my ex-boss threatened to contact my husband, his coworkers, and my father-in-law if I don’t return $48 of office supplies

A reader writes:

I received an email today from my prior boss (I left in November) requiring that I return equipment. However, there was no loaned equipment or return equipment clause that even existed for me to sign. They never provided me with anything outside of a $48 office supplies order from Amazon that included a pack of pens, a four-pack of binders, a box of sheet protectors, and a file/binder holder. I used my personal computer, monitor, keyboard, mouse – everything.

Here is an excerpt:

“I will have no other option than to reach out to your husband Bob directly as I can only assume that the lack of communication on this matter is you have become too busy with your new position, making this intervention necessary. I am happy to connect with him. I have his direct phone and email address through his work. I’d like to get this resolved and not have to start legal proceedings. Of course I will share my sympathies to him and apologize to him for needing to concern him at this stage but have no other alternative. I will attach email threads so he knows I’m not a random individual reaching out. I want him to feel comfortable in communicating with me should he have any questions of course. It is truly a small world out there and I have come to find that I actually know several folks that work in (county) and work in the (husband’s job) department. And even two others that know your father-in-law as patients.”

Is this crazy, or is this crazy?

She also said if it’s not received by Tuesday next week, she expects payment for the items. This is not even stuff I purchased or used a company card for. The purchase was arranged and made for me by the HR person she CC’d on the email.

HR is a single individual who was made aware of all issues, including me asking about being asked to work on my boss’s personal business while on company time. This HR person was also actively participating in keeping my boss’s private business a secret from the owner/president of the company.

I would love to know if there are any laws that my boss would be in violation of by acting on behalf of the company and (a) contacting my husband at his place of work (a completely separate company with no connection to this one) and (b) utilizing patients that “she knows” to get in contact with my father-in-law at his private medical practice.

Your ex-boss appears to be batshit insane.

And if she actually attempted to complain about this to your husband, his coworkers, or your father-in-law’s patients, she’s going to look batshit insane to them too. I mean, your father-in-law’s patients?! Can you imagine being contacted out of the blue by someone who wanted to complain that your doctor’s daughter-in-law hadn’t returned a box of pens? (Hell, even if she claimed you owe more than that, it’s still going to make her look like a loon. People are not receptive to being contacted about their doctors’ in-laws’ work drama, or their colleagues’ spouses work drama.) No one is going to respond sympathetically or think less of you for it; if anything, they’ll feel sympathy toward you.

You can also safely ignore her threats of legal action. She’d need to sue you through the company, not as an individual, and there’s no chance your company is going to sue you for a $48 pack of office supplies.

As for whether she’d be violating any laws by contacting your husband, people who work with him, or your father-in-law’s patients … Assuming you’re in the U.S.: maybe, but probably not, and especially not in any way that would make real sense for you to act on.

If she contacted your new employer about this, it could maybe be tortious interference (a legal cause of action for intentionally damaging someone’s business relationships) but there’s no law preventing her from contacting your husband, weird as that behavior would be. If she contacts people who work with your husband, it could possibly be tortious interference with his job, depending on what she says. If she lies about either of you to anyone, it could be defamation (although you’d have to show one or both of you suffered economic damage as a result). If she works in health care and she were getting the contact info of your father-in-law’s patients through any sort of internal resources, that would be a HIPAA violation — but if she doesn’t work in health care and just knows them socially, it wouldn’t be (HIPAA only covers health care workers and a few other very narrowly defined categories).

I wouldn’t be looking at legal solutions to this, though. Instead, email HR and your ex-boss’s own manager. If it’s a very small company, like 50 employees or less, include the owner too; if it’s larger than that, include someone else high up with authority (your department VP, a COO, or so forth). Say this:

“I am requesting your help in stopping the threats and harassment I’m receiving from Jane Smith. Below you’ll find an email she sent me on (date) in which she threatens to contact my husband, his colleagues, and patients of my father-in-law if I don’t return company equipment. I was never issued any company equipment. The only equipment or supplies I ever received from the company was a $48 office supplies order from Amazon that included a pack of pens, a four-pack of binders, a box of sheet protectors, and a file/binder holder. I used many of those supplies in my work but if you would like me to return what still remains, I’d be happy to do so; please send me a pre-paid shipping label and I’ll of course send that back immediately. However, I am alarmed to be threatened with harassment of my husband, his coworkers, and my father-in-law’s patients, as well as by threats of legal action when no previous request was made for these items. Can you assure me the company will put a stop to this immediately?”

Now, obviously there are problems with the company HR, which is why you have other people included on this email. Even if the HR person is fully in your boss’s pocket, the rest of the person receiving this message are going to be appalled when they see your boss’s message, and they are highly likely to put an instant stop to all of this. No sane company wants a manager sending messages like this, let alone running wild with the sorts of threats she made in her note. They’re going to shut that down. And I doubt very much that it’ll turn out that they want a few pens and some binders back, but if they do, go ahead and send them back.

That should take care of it — and it’s very likely your boss is going to be on the receiving end of a serious conversation about her judgment.

how to answer when a job candidate asks, “how did I do?”

A reader writes:

Lately at the end of interviews, I’ve had people asking me how they did in the interview. Everyone who has asked me this question hasn’t done very well. I think it’s a really awkward question that puts the interviewer on the spot. What’s your take? What’s the best way to respond to this, especially if the candidate hasn’t done well?

I answer this question — and three others — over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and sometimes updating/expanding my answers to them). You can read it here.

Other questions I’m answering there today include:

  • Bumper stickers when you drive clients in your car
  • Is constant knuckle-cracking acceptable at work?
  • Is there a point in your career where you should stop requesting expense reimbursement?

getting people to use the right pronouns, finding trans-friendly workplaces, and trans-inclusive hiring

Today Kalani Keahi Adolpho and Stephen G. Krueger join us to answer questions about trans and gender diverse inclusion at work.

Kalani (they/them or he/him) and Stephen (ey/em or he/him) are the authors of the Trans Advice Column. In their day jobs, both are academic librarians who also write and present on trans and gender diverse inclusion in library work. Their most recent project (with Krista McCracken) is the forthcoming book Trans and Gender Diverse Voices in Libraries, an edited volume with chapters by over fifty trans and gender diverse library workers and students.

They’ll take it from here…

Note: We define “trans and gender diverse people” as anyone whose gender does not completely align with the sex that was assigned to them at birth.

1. How do I get my [customers/coworkers/employees] to call [me/my coworker/my employee] by the correct [name/pronouns/salutation] without confusing or upsetting anyone?

We’re summarizing several questions into this one because they’re all basically the same issue, and it’s so incredibly common. Since the answer varies based on who is asking, we’ll break it down into a few categories.

  • For the person who is being mispronouned/misgendered: If you’re asking this question, you’re probably fine sharing your pronouns (or at least you’ve decided it’s necessary even if you’d prefer not to need to), so do that wherever you can—email signature, nametag, Zoom name, verbal introductions, etc. Remind and correct people if you’re comfortable doing that. If you have allies at work, especially if they are in positions of power (for example, a manager), ask if they can correct people in group settings like meetings and when you’re not present, if you’d like them to do that. Almost invariably, however, the people asking this question are already doing all of this or have reasons not to. Often, pronoun sharing goes ignored and reminders are met with everything from confusion to hostility. There is no magical thing that trans and gender diverse people can easily do to resolve this; even if the issue is ignorance rather than bigotry, it’s not our responsibility to educate everyone we come across on the most basic aspects of gender and respect. Reminding people to use your pronouns over and over and over is exhausting and demoralizing even if they aren’t actively ignoring you or responding aggressively. And in a workplace context, you may be forced to prioritize making the other person feel comfortable even though they are the one behaving offensively, so you can’t always speak up for yourself or leave without risking professional harm.
  • For managers and coworkers: First, do the work to educate yourself about pronouns and practice ones that are unfamiliar to you, especially those you’ll need to use—for example, if you have an employee who goes by they/them pronouns, do the work on your own to get comfortable using these naturally. Don’t rely on corrections from the person affected; if someone has shared their pronouns with you in any form, you need to use them consistently. In addition to this being basic respect, demonstrating the correct language may remind people who forget or are confused. Secondly, if the person asks you for help reminding people, give them space to share what they need but also let them know some specific things you can do to support them (it’s often easier to say “yes, that” than to ask someone for something they may not be able or willing to do, especially if there’s a power dynamic in play). Some things you can volunteer to do include correcting people in the moment or in private later; sharing resources with those who continue to misgender, mispronoun, or deadname your coworker; escalating issues to supervisors or HR; and whatever else makes sense in the specific situation. Managers can be particularly effective at this type of work, and can also push for policy changes. If you’re in a position to do so, make it clear that misgendering, mispronouning, deadnaming, etc. are not interpersonal issues for trans and gender diverse employees to work through with their coworkers; referring to people appropriately is a baseline expectation in the workplace (and intentionally refusing to do so should not be tolerated). If there is pushback, focus on what conduct is expected rather than trying to convince people to change their minds about trans and gender diverse people, which is much more difficult and also not necessary for establishing and enforcing workplace behavior requirements.
  • For everyone: The real issue behind this very common question is that ignorance around the existence of trans and gender diverse people (let alone how to talk to and about us) is incredibly pervasive. One aspect of that is that treating trans and gender diverse people, especially nonbinary people, with basic respect isn’t a standard part of workplace etiquette. Ideally, someone would be able to share their pronouns if they wanted to and have those used consistently, at most with some polite reminders and corrections at the beginning. (Actually, an ideal world is one in which nobody’s gender or pronouns are assumed at all, but we’re pretty far from that one.) So really, we’re including this question as a wake-up call to everyone who doesn’t think they’re directly impacted by it. The suggestions above are band-aids at best. There is a real answer, but it isn’t for any of the people asking the question; the solution is for basic trans and gender diverse inclusion to become an expected part of workplace behavior. Very few employers take this issue on at all and even fewer do so effectively, which means all y’all have got to do the work of educating yourselves and each other. You do need to practice using pronouns apart from he or she until it comes naturally, and you do need to break the habit of assuming gender and pronouns based on name or appearance or voice. You may not know that you’re causing harm, because that lack of awareness is part of the widespread ignorance of trans and gender diverse people’s existence. It’s not your fault if a lot of this feels very new—that erasure is overwhelming, intentional, and violent. But it is your responsibility to learn now that you’ve recognized the gaps in your knowledge. This may seem like a huge amount to take on—that’s normal! We wrote about how to learn about trans and gender diverse people to get you started. But this is not optional. I promise that you are interacting with trans and gender diverse people in the world around you, whether or not you realize it, and ignorance on this topic is harmful. The very least you can do is take on the labor of self-education on basic issues like respecting people’s pronouns.

2. Looking for trans-friendly workplaces

I am trans, and because of this I am pretty selective in where I interview, looking for places that are rated highly for diversity. Late last year I was looking for a new job and was interviewing at a place that is particularly highly rated for LGBT+ inclusion. During the interview process, they also impressed me with their consideration towards my name and pronouns. I was given a great offer, which I accepted.

Fast forward to the actual start of work. To make a long story short, this is actually the most transphobic environment I have ever worked in. Myself and other trans people at the company are regularly outed and dead named. I have taken multiple steps within the company to try to address this, but no one seems willing and able to help. Needless to say, I am looking for another job.

My question is about how to prevent this from happening again. This company completely fooled me. They portrayed themselves as extremely trans-friendly and gave every appearance of respecting my gender identity during the interview process. I can’t believe how toxic and transphobic the reality was. I am hoping that you have some ideas on what to ask and/or look for so I can find a safe workplace. Thank you!

This is a very familiar and very frustrating situation to be in, and, unfortunately, there’s no easy answer. There’s no way to completely prevent this from happening because we live in a transphobic (or, at best, ignorant) society, and because most diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts are ornamental. They function as a PR project more than anything else, and so they are more invested in visible signs of inclusion over deeper, structural work. This results in trans and gender diverse people being misled into thinking they’re entering a safe(ish) work environment. But while there is no way to guarantee you’ll never find yourself in this position again, it doesn’t mean there is nothing you can do to minimize the chances of that happening.

When researching and interacting with prospective employers, make sure you keep perspective on what you find. While we do encourage trans and gender diverse people to look up how the workplace they are applying for ranks in terms of LGBT+ inclusion (if that information is available), you can’t take it at face value. Often in these rankings, LGBT+ communities are treated as a monolith; the experiences of cis LGB and trans coworkers are not separated out. Because many companies have no, or very few, openly trans workers, the criteria and results mostly tell us how a particular workplace ranks for cis LGB people in particular areas. If the data is broken down at all, can you tell what sorts of questions are asked? Can you tell how many people were surveyed? Can you tell what their identities are? Additionally, consider that anonymity might be impossible on these types of surveys, and so responding honestly could jeopardize people’s jobs. Basically, while you should probably be concerned if somewhere is rated poorly for LGBT+ inclusion, you shouldn’t necessarily be reassured if they’re rated highly, unless there’s a lot of focus on trans and gender diverse people’s experiences there in particular.

The most effective type of research in gauging how you’ll be treated at a particular workplace is by talking to current or former employees of identities similar to your own. If you don’t know anyone who works there personally, do you have personal or professional networks who can help make connections for you? Groups like the Trans Educators Network(for PK-12 educators) or the Trans and Gender Diverse LIS Network (for library workers) are designed specifically to connect trans and gender diverse people within those fields, so see if you can find anything like that for your profession. It’s very normal to post in these sorts of spaces asking if anyone has knowledge of a particular workplace; since they’re private, you’re likely to get more direct and useful information than you will from the interview. If the employer has an LGBTQ+ affinity group or something similar, ask if you can talk to someone from that, or reach out directly if the group has public contact information. It’s totally reasonable to email an affinity group asking if anyone is willing to talk to you about their experiences at the workplace or asking about specific issues.

While you may get good information this way, keep in mind that experiences of trans and gender diverse people often vary widely within a single institution based off all sorts of factors. Trans men often end up benefiting from male privilege, while nonbinary trans people face even more erasure than trans men and trans women. Someone who goes by their legal name (whether or not they changed it) won’t be outed by having it show up in paperwork, while someone whose name of use is different from their legal name may run into that issue. And of course, the immediate work environment is a defining factor; some supervisors, departments, etc. may be more or less supportive or safe than others. Additionally, trans and gender diverse people may be harmed by ableism, racism, and fatphobia among their coworkers in addition to discrimination and harassment tied to gender (the breakout reports of the U.S. Transgender Survey separate out the results by race and other factors, demonstrating the varied levels of marginalization faced by trans and gender diverse people of different identities). This is another reason why monolithic ratings like “LGBT inclusion” can be pretty meaningless.

When assessing the workplace, look for structural evidence of trans inclusion that goes beyond the hiring process. Workplace culture can be difficult or impossible to assess from the outside, but keep an eye out for systemic examples of trans-inclusive practices. Is the application process trans and gender diverse inclusive by design, or do they add on extra steps to be inclusive once they know you’re trans? Are there all-gender restrooms that are easy to access? Do they have information about their insurance coverage for trans-related healthcare available? Do they have employee affinity groups related to your identity? This isn’t a complete list of questions, but it may help you get some idea of what to look out for.

Lastly, interviews can be good opportunities to find out more. While it’s obviously worse if they don’t respect your name and pronouns during the hiring process, as you’ve found, good practices here aren’t necessarily indicative of how they treat employees. Pay particular attention to the behavior of people you’ll work closely with, since that will impact you much more than anybody else. Look beyond name and pronouns, since those things may be more reflective of how search committees are told to behave than the workplace culture or individual knowledge. From what you’re able to tell, do their policies and procedures include and acknowledge trans and gender diverse people and issues (for example, if it’s a public library, do people have to share their legal gender and use their legal name to get a library card)?

If you want to come out to potential employers (and can do this without risking your livelihood, which many people can’t due to the discrimination against trans and gender diverse people that remains incredibly common), you can ask questions more directly: What has the institution done to support and protect trans and gender diverse employees? How can you expect to be treated as an openly trans person in this workplace? How do they handle issues around coworkers not using someone’s correct name or pronouns? It is important to pay careful attention to how they answer. Are they struggling to come up with examples? Have they done anything tangible, or are they just talking about how open-minded their department is? Is the work all surface-level, or have they done anything more intensive that demonstrates real commitment? Do they acknowledge failures and ongoing difficulties, or do they pretend that everything is great for trans and gender diverse employees (which may be possible but is very unlikely)?

As you’ve unfortunately already learned, there really isn’t a way to know for sure how your experiences as a trans or gender diverse person will be in a new workplace. So in addition to doing the research described above, think about what you need to do in order to protect yourself. Maybe this means coming out in every interview and directly asking about the experiences of trans and gender diverse employees; maybe it means keeping your gender private for a while after starting a job, so that you can make informed decisions once you’ve learned what to expect. The specifics depend on what you’re comfortable with and how selective you can afford to be in your job search. And, of course, no trans or gender diverse person is under any obligation to be out to employers or anybody else, so personal preference is a factor even if professional security isn’t.

To be very clear, this answer is all about self-protection for you because that is what you and a lot of other trans and gender diverse people need to think about for our own safety and comfort. But that in no way should be taken to suggest that any of this is okay or fair. This letter and our answer to it are demonstrative of a deeply broken system which at best forces trans and gender diverse people to worry about all of this when cis people don’t have to, and at worst causes us significant personal and professional harm.

3. Interviewing trans and non-binary applicants

I’m currently on a hiring committee for an open position on my team and we just had an interview with an applicant who seems like a good fit and will be invited for a second interview very soon. However, the name on their application was a different gender than their LinkedIn profile (let’s say Kevin Smith on the profile but Leah Smith on the resume). Between that and the interview, I believe that Leah is trans and has only recently started presenting as their true gender during this job search because they used their resume name and presented as the gender associated with that name.

None of this is a problem of course, and my team is very open and accepting. However, my boss has not had much experience with trans people and is worried about inadvertently offending or causing discomfort to our applicant. I’d recommended to my boss that he verify the applicant’s pronouns (something like, “May I ask what pronouns you use? I use he/him pronouns”) but he either forgot or didn’t feel comfortable doing so in the initial interview. I recommended using they/them when referring to Leah for now until we find out for sure.

So to be clear, the awkwardness I’m feeling from my team isn’t over whether this person is trans (they truly don’t seem to have an issue there), but rather making sure that this applicant is just as comfortable and feels as respected as any cis applicant. When we bring Leah in for their second interview, what’s the best way to broach this question? What are some other “dos and don’ts” for interviewing someone who is trans or nonbinary? I’ve found tons of sites covering interviewing while trans or non-binary, but info from the hiring side seems to be lacking (or I just can’t find it) and I’d love to be able to have some guidelines to bring to my manager for improvements to our overall hiring/interview process.

First things first: Leah’s gender is absolutely none of your business; neither is that of any other candidate or employee. It’s good to regularly assess your workplace and hiring practices for gender inclusion, but do not center that assessment on a specific individual, especially one who has not made the clear and intentional choice to come out in that specific context. Based on your letter, Leah hasn’t done that at all—your assumptions about their gender aren’t based on the materials they supplied to you directly, and names don’t have genders so you can’t assume based on that anyway. While it’s true that there are patterns in some cultures of certain names being associated with particular genders, anyone of any gender can go by any name whether they’re trans or not, so it’s not a hard rule. Additionally, some cultures don’t have the concept of gendered names at all, and in other cultures, the patterns in how names are gendered directly contradict patterns English-speakers might expect, so cultural competency is as much a factor as trans inclusion.

Changing your behavior in hopes of welcoming one person who you think may be trans is likely to be unsuccessful; the changes won’t feel natural to the candidate, because they aren’t, and they won’t be the kind of long-term support that trans and gender diverse employees need. It also misses the point, which is that you should already be operating on the assumption that some of your candidates and employees are trans or gender diverse.

You’re not wrong that there is appallingly little guidance for employers on trans-inclusive hiring, but there are some things you can do generally (not only when you think you have a trans or gender diverse candidate, since that’s not something you can know or should be trying to guess unless they explicitly tell you). But keep in mind that trans-inclusive hiring doesn’t mean changing your behavior when you think a candidate might be trans or gender diverse; it means updating your regular practices so that candidates of all genders are treated well without having to come out. The fact that you’re trying to welcome this particular candidate by behaving differently than usual indicates that you need to make some changes in how your workplace operates generally.

Regarding your main question, you can use language in meetings that invites a candidate to share their pronouns if they’d like to, but don’t put them on the spot by asking directly (and especially don’t do this only when you think they’re trans). In general, the best approach is to share your own pronouns when you meet someone, which demonstrates that you will know what they’re talking about if they choose to do the same. That said, pronoun sharing always needs to be truly optional, so don’t push your boss or anyone else to do it if they seem hesitant to. In a group setting where several people are introducing themselves, the person leading the meeting can say something like “Please share your names, pronouns if you’d like to, and role” (or whatever makes sense in that situation).

If the candidate chooses not to share, then don’t worry about it; it’s not imperative that you learn the pronouns of everyone you interact with. They/them or the person’s name is fine unless a person has told you to use something else (it’s not a bad idea to default to they/them for everyone whose pronouns you don’t know rather than just people you think may be trans, but this takes a lot of practice and is likely to get pushback if you try to enforce it, especially if there hasn’t been widespread staff training to give people context). In future, it’s a good idea to have an optional fill-in-the-blank pronoun field on your job application form, as long as you’re making sure that those on the search committee know to read it and respect anything the candidate puts there.

Here’s a non-exhaustive list of other things you can do to make your hiring process more equitable for trans and gender diverse people:

  • For in-person interviews, let the candidate know where to find all of the restrooms (which ideally should include an all-gender option); don’t assume that they’ll use a particular one based on what you think their gender is, and don’t worry about which one they choose.
  • Share health insurance information with all candidates early in the process. Whether gender affirming care is covered can be a dealbreaker, and it’s difficult to directly ask about it without outing oneself.
  • Post the salary range in your ads (you should be doing this anyway, but it’s a gender inclusion issue because there is a significant wage gap between transgender and cisgender employees).
  • Include gender identity and gender expression in your nondiscrimination statement.
  • Provide information about policies that often exclude trans and gender diverse people (especially nonbinary people), such as parental leave and dress code, so candidates aren’t left wondering about them. Ideally your workplace will have made sure these policies are gender-inclusive first, but share them either way so candidates can make informed decisions.
  • If your workplace has employee affinity groups, reach out to them; they may be interested in providing feedback on your hiring process, and they might be willing to be contacted by candidates outside of the formal interview. Since you can’t know what identities a person holds and you shouldn’t make them out themself by asking who they’d like to talk to, provide information about all such groups to all candidates (after confirming that the groups are comfortable being contacted).

The thing is, all of this is stuff you should be doing generally anyway. If your workplace has a habit of optional pronoun sharing in meetings, it’s likely to happen naturally in interviews. If your employees generally respect people’s pronouns and don’t make assumptions about gender, they’ll do that for candidates. If your building has all-gender restrooms available and you’re in the habit of listing all the options when telling someone where they are, then you’re going to tell the candidate the same thing.

In general, the answer to how to conduct trans-inclusive hiring is simultaneously very simple and extremely complex: it is to have a trans-inclusive workplace, which is a lot more involved than making a few changes in the interview process. There are two reasons for this. First, it is unethical to portray your workplace as something that it is not, even if you mean well; for our own safety, trans and gender diverse candidates need to be able to make informed decisions (see the other letter in this post for a demonstration of the harm that focusing on the appearance of inclusion can cause). Second, if your workplace actually is one where people of all genders can be treated well, this will come through in the hiring process anyway.

Creative Commons License
“Getting people to use the right pronouns, finding trans-friendly workplaces, and trans-inclusive hiring” by Ask a Manager is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

I’m being used as free doggy daycare, interviewer refused to give me his last name, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. I’m being used as free doggy daycare

I feel I may be being used as free doggy daycare. I like dogs, and don’t mind walking an office dog occasionally. But a lawyer who no longer works at my office sometimes drops her dog off without asking, and I’m usually the one who ends up walking her. This dog is not fully house-trained and has pooped in the office four times and counting. How do I get this moo demon dog banned?

She was a pretty good office dog when she first started coming in years ago when her owner still worked here. The pooping thing is a relatively new development that I don’t think anyone is okay with, but maybe we are all too polite to say anything, since the dog’s owner refers clients to us and vice versa.

It’s incredibly weird that a former employee is still dropping her dog off at her old workplace. Is there any chance she’s arranged it with someone in authority there? If she hasn’t, and she’s bringing her by anyway … that is a truly impressive level of chutzpah. It’s also a troubling level of passivity from people in your office!

If we didn’t have to think about the dog herself, I’d say that you should just stop walking the dog and if she poops in the office enough, presumably at some point someone will deal with the situation. But while that’s the right advice from a strictly work perspective, it hurts my heart for the poor dog.

Given that, it’s worth doing a little digging. Has someone at your office okayed this? Ask around and see what you can find out. If it turns out to be the case, then talk to the person who okayed it, explain the dog-walking has fallen to you and you can’t do it anymore, and ask that they make different arrangements. If the hierarchy at your office is such that you can’t really approach that person, then go through your boss (or that person’s assistant, or whoever makes sense).

But if no one has okayed this and the ex-employee really has just decided on her own that it’s fine to do … well, you should still talk to someone with some authority in your office, explain you can’t keep walking the dog, and suggest the owner be told to make other arrangements.

Either way, the next time the owner comes in, try saying to her, “Have you arranged with someone to be in charge of her? I’m not able to keep walking her so I want to make sure someone else is in charge of her before you leave her here.”

2. My interviewer refused to give me his last name

In one of my last interviews, I was connected to my interviewer / future boss through an email invite with a link through a third party software, meaning I didn’t actually see their name before joining.

Most times in the past I knew beforehand who would be there and could connect to the people on LinkedIn, see their portfolio websites, and know who I would be working with. Lots of times it turned out we had some colleagues in common, as well as workplaces. Afterwards this made it possible to send a thank-you note and possibly stay in touch for later opportunities.

When my interviewer joined the call, only his first name was shown. I asked for his last name, and that I would love to see his other, previous works, but he refused. We then continued the interview, which I felt started on the wrong foot.

Is this a thing I could be legitimately miffed by? I feel like I have no chance to learn about my future boss beforehand, and that there was a huge information imbalance, as I was not given the option to hide my identity, and had to offer all details about myself.

It’s definitely weird. Refusing to give his last name when he had all your information and you were meeting specifically to contemplate the possibility of working together is pretty adversarial. It’s normal to want to know who your boss would be.

Your miffed-ness was reasonable.

3. How does salary fairness work when someone tries to negotiate?

You often mention that employers can’t pay a man and a woman doing the same job different salaries without justification, and I think you’ve said that the justification can’t be that one of the two asked for more money. But what happens if, at the time when you are hiring two people with equivalent backgrounds to fill the same role, the male candidate negotiates for substantially more? Do you then have to give the female candidate the same salary even though she may have already accepted the first offer? And what about if they aren’t hired at the same time? Once you’ve hired a male candidate at a certain negotiated salary, does that have to be the starting salary offered to all subsequent female candidates with the same qualifications? Or, after you’ve hired a female candidate at the given salary, do you then have to automatically raise her salary if a later equivalent male candidate negotiates for more?

I can see the trend toward salary transparency putting a big monkey wrench into wages if the answer to all of these is “yes” or “probably,” although I’m not sure how it would shake out. I can see employers being reluctant to ever negotiate up, setting rigid salaries matched with set qualifications, possibly putting a damper on wages. And of course I can see the possibility of wage inflationary effects as well, perhaps ones that are well due but that could lead to spiraling price inflation.

The answer is yes to all your questions. If you’re hiring two people with the same qualifications to fill the same role and the male candidate negotiates for substantially more, you either hold firm on the salary you’ve offered or, yes, you need to increase the salary of the female candidate even if she already accepted your lower offer. It doesn’t matter if they’re hired at different times; the law requires you to pay men and women the same for the same work if they have the same qualifications (unless it’s due to seniority or an established merit system).

And yes, that means that employers who follow the law and are invested in ensuring they have salary equity might not negotiate. In fact, equity experts often recommend that companies be transparent from the start about salary ranges and that they don’t negotiate. (Negotiating is one of the spots where inequities tend to enter a company’s salary structure; loads of data show that women and people of color negotiate less often and less successfully, so a company that cares about equity and following the law has to account for that.)

4. Using Global Entry and TSA PreCheck when traveling with coworkers

I run a small, five-person office, which is a division of a large corporation based in another state. While we all work for the large corporation, I am senior director level, but my employees are not.

My question is about using Global Entry and TSA PreCheck while traveling with members of my team. I pay for these privileges personally, even though I travel for work both domestically and internationally because (1) our parent company doesn’t and (2) I travel more for personal reasons than I do for business these days.

But recently I’ve traveled with members of my team who don’t have either pass, and it feels awkward as we approach the TSA checkpoint and/or passport control. (We’re a very collaborative, casual office.)

Is it okay to leave them to the long lines, and wait on the other side? I would never board a plane without them, if it’s a connecting flight, but can I go through anyway? And if we’re heading home, can I use Global Entry and … leave the airport? We all make our separate ways to and from.

Yes and yes. At the TSA checkpoint, it’s fine to say, “I’m in this line so I’ll see you at the gate.” And on the return trip, it’s fine to say, “I’ll say goodbye here since I’m heading for Global Entry. Have a safe trip home and see you at the office!”

(Also, this has nothing to do with your question, but you shouldn’t feel like you need to sit together on planes either. A lot of people strongly prefer being able to have space from their boss when traveling and will appreciate it if your tickets seat you separately.)

5. I was close to getting an offer when the job was put on hold … but then they hired someone else

I recently interviewed with a company. I was invited to the final round of interviews. Afterwards, the recruiter told me that the team loved me, but they needed approval from higher-ups before making an offer. While they were obtaining approval, I was asked to complete a background check, provide references, equipment specifications, and my start date; it seemed like the offer was imminent.

After weeks of back and forth with the recruiter asking for updates, I was told the position was put on hold due to budget cuts. I was disappointed but hopeful the job might come back around. The hiring manager and I have mutual connections on LinkedIn, and in my feed I saw someone else post they had just accepted the same job I was interviewing for! I feel like I was lied to. Can I contact the company and ask what happened?

There’s not a lot of point in doing that. The most likely answer is that they did put the position on hold, but then something changed and they decided to hire someone, and for whatever reason it ended up not being you. Who knows why. Maybe the person emerged at the last minute and was a stronger fit … maybe they’d worked with her previously and she had a leg up for that reason … maybe she was internal and what you saw was a reshuffling, not an outside hire … it could be any number of things. Sometimes this stuff happens. It’s unlikely that they intentionally deceived you; it’s more likely that things happened behind the scenes that you weren’t privy to. (And if they did intentionally lie, they’re even less likely to give you a useful answer if you ask about it.)

I think you’re thinking of this as if the job was yours, but you’ve got to remember they hadn’t actually offered it to you yet. If they’d made you a formal offer, then yanked it, and then hired someone else for the job soon afterwards, it would be more reasonable to check in. But in this case they hadn’t offered you the job (even though you were getting lots of good signs) and ended up telling you not to expect an offer, and so they didn’t really have any obligation to check back in with you when they decided to hire someone else. I’m sorry!

the poodle in a stroller, the music file, and other email signatures gone wild

Last week I asked about the funniest/weirdest/most inappropriate email signatures you’ve seen. Here are some of the highlights you shared.

1. The nice day

I know a woman who is known for being kind of blunt/curt in her emails. I think she was spoken to about it, because she added a “have a nice day” line to her signature. The funny thing is that, combined with her blunt writing style, the “have a nice day” just comes off as sarcastic: “You forgot to attach the new cover sheet to the TPS report. Did you not read the memo? Have a nice day!”

2. The sports fan

I sent an email to the CEO of an independent (meaning, not part of one of the major professional leagues) team, in connection with my job. I got back a one-line reply of actual communication. Followed by…

“All the Best,” in larger font; next line, the CEO’s name (Dr. [firstname], which is apparently how he’s known) in larger and blue font, below that, the team’s logo; below that, his full name, title, the Club’s name, his email address and phone number (in a mix of fonts, italicizations, colors, sizes, and capitalizations); and then, a line saying, “Please listen to my ‘Walk Up’ song…”

There was a 1MB file attached. It was a clip of Kelly Clarkson’s “Stronger,” starting with the “you think you got the best of me” line. After about five seconds, an announcer’s voice came over the top, announcing, “Giving his all for [team] Nation, the Chairman, CEO, President and Owner of your [team], [NAAAAAAME]!” Ending just in time for the chorus of the song.

3. The day you deserve

A valued coworker uses (in their email signature): “Have the day that you deserve!” They somehow pull off a universally cheerful and helpful office and email presence that makes it feel more like a good wish that you become a person worthy of having a great day than the curse it has to be.

4. The cat box

A new cat meme is in this woman’s signature every single day, but not good memes. One around Christmas featured Grumpy Cat saying “Your gift is in the litter box.” She sends emails daily to various external clients.

5. The glitter fairy

I work at a Fortune 500 company that has mandatory email signature requirements (down to font and specific colors for specific lines). For some reason one of the department managers felt it was necessary to include a picture of a glittery fairy — complete with animated sparkles — that she changed to a new/different color every two weeks.

6. The gifted and talented administrator

I got a job working for a local council’s education department in a team of admin assistants. I had no experience or professional knowledge of the sector. One of my new colleagues had the email signature “gifted and talented administrator.” I was a little taken aback by her praising herself in her own email signature. It was weeks before I realised she was the administrator for a program for high-achieving students, which I had never heard of, called Gifted and Talented.

7. The poodle

The lady who did payroll at our large, international corporation used magenta Comic Sans and a professionally staged photo of her poodle in a stroller.

8. The standards enforcement

Purple, comic sans, size 14, with stars and swirls … from the person in charge of making sure all of our client deliverables are formatted according to the standard business templates. Really made one question her judgement.

9. The evangelist

Our IT guy (now retired) used have his signature formatted thus:

James Smith
Christian, Director of IT

…as if “Christian” was part of his job title.

10. The un-self-aware

I once was CC’ed on an email ranting about another staff member, who’d made one small, fixable mistake. The email ended with, “Cross me once and you’re out of my life. I will not work with her.”

The email signature was, “Be kind to others, bring peace wherever you go, and love always.”

11. The self-important politician

In the email signature of someone very full of himself (a former politician): “Unless we have a CONFIRMED meeting time on MY calendar and unless I’ve ALSO given you separate WRITTEN confirmation at least one day before that I’ll be attending, I will likely NOT be present for said arranged meeting.”

12. The departure

An employee who I replaced at a previous job had set her email to forward to the group inbox when she left, and had also set up an autoreply explaining that she was no longer with the company and that the email was being forwarded to the team. The signature line read “Onwards and DEFINITELY upwards,” and I still giggle over it.

13. The intern

We had an intern with the following quote in his signature, in the font Impact: “We Be Ballin’. Don’t Let Nobody Tell You Otherwise!” Immediately following this, he attributed the quote to himself and added a year. The year was the year he was born.

14. Excelsior

One of execs has “Excelsior!” in his email signature, which he forgot to remove in his email announcing layoffs.

15.  The charming Anatole

This one’s just charming, but a contact from a non-Anglophone country has a default English language sign-off that is slightly archaic and almost conventional (think “I remain / Yours very truly / Anatole”). But he’s missed a bit, so what we receive is the following:

I remain,
Anatole

And it’s delightful.

16. The mortification

This was me… a decade+ ago. First full time job, really. With a pretty prestigious government agency. Very young. Oh so young. I worked in one department for several months, where I only emailed with friends or individuals for one-off communications. I created rotating email signatures that I liked or thought were funny – from Gloria Steinem to Grouch Marx. I was promoted to another department where my responsibilities included all-staff emails (which included VERY VERY IMPORTANT GOVERNMENT PEOPLE). I failed to remove the quotes my first week. I open an email. Address it. Signature automatically populates. As it does. I get distracted. And hear that “whoosh.”

I sent EVERYONE an email that said “I never forget a face, but I your case I’ll make an exception. – Groucho Marx” Nothing else. That was the entire body of the email.

After my heart found its way back into my chest from my stomach (I have no idea how long it was). I replied all (which really, just called MORE attention to the email) and went very overboard in my apology. I had the head of IT come show me how to recall emails shortly after that, and heard many a story from so many people about more embarrassing email mishaps. In the end, I definitely entertained more people than I insulted. (Hopefully?) First week on the job and I insulted everyone’s face. I actually ended up really loving that job and everyone I worked with and I think I was very successful. Fun start though.

advice for new managers

I’ve had a bunch of questions recently from new managers looking for advice. Here’s a round-up of past columns with advice for new managers.

This is by no means comprehensive; there’s lots more advice if you look through the “being the boss” section of the archives.

general advice for managers

advice for first-time managers

how can I tell if I’m a good manager?

first-time manager? here’s what you need to know

reality-based management

your general vibe

how I can be more authoritative now that I’m a manager?

my staff tells me what they’re doing rather than asking permission

is it bad for managers to sound frustrated or impatient?

as a manager, do I need to hide my stress from my employees?

what should your tone sound like when you’re the boss?

how much should I change my style to meet my employee’s emotional needs?

delegating

how to delegate when you desperately don’t want to let go

don’t expect your staff to read your mind

should managers ask or tell when assigning work?

giving feedback

how can I stop softening the message in tough conversations with my staff?

new manager wonders about the best way to give feedback

I need to give my employee more positive feedback

how to criticize someone’s work without making it awkward

what do I say when an employee assumes they can do something that they shouldn’t?

is it true that nothing in a performance review can ever be a surprise?

dealing with performance problems

how to deal with employee performance problems

what to do if an employee keeps missing deadlines

how much should I hand-hold a disorganized employee?

my employees are making mistakes, but I don’t want to micromanage

my employee has a bad attitude

I feel awful about giving a bad performance review

holding people accountable isn’t always about formal action; sometimes it’s just a direct conversation.

what consequences can managers enforce, other than firing someone?

how can remote managers address problems they hear about secondhand?

is your problem employee coachable?

miscellaneous

how to make 1-on-1 check-in meetings more useful

how to solve a conflict on your team

what should a new manager ask to get to know employees better?

are new managers supposed to be this stressed out?

I’m becoming my friend’s boss — do things have to change?

books

Managing to Change the World

Managing to Change the WorldThere’s also my book, Managing to Change the World: The Nonprofit Manager’s Guide to Getting Results. While it’s targeted toward nonprofit managers, about 98% of it applies across sectors.

Ask a ManagerAsk a Manager: How to Navigate Clueless Colleagues, Lunch-Stealing Bosses, and the Rest of Your Life at Work

There’s also Ask a Manager: How to Navigate Clueless Colleagues, Lunch-Stealing Bosses, and the Rest of Your Life at Work , where I take on more than 200 of the tough conversations you might need to have during your career and give you the exact wording to do it — including 50 conversations for managers.

 

* I make a commission if you use those Amazon links.

I dated someone who was using me to get back at his ex-wife … who turned out to be my boss

A reader writes:

I have a question about something that happened to me a number of years ago. From time to time, I remember everything that went down and I wonder to myself if I reacted the right way or how things could have been different.

I was about three months in to a new job and really enjoying myself. I worked on a separate floor from the executive office and never really had much opportunity or reason to interact with them, as there were about four levels of hierarchy between us. A few weeks after being hired, I also started casually dating/sleeping with an older man. He had pursued me pretty intently on two different dating apps — this becomes very relevant.

After a few weeks of seeing him, one morning I woke up to find that he was taking selfies that included me sleeping next to him. He tried to brush it off by saying that I looked cute while I was asleep, but after bringing it up a few times over the next few days, he finally relented and told me that he was originally thinking about sending them to his soon-to-be-ex wife (!!!!!) because their divorce was acrimonious and he wanted to taunt her by showing that he was sleeping with someone younger. Ew ew ew.

He assured me that he thought twice and he never sent them, but obviously I immediately ended things. Of course I also instantly launched an FBI-level investigation into his entire history online and managed to find a picture of him and his wife at a charity event.

Imagine my shock when I realized that he was still legally married to the executive director of my division! At that point, I only knew her by name but we had never met. Suddenly everything fell into place — one of the pictures on my dating profiles showed me in front of a window with a very distinctive view from our division’s office. You wouldn’t be able to recognize it unless you had been in that room before, but it would be unmistakable to anyone who had spent time there. He of course recognized it and intentionally pursued his wife’s new employee to get back at her, or try to put her in an awkward situation, or god knows what. I was mortified and ashamed and afraid.

It came out through the grapevine that they had a very messy divorce and that she was extremely embarrassed by how publicly he shared very personal details of the proceedings. She was noticeably emotional on occasion and it was clear that she was very strongly impacted by the whole ordeal. Everyone in the office knew that the topic was to be avoided completely.

I was absolutely terrified about what this would mean for me at the company, but she was a consummate professional in every interaction I eventually had with her. That said, she was very awkward and stilted in every one-on-one conversation we had, in ways that she wasn’t with peers. She was known for being warm and convivial with staff, but when we spoke it felt very halting and like she was being overly cautious with everything she said. She was always quick to end our individual interactions. She never noticeably withheld opportunities or did anything to impact my career, but the relationship was definitely strained and uncomfortable.

It goes without saying, but I never brought up the fact that I had been involved with her then-husband, and of course neither did she. However, I can’t help but to assume he actually did send those pictures to her. Who knows what else he sent, especially since he clearly didn’t see anything wrong with taking pictures of me without me knowing. Again — beyond ew.

I ended up leaving a few years later but our relationship continued to be forced and awkward throughout my time at that company. Looking back now, I have to wonder if there could have been a different outcome. The professional side of me rings alarm bells at the thought of bringing something like that up at work, but now that I’m more mature and am married myself, my heart aches for her and — on a human level — I wish we could have spoken about it.

I guess I wonder if you could see a scenario where it would be appropriate to have that discussion. Woman to woman, I wish I could have reassured her that of course I had no clue that they were married, that I never would have dreamed of going out with him otherwise and that I was absolutely revolted by his actions. It kills me to think that she may have wondered if I knew and didn’t care, or that I may have been pulling some weird Machiavellian stunt to take her down a peg or … I don’t know. I just feel gross and sad for both of us and wish that we could have hashed it out.

Ugh, I’m so sorry. None of this is your fault. You were used and manipulated by someone with a twisted agenda, and it’s unfair that years later you’re still carrying the emotional burden of that.

As for whether you could or should have said something to his wife/your director at the time … you didn’t do anything wrong by not talking to her about it.

Might she have welcomed it? Maybe, but maybe not. It could have gone either way and you had no way of knowing which it would be. It could have brought her an enormous amount of relief, or it could have caused her more turmoil and made things more awkward between the two of you at work. Hell, it could have brought her an enormous amount of relief and still have made things unbearably awkward at work. To have any confidence deciding, you would have needed a knowledge of her as a person that you didn’t have.

Talking to her might have completely cleared the air; she might have been grateful for your candor and relaxed around you entirely. In the most extreme good outcome, it could have even made you professionally close. Or you could have talked to her and the awkwardness could have been too much and she could have ended up acting out of pain or discomfort in ways that harmed you professionally at that company, even if inadvertently on her part.

One of the many, many things wrong with what this man did to both of you is that he put on you the burden of needing to figure out the answer to this unknowable dilemma: Do you speak up because it will clear the air and is the right thing to do? Or will that make it worse? And which path is least likely to harm your career? Will you career be affected either way? What is safest for you? What is right for her? Those aren’t questions you should be forced to untangle, and trying was an impossible task.

So I don’t have an answer for you, because I think there is no real answer. You were put in a position you never asked for and didn’t want, were violated by someone you trusted, and were used to harm someone else without your knowledge or consent. It’s just … all-around awful. It’s okay that you weren’t able to find a way to fix what he did. All of it is on him, even the after-effects, and I hope you will release yourself from agonizing these many years later that you could have done something differently.

Read an update to this letter

my employee asked a colleague to help her fake a deal, I’m constantly interrupted when I need to focus, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My employees constantly interrupt me and I can’t focus

I recognize that my employees generally want to do a good job and not waste a lot of time. For them, it is easier to come and ask me something that may take five minutes, instead of them spending an hour figuring it out themselves. While I appreciate this, and I do not want to stop their momentum, I find it is very disruptive to my ADHD brain. For me, the problem is not the five-minute interruption. It’s the 15 minutes afterward that it takes my brain to get focused back to what I was doing. I have explained this, but it continues on a daily basis. I regularly work 12- to 14-hour days because I simply cannot get my work done with so many distractions during the day.

Is there a non-rude way I can ask my employees to save up their questions and we can have a meeting at a designated time each day and I can just answer everyone’s questions at one time?

Further, I have already spent countless hours creating documentation for common tasks. This is extensive documentation with photos, arrows, screenshots, etc. Everyone knows about it and where to access it from the server. But nobody does this when I am in the office. They come and ask me how to do everything.

On days when I have had to come in late or leave early, the work still gets done. Therefore I know the people are capable of solving their own problems without my help. Why do you suppose they can’t do this when I am in the office?

Because it’s faster for them to ask you and you’ve trained them that you’ll answer immediately. You need to retrain those habits.

Not only is there a non-rude way to tell them to save up their questions so you can answer them all at once, but it’s a completely normal thing for good managers to do! Otherwise a lot more people would be in the situation you are: unable to focus and get their own work done. Be straightforward: “From now on, please save up all your questions for me rather than asking them piecemeal, and we’ll do one meeting a day to get them answered.” (I’m saying daily because that’s what you proposed, but in a lot of jobs that would be overkill and weekly or twice a week would work fine. Adapt based on the nature of the jobs you’re managing.) You should add, “Obviously if something is an emergency like X or Y, alert me immediately.” (Make sure to give specific examples of what qualifies as an emergency so you’re all on the same page about that.)

Then if you get interrupted for something that’s not urgent: “Can you hold this for our one-on-one? I can’t interrupt what I’m doing.” The key is being disciplined about saying that, because that’s how you’ll train people in a new habit. Otherwise this won’t work.

You should also block off “work blocks” on your calendar where you’re unavailable for interruptions. (You can try the reverse too — scheduling “office hours” where everyone knows you are available for interruptions.) And if it’s not contrary to the culture of your office, consider closing your door when you need space to focus, especially during this period when you’re trying to instill new habits.

Doing this will probably nudge people to find answers themselves in the same documentation they use when you’re out. But if they bring you those questions in your scheduled meetings, make it unrewarding by saying, “Where have you looked for the answer so far?” and “Check the documentation and if you’re still having trouble, come back to me at that point.” No one is going to use the documentation as long as you’re right there saving them from having to.

Read an update to this letter

2. I was a really late bloomer and I’m nervous about job searching

I’ve had trouble getting off the ground in my life. I was an excellent student in high school, then had a long period of uncertainty and romantic drama after high school and before beginning college (seven years). Then it took me a long long time to get my undergrad (nine years). Followed by more aimlessness (nine years) before landing a job in my field, and I’ve been in this role for 10 years. Now I’d like to move on to another employer, but I don’t know how to explain why I’m in my 50s but only have (relatively) a few years of experience. I wasn’t raising children. I wasn’t traveling the world. I wasn’t doing anything important. I was busy being fearful of everything. I was ashamed of how long it took me to graduate, so I didn’t apply for jobs, because how could I defend that?? I had horrible anxiety and depression in the 25 years after high school, and while I’ve made great progress, the fear of failure is surging back now that I have to face interviews and a possible new job again.

I don’t want to spend another 10 years at my current employer just because I’m afraid to leave. I just don’t know how to sell myself when such a large percentage of my life seems like blank space on a resume.

You are assuming all this will matter to employers a lot more than it actually will! It is really, really common (and usually advisable) for people to only go back 10-15 years on their resumes — you don’t need to get into any of the stuff that happened before then. Focus on the job you’ve had for the last 10 years. Really flesh it out and focus on what you’ve achieved there. If you’ve held multiple titles there, break those into separate jobs. Then create an Other Experience section and put any particular highlights from the previous 5-10 years there. You don’t need a ton of detail about those if they don’t strengthen your candidacy; that section could just be a short bulleted list of selected employers, job titles, and dates. That’s it! You don’t need to get into what happened in the time between high school and college, or how long it took you to graduate college (you don’t even need to list your graduation year, and you definitely don’t need to list the year you started). Just focus on the current job and add a tiny bit of detail about the jobs right before that one.

Employers aren’t likely to be interested in anything before that anyway. Even if you’d had some sort of ideal job history for the last three decades, most employers would only care about the last decade or so anyway, and I’d be telling you to take the early details off your resume at this point anyway. So while you know you had a rocky start, employers won’t care about that period. They want to know who you are now and in recent history. Enough time has passed that the stuff you feel ashamed about doesn’t matter in a professional sense at all.

3. My employee asked a colleague to help her fake a deal

I’m a new manager of a small team of sales development representatives whose charter is to help the salespeople they’re aligned with create pipeline. They do this by setting meetings with potential customers, and they receive commission if the salesperson puts that potential customer in their pipeline.

In a meeting today, one of my SDRs asked a salesperson if he’d convert a prospect from lead to pipeline, and he was hesitant because he didn’t think it’d be a good fit and he didn’t want to open up that opportunity record just to have to kill it. There was no business opportunity because our product did not fit their needs.

Her response was, “C’mon [Rep], I’m pregnant, I’m about to have a baby” (which is true, she’s due in June). He looked very uncomfortable with it but hesitantly agreed. I felt about as uncomfortable as the salesperson looked, and I’m not really sure how to address it. It’s essentially faking a deal to earn money because the commission portion of her compensation is paid on the creation of the deal, not closing the deal.

I want to make sure this doesn’t happen again, but I’m not sure how.

Whoa, that’s a big deal and they did it right in front of you!

Is it too late to undo it now? If so, you should. And either way, you’ve got to have a conversation with your employee, explaining this wasn’t okay and why.

You might also consider talking with the salesperson who felt pressured to say yes and let him know he shouldn’t agree to that kind of pressure from your team and that you’re making it clear to your employee that that wasn’t okay for her to do. Maybe loop in the sales team’s manager too in case she wants to reinforce that message to her team.

Also, it sounds like you were in the meeting where this went down. Make a point of getting more comfortable speaking up in the moment if something is happening that you don’t want to happen. Ideally when you your team member proposed this, you would have cut it off right there by saying something, “That’s not something we can do because of ___” and then having a private conversation with her about it later.

4. I feel snubbed at work — should I quit?

I have worked at a construction company for 10 years as an administrator (been doing this for 18). I feel I’m being snubbed!! I got a significant promotion last year that wasn’t announced in their social media while everyone else got a shout-out. Also, on our highlight reel for the year, I was nowhere to be seen while a new girl was on there three times — and she doesn’t do shit compared!

This is a relatively small, family-owned company run by a grandson and so there is that dynamic. Am I being an overly sensitive schmuck? Should I quit?

I can see why it stings to be overlooked when everyone else is getting recognized! But you can’t make the decision based on just these two instances, which are relatively small in the scheme of things. What’s the rest of the situation like? Are you paid fairly, given interesting work, treated with respect, recognized in other ways? Do you like the job? If so, those things should carry more weight. On the other hand, sometimes when stuff like this really burns, it’s because there are bigger issues that have already been bothering you. Whichever the case, the bigger stuff — good or bad — will be more valuable to focus on.

Read an update to this letter

5. Taking over the office of a colleague who died

In my office we’ve had two colleagues die, one about six years ago and the other about six months ago. The first time, it took me some time but I definitely got used to somebody else being in his office. However, I have now switched jobs and I’m scheduled to take over the office of my second colleague.

I miss her. Every time I think about the new job, I think, “Oh, let me go ask…” and of course realize that I can’t ask her anything about the job. And it just feels weird to take over her office.

I haven’t found anything online about this although I have had two ideas so far: (1) Create some sort of ritual for myself upon moving in. (2) Leave something of hers in the office as a nice memory. I’m also planning to speak to my new boss about possible alternatives. Do you or your readers have any other suggestions?

I think both your ideas are excellent ones, but I’m happy to throw this out to the readers for other things that might help. I’m sorry about your coworker!

Read an update to this letter

can bad employees and bad managers change?

I’m off for the holiday, so here’s an older post from the archives. This was originally published in 2015.

A reader writes:

I am a passionate fan of AAM and often try to guess what you would advise for my own dysfunctional job. Boiled down, my boss needs to stop avoiding confrontation and rein in his apathetic and lazy children before the rest of us give up in disgust. I was scheming how to make this happen and I realized that you would probably say that my boss is never going to mature in that way, at least within the time I’m going to work for him, and there is no way I can goad him into correcting years of indulgent parenting.

This led me to a meta-question for you: Do you think people can change? Can other people instigate professionalism and maturity in a person? As a reader of AAM, I’ve observed that your advice in dealing with bad bosses, bad coworkers, and bad employees seems to be either set up firm boundaries to keep their dysfunction from spilling onto you or terminate the relationship. It’s really tempting to imagine telling an employee that placing hexes on their coworkers is inappropriate and she would say, “You’re right, I’ve been acting completely out of line. I won’t do it again” rather than stomping off in a huff and taking down her voodoo dolls because “the boss is making me.” When dealing with a crazy person, a weak manager, or a wildly immature coworker, can another person instigate growth or are you best just doing damage control?

I think people can change — but in workplace situations, the more relevant question is whether they will change, and how well-positioned you are to get them to change.

When you’re a manager and the problematic person is your employee, you have a lot of leverage. You can say directly, “I need you to do X differently” and you can hold them to that, coach them as long as it’s appropriate, and replace them if they don’t. And some people in that situation do successfully change their behavior.

When the problem is your manager, you don’t have a ton of leverage. You can point out the impact their behavior is having, and ask for things to be done differently. But whether or not it will actually happen will depend on how much your manager cares, whether she sees the situation the same way you do or not, how ingrained the behavior is, and what her overall inclinations, tendencies, and strengths and weaknesses are. And all of those factors will matter; you can have a boss who agrees with you that yes, she really should do a better job of holding people to deadlines (or giving you advance notice of projects or not calling you at midnight or whatever it is), but if ultimately she’s too weak/lazy/disorganized/inconsiderate, it’s likely that she won’t follow through. Or she might improve for a while, but then backslide because she’s doing those things for a reason and no one with authority over her is forcing her not to.

On the other hand, there are managers who hear input from staff members, take it seriously, and make changes. So it’s not impossible — but you need to be clear-eyed about who you’re dealing with and what evidence you’ve seen that the person is or isn’t open to feedback and self-reflection.

What you really don’t want to do is to continue to see evidence that the person isn’t going to change and stick around waiting for them to anyway. At that point, you need to either accept that this is part of the deal with working with them and find a way to live with that reasonably happily, or decide that it’s not for you and start making plans to leave.

our employee is taking nude photos in our office and posting them to Facebook

I’m off for the holiday, so here’s an older post from the archives. This was originally published in 2018.

A reader writes:

I am the office manager of a small (two additional employees, two doctors, and one therapist) health practice. One employee, who I will call Jane, has worked there for over 10 years and handles billing, front desk, and bookkeeping.

Jane is recently divorced and seems to be going through a mid-life crisis of sorts with an obsession on finding new sex partners. She lists our company name as her place of employment on Facebook and some of our patients are her “friends.” We found out through our other employee (who I will call Mary) and our therapist (who I will call Sara) that Jane is now a member of several Facebook groups where people can post suggestive to explicit photos and videos. When we first learned of this, we let Jane know that we were aware and asked her to take anything that linked her Facebook account to us out of her profile or to create an alternate account for her extracurricular activities that we wanted to remain separate as her personal business. She became irate, saying that our awareness of it created a “hostile work environment” for her. She also threatened to sue Mary for informing us. But then some time passed and she seemed to calm down.

In the past few days, however, it was brought to my and the doctors’ attention that not only is Jane continuing to post these things, she is taking and posting the photos daily from our business. Our company bathroom is in the background of some of them as well as the office her and I share (I am in the office part-time). One of the photos described to me is a full photo of her standing in front of my desk with her pants around her ankles. The time stamps show that it is during work hours (there are times each day where she is the only employee in the office).

I am at a loss for how to handle this appropriately and what to do. She even invited a patient who works at a business in our center to be a member of one of the groups. Obviously her doing this from work and involving anything linked to the office has got to stop. Yesterday she went to use the bathroom (which is private) at least four times, staying in there for over 10 minutes each time with her phone in hand and all I could do was picture what she could be doing in there.

Given her experience and high degree of responsibility, it would be an enormous task to replace her, and believe it or not otherwise her job performance is very good. Any advice at all as to how to handle this would be greatly appreciated.

You get to draw the line at people taking nude photos in your office. That’s not okay, and you don’t need to tip-toe around that with her.

And you know, one day Jane will leave of her own volition, and then you will have the work of replacing her at that point anyway. So don’t be held hostage to your fear of having to do that now, to the point that you tolerate totally unacceptable behavior in your office.

Sometimes you need to be willing to let someone go. An employee taking nude photos of herself in your office — in front of your desk! — and posting them to Facebook, where she’s connected with some of your clients, is one of those times.

This would be bizarrely bad judgment under any circumstances, but it’s even odder because Jane knows that you know about her involvement with the explicit-photo groups. You’ve already told her that your business can’t be associated with it. And after that conversation, she seems to have escalated the behavior by posing for the photos in your office. Frankly, it almost seems like a compulsion or an act of hostility toward your office, or both.

It would be 100% reasonable to tell Jane that this needs to stop immediately and all photos taken in your office need to be removed, and that this will be her last warning on the topic and you’ll part ways with her if it continues.

It would also be entirely reasonable to decide that Jane has already demonstrated such terrible judgment that you’re not going to go through a warning process and instead will part ways now. You don’t owe someone a warning and a second chance when something is this egregious (or at least you don’t as long as your own internal policies don’t require it).

To be clear, the issue isn’t that Jane is sharing nude photos of herself in her personal life. That’s her business. The issue originally was that she was connected to clients while doing it, and the issue now is that she’s doing it at work. Keep the focus there.

But before you can do any of that, you need to convince yourself that the fact that it’ll be a pain to replace her isn’t a reason not to take action on something like this. You can’t let your organization be held hostage to that. (And really, how far does that go? What if she starts slapping your logo on these nude photos? ) There’s a point where someone’s behavior just isn’t okay, and this is at that point.

And in case you need it — hostile workplace: it’s not what you think.