The folks who suggested editing and publishing were the closest. A lot of those comments were relatable! The thread about dogs texting their groomers also made me laugh during a tough time. Really, though, I build websites for a firm with a reputation for handling niche projects well. I have the technical skill to build the sites, but my main skills are organizing complex or confusing information and managing difficult personalities, so I get assigned our most unusual stuff. Much of what I do day-to-day is boring (ask me about my gravel database!) but I also have clients who are small nonprofits doing work they’re very emotionally invested in, or even individuals pursuing passion projects that I often compare to ghostwriting memoirs. These clients often share tons of really personal experiences to contextualize why certain things are so important to them. I’m translating people’s most dearly-held ideas, or beliefs, or experiences out of “thought” and into a format that other people can understand. There can be SO MUCH VULNERABILITY involved in sharing these thoughts and experiences, often for the first time, and a lot of anxiety about being misunderstood. Most projects are pretty creative in nature, and if you’ve ever nervously shared a creative endeavor of your own, you may know the fluttery, anxious, exposed feelings my clients experience. I’ve found that quick responses with reassurance and positive feedback help build the confidence they need to keep moving forward (so I can meet my deadlines.) The downside is that if I don’t respond as quickly as usual, the doubt sets in, and the whole project can grind to a halt until clients feel, emotionally, like they’re ready to move forward.

As a result, I had made managing clients’ feelings a key part of how I manage their projects … which was effective when I could do it, but clearly not sustainable. The last few months have made me realize that most of my “borderline” needy clients are taking their cues from me. If I treat them like they’re going to be unreasonable, they’ll be unreasonable. But if I simply expect them to manage their own feelings and get me what the project needs, most of them will do it. This worked wonderfully for the group I was most worried about in my initial letter: a community of nuns whose archives I’ve been digitizing. They’re notoriously particular and a little bit nosy, and were taking my slower emails very personally. But when I sent them the script, they just added my family to their prayer list and relaxed. A few clients were clearly upset that I wasn’t sharing more, and one in particular reached out to my boss to ask for more details, because they “found it hard to be open with me when they knew I was hiding things.” The advice here really galvanized me against these clients’ pushiness, though. If they want to be upset, that’s their business. My business is getting their projects done.

And to answer Alison’s question: I don’t think this is common behavior from clients in my industry. My company tends to attract (or, rather, tolerate) needy clientele more than others. Many clients come to us when other firms drop them. Historically, I’ve been good at keeping even the neediest clients feeling secure, so the neediest of them get assigned to me. I used to wear that like a badge of honor. Now? I’m not so sure.

4. I know who’s unvaccinated because of my job — can I use that info to make personal decisions? (#2 at the link)

Thank you for answering my question earlier this year about how to handle information at work that relates to my personal life/health. I decided you were ultimately right about needing to use a polite fiction that I did not know their kids weren’t vaccinated. I just told the families that we were “busy” any time they invited my kids somewhere. The wild cards in the situation were my kids themselves who are old enough to figure out something was up when we were not actually busy the day of the event we skipped.

Anyway, baby is here and healthy and on his way to being fully vaccinated!