ask the readers: when workplace romance goes horribly wrong

In honor of Valentine’s Day next week, let’s talk about workplace romance!

To kick us off, here are some office romance stories that have been shared in past years.

♥     ♥      ♥      ♥      ♥ 

“I once worked at a bank in a department dealing with loans for high value assets (cars with six-figure price tags, yachts, roller coasters). Every Valentine’s there’d be a parade of fancy bouquets, chocolates, jewelry delivered to the office from ‘secret admirers’ that were usually suspected of being brokers buttering people up (the whole department was shut due to suspicious dealing not long after I left) but a few were genuinely from spouses/boyfriends/girlfriends. For three years, I got nothing because my spouse is an accountant and only bought flowers after Valentine’s when it’s cheaper, but on the fourth year he happened to be off work and had a great idea. Wild flowers. Not much grows in our country in February so I ended up being called to reception to collect a glass (not a vase) containing a bouquet of weeds. The receptionist (thinking it was hilarious) made me take them back to my desk. Once they warmed up to the temperature of the office, it quickly became evident that something had urinated on them :/ it took days to get rid of the smell in the open plan office. He’s stuck to store-bought gifts ever since.”

♥     ♥      ♥      ♥      ♥ 

My last boss had a ‘personal assistant’ who I’m pretty sure was his girlfriend. I actually liked her; she’d show up now and then at the office in fabulous pink leopard prints and do absolutely no work, but she had a great personality and seemed like a woman who didn’t take crap from anyone. I guess she got fed up with my control freak boss, because one day they got into a screaming argument in the office and my boss sent the rest of the admin staff home early. The next day his personal assistant had vanished, never to be seen again, and so had the office microwave.”

♥     ♥      ♥      ♥      ♥ 

“I sat on an interview panel once where I encountered a guy who, when answering a question about dealing with workplace conflict, went on a long, convoluted, extremely detailed story the upshot of which was: he’d started dating a colleague, it wasn’t going well, and he needed a new job so he could break up with her. He did not get the job.”

♥     ♥      ♥      ♥      ♥ 

“I had a former colleague who had been fighting with her husband, so he decided to go all out on Valentine’s Day a few years ago, I guess as a way to make up for it. He came walking in with this huge chocolate cake in his arms and a bunch of roses in his teeth. … He tripped over the area rug in the front of the office suite. We came running out at the crash to find him with his face firmly lodged in the cake and roses jammed up into his ears.”

♥     ♥      ♥      ♥      ♥ 

Let’s hear your own stories of workplace romance in the comments — embarrassing disasters welcomed, as well as genuinely sweet stories.

do professional clothes need to be seasonally appropriate, how to tell coworkers I’m married, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Does professional attire need to be seasonally appropriate?

My wife hosts college students for six-week programs that introduce them to a professional setting. Each student is graded on categories related to their field of study, but they are also graded on professional norms like teamwork and punctuality.

One of these norms to be evaluated on is professional attire, and we disagree on whether it should be seasonally appropriate.

When a student comes to work in the middle of the winter wearing slacks with a sleeveless top and no jacket, she thinks this comes off as strange and should be addressed (we live in the northeast US, so it’s cold). I feel that as long as the student is wearing appropriate business attire, and it isn’t affecting her ability to work, then it shouldn’t matter. What is your take on this low-stakes situation?

I’m with you. If she managed someone who came to work without a jacket in the winter, would she feel she needed to tell them they looked unprofessional? She might ask if they were cold! She might reflect on whether she was paying them enough to afford appropriate winter wear! But she wouldn’t chastise them for being unprofessional (I hope).

I suspect what’s going on here is that these students only have a limited amount of professional clothes (because they don’t need many yet) and so they’re wearing what they have — which might be for a different season.

2. How do I tell coworkers I’m married when they don’t think I am?

I started a new job about five months ago. A week before my new job, my partner of 10 years moved out of our home as we commenced a trial separation. It was a very difficult and emotional time, and I didn’t wear my wedding ring to work. I wanted to avoid questions that had messy answers.

I also had several pet emergencies in the last few months and explained my need to rush home after work or take time off as “I don’t have anyone to help me take care of my dog.” Several coworkers began to make references to me living alone and I didn’t disagree with them, as I was indeed living alone.

My husband and I recently started to reconcile and he is moving back in. I have confessed to one coworker, who I am close with, that I am married and was going through a separation. If anyone at work wanted to, they could access the emergency contact list and see my spouse is listed as my contact and spouse.

I’m not sure if or when I could tell people I’m married. Do I slip it into conversation casually? Will that naturally trigger questions about why I didn’t bring him up before? Will it make my prior absences seem fishy? I might be overthinking it but I don’t know how to go about it! There’s also a part of me that’s nervous things won’t work out with my spouse and then I’ll have to break the news to my coworkers all over again.

Sorry you’re dealing with the stress of this in the middle of everything else! I think you can just start referring to your spouse again and if people ask, you can say, “He’s been out of town for months — long story — but he’s back now!” You don’t owe people the details of your marriage, and this statement gives them the parts that are relevant to them: he’s not new, he’s been away, and he’s back now.

If he moves out again in the future, you could use that same formulation — “he’s away right now” or even, if you’re comfortable with it, “we’re living apart right now.”

3. Why can’t our interns write good social media posts?

I work for a small arts organization, and one of my many responsibilities is to manage the organization’s social media feeds. I feel like I have outgrown that aspect of my role, but seeing as there is very little chance that we will hire a new person to oversee social media, I try to share the posting load with our various interns.

The issue I am running into is that every single intern I’ve worked with in the last three years can’t seem to get our institutional voice right. Last year, I began requesting a social media writing sample with intern applications, and I still struggled with the multiple candidates we have hired since then. A lot of the time, the writing misstates key ideas, misrepresents an artists’ work, or is flat-out grammatically incorrect. I struggle with editing these posts in such a way that the intern’s voice remains meaningfully present while the text accurately, eloquently, and professionally reflects my org. It takes up a ton of time and often I end up rewriting the posts entirely. I’m not sure if I’m doing a bad job outlining expectations, giving confusing feedback, or just setting my expectations too high for these interns. Any advice?

The work you need done takes real writing skill and professional expertise — especially being able to master an organization’s voice — and most interns won’t have that.

You might be able to coach some of them into it, but (a) you’d need to make writing skills a main trait you screen for when you hire, (b) it’s going to take real investment of your time (doing things like sitting with them to compare their version to your version and talking through the differences), and (c) a lot of them still won’t be able to do it. If your goal is to spend less bandwidth on social media, this coaching process will achieve the opposite: it will create more work for you. That probably means it’s not a great intern task, since just when you get someone trained (if you do), they’ll be moving on. (It would be great for them! But it probably doesn’t align with your goal of getting the work off your plate.)

4. Nosy coworker in an open office

I work in-office for a team of ~30. Our office is set-up such that the junior employees work in an open office and the senior employees have their own cubicles or private offices. As a result, the junior employees have almost no privacy. In particular, my desk is very (in)conveniently located next to a high foot-traffic area, so pretty much everyone in the office walks by my desk around 10 times a day and has a full view of all three of my monitors.

So far, it hasn’t bothered me too much, as none of the work I’m doing is confidential to my team and I rarely browse the internet for non-work reasons. However, there is one coworker, “Nicholas,” who is about five years my senior who drives me absolutely insane.

Nicholas walks by my desk about 10 times a day. Each time, he cranes his neck and turns his head a full 90 degrees so that he can very conspicuously stare at my monitors as he walks past. I don’t know why it bothers me so much, because I’m not looking at anything I shouldn’t be looking at, and it’s not like he’s seeing anything he shouldn’t, but it drives me insane. No one else at the office does this, only Nicholas. Nicholas also doesn’t have a direct supervisory role over me, so there’s no reason he needs to do this, either.

I thought it only bothered me, but at a recent happy hour, I learned that all of my other junior coworkers have the same problem with Nicholas. So it seems clear to me that this is a “him” issue, and not a “me” issue.

I know this is low-stakes, but it drives me up the wall. I don’t know if it would be professionally appropriate for me to “confront” him about this and ask him to stop. I’m also leaving this role in about half a year, so I’ve considered just ignoring this and biting my tongue for the length of my stint here. What should I do?

Because you’re junior to him, you’ve probably just got to live with it; it’s one of the annoying things about working in an open office. If he weren’t senior to you, you could probably say something like, “I don’t know if you realize that every time you walk by, it seems like you’re craning your neck to look at my monitors; it’s really distracting.” But you’re junior and he’s senior to you? I wouldn’t.

That said, there are subtler ways to approach it. For example, you could try looking up expectantly every time he does it, like you think he needs something from you, or even saying, “Did you need something from me?” It’s possible that doing that a few times would clue him in that he’s throwing you off from your work … but it also may not.

5. Can I ask my interviewer if they’re considering internal candidates?

I was recently interviewed for a position that I thought I was a good fit for, and the recruiter who reached out to me seemed to agree. However, by the end of the interview, I realized that the manager had asked no questions about practicalities— travel frequency, my availability, etc. That, plus a few other factors, made me suspect there was a strong internal candidate.

Would it have been appropriate to ask if they were considering any internal candidates? I guess it wouldn’t have changed anything for me at that point, but it would have helped me adjust my expectations (I was declined in the end).

You can ask, but it won’t tell you anything conclusive. They might have an internal candidate who they already know they don’t want to hire. They might have an internal candidate they’re not wed to and they’re considering others just as strongly. Or sure, they might already have someone internal they plan to hire (or someone external they plan to hire, for that matter). You won’t have any way of knowing.

The fact that your interviewer wasn’t asking the questions you expected doesn’t necessarily point to an internal candidate! It points to a bad interviewer, and those are at least as common as interviewers who just go through the motions because they’ve already selected someone else.

Related:
do internal candidates have a better chance at the job?

our admins hate all the coffee I buy the office, but they insist I have to keep trying

A reader writes:

I … have a problem at my new-ish attorney job at a tiny law firm. There are five people in the office total and we have one communal coffee pot. I was told at the beginning that the office does not supply coffee because the two partners do not drink it and so we have to take turns buying it for the office.* The two admins told me I could buy whatever I wanted on my turn as long as the coffee was 1) dark roast and 2) unflavored. Great!

The coffee of choice for the two admins is a huge tub of Kirkland coffee from Costco. [Editor’s note: To shop at Costco, you need to purchase a membership, which is around $60 annually. They sell products under their store brand, Kirkland, that can’t be purchased anywhere else.]

I HATE this coffee. I also neither want nor need a Costco membership. Because I was told that I could buy anything, I bought the biggest tub of non-Folgers ground coffee I could get at Target, which I knew I liked. The tub “ran out too fast” and we only had it for like, a week. I refuse to believe we ran out of a giant tub of coffee in a week. Suspicious, but (I thought at the time) irrelevant.

So soon it’s my turn again and I ask the admins if they would mind if I just do a repeat order on Amazon for a big tub of coffee and that way they don’t have to pay for it because it’s expensive. They enthusiastically agree to this. I order a big tub of coffee. They report it is “flavored” and “tastes like caramel.” It is not flavored. It is a house blend. I ask if they have any suggestions. They do not have specific recommendations, but they reiterate they want the darkest roast possible that’s unflavored. I’m like great, okay. My parents drank Peet’s french roast my entire childhood and both of them are a) coffee snobs and b) do not like flavorings of any kind. Guaranteed win, right?

Wrong. I get the bag and it says it has “notes of chocolate truffle, smoke, and caramel.” They insist it is flavored. I explain it is not and that the description is like wine notes where wines say they have hints of cedar or whatever. They do not believe me. I make the pot of coffee the next time I am in first. They immediately report it is somehow BOTH “bitter” and also “tastes like caramel.” I said they asked for a dark roast which is always bitter and that it definitely 100% is not flavored. They insist it’s “weird.”

My stance is that they said I could buy whatever I wanted in the first place, I have bought three options that conform to the given standards, I should be allowed to pick coffee I like for my turn, and I should not have to pay for a membership card to a store solely to get coffee I do not like.

Their stance seems to be passive-aggressively letting me spend $20 on coffee repeatedly and declaring there’s something wrong with it every time.

I have suggested that perhaps that I could Venmo one of them to pick up the coffee they like (and let go of wanting to like said coffee). Apparently part of the point of taking turns with the coffee is to take turns having to go out of your way to run the errand. This is not an option.

I guess my question is not “am I being reasonable” because I’m pretty sure that I am. My question is “is this a hill worth dying on?” and if the answer is “no,” then “how do I get out of having to get a Costco card to buy one (1) tub of coffee every two months that I do not like?”

* As a side note, I also see this as a problem because admins should not have to buy coffee for lawyers, even if we are taking turns.

You are indeed being reasonable. Something is up with the coffee situation. Do they only like Kirkland coffee? If so, why don’t they just say that?

(And yes, admins should not have to buy coffee for lawyers. But I get just going with the system that’s there when you started and not rocking the boat, especially when this boat is already so weird and fraught.)

Anyway, if you want to solve it with a minimum of fuss — which is probably the most practical move here — delivery services like Instacart will generally deliver from Costco, which would mean you could just get it delivered from there without having to get your own Costco membership.

To be clear, this is ridiculous and you should not have to pay the delivery mark-up to resolve this, but it will make the problem go away. Consider it a $10 aggravation fee.

Alternately, you could say to the admins, “I’ve bought three types of coffee and none of them have been right. I can’t get Kirkland coffee because I don’t have a Costco membership. So I can reimburse someone else who picks it up there, or you can tell me another kind of coffee you’d like me to get. Pick anything, and as long as it doesn’t require me buying a special membership like Costco, I’ll get it for the office. But I need you to choose it so I don’t keep buying coffee no one likes.”

If that doesn’t work, the only remaining solution is to swipe an empty Kirkland container the next time one runs out, fill it with the plain dark roast of your choice, and bring it in and see if everyone loves it.

Read an update to this letter

I ramble nervously when I give employees feedback

A reader writes:

Whenever I have to give any challenging feedback to someone I supervise, I tend to ramble on and repeat myself. I want to be sure that I am clear and direct, but then I worry that I was too harsh so I soften things a little. Then I want to give examples but I feel like I have to explain how much weight to give to those examples and so I find myself clarifying what I didn’t mean. All in all, I’m sure it all just makes it harder for the person who is getting the feedback.

I’m kind of a rambly type anyway and that definitely comes out when I’m nervous, but I think I owe it to my employees to not show quite so much of that when they are receiving a critique. I would like to learn how to just say what I mean, be concise, and then pause and let the other person reflect and respond. I would think that would be easier when I’m in a position of greater power in an interaction, but apparently it isn’t, at least not for me! Do you have any advice on how to develop that skill?

I answer this question over at Inc. today, where I’m revisiting letters that have been buried in the archives here from years ago (and sometimes updating/expanding my answers to them). You can read it here.

my coworker brought sex workers back to our hotel on a business trip

A reader writes:

I went on a work trip with my group — me, my manager, and a few coworkers — to Mexico. On the last night there (prior to our 4 a.m. flight the next morning), we all had a bit too much to drink. After hauling some coworkers back to their rooms, one coworker and I went back down to the lobby to find another coworker checking in two sex workers to his hotel room. I’m unsure if my manager is aware he did this.

Do I have to report this? To my manager? To HR? To our anonymous ethics line?

We live in a country where prostitution is illegal, but after a quick google search it looks like it is legal in Mexico. I’m not really against prostitution, but given that this happened on a work trip, at a work-paid hotel, I just feel kind of squeamish. And knowing the coworker has family at home, it grosses me out. His family life is none of my business and he can do what he wants on his own time, which makes me think to just leave this lie. But then the fact this was a work trip makes me pause. What is the most ethical thing to do?

I think you can leave it alone.

It’s gross on a few different fronts, and it’s bad judgment on a work trip where coworkers are nearby (and, as in this case, could end up witnessing it) and when your company is paying for your hotel room — and that’s why you’re feeling squeamish about it — but I don’t think you’re ethically required to report it to anyone.

Part of what makes this gross is that he wasn’t more discreet about it; he should have cared more about ensuring that his coworkers — who he knew were staying in the same hotel and were coming home around that time — didn’t witness it. It feels like forcing unwanted information about his sex life on you, even though that presumably wasn’t his intent.

But ultimately I look at it this way: It’s not that no one can ever have sex in a hotel room paid for by their company. (After all, if you met up with an old flame on a business trip or brought your spouse along, that wouldn’t be anyone’s business.) And sex work does appear to be legal and regulated in many parts of Mexico.

If you were the guy’s boss, my response would be different. If I saw an employee doing this, I’d pull them aside later and have a conversation about their judgment and discretion on business trips (and frankly would count on the embarrassment of having to have that conversation with one’s boss to do a lot of the work of ensuring it didn’t happen again).

But otherwise, it’s gross but not something you’re obligated to report. (With the obvious caveat that if you have a specific ethics policy that says otherwise, you should follow that.)

Updated to add: I think sex work should be legal and safe. I find this guy gross, not sex workers, and talked more about why in the comments here.

do I really have to attend a company dinner, boss is moody and distant, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Do I really have to attend a company dinner?

I work remotely for a virtual company that has quarterly in-person meetings for the leadership team. I am administrative but travel with the team. There is a team dinner the night before the meetings. I bowed out of the last dinner because a family member was located nearby and I chose to dine with them instead. The president of the company with whom I work closely seemed put off. She has mentioned it at least three times that she thought I would have dinner with the team.

I’m appreciative of the invite but have no desire to dine with them. I know I’m a respected member of the team (in fact, I’ve been with the company the longest out of the entire leadership team). I’m well-liked, friendly, and approachable during work hours. I’m fiercely territorial about my off hours and my desire to choose my dinner companion, if anyone at all. I view this invite as optional since it really is just a social gathering before the actual meeting and it is an event that takes place outside of normal business hours.

We have another in-person meeting next month and there’s a dinner. Do I have to attend?

You should attend. The exception would be if you have a medical need to opt out, like if you aren’t doing indoor dining because of Covid.

Sometimes it’s part of the job to put in face time at stuff like this, especially if (a) you work remotely the rest of the time, (b) you’re part of the leadership team, and/or (c) it’s part of a business trip that your company has flown you out for. Any one of those factors would mean you should attend.

We can debate whether or not it should be that way, but the reality is that it is. Moreover, your company president has made it clear that while you view it as optional, she doesn’t. There may be real professional consequences to opting out, even if they’re not immediately apparent.

See it as the price you pay for not having to deal with people in person the rest of the time.

2. My boss is moody and distant

I have a manager who I used to feel was a friend for three years or so. We got along great and never had any problems. Then one day she told me she felt I wanted more in our work relationship and she had pulled back from me. When I explained that all I ever wanted was to be friends, it seems like she started going through periods of moodiness with me.

It has been depressing that I once enjoyed my job and seeing a boss I considered as a friend who supported me as a person and professionally is no longer the same. She has even admitted that she is only rude to me and doesn’t know why. Her body language over the few years that have passed since our conversation seems more annoyed with me now and is sometimes out of the blue.

She is more moody with everyone now, but seems to let it out more with me. I have tried to talk to her about the stress I feel because she sometimes is short or annoyed when I talk to her, but she becomes very agitated and angry with me. She states it’s none of my business when she’s quiet or unfriendly. I would quit my job now because of the stress I feel at times due to this. I just don’t know how to deal with this emotional roller coaster anymore. It’s hard seeing the kind person I use to know but never knowing when the cold, distant, and angry person is going to come out. I am struggling. What can I do?

I can’t say for sure what’s going on with your manager but since she’s moody with everyone, it’s most likely  about something that’s going on with her, rather than the rest of you. That said, we do know that the one time she addressed it, she said that she felt you wanted more from the relationship than she did. That’s worth paying attention to; for whatever reason, she doesn’t want the relationship it seemed like you had previously. (Her instincts there are right, even though the way she’s handling it is bad: managers really can’t be friends with their employees. Friendly, yes, but not friends. More here.)

That also tracks with her getting agitated when you talk about feeling stressed by her responses to you or when you ask why she’s being quiet. Those aren’t really conversations for your manager; they’re conversations for a friend, and she’s tried to say that’s not the relationship she wants. (She’s handling this badly, to be clear! But I suspect that’s what’s going on.)

As for what to do: it would be a good idea to job search. I’m skeptical that she’s being a great manager to any of you, and it sounds like this has become a major source of stress for you.

Meanwhile, respect the fact that she wants a fairly distant relationship. Treat her like your manager, not a friend or former friend, and I suspect you’ll attract less of her ire for however much more time you remain there.

Related:
my boss has mini mean flashes

3. Interviewer said “thanks for making this easy for me” and walked away

I wanted to ask you about a strange interview experience I had when I was fresh out of undergrad. At that time, I was still trying to find a full-time job, so I was interviewing at restaurants to make money in the interim. I was planning to move away and continue my education at some point in the next couple of years.

This particular interview started off normal, but at some point the interviewer asked about my future plans. I told him the same thing: “I plan to get another degree in maybe a year and a half or two years, probably at (location).” He replied something like, “Thanks for making this easy for me,” and then stood up, shook my hand, and walked away. I was so confused I just smiled and shook his hand, and left feeling pretty bad. I asked my family what happened, and they guessed that they didn’t want to hire me if I wouldn’t be there in a couple of years. Ultimately I’m thankful that I didn’t end up working for someone who, I felt, treated me rudely. But my question is, was the interviewer being reasonable about not wanting to hire me? To me it seems like restaurants shouldn’t make it a requirement that their new hires commit to working there for more than a couple of years, but maybe I am out of touch.

Yeah, it’s not uncommon for interviewers not to want to hire people who plan to leave in 18-24 months, but typically that’s less of an issue at a restaurant, where high turnover is more common. That said, maybe he’s been able to hire people who all stay a long time, in which case more power to him.

But he was rude about it! He could — and should — have simply said, “We’re looking for someone who wants to stay long-term so I don’t think we’d be the right fit.” I’m quite sure he would have thought it was rude if you, the candidate, responded to some answer of his that you didn’t like with, “Thanks for making this easy for me” and walked away, and he’s no more entitled to do it himself. (Although admittedly, that would also be kind of awesome for a candidate to do and I’d enjoy seeing it.)

4. Coworker keeps calling me a communist

I am Eastern European and I’ve been in the U.S. for the past seven years. My coworker always calls me a “commie” jokingly, but recently he has been relentless. Every time I say something he doesn’t agree with, he says, “Well, that’s because you’re a communist.” I’m really not, nor have I expressed that type of political association. He even said that if I think about criticizing U.S. capitalism, I should go back to my communist country. Again, my country is not communist.

I have asked him to stop and he always says to stop being sensitive and that he is only joking. I am afraid that if I report him, he’ll get a slap on the wrist and he’ll know it was me and could retaliate. There is a promotion coming up and I am one of the potential contenders, while he is one of the people who can influence the ultimate decision on who would get the promotion.

Your employer is legally required to put a stop to your coworker’s comments; it’s against federal law for them to permit an employee to be harassed based on their national origin. The right next step is to talk to HR; tell them what’s happening and what he’s said when you’ve told him to stop. Make sure you also stress that you’re concerned about retaliation and ask how they will ensure that you’re not retaliated against, even subtly.

You might judge that you feel safer waiting to have this conversation until after the promotion decision is made … or you might decide you want HR looped in before that, so they can be on guard for bias in that process. That depends on factors I don’t know, like your sense of how likely this guy is to try to muck up your promotion regardless. I’m sorry you’re dealing with this!

5. Was my boss implying I’m a slacker?

I do payroll and benefits for a small company. It’s been very stressful lately with new programs, W-2’s, open enrollment, etc. That’s all done now and the next project is a very detailed 401K census. I told my boss I was starting the census data entry, and her reply was, “Please do.” It made me feel like she was implying that I’ve been slacking off. Am I being overly sensitive?

Yeah, I think you’re reading something into it that’s not there. Unless your boss has a pattern of implying you’re not picking up work quickly enough, “please do” in this context most likely just means “yes, that should indeed be the next priority” or “go for it!”

my employee meets deadlines … but is much slower than the rest of us

A reader writes:

I started managing my first direct report a year ago, let’s call her Sondra, and am pleased to say that thanks to my devoted reading of your blog, Sondra recently shared with boss that I did not seem like a first-time manager.

There is one issue that I have been wrestling with in my management of Sondra, which is what good time management looks like at our department.

Most of the people in my department are very responsive to colleagues’ requests and will turn things around very quickly for coworkers without being asked. Sondra is not like that, in that if someone requests her work on a project and gives no timeline, she may take several days or even a week or two to complete it, and when she is given a deadline, she tends to complete work by that deadline rather than significantly before. My boss has been bringing me complaints from colleagues about this and voicing a concern that Sondra is not working her assigned hours if she is not turning things around more quickly.

I have spoken to Sondra directly and learned that she prefers to spend time letting things percolate and working through projects at a steady pace over a few days as much as is possible. I have asked her to proactively ask colleagues for deadlines and let them know what her proposed timeline for completing work is, but my response has largely been to push back on the idea that she is not working hard enough if she takes 100% of the time that is given to her to complete something. Today I found myself telling my boss, “If the deadline is actually sooner than we are telling Sondra, we should be the ones adjusting our communication.”

My take on this is that Sondra’s work style is a bit different than most folks in our department, but that is something we can recognize and accommodate. However, I am wondering if I should be more direct with Sondra that our team culture does not generally allow for the slow and steady pace she prefers, and push more for change from her?

I wrote back and asked, “Is Sondra prioritizing less time-sensitive work (like projects that genuinely could be done a month from now) over things that people would clearly prefer to get in the next couple of days? I’m trying to figure out if she simply can’t work at the pace expected, or if she’s picking things up in the wrong order.”

My understanding is not that she is prioritizing other work over these requests in the sense that she is waiting to start on them until other things are done, but rather that she might not jump right into working on them and wrap them up quickly because she does not feel confident/comfortable working that way. She will read the request, think about it, maybe do some other fairly time-sensitive work, then maybe reference some relevant materials to prepare to work on the request, then maybe do some other time-sensitive work again, then work on the request, and finally perhaps take another break doing other work so that she can review her work with fresh eyes before sharing it.

I know that how myself and my boss handle situations like this are to just speed up and/or work a little late to keep things moving quickly, but I think not everyone feels they can do their best work that way. Our team now is larger than it has ever been; we hired Sondra so we would have more bandwidth and have to hustle less, but because the rest of us still operate in that hustle mindset, I am being told it is not fair for Sondra to “carry less of the load.”

Well, if you actually need Sondra to turn things around more quickly, you need to tell her that — and the deadlines she’s given need to reflect that.

Penalizing someone (even if only in your head) for getting something done by the deadline but not before isn’t fair. People should be able to trust that the deadlines they’re given are the real deadlines.

That said, there are situations that are more “the absolute latest you could get this to me is February 15, but it would really help to get it earlier if you can.” It sounds like that might be your team culture, and that’s why Sondra’s work pace is clashing with people’s expectations.

If that’s the situation, the solution is to have a very explicit conversation with Sondra about those expectations — spelling out that in your team’s context, most deadlines are “this is the latest possible, but sooner would be better.” Talk through some recent projects and how quickly you’d normally expect to see her turn each of them around. Make sure there’s space in that conversation for her to tell you if she can’t work that way, or worries about the quality of work she’d produce that way. In fact, if she doesn’t raise those concerns on her own, you should explicitly ask if she’s comfortable doing that or if she foresees any issues with it.

But the other piece of this probably needs to be a culture shift from the people who assign your team work. If they’re used to being able to give February 15 as a deadline while counting on being likely to get it back days before that, then they need to change the way they’re communicating those timelines. I can imagine being in their shoes and thinking, “Well, I don’t want to give a deadline of Febraury 9, because if something came up that was legitimately more important, I’d be fine with this being pushed back to the 15th … and I wouldn’t want anyone to work extra hours to make sure this gets done by the 9th … but otherwise it would really help to get it by the 9th. So can’t I just say the 15th with the understanding that they’ll push to get it done sooner?” And frankly, that approach has worked for your team up until now! But it’s not working for Sondra. So it might help for people to give two deadlines for a while — a preferred deadline and an absolute deadline. For example: “I’d really like it by February 9 if you can, but Feburary 15 is the absolute drop-dead deadline.” After all, those are the expectations they have in their head; it’s to everyone’s benefit to get them out into the open so they’re not secret.

It’s also worth pointing out to your boss that as your team grows, the more you can do to explicitly spell out expectations, the more successful the team will be. When a team is small, sometimes you can get away with having a sort of unspoken “playbook,” where you all happen to understand “this is how we do things here” without anyone spelling it out. But as you add people, they’re going to have a greater variety of working styles and frames of reference. So as you grow, you need to be really deliberate about figuring out all the stuff you have in your head about how you want people to operate, and then examine which are those are preferences versus must-do’s (because some of them will be important to keep, but maybe not all of them) and make those things explicit for people, so that everyone is armed with the same playbook about how to succeed in your culture.

I work from home and can’t focus

A reader writes:

I graduated in 2018 and began a job where officially I’m a freelancer but in reality 99% of my work comes from one person. I record my hours and bill my client for them, and we have an unofficial agreement that I will make myself available to work X number of hours daily for him, and in return he provides me with pretty steady work, and there’s almost always the option to add hours if I have the time and want to make the extra money. Generally this arrangement has worked out pretty well. He’s a great guy to work for, flexible, respectful, considerate, and he pays a very generous hourly rate.

However, I find it impossible to focus while working from home anymore. Honestly, I was never great at it, but I used to have more time available (I’ve since become mom to several young kids, but I do have child care while I’m working). I feel like a lazy slob who doesn’t have the basic self-discipline to sit down and work and, worse, ungrateful, because so much about my job is ideal, especially as a mom to small kids — the flexibility, in particular. The thing is, I’m not generally lazy. I know how to work hard, have done so in the past, and continue to do so in other areas of my life. But I find it impossible to focus on work during the hours I set aside for it. I try to be very honest in reporting my hours, and if I get distracted and end up browsing the web, I always pause my clock. This means I end up not having enough reportable hours, my boss keeps pressuring me to work more because of my unofficial commitment to set aside a certain number of hours for him, and I’m not earning as much as I need to be — and could be.

I’ve tried to make this work. I shared with my boss that I was finding the work-from-home setup very distracting and difficult. He was sympathetic but his whole team is remote; there is no office to bring me into. He agreed to up my hourly pay so I could find a shared workspace to join, but I haven’t been able to find anything remotely suitable where I live.

Am I being a lazy slacker who should get her adult together, realize how lucky I am to have such a good job, and somehow develop more self-discipline. Or can it be that some people are just not cut out for remote work and I should really be looking for a different job in an office setting, even though it will mean less flexibility and probably a slightly lower hourly rate?

Yes, some people are not cut out for remote work, meaning that they either dislike it or find it challenging to be productive when they’re not in an office. It’s possible you’re one of them. That can change over time too; maybe you were well suited to remote work previously, but having kids has made it harder. That wouldn’t be a failing, and in recognizing it about yourself, you could arrange your life in ways that better suit you.

However, it’s also possible that you’re just burned out — maybe not with this job specifically (although maybe with that too) but with an overwhelming amount of responsibilities generally, particularly since you had kids. We all need a certain amount of zoning-out time where our brains can just relax, and if you’re not getting enough of it, it’s possible your brain is forcibly claiming it during work hours because that’s the only time it can.

As you consider whether this could apply to you, look up “revenge bedtime procrastination,” where people put off going to bed because their brains insist on carving out “me time” for leisure and relaxation, even at the expense of sleep. I think you could be having the non-bedtime version of that: Your brain needs to recharge, and it’s going to take the time it needs to do it, whether you want that or not. If you were working in an office where people could see you, you still might find yourself procrastinating for the same reason. That said, there are other people around in the office, making it harder to fully give into those impulses.

If that theory sounds like it could be correct, can you look for ways to give your brain the leisure time it wants without obliterating your workday? For example, could you regularly set aside one hour at the start, middle, or end of your day to browse the web or otherwise be unproductive? It’s possible that if your brain sees that it’s reliably getting downtime, it will let you work the rest of the time. (Obviously, if that cuts into your work schedule, that’s not ideal. But it sounds like losing an hour a day would be an improvement for you, so if it works, consider it a victory.)

It also wouldn’t hurt to look at non-remote positions and see what your options are, particularly in terms of pay and flexibility. Right now, you’re assuming you won’t be able to find anything that measures up to your current job, but who knows what you’ll discover once you really look. Applying for other jobs is zero commitment, but it will give you more data that you can use to assess your options. If none of the positions you find are as appealing as your current setup, that might help motivate you to impose more discipline on your work hours so that you don’t have to make that trade.

There’s no shame in struggling with this. You’re not a lazy slacker and you’re not ungrateful. You have less time available now that you have kids, but your brain still has the same need to relax and recharge. It might be that the changes in your life mean that remote work doesn’t fit you as well as it used to, but it’s not a moral flaw on your part, it’s an evolution in how you need to manage your life.

Originally published at New York Magazine.

an employee is out to get my star performer, and no one else cares

A reader writes:

I manage Tina, who is a genius. She’s fresh from school but has already saved our department tens of thousands. We acquired a few failed companies and Tina dove in, learned all their systems, and automated the pulling of data in a week. This saved us hundreds of hours in training and is just one of many examples I could share. She’s also kind and a patient teacher who shares her knowledge of AI and automation with all the other analysts.

My problem is with her coworker, Dave. If she speaks, he interrupts. If she volunteers, he argues he should do it. He’s lodged many complaints to me about Tina, but one time I happened to overhear their chat. He came to complain to me shortly after and I let him go on to see if he would be truthful, but he lied about her tone and left out context to make her seem unreasonable. I let him know that I overheard that entire exchange and I disagreed completely with his assessment. Since then, he complains to his manager, Jen, who complains to me.

I scheduled a lunch with Jen off-site to hash this out. I asked why she believes Dan after I proved he lied. Jen replied, “Tina’s not perfect” and gave me two examples where Tina pushed too hard for her solution and overstepped her bounds as an analyst. I thanked Jen and let her know I’d address these with Tina.

When I spoke to Tina, she agreed but asked why I was bringing something up from 2022. I was embarrassed to learn these examples were so old, but Tina just laughed it off and told me she had learned the hard way that an office is not like a college seminar.

I went back to Jen and asked if she realized her examples were from 15 months ago and she confessed they were. I told her that if she ever has recent examples, she can come to me, but I would appreciate evaluating today’s Tina.

Things calmed down for a couple months, but then two awful things happened. First, performance reviews were due and I gave Tina a 5/5 so she could get a decent raise and a small bonus. Then I got an email to click for final approval and there was a warning about needing to fill out her PIP within 10 days of submission. Confused, I went in and her prior manager, Sally, had changed her score to 1/5. I called Sally to figure out what the heck she was thinking. She gave me those same two examples from 2022 and I pointed out that those weren’t even in this performance year, but even if they were they would in no way merit a 1/5. Honestly, I wasn’t the most diplomatic about it because I was pretty pissed and felt like she tried to pull a fast one on me by changing the score without discussion. If it weren’t for the warning message about about the PIP, I may have approved it accidentally.

Since we both had to sign off on the review and couldn’t agree, we escalated it to my department head and manager, Mike. Mike’s response was that he completely trusts and respects his managers’ perspectives, so to compromise Tina will get a 3. Both Sally and I tried to argue this wasn’t fair, but Mike just laughed that the sign of a good compromise was both sides are mad.

I made sure to write really kind comments on every metric and wrote out everything Tina had achieved this year. It was almost two pages on some metrics! Sally was also able to write comments, and she copy and pasted the same nasty paragraph under each metric and summary, calling Tina bossy, pushy, abrasive, and arrogant. Unfortunately, since she put her comments in after mine, this meant hers showed up first too. Tina was really mature about it and kept her chin up despite clearly being disappointed that she would only get an average raise and no bonus when she was doing so much more than any other analyst.

Then, when I left for vacation, Dave sent an email to all the analysts, managers, Mike, and even the department VP, pointing out a huge mistake in a prestigous monthly report Tina produces. Well, it turns out Dave had gone onto the server and changed the report to introduce the error! Tina replied all and provided screenshots proving he had done this. Unbeknownst to Dave, she had sent the report to the VP the night before and attached that version, which didn’t have the error. I found out when Tina called me on vacation asking for support, so I immediately called Jen, who told me Dave was out of line and she would handle it.

Jen’s way of “handling” the situation was to tell Tina that Dave had confessed but it’s understandable Dave would balk at having Tina reporting his data to the VP. She used this as an excuse to break the report out to an analyst from each team “for fairness.” So Dave’s punishment for sabotaging work and trying to smear Tina to the entire department was to get exactly what he wanted. This was all decided while I was on vacation and by the time I had returned and learned of this, a lot of analysts had been promised part of the report. I then found out that Dave wasn’t even on a PIP and was getting 4/5 on his performance review. I complained to Mike, who told me that Dave’s performance is Jen’s purview and not mine. I then went to our VP, Hank, who privately agreed with me that Dave was getting off easy and Tina was getting shafted, but also said that getting into the minutia of analyst’s performance reviews wouldn’t be a good look for him since this was just personality clashes and nothing illegal or discriminatory had happened.

It’s been two months and Tina is quiet, no longer volunteers for work, and generally seems miserable. I don’t blame her, but I also miss my star performer. I also hate that Dave is strutting around rubbing it in whenever he can. I treated Tina to a few lunches off-site so she could vent. I offered to help her in any way, but so far all she asked for was to have the coordination of the analysts’ pieces of the prestigious report taken off her plate. I made it happen, but the analyst in charge screwed it up badly and Hank asked Tina to please take it back over, so she reluctantly did. Other than that, I’ve shut down all complaints from Dave publicly any time I hear them. I tried asking the other managers for help but they all don’t want to take sides in the “drama.”

I just know Tina is going to quit and I’ve failed her as a manager. Is there anything else I can do? Do you agree with me that Dave should have been fired? Sometimes between Sally and Jen I feel like I live in a different reality.

Your company is a mess.

Yes, Dave should have been fired. He’s been on a long-term campaign to undermine Tina with lies, and then purposely inserted a huge error in a report and lied to make it look like she did it. Either one of those is a massive offense and indictment of his character, and it’s unconscionable that he not only wasn’t fired but apparently has suffered no consequences.

Jen also should be facing some consequences — at a minimum, some serious scrutiny of her judgment and management.

The same goes for Sally, Tina’s old manager who changed her evaluation score without you knowing and tried to put her on a PIP when she doesn’t even manage her anymore (what?).

The same goes for Mike and Hank, on whose watch all of this has happened.

What is going on in your company that multiple people are targeting a star performer, using flimsy and even outright fabricated evidence to do it, and no one above them cares to act? Did Tina … murder all their children? The amount of coordinated vitriol directed at her should be setting off alarm bells somewhere in your company, and the fact that it’s not is mind-blowing.

I don’t know that there’s anything else you personally can do; you’ve tried to advocate for Tina (and for common sense) and been shot down at every turn. All that’s really left for you is to be transparent with Tina about what’s going on so she can make the best decisions possible for herself, and to support her in finding a new job where she’ll be treated fairly and her contributions recognized. If she indicates she wants to leave, don’t try to talk her out of it simply because you want to keep your star performer; it’s in her best interests to get out. Offer to be a glowing reference, and let her know what happened is awful and she has your full support in getting out.

I recommend you think about doing the same! This is not a place you want to build a career.

Read an update to this letter

employee is demanding Diet Coke as a religious accommodation, desk is covered with photos of feet, and more

It’s five answers to five questions. Here we go…

1. Employee is demanding Diet Coke as a religious accommodation

My friend is a manager at a public health-focused nonprofit whose mission is focused on building healthier communities by improving access to healthier choices, like walking trails and fresh produce (among other things). They offer some health-related perks to employees — think, subsidized public transit and gym memberships, bike storage at the office, fresh fruit at the office — and also have some policies banning things that are known to lead to poor health outcomes, like smoking. One of the things they have banned is soda, which is not allowed at company events and which the company will not pay for.

They are having a fundraiser in a few weeks where there will be a bar serving beer, wine, several healthy mocktails, and sparkling water. Guests will receive two drink tickets as part of their admission that they can use for whatever they’d like, whether alcoholic or not. It is definitely not an alcohol focused event at all — I have attended their fundraises in the past, and the health focus of the nonprofit’s mission means the majority of the people attending are not big drinkers.

My friend supervises an employee, “Jane,” who does not drink for religious reasons, but who drinks a lot of Diet Coke (she brings several bottles to the office daily). Jane is insisting she should be able to order Diet Coke at the event since she does not drink, and thinks the company should make an exception to their policy to accommodate her religion. As far as my friend is aware, there is not a religious reason why Jane can’t drink any of the other non-alcoholic beverages that will be offered. He does not want to make this kind of exception because of the impression it might give to their potential donors, but is concerned there might be legal repercussions if he says no. What is the best way for him to handle this situation?

There’s no legal requirement to provide Diet Coke as a religious accommodation. They definitely should ensure there are non-alcoholic options there, but they’re already doing that.

If they weren’t a health-focused nonprofit with a policy of not providing soda at their events because of their mission and an employee were asking for it, I’d say to spend the few bucks it would take to make an employee feel taken care of at an event, even if it’s a bit of a silly request. It’s not often you can make someone happy for a couple of dollars, and when you can, you should. But this is a health-oriented organization that explicitly doesn’t serve sodas and has legitimate reason to be concerned about sending mixed messages to donors. Your friend should reiterate the organization’s policy and tell her there will be a variety of non-alcoholic options to choose from.

2. Coworker’s desk is covered with photos of feet

Joan works with me in an office of about 25 people. It is a laid-back advertising and graphic design office, and most people freely talk about non-work related things throughout the day.

When it comes to Joan, aside from her job here, she is also a foot model for advertisements (not fetish stuff). This would be of little concern to me normally, but her work station is plastered in photos of her feet from various publications. She has also occasionally given demonstrations of what are apparently the best ways to pose one’s feet for photographs, and sometimes comments (always positively) about colleagues feet and how they should get into foot modelling too.

We have clients and various external persons come in and out through the office during the day, and they have to pass Joan’s feet-filled work station. Although her coworkers have context on her foot obsession and most don’t seem to mind it, these external parties do not, and I’m worried it could deter them from engaging with us. Am I right to be worried about this?

I don’t think you’re wrong to worry. If I were a client coming into your office and passed a work area plastered in photos of feet … well, I might think “I guess that person works on some sort of foot-related campaign” … but I’d probably be as likely to think “that feels weird and fetishy.” I would definitely not think “oh, the desk of a foot model!”

If you’re Joan’s manager or otherwise have some authority in this situation, you wouldn’t be wrong to explain it looks odd to people without context and ask her to tone down the foot decor.

However, I’m now very interested in knowing the best ways to pose one’s feet for photographs.

3. My remote employee didn’t bother to meet with me when they were in town

I have a remote employee who travels to the city where our company headquarters is and where I am based once a quarter. Occasionally, they come to the city for work-related reasons that are not directly connected to our department. I found out today that this person had been in town for the entire week when they previously told me they had planned to be in the city for two days. They’re supposed to notify me when they are traveling and working outside of their regular work location, so I need to address that from an administrative standpoint.

What I don’t get and what I am really confused about is why this employee doesn’t proactively set up time to meet with me when they are in town?

If I only got to see the person making decisions about my promotions and salary increases four times a year in-person, I would want to take advantage of any opportunity I had to interact with them. I’m not sure if it’s lack of awareness of business norms or disengagement. This person has previously asked me about the path to promotion, so it’s hard for me to imagine they’ve totally checked out. It just seems rude to come to the city and not ask your boss if they have time to meet for coffee. Do you have any advice for me?

Ask them to start setting up time to meet with you when they’re in town.

I see where you’re coming from with being surprised that they’re not doing this on their own, but a lot of people wouldn’t think to do it. They figure you’re busy, or they figure they talk to you all the time anyway, or they just haven’t been exposed to the stuff that says “take opportunities to form a face-to-face relationship with your boss.” It’s so common that you shouldn’t read much into it or consider it rude. Just let them know that you’d like them to do it going forward, if in fact you would.

It’s also useful to keep in mind that there’s a difference between “X is smart to do for your career” and “it’s a problem if someone doesn’t do X.”

4. When your boss asks if you’re looking for another job

A while back, some of my coworkers gave notice within a week of each other (totally unplanned on their part), which prompted my manager to ask some of the remaining team members, “Are you looking for another job, too?”

I’m assuming the answer to that question is almost always “no, I’m not,” but is there ever a situation where you could say, “Well, yes, because XYZ”?

It’s almost never in your interest to give your manager a heads-up that you’re job searching before you’re ready to give notice. You could end up pushed out before you’re ready to leave, on a list for layoffs “because you’re on your way out anyway,” or sidelined from projects that could help your career because your manager figures you could be gone any day.

And you’re certainly not obligated to disclose that you’re job searching just because your manager asks. That’s not a question they’re entitled to an honest answer to, given the power dynamics and the fact that your ability to pay for food and housing probably depends on keeping your job until you’re ready to leave it.

5. Applying to a company where I previously withdrew from a hiring process

I applied for a job in an adjacent industry (think the vendors that service my current industry) last year when I was feeling unfulfilled. I didn’t hear back right away and kept job searching. I was eventually offered a position somewhere else. I rejected it because we couldn’t come to terms on salary and remote work, and my company ultimately offered me more money with a verbal promise of a title bump at the end of the fiscal year.

While this was all happening, I got and accepted a first interview with the vendor company. I was invited to the second round, but I withdrew upon getting the counteroffer from my current job. I felt like I’d burn way too many bridges to leave (and I’d have to give up a volunteer role in my industry). When I withdrew, I apologized and cited seeing my commitments through the fiscal year (a teammate had also left and so my area would’ve been short-staffed). The hiring manager expressed her understanding.

It’s been over a year and I’m honestly still a bit unsatisfied — I know that’s the danger of counter offers! My company never gave me a title bump even though I took on more work. I saw peers get promoted as well. I’m still well connected with folks at the vendor company and a friend there nudged me that they’re hiring again. I’m still interested and want to apply.

But how do I professionally mention why I withdrew? And when do I mention it? It’s the elephant in the room, and I’d ask if I were the hiring manager. Is it worth spending a few sentences in my cover letter talking about it? Do I wait for the first interview (if I get one?)

It’s not a big deal to have withdrawn from their hiring process last year, especially since you explained why and especially after only one interview. (If you had gone through multiple interviews, received an offer, and then spent a week agonizing before giving them an answer … well, you could still reapply now, but you’d need to be more prepared to speak to what had changed.)

Just mention it right up-front in your cover letter: “I had an initial interview with you about a similar role last year, but ended up withdrawing from your hiring process when I realized I wanted to see out some commitments here. I’m still very interested, and the timing is much better for me to make a move. I liked what I learned last time about your work with X and Y, and I’d love to talk about your ___ opening.”

You should also send a note to the hiring manager since you’d talked with her directly before, refreshing her memory about your previous conversation(s) and mentioning that you’re applying again now.

Read an update to this letter