how to ask “did you get my gift?” without sounding like you’re fishing for a thank-you

A reader writes:

I have an extremely low-stakes question: Is there a way to say “did you receive my gift?” that doesn’t come off as aggressively asking to be thanked but instead expresses what I really want to know, which is, “FedEx/etc said it was delivered but was it really? Or do I need to investigate?”

My workplace has a very flexible work-from-home policy so I don’t necessarily see the small team I manage in person on a predictable schedule. This was complicated this year by me catching a cold and working from home the whole last week before our two-week winter break.

I sent the same type of gift I send every year (normally very enthusiastically received). I got emails from the vendor that they were delivered, and only one person texted to say she received it. I waited two days and then sent texts to the three others to be sure the gifts arrived. Everyone responded that they had and “thank you” and “sorry, I was waiting to thank you in person (which would have been in over two weeks at that point). Then I felt like I’d been pushy. I honestly just wanted to know if I needed to investigate an issue!

This has happened in my personal life as well. Right now it has been over a year since attending my friend’s wedding and I haven’t received a thank-you note for the gift I sent. I’m wondering he thinks I’m cheap or unmannered and just opted out of gifting. I don’t want to ask because several years ago I did ask a friend about a gift more than a year after his wedding and I received a hastily written thank-you note the next week. I don’t need thanks! I just need to know you got it!

I was able to solve this with my bother re: gifts for my niblings easily enough; I said that it was important to me to get a “hey, got the package” text, even if it’s not important to him to send one. But I can’t say that to my team members or when it’s a one-off gift. Am I the only one who worries about this and I just need to tamp down my anxiety? Start gifting in person?

You are not the only one who worries about this, and you are right that it’s hard to navigate without coming across as if you’re fishing for a thank-you.

The easiest way to avoid it is indeed to give the gift in person, but that’s not always possible or practical.

The next easiest approach is to send a note close to the time you expect the gift to arrive, saying something like, “I sent you something small in the mail — it should arrive this week.” That way, they’ll know to let you know if nothing arrives. If you want, you can even add, “I’m always nervous about the mail at this time of year so please let me know if it doesn’t arrive.” But after that, you don’t need to follow up; you’ve alerted them that it’s coming, and so the part you’re worried about is taken care of.

Of course, it’s still possible that they might not alert you if the gift doesn’t arrive — because they’re forgetful or they feel awkward about telling you they didn’t receive anything — but you’ll have taken reasonable steps and don’t really need to cover every possible base. The exception would be if the gift is something so valuable that it warrants additional follow-up — but I’m guessing you’re not sending team members diamond jewelry or anything like that.

Alternately, it’s not that big of a deal if you want to just say, “Hey, did you get the package I sent you?” But since you’re looking for alternatives, these are some.

update: my new boss treats me like his assistant … which isn’t what I was hired for

Remember the letter-writer whose new boss treated her like his assistant … which isn’t what she was hired for? Here’s the update.

I did follow your advice and speak with HR. They listened to my concerns and to their credit they launched an “investigation.” I know that at some point they found my claims credible and spoke to my boss, “Kevin,” because he did come back to me and say that going forward he would handle his own expense report submissions and wanted me to take on more substantive projects. However, this was short lived. Once he felt the attention of HR removed, he immediately returned to his old tactics of treating me like an admin, refusing to give me substantive projects and resorting to expense submissions, calendar management, and other similar tasks.

I once again attempted to speak with HR after he went back to his old ways but they were far less helpful this time and just said that I need to work on communicating with my boss. We then had mid-year performance reviews and while I received exceedingly positive reviews from my peers and stakeholders, Kevin gave me a negative rating. His negative feedback was regarding his complaints about my expense submissions not being timely and my securing restaurant reservations not booked far enough in advance. (I wish I was kidding). I was warned by my predecessor Melissa that he had done this to her before and she had to show HR that she was indeed a high performer and was qualified for the high rating. I did the same and was able to speak to my abilities and performance.

Kevin then attempted to put me on a “Performance Improvement Plan” but HR told him he could not do so since I was meeting expectations and my reviews were very positive. He then attempted to skirt this by putting me on an “informal coaching plan,” resulting in him scheduling meetings three times a week to provide “feedback” on where he thought I could improve. The feedback was largely centered on expense submissions, booking travel, and reserving conference rooms. One of his complaints or “feedback” to me was that I booked conference rooms for meetings that he had trouble finding. I pointed out that the floor of our building has multiple maps that show where each conference room is located. He said he didn’t have time to consult a map and my doing so resulted in him being late to meetings. Trust me, this was not why he was late.

I should also add, if it’s not already clear, Kevin has a widely known terrible reputation at the company. His team has by far the largest turnover compared to any of his peers and within the past year prior to me 50% of his team have left with many more planning to leave soon. In his mid-year reviews and in team and company surveys, this has been expressed by multiple team members, but management seems unwilling or unable to address this situation.

This process ultimately proved unbearable so I made the decision to leave. I know it’s for the best and am grateful to not have to deal with Kevin anymore. I did complete my exit survey and exit interview and, while I’m not confident my feedback will be taken seriously, I did state that whoever they hire to replace me should have an administrative assistant background. I’ve learned that in my absence he spoke to his boss’s chief of staff with a request for her to submit his expenses on his behalf and assist with administrative requests. It’s to be determined on how that’s worked out for him.

did a haircut ever change the way you were treated at work?

It’s the Thursday “ask the readers” question. A reader writes:

I’m a woman job hunting right now and desperately want to buzz my hair. It’s a pretty strong look, and I think it would have the same effect on my search as a bold hair color. I’ll probably do it.

But it got me thinking about a period where I went from medium length to very short hair and changed jobs at the same time. I was treated so differently with short hair. People assumed I was quite serious in a way I had never experienced.

Wondering if readers have any good stories about a haircut changing the way they were treated at work? Maybe even bad haircuts?! The week before lockdown in NYC, my hairdresser took out all of her anxiety on my hair and it was the worst haircut of my life. Before I realized how serious Covid was, I was glad to not be leaving the house!

Readers?

coworkers can’t believe I’m not wearing a coat, asking to work remotely after getting a tattoo, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Coworkers are very concerned that I’m not wearing a coat

I am a relatively young woman (late 20s) in a workplace in which many of my coworkers are twice my age or more, and the profession is heavily skewed female. I’ve been at this workplace for about four months.

I leave the building for my lunch break, we all walk to the parking lot together upon closing for the day, and I find myself occasionally going outside for one reason or another. I live in a cold climate, but I hate wearing coats for short trips outside partially because I run hot and partially because of neurodiversity-related sensory issues. I am usually just wearing a thin cardigan if I’m wearing any layers at all.

Nine times out of ten, if a coworker spots me leaving the building, they will literally gasp or admonish me in some way for not wearing a coat for what is essentially a 50-foot walk to my car. One has even taken me aside and inquired if I was able to purchase a winter coat and offered to help me buy one, which was an incredibly kind offer but made me feel embarrassed.

I know they’re asking out of concern and genuine care, but it makes me feel disrespected and not taken seriously as a fellow professional. I am one of the youngest members of the professional staff and more than one coworker has noted that they have children older than me, so I feel as if I constantly have to prove myself.

I usually respond to these comments with something plain (“Thank you, but I’m okay”) or joking (“I’m fine, I’m actually part yeti”) but they continue. How can I reframe my thoughts so that these comments stop bothering me as much as they do?

It’s the age thing that’s making this feel as weird as it does; if your coworkers were all your same age and making the exact same comments, I bet it would read differently. But because you’re the youngest — and very aware of it — the comments are landing as if they think you need mothering, which makes you feel babied.

Would it help to reframe it as “these are kind people who would express the same concern to a 50-year-old coworker”? I don’t know if that’s true — people do often want to caretake younger coworkers in ways they wouldn’t with older ones — but I also don’t know that it’s not true, so if we’re talking about mental reframing, that might be the way to go. Also, if you’re generally respected at work and taken seriously, it might help to center that in your head — yes, you might be getting more caretaking directed at you because you’re younger, but if your work is taken seriously, that’s what really matters. (If it’s not, that’s a whole different issue, but then that would be more the issue than The Coat.)

Also, it might help to start responding with, “I have coats! I just run hot and often don’t wear them.” It might not stop the concerned comments, but it’ll at least establish that you’re not the Little Match Girl.

Related:
I’ve accidentally convinced my coworkers that I’m homeless – but I’m not!

2. Asking to work remotely after getting a tattoo

I work in municipal government under a mayor who banned remote work this year for all municipal employees. Currently, we are only allowed to ask to work remotely if there are extenuating circumstances and if it’s not a recurring request. We can only do so for a day at a time, and it must be approved ahead of time by my grandboss.

I am getting a (huge) tattoo for my birthday next week. I am taking the day off for the all-day appointment. The day after, I would be fine to work, except the placement of the tattoo makes it impossible to wear pants in the immediate healing stage. Ideally, I could work from home for the next two days so I don’t use up all my vacation time for this. A doctor’s note is required for sick time. However, I don’t know how to word my request to work remotely! I am the only person in my relatively small department who has requested to work from home under the new policy, and I have used it two or three times since the summer. I am worried that asking for remote work the day after my birthday looks like I am planning to party hard and be hungover — bad optics. I’m hoping you can help me formulate the request to work from home, or that the commenters can give advice on wearing clothes over a large lower back piece.

Well … I don’t think you should.

To be clear, you should be able to! If your job can be done effectively from home, there’s no reason you should need to use vacation time for this. But look at the facts: your job frowns on remote work and only allows it under unusual circumstances, you’ve already used it a few times since the summer, you’re the only one in your department who has, and the request would be for the two days after a day you’re already taking off. It looks bad. I’m not saying that’s reasonable; it’s not. But that’s the reality you’re working with, with your particular employer’s culture on this.

You’d probably be better off getting the tattoo on a Friday and using the weekend for it to heal. I’m sorry, I know that sucks! Your workplace has made their stance pretty clear, though, and this will use too much capital.

3. I think my employee is using AI to produce bad writing

I’m a new manager and am almost certain the employee I’m managing is using AI.

I think AI works great for certain jobs, but the problem is that he’s using it to generate articles/comms that need to have a lot of nuance. Not only are the same mistakes coming up, but I worry the tone is obvious to others familiar with AI, which is a bit of a reputational risk.

I’d ideally want to have a frank discussion about common AI pitfalls so he can avoid those issues, but I’m conscious it may come across as an accusation, which he can deny anyway. Should I just act as if the output is his work and give my edits as normal?

Have a conversation with him! Give your edits — both specific edits and broad pattern edits (tone, voice, etc.) — and then say, “I don’t know if you’ve played around with AI for any of this, but some of it reads as sounding AI-generated, so either way it made me realize we should talk about why we don’t and can’t use AI.” If he says he hasn’t been using AI, you can say, “Okay, good. Let’s take a minute anyway to talk about why it’s something we can’t use, in case it ever does come up.” So you’re not getting into whether or not he did; you’re just laying out the reasons your team can’t. And then explain the voice issues, nuance, accuracy, concerns about proprietary info, copyright, or whatever AI problems are relevant in your field (likely all of those at some level or other).

4. Will a new employer let you roll over unused vacation time from your last job?

I know someone who is job searching to move to a new city. He works at a hospital in a health care capacity, and has worked at his current employer for 15 years. His vacation accrues with the number of hours worked; if he works extra hours, he accrues more vacation time.

He believes he has heard that employers will roll over vacation hours accrued to one another — i.e., that his unused vacation time could be picked up and made already available by the new employer. I told him that there are employers that will allow for negotiating accrual rates (“my previous employer supplied 20 days of vacation accrued over the year, can you match that”), but I’ve never heard of a company providing the accrued but unused time from a previous employer. The hospital system he is currently employed at is only in one state; this isn’t something where you would find it across the nation.

Is this something you’ve heard of happening, and if so, in what situation? I really can’t picture this in a nonprofit health setting.

No, that’s not a thing that typically happens when you’re moving to an entirely new employer (as opposed to moving around internally). You’re right that you can often negotiate the amount of vacation time you earn each year so that you don’t go from, say, six weeks a year to two, but employers don’t typically “roll over” whatever unused vacation time you have from somewhere else. That’s the other company’s accounting system, not theirs! (Ideally unused time would be paid out when you leave, but not every state requires that. It would be a particularly weird request in states that do … although, really, it’s likely to come across as a pretty strange request everywhere.)

5. My coworker’s out-of-office reply keeps (wrongly) sending people to me

Would you consider the ability to put together an out-of-office auto-reply a pretty basic, table-stakes skill?

I have a colleague, Barb, who is relatively new to our company (less than a year). We both work in IT and have mutually dependent jobs — think project manager (multiple projects across multiple teams) and team lead (accountable for stakeholder relationships and work prioritization for a team). Barb’s first big project was with me and my team, although she has other accountabilities as well.

Not long after Barb started, she had some PTO scheduled and asked if she could list my name in her out-of-office auto-reply. I said that of course she could list me for project X that we were working on together. But I didn’t know her other work, so I didn’t want to be listed as the contact for those other efforts. A few months later, we had more or less the same conversation. Barb asked to list me in her out-of-office; I said only for the project that we were working on together. Time passes, and another PTO comes around. No asking to use my name, which is fine. But then I get a message from a person on a related team asking about something that is Barb’s responsibility. Because Barb listed my name (and only my name) in her out-of-office message. I didn’t check the other two times, but I’m guessing she listed me then as well.

Part of me thinks this is so small and not worth following up on. But also, this feels like part of a pattern, where she asks questions in a “I’m new here” way, but when she doesn’t like the answer, she does what she wanted anyway.

She’s been in the business world for 20+ years, as have I. I am baffled that someone with this level of experience doesn’t have a grasp of out-of-office message patterns. And even if the pattern at this company is different from what she’s experienced before, being told no twice and just ignoring it really annoys me.

Are my expectations unreasonable? That an experienced project manager (1) would be able to put together an out-of-office message without any drama and at the very least would learn after one iteration and (2) wouldn’t blatantly ignore a colleague’s explicit “no”?

Your expectations are not unreasonable on either count. That said, this is probably less about her not knowing how to put together an out-of-office and more about general incompetence and/or intransigence.

Why not just say, “Hey, please stop listing my name on your out-of-office replies; I’m getting messages from people about things I’m not involved in”? And then if she does it again: “I saw you listed me in your out-of-office again. Is there a reason you’re doing that even though I asked you not to?” And meanwhile, just direct anyone who messages you back to Barb: “I’m not sure why she listed me as the contact; I’m not the right person for that, so you’ll need to check back with her.”

I’m angry at my coworkers — can I refuse their apology?

A reader writes:

I was out for a few days recently for personal reasons and came back to discover that two of my colleagues have done something incredibly thoughtless that has completely screwed up a major work product for me and then lied about it to my supervisor, saying I was involved in the decision. I am livid about it, but I don’t know how to cope with this anger in a work situation.

They are desperate to talk it out with me and apologize, mainly to make themselves feel better rather than to help me out at all, but for now I’ve sent a message saying that I’m not able to have the discussion with them.

My instinct is to just stop talking to them because I don’t feel I can trust them again, but that’s not practical in our work situation and would make everyone else in our close-knit, incredibly friendly team really uncomfortable.

Do I just accept their apology and try to get over it, or is there a socially acceptable way to reject someone’s apology? My supervisor (who is not their supervisor) is being helpful with trying to sort out the work stuff but isn’t getting involved in the interpersonal aspect.

Your choices aren’t to just accept the apology or reject it. You can sidestep that binary entirely and instead explain why you’re concerned despite the apology.

For example: “I appreciate you apologizing, but I’m really concerned about why it happened. I of course understand mistakes happen, but you lying to Jane about it could have caused serious issues for me.”

“Concerned” is better framing for most work issues than “angry.” That doesn’t mean you can’t be angry, but the bar is typically very, very high to frame things as anger at work. But you can be deeply, gravely concerned without bumping up against that convention. (More on that here.)

On a similar note, if “lying to Jane about it” feels too harsh for your workplace culture (it will for some, despite being true), you can say “misrepresenting it to Jane.” That’s frankly a pretty BS softening — they lied! it’s a lie! — but in some work cultures it’ll go over better / help everyone move forward if you’re not quite as plain-spoken about it. (Is this is a weird, wildly inauthentic thing about work culture? Yes, absolutely.)

From there, you’re right that you can’t just stop speaking to colleagues, particularly if you need to work with them. You don’t need to trust them again — and it sounds like you’d be wise not to — but you do need to be reasonably civil to colleagues, including ones you don’t trust. That said, you can certainly limit your interactions to mostly work-related ones. (I say “mostly” rather than “exclusively” because you still need to, for example, return a courteous “good morning” and otherwise engage in at least minimal pleasantries in order to be considered professional and because obvious hostility or freezing-out will make people around you feel uncomfortable.)

That doesn’t mean that you’ve forgotten what happened, just that you’re treating them civilly because you are a professional.

should employees use sick time for doctor’s appointments?

A reader writes:

As a relatively new manager, I’m wondering about how to navigate sick time. Background: We’re 100% remote. I have weekly standing meetings with employees; apart from that, I don’t require details on what they’re doing through the day.

When I know someone is at a doctor’s appointment for a few hours, is it appropriate to ask them to use sick time? They didn’t originally document it as such, and I’m sure made up their work in other ways, but I’m struggling to find the balance between flexibility in the current situation, and enforcing workplace rules.

I answer this question — and two others — over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and sometimes updating/expanding my answers to them). You can read it here.

Other questions I’m answering there today include:

  • Asking coworkers to go to vegetarian-friendly restaurants on business trips
  • What do I do when I inadvertently pass on bad info from a coworker?

I think my disastrous ex-employee is co-opting queer identity

A reader writes:

I work in a country with strong job protection, have a boss who is reluctant to do performance improvement, and I just transitioned out of managing a team. One of my reports was a recent-ish hire I’ll call Pam, who is mid-career but entry-level. Pam volunteers for an optional LBGTQ+ employee resource group. She originally joined the group at my suggestion, as a straight ally. (Pam described herself as straight woman with a husband and said she was worried about being seen as homophobic because she is originally from a non-LBGTQ-friendly country.) Pam is now the group lead for our region, which is unusual for an entry-level employee. I accidentally found out that Pam is describing herself as gay/bi/queer, out only to folks associated with the resource group.

I am skeptical. I think Pam is straight and exploiting the group … and I’m unsure what my responsibility (if any) is here, as an employee and as a human being. I also think I could be wrong, and I know Pam is a landmine. Knowing the landmine part, though, I feel uneasy for folks in the group, none of whom I know particularly well.

Here’s why I think Pam isn’t being truthful. In her short time with our company, she has consistently demonstrated misplaced ambition, attention-seeking, and moral challenges. Pam believes that just spending time around higher-ups will get her promoted, even after being repeatedly told to deliver on her work commitments first. The LBGTQ+ group provides her face time with directors. Pam also craves attention to a disruptive degree: she has DM’d and called busy senior managers 20+ times a day about trivial or non work-related matters and created drama by inventing crises, then casting herself as the heroine. Coming out to coworkers she barely knows and swearing them to secrecy … could be true, but sounds a lot like another “Pam Show” episode. Lastly, Pam has not shown good ethics in the rest of her work. She refuses to do tasks or sabotages them because they are “not important” enough, actively hides her lack of understanding and progress, and disregards instructions. She repeatedly makes careless mistakes, blames others, and breathlessly chases execs like they’re pop stars while disdaining to speak to anyone below senior IC level (i.e., almost everyone who she needs to interact with and learn from). She gets in a spooky rage when spoken to about these problems, brags about how attractive she thinks she is, and tells outright lies that have affected my relationship with my manager.

All in all, Pam is not skilled or productive or pleasant to be around and if it weren’t for the labor law protection, I would have fired her outright. So I feel conflicted about her representing an employee group of any kind, even without suspicion of pretense. Pam is a big reason I asked to return to independent contributor status. I think she’s kind of off her rocker and poses a risk, and was not comfortable managing her when I’m not empowered to mete out consequences. By risk, I don’t mean physically dangerous, but her behavior has been so outside workplace norms that I wouldn’t trust sensitive data or anyone’s reputations and careers around her.

I have no one at work I can discuss this with. Do I continue to keep my concerns to myself?

Leave it alone. You might be right that Pam is straight and pretending not to be in order to gain some form of advantage with people in the LBGTQ group, but it’s also possible that she’s not. It’s not uncommon for someone to describe themselves as straight to one group of people, while being out in another group where they feel safer, or to have their identity genuinely evolve over time. Either way, it’s not something you should get into investigating or opining on. The potential harm if Pam is faking it is vastly outweighed by the messiness and harm of trying to police what sexual orientation people claim (particularly at work).

Also, there are much, much bigger issues with Pam! If you were still her manager, my advice would be to tackle those issues very assertively; refusing to do work and sabotaging projects, repeated mistakes, refusing to follow instructions, creating fake crises, interrupting senior managers, and fits of all rage would all be more than enough to focus on without worrying about how she’s identifying to the LBGTQ group, and are all squarely within her manager’s purview.

None of that is yours to address anymore since you’re not her manager (although I hope you fully filled in whoever is now her boss about those problems — and if Pam continues to cause issues for your work in your new role, you should raise that to her boss). But you can comfortably put her participation in the LBGTQ group or anything she says about her sexual orientation in the “not my business” column too.

boss constantly talks about her personal finances, coworker is addicted to her phone, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My manager constantly talks about her personal finances

I am the only direct report to a manager who constantly talks about how much money she is spending in her personal life. Her spouse owns an international company, which allows her to have a pretty nice life, but she still manages to find things to complain about constantly. Quick examples: she sent me the listing of the house they just bought (over $1 million) and pointed out everything she will have to change because it’s “outdated.” Every time we talk, she finds a way to drop in how much money she’s spending: the $20,000 closet renovation, or the $30,000 landscaping project, the $12,000 door, the $250 candle, the $400 dinner she had last night … the list goes on!

While I am not struggling financially, my spouse is a public teacher and we are not living in the same tax bracket and I am so tired of listening to her champagne problems every time we are in a one-on-one.

Is there anything I can do to say, “Stop constantly telling me how much money you’re spending”? She is already known throughout the company for having a difficult personality, but I get the brunt of her constant money talk and my resentment grows every day. I’ve asked a trusted colleague for advice but she is stumped too. I have a good relationship with her boss, my grandboss, but it feels like tattling or whining when it’s not really a performance issue from her, just her personality. Do I have to just suck it up?

What about just allowing yourself to have a more natural (and therefore pointed) response when she throws those numbers around? If you start replying with “Wow, we are clearly in very different financial situations, I could never afford that” or “That’s so different from my own budget that you’re making me think I should ask for a raise,” she might reconsider how often she shares that stuff with you. Alternately, you could straight-out say, “I’m not the right audience for this kind of thing, because on my salary I have very different money problems.” You could even add, “I’ll be honest — it’s can be hard to hear when Cecil and I are struggling.”

If she’s the worst kind of boor, that might not stop her, but there’s a decent chance it’ll make her uncomfortable enough to rein some of it in, and if nothing else, the candid responses might be more satisfying to give.

Related:
my rich friend is oblivious when he talks about money … and I’m at a breaking point

2. Applying for a job where my abusive ex’s new partner works

I am a finalist for a position with a large organization in my city. The position fits fine with my career trajectory, the colleagues seem good, the work seems interesting. I have a number of reasons I want to leave my current job and this path out seems to be pretty good. The catch is a big one though: my abusive ex’s spouse works for this employer. They are in a different department but based on what I know about their work, I expect they will interface with the department I’ve applied to.

I don’t know if my ex’s spouse knows me at all, but I know my ex to be controlling and vindictive. If I were to be offered and accept the position, it is hard for me to imagine my ex being unaware for very long. The last time I had a run-in with my ex, they tried getting my phone disconnected and badmouthed me to friends and family. I dread being anywhere near their spouse for fear they dredge anything up and threaten me, my family, coworkers, or their spouse.

The final interview is over a month away. I have a friend who is in the department I’ve applied to — do I talk to her about the situation? I am thinking I should do the interview and maybe I’ll find it’s a not a good fit and can back out naturally. Or, knowing I’m scared of what may be, should I just back out of the process? I don’t want to turn down a job just because of a harmful jackass but I am getting upset just typing this out. I am in therapy and plan on talking through the feelings with my therapist, but professionally I feel like I’m in a no-win situation.

If this were just the partner of an ex who’d been a bit of an ass, I’d say not to let that keep you from the job. But this would be putting yourself back in the orbit of a person who, the last time you encountered each other, actively tried to harm you. No job is worth that.

You’re also not describing this as a rare, perfect-fit type of job opportunity; you describe it as “fine” and “pretty good.” There are other options that will clear the “fine” and “pretty good” bar too, without jeopardizing your safety and peace of mind.

3. My coworker is constantly on her phone and the rest of us have to pick up the slack

I would love to know how much personal phone use is acceptable in office jobs. I work with someone who picks up her phone between 10 and 30 times an hour (those of us who sit around her find it so distracting that we’ve logged her usage and shown these stats to her manager). “Lisa” is texting, often long conversations that go back and forth every minute or so, and scrolling through Instagram. She has been spoken to twice about this and she improves for a week or so and then it’s back to it. She has ADHD and says she needs to use it between different types of tasks to clear her mind.

In weekly meetings, Lisa is always the one who has a list of things she hasn’t had time to do because she’s so busy and stressed, and the rest of us are getting pretty annoyed because we end up having to do more to cover her. We also worry there will be a crackdown on any phone use at all because one person is abusing the privilege.

What are the rules in other workplaces? Is this something Lisa can be fired for, especially as she’s been spoken to a few times already? Can workplaces ban phones from desks?

Yes, she can be fired for it and yes, your workplace can ban phones — but they have to want to do those things, and so far her manager doesn’t seem to be treating it as a particularly big deal, so I wouldn’t count on either of those happening. Different workplaces have different rules, norms, and expectations around phone use (anything from complete autonomy to no phone use permitted at all), so it really comes down to how your particular workplace and your particular manager feel about it.

That said, Lisa’s manager should be addressing her lower productivity. And if Lisa needs to task-switch to manage her time well, she needs to find ways of doing it that aren’t distracting to others. (That said, is the physical movement of using her phone really a distraction, or is it the annoyance of knowing that she’s once again neglecting her work? Those are two different things, and if it’s really more the second, acknowledging that to yourself might make it easier to deal with.)

Since it sounds like your manager has been willing to address the problem with Lisa when it’s been raised before, you should go back to her now and say that every time she’s talked to Lisa about it, Lisa has improved for a week but then goes right back to it, and you’re continuing to have to do extra work to cover for her, and ask that the problem be addressed in a more lasting way. If the nature of your work allows for it, you could also stop picking up Lisa’s slack and see if that makes the problem feel more urgent to your boss.

It’s possible that your workplace will respond by banning phones for everyone so you can’t discount that risk, but a decent manager wouldn’t do that; they’d manage Lisa more forthrightly.

4. How (and if) to tell someone they aren’t qualified to do a job

I work in a niche part of a larger field that requires its own training, usually formally through graduate school but not infrequently through more informal means. I am a practitioner and educator in this niche part (I went to grad school, and adjunct in a grad program), which is often considered fun and interesting by most people but is very often widely and wildly misunderstood. I wish I could say it doesn’t grate on me, but it does (especially by people who should know better, like people who engage with this area as patrons and users).

I was asked to coffee recently by a dear friend, A, to meet their friend, B, to talk about this specialty. B is working on a project where they must utilize skills from my profession and “are in over their head”, and A wanted to introduce me to B as a current practitioner and see if I can give advice. This happens a lot, and I really love both my job and interacting with people who find different ways into the profession rather than formal schooling! So I was happy to schedule with them both. In the meantime, I looked up B’s website and realized that this was not a problem they stumbled into–they advertise (and charge for) the skills of my profession as part of their whole deal. This happens a lot, too–many people in many fields think they are doing my job when in fact they are not, and (to me, the most important part) they have no curiosity about the entire field that exists of professionals doing this work with best practices and a whole professional organization, literature, and training structure in place.

I am not going to ask for/charge a consultant fee; I have already agreed to meet and ultimately I think B is harmless and enthusiastic. I think most people who misunderstand my field are harmless and enthusiastic! But I think this is poor timing for B, in that I am so annoyed that I can’t decide whether I should try to say, “Hey, don’t offer this very particular and skilled service if you have never even looked for a book on this, much less taken a class or talked to a professional” in addition to my professional opinions about this project specifically. B has been working for this project for over a year! Am I being petty? Is this not my business? I want to stay friends with A, too.

Do you know for sure that B is someone who “has never read a book on the subject, taken a class, or talked to a professional”? Your friend’s assessment that B is in over their head doesn’t necessarily mean that, so before you conclude anything, it’s smart to ask B more about their background in the subject.

When you meet, you could say, “I looked at your website to get an idea of the work you do and I saw you advertise llama grooming services. I don’t want to give you info you already know, so can you give me an idea of your background and training in that area and what kinds of projects you’ve worked on? That will help me understand what would be most helpful.” This is a good thing to ask regardless so you can better calibrate the level of advice you’re offering — and if it does turn out they’re advertising those services with zero skills, it’ll highlight that too.

But you can also decline to provide free consulting, remedial or otherwise. If it turns out they need a lot of help, you could explain that it’s more work than can be covered in a casual coffee but you’d be happy to recommend pros in the field (or write up a proposal of work yourself if you’re interested).

5. Should I have given more notice when quitting around the holidays?

I work for a very small tech start-up, several years old but struggling to grow. I’m the only person in my department. Previously, I worked for a VP and held a lower level individual contributor role on my team. The VP got let go, and I was given all of their responsibilities (most of which I had never done before) and a director title, as well as a small ($5,000) raise and a promise of an end-of-year bonus (that was never put in writing or specified if it was dependent on company performance). I’ve been managing all the responsibilities for our function for several months solo.

I decided I wanted to leave (largely due to the above but other reasons as well) and found a new job at a new company and gave notice yesterday. Because of the holidays, I gave them 3.5 weeks notice so they could have a little more time. When I told my CEO, who I now report to directly, he told me I was not giving them enough time and leaving the company in a bad position, since I’m the only one who can do my job and they will struggle to find a replacement quickly with the holidays. I know two weeks is really all you owe a company, but given my position as the sole person in my role and the holidays, should I have given them more time? I’m not dependent on them for a reference in the future but I am wondering if they are justified in their upset reaction.

Nope. Three and half weeks was generous and more than you needed to give. The point of a notice period isn’t to provide enough time to find a replacement and have them start (the standard two weeks isn’t nearly enough for that in most jobs) but simply to wrap things up in a basic way and transition your work to whoever will be covering it in the interim.

Feel free to ignore your CEO’s attempt to guilt-trip you. He might feel inconvenienced by the timing of your departure, but that’s how departures generally go; they’re often inconvenient, and that’s not a reason to expect someone will alter their plans. His feelings of stress don’t mean you handled it wrong.

should I call out a vulture who takes way more than his share of food at meetings?

A reader writes:

I work at a small college, and part of my job involves working with new faculty. I have one new faculty member who is well on his way to becoming known as a vulture on campus.

My events for new faculty often involve food in addition to programming, and this faculty member (we’ll call him Bruno) will eat a hearty meal and then leave with a substantial to-go plate plus an unopened drink for later. Recently, I was hosting two lunch meetings back-to-back, and to prevent attendees from the first meeting from taking to-go plates, I started covering the food. Bruno watched me put the covers on most of the items and asked me if he could help me clean up. It was clear that he wanted to be invited to take some food with him. When I explained that I had ordered extra food for the next meeting, he proceeded to help himself to a large plate of the desserts that I didn’t have a chance to cover, going so far as to take all of one of the desserts that remained.

While this is irritating to me, I was going to let it slide until a colleague in a different office told me that she had had similar experiences with Bruno and that she found his behavior off-putting. In her case, he was at a well-attended event her office was hosting, and while it was still going on, he left with a full plate of snacks, as well as two cans of sparkling water stuffed in his pockets.

Bruno is a full-time faculty member, so I don’t think need or food insecurity is causing this behavior. He is just out of graduate school, so perhaps he is used to taking food at the end of events. Also, the events I host usually have lots of leftovers (I will often encourage people to take food when I don’t have another event the same day), so he might be under the impression that food at all events is up for grabs.

However, taking food while an event is still going on might mean that attendees who come later will miss out. Also, taking shelf-stable goods, such as drinks that could be used later, is a strain on our budgets and time, since we must replenish these items more often than necessary.

Finally, I am worried that Bruno is developing a reputation for being a mooch or vulture. While there are worse things to be called, this is not the best way for him to begin his career in academia (particularly at an institution where everyone knows each other).

I’m not Bruno’s manager, but I am his mentor, and I feel compelled to talk to him and gently suggest that he ask before assuming that all events allow attendees to take anything they want when they leave. Is this reasonable, or should I just let this go? I recognize that this need might be coming from my own annoyance and Bruno’s behavior might not be the problem I think it is.

Please talk to him. You’ll be doing him a favor, because you’re absolutely right that he’s going to get a reputation for boorish behavior (and in fact may already have one). But even aside from doing him a favor, you should talk to him because there are work-related reasons to tell him to lay off: the budget strain you mentioned, plus the people who aren’t getting food at later meetings because he’s taking extras for himself.

Plus, while anyone who sees Bruno swiping food would have the standing to tell him to knock it off and leave some for others, you have special standing to do it as his mentor.

There are two ways to approach it. One is to simply speak up the next time you see him trying to make off with extra food. For example: “Please don’t take extras with you; this food needs to feed the next meeting too.” Or: “Please just take what you’ll eat during the meeting. We don’t have enough for people to take leftovers with them.”

The other option is to talk with him privately and say something like, “Since you’re a new faculty member, I want to make sure you know the expectations for food at events. Food is usually for the duration of the event only — you shouldn’t take food or drinks with you for later unless the organizer explicitly offers it. Otherwise we risk not having enough for people who come later, and we often save non-perishables like sodas for future events.” If he seems abashed, you might be able to stop there. But if he doesn’t, you could add, “When we do have extras to offer, we’ll usually offer them to students first (if that’s true). It’s not good for a faculty member to get a reputation for taking more than their share.”

He might be embarrassed by being called out (although often people who do this are fairly shameless about it) but who knows, he might appreciate having the expectations clearly spelled out. Either way, it’s something you should address, particularly now that you’re aware it’s a pattern.

how much time can I ask for to consider a job offer?

A reader writes:

I’ve been conducting a low-key job search for months without much movement, and suddenly within the last few weeks I have what seems like serious interest from two different companies. I’m near the end of the interviewing process with both of them but, from what I can tell, one of them is moving much more quickly than the other. I’d be willing to consider accepting an offer from either of them, but so far I’m more interested in the one we’ll call Company A. And of course, Company A is the one that’s moving more slowly – so I’m worried about getting an offer from Company B and needing to give them an answer before I’ve heard back from Company A.

I don’t want to turn down Company B just out of hope Company A will come through with an offer, because if they don’t I’d glad go to work for my second choice. But I also don’t want to accept Company B’s offer if I have a chance at working with Company A.

How do people navigate this? I assume I can’t tell Company B that they’re my second choice or that I need to put them on hold while I wait for an answer from a different employer. And I know I can’t tell Company A to speed up their timeline (and in fact they mentioned that part of the reason for the delay is that they’re waiting to interview a finalist who’s been out of the country and thus unavailable).

If Company B makes an offer before I’ve heard from Company A, how much time can I ask for to think it over before I start to look uninterested? Is a week or two unreasonable? And if I do get an offer from them, is there any way I can contact Company A to explain the situation or will that look like I’m trying to pit them against each other?

Last, I guess, what if I accept Company B’s offer and then Company A finally comes through with their own? Can I back out of the first offer without ruining my reputation in my small industry or is that never done?

I know I’m getting ahead of myself! For all I know, no one will make me an offer and all this worry will be for nothing. But I’d feel better if I knew how to handle it.

You can read my answer to this letter at New York Magazine today. Head over there to read it.