how do I turn down a persistent favor-asker?

A reader writes:

About a year and a half ago, I agreed to have coffee with a company intern who was finishing up her internship and preparing to graduate. I did this as a favor to a colleague — this intern never did any work with my team or department and we never interacted prior to this coffee meeting. (Incidentally, or maybe not, she is also the niece of a company VP.) She asked smart questions about my career and department, and how to approach the job search after graduation. I gave her what information I could, told her I’d forward on any entry-level openings that were shared within my networks, and wished her luck.

Since then, I’ve received emails and LinkedIn messages from her at least once a month asking for introductions to people at seemingly every company she’d applied to (all large organizations in my industry). Some of the time, I don’t have an appropriate contact for her, so I tell her as much, but other times I do have a contact and simply don’t feel comfortable calling in a favor on behalf of a person I barely know and haven’t directly worked with.

I know it’s tough to find a good job right out of college, but this has been going on for A YEAR AND A HALF. How can I politely tell her to stop asking me, a virtual stranger, for introductions?

I answer this question — and two others — over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and sometimes updating/expanding my answers to them). You can read it here.

Other questions I’m answering there today include:

  • I’m my employee’s landlord and I need her to move
  • Explaining a restricted diet at work

can I threaten legal action to get a better job offer?

A reader writes:

TLDR: I was given a lowball job offer. I said it was less than my previous total comp, which it was. I was asked my previous salary and, stupidly, gave it. Asking salary history is illegal in the nearest city and that may or may not cover me. Can I use the threat of legal action to negotiate a better offer?

I was laid off. I applied for a job at a nearby company a friend works at. The interview process was really fast, less than a week from initial submission to final interview. I thought I killed it. My friend on the inside agreed. But after the final interview it took three whole weeks to get an offer. Apparently the CFO had to sign off on everything personally and had a big backlog.

The initial offer was less than I had been making at my previous job and I made the mistake of saying it like that. The in-house recruiter asked what I was making and I am bad at thinking on my feet, so I told her. This job is in a suburb of Philadelphia, and Philadelphia has the Wage Equity Ordinance making it illegal to ask salary history. If you read the law itself, it looks like I’m covered because the company has employees and an office in Philly. But if you read an official FAQ, it doesn’t cover you if the job location is outside Philly, which this is.

Can I use the threat of legal action to negotiate a better offer? I didn’t give a number for what I’m looking for. The recruiter ran off to get a new number based on my history. But I want a higher offer since my last salary lost $10,000 in two years from raises not keeping up with inflation. Also, I have experience now in a technology which my prior employer said they would have given me a higher title for if I had had that coming in.

I was thinking about saying, “We don’t have to get lawyers involved and let your manager know, if..”

It’s a bad idea!

First and foremost, you don’t appear to actually be covered by Philadelphia’s law. The city’s FAQ on the law says it only applies to positions located within Philadelphia, which this job is not. (There are some exceptions to that, such as if you’d be spending a lot of time in the city, but I’m assuming you would have mentioned it if those applied.)

If you’re not covered by the law, you don’t have any standing to threaten legal action.

But even if you were covered, “we don’t have to get lawyers involved and let your manager know” is a bad approach. First, this isn’t really a legal battle; you’d simply be reporting them to the Philadelphia Commission on Human Relations. More importantly, you’re tying together two things that don’t necessarily belong together. Yes, they shouldn’t ask candidates about salary history (if indeed you were covered under the law), but they had already made you an offer without having that info, and you volunteered info about your previous salary as a negotiation point. They might have still been in technical violation when they asked you to elaborate (it’s not fully clear from the info on the city’s website), but introducing that information and then threatening legal action when they engaged with you on it won’t make you look like you’re operating in good faith.

It’s also unlikely to work. Most likely, they’ll be put off by the threat and just tell you that their original offer — the one they made without any info about your salary history — is firm.

Even if it worked, though, it’s unlikely to be in your best interests. They made you an offer that was presumably within their salary structure for the role and the team. Let’s say you successfully threaten them into offering more. What are the chances you’re going to find it easy to get raises there in the future versus having your salary stagnate because they don’t want it to get even more out of sync with others doing similar work? If you have to threaten an employer into offering you more, you’re better off just concluding that they don’t pay what you want … rather than embedding yourself into a company that you believe underpays (and which will presumably continue to underpay and resist raising your salary in the future).

To be clear, I am not saying we shouldn’t hold companies accountable for following the law. And I hate that workers considering holding companies legally accountable need to factor in whether it will get them labeled overly adversarial or so forth. But in reality, you do — and in this case you’ve also got to consider whether making threats over it will get you the outcome you want or just poison the well.

All that said, if you think they violated the law, by all means report them to the agency charged with handling it! But using it to try to negotiate more money isn’t a good strategy.

friend’s job offer was pulled for being a jerk, is my girlfriend’s CEO overstepping, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. My friend’s job offer was pulled after he was a jerk

My friend Howell recently signed the contract for a new job, but was dismissed before he started for aggressive behavior to coworkers. The backstory is this: he needed to pass a medical before starting and after he passed the medical his employer was slow to confirm that they had received the certificate and give him a start date. He emailed the employer about this, and when he didn’t get a response he phoned the company receptionist, shouted at her when she couldn’t put him through to HR, and, as I interpret the story, bullied her into giving a number for HR. He then called HR and spoke to various women who said he wasn’t in their region and they didn’t have access to his file. The way he tells the story sounds as if he told them robustly that he believed they were lying. He then got an email saying that the job offer had been withdrawn due to his behavior to colleagues. He says they are all passive-aggressive misandrists and he wouldn’t want to work for them anyway.

The backstory to this is that Howell has been unemployed for about three years and I had encouraged him to apply for this job for which he has the skills and qualifications. It’s with a big company in the industry I work in, although fortunately there is no way the people I work with will connect me to him. Is there anything Howell can do to repair this and apply for other roles with the company and any advice I could give him? It now appears to me that the reason he has been made redundant a few times and had a slow job search may be more due to personality than the job market.

There’s nothing Howell can do to get considered for a role at that company again. He should send an email apologizing for his behavior simply because that’s the right thing to do, but it’s extremely unlikely they’ll ever consider him again after he bullied and shouted at a receptionist and accused multiple employees of lying. It can take far less to put someone on a “do not hire” list. (And really, would you feel comfortable if you discovered your own company was considering hiring a candidate who behaved like this? These consequences are logical ones and warranted by what happened.)

As for advice to Howell … he needs to do some significant work on his temper and the way he treats people. Personally, I advise reconsidering whether you want to maintain a friendship with someone who believes women who don’t do what he wants are “misandrists.”

2. Is my girlfriend’s CEO overstepping?

My girlfriend works as an executive assistant to the CEO in a mid-size company she joined three months ago. She tells me her male CEO often compliments her on her outfit, how amazing she is, that he doesn’t know what he’d do without her, etc. Also that she’s made him change his dress code to be more stylish.

Over the last few weeks, she’s planned a larger company event at an out-of-state resort. It all went well and during the event her CEO gives her a gift card to a back massage at an exclusive spa close to her home. I find the gift too personal and that the CEO is overstepping. My girlfriend laughs it off and tells me nothing is going on between them. What do you think?

Do you trust your girlfriend? Nothing here is inherently inappropriate.

I originally had written an additional paragraph that said: “Does your spidey sense normally go off when your girlfriend has warm interactions with other men in her life? If not but something is setting off alarms this time, there might be a conversation to have here. But you need to navigate it carefully so you don’t put your girlfriend in a position where she feels pressured to quit a job where nothing inappropriate is happening. (You also don’t get to take repeated bites at that apple; you’d pretty much have to hear her out and decide how you feel about her response, not keep raising it.)” But re-reading your letter, the details you included just don’t warrant that. She has a warm relationship with the CEO she supports — something the CEO/assistant relationship often lends itself to — he appreciates her work. She’s the best person best equipped to judge if the vibe feels off, and she says it doesn’t. Unless there’s more to it, this is just not alarming.

3. Why don’t people say thank you?

I work on an in-house “service” team (think communications deliverables) in a larger group that sits within an even larger organization. I am in a senior director role, but fundamentally I still work for others, so my day-to-day consists of creating things (or overseeing the creation of things) and sending them out to people in our larger organization for “review and feedback.” It’s exhausting, but it’s what I signed up for.

I am consistently surprised by the way people respond to having something they asked for (and that serves a key role in the business) sent to them. When did people stop saying thank you? When did people stop acknowledging the creation of work? When did people stop being … nice?

It doesn’t matter to me if you decide to change every part of the work, the “thank you” part is important. Am I expecting too much? If people are doing what they’re being paid to do, does that mean they are not entitled to be thanked? I’m noticing this behavior more and more. Is this a workplace trend, or is everyone in my organization just a jerk?

How do these same people treat you generally? Are they respectful and decent, or demanding and rude? If they’re generally respectful, then yeah, I think you’re putting too much emphasis on the thank-you; for whatever reason, that’s not the culture in your organization. It might be because people are busy, or they figure their appreciation goes unsaid (not necessarily a great stance, but a common one), or they simply see creating these materials as part of your job and not something that requires specific thanks from them.

To be clear, if they were writing in, I’d recommend they take two seconds to thank people who fulfill requests for them — but on your end of that transaction, I think you’ll be happier if you focus on how you’re treated generally at this job and by these teams, and not so much on specific individual thank-you’s.

Related:
Coworkers who don’t say “please” or “thank you”

4. Was this recruiter using me for insider info?

My job is fine — not great but fine. I’ve decide to look into what other jobs are out there, just to see, so I’ve been replying to recruiters messaging me on LinkedIn.

I had a call today with a recruiter in my space and got asked some odd questions mixed in with expected ones: “How is your team structured at the moment?” The recruiter then mentioned knowing some people in my company, including my current boss by name.
Later on, I was asked, “Do you have any projects coming up over there?”

At the time I thought this was checking on whether I would be available to change jobs. But thinking back on it, we brought in an extra team member on a short-term contract for a large project last year. Was this a sneaky way to see are there any jobs coming up on my team? Or am I overthinking?

Yeah, this was almost certainly a recruiter trying to get intel they could use to try to get business from your current company. Some recruiters do that almost as a matter of course — it’s as if it’s built into their business model — and would still do a perfectly fine job representing you, but it’s also reasonable to be annoyed by it. (I would be! You hadn’t agreed to provide info for that purpose.)

5. How much should I tell my brother’s manager about his hospitalization?

I am my brother’s medical power of attorney, and he is in the hospital with both a heart issue and alcoholism. The heart issue was discovered when he was brought to the hospital with a very high blood alcohol content and threatening suicide.

He had notified his manager that he was in the hospital but has now lost phone privileges. I’m in a different city and trying to navigate until I can get to him.

I do have his manager’s contact info. Should I notify her that he is in the hospital and leave it at that? Should I mention the heart issue? I don’t want to mention the alcoholism due to the ongoing stigma that still, unfortunately, accompanies mental health and addiction issues. (If it makes a difference, we are in the U.S.)

Definitely don’t mention the alcoholism; that’s not a decision you should take away from your brother. You don’t really need to be specific about the heart issue either. You can simply say he’s hospitalized with a medical issue and not able to talk by phone and that you will keep his manager posted once you have better information regarding his return to work (or until he’s able to do that himself). Stick to the stuff that’s relevant to them — he’s out, he’s in the hospital, you’ll know more by X date, but not specific medical information.

what does “energetic” mean in a job posting?

A reader writes:

I have several medical conditions that make me generally a low-energy person. However, my attendance is never an issue, and I’m pretty smart and an excellent worker and employee. Previous managers have raved about me. Not to toot my own horn, but I think I’m a pretty awesome employee.

I applied for an internal position that I’m qualified for. The posting says they’re looking for a “motivated, energetic, self-starter who can make immediate contribution to the team.”

What does “energetic” mean in this context?

I feel I’m motivated and a self-starter, but physically I am not energetic, nor will I ever be. I’m just physically not able to be and yes that probably comes across in zoom meetings and such. I’m always friendly and professional, just not “energetic” as I think it means.

I will probably get an interview because it’s an internal role, so I need to know how to address that. Just bring up projects I’ve initiated to better my teams? Talk about projects I’ve completed before their due dates? I’m not sure how to convey how I’d be a great pick if they’re looking for someone to be outgoing and “energetic.”

Much of the time, “energetic” in this context doesn’t mean a rah-rah / bubbly / outgoing / physical energy type person. It means things like: you see work that needs to be done and you do it, you initiate useful new projects, you have a sense of urgency when it’s needed, and you approach work with a can-do spirit (when realistic) rather than always looking for reasons something won’t work.

The way you’d convey those things in an interview is to talk about times when you’ve approached work that way — think back through your work accomplishments for examples that illustrate those traits and work them in as you’re discussing the job and what you’d bring to it.

And of course, if your interviewer is looking for a super rah-rah type, it’s smarter not to try to appear that way if you’re not. You want the hiring manager to understand who they’re hiring so that there aren’t surprises once you’re on the job … and so you don’t end up in a job that wants you to be someone you’re not or where you won’t thrive. Show them what you would bring to the role so that you can both figure out whether it’s the right fit or not.

does my staff resent me for being frequently out of the office?

A reader writes:

I am the director of a small organization. Since we’re so small, I have day-to-day tasks along with more responsibilities such as board meetings, weekend and evening events, media relations, and external meetings. As we grow, I am finding more demands on my time, and I am often on the run, headed out to meetings and events outside the office. Since I frequently work nights and weekends, I sometimes take an afternoon off or leave early to preserve some work-life balance. (In fact, my board has encouraged me to stay under 50 hours a week for that reason.)

I often feel guilty and worried when I leave the office, even though it’s part of my job. I also have a group of young staffers who are working their first jobs and don’t want them to feel it’s okay for them to come and go whenever they want, or that it’s okay for the boss to be a hypocrite. I also don’t want the senior staff to feel I’m not around when they need me. I have heard the occasional grumble from some of the senior staff that I’m “never there,” even though I’m always working, just not always in the office or available immediately when people want me.

Should I try to explain what is going on, or would that just stir up drama? Do I just accept that sometimes people are going to grumble about management? Or do I need to do something else?

I answer this question over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and sometimes updating/expanding my answers to them). You can read it here.

my friends are entitled contractors who are overstepping work boundaries

A reader writes:

I have two friends, Drake and Josh, who I know from a retail job I had years ago. Drake and Josh work as contractors for Company A, which holds a big event at the end of every quarter. Company A holds the event across multiple cities at various venues and hires contractors to sort, pack, and ship materials out to the venues and then receive and unpack everything after the event.

During the pandemic, our local laws banned very large gatherings and Company A had to split the event into many smaller venues. As you can imagine, the logistics side of the event was greatly impacted. Instead of just one venue per city, Company A now had three venues in City A to coordinate with and had another three venues in City B and so on. Drake and Josh were hired during this time and have stayed with Company A since. Additionally, many of the event-planning employees (including Drake and Josh’s supervisor) at Company A quit during the pandemic due to how stressful it was to manage everything.

Over time, Drake and Josh have stopped seeing themselves as contractors at Company A and act as though they are employees there. Since they’ve been with Company A longer than their current supervisor, they have begun acting as though they are untouchable and have roped in newer hires into their bad behavior. A few examples include: helping themselves to leftover swag from events, complaining to the IT department that the guest wifi is too slow (they don’t have access to the internal company connection, because they aren’t staff), complaining to the facilities department that certain items in the break room are not stocked fast enough, and complaining that they do not receive certain benefits that staff do, such as transportation compensation (because, surprise, they aren’t staff!). They also regularly attend office functions that are clearly meant for staff, such as the biweekly “coffee and donuts” day or the pizza parties that Company A held to incentivize employees to return to the office. Recently the events department had ordered cupcakes for staff who were staying late, and when those staff members went to the kitchen, they found Drake, Josh, and the other contractors eating them. Another time, a completely different department had a catered lunch meeting, and Drake, Josh and the other contractors took home the leftover food, which included multiple untouched party size salads and veggie trays.

A lot of the above behavior is encouraged by Jean, a friend of Drake and Josh who works in another department at Company A. Jean doesn’t like to mingle with her colleagues and prefers to chat with her friends, which is why Drake and Josh attend the pizza parties (Drake once even attended a function on a day he wasn’t even working at Company A). She was the one to inform Drake and Josh of the leftover event swag, the leftover food, and the cupcakes, even though she has no authority over any of those things. Additionally, since Drake and Josh are very unpopular among the events staff, Jean has become disliked by association. Jean’s own manager Camilla (a friend of mine) is also resentful of her as the contractors’ behavior has made things rocky between Jean’s department and events. Jean also vents to her friends about her strained relationship with her manager, and Drake and Josh have been snarky to Camilla in their very limited interaction with her and have also spoken badly about Camilla to me (saying she mistreats Jean and the rest of the department). Drake and Josh have also repeated info from Jean that had not yet been made public, causing Camilla to receive backlash.

The time Drake and Josh have spent at Company A has also clouded their view of the real world. Jean does not have the necessary degree for her job, and was hired primarily due to a recommendation from a higher-up. Drake and Josh do not have degrees but have come to believe that they can also get hired on (Jean’s) recommendation alone, an idea that Jean has encouraged. As such, Drake and Josh have spent nearly two years wanting to leave Company A (as the work has slowed down dramatically post-pandemic) but are only applying to positions with requirements they don’t meet. They have applied to every opening at Company A (regardless of if they would be capable of doing it) and have also asked friends and me about any openings at our workplaces. The latter puts us in a difficult position as they will want to apply regardless of the qualifications and would also expect a recommendation from us, which none of us are comfortable giving knowing how they behave at Company A.

I truly want the best for Drake and Josh, and I personally believe that Jean is not good for them professionally. However, I have drifted apart from them these last few years and am not sure how to frame my concerns in a productive way. I am also not close to Jean at all, and do not feel like I can speak to her about this. On top of everything, since I am friends with Camilla, I feel like the three of them may not even listen to me as they seem to have already labelled her as toxic and will likely brush off everything that she has said to me. I have also grown a bit resentful watching Drake and Josh over the past few years and feel they are much too old to be acting this way (they are in their 30s!). I’m afraid that these negative emotions will all come out if I try to speak with them.

You don’t need to care or even think about 99% of this!

You don’t work at Company A! If Drake and Josh are overstepping boundaries for contractors, their employer can deal with that if they want to. But their employer might not care. A lot of what you described isn’t a big deal at all: it’s not uncommon for contractors to be allowed to help themselves to leftover swag or food. It’s not a big deal that they notified IT that the guest wifi is slow (especially if they ever need to use it for their work — if they do, it’s actually relevant info IT needs). Complaining that the break room isn’t stocked quickly enough does sound like A Bit Much, but there could be context there we don’t have; it’s not a shocking outrage either way.

It’s true that a lot of companies try to preserve clear differences between employees and contractors for legal reasons* (including things like not inviting contractors to some office functions), because the more they blur that line, the more they’re at risk of the government reclassifying their contractors as employees and making them pay back taxes on their pay. But others don’t. At many companies, it would be absolutely fine for contractors to help themselves to cupcakes, take home leftover veggie trays, and attend office functions; no one would care.

But regardless of whether this is a problem at Company A or not … you’re a friend who doesn’t work there, so it’s not something you need to devote any thought to! Josh and Drake aren’t committing any terrible sins. Being upset about this from outside the company is akin to being upset that your friend who doesn’t work with you is, I don’t know, coding database entries differently than you would or not contributing anything to their team potluck. It’s not something that affects you or is relevant to your friendship! If their boss cares, their boss will address it.

Now, maybe you happen to know that their company does care. You mentioned that Josh and Drake aren’t well-liked by the rest of the events staff, and maybe everyone there is outraged and complaining about all the same stuff that’s in your letter. But again, if that’s the case, Company A should be addressing it. If they’re not, that’s on them. It’s not anything you as a friend need to care about.

I can understand worrying that your friends are setting themselves up for bad outcomes, but since you mentioned you’re no longer close to them, that’s not something you’re positioned to address. “Drifted apart in the last few years” put this squarely in the “not yours to address” bucket.

It sounds like you’re getting drawn into all of this because you’re friends with Camilla, Jean’s manager, and she complains to you about it. If Camilla has a problem with Jean’s behavior, she should address it with Jean; that’s her job. If Drake and Josh’s behavior is causing problems for Camilla or her department, she can speak with whoever manages them. But these are all Camilla’s work battles — they shouldn’t be yours just because you’re friends with some of the people involved.

It’s absolutely your prerogative to decide that based on what you’ve heard about Drake and Josh, you wouldn’t refer them for openings at your own employer.

And if you just don’t like Drake and Josh that much anymore, it makes sense to pull back from the friendships.

But you are getting very overly invested in relatively minor work drama at someone else’s company. Decide not to care and set yourself free!

* For what it’s worth, I’m curious about whether Drake and Josh should even be classified as contractors at all. If they’re W2 employees of a contracting company that placed them there, this is legal. If they’re 1099 contractors, they might be right to be annoyed. I can’t say for sure without more info, but I have questions about whether Company A is handling that legally.

I’m in a family business with a cheater, I don’t want to be the face of a company campaign, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. I’m in a family business with a cheater

My wife’s sister owns a business with her boyfriend. We are all really close. I do art for their business and I created their logo. Recently my sister in law unraveled a web of lies in regard to her boyfriend. He’s been cheating on her for over a decade. He says he’s a sex addict. She initially kicked him out but kept the business going with him because it’s their livelihood. They are always doing deliveries on short notice and basically talk business 24/7. He is a total mess on keeping anything organized or written down for finances. He is a good salesman though. She ultimately decided to get back with him.

I don’t like him and I don’t want to do art for their business because he would benefit. I’m struggling on how to tell her this.

I think you could simply be honest: “I’m struggling with the way he treated you, and it’s made me realize I shouldn’t be wrapped up in the business anymore. Mixing business and family is complicated under the best of circumstances, and this has made it harder. So I’m going to step out of the business pieces, but I can do anything you need over the next two weeks to wrap up loose ends or help you look for someone new.”

2. I don’t want to be the face of my company’s recruitment campaign

My company is embarking on a recruitment publicity campaign and has asked me to be the face of my job.

I’m hesitant for many reasons — I don’t think I’m actually a good fit for my role (I find it overly administrative), I don’t particularly like my company (I disagree with some of the employment policies they have), and I am actively taking steps to look for other opportunities.

I’ve tried explaining to them that I am uncomfortable with being part of the campaign as I value my privacy. Furthermore, I’m recovering from a medical issue and do not feel or look 100%. But they refuse to let me off. So far, I’ve been avoiding replying HR on my availability but I know I cannot escape them for long. What can I do to make them back off and maintain my job here till I find something new?

Say this: “I’ve given this some thought but it’s not something I can do. That answer is final — thanks for understanding.” If they keep pushing after that: “It’s making me really uncomfortable that you’re not respecting my answer.”

It’s obnoxious for them to push anyone to do this who has already declined, but if you’re visibly a minority in your field (race, visible disability, etc.), it’s particularly obnoxious since it’s it’s almost certainly because they’re willing to ignore your discomfort in a quest to make themselves look diverse and inclusive (regardless of the actual experience of the person they’re using to do it).

3. My job impersonated me to request free Covid tests

Today, I got an automated email from USPS confirming my request for free Covid tests. It looked legitimate and had my correct name and home address, but was sent to my work email and I did not make this request. A little digging uncovered that my company had submitted this request on my behalf and was doing so for every employee in preparation for an upcoming, in-person all staff meeting we’d all be traveling for. They didn’t ask our permission or let us know this was happening.

Is this … allowed? I’m guessing it’s not illegal, but it feels weird for a company to pretend to be individual staff (and use our personal information without asking) to avoid buying supplies they need to run a safe event. It would be one thing if they asked staff to do that on our own (I’d probably still feel peeved at having to pack my suitcase full of supplies for their event, but at least it would feel honest?). Regardless of if it’s legal/allowed or whatever, am I justified in being weirded out by this?! Do you have advice about what, if anything, I should do to raise concerns?

Yeah, this is a little off; they essentially engaged in a transaction with the government on your behalf while claiming to be you. (I checked the form they would have had to fill out, and there’s nothing asking them to attest to who they are, but it’s still icky.) Also, requests for free tests are restricted one per household, so what if you’d already requested yours or someone else in your household planned to? Or you had those tests allocated for another use? I don’t think it’s worth escalating — it’s more weird than outrageous — although you could certainly point out that you had planned on using those tests for something else and so the event will need its own supply.

At least they’re asking people to test, I suppose.

4. When a company wants manager references

When a potential employer or staffing agency asks for supervisor references, how literal should that be taken? Do they have to be my direct bosses, or can they also be people higher on the organization ladder who gave me tasks to do? In one of my past jobs, my relationship with pretty much everyone in the organization was better than my relationship with my boss.

Typically it means the person who managed you or, in some cases, maybe that person’s boss if they worked closely with you. But it doesn’t mean people who just are higher in the hierarchy and gave you work. You might be able to make a case for it if someone worked closely with you and has the close and nuanced perspective on your work that they’d be expecting from a manager. (It’s also reasonable to say something like, “I’ll be honest, my relationship with that manager soured when I told her I was leaving, and I’m concerned it will affect the reference she’d give. But I’d be glad to put you in touch with two senior leaders from that job who I worked with closely and who could give you nuanced perspectives on my work.”)

Related:
everything you need to know about job references

5. How to communicate an extended work absence for health situations

I am a small business owner who manages a small team and I’m going through a mental health crisis that is limiting my ability to work. I am able to take the time off that I need and my business partner (who knows what is going on) is filling in for me as manager, but I’m unsure how to communicate the situation to my staff. I don’t want to say “I’m having a nervous breakdown and will probably be back at work eventually but I don’t know when.” Do I just say I’m dealing with a family emergency? How should I ask my partner to respond to the genuine concern that my staff have about my absence? So far I’ve been unable to work in-person (I am able to do a few hours/week of remote work — just really essential stuff my partner isn’t cross-trained to do yet) for four weeks, which seems kind of long for a “family emergency.” Maybe I’m overthinking this?

“Dealing with a health situation” or “family emergency” or “family health situation” all work! Family emergencies and serious health situations can take months, depending on what’s going on. It’s also okay to include something like “family health situation that she requests privacy around” if you want (although sometimes in an effort to ward off questions, that can cause more speculation). You could also include something like “she’ll be okay but will need some time for it to resolve.”

open thread – March 8-9, 2024

It’s the Friday open thread!

The comment section on this post is open for discussion with other readers on any work-related questions that you want to talk about (that includes school). If you want an answer from me, emailing me is still your best bet*, but this is a chance to take your questions to other readers.

* If you submitted a question to me recently, please do not repost it here, as it may be in my queue to answer.

my friend is an awful coworker, apologizing for past mistakes, and more

It’s four answers to four questions. Here we go…

1. I referred my friend to my company and she turned out to be an awful coworker

I have a former coworker, “Sadie,” who I became decent friends with over the course of a year of working together at a former job. We both left for other opportunities around the same time. We occasionally kept in contact over the next two years with a phone call every other month or so. Sadie recently left her job and, because my company had an opening for a similar position, I referred her. I love my current job and company and expressed how great of a job it is to her.

Sadie ended up getting the position with my company, making us coworkers again. She was a great coworker-turned-friend at our last job so I didn’t anticipate problems—I even looked forward to working with her again! However, over the four weeks since she started, Sadie has caused countless issues. She’s continually complained about the job, nitpicked things that she thinks could be improved, and asked our boss to make changes to normal practices that have been around significantly longer than either of us. A few comments like this wouldn’t hurt (I don’t mind some healthy criticism!) but it’s become excessive. Think things like “At my old job at company A, we did B practice and it worked a lot better than what you’re doing here” but with more than half of our standard practices. Additionally, she’s been calling me during working hours (and sometimes after hours) to ask questions about work processes she doesn’t understand. When I explain them, she complains about them more. I can feel my boss and other coworkers getting annoyed with her constant questioning and complaining, and they’re only hearing half as much as I am.

I’m upset because I referred her and gave her a glowing recommendation to our employer, and she’s now making me look bad due to her complaining. I’m also frazzled because I’m continually answering her questions and trying to explain the reasoning behind some of the practices she complains about while also trying to get my own work done. I also feel bad because clearly this job wasn’t what she expected it to be, and I’m worried she blames me for telling her about it at all. The whole thing feels like a mess, and I wish I’d just kept my mouth shut and never referred her in the first place. How do I handle things from here?

Are you comfortable being honest with her and saying something like: “I don’t know if you realize, but you’re criticizing a huge portion of what we do here when you’re still really new, and I think you’re getting yourself off on the wrong foot with people. It’s awkward for me because I encouraged them to hire you — and I also feel bad because you seem so unhappy.”

If she keeps it up after that, ignore her calls after hours and try to set some limits on the complaints during work hours too: “I can help explain processes to you, but I can’t keep hearing you vent about them — it’s wearing me out.”

In your shoes I’d also have a discreet word with your boss and just be blunt: “I’m not sure what’s going on. I had a different experience with her when we worked together last time and I didn’t expect this.” It’s your boss’s job to decide how to handle it now, but this will clear up any confusion about whether Sadie is still your idea of a great hire.

2. Vacationing employee wants a company-paid international phone plan

I am a manager of managers for a large, fast-paced frontline operational team that regularly responds to emergencies. When I started in this role a few years ago, the managers had an (unsustainable) informal process where they frequently got involved in decisions after hours and on weekends. We have made good strides since then, forming a functional on-call rotation with a broader team and appropriate compensation. I’m really happy with how far we have come!

Fast forward a bit, there are new members on the team. One requested to change their work cell plan to an international plan prior to vacation so they can stay on top of things. I declined the request, explained that I want them to disconnect from work and we can cover things in their absence. My reports feel it’s more stressful not knowing what is happening and coming back to a full inbox.

This is more about the principle than the cost of the phone plan. I strongly believe it is the right decision to keep boundaries and avoid a slippery slope backwards! But, I also question if it’s appropriate for me to decide what is best for their well-being. What are your thoughts on company-paid international phone plans on (company-paid) vacation?

If your team regularly handles emergencies, it’s extra important that they have real time off to disconnect and recharge. And frankly, no matter how much your team member insists it’s all their idea, other people hearing that the organization bought them an international calling plan so they could “stay on top of things” during their vacation will undo some of the work you’ve done in getting people to unplug.

Normally, there’s only so much you can do to ensure people truly disconnect while they’re on vacation, but this piece is within your control: decline to provide the international calling plan. But also: (a) explain why — that it’s not just about their personal preferences but it’s something with ramifications for the health of the team as a whole, and (b) work with them on how to make their return less stressful. (For example, can you give them their first day back just to sort through what built up while they were away and not throw new work at them immediately, etc.?)

3. Should I apologize for past mistakes?

I have been at my company for about seven years. This is my first and only corporate job, for which I had no formal training. About five years ago, I worked on my first big software implementation project with a small team. In hindsight, there were aspects of the project that could’ve been handled better, and I can acknowledge (to myself) that one stakeholder in particular did not have their (legitimate) concerns addressed and has been dealing with complications related to how this project was completed in the years since. This person is not my manager but is a manager in my department, albeit in a different country.

We recently had a change in leadership and are replacing the software I helped implement five years ago with a different software. This project has a much larger scope and will include more stakeholders, but also more resources. I am in a similar role now as I was then, and recently had a very uncomfortable meeting where the aggrieved stakeholder laid into me in front of other colleagues for the failures of the previous project and how they will not let their concerns be ignored a second time. They derailed an unrelated meeting for about 20 minutes to vent about their frustrations.

I was caught off guard and felt immediately defensive — I was not the only person who worked on that project, and they brought up issues that had never been brought to my attention before, though some issues they brought up I had known about and had never fully addressed. After some reflection I would like to take accountability for past mistakes and provide assurances that I will do better this time, as well as alleviate my anxiety about having to meet with this person again and work together again.

I am thinking I should reach out, either in a call or with an email to clear the air, but I am not sure what to say. Should I apologize and detail my past missteps? Should I focus on the future and the current project at hand? How can I mend this relationship and move forward without fixating too much on my shame around my performance on this previous project so that it doesn’t affect my current job negatively?

I suspect the most effective thing wouldn’t be a complete account of every misstep you made in the past, but clear statements that you now understand the concerns they raised back then, realize they were mishandled, and are committed to ensuring their input is treated seriously this time around. If I were in their shoes, I’d want to hear something like: “I want to let you know that I fully understand the issues you’re raising around X and Y. Those are legitimate issues, and I agree they should have been handled differently last time. Some of that is my responsibility and some of it was in others’ purview — but regardless, I’m going to make sure it doesn’t happen again. I’d like to build some checks into our process this time so you’ll have opportunities to weigh in early, and I’d welcome any input you have on the best timing for those so we can make sure this goes differently than last time.”

4. Our rules for using up accrued leave were changed without anyone realizing it

Recently I noticed a small discrepancy in my leave bank. I earn six hours a pay period and noticed that, while I was compensated six hours in the earned column for a given pay period, my balance only went up by four hours. I was careful to use up my use/lose by the end of the calendar year as directed, so I was confused as to why I would have received less than I earned! When I spoke with my agency’s HR, we determined the issue was that because the larger HR had moved the date by which folks had to use their use or lose from December 31 to January 13, this also meant any leave accrued during that time that was over the limit was lost. The language they gave us around the extension did not explicitly state this. Looking back at it, I suppose there is sort of vague language that maybe suggests it, but even now I’m not convinced.

I’m not interested in dying on this hill over two hours of lost leave (obviously I have plenty!), but I also feel like it may be worth escalating for the principle of it. Really, why am I being essentially penalized because they decided to give people who weren’t on top of their leave some extra slack when I was careful about managing my leave? So what do you think — is this worth pursuing or should I just take the loss and know better for next time?

If we were deciding purely on the principle of it: yes. Earned leave is part of your compensation and they shorted you two hours while obscuring from you that it would happen. People might have made different decisions if they’d known.

More practically speaking: since it’s only two hours, I don’t think you should fight a massive battle over it, but there’s no reason not to send a quick email pointing out that this wasn’t clearly announced and you don’t think it should have been deducted from your balance.